Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsultant Review - 125 FLAGSHIP DRIVE 5/17/1988 EMENINNUM Page 1 oL 3 CHANNEL PROJECT MEMO CLIENT:-- OMA Associates PROJECT: Kenics PROJ.#: 1 WOR Associates DA PREPARED BY: DATE: October 21, 1988 Steve Foster t 1� all attending; Robert Nicetta, N.A. Building Inspector; Greg Wiech and DISTRIBUTION: all attesnding, Robert Action Due Attending: Irene Mackun, N.A. Conservation Commission Scott Stocking, N.A. Dept. of Community Development Steve Foster, CBC . The purpose of._this meeting ,was., to review the Kenics project s uested e r q _-.-- - --by. the Building ,Department,.regarding both Conservation Commission and .Planning- Board. sign-off-.on the.-Building. Permit, card. _.__---_.---_.____----_---_- 1. The project site will be paved in accordance with the original-plan with the exception of the east driveway which has been relocated to approximately, 31 off the east .face of 1. the building--. 2. The proposed additional parking at the east side of the site and also at the southeast rear corner of the site were discussed and a revised plan should be submitted to Scott Stocking for his review of these additional Parking spaces prior to the installation of same. 3. Due to constraints imposed by the cold weather, it is not anticipated that any_landsca ping or seeding would be in place prior to the end , of pl the apting__peason for 1988. It was agreeable to all parties_� that, should the_pj ant ing_not be place, e for the 1988 season that it be deferred until the S p ring of 1989, and that the occupancy of the building_would not be affected by this planting timeframe. Channel Building Company Inc. 23 Main St., P.O. Box 522 Andover, Massachusetts 01810 617-4751651 N Page 2 of 3 PROJECT MEMO CLIENT: PROJECT: Kenics PROJ.#: PREPARED BY: DATE: 10/21/88 DISTRIBUTION: Action Due Attending: 4. It was discussed._that due to the_ledge _uncovered at the northwest corner of_the_site_that the respective parning__and drive grading_ was_revised_in_or_d_er to eliminate any blast_inq of ledqe in this area. ____The ledge-problem in this vicinity_also__has- affected the size of the _basin_ as-_indicated_on the red line_site_plan resented at th`_meet.inq,—The_revised_-grading arrangement_presently in dace and ____the_r_evised_size-of the_detention basin have been reviewed by the_ -----site -The___toe____._of_slope_-location-at the north__edge_of_ the site-at the perimeter._of_.-the---cul-de-sac was _discussed and CBC_will_be_relocating _.__.__the__toe _of_slope_and_also-relocating-the hay_._bales accordingly, as--requested by._the__Conservation_Commission------- 6.. The-hay--baling at the. perimeter-of_the_site-was inspected an-d.-found to be--in suitable__condition._____ _-___ --- - �. It was discussed that the final shaping of the detention basin will be_taking_ place in the forthcom.ing_week,_and at_the _same time the reloaming of the site will be in process as well. Channel Building Company Inc. 23 Main St., P.O. Box 522 Andover, Massachusetts 01810 617-4751651 Page 3 of 3 CHANNEL PROJECT MEMO CLIENT: PROJECT: Kenics PROJ.iY. PREPARED BY: DATE: 10/21/88 DISTRIBUTION: Action Due Attending: 8. It was requested by Irene Makim- that CBC submit a revised site plan at the next Conservation Commission meeting to address the following items: a -The additional-.paving_at-the_east__and_southeast_corners _ --- - of_the_sit,-- --- __.-.-__—____b_ The- grade and-drainage revisions_necessitated_b_y_the -_— 1 edge-outcropping--_at-the-northwest-corner-and-the-respective - -- -------------resizing--af-the-north--detention-pond.--It-wa"etermined_ _that_a_ new _hearing was not necessary for these minor changes, but that it should be scheduled and brought up as_an_agenda at_the Conservation Commiss ion_meeting_to discuss the effect of these changes on the_presently_ imposed Order of Conditions. 9.___The Building-_Permit_card__has-been initialled by the representatiyes of the Conservation_Commission_and-Planning Board_which-viewed the -- ---site. ----- - - ----------- -This-report_represents our understanding of_the_meeting-, discussions, and _agreements.-_ If_err-ors_or- missions_do_exist, notification in-writing_is _requestedwithin_seven__(7_)days-;_ otherwise,__all is accepted. ___ Channel Building Company Inc. 23 Main St., P.O. Box 522 Andover, Massachusetts 01810 617-4751651 ,OR �W(10 46 d 5 t>E"I;`YC .w UE": 120 Maul Sweet APPEALS 'S " � North Ai idover�, B JII_DINtx �� M Er �d Ma ssa ht.i iQ tts 0 1$i45 CONSERVATION TIC N �^c�au� DMSION OF' (617)68a4775 5 I{EurMI-1 KAREN H.P. ELS(:.)N, DIRECTOR k � y UM d 0 1987 lot Planning Board re= Flagship Drive Channel Bldg. This Site came to my attention previously as Lot A. Regan F, Land. The current plan shows two seperate wet lands .t opposite ends of the lot. This is because the area between them has been filled in. The earlier propo al showed the wet-lands as connected and part of larger °e ource rea, yet when 1 visited the site to review the°pl a a T noticed that a wide areaof wetland had been filled in between the high areas along the wrest and east p ° pe°arty lines. Has this filling already been approved? See attached copy of the letter dated 4-6-87 It seems unusual to fill in wetlands before a plan is approved. Sincerely RUM in SiO r U . Idea t �.......,tio Town of APPFALS `•.;: �1ORTH ANDOVER NIiltitiiIcII I S c I I S 01845 (:ON'S1,, VATION "` I)WISR)N OI' ((i 1 7) G87,4777) I'I.ANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAREN I I,I'. NH-LSON, DIRL C:'ITOR April 6 1987 Planning Board re- Regan Land Flagship Drive I have reviewed the plans for this project and have several comments. Lot A appears to require too much wetland filling to be practical but when I visited the Site March 10 1987 the area at the end of Flag Ship Drive had already been filled in. The filled in area is a low point between higher areas and the fill would appear to impede the normal runoff. I noticed no cilverts in place to restore draniage. Sincerely Health Sanatuian l U THOMM El N] HI NE ASSOCIATES, IN(--"A, August 3 , 1987 r. �j Planning Board Town Hall North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Flagship Drive, Channel Building Company' s Proposal for I{enics Dear Board Members : This office had prepared a hydrologic analysis of the above- referenced site. Your Board asked that we submit additional information on the soil -types which exist at the site and more particular explain how the curve numbers were selected which were used in the SCS Hydrologic Model. Attached please find: 1 . Curve Number table from TR-55 . 2 . U.S.G. S. Topographic Map 3 . U.S .D.A. Soils Survey Map 4 . Hydrologic Soils Group Sheet from TR-55 As you may note, the site is comprised primarily of Paxton Sandy Loam in a Hydrologic Soil Group, "C" . Average Curve Numbers ranging from 70 to 80 to 98 were used in the Draincalc Model based on the Post Development surface condition proposed. I hope this report and its attachments furnish you with the information requested. Very truly yours, THOMAS E. NEVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Neve, P.E. , R.L.S . President Attachments cc: Channel Building Co. , J. Bourgeois ENGINVERS 447 01-D BOSTON ROAD l_.AND SURVEYORS TOPSFIEL_D, MA 01983 LAND USE PI_ANNERS (0.1.7) 88'7-8586 i.t TABLE #1 A-1 Runoff Curve Numbers (CN) i I i LAND USE DESCRIPTION HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A B C D Lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc. good 39 61 74 8o I fair 49 69 79 84 II poor 68 79 86 89 Commercial and business areas, paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. 98 98 98 98 Streets: paved with curbs and storm sewers 98 98 98 98 paved with open ditch drainage 82 89 92 94 J gravel .76 85 89 91 dirt 72 82 87 89 Residentia' Average lot size % impervious 1/8 acre or less 65 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre 38 61 75 83 87 1/3 acre 30 57 72 81 86 112 acre 25 54 70 80 85 1 acre 20 51 68 79 84 Meadow or idle-good hydrologic condition 30 58 71 78 Woods - good hydrologic condition 25 55 70 77 — fair hydrologic condition 36 60 73 79 thin stand, poor cover, no mulch 45 66 77 83 `; ? continued B-14 Table B.1--Continued NO"ILI 0 OCILLA C Ch SLCW 11 ObGSSO 0 PARALOMA C NOK ASIPPI 0 CCKLEY B ONTARIC ® OWYMEE B PAAANORE 0 I OKAY C OCOEE AID -CNTKO 9/0 GKALIS C PARASOL B NnKOMiS B OCONEE C C14TCKAGCN 0 OKBCW C PARCELAS 0 NULAN B CCONTO B ONYX B OXERIhE C PARDEE 0 ' N01.1CHUCKY B CCLSTA C CCKALA A CKFCRD 0 MRENAT B NOLIN B OCOUEOC 8 OPAL 0 CLAMIS - 0/0 PARENT C NULO B OCTAGON B OPEGUON CID OLAN D PARIETTE C NOME C ODELL B CPHIR C CLAUKEE C PARIS NCNOALTON B GOkRMOTT C UPIPIKAC 0 PARISHVILLE C NONOPAHU 0 COI.SSA 0 CQUAGA C PAAIKI B PARKAY 8 NOaKACHAMPS C/O COIN C ORA C PAALCA B PARKOALE B NOUKSACK P DONE C CRAN 8 PAAUHAU A PARKE B NOONAN U O'FALLON 0 CRAAGE 0 PALhAPPA B PARKER 8 %OKA B OGDEN 0 CRANCEBUPG B PACHECO B/C PARKFIELO C NORAO 8 GGEECHEE C CPCAS 0 PACK C PARKHILL 0 NCKBGRhE B CGFMAW C ORCFARD B PACKARD B PARKHURST NORBY b UGILVIE C CPO A PACKek C PARKINSON 8 NOkO B CGLALA B CkchANCE C PACKHAM 8 PARKVILLE L NOF)EN B OGLE B UPOWAY U PACK SADOLE a PARKWOCO A/O NCRONF.SS 8 CMAYSI C GREL IA 0 PACKWCCU 0 PARLEVS B NORFOLK B 4HIA A C,RELLA J PACULET 8 PARLIN C NGkG(- 8 OJAI R CREM A PACTCLUS C PARLO 8 NCKKA 8 OJATA 0 CRESTIMBA C PAOEh C PARMA C NCRMA b CKANCGAN b CRFCRO C PAORLNI B PARNELL 0 NOARrST C CKA'A 0 CRIDIA C PADUCAH 8 PARR B hOKRf� C OKEECHOBEE AID CRIF A PAOUS B PARRAN 0 NORTHDALE C CKtELANTA A10 Cklc C PAESL B PARRISH C NOATHFIF,LC B CKE MAM C LRICN 8 PAIET B PARSHALL B NUkTHPORT CKLARED 8 CPITA B PAGOCA C PARSIPPANY D NORTH P(.CER C CKLAWAHA AID ORLAND 8 PAhKANAGAT C PARSONS D NOR Th,)-PfkL AND C/D CKMOK C CRLANOC A PAhkEAh 0 PAR TRI C NUR TUN C OKO U ChPAN C PAHPGC 0 PASAGLHAK B hURTMVILLE C CKuBOJI C URMSBY B/C PAIA C PASCG if '.. hnf.TUNt U OKLLONA C. CHCOELL C PAIGE C PASC SECO 0 '.. NONWALK B WEEK U GRCFINC B PAINESVILLE PASCUETTI C/D NORWAY FIAT A OKTIBBEHA 0 CPO GRANDE C PAINTROCK a PASCUOTANK 8/0 NOR.FLL C OLA C CPCNC 0 FAIT 8 PASSAR C NO.'.ICH D OLAA - A LRCVAUA C PAJAPITO B PASS CANYON 0 '.. hckMU"0 B OLALLA C CKR C PAJARO C PASSCREEK 0 NOTI D CLANTA B LPRVILLE C PAKLCA B PASTURA 0 NOT US A CLATHE C CRSA A PAKINI 6 PATAHS 8 NCVARA B OLD CAMP C Cks INC, A PALA B PATENT C NUVARY B OLDHAM C OKIELLC A PALACIC 8 PATILLAS B NOWC'l0 C CLOS C GkTIGALITA C PALAPALAI B PATILO C - NOvi- C CLUSMAR b/D LPTING C PALATINE B PATIT CREEK B '.. NUKY C CLOWICK H CPT12 C PALESTINE B PATNA C NU,.KOLLS C CLFLO b I'PWCOD B PALISADE B PATCUTVILLE C NUCLA B CLENA B (SALE 0 PALMA 8 PATRICIA 8 NLECES C CLFDUA 0 CSAAIS 8 PAL MAREJO L PATRICK B NUGGCC C CLETE d CSGCCU b PALM BEACH A PATRGLE C NUMA C OLEK B LSFA B PALMER 0 PATTANI C '.. NUh114 C CLLA C GShAWA 0 PALMER CANYON B PATTEhBURG 8 NUNICA C CLI l C SHEA C PALMICH B PATTERSON C NUVN C CLIAGA - h CSFKCSH C PALMS 0 PATTON a/c NOSS U CLINUA d CSM1CMU 8 PALMYRA 8 PATWAY C BUTL:Y - C LLIPHANT B CSICR 8/0 PALO B PAUL B NUT4AS C CLIW.HAIN C '.SKA C PALLRAS B PAULDING 0 NUTkIGSC 8 CLIVtR K LsPUhC B PALLMINO 0 PAULINA 0 NUVALUF C CLIVIER C LSC B PALLS VERGES B PAULSELL 0 NYALA 0 r..LM 110 D CSCee 0 VALLUSE B PAULVILLE 8 NYVCRF A C70'I IL ) USCkIDGE L PAL SU PC VE E PALMALU 8 NYSSA C CLVCS C CSLIE H PAMLICC U PALASAUGUNT 0 '.. NVSSAT0N 0 CLMSTEO e/O C5$13N C PANNA C PAUSAhi 8 NYSTRCM C CLNEY B OST 8 PAMSCEL 0 PAUWELA B CLCKUI C CSIPANCER B PANA B PAVAHRCC B CAME R CLPE C CTERC 8 PAALCA 0 PAVANT 0 LAKUALk M OLSCN C CT"LLC U PANAEWA 0 PAVILLICN B L'AKOEN 0 CLTUN L LT IS C PANASCFFKEE 0- PAWCATUCK U CAKFF-MU R nLUSTEE P/D CTISCO A PANChEK1 8 PAWLET B f AK GLEN B LLYIC h 011SV IL LE A PANChUELA C OAK G-OVE C CLYMPIC b LILEY R PANCC a PAKTON C UAK LAKF B CMAHA P CTSt LC C PANCLAH C 17'FT TEi®® .--•�—� OAKLAND C CMAK C LTTEP B/D PANULAA U PAYMASTER 8 OAKS h1VGF C CMEGA A C17L.aElh C PANI:UAA D PAYNE C OAKVILLE A CM.ENA A CTTEFPCLT B PANE B PAYSCN 'O CA/WnL`U D COIN C CI TLKET A PANGUITCH B PEACHAM C CANAP'JKA 0 CNA A/U CiWAY 0 PANHILL Y PEARL HARBOR U UA S I S R CNALASKA B 07%ELL C PAN IC.CUt B PEARMAN ,ATMAN b CNAMIA a CUACHITA C PAKKY C PEARSCLL D nHAN C CNARGA ? LURAY A PANCChE R PEAV ME C _ nhAR1 b CNAWA C nl1LET C PANLLA U PECATCKICA H 1'1'RAY D CNAWAY b LVALL C PANSEY 0 PkCCS L nbURN U ChUAWA L CVF.GAARC C PANTHE°' C PEOEE C OCALA 0 CNCIOA U OVEHLY C PANTCf, C PtOERNALES C (A*EAKET D (.-NE ILL P. LVtRTCh C PAULA A PEUIGO B/C UCtA10; A GNE i'%TA H rVIC C PALLI 0 PEULAR 0 UCHEY('(Ah 0 Oh I TA C N INA B PAPAA C PtORICK 0 LCHLDLKCNLC 8 CNITE B G►ECr D PAPAI A PEEBLES C ULMI U LNI TA C LWLK CHEEK C PAPAKATING D PtEL l I,CH01-I C LNCVA L IWC.N5 0 PAPC.0 Sc C PEELER B OCla PC 8/0 LNKAY D f WH( B PAk ACISL C PEEPER L 'UITrs A ^LA'rr MYnRnt.nrlr n`IL r.rrnP INnI^ATFS TnF SnlL rnnNP PAS NnT BrFN OFTERfAIPED THn SnIL GRnOPS SIICI' AS R/r INnIrATvC Tk+r pPA1UFO/UIIOPAII'FO tITOATInN January 1971 ESSEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS S�0 36 ���y1y Joins sheet 30 C bC R V13YA H 1 WrA Ra ShC Ram B N 114 RIB SrA B S Cb8 ShB rq =r: UD CaB' �.. RdA` RdA' (1 PbD bC WrB' WrA Rd PbC PcE se SrB �0 " A Pb �o. s0 HfD Sr Sr6 a� �' CcC Srf W g T,. G UD`V✓rA WrB TSB PG Sa — Wa6 Ca)1 f v Rd6 WrA 8 LL ��@ o y Wg w CbC p CrB '= y 3 0 WrB. Wr WrA Cab MmC L R Sr8 S Pab RIA RdA; •.:� WeA AMC• P Wsc RIB s@ Wr8 RdA YPI ; W; •'�' W g rat, .Wrg Pap ILL s Se WrC PaB PaB PaC�� ��, P oD Wh kt RdA {'bD i s a R/g PCB RIB t Sh8 Wr8 PGr�� UC Wr6 Fa r WsB \ WsC wlr 4 Pa¢ ; ha�3 MB MD WsB s LID I �a Hf,C: �b81 Cb 1 H(6 M � Q9e!•S ' �'aC'' Pt�`D ,Y PeC, r MC Pe6 Q i \ r 7 % 5 Ur RI PbC LL// Pb6' N SuC ^r. r Wh lo a k WsB WsP U , SB WsB. Mfl '' �� CbC dam' C/'(,• 4 ..y + rr, '` ,x.,k, .. S€ LO � 5 r r CrC r , i k� F -• +. CbC WsC I tat s ?4 I IJILL. o FHB Wt6 14 r v r Pc P +° t '.'g h �� a r� t e �, rrr P• r - �� Est pStR Cht� RI Pti1 1 O sYStPF Wh LAA ROC Yi' a i:` ° m 5. t f Rt8 +� } Cb�'. MP �y 3 s #r � yt -.@1' Z �• w ..aS3 p !mod i � `t ' f PbC � a � ` ' t ."� °`fit � • ` ' Wr6<' t�,i � �sr *: � ���� fit ' t �� r � � s a \ ? G,oO p LO SUB . V1<rA r� } P t PbC o $tB x ' t i Wr�,,�. Y � `SU Z5 I NE,� =f /11''�"" ( v i :e. N S�ryi W9P G° WsB � PCU C i C•i r •. s 0o roo veEr (.loins sheet 40) ® l �CP � 1 L � � �i � rata _ J . J Frr nklm Sch• �N 3 ery irs, a y �Q ( h 1 ,1 . 214 5 � I�m � % �3 � ��}.,:• l''�� �, � � _ 5©Hi 9�0 �0/' 1 0 uti1"D o - o - u��9 ��� os4 - 2 � tint ��a\_ o. ST M — -. -- �. W W ie _ • �'� s i -� J Mack )� 'o rtge 1 1 i : REq ��' (�5 Q x3 5 , ,23� _ ��,5 �� �(�-�.i 40' ��� I C RSA'/ ei � 1 =, a do uC Iti9 / c -so .331 HI \ o,- �. 238 _�\\, /;",` 1 �.� \• � ,:� '248 a Clay ii zso 0 4 . I I 4725 SUMSv1 .w. - ���� kt SATE-FOREST o� 00' t� 283 -2,. - _ '. �• \ �r - 1 51- am 286 - - - �• 0 _ 48 �•a. }1 - • � o 0 4724 - " 27 a �6 pO 600 000 O FEET �. - _ �„i� f f -To e S �� - 4 k -�M � - - i 'it /- - o. /Ike ,, .. -- f - - � o°-� 250 ii u 0275 .a l II ii BM • •-o �. - i u - '250 179, 4700 - ° • -a,� - - - �, , F� an a 20 ar •`• STATE >B 8 9�< - �- 2 a ti FO Res '..-� F� '!i_. 'ti's '�� �o . 304 `� O A . • \ / A tl ,. o R 4722 S � O Q - a •;,� i - )\' E 4 TAT EST o\. 1�. a. � ''S- •�... ��1 .,����.�-- }/ _ C!VOP ``• '37'3 O°” 30 V8 Ml. TO MASS. 28 328 710 000 I FEET\ 329 5, 330 I Ri ���1 Mapped, edited,and published by the Geological Survey 1 2 SCALI �0y Control by USGS,USC&GS,and Massachusetts Geodetic Survey N,N 1000 0 1000 2000 �9 Planimetry by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs GN taken 1939. Topography by planetable surveys 1942. Revised 1966 1 5 Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum 16y=• 10,000-foot grid based on Massachusetts coordinate system, 276M CONTOUR 11'.4 25 5 M MI LS NATIONAL GEODETIC mainland zone 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 19 �_., .._. :..a:..... ... ,.,hf,h nnkv lanrimark huilriinac Ara shown UTM GRID AND 1979 MAGNETIC NORTH Town of AI'h"'f;ALS NoHh At1Dvei,� . BUILDING C;C)I°�``^>9';�-"�""�If"�TIC:)N "v e<� DIVISION Of' (G{7)Ca85-477,5 11E AI,'I'[I PLANNING {'.r R11"I I l.f'. Nl:_?L.a CDt t, lD{�i➢. '"1'd>P= July 15, 1987 q :°>, t .' �, To: Planning Board h� From: Nancy J. Sullivan, Cons. Admin. Re: Request for Comment - Flagship Drive - Site Plan Review Dear Members of the Planning Board: I have reviewed the plans as submitted and my comments are as follows: 1. Notice of Intent for this parcel of land was considered under file #242-215 and an Order of Conditions issued which allowed for an extensive amount of filling. A new Notice of Intent has been filed with the NACC and considered at its meeting held July 8, 1987, and the Order of Conditions will be issued on July 29, 1987. 2. This proposal requests that the NACC issue an Order of Conditions which allows for additional filling and associated replication. 3. The NACC has reservations as to whether additional filling is necessarily required to allow development to take place on the site. I would recommend that this item be tabled until the NACC has issued an Order of Conditions for the proposal. Sincerely, NORTH ANDOVER CO ERVATION COMMISSION Nancy J. Sullivan Conservation Administrator NJS/mlb b ' 0 14 Amol toe ly Se y W •�____ ` � .� '�i�:rte,, � � a� ' w `� ( - r � 000 `� r k '' ` � h v 0 4 / ` E 40 J f N N (� s uJ t tt a ( (t /i;1 r,- r ' aA�✓n-a iqv LL I a� QY U ° Q . ,, "Ilk q