Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence - 114 MARIAN DRIVE 6/4/2004 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 0 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 Lis 97&68&9540---Pliolle Stisan Y. Sawyer 978.689.9542—FAX Public Health Director June 4,2004 Mark Honeycutt 114 Marian Drive North Andover,MA 01845 RE: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Plan for 114 Marian Drive Map 107C Lot 54,North Andover, Massachusetts Dear Mr.Honeycutt, The North Andover Board of Health has completed the r I eview of the septic system design plans,for the above referenced property,submitted on your behalf by Engineering and Surveying Services dated October 25,2003 (Last Rev. June 1,2004). The design has been approved for use in the construction of a replacement onsite septic system.This approval is valid for three years from the date of this letter and during this time a licensed septic system installer must obtain a permit and complete this work,and a Certificate of Compliance must be endorsed by the installer,designer and the Town of North Andover. The time period for which this plan is valid is reduced to two years from the date of a septic system inspection which did not meet the acceptable criteria in the state regulations.in the event an imminent health problem such as sewage backup into the dwelling is occurring,the time period for which this plan is valid may be reduced by the North Andover Board of Health. The application for a Local Upgrade was approved as requested,for a reduction in the separation between the soil absorption system and the high groundwater fi-om the required four feet to three feet.With the granting of this reduction,the maximum number of bedrooms of this dwelling has been limited to three bedrooms.This restriction shall remain on the property until such time that the dwelling is connected to a municipal sanitary sewer system and the soil absorption system is property abandoned. This approval is subject to the following conditions: appropriate Regional office of the Department The attached DEP Form 9b must be submitted to the app of Environmental Protection at One Winter Street,Boston MA by the property owner. 2. If site conditions are found in the field to be different from those indicated on the design plan and/or soil evaluation,the originally issued Disposal System Construction Permit is void, installation shall stop,and the applicant shall reapply for a new Disposal Systems Construction Permit(3 10 CMR 15.020(1)). 3. it is the responsibility of the applicant and/or the applicant's septic system designer, septic system installer or other representative to ensure that all other state and municipal requirements are met. These may include review by the Conservation Commission,Zoning Board,Planning Board, Building Inspector,Plumbing Inspector and/or Electrical Inspector. The issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit shall not construe and/or imply compliance with any of the aforementioned requirements. submit proof of certification to the BOH 4. As this system uses an infiltrator system,the installer must prior to the issuance of a disposal works permit, Your effort to provide a properly functioning septic system for your dwelling is greatly appreciated. The Health Department may be reached at 978-688-9540 with any questions you might have. l Sincerely S JnY. Sa wyer,REHS/RS Public Health Director file Commonwealth of Massachusetts city/Town of al LoCal Upgrade Approv Form 913 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health if they choose to do so. The Local Upgrade Approval is to be completed by the local Board of Health and a signed copy provided to the system owner. The system owner shall provide a copy of the Local Upgrade Approval to the appropriate Regional office of the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Resource Protection, Title 5 Permitting Program, upon issuance by the local approving authority and before commencement of construction. A. Facility Information important: When filling out 1. Facility Name and Address forms on the computer,use only the tab key Name to move your It Ll Stree cursor-do not t Address 6) use the return 4"ee� Zip Code key. State City[Town 2. Owner Name and Address(if different from above): ran Name Street Address e cityrrawn Zip�Code�-- el- pone,Number 3. Type of Facility (check all that apply): Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Commercial ❑ School 4. Design flow per 310 CIVIR 15.203: gpd ❑ PE ❑ RS 5. System Designer: Name State, Address B. Approval 1. Local Upgrade Approval is granted for: ❑ Reduction in setback(s)—specify: ❑ redualo- 0 6�uctlo� Reduction in SAS area of up to 25%: -§-A—S—size,sq.ft. /0 Local Upgrade Approval* Page I of 2 t5form9b^rev.5102 Commonwealth oi Massachusetts -- City/Town of Local Upgrade_ y Approval Form B.r Approval (continued) Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater: Separation reduction – ---- - — �t. Percolation rate min./inch Depth to groundwater -- Relocation of water supply well (explain): List local variances granted not requiring DPP approval per 310 CMR 15.412(4): List variances granted requiring DEP approval: Approving Authority cl- , Gate ` - .. Print or Type Name and Title t5fonrn9b-rev.5/02 Local Upgrade Approvals Page 2 of 2 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection --Wastewater Management Prograrr Form Application for l r pr oval Required by 310 C R 15.403(1) Form 9A is to be submitted to the Local Board of Health for the upgrade of a failed or nonconforming septic system with a design flow of less than 10,000 gpd,where full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 5.404(1), is not feasible. System upgrades that cannot be performed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405, or in full compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.000, require a variance pursuant to 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.417. NOTE: Local upgrade approval shall not be granted for an upgrade proposal that includes the addition of a new design flow to a cesspool or privy, or the addition of a new design flow above the existing approved capacity of a septic system constructed in accordance with either the 1978 Code or 310 CMR 15.000. A. Facility Informati®n Important: When filling out 1. Facility Name and Address forms on the / computer,use 5 l.v.cW1 i r only the tab key Name - to move y our r„ Street Address of t yx t w cursor-do not -- - -- _.___-- _-- ------- — key. City c°' u. :>u use the return I � JfIpI Y State zip Cade r-� 2. Owner Name and Address: il(4.: Name Street Address City .... - Y State Zip Telephone Number 3. Type of Facility(check all that apply): [p Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Commercial ❑ School 4, Describe Facility: w y ry 6 k ,r 4 ,.,"� .k .�Vv"� w.,,"��E 5. Type of Existing System: ❑ Privy ❑ Cesspool(s) ❑'' Conventional ❑ Other(describe below): 6. Type of soil absorption system (trenches, chambers, leach field, pits, etc): C �1 (" a . ( t5form9a.rev.5102 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 1 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection —Wastewater Management Program Form Application I Upgrade Approval Required by 310 CMR 15.403(1) Am Facility Information (continued) 7. Design Flow per 310 CMR 15.203: Design flow of existing system: spd Design flow of proposed upgraded system ---- - ------ ---- 9Pd 11 CI Design flow of facility - gpd B. Proposed Upgrade of System 1. Proposed upgrade is(check one): ❑ Voluntary ❑ Required by order, letter, etc. (attach copy) ❑ Required following inspection pursuant to 310 CMR 15.301: -- -- - ---- date of inspection 2. Describe t he proposed upgrade to the system: d c. V t G ill d (k V1 e, "� ... ,� r ,� a. � J w 6 . .�i..f. 1°u: CC 3. Local Upgrade Approval is requested for: ❑ Reduction in setback(s)-describe reductions: ❑ Percolation rate for 30 to 60 min./inch: -min.rncn --- Reduction in SAS area of up to 25%: - ---— -------- -- _-.. .---__-_. SAS size,sq.ft. %reduction ❑° Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater: Separation reduction Percolation rate min./in Depth to groundwater ❑ Relocation of water supply well (explain): t5form9a o rev.5/02 Application for Local Upgrade Approval*Page 2 of 4 j Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection I Bureau of Resource Protection —Wastewater Management Program Form Application t Local Upgrade ------ Required by 310 CMR 15.403(1) ❑ Other requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 that cannot be met–describe and specify sections of the Code: If the proposed upgrade involves a reduction in the required separation between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the high groundwater elevation, an Approved Soil Evaluator must determine the high groundwater elevation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(1)(i)(1). The soil evaluator must be a member or agent of the local approving authority. evaluation determined by: High groundwater J"' -- a ure Date of evaluation 3 —— — Evaluator's Name(type or print) Sign t a C. Explanation Explain why full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. (Each section must be completed) 1 An upgraded system In full .,. ecompliance with.31R,0�Ca MR;..1�5.00�0` is A no,t feasible: - � – — 2. An alternative system approved pursuant to 310 CMR 15.288 to 15.288 is not feasible: C (''" . <" <_,, °p r rya ,.f o'..) . 3. A shared system is not feasible: 4. Connection to a public sewer is not feasible: .. A t5form9a^rev.5102 Application for Local Upgrade Approval- Page 3 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protectior Bureau of Resource Protection—Wastewater Management Program Form Application I Upgrade Approval _ -- -_-._- Required by 310 CMR 15.403(1) 5. The Application for Local Upgrade Approval must be accompanied by all of the following (check the appropriate boxes): ❑� Application for Disposal System Construction Permit ❑f'Complete plans and specifications ❑, mite evaluation forms ❑ A list of abutters affected by reduced setbacks to private water supply wells or property lines, Provide proof that affected abutters have been notified pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(2). ❑ Other(List): D. Certiicati®n "I,the facility owner, certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments,to the best of my knowledge and belief, are true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there may be significant consequences for submitting false information, including, but not limited to, penalties or fine and/or imprisonment for deliberat violations." A � <IX --------------- .,. Facility er's -gnat re Date Print Name Name of Preparer Date Preparer's address City/Town State/ZIP Telephone -- —.----�— NOTE: 310 CMR 15.403(4) requires the system owner to provide a copy of the local upgrade approval to the appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Resource Protection, Division of Watershed Management, upon issuance by the local approving authority and before commencement of construction. t5form9a^rev.5/02 Application for Local Upgrade Approval°Page 4 of 4 Page 1. of 1 DefleChlaie, Pamela From: DelleChiaie, Pamela Seat: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 2:38 PM % Too Sawyer, Susan � f / Subject: 114 MARIAN DRIVE -ACTION REQUIRED Importance: High ' Susan, You need to do a septic approval letter and stamp the plans before anyone can gel:a DWC permi/, hope Jon Whyman did not go ahead and start doing anything without a perrnit....I will leave the file in your inbox. P 6/2/04 - H/C: Mark Honeycutt came in to sign the LUA form. 5/18/04 -Susan Sawyer called Greg Saab..- He did review fax. Will submit plans and ask owner to come down and sign LUA. 5/4/04 -Septic Plan Revision 3 submitted. To Sue Sawyer for review. Engineer not charged for Revision 2 & 3- should they be? It is normally a 75 charge per revision after Rev. 1. Since this did not go to Dan, let me know. Tx-- p.d.. 4/29/04-The groundwater offset is okay when pumped. It is still a LUA variance. Given 3 foot, allow the other modification. Greg will show tank. Susan will send out approval letter. Mr. Markey motions to approve a 3 foot variance as long as it is pumping to the D.-box. Dr. 'Trowbridge seconded the motion. All were in favor. 4/27/04- Left message at office for Clay Morin and Greg Saab re: meeting oil 4/29/04.--p.d. 3/31/04-Septic Plan Revision 2 submitted. `To Sue Sawyer for review. Per Susan, needs to go to the BOO meeting on 4/29/04 re: Groundwater reduction. 2/12/04-Received a call from John Whyrnan: 781.334.2323. Requesting variance for Item 12 listed oil tare Plan Denial letter from Dan Ottenheimer, Septic Consultant, on 12/16/03. Mr. Whyman had sent a letter regarding this on 11/26/03 which is mentioned in Item 12. Ms. Sawyer, Flealth Director will review the file and let Mr. Whyman know whether his request will be granted or riot, and what the next step will be with regard to Item 12. Mr. Whyman states that the engineer will be addressing all of the other items on the letter. 12/16/03-Plan Denied 12/16/03 -Received packet of misc. Completed forms in mail -soil tests, dwc app., install cert. ; project management obligations; Comm. Of Mass. DWC permit. Plan is currently in for review, not sure why these forms are being submitted. Soil testing was done back in May 2003. No checks were received with these forms. 11/26/03 -Received septic plan submission. 7/8/03-Tues. -Soil Testing done on 7/7/03. Pile back in active files pending Design/DWC apps.--p.d. Tues. 6/17/03- Received a call from John Curtin looking for status of application for Soil Wresting. John faxed a contact list to me with current/former h/o narrres and phone numbers. Folder not in file drawer. Put copy of Project Detail Report and contact list sent by Mr. Curtin in Sandy's Soil Test inbox.--p.d. 6/2/03-Mon. -Conservation approval put with file and passed on to Sandy's Soil"rest in-bin.--p.d. 5/29/03: Received a faxed copy of test pit sites. Copy to Conservation for sign off. Original file in holding birr until response from Conservation.--p.d. 5/28/03: Spoke with Greg Saab, certified soil evaluator. Fie thought Jon Whyman was going to Call re: test pit sites(Jorr's name not anywhere on application). He will call John and tell him that we need test pit sites indicated. 5/13/03: Left msg. With engineer that we need indication of where the test pits will be. Fold until info. Received before sending to Conservation.--p.d. North Andover Health Department , 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01 845 tacsim& ftmsmittal To: Greg Saab Fax: 978 689-OR'' From: Susan.Sawyer Date: 5/11/2( iN Re: 1.14 Marian Drive Pages: 1 - ' CC: [Click here and type name] ❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle a a a a a a a a Greg, Your plan for the property listed above has been reviewed and unfortunately, a couple of items need addressing before it can be approved. If you disagree with any of these comments please feel free to contact me. 1) Regarding the pump—please indicate on the plan that the pump and alarm must be on separate circuits 2)There need to be buoyancy calculations for each of the tanks 3)Although you did submit the form 9A for the LUA, it is not signed by the owner of the property. Please let the owner know that they must sign the form prior to issuance of an installation permit is issued 4) Please note on the plan that the installer must be certified by the manufacturer of the infiltrator system and show proof of the certification to the BOH. 5)The comment#17 in the Notes should be removed.,due to the revisions 6) Please identify who is responsible for making sur thatall other applicable permits such as; plumbing and electrical are obtained. Thanks, Susan O 0 ! ! O O , O ! , O O ! O O O O ! ! O O - o O O O O O