HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsultant Review - 11 BAYFIELD DRIVE 6/30/1988 MMIMMMIM
CHANNEL
June 30, 1988
Mr. Scott Stocking
Town Planner
NORTH ANDOVER TOWN HALL
120 Main Street
North Andover, MA 01810
Re. Material Installations Addition Project
Lot 1B (formerly Lots 1&2)
North Andover Business Park
Dear Scott:
This proposal received Conditional Approval from the Planning Board in
September 1987 (see attached). Enclosed are revised plans and
drainage calculations. We are seeking amended plan approval prior to
filing for a building permit. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
a
James Bourgeois, R.A.
Vice Presdient Architectural & Engineering Services
Channel/Bayfield Companies
on behalf of Material Installations, Inc.
abs
Enclosure
cc: Thomas Neve, Neve Associates
Norman Gill, Material Installations
Michael Rice, CBC
242 Neck Road Haverhill, MA 01835 508-374-4511 FAX 508-373-4900
of � uuuuouuuouuuuuuuuuummuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumm�uuumuuuuummmmiu�m�ummmmmmmmmumim��uwm�mumuououuuuu!w�uwuuuuu�immo�muuuuuuuuuuuuuuu�uuu�uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu�o�,m�wmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumi�,wwimiummm�umr�mn umuuumnuuuuuuwuvuumoimu�ioi�am
uuuuum�uuuummmu�uuuu�uuu�uwwu�wuwwu�uu�hnmmumuiu�wmuv�muouuuuuuuuHnuuuuu�uuuuuum�m�ti�uuuuuuuuuuuuuu�uummumimummmmmummimmiiuuwu��u�u�uumuuu�uu�uu ceu��uu
z ' TOwzl of
OFFI(�F_S OF: o °, 1' o Mein Slrc�c�t
APPEALS North Andover,
BUILDING ;,''4::;:; t9 L. M;ISS�ichusettS 0 184 5
CONSERVATION 3 @"QH°eat (t INVISION Of; (61 7)685-4775
V1EA1 All 1
PLANNING PLANNING & CO 3 MVNITYI ME VELOPMENT
KAfZAPH.P. NELSON, LARECf'OR
September 2, 1987
Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk
Town Office Building
120 Main Street
North- Andover, MA 01845
Re: Material Installation
11 Bayfield Drive
North Andover, MA
Site Plan Review
through Special Permit
Dear Mr. Long:
The North Andover Planning Board held a public hearing upon
the application of Channel Building Company, 23 Main Street,
Andover, MA. on Monday evening, August 3, 1987 in the Town Office
Meeting Room. The hearing was advertised in the North Andover
Citizen on July 16 and July 23 , 1987 . The following members were
present and voting: Erich W. Nitzsche , Chairman; John L. Simons,
Clerk; George Perna and Paul Hedstrom. John J. Burke was absent.
The petitioner seeks a Special Permit under Section 8 ,
paragraph 3; Site Plan Review. The purpose of the Site Plan
Special Permit is to review the proposal to expand the assembly
and live storage areas of the existing facility by approximately
18 , 200 square feet of land on the North side of Bayfield Drive
known as 11 Bayfiled Drive in an Industrial-1 (I-1) Zoning
District.
John Simons read the legal notice to open the public hearing.
Letters were received and read from the Fire Department, Board of
Health and two (2) letters from the Conservation Commission.
Jim Bourgeois representing Channel Building, Material Installation
and 114 Associates presented the proposed plans.
MOTION: John Simons to continue the public hearing until the
August 17 , 1987 meeting.
SECOND: George Perna
VOTE : Unanimous
On August 17 , 1987 the public hearing was continued. John
Simons read a letter sent to Mr . & Mrs . Redman from Material
Installation with regards to lighting and traffic issues .
Jim Bourgeois of Channel Building presented the Planning
Board with revised plans .
y
Page 2 .
MOTION: By John Simons to close the ublrofaring.
SECOND: George Perna �EP 3 v W fi
VOTE : Unanimous
On August 31 , 1987 the Planning Board held a regular meeting
and voted to approve the Special Permit application by Channel
Building to construct an 18 , 300 square foot addition to the
existing building located on Bayfield Drive at the intersection
of Willow Street.
Three issues of concern were discussed at the Public Hearing
that should be addressed in this Conditional Approval are as
follows :
1 . The unfinished Cul-de-Sac at the end of Bayfield Drive
does not allow for adequate fire protection and access-
egress for the existing building. It was discussed that
the Cul-de-Sac was not finished by the developer of
North Andover Business Park prior to this date because
of a pending application to the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts to create an entry onto Route 125.
The Planning Board is in receipt of a letter from the
Division of Public Works dated November 14, 1986
denying the request for emergency access onto Route 125
and is concerned that no work has taken place on
Bayfield Drive thru 1987 .
2. Concern by abuttors to the North of Material Installation
property of truck noise and lights during the night.
Proponents for the project stated that the newest
dwellings are 200 feet and 400 feet respectively from
the building, but admit that into the winter months ,
a lack of foliage in the intervening woods may be
cause for concern and have suggested that truck traffic
be directed onto the locus by way of the Willow Street
entrances thereby minimizing headlights being directed
to the North by the present access from Bayfield Drive.
3. There was a concern by the Planning Board of the increased
rate of runoff being produced within the North Andover
Business Park by the inclusion of additional impervious
pavement and building additions. The applicants Engineer,
Mr. Tom Neve, has submitted drainage calculations
stating the peak runoff has been decreased from the
locus due to the fact that percentage of impervious
area on the lot has been reduced from the overall
Master plan of the Park and that the lot size has been
reduced. Notwithstanding these factors, the Planning
Board recognizes that if this lot size has been reduced,
another lot. in the Park must have been increased, and
that Mr. Neve nor the Planning Board has an accurate
accounting of the present impervious area versus the
original Master Plan impervious area of the Business
Park overall. >
Therefore, the Planning Board renders;= this' Conditional Approval
foi- bhe construction` of the proposed building=additions for
�.,
Page 3 :
1 . Bayfield Drive will be constructegjXiZlccordance with the
Subdivision Plans of No,,rth ,'jkndbVdr Business Park and be
brought to at least bind8Y pavement to the satisfaction
of the North Andover Fire Department and to the Division
of Public Works prior to construction of the building
addition.
2. The lawn area to the East of the proposed building between
the building and Willow Street shall be designed as a
Detention/Retention Pond to further mitigate runoff flows
and to account for loss ground water infiltration due to
the impervoius area. This will necessitate redirecting
runoff flows into the Ponding area, preferably from the
parking lot prior to discharge off site, with proper pipe
sizing to detain storm water flows to the maximum possible.
3 . Truck traffic flow will be required to access-egress the
property from the Willow Street curb cut only and
automobile egress the site from the curb cut on Bayfield
Drive. This will be a condition for continued occupancy
and will . be implemented by the use of one-way signs and
exit only signs and others as deemed necessary both installed
at the two curb cuts as well as at the truck docks and
pointed indications on the pavement throughout the parking
and access-egress areas.
4 . Upon completion of the building addition and prior to building
occupancy, the applicant shall file an As-Built Plan of the
total site showing at least, but-not limited to the following,
pavement grades, rims and inverts, drainage size, access-
egress signs, lighting landscaping and all utilities.
Said plan to be prepared and certified by a Professional
Land Surveyor and submitted for approval by the Planning Board.
5 . The landscape plan as submitted does not show the existing
row of planted arborvitae to the rear of the existing
building and the Planning Board is of the opinion that the
proposed planting of arborvitae will be of the same nature,
and therefore will not mature to a full effective screening
for many years and therefore will require that in addition
to the landscaping plan as submitted being conformed to in
its entirety, a six (6) foot closed stockade fence be erected
along the property line from a point starting fifty (50)
feet from Route 125 and extending Easterly to the Easterly
line of the proposed building addition.
6 . In accordance with the Fire Department report of July 31 ,
1987 , the following shall be provided:
1 . The addition must be equipped with an automatic fire
suppression system (sprinklers) and. the fire detection
and alarms form the original building must be extended
into the addition. Both of these systems must have
plans submitted to the Fire Chief for approval prior
to construction.
Page 4:
2. The Fire Chief has requested that information regarding
the material to be stored and the amount of storage for
products in this expansion be submitted to himself or
the Fire Presention Officer.
7 . The North Andover Conservation Comission' s Order of Conditions
under File No. 242-193 , shall become a part of this approval
and be strictly adhered.
8 - In addition to the aforementioned Conditions, the Planning
Board approves only that work as shown on the submitted
plans namely:
1 . Sheet Ll-1 dated 9/5/86 and revised 8/13/87
2 . Sheet L2-1 dated 9/5/86 and revised 8/13/87
3 . Sheet L4-1 dated 9/5/86 and revised 8/13/87
4 . Unnumbered Sheet dated 8/13/86 and revised
9/9/86 and entitled "Scheme 3"
9 . Any proposed changes and/or future building expansion will
be the subject of a new Public Hearing under a new Special
Permit Application and further that any changes from these
approved plans and that may be shown on the As-Built Plan
submitted for approval prior to occupancy will negate this
Special Permit and will require a new filing of application.
Sincerely,
PLANNING BOARD
Erich W. Nitzsckfb,
Chairman
cc: Director of Public Works
Highway Surveyor
Board of Public Works
Tree Warden �a
Conservation Commission �:• ;_� ;;:
Building Inspector
Board of Health ,
Assessor
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Applicant
Engineer
File
Interested Parties
PAGE; THREE
NORTH ANDOVERIBUSINESS PARK'
23 . Plans do not show lot grading and cuts and fills in accordance
with Sec. III , B, 3,k,
24 . Subdivision does not tie into any existing monumentation.
25 . Plans do not indicate why only Lot 8 should be considered the
subdivision. Under the Subdivision Control Law and the Planning
Boards Rules and Regulations all land of the applicant being
1r}s
subdivided including all dattL and streets should be part of
the subdivision.
26 . The applicant has not submitted a Statement of ';Environmental
Impact in accordance with the Preliminary Plan approval .
27 . Applicant has notdemonstrated that Willow Street has the
proper Street and pavement width along its entirety from
Route 114 to be able to handle the increased traffic from this
subdivision or to allow the Town of North Andover to maintain
such proper widths.
28 . The applicant shall beaware that all underground utilities
will be installed prior to the placement of the binder pavement:
-If this is not performed, no lots will be released.
29 . The Plans do not reflect covenant restrictions that would prohibit
lot development encroachment into the 100 year flood plain.
30. ,:, The plans do not reflect the existing utilities and elevations
on Willow St. extension.
31 .' The plans do not show the termination of the drain easement on
Lot 7
32 . The Plans do not show a proper drain easement on Lot 2 at the
Margolis property. Considering that the drain inverts are to
be set below the existing grade very close to the property line,
proper rip-rap and erosion controls -shall be detailed to
:.,insure that surface water from Lots 1 and 2 under
development condiitons will not adversely affect the Margolis
property '@4:2r the integrity of the roadway embankment.
33All drain Easements shall be delineated on the topographic and
drainage "plans to insure the Planning Board and H. S . that the
drainage is in within the Easements.
GE: TWO
NORTH ANDOVER BUSINESS PARK
Board can verify the extent of imprevious `areas . This is
important so that the Planning Board can verify if development
is in keeping with the drainage calculations dated March, 1983. or -_�4r C_cJ
11 . Watershed bor(lering lineshave not been shown on Definitive Plans
so it must be assumed that the detention basin is allowed also
to flow on land of Symosek and create additional flooding.
Developer is required to mitigate the additional flooding on
abutting properties to zero. In accordance with Section III ,
B, l , e) of the Planning Board Rules and Regulations .
12 . This subdivision ignores the Prelimianry approval decision in
that the drainage under Willow Street is being utilized as a
drainage constriction. The H. S . has requested that the drain
under Willow Street be enlarged and that all drainage constrictions
be outside the roadway. The existing 15 inch drain was considered
to be temporary by the H. S.
13. The typical roadway area section is not in compliance with the
rules and regulations, specifically Section V, c.
14. There shall be no weephole in drainage structures as noted
on detail sheet.
15. Plans do not reflect requirements of the Dept. of Public Works
in their report of May 8, 1984.
16. Plans do not reflect requirements of the H. S.. in his report of
May 15, 1984.
17. Plans do not reflect requirements of the Fire Dept. in its report
of April 26, 1984.
1$: Plans-.do not reflect the requirements of the Conservation Commission
-heir Order of Conditions dated October 14 , 1983 under File
�IaTQ 242-193..'.
19 Plans do not reflect a buffer zone on Lots 6 and 7 abutting a
re�� de�ntial zone as required in the Preliminary Approval .
20 P]ans ';do nA show solid line on proposed street and lot lines .
21 No basements have been dimension-d_in proper form._for- conveyanQe.
l2' Phans do not show erosion and sediment control methods in accordance
with Section III, B, l .k. of the Rules and Regulations .
NORTH ANDOVER BUSINESS PARK Lthep U�iRD
1 . In accordance with the Preliminary Subdivision Approva ,
do not show a c losed water main system down Route 125 to Hill-
side Road as required by the Dept. of Public Works with the
Preliminary approval . eT;
2 . All other aspects of Dept. of Public Works report in accordance
with Preliminary approval . r<,
3 . Drainage calculations have not been submitted based upon
the Order of Conditions from North Andover Conservation
Commission.
4. Drainage calculations have not been submitted for all drain
pipes.
S. Project proposes filling, raising the 100 yr. flood elevation
from elevation 236 to elevation 237 . This additional flood
height will cause flooding on land of Margolis through the
proposed twin 18" drains at Station 35+50. Project should
mitigate this flooding.
IAI-
6 . R-equire municipal fire alarm system as requested by Fire
Department.
7 . The plans do not indicate an access egress onto Route 125 in
accordance with `the Fire Department request and in accordance
with the Preliminary approval .
8 . No documentation has been submitted as to ownership of the
existing Willow Street in its entirety,either private or public ,
in accordance with the preliminary approval , nor is any
information provided documenting by metes and bounds the
outside limit of Willow Street.
� . Drainage si i}�rri-i Lied a rc' c.icr l,ed M<lrch 1110F i1nd
indicate 31 .98 Acres of impeevious surface with plans which a
only show approximately 3 Acres of roadway. Proposed site
plans of lots documenting the impervious area should be
submitted `so that they can be verified with the Asbuilt
Plans .
10 . iRequire that As-Built Plans of the entire subdivision be
submitted including all lot development so that the Planning
A A !1A,
ASS , A
INCO
April 19, 1988
Planning Board
Town Hall
North Andover, MA 01845 ii
RE. North Andover Business Park, Lot 1-B, Materials Installation
For Channel Building Company-Revision to Site Plan
and Hydrologic Analysis
Attn: Town Planner, Scott Stocking
Dear Board Members :
Please find herewith and attached:
1 . Revised Site, Grading and Utilities Plan-Sheet L2-1 showing
the new addition, parking and circulation pattern and new
drainage proposed for the above-referenced lot.
2 . Revised drainage calculations which compares the new proposal
with the Master Site Plan previously approved for the Park.
Please note that these drainage calculations clearly
demonstrate that the site plan as proposed creates less
of an impact than the Master Plan had indicated. Please
note that the peak rate of runoff shall be less than
permitted for the 100 year,' 25 year and 10 year storm events.
Please accept this revised site 'plan since it is consistent
with Master Site Plan for this lot.
If there are any questions regarding this project, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
ti
Very truly yours,
THOMJ�S E NEVE ASSOCIATES, INC.
Thomas E. Never, P. E. , P . 1-6.
PrPnident
J i IT) T101)qe0i C3
447 (X() 110!0 _)N POAD
I AND �111 JOW-YOFM TOP�',FIF-1 (), MA 01(011
I AND I IIJ ill ANM III',
((',17) fin I
�
]
` .
,
Ddtw for LOT l0. m4liN", ����N}Nks INSTALLATION
P,�nurmd bv
THOMAS C . N[VV A5SOC\6yES, INC. T0PSFX6LD, MASS \ 8�pRDD
�
EVOOT
SUWCATCHMEN| ) to 2 °."="=..".=...°..."..~."...==~.~~~.~
SUBCHT[HMENT I SITE SUQCHTCWMEMT FROM WATERSHED PLAN
80 98 AREA- 4.39 ACRES SCS TR-20 METHOD
20 79 LEN6TH= 1000 FEET TYPE Jl 24-HOUR STORM
0 0 SLOPE= .8 % RAINFALL- 7.0 INCHES
00 Tc- 21 MINUTES -- - - 0 12,68 HRS
\00 94
�
VOLUME= 1 .93 8F �
SUBCHTCAMENT \ RUNOFF
�
SITE SUBCRTCHM[NT FROM WATERSHED PLRN
26 -
24
20 .
~
Is
�
w �
+ \5
o
1 �
~
12 --
10 .^
PEAK= 26.8 CFS
u
'q VOLUME- 1 . 93 AF
OJ
TIME (hours )
SUBCHTCHMENT 2 SITE AS pH0POSEO~EN%STING AND NEW MOOlT%ON
52 98 AREA- 4,39 ACRES 5CS TR-20 METHOD
48 73 LENGTH~ 1000 FEET TYPE II 24-HOUR STORM
0 W SLOPE~ 1 .0 % RAINFALL- 7.0 INCHES
Tn~ 23 MINUTES 12. 10 HRS
09 VOLUME- 1 .81 AF
f)61O fol- LOT 10, W. TERIK-6 INVALL(MON
I'vapaved by THOMAS L. NEVI. ASSOCIATES, INC. YOPSFIEL.D, MASS 19APROB
SUDCATCHMENT 2 RUNOFF
SITE AS PROPOSED, EXISTING AND NEW ADDITION
24 ,
22 - AREA- 4 . 39 RC
20 - CN- 09
le - Tc— 23 MIN
ca 16 -
14 - SC TR-20 METHOD
12 - TYPE II 24—HOUR STORM
10 - RAINFALL— ? IN
la- 6 - PERK- 24 . 3 CFS
4 @ 12. 1 HRS
2 . VOLUME® I . BI AF
TIME (hours )
�
`
. i
�
Data for 104 |0, NAL*r^ HIIlE �(ALS lW'ilA1LAfl(JN PaQm 3 �
Prbomrmd bv YHOwh\ F. NVVE 6SS0ClA1CS ' INC. \0P5FlELD . hi�sG i0MPR88
5,coirm uvpjr
5UBCMTCMM[MY > to 2 =~~~=..=...~.......~� ..~.=" -==---=~--~--~"
SU@CHTCHMENT I SITE SU0CATCHM[NT FROM WATERSHED PLAN
80 98 AREA- 4.39 ACRES SCS TR-28 METHOD
20 78 LENGTH= 1000 FEET TYPE ll 24-14OUR STORM
0 W SLOP[" .B % RAINFALL- 5.5 INCHES
Tc- Z] MINUTES 0 12.08 HRS
\00 94
VOLUME= 1 .48 8F
SUBCRTCHMENT 1 RUNOFF
SITE SUBCRTCHMENT FROM NRTERSH[D PLAN
CN= 94
--
'-
Tc= 21 MIN
~ 1°
w
12 - SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE 11 24-HOUR STORM
~ 18
-Z RAINFALL- _
-
[� G
VOLUME- 1 . 49 RF
Cu
TIME (hours )
-
5UBCHTCHMENT 2 SITE AS PRO9USEO,E%I5TING AND NEW ADDITION
52 98 AREA- 4,39 ACRES SCS TR-20 METHOD �
48 79 LENGTH~ 1000 FEET TYPE Jl 34-HOUR STORM
W Q (3L0PE- 1 .0 RAINFALL- 5.5 INCHES �
�
Tc~ 23 MINUTES PEAK- 18.3 CFS 0 |2. | ) HRS �
100 89 1 .37 0F �
|
|�
|�
Patio 4
E , WU ASSOCIATES. INC. T()PSFIELD, MASS
t t �-c Q LALL-1i 0, ....._i 9 K'Aw-a at-ft"ng-C,Q-tau a A p-m-a—-----
SUDCAfCHMENT 2 RUNOFF
SITE AS PROPOSED. EXISTING AND NEW ADDITION
ARE 4 . 39 AC
CN- 89
13 Tc- 23 MIN
J2
SCS TR-20 METHOD
10
TYPE II 24-HOUR STORM
RAINFALL- 5. 5 IN
id 5 PEAK= 18. 3 US
4 @ 12. 11 HRS
3
2 VOLUME- 1 .37 RE
CV M;-1U-) W rl CD
CD
TIME (hours )
it
`
(
�
'
�
Data for L01 10. Nflk]P, MTrRjALs XN�;THLLATlUN
yrermrmd by THOMAS F . N[UE ASSU[l AlE5 . INC. T0P5FIEIu . MAS6
sybom Gvw T
SUBC8TCHhENT } to Z .~~~~~."~=~~~~~...~=~~....~~~.~~~~�~���~~���~~~~~~ /
SUQCMTCHMENT V SITE SUBCATCNMENT FROM UATERSHE0 PLAN �
MR Q
80 98 AREA~ 4.33 ACRES SCS TR-20 METHOD
20 '79 LENGTH~ 1000 FEET TYPE I{ 24-HOUR STORM
8 0 SLOPE= .8 % RAINFALL- 4.8 INCHES �
Tc= 21 MINUTES @ 12`08 HRS �
\00 94
VOLUME- 1 .29 8F �
�
SUBCATCHM[NT } RUNOFF
SITE SUBCRTCHM[NT FROM WRT[RSHED PLHN
RRER= 4 . 39 AC
is
/2
* l
+
10 - SCS TR-20 METHOD
g TYPE II 24-HOUR STORM
X RAINFALL- 4 .8 IN
2 VOLUME- 1 .29 FIF
Ln
u
�
/
TIME (hours )
5U8CHTCHMENT 2 SITE AS PR[PD9ED,EKISTING AND NEW ADDITION �
52 98 AREA- 4.33 ACRES SCS TR-20 METHOD �
48 79 LENGTH- 1000 FEET TYPE 17 24-HOUR STORM i
W 0 SLOPE~ 1 .0 % RAINFALL- 4.8 INCHES
Tc~ 23 MINUTES P[ W |2. | \ HRS '
)W0 89 �
VOLUME~ 1 . 16 8F '
!
�!
.|
/
�`
Coo t a Ear t0l 113, NAW. HAURIAL-S INSIgAlt (ATION
I'l VJ)dF 00 byl HlOhAS E . NIVE, ASSOCIATES, INC. l0flSFJCLD,- MA )5
SUDCATCHMENT 2 RUNOFF
SITE
AS PROPOSED, EXISTING AND NEW ADDITION
I t) -
13 FIRER- 4 .39 AC
12 CN- 09
11 Tc- 23 MIN
10
9 - SCS TR-20 METHOD
8 - TYPE II 24—HOUR STORM it
7 - RAINFALL- 4 . 8 IN
5
4 PERK- 15.6 US
3 e 12. 11 HRS
2 - VOLUME— 1 . 16 AF
(Oki
TIME (hours )
dl
rrrI
IY
f II
T
� t
n . SEP 30
V � i
THOMAS L/' . r E lc.HANNEL BUILDING CO.!
A7t`7®t.1A F 11 C-
September 30 , 1986
Conservation Commission
Town Hall
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: North Andover Business Park, Lot 1-B , Hydrologic Analysis
Dear Members :
An hydrologic analysis of Lot 1-B (previously Lot 1-A and Lot
2-A) in, the North Andover Business Park was calculated in order
to determine the peak rate of the discharge for the 100 year
storm. The analysis compares the proposed conditions (building
addition and regrading). against the "Master Plan" proposed for
Lot 1-A and 2-A.
The hydrologic analysis was conducted using the S .C. S . method.
The entire site was considered in the analysis with the exception
of the narrow panhandle area running along the west side of the
Willow Street ( extension) , which will remain unchanged according
to the site development plans .
The soil was determined to be in hydrologic soil group C (U.S.D.A.
soil conservation maps) .
CN WATERSHED PLAN PROPOSED CONDITION
- Impervious 98 4 . 19 acres 2 . 08 acres
-Regraded area
-Lawn-fair condition 79 1.57 acres 1 . 93 acres
-Weighted Cn 92 .8 88 . 9
-Time of Concentration 10 min 8 min
See Hydrographs
ENGINEERS 447 OLD BOSTON ROAD
LAND SURVEYORS TOPSFIELD, MA 01983
LAND USE PLANNERS .(617) 887-8586
CONCLUSION:
The entire site was considered as one subcatchment, to determine
the overall runoff leaving the site. The runoff in both the
proposed plan and the "Master Watershed Plan" drains to the same
area east of Willow Street.
HYDROLOGIC SUMMARY
Master Watershed Plan ( 100 year storm event) 38 .7 C.F . S .
Proposed conditions ( 100 year storm event) 27 . 1 C.F. S .
The peak rate of runoff is less for the proposed conditions as
opposed to the "Master Watershed Plan due to two factors .
1 . The lot size has been decreased
2 . The percentage of impervious area on the lots has been decreased
Very truly yours ,
THOMAS E. NEVE ASSOCIATES , INC.
Thomas E. Neve, P .E. ,R.L.S.
President
Enclosure
/r
THOMAS E. NEVE ASSOCIATES , INC. DATE
PROJECT: NABUSP SHEET OF
HYDROGRRPH FOR SUBCRTCHMENT # 1
36 SUBCAT # 1
34 PERK = 32.7 ----------
3e RAINFALL = S.5 AREA= 5.76 ACRES
28 CN= 92.8
26 AREA = 5.7E Tc= 10
24 CF•1 = 9�•8 RAINFALL= 6.5 INCHES
v
20 - PEAK FLOW= 38.7 CFS
18 Tc = 10 VOLUME= 2.47 ACRE-FT
14
b- 12
10
8
6
4
0 0 1 1 13 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 L0
TIME (HOURS)
HYDROGRRPH FOR SUBCRTCHMENT # 2
26
24 PERT: = 2'. 1
SUBCAT # 2
RAINFALL = 6.5 AREA= 4.01 ACRES
20 -
18 AREA = 4.01 .----- CN= 88.9
16 CN = 88.9 RAINFALL= 6.5 INCHES
U 14
Tc - B PEAK FLOW= 27. 1 CFS
3 12 VOLUME= 1 .58 ACRE-FT
0 10
tL 8 `
6
4
2
q0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
TIME (HOURS)