The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence - 102 PETERS STREET 5/11/2012 'Eel: 978-682-4042 DI-J"NIDEE Fax: 978-682--3413 May 11, 2012 Ms Judy M. Tymon, AICP Town Planner Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: 102 Peters Street North Andover, MA Please find the following enclosed: Copy of the Certified Decision Three Copies of the signed inylar plans Registry of Deeds receipt dated 5/9/12 If you have any questions,please call me, Thank you. JeaErey heehy EnclI osu )r '(5) Mailing: Offilce: P0. Box 3099 - Andover, M.A 018310 30 Cdenn Street, Lawrence, MA 01843 Cambridge Statistical —Makln Diselnetiansa Eeientlr November 19th, 2013 North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: 94/102 Peters Street To whom it may concern: My name is William Dwyer, and I am the owner of 94 Peters Street. It has just come to my attention that my neighbor, Jeffrey Sheehy, at 102 Peters Street, is planning to construct a fence along our common lot line. I am opposed to Mr. Sheehy putting this fence up for a number of reasons. I feel that it will have a negative impact on my property. There is currently a grass strip that runs along the common lot line where the fence is planned, and adding the fence will increase my landscaping costs. The fence will be very close to my pavement, this will cause safety issues with cars hitting the fence while entering and exiting my driveway. Finally, the proximity to the new fence will also make properly plowing my driveway nearly impossible without causing damage to the fence. I see no benefit or purpose to this fence being constructed and I would ask that the town not require Mr. Sheehy to build the fence. Sincerely, William J. Dwyer, M.D. 94 Peters Street o North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Office 978-697-2556 m Fax 978-697-2556 TOWN OF NORT1.4 ANDOVER DIVNI()N OF PUBLIC WOI�KS 3840S(]000SllRBB7 NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Ol845-2989 BRUCE D.THQ}00GAO, P.E. DIRECTOR Eugene P. Willis, PE 7elechume (97<�) 0B5-0950 Director o/Ennzineer//t�T Fax/97,D 604-9573 February 24'20i2 North Andover Planning Dept l600 Osgood St. North Andover MA.0l845 Re: IO2 Peters St. site second plan review Dear Board Members, I have received the preliminary plan for cornment"Proposed Site Plan for 102 Peters St." by � Andover Consults, dated 2-15-12. l offer the following comments: i. The overflow structure proposed iDNVY corner of lot was not relocated t0 the south and � � away from the Peters SL right-of-way but rcp)mocd by u gouc evvo|e. ()vcrtinuo" the voids in the stone will fill with sediment resulting in zero storage vo|uouo. The originally proposed dryvve|l should he included iu the final design. 2. The hydraulic modeling of the site, as well as the subsequent report, has not been rnv|ovvcd by DPW. � Sincerely, � Eugene P. Wi8io, P.[I. � Director of Engineering Co: fi|e,0AConservation, BmunTbihodeau DPW E ri ht, Joan Fronm: Tymon, Judy Sent Wednesday, February 2B. 2O1212:31 PM To: 'James Fairweather' Co: Hughes, Jennifer; Enright, Jean Su 102 Peters St. .Attachments: 1U2 Peters St comments#3.pdf; Hencook-2nd review 102Petans.pdf; 2 24_12DPVVrev2 .pdf Jim, I have the following remaining items to be addressed regarding 102 Peters St.: | talked with Gene Willis and he says heissatisfied as long as Lisa has reviewed the hydraulic modeling he has nofurther � issues. There are several items in Lisa's latest review letter(2/24/12)that need a response-#2, #3,#4 #5 and#6. There are several items on the Hancock review tobe resolved /2/22/12\: #7. |t would be helpful to know where the sign would go. | know the applicant has not tenants, but vve struggle with this issue after the building is built and no signage was indicated during the Site Plan Review process. #26. | agree that more than m sketch needs tobeprovided. There should bea plan showing the full sight lines and the issue of the proposed maple trees should beaddressed. If you have a new set of plans and responses to these questions, I need to send it to the Planning Board in advance of the meeting next week. | send the electronic packet out onFriday. |f you need more time, we will require a request for postponement. Let me know K you have any questions. Judy Tymon, AICP � Town Planner � Town of North Andover 16OO Osgood St. North Andover, MA 01845 978'688-9535 � PleaSC,[lot(-'the MaSSaCIIUSOIIS Secretary of State's office has detei-mined that most emails to and ftom I-OLMiCirRI OffiCO,alld officials am public mcoixis. For More information please,refer to: Please consider the onwmomon/bumm printing this omoo. 1 James Fairweather From: BILL MacLEOD Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:39 PM To: Subject: Fwd: Peters Street Response Attachments:Andover--Wall fixture Point By Point.pdf ----------Original Message---------- From: George Nammour Date: Feb 28,2012 3:30:22 PM Subject: Peters Street Response To: 18. The proposed building is shown less than one foot from an excising sewer easement. It is unclear from the plans if the intent is for the building to be at 15 feet from the property line or if the dimension shown is labeling the easement width. Hancock is concerned that building footings would encroach into the easement. Andover Consultants' Response: The building will be constructed outside of the easement. Hancock Response: It remains unclear from the details provided how the building structure below grade would not encroach into the sewer easement.Standard construction details have footings extending beyond the face of the structure. If the soil conditions permit, a spread footing will be used, which extends no more than 6" from the face of the foundation and will not encroach into the easement. 11. Section 8.5.e.xvii—LIGHTING FACILITIES:Identification of the proposed illumination, indicating the direction and the degree of illumination offered by the proposed lighting facilities, including an example of the light fixture to be used. It is unclear from the submitted plans whether any illumination is proposed and if the type, direction and degree of illumination conform to the guidelines set forth in Section 6.0—Signs and Outdoor Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Bylaw. Andover Consultants' Response: No lighting for the parking lot is proposed. The architect's final plans will include details of any lighting located on the exterior of the building. A cut sheet of a typical wall mounted light proposed for use is attached for your review. Hancock Response: The plans still do not depict the direction and degree of illumination proposed. Two wall packs (fixture cut submitted) will be mounted on the building (one at each gable). Another recessed-ceiling light fixture will be mounted over the front entrance. The wall pack fixture is I T° Impact Mite LED Trapezoid, cutoff wall fixture 02, with 21 LED LightBARS, and 51 watts total. The foot-candle at the base of the wall is 3.6. George Nammour, AIA Maclaren Associates 11 Main Street P O Box 606 Atkinson, NH 03811 603 329 3511 T 603 329 3494 F 2/28/2012 100' 0" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00-1 5/8' 0.0 0.1 01 A-1 0.1 0.1 --0.2-__0.2_- n 9 n 9 9.2 0.2-___0.2 0.0 I 0.0 0.1 .1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0. ( 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 .2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 .5 0.6 0.6 0. 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 50'-10 1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2-1 1/8.. 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 i 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.9 2.6 2.6 1.9 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 OJ 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.6 3.8 3.8 2.6 1.4 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 z4 - La r � J From: Tymon, Judy Sent: Tuesday, To: Cc: 'James Fairweather'; Enright, Jean Subject: 1O2 Peters St. Attachments: 120313 Continuance. 120312 LisaReview1O2 PebsnsSt.pdf Jeff, As you know,the public hearing for your project will be continued at the March 20t" meeting. There is only one outstanding issue, which is treatment of groundwater during high groundwater conditions( large storm events). Although you are not required to meet this standard (Site Plan Review does not require it and that section of the parcel is outside of Conservation Commission jurisdiction), our peer reviewer does recommend that this be addressed. (see attached letter) It will be the Planning Board's decision to make and I am sure they will take into account the changes that have already been made to the project based on the review process. That said,the Board could decide on March 20th to leave the hearing open so that I can draft a decision that would be ready for them at the meeting on April 3. At that meeting, they could close the public hearing, review the decision and vote. The decision would then be filed the next day,April 4. The timefranne for this project requires that vve file m decision with the town clerk by April 5. |n order to make sure that | have time to make final changes and file with the c|erk, |amrequestinQthatyouaOroetoacontinuanmefnrynurpro'ectunti|Apri| 3//h. | don'tseeanyprob|emvvith filing the decision xion by the 4 but in case something comes up, | want to make sure we don't overrun the deadline. � The form is attached. You can bring it to the next meeting or email it back to me ortoJean Enright. Let me know if you have any questions. Judy Tyinionw AICP Town Planner Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood St. North Andover, MA 01845 � 978'688'9535 � � � � � Please note the M0000chu*ettsSecretary of State's office has determined that most anailsm and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: Please consider the onwmnmont before printing this email. 1 %40RTPI ICY o'*"' Town of North Andover Office of the Planning Department (;OlnrllLunity Development and Services Division P(978)688-9535 7.600 Osgood Street F(978)688-9542 Building 20, Sprite 2-36 North Andover,Massachusetts 41845 TO: Jeff Sheeh FAX: FROM: Jean Enright, Planning Assistant FAX: 978-688-9542 PHONE: 978-688-9535 Please sign your name and fill in address of premises affected, fill in current date, return same to fax 978-688-9542. Or email to jenrightCa)town ofn ortli-,in d over.com. Thank you. Special Permit 66REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE" NAME: —Jeff Sheehy ADDRESS OF PREMISES AFFECTED: 102 Peters St. North Andover PHONE NUMBER: AREA CODE: ( 978 462-4042 461 WISH TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE UNTIL 04 /30 /12 9 THEREFORE, WAIVE THE TIME CONSTRAINTS FOR ISSUING OF ANY AND/ALL DECISIONS RELATIVE TO ANY/AND ALL PERMITS OF THE PLANNING BOARD FOR THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MA." SIGNED BY PETITIONER OR REPRESENTATIVE: (SIGNATURE) DATE: (FILL IN CURRENT DATE) BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 ��A�� ^�� Eggleston _ ' _ - March |2` 2OL2 North Andover Planning Board ]dOO Osgood Street North Andover, MA 0 184 Attn: Judy Tymou° Town Planner North Andover Conservation Commission 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, M/\ 0l845 /\t o: Jennifer Hughes, Conservation Coordinator � � RE: Stonmwatrr Management Rcview 102 Peters SCrcs1 Dear Ms. 1yn/on and Ms. IluQhoo: In to||ovv up 10 my most recent (February 24, 2012) oocnrncotm on the above-referenced project I have received and reviewed the February 28, 2012 response b.ocn Andover Consultants Inc. With these latest revisions, all of my previous oon000mrdm on the project have now been satisfactorily addressed and I have no further comments at this time. The project as proposed onup)icm with North Andover's zoobu& requirements for Site P1mu Xov}evv with respect to dcniuugo' and largely complies with the stornnwsdor management requirements of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) and the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw; the one exception being that there may be times during high groundwater conditions when the volume of water retained and treated onsite is less than the 1/2-inch vvote[ quality vn)ucuo for the project. As indicated in Andover Consultants' roapouon` the discharge fi-ono1he parking lot d[a|uVgs system in |0001od outside of Conservation Commission jurisdiction and foi| compliance with the Z)BP Standards (e.g. by ensuring that 80 percent TSS removal is provided even during seasonal high groundwater) is not strictly required. The zoning requirements for Site Plan Review do not address water quality. Once again, I appreciate the opportunity to assist the North Andover Planning Board and Conservation Cnnonoiaoiou with the review of this project, and hope that this iofbrnocdioo is suitable for your needs. Please feel ficu to contact nuo if you or the opp|icnoLy have any questions regarding the issues addressed herein. Sincerely, 88GLB9T0NBNV|KVNM8NlAL Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. 3I Old Fr4minghannRd Unit 29 Sudbury MA 01776 t8i5D8.25Y.11]7 fax 866.820.7840 Enright, Jean From: Tymon, Judy Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 10:22 AM To: 'Lisa Eggleston' Cc: Enright, Jean; 'James Fairweather' Subject: RE: 102 Peters St Lisa, I will be out this afternoon and on Monday. if you have your response ready before Tuesday, could you forward it to Jim Fairweather and to Jean Enright(Planning Dept.Administrator)? Thanks, Judy From: Lisa Eggleston Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 9:58 AM To: Tymon, Judy Subject: RE: 102 Peters St html>head>meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf.--16"> /head> body> Nape, didn't have those. Thanks Judy. Lisa D. Egg eston, PE. Eggleston Environmental 32 Od Framingham Rd., Unit X29 Sudbury, MA 01776 tel 508.259.1137 fax 866,820,7840 From: jtrr Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:15:10 -0500 Subject: RE: 102 Peters St Lisa, There's been so much back and forth on this project so I may be sending you items that you already have, Here's two more: Applicant's response to DPW Hancock's response- Unfortunately, he did not have the Feb 22. Plans, so some of his issues have been resolved. Judy From: Lisa Eggleston ] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 11:47 AM 1 To: Ty0on, Judy Subject: FVV: 1O2 Peters Sl ht0|> h8dd> meta h[Lp-eqUiY="COOteOt-Type" content='text/ht0|/ Ch8Bet=UU-16"> /hedd> bOdy> Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environnierital fleCl5e170te OWx�eW aCIC11'6155: 32 Old Framm[nghamN Rd~ Unit #29 Sudbury, MAQ1776 ha� 500.259.1,137 fax 866.820.7840 From: fi /o: CC: Subject: 102 Peters St Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2O1209:5G:02 -O5OO � � Lisa: The attached plans reflect the latest revisions for the 1O2 Peters Street project. The attached are basically the same plans sent last week with the exception of the reintroduction of the drywell down stream of the detention outlet. The d/yweU was added at the request nf the Town engineer. | have attached a copy nf our letter responding tu Gene Willis's comments for your information. As was previously explained, the infiltration components are not needed to attenuate peak flow rates and are just added features to provide the opportunity to infiltrate additional flow. A|ao, there is no direct � discharge to any nearby wetland. I believe that the latest revision adequately addresses all concerns. Let me know if you � want a hard copy of the attached. � � Sincerely, James S. Fait-weather D'P8 Andover Consultants,Inc. I East River Place Methuen,&4A 0|844 978'687'3828 ox1. 13 br> hr> [onthaoe="Ar|a|" cO|o[="8rey" size="1">P|eaoe note the Massachusetts Secretary ofState's o0iom has determined that most emai|stoand from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: br> Please consider the environment before printing this eOlai|.br> /font> /body> /h\m|> ~/htozlbt~}u> font fanc=//Az ul// oo}or~"Gxay" sizm=''l/'>],/eooenote the Massachusetts Secretary o[State's office has determined that most cnnoiln10 and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: br>Please consider the covicoRozcoI before printing this eooail.br>/fon1>/body>/htzn{>