HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-10-20October 20, 1980
Regular Meeting
The PLANNING BOARD held a REGULAR N~TING on Monday evening, October 20, 1980
at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Office Meeting Room. The following members were present
and voting: William Chepulis, Chairman; Michael P. Roberts; Joseph D'Angelo;
John J. Burke; and Paul A. Hedetrom, who arrived late for the meeting.
Mr. William Cyr, Highway Surveyor; Susan St. Pierre, Town Planner; and Charles
Foster, Building Inspector, were also present.
The meeting came to order at 7:45 p.m.
CONTINUED PUBLIC B~ARING - Kenneth M~.nhe,y - Special Permit in Watershed District
This public hearing w~s continued from September 22, 1980. Mr. Chepulis read
the Board of Appeal's decision, d~ted October 16, 1980, Petition No. 24-'80,
which states that the Board of Appeals granted a variance to the applicant
(Kenneth H~phey) from the '~o-cut" by-law, with the condition that the drive-
way will be no greater than fifteen feet in width.
Mr. Cyr stated that he has no objections to the Special Permit being granted
as long as the By-Law is upheld.
Motion: by Mr. Roberts to grant the Special Permi~ application of Kenneth
Haphey to construct a driveway in the watershed district. In addition, the
Planning Board makes the following findings and the permit is subject tn the
following conditions:
a) The specific site is an appropriate location for such a use, structure, or
condition;
b) The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood;
c) There will be no nuisan0e or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians;
d) Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation
of the proposed use;
e) The Planning Board will not grant any Special Permit unless they make a
specific finding that the use in is harmony with the general purpose and
intent of this By-L~w.
Conditions:
1. Perimeter drains from the proposed house and any other drains from the
property shall not be direcSed toward the street;
2. A driveway entry permit shall be obtained from ~he office of the Highway
Surveyor;
3. Hay bales shall be placed along the length of the proposed driveway during
the entire term of construction;
4. ~nly those trees necessary to be removed for construction of the driveway
shall be disturbed. Ail tree removal activities shall occur under the
direction of the Tree Warden;
5. The construction of the driveway shall be completed no later than October 15,1981;
6. The driveway shall be no greater than 15' in width in accordance with the
Board of Appeals decision of October 14, 1980, Petition No. 24-'80;
7. Construction shall conform with the Conservation CommAssion's Order of
Conditions, dated October 3, 1980, File No. 242-97.
October 20, 1980 -2- Regular Neeting
HapheyI con't.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Burke and the vote was unanimous in favor
of the mo$ion.
WILLOWS INDUSTRIAL PARK EXTENSIOW - DECISION - This decision is continued
from October 6, 19'~0.
Robert Regan and V. Grasso were present at the meeting.
Mr. Chepulis read a letter from Charles Foster, Building Inspector, dated
October 20, 1980; Re: Interpretation of Yard Setbacks between Industrial
and Residential Zones.
Several abuttors to the industrial park were again present and Mr. Foster
gave a presentation on the plan to the abuttors concerning their property
lines amd setbacks.
Mr. Chepulis pointed out that there should be 40' between curbs and the plan
calls for 32'.. Mr. Cyr said that 32' is sufficient.
Notion: by Mr. Roberts to approve the definitive plan of land entitled
Willows Industrial Park Extension, dated June 13, 1980 and revised October 6,
1980 with the following conditions:
Boilerplate conditions 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6
7. That, as required by our Zoning By-Law, Table 2 Summary of Dimentional
Requirements, Footnote 3: Adjacent to residential districts, the required
side or rear setback shall be ~00 feet. The first 50 feet shall remain
open and green, be suitably landscaped, unbuilt upon, unpaved and not
parked upon. Said 100 foot setback shall extend from the prcper~y line;
8. Ail water amd sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the Board of
Public Works letter, dated September 22, 1980;
9- As reqllired by the Bighway Surveyor's letter, dated September 16,
a) Ail road improvements shall be made in accordance with the revised
plan, dated October 6, 1980;
l a minimum grade of 1% shall be maintained on the entire
roadway;
where drainage is to be discharged, a drainage easement deeded to the
Town of North Andover shall be required;
d) road gravel must be of good quality and free of any stones over 6 inches;
e) waiver of 40 foot paved area;
10. Revised plan showing the ~% grade shall be submitted to the Planning Board;
11. A Certificate of Compliance recluired from any Order of Conditions issued by
the Conservation Commission shall be required of the applicant prior to the
final release of any bond or covenant;
12. All work in said subdivision shall be completed no later than October 15, 198~,
except the finish coat. On October 15, ~98~, the Planning Board will set a
completion date for the finish coat.
The plans will not be signed until the above order of conditions have been
outlined and a set of plans properly enumerated and dated have been submitted
to the Planning Board.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Burke and the vote was unanimous in favor of the
motion.
Note: Paul Hedstrom arrived at this point.
October 20, 1980 -.3- Regular Meeting
WILLOWS INI~STRIAL PARK - Request for waiver from underground utility lines
The clerk read the letter from R. Regan, V. Grasso, and L. Hamel. There was
discussion about points brought out in the letter between the Planning Board
and the applicants, including the following: Mr. D'Angelo ~uestioned the amount
of lines in the water table. Mr. Regan said that a substantial amount of lines
would be in the table (2/3 to 3/4). Questio~ of cost difference: 5 to 1.
Question of who pays for the initial service cost: the developer. Mr. Cyr
requested that, if the decision is made to grant the waiver, he would like
the utility lines set back from the lot lines, and they would have to be
on the street easement.
Mr. Hedstrom pointed out that it is not the size of the subdivision th2t is
important, but the type of clientele it will attract.
Mr. Condon, an abutter, questioned the kind of precedent the Planning Board
would be setting by granting this w~iver. Mr. Hedstrom responded that this
is ex~ctly the point of this discussion. Mr. Grasso the~ referred to an
article in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune in which Brian Sullivan ~tated that
North Andover should not become a 'rbedroom town."
Mr. ~rank Greslick, M~rian Drive said that it is the desire of the abutters
and the intent of the developers to have the locations attractive.
At this point, Mr. Hedstrom requested from the applicants a recordable copy
of their Design Review Restrictions and the applicants agreed to provide one.
Notion: by Mr. Hedstrom: to approve the Willows Industrial Park's request
for a waiver from the Subdivision Rules and Regulations requirement of
subteranean utility lines for Willows Industrial Park and Willows Industrial
Park Extension; Section 4, Par. D with the condition that the Planning Board
receive by its nex~ meeting a reoordable copy of the Design Review Restrictions
on the balance of the land and subject ~o prior approval of the location of
the lines by the Plaguing Board.
Second by Mr. Roberts and unanimous vote in favor of the motion.
INGALLS CROSSING - Completion date and bond release
The clerk read letters from B. Cyr and J. Borgesi. Mr. Cyr said that the
biggest problem here is that the completion of the culdesac has been waived,
and rather tb~__n go ahead and entirely pave it, the culdesac's grade will be
lower. Mr. Arthur Kalogianis said that when Laconia Way becomes a through-wa~v,
he would like to leave some money with the to~n in case it goes through. It
would be foolish to finish a ro~d if it is going to go through. He wants to
leave the money with the idea that the road will be extended. Both Mr. Cyr
and Mr. Ealogianis agreed that $8500.00 would be sufficient.
Notion: by Mr. Roberts that per the agreement with the developer and the
Highway Surveyor concerning the ex-tension, the Planning Board, at a future
date when the next phase of the development is complete, will set a completion
date on the ouldesac portion of the development.
Second: Mr. Hedstrom and unanimous Vote in favor of the motion.
October 20, 1980 -4- Regular Meeting
i~GALLS'CROSSING - Bond release
Notion: by Mr. Burke that the Planning Board release $14,500 per the
Highway Surveyor's recommendation, and $840 per the reoommendatien of the
Board of PUblic Works, for a total of $15,340, leaving a balance of $10,500
held by the Highway Department.
Second: by Mr. Roberts and unanimous vote in favor.
LAKRSIDE - Bond release
The clerk read letters from the Highway Surveyor and the Board of Public Works.
Motion: by Nr. Roberts that no money be released for this subdivision and a
letter be sent to the developer explaining why the money is not being released.
Second: by Mr. Hedstrom and 3-1 vote. Mr. D'Angelc voted against the motion.
BC~TNEYLANE- Bond release
The clerk read a letter from the Highway Surveyor.
Motion: by ~r. Roberts that the Planning Board release $21,000 per the
recommendation of the Highway Surveyor, leaving a balance of $53,640 ($50,000 - HWY,
$3,64o - BPW).
Second: by Nr. Burke and unanimous vote in favor.
MR. &. MRS. SPRACKLIN - request ~o have Haymeadow Road paved
Mr. Cyr gave Nr. Chepulis a letter he wrote om August 12, 1980, which Mr. Chepulis
rea~ and the Town Planner gave an explanation of ~t has happened in this
subdivision.
Mr. Cyr said that he has talked with the engineer, but has not received a reply,
and does not have the tools to refuse an occupancy permit. He strongly pointed
out that this is an urgent matter and contact with Town Counsel is needed to find
out what is going on.
Several residents of the street were present and questioned how an occupancy
permit could be issued on an unpaved road. Paul Hedstrom pointed out that
completion dates must be read.
Motion: by Mr. Roberts that the Planning Board notify Town Counsel immediately
to contact Mr. Hyder in reference to his letter of June 30, 1980 concerning the
transferring of funds if the work is not completed by August 14, 1980. Also, the
Planning Board authorize Mr. William Cyr to contact Town Counsel and Attorney
Hyder in an effort to expidite the completion of the dangerous situation that
exists in this development on behalf of the Planning Board.
Second: by Mr. Burke and unanimous vote in favor.
October 20, 1980 -5- Regular Meeting
PLANNERS INFORMATION
The clerk read a letter from Attorney John Willis, Sr., who represents Mr.
Flatley, developer of the Trafalgar Estates Subdivision concerning the sub-
mission of a letter of credit in lieu of bank books for the next phase of
the subdivision. Mr. Chepulis said that he would have liked to have received
the letter from the developer and not Town Counsel, because the Planning Board
should refer this matter to Town Counsel.
Mr. Cyr recommended that we do not accept several bankbooks for one subdivision
in the future - it is too confusing.
Motion: by Mr. Roberts that we notify the petitioner that a letter of credit
would be acceptable by the Planning Board.
Second: by Mr. Hedstrom and unanimous vote in favor.
Susan St. Pierre requested setting a date for a workshop with the Planning Board.
Set for Wednesday, October 29, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Building.
Mr. Chepulis asked if any members of the Planning Board had wnlked Campbell
Forest on October 15. Response: '~o."
BOARD OF APPEALS - legal notices
Subatch - request for a variance on Thorndike Road.
Motion: by Mr. Hedstrom that no recommendation be n~e by the Planning Board
except to adhere to the Zoning By-Law.
Second: by Mr. Roberts and unanimous vote.
LEGAL NOTICES - Towns - received and.on file.
MINUTES - October 6, 1980 - Motion by Mr. Roberts to accept as written. Seconded
by Mr. D~Angelo. Unanimous vote.
Mr. Chepulis remided the Board of the October 25, 1980 seminar in ~raz~ingham.
The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. ~~. /~~
William Chepulis, ~nairman
Jean E. White, Secretary