Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - 67 CRICKET LANE 1/31/2008 BUILDING PERMIT 0*00 oT 6 9ti TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER APPLICATION FOR PLAN EXAMINATI0 � Eb Permit NO: Date Received 3ypDRM1TED 1P"icy* SSAGHU`�E Date Issued: IMPORTANT:Applicant must complete all items on this page Print PROPERTY OWNERL�c Pnr�t MAP NO; PARCE4. ZONING DISTRICT Historic District yes n© _ Machine:Shop Village yes no TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED USE Residential _ Non- Residential N Building One famiI di ' Two or more family Industrial Alteration No. of units: Commercial Repair, replacement Assessory Bldg Others: Demolition Other Septic 1l1/ell = Floodplain an - ds District -W ewer DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PREFORMED: , �D l q,K(z' C c+Z��.� iLool- 1 t/ r-ta lee- f zo`x(i I'glu v e)L)G c�'(` A z i vti a �f�rE,1ti Identification Please Type or Print Clearly) OWNER: Name: tJffCW ° Phone:77Z c°7- Cz;?0 Address:_ 6 (2 cK'& 6*ri �. CONTRACTOR Name tn.1 - 1 Super�is�r's Construction License % ��-. . , �xp :Date:- '� ��` , -Horne�rnprovement.License. '��J�.f �� Exp Date. ` / � ��' ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Phone: Address: Reg. No. FEE SCHEDULE.BULDING PERMIT.$12.00 PER$1000.00 OF THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST BASED ON$125.00 PER S.F. Total Project Cost: $ E )-37 r)o FEE: $ Check No.: Receipt No.: NOTE: Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guara ty fu d Signature of Agent/Owner Signature of contractor Plans Submitted Plans Waived Certified Plot Plan Stamped Plans TYPE OF SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Public Sewer Tanning/Massage/Body Art Swimming Pools Well Tobacco Sales Food Packaging/Sales Private(septic tank,etc. Permanent Dumpster on Site THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY INTERDEPARTMENTAL SIGN OFF U O DATE REJECTED DATE APPROVED PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS DATE REJECTED DATE APPROVED A CONSERVATION a c g COMMENTS DATE REJECTED DATE APPROVED�,�/� HEALTH COMMENTS Zoning Board of Appeals: Variance, Petition No: Zoning Decision/receipt submitted yes Planning Board Decision: Comments Conservation Decision: Comments Water & Sewer Connection/signature &Date Driveway Permit Located at 384 Osgood Street ;FIRE;DEPARTMENT Ternp Dempster on site yes no Located at 124 Main Street F�re'Departrnent signa#ere/date COMMENTS. : . , ®�%AORTil AA'. �g.ILE® /g�•p® OL It— A ,pro cocmi iwc« toy 7 RA�4AreD PPP,y c(� �SSAC HUS�� PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT Community Development Division Date: January 15,2007 Warren and Robin Markowsky 67 Cricket Lane North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Building application for addition Dear Mr. and Mrs. Markowsky, Thank you for submitting the requested information in regards to your building application to close in the screened room and add a porch to your property listed above. Your application for the addition has been reviewed by the Health Department, however, it was unfortunately denied on January 15, 2008, for the following reasons. As detailed in the previous denial, the review of the house floor plans, submitted by you, indicate that the home has greater than the nine (9) rooms (not including bathrooms and hallways)that it was originally approved for and is therefore currently in non-compliance with the State Environmental Code regarding subsurface disposal systems. The Health Dept, file shows no previous approval or agreements regarding the number of rooms; however please know that the code also does not penalize homeowners for past actions. The purview of this office is to bring systems into compliance as these conditions come to our attention as in your case. The enclosure of the porch as described in the proposal submitted by Dan Gobeil Home Improvement describes in detail the enclosure of the screen room. This enclosure is by definition and increase in flow. See attached section of the MA DEP regulations.310.15.204 An increase in flow cannot be allowed other than as listed in the regulation. Mr. Neil Bateson came to our office to review materials to do a Title V inspection on your property. We informed him that to do the inspection at this point is not prudent and suggest he hold on the inspection until further notice. As of right now a full septic system upgrade would be required to move forward in this project. If you choose to do a new septic system, the place to begin would be with an engineer who specializes in septic systems. We would be happy to walk you through the process if you plan to take action in this direction. 1600 Osgood Street,North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Phone 978.688.9540 Fax 978.688.8476 Web www.townof north and over.corn In addition to not needing the Title V Inspection, it is also unnecessary to complete the original tasks requested. These items were noted in the previous letter, "Once the floor plan is reviewed, a determination will be made whether a septic upgrade is required. It is recommended that you complete tasks l.a and 2.a prior to the hiring the septic inspector." If you disagree with the findings of this review in regards to the number of rooms being greater than 9, please contact this office and we could arrange a walk through of your home. Also see section 15.412 and the complete code for variance information if you consider enforcement of this regulation to be manifestly unjust and you wish to come before the board to ask that a deed restriction be considered. You must prove and supply all previously requested information(see previous denial letter)and request to be on a Board of Health agenda to address this consideration. Sincerely, S Sawyer, REHS/RS ublic Health Director Cc: Building Department File 1600 Osgood Street,North Andover,Massachusetts 01 845 Phone 978.688.9540 fax 978.688.8476 Web www.town0northandover.com 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 15.204: Increases in Design Flow to System No person shall increase the actual or design flow to any cesspool or to any other system above the existing approved capacity,or change the type of establishment of a facility served by a cesspool, il unless the cesspool or system is upgraded first. Upgrades to accept increased design flow shall be performed in full compliance with the requirements applicable to new construction unless a variance is allowed pursuant to 310 CMR 15.414. For purposes of 310 CMR 15.204,the approved design flow shall be the flow listed in the most recent Disposal Works Construction Pen-nit. �f 15.211: Minimum Setback Distances (1) All systems must conform to the minimum setback distance for septic tanks,holding tanks,pump chambers,treatment units and soil absorption systems,including reserve area,measured in feet and N as set forth below. Where more than one setback applies,all setback requirements shall be satisfied. Septic Tank Soil Absorption System Holding Tank ;t Pump Chamber Treatment Unit 3 Grease Traps Property Line 10[5] 10[5] Cellar or Crawl Space Wall, Swimming Pool(inground),foundation drain 10 20 Slab Foundation 10 10 Water Supply Line(pressure) 10[1] 10[1] Surface Waters(except wetlands) 25 50 Bordering Vegetated Wetland(BVW), Salt Marshes,Inland and Coastal Banks 25 50 Surface Water Supply- Reservoirs and Impoundments 400 400 Tributaries to Surface ft Water Supplies 200 200 Wetlands bordering Surface Water Supply or Tributary thereto 100 100 Certified Vernal Pools 50 100[2] Private Water Supply Well or Suction Line 50 100 Public Water Supply Well (2) (2) Irrigation Well 10 25 }, Open,Surface or Subsurface Drains which discharge to Surface Water Supplies or tributaries thereto 50 100 Other Open,Surface or Subsurface Drains (excluding foundation drains)which intercept seasonal high groundwater table[3] 25 50 Other Open,Surface or Subsurface Drains = (excluding foundation drains) 5 10 Leaching Catch Basins& Dry Wells 10 25 Downhill Slope not applicable 15[4] [1] Disposal facilities shall be at least 18 inches below water supply lines. Wherever sewer lines must cross water supply lines,both pipes shall be constructed of class 150 pressure pipe -_ and shall be pressure tested to assure watertightness. ; [2] The required setback shall be 50 feet where the applicant has provided hydrogeologic data acceptable to the Approving Authority demonstrating that the location of the soil absorption system is hydraulically downgradient of the vernal pool.Surface topography alone rF is not determinative. } 4/21/06 310 CMR-512 I - 1 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION L n 15.412: continued (c) With the exception of those watersheds(Ware,Quabbin and Wachusett)to which the V_ provisions of 350 CMR 11.00 (MDC Watershed Protection regulations) apply, local Approving Authorities may,after consultation with the local water supplier,issue variances for the siting of systems within the setbacks to surface water supplies or to tributaries to surface water supplies and may exempt tributaries consistent with the standards and 1 procedures of 350 CMR 11.00 without Department approval provided that no such variance or exemption shall result in the siting of a septic tank or soil absorption system within 200 feet of said surface water supplies or 100 feet of said tributaries, or siting of a septic tank within 25 feet or a soil absorption system within 50 feet of any surface water. Copies of all such variances for uses and exemptions of tributaries shall be submitted to the Department by the local Approving Authority within 30 days of issuance. 15.413: Conditioning of Variances (1) The local Approving Authority or the Department may issue variances subject to such conditions, including, but not limited to, monitoring and reporting requirements, deed recordation requirements,financial assurances or other qualifications on the use of the system, as it deems necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment. Any conditions shall be expressed in writing in allowing the variance. (2) Any denial of a variance by the local Approving Authority or the Department may direct the applicant to upgrade an existing system consistent with the requirements and standards of 310 j CMR 15.404 and 15.405. Failure to do so may be the subject of enforcement action by the local Approving Authority or the Department. 15,414: Variances for Increased Flow to Existing System Local approving authorities and the Department may vary the application of any provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 with respect to any particular case involving increased flow to an existing system only when in the opinion of both the Department (except as provided in 310 CMR 15.412(4))and the local Approving Authority all of the following conditions are met. A showing by the person requesting a variance that the proposed variance would satisfy the maximum feasible compliance provisions as set forth in 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405 shall not presumptively entitle such person to a variance. (1) The person requesting a variance has established that strict enforcement of the provision of 310 CMR 15.000 from which a variance is sought would be manifestly unjust,considering all the relevant facts and circumstances of the individual case including, at a minimum, the following: (a) the owners of any such system for which permit applications were filed after March 31, 1995 shall be deemed to have had knowledge that full compliance with the requirements applicable to new construction is preferred; (b) the costs of full compliance with the requirements applicable to new construction shall be compared to the costs of compliance with a variance;and (c) whether an upgrade in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is feasible without increased flow. (2) The system cannot be brought into full compliance through any of the following: (a) an upgraded system which is in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.293; (b) an alternative system which has been approved for such use pursuant to 310 CMR 15.284 (remedial use), 15.285 (piloting), 15.286 (provisional approval), or 15.288 (certification for general use); (c) a shared system which has been approved for such use pursuant to 310 CMR 15.290 and 15.291;or (d) connection to a sewer system. (3) The upgraded system with the increased flow provides better protection of public health and safety and the environment than the existing system with no increase in flow. Increased flows not in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 will rarely pry�ovide better protection than existing flows to a system designed and constructed in compliance'with the 1978 Code or 310 CMR 15.000, but are more likely to constitute improvements over nonconforming or failed systems. 9/22/06 (Effective 4/21/06)-corrected 310 CMR-566 l C, cur �� •, .���a.. yi y 9 I I N W V f � r �.M �' a �' �� �4.„� �`'�� Q„ �, �; � � �- � 7, � � � � ���� � � J, _� S � � � ,� t F^ � e� ����, .. ( ''a i ii � � t .� f � �� ^,,, P, 1 ' �x/_ �� ,a °� , ., —�.a�, ��� C” ��. � \J �,�.,, -_._.� //�y°� 'k ,�L n,..t �kl �s�F}. r h 3 is. ,d' E"^sJa t � �� � f� 5n ..�. , tea, �,. �^�,� *,, p..r \d �, Q. W'qN' w,.,� � y i W w t e.s,�,�.,,,, ... j jf/ V �I.. ... ui„i via �����Y4, i.. �F.,...��. yr �r•�.�i� k 04 Q vi - °w. ( f Otto", NN a,n4 yk4 w +� rC r°d °r4, " AR y / i e'P r � ., e+'`" c`�1^ y °} "gyp°s/n �,a'✓/d��d"�`�°°�r �V.) Aball CID y/rr„u. ,. / b � d. 72z v �' +,rid 4 ,Y,�• , c pppVV / Al Hot x », F 2� NJx u ;L _ �E•� �' ; y _ _ oil t 9 ~+4 �a '����rr ✓ �� �a���-`���� � t _. E 6•.t t -`� I '� ��� �t�✓�b 11A z � F c0