Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 478 CHICKERING ROAD pORTN o� 1- A JOYCE BRADSHAW 13SACFtuset RECEIVED TOWN CLERK NORTH ANDOVER NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF 10 OR 24 A 11= 18 THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Any appeals Shan be filed NOTICE OF DECISION within(20)days after the Year 2000 date of filing of this notice Property at: 478 Chickering Road in the office of the Town Clerk. NAME: Salvatore Lupoli DATE:4/12/2000 ADDRESS: 478 Chickering Road PETITION: 011-2000 North Andover,MA 01845 HEARING: 4/11/2000 The Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Tuesday evening,April 11,2000 at 7:30 PM upon the application of Salvatore Lupoli,for premises at:478 Chickering Road, North Andover,MA. Petitioner is requesting a variance from the requirements of Section 7,paragraph 7.1,7.2&7.3 of Table 2,G-B Zoning District,in order to allow a front,side and rear setbacks and from Section 8, Supplementary Regulations. Petitioner is requesting a finding from Section 9.3 in order to demolish an existing non-conforming structure. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit from Section 9,Paragraph 9.1,9.2&9,3 to allow the new construction of a structure on the Vie-existing non-conforming lot. The following members were present: Walter F. Soule,Raymond Vivenzio,Robert Ford, Scott Karpinski and George Earley. Upon a motion made by Scott Karpinski and 2nd by Walter F. Soule the Board voted to GRANT a dimensional variance for relief of a front setback of 20',side setback of 22'and rear setback of 32',and that the proposed building doesn't extended higher than 30'on the condition and basis that the petitioner has satisfied the provisions of Section 10,paragraph 10.4 of the Zoning Bylaw and that the granting of these variances will not adversely affect the neighborhood or derogate from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The Board voted to GRANT a Special Permit for a finding from Section 9.2 in order to demolish an existing non-conforming structure on a non-conforming lot,and GRANT a Special Permit from Section 9,9.1,8.2&9.3 to allow the new construction of a structure on a pre-existing non- conforming lot. The Board finds that the applicant has satisfied the provision of Section 9,paragraph 9.1 of the Zoning Bylaw and that such change,extension or alteration shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the neighborhood. In accordance with the Plan of Land by: Hans-Georg A.Mertsch,Jr. #33941,Civil Engineers,21A Street,Burlington,MA,dated: 3110/2000. Voting in favor: Walter F. Soule,Raymond Vivenzio,Robert Ford,George Earley and Scott Karpinski. Furthermore,if the rights authorized by the variance are not exercised within one(1)year ofthe date ofthe grant,they shall lapse,and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Furthermore,if a Special Permit granted under the provisions contained herein shall be deemed to have lapsed after two(2)year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced,they shall lapse and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. By order of the d of Appeals, Raymond Vivenzio, ml/decisions2000/10 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535