Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - 430 OSGOOD STREET 2/16/2001
ORIGINAL SIGNATURES ale e a r c ,h i t e- c t s a n d p l a ,n n e r s Limited HAND DELIVERED 16 February 2001 FF CPFRVED Planning Board Town of.North Andover FF 1 �nOT 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Heidi Griffin PLANNINU vrerAH I MENT Reference: North Andover High School North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan Special Permit Dear Heidi and Planning Board Members: We submit to the Planning Board a completed Application for Site Plan Special Permit with the required attachments. A Table of Contents for this filing package is included in Attachment 1. Enclosed are 10 sets of the-application including one signed original and by copy of this letter one additional complete copy is being sent directly to the consulting engineer. Your plan sets include 1 full size set of plans and 9 half size sets. One copy of the Stormwater Management Design and Calculations Bookis being sent to the Planning Board and one to the consulting engineer as we discussed. I have enclosed two first,class stamps and two.mailing labels for each abutter and the original certified abutters list. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to contact.Rick Rice or myself. Sincerely, Jon Oxman !1A DiNISCO DESIGN JO/cm cc: Rick Carey, VHB, Inc. Louis Minicucci (Attachments 1-3 only) Nancy Kurtz Paul Szymanski Patrick Saitta Kenneth DiNisco (Attachments 1-3 only) Richard Rice (Attachments 1-3 only) Enclosures: Attachments 1-28, LF1-1-F3 (See Table of Contents, Attachment 1) Kenneth DiNisco Richard N. Rice Gary E.Ainslie Christopher Huston 8 7 S u m,m e r S t r e e t B o s t o n M A 0 2 1 1 0 6 1 7 . 4 2 6 2 8 5 8 f a x 4 2 6 1 4 5 7 w w w . d i n i s c o c o m ATTACHMENT 1 a r c h i t e c t s a n d p l a n n e r s Limited ATTACHMENT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 16 February 2001 Reference: North Andover High School North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan Special Permit Note: Large format attachments are listed together at the end Table of Contents (16 February.2001)........................................................... Attachment 1 Application for Site Plan Special Permit ........................................................ Attachment 2 Memorandum (16 February 2001)................................................................. Attachment 3 Location Plan (16 February 2001) ................................................................. Attachment 4 Existing Site Aerial Photograph (15 November 2000) .................................... Attachment 5 Rendered Site Plan (16 February 200 1) ........................................................ Attachment 6 Renderings (12 October 2000)...................................................................... Attachment 7 Construction Schedule (23 January 2001)..................................:.................. Attachment 8 NotUsed ...................................................................................................... Attachment 9 Zoning Information Table (16 February 2001).............................................. Attachment 10 Letter from Rick Rice to North Andover Building Department (31 January 2001) Parking Requirements....................... ......................................................... Attachment 11 Letter from Rick Rice to North Andover Building Department (31 January 2001) Earth Removal........................ ...................................................................... Attachment 12 Stormwater Management Design and Stormwater Runoff Calculations (Revised 08 January 2001)........................ Attachment 13 Wetlands Notice of Intent (Revised 08 January 2001).................................. Attachment 14 Kenneth DiNisco' Richard N.Rice . Gary E.Ainslie Christopher Huston 8 7 S u m m e r S t r e e t B o s t o n M A 0 2 1 1 0 6 1 7 4 2 6 2 8 5 8 f a x 4 2 6 1 4 5 7 www -dinisco c o m Attachment 1 —Table of Contents— North Andover Planning Board Page 2 Site Lighting Fixture Cuts (16 February 2001).............................................. Attachment 15 Site Lighting Photometric Distibution Plan (16 February 2001)..................... Attachment 16 Site Section Drawings (16 February 2001) .................................................. Attachment 17 Traffic Impact Study (February 2001) .......................................................... Attachment 18 ENF Form (31 October 2001) ..................................................................... Attachment 19 ENF Certificate (22 December 2001)......................................................I.... Attachment 20 Letter from Rick Rice to MEPA (22 November 2000)................................... Attachment 21 Letter from Paul Szymanski (16 November 2000)...........................I............ Attachment 21 A Letter from Fred King to Army Corp of Engineers (21 December 2000)........ Attachment 22 Sewer Connection /Extension Permit (24 January 2001) ..........:................. Attachment 23 Massachusetts Historical Commission Project Notification Form.................. Attachment 24 Panoramic View from Neighbor's Property (16 February 2001).................... Attachment 25 Letter from Robert Naftal,North Andover Bicycle Advocacy Committee to North Andover Planning Board (11 February 2001) ..................................... Attachment 26 North Andover High School Feasibility Study Executive Summary (13 November 1997) ................................................... Attachment 27 Certified Abutters List (02 November 2000)................................................. Attachment 28 LARGE FORMAT ATTACHMENTS Plan Set—'(16 February 2001) .......................... ..Attachment'LF1 Title Sheet T-1 Site Survey 1.0.1 = 1.0.5 Layout& Materials 1.1.1 — 1.1.5 Grading Plan 1.1.6— 1.1.10 Planting Plan 1.1.11 — 1.1.15 Site Utilities 1.2.0— 1.2.5 Sediment and Erosion Control 1.3.1 — 1.3.3 Stormwater Drainage Plan 1.3.6— 1.3.11 Key Plans 3.3.1 —3.3.3 Site Power and Lighting 10.0.1 - 10.0.6 Elevations— (15 December 2000) .............................................................Attachment LF2 Site Lighting Calculation Plan — (16 February 2001) ..................................Attachment LF3 99430.0 CorPlanDept 02.2-TOC ATTACHMENT 2. Town of North Andover Planning Board Please type or print clearly: - 1:. Petitioner:_ DiNisco- Design Partnership Ltd. - Address: 87 Summer Street Boston; MA 02110 Telephone Number: 617-426-2858 2. Owners of Land: North Andover School Department Address• . " 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Telephone-Number: 978-794-1503 Number of years ownership: 30. Years If applicant is not the owner,please state interesYin property:. 'Architect. 8.3 - 3. Request-for a Special Permit under Section 2.a.i of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw to Construct a new building of more than 2,000 SF and _ increase the parking more than five additional spaces: C� 446 f1 S ('J t '�- • 4. - Location of Property: 675 Chicke ring Road North Andover, MA 01845 Zoning D1strict• Residential 2 Assessors: Map: V ! Lot# Registry of Deeds: Book#: 1170 Page# 337 5. Existing Lot: Lot Area (Sq. Ft): 2,100,463 SF Building Height: 42 Street Frontage; 2,900 f/-FT Side Setbacks: 1,760 SF/340 SF Font Setback: 162 FT Rear Setback: 37A FT Floor Area Ration: 0.10:1- Lot Coverage: 7% 6. Proposed Lot (if applicable): Lot Area (Sq.Ft.): 2,100,463 SF Building Height: - 40 TT "(3._story)/50 FT Street Frontage:. 2.1900+/7 FT Side Setback: 1300SF/1000SF (AUD/GYM) Front Setback: 32 FT Rear Setback: 150 SF Floor Area Ratio: 0.14:1 Lot Coverage: 8% 7. Required Lot (as required by Zoning Bylaw); j,otArea (Sq.Fta)° 43,560_SF Building Height: 65 FT (SECT 704.4) Street Frontage: . 150 FT Side Setback: 30 FT Front Setback: 30 FT Rear Setbacks 30 FT Floor Area Ratio:- N/A Lot Coverage: N/A Existing Building (if applicable): Ground Floor(Sq.Ft.) 148,743 SF #of Floors 2 Total Sq. Ft:; 777704,471. SF eight: 42 FT . Type of Construction: N A Use: Educational yP 9. .Proposed Building: 3 Ground Floor(Sq.Ft.) .171,37 8 SF of Floors Total Sq. Ft.; 300,649. SF - Height-, 40 FT (3 story/50 FT Use: F�cl;i�at;nn 1 ___ Type of Construction: 2B / 2C AUD/GYM) 10. Has there been a previous application for a Special Permit from the Planning Board on these premises? o If so,when and for what type of construction? 11. Petitioner and Landowner signature(s): Every application for a Special Permit shall be made on this form which is the official form of the Planning.Board. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The elated copy . of this application received by the Town Clerk or Planning Office,does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all expenses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements,as cited herein and in the Planning Board Rules and Regulations may result in a dismissal by the Planning Board of this applicatio P1*7� 1 omrnplete. Petitioner's Signature: Print or type name here: Richard Rice, Vice President ' Di.Ni.sco Desig Partnership, Ltd. d Owner's Signature: ' °I Print or type name here: Paul Szymanski, Director._Management Support Services North Andover School Department ' ATTACHMENT 3 , , a r c h i t e c t s a n d p l a n n e r s Limited ATTACHMENT 3 MEMORANDUM 16 February 2001 Reference: North Andover High.School North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan Special Permit This Memorandum sets forth the facts relied upon in this application as requested in the instructions. The specific points the instructions have identified to be addressed are referenced below and numbered as per Section "9. Written Documentation" of the submission instructions. 9.i LOCATION MAP See Attachment 4. 9.ii SITE SURVEY See Site Survey, sheets, 1.01 — 1.0.5 of Attachment LF1 and Existing Site Aerial Photograph, Attachment 5. 9.iii PROJECT NAME / DESCRIPTION North Andover High School The North Andover School Building Committee proposes.to construct a new 300,000 square foot, three story high school at the existing high school site on Chickering Road. The new school-is being designed for an enrollment of 1,500 students, based on enrollment forecasts. The existing high school of 204,000 square feet has a design capacity of 900 students and is currently over capacity with a 2000 enrollment of 1,047 students. Cochichewick Brook and related wetlands run through the southern end of the 48.2 acre site. There are also wetlands along a portion of the eastern edge which drain into the Cochichewick Brook. The topography climbs from a grade of 94' at the south to 163' at the north in a series of three terraces. The existing high school, located on the lower terrace at the southern end of the site, was constructed in 1972. See_ Plan Set, Attachment LF1, Rendered Site Plan, Attachment 6, and Renderings, Attachment T . Proposed construction activities include earthwork-preparation.to enlarge the middle terrace, stockpiling fill and loam during construction, and construction of a new high school while the existing high school is occupied. Proposed site improvements include installation of a new driveway system.providing 360 degree access around the school and improvement of the existing.Osgood Street entry drive; increased parking (510 spaces plus 65 parallel parking spaces along the drive), new stormwater management system, playfields and landscaping. Work required by the Conservation Commission includes wetland plantings and wildlife habitat enhancement (installation of bird boxes) as part of the wetland buffer zone mitigation. Kenneth DiNisco Richard N. Rice Gary E. Ainslie Christopher'Huston 87 Summer Street Bo sCo n MA 02110 617 . 426 . 2858 fax 426 . 1457 W w w . d i n i s c o c o m Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, February 16, 2001 Page 2 Site construction will be phased, with the new building to be constructed north of the existing school, which will be demolished once the.new school can be occupied. The phases are identified in the Construction Schedule, Attachment 8. Listed below are the current tenants as requested: North Andover High School 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Susan Nicholson, Principal Phone: 978-794-1711 North Andover School Department 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Attention:-Paul Szymanksi, Director Management Support Services Phone: 978-794-1505 North Andover Community TV 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Tom Shallow Phone: 978-687-6570 9.iv EASEMENTS / LEGAL CONDITIONS The property has the following easements: The New England Power Company Easement for power lines runs from Osgood Street along the entry drive and then north of Cochichewick Brook to Chickering Road. See Site Survey, sheets 1.0.4— 1.05 of Attachment LF1. The proposed project was approved by the North-Andover Conservation Commission on 07 February 2001 which is expected to sign the Order of Conditions for this project on 21 February 2001, a copy of which will be forwarded to the Planning Board upon receipt. 9.v TOPOGRAPHY The present topography is described in the General Project Description above and documented in the Site Survey, sheets 1.01 — 1.05 of Attachment LF1. The proposed topography will expand the middle terrace by cutting back into the slope of the higher terrace to the north and adding fill to the slope down to the lower terrace to the south. The elevation of the lower terrace will also be raised with fill. Current estimates of earthwork are: 1. Site cuts: 108,000 cubic yards 2. Site fills: 105,00 cubic yards 3. Remove & Dispose of surplus soil: 3,000 cubic yards 4. Temporary stockpile fill on site*: 55,000 cubic yards *Fill stockpiled until existing building can be demolished Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, February 16, 2001 Page 3 All the above earthwork is incidental to the construction of the new high school project, including the required parking, roadways and playfields. The proposed topography is shown the Grading Plan, sheets 1.1.6— 1.1.10 of Attachment LF1. 9.vi ZONING INFORMATION The project site is in a Residence 2 District. See Zoning Information Table, Attachment 10. 9.vii STORMWATER.DRAINAGE See the following: Erosion and Sedimentation Control, sheets 1.3.1 — 1.3.3 of Attachment LF1 Stormwater Drainage Plan, sheets 1.3.6— 1.3.1 1 of Attachment LF1 Stormwater Management Design and Stormwater Runoff Calculations, Attachment 13. Calculations for 2, 10 and 100 year storm events are included. The architect and project consultants for stormwater.drainage design and site utilities met with the North Andover DPW on 13 February 2001. A copy of the above documents will be submitted to the Department of Public Works for their Review and Approval as requested in your.instructions. 9.viii BUILDING LOCATION The existing high school, which will be demolished, is located on the'lower terrace. It has two stories, an overall height of 42 feet and the gross area is 204,471 square feet. Seethe Site Survey, sheets'1.0.1 — 1.0.5 of Attachment LF1. The new high school is located on the middle terrace. The north wing is three stories and the south wing is two stories. It has a height of 50 feet at its tallest point (the crown of the arched auditorium roof over the stage). The gross area is 300,649 square feet. See Key Plans, sheets 3.3.1 —3.3.1 of Attachment LF1. 9.ix BUILDING ELEVATION See Elevations, Attachment LF2. Also the Renderings, Attachment 7, include views of the high school from Chickering Road. 9.x LOCATION OF PARKING / WALKWAYS See Site Survey, sheets 1.0.1 — 1.0.5 of Attachment LF1 for existing parking. See Layout & Materials, sheets 1.1.1 — 1.1.5 of Attachment LF1 for the proposed parking, walkways. In the new design the existing curb cut onto Chickering Road which is currently not used, will be closed and the existing entry from Osgood Road will be widened from two lanes to three lanes. The new design also includes a walkway to the existing pedestrian bridge, which will remain, linking the Osgood Road entrance, 9.xi LOCATION OF WETLANDS / NOTICE OF INTENT The Site Survey and Site Plans show the wetlands, wetland buffer zones and riverfront area. See the,Notice of Intent, Attachment 14. The Conservation Commission approved the project at the 07 February 2001 Hearing and an Order of Conditions is expected to be signed on 21 February 2001. A copy of the Order of Conditions will be forwarded upon receipt. Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, February 16, 2001 Page 4 9.xii LOCATION OF WALLS / SIGNS See Site Layout and Material, sheets'1.1.1 —.1.1.5 of Attachment LF1 for retaining walls. A low concrete retaining wall is used at the site drive to minimize disturbance of the adjacent wetland, and a boulder retaining wall is used at the southwest corner of the site for the same purpose. The existing sign at the Osgood Street Entry will remain, Wall signs will be located to the right of the South Entry (see renderings, Attachment 7 and elevations, Attachment LF2) and another yet to be designed sign will be located on the to identify the school from Chickering Road, looking south. 9.xiii LOCATION OF ROADWAYS / DRIVES See Site Survey, sheets 1.0.1 — 1.0.5 of Attachment LF1 for location of adjacent roadways and curb cuts. See Layout and Materials, sheets 1.1.1 — 1.1.5 of Attachment LF1 for site drive layout, and types of curbs and gutters. 9.xiv OUTDOOR STORAGE / DISPLAY AREAS There are no outdoor storage or display areas on the site. Storage for site related equipment is contained in the building. 9.xv .LANDSCAPING PLAN See Planting Plans, sheets 1.1.11 — 1.1.15 of Attachment LF1. See Layout and Materials, sheets 1.1.1 - 1.1.5 of Attachment LF1 for paving and fences. 9r.xvi REFUSE AREAS See Layout and Materials, sheet 1.1.3 of Attachment LF1 for location of outdoor refuse storage areas (dumpsters). 9.xvii LIGHTING FACILITIES See the following documents: Site Lighting Plan and Schedule, sheets 10.0.4— 10.0.6 of Attachment LF1 Site Lighting Calculation Plan, Attachment LF3 Site Lighting Photometric.Distribution Plan, Attachment 16 Site Light Fixture Cuts, Attachment 15 Site Section Drawings Attachment 17 Site lighting will consist of roadway and parking lot lighting, and illumination of the north and south entries. Building lighting will consist of code required egress lighting and general illumination of the north and south entry tower elements. Exterior lighting will be time clock controlled to reduce levels to those necessary for security and emergency egress when the building is unoccupied. 9.xviii DRAINAGE BASIN STUDY See Stormwater Management Design and Stormwater Runoff Calculations, Attachment 13. 9.xix TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY See Traffic Impact Study, Attachment XX. See 9.20. The project does not access a state highway. A indirect access permit is being filed with Mass Highway. Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, February 16, 2001 Page 5 9.xx COMMONWEALTH REVIEW The following documents have been submitt ed to Commonwealth agencies: Notice of Intent—See Attachment 14. Environmental Notification Form (ENF) - Previously submitted to the Planning Board (Attachment 19). See also ENF Certificate, Attachment 20 and Letter from Rick Rice, Attachment 21. Army Corp of Engineers—As noted in the letter from Fred King, Attachment 22; no further review or application is required with the Army Corps of Engineers relative.to Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. A copy of the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions will be.forwarded to the Army Corp of Engineers upon receipt. Department of Environmental Protection Sewer Permit Application -See Approved Permit,Attachment.23. Mass Highway Indirect Access Permit—Application now being prepared and will be forwarded upon submission to Mass Highway. Architectural Access Board—Application will be forwarded upon submission to the Architectural Access Board. Massachusetts Historical Commission—See Attachment 24. 9.xxi UTILITES See Site Utilities,sheets 1.2.0— 1.2.5; Sedimentation and Erosion Control, sheets 1.3.1 — 1.3.3; and Stormwater Drainage Plan, sheets 1.3.6 -1.311 of Attachment LF1. 9.xxii FISCAL IMPACT The new high school is a town project that was approved at Town Meeting with funding subsequently approved by a proposition 2 1/2 override vote. 9.xxiii COMMUNITY_IMPACT Architecturally the new high school has been designed to have a traditional, classical appearance.There are also references to historical mill buildings; which played a significant role in the history of North Andover, such as the clerestory windows. The visual impact of the building has been evaluated in rendered views of the building from Chickering Road (Attachment 7), Site Sections (Attachment 17) and views of the new high school from the neighbors' properties (Attachment 25) have also been prepared. Three meetings have been held thus far with the neighbors during which their concerns have been addressed. At one meeting the,proposed building and site drive were staked out for neighbors to evaluate the visual impact from their properties. A fourth meeting is scheduled. The proposed site plan is also consistent with existing pedestrian movement, integrating the existing pedestrian bridge to the southern end of the site. Walkways also extend to Prescott street at the northern end of the site and to new sidewalks currently being added to Osgood Street to the west (See Rendered Site Plan, Attachment 6 and Layout and,Materials; sheets 1.1.1 - 1.1.5 of Attachment LF1.). The site plan is also consistent with the North Andover Bicycle Advocacy Committee's plans for the development of a Rail Trail along the Route of the former Essex Railroad, which has adjacent sections in use as a public bicycle and pedestrian"trail (Attachment 26). Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, February 16, 2001 Page 6 The conclusion to build a new school on the site of the existing high school site is based on a planning process that is consistent and compatible with the existing use of the site. The School Building Committee completed a feasibility study in 1997 evaluating seven planning options that included various renovation /addition options as well as construction of a new high school in various locations on'the existing high school site. See Executive Summary of 1997 Feasibility Study, Attachment 27. A critical determinant in identifying the optimal scheme was the need to minimize the impact of a 36 month construction project on the health, safety and education of the students. The conclusion of this study was the recommendation to construct a new high school on the middle terrace. This option was the most cost effective and least disruptive to the educational program during construction. In addition, by locating the new high school on the site of the existing high school significant site development and infrastructure is already in place which would have to otherwise be developed if the project were on an undeveloped site or on a site currently developed for another use. An additional benefit to North Andover is the community use of high school facilities including the play fields, athletic facilities inside the building, TV studio,-multipurpose room, and cafeteria. The auditorium, with a full fly loft, has a capacity of 800. For large town events the gym has a seating capacity of 3,200. 10. PLAN OF LAND See Site Survey, sheets 1.0.1 — 1.0.5 of Attachment LF1._ ABUTTERS LIST A,copy of the Abutters list is included as Attachment 28. 99430.0 CorPlanDept 02.3-Memo ATTACHMENT 4 Al U ICI A L Af R T,�` M ��� CIS 7�� i �,.. ✓/ A �.. a � }������ � --_ .. _,_.- � ,,,,� � t t � r� p r s umping r to 133 / I, 1�� �� "" • 'r . `oaf , �n 7 ♦�/,� �., �D `y., � 1 �� ( y t,�` r � � �I�r "",ew� aF'"�I�/r� t . f Y� 4S "N '� ou e ✓ �. �Vf /' I p/ a , ;I� r �� SIDEN , s E c eyPr u, '-�-jr^1 ��. �'q � 6 RESIDENTIAL r a /�r c. Q . � RESIDENTIAL "-W eo m •r x w / C • It'1 tv .. 34 p id le } k V0 •,. r� pp �6 P Jill r " 1 . 4 _ ;ant� 4a a .,.^ � q ✓r„ � '� rte. � � 1 r' .. r � H � r � of elTt " 0 1500 Location Pap 16 February 2001 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL • � North Andover, MA tea architects and planners ATTACHMENV S o _.-_. N w �v p, Nj ao (LL s_. LL S t 1 ro Z ' y , O , � i s (( EE S LL t 1(E E LL i Z 'o o a - LL a : f r ( r { E r t j S F O 3 7 € i _ 3 E $ { t Z I �Z ii I I € j j EE s (s tt E jj 3` N : ( 3 E ( [ y E S v O N O ID 0 2' ro ! o:E ; 15 ;c 0`a) m U3 roj Eol i Uo o ro o. i col LLs f c.a' U' � n' z 0[ SEE dj of �`E Cc c E } _ f € a a3 Z O J N x, O; o Q €aaC[ ice! io'; F m o }. c� a'o o in W U, o€ o 3� W rn fA'Y: :U W aEi rn (D vi j � � '= E 3 c W m`� o i�t O, 'U3`i' ¢ a m Q€ ¢,� o E:LL : ° U) o V O o�{c �ic !-o `OCirn m3 co -o'o�: , :°25' �-> c. 'E) 2:cc c c c E Z (a a€'� ° a:�' Rio os�?a� CL a:0'a E o: 7 a..N o �'ro a E <o O W a 2 a) i� sZip '9 � X � W W:m.m o ro' U. W o..� � �,� �<ro > al Q � [F 'm jw[0 1�;U ipm m l�;w c cn:� a' U �w`:m m U.c7 rn � ,� Fes- 1�t rr d O o F- z z ATTACHMENT 10 Attachement 10 North Andover High School Zoning Information Town of North Andover Planning Board 16 February 2001 Required Existing New Minimum Lot Area 43,560 SF 2,100,463 SF 2,100,463 SF Maximum Height (Note 1) 65 FT 42 FT 40 FT(3 Story)/ 50 FT Aud/Gym) Minimum Street Frontage 150 FT 2,900 FT 2,900 FT Minimum Front Set-Back 30 FT 162 FT 32 FT Minimum Side Set-Back 30 FT 1760 FT/340 FT 1300 FT/1000 FT Minimum Rear Set-Back 30 FT 374 FT 150 FT Building Ground Floor Gross Area N/A 148,743 SF 171,378 SF Building Total Gross Area N/A 204,471 SF 300,649 SF Maximum Floor Area Ration N/A 0.10:1 0.14:1 Maximum Lot Coverage N/A 7% 8% Maximum Dwelling Unit N/A N/A N/A Density/Acre Use Educational Educational Open Space N/A N/A N/A Parking Spaces (Note 2) 350 510 (lined) 65 overflow Signs Ground Sign (Note 3) Existing Sign Wall Signs 10% of Elevation N/A S Elev of S Wing W Elev of N Wing W Elev of S Win Earth Removal (Note 4) Permit Not Required Landscaping Plan. Brd. Review (1) Tree / (5) Parking More than 200 Spaces rovided Notes 1 Building height of 65 FT allowed from Section 7.4.4 of Zoning Bylaw. 2 Parking Requirements determined by Building Inspector because schools are not a listed use in the North Andover Zoning By-law. See Letter to Robert Nicetta, 02 February 200, Attachment 11. 3 Non Conforming Ground Sign may be continued and maintained from Section 6.4.3. 4 All earthwork is incidental to construction. See Letter to Robert Nicetta, 31 January 2001, Attachment 12. ATTACHMENT 1:1 ►l��tilGtx �e P a.r c h i t..e c t s• a n d p 1 "a n n e r s Limited ' 02 February 2001 Town'of.North Andover Building Department 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01.845 Attention: Robert Nicetta, Building Commissioner Re: North Andover High School North Andover,MA Subject: Parking Requirements Dear Bob: The purpose of this letter is to describe the parking proposed for the new high school project. As we have discussed, schools.are not a listed use in the North Andover Zoning By-law, and the Building Inspector shall make a determination as to a sufficient quantity of parking, per the by-law. EXISTING SCHOOL At present, there exists 350 parking spaces serving the students, faculty and staff of 'the existing 1000 student high school. NEW HIGH SCHOOL The new high school is being designed to accommodate.1500 students (a 50 percent increase in enrollment).. Parking for new facility will include a total of 510 spaces in two lots "Overflow" parking is provided by 65 parallel parking spaces along the outside of the access drive (with the inside curb kept clear for a fire lane); in addition it.is possible to park another 80 cars.in an unpaved area along the emergency access drive.which runs along the north playfields to a gate at Prescott Street. Administratively,.the School Department can regulate those students allowed to drive to school, thus controlling daytime parking needs: While.additional parking may be advantageous for the largest-public-usage of the : building (i.e.town.meeting) the site'simply cannot support additional parking for such an' infrequent event given wetlands constraints and the need to maximize open space for playfields. Kenneth DiNisco Richard N. Rice Gary E.Ainslie Christopher Huston. 8,7 S u m m e r S t r e e t B o s t o n M A 0 2 1 1 0 6 1.7 . 4 2 6 2 8 5 8 f a x 4 2 6 1 4 5 7 . w w w . d i n i s c o c o m Robert Nicetta, 02 February 2001 Page 2 MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT: By means of comparison,the 1200.student middle school project included a Total.of 191 spaces in three lots, plus.43-parallel parking spaces.along the outside curb of the access drive, for a total of 234 spaces. At recent visits to the middle school during the - school day,-more than 100 spaces in the most remote portions of the parking,lots were observed to be unused._ Please note that the.total number of:spaces proposed for the high school is more than double those provided at the middle school. Should you have any comments or questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate.to contact me. - Sincer , Richard Rice DiRISCO DESIGN" cc: Louis Minicucci :Nancy Kurtz Paul Szymanski Y Pat Saitta Kenneth DiNisco 99430.0 COrCfylrwNSt 07 T, a 'r c h .i 'f .e o t" s a. ri 'd p 1 a ri n...-e r s" 4, A4ef L united 31 January 2001 Town of Noith Andover . :. ..: . Building Department 27.Charles'Street North Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Robert Nicetta;=Building Commissioner Re: Nortfi.-Andover-High School North Andover,MA Ref:.: = A licatiili of Earth Removal Permit.:' PP ty, Dear Bob: The construction of the'new high school project will-require the following earthwork ta.be performed on site*.(all quantities.current estimates): = • Site cuts: 108,000 cubic yards • _ Site fills: 105,0.00 cubic yards • Remove & Dispose of surplus soil:3,000.cubic yards Temporary-stockpile fill on site*:55,000 cubic yards .. "fill stockpiled until existing building can be demolished All:the above earthwork is.ocidental to the construction of.the new high school'project, including the required=parking, roadways and playfields. Thus,_under Article 5.5 of the North Andover. Zoning By-law;it is our understanding that an Earth Removal Permit is not required . As there is-am in Article 5,6 Miscellaneous Removal of Earth;-We would --appreciate confirmation,that ow interpretation:is correct. .Thank.you for your continued assistance with this project: R re id Rice DiNISCO 'DESIGN RNR/crri . Cc: Louis Minicucci Nancy Kurtz Paul.Szymanski` . . Pat Saitta Kenneth DiNisco .99430.0 corcryitmvst oa Kenneth DiNisco Richard N.Rice._ Gary:E.Ainslie: Christopher Huston 8 7 S u in to e.r .B t r e e:t B .o s t 6 n, M A 0 21 1. 0 6 1 7 . 4. 2 6 2 8 -5 8.. f a x 4 2 '6 1 4 5 7 W w w d i n i s c o c o m IATTRUMILT 13 O One Complete P copy Included with application sent to Planning Board {r ( and one complete copy sent to ►�i� ® ; ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Board's Consultant 20217 ® REPORT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND STORMWATER RUNOFF CALCULATIONS NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT CHICKERING ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston,MA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Fra MA. 01701 CM -:0 MOM !— Of October 5,2000 Revised:December 6,2000 January 8,2001 0o SCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING TIT HIAENT 1 _ I 06 October 2001 submission also includes 31 January 2001 revision k — X02 _ I of Wetlands Replication Narrative 117 i _ -E Ia DS — !I —C Y —T,-PIT-- ( — ' _ 1.OR=ADO 1- R �'-S(GH0 D Is--_Cr I I— -- —� — --- -- - - - ----- �75�C-$I1C—�R��t�H2O _ I E - - �j, sET S.—�--I -- — - O —H ANDOl-�Rq 5 C i i_ I ! ---�- - --- ----�---- T - — ---- -- - - -� I 1 --�� -i- -- - -� I � - -I - Y it ! I I I- . (E-D"B'SCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURD EYING PLA\SI`!G 20217 NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE CONTENTS NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL 675 Chickering Road North Andover, Massachusetts Project Narrative and Summary Notice of Intent Form Local Waiver Request Form Application Checklist Form Certified List of Abutters Locus Map (8.5 x 11 Section of U.S.G.S. Map) Stormwater Management Form Narrative Attachments & Calculations Attachment 1. Wetland Replication Narrative Attachment 2. Stormwater Management Report (separate cover) Attachment 3. Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative Plans: The attached plan set includes the following: Existing Conditions Plans (By Richard F.Kaminski &Associates,dated 9/25/00) 1.01 Site Survey- Overview, Key Plan &Legend 1.02 Site Survey - (North Portion of Site) 1.03 Site Survey - (Central Portion of Site) 1.04 Site Survey - (Southern Portion of Site) 1.05 Site Survey - (Southeastern Portion of Site) Site Lavout and Material Plans (Bv Carol R. Johnson Associates,Inc.,dated 9/19/00) 1.11 Layout &Materials, Overview 1.12 Layout &Materials, North 1.13 Layout & Materials, Middle 1.14 Layout & Materials, South 1.15 Layout & Materials, Southeast Planting Plan (Bv Carol R. ,Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 9/19/00) 1.16 Planting Plan, Overview 1.17 Planting Plan, North 1.18 Planting Plan, Middle 1.19 Planting Plan, South 1.1.20 Planting Plan, Southeast 20217 Notice of Intent Package Contents ooSCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School ENGINEERING • SURVEYING PLANNING Site Utility Plans (By Robert W. Sullivan, Inc., dated 9/18/00) 1.2.0 Site Utilities, Legend Details 1.2.1 Overall Site Plan, North 1.2.2 Site Utilities Site Plan, North 1.2.3 Site Utilities Site Plan, Middle 1.2.4 Site Utilities Site Plan, South 1.2.5 Site Utilities Site Plan, Southeast Erosion Control Plans (Bv Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc.dated 1015100) 1.3.1 Erosion & Sediment Control —Phase 1 1.3.2 Erosion & Sediment Control —Phase 2 1.3.3 Erosion & Sediment Control - Details Stormwater Management Plans(Bv Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc.dated 1015100) 1.3.6 Stormwater Drainage Plan - Overview 1.3.7 Stormwater Drainage Plan—North 1.3.8 Stormwater Drainage Plan —Middle 1.3.9 Stormwater Drainage Plan—South 1.3.10 Stormwater Drainage Plan —Southeast 1.3.11 Stormwater Drainage Details Architectual Plans 3.3.1 Key Plans - Basement and First Floor .2 cc--D'E—::')SCHOFIELD BROTHERS_ ENGINEERING - SURVEYING • PLANNING 20217 NOTICE OF INTENT Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and North Andover Wetland Protection Bylaw NARRATIVE AND SUMMARY NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL 675 Chickering Road North Andover, Massachusetts General Project Description The North Andover School Building Committee proposes to construct a new 300,000 square foot, three story high school at the existing high school site on Chickering Road. The new school is being designed for an enrollment of 1,500 students, based on enrollment forecasts. The existing high school of 204,000 square feet has a design capacity of 900 students and is currently over capacity with a 2000 enrollment of 1,047 students. Cochichewick Brook and related wetlands run through the southern end of the 48.2 acre site. There are also wetlands along a portion of the eastern edge which drain into the Cochichewick Brook. The topography climbs from a grade of 94'at the south to 163'at the north in a series of three terraces. The existing high school, located on the lower terrace at the southern end of the site, was constructed in 1972. Proposed construction activities include earthwork preparation to enlarge the middle terrace, stockpiling fill and loam during construction, and construction of a new high school while the existing high school is occupied. Proposed site improvements include installation of a new driveway system providing 360 degree access around the school, a new, second site entrance with traffic signal off Chickering Road, increased parking (totaling 508 spaces), new stormwater management system, playfields and plantings. After the new high school is constructed and occupied, the existing high school and the existing pedestrian bridge will be demolished and the lower parking areas and new playfields will be constructed. The proposed project is entirely within the area previously developed for the existing high school and infrastructure. Alternatives Analvsis The construction of a new high school at the existing high school site has been proposed as shown only after an extensive study, which included the consideration of other potential sites. The proposed new high school site has already been developed for the existing high school. Significant site development and infrastructure would be necessary in locating the 20217 Narrative and Summary =°SCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING high school on an undeveloped site or site currently developed for another use. Because of this the existing high school site is advantageous compared to other sites both in terms of cost and environmental impact as significant site development for the proposed project is already in place. Beyond this advantage of the existing site, there are no other known sites of sufficient size either owned by the Town of North Andover or privately. One site that was raised as a possibility, the nearby Osgood Hill site, has been designated by the town as conservation land, and also has a severe topography that would make development impractical. The School Building Committee completed a feasibility study in 1997 evaluating seven planning options that included various renovation / addition options as well as construction of a new high school in various locations on the existing high school site. In order to meet current educational standards and building codes the existing school building would require complete renovation, with little more than the shell remaining. A critical determinant in identifying the optimal scheme was the need to minimize the impact of a 36 month construction project on the health, safety and education of the students. The conclusion of this study was the recommendation to construct a new high school on the middle terrace. This option was the most cost effective and least disruptive to the educational program during construction. The proposed design on the middle terrace has gone through numerous revisions in response to environmental, technical and economic pressures. A Notice of Resource Area Delineation was filed in September of 1999. In response to the proximity of flagged wetlands, the building footprint has been condensed and moved totally out of the 50'No- Build Zone established by the North Andover Conservation Commission. Proposed parking has been reduced and fewer playfields are being provided as a result of the constraints imposed by the wetland areas. Based on the needs of the school and recreational sports programs, it is imperative that the high school site accommodate no less than six fields for soccer, field hockey and lacrosse use, and one full size baseball field. A traffic study has determined that 600 spaces would be optimal for the projected school enrollment of 1500 students. Parking restrictions, if necessary, will be used by the school department to limit parking to the proposed 508 parking spaces. Additional visitor parking for special events will be accommodated by parallel parking on one side of the main access drive. This design represents the most environmentally sensitive design which minimizes alteration of existing wetlands and wetland buffer zones. The project size and scope have been reduced to the minimum amount feasible. With respect to its environmental impact, the proposed project has the added benefit of improving the River-front Area. The demolition of the existing school and parking will result in the net reduction of impervious area in the existing 200'Riverfront Area by 50,980 square feet. 2 20217 Narrative and Summary E-DEB� SCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Wetland Resource Areas The wetlands were delineated in July of 1999, by Richard F. Kaminiski and Associates, Incorporated, and a Determination of Applicability was filed on August 18, 1999. The Final Determination of Applicability was recorded at the Essex Registry of Deeds on September 9, 1999, and is referenced as#33474. The wetland resource areas described in the Determination of Applicability are as shown on the existing conditions plan (included in this filing). These areas include Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW), Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF), Bank (of Cochichewick Brook), and Riverfront Area. Perennial Stream Cochichewick Brook runs through the southern portion of the site and exits the property at a large box culvert under Chickering Road (Rte. 125). This brook is shown as a perennial stream on the Lawerence U.S.G.S. Quad Sheet and has been formally determined by the North Andover Conservation Commission to be a River subject to the Rivers Protection Act. Bordering Vegetated Wetland There are two general areas of BVW related to this site. One is the wetland bordering on Cochichewick Brook in the southern portion of the site. The vegetation found in this area consists of New England aster (Aster novae-angliae), rough leaf goldenrod (Solidago patula), narrow-leaf cattail (Thypha angustifolia), purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), buckthorn (Rhamnits frangula), and red maple (Ater ritbrum). The second BVW is a wetland area running along the major portion of the eastern side of the site. This wetland area drains into Cochichewick Brook. This area contains many of the same types of vegetation listed above, as well as pale touch-me-not (Impatiens pallida), northern arrowwood (Viburnum recognitum), black willow (Salim nigra). Bordering Land Subject to Flooding The limit of BLSF on the site is shown as the 95-foot elevation contour. This elevation is the 100-year flood elevation associated with Cochichwick Brook. Riverfront The riverfront area is the area within 200 feet of the bank of Cochichewick Brook. The boundary of the Riverfront and the top of bank are shown on the existing conditions topographic plan. The total area of Riverfront on the property is approximately 5.2 acres. All of the riverfront area within the proposed limits of alteration for this project is land that is presently developed for the existing school parking areas and driveways. No natural Riverfront area is proposed to be altered. Buffer Zone The 100 foot Buffer Zone is classified as a resource area under the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw. The bylaw further breaks down the buffer zone into the 25 foot_'_'No 3 20217 Narrative and Summary 'BB'SCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School F.YGIVEERI\G SCRVF.1'I`G P1.:\SYING Disturbance Zone", and the 50 foot "No Build Zone". These boundaries are also shown on the enclosed plans. Performance Standards The proposed North Andover.High School project has been designed as described in the introduction to this narrative to minimize intrusions and alterations of wetland resource areas. As designed, the project will alter some land within Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Riverfront Area, as well as area within the 100-foot wetland buffer zone. Under the local wetlands bylaw, the buffer zone is a resource area and some areas of the buffer zone including the 25 foot "No Build Zone" is planned to be altered. The following describes how the project will meet the performance standards and minimize alterations as applicable to the various resource areas. Bordering Vegetated Wetland The bordering vegetated wetland is being altered at 5 locations. Four of the locations are related to the construction of the access driveway and involve the wetland area along the eastern side of the site. To minimize the alteration of wetland due to the driveway, a retaining wall is proposed along the sections of driveway to eliminate side slopes into the wetland area. This has kept the wetland alteration to less than 5000 sq. ft. A small area of BVW (200 ± square feet) in the southwest portion of the site is being altered for the grading related to the athletic field construction. The total wetland alteration is 4605 ± square feet. This total includes some temporary alteration adjacent to the proposed retaining wall necessary for construction. In conformance with the North Andover Wetland Bylaw and the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act Regulations, wetland replication is being proposed. According to 310 CMR 10.55(4)(b), the surface of the replacement area will be greater or equal to the area that will be altered, the ground water and surface elevation will be equal to the displaced area, it will be connected and in the vicinity of the same water body, and at least 75% of the surface of the replacement area shall be reestablished with indigenous wetland plant species. The replication will be in 3 locations and will total 9910 ± square feet which is just over twice the area of the wetland being altered. Most of wetlands that are proposed to be altered were created as a result of the construction of the existing North Andover High School building and related site work in 1972. The BVW being displaced contains invasive wetland plant species (see above list). The replication area will be planted with native wetland species such as american elderberry (Sambiccus canadensis), and silky dogwood (Comics amornum) and a native wetland seed mix. See Attachment XXX-Landscape Management Plan. 4 20217 Narrative and Summary a°SCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School F.`GI\F.F:RIYG Sl'R\F.SISG PLANNING Riverfront Area As described above, the entire portion of the Riverfront Area proposed to be altered under this project had previously been extensively altered in 1972 for the construction of the existing high school. The area includes parking lots, access driveways and lawn areas. Under the proposed project, the new school building will be moved to the middle portion of the site, away from Cochichewick Brook and the southern portion of the site will be converted to athletic fields. This change will result in a substantial reduction in impervious surfaces within the Riverfront from the existing 70,920 +/- sq. ft. to 19,940 sq. ft. The total area of Riverfront to be altered is 2.8 acres of the 5.2 acres total on-site Riverfront. Due to the proposed site changes and related reductions in impervious surfaces, the project can be considered as a "redevelopment project" under 310 CMR 10.58(5). The project will result in a net beneficial impact to the environment relative to wetlands and riverfront values. As such, the Conservation Commission "may allow work to redevelop a previously developed riverfront area" provided it conforms to the following criteria: (a) At a minimum the proposed work shall result in an improvement over existing conditions of the capacity of the Riverfront Area to protect the interests identified in the Act. In this case, the change in the land use from parking areas to athletic fields with the resultant reduction in impervious surfaces, will provide a significant benefit relative to the interests of the Act. Moving the building and intensive use areas away from the Stream and Rivet-front will provide a wide, open space buffer. to the other wetland resource areas. Since the existing area to be altered is presently considered degraded relative to wildlife habitat values, the proposed use for athletic fields will provide significant improvement. (b) Stormwater management is provided according to the standards established by DE P. To meet this requirement, the stormwater management system has been designed to meet all requirements of the DEP Stormwater Management Policy and the No. Andover Wetlands Regulations to the extent practicable. Complete information on this is contained in the Stormwater Management Report included with this filing. This will result in a significant improvement in the quality of stormwater runoff from the site to the wetland resource areas. (c) Within 200 foot riverfront areas proposed work shall not be located closer to the river than existing conditions or 100 feet whichever is less. In this case, the proposed work is entirely within the degraded area. (d) Proposed work including expansion of existing structures, shall be located outside the riverfront area or toward the riverfront boundary away from the river. As explained above, the proposed school building will be moved substantially away from the riverfront area. The only structures will be some fencing, benches, walkways, etc. related to the athletic field uses. (e) The area of proposed work shall not exceed the amount of degraded area... In this case the limit of work is entirely within the degraded area. 20217 Narrative and Summary °oSCHOFIELD BROTHERS North Andover High School ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING (f) And (g). Since the area of work, is within the degraded area and will substantially improve the existing conditions, no additional "restoration" of "mitigation" is proposed under 310 CMR 10.58(5)(f) and (g). In addition to the above, the project must meet the criteria contained under sections 10.58(4)(a) and (b). These require that the project be designed to meet the performance standards for all the other wetland resource areas, and that the project must protect rare species. The explanation as to how the project has been designed to comply with the performance standards for the other resource areas is contained in this narrative. Also, according to the latest edition of the Mass. Natural Heritage Atlas, the site is not within an area of habitat of rare wildlife, nor are there any certified vernal pools on site. Buffer Zone Under the proposed project, approximately 5.8 acres of land within the 100 ft. Wetland Buffer Zone will be altered. Nearly all of this 100 foot buffer to the BVW is currently developed in the form of lawn, athletic fields, and pavement. The proposed land use within the buffer zone will be very similar to that of the existing so that there will be virtually no impact as to the values of the existing buffer zone upon completion of the project. In general, all land on the site will be permanently stabilized against erosion following construction and temporary erosion and sediment controls will be employed during construction to protect the adjacent wetland resource areas. Stormwater management on the site will be significantly improved resulting in improved quality of runoff to the wetland resource areas. Relative to the Buffer Zone resource areas under the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw Regulations, the proposed building has been kept outside of the 50-foot No-Build Zone. Areas of the driveway and landscaping will be within the 50-foot No-Build Zone but these may be permitted by the Conservation Commission. It is not possible to avoid all alterations of the 25-foot No-Disturbance Zone, and there are no alternatives that would allow the project to be designed and meet the project program requirements that would not require altering land in this 25' area. The alternatives considered are described in the introduction to this narrative. Therefore, a waiver is being requested from the requirements of this section of the local wetlands regulations. Stormwater Management The stormwater management system has been designed to meet the requirements of the North Andover Conservation Commission and DEP's Stormwater Management Policy to the -extent -practicable.- The stormwater strategy utilizes a combination of __'_Best 6 20217 Narrative and Summary 'HE=' BROTHERS North Andover High School ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Management Practices (BMP's)" consisting of a stormwater management detention basins, particle separator devices for enhanced TSS (Total Suspended Solids Removal) and deep sump catch basins with oil and gas trap hoods to attain the required water quality and control the peak rate of runoff. Post-development rates of runoff will not exceed those experienced under pre-development conditions. Stormwater recharge on site will be enhanced over existing conditions, but soils with very poor infiltrative capacity prevent complete conformance with the recharge requirements. Complete details are contained in the attached Stormwater Management Report. Erosion Control To protect the resource area during the site work, sediment control barriers and sediment traps will be installed prior to the start of work and will be maintained until all disturbed areas have been permanently stabilized. During the first phase of construction, work on the site will be restricted to the northern portion of the site behind the existing school. During the second phase of the site work, the existing school building will be demolished and the lower athletic fields and parking area will be completed. The details are contained on the plans and include the erosion and sediment controls for both phases of the construction. 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131 , §40 Town A. General Information Important: When filling out 1. Applicant: forms on the North Andover School Building Committee computer, use only the tab Name E Mail Address(if applicable) key to move 675 Chickering Road your cursor- Mailing Address do not use the North Andover MA 01845 return key. City/Town State Zip Code (978) 794-1503 (978) 794-0231 r� Phone Number Fax Number(if applicable) IL Af 2. Representative (if any): ro� DiNisco Design Partnership Firm Richard Rice Note: Contact Name E-Mail Address(if applicable) Before 87 Summer Street completing this Mailing Address form consult Boston MA 02110 your local Conservation City/Town State Zip Code Commission (617) 426-2858 (617) 426-1457 regarding any Phone Number Fax Number(if applicable) municipal bylaw or ordinance. 3. Property Owner (if different from applicant): Name -- - Mailing Address City/Town State Zip Code 4. Total Fee: The Town of North Andover is exempt from filing fees with the state and the town. (from Appendix B:Wetland Fee Transmittal Form) 5. Project Location: 675 Chickering Road North Andover Street Address City/Town 92 3 Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number 6. Registry of Deeds: North Essex 1170 337 County Book Page Certificate(if Registered Land) WPAForm3 Pagz 1 of,' Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131 , §40 Town A. General Information (cont.) 7. Summary of Project Impacts: a, Is any work being proposed in the Buffer Zone? ® Yes If yes, how many square feet? 254,700 sq. ft. ❑ No b. List the impacts of proposed activities on each wetland resource areas (temporary and permanent impacts, prior to restoration and mitigation): Resource Area - Size of Impact (e.g., sq. ft.) Bordering Vegetated Wetlands 4605 sq.ft.. Riverfront Area 122,670 sq.ft. Floodplain 0 Bank 0 B. Project Description 1. General Project Description: The project consists of the demolition of the existing North Andover Nigh School and the construction of a new high school with parking, driveways,utilities, grading, landscaping, athletic fields, and associated appurtenances. 2. Plan and/or Map References: See attached list of plans and attachments. Title Date WPA Form 3 Page 2,f 3 Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental.Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 3 ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Town C. Activities Subject to Regulation 1. a. Check the applicable resource areas if work is to be conducted in an associated Buffer Zone: Inland Resource Areas Coastal Resource Areas ® Inland Bank ❑ Coastal Beach ❑ Barrier Beach ® Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shore ❑ Coastal Dune ❑ Salt Marsh ❑ Coastal Bank b. Complete for all proposed activities located, in whole or in part, in Wetland Resource Area(s). Inland Resource Areas: Bordering Vegetated Wetlands: Bordering Land Subject to Flooding: 4605 sq. ft.. N/A Square Feet altered Volume of Flood Storage Lost(cubic feet) 9910 sq. f i. N/A Square Feet replaced Volume of Flood Storage Compensation(cubic feet) Land Under Water Bodies: Isolated Land Subject to Flooding: N/A N/A Square Feet altered Volume of Flood Storage Lost(cubic feet) N/A N/A Cubic Yards dredged Volume of Flood Storage Compensation(cubic feet) Bank: 0 ft. Linear Feet altered Coastal Resource Areas: Coastal Dune: Land Under Salt Pond: N/A N/A Square Feet altered Square Feet altered N/A N/A Cubic Yards/Volume removed Cubic Yards dredged Salt Marsh: Rocky Intertidal Zone: N/A N/A _ Square Feet altered Square Feet a'?ered Coastal Bank: Designated Port Area: N/A N/A Linear Feet altered Square Feet altered WPA Form 3 Page 3 ct 8 Rev.02100 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form ® Notice of intent Provided by DEP r� Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Town — C. Activities Subject to Regulations (cont.) Fish Run: Land Containing Shellfish: N/A N/A Linear Feet altered Square Feet altered Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage: Beach: N/A N/A Square Feet altered Square Feet altered Land Under Ocean: N/A Square Feet altered Cubic Yards dredged Riverfront Area: a. Name of Waterway(if available): Cochichewick Brook b. Width of Riverf ront Area (check one): ❑ 25 ft. - Designated Densely Developed Areas only ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only ® 200 ft. -All other projects c. Describe how the Mean Annual High-Water Line was determined: See Request for Determination of Applicability and Notice of Resource Area Delineation dated 9/1/99. d. Distance of proposed activity closest to the Mean Annual High-Water line: 10 feet Feet e. Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: 224,820 sq. ft. --- Square Feet f. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: 122,670 sq.ft. 31,625 sq. ft. 91,045 sq. ft Total Square Feet Square Feet within 100 ft. Square Feet between 100 ft.and 200 s.WPA Form 3 - Page 4 c!d _- 'Rev.02100 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: r- Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA r11e Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Towr, C. Activities Subject to Regulation (cont.) 2. Check all methods used to delineate the Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) boundary: ® Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by Conservation Commission or DEP (attached) ❑ DEP BVW Field Data Form (attached) ❑ Final Determination of Applicability issued by Conservation Commission (attached) ❑ Other Methods for Determining the BVW boundary(attach documentation): ❑ 50% or more wetland indicator plants ❑ Saturated/inundated conditions exist ❑ Groundwater indicators ❑ Direct observation ❑ Hydric soil indicators ❑ Credible evidence of conditions prior to disturbance. 3. a. Is any portion of the proposed project located in estimated habitat as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program? ❑ Yes If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of N01 to Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Route 135, North Drive Westborough, MA 01581 ® No 2000-2001 Date of Map b. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? ❑ Yes If yes, provide name of ACEC (see Appendix D for ACEC locations): ® No - c. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Restriction Act (M.G.L. c. 131, § 40A) or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act (M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? ❑ Yes ® No WPA Form 3 Page S zi 9 Rev.02/00 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands : WPA Form 3 ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Town D. Performance Standards 1. Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CM 10.24 or 310 CMR 10.53? ❑ Yes If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: ® No 2. Is any activity within any Resource Area or Buffer Zone exempt from performance standards of the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.00. ❑ Yes If yes, describe which exemption applies to this project: ® No 3 a. Is the project located in the Riverfront Area? ® Yes If yes, indicate the proposed project purpose: ❑ Single Family House ❑ Industrial Development ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Development ❑ Transportation ® Other (describe) public school building construction b. Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? ® Yes ❑ No 4. a. Describe how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Attach narrative and supporting documentation. b. Is this project exempt from the DEP Stormwater Policy? ❑ Yes If yes, explain why the project is exempt: ® No If no, stormwater management measures are required. Applicants are encouraged to complete Appendix C: Stormwater Management Form and submit it with this form. WPAFoun 3 Pa;°6 ci d Rev.02/00 xn Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands �u WPA Form 3 ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131,/40 Town E. Additional Information Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI): • USGS or other map of the area (along with a narrative description, if necessary), containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. • Plans identifying the location of proposed activities (including activities proposed to serve as a Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. • Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries shown on plans (e.g., a DEP BVW Field Data Form). • List the titles and final revision dates for all plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. F. Fees The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must be calculated and submitted to the Conservation Commission and the Department(see Instructions and Appendix B. Wetland Fee Transmittal Form). No fee shall be assessed for projects of the federal government, the Department, or cities and towns of the Commonwealth. Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B) to confirm fee payment: N/A N/A Check Number Check date N/A Payor name on check Applicant name(if different from payor) G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents, and gdata are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Conservat' om sion wil plat notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of the app nt ' acco ance with th w�tharlds regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). Lue ertify under nal i of perj y th. all abutters were noti�i of this application, pursuant to the ents of M.G.L c. 31, 0. No ' must be made in wr by nd delivery or certified mail ce' reque ted) o I but ithin 100 feet of the prope in of the project locat' n. 9 c o ignatu of Applicant / Date e of Pro y O ner i different) Date 5404. Si nature of Representative(if any) Date WPA Forth 3 Page 7 of 6 Rnv 02100 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: a�•. '' Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands *h W A Form 3 ® Notice of Intent Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Town G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements (cont.) For Conservation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent (Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; two copies of pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B; and the city/town fee payment must be sent to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For DEP: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent (Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; two copies of pages 1 and 2 of Appendix B; and a copy of the state fee payment must be sent to the DEP Regional Office (see Appendix A) by certified mail or hand delivery. Other: If the applicant has checked the "yes" box in any part of Section C, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructions for additional submittal requirements. The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. W PA Form 3 —__ i- __,paces d8 a Rev.02100 f Town of North Andover NORTH OFFICE OF �?o<< ,tic COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES ° . 27 Charles Street • North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 WILLIAM J. SCOTT 1SSAC USES Director NORTH ANDOVER CONSERVATTON COA17T.ISSION Fax 9780 688-9< (978)688-9531 WAIVER REQUEST FORM All projects submitted for review to the Conservation Commission should comply with the North Andover Wetlands Regulations as well as the State Regulations (310 CMR 10.00). If you cannot comply with any portion of the North Andover Wetlands Regulations you should file this Waiver Request identifying any areas where your proposed project is not in full compliance. Project: North Andover High School Applicant: North Andover School Building Committee Applicant's 675 Chickering Road Address: No. Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Louis Minicucci Jr. , Chairman Phone: 978-794-1503 I hereby request a Waiver from Section(s) III.D.4.a. 25 FT No Disturbance Zone, ' III .E.4. Vegetated Wetland Alteration of the North Andover Wetlands Regulations. The reason(s) for this Waiver Request .are described below: SEC w/4YL1t►gT IyZ cDV 'r'HV, N-ol 1 ' h / ature 0 A plic t Date ° G 688-9535 BOARD OF APPEALS .688-9541 BUMDING 688-9545 - CONSERVATION 68&9530 ItF°t 688-9540 PL./WN� APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Notice of Intent p9RTN l� 4 � ' r General Requirements— Wetland Protection By1aW: Please check the following boxes indicating that you have read & now understand the applicable rule and/or regulation: Section 178.2 (page 2) —This section identifies the Town's wetland resource areas. �d Section 178.4 (page 3) —This section pertains to permit application types. CJ Section 178.5 (page 4) —This section pertains to public hearings and the burden of proof placed on an applicant. Section 178.8 (page 7) —This section pertains to responsibility for compliance. General Requirements— Wetland Protection Regulations F1 Section VI (A through Q. Eight (8) copies of Notice of Intent(including plans and other appurtenant data) must be delivered by hand, or by certified mail, and received by the NACC office at least nine (9) business days prior to the scheduled hearing. List of Abutters within 300' of the parcel(s)where work is proposed as certified by the Town Assessor's Office. (NOTE: This certified list shall not be more than 30 days old at the time of filing.) ❑ Notification made to abutters by certified mail not less than seven (7) calendar days prior to the public hearing and proof of mailing presented at that hearing in the form of"white slips" or si nad "green cards." To D6 f-EM7- vPon! pErc 011Y,17'/01! of Trtr r?14Tj cAeq rlk1i vim' IigT F—,4rr.IN)� ❑ Notification of public hearing made in the North Andover Citizen at the applicant's expense not less than seven (7) calendar days prior to the public hearing. (f3y NOTXXI4 -9 NVO✓T-.= IZ C1DaSE1X-V-/4 toN QFr1�,K) "North Andover Riverfront Maps"(Appendix B) examined to determine if this wetland resource area is within 200' of proposed work. The "1997-98 Estimated Habitat of Rare Wetlands Wildlife Map & Certified Vernal Pools" has been reviewed. ❑N/-Ae Filing Fee sent to the DEP Lock Box. Town portion of state tiling fee and the local Wetland ByLaw fee has been included with this application (Section I(D)), 8 1/2" x 11" copy of the portion of the USGS topographic map depicting the project location has been included with this application. A written narrative description of the proposed project and potential impacts to all wetland resource areas has been incl. ❑µ0 A��}}descdption of observed valuable and/or unique wildlife habitat characteristics has b---n ind. ❑N/Mere applicable, a"Wildlife Habitat Evaluation" performed by a qualified Wetland/Wildlife Biologist has been incl. (Refer to Section III(E)(6)). I i i APPLICATION CHECKLIST ® Notice of Intent (continued ...) e Storm water Management Requirements(Section IV): � ( O THrc TaXT'Vgr I�RA�TICAII(�) The project is in compliance with the Wine (9) North Andover/State Stormwater Standards." (p.21) Q The "Town of North Andover/DEP Stormwater Management Form" has been submitted with the Notice of Intent and signed/stamped accordingly. Q Hydrologidhydraulic calculations showing the full flow capacity and velocity of all water courses, open and only sometimes closed channels, and storm drains flowing into, on and out of the parcel. Including engineering calculations for compensatory flood storage areas have been incl. (Refer to Section IV and Section VI). (p.21 & p.24) Erosion &Sedimentation Control Requirements(Section IV): Narrative erosion control plan and/or report provided for any proposed alteration of wetland resource areas. dConstruction schedule and sequence provided for any work within a wetland resource area including specifications for temporary and permanent ground cover. Plan Requirements(Section VI(B)(3-6)): A title that includes the name of the project, location and names of the person(s) preparing the drawings and the date prepared including any revision dates. (pp.29-32) Drawings must be stamped and signed by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer of the Commonwealth Wor Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the Commonwealth (whichever is applicable). (pp. 29-32) All existing condition plans shall include, at a minimum, the following information (p.29): Q All wetland resource areas within 100'of proposed work (unless Riverfront Area which is 200'). Q All property boundaries, existing lot lines and abutters from most recent information available at the Assessor's Office. ❑ri/�atershed Protection Distdct boundaries', surface water supplies, wells, and septic systems within 100' of proposed work. rQ Existing contours at 2' intervals and datum source. Ll All existing natural and man-made features including tree lines, rock outcrops, stone walls, fence lines, cart roads, f�o` paths, overhead and underground utilities and drainage structures. Elevations of all natural and man-made drainage structures, waterways, and wetlands. t Q 100-year flood elevations of all natural and/or man-made waterways and waterbodies as determined by FEMA or i engineering calculations: Scale of 1" — 40' w j APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Notice of Intent (continued ...) All developed condition plans shall include, at a minimum, the following information (p.31): Location of proposed work. 0 All proposed man-made features including roads, driveways, parking areas, structures, buildings, overhead and p�underground utilities. ©4' Subsurface sewage disposal systems. Proposed grading and changes in elevation depicted with 2'contours and spot grades. All surface and subsurface drainage structures including the location, cross section, slope and surface treatment of all drainage channels. The inverts, slope, pipe materials, catch basins, manholes, and end treatment of all storm drains discharging within 100' of any wetland resource area. Location and detail of all temporary erosion control devices, diversions, terraces, silt fences, hay bales barriers, sedimentation basins, and soil stockpile locations on the project site. d Location and nature of all proposed alterations to wetland resource areas. Date: Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Representative .--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (TOWN USE ONLY ❑ COMPLETE APPLICATION—It appears as though your application meets minimum submittal requirements,as such, a public hearing will be scheduled before the NACC within 21 days upon receipt of this application. ❑ INCOMPLETEAPPLICATION- The following sections of the Wetland Protection ByLaw Wor Regulations have not been complied with and as a result this Department is rejecting this incomplete application wirn two(2) business days from the date of receipt (Section 178.4 North Andover Wetland Protection ByLaw). You may pick up this application and j supporting plans at the Conservation Office and re-file a complete Notice of Intent. Wetland ByLaw - Section(s): I Wetland Regulations—Section(s) Signature of-Agent: =:Date 20217 NOTICE OF INTENT NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL ABUTTER NOTIFICATION FORM CERTIFIED ABUTTER LIST Town of North Andover Of NORTH -1 OFFICE OF �? °< �° COMMUNITTY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 0 p 27 Charles Street o ^" North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 �9SSACNUS�t�y WILLIAM J.SCOTT Director (978)688-9531 Fax(978)688-9542 CONSERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to the authority of the Wetlands Protection Act, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40, as amended, and the Town of North Andover's Wetland Protection Bylaw,the North Andover Conservation Commission will hold a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, October 18, 2000 at 8:00 P.M. in the Department of Public Works Conference Room located at 384 Osgood Street,North Andover, MA 01845 on the Notice of Intent of North Andover School Building Committee To alter land at 675 Chickering Road For the purpose of the demolition of the existing North Andover High School and the construction of a new high school with parking, driveways,utilities, grading, landscaping, athletic fields, and associated appurtenances within the Buffer Zone of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW). Plans are available at the Conservation Commission's Office, 27 Charles Street, or by calling (978) 688-9530 for an appointment. By: Scott Masse, Chairman N.A.C.C. Run once in the North Andover Citizen on October 11, 2000 FAX THIS LEGAL NOTICE TO COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER CO. 1-781-453- 6650 cc: D.E.P. Legal Ad Billing Info: North Andover School Building Committee 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Tel: (978)794-1503 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 NOTIFICATION TO ABUTTERS UNDER THE MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT In accordance with the second paragraph of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40, you are hereby notified of the following: A. The applicant is Town of North Andover - School Building Committee. B. The applicant has filed a Notice of Intent with the North Andover Conservation Commission, seeking permission to construct a new High School building with parking, driveways, utilities, landscaping, athletic fields, and associated appurtenances, and including demolition of the existing High School, in an Area Subject to Protection Under the Wetlands Protection Act (General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40) and the North Andover Wetlands Protection Bylaw. C. The address of the lot where the activity is proposed is North Andover High School, at 675 Chickering Road, North Andover. D. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be examined at North Andover Conservation Commission office at 27 Charles Street, North Andover between 8:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. on Monday through Friday. For more information, call 978-688-9530. E. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be purchased from Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. by calling 508-879-0030 between 8:00 and 5:00 on Monday through Friday. Also, copies may be purchased through DiNisco Design Partnership by calling 617-426-2858. F. Information regarding the date, time, and place of the public hearing may be obtained from North Andover Conservation Commission by calling 978-688-9530 between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. on Monday through Friday. Note: Notice of public hearing, including its date, time, and place, will be published at least five (5) days in advance in the North Andover Citizen. Note: Notice of public hearing, including its date, time, and place, will be posted in the Town Hall not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. Note: You may also contact the nearest Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office for more information about this application or the Wetlands Protection Act. To contact DEP, call Northeast Regional Office at 978-661-7600. tix-S" r..-,-°-.""'3- '^a .- �•v'l�v �°. u, -� 'S' *rr '{ � a r ss-.r�^ a .:eF .- ,�"�T r , t r e µ WS "y !� � s} � � -21'lt '�'�•rC �. J •�-��Wr -..c.rzy r '.R z ��-� `� .r�6'' K k 53.�r 1 t.r"",t�• �p s Y . &rg��3G�� ����' �����y�T.��,ls-•fl,,��.-'��'.-F+s �� �"�i f`Sc�l- ( � 3 � � a�`z Y,'r �. te, �' �` E :sue z -d"7, � - X v+, a.".,..` �.v`,C�y t��•� � -4. - i p .q Z ' 'PA;R, ? 5— SUBJECT PROPERTY.- MAP-.IPAR #1 NAME I ADDRESS Norz llht I qov!z/?_ (-4o 2. 2 - ABUTTERS: 11 O.� I I oDoN K�C_ 1�R.I I S o o D T 21 A! ��U DJ4il Z r N o ✓� 2 > 0/8 S- 31 101 3 R i (, 0 oSG-d o U s T- I YW? rz 2-v lZ ©N -- fGT/f r-Oo v z:�rZ 41 - tZ AZ INr. S C- q-V O W o r,-,F fl o vr'Tz_ /� s 5 F/02- I pv 0, N 9 d- P, �'2G os Go a P s1 I • roi� I i/ /�!�1Z r r4 N�o ✓rc_,}Z W1 � 6 C o o r 71 cs&_0o9 s IRE 2$0 T fZ t I 1,L.r 4t" 1=, IFrY'N/ T�2 Tl� o R T)-! •v Q o✓F,7-i rtf p 81 2- —o(. o ov-T* jV 0vZo 2 i2/ fT-. Y`/ O 9 TRv T J ✓ '�01✓ -S Y B Ev / 101 S b rGL oN� o �c�rti X125 0 O De Z O C1 D 11 G o CSst i4r✓ G-1c1'7�c/Y l/ f�lffL'L- o / 6 3 / 1 `z r,4 iI,- �Rav(_ A/<_ 121 S !47 I >' 2 Y1-j;z1v,1��-t,,--,�X R0 I -L Iz/ r4 131 �I.`� I O L A r3,D I E:-S /c1-f_iR K �1Z7-L 7 2-2 8 - 6322 151 81{ 1 r I I�nE L/4�r�) rte- 61 o c 14 c Kr-'T- l, I I ,o RTC (>�ri r 2 . k11/`(- 0 F7C� 161 a `f I r I (, 12 r___�). /\/c/Zrr-f rq ry i7 o v r 17 8�f I W( z 4 T7 I > 181 c2 y 1 7:Zo73 Cr2TS 21GN/4tRI,-; J I _K it 6- 20..,q -G) I 1 13 r-9 R g iel ZI L r' I 10 R TH P/Vb o v rc rz 1 14114 o / y THIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON // Z 0-O THIS LIST OF NAMES &ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF INT {BEST WAS PRE RED BY THE A PPLICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. AS RS OFFIC x� avt`�'.- -,F: .'- ~'e�k3 # `s.vy ` ,;h -yY [ ''✓, '' �'°°6ics'."�-.F �.�, ,r:.,s7rE .�'= ?��+> n- .7�.!S;sf4"�'-r+�s. 1v-its.-��.. "�'p+:x�����'i��-'G�°'��� '�.- ,' �.`•����'x f��'- � .�� r' TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER LIST'OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE- SUBJECT PROPERTY- MAP I PAR #I NAME ADDRESS 1{d27'rf l�h/nova rte. !�J 6F/ Sc jq oI L �7 S Gi c K 2 Js,/G- `ZV ABUTTERS: 21. g1-t ! I 1,-7L)rz p H y c-,Iq I ►vf:=, i J (- C �-r<F,, / rz., q 1'x!0-t-�,T- �v ) o 2 J �(-r- 31 ! I I(rT? c c7 20 c,14 Jc I r-- 1n/ o Aq lz No r-1,74 Nr ,o vrEz !s 41 Z U ,3 ✓► Sk L_FV. L 22 c 14 1c-I<i=,rZ rzo llq 91 I 5 ({ow tV, S u ,-/ w , v tZ Drzl yr ' s / z3 6 ER q I eq cy z6 c rG < - RIrV ll , I /�'�rz rl� vi 2 71 C7 2 I J =-� Elq _o o a 0 SI 2. rzZS c- TT .f T. w o vr= / 9 2 7 rc J;R. Q4 yll;✓S E- / P R7,:-,S C,o TT S 4 rz0 - A?- I Q v / 101 '2 C..o S rz v<< '., c o a-7 w 13(.-1 z- s Q c r:-v L•� 1 I/ HT wHz 9 6r,--,qL7-/ T' -1T a:rLoT% Is T 1 d-- R A-;c s< 14-0 w i2 /V -r - 121 2 ( /-4 -7 �!: w L? a 21 i'12ir.f O fjo I rLl-v r?2 I k ✓ae- gl07Qft l i 141 5 a 7 6 0{�JC.Kt�rc�NG- 12c�( -D L,y f4 �F N-may ��/J�„�-,� n>• I s � 151100 I I oc wEL� Y(4opi/SZS r, G76 VS �dD ST. J Wttl, 1p. ,)c.KWCL(- L/vih/C- r l\lorz-r4 c.✓, o� oS GvdD .� 1 t;l 19 9W C -0 G L 1 <./4 ( -f t /Yo 1 7 1 1 1 P L z zo �0 5'os L t�l�rn' 1 =s co T 1 1 12 T7 181/0 ,0 I 14--oryF/S F . o do S lv.�rz THIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON / THIS LIST OF NAMES &ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF INTERE T WAS P PA BY TH A P LICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. ASSESS FFICE u � �`_ r,t,- = r" :ry"-et ,z _ ..rri: _ _ Yik�-:F. v",� -.r+rc+---v,,: •�..-r n ,L3�:•w�' I� kY}F•�V_T�ifa��'�]\a.y � ���+T,'}�Jt�.� �i� �'� � rp'��.�•Ct1YJK� "i - y� -•`aY `f^ (y Nt (I,.'.YTi. i 'S t < '� ti ar 'N k S.. aYitvl•• k. 2 s ` _ zL � �..r��"�'"G'��� �•.. � -'4�•-+... ���� ")'r`l� •L _ r5! +•�3�yc,�� .� g,'-".'. ckx t by r�•r �' Y i �� �� '� '� moo- ��,"`y'� st'r�'r ✓.�" a _ .,r�'�.,re,.a�,ac s..e �" .. _ --� 5 It �.?4.-1.� 1 ���5 �� iTr. 3 sC,�' �3.Y J. • -._':_LIST OF PARTIES.:OF INTEREST SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR # NAME ADDRESS Woarl�pIV ,9 v 2 0/;z v ABUTTERS: w i o KIz' L. rHawi 7 o Goon w1L�� ,4r-i P, LCL I ,ot'zT• 0o yL, P Z2 L4 TF s T ( , � I �R7 vI-2 / `f 5- 31 /o I I I R v ) L Q 1= F F 0 Gd op S 2 N u v 4 ' R1 r- Z OrGo,O p -C7'. o 2T/ V I-"12 / 5 ERB�'R1�1r�/ 12/ K Gd OP e1 T' 6I 'J i ortRF_//} Y1-I/Z o2v X CS G o� S , < 7 !�L►'Li rZ T M,4 . o Gd�D r�- A !H ' o i2T rd �i I11 jl v - - o/ IFS_ 8 Jp I CLARK P4— I C, — 0 D 9 I 10l 11I 2 I Yf'I/Z.�r=tt os Coop S J 12 I 3 14 - rZ Gr K 12 v 0,,4 T d 77"F r< -r•- I 0,J 131 I �- o w V�r�✓ c on/!JO• 3 w L /cad xr, A�S13 4-T/ --n/ 14 3 13 I IL21 r. 1)—N,4-9-S 3 wrw - 151 3 I -3d2_o alLr,?l IF,_q/ o 0;F/ (,F__ o 7ooc 161 S5 3 I r I 5<2 LI< rtrh/ <)41 1 1 —O ?Ti 17 I 1 3 , - s o � . , o P� r s - . , , -•- N� soh /- ��-- �z �.�- �s 181 8 3 I 6 r s w rz M,-2 tf �U R , THIS C IFIES ONLY THAT ON / THIS LIST OF NAMES&ADDRE SES OF PA TIES OF INTE ST AS PREP R BY THE LICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. 8 ASSESSO S FICE _. _ � JCL........ .....„fK. .��v�2Ya'R.-.StTu-�.aFi..4 .... .�r ti.- -••- . —�- L � �-c ---- AWRENCE 7-7T-- .—\- �----N- �1 /I r Se�Lego I .YCIPAL AIRP J O • _.. J 15s S a� L Bea —pumping Ilin9�'\fr`��` - �fi• f _jjl' -_1—f =`-.. •-• -- ...y y ♦:/BM / \ .Sta 1 S.0 _ �1 S tai G � Hp;tal St ro j'� 1 0 - _, \ \ '7 ` Sr u, 3 1�'`;\4•S Osgoo Hill •'. �.� �;�� Doukledec�' �•e�. ,Four Acrd; �- O'Reilly Bridge ���, :\��• m J / r -- __ t Let A N�•= 1�1 =E'�' \Sch• �f � `• •.. _ �' ',. 59' 1. ` � I 55.0 Y nnell e ! NION h g / f St els \ _ ® 1J' o !VO y� 8.1• d� vim,. -` \\ asp � �, -- -. -_ ' t ' Tb"tiCHAN E' n isn r e 0A i■.1 • C) "� �j�r \ �� OM - � �-'"� y�•' 1, Sch '1 _, Qtt[h�1f/1P�F'99q- I` \ Cr\ / ` ,—i�l /�I roo r.I _ •'`�\ ,so•;' t I c�a P mpingr,,37.a.'QIj e`•J Parr rAtki •� �. Sch ' r \ Sande•; l ' L�� _ - �• GRE�Tr 48.6 --C' A-eE '.. U \_ Holy ep Ichr ,�• /_ ; ��. :;. r/ :�\;�r� .North Arido I er \\ �" Center Sub to=_ o i a ,''' Q CC PACE r' �'T `j. Sch .`tr' �•';') �.f.-',`' - ,•i^��iI,�1It -I // -11 •_�. \ o!'' ' .�0-5i I \ ._ •I :\ 'I. ::-. �•. 1 \�i � f� '�• ' t 1 80;5 I '\• PROJECT: North Andover High School FIGURE ONE °oSCHOFIELD BROTHERS N. Andover,Massachusetts Schofield Brothers of New England. 11IC. JOB •�,�. 20217 LOCUS N'L'�P ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLAN`:I`:-' LL 1`I SCALE: 1:25 000 DATE: September 6, 2000 Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. SOURCE: LaINTence U.S.G.S. Quad 1071 Worcester Road a Framingha.=n.IYLA 01701-5299 DI..AWN'BY:LAS TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FORM This form is intended to ensure that proposed stormwater control designs meet the stormwater management standards described in the DEP's Stormwater Management Policy (Nov. 1996 - REV Mar. 1997) and the Town of North Andover's Wetland Protection Regulations. The Commission requires that applicants submit this form with the Notice of Intent, as well as supporting documentation and plans, to provide stormwater information for conservation commission review. If a particular stormwater management standard cannot be met, information should be provided to demonstrate how adequate water quality and water quantity protection will be provided by the project. Engineers should use this form to certify that the project meets the stormwater management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. This form should be completed by checking the appropriate boxes for each standard and by signing and stamping the back of this form. Project Location: NORTtq ANPOVE,R HI(,(-) SCHOOL No. ANC)ovfR , MA. (� The proposed project is/Is not circle one) exempt from one or more of the stormwater management standards. If project is exempt, explain why: Stormwater runoff volumes to be treated for water quality are based on the following calculations: (check one that applies) 0 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for Critical Areas (e.g. Outstanding Resource Waters and Ephemeral Pools). N 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for other resource areas. Standard #1: Untreated stormwater (See plan L(4 NS A+40 .,4-rT,4cHY�C z? 2 The project is designed so that new stormwater conveyances (outfalls/discharges) do not discharge untreated stormwater into, or cause erosion to wetland resource areas of the Town of North Andover. Standard #2: Post-development peak discharge rates (See plan /qN,P mr^r7 Z R Post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates on the site either at the point of discharge or downgradient property boundary. 0 N/A: project site contains waters subject to tidal action, so standard is not applicable. 9 Stormwater controls have been designed for the 2-year, 10-year, and 1 00-year, 24-hour storm. Standard #3: Recharge to groundwater (See plan _) `PLW,J qN 17 1QTT�f c;It-1 v7' fk The annual groundwater recharge for the post-development site approximates annual recharge from existing site conditions on a sub-watershed level. T- 7N-[F- �xTEN i ?fz/q c-TI c.g13C,f;� sit ATrpcs{�,�.�rr 2 Soil types have been identified according to either the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) County Soils Survey or on-site soil evaluation. Calculations on Stormwater flow are based on a soil hydrologic group of B AN c and total impervious area of 13Y,5-0- (square feet). o--rz- 1E r�,, co,.r97 roAljr Soil types at each planned point of stormwater runoff infiltration include: LA P0R7HEN i-S Infiltration Best Management Practices (BMPs) used for this project include: unlDMR.G2ovND 0ET•FK7-/01/ 13r4s 1N L,5 jTr/ 51"aTZgG c�tl'Ri�IC �i`� , Standard #4: 80% TSS removal (Set plan _) pUAirs R N 1) q /'U k"irc--v7 2 l The proposed Stormwater management systems will remove 80% of the post-development site's average annual load of Total Suspended Solids(TSS). - t? The BMPs selected forthis project include(list BMPs with TSS removal rates): DEEP Su MP c.)17-GH 7B,9J/n/ t.017-�4 olL_ a- G►4S TRK1P t-foojo - 2S �� oiL ati/p -sEPit"E.rYr.sEFNR,4i 0(Z. as Vq J)-tL-) — 52 0 ::oc 77% Page 1 of 2 'Ua� ENTr�ry t3�d1 rh/-- Cror+ �/T TORY ��?•�cti��%`I) -70`j'o 11/98 j TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ff Standard #5: Higher potential pollutant loads (See plan— ) Rr The project site does oes n (circle one) contain Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads. If site contains such Ian uses, describe: ❑ If applicable, BMPs selected for controlling untreated storrwater in these areas are designed to prevent infiltration of �If stormwater and include: ed Standard #6: Protection of critical areas (refer to Section II in the local Regulations) (See plan 9 The project site does K oes not rcle one) contain Critical Areas with sensitive resources. —) If site contains critical areas, escribe: ❑ If applicable, BMPs selected for stormwater discharges in these areas include: Standard #7: Redevelopment projects (See plan ) ® The proposed activity is is no ircle one) a redevelopment project. Note: Components of redevelopment projects which plan to develop previously undeveloped site do not fall under the scope of Standard 7. ❑ If the project is a redevelopment project,the following stormwater management standards have been met; ❑ The standards which have not been met include: { f ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or expanded stormwater controls. r t 5tandard #8: Erosion/sediment control (See plan ) SF--E pe,4N st.,y0 q•-rr,4c,�ti,,�,�T Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project to design prevent movement, and stabilize exposed soils. g P e ent erosion, control sediment An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been developed. >tandard #9: Operation/maintenance plan (See plan_) Sr W. A z T )4 c.HY^ F7, N T 2 tq PP>`NO�� 2 An operation and maintenance plan for both construction and post-development stormwater controls'hds been developed. The plan includes BMP owner(s); parties responsible for operation and maintenance; schedule for inspection and maintenance; routine and non-routine maintenance tasks; and provisions for appropriate access and maintenance easements surrounding control(s) and extending to public right-of-way. IF attest under the penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and m familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any ZF rc�. nd all documents, accompanying this certification statement; and that I of m fully N, —+ authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the project -a �q Q ppIicant. P J "A�'®��G�8T A J F'Rr=vQic. W. I< 7- 0o (Stamp/Signature) rint Name Date be2of2 20217 1- a •>� ATTACHMENT 1 WETLAND REPLICATION NARRATIVE NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL CHICKERING ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston,MA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA.01701 September 20,2000 C:])SCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING SURVEYING • PLANNING Attachment One Wetland Replication Narrative There are two general areas of BVW related to this site. One is the wetland bordering on Cochichewick Brook in the southern portion of the site. The second BVW is a wetland area running along the major portion of the eastern side of the site. This wetland area drains into Cochichewick Brook. The proposed site layout requires the filling of small areas of bordering vegetated wetland at 5 locations. Four of the locations are related to the construction of the access driveway and involve the wetland area along the eastern side of the site. To minimize the alteration of wetland due to the driveway, a retaining wall is proposed along the sections of driveway to eliminate side slopes into the wetland area. The total area of BVW to be altered due to the driveway is 4,405 sq. ft. A small area of BVW (200 ± square feet) in the southwest portion of the site is being altered for the grading related to the athletic field construction. The total wetland alteration is 4605 ± square feet. This total includes some temporary alteration adjacent to the proposed retaining wall necessary for construction. In conformance with the North Andover Wetland Bylaw and the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act Regulations, wetland replication is being proposed. The existing wetland plant species found in the bordering vegetated wetland is attached at the end of this report. The areas of BVW to be filled are generally classified as shrub swamp. Some of the plants found in these wetland areas are invasive non-native species. Based on the plans for the construction of the existing high school site, the areas of wetlands to be altered were created as a result of the high school construction in 1972. The area to be altered along the driveway was created as a drain way that has become thickly vegetated with wetland species. The area in the southern part of the site along Cochicewick Brook was filled land intended for the location of a parking lot, but that area was not completed. The terrain was left low, irregular, and poorly drained. As a result, wetlands species have become established. When BVW is to be altered for a project, the North Andover Wetlands Protection Bylaw Regulations requires that the area of replication be at least twice the area of the wetlands to be filled. This project proposes the replication of wetlands in three locations with a total area of 9,910 sq. ft. which will meet this regirement. The wetland replication area design contained in this filing is a collaborative effort between Carol R. Johnson Associates, Inc. and Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. To provide information as to the relative experience of the persons involved in the design, resumes for Charlotte M. Cogswell, Senior Ecologist, of Carol R. Johnson Associates, Inc. and Fredric King, Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Planner, of Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. are attached. North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 2 The proposed wetland replication areas are designed to reestablish the shrub swamp community. The shrub species selected to be planted are native to the area, do currently exist on site, and are beneficial for wildlife habitat. The proposed species include arrow- wood / Vibttnuan dentatian, sweet pepperbush / Clethra alnifolia, silky dogwood / Conzus anionutm and Elderberry / Sambttcus canadensis. The Clethra will be planted near the upper fringe of the replication area and the Elderberry will be planted in the wetter lower portions. The silky dogwood and arrow-wood will be planted throughout. To completely stabilize the bottom of the wetland area while the shrubs are small, "New England Wetmix" (wetland seed mix) will be sown over the entire area. This seed mix includes fox sedge / Carex vulpinoidea, fringed sedge / Carex crinita, Canada manna / Glyceria canadensis, chufa / Cypertts escttlenttts, soft rush / Juncos effitsus, bearded sedge / Carex comosa, lurid sedge / Carex lurida, woolgrass / Scirpus cyperinus, boneset / Eupatorium perfoliatttnt, hop sedge / Carex lit ilina, blue vervain / Verbena hastata, green bulrush / Scirpus atrovirens, Joe-pye weed / Eupatorium fistulosum. A dense vegetative cover of these native plant species together with the relatively dense planting Of shrubs will discourage the establishment of invasive, non-native species into the new replication areas. The depth of seasonal high groundwater is at the surface within the wetland areas that are proposed to be altered. The wetland replication areas are to be located directly adjacent to the existing wetlands. The plans for the grading to establish the wetland replication (Plan Sheet 1.3.9) show the initial grade to be generally the same as the adjacent wetland area. Following excavation to the initial grade, a wetland specialist will inspect the site to determine the final grade to be established to assure that the wetland replication area will have the proper wetland hydrology. The specialist will also inspect the organic topsoil to be installed in the bottom of the replication area for suitability. The recommended construction procedures for the proposed wetland alteration and replication areas are described in the following section and a typical wetland construction detail is included. Recommended Construction Procedures for the Proposed Wetland Alteration and Wetland Replication Areas 1. The construction of the wetland alterations and the wetland replication areas are to be done simultaneously. 2. Prior to any work on the area of alteration and replication areas, the temporary erosion and sediment controls consisting of staked haybale and silt fence sediment barriers shall be installed in the locations shown on the plans, this narrative and as described in the erosion control notes. 3. Trees and brush are to be cleared from the wetland areas to be altered and the proposed wetland replication areas. North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 3 4. The wetland replication areas and sideslopes will then be excavated to the proposed initial sub-grades as shown on the grading plan and the wetland area detail. The prepared area shall be then be inspected by wetland specialist to ensure that the proper hydrological properties will be present and any adjustments shall be made, if necessary. 5. The existing organic topsoil and all unsuitable subsoil and debris will be removed from the area proposed to be altered (filled). The organic topsoil shall be stockpiled separately for use in the wetland replication areas. Remove large stumps, roots and rocks over 6 inches, from the removed organic topsoil but small roots and stumps may remain. This material must be inspected and approved by the wetland specialist for suitability prior to installation. 6. The removed organic topsoil shall be spread throughout the replication area to the depth and elevation shown on the plan and a minimum of 6 inches of loam topsoil on the prepared sideslopes. If additional organic topsoil is necessary for the replication areas, a mixture of 75 percent screened loam and 25 percent (by volume) of peat may be used. This material to be used must first be approved by the wetland specialist. 7. A row of haybales/silt fence shall then be installed at the base of the new sideslope to protect the replicated area until the sideslopes are stable. 8. The wetland replication area shall be planted in accordance with the planting plan and the planting will be monitored by the wetland specialist. Note: In accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations, 310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)6., at least 75% of the surface of the replacement area shall be reestablished with indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons. 9. The sideslopes shall be hydro-seeded with conservation seed-mix. 10. The newly seeded and planted areas shall be watered and maintained as necessary until growth is fully established. 11. It is proposed that the progress of the growth of the wetland replication area be monitored by the wetland specialist and progress reports filed with the North Andover Conservation Commission to assure the success of the replication and compliance with the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw Regulations. z O F- LLJ OZw -rU C,,, F, F- O F- -� a w Q Q > w 0- U Z O =, QwQ W � m Z p Q O U W � J _� F- Q - w0 Oz d- � z ¢ W < ww Ow � Q mcr) Q — Q Q f-- p LL1 Q /\ z � LL- LLJ FIE z \% F� w crf Q � � m m z �` O J �O L1J w > O U ry Q U w \ p Q QW < w \% w zQQ ly- �` p F- z .. LLJ 00 Q \ Q wQ I W \� z 3: -1 O Qry W z OQ 0 W Q = n- z U O � 0\ Up < O LL-Q Q :7j- z z 0O � U Y U LJ � U1 lL J C/) a- Q O W Z Q L1J W (n Q z I— Q LLJ Li ' z W z Q O ry O Wetland Species Existing Conditions Area 1 - Area north of the tennis courts Purple loosestrife/Lythrum salicaria Narrow-leaf cattail /Thypha angustifolia Arrow arum /Peltandra virginica Pale touch-me-not/Impatiens pallida New York aster/Aster novi-belgii Sedge/ Carex spp. Sensitive fern/ Onoclea sensibilis Pale touch-me-not/Impatiens pallida Silky dogwood / Cornus amomum Glossy buckthorn/Rhamnus frangula Swamp white oak/Quercus bicolor Northern arrow-wood /Viburnum recognitum Black willow/ Salix nigra Sedge/ Carex spp. Rough-leaf goldenrod / Solidago patula Pignut hickory/ Carya ovata Area 2 - the area southwest of existing school, to the east of Chickerina Road New England aster/Aster novae-angliae Purple loosestrife/Lythrum salicaria Rough-leaf goldenrod / Solidago patula Common tansy / Tanacetum vulgare Brass buttons / Cotula coronopifolia Tatarian honeysuckle/Lonicera tatarica Paper birch/Betula papyrifera Grass spp. Red maple/ Acer rubrum Silver maple / Acer saccharinum Narrow-leaf cattail /Thypha angustifolia Common reed /Phraamites australis SEP 22 2000 10:41 FR CAROL JOHNSON TO 91503D8791797 P-92-493 CHARLOTTE M.COGSWELL Senior Ecologist Professional Experience Charlotte Cogswell,a Senior Ecologist at Thompson Road Relocation,Avon,CT, CRJA,is a botanist/community ecologist with for which,under the auspices of the 19 years of experience In Inland and coastal Connecticut Pepartmont of wetland ecosystems, conducting studies Transportation, she Is responsible for involving plant population and community EIE preparation, ecology,the potential environmental effects of nutrients,toxic contaminants,and physical For Cor wetlands Cogswell was also respon- habitat alterations;plant herbivore interac- award-winning for wetlands delineation for the tions, restoration ecology; and wildlife award-winning Methuen Comprehensive habitat analysis. Her experience encom- Grammar School site in Methuen,MA. passes field work,data reduction and In addition to these CRIES assignments,Ms. statistical analysis, report preparation, Cogswell has recently served in the environmental permit preparation,program followin; roles: management,and expert testimony. • Chief Scientist for the Mercury Study- Recent project assignments as part of the Quabbin and Wachusett Reservoirs,MA, CRJ Ecological Services team include; for which she has coordinated and Project Ecologist,Upper Charles River helped to conduct an assessment of the Reservation Master Plan,Watertown, potential risk to ecological communities Newton,and Waltham.MA,for which in the Reservoirs due to mercury and she has characterized the ecology other metals and organic compounds of (habitats,water quality,blots,etc.) of a concern. Aye-mile secclon of this MDC corridor Project Ecologist, Restoration along the Charles River for use In Investigation of Narragansett Bay,Rhode pathway design and restoration efforts. Island,for which she conducted a dive • Project Ecologist,Route 146, survey of nearshore epifauna and Worcester and Millbury,MA,where sediment characteristics off the U.S. she is assisting with the design and Nava'Education and Training Center development of planting plans for water McAllister Point landfill and other quality enhancement areas and flood subtital areas near landfills and reference storage compensation areas on sites sites in southern Narragansett Bay for a along the Blackstone River,some of Restoration Investigation and which are presently contaminated. summarized findings for submission to EPA. • Project Ecologist, Federal Medical Center/Federal Prison Camp, Fort Ship Scientist, Restoration and Devens,Ayer,MA,for which she has Investigation -Thames River, Connacticut,for which she collected coordinated the submission for and secured state and federal wetland and sur ace water and sediment samples as water quality permits. par of a Remedial Investigation at the U.S.Naval Base on the Thames River. • Project Ecologist, Barnstable Municipal Sediment was collected for chemical, Airport Access Plan,Hyannis,MA,for physical and biological characterization. which she conducted a natural resources inventory for the Airport for planning Protect Manager,Ecological Risk purposes. Assessment,Merrimack River,Nashua, Nom,far which she conducted an ERA fc- a F.CRA facility on the Merrimack Riv^.r, fcr submission to EPA. Contaminants c: concern Included cyanide,formaldehyde an_ammonia. SEP 22 2070 10:41 FR CAROL. JOHNSON TO 915088791797 P.03iO3 7 CHARLOTTE M.COGSWELL continued Professional Experience continued • Project Ecologist,Super Conducting Ms. Cogswell is the author or contributing Super Collider,Texas,for which she author of numerous technical publications surveyed ecological characteristics of and reports on wetland evaluation and streams draining the West Complex and ecological risk/effects assessments.With Northern Arc of the SSC,prepared a Carol R.Johnson Associates,Inc.and stream characterization report for the Christine Werme,she co-authored Master West Complex for submission with Plan; Coolidge Reservation,Manchester-by- NPDES and Texas Water Commission the-Sea,Massachusetts,for the Massachu- permits, setts Trustees of Reservations (1992). She She has prepared Environmental Notification is also a member of numerous professional Forms,Environmental Impact Reports,and associations. Permit Applications for these additional She has been a part-time faculty member at projects; the Rhode Island School of Design,teaching • 1987 Plant Ecology of New England;a guest Inwood Office Park,Woburn,Reading, lecturer In Biology at the University of and Wilmington,MA ConnecticuC a lecturer for the Massachu- Ed Callan,Client setts Association of Land Surveyors and • 1986 Civil Engineers, Inc.,the Marine Biological Cartsbrooke II Gristmill III Subdivision, Laboratory Ecosystems Center at Woods Marlborough,MA Hole,MA;and the Marine Biological Thomson-Liston Associates, Client laboratory, 5.U.M,RfW,H.0,I, • 1983 Ashfield Lake Dam,Chapter 91.ENF EIR Education (Drawdown) University of Connecticut,Storrs,Connecti- Town of Ashfield,MA,Client cut,Ph.D.candidate,Plant Ecology, 1984-1993; (undertaken as Project Manager with MA,Ecology, 1984 GZA) • 1991 University of Vermont,burlington,Vermont. Glass Landfill Closure,Salem, MA EA.botany,1 975 EOEA 8437 GTE Products, Client Ms.Cogswell has served as a consultant to the New England Division of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers on several project, including a wetland assessment of proposed sites for the disposal of PCB-Contaminated sediment within a salt marsh area of the New Bedford, MA,Inner Harbor,evaluation of 22 wetlands along a 12 mile proposed Central Connecticut Expressway in Bolton, Coventry,and Andover;a 401(b)(1) assess- ment for a proposed dredging of the Winthrop,MA, Haroor,and other beach nourishment projects. +;:+: TOTAL PRGE.03 ;+:= r C 1 V I L E IN G 1 IN I; E R I \ G FREDRIC W. KING Senior Project Engineer Wetlands Specialist PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. King is a senior project engineer and wetlands specialist for Schofield Brothers who has been with the firm since 198=1.. Formerly, he held the positions of Conservation Assistant, Environmental Director, and Conservation Administrator for the town conservation commissions of Acton, Billerica, and Wayland, respectively. As a project engineer, Mr. King has been involved in a wide range of projects including civil engineering site planning for commercial and industrial developments, roadway design_ residential subdivisions plans, sewer, drainage, subsurface sewage disposal system designs and evaluations, project permitting, soil testing and site evaluations. As a wetland specialist, Mr. King's responsibilities include delineation of wetland boundaries, preparation of Notices of Intent under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and applications for other environmental permitting, presentations of projects before town boards and state agencies, design of erosion and sediment control, wetland replication plans, drainage design and stormwater impact analysis, and inspections, supervision, and certification of wetland replications and erosion control installations on constriction projects. Together with his work for conservation commissions, Mr. King has over twenty years of experience in the wetland service area. He is currently a member of the Maynard Conservation Commission. EDUCATION University of Lowell - B.S. in Civil Engineering Technology, 1987 University of Massachusetts - B.S. in Forest Management, 1971 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer, Massachusetts PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Massachusetts Association of Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions CERTIFICATIONS Certified Septic System Inspector, Massachusetts Approved Soil Evaluator, itilassachusetts 20217 •� _' ATTACHMENT 3 _i EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE FOR THE PROPOSED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership. 87 Summer Street Boston,NIA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA. 01701 October 4,2000 ooSCHU'RELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING 20217 NARRATIVE & SUMMARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PROPOSED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL To protect the wetland resource areas and down-gradient drainage and infrastructure during the proposed site work, sediment control barriers and sediment traps will be installed prior to the start of work and will be maintained until all disturbed areas have been permanently stabilized. During the first phase of construction, work on the site will be restricted to the northern portion of the site behind the existing school. During the second phase of the site work, the existing school building will be demolished and the lower athletic fields and parking area will be completed. The details are contained on the plans and include the erosion and sediment controls for both phases of the construction. The planned site work procedure is very complex and schedule of work cannot be completely planned in advance. It is, therfore, important that the plans for erosion and sediment controls be flexible to allow the contractor to react to changing site conditions so that the performance standards of controlling erosion and sediment are met. The installation of erosion and sediment controls shown on the plans will set the site up for the site work for each of the two phases of construction. As the work proceeds, the control installations and the site in general must be monitored to assure that the installations are properly maintained and are performing as required. If the systems are not performing as necessary, or if changing site conditions dictate changes to the system, necessary adjustments to the installations must be made, y The general "Performance Standard" for erosion and sediment controls shall be that: "The Contractor shall install, routinely inspect and maintain all sediment and erosion controls such that they are in proper working order at all times. Further, the Contractor shall manage the site such that erosion and sediment from runoff and wind blown dust are controlled and minimized at all times. This includes minimizing areas of exposed soils, installing temporary cover, making necessary adjustments in the erosion control installations, and installing additional erosion control devices as may be necessary to meet this requirement. All erosion controls shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service Guidelines." The systems to be installed initially as shown on the plan include the following Erosion Control - Best Management Practices (BMPs): - Silt Fence Barriers and Haybale & Silt Fence Barriers. - Temporary Sediment Basins North Andover High School—Erosion and Sediment Control Page A3 -2 The following are examples of other sediment and erosion controls that may me necessary in addition to the above to meet the "Performance Standards": - Temporary Diversion Swales— to direct runoff away from unstable areas. - Haybale Check Dams — at locations of concentrated flow to trap sediment and reduce flow velocity, - Temporary Hydro-Seeding— to provide vegetative cover for areas that may not need to be disturbed for extended periods during construction. - Mulching -Temporary straw, wood chip, or other mulch to protect exposed slopes, - Straw Bale and Fabric Bins —Used to discharge pump discharges from excavation de-watering. - Filter Berms —Used to collect and filter runoff from large exposed areas where a sediment basin can not be constructed. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE The site contractor shall inspect all erosion control installations at least weakly and following each rainfall exceeding 1/4 inch of precipitation. Repairs and maintenance shall be shall be performed immediately. The following describe the inspection, routine maintenance and non routine maintenance which are required for each BMP. For maintenance and inspection requirements for BMPs not listed specifically, refer to U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service Guidelines. HAYBALE & SILT FENCES Inspect to see that the silt fence is properly anchored into the ground, that there are no breaks in the fence material, the material has no sags and the fence is upright. Check to see that the accumulated sediment is less than 12 inches. Inspect haybales to check for condition and that they are properly staked and tight together. Maintenance includes removal of accumulated sediment if greater than 12 inches in depth and making necessary repairs to the silt fence. Haybales that are rotted or otherwise degraded such that they can not function properly shall be replaced. Small gaps in the haybales can be chinked with loose straw. Maintenance and inspections of haybale dikes and stormwater inlet protection installations are the same as above. North Andover High School—Erosion and Sediment Control Page A3 - 3 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Inspect the basin for the following, - Accumulated sediment must be less than 1/4'h of the basin volume. - Check the condition of the berm (dike) for erosion and general condition. - Inspect the outlet structure for accumulated sediment at the stone filter and that it is draining freely. If ponded water remains for a significant time following a storm, the stone filter must be cleaned. - Inspect the outlet pipe for condition and blockages. Maintenance includes removal of accumulated sediment, repairing the basin side-slopes and dike and cleaning of the stone filter. After removal of the sediment from the bottom of the basin, the stone filter can generally be cleaned with a high pressure hose. The water forces sediment down and out of the stone and the filter fabric lining of the concrete structure keeps sediment from leaving the basin. TEMPORARY MULCHED AREAS Areas of exposed soil where no work is planned for an extended period of time (generally more than two weeks) should be temporarily stabilized with straw mulch and jute netting, wood chips, or hydro-mulched with a tacifier. The mulch must be inspected regularly and repaired as necessary. WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDER OF CONDITIONS This project will be subject to an Order of Conditions issued under the Wetlands Protection Act and the North Andover Wetlands Protection Bylaw. In additions to the plans and construction specifications, the Order of Conditions will generally contain special conditions relative to sediment and erosion control. The Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Order as part of the plans and specifications. r Device: Dust control procedures Application: Exposed soil Description: Dust control methods will be employed to prevent the blowing and movement of dust through the application of temporary measures that are designed to reduce wind erosion. Installation: In residential areas, construction roads, access points, and exposed soil surfaces will be moistened periodically with adequate water or other approved methods to control dust. Maintenance: When temporary dust control methods are used, repetitive treatment will be applied as needed to accomplish control. Maintain dust control measures through dry weather periods until all disturbed areas are stabilized. Specification: The use of temporary mulch will reduce the need for dust control in areas that will remain disturbed for longer than 30 days. Water quality should be considered when materials are selected for dust control. The following are common methods of dust control: a. Water The site may be sprayed with water until the surface is wet. Avoid erosive quantities of water. b. Calcium Chloride Granules or flakes may be applied at a rate that will keep the surface moist but not cause pollution. Used only when other methods are not practical . Calcium chloride will not be used within or adjacent to streams, water bodies, or wetlands . 68 CJ 20217 ATTACHMENT 1 �2n , WETLAND REPLICATION NARRATIVE NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL CHICKERING ROAD NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston,MA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA. 01701 Revised January 31,2001 cE--:D"=--'SCn"0F1E1D BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Attachment One Wetland Replication Narrative (Revised 1-31-01) Note: This document is revised to reflect the latest revision to the site plans for the North Andover High School that are dated January 31, 2001. The plan revisions result in substantially less alteration of Bordering Vegetated Wetland and the plans for the wetland replication areas have been adjusted accordingly and are described below. There are two general areas of BVW related to this site. One is the wetland bordering on Cochichewick Brook in the southern portion of the site. The second BVW is an area running along the major portion of the eastern side of the site. This wetland area drains into Cochichewick Brook. The proposed site layout requires the filling of small areas of bordering vegetated wetland at 2 locations. One of the locations is related to the construction of the access driveway off the northeast wing of the proposed building. The area for the driveway is very narrow and requires a minor encroachment into the easterly wetland. To minimize the alteration of wetland, the driveway grades have been kept as low as possible to minimize the driveway side-slope and fill into the wetland. The total area of BVW to be altered due to the driveway is 320 sq. ft. The second wetland alteration location is a small area vegetated wetland in the southwest portion of the site bordering on Cochichewick Brook. This area is being altered for the grading related to the athletic field construction. A boulder retaining wall has been proposed to minimize the filling of wetland and keeps the area of filling to only 200+/- sq. ft. The total wetland alteration now proposed is 520 ± square feet. This total includes some temporary alteration at the northeasterly alteration site necessary of the installation of a proposed impermeable barrier. The impermeable barrier is necessary to protect the existing wetland hydrology against possible impacts due to the driveway construction. In conformance with the North Andover Wetland Bylaw and the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act Regulations, wetland replication is being proposed. The North Andover Wetlands Bylaw Regulations require the area of wetland replication to be at least twice the area of alteration. To compliance with this requirement, two wetland replication areas are proposed in close proximity to the wetland areas to be altered. The following are the area computations for the two wetland fill and replication sites: North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 2 Revised 1-31-01 NORTHEAST AREA Proposed Permanent Alteration = 140 sq. ft. Proposed Temporary Alteration = 180 sq. ft. Total Alteration = 320 sq. ft. Minimum Required Wetland Restoration and Replication = (2 x 320) = 640 sq. ft. Temporary Alteration to be restored in place= 180 sq. ft. Proposed New Wetland Replication Area = 470 sq. ft. Total Restoration and Replication = 650 sq. ft. SOUTHWEST AREA Proposed Total Permanent Alteration= 200 sq. ft. Minimum Required Wetland Restoration and Replication = (2 x 200) =400 sq. ft. Proposed Wetland Replication Area = 2,680 sq. ft. Note that the wetland replication area shown for this location was part of an earlier plan version that proposed greater wetland alteration than the current design. It was decided to maintain the wetland replication area as designed to increase the wetland values on the site. The existing wetland plant species found in the bordering vegetated wetland is attached at the end of this report. The areas of BVW to be filled are generally classified as shrub swamp. Some of the plants found in these wetland areas are invasive, non-native species. Based on the plans for the construction of the existing high school site, the areas of wetlands to be altered were created as a result of the high school construction in 1972. The area to be altered in the northeast portion of the site is a thickly vegetated shrub swamp located at the edge of the lawn for the athletic fields. The area in the southern part of the site along Cochicewick Brook was filled land intended for the location of a parking lot, but that area was not completed. The terrain was left low, irregular, and poorly drained. As a result, wetlands species have become established. The proposed wetland replication area design is a collaborative effort between Carol R. Johnson Associates, Inc. and Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. To provide information as to the relative experience of the persons involved in the design, resumes for Charlotte M. Cogswell, Senior Ecologist, of Carol R. Johnson Associates, Inc. and Fredric King, Senior Project Engineer / Environmental Planner, of Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. are attached. The proposed wetland replication areas are designed to re-establish the shrub swamp community. The shrub species selected to be planted are native to the area, do currently exist on site, and are beneficial for wildlife habitat. The proposed species include arrow- wood / Viburnum dentatum, sweet pepperbush / Clethra alnifolia, silky dogwood / North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 3 Revised 1-31-01 Corms arnomum and Elderberry / Sambucits canadensis. The Clethra will be planted near the upper fringe of the replication area and the Elderberry will be planted in the wetter lower portions. The silky dogwood and arrow-wood will be planted throughout. To completely stabilize the bottom of the wetland area while the shrubs are small, "New England Wetmix" (wetland seed mix) will be sown over the entire area. This seed mix includes fox sedge / Carex vtdpinoidea, fringed sedge / Carex crinita, Canada manna / Glyceria canadensis, chufa / Cypertts esctdenttts, soft rush / Juncits effusus, bearded sedge/ Carex coniosa, lurid sedge / Carex htrida, woolgrass /Scirptts cyperintts, boneset / Eupatorium perfoliatum, hop sedge / Carex htpi.lina, blue vervain / Verbena hastata, green bulrush / Scirpus atrovirens, joe-pye weed / Eupatorium fistulositm. A dense vegetative cover of these native plant species together with the relatively dense planting of shrubs will discourage the establishment of invasive, non-native species into the new replication areas. The depth of seasonal high groundwater is at the surface within the wetland areas that are proposed to be altered. The wetland replication areas are to be located directly adjacent to the existing wetlands and the existing grades are only slightly higher than the adjacent wetland. The plans for the grading to establish the wetland replication is shown on Plan Sheets 1.3.8 and 1.3.9 and the planting details are shown on the Landscape Plans. The excavation and grading necessary for the wetland replication areas will need to be directed by a wetland specialist to assure that the proper grades are established with the correct hydrologic conditions. Initially, the areas will be excavated to the same grade as the adjacent wetland. Following excavation to the initial grade, a wetland specialist will inspect the site to determine the final grade to be established to assure that the wetland replication area will have the proper wetland hydrology. The specialist will also inspect the organic topsoil to be installed in the bottom of the replication area for suitability. The recommended construction procedures for the proposed wetland alteration and replication areas are described in the following section and a typical wetland construction detail is included. Recommended Construction Procedures for the Proposed Wetland Alteration and Wetland Replication Areas 1. The construction of the wetland alterations and the wetland replication areas are to be done simultaneously. 2. Prior to any work on the area of alteration and replication areas, the temporary erosion and sediment controls consisting of staked silt fence sediment barriers shall be installed in the locations shown on the plans, this narrative and as described in the erosion control notes. 3. Trees and brush are to be cleared from the wetland areas to be altered and the proposed wetland replication areas. North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 4 Revised 1-31-01 4. The wetland replication areas and sideslopes will then be excavated to the proposed initial sub-grades as shown on the grading plan and the wetland area detail. The prepared area shall be then be inspected by wetland specialist to ensure that the proper hydrological properties will be present and any adjustments shall be made, if necessary. 5. The existing organic topsoil and all unsuitable subsoil and debris will be removed from the area proposed to be altered (filled). The organic topsoil shall be stockpiled separately for use in the wetland replication areas. Remove large stumps, roots and rocks over 6 inches, from the removed organic topsoil but small roots and stumps may remain. This material must be inspected and approved by the wetland specialist for suitability prior to installation. 6. The removed organic topsoil shall be spread throughout the replication area to the depth and elevation shown on the plan and a minimum of 6 inches of loam topsoil on the prepared sideslopes. If additional organic topsoil is necessary for the replication areas, a mixture of 75 percent screened loam and 25 percent (by volume) of peat may be used. This material to be used must first be approved by the wetland specialist. 7. A silt fence shall then be installed at the base of the new sideslope to protect the replicated area until the sideslopes are stable. 8. The wetland replication area shall be planted in accordance with the planting plan and the planting will be monitored by the wetland specialist. Note: In accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations, 310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)6., at least 75% of the surface of the replacement area shall be reestablished with indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons. 9. The sideslopes shall be hydro-seeded with conservation seed-mix and planted in accordance with the Landscape Plans. 10. The newly seeded and planted areas shall be watered and maintained as necessary until growth is fully established. 11. It is proposed that the progress of the growth of the wetland replication area be monitored by the wetland specialist and progress reports filed with the North Andover Conservation Commission to assure the success of the replication and compliance with the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw Regulations. North Andover High School Wetland Replication Narrative Page 5 Revised 1-31-01 Recommended Procedures for the Restoration of Temporarily Altered Wetland Approximately 180 sq. ft. of wetland area will be temporarily altered at the Northeast wetland alteration site from construction activity for the installation of an impermeable barrier. The restoration work will require the following: 1. Follow the erosion control procedures as outlined in the wetland replication area procedures described in the foregoing section. 2. Remove any fill and debris from the area to be restored to expose the existing topsoil. 3. Loosen the existing topsoil to eliminate any compaction that may have occurred from the construction activity and rake the area to re-establish the existing grades. 4. The Wetland Specialist shall inspect the work and recommend any necessary adjustments to the area prior to planting. 5. The area shall be planted in accordance with the same planting scheme proposed for the wetland replication areas. 6. It is proposed that the progress of the growth of the wetland restoration area be monitored by the wetland specialist and progress reports filed with the North Andover Conservation Commission to assure the success of the restoration and compliance with the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw Regulations. z O 0 0 F_- OZUpU t „F• t- O (n F- --� QO �w w n OZ 0-' O ¢ J w � LJ � mZ'� o o Q O U �w � J _� - w0- O z a � z IL <o w w Q w w _1 w a < m�Q — J � � C) W ry �� z � D LLJz � � w m Q w m m z o -J ° WZ LLJ LLJ Q Q m U w o Q Li w LLJ \\�� w Q U N cy- o �- z z N � � Q ,� Q wQJ u w , >- cr w ,, z o LWO w � v L o = 2 �` o C o v � cn ul , Q - z n Z u �- �- U = 00 Q Q O L�CD 0 Owp JL) Z z �Om U 1!: < � u 2 T (/) a_ Q�� C W z W LL ry Li J � o � ' z � U, -- u Z W i C Wetland Species Existing Conditions Area 1 —Easterly Wetland Area Purple loosestrife/Lythrum salicaria Narrow-leaf cattail/Thypha angustifolia Arrow arum/Peltandra virginica Pale touch-me-not/Impatiens pallida New York aster/Aster novi-belgii Sedge/Carex spp. Sensitive fern/ Onoclea sensibilis Pale touch-me-not/Impatiens pallida Silky dogwood/Cornus amomum Glossy buckthorn/Rhamnus frangula Swamp white oak/Quercus bicolor Northern arrow-wood/Viburnum recognitum Black willow/ Salix nigra Sedge/Carex spp. Rough-leaf goldenrod/ Solidago patula Area 2 - Area southwest of existing school, to the east of Chickering Road New England aster/ Aster novae-angliae Purple loosestrife/Lythrum salicaria Rough-leaf goldenrod/Solidago patula Common tansy/Tanacetum vulgare Brass buttons/ Cotula coronopifolia Tatarian honeysuckle/Lonicera tatarica Paper birch/Betula papyrifera Grass spp. Red maple/ Acer rubrum Silver maple/Acer saccharinum Narrow-leaf cattail /Thypha angustifolia Common reed/Phragmites australis SEP 22 2000 10:41 FR CRROL JOHNSON TO 91500,8791797 P-02-14;13 CHARLOTTE M.COGSWELL Senior Ecologist Professional Experience Charlotte Cogswell,a Senior Ecologist at Thompson Road Relocation,Avon,CT, CRJA,is a botanist/community ecologist with for which,under the auspices of the 19 years of experience In Inland and coastal Connecticut Department of wetland ecosystems, conducting studies Transportation, she is responsible for involving plant population and community EIE preparation. ecology,the potential environmental effects of nutrients,toxic contaminants,and physical For Cor wetlands Cogswell was also respon- habitat alterations;plant herbivore interac- awe for wetlands delineation for the dons, restoration ecology; and wildlife award-winning Methuen Comprehensive habitat analysis. Her experience encom- passes field work,data reduction and In addition to these CRJES assignments,Ms. statistical analysis, report preparation, Cogswell has recently served in the environmental permit preparation,program following roles: management,and expert testimony. • Chief Scientist for the Mercury Study- Recent project assignments as part of the Quabbin and Wachusm Reservoirs,MA, CRJ Ecological Services team include; for which she has coordinated and - Project Ecologist,Upper Charles River helped to conduct an assessment of the Reservation Master Plan,Watertown, potential risk to ecological communities Newton,and Waltham.MA,for which in the Reservoirs due to mercury and she has characterized the ecology other metals and organic compounds of (habitats,water quality,biota,etc.) of a concern. five-mile section of this MDC corridor - Project Ecologist, Restoration along the Charles River for use In Investigation of Narragansett Bay,Rhode pathway design and restoration efforts. Island,for which she conducted a dive • Project Ecologist,Route 146, survey of nearshore epifauna and Worcester and Millbury,MA,where sediment characteristics off the U.S, she is assisting with the design and Naval Education and Training Center development of planting plans for water McAllister Point landfill and other quality enhancement areas and flood subdul areas near landfills and reference storage compensation areas on sites sites In southern Narragansett Bay for a along the Blackstone River,some of Restoration Investigation and which are presently contaminated. summarized findings for submission to EPA. • Project Ecologist, Federal Medical Center/Federal Prison Camp, Fort Ship Scientist, Restoration and Devens,Ayer,MA,for which she has Investigation -Thames River, Canneccicut,for which she collected coordinated the submission for and secured state and federal wetland and surface water and sediment samples as water quality permits. part of a Remedial Investigation at the U.S.Naval Base on the Thames River, • Project Ecologist, Barnstable Municipal Sediment was collected for chemical, Airport Access Plan,Hyannis,MA,for physical and biological characterization. which she conducted a natural resources inventory for the Airport for planning Project Manager,Ecological Risk Assessment,Merrimack River,Nashua, purposes. NH,for which she conducted an ERA for a RCRA facility on the Merrimack River for submission to EPA. Contamina= of concern Included cyanide,formaldehyde and ammonla. SEP 22 2000 10:41 FR CAROL JOHNSON TO 915088791797 P.033/03 7 CHARLOTTE M.COGSWELL continved Professional Experience continued • Project Ecologist,Super Conducting Ms. Cogswell is the author or contributing Super Collider,Texas.for which she author of numerous technical publications surveyed ecological characteristics of and reports on wetland evaluation and streams draining the West Complex and ecological risk/effects assessments.With Northern Arc of the SSC,prepared a Carol R.Johnson Associates,Inc.and stream characterization report for the Christine Werme,she co-authored Master West Complex for submission with Plan; Coolidge Reservation,Manchester-by- NPDES and Texas Water Commission the-Sea,Massachusetts,for the Massachu- permits. setts Trustees of Reservations(1992). She She has prepared Environmental Notification is also a member of numerous professional Forms,Environmental Impact Reports,and associations. Permit Applications for these additional She has been a part-time faculty member at projects: the Rhode Island School of Design,teaching • 1987 Plant Ecology of New England;a guest Inwood Office Park,Woburn,Reading, lecturer In Biology at the University of and Wilmington,MA Connecticut;a lecturer for the Massachu- Ed Callan,Client setts Association of Land Surveyors and • 1986 Civil Engineers, Inc.,the Marine Biological Carlsbrooke Il Gristmill III Subdivision, Laboratory Ecosystems Center at Woods Marlborough,MA Hole,MA;and the Marine Biological Thomson-Liston Associates, Client laboratory,B.U.M.P./W.H.Q.I, • 1988 Ashfield Lake Dam,Chapter 91,ENF EIR Education (Drawdown) University of Connecticut,Storrs,Connecti Town of Ashhold,MA,Client cut,Ph.D.candidate,Plant Ecology,1994-1993; (undertaken as Project Manager with M.A.,Ecology, 1984 GZA) University of Vermont,Burling'on,Vermont, • 1991 Glass Landfill Closure,Salem,MA BA.Botany 1 975 EOEA 8437 GTE Products,Client Ms. Cogswell has served as a consultant to the New England Division of the U_S.Army Corps of Engineers on several projects, including a wetland assessment of proposed sites for the disposal of PCB-contaminated sediment within a salt marsh area of the New Bedford, MA, Inner Harbor,evaluation of 22 wetlands along a 12 mile proposed Central Connecticut Expressway in Bolton, Coventry,and Andover;a 401(b)(1) assess- ment for a proposed dredging of the Winthrop,MA,Harbor;and other beach nourishment projects. h:-+ TOTAL PAGE.03 -+ C C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G FREDRIC W. KING Senior Project Engineer Wetlands Specialist PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. King is a senior project engineer and wetlands specialist for Schofield Brothers who has been with the firm since 1984. Formerly, he held the positions of Conservation Assistant, Environmental Director, and Conservation Administrator for the town conservation commissions of Acton, Billerica, and Wayland, respectively. As a project engineer, Mr. King has been involved in a wide range of projects including civil engineering site planning for commercial and industrial developments, roadway design, residential subdivisions plans, sewer, drainage, subsurface sewage disposal system designs and evaluations, project pernutting, soil testing and site evaluations. As a wetland specialist, Mr. King's responsibilities include delineation of wetland boundaries. preparation of Notices of Intent under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and applications for other environmental permitting, presentations of projects before town boards and state agencies, design of erosion and sediment control, wetland replication plans, drainage design and stormwater impact analysis, and inspections, supervision, and certification of wetland replications and erosion control installations on constriction projects. Together with his work for conservation commissions, Mr. King has over twenty years of experience in the wetland service area. He is currently a member of the Maynard Conservation Commission. EDUCATION University of Lowell - B.S. in Civil Engineering Technology, 1987 Universitv of Massachusetts -B.S. in Forest Management, 1974 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer, Massachusetts PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Massachusetts Association of Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers Massachusetts Association of Conservation Conunissions CERTIFICATIONS Certified Septic System Inspector, Massachusetts Approved Soil Evaluator, Massachusetts ATTACHMENT 15 FIXTURE G1 7 , v7 yhavl"l Post z S ti r t =e c5 1 i" �E:. r 1. ..IT 1, S � If h,1 Key Arena,Seattle,Washington. Seattle Center, Seattle,Washinglon yhavn Post. Dcsigncr: Alfrcd Homann. Colors: Nyhavn Post is a boldly scaled second generation version of While,Black&Natural Aluminum. Mounting: the 01'Igltlal \Vol'h of art Ny-havrl inspired by Alfred I-10111alln. Post mounted on Straight Arm Pole (see pole section). Electrical: The "Hillular Piro-s 'Ind doille are fahricated from heavy gauge Provided with"F"Can Style Ballast I20/277V for Metal Halide&High Pressure Sodium. die Cast a1U111in11111. The Refer to technical data sheets for further details. Lamps: Max: 1/150 W/Inc. main shade is fabricated Max: 1/100 W/MH Max: 1/100 W/HPS fr0111 a heaV}' gaLlU alU- For lamp specification see section 12.01 Lampholder. Medium Base Pulse Rated / \ IhttlLl111 spinning painted Labels: cUL,Wet Location. White on the inside for 22-4° rcllcctancc. It features a Dia Fixture Maximum Catalog meter Height Wattage Number fully ga5t,�etcd clear UV stabilized break proof polycarhonate 22.4" 15.8" 1/15 OW/INC NYP-483-While 22.4" 15.8" 1/IOOW/HPS NYP-468 White 1"11111) c<)mpartlllellt el1CIOSILIre. 22.4" 15.8" 1/IOOW/MH NYP-471-White 22A" 15.8" 1/150W/INC NYP-496 BIack 22.4" 15.8" 1/IOOW/HPS NYP-519-Black ) 22.4" 15.8" 1/I OOW/MH NYP-506 Black 22A" 15.8" 1/150W/INC NYP-522-Natura1 Io�'^g 22.4" 15.8" I/IOOW/HPS NYP.484-Natura1 - pn 22.1" 15.8" 1/IOOW/MH NYP-497 Nalural poulse l 9MQ 3 { \ 4A' j• jj4 'S r_�, �t" sal-i.r "•*. `'-{��� t r � k '•T �Tti 5 f a :r,tr'8py� ,.��i n t•>•,'+'j�; { +i.i r,Sm, t It S s fa 1 3 ♦i l y i _ r Y is fiy mar fiK'' r s. { k S , f W '+ r F ` s'• a owt$as The outdoor Colonnade series features two sizes ;VISA LAG HTI N G in each,of four unique styles. The luminaire may `An Csfdenburg Group Company be painted any color,or hand finished in a natural verdigris over solid copper. Lamping is offered in incandescent or compact fluorescent. «_t - A f 4 uy>�'�.-�_ '•`����erg_>�..k, s. I' l+ COLONNADE" DIMENSIONS BASE ADD ADD NOTES W H D MC MODEL NO. LAMP SUFFIX FINISHSUFFIX —p—, r—W— WHITE ACRYLIC DIFFUSER 7-1/4" 16" 4-1/2' 8" OW1040 -20FI3 -PT,VG I 1 FLUORESCENT LAMPING 184mm 406mm 114mm 203mm -2N40 NC I INCREASES°D°DIMENSION — L BY 7/8° H 9-1/4" 20-1/4" 5-1/2' 10° OW1042 -30F13 J235mm 514mm 140mm 254mm -21175 WHITE ACRYLIC DIFFUSER 7-114" 16" 4-1/2" 8" OW1044 -20F13 -PT,VG FLUORESCENT LAMPING 184mm 406mm 114mm 203mm -2N40 INCREASES"D'DIMENSION BY 7/8" 9-1/4" 20-1/4' 5-1/2' 10' OW1046 -30Fi3 235mm 514mm 140mm 254mm -2N75 WHITE ACRYLIC DIFFUSER 7-114" 16" 4-1/2° 8' OW1048 -2OF13 -PT,VG FLUORESCENT LAMPING 184mm 406mm 114mm 203mm -21140 INCREASES"D'DIMENSION BY 7/8° 9-1/4" 20-1/4" 5-1/2" 10" OW1050 -30F13 235mm 514mm 140mm 254mm -21175 WHITE ACRYLIC DIFFUSER 7-1/4' 16' 4-1/2" 8" OW1052 -20F13 -PT,VG ® FLUORESCENT LAMPING 184mm 406mm 114mm 203mm -21140 INCREASES"D°DIMENSION BY 7/8' 9-1/4" 20-1/4" 5-1/2' 10' OW1054 -301`13 235mm 514mm 140mm 254mm -21175 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS LAMPINGS FINISHES OPTIONS LAMPING Contact local representative for lamp specifications. OF13 13 waB,quad(double PT Painted(Specify color sulfix Verity availability of options selected. BALLAST Normal Power Factor.0 degree fahrenheit starling twin tube),G24D-1 base from Finishes brochure.) 277V Fluorescent lamping. temperature for fluorescent lamping. N40 40wa8,A-19,medium base VG Verdigris(Hand applied finish HOUSING Solid aluminum bar stock,all non-ferrous construction. N75 75 wait,A-19,medium base over solid copper.Finish will MOUNTING Mounts to a standard wall electrical junction box. vary from fixture to fixture.) OW1042,1046,1050 and 1054 mount with two(2) additional fasteners. PHOTOMETRICS Applications assistance available. U� o � Wet Locations Design Modification Rights Reserved. VISA LIGHTING 8600 West Bradley Rd. Tel: 414 354-6600 Specilier Hotline: ©1996 Visa Lighting I VLISPPPP/OW003 An Oldenburg Group Company Milwaukee,WI 53224 Fax: 414 354-7436 1-800-788-VISA Print Code Rev 0996 i. FIXTURE 3 j r h DIMENSIONS 63 I J a.. i 45/16— , 10.95 cm Oi 3' j (Mounting Bolt Pattern i ORDERING NG I N FORMATION LU1411i IAIRE DISTRIBUTION' 'NAT iAGE /CL ,AGE FINISH JPTIONS cr ,hn 103 35 HPS .OV BRP Ina --iJ s�,;,�ps 7 PCB 7 HPS WP OR' `SITU NP OEM, IUD 100 HPS 150 HPS BGP SL 103 U�/Down light 104 50 MH SC UT >! Halt Cylinder `T 70 MH 1 k1VT 100 MH Ib1T 150 MH" } 175 MH ,!STRIBUTi0N I�iISH OPTIONS 3R.P = 9r = Single Fuse,IN/.'_'?`/l ,vrh :0 u1!Ci; Ci K? = RI : Pr3 = eutton Type? crooed NT-U -'Ni^e'crow CgwagP( 11P = 'Alh= CR = uuari_Ramme Uphgr( i l '41 ;'BM= Emer enc' Lear-SOC,.ef `!P = iNai:a g bl'-U =Medium craw Drwnhgnt with 10°6 Uplignt 3G? = Re:;: SL = Soli;e'Dins;ng Lens UD =Medium Oownlight SC = So�::al Ccrcr UT = 5'Uplill 104 Down Light with 50%Ualight Fli =Forward brow Do'xnlignt Half Cylinder INT =Wide Now Downlignt NIT =Medium rhrow Downlight -Not 2,aiable with FT cr MT distribulions. " NS:9vt 102. t � � r r� 3 st> 5a�:.• 3 rs E miCII1371 r F 00 ti Y • 1 ! f � H A F=RO T P e • - CP/MP Post Top GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Post Top Mounted Form Ten products are cylindrical(CP)or semi-spherical (, (MP)sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 750 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class I anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of six(6)interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems.Optional twin glow rings at post top are available in 4 colors and are illuminated by the primary source. Example: CP 17 1 3 175MH 120 BRA HF HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS _ 17" ® ® 1 (Horizontal Lamp) See 120 BLA GRG 22" 1 Chart 208 BRA GRG CP � 3(Horizontal Lamp) Below 240 NA GRR 277 BLP GRY \ 4X(Horizontal Lamp)' 347 BRP HF MP 480 NP LF OO Q(Horizontal Lamp) QUAD WP HS SC PC PCR FM(Horizontal Lamp) POLY OS Q VS(Vertical Lamp) SG NOTES: WATTAGE: FINISH: OPTIONS: 1.Furnished with non-yellowing acrylic sag lens, CP17" MP17" CP22" MP22" BLA: Black Anodized GRC: Glow Ring Clear „ Type VS not available with 17"mogul base units. AM BRA: Bronze Anodized GRG: Glow Ring Green 2.Medium base lamp. NA: Natural Anodized GRR: Glow Ring Red 3.150HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp. 100HPS 100HPS 250HPS 250HPS BLP: Black Paint GRY: Glow Ring Yellow 4.Not available in MP units or 48OV.1000W total 100MV 100MV 250MV 250MV BRP: Bronze Paint HF: In-Head Fusing load. 50W MH' 50W MH1 25OMH 25OMH NP: Natural Aluminum Paint LF: In-Pole Fusing 5.175W max on 17".units. 70W MH' 70W MH' 400HPS 400HPS WP: While Paint HS: Internal House Side Shield 6.May not be available in all configurations, 10OMH' 10OMH' 400MV 400MV SC: Special Color Paint(specify) (Supplied standard with Type FM) consult factory. 150HPS' 150HPS' 40OMH 40OMH PC: Receptacle and Photoconlrol' 7.22"units only.Furnished with sag glass lens. 175MV 175MV 750MH PCR: Photoconlrol—Receptacle Only' 8.Not available with Type 4X. 175MH 175MH 750HPS POLY:Polycarbonate Sag Lens (In lieu of flat glass)" 250MV OS: Quartz Restrike' 250MH SG: Sag Glass Lens(In lieu of flat glass) (Supplied standard with Type 4X and 750W CP22") N —A —� Approx. Ph.t_d- CP Style Size A B C D EPA Weight optonap 17' 17' 8' 10' 18' .7 31lbs 432m 203p. 254mm 457Rm 14 kgs O E 22' 22' 11' 11' 22' 1.0 501bs 55R m 279,m 254mm 559mm 22.6 kgs o c Approx. MP Style Size A E F G EPA Weight -- C F 17' 17' 11' 10' 21' 32lbs 432Rmi 279m 254m 533mr 14 kgs 22' 22' 14' 11' 25' 1.0 501bs 559m 356mm 59w 635mn 22.6 kgs 2 a � l -bu=s _ b Z� s L L [ � •t�^^� Lt � .tF T i fig 3� 9 Y f f.r F .V F---i F=9 i=O 77 P FIXTURE G5, G6, G7 ® - CA/MA Arm Mount q } GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Round Arm Mounted Form Ten products are cylindrical (CA) or semi-spherical (MA) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 750 watts. \ Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class I anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane.Luminaires can accept one of six(6)interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. Example: CA 17 1 3 250MH 120 BRA HF HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS _ 17" 1(Horizontal Lamp) See 120 BLA AP ® 22" 1 Chart 208 BRA AT CA o 3(Horizontal Lamp) Below 240 NA HF 277 BLP LF 2 O 4X(Horizontal Lamp)' 347 BRP HS MA 480 NP MF 3 O Q(Horizontal Lamp) QUAD SC WP PC PCR © FM(Horizontal Lamp) POLY PTF O VS(Vertical Lamp) OS 4 SG NOTES: WATTAGE: FINISH: OPTIONS: 1.Furnished with non-yellowing acrylic sag lens, CA17" MA17" CA22" MA22" BLA: Black Anodized AP: Adjustable Knuckle—Pole Mount Type VS not available with 17'mogul base units. BRA: Bronze Anodized (1&2-way,180°) 2.Medium base lamp. NA: Natural Anodized AT: Adjustable Knuckle—Tenon Mount 3.150HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp. 100HPS 100HPS 250HPS 250HPS BLP: Black Paint (2 3/8"x 4") 4.Not available in MA units or 48OV.1000W total 100MV 100MV 250MV 250MV BRP: Bronze Paint HF: In-Head Fusing load. 50W MH= 50W MH' 250MH 25OMH NP: Natural Aluminum Paint LF: In-Pole Fusing 5.175W max on 17"units. 70W MH' 70W MH' 400HPS 400HPS WP: White Paint HS: Internal House Side Shield 6.May not be available in all configurations, 10OMH' 10OMH 2 400MV 400MV SC: Special Color Paint(specify) (Supplied standard with Type FM) consult factory. 150HPS' 150HPS' 40OMH 40OMH MF: Mast Arm Fitter(CA only) 7.22'units only.Furnished with sag glass lens. 175MV 175MV 750MH PC: Receptacle and Photoconlrol' 8.Not available with Type 4X. 175MH 175MH 750HPS PCR: Photocontrol—Receptacle only' 250MV POLY:Polycarbonale Sag Lens 25OMH (In lieu of flat glass)" PTF: Pole Top Filter OS: Quartz Restrike6 SG: Sag Glass Lens(In lieu of flat glass) (Supplied standard with Type 4X r • . . and 75OW CA22") EPA'S Approx.WI. EPA'S Approx.WI. Single Twin Single Single Twin Single CA Style Size A B C D I Aim 180' Ouad Fixture MA Style Size A 8 C D Arm 180° Ouad Fixture 17' 17' 8' 5' 5' .7 1.5 2.1 261bs 17' 17' 11' 5' 5' .8 1.6 2.3 27lbs 432ffm 203:Tm 127m 127mm, 11.8 kgs 432Rm 279ff n 127mm 127ffn 12.2 kgs 22' 22' 11' 7' 5' 1.2 2.3 3.3 43lbs 22' 22' 14' 7' Y 1.3 2.7 3.7 43lbs 559mi 279,m 178mn 127irmi 19.5 kgs 559m 356m 1711, 1278 19.5 kgs _C1 - S --�- B lr D B =---— __ C Bit Note:C=Armlenglh D=Arm Height 19 V FIXTURE G8 n qk`� •Low copper alloy die cast housing � , ;, "' •Master color MH for 150W, HQI for 250W s •Hinged door frame for ease of maintenance tf �� `� •UL,cUL listed IP65 Pti> i` ' �R\ a,,�,k' � `�, • 1 SOW master color 80 CRI r`� , � '`� ° ti •250W HQI S/E 90 CRI �;„ } 1 •25OW normal MH 65 CRI love }arr71C�(XY�+ii ri y. su erli ht wide p g 150/250 superlight 150 wide ORDERING CHART ,SERIES Prod 10 Lamp Type Wattage Body Finish Grill Ballast Lens 0 xxx x xx x xx x x x Rtions SUPERLIGHT I SW1 9-HID Ut-150W MASTER COLOR B-Adjustable 78-Text Black o-None 9-120V MAG.HPF T-Clear Tempered 0 None 150 WIDE MH D/E Flood Light A-277V MAG.HPF Glass accessories 150 watt PROTECTION GRILL 128-0-010-940 VERTICLE LOUVER 128-0-008-940 COWL TEXTURED BLACK 128-0-028-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)SINGLE LUMINAIRE 128-0-199-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)DOUBLE LUMINAIRE 180 DEGREE 128-0-200-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)TRIPLE LUMINAIRE 120 DEGREE 128-0-073-940 UNIVERSAL POLE MOUNT CLAMP 120-0-240-940 superlight 250 wide ORDERING CHART SERIES Prod i Lamp Type Wattage Body Finish Grill Ballast Lens i SUPERLIGHT SW2 9-HID Z3-250W HOI MH S/E 8-Adjustable 78 Text Black o-None E 120/277/347V MAG. T-Clear Tempered 0 None 250 WIDE T15 MOG 5000K Flood Light CWA Glass 29-250W NORM.MH S/E T15 MOG 4200K accessories 250 watt PROTECTION GRILL 128-0-034-940 VERTICLE LOUVER 128-0-032-940 COWL TEXTURED BLACK 128-0-029-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)SINGLE LUMINAIRE 128-0-199-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)DOUBLE LUMINAIRE 180 DEGREE 128-0-200-940 POLE TOP(3"TENON MOUNT)TRIPLE LUMINAIRE 120 DEGREE 128-0-073-940 UNIVERSAL POLE MOUNT CLAMP 120-0-240-940 3 $-.E �- f�'e �/ —e®may —____—�— ;. �� .� x � 1 ,..� %...rte° 3✓,q I I •Q� 1i I �� __ 1��� 4� -� _ s �. .r/ a .--7 � ��� .__ .- � a� j � .,: . _� '� �" I ,e„ - --- ________.--� N, + ..- �,,.,; _ � � > �•�., •i: r� rL,_�vi_ � i i �c' a�� �M1Rl�c " Ya .. ,. � ., -- � � ._,>__ � ':� �, � ,� �� c N �3 `u.'i'z.�t.t��.,� � ��'���iG���/111��%V��:�. �����i� '�1�� �. ' ������ �• � �• [���1 �. � 'III � •, '•��������iuiii��1����I ' ' �� ATTACHMENT 18 PROPOSED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Bruce Campbell & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers & Planners &YA 38 Chauncy Street, Boston MA 02111 tel: 617-542-1199;fax: 617-451-9904; e-mail:info @bca-engineers.com February, 2001 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MA INTRODUCTION General/Site Location Bruce Campbell & Associates, Inc. (BC&A) has been retained by DiNisco Design Partnership Limited to conduct a traffic impact study of the proposed new North Andover High School. The existing 974-student high school is presently located east of Route 125 (Checkering Road)in North Andover,opposite Walker Road. The new North Andover High School(NAHS)is to remain on the same site but be situated on the northerly portion of the site. The existing school has one access drive connecting to Osgood Street, east of the site. Another drive, which is closed by a gate, connects to Route 125 (Chickering Road),just south of the existing William F. Rock Memorial Overpass. A site location map is presented in Figure 1 while a proposed site plan is presented in Figure 2. Project History BC&A completed a Traffic Impact Study' in July 1997 for the proposed NAHS renovation/relocation. The study included traffic counts at the following intersections: • Osgood Street/High School Driveway • Prescott Street/Chickering Road • Osgood Street/Chickering Road The study concluded that an increase in vehicle trips, due to an expected enrollment of 1,500 students by the year 2010, would result in poorer levels of service on the existing single driveway off Osgood Street. Initial mitigation measures included the construction of a second driveway north of Osgood Street,closer to Prescott Street,and the introduction of peak spreading,or staggering the peak traffic over a period greater than 15-20 minutes. Recently there has been a policy proposed to restrict student cars on-campus. In 1999,BC&A completed a Feasibility Study'for determining site access options(with and without a pedestrian bridge) for the relocated NAHS. The study's conclusions recommended maintaining the existing pedestrian bridge. The study also recommended reviewing the following options; ITraffic Impact Study,Proposed North Andover High School.Renovation/Relocation,North Andover, Massachusetts,Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc.,July 1997. 'Feasibility Study,North Andover High School Relocation,North Andover,Massachusetts,Bruce Campbell& Associates, Inc.,November 1999. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates, Inc. 2/01 Page 1 ® using existing gated access near Walker Road with signal modifications, ® using existing gated access allowing only right turns, ® creating new site drive opposite Heritage Assisted Living Facility. The project team and the school department decided to further investigate the third option-creating the new site drive opposite the Heritage Assisted Living Facility. As a result of this recommendation,in August 2000 BC&A completed a Traffic Signal Feasibility Study3 to determine the feasibility of creating access onto Route 125 with a new site drive opposite Heritage Assisted Living Facility and installing a traffic signal at this location. With this access alternative,BC&A met with the MassHighway Department(MHD)District 4 traffic engineer and MassHighway outlined the traffic signal requirement of the proposed signal and also the two adjacent signals up and down stream of the site. As a result of MHD requirements,BC&A developed preliminary cost estimates of traffic signal and roadway requirements. These cost estimates far exceeded off-site improvement budgets and this second access point was abandoned in favor of improving the Osgood Street access/egress. This study then reviews pal the preferred access/egress to the site via Osgood Street. Definitions The following are brief definitions of terminology used in this report: AM Peak Hour= One hour in the morning when traffic is heaviest. This coincides with peak commuter times, usually between 7:00-9:00 AM. School PM Peak Hour= One hour in the afternoon when traffic is heaviest. This coincides with school dismissal, usually between 1:30-4:00 PM. LOS = Level of Service is a quantitative measure used to describe the operation of an intersection. Level of Service values range from LOS A to LOS F. LOS A represents very good operation and LOS F represents very poor levels of service. Generally, LOS A through D are considered acceptable while LOS E and F are considered deficient. Details of the criteria are available in the Appendix. Delay= Average delay per vehicle in seconds. 3Traffic Signal Feasibility Study,North Andover High School,North Andover,Massachusetts,Bruce Campbell &Associates,Inc.,August 2000. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates, Inc. 2/01 Page 2 2000 EXISTING CONDITIONS Study Area An evaluation of existing conditions in the vicinity of the site was conducted based on existing Weekday AM (7-9 AM) and School PM (1:30-4 PM) peak hour traffic volumes from two of the previous studies, roadway geometry and traffic control. The study area included: Osgood Street/School Site Drive Osgood Street/Prescott Street Osgood Street/Colgate Drive Chickering Road/Prescott Street (signalized) Chickering Road/Walker Road (signalized) Roadway Designations Chickering Road(Route 125)is owned by the State of Massachusetts. Prescott Street,Osgood Street and Walker Road are owned and maintained by the Town of North Andover. Existing Traffic Volumes Previous traffic count data was obtained at the signalized intersections of Chickering Road/Prescott Street, Chickering Road/Osgood Street and Osgood Street/High School Driveway from 1997 and Chickering Road/Walker Street data from 1999. All data were utilized, but updated and adjusted by an annual growth rate and balanced to obtain year 2000 volumes. Seasonal Adjustments To determine if the July traffic count data required a seasonal adjustment,the 1998 Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway)Weekday Seasonal Factors publication was consulted. The 1998 Weekday Seasonal Factors for Urban Arterials, Collectors & Rural Arterials show that the months of May and September are higher than the average month; therefore, the counts were not adjusted for seasonality. Figures 3 and 4 show the balanced AM and School PM peak hour volumes, respectively. The number of vehicles entering each intersection was tabulated for the adjusted year 2000 condition and summarized in Table 1 below. The year 2000 existing traffic volumes are also shown graphically in Figures 3 and 4. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates, Inc. 2/01 Page 3 Table 1 Traffic Volume Directional Distribution During Peak Hours Location School School P AM Osgood Street/School Site Drive 783 569 Osgood Street/Prescott Street 372 281 Osgood Street/Colgate Drive 1361 1363 Chickering Road/Prescott Street 1209 1204 Chickerin Road/Walker Road 1271 1276 2000 Existing Level of Service Analysis A level of service(LOS)analysis was conducted at the study area intersections using the procedures outlined in the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)4. The intersections were analyzed with the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) program for the unsignalized intersections of Osgood Street/ Colgate Drive/Route 125,Osgood Street/Prescott Street and Osgood Street/High School Site Drive as well as for the signalized intersections of Route 125/Prescott Street and Route 125/Walker Road. The signalized level of service designations(A-F)are based solely on calculated average total delay. The overall delay is based on weighting the average delay per vehicle on each approach by the number of vehicles on that approach. The HCM methodology for two-way unsignalized level of service was used and is based solely on delay. The delay is based on capacity which is based on gap acceptance and intersection volumes. LOS analysis results are noted in Table 2 for both the AM and School PM peak periods. The LOS analysis worksheets and criteria for LOS analysis are included in the Appendix. For the intersection of Route 125/Prescott Street it was conservatively assumed the pedestrian button was actuated every other cycle. As can be seen from the analysis in Table 2, during the AM Peak Hour the School Drive eastbound approach and the Colgate Drive approaches operate at deficient LOS of F and E respectively. It should be pointed out that the LOS F out of the High School site drive exists today and is only during the morning peak period when everyone is entering the school site (left turns in opposing the few left turns out). During the PM peak the Colgate Street approach operates at LOS D. All other movements at the study area intersections operate at LOS of C or better during the peak hours. 41997 Highway Capacity Manual;Transportation Research Board Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 4 Table 2 2000 Existing Level of Service Analysis r' AM Peak Hour _r School PM,Peak Hour ",Unsigndl zed Intersection Movement Delay LOS Delay Osgood Street/School Osgood NB left B 12.1 A 7.8 Drive School Drive EB F >120 C 24.4 Osgood/Route 125 Rt 125 NB left A 9.0 A 8.7 Rt 125 SB left A 9.1 A 9.4 Osgood WB B 14.6 C 19.9 Colgate EB E 38.9 D 25.4 Osgood/Prescott Osgood NB left A 7.7 A 7.5 Prescott EB A 9.8 A 8.9 Signalized Intersection ,Movement LOS Delay. LOS Dela Route 125/Prescott Street Prescott EB C 33.7 C 31.5 Prescott WB C 31.2 C 31.3 Rt 125 NB A 9.1 B 10.7 Rt 125 SB B 11.0 A 9.5 Overall B 12.3 B 11.0 Route 125/Walker Road Walker EB C 23.2 C 21.7 Rt 125 NB A 5.4 A 5.8 Rt125SB C 21.5 B 14.1 Overall A 15.6 B 10.4 [L--Os:=level of service;delay in seconds Accident History An accident data summary for the study area intersections was obtained from the Registry of Motor Vehicle files,maintained by MassHighway,for the years 1995, 1996 and 1997. The accident table below, Table 3, summarizes the reported accidents. In addition,the crash rate was also calculated and compared to the Massachusetts average. All intersections within the study area are below the State average for crash rates. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates, Inc. 2/01 Page 5 Table 3 -Accident Data Summary* Rear Head Property Year Total Angle End On Other Damage Injury Fatality Crash Rate Only Route 125/Prescott Street si nalized 1995 3 2 1 2 1 0.76 1997 2 2 2 Total 11 5 1 3 1 0 3 1 6 0 Route 125/Walker Road si alized 1995 0 0.26 1997 0 Total 4 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 Route 125/Os ood Street/Col iate Drive 1995 2 2 1 1 0.42 1997 4 3 1 2 2 Total 7 5 1 0 1 3 4 0 Os ood Street/Hi h School Drive 1995 1 1 1 1996 0 0.14 1997 0 Total 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 No accidents were reported at the intersection of Osgood Street/Prescott Street *Source: Massachusetts Highway Department Crash Rate expressed as accidents per million entering vehicles State Average=0.70 for unsi nalized intersections and 1.02 for signalized intersections TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION Vehicle Trip Generation The North Andover High School enrolled 855 students during the 1996-1997 school year when counts at the access driveway were conducted. To determine the relationship with national standards,the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation' manual was reviewed. This manual lists data for estimating vehicle trip activity for hundreds of land use sources. Included is Land Use Code # 850 High School. This source was referenced to determine the number of vehicle trips generated by the enrollment of 855 students. By this method,the trips generated during the AM and PM peak hours of the school were 393 and 257,respectively,whereas the traffic count results in 662 trips in the AM and 434 trips in the school PM peak hour. Rates calculated from the 5Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers,6''Edition Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 6 actual traffic counts were compared with the rates determined from the ITE data and are shown in Table 4. Table 4-Trip Generation Rate Summary Vehicle Trips per Enrolled Student Data Source AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL ITE Land Use 9530 High School 0.32 0.14 0.46 0.09 0.21 0.30 1997 NAHS traffic count 0.54 0.23 0.77 0.11 0.40 0.51 (855 enrolled students) As can be seen, the vehicle trip generation rates from the traffic count are higher than ITE data. Possible reasons for this are: lower ridership on school buses, higher drop-off/pick-up by parents, more student drivers and less walkers than at ITE surveyed schools. The 1997 existing trip generation for the high school was determined from the traffic count and is shown in Table 5 below. Trip generation for the 1,500 projected student enrollment is also shown in Table 5 and was calculated using the trip generation rates from the existing school since it is assumed that similar characteristics, such as operation and services of the school will be retained. During the 1999-2000 school year, 974 students were enrolled in the school. According to the school department projections, by the year 2010, the enrollment is expected to reach 1,500 high school students, an increase of 645 students. Table 5 -Vehicle Trip Generation Rate Summary Condition School AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 1997 Existing North Andover High School 463 199 662 90 344 434 (855 enrolled students) 2010 Projected North Andover High School 812 349 1,161 158 603 761 (1,500 enrolled students) Vehicle Trip Distribution To determine the trip distribution, data was obtained from the North Andover school department through School Geographics, Inc., (consultant to the school department) detailing residences of all the enrolled students. This information fairly closely resembled data obtained from the traffic count conducted at the school site drive. From the information, trip patterns to/from the school were determined. Table 6 below shows a summary of the trip distribution for the high school. Trip assignments are shown in Figures 5 and 6. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 7 Table 6-Trip Distribution Proposed North Andover High School Direction Percentage Osgood Street to south 85% Walker Road I% Prescott Street 2% Chickering Road to north 12% Total 100% 2005 NO BUILD CONDITIONS Area Roadway Improvements Research into area roadway improvements with MassHighway indicates there are no proposed improvements along the Route 125 corridor intersections in the area. However,discussions with the Town indicate that Osgood Street is undergoing a transportation improvement project for a 1.5 mile- long section. The project begins at Main Street,near the Police Station and continues to Chickering Road (Route 125) at Colgate Drive. The improvement project, which is presently under construction, consists of full-depth pavement reconstruction and new pavement markings, new sidewalks and drainage,wheel chair ramps, curbing and selected intersection improvements. At a future date, the High School project team will meet with the Town's public works department to coordinate site drive construction with the ongoing transportation project. 2005 No Build Volumes Standard traffic engineering guidelines require that a five-year future condition be analyzed. Generally, there are two components to the future year No Build condition—area background development and normal traffic growth. ❑ Area Background Developments North Andover officials were contacted to determine the appropriate traffic growth rate and proposed new area projects. Based on input from the North Andover Planning Department, no new projects are proposed in the area that will significantly affect traffic volumes. ❑ Traffic Growth The future traffic volume projections also include a general annual background growth to account for smaller unspecified developments and general increases in traffic volumes over time. Based on input from the North Andover Town Planner, and being consistent with previous reports for the school, a 1%per year growth rate was determined. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 8 ❑ 2005 No Build Networks The 2005 No Build traffic volumes were developed by factoring up the existing traffic counts by 5.10% (1Wyear compounded for five years). The resulting 2005 No Build volumes are shown in Figures 7 and 8. ❑ 2005 No Build LOS Analysis As can be seen from the analysis in Table 7,the School Drive and the Colgate Drive approach will continue to operate at deficient LOS during the AM peak hour. The few left turns exiting the site drive in the morning oppose the many left turns entering the site. During the PM peak these approaches operate the LOS D. All the other movements at the study area intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better during the peak hours. Table 7 2005 No Build Level of Service Analysis AM'Peak-Hour - School EM Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Movement LOS De la LOS Dela Osgood Street/School Osgood NB left B 12.2 A 7.8 Drive School Drive EB F >120 D 25.1 Osgood/Route 125 Rt 125 NB left A 9.2 A 8.8 Rt 125 SB left A 9.2 A 9.5 Osgood WB C 15.3 C 21.6 Colgate EB E 43.6 D 273 Osgood/Prescott Osgood NB left A 7.7 A 7.5 Prescott EB A 9.8 A 8.9 Signalized Intersection 1Vlovernent , LOS Dela : LOS Dela Route 1251Prescott Street Prescott EB C 33.9 C 31.6 Prescott WB C 31.2 C 31.3 Rt 125 NB A 9.3 B 11.2 Rt 125 SB B 11.6 A 9.8 Overall B 12.7 B 11.4 Route 125/Walker Road Walker EB C 23.6 C 21.7 Rt 125 NB A 5.5 A 6.1 Rt 125 SB C 25.7 B 15.0 Overall B 17.9 B 10.9 LOS=level of service;delay in seconds Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ae.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 9 BUILD CONDITION 2005 Build Volumes To obtain the 2005 Build traffic volumes,the trips generated by the high school were added to the 2005 No Build traffic volumes. The resulting 2005 Build AM and PM peak hour volumes are presented in Figures 9 and 10. 2005 Build Level of Service Table 8 2005 Build Level of Service Analysis :AM Peak Hour School PM Peak_Hour Unsignalized Intersection "Nov ement LOS Dela�' LOS Delay- Os good Street/School Osgood NB left B 12.7 A 7.7 Drive School Drive EB F 68.1 C 15.8 Osgood/Rt 125 Rt 125 NB left A 9.2 A 8.8 Rt 125 SB left A 9.5 A 9.6 Osgood WB C 16.3 C 23.5 Colgate EB F 54.8 D 29.1 Osgood/Prescott Os goo NB left A 7.8 A 7.5 Prescott EB B 10.3 A 9.0 Signalized Intersecfion`: IViovement LOS De ay LOS Dela Rt 125/Prescott Street Prescott EB C 34.1 C 31.7 Prescott WB C 31.3 C 31.5 Rt 125 NB A 9.4 B 11.2 Rt 125 SB B 11.6 A 9.8 Overall B 12.9 B 11.5 Route 125/Walker Road Walker EB C 23.9 C 21.8 Rt 125 NB A 5.5 A 6.1 Rt 125 SB C 25.9 B 15.1 Overall B 18.1 B 11.0 LLO--S=level of service;delay in seconds According to the 2005 Build Analysis shown in Table 8 above, the Colgate Drive eastbound approach will decrease from LOS E in the No Build condition to LOS F during the build condition during the AM Peak. During the PM peak hour the approach will continue to operate at LOS D. The reason for the low levels of service for this approach is due to the high volume of vehicles on Route 125 even though there are very few vehicles using the Colgate Drive approach. For the Build condition,the school drive was analyzed with separate left and right turn lanes exiting the driveway. In addition since the traffic volumes into the site at this intersection will be increased considerably, Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 2/01 Page 10 the peak hour factor was also increased. With the increase in traffic volumes,the School Drive will still operate at LOS F during the AM peak hour. Although the addition exiting lane on the site drive will improve safety and vehicle queuing, the LOS for that movement will still remain at LOS F. According to the analysis,with the addition of the extra lane,the School Drive approach will operate at LOS C during the I'M peak hour. All the other movements at the study area intersections will operate at LOS C or better. CIRCULATION In addition to the off-site review of traffic impacts, on-site traffic circulation was reviewed and which included bus drop-off/pick-up areas, bus circulation area separated from the primary traffic flow, and student/visitor drop-off/pick-up areas. With the relocation of the access road over the existing wetlands crossing,a realigned single access road was designed for school busses and delivery vehicles that minimizes the encroachment into the wetlands area (thus eliminating the need for extensive retaining wall construction). CONCLUSIONS/RE COMMENDATIONS Table 9 below summarizes the increase in traffic due to the expw Table 9 Traffic Volume Directional Distribution During Pi 2005 No Build 2005 Bu; Location AM Peak School PM AM Peak Scl Peak Osgood Street/School Site Drive 789 576 1288 Osgood Street/Prescott Street 380 288 455 Osgood Street/Colgate Drive 1420 1426 1480 1 Chickering Road/Prescott Street 1269 1265 1284 1 1 Chickering Road/Walker Road 1335 1341 1340 1— 1 U.4% 0.3% The existing School Site Drive is currently operating at poor levels of service with its present geometry,and will continue to operate at poor levels of service under the Build condition even with the addition of an extra exit lane. This problem would only be evident during the morning School peak hour where there are anticipated a lot of left turns coming in and would be opposed by very few left few turns out, During the rest of the day this intersection will operate sufficiently. One solution to this problem would be the addition of a second exit. However, this is not proposed at this time. Another way to reduce the traffic impacts at the site drive would be to spread the arrivals and departures of vehicles over a longer period of time, and also encourage use of the bus system. However,given that the LOS F is expected to occur for a single minor movement at the intersection during one hour of the day only,no additional mitigation is proposed(such as traffic signalization) to alleviate a single hour deficiency. Ref. P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates, Inc. 8/00 Page 11 In addition to the on-site improvements,BC&A reviewed the off-site impacts and working with the project team, developed an intersection improvement plan that upgrades the Osgood Street/High School Access Road intersection to improved geometry, two exit lanes, curbing and relocation of the sidewalk from the north side of the access road to the south side. New wheelchair ramps will also be installed. As indicated earlier, Osgood Street is presently being reconstructed to include full depth reconstruction and new curbing. The project team will work with the Town's consultant and the contractor to coordinate activities at the improved site drive intersection. Ref: P:\977\02\977rpt3.ac.wpd Bruce Campbell&Associates,Inc. 8/00 Page 12 v Pa 123) ® LAWRENCE FRENCH MUNICIPAL e COUNTY t Q 'IPA CO RAS IN{� AIRPORT Y c TPpND WEAC�jt F l RD TH o Cn RD F9 J'l vl-i S 1119, 00 9L �`O n 2F p w� NO a S-\ P FOULD � y Sutton' R Pond r° z Gy° RgER AV m p y MO TON ST od r,P�S� �T�{{AL Pond D° N`-"+ M PLGI CS"• JJ GO -+ �� N' s G��O CAS ST qo SAS �R A, z Mill ., s fk UNION'A S 26,d duo 9 i 4 - �, W -*SIT COYNF� P V$1 N 3 0 sT Ss �+� /y _ i HS L ICA�VSEO p o RD 2 0 ��,` `r°y k'�C �P� �'s� tm vQJ D SZ �'J�V r F� N 8hi5V 0 91 �G� ��QP ^' S� F� ATE IL q He A���a ,s� �O sl FDA o 9 F ����5 s' P o <\ �o r LA WRENC EASTSC ZZ R l F 4�� O PARK pKST �:4 s SHAWSHEE pe., 1 ST P� MS (A PK E T A$qV1 K oy T e� PAZ OpK ,C J�P� ��`y REDG SCH 495 / E ��� ATKINSO �w BEACH TOWN SH SCH 'MORIAC & Qj0 S�1H�l MARWE ST RD N ` Flo AX ST co, q E PL C ADAMS c QV CEhi O 4GO J AU m AN "' f1ELpSON �" �� AV�M1 Cep S Museu GREAT • ao NORTH B C Figure 1 SITE LOCATION MAP A North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 7tvs O W 0 ry to O N Ln Oc0o0 89 COLGATE DRIVE i 2 1 0 8—� 8-� N00 O� � goo 0 SA �F o(0— 02 PRESCOTT STREET a /�4 ,I SO 0 7 � (0 C14 32 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY McDONALD'S o c0 c0 WALKER ROAD / 1 EXISTING �I NORTH ANDOVER 103 n HIGH SCHOOL d IN = 463 OUT = 199 20 0 179—, 00d _ tLn O Q: N L1 ll Z W PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w � Y O U � U v SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C Figure 3 2000 EXISTING AM � A PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 977tvs2 O O W 0 0 O N I-r7 )°in— 123 COLLATE DRIVE 1 1 5—� 10 v>oo o� Co �n goo 0 s� �PF <j, � �o Jo_�ol- a 05 O PRESCOTT STREET 6 8 0 I 2 �' COON 14 Nco< u-> ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY McDONALD S rn M COLn WALKER ROAD 1 EXISTING 26---4 NORTH ANDOVER 57 HIGH SCHOOL N N �Ln `n IN = 90 1 OUT = 344 �c 54 290--1 Ln rn ° (Or- o of N lJ U Z W PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w � y O U � 0 • SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C • Figure 4 2000 EXISTING SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 977tvs2 O w 0 w N V) O N J � X18 COLGATE DRIVE I� O� co o'0 s� �F F� PRESCOTT STREET 2 7 10 Ln co ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN = 349 OUT = 150 TOTAL= 499 EXPANDED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL McDONALD'S N WALKER ROAD 3 N 23 a 127 Q 6' O N d' N LJ U Z F- PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w O Y � U_ r U •SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C XX = NEW TRIPS FROM PROPOSED SCHOOL Figure 5 AM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 977tvs2 O r O w O W 0 Of tn F- O N 00 31 COLGATE DRIVE O� co 00 s� ,pF PRESCOTT STREET ` 1 i /�3 1-4 1 � f 2� oo� ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN = 68 OUT = 259 TOTAL= 327 EXPANDED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL McDONALDS M WALKER ROAD 39 0 220 co a o f, O_' N 0 Z W PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w � Y O 2 •SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C XX NEW TRIPS FROM PROPOSED SCHOOL Figure 6 SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION North Andover High School Not to Scale I North Andover, MA '7tvs2 O O W O w C-9 ry N N O nOC) )0( — 92 COLGATE DRIVE I 0-� + 4 f-2 1 8-► 8 \4 ;X �PRESCOTT STREET ` 1 i 34; r �� 71--, �� ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY McDONALD�S d- rn (D'0 WALKER ROAD � I NORTH ANDOVER 108 (or, SCHOOL io 20 179 ter. Cr N Z N===T 0 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE D w O Y � U 2 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C Figure 7 2005 NO BUILD AM & A PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover HIgh School Not to Scale I North Andover, MA 77tvs2 O w O w c9 of 0 O dLO 0U) 126 COLGATE DRIVE A) 1 � 1 1-4 5-� 11 �noo 0� 7 �0 00 s� �F F� U >> o —LOO 16 PRESCOTT STREET 6 0 8 (OOM 21 N(n 15 N� cvr7 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY McDONALD'S r� co (DLO WALKER ROAD 27 �I NORTH ANDOVER 60 0- HIGH SCHOOL N (DCV � 54 ° 290--, Ln� a (Dr- 0 n d' N LJ U Z W PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w � Y � r U •SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C Figure 8 2005 NO BUILD SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover High School Not to Scale Norht Andover, MA 77tvs2 O W O w O (-O cOM (ON �—110 COLGATE DRIVE � 1 1 1 0 8--m— 8 c�c�o Os U') goo 0 s�, F� Ln —110 �—0 CO— -'0—16 O PRESCOTT STREET / 1 6 I 0 58� � � ( 81� 34 —tN N— d- ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN = 812 OUT = 349 TOTAL= 1161 EXPANDED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL McDONALD'S d- rn co(0 WALKER ROAD '� i 27—4 � i 108 ccr �I 43 1 306 ,nom o co d' N L'J U Z PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w � Y10 _ 2 U •SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C Figure 9 2005 BUILD AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 77tvs2 O w O w U � N F- O N d- LnM )o�n� 157 COLGATE DRIVE I� + $ 1-4 5-r 11� L Ln Ln Z::Lnio-PRESCOTT STREET 1 i 9� � � I 23� 1 � ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN = 158 OUT = 603 TOTAL= 761 EXPANDED NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL McDONALD'S r rnn WALKER ROAD 28 60—,� oN Ucr 93 510 r)r Q Nr '.. o n D! N U LJ U Z PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE w o Y � U_ = v 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION B C Figure 10 2005 BUILD SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES North Andover High School Not to Scale North Andover, MA 77tvs2 ATTACHMENT 19 BSCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA 01701-5298 508-879-0030 October 31;2000 1-800-696-2874 FAX 508-879-1797 20217 A complete copy of the ENF has been previously sent to the Planninc Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Board Attn: MEPA Office 251 Causeway Street, 9``'Floor Boston, MA 02114 RE: Environmental Notification Form for North Andover High School in North Andover,Massachusetts To the MEPA Office: Via Hand Delivery. Enclosed please find the completed Environmental Notification Form for the North Andover High School Project. The enclosed includes the Original Signed ENF set and one complete copy. Also enclosed is one additional photocopy of the first four pages of the ENF Form as required. The ENF.package includes the following: Completed ENF Form (17 pages) - An original 8 '/a x 11 of the U.S.G.S. Map The ENF Distribution List. The Form of Legal Notice to be Published in the Eagle Tribune on 11/3/00 Site Plans: Four sheets including: Site Survey-Overview,Key Plan &Legend, 9/25100 (existing conditions). Layout & Materials Overview 10/20/00 (50%DD Submission) Grading Plan Overview 10/20/00 (50%DD Submission) Stormwater Drainage Plan Overview, 10/24/00 If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone on this letterhead,or Rick Rice at DiNisco Design Partnership 617-426-2858. Very truly yours, Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. Fredric W.King, P.E. Senior Engineer Enclosures Commonwealth of Massachusetts For office use Only Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Executive Office of Environmental Affairs o MEPA Office EOEA No.: IL M Environmental MEPA Analyst: : Notification Form Phone 617-626- The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: North Andover High School Project Street: 675 Chickerin Road -Municipality: North Andover Watershed: Merrimack Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 042 deg. 41' 57.12" N. X = 326550 Y = 4729370 Longitude: 071 deg. 07' 051" W. Estimated commencement date: 7/1/2001 Estimated completion date: 6/1/2005 Approximate cost: 58.8 Million Status of project design: 50 %complete Proponent: North Andover School Building Committee Street: 675 Chickering Road Municipality: North Andover I State: MA Zi Code: 01845 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Richard N. Rice Firm/Agency: DiNisco Design Partnership Street: 87 Summer Street Municipality: Boston I State: MA Zi Code: 02110 Phone: 617-426-2858 Fax: 617-426-1457 1 E-mail: r.rice@dinisco.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory El threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes NNo Has this project been filed with MEPA before? F]Yes (EOEA No. ) NNo Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ❑Yes (EOEA No. ) NNo Is this an Expanded ENF (See 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: • Single El R? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes NNo • Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) ❑Yes NNo •Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) DYes NNo .a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes NNo Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): Mass. Dept, of Education — School Building Assistance Program (63% reimbursement) Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? ❑Yes(Specify ) NNo List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: No. Andover Wetlands Bylaw, NPDES., Site Plan Review Revised 10199 Comment period is limited. For information call 617-626-1020 Which ENF or EIR review thresholds) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ® Land ❑ Rare Species ❑ Wetlands, Waterways, &Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ❑ Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ❑ Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical & Archaeological Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals ® Order of Conditions e 48.22 El Conditions Order of Total site acreage Conditions New acres of land altered 0 ❑ Chapter 91 License Acres of impervious area 9.21 +3.09 12.30 ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Square feet of new bordering ' 4,605 MHD or MDC Access vegetated wetlands alteration Permit Square feet of new other 0 El Act Management Act Permit wetland alteration ❑ New Source Approval Acres of new non-water 0 DEP or MWRA dependent use of tidelands or Sewer Connection/ waterways Extension Permit ❑ Other Permits (including Legislative Gross square footage 204,000 96,000 300,000 Approvals)— Specify: Number of housing units 0 0 0 Maximum height (in feet) 42 +8 50 Vehicle trips per day 2580, +1950 4530 Parking spaces 350 +161 511 Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 24,060 +9,140 33,200 GPD water withdrawal 0 0 0 GPD wastewater generation/ 24,060 +9,140 33,200 treatment Length of water/sewer mains 0 0 0 (in miles) CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ❑Yes (Specify _ ! ❑i`�o Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, or watershed preservation restriction? ❑Yes (Specify OX IN RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species,Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? ❑Yes (Specify ) NNo HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure,site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify ) NNo If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? OYes (Specify ) ONo AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes (Specify ) NNo PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.) General Project Description The North Andover School Building Committee proposes to construct a new 300,000 square foot, three-story high school at the existing high school site on Chickering Road. The new school is being designed for an enrollment of 1,500 students,based on enrollment forecasts.The existing high school of 204,000 square feet has a design capacity of 900 students and is currently over capacity with a 2000 enrollment of 1,047 students. The existing high school building is proposed to be demolished. Proposed site improvements include installation of a new driveway system providing 360 degree access around the school, 161 additional parking spaces for a total of 511 spaces, new stormwater management system, playfields and plantings, and other associated utilities and infrastructure. The proposed project is entirely within the area previously developed for the existing high school and infrastructure. Therefore, no previously undeveloped land will be disturbed. Alternatives Analysis The construction of a new high school at the existing high school site has been proposed as shown on the current plans only after an extensive study, which included the consideration of other potential sites. The proposed new high school site has already been developed for the existing high school. Significant site development and infrastructure would be necessary in locating the high school on an undeveloped site or site currently developed for another use. Because of this the existing high school site is advantageous compared to other sites both in terms of cost and environmental impact as significant site development for the proposed project is already in place. Beyond this advantage of the existing site, there are no other known sites of sufficient size either owned by the Town of North Andover or privately. One site that was raised as a possibility,the nearby Osgood Hill site, has been designated by the town as conservation land, and also has a severe topography that would make development impractical. The School Building Committee completed a feasibility study in 1997 evaluating seven planning options that included various renovation/addition options as well as construction of a new high school -3- in various locations on the existing high school site. In order to meet current educational standards and building codes the existing school building would require complete renovation, with little more than the shell remaining. A critical determinant in identifying the optimal scheme was the need to minimize the impact of a 36 month construction project on the health, safety and education of the students.The conclusion of this study was the recommendation to construct a new high school on the existing site. This option was the most cost effective and least disruptive to the educational program during construction. The proposed design for this site has gone through numerous revisions in response to environmental, technical and economic considerations. In response to the proximity of flagged wetlands, the building footprint has been condensed and moved totally out of the local 50' wetland "No-Build Zone" established by the North Andover Conservation Commission and wetlands intrusions have been minimized. Proposed parking has been reduced and fewer playfields are being provided as a result of the constraints imposed by the wetland areas. Based on the needs of the school and recreational sports programs, it is imperative that the high school site accommodate no less than six fields for soccer,field hockey and lacrosse use, and one full size baseball field. A traffic study has determined that 600 spaces would be optimal for the projected school enrollment of 1500 students. Parking restrictions, if necessary, will be used by the school department to limit parking to the proposed 511 parking spaces. Additional visitor parking for special events will be accommodated by parallel parking on one side of the main access drive. The current design layout represents the most environmentally sensitive design which minimizes alteration of existing wetlands and wetland buffer zones. The project size and scope have been reduced to the minimum amount feasible. With respect to its environmental impact, the proposed project has the added benefit of improving the Riverfront Area. The demolition of the existing school and parking will result in the net reduction of impervious area in the existing 200'Riverfront Area by 50,980 square feet. -4- FROM: FAX: Dec-28-00 Thu oA TT/°'CHMENTEi2®1 F. PT FIF, �1 g /n NAME A - fy '!3C/�fi2i C-/l� lff: �9P/Llf/Irll�lP/l�Sf!P7 cs< � :aor t ... or cant a Cor ooa fp 9 0 o �a carCpl/�l�li ✓UQ��fI7P�j �..-�,��,�99/�—/.i%�iy - ..rone Elea ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI rtor G0vGRNOR December 22 , 2000 rGE JANE SWIFT � LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR t Contrast o 01kelFtM)690 Fax(017)626-1181 BOB DURAND http;//www,magnot.state.ma.us/envir SECRETARY C.E12TT ICATn Or THE SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AF'FATRS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM PROJECT NAME : North Andover high School Project PROJECT MUNICIZ'A-LITY : 675 Chickering Road - North Andover PROJECT WATERSHED : Merrimack River FOEA NUMBER : 12350 `'PROJECT PROPONENT : North Andover: ,Sc:bool Ruilding Comm.ttee . ., DATE NOTICED TN. MONI'T'OR ruxouant to the Massachusetts Environmental to1icy Act {G. L. c. 30, oo . 61-62H) and Section 11_ 06 of the MFPA. ' regal at ions (3 01 CMR. 1� , Q O) , I. determine, that this project does require- the preparation of an Mavironmexztal Impacts Report (EIR) . Acoording to the Environmon.tal Notification Form (ENF) , the proposed project consists of the construction of a three-story, 300, 000 square foot (of) high school (Grades 9-12) . The school will include a kitchen facility, an auditorium, a cafeteria, a gymnaoivm, a library, a staff cafeteria, and administrative speac:e , it would be built to accommodate a total. of 1, 500 otudento and 160 staff : Tho oxisti.ng 204, 000 sf high school on the project sate will be demolished when the new school is ready in the fall of ?004 . The project: site contains about 48 . 22 acree. The project is subject, to rev.iew pursuant. to Section 11 . 03 (6) (b) (14) of the MEPA regulations because. it generates 1, 000 or more new vehicle trips and the ron.struction of 1.50 or more parking spaces . It will require an Access Permit from the Massachusetts Highway Department (MI•ID) , The project will need to obtain a 401 Water Quality Certificate and a Sewer. Connelc^ti.on/ Extension Permit from the Department of Envi.ronmental. irotection (DEP)* . ltt must comply with the National. Pollution 'Di'scharge Elimination System - (NPDES) General. Permit for stormwater discharges from a construction site. An Order of -Conditions will be required from the North Andover Conservation Commission for impacts to wetland resource areas and a buffer zone. Because the kt Printed on Hecyc{ed Stock 30%Poet Consumer Weate FR0r1: FAX: Dec-28-00 Thu 08: 18 PAGE: 03 EOEA #12350 ENF Certificate December 22, 2000 proponent ie seeking funding from the Massachusetts Department .of Education, MEPA jurisdiction ext.ends. to all aspects of the project that may have significant environmental. impacts . The total project will contain approximately 511. parking spaces . Driveway acceNN will continue to be provided onto Osgood Strcct . A gated, emergency only driveway off Ch_ic:kering Road (Route. 125) would be maintained. Lased on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Land Use Code 530 (High School) , the proposed project is cstimatcd to gonerate approximately 1, 950 new vehicle trips per weekday. The project will be supplied with public water and wastewater aervice by the Ioval municipal systems . The project wi.17 Z.rn.c.rearp. the r..onr_umption of water. by approximately 9, 140 gallons pnr day (gpd) Lind .the generation of wastewater by approximately the same amount. The project will impact-appr.oximately 4 , 605 sf of~.boxdexang veg?tat:s?d =weat:l.andq (RVW) and 122 , 670. 5f of Riverfront- Are-a.-to ' Cochichew4ick •Brook. The proponent is proposing to repl 'ca.t6 about ,sf of BVW, in the Riverfront Area,. the proponent ,will,'. relocate-Its .existing .parking .areas and driveway -and cregtP:: landscaped athletic fields. Thc: quality of stormwater. runoff= .generated by the proj ect will be improved ,by the impl'ementati.on. of. Sest Management Practices . Existing site runoff flows to the Cochiehewiek' Brook. Approximately 3 . 03 ar..rPS of additional impervious area will be created by the project . Runoff from the proposed parking areas will flow to catch basins oquipped .with deep sumps and oil separators that flow to an underground stormwater detention far_.ilit.y, Roof runoff will flow to this same system. The peak rate of water discharging from the site will remain at or below existing runoff levels . The proponent has committed to perform an annual inspection and maintenance program for the nt;.ormwat e collection system. Maintenance: will include seasonal .road and parking lot sweeping. I encourage the proponent . and the Town of North Andover, to improve access to the site by providing sidewalks along Osgood and Andover Streeto and along the access driveway to the ,school . The. Town of North Andover is also encouraged to continue to plan a. rail. trail for walking and bicycles along Cochichewick Brook. Based on a review of the information provided by the proponent, a review of the comment letters, and after conoultat.ion with the rcicvant public agencies, T find that the 2 FROM:. FAX: Dec-28-00 Thu 08: 17 PAGE: 02 EOE'A ##1.23 S'o ENF. Ccrtificat.e December 22, 2000 r7i�firnl i_al impacto of this project do not warrant the preparation of axe ETR. 22 , 2000 W , ]date Bob Durand cc: David Murphy, DEP/Boston John Felix, DEP/NEIZO Comments received: North Andover Public Schools, 11/16/00 DiNisco Design Paftnernhip, 17./22/00 D�]P/NERO, 11/29/00 MHD, 11/30/00 DEP/Nn-RO, 12/8/00 E12350. BD/WTG/wg 3 ATTi4CHMENT 21 pa r .c h: i t e c . fi s a n d l a n, n .e r s Lunited , VIA COURIER . 2ZNovember 2000. Commonwealth of Massachusetts e Executive Office of Environmental Affairs.Y MEPA.Office 251 Causway Street, 9`.Floor. t . Boston, MA 02114--2i 50 : f(' Attention: William Gage .g Reference: North Andover High School North Andover, MA.. ENF Subject: Submission - Dear Mr Gage : As-requestedat the 14 November 2000 site visit-for the'North`Andover.High School Project, we submit'for your information.the following--materials • Notice of Intent filed'with North.Andover Conservation Commission (Vol. 1 &2 and roll 'of full size drawings) • Stormwater Management Design (summary) by Schofield Brothers dated 05 October 2000 • Osgood Street Improvement Drawings;Town of North-Andover, dated 02/03/99 • Traffic.Study for North Andover High School by Bruce Campbell.Assoc.; dated July 1997 and memo dated 1 B.October.2000. Temporary Athletic field Planning.letter from North Andover School Department, dated 16 November 2000. Site Diagrams(11 .x 17 format) dated 1.5 November and 20 November 2000 showing: - Existing Site —Site Plan —Site Plan: Wetland'Alternatives —Site Plan : Wetland Replication —Site Plan : Impervious Riverfront Area Reduction =Maximum Impervious Area During Construction Construction Time Schedule Kenneth DiNisco RichaYd N.Rice Gary E.Ainslie Matthew D.Michel Christopher Huston 817 S,u_mmer Street B o s t o n MA 02110 6- 17 . 42.6..2858 fax 426 . 1457 William Gage; 22 November 2000 Page 2 In addition, the ENFwascouriered to.Mass Highway/ District 4 and to Tom Burns at Mass Highway/Ten Park Plaza on 20 November 2000.. Thank you for your assistance'With this : project. Should you have any comments,or questions regarding these materials, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely; ; Richard.Ri e DiNISCO .DESIGN.: , RNR/cm cc: (letter only) Louis Minicucci Paul Szymanski Nancy Kurtz Fred King .: Kenneth DiNisco Enclosure: As noted above. 99430.o corctylst/Twn o4 r -- ATTACHMENT 21 A -------------------- North Andover Public ls DFC z 2000 c o.s North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 rfiz 17 Ncrv�m er 16, 2000 Mr. William T. Gage — Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251. Causeway Street, 91h Floor Boston, MA 02114-2150 j Subject: Alternate Use of Fields Re: New North Andover High School Dear Mr. Gage: The matter of alternate use of fields was discussed during our review meeting on November 14,2000. As I mentioned to you we have been working on contingency plans for the better part of one year. We recognize that some inconveniences will be associates with construction, however, it will be short lived and good planning will minimize.the impact. Here is a brief status report. ❑ Our Athletic Director.; Mr. Jack Stephenson, is an active participant in a,conununity Fields Committee. The goal of this committee is to coordinate the use_of.all Town owned fields.and to assure fair and equitable allocation of same.To that end, in June of 1999 the Town Manager wrote a Policy Governing the Allocation of Town Owned Recreation Facilities to Organized Youth Athletic Organizations. With respect to the School Department's use of Town owned fields, the policy states "...the North Andover High School teams shall have first priority for the use of any North Andover recreational fields or facilities" ❑ With a few exceptions, fields.currently used to support our High School athletic programs are located at our Middle School site. The athletic activities scheduled at the Middle School fields include(for both boys and girls) Soccer,Field Hockey, Track and Field, Lacrosse, Baseball and Softball. ❑ Two new soccer fields are in the design phase. They will be constructed during the spring of 2001 and added to our inventory of fields the following year. I trust that this update conveys the sense of urgency that we have placed upon our planning for the alternate use of fields. Please feel free to contact me directly if you feel the need for more information. Sine ely, . y , Paul P. Szymanski Director, Management Support Services CC: Rick Rice, DiNisco Design Partnership Jack Stephenson, Director of Athletics 675 Chickering Road, North Andover, Massachusetts 01845-(978) 794-1503 FAX (978) 794-0231 ATTACHMENT 22 BBS IELD BROTHE 2000 ENGINEERING • SURVEYING PLANNING Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA 01701-5298 508-879-0030 ='<rr c�i1 st'"t 1-800-696-2874 '=c EP December 21,2000 FAX 508-879-1797 :c r Rluf r: ll.A� 20217 u EMI!C41> DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Attn: Jon Oxman RE: North Andover High School,North Andover,Massachusetts Army Corp-of Engineers—File No. 200002868. Dear Jon: Through your office, I am in receipt of the letter from Tina Chaisson of the Regulatory Branch of the New England District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated December 11, 2000. Included with the letter is information relative to the Section 404 and 401 permit requirements. Per the Massachusetts Programmatic General Permit, the North Andover High School Project as presently designed meets the terms of"Category 1" which is the non-reporting Category. This is because the project will alter less than 5000 sq. ft. of inland waterway or wetland and does not exceed any of the thresholds within Category Il or for an Individual Permit. As such, no further review or application is required with the Army Corps of Engineers provided that all other Federal, State and local authorizations are obtained. In this case, the Order of Conditions under the Mass. Wetlands Protection Act should be the only other applicable permit unless some other requirement comes to light through the MEPA, Environmental Notification Process, currently underway. The project also does not exceed any threshold requiring a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Although not specifically required, I would recommend sending a copy of the Order of Conditions to be issued by the North Andover Conservation Commission, to the Corps for their record under their file number. This will show compliance with the terms of the General Permit.. If you have any questions regarding this,please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Schofield Brothers of New England,Inc. Fredric W. King,P.E. Senior Engineer ATTACHMENT 23 C IMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUS. TS z F EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Metropolitan Boston-Northeast Regional Office sy0 ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI RECE V ED BOB DURAND Governor Secretary JANE SWIFT JAN 2 5 2001 LAUREN A. LISS Lieutenant Governor Commissioner R. W, SUIMAN, INC. Paul Szymanski January 24, 2001 North Andover High School 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Sewer System Connection/Extension Permit No. 51005282 Dear Mr. Szymanski : In response to your application for a sewer connection/ extension permit to discharge into the sewer system at Chickering Road in North Andover, Massachusetts, and after due public notice, I hereby issue the attached final permit . No comments objecting to the issuance or terms of the permit were received by the .Department during the public comment period. Therefore, in accordance with 314 CMR 2 . 08, the permit becomes effective upon issuance. This Permit is an action of the Department . If you are aggrieved by this action, you may request an adjudicatory hearing. A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing must be made in writing and postmarked within thirty (30) days of the date this permit was issued. Pursuant to 310 CMR 1. 01 (6) , the Notice of Claim shall state clearly and concisely the facts which are grounds for the proceeding and the relief sought . The Notice of Claim, along with a valid check payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the amount of one hundred dollars. ($100 . 00) , must be mailed to: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 The Notice will be dismissed if the filing fee is not paid, Unless the appellant is exempt or granted a waiver as described in 310 CMR 4 . 00 . This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)5746972. 205A Lowell St Wilmington,MA 01887 . Phone(978)661-7600 . Fax(978)661-7615 . TTD#(978)661-7679 Z�j,1 Printed on Recycled Paper -2- If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ralph Lizio at (978) 661-7600 . Sincerel .Z ?c" John ,� 3 Bureau of Resource Protection JZ/RL Enclosure CC : J. William Hmurciak, Director of Public Works, 384 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA 01845 Paul Sullivan, P.E. , Unit 302, Union Wharf Commercial St. , Boston, MA 02109 314 CMR: Division of Water Pollution Control One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 7.20 : PERMITS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TOWN: FOR For issuing office SEWER SYSTEM EXTENSION OR CONNECTION use only: INSTRUCTIONS The application should be signed by the appropriate municipal official, and submitted in triplicate, with the original and one copy to the Division's Boston Office and one copy to the appropriate regional office. The signature of the design engineer or other agent will be accepted only if accompanied by a letter of authorization. If connection is to be made to the MWRA sewerage system, indicate "MWRA" in item 11 . If the project includes sewers, pumping stations, force mains, or syphons, . construction plans must be submitted with the application. If additional space is required to properly answer any questions, please attach' additional sheets and refer to the attachments in the space provided. North Andover High School. (1) Name and Address of Applicant:North Andover School Building Committee 675 Chickering Road, N. Andover, MA01845 978-794-1503 Telephone (2) Name of Sewer System Owner: North Andover o (Municipality or Sewer District) Sewer (Department) (3) Type of Project: Sewer Connection (Sewer Extension or Sewer Connection) (4) Number of Residences to be NA served: 12/31/86 Page 1 of 7 Sewer Connections 314 CMR: DIVISION- OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (5) Number of Bedrooms: N/A (6) Other establishments to be served: (a) -- NA Name Address Type of Establishment Design Flow (b) NA (c) NA (d) NA (7) . Design Flow-Gallons Per Day: ' Sewage 33,200 Industrial Wastes NA Total 33,200 (8) Location, Length, Size and Capacity of Sewers to be Connected to the existing system: (Attach sketch) (a) Chickering Road, 1450 feet, 8" san, capacity = 538'. gpm Name of Street Length of Sewer Size of Sewer Flow Full Capacity (b) NA (c) NA (d) NA (9) Location, Size and Capacity of Pumping Stations to be Connected to the existing system: (a) NA Pump Station Location Number of Pumps Pump Size Pump Capacity (b) NA 12/31/86 Page 2 of 7 Sewer Connections 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (10) General Description of. .Sewers and Pump. Stations within the existing sewer system which will transport the flow from the proposed sewer extension of connection to the receiving Wastewater Treatment Facility: North Andover Public Sewer System (11) Receiving Wastewater Treatment Facility: Name: fTrPatPr T awrenee Sanitary T)iRtrint Average Daily Flow: Million Gallons Per Day Design Flow: Million Gallons Per Day (12) Does the discharge contain any industrial waste? Yes No X If yes, list any pollutants which you know or have reason to believe are discharged or may be discharged. For every pollutant you list, please indicate its approximate concentration in the discharge and any analytical data in your possession which will support your statement. Additional wastewater analysis may be required as part of this application. (13) Does the discharge contain any industrial waste containing substances or materials which could harm the sewers, wastewater treatment process, or equipment; have an adverse effect on the receiving . water; or could otherwise endanger life, limb, public property, or constitute a nuisance? Yes No X . (14) Do the wastewaters receive any pretreatment prior to discharge.? Yes X No *(See attachment 5) . 12/31/86 Sewer Connections Page 3 of 7 314 CMR: DIVISION .OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (15) List, in descending order of significance, the four (4) digit standard industrial classification (SIC) Codes which• best describe the facility producing the discharge in terms of the principal products for services provided. Also, specify each classification in words. SIC CODE SPECIFY A. B. C D. (16) Is the Proposed Discharge Consistent with Existing Sewer Use Regulations: YES: X NO: (17) Is there a site of historic or archeological significance, as defined in regulations of the Massachusetts Historical Commission, 950 CMR 71. 00, which is in the area affected by the proposed extension or connection? YES: NO: X (18) Does this project require a filing under 301 CMR 11 . 00, the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act? YES: X NO: If yes, Has a Filing been Made? YES: NO: X (19) Name and Address of Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer Designing the Proposed Syste Paul D. Sullivan, P.E. Name Unit 302 Union Wharf Commercial Street Address Boston, MA 02109 City State Zip _(617) 523-8227 40402 Telephone Mass. P.E. Number 12/31/86 _ Page 4 of 7 Sewer Connections 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL (20) Certification "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel :properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment of knowing violations. " (I will be responsible for publication of public notice of the applicable permit proceedings identified under 314 CMR 2 .06 (1) (a) through (d) . ) Dil?t5C-i c,1 j iVl G^/✓Jr A 0 132 ,4 lc / �cJ , r t•S hPr'nt d "Nof plicant Title aturcant Dat e Signed Paul D. Sullivan Professional Engineer 617-523-82: Name of Preparer Title Phone No. 21) General Conditions (a) All discharge authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit and the approved plans and specifications . The discharge of any wastewater at a level in excess of that identified and authorized by this permit shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. Such a violation may result in the imposition of civil and/or criminal penalties as. provided for in Section 42 of the State Act. (b) After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, .suspended, or revoked in whole or in part during its term for cause including, but not limited to, the . following: 1. Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit; 2 . Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; and 3 . A change in conditions or the existence of a condition which 12/31/86 Page 5 of 7 Sewer Connections 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of the authorized discharge. (c) In the event of any change in control or ownership of facilities from which the authorized discharges originate, the permittee shall notify the succeeding owner or operator of the existence of this permit by. letter, a copy of which shall be forwarded to the Director. Succeeding owners or operators shall be bound by all the conditions of this permit, unless and until a new or modified permit is obtained. (d) The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges; nor does it authorize or relieve the permittee of any liability for any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights; nor any infringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations; nor does it waive the necessity of obtaining any local assent required by law for the discharge authorized herein. (e) The provisions of this permit are severable, and the invalidity of any condition or subdivision thereof shall not make void any other condition or subdivision thereof. (f) All information and data provided by an applicant or a permittee identifying the nature and frequency of a discharge shall be" available to the public without restriction. All other information (other than effluent data) which may be submitted by an applicant in connection with a permit application shall also be available to the public unless the applicant or. permittee is able to demonstrate that the disclosure of such information or particular part thereof to the general public would divulge methods or processes entitled to protection as trade secrets in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. c.21, s .27 (7) . Where the .applicant or permittee is able to so demonstrate, the Director shall treat the - information or. the particular part (other than effluent data) as confidential and not release it to any unauthorized person. Such information may be divulged to other officers, employees, or authorized representatives of the Commonwealth or the United States Government concerned with _the protection of public water or water supplies. (g) Transfer of Permits. 1. Any sewer system extension or connection permit authorizing an industrial discharge to a sewer system is only valid for the person .to whom it is issued, unless transferred pursuant 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL_ to 314 CMR 7.13 . Such permits shall be automatically transferred to a new permittee if : A. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; and B. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittee containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them. 2 . Any sewer system extension or connection permit not subject to 314 CMR 7 .13 (1) automatically transfers to a subsequent owner, operator, or occupant. (22) Special Conditions SEE ATTACHED DEP/DWPC SP AL OdWDITHM PROV L'IRECO E ED: g � S=0150 Signature and Title of Appropriate Municipal OfficYal (Phone) (FOR ISSUING OFFICE USE ONLY) ISSUE I CTOR SION OF WATER LUTIO C ROL FECTIVE TE F PERMIT 12/31/86 Page 7 of 7 Sewer Connections (22) SPECIAL CONDITIONS PERMIT NO. 51005282 1 . This permit authorizes discharges of up to 33 , 200 gallons per day from the project specified within the permit . 2 . The project shall be constructed according to the plans received by the Department consisting of (7) sheets and titled as follows : Title : North Andover High School LOCATION: Chickering Road LITY: North Andover APPLICANT: Paul Szymanski ENGINEER: Paul Sullivan, P.E. $#40402 DATE (LAST REVISION) : September 27, 2000 Any deviation from the ajp roved 121ans shall recfuire review an a"roval from the D x2artment . 3 . Any future Sewer Connection that will: a. discharge 15, 000 gallons or more per day; or b. include a pump station except those serving one or more single family dwellings on a single lot, Shall be subject to a new and separate sewer connection permit application as required by 314 CMR 7 . 00 and 310 CMR 4 . 00 . 4 . All engineering design and construction shall insure against inflow and infiltration of the sewer system. 5 . Manholes shall be inspected for water tightness prior to placing into service . 6 . Required distances from water mains and service lines shall be maintained. 7 . The construction of the proposed sewer project shall be completed within five (5) years of the date of issue of this permit . 8 . Watertight construction. methods and materials shall be used throughout sewer construction. 9. All necessary Wetland permits shall be obtained before construction begins. ATTACHMENT-24 lv�lf� f! a r c ,h i t e c t s a n d p. l .a n n 'e r s Limifed 12 February 2001 ._Judith B. McDonough . Executive Director Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Reference: North Andover High School North Andover, MA Dear Ms: McDonough: In order to satisfy the requirements of the State's Department of Education, we respectfully request that the Massachusetts Historical Commission conduct a review of:the above referenced project. The project consists of demolishing the existing 1972 building and constructing a new high school. The existing school site contains the existing high school constructed-in 1972. Thee project.proposes to build a new 300;000 SF high school to:replace the existing`building. The existing school is inadequate in size and functionality with ineffective sound attenuations between classrooms as it an open classroom concept. The building is energy inefficient(electric heat) and in poor_physical condition. The new state-of-the-art school will accommodate the 1500 students in grades 9-12 in the town.of.North Andover. We enclose the following information to assist you in your review.of the site: MHC Project Notification Form USGS site-location Existing site plan • Preliminary site plan • Representative photographs of the existing building On behalf of the:town, our office will be submitting the project to the Department of Education by 15 May 2001 as part.of the grant application. The grant application requires project clearance by the Historical Commission and we would greatly appreciate a written.response from the Commission prior to that date. Kenneth DiNisco .Richard N. Rice Gary E.Ainslie Christopher Huston 8:7 S u m m e r S t r e e t B o s t o n M A 0.2 1 1 0 6 1 7 4 2 6 2 8 5 8 f a x 4 2 6 1 4 5 7 w w d i n i s c 0 c 0 m Judith McDonough, 12.February 2001 Page 2_ = . Should.you have anyquestions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Richard N. Rice DiNISCO DESIGN RNR/dd cc: William Allen, Superintendent of Schools Louis Minicucci,:SBC Chair Paul Szymanski, Director of Management Support Services Kenneth F. DiNisco Enclosures:! MHC Project Notification Form USGS site location Existing site plan Preliminary site plan Representative photographs of the existing building 99430 CorCty1St1Twn 10 l0/00 950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH APPENDIX A MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MA 02125 PROJECT.NOTIFICATION FORM Project Name_ New North Andover High School Location/Address 675 Chickering Road City/Town North Andover, MA 01845 Project Proponent: Name Town of North Andover, School Building Committee Address c/o North Andover School Department, 675 Chickering Road City/Town/Zip/Telephone North Andover, MA 01845; (978)794-1503 Agency license or funding for the project(list all licenses,permits, approvals, grants or other entitlements being sought from state and federal agencies) Agency Name Type of License or Funding(specify} Mass. Historical Commission Notification and Review Mass.Architectural Access Board Notification and Review Mass. Dept. of Environmental Protection Sewer Connection Permit Mass. Secretary of Environmental Affiairs Notification and Review(ENF) Mass. Dept. of Education School Building Assistance Grant Project Description(narrative) The existing school site contains the existing High School constructed in 1972. The project proposes to build a new 300,000 SF High School to replace the existing building. The existing school is inadequate in size and functionality with ineffective sound attenuations between classrooms to accommodate the 1500 students in grades 9-12 in the town of North Andover. The existing building is not inventoried with the local or Massachusetts Historical Commissions. Does the project include demolition?if so, specify nature of demolition and describe the building(s)which are proposed for lemolition. Yes. The project proposes to demolish the existing building once the new high school has been constructed. )oes the project include rehabilitation of any existing buildings? If so,specify nature of rehabilitation and describe the wilding(s) which are proposed for rehabilitation. Vo. foes the project include new construction?If so,describe(attach plans and elevations if necessary). Yes. The new high school will be 300,000 SF organized into a three story educational wing and a community wing which includes an auditorium, field house and cafeteria. Please refer to the attached schematic site plan. 5/31/96(Effective 7/1/93)—corrected 950 CMR-275 .0/00 950 CMR:OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH APPENDIX A(continued) To the best of your knowledge,are any historic or archaeological properties known to exist within the project's area of potential impact?If so,specify. There are no known historic or archeological properties impacted within the project area. What is the total acreage of the project area? Woodland o acres Productive Resources: Wetland 6.49* acres Agriculture nacres Fioodplain a_97 acres Forestry 0 acres Open Space n acres Mining/Extraction 0 acres Developed c, 21 acres Total Project Acreage 48 2p acres What is the acrea a of the proposed new construction? 12.30 acres *Wetlands soutA of the nortHern Cochichewich Brook top OT-bank OT-bank are no ince_d_._These are not delineated and no work is NAPhro osed in this area. atPis the present land use of the project area? Public Use (School) Please attach a copy of the section of the USGS quadrangle map,which clearly marks the project location. Please refer to the attached USGS map. This Project Notification Form has been submitted to the MFIC in compliance with 950 CMR 71.00. 47%1 I3O Signature of Person submitting this form Date Name Richard N. Rice; DiNisco Design Partnership, Ltd. Address 87 Summer Street City/Town/Zip Boston, MA 02110 Telephone * (617)426-2858 REGULATORY AUTHORITY 950 CMR 71.00: MGL c.9, §§26-27C as amended by St. 1988,c.254 This form must be filed with the School Building Assistance Grant Application 7/1/93 .950 CMR-276 t: , IEa ptiTT1}7ti1t� -° BMta - n to E i b� \133 All Doujo :ill , lge -. I �'" � -•., -_ � ,i ,/ '':\ i it , Project Area \, N�N � t, � � •{.its':,.... •- _ .- `� �� 1 I _ 0 y� Un 45 e' Icljr y F Icem Nf ark � !• r� + , _ 10 �♦ '. _ _ . :.- : _ P � - - -. .,h ` o •\ 1SGS Topographic Quadrangle, 7.5 minute series JORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOLa -forth Andover, MA Limited architects and planners ATTACHMENT 26 February 11, 2001 Heidi Griffin North Andover Town Planner c/o Paul P Szymansky North Andover Public Schools Greetings: This letter is to document the request and presentation made by the North Andover Bicycle Advocacy Committee and North Andover Trails Committee to the North Andover High School Planning Board on December 14, 2000 regarding bicycle and pedestrian access to the new High School. The North Andover Bicycle Advocacy Committee and the North Andover Trails Committee are concerned about maintaining a pedestrian and bicycle pathway from the existing pedestrian overpass across Rt. 125, adjacent to the High School, to the current High School driveway entrance on Osgood Street. We are concerned with maintaining pedestrian and bicycle access through this corridor as the new High School is designed, to insure safe and adequate access to the school for pedestrians and bicycles. Furthermore, this path approximates the route of the former Essex Railroad, which has adjacent sections in use as a public trail, and we want to maintain access to the High School property from this trail. Our request was for a ten foot wide path for bicycles and pedestrians along this route through the high school property. At the meeting, there was discussion by the Architect as to a limited width for the driveway and adjacent sidewalk to the school due to wetland concerns. It was stated that a pedestrian and bicycle path will be provided which travels around the planned athletic fields, but that the width of such path will be constrained in the area of the school driveway. We thank the High School Planning Board for the opportunity to present our proposal on Dec 14, and are grateful for the consideration of pedestrian and bicycle access to the new High School by the Board and the Architect. Sincerely, <signed> Robert A Naftal Chairperson, North Andover Bicycle Advocacy Committee 386 Sharpners Pond Road North Andover, MA 01845 http: //www.amateur-sports.com/nabac naftal @lucent.com Phone/Fax +1 978 960 3066 ATTACHMENT .27 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Enrollment Projections In February, 1996 New England School Development Council (NESDEC)was hired by the North Andover School Committee to develop a Long-Range School Facilities Plan. After having reviewed their report, DiNisco Design (DDP) in association with Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER)formulated enrollment projections to the 2009-2010 school year. This extended projection was to reflect known births that occurred in 1996 and will be the freshman class of 2009-2010. The North Andover School Committee provided enrollment projections and demographics as prepared by their consultants, New England School Development Council (NESDEC) in 1996. At that.time the 1995-96 enrollment for grades 9 through 12 was 854 students and projections for the year 2005-06 were 1312,students. Utilizing this Reports historical data combined with the MISER data DiNisco Design provided enrollment projections for the school year 2009-2010 of 1,500 students. This is an enrollment increase of 646 students. The students in question are either already bom or are already enrolled in the elementary school system. .Based upon our evaluation of historical data combined with previous enrollment trends, we would expect a leveling off of enrollment and a possible decline after the year 2009-2010. �r Options 9 Seven planning options were presented ranging from minimal changes to the existing high school to a new high school. All options share a common set of assumptions and are based upon the educational specifications described in Section Seven. Assumptions common to all renovation/additions and new school options are as follows: Zi, - tg�� 1. The existing building as applicable and all engineering systems will be full gg 9 ( ) 9 9 Y Y modernized, including converting the mechanical systems to gas fired equipment. _ s 2. All revisions or renovations to utilizing the existing building will conform to standards of new construction. 3. Design capacity of each option is 1,500 students. 4. The existing school will be fully occupied during construction (as applicable) and renovated areas will be phased as new spaces become available. 5. New high school options utilize the existing site. Options B.1, 6.2, and B.3 assumes limited land acquisition for a second access. 6. All options meet DOE standards and the net cost to North Andover is calculated after reimbursement. The cost of a new school assumes the maximum allowable cost offered by DOE. The cost of land is not reimbursable and is included at total cost by the-town. DDP Project No.97-407.00 13 November 1997 North Andover High School Feasibility Study Page 2.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Objectives 1. Conserve land to optimize playfields and utilize parking more efficiently. 2. Establish equity of size, finishes and equipment between existing and new classrooms. 3. Organize core facilities for ease of use by the community without intrusion into academic areas. 4. Build in flexibility by organizing classrooms and general academic spaces together. Summary of Project Costs The following summary of project costs is listed in order of descending costs to the town of North Andover(NA). Refer to individual cost options for additional information. Option NA Cost at 37% Project Cost (100%) 0.0 Renovation/Modular Classrooms $28,769,000 $ 28,769, 000 B.3 * New Senior High School ( Existing Site) $ 17,053,000 $43,657,000 B.1 * New Senior High School ( Existing Site) $ 17,055,000 $43,663,000 B.2 ` New Senior High School ( Existing Site) $ 16,894,000 $43,228,000 A.2 Renovation and Addition $ 16,046,000 $43,368,000 A.3 Renovation and Addition $ 14,902,000, $40,276,000 A.1 Renovation and Addition $ 14,767,000 $39,911,000 *James Anderson (DOE) in a telephone conversation in October, 1997 with George Blaisdell has confirmed that a new school option will be eligible for reimbursement providing that project costs are within allowable DOE regulations. Land acquisition costs are not reimbursable. DDP Project No.97-407.00 13 November 1997 North Andover High School Feasibility Study Page 2.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conclusions The School Building Committee initially had two basic decisions to make. One is to renovate the existing high school while occupied or build a new high school. In analyzing options that involved additions/renovations to the existing high school the following major issues had to be taken into consideration: , tti portions of the facility being demolished in phases,combined with an increase in enrollment during construction, modular classroom units (MCU) would be extensively required. 2. Restricted site access during 1) v b other school during U resulting in the need to relo cee at east o e(1 grade level an construction. 3. The site is divided into three plateaus. The upper two are used for playfields. The lower plateau which is used for parking and existing building can not accomodate renovation/addition construction activities, MCU's and additional parking. 4. A prolonged construction schedule (30 months)would adversely affect the education program. Simply stated,.9th and 10th grade students will spend three academic years in a disruptive construction environment. All of the new school options satisfactorily deal with the above issues with minimum construction disruption. However, in order to provide adequate traffic flow to and from the site, and additional playfields for the increased enrollment, the acquisition of additional land is highly recommended. s: 4' Presently, square foot costs for a new school fall within the maximum limits established by DOE regulations.f the costs for ew the schoo options will be required based within upon the latest ea re- evaluation o t available DOE regulations at the time. Based upon the above considerations, Option B.2 is recommended as the most cost effective and least disruptive solution. The acquisition of additional land off of Osgood Street to provide a second access to the site substantially improves all options. While a second access is highly desirable for traffic flow it is not fatal to any option. Although the costs of new construction is more than $3 million higher than renovation/addition options,the value received and minimum disruption to the educational process are significant. i r. 13 November 1997 DDP Project No.97-407.00 Page 2.3 North Andover High School Feasibility Study s' h ATTACHMENT 28 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER -- LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE 1 OF Y")q P ci z P A•IZ jqp 5 V 'P 12 Z 3vD SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP IPAR4tl NAME I ADDRESS h/o c2, n,-,i ov0fK lit(, SUlo ld (,-7,7 L r GiLF Y�f`�f Er t`a . ABUTTERS: 1 /o;z 01DoMN�� 1F'-I 44S ooh ST- 6 Gq R')(- a o rv,t . rte. `-- tv o , /q r/ o v F-'r`Z o ✓ [f�� 2 lo -1 3 I`ro R Vd!a N R (-TY 7"fZ vJ 717 q96-6- QS v o D T H ,YJ -f-;), t u D f. T � R,7-/� o/ Fi6r- 3 /ate LIqTzso ev , AR T"/+(-, O OS-6-1000 T-1 / r2;!H T Z/V Iz S Q A/ f/c)mrg- ni a v t Z ✓ s r'I?�iz G (:z Nt_ s<. q y o /TVs- 5 P MES I R-r 14-P 9 vZY7- }vJ F 54 s- 6 2 /✓ U /�u ��rzy9� i/f o o 7 REK i I`1oPI 1/qrit,-r- Tro, 3s o wrn/T l-K o T4 .,r 0 0 L/r:,\7- o �S 81 Z / 2 rz-I r IV --(•. 10 s, cS IG.LPC� � 1 �I� ac lA tv125 c� C,S�i ' fi lZ i?-'iElYT° - I �.4 tg-t G,~Z� vf IvG 12 gr K, G- >= rZ 8--/q- 13 � S O EL/-2 Q F,12 d4,S IMQZTW (4N 0VI �, Y- 14 0 17 Ki re!2[-•K c z R l,.it t== Z 17,0 X 6 33�O co R P. -Po TZ T�. ..� o f,?- 2.2 632 Q 15 y / 1 r7 EZ L aiv r) 1 dw-Y 6 / 0 c Nf/ c K Ti:T`t I o 1" 16 y s CoRI�(G� IUS J . 'Vli1c %�L.��[•/ 2 c [�/ct<t'oz-I �- /\/o f2 T'/,YL r4"/c-) Q v TZ, Q / 17 gLf wt KSt /-7 AA 1> 18 / Rc T3 Fr2 I S 21 G H/�/2 12 37 K E rc 6• t�z o,q Y-:�rZ a f S y L rZ- ,,-; T•t4 P/v sq silo rz 0/ C/Sl- I-HIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON // 0/6-0 THIS LIST OF NAMES&ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF NT ST WAS PREPARED BY THE A PPLICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. kS RS OFFIC TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR #j NAME ADDRESS 11e�+2T E 1 1 hlo��/�Z i� Eat Er1 3�t{�of (_7 G ! c K ,2/�t/G- � ABUTTERS: 1 2 6'q r Vf,'YQ t - — /-21911/ S� �W�/ • ter Z/ NO 2 e� >sfiv fZ P Y ----- L AI I h/ / G G f°�r c f� t2 s a�/ •� U 3 d 1 {`(1CrFZO ��c c'7 20 GHJ L1�1= 1rt/ 4 Z c/ < 'o t/► t—Sk L ✓ L 22 ct{IC- <(FdR G-- tzar 5 -sukaly cli 7 Rz I v fzty� vv✓ S c� / ct z3 6 3 26 _T f ry vi 6i 7 2 / g�q Tc TZ l lz 1z,.I c 7-'T' z-7- � R t�/� —o o rz Tky tqfv 0 a VZTr, o/ Pr r 8 .S E T tZ F1 9Z. w 21 N !- v'='K 0 / 9 c1 2 7 Mc Guorz lz -cR, PTZ,rS C,oT'T S 10 "2 tgC_p S E tZ v tc- emote . a-7 T'v /-/iZr� 11 7:-g a—r T f .4-r 12 z /-o st / - C/O / Yy 13 / c9 5� - ct 410-0 u 14 7 6 GIC KF/cr/✓G- t2. T� q ut.Y t^/4 lN�rz q /� �h'�q ,,,�J2 ✓� co 1 b 15 / 00 Tl4ovl-✓gS f? C,7G (jS 6QcSD ST. w vyr. 'P. Rtac�u►�LC� �r vi h/G tZ�✓.� 7"t�. i\l o tz7T,4 /Woo�X ytoiL o✓ 8�(� I�d m l3 L 4 C, i c 1 i of o /xr-,o 17 ®� p L z zo J�S p �� o lzTE s coT-r 1 F2 Tt 6z ✓ v n5a Z V.o f Z t-/ /9h/1,20 vt;-K- i" 0 THIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON / THIS LIST OF NAMES&ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF NTERE T WAS PP-.,EPAWD BY TH A P LICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. 4SSESS FFICE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR #j NAME ADDRESS NO rt AIV olla H104 s(,H4 vc- �-7s o/ � ABUTTERS: 1 Imo k�wrc- H Vel S 7C. o Go-9 2 1 I- S R F 10 v 4 v j ' (L Tc Z ass Goo D ST. lY o g:,-4 aq e-y d 'o v r°°r`? 0 61 ( gt2I4F/ r4/L ra V I — ,s q Aa Manic, < CQ f2 rrq Tr?s ig v =' i 7 01 M mq L . 6 o G P �� >✓ ivA +zT r� �/� �r orw/4— o/ T l S 8 rzr C ) — c,, 'o D s o Mr!f t(42 r A 0 l S(-S 6�ill o v r5 VQ. o 10 o lY�-r-r=� �o�✓�2 � c��` Y 12 / T 6-,1 T-6'fir K 4 itl 0 tC 1 o / 0,-44 T J 29 J>� 13 vrr,:7 -r(op o- x 14 -9 o CA 3 -o (nJrr✓ 3 J - 03 C,p 16 S�3 ��a2s ��wr —ocr�� szs 6 �� c, , �►� �r�/ cz�o�I 17 18 p1 PHIS Cpq IFIES ONLY THAT ON I THIS LIST OF NAMES &ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF NTER ST AS PREP R BY THE LICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. o \SSESSO S O FICE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR #I NAME ADDRESS ABUTTERS: 1 � F3 Ety3,0V ,rr22 2 2 Z o w V-r�71lIY r,:7°/4 :?a -7 a G �w SS.o� r RT 1hf c ✓✓�� ✓ �Z �? c� �l D -- / 3 2 Li ( ihf v t fZr' 2 1.3 a rlfod c 12.L 1— .V t'a4,S >_t—_ G3� 4 q Z`.0'Its &-g-K a, J o 7-H rV-V vim"2 ktia O/ 5 3 Zs- G c cI oy t4 A( T RIh/G J47 8 I 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 'HIS CERTIFIES ONL Y THAT ON // 02 D THIS LIST OF NAMES &ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF VTERE T S PREPAREVbY THEAPP I ICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. ,SSESSO OF'rfCE u L-ol , ATTACHMENT 5 5 Nz- gKI g ......... ........ A; XP/i::1,,,,,"/i, 4-h W INO kil -7/", W gg 1 f ik, ,4 X)u�i Z6, Vi 114"? ................ "A r N", j 14/k J, T PIV I.. ....... 164tout A �jg AN. 4' r f r�ll Jok a-111 'T V, G' ill,�7 , " I a 011 J jg F P F FIA"71111"':f A j, t P �Pq Nip,V1,107 A. RN 161 Ig Of ON,", '44" A IN 16 A` A, P, R :'46, Z Ukl%/, I �0 6, It C14 SIR go Z Mkg j, ........... RICKERIN C-, 4/9 4 xwe AAA A 10 'T/�, 7, "YOUNMIN, f n t""'W 7, A X 0 100 200 Existing Site IN IF91 F------::Il 15 November 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA NM4" P44U� L itied architects and planners ATTACHMENT 6 W "'Of Ogg mm", 1, 11 '-1 �',441W 15", 0 "Ai W *f L W, koll imi loi Je, 11j T lo� Afs ,A1 Vogl"". 20 911 A 10 X A �A IV mov" A/ X/2",21, ge, Al -A tv W, 4 ilk, 11114,011 173 J, An 4" Wlill' 4 6FIV1111 xx X"i Y) "lop IV A, Or "HI K I 1111k",/Or i-N —7- K"N6 k AD, q) 40'r N 4� 09 'j- 4, A0W 0 100 200 Site Plan 16 February 2001 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL NM4" 4��t,�d North Andover, MA N4 PMUL a r c h i t e c t s a n d p I a n n e r s f ATTACHMENT 7 TT ��y.,,"� viflti!� i i I)>rr4P�1`ri, i i ,'✓,s� ' r,,,,�✓"f f '/"%� r y/ri - �r, i �� � n� ✓ .,w �,.�/l� l / ' //ice �i///ai/r/,' ✓ r / / r� r w r.� � U ,tl Icy/r �^r e3 r V a �� a1 fi/rr r r/ IfY M yyy 1i 1 � A r / i I W �I i n I ,,...,„ � r� � .,, ,, �' J. � ! i� �i q✓m;;,ro "' Y°, ,. ,7�r w n"Y`°:. ... � �I ��: a, ,, ,, „r � r'% " �. t1i� �;;C;/f 1p ikr,�, % , �; J � x✓,gip�;- l 1 � rii; "� r -'(„ J n T 1 i 1 i r CI V u'u r i f / •�.. ,i, i 1 i% ,�.,,"; .., rr., irw;': i. �iir �.'<" � ii� la' ,,,1".,. % . I III � „�: ,„ � J�� i�0 I� � ' u r/�l u�w�C�✓�w:d.GF��� rte„ ,�- ':�, ,l�,i,:.�. ,�. �:�� ,N �m r��V ,rdi� ��, �,,,.� '.. ,,,;, � y ,. r ^„� � _„,. ,,, ,�?�ry ,... „, � r„ ,,.., riumi�mm l'. .,,..,,. r,„,..;m y r r; � ,;,.,;, ,,,;;���✓ra �Ya�,;:,,�' i I m( �l/ r r✓r 1'r � /J / �, r�L �/Yfr ,c J � i� /rxw'Pialiuu�'�,,�.� �,/r,�oJw�w�aur� ,.�✓�� �.�✓'.✓' � �� ✓r°'�#�l'sl!'�l�rGywr�, %��r.6�'��"" "" �,w�� ��mm��m�.' r.ur ur.^ �, :,,., „�,,,,,�,�,,;,,,, %/// �'�� � �o ,�,�, .�.. v�4�'u,+wHw( waiy'w .u� ,r ..,.,,,✓^,,,,,,..� r; e � I i /J io»WmWw!do-ilb✓/5urrtw� ,.�1;N9;wH*wwxrwor�wiW.nmmn.m✓smam.mmw. mow.,..,.,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,;',,,.��,,,, �.,� r..i�r,�� ,o „« ��' ,i',e;�/ �I�Y�� � W 1 �I � 7. �'`/ i1 rl/r ✓rl�/%a fl "i�� �l /arc„�ii :�,uv w,i,�,�� r ru aru;°,;,,;,," ,�,,, , � i 1�:,�%,� i �,. J?/%I i �+mnnj�+rroMnm i,ryry Cw' r°O)Yr�"�� �„ ' , ,rykr w �/�,,, �,� f� a u ?�nfriri3���vl�mr�l�r�2�lh',�,1 rfr�,�w��»r✓mn y,rle,J,r ✓�',.,.,:wu�rw,:�✓.r :.. . ,„ � �� ace✓; ,'�: �a r c „W rrfer/ r ;;/ K✓�wniAiNrvrolr;4frd> ?nr,m' +� '�»". w ^^ / r + rD1 ��� ;r/ ��a�II,J� J��;�JVmrAz�m✓mmrmrMw ©F.M.Costantino View from rin g Road - Southbound 12 October 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL o North Andover, MA t,; tied architects and planners U,":///,r�✓ a ,/�rl / /r / �l/�✓/✓G Y 1 �! r�J., .�/i � .. r �� � J re/ Jrr l�, // /„/. ////,/r>i„ r,/ ��, ///°, (�%/// 1, I ,✓ /// / /��/. „i„+ /� /j//�” /%�y�lJ�//f y�,��� ✓ �i� l!rho/ sr, l/n9>. �N I +�", �:; .. ..,. r % /i,r/�//r�»/'� .��,:w�,rm' '���'i /V`.I�aF%rir✓/ii // i �;% e /� r, ;.: »iyr�,a Drcr,,,,,,,,;,, ,r �..... �� /�.., :. ' (Il ,/" ,. ",r,�i, ry/�� f r „ h�uNraL:"ru'-�.'�li' uui N1�'ttVl« rr. r ,', ✓ Gf /„rIl T 1 'r if", I, rwl mm,' f m'''V''rtll. vrv,IiNY"lWINGYA7� wyk ," �„ -. ,„�, � V � dal : I..I w. vBraYtarY�w4n✓1�ir'�,I%�r' ' ui,�iaw w.'�aw rarr�c ? y. lY'»wm,' ur�'wvu+rnawmunumwllNWm '.. ,,: w; „�YI'i, ,,. ,., , n,✓scurRtlt,ra„ Ilaflvtiv r r, / �G% IM' au ,,. Imwnnrre. �»r/ ,, ;; v /! Y l�l �1�//tl /Jl/ r J ✓l'i /� / rr; rY/1Ioo�A u I , ,". r V L. I, r.,» � IIA,I „ ,.., „rr// !„�G r //,✓„r�fr /.. rr r I,r;,/'I' „ II u , ,r i l E// /( r” ail✓ r r / /// r/ r r,.. / ,,, / /< /,,rr Ur�l �f, a) « � lel I rw II)m I I I N' Y r v,i I Nrl ifl II YH i ul, 1 IIV fnlll f, fll rt I n�R r / 1 Ir w� l Ir 'III /... / ,.. ,,,r r r.., .r I ,J r ,r r. 1. r„ r r. �I Y t ✓, r V0, r, V II m uu I 1 81. y u U. IIII r / r„ /i ✓,n», _, /rr.:. :., / .,... .,i� / ,�,.,.�,�i l%{,hi lir n/lrf /.©, /' 'YI 9 // kk,,. / ��i, �, /I o 111/1 e; �./r,%, r.c /�� r �ti+ "r � .✓ /J /�IJ Yi/ ,�>��,f r � . i. r 1 / I u..tr,.� I� Ili //rr rr/a/ ,i /,,,,o/l .,�, r/ ✓„ ,,/, ,l,, � � I� / / / I �r lr J / /rr,:J/////r'1 ,.+ 11/l/�,,: ..,,,:, r, �l- /ii,✓/✓!� 1,i,!�� I�✓, � ,/o u 1111111 °, I l y u / / ©F.M. Costantino 'Vyiew Afrom ic rin rt n1 12 October 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL ha North Andover, MA V`-N�� Do+ P44UL imited architects and planners N' II uA l UN mYi,nr 1 r d > .v.,,.,, ,i,..✓/,/%/. ,.� i 1 G ii i..,,. l y�,!1 :�"!'. ! .,,r}a,«». m„�„-rni.ro�, ,. ., ,ro wR. aa�& o � iii�%/,,,,,.,' � i � / 1.a ✓ «, ,� �ulR�. � pr„/,`r�I /1 c ��/'r �r�%�"%� �/�„,�,,.,.. ✓ >» ;% �„r- r � y '/i � 1 �,"'�� .lug ul���i � '.,., n,, � ��t� y ,q.„;� il%�,, ;?// r � "`' �"l�ff!�flrir�/,�;.tm:J �'rdnw�/fHrrl"oiw ,✓nl�r r, �l .... � „q r > ✓n,.,.,,.,.,. . � �li., / ! J.,.� 1 i � ,�, ,. lea /., ..a%/ f M it �, r / 1, / �,/,�, ,, ,,, / l/ / /, ;, ,�r„ ✓r,/!nr /- G r 1 4,u- NI MI r� �l /i� ✓ /.. 1. id4 NN. . ,..° �,�,; , ,..,„ l �/�ri,,,r�f���/� J ➢ ,j��6 ,s. �,o, "` ,�;ll0/ ��. � ��r'`%' I ,/� ,'p� vri„d� ., �,tl �flwmU9l i / �J� �1 ' INK Wired g u r � �,.✓ ,,,, ,,. /, iii✓�, ,l f r�r� r, �� ,- / I I r r / i r i i ✓ / i �, „l � l�i; f r I ,�.... r. ✓ ,,,✓..,�, ,//m/ii .�/ r„ Nil,,� r;. ,,li � �� 1� � r� � � i :f G I 11 r ��IN gipuy u n 1, L .,,1 Gr / ✓� r, � � � 1, si. �/ ��� / ✓ i� aw ' r 1 rU l r, c, rn1 � I i ,. /.✓ ur �. it ,. . .�,.. � /1 i� / i.. , f, i../�/Nrd/Irrmi➢rie,,.., r d�,�l 1/�,.:� ���li� I�rSI�JU9G°raw,�.,,,, .,,,i ,„,,,; „,�//.!i%�%�,�/���Il(������//,�%llf�l!II/���//nfi�p�/�///,iii! ©F.M.Costantino View from Southeast 12 October 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA Limited architects and planners Pf � /, ,.. r v/ ri, ///z."„r, ',,. ”, J!,,,, ✓l!'/f'/ 5101 ,.a !. /:��v�//„ /,,,,, ,„ '"`' , r/,j,/r, ;,,it rrr,,, �f r „ i�/,/ ,,,,, :,, ,,,„ i/ ,✓i / :✓ /, r � " fp/ ,...,. r r /,,% ,,, ,r „... ,.� ,r ,.a �r�ry ./ rr,/,//,.. r :,,. ✓c ,. �.;rr-.r,, „, Ii %...r ���/.rr/�r�l//l�,,r ,,,r �/: „✓ �i,,„ / :"r�,!' . P/,i r r n,. ��1 /Jy„ 1%Of /r.:, /, ,.,,,. „�r,;,' ",,;,' .:, � ,// ra. 'r', �����1„r ar � r�� „u 1//., r�✓ !y /�/ o,,,/J"Ji�� /y„ � r;, ,,, / /yb ,, yr�1 vrNas� � �/u, X,r, �; > �„- ,, r !✓ / ,rr(��ll, i/.°» r �-` /�,, /' ,r //„ iii l // � ,d / ,;.. ,�".. of /,,,,,:,,„r;:rr r,,:.. ,r�' '�, r, , �r t ,r_J,r! -� �', � ,,. � ,, ”„ n✓iar �� r�, In � GL X;,.. ,,..� r / ./ 1 /,a i .,( // :.�'rr, ✓.. ,.. rm, ,... rrNl/i/',/. :,,,id �.. ✓„ ,,,,-. � ,: r; „;, / � ,. rr r F, / /r/.r 1 ,,-rl / r�Jy r, ,,�/, i r�,�� ,, , /,.r,,ir/I / r,,,, r 1 „; / �, //,,,./ JJ/.r r, r / � / 9� r, r /, c a; ,M„ ,, r ✓„ »�%% ✓ r,,, / / rrr r / ,,�r, / / r« r , �., //,t ..9, '�;,, � `r-... �.. r.. � a,. /f// r ,u �/� r! -:v„ %1/, �' ., �b ,„„„^"r ,,�u � J✓/ r „r i, /�,� .,,.,, r s .,,.ri.. ✓ L.r � /�� ,u /!/�,a✓, rrr,r o� ,,, ,,,, k, y >: ,., ,�r, /„. ,r //, /��,�., �, r r /JJ�”'/r VV ,, 1 rrr r ✓,. ., f r/�, / �� yin , r ��✓ . / , , /, r' k r,rr� ,, � �y , ,/ mow, r, �, r „ „ r /, � r/ /, / , ,,,, �u', ✓, r jiv „,,... � ,..,r7 r r � / i J ,„, rXNlr ,y �. 1 i ,X:.. ✓ v,�_� r r rr,r„ ,, 1, ,; ,,, „( m r IIIIJ I, ,,,, I / r/ r .✓,,,, r,' 1�, , -c„s„ n, r„ ,,,,,, .;-,,, ;;: �-rrr- i ,n ,,, r „r//e,a;.. !. t: °i �� N/r,,,, ,� a � rw. r, �//i/9 �r"✓, .r' r �'� _,,Y� a>, „�,, r r �/✓r,, e ur�I rN�r r,,,, / r/// r,,, r r r � r�; /?, ,f ,i!I � s F,` �> r/, r 7u n1 e ,,' r ✓ r , ✓ r ,r."IXr r /:, Ur,r � ,r e :.o r, ,,, „r „mw✓; �,.,.«N, di,/!l ', ,:,,,,� ,., ,«G,7�i, ,,,, ,✓ir,:, rC¢, r,,, r ,,,p/„ l( r,s.:G/ /,:/i,r, ,.,»a r� Ni �' � ;. �,,,; Icy ,,,, , 1, i „ir r'„i r ,,,,.✓ dX/ _: N;:>,,,, ,,. 1,� », ”- a, v ,;- .,, '��' o o„, :r � „�,r. ✓r .,,�r '� ,//� r r _.,r,>. ,�/rl,/!�X„', „�,.,.. vX If ;-.: �;.... lti:: f 1,.,.: '(m`.; rr;. / .. � r,,, %r!%?� �. ,,rr » a ;Y /J�i ✓✓r,r >,%»�r/ ( ., r n � � r» ru,,i ��1i Jr r ,,j�, �'I ,! ,r � ,,, „i r/,y ,,, /r ,//,J/':. X r /.y,;, y ,r„ or✓l,r r a,/,1� ',�� /;: �/rxn.; r„l, r; ervr;” ./;, of , ;"r%k wr ,,,; 1 y;, rr r „ ,,,,,? „r,� ,,, ,v1r,arlr rJ, �, r r„ ,� n✓ ��, ,� //, r / r r,,,,Fll N, ; ,�'� i r /�;, r,„�r d�� NY ,,,, /r l ;.,ii V r* y!✓r, r. ,,,, e,eLV uG � >r� %6; // „0/%:a „r�,, ✓ ,,,,rf, � :, ,,, „,�1 ,? „%, r; rr�` ri ,',a ri /;., ,, /i r.;, ,,,,, ,cA„ r,,,/4 'I” ,..1 „ ,,dN, ,m. ,. r ,,,, ry/ ,,,7r .fir f ,,.r: ,wn„ ,r � „ii/f/ ;, ';;dw,.; L��lr o y: � ,1. ,r• r�;,;;, ✓ / ✓�� : !;' � bn,nXv1Gr;; iWl '%%niMe � n rNn✓ 1, X7iyN � % � X�l 1 ,A' ^rn/ ur, r, r ✓ r r X/;,,f 1 Xr%J/' l+x' f,' X x r ✓ /” w / „i, r/ r% l dLrc 'r � ✓ /�� �(r r� IpJry Hlr l e I /;,, ✓ �l r,' r n rr' ,rt � �"tr» �,!1/ ,c �, r,, r' v �i�ri�fr �X/ I�r ���' r g r, , y7 ,.sir v ✓/, p9 , a,. �� , ,,,;, .. ,,.� �� „ � �, ,/,rf �%;%� 1. /%/ ✓/✓ „� i r/ r:-. /r�� "9; �k,„,wr ,,,.;. /.. "*ii.;r ,__ ... ,;, r, i,/ ,rvs,� r ,/ f�i ////✓,. r%�/i� /: l � � / /�� r r / / � ,. ,,;� � ,,/a ,. ✓ /a J � � �-/„; � r � emu' a r�/r�� � � r rrlla�iii�lirllr t i ;/� as w, w.� ,;;/ r n w,.n ,� � /��➢INrX Y� IN', "I � / ,tea JN1yJ , ..�.. . r r f/ r n)✓ r�i///� r „ „.. ,rPn r:r � r„n �� f�%�,i;. ✓p,,Y /�! ..,,:, ....,.,. e r,;:�'” .,, ,rr ,,;-; ;;y'+ //r/a ,,,,{�i".1�Ff°�,,,a� ,�'" '�/ Ji/All ,'"' I r uP III/, i r u r„ ©F.M.Costantino South Entry 12 October 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL a Noah Andover, MA P444L i architects and planners x V , w I N I I r 1 ,,,��iPl����'`���^� � r !, � ✓. / i I r%U,� // �� ��, , flr/u ! rN✓ „r, ; x�`''%,� W ypy„^ryra , r/' N it r i � u 1 fIl S �r Yi V1; I"I r, I' Y I b / !w - r �ei� ;,' a // r ✓ x�.� // C//%rr/xr � n. �!/ I �{ .., ..r l, r � r1 � f,.x,�;�o,. p,., If.,, n � I "fV „ �., � //�„-:,r�, ,,.... ,,% ,... ,,, ,,,r;// .,'F � l/,,: .:�., �,,, �, i, p ..�trl� ✓% ,%�1,�e yr,: I�/„5 ,,, I (i", ^M �tll j. I �u i t ,�;/ nt „, r, IXr,%lJ/1P , 1 � �, '��I�>✓N � � r r „r,1p���/ /;i it a ,,,il,� i)I +,,,;n p r "„ qi t r' rr 'r ,i `°,;•„ ,;, 1., "Vdr,,,..., ,l,r , ,r ° 'l N�r�/,//,� �IVI ,���� rH>N�/ ,u+ .�,� ,(r ;.� ;b n 1 { k 7 J,. r; i:.' /,.j�^ �;, '” l,�,, / r, I,a.., , f�„�,:,,✓3�, IY ,u ,,r,, ,,,.,, ,�I 1 ✓�/'a rr � Yi a %�� �%(',':,, ��r` nM II i. i ,;� x�x .a r:-x'"% 1 �� l/ �/,,,� � r;' / �/1'" %!i�//✓ ��// 7 u' %� j if �� i ,rv,.. �✓�`` ! ;,„,,, rr/ir ,r ;. '.a, bAiG,^ :; ,,;,,,,, (. (;r” l�r� v, ' ;,�,.N`IIJ,„�{l/,/r' 4�;. ,r / �^'�"�^ ; a,l ,�,.,. a,H�m�ww•,n'r „„ >;r”' "'", ,a, ,N r '":1% � ( l,': ,,, /l ,c', „„S'�';,,, i rar ,�' ;,,; Y ,' � f.�, ,/ h� , <.,/, "• ,,,,,,,,".:`� G', � ,�/ y .,:e s 4 ,,,, ,, r�� ,'. �II y!',,;:. om�, y'�/r�n�:' i�1�.! i✓� „r a�" i�ri,. gin..„ ,. „;,, /� 'N'N "' ��"/vl�" � r �i%✓�� � it Ir,N I�� i,, , %ni„ ;( rr a �, ,. ',: aM/r✓�r� �J ;q'rz a, ,.., �„,11' � � r"� ��,r � � /i M I y a !Illir n%� ;'fir� /w / ;,t i 9 ', .f �r„. j ,�.. ,? �;¢ �i/% ''✓/�//��, ;r /,Y///✓' Q � ,,,;,,. ��,1 IWI� x ,rn rre, ,,.,,� I -�l; ,: _, ,., r u 1:' ,�/I r ,%/ ,,i(I r i „ l � r i I ImPrOIM n i i I�W�uu ,,,;.. +( rbr ,,. d r rY/ra,/o//r/�In / l / %iii n /Y � „ cp F.M.Costantino East Courtyard 12 October 2000 MOMMUMMEMEMEM NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA a Do+ Limited architects and planners ATTACHMENT 16 /* /* /* > < /* /*X 00 0 CZ:D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-=�----- ---------------- ...... ...... 0 100 200 Site Lighting Photometric Distribution Plan N 16 February 2001 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA P444PIL ,itd architects and planners ATTACHMENT 17 H.B. Prop.Line 149' f r / _ w k ',. .. „ ,,,, :., . ..v.,.,_. ,,. ,. .... .,, ,v° ,.,.. ;1 :;. yr .,,:,,r,r, „_„ ,r .,,,, F. 2Y r✓l %.).,r(': l ri l„ P.r:":, s a, 1. ,., ", ,,,., ..., ,f,,, ,. „✓.,.,./... ,.,..:.v ...:: .,x,.r, , f';: / .,,, r, / SITE 5ECTION 'A' 125' x v ✓ d iri/?� %/a r+lr � f / r ✓ f x r � rr a ✓/ / fi :'x'i / ° �:, r / Y / t(r r-/ !r sra r:.� �1 ff� r. / r lw ✓ r a nm/ /ml.: 'w r, '. d ,,,,:..4 ,. ,e ,. .:.rw l / ,,::-.u, )e„ ( f w rr e ✓ a x r,;:.,,l:„/C' r :. ,,.. ,,.,,. ✓,:r ,._... „✓ 1,,,. „i, . .'' r rld x<;. /. ,_ v.,s;#zl. ,w..� c /.:. ,.,,: ,,..r -,e r ,r-,: ,.._;:'. .„ ...., ,..,_ .>, r,7 F+,,: �rf.^,.,✓ a W i :,.mot„ 6 .,,r / „l / , r�.; ..x,,. ,., / ,rf.,.r ., ..fir,✓. ,r r,':f,r.. ,u..r.: ,r/. ,. ,,../, .., ... ._... r , ,,, i.. ,.1 .. ., ...:r. „ ,,.xe ,. ..... .. ,,,”,_ 1.':, .Yr rr:.; f rr r r..,v ,. ,,.,. ,"Y rr:.✓ m ,., ,, :;.. , , ,.. .... ,i n: r✓.a, ,.,' r., ,v.' r ,» i...,., ,, i, .,.. /!.. ..,,l..,x ,rt.,o- „ x, :,f, ..,. .. , .,,,r ,. ,.,. ,,,. ,..,., ,✓ Lt,r. ,,, .,,,r.._. , r ,. v ✓,..,rr:.,,,.. arm riJ/: ...,G,. r,,._., r, ., .,✓ „'ra, r'.. ✓ ....,. / X , A ,,...: r r _ 4, .,: m::xr !r... / / .. ,,..u,;:;. :«. ... ... ,, r,..1... . m r Y.�.,/e.., ,. .:✓. x�' ,,,., ,..:/...:Y.l.l .l.,u::n.,, r r:n,,,.i,..,. ,/�.r,.. ,rr l � ,,,.,.,,,r( f ,J,,,,:s4, „✓,. µ r,r:..,, ..,..:.. t ,, " ::../, ,,.i 1 l ,.,z,. ... ,. r / ,,,, :.�'�.. L ✓.. ,,. ,,,/' . ,y w.,, ,r c v, ..:. .,,,, l ,./:,.:/, u.. 'r".( ,4r. :.✓Y,t l, / ,f[r1�'_ ,rr r. _. .: ,,,, ., ,., r ,fr", l r I,.. ,n ,+.. n r v/ ..,. / ✓./ r ,v;,:rs ,,. ff _. , . r ,.. r ..::: _.: .r. . r ,.. ::u l ,.,. ,,. ,,, ., _, � ..::,. ,.,r,. ,. ,. .._.,,.,_,r,,✓.. ,< ,.r r .rf �rc.r m r T l J r SITE SECTION 'E' 0 40 80 Its Section 14 February 2001 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA architects and 1) lanners ...a: ;# i rya a: •,. ,."I i �,'�'X� J r / : , �} r , ., _ . r . ' ",., 'n:'. a ,.,.,. .•d. .:, :r>,.. x :� ;. : >,-..,, ..,. :vf , . �^a}:.' r _ ✓., ,,,r.> u9 Yi£S.e't� <-•w.a,. xr., Y r., s«*..,. .. .. '•, A.f > .., �. , «,. . .. / .... s,.A , `:s a". .4,T, Y; a\ +i*Y.SC. .m: rv'. :u�. ..,.a,.. >xr'..' '4. '- ,. ,..:,te-as .. ,'. ..- '. .. .._,... .. r ..,: 3' ,,, ,. yy .;.x ".-Y..��e � J >+• i; ry:si t�'F;S.<., fi., y.... ..w .+-. ,,.$, a,", ,,._ ..... : . ,... .f.) d\ -•7,`., ,�A p `"�.: � `r>r x' !"�• , .,..r.�.:....' ,.., 1... .,:,�:... :..,.yk�... :. s,. ..... ... •. ..,,As. , :. ,y, �.. .k ,f , v°7,' :� �� b,.. i:'� �.�,ar .�.K- '"dr�"n �..v .. fs ." •-,.r ?.c-..., k. r'�'at,.,.r.., ,.. .:,.: ^ y'q , .,. xS?"a L'' ,,I l.Y�k" 1 �- ..ur,wf H. P Jg 7. F c „' , ,.•.s, 4 4 k #`; ""'. n-.� �,ro" t, J � �� ,�c�,>r •., � :.'1„a'*�,5� `7 crs[; y. y' .. a )'; -.`' t '• •_ _ ::. •7.^,.rte "cx� 'l' s;;;ti, ,�; � try '��,, ,�, {�,�",��, 2 :Py "' ^$ : ,•:Su,. .a,..°,... .'r.w ,' . St«< �; ,' t� �,:ca+'C�`Yr '^: ., �• .1,x,4., , Y ,`,. ': '.;S '� '.';«r:� :.... t ..•.?_ �. #,., Y, .d'�2; t.:!^,..�"X`f`.'`.. '1y. f''.'.�`A^Y^14,.�^k.a�kr'i,ay' a, 4 x Y it t„ i ra , _.,. /" 'M ,: •: _ �.. .';��fr`,rn..-. ., W'� ""r a. .,.� ,r � ", ,... s �w} I s f,� ir:. \ f - : p • 1 / ! r 1 a , f , .�,� .. r..' ,_.'� .." .>: ''emu. '}` (�' 4 $r x 4, r cr;.,.r• .. r Y;- ,r • , r' Si .;.g .. ";�` ., " Ya°� -: ... .r '4?y,..,- .t�� I 1 �w«,• nR'.,6'� �"� ��� ,Yr'`? r dr�F ',. , -4, �.}� C' yl, �t r ru. W A, 4 ,C +-- ,. _ ..r � .. 4s " ..ad .... .- •. x. , y °'r." ,"°'�"�f 7 V. .a4 a.\,_,.. 4;r. `e.. r , 1 1 k .g,. , r i:. J.-'.' � .::`v."'� ^'*•s4rq?$..! $: �fi «„pt, • ..� r I �, r _ m.•..4 ,7 .:x as r. ,...�• _ ., ., .. ;:i�i�.+;"",'.fir' .- `• ..� .� s .. ..;i%. � � .*'�4.`r,, �,*¢, .5 � i✓�s, �',�,.. � / i -'x. :'�P v+`< �"• !'� ,'9..^ :.. t I, x � f� .j'yyy '�" x� 7'id,' { a� "i3Lad ' � � \` ♦ 'a , y Jv.�7,f i t , - . ... -. :.. +(`'. :,. - .. .. :..:,; ..„ .,'-, � •.� l' .� 't,'•[yi ! ,iGS+Z2�,RU",62"LY'.F.ti4'P �'� I'+ ,. , y `1 �r 7 � r , «t' ., ,ricer �. .- .Mk ¢ �' ._".. ,�: t ..,. K /i .J yy5 ♦T'd :L' .. J �.. ^ "!� '� .r'' � ��,,, �.�•r Y' ri' rev � 1. ��"��� r;', �t-;� r #'��:; �:.. �b�'- ..�;:. z�•,t.,-. a`Y ^-,'"r,;. %r-.'k,,. �r^v'�'.-`s a, :,:...- ' ^"*"`�i�4 k.� to'F+,. �j'_ � �:r�� k , �. :;,� � 'j ti.�•^" %...,.--�t,Y�'/ ✓i: .::', "� �., �7:?y�', � "�' %I � 1/��`\�U\.r4.•.. "r ,'r, I.�' .r 'rw '_r`-'`',,�i"�' :. • � ��`�..:.: ��.�' ♦ �� Y:::.. ;r e c `,y ,f �� d / /r7�Yr ' X� e,r r, .i,.`K . �y '.f„��,-,•.' \♦ J„. P�� y �'« `` ,�.� ,"%. r "` { L�u*�r4 S��4 r y��•��lt*--..'�z >r'� `�cK r.�,ti+' .s: , \ j.:+ f`* f z% �a ..,~ 6d "•`' ,c 'S.'^a' 2 JL Y ....,..,_ h`t'. ., � (.;:, : �. x.?vn •l.. ..�' .. ur. , l c 4�,1 >-#�„�', '� * ��y}.�i',trt'rT SS ! ��: '�b .. F. a�; �f.w,i5RlSae ...E,,�,x ,. f ii'=• ^. h 1 1' �. ^y� L :. 4';�, .. �. # r.. " ro t: � a' l•,,,. y.- ' 4{ t�� ti.if r rt' n'C ;d"sc 4�r s v .,� t Af � � e y^ -, - - —' � 5'?. r rr.3'ro'wYXt a vr;,z 3v:$•",.m.rf7 ` = KK .. :. .,;.y .^s r ,., > „',�,... ,-,�:-: .' ' _ .,+r. rri+ w. r +%- .. rt- °`' y,• bwq^, •.W -�' r :I Via' ]h ERfNG ( SAD ' �. T- .__ '" ICK �> : �.,:.. �J..,,�•nryx.�f;, w. '` •.. '- �+ t a�� - ,%'�`9'as'�.. � *�lrAlxN' ° �yy3r;�,:.,,,^ria...._, y I y-�---!'� 2+' � .� - yy{r ,—:r �' .,. .' .. 5,�.,�.,-„w., "s}�jwR''<+r,,,: .'S,.Yr p'/ r �: �� �"'�. =i —_1.++� e,st"- �:.,. ,� - ........ ._- .... •.. r .. - , � l IA 0 100 200 Site Plan N 20 December 2000 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL North Andover, MA °f�f° • Limdked a r c h i t e c t s a n d p l a n n e r s / r ATTACHMENT t / r 1 / / D J / / M / I r f / � r ..nu 1' r• .,. .,,..M,„... 7 r i � Fad ,�„ i View of Proposed High School r / / s r / � � I r N , y ( I , d U," Exsiting View Panoramic i Neighbor's r r #1 - Mark & Kimberly Ili i , 660 Osgood Street 16 February 2001 MEEMMEMEEHIMM NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL d g North Andover, MA Limited architects and planners / l r / l f � a / / rrr � ...rrr x f� f r ,. / / s J A it y u i ,f ;sins; View of Proposed High School with Planting Panoramic i Neighbor's r #1 - Mark & Kimberly Ili i nc , 660 Osgood Street 16 February 2001 NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL m � North Andover, MA P" Li4ltd4q m, architects and planners