Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Building Permit # 2/18/2016
BUILDING PERMrr APPLICATION FOR PLAIN EXAMINATI Permit NO: Date Received. _.� ( �? mma % ' Gate �D TANT: Applicant must co m lete all items on this 77 / i� i � uv, / '�df� i %// / / /// / / ii i / m / i 5mwwm�nw4�4� wlu dF.�rvnw �l ""gym i _g it y�5y/I �1, 9 A �"mL z, ii TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED 115E Residential Non- Residential F1 New Building ❑ One family X-I ddition l_.1 Two or more family I I ndustriel . lteration No. of units; Commercial ❑ Repair, replacement ri Asses ory Bldg ❑ Others: Demolition ❑ Other // / Modifications to existing wireless facility: relocate (3)existing antennas on existing mount, remove ( ) existing GSM antennas and swap with (3) new antennas. Install (6)new remote radio heads. No expansion to equipment height or ground footprint. No debris to be generated. Unmanned facilites Ialentiffcatien Please Type or Plant Clearly) OWNER- (Name: SBA Properties, Inc. Phone: Address: 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, NW, Soca Raton, FL 33487 7 7777,77,71� AB' AST e� / d / / �sqr AlllrldslA � fA� 4 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Phone: Address: Reg. INo.. a FEE SCHEDULE.'BULDING PERMIT.$12.00 PER$1000.00 OF THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST BASED ON$125.00 PER S.F. Total Project Cost: 2-5,000.00 E: 300.00 Check No.: Receipt No � " NOTE: ��1�a��1s�0 tra���z�a �w�th IfTz�� ��ta}I^� �� PI^aTa'��1°s do not laav�p( Fes'. �a ��ae Ia lA�c�l �1�1� SI t tune gent/ u . ' � ign til e of ttr t�tC�r 'please see st rnpeq drawings Bill Flanrahan, Smartlink, LLC (on behalf of AT&T) see attached Owner Letter of Authorization Plans Su'rrnit—t ❑ Plans Waived ❑ Certified Plot liar l❑ Stamped Plans ❑ - TYPE OF SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Public Sewer ❑ Tanning/Massage/Body Art ❑ Swumming Pools ❑ Well ❑ Tobacco Sales ❑ Food Packaging/Sales ❑ Private(septic tank, etc. ❑ Permanent Dwnpster on Site ❑ THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY INTERDEPARTMENTAL SIT OFF - U FORM PLANNONO & DEVELOPMENT Reviewed On Signature_ J, COMMENTS-1Pt6le—,; �ll CLQ i� -/ks H 6 611(iiQz a-c,,It:nQ � r CONSERVATION Reviewed on Signature COMMENTS ^� HEALTH Reviewed on Signature 1\ COMMENTS Zoning Board of Appeals:Variance, Petition No: Zoning Decision/receipt submitted yes Planning Board Decision: Comments Conservation Decision: Comments Water& Sewer Connection/Signature & Date Driveway Permit DPW Town Engineer: Signature: Located 384 Osgood Street FIRE DEPARTMENT = Temp,Dumpster on site yes Located of 1,24 Main Street,,, Firs Department sigrAatiar,e/date . . COMMENTS � . J60RTH of Tow' n Andover ®No E - ® - - ® h ver Mass O�—O � Lr,xa � 9 � COC HIC"[WICK �1' �,9 ADRATED 5 S 11 BOARD OF HEALTH Food/Kitchen RM IT T U Septic System THIS CERTIFIES THAT ............................................ BUILDING INSPECTOR has permission to erect .... buildings on Foundation Rough to be occupied as ...... . . ..... .�. ...... . . .. ...................................... Chimney provided that the person acceptin this permit shal every respect conform to the terms of the application Final on file in this office, and to the provisions of the Codes and By-Laws relating to the Inspection,Alteration and Construction of Buildings in the Town of North Andover. PLUMBING INSPECTOR Rough VIOLATION of the Zoning or Building Regulations Voids this Permit. Final PERMIT EXPIRES IN 6 MONTHS ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR UNLESS TA Rough Service: ................... ....... .............................................. Final BUILDING INSPECTOR GAS INSPECTOR` Occupancy Permit Required t® ccupr Buildin Rough Display in a Conspicuous Place on the Premises - Do Not Remove F'naj No FIRE QEPARTII(IEN;�'i � �`� �� Lathing all To Be Done ; Until Inspected and Approvedthe Building Inspector. sUrne� �� s `c �E b_ Engineers 400 Valley Road,Suite 304 Planners Mount Arlington,NJ 07856 TWA Surveyors T:971398.3110 Landscape Architects F:973.398.3199 MASERwww.maserconsulting.com C 0 8 8 U L I I N 0 P. A, at&t "46:e 550 Cochituate Road Framingham, MA 01701 LTE 4C Antenna Mount An Site Name: MAL03349 FA #: 10063415 Site Address: 300 Chestnut Street North Andover, MA 01845 Essex County Maser Project Number: 15946067A December 31, 2015 Analysis Type Sector Mount PasslFafl Pass Member 58. 7 % Utilization kk OF PC,TRW E. TSOUKALAS _PIVIL Petros E Tsoukalas, P.E. Professional Engineer Massachusetts License#52056 Cuslorner Loyally through Ckenl SoHsfacfion 12/31/2015 4V Page 2 of 4 Prepared by DJS Checked by FEP MASER C C N 6 C L T I N 6 P. IL Objective: In accordance with your request, Maser Consulting P.A. has evaluated the structural impact of the final AT&T equipment on the existing antenna mount at the above referenced address. Introduction: Maser Consulting P.A. has reviewed the following documents in completing this report: • RFDS 757082, provided by Smartlink, dated 10/09/2015; LTE 4C Scope • Structural Mount Analysis prepared by Hudson Design Group, dated April 14, 2015 (Rev.1) • Construction drawings prepared by Hudson Design Group, dated August 25, 2015 • Antenna Frame Mapping Report prepared by ProVertic, dated 01/26/2015 • Construction Drawings prepared by Maser Consulting P.A. for LTE 4C Scope of work The proposed AT&T equipment is to be supported on existing antenna sector mounts constructed of structural steel pipes, channels, and HSS members at a centerline of 120'-0" above ground level. This report is based only upon this information. This analysis is based on the requirement that the additional 2" stabilizer arm at each sector has been installed as required by Hudson Design Group Structural Mount Analysis referenced above. NO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT THE ADDED STABILIZERS IN PLACE AT EACH SECTOR. Discrete and Linear Appurtenances: Maser Consulting P.A. understands the final AT&T loading to be as follows: • (3)CCI HPA-65-BUU-H8 Antennas • (3) Kathrein 80010121 Antennas • (3) Kathrein 80010766 Antennas • (6) Kathrein 782-10250 TMA's • (6) RRUS-11's • (3) RRUS-32's • (3) RRUS-E2's The maximum sector frame loading occurs at the Alpha Sector and has been utilized for purposes of this calculation. (1)CCI HPA-65-BUU-H8 Antenna per sector • (1) Kathrein 80010121 Antenna per sector • (1) Kathrein 80010766 Antenna per sector • (2) Kathrein 782-10250 TMA's per sector • (2) RRUS-11's per sector • (1) RRUS-32 per sector • (1) RRUS-E2 per sector 12/31/2015 Page 3 of 4 Prepared by DJS Checked by FEP MASER C O R 1 6 L i l Y G P. A. Codes, Standards and Loading: Maser Consulting P.A. utilized the following codes and standards: • Massachusetts State Building Code, 8th Edition, And All Subsequent Amendments, Incorporating the 2009 International Building Code • Structural Standards for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas ANSI/TIA-222-G-05, Including Addendum 1, Dated 2007 o Basic Wind Speed— 110 mph (3 Second Gust), 40 mph with 1 inch ice thickness o Exposure Category-C o Structure Class—II o Topographic Category • Specification for Structural Steel Buildings ANSI/AISC 360-05, American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 13th Edition Analysis Approach &Assumptions: The analysis approach used in this structural analysis is based on the premise that if the existing antenna mounts are structurally adequate to support the proposed equipment per the aforementioned codes and standards, or if the increase in the forces in the structure is deemed to be negligible or acceptable, then the proposed equipment can be installed as intended. Risa-3D, a 3D finite element modeling and analysis program, was used to determine the capacity and usage of the existing antenna support mount. The following assumptions were utilized in this report: • Structural Steel Angles are constructed of A36 Grade Steel. • Structural Steel Pipes and HSS Members are constructed of A53 Grade B Steel. • It is assumed that the telecommunication equipment supports, antenna supports, and existing structure have been designed by a registered licensed professional engineer for the existing loads acting on the structure, as required by all applicable codes, prior to the proposed modifications listed within this report. • It is assumed that information provided by the client regarding the structure itself, the antenna models, feed lines, and other relevant information is current and correct. • It is assumed all other existing appurtenances, antennas, cables, etc. belonging to others have been installed and supported per code and per specifications so as not to damage any existing structural support members, and that any contributing loads from adjacent equipment has been taken into consideration for their design. • Proposed equipment and locations should not deviate from the proposed locations noted herein and shown on the associated Maser Consulting P.A. final Construction Drawings. Calculations: The calculations are found in Appendix A of this report. 12/31/2015 Page 4 of 4 Prepared by DJS MASER Checked by FEP 0 0 n 8 0 L t I N I P. A. Conclusion: Maser Consulting P.A. has determined the existing antenna mounts have ADEQUATE structural capacity to support the proposed and existing loading. The existing antenna mounts have been determined to be stressed to a maximum of 58.7%® of their structural capacity with the maximum usage occurring at the antenna masts. Therefore, the proposed AT&T installation CAN be installed as intended. This analysis is based on the requirement that the additional 21' stabilizer arm at each sector has been installed as required by Hudson Design Group Structural Mount Analysis referenced above. NO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT THE ADDED STABILIZERS INPLACE AT EACH SECTOR. The conclusions reached by Maser Consulting P.A. in this evaluation are only applicable for the existing structural members supporting the proposed AT&T telecommunications installation described herein. The existing bolts and structural members should be checked for any existing issues. Further, no structural qualifications are made or implied by this document for the existing tower structure. Maser Consulting P.A. reserves the right to amend this report if additional information about the existing frame is provided. The conclusions reached by Maser Consulting P.A. in this report are only valid for the discrete and linear appurtenances listed in this report. Any change to the installation will require a revision to this structural analysis. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you should have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call our office. Very truly yours, Maser Consulting P.A. Petros E. Tsoukalas, RE Daniel Sledgeski, E.I.T. Geographic Discipline Leader Structural Design Engineer \\mtc ad01\Proj ects\2015\1 5946000A\1 5946067A\Structural\Rev.O\Word\MAL03349.docx �,343A, hal `( BIA [34-) a R, '3348'/-1 307 '[ 't !""'61 F" + '56 1 7�i�"b LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION SBA Site ID: MAo1o85-A,North Andover Property Located at: 300 Chestnut Street,North Andover,MA,o1845-5308 THE CITY/COUNTY OF:No Andover/Essex APPLICATION FOR ZQNINQZUSEZRWLPING���� This letter authorizes AT&T and its authorized agents to file for all necessary zoning,planning and building permits (local,state and federal)for the purposes of installing,operating and maintaining a telecommunications facility on the existing tower on the property referenced above on behalf of SBA Properties,LLC. All approval conditions that may be granted to AT&T in connection with above referenced facility relating to this specific application are the sole responsibility of AT&T. SBA Properties, LLC Jason Silberstein Executive VP,Site Leasing Date: 12/29/2015 s m a r January 14,2016 Gerald Brown Inspector of Buildings 1.600 Osgood Street Building 20, Suite 2035 North Andover,MA 01845 Re: Building Perinit Application and Section 6409 Eligible Facilities Request Applicant: New Cingular Wireless PCS,LLC ('AT&T") Dear Mr.Brown: Smartlink LLC,on behalf of AT&T,is submitting this Building Permit application and Section 6409 Eligible Facilities Request to replace three(3)antennas and add six(6)remote radio units at its existing antenna and ancillary Transmission Equipment at an existing wireless Base Station located at Chestnut Street(parcel ID#210/198.0-0002-0000.0). A. Section 6409 Eligible Facilities Request being Filed with the Building Permit The Section 6409 Eligible Facilities Request accompanies this Building Permit Application because the Town of North Andover has not yet developed an Eligible Facilities request permit application form that complies with Section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and.Job Creation Act of 2012,commonly known as the "Spectrum Act", or("Section 6409") (Pub. Law No. 112-96, 126 Stat 1.56)(codified at 47 U.S.C. § 1455). Section 6409 mandates that state and local governments"may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." Under Section 6409(a)(2)(A)-(C)an Eligible Facilities Request is any request to modify a Tower or Base Station that involves "collocations of new Transmission Equipment, "removal," or "replacement"of Transmission Equipment. B. Why this Eligible Facilities Request Must Be Granted 1. The existing facility is a Base Station. AT&T, a Federal Communications Commission("FCC")licensed wireless carrier, submitted this Eligible Facilities Request to add, modify and replace its existing antenna and ancillary Transmission Equipment at the existing Base Station. The FCC defines Base Station as "the equipment and non-tower supporting structure at a fixed location that enable Commission- licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications 33 Boston Post Road West - `~quite 21.0 - Madbomugh, NAA 01752 "Oeor Oreo r rI J S M a rl network. . .the term includes equipment associated with wireless communications service including,but not limited to,radio transceivers,antennas,coaxial or fiber-optic cable,regular and backup power supply and comparable equipment." The term"existing base station"also includes a structure that currently houses or supports an antenna,transceiver or other associated equipment that constitutes part of a Base Station even if the structure was not built solely or primarily to provide such support. The existing Base Station in this application is one hundred twenty feet(120')high at its centerline and presently contains wireless facilities and Transmission Equipment. (The proposed Base Station modifications will not increase its height or expand its footprint.) Therefore,the existing Base Station meets the FCC definition of a Base Station, 2. The Application's equipment is considered Transmission Equipment. The list of equipment identified in the Eligible Facilities Request application is considered Transmission Equipment as determined by the FCC. The FCC defines Transmission Equipment as "any equipment that facilitates transmission for any Commission-licensed or authorized wireless communication service, including, but not limited to,radio transceivers, antennas and other relevant equipment associated with and necessary to their operation, including coaxial or fiber-optic cable,and regular and back-up power supply. This definition includes equipment used in any technological configuration associated with any Commission- authorized wireless transmission; licensed or unlicensed,terrestrial or satellite,including commercial mobile,private mobile,broadcast and public safety services,as well as fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul or fixed broadband." 3. The Base Station will not be Substantially Changed. In a Report and Order adopted on October 17,2014,the FCC determined that any modification to an existing telecommunications Base Station that meets the following six(6) criteria does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the existing Base Station and therefore is an Eligible Facilities Request which must be granted. Attached herewith please find a certification that identifies how each of the above six(6)criteria are met and therefore no substantial change is proposed. a. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment do not increase the height of the Base Station by more than 10 percent(10%)or ten(10) feet,whichever is greater. b. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment do not protrude from the edge of the support structure by more than six(6)feet. c. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment do not involve the installation of more than the standard number of equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed three. d. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment do not entail any excavation or deployment outside of the Base Station site. e. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment do not defeat any existing concealed or stealth-design. f. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment comply with prior conditions of approval of the Base Station,unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in '33 Bostori Post Road West - SUite 210 - Madbor,ough, IMA 01752 p: 97&808.82S8 -f:978334D223 smartl height,increase in width,addition of equipment cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the corresponding"substantial change"thresholds in numbers 1-4. The modifications to the Transmission Equipment at the Base Station located at Chestnut Street contained in this Eligible Facilities Request fully conform to Section 6409 as enacted by Congress and as interpreted by the FCC,as more specifically articulated in the Eligible Facilities Request Certification,attached herewith. Accordingly,this Eligible Facilities Request must be approved within sixty(60)days, as required by federal law and FCC implementing regulations. C. Notice of Federal Law Expedited Permit Processing and Deemed Granted An Eligible Facilities Request is deemed granted sixty(60)days after a complete application is filed with a local jurisdiction. If sixty(60)days pass after the submission of AT&T's Building Permit Application and Eligible Facilities Request and the Town of North Andover has not acted to grantor deny the request, it will be deemed granted. Atthat time, AT&T may advise the Town of North Andover that the application has been deemed granted. If the Town of North Andover wishes to contest whether the Eligible Facilities Request has been deemed granted,the burden is on the Town of North Andover to file a lawsuit in a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days after receipt of a written communication notifying it that the Eligible Facilities Request has been deemed granted. Failure to file a lawsuit in a timely manner may forever bar this jurisdiction from contesting that this Eligible Facilities Request has been deemed granted. AT&T is committed to working cooperatively with you,and all jurisdictions around the country,to secure expeditious approval of requests to modify existing personal wireless service facilities. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions. Sincerely, Bill Hanrahan Real Estate Specialist Smartlink,LLC (in) 508.498.1230 (email)1�ffl,ha�irahan --------------- 33 Bostori Post Road West - S(,Re 210 , MaHborough, MA 01752 p: 978M83258 -f:978.334D223 Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Vag-e-1 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA : 10063415 MATI-ICAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A 300 Chestnut Street North Andover, MA 01845 Final AT&T Aggyrtenance ConfJgML tion: (1) CCI HPA-65-BUU-H8 Antenna per sector (1) Kathrein 80010121 Antenna per sector a (1) Kathrein 80010766 Antenna per sector (2) Kathrein 782-10250 TMA's per sector (2) RRUS-11's per sector (1) RRUS-32 per sector ® (1) RRUS-E2 per sector �a�i�w�mmuw!mwwa�i��uiw�w���uuuinmu�iuia�muuuwiu��uuumuuuuuummuoiiaimuuuuuuuuu�uiuiu�iuiu�iuu�uuim�a��ui�uuuiuiiimum�uiu�w�m�mu�uuw�u�wiiu�uimu�iuuuuuouimoimu��oiiru�i��u��o�o�i�i�uiuimmmiooimu�mumuoiuuuui�m�uuuu�u���mnmmmm�m�mimim�mmti�im�mtiriuti�wiu�uwwiu�a�uuu�m���mimm�iormn�mminiai�m�i��w��umm���tim�uu��oiiuci�G��mmuum, i�un�a�� u�u�uuw�wuuim!wmm�uu�miui�wi�mdm�iuum�rvmm�m��mo�a� �ei�gn Wind L�a�d n ppunar��� : Iln U I[TIA-222Reference Location: North Andover, MA Basic Wind Speed(Ultimate): Vult:= 110 MPH (Figure Al-le, p. 232) Antenna Centerline: z:= 12011 Structure Class: Class:= "It" (Table 2-1, P. 39) Exposure Category: Exp;= ",C", (Section 2.6.5.1, p. 12) Gust Effect Factor: Gh:= 1,0 (Section 2.6.9, p. 16) Wind Directionality Factor: Kd:= 0.95 (Table 2-2, P. 39) Topographic Category: Topo:= "1" (Section 2.6.6.2, p. 13) Crest Height: CH:= Oft (Section 2.6.6.4, p. 14) Importance Factor: 1:= 1.0 if Class= 91" = 1 (fable 2-3, P. 39) 1.15 if Class= "III" Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 2 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Force Coefficient: Cf square(h,w) := 1.2 if h <2.5 Table 2-8, P. 42 w C1.2+ .22.(h - 2.5I] if h >2.5n h <-7 11 Square Members 4.5 w 1l JJ w w C1.4+ 0.666•(h - 7I] ifh >7nh <_25 18 w J w w 2.0 otherwise Cf round(h,w) := 0.7 if h <2.5 Table 2-8, P. 42 w 111l Round Members 10. 7+ 0=11•(h - 2.5IJ if h >2.5Ah <7 4.5 `w J w w C0.8+ 0.444•Ih - 7IJ ifh >7nh <_25 18 w J w w 1.2 otherwise Terrain Exposure Constants: a:= 7.0 if Exp= "B" z9:= 11200ft if Exp = "B" Kzmin:= 0.70 if Exp= "B" 9.5 if Exp= "C" 900ft if Exp= "C" 0.85 if Exp= "C" 11.5 if Exp= "D" 700ft if Exp= "D" 1 1.03 if Exp= "D" Table 2-4, P. 40 2 or. Velocity Pressure Coefficient: Kz(z):= K E--ma 2.01• z KZm• z Z m - ( g KZ<-min(KZ,2.01) Velocity Pressure Coefficient: Kz:= Kz(z) = 1.315 (Section 2.6.5, P. 13) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 3 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington,NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Velocity Pressure Coefficient: Kzt(z) '— Kzt f— 1.0 if Topo = "1" (Section 2.6.6.4, p. 14) otherwise Ke <-- 0.90 if Exp= "B" (Table 2-4 p. 40) 1.00 if Exp= "C" 11.10 if Exp= "D" Kt f— 0.43 if Topo = "2" (Table 2-5 p. 40) 0.53 if Topo = "3" 10.72 if Topo = "4" f<— 1.25 if Topo = "2" (Table 2-5 p. 40) 2.00 if Topo = "3" 1.50 if Topo = "4" C fzl (Section 2.6.6.4, P. 14) Kh F-e CHJI 2 1 + Ke Kt (Section 2.6.6.4, P. 14) Kh ', Kzt:= Kzt(z)= 1 Velocity Pressure: qz:= 0.00256-Kz•Kzt Kd•Vult2•I•psf= 38.701•psf (Section 2.6.9.6, P. 25) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis P—age-4 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt. Arlington,NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A AT&T in Loading_(No Ice): Kathrein 800-10121 Dimensions: hantl := 54.5-in want, := 10.3-in dant, = 5.9-in Weight: DLantl := 44.11bf Mounting Pipe: LP, := 96-in dpi := 2.375-in Area (Normal): ANa:= hantYwant] = 3.898 ft2 Area(Side): ATa:= hantYdant] = 2.233 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf N–a:= Cf square(hantl,want 1)= 1.324 Force Coefficient (Side): Cf T–a:= Cf square(hanti,dantl) = 1.475 Pipe Area (Normal): ANP:= max (Lpl – hantI)*(dP,),O] = 0.684 ft2 Pipe Area (Side): ATP:= LPI'd PI = 1.583 ft' Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf P:= Cf round(Lpl,dpl) = 1.2 Normal Effective Projected Area: UAW= (Cf N a-ANa) + (Cf P-ANP) = 5.983 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAT:= (Cf T a-ATa) + (Cf P-ATP) = 5.193 ft2 Effective Projected Area: EPAa:= inax(EPAN,EPAT) = 5.983 ft2 Wind Force: Fantl := qz,GII-EPAa= 231.543•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, R 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 5 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xined Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A CCI HPA-66R-LCUU-H6 Dimensions: hant2:= 92.7-in want2:= 14.4-in dant2:= 7.04n PER RFDS Weight: DLant2:= 881b Mounting Pipe: Lp2:= 102in dp2:= 2.375-in Area (Normal): ANa:= hantTwant2= 9.27 ft2 Area (Side): ATa:= hant2*dant2= 4.506 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): CfN—a f�squa C re(hant:2,want2) = 1.375 — Force Coefficient (Side): CfT—a Cfsqua re(hant2,dant2) = 1.608 — � Pipe Area (Normal): ANP max (Lp2— hant2)'(dp2),0] = 0.153 f12 Pipe Area (Side): ATP Lp2*dp2= 1.682 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf P:= Cf round(Lp2ldp2) = 1.2 Normal Effective Projected Area: UAW= (Cf N a-ANa) + (Cf P-ANp) = 12.93 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: SPAT:= (Cf T—a'ATa) + (Cf p-ATP) = 9.265 Effective Projected Area: EPAa:= max(EPAN,EPAT) = 12.93 112 Wind Force: Fant2:= qz*Gh-EPAa= 500.415.lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 6 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063416 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Kathrein 80010766 Dimensions: hano:= 96-in want3:= 11.8-in dant3 6,O-in. Weight: 17Lant3:= 61.71bf Mounting Pipe: Lp3:= 102-in dp3:= 2.375-in Area (Normal): ANa:= hantTwanO = 7.867 Area (Side): ATa:= hantYdanO= 4 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): CfN—a C re(I'ant3,want3) 1.438 — f_squa Force Coefficient (Side): CfT—a Cf�squa re(hanO,danG) 1.7 — Pipe Area (Normal): ANP max (Lp3 — liant3)-(dp3), 0.099 Pipe Area (Side): ATP Lp3'dp3 = 1.682 W Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf P:= Cf round(Lp3)dp3) = 1.2 Normal Effective Projected Area: EPAN:= (Cf N—a'ANa) + (Cf P'ANP) = 11.43 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAT:= (Cf T—a'ATa) + (Cf p'ATp) = 8'819 ft2 Effective Projected Area: EPAa:= max(EPAN,EPAT) = 11.43 ft2 Wind Force: FanOqz.Gh-EPAa= 442.346.1bf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 7 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A TMA Dimensions: hal := 14.5-in wa, := 9.0-in dal 2.5-in Weight: DLal := 161bf Area (Normal): AN:= 11 a Ywa 1 = 0.906 ft2 Area (Side): AT:= hat-dal = 0.252 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf N:= Cf square(hatwal) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cf T:= Cf square(hal,dal) = 1.347 Front Effective Projected Area: UAW= Cf N'AN= 1.087 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAT:= Cf T'AT= 0,339 ft2 Effective Projected Area: EPAa:= max(EPAN,EPAT) = 1.087 ft2 Wind Force: Fal qz*Gh-EPAa= 42.087.lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) RRUS-11 Dimensions: ha3 17.1- n w,3:= 10,0-in da3:= 7.6-in Weight: DLa3:= 501bf Area (Normal): AN:= haYwO= 1.188 ft2 Area (Side): AT:= haYdO = 0.903 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf N:= Cf square(hO,%3) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cf T:= Cf square(hO,dO = 1.2 Front Effective Projected Area: UAW= Cf N*A,= 1.425 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAT:= Cf TAT= 1.083 ft2 Effective Projected Area: EPAa:= max(EPANIEPAT) = 1.425 ft2 Wind Force: Fa3 := qz,Gh-EPAa= 55.149.lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 8 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATIICAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A RRUS-32 Dimensions: ha4:= 19.7-in wa4:= 17.0-in da4:= 7.2-in Weight: DLa4:= 501bf Area (Normal): AN:= ha4'wa4= 2.326 ft2 Area (Side): AT:= ha4*da4= 0.985 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf N— Cf square(ha4,wa4) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cf T:= Cf square(ha4,da4) = 1.21 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAN:= Cf N*AN= 2.791 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAT:= Cf YAT= 1.192 ft2 Effective Wind Area: EPAa:= max(EPAN,EPAT) = 2.791 ft2 Wind Force: Fa4:= qz,Gh'EPAa= 108.008-1bf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) RRUS-E2 Dimensions: h,5:= 20.4-in was:= 18.5-in day:= 7.5-in Weight: DLa5:= 601bf Area (Normal): AN:= ha5'wa5 = 2.621 ft2 Area (Side): AT:= ha5'da5= 1.062 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf N— Cf square(ha5,wa5) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cf T:= Cf square(I ha5,da5) = 1.21 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAN:= Cf N-AN= 3.145 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAT:= Cf YAT= 1.285 ft2 Effective Wind Area: EPAa:= max(EPAN,EPAT) = 3.145 ft2 Wind Force: Fay:= qz'Gh'EPAa= 121.714.lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 9 of 26- 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Antenna Mount LogdIng. HISS 30 Loadip(L. Height: hmi 2ft Width: w,., 3-in Area: Aa:= hmI-wmI = 0.5ft2 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf square(hin 1,wrn 1) = 1.433 Wind Load: fin, := qz-Gh-Cf-wmI = 13.868.plf (Section 2.6.9.2, R 20) L3x3x1/4 LoadIM. Height: bm2:= 6.25ft Width: wm2:= 3-in Area: Aa:= hm2'wm2= 1.562 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf-Square(hm2,wm2) = 2 Wind Load: fm2:= qz.Gh-Cf'wm2= 19.35.plf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) 2.0 STD PIPE: Height: hin3:= 10ft Width: wm3:= 2.375-in Area: Aa'= hm3'wm3= 1.979 f12 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf jound(hm3,wm3) = 1.2 Wind Load: fm3:= qz.Gh-Cf'wm3= 9-191 TIf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) 1.6 ST® PIPE: Height: hm4:= 2,25ft Width: wm4:= 1.875-in Area: Aa:= lim4'wm4= 0.352 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf round(hm4,wm4) = 0.964 Wind Load: fm4:= qz*Gh'Cf*wm4= 5.832.plf (Section 2.6.9.2, R 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 10 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xincd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A 3.6 STD PIPE: Height: 11m5:= 2.25ft Width: wm5:= 3.5-in Area: Aa:= hrn5*wrn5 = 0.656 ft 2 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf round(hm5,wm5) = 0.816 Wind Load: fm5:= qz.Gh-Cf'wm5= 9.209-pif (Section 2.6.9.2, R 20) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 11 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Do !W—Uts, ANSIITIA-222-G Reference Basic Wind Speed With Ice: Vi := 40 MPH (Figure a5-2a, p. 233) Design Ice thickness: ti := I.Oin (Figure Al-2a, p. 233) Ice Density: pi := 56pcf (Section 2.6.8, p. 16) Importance Factor: lwind:= 1-00 (Table 2-3, R 39) Importance Factor: lice:= 1.00 if Class= "III, (Table 2-3, R 39) 11.25 if Class= 911" .10 (Section 2.6.8, p. 16) Importance Factor: tiz.(Z) := K-m o '(-- �33ft� Kiz+- min(Kiz.,1.4) 2.0.ti-lice-Kiz.(Kzt)0.35 tiz:= tiz.(z) = 2.3-in Velocity Pressure: qz:= 0.00256-Kz.Kzt,Kd.Vi2.'wind-Psf 5.117-psf (Section 2.6.9.6, P. 25) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 12 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A AT&T Wind Loading (With Ice): Kathrein 80010121 Dimensions: hi anti hantl + 2't1Z= 4.921 ft Wi antl == Want, + 2't1z= 1.238 ft di anti dantl + 2't1Z= 0.871 ft Mounting Pipe Li_pl Lpl + 2'tiz= 8.379 ft di_pl := dpi + 2-tiz= 0.577 ft Area (Normal): AiN:= hi antl'wi anti = 6.09 ft2 Area (Side): AiT:= hi antl'di anti = 4.286 ft2 Force Coefficient (Non-nal): Cif N Cf square(hi_ant1,wi anti) = 1.266 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_antl,di anti) = 1.34 Pipe Area (Normal): ANp:= max (Li_pl — hi_ant1)'(di_P1),0] = 1.996 ft2 Pipe Area (Side): ATp:= Li_pl'di_pl = 4.836111 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf P:= Cf round(Li_pl,di_Pl) = 0.967 Normal Effective Projected Area: EPAiN:= Cif N'AiN) + (Cfp-ANp)= 9.638 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAiT:= Cif T'AiT) + Cf,.ATP= 10.42 ft2 Effective Projected Area: EPAi := max(EPAiN,EPAiT) = 10.42 ft2 Wind Force: Fiantl := gz'Gh•EPAi = 53.324•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc—anti = jwantl 2 2= 0.989 ft (Figure 2-2, P. 47) � + danti Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz anti = 71'tiz(Dc antl +t1Z) = 0.702 112 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit anti := (Aiz antl'hi_antl)'Pi= 193.5291bf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 13 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A CCI OPA-66R-LCUU-H8 Dimensions: hi ant2 hant2+2't1z= 8.104 ft wi ant2 want2+ 2'tiz= 1.579 ft di ant2 dant2+ 2't1Z= 0.963 ft Mounting Pipe Li_p2:= Lp2+ 2•tiz= 8.879 ft di_p2:= dp2+ 2•tiz= 0.577 ft Area(Normal): AiN:= hi ant2'wi ant2 = 12.799112 Area (Side): AiT:= hi ant2'di ant2 = 7.801 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N:= Cf square(hi_ant2,wi_ant2) = 1.317 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_ant2,di ant2) = 1.447 Pipe Area (Normal): A := maf(L — h •(d ) 0] = 0.447 ft2 Np i�2 i_ant2) i�2 Pipe Area (Side): A := L •d = 5.125 ft2 Tp i�2 l�2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf p Cf round(Li_p2,di_p2)= 0.986 Normal Effective Projected Area: EPAiN:= Cif N'AiN) + (Cfp'ANp) = 17.297 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAiT:= Cif T'AiT + C f,.ATp = 16.345 ft2 _ Effective Projected Area: EPAi := max(EPAiN,EPAiT = 17.297W Wind Force: Fiant2:= gz•Gh'EPAi = 88.516•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc ant2 :=lwant2 2+ dant2 2= 1.334 R (Figure 2-2, P. 47) Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz ant2 7r'tiz'(Dc ant2 +tiz) = 0.908 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DL : ) = 412.026lbf iz ant2 = Aiz ant2h' i_ant2 'Pi Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 14 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Kathrein 60010766 Dimensions: hi ant3 hant3+ 2•tiz= 8.379 It wi ant3 want3+ 2•tiz= 1.363 ft di anti dant3+ 2,tiz= 0.879 ft Mounting Pipe Li_p3:= Lp3 + 2•tiz= 8.879 ft di_p3 := dp3 + 2•tiz= 0.577 ft Area (Normal): AiN:= hi anO-wi anti = 11.418 ft2 Area (Side): AiT:= hi ant3'di anti = 7.368 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N— Cf square(hi_ant3,wi anti) = 1.362 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_ant3,di anti)= 1.484 Pipe Area (Normal): ANP:= max (Li_p3 — hi_ant3)-(di_p3),0] = 0.289 ft2 Pipe Area (Side): ATp:= Li_p3•di_p3= 5.125 112 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cf p:= Cf round(Li p3,di_p3)= 0.986 Normal Effective Projected Area: EPAiN:= (Cif NAiN)+ (Cf_p•ANp) = 15.838 ft2 Side Effective Projected Area: EPAiT:= (Cif T'AiT) + Cf,.ATP = 15.991 ft2 Effective PmiprtP.r1ArP.A: FPA. •— mnvIPPA.__ FPA.—I — is QQi ft Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 15 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A TMA Dimensions: hi al hal + 2-tiz= 1.588 ft wi al wal + 2tiz= 1.129 ft di al dal +2•tiz= 0.588 ft Area (Normalt): AiN hi al*wi al = 1.793 ft2 Area (Side): AiT hi—al*dial = 0.933 ft Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N Cf square(hi_al,�i al) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T Cf square(hi_al,di_al) = 1.209 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAiN•= Cif N'AiN= 2.151 ft Side Effective Wind Area: EPAiT Cif T'Aff= 1.128 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAia:= ma#PAiN,EPAiT) = 2.151 ft Wind Force: Fial gz'Gh•EPAia= 11.01•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc—al `'Pa12+ dal2 = 0.778 ft (Figure 2-2, P. 47) Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz al T*tiz,(Dq_a1 + t1Z) = 0.577 ft Total Ice Dead Load: DLit al (Aiz al'hi al)'Pi = 51.2721bf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 16 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A RRUS-11 Dimensions: hi a3:= ha3 + 2•tiz= 1.804 ft wi a3 wa3+ 2•tiz= 1.213 ft di a3 da3 + 2•t1z= 1.013 ft Area (Normalt): AiN:= hi aYwi a3 = 2.188 ft2 Area (Side): AiT hi aYdi a3 = 1.827 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N Cf square(hi_a3,wi a3) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_O A a3) = 1.2 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAiN:= Cif NAiN= 2.625 112 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAiT:= Cif TAT= 2.192 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAia:= ma#PAiN,EPAiT) = 2.625 ft2 Wind Force: Fia3 gz.Gh•EPAia= 13.436•1bf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc a3 wa32+ da32= 1.047 ft (Figure 2-2, P. 47) Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz a3 7r-tiz-(Dc a3 +t1Z) = 0.737 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit a3 (Aiz a3-hi a3)-pi = 74.4191bf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 17 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A RRUS-32 Dimensions: hi a4 ha4+ 2•tiz= 2.021 ft wi a4 Wa4+ 22t1z= 1.796 ft di a4 da4+ 2•tiz= 0.979 ft Area (Normalt): AiN hi a4'` i a4= 3.629 ft2 Area (Side): AiT hi a4'di a4= 1.979 11 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N Cf square(hi_a4,wi_a4) = 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_a4A a4) = 1.2 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAiN Cif N'AiN= 4.355 ft Side Effective Wind Area: EPAiT Cif TAT= 2.375 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAia:= max(EPAiN,EPAiT) = 4.355 ft2 Wind Force: Fia4 gz'Gh'EPAia= 22.288•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc a4 `'`'a42+ da42= 1.538 ft (Figure 2-2, P. 47) Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz—a4:= "r'tiz'(Dc_a4+ t1Z) = 1.03 ft Total Ice Dead Load: DLit a4 (Aiz a4'hi a4)'Pi = 116.5141bf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 18 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A RRUS-E2 Dimensions: hi a5 ha5 + 2,tiz= 2.079 ft Wi a5 wa5+ 2•tiz= 1.921 ft di a5 da5 + 2*tiz= 1.004 ft Area (Normalt): AiN:= hi a5'Wi a5= 3.994 ft2 Area (Side): AiT hi—a5-di—a5= 2.088 ft2 Force Coefficient (Normal): Cif N Cf square(hi_a5,wi a5)= 1.2 Force Coefficient (Side): Cif T:= Cf square(hi_a5,di a5) = 1.2 Front Effective Wind Area: EPAiN:= Cif N'AiN= 4.793 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAiT:= Cif TAT= 2.506 ft2 Side Effective Wind Area: EPAia:= max{EPAiN,EPAiT)= 4.793 ft2 Wind Force: Fia5 := gz.Gh•EPAia= 24.528•lbf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc—a5 Wa52+ da52= 1.664 ft (Figure 2-2, P. 47) Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz a5 7'tiz'(Dc a5 +t1Z) = 1.104 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit a5 (Aiz a5'hi_a5)'Pi= 128.5521bf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 19 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Antenna Mount Loading With Ice: HSS 3x3 Loading: Height: him, hml + 2•tiz Width: wiml wml + 2•tiz Area: Aa'= him,-wiml = 1.497 ft2 Force Coefficient: Cf Cf square(himl,wiml) = 1.257 Wind Load: fiml := gz'Gh"Cf'�"�iml = 4.048•plf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc mi `'`'mi2+wml2= 0.354 ft Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz ml := iT'tiz'(Dc ml +t1Z)= 0.324 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit ml:_ Aiz—ml)-pi = 18.122•plf LUU114 Loading: Height: him2:= hm2+ 2•tiz Width: Wim2 wm2+ 2•tiz Area: Aa:= him2'wim2= 4.172 ft2 Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf square(him2,wim2) = 1.518 Wind Load: fim2:= qz"Gh'Cf'�'im2= 4.888•plf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc m2:_ `J`'m2= 0.25 ft Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz—m2:= 7r•tiz'(Dc m2 +t1Z) = 0.262 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit m2:= Aiz m2)•Pi = 14.667•plf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 20 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A 2.0 STD Pipe Loading: Height: him3 hm3+ 2'tiz Width: wim3 wrn3+ 2'tiz Area: Aa hirnYwim3 = 5.991 ft Force Coefficient: Cf Cf round(him3,wim3) = 1.044 Wind Load: fim3 gz-Gh'Cf'wim3 = 3.084-p1f (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc m3 ` .3= 0.198 ft Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz m3 1r'tiz'(Dc m3 +t1Z) = 0.231 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit m3 (Aiz m3)'Pi = 12.929•plf 1.5 STD Pipe Loading: Height: him4 hm4+ 2•tiz Width: wim4 wrn4+ 2-tiz Area: Aa him4'wim4= 1.408 ft Force Coefficient: Cf Cf round(him4,wim4) = 0.754 Wind Load: fim4 gz'Gh-Cf'wim4= 2.065-p1f (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc m4 wrn4= 0.156 ft Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz m4 7r'tiz'(Dc m4 +t1Z) = 0.206 ft2 Total Ice Dead Load: DLit m4:= (Aiz m4)'Pi = 11.539-plf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 21 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A 3.5 STD Pipe Loading: Height: him5 hm5+ 2'tiz Width: wim5 wm5+ 2'tiz Area: Aa him5-wim5= 1.764 ft Force Coefficient: Cf:= Cf_round(him5,wim5) = 0.732 Wind Load: fim5 gz'Gh'Cf'wim5= 2.512•plf (Section 2.6.9.2, P. 20) Additional Ice Dead Load Largest Out-to-Out Dimension: Dc m5 wm5= 0.292 ft Cross Sectional Area of Ice: Aiz m5 '7T'tiz'(Dc m5 + t1Z) = 0.287 ft Total Ice Dead Load: DLit m5:= (Aiz m5)-pi = 16.057•plf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 22 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Summant: Dead Load Wind Load Wind Load Dead Load No Ice No Ice With Ice [With Ice Kathrein 80010121 DLantl = 441bf Fant] = 2321bf Fiantl = 53Ibf DLiz anti = 194 lbf CCI OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 DLant2= 88 Ib Fant2= 5001bf Fiant2= 89 lbf DLiz ant2= 412 lbf Kathrein 80010766 DLant3 = 62 lbf Fanta= 4421bf Fiant3 = 821bf DLiz ant3= 361 lbf TMA DLaI = 16 lbf Fal = 421bf Fial = 11 lbf DLiz al = 51 lbf RRUS-11 DLa3 = 50 lbf Fa3 = 55 lbf Fia3 = 13 lbf DLiz a3= 741bf RRUS-32 DLa4= 50Ibf Fa4= 108 lbf Fia4= 221bf DLiz a4= 117 lbf RRUS-E2 DLa5 = 601bf Fay= 1221bf Fia5 = 25 lbf DLiz a5= 129 lbf HSS 3x3 fml= 14•plf fiml = 4•plf DLiz ml = 18•plf L3x3xl/4 fm2= 19•plf fim2= 5•plf DLiz m2= 15•plf 2.0 STD Pipe fm3= 9•plf fim3 = 3•plf DLiz m3= 13•plf 1.5 STD Pipe = 6•plf f = 2 if DL = 12pif fm4 im4 p DLiz m4 3.5 STD Pipe fm5= 9•plf fim5= 3•plf DLiz m5= 16•plf Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 23 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Riso Model: Y Ak x 71, CD C14Lai w 9: (L a_ LLJ Q- CL .0o. a- w c%i i—L W, EL CL cwa eve a w IL UJ IL IL Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Page 24 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA#: 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAL03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A Most Critical z x 26,41b 92,81b -160.7761b,"v 5281111111 20016 pi 47,41fp 4 6.51 b -3 TIN) 2151, 601b -58 2121b, -9 702W 7,21� -160., 1b 14 37,0b 0 97 ''Y7 1b 10 6.306lb 81b 1-4 7.211 M9 24 96 6 A 1147,47, 200W"' AI i5.2W1 < 176.6' 306.306b 1 ,"", LWW', LC 12,12DIIF,�Fll LEnveWpe Only Sokition Basic Load Combinations: 1) 1.4*Dead Load 2) 1.2*Dead Load + 1.6*Wind Load (No Ice) 3) 1.2*Dead Load + 1.0*1ce Dead Load 2) 1.2*Dead Load + 1.01ce Dead Load + 1.6*Wind Load (With Ice) Maser Consulting P.A. Structural Analysis Mage 25 of 25 400 Valley Road Mount Analysis Date: 12/31/2015 1:08 PM Suite 304 FA : 10063415 MATHCAD-Mount Analysis.xmcd Mt.Arlington, NJ 07856 MAI-03349 Maser Project No. 15946067A iso 3D Member Code Check: Y Z- x .00 Ci CD 11101'10,00;010111 W� 1101""0"'0111 400 room Cry m C". Code Che 1 No Cate 1. '90-1.0 715-.90 ,5D-75 0-50 The existing antenna mounts have been determined to be stressed to a maximum of 58.7% of their structural capacity with the maximum usage occurring at the antenna masts. Therefore, the proposed AT&T installation CAN be installed as intended. The Commonwealth of'Massachusetts Po Department of IndustrialAccidents -: Office of Investigations 1 Congress Street, Suite 100 Foston, MA 02114-2417 wivw mass.govIdia Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers Applicant Infargnatian Please Print Legibly Name (Business/Organization/Individual): Empire Telecom LLC .Address: 16 Esquire Road City/State/Zip:Billerica, MA 01862 Phone#:617-639-4906 Are you an employer? Check the appropriate box: Type of project(required): 1.❑ I am a employer with 100* 4. ® I am a general contractor and I employees (full and/or part-time).' have hired the sub-contractors ®New construction 2.❑ I am a sale proprietor or partner- listed on the attached sheet. 7. ❑Remodeling ship and have no employees These sub-contractors have g. Demolition working for me in any capacity. employees and have workers' 9 E]Building addition [No workers' comp, insurance comp. insurance.t required.] 5. ❑ We are a corporation and its 10.0 Electrical repairs or additions 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing all work officers have exercised their 11,0 Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp, right of exemption per MGL 12.®Roof repairs insurance required.] t c. 152,§1(4),and we have no employees. [No workers' 13.[IN Other Wheless site development comp. insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information, f Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit a new affidavit indicating such. tContractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the sub-contactors and state whether or not those entities have employees. If the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policy number. I ani rrwt employer drat is pr�ovidlrrg rporlcers'conrperrsation insnrtnace for my enrplqyees. Below is the policy otic jab site information. Insurance Company Name:Starr Indemnity&Liability Company Policy#or Self-ins. Lic.#: 100000194500 Expiration Date: 11/30/2016 Job Site Address: ' " 0 9 (�"� City/State/Zip: Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisomnent, as well as civil penalties in the form of STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby certify under the pain,and penalties of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct Signature: Date:2/11/2016 Phone#: 6176394908 Official use only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by city or town official. City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1.Board of Health 2.Building(Department 3,City/Town Clerk 4.Electrical Inspector 5.Plumbing Inspector 6.Other Contact Person: Phone#: ® CERTIFICATE LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 1/1412016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(les)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTANAME:CT Joe Flemin Arthur J.Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. PHONE 856-482-9900 Fax 856-482-1888 Gallagher McIntyre EMAIL 220 Lake Drive East .Joe_Fleming@ajg.com Cherry Hill NJ 08002 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Hartford Fire Insurance Company 19682 INSURED INSURERB:ACE Property&Casualty Insurance C 20699 Empire Telecom USA,LLC INSURERC:Allied World National Assurance Com 10690 1150 1st Avenue,Suite 600 INSURER D:Starr Indemnity&Liability Company 38318 King of Prussia, PA 19406 INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1211694847 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR INSD WVD POLICYNUMBER MM/DD MMIDD C X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y 0309-9013 11/30/2015 11/30/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE ❑X OCCUR PREMISES Ea occurrence) $300,000 X Contractual Liab MED EXP(Any one person) $5,000 X XCU PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 POLICY Fx-1 PE0 [7X]LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $4,000,000 OTHER: $ C AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY6000-0185-CA ONLY 11/30/2015 11/30/2016 Ea accident T $1,000,000 C 6000-0186-ALL OTHER 11/30/2015 11/30/2016 C X ANY AUTO STATES 11/30/2015 11/30/2016 BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED 03099072-1 D-MA ONLY BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS HIRED AUTOS AUTOS Per accident Comp/Collision Ded $$1000/$2000 B X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR XOOG27931339001 11/30/2015 11/30/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $15,000,000 EXCESS LAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $15,000,000 DED X I RETENTION$26,000 $ D WORKERS COMPENSATION 100000194500 12/14/2015 11/30/2016 X STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/ ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECUTIVE ❑N NIA E.L EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 A Property 13UUMBI6836 12/14/2015 12/14/2016 BPP Limit/Deductible $6,455,000/$5,000 Leased/Rented Equipment Limit $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,maybe attached If more space is required) Professional Liability Policy#CEO G27409878 002 Policy Period: 11/30/15-11/30/2016 Carrier:ACE American Insurance Company Occurrence/Aggregate: $3MM/$3MM RE: Job#MAL03349; Location: Chestnut Street, North Andover, MA 01845. See Attached... CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN SBA Properties, Inc. ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 5900 Broken Sound Parkway, NW Boca Raton FL 33487 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 26(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: LOC#: ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULEPage 1 of 1 AGENCY NAMED INSURED Arthur J.Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Empire Telecom USA, LLC 1150 1st Avenue, Suite 600 POLICY NUMBER King of Prussia, PA 19406 CARRIER NAIC CODE EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: 25 FORM TITLE: CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SBA Properties, Inc. is named as additional insured with respect to the above General Liability Policy, if required by a written contract executed prior to services performed. ACORD 101(2008/01) ©2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Massachusetts Dey)a rt ent of Pubhc Safe y Board of Su Ndl ng egLflatlsans and 13tkandar s License: CS-108961 a.a nstrucl:Ion SLAp.rvism DAVID COOPER 24 WENTWORTH DRI `` IS///l BEVERLY MA 09916 ] o Il/1� ial Expiration: Cornrn� sionr 02/24/2019 Construction Supervisor Restricted to: Unrestricted-Buildings of any use group which contain less than 35,000 cubic feet(991 cubic meters)of enclosed space. Failure to possess a current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code is cause for revocation of this license. DPS Licensing information visit: WW M.MASS.GOVIDPS x