Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 200 CHICKERING ROAD 7/15/1996 )ectina Commissioner of 3nN.E.2do789 inc. viS!Ommis ational Amusements App, Ct- 80, 52 delay 26 Mass d that d De t. Bost I ling ordinance held Services 'Boston zoning ing applied) - (1988) ( n interpreting permissible and that new zon in adopting zoning was if Cambri!ft9e_r 26 Mass. Nichols vo Board Of Zonin A eal 0 ermit is reVired 3o N.E.2d 1257 (1988) (special P one conforming App. Ct• 631, 5 ng structure to change from to alter nonconforming ing use) - use to another conform - Serena, 550 N-E.2d 1390 (Mass. of Norwell V. App. plannin C1 V. Serena, 27 Mass. Bd. 1_0__W_I_'J_ 1 11 Bd- of Norwell in p�i�annin lo 31 (198 1990) , !ajf�fKi�im�n, , (1989) (transfer of two lots nonconforming Ct. 689, 542 N.Eo2d 314 of zoning change which would make was to anticipation two lots from change where transfer did n protect d trust with husband and wife as Sole husba d and wife an beneficiaries) • oealS of Dedham, 26 Mass OM., v. Board of f-:� decision Tex-Stj!��ru-on,st_-_ Corp. of appeal s . 2d jj_j__;6 (198 was not abuse ZT-'- d nonconforming use . qi71, 52s NoE App. I permit to expand be to deny special, . on where finding that increased use would of it,�! discretl detrimental to the neighborhood) o 33 Mass App. Ct- i� Board of A eels of War-ii, aivision s V. Boa definitive sub 1 :! 21 2d 9 shown on Z _ 369 (19 2) (lot zoning change to 55, 596 N.E.2 in separate ownership before plan -must be placed expiration of s year zoning freeze on remain buildable after definitive subdivision plans) . D. Section 7 : . App. Ct. 169, 516-_N E- Commonwealth V. PorrazzO, 25 Mass - iol�dtion may-bE (criminal Dr-osecution--for ,Z-oning v f changes needed is court, but I(j day noting 0 (1987) t in district brought commencing such action) - required prior to CO 11"]1pipeals! of North,"Andover:, 27 Mass- APP- Goldlus-t v Board of Ap Andover bY-law, Cto 11�81_ - 1019 (1989) (under North Andov from zoning , 541 N-E.2d setback to be measured where split lot zoning, rear boundary and not from rear lot line) * let 30 Mass. App• Ct* I I of A eals of Somerset, building Lord v. �Z�onin Bd. %a� ^�lo limitation for '�� (violations o�ye ear��A ( ;91� 11 (19 1) lies to structural 226, 567 N-E.2d 954 s zoning violations app inspector to redress violations, but not us e violations) • 5