Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Board Meeting Minutes 12.21.10 PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 1 Present:J.Simons,T.Seibert,M.Colantoni,R.Rowen,R.Glover,C.LaVolpicelo 2 StaffPresent:J.Tymon,J.Enright 3 Meetingbeganat7:04 4 POSTPONEMENTS: 5 CONTINUEDPUBLICHEARING:125FlagshipDrive:ApplicationforaWirelessFacilitiesSpecialPermitSitePlan 6 Review.Proposalfora140ft.multicarrierwirelesstower,withassociatedequipmentatthebaseofthetower 7 andtheinstallationof9panelantennaswithassociatedequipmentcabinetsintheIndustrial1zoningdistrict. 8 CONTINUEDPUBLICHEARING:1003OSGOODST.WatershedSpecialPermitandSitePlanReviewSpecialPermit 9 forconstructionofanew21,000sq.ft.restaurant/office/retailbuildingandrelocationofanhistoricbarn. 10 11 BONDRELEASE 12 Red Gate:. Rick Dellaire requesting reduction of the surety bond for Red Gate Subdivision 13 J.Tymon:IhavereceivedaletterdatedDecember6,2010fromGeneWillisrecommendingthebondbereduced 14 to$30,300.Thebindercoathasbeenputdown.SeveralinspectionshavebeencompletedbyGene.Ihavealso 15 inspectedtosite.Theremainingamountheldwillbeenoughtocoveralloutstandingissues. 16 R.Rowen:askediftheyareplanningonfinishingoffeverythingsotheycanbringitforstreetacceptanceatTown 17 MeetinginMay. 18 J.Tymon:No.HewantedtogothroughatleastonewinterwiththebindercoatandhavetheDPWgobackout 19 andinspectagain.Theremaybeabuyerfortheforthlot.Westillhaveacovenantonthatlot. 20 MOTION 21 AmotionwasmadebyR.RowentoreducetheRedGatebond$30,300.ThemotionwassecondedbyT.Seibert. 22 Thevotewasunanimous. 23 24 PUBLICMEETINGS: 25 CONTINUEDPUBLICHEARING:1679OSGOODST.DefinitiveSubdivisionfor8singlefamilyresidentiallotswithin 26 theR3District,submittedbyGMZRealty. 27 J.Tymon:WehavereceivedareviewbyL.Eggleston.Theapplicantwilladdresssomeoftheissuesnoted.Oneof 28 theprimaryissuestobediscussedisthevolumeofdischargefromtheproposedgravelwetlandtoanabutting 29 property.AlsotobediscussedistheintegrationofC.!ķğƒ͸ƭlotintothesubdivision,theoverallproximitytothe 30 commercialdevelopmentdistrict,andthewaiverforthewidthoftheroadway. 31 JoeCoronati,RepresentingGMZRealtyTrust:Startingwiththedetentionpond,explainedthatthereisroomto 32 makethedetentionpondlargeenoughtohandleL.9ŭŭƌĻƭƷƚƓ͸ƭconcernaboutstormwatervolumeexitingthesite. 33 Asfarasseparationfromthecommercialdistrict,theyhavechangedthelayoutofthehouse(onthelottowards 34 thebackoftheproposedsubdivision)andmovedthehouselocationonthelot.Thiswillallowthemtomakethe 35 pondwiderandmoveitclosertotheroadandtokeepthetreebufferonthebackofthelot,betweenthe 36 commercialdistrictandsubdivision,andcouldpossiblyplaceaͷƓƚĭǒƷ͸deedrestrictioninthisareaofthelot.Next 37 itemstheapplicantwouldliketodiscussaresixwaiversbeingrequestedfortheproposedsubdivision.Requestfor 38 waiverswerefor:(1)roadlength,(2)fromhavingtoprovideanitrogenandphosphorousloadingreport(L. 39 Eggleston,ofEgglestonEnvironmental,providedheropiniononthisrequesttotheBoard),(3)requirementto 40 provideafullflowcapacityforallthedrainagepipesonthePlans,(4)regulationforconcretedrainagepipes,(5) 41 fromhavingtoprovideatrafficstudy,(6)fromprovidingallthetestpitdataonthePlans. 42 ApplicantwilladdaformalwaiverofsidewalksaswellasawaiverforreducingtheroadwidthfromЋЏ͸toЋЍ͸͵ 43 ExplanationforeachwaiverrequestwasprovidedtotheBoard.TheBoardapprovedallwaivers. 44 J.Coronati:PresentedanoptionforincorporatingC.!ķğƒ͸ƭresidentialparcelintothePlans.Handedoutan 45 OverviewGradingandDrainagePlan.TheoptionincludedaЍЉ͸wideRightofWaywithahammerheadlocatedon 1 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 46 C.!ķğƒ͸ƭproperty.TheRightofWayprovidesfrontage.Adrivewaywouldbeconstructedtoprovideaccess. 47 Thehousepositioncouldbechanged. 48 R.Rowen:TheЍЉ͸RightofWaywouldbearoad? 49 JohnSmolak:AttorneyforSPCTrust.InordertocreatethefrontageweareproposingtheЍЉ͸widelayoutwitha 50 hammerheadtoprovidethefrontageforthisparticularlot.Weproposea12ЊЍ͸widthofpavement.Itisthe 51 functionalequivalentofacommondrivewaywhichisstyledasaSubdivisionroadway.Wewouldhavetorequest 52 waiversfromSubdivisionroadwayrequirements. 53 R.Rowen:Thewidthofthehammerheadwouldcreatethefrontage? 54 J.Smolak:Thatiscorrect.WeŷğǝĻƓ͸Ʒdiscusseditwiththeapplicantyetbutwemayenduphavingashared 55 maintenanceagreementforthatsegmentofroadwayratherthancreatingaPublicWayforthatsegment. 56 J.Simons:Inthepast,wherewehavewaivedtheconstructionofaroadway,wehaveshowedcapabilityof 57 constructingsomethingthatwasconformingtoourRulesandRegulations.Wehavedoneitwiththreelotsbut 58 wehavenevercombinedaroadwitharoad.ItisreallyathreelotcommondrivewaywhichweķƚƓ͸Ʒallow. 59 J.Smolak:WehavehadaconversationwiththeFireChiefabouttheproposedlayout.Hewillhavetospeakfor 60 himselfbutfromasafetystandpointIthinkhewassatisfiedwiththeproposalascurrentlyarticulated.Hedid 61 suggestthatthethreehousesoffthecommonroadwayhavesprinklersandgranitemarkingsatthefork,or 62 intersection,ofthosethreedrivewaysfromthemainroadway. 63 J.Smolak:C.Adamsdidnotwanttobeinthissituationbutasaresultontherezoningin2008hewasleftwitha 64 peninsulaoflandthatiszonedresidentialthathereallyķƚĻƭƓ͸Ʒhaveanyuseforunlesshegoesbackandrezones. 65 Itis1to1.5acresofland.YouķƚƓ͸ƷwantcommercialtherebutwearelookingfortheBoardtoaccommodate 66 residentialbecauseitismoresuitedforresidential.Iunderstandyourconcernsabouttheroadwayandsetting 67 precedentonthiscircumstancebutatleastfromasafetystandpointtheFireDepartmentwillsubmitmore 68 detailedcommentsiftheBoardwantedandwecouldmakeitworkfromasafetystandpoint.Inaddition, 69 maintenancecouldbeaccomplishedthroughacommonmaintenanceagreement. 70 R.Rowen:CouldyoumakeitaЎЉ͸andstillgetthelotsthatyouarelookingfor,couldyoudrawaplanthatmoves 71 thenewhousebackfurther,onadrawing,andgetaconventionalculdesac?Thenyoucoulddemonstratethat 72 youhaveaconformingplan.Thenyoucangofromtheretomaybebuildsomethingdifferentonceyouare 73 entitledtoalltheselotsonaconformingplan. 74 J.Simons:Thatisthefirststep.IwouldlikethepotentialtowaivetheconstructionofaroadwaybutIķƚƓ͸Ʒwant 75 touseitpromiscuouslywhenitķƚĻƭƓ͸Ʒmakesensetodoitandtherearetoomanywaiversbeingaskedforhere. 76 R.Rowen:Thewaiversshouldbeforthecommonbenefitofallnotforthejustificationtoaddingahousethat 77 ǞğƭƓ͸Ʒentitledintheparcel. 78 J.Coronati:Believesthereisenoughlandareatodemonstrateaconformingroadway. 79 J.Smolak:So,ifwecandemonstratethatwecangettheRightofWayforaSuddivisionroadwayconformingwith 80 theSubdivisionwidthrequirementsandculdesacrequirementsandprovidedthatwecansatisfytheFire 81 DepartmentintermsofanyaccessconcernsistheBoardͶͶͶͪ 82 J.Simons:Thosearethetwokeythings. 83 J.Simons:Procedurallyhowdowehandlethis? 84 J.Tymon:WecoulddoitasModificationtoanapprovedSubdivision.Wewouldhavetoapprovethisandthenre 85 notice.Wecouldmakeitachangetoacurrentplan. 86 J.Smolak:Ithinkwewouldneedtosubmitaformalrequesttomodifytheexistingproposal.Wewouldprovide 87 newspapernotice,abutternotification,andclearlyidentifytheextendedparcelwithouthavingtowithdraw. 88 J.Simons:askedJ.TymontoseeifTownCounselwouldapprovethatrecommendation. 89 J.Coronati:AskedtocomebackinJanuarywithamodifiedplanshowingwhatwasdiscussedtonightandagreed 90 tosignacontinuanceuntiltheendofFebruary2011. 91 92 MOTION: 2 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 93 AmotionwasmadebyR.RowentoaccepttheğƦƦƌźĭğƓƷ͸ƭwrittencontinuancerequesttorenderadecisiononthe 94 SubdivisionuntilFebruary28,2011.ThemotionwassecondedbyT.Seibert.Thevotewasunanimous. 95 96 ContinuedPublicHearing:254GreatPondRoad.Applicantseekstoconstructanewsinglefamilyresidence 97 withinthenondischargezone,withaccessorystructureswithinthenondisturbancezoneandtoremovean 98 existingtenniscourtwithinthenondisturbancezone. 99 MOTION 100 AmotionwasmadebyR,RowenclosethePublicHearingfortheSpecialPermitfor254GreatPondRoad.The 101 motionwassecondedbyC.LaVolpicelo.Thevotewasunanimous. 102 MOTION 103 AmotionwasmadebyR.RowentoapprovetheWatershedSpecialPermit,asamendedthisevening.Themotion 104 wassecondedbyC.LaVolpicelo.Thevotewasunanimous. 105 106 ContinuedPublicHearing:1857GreatPondRoad.Applicant,SteveGalizio,seekstoconstructaŅğƩƒĻƩ͸ƭporch 107 andreplacetheexistingbrickwalkwithconcretepavers. 108 MOTION 109 AmotionwasmadebyR.GlovertoclosethePublicHearingfortheSpecialPermitfor1857GreatPondRoad.The 110 motionwassecondedbyR.Rowen.Thevotewasunanimous. 111 MOTION 112 AmotionwasmadebyR.RowentoapprovetheWatershedSpecialPermitfor1857GreatPondRoad,asamended 113 thisevening.ThemotionwassecondedbyM.Colantoni.Thevotewasunanimous. 114 : 115 DISCUSSIONITEMS 116 Zoning Amendment : C. Foster to present proposed zoning change regarding two-family dwelling units in the R-4 117 District for Annual Town Meeting 2011. 118 C.Foster:presentedtheBoardsomestatisticsonthenumberoffamiliesaffectedbythepastzoningamendment 119 regardingtwofamilyunitsintheR4district.WouldlikeafeelingfromtheBoardastowhattheirexperiencehas 120 beenwiththeexistingtwofamilyhousesasopposedtotheproposedtwofamilyhouses.Mostpeopleseemto 121 agreethattheproblemarosebecauseoftheproposedtwofamiliesratherthantheexistingtwofamilies.Does 122 notunderstandwhytheexistingtwofamilyhouseshavetogothroughtheSpecialPermitprocedure.Thepresent 123 amendmentprovidesthattwofamiliesaretakenfromtheallowedusesection.ThesecondsentenceoftheBylaw 124 saysthattheymaybecomeanallowedusebyaSpecialPermit.BelievestheBylawisflawedandwantstheexisting 125 housesbereturnedtoanalloweduse.ExistingtwofamiliesshouldnothavebeenincludedintheSpecialPermit 126 process.Askingthattheexistinghomesbereturnedtoanalloweduse. 127 J.Simons:askedforclarificationoftheproblemthatC.Fosteristryingtocure. 128 C,Foster:existingtwofamilieswerenotaproblem.Whyweretheytakenoutofanalloweduse? 129 J.Tymon:ExistingtwofamilieswouldhavetogoforaSpecialPermitforanyalterationbecausetheyarenon 130 conforming.HadaskedtheBuildingDept.todoresearchintohowmanybuildingpermitswereissuedfrom 131 7/20057/2010.Therewerecloseto100permitsforalterations/modifications. 132 J.Simons:IfyoudosomethingrequiringabuildingpermitinternallyyouķƚƓ͸Ʒhavetodoanythingspecial.Ifyou 133 dosomethingexternallyyouhavetodosomething? 134 R.Glover:ThelanguagereadsͷƓƚmajorexteriorstructuralĭŷğƓŭĻ͸͵ 135 J.Simons:HowmanySpecialPermitrequestshavetherebeenforexistingtwofamilies? 136 J.Tymon:None.TheBuildingLƓƭƦĻĭƷƚƩ͸ƭinterpretationisthatheisallowingtheexistingtwofamiliestohave 137 theiralterations/modificationswithjustabuildingpermitwithhissignaturewithoutgoingthroughtheSpecial 138 Permitprocess. 139 R.Rowen:askediftheInspectorisjudgingthemnonmajor. 140 C.Foster:statedthathefigurestheInspectorbelievestheyaregrandfatheredin. 3 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 141 S.Simons:Thechangebeingproposedistomakeexistingtwofamiliesanalloweduse? 142 C.Foster:Yes.Handedoutproposedlanguageforanamendmenttothezoningbylaw. 143 J.Simons:RecommendedtohavetheBuildingInspectorcometoaPlanningBoardmeetingtodiscusstheissue.In 144 addition,wouldliketositdownandworkthroughthelanguageoftheproposedchangeandthelanguageofthe 145 existingBylawintotal. 146 C.Foster:Areyougoingtosponsorthearticle? 147 J.Simons:Wedonotknowyet.Weneedtodoalittlemoreduediligenceandmakesurewefullyunderstandit. 148 C.Foster:Askedwhenthewarrantwillbeopenuntil. 149 R.Rowen:WewillcertainlytakeactionbeforetheWarrantcloses. 150 J.Simons:askedifsomeoneontheBoardwouldreadthelanguageinadvanceanddosomehomeworkonit.T. 151 Seibertwillreviewthelanguage. 152 153 NEW PUBLIC HEARING : Amend the Planning Board Regulations, including applications and filing fees to 154 accompany the Town of North Andover’s Stormwater Bylaw, Chapter 160 of the town’s Bylaw. 155 J.Tymon:WeareopeningupaPublicHearingtoaddasetofregulationsthatwillaccompanytheƚǞƓ͸ƭ 156 StormwaterBylawthatwaspassedin2008.TheBylawgrantedtheauthoritytoenforcetheBylawandtoadopt 157 theregulations.TheregulationsallowtheBoardtograntaLandDisturbancePermit.Itappliestoanyland 158 disturbanceorchangeofsurfaceofmorethananacreandlandthatisnotcurrentlyregulatedbyanyother 159 authority.TheproposalhasbeenreviewedbyTownCounselandcommentshavebeenprovided. 160 L.Eggleston,EgglestonEnvironmentalˁƚǞƓ͸ƭoutsideconsultant):Theproposedregulationsaremodeledafter 161 someof!ƓķƚǝĻƩ͸ƭaswellassomeStateBylawsandRegulations.TheƚǞƓ͸ƭBylawgoesintoafairamountof 162 detail.Intheregulationstherearespecificareaswherethetextisinboldbecauseitisdrawnstraightfromthe 163 Bylaw.IfitisintheBylawweķƚƓ͸Ʒreallyhavetheflexibilitytomodifyit.GiventhatDEPdoeshavethe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭ 164 StormwaterManagementStandardsitseemedwisetojustdefertothoseandtosaythatthingsshouldbe 165 consistentwiththosestandards.Thereareacoupleareaswherewehavedigressedfromthemandestablished 166 morestringentcriteria.Oneisinthesizeofthestormsthatweareaskingtobemodeled.Anotheristoestablisha 167 minimumЊͼwaterqualityvolumeratherthan59t͸ƭstandardofЊΉЋͼincertainareasandthenЊͼinmore 168 sensitiveareas.WeestablishedЊͼwaterqualityvolumeacrossallareas.Wehaveoutlinedthecriteriaforthe 169 analysis.IthinkitactuallymakestheğƦƦƌźĭğƓƷ͸ƭjobaloteasierifthecriteriaisspelledoutandparticularlyifitis 170 consistentacrossthedifferenttowndepartmentssothatConComisnotlookingforsomethingdifferentthatthe 171 PlanningBoard,etc.TheseparticularregulationswillonlyapplywhereyouhavejurisdictionundertheLand 172 DisturbancePermit.Ourgoalis,throughthenextproject,tobringinyourSitePlanReview,Subdivisionand 173 WatershedSpecialPermittoallhavethesamerulespertainingtodrainage.Fortonightthisisonlygoingtoapply 174 totheLandDisturbancePermitundertheStormwaterBylaw. 175 R.Rowen:ButwecanalwaysimposethisasaconditionofaSitePlanReviewSpecialPermit? 176 L.Eggleston:YouhavelanguageforSitePlanReviewthatsaysyoumustmeetthe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭStormwaterStandards. 177 Youcanchoosetowaivewhereitisoverkill. 178 J.Simons:Hypothetically,wecouldproposetomorrowaonesentencechangetothePlanningBoardRulesand 179 RegulationsthattheSubdivisionhastocomplywiththeStormwaterRegulations. 180 L.Eggleston:IcouldgiveyousomequicklanguagefortheSubdivisionRulesandRegulationsthatbasicallysays 181 youmustcomplywiththe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭStormwaterManagementRegulations. 182 R.Rowen:Agreeswithcraftingthelanguagebutcautionedthatinthepasttheinfrastructureshavenotfailedand 183 thattheyhavebeendesignedadequately.WeķƚƓ͸Ʒwanttodestroythelookofthetowntoprotectitagainst 184 somethingthatisnotreallyaproblem. 185 J.Simons:Statedthatwehavetheabilitytowaiverequirements. 186 PublicComment: 187 JohnSmolak:ConcernedthattheTownandtheSelectmenhavetriedtostreamlinethepermittingprocessandhe 188 doesnotequatestreamliningtheprocesswithmakingeverythinguniformsothatitexceeds,insome 4 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 189 circumstances,whattheStaterequires.Also,believesweneedtolookatwhatsurroundingTownsaredoingand 190 tolookatthecostimplicationsforprojectsonthecommercialandresidentialside.Thisproposalonlydealswith 191 theStormwaterBylaw.YouarenottriggeringConComjurisdictionorPlanningBoardjurisdictionwithrespectto 192 Subdivision.Itisalimitedpopulationthatyouareeffectingandyouarehittingmostlyresidential.Singlefamily 193 homeownersthatmightdisturbanacreoraraiseandrebuild.Notthelargedevelopers.Thereare50pagesof 194 regulationsontopofa13pageBylaw.SuggeststhattheRegulationsjustdefertotheDEPStormwaterRegulations 195 asamendedandastheymaybeamended.Believesthatpotentiallythiswillleadtooversizingincertain 196 circumstancesanddrivingupexpenseandcosts.WealreadyhavetheStormwaterBylawandthatisallthatis 197 required.HandedoutanddiscussedRegulatedMS4AreasinMamappingandImperviousCover&Watershed 198 DelineationbySubbasinorGWCANA,Ma.BelievestheStormwaterBylawitselfisadequate.Concernedthatthe 199 Townisoverregulating.ConcernedwithwhatwillhappendowntheroadwithSitePlanReviewandSubdivision 200 Control.Believesthisisafactorindrivingupdevelopmentcosts.DoesnotbelievetheTownneedstogoabove 201 andbeyondtheDEPStormwaterStandards.Believesitisunnecessarytohavesuchanextensivesetofregulations. 202 J.Tymon:WhatwearetryingtodoistomakeitconsistentwiththeexistingMAStormwaterHandbookStandards. 203 WehavebeenessentiallydoingthatforourprojectsforthelastyearandahalfsincewehavehadL.Egglestonas 204 ouroutsideconsultant.Wearealsotryingtomakeallourregulationsconsistentsothatitiseasierfordevelopers. 205 Itwillbeastandardsetofregulationsandthereareveryfewinstanceswherewearegoingaboveandbeyondthe 206 MAStormwaterStandards.ThereisalsocompleteauthoritywithintheRegulationstowaiveanyandall 207 requirements.Stormwatermanagementhasbeenoneofthebiggestissuesofanyprojectthatwehavebeen 208 lookingat. 209 C.LaVolpicelo:Believesthathavingonedocumentforadevelopertoreferenceiseasierthantryingtoreference 210 theStateStormwaterHandbookandthenhavetoreferenceeachindividualƷƚǞƓ͸ƭregulationsaswell. 211 L.Eggleston:AlotofitemsintheRegulationsareproceduralandthosearenotintheHandbook.Thetechnical 212 criteriaareverysimilartotheStormwaterHandbook. 213 J.Simons:AskedforitemsthatareintheRegulationsthatareaboveandbeyondtheStateHandbook. 214 L.Eggleston:ProceduresandFeesareadministrationitemsoftheBylaw.Section7:thevastmajorityisconsistent 215 withthe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭStormwaterStandards(excepttheHydrologiccriteria),theerosionandsedimentplanandthe 216 O&Mplanisconsistent.Someofthemhavejustbeenimproveduponfromwhatthe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭguidancehas.The 217 inspectionsandsuretyrequirementsarenotcalledforinthe{ƷğƷĻ͸ƭStormwaterHandbook. 218 J.Tymon:TheRegulationswouldprovideguidanceforme.ItismuchmoresimplifiedthantheDEPStormwater 219 Handbookwhichwillmakemyjobeasier. 220 L.Eggleston:DoesnotbelievetheDEPmanualspellsouteverythingthatthetownrequiresforasubmission. 221 222 Boardhadsomediscussiononwhatwaspresented.Somemembersdidnotbelievetheywerereadytovoteon 223 thematteratthistime. 224 J.Simons:askedifJ.TymoncouldworkwithL.Egglestontoreviewthedocumentagainandtrytostreamlineit 225 andtoremoveanythingthatmayberedundant. 226 J.Smolak:Commentedthatthenewpermitwillbeissuedin35monthssothetownwillknowwhatisrequiredof 227 itintermsoflocalBylawsandRequirements.Suggeststhistopicistableduntilthatisissuedsoweknowwhatis 228 goingtoberequiredandcanactaccordingly.Secondly,statedthathisisnotsurethatanyofthestakeholders 229 (peoplewhowillbeimpacted,developmentcommunity)havebeeninvitedtobeinvolvedinthisprocess. 230 J.Simons:StatedthatthiswasaPublicHearingandthatanyonethatwantedtoattendcouldhave. 231 232 TheBoardagreedtoreviewthematerialandcontinuethediscussionatthenextPlanningBoardMeeting. 233 234 MOTION 235 AmotionwasmadebyT.Seiberttoadjournthemeeting.ThemotionwassecondedbyM.Colantoni.Thevote 236 wasunanimous. 5 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT PLANNINGBOARD MeetingMinutes Tuesday,December21,2010 TownHall,120MainStreet 7.00PM 237 238 Themeetingadjournedat9:50PM. 239 240 MeetingMaterials:Dec.21,2010agenda,G.WillismemoRedGatePastureSubdivisionbondrelease,DPWUnit 241 PricesRedGateSubdivision,ZoningBylawPriortoMay,2004withcommentssubmittedbyC.Foster,ͻIźƭƷƚƩǤͼ 242 memosubmittedbyC.Foster,NAStormwaterManagementandErosioncontrolRegulationsLandDisturbance 243 Permit,ProposedArticleX:AmendNAGeneralBylaw,NewChapter,Chapter160,StormwaterManagement& 244 ErosionControlBylaw,Urbelis&Fieldsteel,LLPMemodated12/20/2010,MAStormwaterHandbookstormwater 245 managementstandards,LegalNoticeNoticeofNAPlanningBoardPublicHearing,RegulatedMS4Areasand 246 ApplicableWatershedSpecificGeneralPermitsinMA,Imperviouscover&WatershedDelineationbySubbasinor 247 GWCANorthAndover,MA,DraftDecision1857GreatPondRd,DraftDecision254GreatPondRd,1679Osgood 248 StOverviewGradingandDrainagePlan(C4),1679OsgoodStSoilErosionandSedimentationControlPlan(C5), 249 1679OsgoodStSoilErosionandSedimentationControlPlan(C6),1679OsgoodStЊЉЉ͸WetlandBufferImpactPlan 250 (C7). 251 6 Dec212010meetingminutesDRAFT