Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 122 FOSTER STREET 5/20/2014 Tree Cover Assessment pursuant to§8.9(5)(d)(ili)(3)of the Town of North Andover 1972 Zoning Bylaws,last amended May 20,2014 Prepared by William R.VanDoren Massachusetts Licensed Forester#380 • Connecticut Certified Forester#F000691 June 4, 2015 Executive Summary Forester William R.VanDoren(MA Licensed Forester#380,CT Certified Forester#F000691)was tasked with assessing the"...tree cover on the subject property and all properties directly abutting the subject property, by dominant species and average height" in accordance with the Town of North Andover 1972 Zoning Bylaws, last amended May 20, 2014 (§8.9(5)(d)(iii)(3)). On June 2-3,2015,sampling was conducted for the subject tract of 122 Foster Street; North Andover, MA. The subject and abutting tracts are characterized by areas with scattered trees and a more open canopy,as well as wooded areas with complete canopy cover. The predominant forest type is mixed pine-oak. The white pines are typically emergent above the main canopy, and the hardwoods form a continuous main canopy. Scattered saplings and poles,typically of white pine,are present in the understory of wooded areas not subject to grazing. A gradient is present of diminishing canopy height and cover from upland to wetland areas. The dominant tree species were white pine, black oak, and soft maple. Mean tree height(basal- area weighted) ranged from 56.5--89.1 ft,while top height ranged from 68.0—106.3 ft. Overview ProTerra Design Group, LLC, contracted with William R.VanDoren (MA Licensed Forester#380,CT Certified Forester#F000691)to assess the"...tree cover on the subject property and all properties directly abutting the subject property, by dominant species and average height" in accordance with the Town of North Andover 1972 Zoning Bylaws, last amended May 20, 2014 (§8.9(5)(d)(11i)(3)). On June 2- 3, 2015,sampling was conducted for the subject tract of 122 Foster Street; North Andover, MA. There were two primary components of the task;estimating the average height, and the dominant species,of the tree cover, There are various methods of calculating the "average height"of a group of trees. The four most common methods include: • Calculating an average from a complete census of the trees in the subject tract or stand; • Calculating the average height of dominant and co-dominant trees; • Calculating the average height of a fixed number of the largest trees (e.g.,the k1 _largesttrees, where k might be 30-50),called the top height; and • Calculating the mean height,weighted by basal area,called Lorey's mean height. Of these methods,the first three can require a complete census of the trees on the subject tract, if in part only to arrive at the subset of trees to be measured. This is time consuming and costly;further, Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 122. Foster Street • North Andover, MA Page 1 of 8 many trees in all canopy layers(strata) must be measured when the height of the main canopy is likely the variable of Interest. The fourth, Lorey's mean height,can be calculated as the arithmetic average of the heights of trees measured by horizontal point(also called variable radius) sampling(Kendall and Sayn-Wittgenstein (1959)and Beers and Miller(1973)). This estimate Is also more representative of larger trees and thus the taller trees most likely to be in the main canopy. Thus, Lorey's mean height (shortened to mean height in the narrative)was reported for this assessment. Top height was also reported,and was calculated as the mean of the tallest tree selected for measurement on each plot. Species dominance was assessed using the metric of basal area. Basal area is the cross-sectional area of the tree at 4.5 ft above the ground (or at a point where stem irregularities are not present),a common measurement in forestry. In typical forest stands, there is an inverse relationship between the number of trees of a given diameter and their diameter—which is to say, as the diameter Increases,the number of trees of that diameter class decreases. Larger diameter trees are also,typically,taller and more likely to be In the main canopy. Use of trees per acre as a metric for assessing species dominance could skew results toward lower canopy stratum and produce a result not necessarily representative of the main canopy—again,the stratum of interest—In mature forests consisting of larger diameter trees in the main canopy with seedlings and saplings in the understory. Variable radius sampling is also an efficient sampling method to estimate basal area and thus species composition. To sample the subject tract and abutting tracts which could be accessed because of similar ownership, a random starting point was used to lay out a systematic grid of inventory plots. Available surveys and cadastral data were combined to establish the sample area,and georeferenced based on field reconnaissance. The grid was sized to ensure the same tree was not likely to be selected for sampling from two different points,while providing an adequate number of sampling points;thus, plots were spaced on a one-acre grid (i.e., 208.7 ft square). At each grid intersection, a variable radius sample plot was located. Variable radius sampling selects trees for measurement in proportion to their basal area. The plot layout was checked to ensure the grid was not concurrent with regular, repeating features in the landscape to avoid bias and ensure a random sample. A basal area factor(BAF)was selected such that an average of 4-10 trees would be selected for measurement per plot(Avery and Burkhardt, 2002; Husch et A, 2002; Marshall et al.,2004). BAF 20 was ultimately used,and an average of 6.2 trees were selected for measurement at each plot. Abutting tracts not under common ownership with the subject tract could not be accessed and sampled using traditional variable radius plots. Thus,a two-part sampling scheme was conducted. First,variable radius half-plots were established equidistantly along the shared property lines. Instead of a full circular plot as in ordinary variable radius plots, hemispherical plots, aligned to the property lines,were used to sample trees in the abutting property. Half-plots were selected because they are the only edge ` sampling correction technique which does not require access to the subject tract. While some bias can be present in certain circumstances, it is minimal and acceptable under these conditions (Penner and Otukol, 2000). Second,a qualitative visual assessment of the tree vegetation and condition along the property lines and In the interior of the abutting tract was conducted,and developed into a narrative description. Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 Page 2 of 8 122 Foster Street North Andover, MA i Trees selected for measurement at each plot were identified to genus and species, measured for diameter at breast height (dbh), and measured for total height from ground to top of the crown envelope. Dbh was measured using a Biltmore stick,diameter tape,or Leica Dista D810 laser non- contact dendrometer diameter function; and total height was measured using a clinometer or the Disto's height function, both depending on conditions(i.e.,visibility,terrain,etc.). Digital and analog Instruments were calibrated at the beginning and middle of each work session and when batteries were replaced or power was otherwise fully cycled in digital instruments. Weather conditions at the time of inventory were overcast,±55°F,with Intermittent light drizzle. A Garmin GPSMap 62c(±3m accuracy)was used to navigate to plots In the field. Where plots could not be located due to field conditions(i.e.,standing water or emergent wetlands), they were dropped from the Inventory. The walkthrough method (Ducey et al., 2004)was used to reduce boundary overlap bias. Of the 21 plots originally laid out, 16 were able to accessed and inventoried in the field,and nine of those were located in wooded areas. This corresponds well to the approximate area of each land classification,with approximately 20.34 ac.total area under common ownership as the subject tract, 9.00 ac. of upland wooded area,and 5.30 ac. of open canopy area. An additional seven half-plots were located along property lines to sample abutting tracts. Both the subject and abutting tracts had areas with more scattered trees and open canopy conditions, as well as wooded areas with more complete canopy cover. Thus, results are presented for the subset of plots in each tract falling in open canopy areas, closed canopy areas, and aggregated as a whole. When aggregated,simple random sampling(as opposed to stratified random sampling)was used, Due to the small size of the tracts and sampling scheme,the small sample size precluded the efficient use of stratification. E Tract summaries E Parcel 104.D-26 Sub'ect tract The northern part of this tract was forested. Within the forested area,the upland portions had a closed canopy conditions dominated by white pine and mixed (red, black,scarlet,and white)oaks,with the most predominant associate being soft maple. The wetland areas had a lower leaf area index and less canopy closure, but canopy cover typically approached 100%and thus was a closed canopy. The southern part of the tract was maintained as an open pasture with scattered trees and landscaped areas. Within the forested part of the tract, five plots were able to be established. Mean basal area was 140 W'/ac (awla). Red oak(40%by basal area) and white pine (34%by basal area)were the dominant species;associates included black oak(9%by basal area), paper birch (6% by basal area),soft maple(6% by basal area), and scarlet oak(6% by basal area). Mean tree height was 84.3 ft(±5.9%, a=0.1);top height was 101.0 ft;and quadratic mean dbh was 17.5 in (t9.5%,a=0.1). Within the open canopy part of the tract,six plots were able to be established. Mean basal area was 53.3 W/ac. Black oak,scarlet oak, and white pine were the dominant species (25% by basal area each); Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 122 Foster Street North Andover, MA Page 3 of 8 white oak composed 19%of the basal area,and red oak composed 6%of the basal area. Mean tree height was 70.7 ft(*8.5%,a=0.1);top height was 82.3 ft;and quadratic mean dbh was 17.8 in (i14.2%, a=0.1). 1 The wetland portions of this tract were unable to be directly sampled due to standing deep water. Generally,the areas with tree cover were dominated by trees characteristic of more poorly drained soil, such as pole-and small-sawtimber size soft maple and white ash as well as small trees like dogwood; with mean canopy heights ranging from 50-75 ft. A gradient existed from south to north,toward Mosquito Brook,of increasing soil saturation,decreasing canopy height, and lower canopy closure. Overall on this tract, 11 plots were able to be established. The mean (unstratified) basal area was 92.7 ft'/ac(42%, a=1a), White pine was the dominant species (composing 31%of the basal area),followed by red oak(29%of the basal area), black oak(14%of the basal area),scarlet oak(12%of the basal area), white oak(6%of the basal area),and soft maple and paper birch (4%of the basal area each). Mean tree height was 80.0 ft(±5.1%,a=0.1);top height was 94.0 feet; and quadratic mean dbh was 17.6 in (1.7.7%, c(=0.1). Parcel 104.D-15(Abutting tract same owner as subject tract None of this tract was maintained as an open pasture; however, much of the eastern and western parts of the tract were forested,shrub, or emergent wetlands. It was under the same ownership as the subject tract and thus was able to be sampled in its entirety subject to accessibility constraints. A small, upland area of forest occurred in the central part of this tract. Within this forested area, one plot was able to be established. Soft maple was the dominant species,composing 50%of the basal area;white pine, also dominant but not well-represented in the sole plot here,composed 25%of the basal area. Red oak composed the remainder of the basal area. Basal area was 160 ft'/ac. Mean tree height was 66.9 ft(±18.9%, a=0.1); top height was 100.0 ft,and quadratic mean dbh was 13.3 in (•1.25.6%,a=0.1). The eastern and western portions of this tract were inaccessible due to standing water,and appeared to be forested,shrub, and emergent wetlands. The edges of these wetlands, in the gradient from uplands, were characterized by trees typical of more poorly-drained soils,such as pole-and small sawtimber- sized soft maple and white ash, and small trees like dogwood. Canopy heights ranged from 50-75 ft, with a general gradient of south to north,toward Mosquito Brook,of increasing soil saturation, decreasing canopy height,and lower canopy closure. Some areas of emergent wetlands were devoid of tree cover. Parcel 104.D-24 tAbutting,tract some owner as subject tract This tract was entirely forested, and because It was under the same ownership as the subject tract, it was able to be sampled in its entirety. Three plots were able to be established on this tract. Overall,the basal area on this tract was 180.0 ft'/ac(19%, a=1a). White pine was the dominant species (63%of the basal area). Associates included black oak(composing 15%of the basal area),soft maple(composing 11%of the basal area),white oak(composing 7%of the basal area),and red oak(composing 4%of the basal area). Mean tree height was 89.1 ft (f5.5%, a=0.1);top height was 106.3 ft; and quadratic mean dbh was 18.7 in (19.7%, a=0.1). Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 122 Foster Street North Andover, MA Page 4 of 8 Only a small area of wetlands was present in the northwest corner of this tract,with generally similar conditions as described above for wetlands on other tracts. i Parcel 104.D-27(Abutting tract some owner as sub ect tract This tract is primarily occupied by a residence and its associated yard and outbuildings. As such, It has more open-canopy conditions,with more dense vegetation along property lines,and scattered trees within otherwise landscaped areas. One plot was able to be located on this tract. The basal area per acre on this tract was 40 ft'/ac,and black oak and soft maple are the dominant species. Mean tree height was 65.0 ft(±20.4%,a=0.1);top height was 68.0 ft; and quadratic mean dbh was 19.5 in (±16.2%, Parte!104.D-144 Abutting tract diffBrent owner from subject tract This tract was unable to be sampled in its entirety because it was not under the sante ownership as the subject tract. The tree vegetation along the southern part of the shared property line consisted of open- grown hardwoods of typically smaller diameter,and small saplings and brushler conditions along the field to the east. The tree vegetation along the northern part of the shared property line consisted of larger diameter softwoods and hardwoods, as the adjacent property was more wooded here and consisted mostly of white pines. Two plots were able to be established and sampled along the shared property line. Mean basal area was 200 ft'/ac(253%, a=1a). Adjacent to the field, black oak was the dominant species(composing 67% of the basal area),followed by black cherry,composing the balance. Adjacent to the wooded area, all the sampled trees were white pine. Mean tree height adjacent to the field was 31.0 ft(±3 5.8%,a=D.1), adjacent to the wooded area was 83.3 ft(±4.9%, a=0.1),and overall was 69.7 ft(±15.5%,a=0.1). Top height adjacent to the field was 47.0 ft;adjacent to the wooded area was 97.0 ft,and overall was 72 ft. Quadratic mean dbh adjacent to the field was 10.0 in (±12.7%, a=0.1); adjacent to the wooded area was 20.3 in (±16.6%,a=0.1),and overall was 17.2 in (±13.6%, a=0-1). Parcel 104.D-28 Abuttin tract different owner from sub'ect tract This tract was unable to be sampled in its entirety because it was not under the same ownership as the subject tract. The tree vegetation along the property lines was characterized by large,open grown hardwoods,typically oaks. In the western extent of the shared property line,few saplings and little brush were present, and there was a gradual gradient Into a landscaped area behind a residence. Along the eastern reaches of the shared property line, larger oaks were still present. However,there were more smaller dbh trees and brushier conditions,including saplings and small poles of oak, maple,and white pine; and small fruit trees were present as well. This area transitioned abruptly into a parking area and area that appeared to have light industrial uses. Three plots were established and sampled along the shared property line. Mean basal area was 146.7 W'/ac(70%, a=1a). The dominant species was black oak, composing 36%of the basal area. Associates included red oak (composing 27%of the basal area),soft maple(composing 18%of the basal area), and scarlet and white oak (each composing 9%of the basal area). Mean tree height was 56.5 ft (±13.4%, a=0.1);top height was 74.3 ft, and quadratic mean dbh was 15.5 in (±16.6%, a=0.1). Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 Page 5 of 8 122 foster Street North Andover, MA Parcel 104.D-47(Abutting tract, different owner from subiect tract) This tract was unable to be sampled in Its entirety because it was not under the same ownership as the subject tract. The tree vegetation along the property lines was characterized by large, open grown hardwoods,typically oaks,along with brushy saplings and small poles of oaks, maple, birch, and cherry. A large field occupied much of the area near the shared property line,and vegetation along the far edge of the field appeared to be primarily large, open-grown, hardwood trees in large part adjacent to wetland. Two plots were established and sampled along the shared property line. Mean basal area was 120 ft'/ac (0%, a=1o). Black oak was the dominant species,composing 67%of the basal area. Other species included scarlet oak and white oak,each composing 17%of the basal area. Mean tree height was 68.8 ft (±8.8%, a=0.1);top height was 81.0 feet; and quadratic mean dbh was 22.7 in(±14.5%,a=0.1). Works cited Avery,T.E.,and H.E. Burkhart, 2002. Forest measurements, Fifth edition. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY. Beers,T.W., and C.I. Miller. 1973. Manual of forest mensuration. T& C Enterprises. West Lafayette, IN. Ducey, M.J.,J.H.Gove,and H.T.Valentine. 2004. A walkthrough solution to the boundary overlap problem. Forest Science 50(4):427-435. Husch, B.,T.W. Beers, and J.A. Kershaw,Jr. 2002. Forest mensuration, Fourth edition. John Wiley& Sons. Hoboken, NJ. Kendall, R.H., and L.Sayn-Wittgenstein. 1959. An evaluation of the relaskop. Tech. Note 77. Department of Northern Affairs and Natural Resources, Canadian Forest Research Division,Ottawa, Ontario,Canada. Marshall, D.D., Iles, K., and l.F. Bell. 2004. Using a large-angle gauge to select trees for measurement in variable plot sampling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:840-845. Penner, M.and S. Otukol. Boundary Plot Corrections for Variable Radius Plats—Simulation Results. In: Hansen, M.,and T. Burk(eds.), 2000. Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century. General Technical Report NC-212. U.S. Dept.of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. St. Paul, MN. Common and scientific names of tree species referenced black cherry Prunus serotina F black oak Quercus velutina dogwood Cornus spp. paper birch Betula popyrifera red oak(northern) Quercus rubra scarlet oak Quercus coccinea soft maple Acer rubrum white oak Quercus alba white pine(eastern) Pinus strobes Assessment of tree cover June 4, 2035 Page fi of 8 122 Foster Street North Andover, MA n -r3 � o � ca Table 1. Summary of basal area by species and tract,including totals. Broken down by closed-and open-canopy portions of tracts, and information about sample size(number of plots) and summary statistics is also provided. Standard deviation,standard error of the mean, oand sampling error were not calculated where n<2. < o r, rt � J D mean basal area(ftl/acre),by species and total Total sampling statistics >Z C n o standard samplingerror 0 {# black black paper red soft scarlet white white (standard error of ((X=0.1, Tract Statpu{s( Canopy plots) cherry oak birch oak maple oak oak pine Total deviation) �pthe mean j} %ofine-eayn{y) t .. a .... .. T ::104.D46 Subject ..Closed 5 0 0 12:0 8.0'.' 56.D'; 8.0i; 8.0 0.D .'48.0 {140 0 104.D-26 Subject Open 6 0.0 133 0.0 3.3 0.0 13.3 10.0 13.3 53.3 , 104. 45 Abutting-Same Owner` Closed 1 0:0 0.0 .0 ..:..4 :: 8D.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 160.0 104.D-15 Abutting-Same Owner Open 0 1174 D 2'4 Abutting-same Owner'i: Closed 3 Oso 26:7 0.0. 6.7 20.0 '' 0.0 ',; 13.3 1113:_1813.11: 104.D-24 Abutting-Same Owner Open 0 1.044-17. Rbutting Same Owner Ci,osed .. Q 104-D-27 Abutting-Same Ovmer Open 1 0.0 20.0 0.D 0.0 20�.y0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 104.D-144 Abutting-Different Owner :Closed `1 0.0 00 0.t�' 0.0.':. 0.0 0.0 0.0 28M:.:280.0 104.D-144 Abutting-Different Owner Open 1 40.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 120.0 �a 51. 104.D-28 Abutting-D,ifferentOvurEer closed ... ... 0.. . 104-D-28 Abutting-Different Owner Open 3 0.0 53.3 0.0 40.0 26.7 13.3 13.3 0.0 146-7 104_D-47 Abutting-DifferentOtvner Closed 0 104.D-47 Abutting-Different Owner Open 2 0.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 D-0 120.0 m M � N 0 CD aQ Ln Table 2. Summary of tree height by tract. (basal area-weighted height(Lorey's mean height) is calculated. Subtotals are provided for the closed and open canopy portions of each tract,and information about sample size (number of trees)and summary statistics are provided, i mean height n (it,basal area- o sampling error (If trees sampled) weighted) (standard deviation) (a�0.1,%ofmcan) Tract Status Ciased. Open IIIWW edl Open " ffClosed: Open Cfosed open 104.D-26 Subject 35 16 84 3 70.7 :17;3..:: 13.7 5.99'0 8.570 104.0-15 Abutting,-Same Owner ��� 8 I 104,13.24 Abutting-Sarno Owner 27 �" 89.1 . H= 1.04,13.27 Abutting-Same Owner ' ' 2 65.0 4.2 29.1% 104,D-144 Abutting-Different Owner r 14 6 f.86.3. 31.0 8.9 13.5 - A 996:35.890 1U4.R 28 Abutting-Different Owner ' 22 SG.S ? 7.0.5 13.A90 104,0-47 Abutting-Different Owner W 12 68.8 11.7 8.8% Table 3. Summary of top height by tract. The mean maximum height sampled at each plat is calculated. Subtotals are provided for the closed and open canopy portions of each tract, and information about sample size(number of trees) is provided. Measures of dispersion omitted due to small sample size. top height n lft,basal area- (gplotssampied) weighted) Tract Status ;Closed: Open G" Closed. Open 104.D-26 Subject 5 G 1014i 82.3 104.D-15 Abutting-Same Owner y 1 U 10P,0. 1040-24 Abutting Same Owner 3 0 106,3' 104.D-27 Abutting-Same Owner 0 i 1 68.0 104.D-144 Abutting-Different Owner 1 1 97.ti 47.0 104.D-28 Abutting-Different Owner 0 3 74.3 104,D-47 Abutting-Different Owner " 0 7 Table 4. Summary of tree diameters by tract. Basal-area weighted dbh (quadratic mean dbh) is calculated. Subtotals are provided for the closed and open canopy portions of each tract,and information about sample size(number of trees)and summary statistics are provided. quadratic mean dbh n (in,basal area- a sampiingerror (fltreessampled) weighted) (standard deviation) (a�0.1'%ofmean I Tract Status ty :.Closed open Cfesed� Open_'C Closed: Open t Closed Open 104.D-26 Subjer.t 35 16 17 5 17.8 5 8 5.7 - 9.5% 14.2% 104.D-15 Abutting-Same Owner 8 13.3 5.1 `0 25 G9e' 104,D-24 Abutting 5amc Owner 27 18.7 S.5 104.D-27 Abutting-Same Owner 2 1.9.5 0.7 16.2% 104.D.144 Abuttirig-Different Owner ° 14 6 m_I- 20.3 : 100 413..:. 1.5 i ," 100% 123% 104.13-28 Abutting-Different Owner 7.2 IS'S I, 7.0 16.6% 104.0+47 Abutting-RifferentOwncr _ 12 727 f,.3 .„ 34,590 Assessment of tree cover June 4,2015 122 Foster Street North Andover, MA Page 8 of 8 Tree Cover Map farepafed by William R.VanDoren Subject Traci: �". "� """' "�" '' Connecticut Massachusetts 122 foster Street , r' U'` —"' _ — � — — �r — Certified Licensed North Andover,MA 01845 Forester NF000691 Forester 4380 Prepared June 4,2015 �• , —- —- — — FORESTRY PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONVEYANCE Troo Cow Map piswirl4 Toxo of Nath hndovcr 1912 Inn n9 nyttm, -�• �7Y..,,,_ bstxroldrdktay20,201409(5)(dXii)(3). Sa£xwsin"o:DataGadW=Qgiie6d,61ns,t+asrrs' au. � .,�•.�_.� ,� ay .,�,.;,-� ,yy. 41& as�avpTL,14=ckWWollllmds 5oLOT Roaad6huctubd8?801ocwl adadin — ^ur.. •,.,`,k;r„— ......str.. aW _ ,�:a _ ,LU.. ..,.. th0 t1enBWXCat.tyR0y0yrdPnodsf'I,nNS0621:and '-•,. ..+ _ -�.'-+,4.._ a"r-'-�,,u._, »tee„ "�" -"'- a:arvuy try Rai h 8.Rras:aw,daWd 2145,rocadod hi I ie •`.••-`�ie,u - - ,_-,y'— ily a¢urvn �rrankC.xCola3AAt.s6yoreeodsP'1,f0=404In an PfW,and a:r.w}vyy Trm4Q,Gplatas6Asa>c.,datad4RYT7,rexardodinliw fin ffmtien Es©x CountyRogls6yof DoodsP6xn x/1501,and !ry GeknasnnSWC4dabd1V2R1,re(udodIndsn thaherSlMft,�xCo;iatfRay0yaOoodO,n£s01IV;and "%iy tq Yw4a Fluynnas,Mail IMV,remdodFn Ow Ina NAd m rss7x Cniml Reg! M Nods Plan 011380,wid a ast¢voyGyAl_Ga-4�na,C.vzed&k1�rawrdodlnlha ryN --- /j nnWTnenFe,oxCourt,R ,3y of Nods Pun s rr7ny lvnoN nld A ,da!od99"1,iacordad In ltw — .,u+,. /(I }� y.,.>..,�_ a,•,.•""-••_•.•..,,.,�s ==...-- nurhsT.encayCoixityRng:soydl}nndsPt+nA`l63d;and \`I-•-.tW — .7k, OS GPS,;x74 Gobi roWnna�,ar+Co,Juno 27,2945,t7 map Popara. Y�"�' vll. S7 r'r=•�, „rn ,rY,nrrt: .�,. ��7, *c yv° l.41 YYd ar. — — �, }, r "^-^ -,A14 \..¢f4• ..YM .....-LLtd. ,u.. .ur. .w.7? t04. 7�1} Fii hnDr77NGjwr,,SmwownER Wmnasl{acbs:Willa rine Oro<arl nwnntop hal ht 89.1 N1063 R ¢u w. — — norgcl WaW d w t f andakVk_.. s� a7,k ,sem I 'ly a1q. Y.. alb .u.— .w- .uo- •�y .7w ,w. .uw , S69A .fid. Yi, w .. -.tixr• iI. ..� .114- .xdte .ate .1;.4_ .1.4- 5/-" ..Y4...W. .LL4 ..W. _.....�1/j tCN-D15 1Vaaiod —ARi7f7t74G TRACT'Stdl.E QWNFR._.---" . ,y4. ,�• yr,-.� [aamnarl Nwaln suitmnrob,Wl¢ta Olr+a - 91D ,7 �,.�- ,U6 , 40� M ylmeprvTfiriWrt Id:60,9140010rt 104.0444 Aa111TWG TR4Cr, .u. ..¢y.. "u" ,.w •.u4. .u,4. ._......... - { •r•µ\. ,DIFFERENT(MIR V"od ( x 70 2 -( " ..� ``\ bomrvd¢*odes.%%hio Gino Aa, �_ \ •. 15,$ ( °d0 j ..,yky,3 \ 01ixNtmovetop helThL ffl.7IV11011 983 1011}20 SuwFCTTRACT 030 r1 7-r }, ;,,t•... - 95.0 Uamnanlcpows:ftadox,xsxbpha •�...._..- '�"-" - ,r..,.Y;,i\ i Skmailmoarvlop 3wight SDeRNdAft !,. 1LU 79.5 91.0,� .� •,_ - �'4 .. l-�: y+ Paye ALP zu z'..d a,v rekt s hy)� f � 740 Ir' y \ 1w 6.47 57.20. L :: `�•— -- Apt/T704C,TRACT,DIFFERENT 04TNER •`�, R'c+n!I maarvYrop hel)fd Ba 81P81.0!! 650 _ - Yard 680 ; , �,:ire 14 The hnlaht daft K i —au —�.w-� fluid �� �'> 4046.21 —MUTTM4IRACf%'"W..-omVER�^ inarnssibEoprA sof[m,*$) ',�— - - — qy [brn;n;ntaynaaa'bL9ckonN � , .,` ,_ ,,! fTrrx,'I maanlcp tAwThx&50A,'$9.° C.O� Pkl win no nznarixod toes , � '�' "1'd" FFERE •`may Areeagaandmufmzsnhcht %' f AVG (loot}04 Aes nsx7ipbd al p':oi 104.0=26 -•� r1lUf lndcdnsh.x7rdc17a ABUTTINS?A40;DINTOWNER rn mrdo!„I,n.Atwt � ,` ..,,. —, UamhTScpacsas:Ultckoar; �,/ or��maan4op rsgrir�5 nne_3 n - `'a � Property coram ProPorty Pat% lr--' lntofii tlmnl 61 own � €.,....I no wo. II z 3 -rile eek _3 N1 �- kaniwn X-- Ealolhrbrhx+lu W. tWrei>r3:dwuren '1 � : 3 Q 4on 000 "'�� LAWl*r alara Wtl �.�� Vbtland4 1daClf Onk I -_j :An matte Ed r y�I duzoa 3nlm n ¢ora Won { onwxlr 5LM10 on isnd -- lnlasior tilt£iw .. Modsload •� RIkIola nano Trnafnn � � .._ regoak [ .i purta0i ` ............ ..,