Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - 271 STEVENS STREET 8/17/2016 q' �;"aR�lP�19,Da`6d�mre,,,o e • �4 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER VARIANCE1 ���� I ZONINGA F 'PEAL SQ NAME: w ADDRESS APPEAL:» Towr! Tic T'IM6 star p� a F Procedure & Requirements for an Application for aVarlance Twelve (12) copies of the following information must be STEP 6: SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND submitted thirty 30 days prior to the first public hearing. PREPARATION OF LEGAL NOTICE: Failure to submit the required information within the The Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals schedules' time periods prescribed may result in a dismissal by the the applicant for a hearing date and prepares the legal Zoning Board of an application as incom lete, notice for mailing to the parties in interest (abutters)and The information herein is an abstract of more for publication in the newspaper. The petitioner is specific requirements listed in the Zoning Board notified that the legal notice has been prepared and the Rules and regulations and is not meant to cost of the Party in Interest fee. supersede them. The petitioner will complete items STEP 7: DELIVERY of LEGAL NOTICE TO that are underlined NEWSPAPER The petitioner picks up the legal notice from the Office STEP 1: ADMINISTRATOR PERMIT DENIAL- of the Zoning Board of Appeals and delivers the legal The petitioner applies for a Building Permit and notice to the local newspaper for publication. receivers a Zoning Bylaw Denial form completed by the Building Commissioner. STEP 3: PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: STEP 2: VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM: The petitioner should appear in his/her behalf, or be Petitioner completes an application form to petition the represented by an agent or attorney. In the absence of Board of Appeals for a Variance. All information as any appearance without due cause on behalf of the required in items 1 through and including 11 shall be petition,the Board shall decide on the matter by using completed. the information it has received to date. STEP 3: PLAN PREPARATION: STEM' 9: DECISION: Petitioner submits all of the required plan information as After the hearing, a copy of the Board's decision will be cited in page 4, section 10 of this form. sent to all Parties in Interest. Any appeal of the Board's decision may be made pursuant to Massachusetts STEL 4: OBTAIN LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST: General Law ch,40A§ 17,within twenty (20)days after The petitioner requests the Assessor's Office to compile the decision is filed with the Town Clerk. a certified list of Parties in interest(abutters). STEP 10: RECORDING THE DECISION AND PLANS, STEP 5: SUBMIT APPLICATION: The petitioner is responsible for recording ce(tification of Petitioner submits one (1) original and eleven (11) Xerox the decision, the Mylar,and any accompanying plans at copies of all the required information to the Town Cleric's the Essex County, North Registry of Deeds, 354 Office to be certified by the Town Clerk with the time Merrimack St. Suite#304, Lawrence MA, 01843 and and date of filing. The original will be left at the Town shall complete the Certification of Recording form and Clerk's Office, and the 11 Xerox copies will be left with forward it to the Zoning Board of Appeals and to the the Zoning Board of Appeals secretary. Building Department. @�e�dlJimYauctnt #dtc�eY�va�s�dfYC�dnd3¢sJcdhV���cYd¢tddel�s4td�Si�Ydaab'atd�ct�a C�WMh'ds43Y`3e' OKidt3iya�calRndeteli:ed�� alhhud o�¢uV:B�sclfi td�ti'tL'flYtiti6tl6duitdeWtimv:sa IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS: 978-688-9533 Office of Community Dev. &Services North Andover Town Hall 1600 Osgood St., Bldg,20, Suite 2035 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 878-688-9501 Town Clerk's Office 978-688-9542 fax for Community Development offices 878-688-9566 Assessor's Office 978-688-9545 Building Department 978-688-9541 Zoning Board of Appeals Office PAGE 1 of 4 PAGE 2 OF 4 NORTH ANDOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS application for aVARIAN CE WU!gil 1. Petitioner: *Name, *Address and telephone number: Gerald Brecher, 488 Pleasant Street, North Andover, MA 01845, 617-510-5133 c/o Donald F. Borenstein, Esq., Johnson & Borenstein LLC 12 Chestnut Street,-And over, MA 018101 978-475-448 *The petitioner shall be entered on the legal notice and the decision as entered above. 2. Owners of Land: Name, Address, telephone number, and number of years under this ownership: William Melvin, 271 Stevens Street, North Andover, MA 01845 Years Owned Land:. 53 years 3. Location of Property: a. Street: 271 Stevens Street Zoning District. Residence-3 b. Assessors: Map number: 95 Lot Number: 8 c. Registry of Deeds: Book Number: 983 Page Number: 258 4. Zoning Bylaw Section(s)* under which the petition for the Variance is made. Section 7.1- Lot Area, Section 7.1.1- Contiguous Buildable Area, Table 11- Dimensional Requirements *Refer to the Zoning Bylaw Denial and Plan Review Narrative form as supplied by the Building Commissioner. 5. Describe the Variance request: Lot 1- Applicant requests a variance from N.A. Zoninq Bylaw Section 7.1-Lot Area for a lot with 16,025 s.f. of Lot Area, where 25,000 s.f. is required and from Section 7.1.1- Contiguous Buildable Area ("CBA") for a lot with 52%/ 13,036 s.f. of CBA where 75%/ 18,750 s.f. is required. Lot 2- Applicant requests a variance from N.A. Zoning Bylaw Section 7.1.1- Contiguous Buildable Area ("CBA")for a lot with 67%/ 16,785 s.f. of CBA where 75%/ 18,750 s.f. is required. Zoning Board Ruies; and Regulations as cited on page 4,section 9 of this application.Failure by the applicant to describe the.request clearly may result In a decision that does not address the Intent of the applicant. The decision Will be limited to the request by the applicant and will not Involve additional items not Included above. 6 A. Difference from Zoning Bylaw requirements: Indicate the dimension(s)that will not meet current Zoning Bylaw Requirements. (Lines A and B are in case of a lot split) Lot Area Open Space Per6entageLot Frontage Parking CBA Sq. Ft. Sq, Ft, Coverage Feet Spaces Fro Side A We B Rear existing existing ing dwelling dwelling t 1-A.16,025 0. % 52% 9.0 feet 6.4 feet t 2-B. % 67% - Page 3 of 4 NORTH ANDOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS application for aVARIANCE i The Property presently consists of 2 lots as shown on a 1963 variance plan, the information 6 B. Existing Lot• in this section reflects the combined total of both parcels. Lot Area Open Space + Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot Setback Sq.Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear 41,025 NA 322 - 9 FT 6.4 FT 222 FT 200 FT 6 C. Proposed Lot(s): ILot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot Setback Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear 16,025 -- NA 147.48 -- 9 FT 6.4 FT 22.7 FT 200 FT 25,000 -- NA 174.52 -- 30 FT 20 FT 99 FT 114 FT f 6 D. Required Lot: (As required by Zoning Bylaw&Table 2) Lot.Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot Setback Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear 25,000 -- NA 125 - 30 FT 20 FT 20 FT 30 FT 7A. Existing Building(s): Ground Floor Number of Height Total Use of Number Square feet Floors Sq.feet Building* of Units** 900+/- 2 30+/- 1,800+/- _Single FaMLly Residence 1 *Reference Uses from the Zoning Bylaw&Table 1. State number of units in building(s). 7B. Proposed Building(s): Ground Floor Number-of Height Total Use of Number Square feet Floors Sq.feet Building* of Units`* 1,500+/- 2 30+/- 3,000+/- Single Family Residence 1 *Reference Uses from the Zoning Bylaw&Table 1. **State number of units in building(s). I 8. Petitioner and Landowner signature(s): Every application for a Variance shall be made on this form,which is the official form of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or the Zoning Board of Appeals does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all expenses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements,as cited herein and in the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations may result in a dismissal by the Zoning Be of this plication as incomplete. Si nature: , -� Type above name(s) here: Gerald recher PAGE 4 OF 4 V IFA RIANCE 9. WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION *10. B. *Plan Specifications: Application for a Variance must be supported by a I) Size of plan: Ten(10)paper copies of a plan not legibly written or typed memorandum setting forth in to exceed 11"x17", preferred scale of 1 1'=40' detail all facts relied upon. When requesting a Variance D) One(1) Mylar, with one block for Registry Use from the requirements of MGLA ch. 40A, Sec. 10.4 and Only, and one block for five (5)ZBA signatures&date. the North Andover Zoning By-laws, all dimensional no Plan shall be prepared, stamped and certified by requirements shall be clearly identified and factually a Registered Professional Land Surveyor. Please supported.. All points,A-F,are required to be note that plans by a Registered Professional Engineer, addressed with this apEplication. Registered Architect, and/or a Registered Landscape Architect may be required for Major Projects. A. The particular use proposed for the land or *10 C. *Required Features On Plan; structure. I) Site Orientation shall include: B. The circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape 1. north point or topography of such land or structures especially 2. zoning district(s) affecting the property for which the Variance is 3, names of streets sought which do not affect generally the zoning 4. wetlands(if applicable) district in which the property is located. 5. abutters of property,within 300'radius C. Facts which make up the substantial hardship, 6. locations of buildings on adjacent properties financial or otherwise,which results from literal within 50'from applicants proposed structure enforcement of the applicable zoning restrictions 7. deed restrictions, easements. with respect to the land or building for which the 11) Legend&Graphic Aids shall include: variance is sought. 1. Proposed features in solid lines& outlined in red D. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief 2. Existing features to be removed in dashed lines sought will be desirable and without substantial 3. Graphic Scales detriment to the public good. 4. Date of Pian E. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief 5. Title of Pian sought may be given without nullifying or 6. Names addresses and phone numbers of the substantially derogating from the Intent or purpose applicant, owner or record, and land surveyor. of the Ordinance. 7. Locus F. Submit RDA from Conservation Commission when 10 D. Minor Projects Continuous Buildable Area is applied for in ZBA Minor projects, such as decks, sheds, and garages, application. shall require only the plan information as indicated with an. asterisk C). In some cases further information may 10. PLAN OF LAND be required. Each application to the Zoning Board of Appeals shall 11. APPLICATION FILING FEES be accompanied by the following described plan. Plans must be submitted with this application to the Town 11.A. Notification fees: Applicant shall provide a Clerk's Office and ZBA secretary at least thirty(30)days check or money order to: "Town of North Andover" for prior to the public hearing before the Zoning Board of the cost of first class, certified, return receipt x#of appeals. all parties in interest identified in MGLA ch. 40A§11 on the abutter's list for the legal notice check. Also, A set of building elevation plans by a Registered the applicant shall supply first class postage stamps Architect may be required when the application for each address listed on the abutter's list, plus an involves new construction/conversion/and/or a additional 2 for the decision mailing. proposed change in use. 11. B. Mailing labels:Applicant shall provide four(4) sets of mailing labels no larger than 1"x2-5/3" (3 copies 10. A. Major Projects for the Legal, and one copy for the Decision mailing). Major projects are those,which involve one of the 11. G. Applicant shall provide a check or money order following whether existing or proposed: S "Town of North Andover"per 2005 Revised Fee X)five (5) or more parking spaces, Schedule. tt)three (3) or more dwelling units, o- A Variance once granted by the ZBA will lapse in HI)2,000 square feet of building area. 1 (one) year if not exercised and a new petition must Major Projects shall require,that in addition to the 10B & be submitted.-4 10C features, that the plans show detailed utilities, soils, and topographic information. COMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Applicant: Gerald Brecher Owner: William Melvin Property: 271 Stevens Street Date: August 3, 2016 APPLICATION ADDENDUM The Property: The Property at issue in this matter, 271 Stevens Street, North Andover, MA, presently consists of two parcels of land fronting on a public way, Stevens Street, and shown on a plan of land entitled, "Plan of Land in North Andover Owned by W.E. Melvin" dated Oct. 1963, approved by the North Andover Board of Appeals ("Board") on 11-12-63 ("1963 Plan"). A copy of that plan is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Lot I on the 1963 Plan has Lot Area of 15,700 s.f. and Lot Frontage of 180' and is improved by an existing single-family dwelling. In addition to the existing home, a second dwelling had previously existed.on Lot 1, that structure is identified as a 1-story wood-frame, dwelling on the 1963 Plan. 'Only the foundation of that second dwelling remains today. Lot 2 on the 1963 Plan has Lot Area of 25,000 s.f. and Lot Frontage of 142'. Collectively, the Property includes 40,700+/- s.f. of land with 322+/- ft. of frontage. The Property is located in the Residence 3 zoning district, which has current dimensional requirements of 25,000 lot area, and 125 ft. frontage (in the R3 District, CBA is 75% and lot width is 100 ft.). The Property is improved by a single-family home located at the extreme northern corner of the property that was constructed in approximately 18801. The Board issued a Variance for the Property dated November 14, 1963 ("1963 Variance"), to allow the division of the Property into Lot I and Lot 2 as shown on the As noted on the Assessors' property record card. 1963 Plan. A copy of the 1963 Variance documents are attached hereto collectively as Exhibit 2. The existing home was to be located on the 15,700 s.f. lot, Lot 1. The variance contains no stated time limitation on its use or exercise. It appears that the 15,700 s.f lot was marketed for sale but never sold. Mr. William Melvin sought and obtained the 1963 variance, and Mr. Melvin has continued to own the entire Property since since the issuance of the 1963 Variance. The Variance remains on file with the Town. The Status of the Variance: The current version of the Massachusetts Zoning Act provides that "(i)f the rights authorized by a variance are not exercised within one year of the date of grant of such variance such rights shall lapse." G.L. c. 40A, s. 10. However, the one-year lapse provision "was not contained in the pre-1975 version of the Zoning Enabling Act" and "is not retroactive to variances issued but not used,prior to adoption of the new Zoning Act by the city or town." Bobrowski, Handbook of Massachusetts Land Use and Planning Law, 3d Ed., s. 10.10 (2011) citing dictum in Hogan v. Hayes, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 399, 403-4 (1985). In the Hogan case, the Appeals Court considered the retroactive application of the 1975 amendment's one-year lapse period to a variance issued in 1974. The variance in Hogan allowed the division of a parcel of land into two, non-confirming lots (one that would contain an existing dwelling and a second on which a new dwelling was to be constructed). The Appeals Court held that the variance had been exercised by virtue of the sale of the unimproved lot prior to adoption of the 1975 amendment. However, the Appeals Court went on to comment on the retroactive application of the one-year lapse period as follows, "The notion that variances more than one year old, and remaining unexercised by the effective date of the new statute, are destroyed wholesale by a retroactive application of§ 10, would appear quite drastic, and hardly matches the text of that provision. A milder contention might take the form that § 10 should extend to cancel variances, granted well before the effective date of the new statute, which have not been exercised within a year after that date. Even that proposition might put a great and insupportable strain on the statutory language. (See the reading of§ 10 in Knott v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Natick, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 1002, 2 1004 [1981].)" Hogan v. Haves, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 399, 403- 404 (1985). The Appeals Court next addressed the issue of a retroactive application of the one-year lapse period in the case of Asack v. Board of Appeals, 47 Mass.App.Ct. 733 (1999). In Asack the court held that an owner who purchased without knowledge of a pre-1975 variance and subsequently acquired additional abutting land could not claim the benefit of the old variance. The Asack court found this to be clearly distinguishable from the circumstances in the Hogan case, where the same owner who had obtained the pre-1975 variance continued to own both lots after the Zoning Act was amended. In Hogan, the Appeals Court held it to be unfair and inequitable to retroactively apply the one year limitation period introduced by the 1975 amendments in a situation similar to the one presented here, where the original owner who obtained the pre-1975 variance continued to own the lots benefited by the variance. . In his treatise, Handbook of Massachusetts Land Use and Planning Law, Mark Bobrowski, Esq. states, "The lapse provision, which was not contained in the pre- 1975 version of the Zoning Enabling Act, is not retroactive to variances issued, but not used, prior to adoption of the new Zoning Enabling Act . . . Hogan v, Hayes, 19'Mass.App.Ct. 399, 403-404 (1985). The Court suggested this result in dictum." Bobrowski, Handbook of Massachusetts Land Use and Planning Law, 3d Ed., s. 10.10 and FN 189 (2011) Thus, it is a fair conclusion (1) that the one-year lapse period for variances, introduced by the 1975 amendments to the Zoning Act, is not applicable to the 1963 Variance benefiting the 271 Stevens Street Property —particularly where the same individual who obtained the 1963 Variance has owned the property since before the 1963 Variance was issued, and (2) that the 1963 Variance remains effective today. Relief Requested: Although it is the Applicant's position that the 1963 Variance remains effective today, the Applicant nonetheless seeks a new variance from the Board. Since issuance of the 1963 Variance, the Town has adopted a Wetlands Protection Bylaw that generally 2 In Knott v. Zoning Bd.of Appeals the court considered whether a variance issued under the pre-1975 version of the Zoning Act had lapsed. In that case the court noted the adoption of"the new c.40A, § 10. . . which for new variances restricts to one year the time in which the rights granted may be exercised". Knott v.Zoning l3d.o Appeals 12 Mass.App.Ct. 1002, 1004(Mass.App. Ct. 1981) 3 requires compliance with a 50' no build zone measured from the edge of any wetlands resource area. The Town has also adopted a Continuous Buildable Area ("CBA") requirement of 75% of the applicable minimum Lot Area. A wetland has been identified at the rear of the Property. In order to comply with the requirements of the Town's Wetland Protection Bylaw, the boundary between Lot I and Lot 2 must be reconfigured so as to allow for the siting of a home on Lot 2 in compliance with the setback requirements of both the Town's Zoning Bylaw and Wetlands Protection Bylaw. This proposed lot line configuration is shown on the proposed site plan filed herewith. No new non-conformity is created by the revised lot boundary., the relative lot areas of Lot I and Lot 2 remain the same, and the Applicant has requested variance relief from the Lot Area and CBA requirement for Lot 1, and the CBA requirement for Lot 2 (Lot 2 is otherwise a fully complying single-family lot), which is equivalent to the relief that was granted under the 1963 Variance. In practical terms, the Applicant is seeking a modification of the 1963 Variance, to address the more recently enacted CBA requirement and to allow a change in the common lot line between Lot I and Lot 2. This would permit compliance with the Town's Wetlands Protection requirements, without creating additional zoning non-conformities. The existing dwelling, constructed in approximately 1880, is located on the Property 9.0 feet from the front lot line and 6.4 feet from the right side lot line. These setbacks would not change under the Applicant's proposal. Variance Elements: A. Particular Use Proposed- The Applicant's proposed use of the Property is the same use permitted by the 1963 Variance, to retain the existing, single-family dwelling on a somewhat undersized lot and to allow a new, single-family home on a second, 25,000 s.f. lot. Today, this proposed use takes on even more importance as a tool to preserve the existing historic home. The existing dwelling was constructed in 1880. The Applicant's proposal would allow for the preservation of this 135+ year old structure with an architecturally appropriate addition and the construction of a new home on Lot 2 of a complimentary architectural design. If the requested variance is not approved by the Board, the Property would be an obvious target for a "tear-down", with the existing home being demolished and a much larger and potentially much less neighborhood-compatible home eventually being developed on the over-sized lot, as of right. B. Circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape or topography, especially affecting the Property which do not affect generally the zoning district- The Property's, unique triangular shape; position of the existing home; and the soil conditions and topography that resulted in the unique location of the wetlands on the 4 Property, all specially affect the Property and do not generally affect the R-3 Zoning District where the Property is located. C. Substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, which results from literal enforcement of the zoning restrictions to the Property- The Owner of the Property would see a material decrease in the value of the Property if it were not considered two separate building lots. Mr. Melvin has owned the Property for more than sixty (60)years, and would have been under a reasonable belief that he owned two building lots as a result of the 1963 Variance. Limiting the Property to a single building lot would be a substantial financial hardship to him. This would be particularly onerous to Mr. Melvin, who is elderly and is in need of the full value of the Premises to fund his maintenance and care. The Applicant, Gerald Brecher (who lives roughly across the street from the Property) and other Town residents in proximity to the Property would also suffer a hardship if the requested variance were not issued and the Property were to be sold as a likely "tear- down", without any control over the design or aesthetics of what would be built on the Property. Under the proposed variance, the existing, historic home would be preserved and tastefully restored on Lot 1, and a complimentary home built on Lot 2. Without this relief, the Applicant and others in the neighborhood would suffer hardship from the likely alternative to this appropriately designed proposal. D. Relief sought will be desirable without substantial detriment to public good. For the reasons explained above, the desirable relief requested by way of this variance request would be consistent with the public good of preserving the existing historic home and insuring improvement on the Property that is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. E. Relief sought may be given without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance. The variance relief requested by this application is entirely consistent with and promotes the stated purposes found at Section I of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw, specifically including, 1. Encouraging the most appropriate use of land; 3. Conserving the value of land and buildings The relief requested does not nullify or substantially derogate from any of the other enumerated purposes of the Bylaw. 5 Conclusion: The circumstances presented by the Property meet each element of the Board's consideration of the issuance of a variance, as outlined above. In addition to preserving the value of the Property for its long-time Owner, the proposal is a benefit to the Town and to the neighborhood where the Property is located. Without the requested variance, hardship both financial and otherwise will result. Furthermore, the circumstances presented by this application are so unusual and unique, particularly the fact that the applicant for the 1963 Variance has continued to own the Property benefited by the variance for over 50 years, that no harmful precedent would be set by the Board's approval. Accordingly, the Board is respectfully urged to grant the requested relief. 6 Exhibit 1 AU'oil 10- ;. h9 y 74 w� 4 1 mW 4 _. 0 Q 4 I U CJ : Exhibit 2 Door Sire The Allowing POW100 vyp AMA at nowMag A M'��4�xrtZ co" *wAvy UO 1%0 at ths Zinn OtTlap- xMiago plowat Q& WOU"In veral WrAq And RAW A AM$ AAamejoto hontsvp 00hy got, is at tot Quins 9'p4Lrx'4 w au to permit the dIVASIOU 01 Ox OdINULng I'It an. !at to 0464gig. POOO ap A. and *MW lat to ft" 04110 IS "00 at an per Wouso- V &w-4 PrOMA007 10eated at beat Ad&' wr aftovvae strook yplwm of Mov dAt'st QCM titz' pler:"O�M+v Aroot W Mown at PW 271 st.saw "Ops", PAU0 WaQwd vas &TOMW A the walk TAbaw5, c4a 14654 All aWtvra veve d0jr 4tj6d of swing Q WORK106 KQI� No, WIVY OppArod an his OMM HOMO TATY I'Mrc --w- , Ibnettyly P;"Sawt 0*1 thora ugo, ie Q0 WaV4 d1XVIISM OnA VOW up tba polItI4, A!,, _M t\v ur�Lw-aw�' HIV Morton 000004 tik&j MUM M4 the veto Mov vo"Onvis gruptMA for the tv,1013py rMaxp4w 0! sit �ft"j I lb stint tin paroal 141, at not poWny watift W-031-10 41-101 WOOS th* VIZAVOO It voct-, -4 the A"Own ja 'OeA J" ca" WOMAN YIC MWOV will AW AMIlly OAK tin �wl& v� Ow suk�" Wj gall atroet tkw avve."On-w" VROW and IfIl. not "Wrl wumon Vill 'not, 0 ly, Amm Laos Achu TIV TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF DECISION It 41 Date Al. g A?,�. Petition No.. — . Date of Hearing, AW*QWkW A4 166� Petition of. Prenuises affectied. Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . . . . . . . . "VIwr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........'i After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .and hereby authorize the Building Inspector to issue a permit to. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . for the construction of the above work, based upon the following conditions: EF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Appeals THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS C17Y CM BOARD OF APPEALS ................November.q.4.,.... ................ 63 NOTICE OF VARIANCE Conditional or Limited Variance or Special Permit (Queral Laws Chapter 400,Seedon 18 as amended) Notice is hereby given that a Conditional or Limited Variance or Special Permit has been granted To-- WUl:U--M s- ------ ----1__o __A!Q ---------------------------------•_-..--•-..----..-..- ------------------------------------------------------ Owner or Petitioner Address-----;M 1--At.4."_ 10.1t mm 4..........................-------------_---_--- -------- ------------------------------------ Cityor Town......._.. _----_- ............... ................ ----------------- 271 Steveno Stmet. --------- ----------­­---------------------- ------------- ---­--------- Identify Land AVerted ..................................... ........................................ ------------ -----------­------------------------- --------------- UP by the Town of.................... --...---------------------_--.--Board of Appeals affecting the rights of the owner with respect to the use of premises on- ----­----­---- -­-- ............................ - ah'61' city or Town the record title standing in the name of 331an 1. Melvin ..................................... ............................ ................­......­­....­........................ whose address is...... Andovor,, .........*---------------- Street City or Town state by a deed duly recorded in the..................._..................._.County Registry of Deeds in Book _-..•---------.- Page................. ....................................................Registry District of the Land Court Certificate No.-----------_-- ---------_----Book ----------------Page.---------- - The _----..-...Page.-------------The decision of said Board is on file with the papers in Decision or Case NoAk III W- 63 *W North Andover in the office of the Town Clerk-------------------------------------- _.pkat-.............. --------------- ----------- ...... Signed this__ _day of-----•- ------�q ----------------1963. Board of Appea s: - .... ...........Chab man /--B-oArd of P"s .........Clerk Board of Appeals ............................................19k........ at- ------_..o'clock arid.............. ..................minutes __M. Received and entered with the Register of Deeds in the County of.......................................... Bonk .................. Page.............._......... ATTEST ............... Register of Deeds Notice to be recorded by 41111111�M Land Owner. room 1004 moss%& wApavc cmc Ravmxn CHAPTER 2iz4962