HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence - 178 STONECLEAVE ROAD 6/25/2003 Page 1 of 1
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Sandra Starr[sstarrc@townofnorthandover.com]
Sent: Wednesday,June 25, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Pamela DelleChiaie
Subject: Re: 178 Stonecleave Rd -Status of Septic Design -Call Required
I probably will not be returning any of these septic status calls and will expect you to respond after checking the
file or getting info. from me.
This plan has been reviewed but I forgot it at home and can't remember what the problems were. I think there
were some.
S
----Original Message----
From: Pamela CeHe iaic
To: Sa ndra Sta n
Cc: Pa mOa DoHeChi ie , 116°6 Gaiffin ; fS6an LaGrass
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: 178 Stonecleave Rd-Status of Septic Design -Call Required
Mrs. Patricia Burba called looking for status of design plan. Please call her at 978-682-5828. No file in active
drawer. Assuming Sandy has file.—p.d.
10/6/2003
Bill Dufresne July 17, 2003
Merrimack Engineering
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. Dufresne:
Please be advised that the proposed plan dated 5/20/2003 for the upgrade of the septic system at
1.78 Stonecleave Road cannot be approved as submitted. Issues are as follows:
Because there is a private well on this site and an individual subsurface sewage disposal
system,the site comes under Title 5's nitrogen loading rule as noted in 310 CMR
15.214(1-3). This section of Title 5 states that under nitrogen loading, a maximum of 4
bedrooms per acre of land is acceptable without additional treatment being required of
the septic system. The additional treatment treats the effluent and limits the amount of
nitrogen released to the ground. Under 310 CMR 15.217 some alternative technology
may be proposed for this site to allow additional flow. According to Claire Golden at
DEP NERO office, the RUCK.system is approved for general use and a nitrogen credit,
However, it is approved for a maximum of 550 gpd, or 5 bedrooms. This is also the case
with the recirculating sand filter—550 gpd. Those approved for provisional use, that is,
must go through DEP, and can be used for up to 660 gpd are the Bioclere, Micro
FAST, Modular FAST, Zenogem and the single home FAST. Those approved for
piloting are the Amphidrome, Singulair by Norweco and RSF. Please call Steve Coor at
DEP for further information and clarification.
Feel free to call if you have questions about the content of this letter.
Sincerely,
Sandra Starr, R.S., C.H.O.
Health Director
Cc: File
Homeowner
Page 1 of 1
From: "Dan ®ttenheimer" <info @millriverconsulting.com>
To: "Heidi Griffin" <hgriffin @townofnorthandover.com>; <blagrassetownofnorthandover.com>;
<pdellechiaie @townofnorthandover.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:41 PM
Attach: Stonecleave Road#178 Plan Review Letter.doc
Subject: 178 Stonecleave
I iei i, Brain and Parn
Ataac lq i :;d please e t'ind H')e plan review lella �r. for .fit � 78 ;,' cane(.'.ieav-�`� S� r ref. i i.ie�re r,ue -:
nur�nber c-.�t t��nis ir.r needs s c:,t c:�tic�n ion, Most signi�ic.:c nfl Ih design uses a leach field
when in this instance the regr. laiions wc)(.fld require le(_ .Ji 6�renches. There are also a
number, of sr'n ll r Hngs which i t,.hur°ik are ih re because this is an oNcJer �:,lan an
Merrin ack hadn't yet rnade SOME� Of these w..r�rrecii(Dr s on sr":,rne of h(E-1ir r 9andr.rd
drawings and no es. 6 (;:ii o made fwo sr.rc gr s ions of the end tr:x. then-.I .[o consider
wwi,kh wwo. ..wld reduce fl°ie c.os� of consr rucfion and rn interiancr e.
Dan
n
Mill River Consulting
Septic Systern Management Services
5 Bio(,-,-kkr ur.n Cen er..
978 X82- ?14 (Dr. .i-t )0 37/ ; 044
fax 9782820012
irrtcCr,.r°uiiiricrrrt �. n,.rrru.witir�w� .w n
10/6/2003
Page I of I
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Lagrasse, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:27 PIVI
To: DelleChiaie, Pamela
Subject: RE: Plans to be sent& Follow-Up
dan should have this one on his plate. i only signed off on the building permit application
-----Original Message-----
From: DelleChiaie, Pamela
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:25 PM
To: 'Daniel Ottenheimer(E-mail)'
Cc: Griffin, Heidi; Lagrasse, Brian
Subject: Plans to be sent&Follow-Up
Importance: High
Hi Dan,
It's the last day of the month, and guess what I have for you....three more plan reviews. They are as
follows:
151 Abbott Street-Revision (NEES)
105 Sullivan Street-Revision (Engineering & Surveying Services)
191 Granville Lane-New (NEES)
I will be sending these in the mail today. Also, is Brian having you finish up on the 178 Stonecleave
review, or is he doing that? Let me know. Thanks.
Pamela DelleChiaie, Health Dept, A ssistant
Town of With Andover
Community Development, eivices
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 0,1845
pd(-,�lle(,I-tiaie@towt-ioft7oithandovet',com
Tel. 978-688-.9540
1-ax 978-688-,9542
10/6/2003
OF NORTH ANDOVER
�'„iOffice of COMMUNITY DE I� ,,OP 1f1 AND I ER lf"E
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
27 CHARLES STREET'
,i
(,)P"t"t:t ANE)OVER, ASSM"'I 11,JSFITT'S 0 184 5
97&68&95 40
Acting Health Director 97&688,9542- FAX
September 30, 2003
Bill.Dufresne
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Parr Street
Andover, MA 0181.0
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road,Map 104B,Lot 129
Dear Mr. Dufresne:
The proposed septic system design plans for the above site dated May 20, 2003, and revised
August 1.8, 2003 have been reviewed, Unfortunately,the plan cannot be approved as submitted.
The following items are in need of attention prior to plan approval:
1. A note is required stating the building sewer shall be laid on a compact, firm base.
(3 10 CMR 15.222(5))
2. Please specify building sewer joints to be watertight. (3 10 CMR 15.222)
3. Tees on septic tank must extend 6" above flow line. (3 10 CMR I5.227(l.))
4. Three (3) access manhole covers are required and are shown in the tank detail top
view but are not shown in the tank detail section.
5. Inlet and outlet tees must be located on the centerline of the tank and it is not clear
from the plan that it shall be required. (31.0 CMR 15.227(1))
6. The septic tank, pump chamber and distribution box must be placed upon 6" of
stone which has mechanically compacted soil if is not native. Please indicate this on
the plan to provide greater clarity to the installer. (310 CMR 15.221)
7 Tees may not be replaced with"pre-cast concrete tees" as indicated on the design.
(3 10 CMR 15. 227(l))
8. The pump chamber must be state a loading on the plan, (3 10 CMR 15.226(3))
9. The pump chamber must be specified to be watertight. (310 CMR. 15.22 1)
10. The inlet elevation and details of construction of the distribution box have not been
provided. (3 10 CMR 15.220)
1,1. Watertightness of the distribution box has not been specified. (3 10 CMR 15.221)
12. Please provide pump calculations to demonstrate the findings achieved on the design
plan of 40 gpm at 6' TDH.
13. Please explain or modify pump note#7 which describes calculations for a 6
bedroom dwelling when other calculations are based on a 4 bedroom dwelling.
14. Please provide detailed information and specifications for the control panel and
alarm. (3 10 CMR 1,5.220 and 23 1)
15. The system profile is not to scale, (310 CMR 15,220)
16. Trenches are the required type of soil absorption system when using pressure closing
of effluent. (3 10 CMR 15.254)
17. Please provide the location and elevation of the foundation drain. If there is no
drain, please make a statement to that effect on the plan. (NA 8.02y)
1.8. Please indicate that removal of soil horizons Fill &B shall extend at least 6" into the
suitable soil of the C horizon. (NA 9.02)
19. Please provide distances from the septic tank and soil absorption system to the
dwelling,and property line. (NA 8.03)
20. Please clarify the note which appears to read"scale waiver requested replacement in
same location". It is unclear if a variance is being sought from either state or local
regulations.
21. Please reference specifications for the sand fill to be imported far construction of the
soil.absorption.system. (3 10 CMR 15.255)
22. Final grade over the leach facility must indicate a slope of 0.02ft/ft minimum. (3 10
CMR 15.240(10))
While not a reason for disapproval, it appears you may be able to;
1. Utilize a smaller pump and reduce construction and operation costs. It
appears that the 0,5 horsepower pump specified could possibly be
replaced with a smaller unit,
2. Not designing based on 900 sq, ft, of soil absorption system but on the
design loading rate as specified in state and local regulations.
Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to
working with you to obtain a replacement septic system which will be in compliance with all
regulations and assure the protection of public health and the environment of North Andover.
Sinc,c�rely
�"
non Lagrasse
Health Inspector
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir,
File
TsAlXP 7 fMf 7
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 0 LAND SURVEYORS 0 PLANNERS
66 PARK STREET•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01810•TEL(978)475-3555,373-5721 -FAX(978)475-1448^E-MAIL:merreng @aoi.com
November 17, 1003
y .off
Mr. Brian LaGrassew '. '.
Health Inspector
Town of North Andover
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. LaGrasse,
We are in receipt of your letter dated September 30, 200 i"�We have revised the plans to
address all your concerns with exception to those pe ning to the pump and specifications.
We have additionally reduced the height of the A.S. by I foot and are submitting a formal
application and request for a local upgrade roval.
Granting of this request will reduce th pound in the rear yard and eli minate the need for a
pump system thus reducing the over, replacement cost by$4,000.00 to $5,000.00.
On behalf of our client, we resp tfully request this design be approved as resubmitted.
Very truly yours,
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES
William Dufresne
Project Manager
ed
4 r ORM 9A. Application for Local
Upgrade Approval .
Commonwealth
(City/Town) a99flc�lllg�$t3
Title 5,.�10 CMR 15.000 APPROVAL
DEp Form
Required by 310 CM 150403(1)
Form 9A is to be submltted.ta the Lo
uanconforming septic sYsit�m with a design cal Board of Health for the u
defined in 310 C1V1It 15.4041 gn now of less than 10,000 d upgrade of a failed or
( ),is not feasible. gp ,where full compliance,as
System upgrades that cannot be performed in accordance
compliance wetly the requirements of 310 C'V R 15.000,rc u�t 310 CM 15,404 and 15.40,5,or i
15.410 through 15,417. n full
q . a variance pursuant to 314 CVIIt
1V'C1TE:Local upgrade a '
new design Praval s 1 not be
ga flaw to a cesspool or. to ° upgrade proposal that includes
capacity of a septic system co vy,or the diti f a new design'
he addition of a
nstru ed in acca t either the 1978 ode or the g approved
Facility Address: 17 MR 15.000.
Facility/System owns City n: if v
Address:
City/Town:
Telephone: State:
Type of Facility(check al at apply):
Describe facility PP Y)� esid 'al ®In - anal
E3 Co ercial ®Schaal
Type of existing system:
Privy � Cessp l(s) onventianal,System
r(describe
Type of soil absorption system(trenches,chambers,leach fie
Design F field,pits,etc)
g love per 310 C1141t 15.203:
Design.Design flow of existing system
Deli flow ofproPosed upgraded system�Wgpd� d
gn flow of facilitygpd
Proposed upgrade of system is: 91Voluntary EI Req t u'
red by order, letter,etc.
(attach copy)
(�Required following inspection pursuant to 310 C
Provide date Of inspection / 15.301
F012M 9A . Application for Local Upgrade Approval
Department afEnybomental Protection
Page 1 of 3 DEP ApPmved form
—3/20/02
r f
Describe the proposed upgrade to the system IJ E
Local Upgrade Approval is requested for:
❑ Reduction in setback(s) (Describe reductions)
❑ Percolation rate for 30 to 60 min/inch Percolation rate min/inch
❑ Reduction in SA$qu.of up to 25%
(SAS size and%reduction) SAS sq ft Reduction %
Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater
Separation.reductio n Percolation rate 7. min/inch
Depth to groundwater ft
❑ Relocation of water supply well(Explain)
❑ Other requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 that cannot be met
Describe and specify sections of the Code
.If the proposed upgrade involves a reduction in the required separation between the bottom of the soil
absorption system and the high groundwater elevation,an Approved Soil Evaluator must determine the.
high groundwater elevation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(1)(i)(1).The soil evaluator must be a'member
or agent of the local aaaroving,authority.
High groundwater.elevation determined by
lZo/D3
(Print or type evaluator's Name) (Signature of evaluator) (Evaluation Date)-
Explain why full compliance,as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1),is not feasible.
(Each section must be completed)
1. An.upgraded system in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible:
LW
12o rr Y y Erl 1,N p ?t Cnur_F V1 m^W_Y t L G l�tir rlr ,p,
2. An alternative system approved pursuant to 310 CMR 15.283 to 15.288 is not feasible: _
Department of Environmental Protection DEP Approved Form—3/20/02
Page 2 of 3
FORM 9A Application for Local Upgrade Approval
3. A shared system is not feasible:
4. Connection to a public sewer is not feasible:
i
'The Application for Local Upgrade Approval must be accompanied by all of the following; .
(Check the appropriate boxes)
❑. Application for Disposal System Construction Permit
L� Complete.plans and specifications
Site evaluation forms � r��vj�r �r�iy►i, t� t.v�TNt'S ,�n�
❑ A list of abutters affected by reduced setbacks to private water supply wells or property lines.
Provide proof that affected abutters have been notified pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(2).
❑ Other(List)
CERTIFICATION: ,
"I,the facility owner,certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments,to the best
of my knowledge and belief,are true,accurate,and complete.I am aware that there may be
significant consequences for submitting false information including,but not limited to,penalties or
fine and/or imprisonment for del—..7
Facility owner's sign ture Date
Print name
Name of preparer 8 Date / /off
Preparer's Address:
City/Town: ,A ! J?&-9 State: e 3 Zip:_ j2P4t�Iy
Preparer's telephone:_fjt
NOTE: 310 CMR 15.403(4)requires the system owner to provide a copy of the local upgrade
approval to the appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection,Bureau
of Resource Protection,Division of Watershed Management,upon issuance by the local approving
authority and before commencement of construction.
Department of Environmental Protection DEP Approved Forth—3/20/02
Page 3 of 3
TOWN OP' NOKI'll ANI)OVICR
Oil"i4,�eofC'O�%,IMI,JINI'I'YI)EVE tat,)PMt',N,rANI) SF,RVIC"IIIC(,,S
HEALT11 DEPARINIEN'F
27 C1 1ARLFSS1'R FIET
NORTI-1 ANDON/F.A, M ASSACI I[JSEITS 0 1�P5
Heidi Griffin 978,089,9540 Phone
Ading HeAh Dircoor 978,689,9542- FAX
December 8, 2003
Daniel Koravos, P.E.
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road, Map 10413, Lot 129
Dear Mr. Koravos:
The proposed septic system design plan for the above site dated May 20, 2003, and revised
August 18, 2003 and November 15, 2003 have been reviewed. Unfortunately, the plan cannot be
approved as submitted.
The following items are in need of attention prior to plan approval:
1. The septic tank, pump chamber and distribution box must be placed upon 6" of stone
and soil which has been mechanically compacted if the structure is not placed on
native soil. The distribution box is specified to be placed in an area of fill. (3 10 CMR
15,221)
,�/"2. Note#14 does not appear accurate as you have depicted a water supply well 110'
from the proposed soil absorption system while the note indicates you have found no
wells within 150' of the proposed soil absorption system.
3. It is unclear why 10" of leach stone is proposed beneath the soil absorption system.
/ 4. It is unclear why the Local Upgrade Approval request for reduced separation from
the bottom of the soil absorption system to the estimated seasonal high ground water
should be provided. The application submitted with the design plan indicates it is to
avoid using a pump tank in this septic system design. However, it is apparent that the
building sewer is specified to be raised anyhow and the existing deck will be replaced
with a porch thus making gravity flow and compliance with regulation a possibility.
Please amend the design plan to provide compliance with the regulations or provide
greater clarity as to why compliance is not feasible.
/5. It is unclear why the proposed soil absorption system is not in the location of the soil
and percolation testing performed on May 20, 2003.
While not a reason for disapproval, it appears you may be able to not design based on 900 sq. it.
of soil absorption system but on the design loading rate as specified in state and local regulations.
Lastly, you are encouraged to remove the undesired portions of the design plan rather than cross
them out as this might cause some confusion for future plan viewers such as the owner, septic
installation contractor, or onsite wastewater maintenance personnel.
Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to
working with you to obtain a replacement septic system which will be in compliance with all
regulations and assure the protection of public health and the environment of North Andover,
Sm�c�ere�ly�� ,.. ,..
Brian Lagra.
sse
Health Inspector
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir.
File
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
DelleChieie, Pamela
From: Dan Oftenheimer[info a@ millriverconsulting,coml
Sent: Monday, December 08,20013 11:22 AM
To: Heidi Griffin; Brian LaGrasse; Pamela Dellechiaie
Subject: 178 itonecleave Road
I.1eicwii, Brian and 'earn,
/h1 ic.ac:.:l" ed please finci ihE; plan review is(:ar .I.I„u property at 178 `tc-)nec'leave Roa(,1.
Ur f'ortranotely the design (::or.rlc:.i r'acai be c.q,)pr(:we i a;as r>I.abrniffedd
Dan
Daniel Ofterwheirner, President
Mill River Consulting
Blawaclkburn c'er°rter
Gloucester,r, 0 19,30-2259
978-282-0014 c::':r' 1-800-377-3044
fax: 978 282-00'12
IVr'��ar,Qar�°"`Pkllll E ">rl.°a 4.11 YV"ia_ „cx°trn
12/8/2003
MER IMAC K ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC,
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS
66 PARK STREET-ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01810•TEL(978)475-3555,373-5721 - FAX(978)475-1448^E-MAIL:merreng @aol,com
December 11, 2003
Mr. Brian LaGrasse r
Health Inspector
Office of Community Development and Services
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. LaGrasse:
We are in receipt of your review letter dated December 8, 2003 regarding the above
referenced site.
We have revised the plan to address items 1, 2 and 4. With regard to item#3, the plan does
not propose 10 inches of stone under the pipe but in fact requires 6 inches under the pipe with
an additional 4 inches to the top of the perforated pipe for a total of 10 inches as required by
Title 5 and the North Andover Board of Health Regulations.
With regard to item #5, test pits were conducted in as close a proximity as possible to the
proposed S.A.S. without interfering with the existing S.A.S. It was obvious to both the
Health Inspector and the Soil Evaluator at the time of testing that test pits could not be
performed within the existing S.A.S. (location shown on plan).
Given the above explanation, we feel this design meets all requirements of Title 5 and the
North Andover Board of health Regulations and that all your concerns have been addressed
and respectfully request that this design be approved as resubmitted.
Very truly yours,
MER�RIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES
William Dufresne
Project Manager
cd
'11)WIV OF" 4 WRT11 ANI)OVER
Office o1'(`()MN1UN['l'Y MWELOPAIENTAND SiqlWICES
11EALTH DEPARIFNIEN T
27 (TIARI-ES STRII�ET
NORT11 AfqDOWA, MASSACIIUSUTTS 01845
Heidi Griffin 978,6W9540 - Phone
AcOng Hcafih Dircelor 978.689.9542 —FAX
December 12, 2003
Daniel Koravos, P.E.
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road, Map 104B, Lot 129
Dear Mr. Koravos:
The North Andover Board of Health has completed review of the septic system design plans for
the above referenced property submitted on your behalf by Merrimack Engineering Services dated
May 20, 2003, REV December 10, 2003.
The design has been approved for use in the construction of a replacement onsite septic system.
This approval is valid for three years from the date of this letter and during this time a licensed
septic system installer must obtain a permit and complete this work, and a Certificate of
Compliance must be endorsed by the installer, designer and the Town of North Andover. The
time period for which this plan is valid is reduced to two years from the date of a septic system
inspection which did not meet the acceptable criteria in the state regulations. The time period for
which this plan is valid may be reduced by the North Andover Board of Health in the event an
imminent health problem such as sewage backup into the dwelling is occurring.
This approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. If site conditions are found in the field to be different from those indicated on the
design plan and/or soil evaluation, the originally issued Disposal System Construction
Permit is void, installation shall stop, and the applicant shall reapply for a new Disposal
Systems Construction Permit (3 10 CMR 15.020(1)).
2. It is the responsibility of the applicant and/or the applicant's septic system designer,
septic system installer or other representative to ensure that all other state and
municipal requirements are met. These may include review by the Conservation
Commission, Zoning Board, Planning Board, Building Inspector, Plumbing Inspector
and/or Electrical Inspector. The issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit
shall not construe and/or imply compliance with any of the aforementioned
requirements.
Your effort to provide a properly functioning septic system for your dwelling is greatly
appreciated. The Health Department may be reached at 978-688-9540 with any questions you
might have.
For future reference, you are encouraged to remove any undesired portions of the design plan
rather than cross them out as this might cause some confusion for future plan viewers such as the
owner, septic installation contractor, or onsite wastewater maintenance personnel.
Sincerely.,.
e�
anLaCrr �_.
i asse
Health Inspector
encl: List of licensed septic system installers
cc: file
Merrimack Engineering Services
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir.
File
Page 2 of 2
11/19/2003 14:10 978-'744-8577 BURSA DENTAL PARTNER PAGE 01
E Humber of pages Induding cOvOr
o m
StWey J. Burbs D.D.S.
129 M914and
Salem, MA 0 1970
7 7575
FAXYHONE0 Y o � 97 7
REMARKS: AiMaw AhM YOM wMM;j5jj:Y:A78A705 ORBAWCOMMWr
4
t�J
fl
4�4c,
/f SAP
i
M.
u
Page I of I
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Dan Ottenheimer[info@ millriverconsulting.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Heidi Griffin; Brian LaGrasse; Pamela Dellechiaie
Subject: 178 Stonecleave Road septic design plan
kieidi, Briari and [Darn,
We have comple'I'E.d review of fhe design plan for 178 Sfoneclea\/e and wish to discuss
H-)is with sorneone frorn yourOffice too. Sirr)ilar- quesfions hOVE;' c0seri as on he 426
Surn'T� er Streel desk. r) r.-.flan,
J-hanks,
Don
Daniel Ottenhelmer, President
Mill River Constolfing
Ser.)ti(, Systern Mancigement Seivices
5 Blackburn (,eriier
GI(Ducester', MA 0 1930-2259
978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-,3044
fax: 978-282-0012
fr f(,-)6a'�rr?HOvcrcc)k
12/4/2003
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS
384 OSGOOD STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845-2909
J. WILLIAM HMURCIAK, DIRECTOR,P.E.
Timothy J. Willett 0 1 No prw Telephone (978) 685-0950
Staff Engineer ,� b°�., �`"d"�o` Fax(978) 688-9573
o
, n
March 18' 2002 �SS CH (d 1, i
Ms. Patricia Burba
P
178 Stonecleave Road � a ' �'�
North Andover, MA 01845
�t
RE: Drainage Plan ,,. ,�,�n „.�, _ urv.�w�
Dear Ms. Burba:
As you requested, enclosed is a copy of the subdivision plan for Stonecleave Road, showing the
proposed drain lines, structures, and easements. This is not an As-built Plan, as they were not required
in those days. Hopefully,the contractor who built Stonecleave Road installed the drainage system
according to plan.
Your contractor will need to secure a street opening permit from this office prior to any work. Also,
since you have a well and septic system,the North Andover Board of Health will have to approve the
proposed work with a"sign off' on the sketch of the proposed drain work.
If you have questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
Timothy JVillett/
Staff Engineer
CC: Bill Hmurciak
Bob Beshara
Sandra Starr
Brian Legrasse
Julie Parrino
_.. ..
11 r
-
4
)'�
- t -.> u a /'v,,- W�'v�t.,�y' „i,`g ,,,.� -c .F ^Z ,z fr�a�y.yx Fa L f �,, 1 X. F }
Y z
�. . i ti, � 3 ,v Y�r 7 ss ',` ca.' � " 2 a zrc r- 7 av-` a't�. _.iY �'
c'-.` - R 1. �cht `x'e �'' �if✓ Sg .it ..�.r. � � 's �:�`t�`a\�r..t "��� 'YJ t
KIS 1, _ > rt.,t- �. 3 r,� _.y ,r 3 "s5'�, 1•: tu-rr-lt'v'..t,-z,�'r1.f..`�,,.Y _ .,..,.s :.z.I:,. -I 1
rF,`a} Y^Z t:� 3 is �`�,7�``yv d < - `, YZ � r �fv� EC0.h .
*"N v, r�,✓fit a �'-:`��-"� - .. r,-iU Cyr Lu ;3�?<'-c Y,: � i. - E
�-�2y: � '4 '��. �..ZKf 1. ..:Y♦_'y �M1y� ' �h\". J'S �.T-`tt.bi� r)? f ht4,c,. -�.2
`„.._ z.-.tt..tt v 2 >: x - `a; tg ,'t a 7fi ts�.;-yes:?,.. ', ,' r,1
av,;. { tip._ r 4f1 x^ v--c 4 .-s a"��,,�. .r a. z R� 2 � _ ;r. `�°` `�''*:•
N i 1 'y.' .-JJ. .'%4 nIYt�sftC•.-"_o 'y'h.�.S;.sryy.. L:.�L 3`.-' y` -H.ks- 7 :nRll:� �:4c$
" -i'�e::'i J r 5- i"Ls'G <"Y<_� }s{y _ 7a } :?.. _{.fi?.G }^.,r if(3.'}�,:..:.'
1C yY l k �.11. -�� ,}Yti.� V:,.=` F:?i'+^ —, S .. y ,,p?�( -
� 1,, .s',h- r�5'>i:�?�. 'tf�G3 :t .} 5..'d'f`�',.,. ;'�.:>,s rzt':.�,4:: 1. iaTi' Y !�y
�.r '" f�- . ,'-"s t }L- s' 'is �.' 3..c 3 t.Yi. is 1F -_ L.:iii( -
; 4 t t J. -11611. t'. f ."` G -,�_,{.,;:V �[ 'F'4
i a t > : - '�
a y -� y E j Stt _
+sss L s
7i
a r.... . .: :::. _ - - -
n
�, =h TC
. �: ..
tt� �,.+w�r.y.r.nty� r ,,, 4 Y c
x
k
' '
�, , , = , '
�� �
F �f
y ' liz n ,K
Xt3
�C `
r Y �.
1.�z4
-- pfd j r�
9
v `+
} }
.C` �'ik
Fog
,...:l}O E51 t
..L 1
WWRI, �, 3? - .,s, - fi ate- S1�-'C''s2 �: rs e - i` s >rz�. -: C
M ���' � tai*2 ,,' ic
>' iia;. -x�, .r„ -- t -z .. 4„ „ :rl-i o} _t6. x S• 'x:52., T.t - _ ` > f fie - h i''`-.�'�..;: v' ':::zr;1.e>-: Win.,.y,v.v. .r.=r .v,. :4. w. "�ss�..� ,� _- - ;J.-:�-t.,.- ..x:�! ;.—
.n�:.,ati 3r :.� a .,...y
r , u
s.yi xv. .,...
1'.:.� ...... .-. _ ..... ..;::.nsi.'.`.fm15d �-W:,['.2 n{.r J, x k :�V�i .1;.:r :=L
;.�... _i_- i .-r...��.3 - i 11_ ``.'Il
AR yyy:
�.
is D,k;
�'
t '*' ' ti
z " t
,� c t,#
g"T 7. y'
M ,. -. }Y
{
1 _ _ f .. t
[{' .
VY) t l Y Y 1 4�i 2"y f f .1-,� ti t 3S 1
t 5c 2 -.a� 2 > -
? ''� mot- ��. 4 Y 7 >
},f az t s - i _ t_,
Wit`f yl
F1 5 ..] �.` - -
4 f { `
<� y t 3�`j 1 �� .
F T i t,� L i
'} °5 1. i _
n F 1^j. h i '31t� i. . F
s
)
s'_
vo 4�-� o i- H�u hj X��������
_�