Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous - 723 OSGOOD STREET (2)
tAORT11 '"_Cr_1VE0 TO !'A ' Town of North Andover J Office of the Planning DepartmeqtlO APR 21 PM 4: 15 Community Development and Services Division 1600 Osgood Street Ur S US tIORT19 North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 VAS NOTICE OF DECISION Any appeal shall be filed within(20) days after the date of filing this notice in the office of the Town Clerk. Date: April 20, 2010 Date of Hearings: March 2,2010,April 6, 2010,April 20, 2010 Date of Decision: April 20,2010 Application of: T-Mobile Northeast Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.) Premises Affected: 723 Osgood St. Map 35,Parcel 23 Referring to the above petition for a renewal of a Wireless Special Permit from the requirements of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw, Sections 8.9 Wireless Service Facilities and Section 2.65 Special Permit Granting Authority: So as to allow the renewal of a Special Permit to continue operation of 3 panels concealed within an existing monopole located at 723 Osgood St., and three equipment cabinets located on the ground within the existing fenced-in compound. The Special Permit was originally granted by the North Andover Planning Board on October 25, 2006. Upon a motion by Richard Rowen and a 2"d by Courtney LaVolpicelo, the Planning Board hereby APPROVE the renewal of a Wireless Special Permit for an installation of a Wireless Facility on an existing structure by a vote of 5 in fa y.cw and 0 against. On half of the Norti(/Andover Planning Board John Simons, Chairman Richard Rowen Timothy Seibert Courtney LaVolpicelo Michael Colantoni The Planning Board herein approves the renewal of the Special Permit to continue operation of the Wireless Facility, which consists of 3 panels concealed within an existing monopole located at 723 Osgood St., and three equipment cabinets located on the ground within the existing fenced-in compound. The renewal of the Special Permit was requested by T-Mobile Northeast Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.). This application and additional documentation as cited herein was filed with the Planning Board on January 28, 2010, with subsequent submittals on file. The applicant submitted a complete application which was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Sections 8.3, 8.9, 10.3, and 10.3.1 of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and MGL c.40A, Sec. 9. The Planning Board finds that the applicant has met the following requirements as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Section 8.9: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The renewal application meets the filing requirements of the Wireless Service Facilities By-law Section 8.9. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed wireless facility is in compliance with FCC regulations regarding Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits, as indicated by the submittals and reports provided by the applicant, authored by Donald L. Haes, PhD. The reports are dated December 29, 2009. The conclusion stated in the reports is that the applicant's Wireless Facility installation contributes a maximum RF exposure of less than one-tenth of one percent of the current State and Federal permissible exposure guidelines. The Planning Board's consultant, Mark Hutchins,has reviewed this report and has agreed with its fndings.The Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits this Board from taking health effects of RF transmissions into account beyond FCC requirements. Mr. Hutchins also verified that the application is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards and that the application is proper with regard to the following: ■ The determination that a significant gap in coverage exists. 2. The applicant has provided a letter from a certified engineer stating that the antenna installation on the tower is structurally sound. 3. The applicant had also demonstrated that the site is in compliance with the Noise Standards as set forth in section 8.9.8(b). 4. The Planning Board received input and answered questions from residents. However, the Planning Board believes that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw requirements for this application. 5. Section 8.9.3.b.i. of the Zoning Bylaw not only encourages,but if feasible, requires that a wireless service facility shall be located on a preexistent structure. 2 In this case, the applicant intends to locate the facility on the preexistent structure upon which it is located now. Requiring this applicant to place its existing facility at a different location would go against the preexistent structure mandate of the Bylaw. 6. Section 8.9.6 of the Zoning Bylaw not only encourages,but requires, colocation of a wireless facility. Requiring this applicant to place its existing facility at a different location would go against the colocation mandate of the bylaw. 7. Opponents wanted the Board to deny this application because periodic reports were not filed by the applicant since the time the original special permit was issued. However, the applicant has now filed current reports regarding radiofrequency emissions and the structural integrity of the tower on which the antennas are mounted. Nothing has been filed by opponents to contradict those reports. 8. Opponents also wanted the Board to deny this application because they contended that the applicant should have paid fines for failure to file annual reports. However, no such fines have been issued against the applicant so this application cannot be denied for failure to pay fines. Current reports have been filed. Furthermore, it is not within the authority of this Board to levy such fines, which are enforced by a criminal proceeding. In addition, at the hearing, the opponents could not provide the Board with any example of a municipality in the Commonwealth where fines for failure to file annual reports were allowed by a court when the wireless carrier contested the fines under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. 9. Opponents also wanted the Board to deny this application because they contend that the application for renewal of the special permit was filed after the expiration of the special permit for the existing facility. However, the applicant has filed all of the necessary information for the issuance of the special permit, there has been no substantive information filed by the opponents to refute or contradict the information filed by the applicant, and the Board is of the opinion that denial of this particular application on such a ground would be a violation of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. 10. Opponents claim that various provisions of Section 8.9.5 in the bylaw, requiring an applicant to submit information, have not been met and therefore the permit should be denied. However, Section 8.9.5.d.ix states: "ix) Waiver. The SPGA may waive one or more of the application filing requirements of this section if it finds that such information is not needed for a thorough review of a proposed wireless service facility." 3 The Board finds that the information which has not been provided as may be required by Section 8.9.5 is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed personal wireless service facility. Therefore, the Board hereby waives the application requirements in Section 8.9.5 for the information which has not been provided. Refer to the WAIVERS section of the decision for the complete list of waivers. 11. The Board finds that the application complies with Section 10.31 of the Zoning Bylaw in that: a. The specific site is an appropriate location. This is not a new site. This application is for a location and facility which have been in use. Engineering reports confirm that this site is needed to close a substantial gap in coverage. b. The use will not adversely affect the neighborhood. There is no additional equipment being added to the existing facility. The facility complies with FCC regulations regarding radiofrequency emission. C. There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. The facility has been in use for more than three years and there are no reports of any hazards. The facility complies with FCC regulations regarding radiofrequency emission. d. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The facility has been in operation and there are no physical changes being proposed. e. This use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning bylaw. The bylaw specifically provides for such a wireless facility and the use has been in operation for more than three years. 12. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 takes precedence over the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. In the recent Essex County Superior Court case of Fournier, et al. v. North Andover Planning,Board, et al., the Plaintiffs' (neighbors of the wireless facility) challenge to this Board's action in granting a special permit was on the basis of a 600 foot setback provision in the zoning bylaw, and in dismissing that case, the Court was clear that the 600 foot setback did not control because the Court found that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 "compelled" (the Court's word) this Board to grant the special permit. Similarly, in the context of this particular application where the applicant has filed satisfactory current technical reports and otherwise filed sufficient information to the Board's satisfaction, if this Board were to deny the special permit on the procedural basis that an application for renewal was filed after the expiration of a special permit rather than prior to the expiration of the permit or on the basis that fines should have been (but were not) imposed for failure to file annual reports, 4 1 . the Board would, in the words of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, be taking actions that "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services" and this Board has no intention of violating that federal law. WAIVERS The applicant has requested the following waivers, which have been granted by the Planning Board for the reasons specified below: 8.9.5(d)(ii)(2) Identify the Zoning District designation for the subject parcel. Submit a copy of the Town zoning map with parcel identified. This requirement was filed with the original special permit application. 8.9.5(d)(iii) Siting Filing Requirements. A one-inch-equals-40 feet plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts showing the following: For clarity purposes and in an effort to fit the plan on one page, the plan has been designed with a scale of a one-inch equals 200 feet The following waivers are requested due to the fact that the installation is located within an existing facility. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(3) Tree cover on the subject property, by dominant species and average height. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(9) Contours at each 2 feet AMSL for the subject property and all adjacent properties within 300 feet. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(12) Lines representing the sight line showing viewpoint (point from which view is taken and visible point(point being viewed)from `Sight Lines"subsection below. 8.9.5(d)(iv) Sight lines and photographs as described below: (1) Sight line representation. A sight line representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closest faVade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point (visible point) of the wireless service facility. Each sight line shall be depicted in profile, drawn at one-inch equals 40 feet scale. The profiles shall show all intervening trees and buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300 feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or public roads, if any. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(3) Proposed(after condition)photographs. Each of the preexistent condition 5 photographs shall have the proposed wireless service facility superimposed on it to show what will be seen from public roads and residential buildings if the proposed wireless service facility is built. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(4) Siting elevations or views at-grade from the north, south, east and west for a 50 foot radius around the proposed wireless service facility plus from all preexistent public and private roads that serve the subject property. Elevations shall be at either on- quarter inch equal one foot or one-eight inch equals one foot scale and show the following 8.9.5(d)(iv)(4)(d) Preexistent trees and shrubs at current height and proposed trees and shrubs at the proposed height at time of installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned 8.9.5(d)(v)(3) Colors of the proposed wireless service facility represented by a color board showing actual colors proposed. Colors shall be provided for the antenna mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. 8.9.5(d)(v)(5) Appearance shown by at least two photographic superimpositions of the wireless service facility within the subject property. The photographic superimposition's shall be provided for the antennas, mounts equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any,for the total height, width and breadth. 8.9.5(d)(v)(6) Landscape plan including preexistent trees and shrubs and those proposed to be added, identified by size of specimen at installation and species. 8.9.5(d)(v)(7) During the public hearing process the applicant shall schedule with the Planning Board a balloon or crane test at the proposed site, at the expense of the applicant, to illustrate the height of the proposed facility Finally the Planning Board finds that this project generally complies with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw requirements as listed in Section 8.9 but requires conditions in order to be fully in compliance. The Planning Board hereby grants an approval to the applicant provided the following conditions are met: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 Thea applicant is required to repair the damage to the security fence observed and pP re uq re aP g noted in the Noise Study. This repair will take place within 30 days of the issuance of the special permit and will require a site visit by the Planning Office. The applicant is required to insure that all security measures are in place, including but not limited to security fencing and locks. 2) Discontinuance Abandonment a) At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of wireless service equipment, such carrier will notify the Town by certified US mail 6 of the proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless service equipment shall be considered abandoned upon discontinuation of operations. b) Upon abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless service equipment placed on the site by the carrier within 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use. "Physically remove" shall include, but not be limited to: i) Removal of antennas, mount, equipment shelters and security barriers installed by the carrier(unless the same will continue to be used by the owner) from the subject property. ii) Proper disposal of the waste materials generated by the carrier from the site in accordance with local and state solid waste disposal regulations. iii) Restoring the location of the wireless service facility in its condition before the installation, except that any landscaping and grading shall remain the after-condition. c) The equipment shall be deemed to be abandoned or discontinued if it has not been used for the purpose for which it was originally constructed for a period of six (6) months or more. Once abandonment or discontinuance has occurred, the carrier shall remove the equipment from the subject property within ninety days. 3) Term of Special Permit. a) A Special Permit issued for this wireless service facility shall be valid for three (3) years from the date of the decision for the Special Permit renewal. The special permit may be renewed under the same criteria as the original special permit, provided that the application for renewal of the special permit is made prior to the expiration date of the original or any renewed special permit. Additional measures governing the administration of the special permit are found in Section 10.3 of the Zoning Bylaw. b) The applicant shall submit to the SPGA at annual intervals from the date of the decision for the Special Permit renewal, preexistent and current RFR measurements. Such measurements shall be signed and certified by an RF engineer, stating that RFR measurements are accurate and are in compliance or whythe measurements fail to comply with all applicable FCC Guidelines as p Y pp specified in Section 8.9(5)(d)(vii) RFR Filing Requirements of this Bylaw. The measurements shall be submitted for both the applicant and all co-locators. If the applicant fails to comply with this requirement, the Special Permit will be revoked, until such time that the installation is brought into compliance with FCC 7 A ` Guidelines. c) The applicant shall submit to the SPGA at annual intervals from the date of decision of the Special Permit renewal, preexistent and current measurements of acoustic noise from the wireless service facility. Such measurements shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet the Noise Standards sub-section 8.9.(5)(d)(vi) of this Bylaw. The applicant shall forward to a separate consulting engineer, selected by the Town,the above materials for review. The applicant shall pay for such review. d) The applicant and co-applicant or their successor in interest shall maintain the wireless service equipment in good condition. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to,painting and structural integrity of the antennas. 4) In an effort to reduce noise levels, the applicant shall keep in optimum working order, through regular maintenance, any and all equipment that shall emanate sounds from the structures or site. 5) The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the applicant, its employees and all successors and assigns in interest or control. 6) The following information shall be deemed part of the decision: a) Application titled: Application for Special Permit-Renewal T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, LLC) 15 Commerce Way Norton, MA 02766 Prepared for: -Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, LLC) b) Documentation Submitted: 1 Application for Special Permit, received January 28, 2010. 2 Supporting Statement, including waivers requested, from Wellman Associates. dated January 28, 2010 3 Letter of Authorization from T-Mobile Northeast, LLC 4 Affidavit of Radio Frequency Expert, dated January 25, 2010 8 5 FCC Radio Authorization, dated February 2006 6 Photographs of Existing Condition 7 Environmental Sound Assessment, Dated January 13, 2010 8 RF Coverage Maps, showing coverage before and after installation 9 RF Emissions Report prepared by Donald L. Haes, dated December 29, 2009. 10 Structural Assessment, prepared by Marc Chretien, P.E., dated March 12, 2010 11 Site License Agreement between Sprint Spectrum Realty and Omnipoint Communications, dated May 18, 2007. 12 Site Plans, pages T-1, A-1, A-2, S-Iand E-1. Prepared for: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.) 15 Commerce Way, Suite B, Norton,MA 02766 Prepared by: Coler& Colantonio 55 Bobala Road Holyoke, MA 01040 Date: November 15, 2006 - . a P^^1 gym C} c)m I - v FW3 G97 , l 9 NORTFI q 1�f ° Town of North Andover; � it 5 07 to Office of the Planning Department ° ;* Community Development and Servi � ii sion' 9 �9sR,Too 1600 Osgood Street Sq�Hus� g T 0 North Andover,Massachusetts 01845601 MAS,OV A- 01 a� a NOTICE OF DECISION Any appeal shall be filed within (20) days after the date of filing this notice in the office of the Town Clerk. Date: April 20,2010 Date of Hearings: March 2,2010,April 6, 2010,April 20,2010 Date of Decision: April 20,2010 Application of: T-Mobile Northeast Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.) Premises Affected: 723 Osgood St. Map 35,Parcel 23 Referring to the above petition for a renewal of a Wireless Special Permit from the requirements of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw, Sections 8.9 Wireless Service Facilities and Section 2.65 Special Permit Granting Authority: So as to allow the renewal of a Special Permit to continue operation of 3 panels concealed within an existing monopole located at 723 Osgood St.,and three equipment cabinets located on the ground within the existing fenced-in compound. The Special Permit was originally granted by the North Andover Planning Board on October 25, 2006. Upon a motion by Richard Rowen and a 2nd by Courtney LaVolpicelo, the Planning Board hereby APPROVE the renewal of a Wireless Special Permit for an installation of a Wireless Facility on an existing structure by a vote of 5 in f4yor and 0 against. On Yehalf of the Nort Andover Planning Board John Simons, Chairman Richard Rowen Timothy Seibert Courtney LaVolpicelo Michael Colantoni 1 The Planning Board herein approves the renewal of the Special Permit to continue operation of the Wireless Facility, which consists of 3 panels concealed within an existing monopole located at 723 Osgood St., and three equipment cabinets located on the ground within the existing fenced-in compound. The renewal of the Special Permit was requested by T-Mobile Northeast Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.). This application and additional documentation as cited herein was filed with the Planning Board on January 28, 2010,with subsequent submittals on file. The applicant submitted a complete application which was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Sections 8.3, 8.9, 10.3, and 10.3.1 of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and MGL c.40A, Sec. 9. The Planning Board finds that the applicant has met the following requirements as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Section 8.9: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The renewal application meets the filing requirements of the Wireless Service Facilities By-law Section 8.9.The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed wireless facility is in compliance with FCC regulations regarding Maximum Permissible Exposure(MPE) limits, as indicated by the submittals and reports provided by the applicant, authored by Donald L. Haes, PhD. The reports are dated December 29, 2009. The conclusion stated in the reports is that the applicant's Wireless Facility installation contributes a maximum RF exposure of less than one-tenth of one percent of the current State and Federal permissible exposure guidelines. The Planning Board's consultant, Mark Hutchins,has reviewed this report and has agreed with its findings.The Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits this Board from taking health effects of RF transmissions into account beyond FCC requirements. Mr. Hutchins also verified that the application is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards and that the application is proper with regard to the following: ■ The determination that a significant gap in coverage exists. 2. The applicant has provided a letter from a certified engineer stating that the antenna installation on the tower is structurally sound. 3. The applicant had also demonstrated that the site is in compliance with the Noise Standards as forth in section 8.9.8(b). 4. The Planning Board received input and answered questions from residents. However, the Planning Board believes that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw requirements for this application. S. Section 8.9.3.b.i. of the Zoning Bylaw not only encourages,but if feasible, requires that a wireless service facility shall be located on a preexistent structure. 2 In this case, the applicant intends to locate the facility on the preexistent structure upon which it is located now. Requiring this applicant to place its existing facility at a different location would go against the preexistent structure mandate of the Bylaw. 6. Section 8.9.6 of the Zoning Bylaw not only encourages,but requires, colocation of a wireless facility. Requiring this applicant to place its existing facility at a different location would go against the colocation mandate of the bylaw. 7. Opponents wanted the Board to deny this application because periodic reports were not filed by the applicant since the time the original special permit was issued. However, the applicant has now filed current reports regarding radiofrequency emissions and the structural integrity of the tower on which the antennas are mounted. Nothing has been filed by opponents to contradict those reports. 8. Opponents also wanted the Board to deny this application because they contended that the applicant should have paid fines for failure to file annual reports. However, no such fines have been issued against the applicant so this application cannot be denied for failure to pay fines. Current reports have been filed. Furthermore, it is not within the authority of this Board to levy such fines, which are enforced by a criminal proceeding. In addition, at the hearing, the opponents could not provide the Board with any example of a municipality in the Commonwealth where fines for failure to file annual reports were allowed by a court when the wireless carrier contested the fines under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. 9. Opponents also wanted the Board to deny this application because they contend that the application for renewal of the special permit was filed after the expiration of the special permit for the existing facility. However, the applicant has filed all of the necessary information for the issuance of the special permit, there has been no substantive information filed by the opponents to refute or contradict the information filed by the applicant, and the Board is of the opinion that denial of this particular application on such a ground would be a violation of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. 10. Opponents claim that various provisions of Section 8.9.5 in the bylaw, requiring an applicant to submit information, have not been met and therefore the permit should be denied. However, Section 8.9.5.d.ix states: "ix) Waiver. The SPGA may waive one or more of the application filing requirements of this section if it finds that such information is not needed for a thorough review of a proposed wireless service facility." 3 The Board finds that the information which has not been provided as may be required by Section 8.9.5 is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed Personal wireless service facility. Therefore the Board hereby waives the application requirements in Section Pp q 8.9.5 for the information which has not been provided. Refer to the WAIVERS section of the decision for the complete list of waivers. 11. The Board finds that the application complies with Section 10.31 of the Zoning Bylaw in that: a. The specific site is an appropriate location. This is not a new site. This application is for a location and facility which have been in use. Engineering reports confirm that this site is needed to close a substantial gap in coverage. b. The use will not adversely affect the neighborhood. There is no additional equipment being added to the existing facility. The facility complies with FCC regulations regarding radiofrequency emission. C. There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. The facility has been in use for more than three years and there are no reports of any hazards. The facility complies with FCC regulations regarding radiofrequency emission. d. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The facility has been in operation and there are no physical changes being proposed. e. This use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning bylaw. The bylaw specifically provides for such a wireless facility and the use has been in operation for more than three years. 12. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 takes precedence over the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. In the recent Essex County Superior Court case of Fournier, et al. v. North Andover Planning Board et al., the Plaintiffs' (neighbors of the wireless facility) challenge to this Board's action in granting a special permit was on the basis of a 600 foot setback provision in the zoning bylaw, and in dismissing that case, the Court was clear that the 600 foot setback did not control because the Court found that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 "compelled" (the Court's word) this Board to grant the special permit. Similarly, in the context of this particular application where the applicant has filed satisfactory current technical reports and otherwise filed sufficient information to the Board's satisfaction, if this Board were to deny the special permit on the procedural basis that an application for renewal was filed after the expiration of a special permit rather than prior to the expiration of the permit or on the basis that fines should have been (but were not) imposed for failure to file annual reports, 4 the Board would, in the words of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, be taking actions that "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services" and this Board has no intention of violating that federal law. WAIVERS The applicant has requested the following waivers, which have been granted by the Planning Board for the reasons specified below: 8.9.5(d)(ii)(2) Identify the Zoning District designation for the subject parcel. Submit a copy of the Town zoning map with parcel identified. This requirement was filed with the original special permit application. 8.9.5(d)(iii) Siting Filing Requirements. A one-inch-equals-40 feet plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts showing the following: For clarity purposes and in an effort to fit the plan on one page, the plan has been designed with a scale of a one-inch equals 200 feet The following waivers are requested due to the fact that the installation is located within an existing facility. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(3) Tree cover on the subject property, by dominant species and average height. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(9) Contours at each 2 feet AMSL for the subject property and all adjacent properties within 300 feet. 8.9.5(d)(iii)(12) Lines representing the sight line showing viewpoint (point from which view is taken and visible point(point being viewed)from `Sight Lines"subsection below. 8.9.5(d)(iv) Sight lines and photographs as described below: (1) Sight line representation. A sight line representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closest fagade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point (visible point) of the wireless service facility. Each sight line shall be depicted in profile, drawn at one-inch equals 40 feet scale. The profiles shall show all intervening trees and buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300 feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or public roads, if any. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(3)Proposed(after condition)photographs. Each of the preexistent condition 5 photographs shall have the proposed wireless service facility superimposed on it to show what will be seen from public roads and residential buildings if the proposed wireless service facility is built. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(4) Siting elevations or views at-grade from the north, south, east and west for a 50 foot radius around the proposed wireless service facility plus from all preexistent public and private roads that serve the subject property. Elevations shall be at either on- quarter inch equal one foot or one-eight inch equals one foot scale and show the following 8.9.5(d)(iv)(4)(d) Preexistent trees and shrubs at current height and proposed trees and shrubs at the proposed height at time of installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned 8.9.5(d)(v)(3) Colors of the proposed wireless service facility represented by a color board showing actual colors proposed. Colors shall be provided for the antenna mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. 8.9.5(d)(v)(5) Appearance shown by at least two photographic superimpositions of the wireless service facility within the subject property. The photographic superimposition's shall be provided for the antennas, mounts equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any,for the total height, width and breadth. 8.9.5(d)(y)(6) Landscape plan including preexistent trees and shrubs and those proposed to be added, identified by size of specimen at installation and species. 8.9.5(d)(v)(7)During the public hearing process the applicant shall schedule with the Planning Board a balloon or crane test at the proposed site, at the expense of the applicant, to illustrate the height of the proposed facility Finally the Planning Board finds that this project generally complies with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw requirements as listed in Section 8.9 but requires conditions in order to be fully in compliance. The Planning Board hereby grants an approval to the applicant provided the following conditions are met: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1) The applicant is required to repair the damage to the security fence observed and noted in the Noise Study. This repair will take place within 30 days of the issuance of the special permit and will require a site visit by the Planning Office. The applicant is required to insure that all security measures are in place, including but not limited to security fencing and locks. 2) Discontinuance Abandonment a) At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of wireless service equipment, such carrier will notify the Town by certified US mail 6 of the proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless service equipment shall be considered abandoned upon discontinuation of operations. b) Upon abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless service equipment placed on the site by the carrier within 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use. "Physically remove" shall include, but not be limited to: i) Removal of antennas, mount, equipment shelters and security barriers installed by the carrier(unless the same will continue to be used by the owner) from the subject property. ii) Proper disposal of the waste materials generated by the carrier from the site in accordance with local and state solid waste disposal regulations. iii) Restoring the location of the wireless service facility in its condition before the installation, except that any landscaping and grading shall remain the after-condition. c) The equipment shall be deemed to be abandoned or discontinued if it has not been used for the purpose for which it was originally constructed for a period of six (6) months or more. Once abandonment or discontinuance has occurred, the carrier shall, remove the equipment from the subject property within ninety days. 3) Term of Special Permit. a) A Special Permit issued for this wireless service facility shall be valid for three (3) years from the date of the decision for the Special Permit renewal. The special permit may be renewed under the same criteria as the original special permit, provided that the application for renewal of the special permit is made prior to the expiration date of the original or any renewed special permit. Additional measures governing the administration of the special permit are found in Section 10.3 of the Zoning Bylaw. b) The applicant shall submit to the SPGA at annual intervals from the date of the decision for the Special Permit renewal, preexistent and current RFR measurements. Such measurements shall be signed and certified by an RF engineer, stating that RFR measurements are accurate and are in compliance or why the measurements fail to comply with all applicable FCC Guidelines as specified in Section 8.9(5)(d)(vii) RFR Filing Requirements of this Bylaw. The measurements shall be submitted for both the applicant and all co-locators. If the applicant fails to comply with this requirement, the Special Permit will be revoked, until such time that the installation is brought into compliance with FCC 7 Guidelines. c) The applicant shall submit to the SPGR at annual intervals from the date of decision of the Special Permit renewal, preexistent and current measurements of acoustic noise from the wireless service facility. Such measurements shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet the Noise Standards sub-section 8.9.(5)(d)(vi) of this Bylaw. The applicant shall forward to a separate consulting engineer, selected by the Town,the above materials for review. The applicant shall pay for such review. d) The applicant and co-applicant or their successor in interest shall maintain the wireless service equipment in good condition. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, painting and structural integrity of the antennas. 4) In an effort to reduce noise levels, the applicant shall keep in optimum working order, through regular maintenance, any and all equipment that shall emanate sounds from the structures or site. 5) The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the applicant, its employees and all successors and assigns in interest or control. 6) The_following information shall be deemed part of the decision: a) Application titled: Application for Special Permit Renewal T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications,LLC) 15 Commerce Way Norton, MA 02766 Prepared for: -Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, LLC) b) Documentation Submitted: 1 Application for Special Permit,received January 28, 2010. 2 Supporting Statement, including waivers requested, from Wellman Associates. dated January 28, 2010 3 Letter of Authorization from T-Mobile Northeast, LLC 4 Affidavit of Radio Frequency Expert, dated January 25, 2010 8 5 FCC Radio Authorization,dated February 2006 6 Photographs of Existing Condition 7 Environmental Sound Assessment, Dated January 13, 2010 8 RF Coverage Maps, showing coverage before and after installation 9 RF Emissions Report prepared by Donald L. Haes, dated December 29, 2009. 10 Structural Assessment,prepared by Marc Chretien,P.E., dated March 12, 2010 11 Site License Agreement between Sprint Spectrum Realty and Omnipoint Communications, dated May 18, 2007. 12 Site Plans, pages T-1, A-1,A-2, S-land E-1. Prepared for: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc.) 15 Commerce Way, Suite B, Norton, MA 02766 Prepared by: Coler& Colantonio 55 Bobala Road Holyoke,MA 01040 Date: November 15, 2006 y 9 ,LMANAsSOCIATES, INC. March 31, 2010 27i FrI 7 Town of North Andover Planning Board HUH FH 1600 Osgood Street cliUSETjs North Andover, MA 01845 G113SnH3VSSVW 1!-3A0GHV HAON RE: Applicant: T-Mobile Northeast LLC 27 0 r�`k01 Special Permit Renewal Applications: ■ Johnson Street SZ -.I W8 ■ 723 Osgood Street ■ q0j'jjCj S'�b] 1-1 iaoi 586 Massachusetts Avenue 03AI302J Dear Members of the Planning Board: As requested,please find enclosed a statement from an engineer regarding the current structural integrity of the existing wireless facility located at Johnson Street. Additionally enclosed are coverage map demonstrating T-Mobile's significant coverage gap in coverage without the existing facility, along with a coverage map depicting the coverage the existing facility currently provides. Sincerely, IG JZVilante Authorized Agent r 34 Hemingway Drive " *, ADVANCED East Providence,RI 02914 Ph:508-342-5339 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.C. Pax 508-342-5303 March 12,2010 Town of North Andove 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Structural Assessment Existing antenna installation 586 Massachusetts Avenue, North Andover,MA 01845 T Mobile Reference:4800020A To Whom it May Concem: At the request of T Mobile,this office has performed an inspection of the existing antenna installation located at the above-referenced site on January 14,2010,and has reviewed the original construction drawings by Bay State Design dated August 25,2006,RevO in order to assess the structural condition of the existing spire to support the existing antenna inventory which consists of: • Three(3)72"Hx13"Wx6"D antennas mounted within the existing timber-framed spire behind three(3)fiberglass panels at 63'AGL Our inspection revealed that the fiberglass panels,that conceal the antennas mounted within the spire,are well secured and show no visible indication of failure such as missing or protruding fasteners,cracks,or buckling. Also,the seams between the fiberglass and timber appear solid and water-tight. The existing spire,overall, appeared in excellent condition with no visible signs of exterior damage. Based on the inspection performed,and the review of the original construction drawings,it is the opinion of this office that the existing antenna installation and existing timber-framed church spire is structurally sound and is capable of safely supporting the existing antenna inventory without modification. Very truly yours, A44;;&; Marc R. Chretien, P.E. 01 Advanced Engineering Group, P.C. MARC R. CHH-TTIE: 7-4 c,v No.4031 4 4Bo00204-s[n chua Assess~ In Building coverage (-76 dBrn) r Existing On Air RF coverage in North Andover, MA coverage(-8 ) cover 4 k J+ j EXETER ST ' Y cn S q M (ez �T Co m ' 70 Al . {a Np0,4 A 0.3 rQ� „ miles STATE HW-Y,,!33 4D 6161 G "�zPropr�etary and conf�d toal information. Authorized use by TWoblle Employees and Its Agents only. In Building coverage (-�� darn) Proposed PF coverage in North Andover, IVI including in Vehicl ®verage (-84 dBrn) 4B�6 686 4B00020K,'La 60 Oft (AGLY". M" 4.xk "1 . r xaC ' Y" 4BZ0023A a EXETER ST � f, � $"'.,n�� /►�.'�„�e`y$x� h '��rsr-ass �'���,'y���'"� � .d + N� ,� �' yu � Vj+�. i' � . 7D r * •ti VO s . 1 , r 1 1 ' 0 0.35 0.7 riles STATE HWY 133 1 1 Proprietary.and C... ide tial i tormatiohAkuthorized use by T-Mobile obile m to ees and its Agents only. t i 4i• 34 Hemingway Drive ADVANCED East Providence,RI 02914 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.C. Ph:508-342-5339Fax:508-342-5303 March 12, 2010 Town of North Andove 120 Main Street North Andover, MAO 1845 RE: Structural Assessment Existing antenna installation Johnston Street, North Andover, MA 01845 T Mobile Reference:4BS0345D To Whom it May Concem: At the request of T-Mobile,this office has performed a visual inspection of the existing 185'tall guy tower located at the above-referenced site on January 14,2010,and has reviewed the structural analysis report prepared by H.E. Bergeron Engineers, P.A.dated June 21,2000(project#2000-095)that was associated with the T-Mobile installation, in order to assess the structural condition of the existing tower to support the existing antenna inventory which consists of: • Three(3) RR651900XP panel antennas,each mounted on 10'wide sector frames approximately 130'AGL Our inspection of the guy tower revealed that the the structure appeared structurally sound and plumb,with no visible signs of corrosion, metal fatigue,or bolt failure. The reinforced concrete foundation appeared sound with no visible stress cracks or spalling. A review of the tower documents referenced above indicates that the tower,with the current inventory,has a stress ratio of 91%and is well within the design parameters of the tower. Therefore, based on the inspection performed,and the review of the original tower documentation,it is the opinion of this office that the existing 185'±guy tower is structurally sound and is capable of safely supporting the existing antenna inventory without modification. Very truly yours, Ofof A4- MARC R. Marc R. Chretien, P.E. CHRE rli�N ' Advanced Engineering Group, P.C. " FMI No.40313 4600020A-ShvcturalAssesmwt r STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT OF 185'GUYED'TOWER NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for Omnipoint Communications Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 •Civil•Sb"ral•Land Surveying 2605 Waite Mountain Highway North CormW,NH 03860 603-356-6936 t.E.Bergeron Engineers P.O.Bax 440 65 W.Commercial Street Civic •Structural •land Surveying ❑ 2605 White Mountain Highway ❑ Portiand,ME 04101 North Conway,NH 03560 (207)7BO-1100 (603)356-6936 (207)780-1101(tax) (603)356-7715(tax) www.habcivii.com r H-8 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT OF 185' GUYED TOWER NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for Omnipoint Communications Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 June 21,2000 Or y+q\ tiP sf7. H. � ear�l►rva s BERGERO Q STRUC AL w J rST�P I. s`rrs'T EAG\ Prepared by: H.E.Bergeron Engineers,P.A. P.O.Box 440,2605 White Mountain Highway North Conway, NH 03860 HEB Project No.2000-095 r i f,Bergeron Engineers i?O.Sox 440 65 W.Commercial Street ;ivii -Structural -lanO Surveying 2605 White MDUntain Highway ❑ Portland.ME 04101 North Comxay.NH 03860 (207)780-1100 (603)356-6936 (207)780-1101(fax) (603)356-7715(fax) www.habcivii.com STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT of 185' GUYED TOWER NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS prepared for Omnipoint Communications EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: H. E. Bergeron Engineers, P.A. (BEB) performed an inspection and structural analysis of this 185-foot guyed tower. The analysis was performed with the addition of a six-panel antenna array installed on three lightweight PCS mounts at 130-feet. Each antenna is to be fed by two 1-1/4"waveguide cables. Our analysis indicates the tower is capable of supporting the proposed antennas.New waveguide cable must be installed in a bundled arrangement. HEB recommends vegetation be removed from guy anchors and guy paths be cleared of trees and brush. INTRODUCTION: An inspection and structural analysis was performed on the above-mentioned communications tower by H. E, Bergeron Engineers, P.A. (HEB) for Omnipoint Communications (Omnipoint). The tower is located off Johnson Street in North Andover, Massachusetts and is owned by Media One. Robert E. Adair, P.E. inspected the tower on June 1, 2000 to record information regarding physical and dimensional properties of the structure and its appurtenances. Mr. Adair climbed the structure in its entirety to compile data necessary to perform the structural analysis. The structure is a 185-foot galvanized steel, guyed tower of unknown manufacturer. The tower currently supports multiple dipole, whip, and dish antennas. Nextel Communications proposes to add a six-panel antenna array consisting of six EMS RV65-19-OOXP panel antennas. The proposed antennas are to be installed on three PiROD lightweight PCS mounts at an elevation of 130-feet.Each antenna is to be fed by two 1-1/4"waveguide cables. The analysis was conducted with the following antennas(and their associated mounts and coaxial cables)to be removed as authorized by Media One: • 4' grid dishes at 55',61', 67', 86', and 93' 4' dish with radome at 167' r Omi point Conununications June 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North A+idover;MA Page 2 Onutipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-095 Yagi antennas at 82', 100', 118', 132', 144 ,and 149' • A piece of channel steel at 184' FIELD INSPECTION: 1. General Condition: The tower, a painted galvanized steel structure, appeared to be in fair condition. No signs of movement or overstress of the tower were observed. 2. Welded and Bolted Connections of Lattice Bracing: l Connections were visually inspected to the maximum extent practicable. All connections that were observed appeared to be sound, with no loose or missing bolts noted. 3_ Antenna Connections: Antenna mounting hardware was in generally poor to fair condition, with rusted bolts and hardware prevalent. 4. Splice Plate Connections: Observed splice connections were in good condition. No loose or missing bolts or nuts were observed. 5. Guy Cables and Connections: Guy cables appeared to be in fair condition, as they exhibited some surface rust. Condition of guy anchor attachment hardware could not be evaluated, as dense vegetation precluded inspection. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: Methodology: The structural analysis was done in accordance with EIA/TIA-222-F, Stru�crural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structure s•, and the American Institute of Steel Construction AI SC( ), Manual ofSteel Construction Allowable Stress Design,Ninth Edition. Oinnipoint Comntwtications June 21,2000 185' Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA Page 3 Onutipoint Site#48S-0345-04 HER Project#2000-095 i The analysis was conducted using a wind speed of 90 miles per hour and one-half -AEB inch of radial ice over the entire structure and all appurtenances. The EIA/TIA Standard requires a minimum wind speed of 90 miles per hour for Essex County, Massachusetts.The tower was analyzed by calculating the resultant wind loading and associated maximum bending moments, shear forces, and axial loads. The moments and forces were used to calculate compressive stresses in leg members and combined axial and bending stresses in the tower mast, which were compared to allowable stresses according to AISC. Two loading conditions were evaluated in accordance with EIAfM-222-F to determine the tower's capacity. The more demanding of the two cases is used to calculate the tower capacity: • Case 1 =Wind Load(without ice)+Tower Dead Load • Case 2 =0.75 Wind Load(with ice)+Ice Load+Tower Dead Load In addition, the TIA/EIA standard permits a one-third increase in allowable stresses for towers less than 700-feet tall. AIlowable stresses of tower members were increased by one-third when computing the load capacity values shown below. Analysis: Analysis of the tower was conducted in accordance with the criteria outlined herein with antenna changes as previously described. Our analysis determined the existing tower is capable of supporting the additional proposed antennae. The following table summarizes the results of the analysis based on combined axial and bending stresses of the tower mast and compressive stresses of individual leg members: Tower Capacity Elevation Ca aci 0-65' 58% 65'-116' 91% 116'-170' 84% 170'-185' 19% Omnipoint Con:niunications June 21,20040 185'Guyed Tower,North Andover,MA Page 4 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-095 Diagonal bracing was determined to be appropriately sized based on a slenderness ratio(effective length divided by the radius of gyration)of 200 or less as required by ELVM-222-F. EIAIM-222-F paragraph 8.2.1 requires all guy cables to have a factor of safety of 2.0 or greater for structures less than 700-feet in height. Based on this requirement, all guys are adequately sized to support the proposed loading. Base Foundation and Guy Anchors: Evaluation of the existing base foundation and guy anchors was not performed, as information regarding their design or construction was not available to HEB. Base reactions imposed with the additional antennas were calculated as follows: Location Vertical Horizontal Base: 48.0 kips -1.7 kips Guy Anchor. -23.3 kips -18.1 kips CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Our structural analysis indicates Media One's 185-foot guyed tower located in North Andover, Massachusetts is capable of supporting the antenna loading proposed by Omnipoint Communications. New waveguide cable must be installed in a bundled arrangement. We recommend that vegetation be removed from guy anchors and guy paths be cleared of trees and brush. LIMITATIONS: This report is based on the following: 1. Tower is properly installed and maintained. 2. All members are in new condition. required members are in lace. 3. All req P 4. All bolts are in place and are properly tightened. 5. Tower is in plumb condition. 6. All tower members were properlyPerlY designed, detailed, fabricated, and installed and have been properly maintained since erection. 1 NORIZ./DIAGONAL BRACING (TYP.) TUBE STEEL LEGS :.,,,• 95't N H.EDMUND BERGERO10innipoint 185' GUYED TMER FIGURE 1 CML ENGINEERS, Pk NORTH ANDOMR, MA NORTH CONWAY. N.Hpmpor� for DRiNN: RFA SCALE. 1" 20' IHM�M"B (603) 358-8938 COMMUnICQtIOnS DATE.• 21 JUN 00 PROD. 12000-095 0 185' Gu'YED ToIVLR NoRTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS PREPARED FOR OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS OMN1Poim SITE#BS-0345-04 H-B - r _SS Y rti N{ �N raiA; .•yam- � 1� 1 Photo showing overview of 185' guyed tower located in North Andover,Massachusetts. Photos taken June 1, 2000 LY H. E. Bergerac Engineers. P.A. r • r •5 p� f ' �. ,. �f• ' c y '� t � 'sx.r••f may" +� ''"`Iw��^`�'v t'4 v���`:�'"� -'_�-Y. � ? 185' GuYEDToNvER NoRTji ANDovER, PREPARED FOR OmNipoiNrr CommUNICA'nONS OmNipoiNT SuE#BS-0345-04 Y 6 Photo - 'y'.a^'��'"aJ'y`i �'+ ��?.: .�iY r y��,�-r"f",._.�.7Rk-'za•rCR." :✓. z � � � � •Y;���.�s''� .ten; .Y � f` .a,s �r `• 1„�• 1 ti,?rY t `�fi YK.c +t. d � � - 1'..._;.. -, 114 j.,�Qy' "\`.�,'?•,ice^-X�. ♦-n." ��-��1 1' '-sti "� � .�,rr�+> '�+i+%i: ,t•`"���ti'. ,viz '� -- :. - �.�w.t .`� y✓fin �. r showing dense o guys and guy anchors. Photos taken June 1. 2000 by H. E. Bergeron f-jigineers,P.A. H. E. BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway,PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover,MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. Kieftftentovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: e- Date: &1ZI General Information Tower Manufacturer Unknown Tower Type Guyed Total Height of Tower 185 IL Leg Spread 3.00% Wind Speed Essex County 80 mph. Radal Ice 0.5 in. 75%Reduction for ice yes(yes or no) 113 increase for allowable loads yes(yss orno) O.K. Number of faces 3 faces Antenna Force Calculations based on EIA/TIA•222-F,using to following formulas: Force on discrete appurtenance: F.Az'Gh'Ca A Force on microwave antennae: F=Cr'A'Gh*WVA2,where Cr4(CaA2)+(1Ce^2))11(112) Gh=.65+.601(hf33)A(1/7)= Ghs 1.12 V as specified EIA-222-F Fy 35 ksi E(Modulus of Etasticity) 29000 kst Fb 0.6 K 1 L P rhes Section Leg Spread®Base Leg Size Width of Leg nbraeed Shape(round=R flat Section No. Length otaection (Description) to Wind Area r= Lengths =F) 1 65 3.00 27/4x.148 14.00 2.88 127 0.97 48.00 R 2 51 3.00 2 7/8 x.148 14.00 2.88 127 0.97 48.00 R 3 54 3.00 2 7/8 x.148 14.00 2.88 1.27 0.97 48.00 R 4 15 3.00 27/4x.148 14.00 2.88 1.27 0.97 48.00 R top 3.00 #WA #RYA AWA #WA #RYA #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA #RYA #WA #WA MA #WA #WA #WA 185 Tower Ries Unbraced Section No. Length Data into Area I J S. ra K(d cant 2.0) 1 780 14.00 3.81 828.2 1650.4 38.43 14.74 1.00 2 612 14.00 3.81 828.2 1656.4 36.43 14.74 1.00 3 648 14.00 3.81 8282 1656.4 38.43 14.74 1.00 4 160 14.00 3.81 828.2 1656.4 38.43 14.74 2.00 top #WA #PYA #WA OVA #WA #WA 0 #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA 0 #PYA #WA #NIA #WA #WA #WA 0 #WA #WA #WA #WA #NIA #WA 0 #WA #WA #WA #WA #WA *WA 0 0.00 #WA #WA #WA OVA #WA 0 0 idortnation Page 1 H. E BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover,MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. Klementovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: Q. <<1. Date: Tower Summary Section J type - - Ag= 211 sf z- 325 ft Quantity Per (S-) Face Length(ft.) Wid#h(in.) Area pd) Area w/ice Wt.Per ft. Tower WL(lbs.)Ice Round Members Leg 2 65.0 2.88 31.1 42.0 4.3 842.7 401.8 Diagonal 33 3.6' 1.50 14.6 .24.4 1.6 565.1 428.6 Horizontals 33 3.0 1.25 10.2 18.3 1.3 386.1 312.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Flat Members Leg 0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l Base Horizontals 4 2.0 1.75 1.2 1.8 2.8 66.5 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Section 2 Tpe Ag= 166 sf z= 5 ft Quantity Per "'Obs') Face Length(ft.) Width(in.) Area(sQ Area w/ice Wt.Per fL Tower Wt.(lbs.)ice Round Members Leg 2 51.0 2.88 24.4 32.9 4.3 661.2 315.3 Diagonal 26 3.6 1.50 11.5 19.1 1.6 440.6 336.3 Horizontals 26 3.0 1.25 8.0 14.3 1.3 298.4 245.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flat Members Leg 0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Section 3 pe Ag= 175 sf z= 143 ft Quantity Per (lbs.) Face Length(ft.) Width(m.) Area(sf) Area w/ice WL Per ft. Tower WL(lbs.)Ice Round Members Leg 2 54.0 2.88 25.9 34.9 4.3 700.1 333.8 Diagonal 27 3.6 1.50 12.2 20.3 1.6 466.6 356.1 Horizontals 27 3.0 1.25 8.4 15.2 1.3 315.9 259.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flat Members Leg 0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t),0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Section 4 tYPB Ag= 49 sf z- 177.5 fl Quantity Per WL{Ibs.) i Face Length(fL) Width(in.) Area(sf) Area w/ice W.Per IL Tower Wt.(ft.)Ice Round Members Leg 2 15.0 2.88 7.2 9.7 4.3 194.5 92.7 Diagonal 8 3.6 1.50 3.4 5.6 1.6 129.6 98.9 Horizontals 8 3.0 1.25 2.3 4.2 1.3 87.a 72.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tower Summary Page 1 H. E BERGERON ENGINEERS,P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway,PO Box 440 North Conway,NH 03860 (603)356-6836 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover,MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J.Klementovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: u2- Date: &W Antennas Coeff. A o Area no Force W0101 Weight jed Type Eley.(21 GM1 KZ a2 1,Cd iee le,.d i rw ice w/Wall Eleni Disl Box 11 12 1.00 20.74 i.0 12 0.028 0.033 0.020 0.030 1 11 1 J-box t2 12 1.00 20.74 0.8 1.1 0.022 0.030 5 10 1 12 2 Yagi Von 10's.a. 82 1.30 26.89 14.6 26.5 2 17 3 Yagi 12' 100 1.37 28.46 5.7 7.0 2 35 4 Lights 104 0.8 1.39 28.78 1.6 2.5 0.042 0.065 20 50 2 39 5 UO 20.74 Torque Arm 116 1.5 1.43 29.70 4.0 4S 0.199 0.224 360 540 30 6 1.00 20.74 Yagi 118 1.44 29.84 2.7 3.3 3 2 7 Yagi 132 1.49 30.81 2.7 3.3 3 16 8 Yagi 144 1.52 31.59 62 7.5 3 28 9 Yagi 149 1.53 31-90 6.6 11.1 3 33 10 SS Whip 159 12 1.57 32.50 4.8 7.3 0.209 0.318 80 150 3 43 11 1.00 20.74 Torque Arm 170 1.5 1.60 33.12 4.0 4S 0.222 0.250 360 540 4 12 110 20.74 Whip 172 12 1.60 33.23 5.3 7.8 0.234 0.346 75 90 4 2 13 t Yagi 176 1.2 1.61 33.45 8.3 8.0 0.285 0.359 125 225 4 6 14 SS Whip 181 12 1.63 33.72 6.3 7.8 0.242 0.355 80 150 4 11 15 SS Whip 183 12 1.63 33.83 5.2 7.7 0.237 0.350 &D 150 4 13 16 Empty Channel 184 1.63 33.88 33 3.8 4 14 17 Beacon 185 0.8 1.64 3313 2.5 2.7 0.076 0.082 40 65 4 15 18 1.00 20.74 1.00 20.74 1.00 20.74 Dishes Orieni ElerN ' is Cs 4'Grid Dish 55 1.16 i80 14.2 142 76 175 1-55 .0.0001 20 4'Grid Dish 61 1.19 90 14.2 142 75 175 1-81 -0.0001 0.0006 20 4'Grid Dish 67 1.22 160 142 142 75 175 2-2 0.0027 21 4'Grid Dish 86 1.31 160 14.2 142 75 175 2-21 -0.0014 0.0004 22 4'GridDish 93 1.34 180 14.2 14.2 75 175 2-28 0.0022 0.0008 23 4'Dish w!Radome 167 1.59 180 14.2 14.5 ISO 250 3 51 -D.0018 24 1.00 1.00 0.0000 0.0009 1.00 Proposed Antennae (6)EMS RV65.19 130 1.4 1.48 3D.68 36.7 49.8 1764 2395 800 1710 3-14 25 on PCS mounts 1.00 20.74 1.00 20.74 Antennae Info. Page 1 H. E BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover, MA Job No.: 2000,095 Calculated By: J. Klementovich Date: 14-.fun-00 Checked By: vz-. ►L.. Date: � l Existing Wind Load Without Ice Areas Factors Section Gross Flats Rounds Ae Aa Dt Dr Ca Qi Gh Wind Load Uniform Load 1 210.6 1.2 55.9 35.1 27.08 1 1 1.2 20.74 1.12 2691 tbs. 411bs1tt. 2 165.2 0.0 43.9 26.6 17.25 1 1 1.2 27.66 1.12 2609 tbs. 51 lbs/IL 3 174.9 0.0 46.5 28.2 9.00 1 1 1.2 31.53 1.12 2756 tbs. 51 lbsift. 4 48.6 0.0 12.9 7.8 1.67 1 1 1.2 33.53 1.12 777 lbs. 32 Ibs/ft. top MA #NIA #N/A #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA tbs. #NIA IbsM. 0 #NIA #N/A MIA #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. #NIA lbs/ft. 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA lbs. #NIA lbs/R. 0 #N/A MIA #NIA MIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 93.93 1.12 #NIA lbs. MIA lbs/R. NIA 0 MIA # #N/A #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. MIA lbsltt. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 0 tbs. #DIVIOI Ibs/lL 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.00 1 1-1.2 33.93 1.12 0 tbs. #DIVIOI Ibsift. Existing Wind Load With Ice Areas actors Section Grass Flats Rounds Ai'-- At Df Dr Ca Qz Gh Wind Load uniform Load 1 210.6 1.8 84.6 57.4 37.92 1 1 12 20.74 1.12 3775 tbs- 58lbslfL 2 165.2 OA 66.4 43.3 24.42 1 1 1.2 27.66 1A2 3670 tbs. 72IbsHL 3 174.9 0.0 70.3 45.9 13.50 1 1 1.2 31.53 1.12 3905 tbs. ?2 Ibsltt. 4 48.6 0.0 19.5 12.7 2.50 1 1 1.2 33.53 1.12 1098 tbs. 73 lbslR. top *N/A MIA #NIA MIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA tbs. #NIA IbsHL 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MA tbs. #WA Ibs1fL 0 #NIA MIA #NIA #N/A 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. OWA ibsiiL 0 #N/A MIA #NIA MIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. #NIA ibsM 0 MIA MA #N/A #NIA O.OD 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. #NIA lbsiR. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 d tbs. #011//01 lbs/IL 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 j 0.0 1 0.00 1 1 1 1.2 j 33.93 1.12 0 tbs. #DIVIOI lbs/ft. Wind Loads Page 1 H. E BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603)_356-6936 Client: Omnlpoint Job: North Andover, MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. Klementovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: V-•&DAO- Date: 6,1zi Proposed Wind Load Without Ice -x:fAreas Factors Section Gross Flats Rounds Ae Aa Of ca ax Gh Wind Load Uniform Load 1 210.6 1.2 55. 35.1 62.29 1 1 1.2 20.74 1.12 36721bs. 54 bslft. 2 165.2 0.0 43.9 26.6 44.68 1 1 1.2 27.66 1.12 3636 lbs. 7111191% 3 174.9 0.0 46.5 28.2 16.58 1 1 1.2 $1.63 1.12 3078 ibs. 57 ibslfL 4 48.6 0.0 12.9 7.8 1.67 1 1 1.2 33.53 1.12 77?tbs. 52lbslft. top #NIA MIA MIA MIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.83 t.12 MIA tbs. MA 1bslfL 0 #NIA #NIA MIA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 NNIA tbs. *NIA IbstfL 0 #NIA MIA #NIA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA-lbs. #NIA lbslfL 0 MIA MIA MA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. MA Ibsift. + 0 MA MIA *N/A #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA lbs. #NIA IbslfL 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 0 tbs. #QNI01 Ibsift. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 O tbs. #DNlO! IbslfL Proposed Wind Load With ke Areas Factors Section Gross Flats Rounds Ae At Df r Ca Cz Gh Wind Load Uniform Load 1 210.6 1.8 84.6 57.4 78.54 1 1 - 12 20.74 1.12 4904 tbs. 75 lbsift. 2 165.2 0.0 66.4 43.3 56.29 1 1 1.2 27.66 1.12 4664 tbs. 9S lbslft. 3 174.9 0.0 70.3 45.9 22.25 1 1 1.2 31.53 1.12 4276 tbs. 79 lbslft. 4 48.6 0.0 19.5 12.7 Z.50 1 1 1.2 $3.55 1.12 1098 tbs. 73 lbslft. top MIA MIA #NIA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA lbs. #N!A lbsifL 0 #NIA 91WA MIA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 #NIA tbs. #NIA lbslft. 0 #NIA MA MIA #NIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA Ha. #N!A IbslfL 0 #NIA MIA MIA MIA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MIA tbs. MA Ibslft. 0 #NIA MIA MIA MA 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 MA ibs. #NIA lbsM 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1 1 1.2 33.93 1.12 0 tbs. #D1vro1 lbs/ft. Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 QO 0.00 1 1 1.2 3&93,1.12 0 tbs. #OIv101 1bslft. Wind Loads Page 2 H. E. BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover, NIA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. Klementovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: (Z. Aghoa. Date: 61zI Dead toad Multipliers Manufacturers Spreadsheet Linear Linear Length to be Manufacturers Weight for Ecom 1.0 DL Determined Appurtenance Appurtenance Dead Load DL plus Ice Section looked at Number Section Multiplier Ice Load Dead Load DL plus Ice !Multiplier Multiplier 1 65 1860 842.7 1185.0 759 1621 3.1 5.5 2 51 1400 661.2 896.8 570 1158 3.0 5.2 3 54 1483 700.1 949.5 191 417 2.4 4.1 4 15 412 194.5 263.8 5 18 2.1 3.6 top 0 #NIA #WA #NIA #DIVIO! #DIV101 #NIA #NIA 0 0 #NIA #N/A #NIA #DIV/O! #DIV/01 #WA #NIA 0 0 #NIA #NIA #NIA #DIVIO! #DIV/01 #N1A #NIA 0 0 #NIA #NIA #N/A #DIV/01 #DIV101 #NIA #N/A 0 0 #NIA #NIA #NIA #DIV/0! #DIV/01 #NIA #NIA 0 0 0 *N/A #DIV101 #DIV/01 #DIV/01 #DIV/01 #DIVI01 0 0 0 0.0 #DIV/01 9DIV101 #DIV/01 #DIVI01 #DIV/al . H. E BERGERON ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover,MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. Klementovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: - hflAAa- Date: Ott Guy Loads FD=qz GHCcdLc=Total Drag Force(lb) FL=qz GHCLdLc=Total Uft Force(lb) qz=Velocity pressure at mid-height of guy(bqe) GH=Gust response factor based on total height of structure d=Diameter of guy strand(in) Le=Chord length of guy(ft) LA=Horizontal length from tower to guy anchor e=Clockwise angle from guy chord to wird direction vector(e<=1801('ar Radians) Cn=1.2 sin 3 9 �( CL=1.2 sine fl oos e H LA Lc a qz GH d #duys Wind Pressure 65 95 115.1 0.60 20.7 1.12 318 1 0.023 116 95 149.9 0.88 24.4 1.12 7/16 2 0.027 170 95 194.7 1.06 27.2 1.12 7/16 2 0.030 0.0 ##### 20.7 1.12 0.023 0.0 ##### 20.7 1.12 0.023 0.0 ##### 20.7 1.12 0.023 0.0 ##### 20.7 1.12 0.023 0.0 ##### 20.7 1.12 0.023 0.0 CHM 20.7 1.12 0.023 I� i Guy Loads Page 1 Omnipoint Communications June 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover, MA Page I . Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-045 s.....xssa...a....u.a.sr..s..m.sasaxsss...........sasss.........a...arxsssa=........W..........a...... xa R 0 D A L BOUNDARY CONDI TXONS COORDINATES (F•FIX.S.SUP.M•MASTER/SLAVE) NODS RESAND DBDOOD NO NO % Y Z NODE TEMP ALPHA BETA CAIRM DIR XYZXY'L STIFFNESS _ ac-s ==s ...... ........... ....vasa....as....smmass........oaxsssaa=a.....asass.s.......= a.eaaa.xma...........a...... Units: Ft Ft Ft F Deg Deg Deg K /In. /Deg i 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FFF.F. 2 2 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 3 0.00 116.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 4 O.OD 170.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 5 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 6 -10.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MMKSSS Dx Slave to Node 2 DY Slave to Node 2 DZ Slave to Node 2 22 7 5.00 65.00 6.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Go MMSSS Dx Slave to Node 2 DY Slave to Node 2 DZ Slave to Node 2 23 6 5.00 65.00 -8.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101MSSS DX Slave to Node 2 DY Slave to Node 2 DZ Slave to Node 2 31 9 10.00 116.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MMNSSS Dx Slave to Node 3 DY Slave to Node 3 DZ Slave to Node 3 32 10 -5-00 116.00 -8.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VWSSS DX Slave to Node 3 ' DY Slave to Node 3 DZ Slave to Node 3 33 11 -5.0D 116.60 8.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 mmms3S DX Slave to Node 3 DY Slave to Node 3 DZ Slave to Node 3 41 12 10.00 170.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 to N DX Slavea to Node 4 DY Slave to Node 4 DZ Slave to Node 4 42 13 -5.00 170.00 -8.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MNMSSS DX Slave to Node 4 DY Slave to Node 4 DZ Slave to Node 4 43 14 -5.00 170.00 8.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MMSSS Dx Slave to Node 4 ' DY Slave to Node 4 DZ Slave to Node 4 101 15 -95.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFF 102 16 41.50 0.00 82.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFF 103 17 47.50 0.00 -62.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFF TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES . 17 TOTAL NUMBER OF EQUATIONS s 26 -saIIaax...........0.............ass...... .........m. ...a....m.a....a...............................amiss...... 2 MOVE PRISMATIC BEAN C LEMENT ELEM NE PE ALPHA BETA GANNA LENGTH MAT PROP RELEASE REF OFFSET STIFFNESS NO NO NO TYPE TYPE Ng PE TEMP DIR HE PE NE PE c=x ssaa::asax.o..:.saessae....mssaa..mss..m..........aea...w..a..xssaassaasasaas..... .............. 'Uaies Deg Deg Dag Ft F FL Ft x /in /Deg R /In /Deg 1 1 2 90.00 -90.00 0.00 65.00 1 1 2 2 3 90.00 -90.00 0.00 51.00 1 1 3 3 4 90.00 -90.00 0.00 54.00 1 1 4 4 5 90.00 -90.00 0.00 15.00 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PRISMATIC BEAM ELEMENTS . 4 R Omnipoint Communications Jule 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA Page 2 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HER Project#2000-095 xazaza....cxc..aza za rxas..xaxs.............. s...e-z ..emsssz..........s.xaas...s..asa....................0xxaas-...sxx......... 2 N 0 D £ C A 8 L E E L E M E N T ELEM NE PE ALPHA BETA CHORD MAY PROP REP CONNECTION OFFSETS NO NO NO LENGTH TYPE TYPE TEN LU TEMP DX DY DZ DX BY DZ a.sx:xaa==+ssrx.+.+..zzsaazcam�aa:x.....a................... ...... ..x..a..... .....aax....zdxaaza=...osac.............. xaaacsc I Units: Dee Deo FC R Ft F Ft Ft Ft Ft Ft PC 21 101 21 90.00 -37.41 107.00 7 2 1.54 0.00 22 102 22 -150.01 -37.40 107.02 2 2 2.54 0.00 23 103 23 -29.99 -37.40 107.02 2 2 1.54 0.00 31 101 3295.50 -52.0? 147.01 2 2 2.08 0.00 32 102 33 -144.51 -52.06 147.09 2 2 2.08 0.00 33 103 31 -24.50 -52.06 147.69 2 2 2.08 0.00 34 101 33 84.50 -S2.07 141.07 2 2 2.08 0.00 35 102 31 -155.50 -52.06 147.09 2 2 2.08 0.00 36 103 32 -35.49 -52.06 147.09 2 2 2.08 0.00 41 101 42 95.50 -61.99 192.55 2 2 2.08 0.00 42 102 43 -144.51 -61.49 192.56 2 2, 2.09 0.00 47 103 dl -24.50 -61.99 192.56 2 2 2.08 0.00 44 101 43 84.50 -61.99 192.SS 2 2 2.08 0.00 45 102 41 -155.50 -61.99 192.56 2 2 2.08 0.00 46 103 42 -35.49 -61.99 192.56 2 2 2.08 0.00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CABLE ELEMENTS . 15 .a.-i.....ir...=.=.aix.a....r.mm..aa.axa....a.ie.a..-isaiaa...a-a-......l--.f.eaey-aaxs-Finas a--F....a.3...s.aaax MATERIALL PROPERTIES - MATL DESIGNATION YOUNG'S POISSON'S THERMAL MASS WEIGHT 140 MODULUS RATIO COEFF DENSITY DENSITY .sz.zaa�...sa=...c.casa ...............x....s.ax.se....xa....sazai..cxazazr.....aa......acmz.maa.azxaar.............rxz aaaa.m....... Unite: X /In ^2 F Slug/Ft-3 LbIFt '3 1 Mast 2.9.+004 0.250 6.50-006 15.2 490 2 GUys 9.23e+004 0.250 6.Se-006 15.2 382 ..xzzaax.s.cxr=.f+czaaar .............se........==.........scam.arxsz:ax_asrsasxxaacxazxz.ar.s.aaza..a..za.=..............a....... -- 2 NODB-faPfR" SMATIC a EAM ELEMENT PRO PERT I E 6 PROP DESICt:AT1orN A iXX IYY J IXY SPY SFX CM x..afsxasax+- axF.+z.�aas.isxx.axi a .a....=..a....sa:aasaxz:aaf.zssa.......=.....-.. assx..a..sza.ac..................: Units: In^2} 2n^4 IA^4 In^4 In^4 Za'6 1 Mast 3.81 828 826 1.66e4003 0 1.000 1.000 0 xcx ...ccza:xzaaaxxs.+sa..........aaxxc:xza eua.asxxxca:arms..vacs..arasass...ars...a..........xxsax...... .......mxc aaz.agsmza... 2 MODS CABLE ELEMENT PROPERTIES PROP DESIGNATION A Diameter :...-a....==.=......ta.....sass......aza......aa..sa.aa.....s......z......aaa:xaa..asxxa..axamazxm......a....a.z......... aUnits: In^2 In 2 3/8' cable 0.11 0.375 xaxrxz.smax..caaxaazs:e.crxsa...amaxar........ox.x...am........sas.air_saa.....e....sczcasaazxzcxaaxr...aris.�eaaneaxrams:xsx= G R A V I T Y L O A D M U L T I PL I E R S REC NO PX PY PZ a::xa+..a...csass==...- ......................... saes...•........a.azxz.a:xc............vsraaaa.c=macsa...ssa:...aazzaa DESCRIPTION Deed loads LOAD CASES : 1 ELE10,E TP LIST 1 1 0.000 -3.100 0.000 DESCRIPTION d.l. LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 2 2 0.000 -3.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION d.l. LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 3 1 3 0.000 -2.400 0.000 DESCRIPTION d.l. LOAD CASES 1 i ELEMENT LIST 4 4 0.000 -2.100 0.000 Omnipoint Communications June 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA Page 3 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-095 DESCRIPTION Dead load WACO LOAD CASES : 3 ELEMENT LIST 2 li 0.000 -5.500 0.000 DESCRIPTION d.l. w/ice ! LOAD CASES = 3 ELEMENT LIST : 2 12 0.000 -5.200 0.000 DESCRIPTION d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 3 13 0.000 -4.100 0.000 :.. DESCRIPTION d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST : 4 14 0.000 -3.600 x.000 DESCRIPTIO.v Dead toad of guys LOAD CASES 1.3 ELEMENT LIST 21-46 21 0.000 -1.000 0.000 zasas:a+amass.a.a......sa...m.mamr.cs..w s... ..er...x.............ca..............s 2+•�Ny0'DE BRI SHAT IC BEAM ELEMENT LOAD I N F 0 R H A T 1 0 V REC LOAD LOAD DIST NO TYPE SYS SPEC DIST PK PY PZ M% MY N8 -.:. =a=+.zea=re..rm....macsrm............a...+=aasz=.ems-....m..... ..macs....... .. =units;=sz_zz==_r.+c_mmm,:.-=_- Ft K % % Ft-% Ft-K . DESCRIPTION Wind on section 1 LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 1 1 :)RIF GLO FRAC s 0.000 9.OS6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.056 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION 2 LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 2 2 UNIF GLO FRAC B 0.000 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 K 1.000 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION 3 LOAD CASES : 1 ELE.17ENT LIST 3 3 UNiF GLO FRAC H 0.000 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : 4 LOAD CASES : 1 ELEMENT LIST 4 4 Mil Gid FRAC H 0.000 0.0S2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.052 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION wind w/ice on section 1 LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST : 1 11 UNIF CLO FRAC H 0.000 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : Wind w/ice On 2 LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST t 2 12 UNIF GLO FRAC H 0.000 0.095 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.095 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 i i I� Omnipoini Communications izine 21,2000 185'Giryed Tower, North Andover,MA Page 4 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#20W-095 ' DESCRIPTION wind w/ice on 3 LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 3 - 13 IINIF GLO FRAC 2 0.000 0.079 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.079 0.000 D.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : Wind w/ioe 00 4 LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 4 14 IWIF GLO FRAC 9 0.000 0.073 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 E 1.000 0.073 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Box @ li• LOAD CASES : 1 ELEML;NT LIST 1 DISTAA'CES Il 101 CONC CLO DIST 0.028 -0.020 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.000 DESCRIPTION , J-box 8 12' LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 3 DISTANCES 12 - - 102 CONC GLO DIST 0.022 -0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION t Lights 8 104• LOAD CASES = 1 ELE."'.-7T LIST : 2 DISTANCES a 39 i 0.042 -0.020 O.ODO 0.000 0.000 0.060 105 CONC GLO DIST DESCRIPTION Torque arm 0 116• LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LZST : 3 DISTANCES , 106 CONC GLO DIST 0.199 -0.360 0.000 D.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION SS Whip 6 159' LOAD CASES : 1 ELEMENT LIST : 3 DISTANCES 43 111 CONC GLO DIST 0.209 -0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Torque arta 6 170' LOAD CASES = 1 ELE--ENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 112 CONC GLO DIST 0.222 -0.360 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION , Whip 0 172' LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES n 2 113 CONC GLO DIST 0.231 -0.075 8.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : SS Whip 8 181• ' I LOAD CASES : ELEMENT LIST 4 4 DISTANCES 11 115 CONC CLO DIST 0.242 -0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION SS Whip 8 183' LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 13 116 CONC CLO DIST 0.237 -0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION BORCOn p 185' LOAD CASES I ELE:,L:IT LIST 4 •• DISTANCES 15 118 CONC GIA DIST 0.076 -0.040 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 Omnipoint Communications June 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA page 5 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-095 DESCRIPTION z (6) RV90-65 on PCS mount. 130' LOAD CASES 1 ELEMENT LIST : 3 DISTANCES 14 125 CONC GLO DIST 1.764 -0.900 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 i DESCRIPTION Rox 9 11' w/iCe LOAD CASES E5 -- ELEMENT LIST 1 DISTANCES 11 201 CONC GLO DIST 0.033 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : J-box 8 12' w/ice LOAD C:.SES 2 ELEVENT LIST 1 - -• - - DISTANCES 11 202 CONC GLO DIST 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 .. DESCRIPTION Lights 0 104' w/ice LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 2 DISTANCES 39 205 CONC GLO DIST 0.065 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 O.00D DESCRIPTION : Torque arm 166' w/io6 LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 3 DISTANCES i 206 CONC CLO DIST 0.224 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION SS Whip 4 159' w/ice EL.EM CASES 2 ELEEh'T LIST : 3 DISTANCES 43 211 CONC GLO DIST 0.318 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Torque arm 8 1701 w/ice LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 212 CONC GLO DIST 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Whip 8 112' w/ice LOAD CASES : 2 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 2 213 CONC GLO DIST 0.346 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 O.00D DESCRIPTION : SS Whip 8 181' w/iCe LOAD CASES z 2 ELEME,M1 NT LIST 4 z DISTANCES ES z 11 215 CONC GLO DIST 0.355 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION SS Whip 0 163' W/ice LOAD CASES 2 ELET1£YT LIST 4 DISTANCES 13 116 CONC GLO DIST 0.350 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : Beacon 9 185' w/iCe LOAD CASES 2 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 15 218 CONC OLD DIST 0.082 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : (6) RV90-65 oa PCS m0unts 130' w/ice LOAD CASES v 2 ELEMENT LIST 3 DISTANCES 14 225 CONC GLO DIST 2.395 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 Omnipoint Communications June 21.2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA Page 6 Onnlipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2000-095 DESCRIPTION Sox 0 11' d.l. W/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 1 DISTANCES 11 301 CONC GW DIST 0.000 -D.030 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION J-box 0 12' d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST : 1 DISTANCES 12 302 CONC GLO DIST 0.000, -0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Lights 0 104- d-1. WiCe _ LOAD CASES a 3 ELEVENT LIST 2 DISTANCES 39 305 COW GLO DIST 0.000 -0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Torque arm 6 116' 0.1. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 3 DISTANCES 306 COW GLO DIST 0.000 -0.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTIOX : SS Whip 0 159' d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 3 DISTANCES 43 311 CONC GLO DIST 0.000 -0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : Torque arm 0 190• d.l. w/tea _ • LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES 312 CONC GLO DIST 0.000 -0.540 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION Whip 6 172' d.l. Wice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST 4 DISTANCES : 2 313 CONIC GL0 DIST 0.000 -0.090 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION SS Whip 0 181' d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEVENT LIST 4 DISTANCES : 11 315 CONC GLO DIST 0.000 -0.150 0-000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ' DESCRIPTION ES Whip 6 183' d.l. w/ice _ LOAD CASES : 3 ELEMENT LIST 4 _ DISTANCES 13 316 CONC CLO DIST 0.000 -0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.040 DESCRIPTION : Beacon 0 185• d.l. w/ice LOAD CASES 3 ELEMENT LIST : 4 DISTANCES 15 318 COW GLO DIST 0.000 -0.065 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION (6) RV90-65 on PCS mounts 130' 4.1. w/iCO LOAD CASES 3 ELEHEUT LIST 3 DISTANCES 14 325 CONC OLD DIST 0.000 -1.710 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 i II Omnipoint Communications June, l.2000 185' Guyed Tower, North Andover, MA Page 7 Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 HEB Project#2100-095 i s..sass.n_x...a:==ss......t.....=....saes=ass=sao.rearas........ ....saasQsa.a.ssee...... ....asccsaeaseevesa=sssa.a=ssaa1:sastos 2 MODE CABLE ELEMENT LOAD I N F O R M A T I O N AEC WIND ICE ' NO PRESSURE ALPHA RADIAL THICK DENSITY .. _xsc=•.ssv..a.:. = so .....a.o..........=............. ................sass.....sa.s.r-...........ea_asause1j�aaaeaas cunits.- x /Ft -2aa :Deg In Lb/Ft ^3 DESCRIPTION Wind on 6S• guys LOAD CASES 1-2 ELEMENT LIST 21-23 21 0.021 90.000 0.000 0.000 • I DESCRIPTION Wind on 116' guys LOAD CASES 1-2 ELEMENT LIST 31-36 '`' 31 0.027 90.000 0.000 0.000 DESCRIPTION : Wind on 170' guys LOAD CASES 1-2 ELEMENT LIST 41-46 41 0.030 90.000 0.000 0.000 s,.asaassxoa..a=.......ssass..as....asssa=aa.saa.....sssy.ss=ssaasm=.a..s.==..as.==..wo....... . ........ S T R U C T U R E L 0 A D C 0 M S I M A T I O N S CONS LIST OF FACTORS • CASES - ....s_xs=c .===.......:sx=._Assass......ss...a....essa...a...a.:sa.a....a.......es.a...sa.ssa..... ................... ....... ' DESCRIPTION ; Wind + dead loads 1 1.1 DESCRIPTION Wind slice + dead i ice loads 2 .7512.1.3 I, i t • r' Onulipoint Communications June 21,2000 185'Guyed Tower, North Andover,MA Page S Omnipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 NEB Project#2000-095 asssax..czaa.._=acesc...zaia.as.... .........asssaax...zaza.sax.asa...............sxasamrcaamza=vzz.aaze.f+asafers=zussamaosa P-D E L T A A N A L Y S I S R E S U L T S ......................ass.......s+..zsv.. .......... ...sassmaz-...... ................. ........... S T R U C T 9 R E LOAD COMBINATIONS COMB LIST OF FACTORS . CAS8S as saaa...a�3aas..........__......sasa....aaa.........x......+.s_xasiaaf.a...c.iiiSaa+.++<cs+++++s.�Ol6Rlsa.sCixia�Y+iis aal.aiaasci.i ax LOAD COMBINATIONS: COMB 1 (Find + dead loads) 1.00 X CASE 1 COMB 2 (Wind v/ice + dead 4 ice 1086x1 : 0.75 X CASE 2 + 1.00 X CASE 3 axxzs....ez..zza.=a.....mas..+zaaasass...aa.......sx:.afas.afaaasax.+. a..saaassaxaawaxsaa.acazame......a:xc...i:suaaarsszaasz+ N O D A L D I B P Ti.A C E N E N T 8 NODP LOAD (• Indicates Displacamants Occur in Nodal Weal System) ITO COMB DX DY DZ OX OY Oz .� ss..scs==s.sxsaz...,=assaaeas:zas.a.szamss a3szasss...u:axxxaxsa+a.isazzz.aza.....n..assaz=......a.......... ........s........... Units. IO In In DeE DO-19 D" 2 1 1.1356 -0.3163 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1045 2 1.1038 -0-3233 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1091 3 1 1.2948 -0.5231 0.0000 0.6000 0.0000 -0.0518 2 1.2308 -0.5282 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0584 4 1 2.0898 -0.6450 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0570 2 2.0586 -0.6458 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0645 S 1 1.9720 -0.6457 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0319 2 1.9201 -0.6069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0383 azc_sau..�zc..._a..=.=...ssa.s.azoasaaz..asaszamza...x..zas.......z...mzs...ex.saeszs.az.a...sazzss....a...axas..............x . 2 N O D E P R I S R A T I C 3 E A K E L E M E N T -- FORCES AND MOMENTS ELBI1 LOAD NODE SIGN CONVENTION . BEAK=tGNEKS 210 COMB NO AXIAL SHEAR X SHEAR Y MOMENT X NOKWT Y TORSION aay......zea.x==..:.ay..:a<xaa:xe...faa...ixaaax a-�uzsawaaasa.+..:qas+:axaasas..axasea+.+.issazsssrsxasoa:.oazas amaass... Units. R K X K -Ft 1 1 1 46.GO82 0.0000 1.7922 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �,- 2 -43.3762 0.0000 -1-9017 -4.6136 0.0000 0.0000 2 1 -47.9721 0.0000 1.8019 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 2 -43.3025 0.0000 -2.9082 -4.4499 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 2 :12 -38.3116 0.0000 2.3617 -38.3036 0.0000 0.0000 3 -36.3090 0.0000 -1.3019 -10.7117 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 -36.6680 0.0000 2.3166 -37.6458 0.0000 0.0000 3 -35.1806 0.0000 -2.3666 -12.7627 0.0000 0.0000 3 1 3 -22.23$4 0.0000 3.8912 -45.0925 0.0000 0.0000 4 -19.5814 0.0000 -1.1631 6.9661 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 -22.6620 0.0000 4.0108. -46.2511 0.0000 0.0000 4 -17.9383 0.0000 -1.2194 9.8256 0.0000 0-0000 ■ 4 1 6 -0.6844 0.0000 1.5685 -13.1972 0.0000 0.0000 5 -0.0400 0.0000 0.0760 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 -1.1562 0.0000 1.6701 -13.9348 0.0000 0.0000 5 -0.0649 0.0000 0.0615 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r ■ ■ ■ O►nnipoint Conununications June 21, 2000 185'Guyeri Tower, North Andover,MA Page 10 Ont►(ipoint Site#4BS-0345-04 NEB Project#2000-095 i 44 1 101 -2.9160 -5.0978 -0.2612 5-6297 43 2.6634 5.2279 0.2650 5.8733 2 101 -2.6195 -4.7724 -0.2446 5.4496 r 43 2.5050 4.9841 0.2475 5.4946 r 45 1 102 0.4235 -2.3883 1.1701 2.5930 41 -0.6309 2.4096 -1.1532 2.7448 2 102 0.3593 -1.9741 0.9695 2.2284 41 -0.5149 2.0040 -0.9568 2.2796 46 1 103 0.4560 -1.8002 -0.7922 2.0195 43 -0.6543 1.8101 0.7722 2.0739 2 103 0.3699 -1.4936 -0.6593 1.6785 42 -0.5371 1.5150 0.6443 1.7317 xaa�...ss��32xoxs=.asss.a..-aii..sa.�x...axxaa...as . .aiaa.......3xmi4...C.fsRaa......iaRaa-'R.aaaaxaa3xxa aa'ixaaisaiaasmaxxa.aa RY P Aa C T I O N S NODE LOAD (+ Indicates Reactions OCCuz in Nodel Local System) NO COMB PX PY P8 Nx my NZ _ - ..........-sat-...s-axasiaa-.S...aaa..Y.ia...............x...........--................aGxa.6Y.aaixsaC Yunits:xxaxx X X -Ft X -Ft X -Ft 1 1 -1.7251 46.0107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 -1.7340 47.9746 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 101 1 -18.1210 -23.3452 0.0000-- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 -17.1398 -22.1026 0.4000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 102 1 1.9596 -7.0173 4.1666 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 1.5645 -5.6049 3.3112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l 103 1 1.9596 -7.0173 -4.1666 6.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 1.5645 -5.6049 -3.3112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 I 1 t H. EDMUND BERGERON CIVIL ENGINEERS, P.A. 2605 White Mountain Highway, PO Box 440 North Conway, NH 03860 (603) 356-6936 Client: Omnipoint Job: North Andover, MA Job No.: 2000-095 Calculated By: J. KI mentovich Date: 14-Jun-00 Checked By: Q• n1;lL Date: Evaluation of Leg! Members Percent Capacity Section Size KVr Co Fa allow 133%ANow Efev. Max 1 2 7/8 x.148 49,69 127.82 17.92 23.90 13.93 0 53% 2 2 718 x.148 49,69 127.82 17.92 23.90 21.66 65 91% 3 2 7/8 x.143 49.59 127.82' 17.92 23.90 19.99 116 84%4 2 7/8 x.148 49.69 127.82 17.92 23.90 4.S3 170 19% top 0.00 #NIA 127.82 #NIA #WA MIA 185 #WA 0 0.00 MA 127.82 #N/A MA #DIV/O) 185 #DIV/O! 0 0.00 #N/A 127.82 MA #N/A #DIVIO! 185 #DIV/0! 0 0.00 #N/A 127.82 #WA MA #DIV/O! 185 #DMO! 0 0-00 #WA 127.82 #N/A MA *N/A 185 *WA 0 0.00 #D!V/01 127.82 #DIV/O! #DIV/01 #DIV/0! 165 #DIV/O! 0 0.00 4DIV101 127.82 #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/01 0 #DIV/O! 0 0.00 #DIV/0! 127.82 #DIV/01 #DIV/O! #DIV/01 0 #DIV/01 0 0.00 #DIV/01 127.82 #DIV/O! #DMO! #DMO! 0 1 #DIV/0! Evaluation of Tower Mast 1 Combined as ower Section Fa a11ow 133%Albw to Alk w. Ib Loads Capacity Capacity ' 1 18.11 24.14 12.60 28.00 1.44 0.57 57% 58% 2, 18.95 25.28 10.16 28.00 11.98 0.80 80% 91% 3 18.79 25.05 5.96 28.00 14.46 0.73 739E 84% 4 20.02 26.69 0.31 28.00 4.34 0.17 17% 19% top #N/A #N/A #WA 28.00 *N/A MIA MA MIA 0 MA #NIA MA 28.00 #N/A #WA #N/A *WA 0 #N/A #NIA MIA 28.00 MA MA #NIA #N/A 0 #NIA *WA MA 28.00 #N/A MA. #WA #WA 0 #N/A #N/A *WA 28.00 MAMAMIAMA 0 MIA MA *WA 28.00 #WA WA #WA #NIA 0 #D!VIO! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! 28.00 #DiVIO! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #RNID! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/O! OWN 28.00 #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #D11v/0! #DIV/O! 0 #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV" 28.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! TowerCapaedy Page 1 s Existing On Air RF coverage in North Andover, MA In Building coverage (-76 dBm) In Vehicle coverage (-84 dBm) q' I toe— SA tip Cli w v q Z j G 4" Ands ,er .h Zt, 0A < 4BSQ345D r t w \ t t ay i r� 1 'z I , 4 d t7 0,4 0.8 UD S INI S9' m Proprietary star p y and Confidential information. Authorized>use fY T-Moble Employees and its Agents only Proposed RF coverage in North Andover, MA In Building coverage (a7 dBm) including In Vehicle coverage (-84 dBm) � ABS0345D @ 130 ft (AGL) e 4 A4S� Ak yY I1 a 'w Y E a a � t r r O . miles r Proprietary and Confidential information. AuthofiAzed'use by T-Mobile Employees and its Agents only. 34 Hemingway Drive ADVANCED East Providence,RI 02914 ' "` •" ENGINEERING GROUP, P.C. Ph:508-342-5339 508-342-5303 March 12,2010 Town of North Andove 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Structural Assessment Existing antenna installation 723 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA 01845 T Mobile Reference:4BS0658D To Whom it May Concern: At the request of T Mobile,this office has performed an inspection of the existing 100'tall flagpole(monopole) located at the above-referenced site on January 14,2010,and has reviewed the original tower documentation by EEI dated March 13,2003(project#11485-E01),and a structural analysis by Semann Engineering Solutions dated March 17,2008 that was associated with the T-Mobile installation, in order to assess the structural condition of the existing tower to support the existing antenna inventory which consists of: • Three(3)DB932DG65T4E-M antennas within a fiberglass shroud at 96'AGL • Three(3)Allgon 7262.02 antennas within a fiberglass shroud at 86'AGL. • Three(3)APXV18-206517 antennas within a fiberglass shroud at 76'AGL. Our inspection of the flagpole revealed that the the structure appeared structurally sound and plumb,with no visible signs of corrosion, metal fatigue,or bat failure. The reinforced concrete foundation appeared sound with no visible stress cracks or spalling. A review of the tower documents referenced above indicates that the tower,with the current inventory, has a stress ratio of 81%and is well within the original design parameters of the tower. Therefore, based on the inspection performed,and the review of the original tower docurnentation,it is the opinion of this office that the existing 100'±flagpole(monopole)is structurally sound and is capable of safely supporting the existing antenna inventory without modification. Very truly yours, iy X44 MAP R. CHR;-* ,TN Marc R. Chretien, P.E. " Civ Advanced Engineering Group, P.C. No.40313 4BS06M-SmicbmalAssessment 1079 N. 204'"Avenue Elkhorn; NE 68022SEMAAN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Ph: 402-289-1888 Fax: 402-289-1861 100 ft EEI Flagpole Monopole Structural Analysis Prepared for: Sprint Sites USA 2393 Pendley Road Suite 200 Cumming, GA 30041 Site: BS54XC860 For: T-Mobile North Andover, MA March 17, 2008 Mr. Peter MacMaster Sprint Sites USA 2393 Pendley Road Suite 200 Cumming, GA 30041 Re: Site Number SS54XC860-North Andover. MA. Dear Mr. MacMaster: We have completed the structural analysis for the existing monopole, located at the above referenced site. The purpose of this analysis is to determine that the existing monopole design is in conformance with the TIAEIA-222 Rev F standard and local building codes for the proposed antennae loads installation. Refer to the Review and Recommendations section at the end of this report for the analysis results. Description of Structure: The structure is a 100 ft EEI Monopole. Refer to EEl job#11485 dated March 18,2003 for a detailed description of the structure. Method of analysis: The tower was analyzed using Semaan Engineering Solutions' software suite for communication structures. The structural analysis is performed using the SAPS finite element engine. The method is 3D, non-linear, which accounts for the second order geometric effects due to the displacements. It also treats guys as exact cable elements and therefore is ideal for guyed towers. The analysis was performed in conformance with TIA/EIA-222 Rev F and local building codes for a basic wind speed of 90 mph and 1/2"radial ice with reduced wind speed (fastest mile). This wind speed is equivalent to a 110 mph 3-second gust per the IBC 2003. This is in conformance with the IBC 2003: Section 1609.1.1, Exception (5) and Section 3108.4. Wind is applied to the structure, accessories and antennas. • Page 2 Structure loading: The foll ing loads were used in the tower analysis: Elev(ft) Qty Antennas Mounts Coax Carrier 99.0 1 15'x 25' Fla 3 DTMA-BRS160 96.0 3 XP4-65-R Inst Shroud (12) 15/8 Sprint 3 [3BWDG65T4E-M 86.0 3 7262.02 Inside Shroud (6) 15/8 AT&T Pro osed Loads: Elev(ft) Qty Antennas Mounts Coax Carrier 76.0 3 APXV18-206517 Inside Shroud 6 7/8 T-Mobile All new access holes shall be reinforced with welded rims that are compatible with the pole and to be sized and supplied by pole manufacturer. All transmission lines are assumed running inside of pole shaft. Results of Analysis: Refer to the attached Computer Summary sheets for detailed analysis results. Structure: The existing monopole is structurally capable of supporting the existing and proposed antennas. The maximum structure usage is: 80.9%. Foundation: Pole Reactions Orlginal Dem Current Analysis % Of Reactions Reactions Design Moment(ft-kips) 292.00 411.57 141.0 Shear Ides 5.50 6.42 116.7 The foundation has been investigated using the supplied documents and soils report and was found adequate.Therefore,the foundation will not require modification. Review and Recommendations: Based on the analysis results,the existing structure meets the requirements per the TIA/EIA-222 Rev F standards for a basic wind speed of 90 mph and 1/2"radial ice with reduced wind speed. • Page 3 SEMAAN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Job information 1079 N.204f-Aue:nae Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TiA/EIA 222 Rev F Elkhorn,NE 68022 Description: Phone:402-289-1888 Client Sprint Sites USA-GA 2 Fax:402-289-1861 Location North Andover,MA Shape: 18 Sides Base Elev(ft): 1.00 Copyright SeMaan E rigineering Solutions,Inc Height: 99.00 (ft) Taper: 0.143120(in/ft) Sections Properties Diameter(in) Overlap Steel Shaft Length Accross Flats Thick Joint Length Taper Grade Section (ft) Top Bottom (in) Type (in) (inift) (ksi) 1 26.724 24.92 28.75 0.188 0.000 0.143120 65 2 46.013 19.25 25.83 0.188 Slip Joint 44.844 0.143120 65 3 30.000 20.00 20.00 0.188 Butt Joint 0.000 0.000000 30 86'-0" � Discrete Appurtenance 3W-0" Attach Force 3/16"Thick Eley(ft) Eley(ft) Qty Description (30 KSi) 99.000 99.000 1 15'x 25'Flag 96.000 96.000 3 DTMA-BRS180 96.000 96.000 3 XP4-65-R 96.000 96.000 3 OB932DC65T4E-M 86.000 86.000 3 Allgon 7262.02 76,000 76,000 3 APXV18 517 fi9,_fl" Linear Appurtenance Elev(ft) Exposed From To Description To Wind 0.000 76.000 718 Coax No 0.000 86A00 1 518" Coax No 0.000 96AM 1 518" Coax No Load Cases No Ice 90.00 mph Wind with No Ice lice 77.94 mph Wind with Ice 46'-O"1/8 3/16"Thick Reactions (65 KSI) Moment Shear Axial Load Case (KipA) (Kips) (Kips) No Ice 411.57 6.42 5.34 Ice 320.66 4.98 7.06 6'-8"11116 45" '-11"7r'E 26'-8"11/16 3/16"Thick (65 KSl) Load Case : No Ice Max Stress 80.9%at O.Oft e � 99.000 24 95.000 24 90.000 w.._. _ a�e_me�n_{� ; _--- 24 24 80.000 n_ . m r 24 75.000 24 69.000 24 0 . .. 65.000-, _... �..._ ` 60.000 52 S.Dofl 0.000 ami 52 Lu 45.000 ..__ . _ _ _.._. .e._. ..__ __. .. _ _ n__.. _ r_._n_. 40.000 x. r _.. _._ _ 47_ f 35.000 F5_21 30.000-1 ,_fin 26.724, _ _.,_ -�_d. _.m,_ _ _.r 22.987 , 52 2Q000 52 15.000 S2 10.000 e. 0 a � __... . 5.000-,- 0.000 2.86 7.86 12.86 17.86 22.86 27.86 32.86 37.86 42.86 47.86 51 , 6 Stresses(ksi) Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F Copyright SeMaan Engineering Solutions,Inc Location: North Andover,MA Y 3117/2008 3:40:05 Ph Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 1 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper: 0.143120 (in/ft) base Elev: 1.000 (ft) Shaft Section Properties slip Bottom Top Sect Lenath Thick Fv Joint Joint Weiaht Ob Elev Area fX Wit nit Dia Elev Area lx W/t Dtt Taner Num (ft) (in) (ksi) Type Len(in) (lb) (in) ft (sqin) OnA4) Ratio Ratio (in) (ft) (sqin) (in^4) Ratio Ratio (in/ft) 1 26.724 0.1875 65 0.00 1,442 28.75 0.000 17.00 1752.0 25.63 153-3 24.92 26.72 14.72 1138.2 22.03132.93 0.14312 2 46.013 0.1875 65 Slip Joint 44.84 2,083 25.83 2298 1526 1268.5 22-88 137.7 1925 69.00 11.34 520.8 16.69 102.67 0.14312 3 X000 0.1875 30 Butt Joint 0.00 1,204 20-0069.00 11.79 584.7 17.40 106.6 20-00 99.00 11.79 564.7 17.40 106.67 0.00000 Shaft Weight 4,729 Discrete Appurtenance Properties Attach NO ice Ice - Distance Vert FIPV Weiqht CaAa CaAa Weiqht CaAa CaAa From Face Ecc (ft) Description Qty (lb) (sf) Factor (lb) (sf) Factor (ft) M 99.00 15'x 25'Flaa I 150M 31.875 1.00 200.00 31.875 1.00 0.000 0.000 96.00 DTMA-BRS160 3 11.00 0.000 1.00 16.29 0.000 1.00 0.000 0.000 96.00 XP4-65-R 3 20.00 0.000 1.00 45.69 0.000 1.00 0.000 0.000 96.00 DB932DG65T4E-M 3 10.00 0.000 1.00 28.20 0.000 1.00 0.000 0.000 86.00 Alloon 7262,02 3 16.00 0.000 1.00 36.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 0.000 76.00 APXV18-206517 3 26.40 0.000 1.00 39.60 0.000 1.00 0.000 0.000 Totals 16 400.20 697.34 Number of Loadings: 6 Linear Appurtenance Properties Elev Elev No Ice - - Ice From TO Weight CaAa Weight CaAa Exposed (ft) (ft) Description (M) (SOM flbfft) (sf/ft) To Wind OM 96,00 (1211 5/8" Coax 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 N 0,00 86,00 (6)15/8" Coax 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 N 0.00 76.00 (6)7/8 Coax 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 N Total Weight 228.78(lb) 0.00(lb) Pole; BS54XC860 Code: TIAIEIA-222 Rev F Copyright Setnaan Engineering Solutions,Inc Location; North Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:05 Ph Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 2 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper., 0.143120 (inJft) Base Elev 1.000 (ft) Seciment Properties (Max Len : 5ft) Sea Top Flat Elev Thick pia Area tx W/t tNt Fy Rs Weight (ft) Description (in) (in) (in^2) (in^4) Ratio Ratio (k'si) (ksi) (lb) 0.00 0.1875 28.750 16.998 1.752.0 25.63 153.33 65 51 0.0 5.00 0.1875 28.034 16.572 1.623.6 24.95 149.52 65 52 285.6 10.00 0.1875 27.319 16.146 1.501.6 24.28 145.70 65 52 278.3 15.00 0.1875 26.603 15.720 1.385.9 23.61 141.88 65 52 271.1 20.00 0.1875 25.888 15.294 1.276.3 22.93 138.07 65 52 263.8 22.99 Bot-Section 2 0.1875 25."0 15.040 1.213.7 22.53 135.79 65 52 154.2 25.00 0.1875 25.172 14.868 1.172.6 22.26 134.25 65 52 206.4 26.72 Top-Section 1 0.1875 25.300 14.945 1.190.8 22.38 134.93 65 52 174.9 30.00 0.1875 24.831 14.666 1.125.3 21.94 132.43 65 52 165.0 35.00 0.1875 24.116 14.240 1.030.1 21.27 128.62 65 52 245.9 40.00 0.1875 23.400 113.814 940.4 20.60 124.80 65 52 238.7 45.00 0.1875 22.685 13.388 856.1 19.92 120.98 65 52 231.4 50.00 0.1875 21.969 12.962 777.0 19.25 117.17 65 52 224.2 55.00 0.1875 21.253 12.536 702.9 18.58 113.35 65 52 216.9 60.00 0.1875 20.538 12.111 633.7 17.90 109.53 65 52 209.7 65.00 0.1875 19.822 111.685 569.1 17.23 105.72 65 52 202.4 69.00 Too-Section 2 0.1875 19.250 11.344 520.8 16.69 102.67 65 52 156.7 69.00 Bot-Section 3 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 70.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 40.1 75.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 200.6 76.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 40.1 $OM 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 160.5 85.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 200.6 RA no 1.1975 20.nnn 11.7!9n SRA_7 17 An 1nR-97 3n 2d do_1 90,00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 160.5 95.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 200.6 96.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 40.1 99.00 0.1875 20.000 11.790 584.7 17.40 106.67 30 24 120.4 4,728.8 Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TfA/M 222 Rey F CopyiigbtSemaanEngineeningSolutions,Inc Location. North Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:05 PN Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 3 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) x Taper; 0.143120 (inPft) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) Load Cast?: Na ice 90.00 mph Wind with No ice 28 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Shaft Segment Forces Seg Tap Ice Wind Dead Tot Dead Elev as CMGh C Thick Tributary Aa CfAa Force X load ice Load (ft) Description Kz (psf) (psf) (me-ft) Cf (in) (ft) (sf) (sf) (Ib) (ib) (ib) 0.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 215.62 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 210.25 0.650 0.00 5.00 11.830 7.69 269.5 0.0 285.6 10.00 0.00 1 AO 20.736 35.04 204.89 0.650 0.00 5.00 11.532 7.50 262.7 0.0 278.3 15.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 199.52 0.650 0.00 5.00 11.234 7.30 255.9 0.0 271.1 20.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 194.15 0.650 0.00 5.00 10.936 7.11 249.1 0.0 263.8 22.99 Bot-Section 2 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 190.95 0.650 0.00 2.99 6.391 4.15 145.6 0.0 154.2 25.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 188.79 0.650 0.00 2.01 4.310 2.80 98.2 0.0 206.4 26.72 Too-Section 1 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 186.93 0.650 0.00 1.72 3.653 2.37 83.2 0.0 174.9 30.00 0.00 1.00 20.736 35.04 186.23 0.650 0.00 3.28 6.843 4.45 155.9 0.0 165.0 35.00 0.00 1.02 21.258 35.92 183.13 0.650 0.00 5.00 10.197 6.63 238.1 0.0 245.9 40.00 0.00 1 A6 22.063 37.28 181.02 0.650 0.00 5.00 9.899 6.43 239.9 0.0 238.7 45.00 0.00 1.10 22.800 38.53 178.40 0.650 0.00 5.00 9.601 6.24 240.5 0.0 231.4 50.00 0.00 1.13 23.482 39.68 175.33 0.650 0.00 5.00 9.303 6.05 240.0 0.0 224.2 55.00 0.00 1.16 24.118 40.76 171.91 0.650 0.00 5.00 9.005 SAS 238.6 0.0 216.9 60.00 0.00 1.19 24.715 41.76 168.16 0.650 0.00 5.00 8.707 5.66 236.4 0.0 209.7 RS_ttn n_nn 1.21 25277 42.71 164.14n.fi5n n_nn 5-nn R MR 5.47 2.13.5 n.n 2n2.4 69.00 Too-Section 2 0.00 1.24 25.706 43.44 160.74 0.650 0.00 4.00 6.512 4.23 183.9 0.0 156.7 70.00 0.00 1.24 25.810 43.62 167.35 0.650 0.00 1.00 1.667 1.08 47.3 0.0 40.1 75.00 0.00 1.26 26.317 44.47 168.98 0.650 0.00 5.00 8.333 5.42 240.9 0.0 200.6 76.00 Aooertunance(s) 0.00 1.27 26.416 44.64 169.30 0.650 0.00 1.00 1.667 1.08 48.4 0.0 40.1 80.00 0.00 1.29 26.801 45.29 170.53 0.650 0.00 4.00 6.667 4.33 196.3 0.0 160.5 85.00 0.00 1.31 27.263 46.07 171.99 0.650 0.00 5.00 8.333 5.42 249.6 0.0 200.6 86.00 ,4nnertunance(s) 0.00 1.31 27.353 46.22 172.28 0.650 0.00 1.00 1.667 1.08 50.1 0.0 40.1 90.00 0.00 1.33 27.707 46.82 173.39 0.650 0.00 4.00 6.667 4.33 202.9 0.0 160.5 95.00 0.00 1.35 28.134 47.54 174.72 0.650 0.00 5.00 8.333 5.42 257.5 0.0 200.6 96.00 Aooertunance(s) 0.00 1.36 28.217 47.68 174.97 0.650 0.00 1.00 1.667 1.08 51.7 0.0 40.1 99.00 Armertunance(s) 0.00 1.37 28.464 48.10 175.74 0.650 0.00 3.00 5.000 3.25 156.3 0.0 120.4 Totals: 99.00 4,871.6 0.0 4,728.8 Pole: BS54XC860 Code. TI41EIA-222 Rev F Copyright SemaanEngineering Solutions,Inc Location: North Andover,MA Y 3117/2008 3:40:06 Ph Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 4 Shape: 18 Sides Bane Dia: 28.73 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) Taper: 0.143120 (infft) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) Load Case: No Ice 90,00 mph Wind with No Oce 28 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Discrete Appurtenance Segment Forces Total Nora Vert Wind Mom Mom Dead Elev qz gzGh CaAa GaAa Ecc Ecc FX Y Z Load (ft) Description Cut (psf) (psf) Factor (sig (ft) (ft) (ib) (ib-ft) (Ib-ft) (lb) 76.00 APXV18-206517 3 26.416 44.642 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.20 86.00 Alloon'7262.02 3 27.353 46.227 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 96.00 DTMA-BRS160 3 28.217 47.687 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 96,00 XP4-65-R. 3 28.217 47.687 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6000 96.00 DB932DG65T4E-IM 3 28.217 47.687 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 99.00 15'x 25'Flaq 1 28.464 48.104 1.00 31.88 0.000 0.000 1.533.31 0.00 0.00 150.00 1,533.31 400.20 Pole; BS54XC860 Code. TiA/EIA-222 Rev F Copyright SemaanEngineering Solutions,Inc Location; North Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:06 Ph Height; 99.00 (ft) Page: 5 Shape : 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) Taper: 0.143120 (in/ft) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) 7f Load Case: No Ice 90.00 mph Wind with No ice 28 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Mind Load Factor: 1.00 Applied Segment Forces Summary Seg Lateral Axial Torsion Moment Elev FX(-) FY(j MY MZ (ft) (lb) (ib) (lb-ft) (Ib-ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 269.47 298.57 0.00 0.00 10.00 262.68 291,33 0.00 0.00 15.00 255.89 284.08 0.00 0.00 20.00 249.10 276.84 0.00 0.00 22.99 145.57 161.93 0.00 0.00 25.00 98.17 211.62 0.00 0.00 26,72 83.20 179.38 0.00 OAO 30.00 155.87 173.56 0.00 0.00 35.00 238.13 258.90 0.00 0.00 40.00 239.92 251.65 0.00 0.00 45.00 240.47 244.41 0.00 0.00 50.00 239.97 237.16 0.00 0.00 55.00 238.57 229.91 0.00 0.00 60.00 236.38 222.67 0.00 0.00 65.00 233.48 215.42 0.00 0.00 69.00 183.88 167.12 0.00 0.00 70.00 47.26 42.72 0.00 0.00 75.00 240.91 213.60 0.00 0.00 76.00 48.36 121.92 0.00 0.00 80.00 196.27 168.80 0.00 0.00 85.00 249.57 211.00 0.00 0.00 86.00 50.08 90.20 0.00 0.00 90.00 202.91 164.64 0.00 0.00 95.00 257.54 205.80 0.00 0.00 96.00 51.66 164.16 0.00 0.00 99.00 1,689.65 270.36 0.00 0.00 Totals: 6,404.93 5,357.75 0.00 0.00 Pole: SS54XC860 Code: TIAIEIA-222 Rev F Copyright Semen Engineering Solutions,Inc Location. North Andover,MA Y 3/1712008 3:40:06 PW Heiqht: 99.00 (ft) Page: 6 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) x Taper: 0,143120 (inMt) Base Elev. 1.000 (ft) Load Case: No Ice 90.00 mph Wind with No tee 28 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Calculated Shaft Forces and Deflections Seg Lateral Axial Lateral Moment Torsion Moment X Z Total Elev FX(-) FY() FZ MX MY MZ Deflect Deflect Deflect Rotation (ft) (kips) (kips) (kips) (ft-kips) (ft4dps) (ft-kips) (in) (in) (in) (deg) 0.00 -6.420 -5.339 0.000 0.000 0.000 -411.575 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.00 -6.178 -5.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 -079.476 -0.172 0.000 0.172 -0.321 10.00 -5.939 4.685 0.000 0.000 0.000 -348.588 -0.679 0.000 0.679 -0.640 15.00 -5.703 -4.373 0.000 0.000 0.000 -018.895 -1.519 0.000 1.519 -0.956 20.00 -5.466 -4.078 0.000 0.000 0.000 -290.381 -2.688 0.000 2.688 -1.269 22.99 -5.327 -3.905 0.000 0.000 0.000 -274.054 -3.542 0.000 3.542 -1.457 25.00 -5.231 3.685 0.000 0.000 0.000 -263.330 -4.184 0.000 4.184 -1.584 26.72 -5,152 -3.494 0.000 0.000 0.000 -254.311 -4.776 0.000 4.776 -1.692 30.00 -5.005 -3.304 0.000 0.000 0.000 -237.432 -6.007 0.000 6.007 4.893 35.00 -4.773 -3.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 -212.405 -8.142 0.000 8.142 -2.178 40.00 -4.536 -2.768 0.000 0.000 0.000 -188.540 -10.571 0.000 10.571 -2.454 45.00 -4.297 -2.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 -165.858 -13.285 0.000 13.285 -2.722 50.00 -4.055 -2.272 0.000 0.000 0.000 444.375 -16.274 0.000 16.274 -2.980 55.00 -3.813 -2.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 424.098 49.527 0.000 19.527 x.226 Rn nn .3 571 -1.817 n_nnn n_nnn n_ann -1ns_n3s -23_n29 n_nnn 23.n29 3.459 65.04 -3.330 4.606 0.000 0.000 0.000 -87.176 -26.765 0.000 26.765 -3.674 69.00 -3.138 -1.445 0.000 0.000 0.000 -73.856 -29.910 0.000 29.910 -3.835 70.00 -3.091 -1.401 0.000 0.000 0.000 -70.718 -30.717 0.000 30.717 -3.874 75.00 -2.837 -1.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 -55.265 -34.856 0.000 34.856 -4.027 76.00 -2.782 -1.079 0.000 0.000 0.000 -52.427 -35.701 0.000 35.701 -4.053 80.00 -2.575 -0.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 -41.300 -09.135 0.000 39.135 -4.145 85.00 -2.312 -0.726 0.000 0.000 0.000 -28.423 -43.519 0.000 43.519 -4.229 86.00 -2.255 -0.639 0.000 0.000 0.000 -26.112 -44.406 0.000 44.406 -4.243 90.00 -2.041 -0.489 0.000 0.000 0.000 -17.090 -47.976 0.000 47.976 -4.285 95.00 -1.769 -0.302 0.000 0.000 0.000 -6.885 -52.477 0.000 52.477 -4.314 96.00 -1.705 -0.142 0.000 0.000 0.000 -5.116 -53.380 0.000 53.380 -4.317 99.00 -1.690 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -56.092 0.000 56.092 -4.321 Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIA/EIA222Rev F CopyHghtSecnaanEngineering Solutions,Inc Location: INorth Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:06 Pa Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 7 Shape : 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper: 0.143120 (in/ft) Base Eley: 1.000 (ft) ' Load Case: No Ice 90.00 mph Wind with No Ice 28 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Calculated Stresses Seq Applied Stresses Allowable Eley Axial(Y) Shear(X) Shear(Z) Torsion Bending(X) Bending(Z) Combined Stress(Fb) Stress (fit) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Ratio 0.00 0.31 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.15 41.48 51.3 0.0 0.809 5.00 0.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.92 40.24 51.9 0.0 0.776 10.00 0.29 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.64 38.95 52.0 0.0 0.749 15.00 0.28 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.29 37.59 52.0 0.0 0.723 20.00 0.27 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.88 36.17 52.0 0.0 0.696 22.99 0.26 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.03 35.31 52.0 0.0 0.679 25.00 0.25 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.44 34.71 52.0 0.0 0.668 26.72 0.23 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.92 33.18 52.0 0.0 0.638 30.00 0.23 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.92 32.17 52.0 0.0 0.619 35.0D 0.21 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.30 30.53 52.0 0.0 0.587 40.00 0.20 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.58 28.81 52.0 0.0 0.554 45.00 0.19 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.78 26.99 52.0 0.0 0.519 50.00 0.18 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.87 25.07 52.0 0.0 0.482 55.00 0.16 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.86 23.05 52.0 0.0 0.443 60.00 0..15 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 2034 20.92 52.0 0.0 0.402 65.00 0.14 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 18.66 52.0 0.0 0.359 69.00 0.13 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.63 16.79 52.0 0.0 0.323 69.00 0.12 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.39 15.54 52.0 0.0 0.299 70.00 0.12 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.74 14.88 24.0 0.0 0.620 75.00 0.10 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.52 11.65 24.0 0.0 0.486 76.00 0.09 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.93 11.05 24.0 0.0 0.461 80.00 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.61 8.72 24.0 0.0 0.363 85.00 0.06 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.92 6.02 24.0 0.0 0.251 86.00 0,05 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.44 5.54 24.0 0.0 0.231 90.00 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.56 3.65 24.0 0.0 0.152 95.00 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 1.55 24.0 0.0 0.065 96.00 0,01 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 1.19 24.0 0.0 0.050 99.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 24.0 0.0 0.021 Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIA(EIA-222 Rev F Copyright Sernaan Engineering Solutions,Inc Location: North Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:06 PR Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 8 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) x Taper: 0.143120 (inMQ Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) fir' Load Case: lee 77.94 mph Wind with Ire 27 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Shaft Segment Forces Seg Top Ice Wind Dead Tot Dead Elev qz gzGh C Thick Tributary Aa CfAa Force X Load Ice Load _ft) Description Kz (psf) (pst) (mph-t#) t3 (in) (ft) (sf) (sf) (lb) (lb) (lb) 0.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 186.73 0.650 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 182.08 0.650 0.50 5.00 12.247 7.96 209.2 88.0 373.6 10.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 177.43 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.949 7.77 204.1 85.8 364.2 15.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 172.78 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.650 7.57 199.0 83.6 354.7 20.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 168.14 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.352 7.38 193.9 81.4 345.3 22.99 Bot-Section 2 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 165.36 0.650 0.50 2.99 6.640 4.32 113.4 47.9 202.0 25.00 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 163.49 0.650 0.50 2.01 4.477 2.91 76.5 32.4 238.7 26.72 Toa-Section 1 0.00 1.0015.551 26.28 161.88 0.650 0.50 1.72 3.796 2.47 64.8 27.5 202.3 30.00 0.00 1.00 115.5511 26.28 161.28 0.650 0.50 3.28 7.116 4.63 121.6 51.2 216.3 35.00 0.00 1.02 15.943 26.94 158.59 0.650 0.50 5.00 10.614 6.90 185.9 76.0 321.9 40.00 0.00 1.0616.546 27.96 156.77 0.650 0.50 5.00 10.316 6.71 187.5 73.7 312.4 45.00 0.00 1.1017.099 28.89 154.49 0.650 0.50 5.00 10.018 6.51 188.2 71.5 302.9 50.00 0.00 1.1317.611 29.76 151.84 0.650 0.50 5.00 9.719 6.32 188.0 69.3 293.5 55.00 0.00 1.1618.088 30.56 148.87 0.650 0.50 5,00 9.421 6.12 187.2 67.1 284.0 60.00 0.00 1.1918.535 31.32 145.62 0.650 0.50 5,00 9.123 5.93 185.8 64.9 274.6 AS nn O.AA 1.21 18 957 3203 1d2.1A 8.650 A_5A SAO R_R25 5.7d 183.8 6227 285.1 69.00 Too-Section 2 0.00 1.2419.278 32.58 139.20 0.650 0.50 4.00 6.845 4.45 145.0 48.8 205.5 70.00 0.00 1.2419.357 32.71 144.92 0.650 0.50 1.00 1.750 1.14 37.2 12.7 52.8 75.00 0.00 1.2619.737 33.35 146.34 0.650 0.50 5.00 8.750 5.69 189.7 63.3 263.9 76.00 Aaaertunance(s) 0.00 1.2719.811 33.48146.610.650 0.50 1.00 1.750 1.14 38.1 12.7 52.8 80.00 0.00 1.29 20.099 33.96 147.67 0.650 0.50 4.00 7.000 4.55 154.6 50.6 211.1 85.00 0.00 1.31 20.446 34.55 148.94 0.650 0.50 5.00 8.750 5.69 196.5 63.3 263.9 86.00 Aaaertunance(s) 0.00 1.31 20.514 34.66 149.19 0.650 0.50 1.00 1.750 1.14 39.4 12.7 52.8 90.00 0.00 1.33 20.779 35.11 150.15 0.650 0.50 4.00 7.000 4.55 159.8 50.6 211.1 95.00 0.00 1.35 211.099 35.65 11511.30 0.650 0.50 5.00 8.750 5.69 202.8 63.3 263.9 96.00 Apoertunance(s) 0.00 1.36 21.162 3S.76 151.53 0.650 0.50 1.00 1.750 1.14 40.7 12.7 52.8 99.00 Aaaertunance(s) 0.00 1.37 21.347 36.07 152.19 0.650 0.50 3.00 5.250 3.41 123.1 38.0 158.3 Totals: 99.00 3,815.7 1,411.5 6,140.2 Pole: SS54XC860 Code. TLAIEIA--222 Rev F Coptr9nrsemaanEng neenngsauoons,Inc Location: North Andover,MA Y 3117/2008 3:40:06 PN Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 9 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Tap Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper: 0.143120 (in1Tt) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) �7 Load Case: ice 77.94 mph wind with Ice 27 iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Discrete Appurtenance Segment Forces Total Horiz Vert Wind Mom Mom Dead Elev qz gzGh CaAa GaAa Ecc Ecc FX Y Z Load (ft) Description Qty (psf) (Psf) Factor (sf) (ft) (ft) (ib) (lb-ft) (Ib ft) (lb) 76.00 APXV18-206517 3 19.811 33.480 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 118.80 86.00 Allgon 7262.02 3 20.514 34.668 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 108.00 96.00 DTMA-BRS160 3 21.162 35.763 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.87 96.00 XP4-65-R 3 21.162 35.763 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 137.07 96.00 DB932DG65T4E-All 3 21.162 35.763 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.60 99.00 15'x 25'Flag 1 21.347 36.076 1.00 31.88 0.000 0.000 1.149.91 0.00 0.00 200.00 1,149.91 697.34 Pole: SS54XC860 Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F CopyrghtSemaanngineering Sofutions,Inc Location: North Andover,MA 3/1712008 3:40:06 Ph Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 10 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) Taper: 0,143120 (in/ft) Base Elev. 1.000 (ft) Load ad Case: Ice 77.94 mph Wind with Ice 27 Iterations st Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 GO, Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Applied Segment Forces Summary Seg Lateral Axial Torsion Moment Elev FX(-) FY(-) MY MZ (ft) (lb) (lb) (lb4t) (lb-ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 209.21 386.62 0.00 0.00 10.00 204.12 377.17 0.00 0.00 15.00 199.02 367.71 0.00 0.00 20.00 193.93 358.26 0.00 0.00 22.99 113.42 209.78 0.00 0.00 25.00 76.49 243.98 0.00 0.00 26.72 64.85 206.83 0.00 0.00 30.00 121.56 224.77 0.00 0.00 35.00 185.88 334.85 0.00 0.00 40.00 187.50 325.40 0.00 0.00 45.00 188.16 315.95 0.00 0.00 50.00 188.03 306.49 0.00 0.00 55.00 187.19 297.04 0.00 0.00 60.00 185.75 287.59 0.00 0.00 65.00 183.77 278.13 0.00 0.00 69.00 144.96 215.87 0.00 0.00 70.00 37.21 55.38 0.00 0.00 75.00 189.71 276,86 OAO 0.00 76.00 38.08 174,17 0.00 0.00 80.00 154.55 219.41 0.00 0.00 85.00 196.53 274.26 0.00 0.00 86.00 39.44 162.85 0.00 0.00 90.00 159.78 21515 0.00 0.00 95.00 202.80 269,06 0.00 0.00 96.00 40.68 32435 0.00 0.00 99.00 1,273.02 358.32 0.00 0.00 Totals: 4,965.65 7,066.35 0.00 0.00 Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F Copyright Semen Engineering Solutions,Inc Lcration: North Andover,MA Y 3/17/2008 3:40:06 Ph Heiqht: 99.00 (ft) Page: 11 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper: 0.143120 (in/ft) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) Load Case: Ice 77.94 mph Wind with Ice 27 Iterations Gust Response Factor: 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Calculated Shaft Forces and Deflections Seg Lateral Axial Lateral Moment Torsion Moment X Z Total Elev FX(-} FY(-) FZ MX MY MZ Deflect Deflect Deflect Rotation tit) (kips} (kips) (kips) (ft-kips) J24Nps) (fk-kips) (in) (1n) (in) (deg) 0.00 -4.980 7.055 0.000 0.000 0.000 320.662 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.00 -4.799 -6.648 0.000 0.000 0.000 -295.760 -0.134 0.000 0.134 -0.250 10.00 -4.620 -0.253 0.000 0.000 0.000 271.763 -0.529 0.000 0.529 -0.499 15.00 -4.442 -5.868 0.000 0.000 0.000 -248.664 -1.184 0.000 1.184 -0.745 20.00 -4.261 -0.498 0.000 0.000 0.000 226.455 -2.095 0.000 2.095 -0.989 22.99 -4.155 -5.282 0.000 0.000 0.000 -213.726 -2.761 0.000 2.761 -1.136 25.00 -4.082 -5.033 0.000 0.000 0.000 -205.362 -3.261 0.000 3.261 -1.235 26.72 -4.023 -0.819 0.000 0.000 0.000 -198.325 -3.723 0.000 3.723 -1.319 30.00 -3.911 -4.584 0.000 0.000 0.000 -185.147 -4.683 0.000 4.683 -1.476 35.00 -3.732 -4.241 0.000 0.000 0.000 -165.593 -6.348 0.000 6.348 -1.698 40.00 -3.549 -3.908 0.000 0.000 0.000 -146.933 -8.242 0.000 8.242 -1.914 45.00 -3.363 3.587 0.000 0.000 0.000 -129.189 -10.358 0.000 10.358 -2.122 50.00 -3.174 3.277 0.000 0.000 0.000 412.377 -12.688 0.000 12.688 2.323 55.00 -2.984 2.979 0.000 0.000 0.000 -96.507 -15.224 0.000 15.224 -2.514 sn nn -2794 -2 891 n_nnn n_nnn n_nnn -131.5.07 -17.45d n_nnn 17 q5 -2_x95 65.f}i} -2.603 2.416 0.000 0.000 0.000 .67.619 20.866 0.000 20.866 2.862 69.00 -2.450 -2.205 0.000 0.000 0.000 57.208 -23.317 0.000 23.317 -2.987 70.00 -2.413 -2.148 0.000 0.000 0.000 54.758 -23.945 0.000 23.945 -3.017 75.00 -2.211 -1.879 0.000 0.000 0.000 -42.693 -27.169 0.000 27.169 3.136 76.00 -2.165 -1.705 0.000 0.000 0.000 -40.483 27.828 0.000 27.828 ~3.156 80.00 -2.000 -1.493 0.000 0.000 0.000 31.824 30.502 0.000 30.502 3.226 85.00 -1.789 -1.229 0.010 0.000 0.000 -21.824 -33.916 0.000 33.916 -3.292 86.00 -1.741 -1.068 0.010 0.000 0.100 -20.035 -34.606 0.000 34.606 -3.302 90.00 -1.569 -0.862 0.000 0.000 0.000 43.073 -37.385 0.000 37.385 3.334 95.00 -1.351 -0.604 0.000 0.000 0.000 -5.226 -00.889 0.000 40.889 3.356 96,00 -1.292 -0.283 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.875 -41.592 0.000 41.592 3.359 99.00 -1.273 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.000 -43.702 0.000 43.702 3.361 Copyright Sernaan Engineering Solutions,Inc Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIAIEIA-222 Rev F ly Location - North Andover,MA 311712008 3:40:06 Ph Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 12 Shape : 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) Taper: 0.143120 (in/ft) Base Elev: 1.000 (ft) Load Case: fee 77.94 mph Wind with lee 27 Iterations Gust Response Factor. 1.69 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Wind Load Factor. 1.00 Calculated Stresses Seg Applied Stresses Allowable Elev Axial(Y) Shear(X) Shear(Z) Torsion Sending(X) Bending(Z) Combined Stress(Fb) Stress ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Ratio OM 0,42 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.06 32.49 51.3 0.0 0.634 5.00 0.40 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.11 31.53 51.9 0.0 0.608 10.00 0.39 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.12 30.53 52.0 0.0 0.587 15.00 0.37 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.08 29.47 52.0 0.0 0.567 20.00 0.36 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.98 28.36 52.0 0.0 0.546 22.99 0.35 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.32 27.68 52.0 0.0 0.533 25.00 0.34 0,55 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.86 27.21 52.0 0.0 0.524 26.72 0.32 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.67 26.01 52.0 0.0 0.500 30.00 0.31 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.89 25.22 52.0 0.0 0.485 35.00 0.30 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.62 23.93 52.0 0.0 0.460 40.00 0.28 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.27 22.58 52.0 0.0 0,434 45.00 0.27 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.86 21.14 52.0 0.0 0.407 50.00 015 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.36 19.63 52.0 0.0 0.378 55.00 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.78 18.04 52.0 0.0 0.347 60,00 0.22 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.11 16.35 52.0 0.0 0.315 65.00 0.21 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.35 14.58 52.0 0.0 0.280 69.00 0.19 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.88 13.10 52.0 0.0 0.252 69.00 0.19 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.92 12.13 52.0 0.0 0.233 70.00 0.18 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.41 11.61 24.0 0.0 0.484 75.00 0.16 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.90 9.08 24.0 0.0 0.378 76.00 0.14 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.44 8.60 24.0 0.0 0.359 80.00 0.13 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.63 6.78 24.0 0.0 0.283 85,00 0,10 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.55 4.68 24.0 0.0 0.195 86.00 0.09 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 4.30 24.0 0.0 0.179 90.00 0,07 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.72 2.84 24.0 0.0 0.118 95.00 0J05 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.09 1.21 24.0 0.0 0.050 96.00 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.92 24.0 0,0 0.038 99.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 24.0 0.0 0.016 Pole: BS54XC860 Code: TIAIEIA_222 Rev F Copin9htsemaonEngineeringsoludons.inc Location: North Andover,MA 3117/2008 3:40:06 PR Height: 99.00 (ft) Page: 13 Shape: 18 Sides Base Dia: 28.75 (in) Top Dia: 20.00 (in) X Taper: 0.143120 (infft) Base Eley: 1.000 (ft) Analysis Summary Reactions Max Stresses Shear Shear Axial Moment Moment Moment Combined Allowable FX FZ FY MX MY MZ Stress Stress Elev Stress Load Case (kips) (kips) (kips) (ft-kips) (ft-kips) (ft-kips) (ksi) (ksi) (ft) Ratio No Ice 6.4 0.00 5.34 0.00 0.00 411.57 41.48 51.3 0.00 0.809 Ice 5.0 0.00 7.06 0.00 0.00 320.66 32.49 51.3 0.00 0.634 FOUNDATION LOADING MATERIAL LIST MOMENT 292.-A1p—Tl ITEM OTY. DESCRIPTION SHEAR 5.50 kip, 1 4 '2 t/4"e.e'-0"(Am-R.75)ANCHOR BOLTS AXIAL 5.60 kip. 2 18 MB REBAR,15'-6"(ASTM A515-GR.60) 3 16 115 REBAR R 15'-6"(ASTM A615-GR.50) I.ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE ATTACHED w/(2)HEX NUTS TO BOTH TEMPLATES _ 2.ANCHR BOLTS SHALL BE INSTALLED s,AONGER THREADED END UP. "AR RA" IVOL.CONCRETE O 4000 psi(TYPE II CEMENT) 3.0Id3 O ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION STEEL(ASTM A61S-RAO) 1040.0 lb, ' - "' (4)2 1/4"0.8'-0"LG. ANCHOR BOLTS ON A -0.0 37"e BOLT CIRCLE (f E 4 f-'.4 GENERAL NOTES: '1 'I 1. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASE ON THE FOLLOWING EEi JOBS 11485,DRAWING/GS54518 SOIL REPORT BY JAWORSKI GEOTECH,INC.,REPORT N0.02255G-APRIL 23.2002 ANCHOR BOLTS ARE H 2. FOUNDATION EMBEDMENT IS SHOWN FROM THE ROUND LEVEL AT THE TIME OF SOIL INVESTIGATION CENTERED UNDER AS DEPICTED IN THE SOIL REPORT.SHOULD THE ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE ACCESS PORTS.SEE IN THE REPORT, THE GE07ECHNICAL ENGINEER AND FOUNDATION DESIGNER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED STR.OWC 6554518 IN ORDER TO RE-EVALUATE THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. A V(EW"A-A° 3. SOIL REPORT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.STEEL CAISSON OR SLURRY METHOD (TEMPLATE NOT SHOWN) MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SOIL FROM CAVING DURING CONSTRUCTION.THE CAISSON SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER COMPLETION OF CONCRETING OR,IF LEFT IN THE ROUND,ALL VOIDS AROUND THE CAISSON SHALL BE FILLED WITH PRESSURIZED ROUT.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS,TECHNIOUES SEOUENCES,AND PROCEDURES 4. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOTS S. SPECIAL INSPECTION OF REINFORCEMENT,ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLATION.AND CONCRETE IS REWIRED PER 1997 UBC/1998 CBG FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL O BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. 0 3 , „ (18)pe REBAR, ED ON 6' 8. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL IRE.CONFORMWELDING TO AS1N A8PERMI Fy,MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED ON A ASSEMBLED USING STEEL WIRE.WELDING O NOT PERMITTED, LARDR-55 LENGTH: FOR HS 49'e CIRCLE NO.8 BARS AND SMALLER- T ,b0;FOR N0.7 BARS AND LARGER-IC.IN O MEDIUM SAND HORIZONTAL TIES SHAH 8E STAGGERED WITH NO MORE THAN SOIi OF SPLICES 1N ONE PLACE. 3 7. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ($ Y ACI 318-99,ACI 336.3R-93,AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 4 4 0. MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-4000 psi AT 26 DAYS.USE TYPE 11 CEMENT UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 4�•• ' b. CONCRETE MIX SHOULD HAVE A SLUMP OF 7"(31')FOR DRILLED PIER AND 3"(31") eT Ff Z FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS. 4"MIN 0. FOR DRILLED PIERS ONLY THE CONCRETE OVER THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL PIER•.60" CONCRETE COVER BE VIBRATED.FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE VIBRATED. SECTION"B-B" 8. PLACEMENT.ANCHOR CRETE CONSUL>�E SITENTATION REOUIReO PRIOR TO ON PLAN AND MONOPOLE DRAWINGF R PROPERR ESS PORT R ENTATIONN. W ��H OF MAh,r i WYG v ENGINEERED �•Aq N J -15.0 CBR' ENDEAVORS s1"e ycNo.426tlio INCORPORATED 7610 440)0 Od"0-1 •Mmla.(8 )270-4812 ONgL E $ P): 440)918-110•P): (Bee) d,com ss A•7 A3� h:(440)91y1f08•www.a0gen0.e0m 0SPRINT PCS 100'-0" MONOPOLE (18)65 REBAR.L.15'-6' STEVENS ESTATESS54XC860 ESSEX COUNTY, MA SCALE: _NS 1 xo, 11485 D COMPLETED DRAWING 3/18/03 L.A.P. SHEET T o1 1 m+Awlxc xo. 11485D-100.0 RFV DESCRIPTION DAiE DW C.R rorf: aRmw«ro tWEi Wrotw wunc aRRKi1M ttSxTlxf 17 to R bG AtIX �x0 x xa MAd[R ra iWIK Kg��;L,��c"+ MATERIAL RE(}'0. PER ASSEMBLY ww.cKsfSRv xn!umlwL xAlrAao p Wwt W a x«n .wnwA wgwsu6 sR mx m'•rua.at ,♦ pv=���t/r• * CALV.WT, OTT. ITEM MK.NO. pESCKPnpE i rf•.R'naa ' _ _- 1 1 -_- SHAFT ASSY.(TOP SECTION) '.. Oxa••.ro'-r ca.xeaw ouir - ,6 O � 4 _ ?• __ 1 2 -__ SHAFT ASSY.(BOTTOM SECTION) iRNY./••Qa RNwilro r� roID —Rx0o60 iSLGNIKf Al f!}W ~ K wn1wA 3 a,53 ] ] C1056B �ftnf" .11 AIxa Axo 60D.+AONx! B ` r0lK!Yex 1rNR11M 6 4 HARDWARE AS FOLLOWS: tD tf•.+0'-0'w.xtAvr 0YR AW - Aq1 ONCnOx�i M 2.51 } P-10511 "• xwnxIX[„MI run tRSRx"/!•as WLwtOn rP[ 4 , jg�pp 1 1!fKl a V A A i'i��y'niq" 'kw r x091 p•n 133652 1 B 215-A5550E-5 tfy, 16xaisA'.°"KP4 ,a 36x•.arugN 7M A.atxo R.x K�AO j�o�Nw� t 5 i�a A�t�.tw! OG ..w-o•w.Ht—aurr Ru� VIEW "A-A" +� 1t 55.]5 2 T D.Do-z2x SETTING TEMPLATE +n'aa.xownxa w xm0 Aw 4owKP rq nAtnr n n AxnxrlA D.a 5 5 aS13220 ]/iB'¢«a xELLM4 HOOK SS�Y.SLIP JOINT JACKING p1; o b:e �w aiY nW xsnx 1 ,1 "rl' .a vi nn AWf O 03 12 qx t.xr.Np b IMII•.K 1 13HALO/06 Yyro r0116tp gga' OL'Sx25 15'x 2S AMERICAN FUG i ¢Mn41M• MR //1 P5 N10052 20'BOSS BM KIT }k i 18DALLON MUCH-MP PAINT $ y .118 i ,7 75017MA 2101 OL-2 OO(AU OBSTROCTION ' Wr•A•o•tw aaaiCERlnx 12 _ 1 IB MIMS ,SOS SO CORD ' ggw ' AT. 'U mWl, 3 t � � yp�0ur MSO rTpIgK��AEt0.M[KRLriRiO ! yy +W LA x� MM nAa ACCI�OIIY xe1'i S � � YMe 't ELBG TRUCK'DETAIL TOTAL CALV. STR. At ACCES. WT.--(--��8 0� r xouxtnAf+nlotwp TOTAL ANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE WT.7ktv _____ k .6xAMtro Kxa Axotpo GENERAL NOTES Q • ° 't ilxu-� xKoxx" n� f'iMR'!! �f[el"'rotwlsto iSui ml� i If i,W.r nw NA MRSA K Rip �xro x7n•�,in�� Eu,q�p�itll�w�aw� nw { 7E r + L gnNRMwRV-.plxT YW ix r4x'ut[KCtIW Wu'K n!!7r[x[nATIKx np1xAL Kw x(wt J61Cx NE rfMflW �rQ-P 4�[4t a/Wl�nt rxMt ix Mgi w aM."vna@ rN AiY AW Axa M!M NpAD lC0.p tla} 09rAL It+P,♦tAtx fRltt) q�er �ii[MYa110grr KVItW Kn AKxxwr A t60r10N r4Km56 WIt09 m wtnAmo aW 4) 4N gipr na OI tK xagr0.t suLL K WNW=AN.R ou-N K 4it rew. u '°" i x „,,,, I y •a-a•oyv +wuMgm A Iwo aro w SECTION "B-B" ,, M tpwwxt I �~� « CES wI�' K�WwRa OF a � �k'�'.�`rks+nAI x A I lc,Lo laua+i:t�1g+M6 ter "!"K�`m. nes Pr' '4 a�t riL WtU1Yt�NlVtq W Ip w�lwlt« t{I KNSp Ro+Oa h41C), K rI&. AJ&.H,N aextro Kenos voun.AK 1afAgm ox f—Pw Ktnax run R x015 ![vp0.OMECIIM. 13 2 p COREL 1 gtNnlRAa,� n�qM.Alx a An A p r -1M1n/Rt1 2 w 4n IMTAYfl1. K"t'Prws Y 4tp r°'giin N0.426xrav � � .ca/lr�w�. p�4)37£� � Na AgagR tp�R fwu�. .'rw'�emrK.lp txt ryMKpaSoi gw a«iaf:r�q�'R r"wao��lnxL�iq "%G4NA 1-r •x Rda ± IT, t1pK1yp�'! 'yKglliNp�AW WM�p��lppp�4�110 Q(I.KKAfKt4lKs�i ra tgKKaKl�n�AWq�[rxwxaxAKAerWILMpY1p� IS O L aA n)1M001x[Rtn M s�Af!ReR n� nNrp 416 Wp xmuWLLRI Iql![TK Kxningl! YArxx fllff W .t; 1>)P0w iAra1.0.rN+"/A - t� ? d i wixs�wo'f�r.r-'• /�__is_ / / // 1N61N![RIs nxortnonAteo �= R / 1reWPNxorxwrNs g xoLts ax A 7510 J•RIMr 0"•M•W..ON 41090-48n t x r ' '01RCw Px;(Ip)!t•-im.Pn:(wa)270-}5!5 515-1105..nw.wMa.ean !urs-w"•Nm na[Ao[o S 7 - llnMt pxMa) a.xugx ea s 700'-0" FLAG POLE :"i=o'riro'�ec*Tal iSi'limxro"`O ns SECTION "C-C" SPRINT PCS/NJ ,w Ki1"WnL,CO.'%(x7».4j ERECTION VIEW STEVENS ESTATE, 8554XC860 ESSEX COUNTY, MA xOn:KL[ttvA*TMs+xoMxi SCALE NONE 4M Ixl1 W WAt ASS[wl.941 xAvt A 4Era r4N Oxawx4 n a7xrATER4Al Axa wi rol K .w xWE rR4YCt ro. 11 485 riM b BAY PNrza xtwm la,T Wx,p qLL K e4p1TM`.ID wlr4 Lo.I. RLP•004ttl.COrNp Upp wIXdr q w uxlCs!4MERRIK rano. f�KAlu4h+wAx ro.Af ExtrAM p e 4Arzxtu i,a w ruble w,w.xwwfx wrxwr rxE JO.:KETI:=-.VAL DWGinx" O KgM M MVEx>1M N[REXAVFO. rrt w. r Existing On Air RF coverage in North Andover, MA In Building coverage (-76 dBm) In Vehicle coverage (-84 dBr ) `r i � m L� z X • t t , - ��.� ., . AT Pp O GRE ND RD � f k 4 , C A wX ICK ST' A II' 4E;50658I'3 F Q W .ETER ST R a , 0 0.45 0:9 ?? s� cn � � dies �. 4B�"Q►�►2® ► �e, p opr►etary and Cont�de� ttial rnfiormattion Authorized;use by T-Mobile Employees and its Agents only. Proposed RI` coverage in North Andover, MA In Building coverage (-76 dBrn) in cludin In Vehicle coverage (-64 dBm) 4BS06581� 77 ft ( GL) 4 L �dk x $. » a rNwvsM .,x .., POND � RD r_ r V1Jl�E P1; tt #x C 7 W I KSI M, ,'• ,� ,�4 806 �� ` � �. } Sj. Q r �. 0 0.45 0.9 F �a. miles X0020 w 7- wl F rieprietary and..C�anfsderrtraI,information -AUtharrzed� e by T-Mobile Employees and its Agents only. WELLMAN S � IATE , ^ E ...#lIV 70 BROADWAY o WAS . yy.BOX,739 _ 201 O 16 Ail 0: 16 WESTF01m,MA 01886 March 11,2010 Please time stamp both copies and Tit 11 return one copy to Mary Ippol to. MASSAr Thank you. Town of North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Applicant: T-Mobile Northeast,LLC Special Permit Renewal for a Wireless Communications Facilities at 723 Osgood Street Dear Members of the Board: The Applicant respectfully requests a continuance to the next meeting scheduled for April 6, 2010 based on the pending documents the Board has requested. We look forward to meeting with the Board. Should there be questions concerning this application in the meantime, please call me at (978) 846-4954. We thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Gin Vilante Authorized Agent for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Print Form Til .. ' Town of North Andover Planning Board!D JAN 28 AI - Application for S ial Permit Please or print clearly. td 0 �" 111 r' ' r 1. Petitioner:T-Mobile Northeast, LLC(forrnerly Omnipoint Communications,LLC) Petitioner's Address:15 Commerce Way,Norton, MA 02766 Telephone number:508.286.2726 Gerry Marquis,or 978.846.4954 Gin Tante-Agent 2. Owners of the Land.7Own of North Andover Address:121 Main Street,North Andover,MA Number of years of ownership: 15 years 3. Year lot was created:Unknown 4. Description of Proposed Project: Th'At°(rpl§.afi^=f^ S ct _cr MU21-ro,pfivaftm nh2.ro 5 ._._ 5. Description of Premises: 6. Address of Property Being Affected723 Osgood Street(Stevens Estate) Zoning District:Residential District 1 Assessors: Map:35 Lot#2 Registry of Deeds: Book#:��i Page#:0063 7. Existing Lot: Lot Area(Sq.Ft) 152.15 acres Building Height N/A Street Frontage: Side Setbacks: Front Setback: Rear Setback: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 8. Proposed Lot(if applicable): N/A i Height_ Lot Area(Sq.Ft) Building Street Frontage: Side Setbacks: Front Setback: Rear Setback: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 9. Required Lot(as required by Zoning Bylaw): Lot Area(Sq.Ft) N/A Building Height Street Frontage: Side Setbacks: Front Setback: Rear Setback: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 10. Existing Building(if applicable): Ground Floor(Sq.Ft.) N/A #of Floors: Total Sq.Ft. Height: Use: Type of Construction 11. Proposed Building: Ground Floor(Sq.Ft.) N/A #of Floors: Total Sq.Ft. Height: Use: Type of Construction 12. Has there been a previous application for a Special Permit from the Planning Board on these premises?Yes If so,when and for what type of construction? 6/2006 13. Section of Zoning Bylaw that Special Permit Is Being Requested g q g ga 1 14. Petitioner and Landowner signature(s): Every application for a Special Permit shall be made on this form which is the official form of the Planning Board. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or Planning Office does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all expenses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements,as cited herein and in the Planning Board Rules and Regulations may result in a dismissal by the Planning B oard of this application as incomplete. Petitioner's Signature: Print or type name here:Gln e-Authorized Agent Owner's Signature: 1,4 Print or type name here:Town of North over 15. Please list title of plans and documents you will be attaching to this application. Plan Title:Sprint Stevens Estate dated 11/15/06 Please see the attached application package. WELLMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 70 BROADWAY STREET P.O. Box 738 WESTFORD,MA 01886 January 28, 2010 Town of North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street Bldg 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover,MA 01845 RE: T-Mobile Northeast,LLC Special Permit Renewal—Wireless Facility at: 723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA Dear Members of the Board: This firm represents the Applicant in connection with an application for a Special Permit Renewal from the Town of North Andover. On behalf of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (the "Applicant"), formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc., we respectfully request to renew our Special Permit for the wireless service facility at the above referenced location pursuant to Section 8.9 and any other relief deemed by the Town to be required under applicable provisions of the Town of North Andover By Laws. This letter is submitted in support of the attached renewal application, together with various other supporting materials enclosed herewith. Company Information Omnipoint Communications, Inc. was a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc. Effective July 1, 2009, T-Mobile USA, Inc. has simplified its corporate structure by combining certain of its subsidiaries including Omnipoint Communications, Inc.. Certain assets, including local government permits and pending applications by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. have been and are now conveyed to and assumed by T-Mobile Northeast,LLC,a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA,Inc. Description of Existing Installation The Applicant has currently installed three (3) panel antennas concealed within the existing monopole. Coaxial cables connect the antennas to three (3) equipment cabinets located on the ground within the existing fenced-in compound. Pursuant to the FCC mandate requiring E911 capabilities, one (1) 19" GSM antenna as well as one (1) 3 9/16" GPS is installed on the Applicant's existing ice bridge. No permanent back up generator has been installed. Submission Requirements Section 8.9.5(d)(i)Application Filing Requirements i) General Filing Requirements (1) Name, address and telephone number of the Applicant and co-applicants as well as any agents for the Applicant or co-applicants. A 24-hour emergency telephone contact number shall be included for use during construction as well as operation of the wireless communication facility. The Applicant requesting the Special Permit is T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, formerly Omnipoint Communications, Inc., with an address of 15 Commerce Way, Norton, MA 02766. Gerry Marquis, Zoning Manager, may be reached at (508) 286- 2726. The agent for the applicant is Wellman Associates with a mailing address of 70 Broadway Street, P.O. Box 738, Westford, MA 01886. The agent's representative Gin Vilante may be reached at (978) 846-4954. The 24-hour emergency telephone contact number is 1 (888)218-6664. (2) Co-applicants may include the landowner of the subject property, license carriers and tenants for the proposed wireless service facility. The Applicant has executed a License Agreement with Sprint to collocate on the existing monopole. Please find enclosed, the letter of authorization from Sprint acknowledging our collocation on the monopole submitted with the original application for a Special Permit in June of 2006. (3) Every application for a wireless service facility Special Permit shall include at least one licensed carrier and the owner of the land as an applicant or a co- applicant. Enclosed please find the Applicant's FCC license to provide service in the Town of North Andover. (4) Original signatures for the applicant and all co-applicants applying for the Special Permit. If an agent represents the applicant or co-applicant, an original signature authorizing the agent to represent the applicant and/or co-applicant is required. Photo reproductions of signatures will not be accepted. All other filing requirements in the Zoning Bylaw and the Rules and Regulations as applicable must be complied with. Attached please find the Special Permit Application for renewal which contains original signatures from the Applicant and the property owner as well as authorization from the Applicant allowing Wellman Associates, Inc. to represent them through the Special Permit process. ii) Location Filing Requirements (1) Identify the subject property by including the name of the nearest road or roads, street address, and Assessors Map and Parcel number of subject property. The subject property is located on the Stevens Estate property with an address of 723 Osgood Street. The subject property is identified at the North Andover Assessor's office as Map 35, Parcel 23. The closest property line is approximately 600 feet from the existing facility. (2) Identify the Zoning District designation for the subject parcel. Submit a copy of the Town zoning map with parcel identified. The subject parcel is located in both Residential District 1 and Residential District 2. The existing installation islocated in the Residential 1 District. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit, and this requirement was filed with the original special permit application. (3) A locus map at a scale of 1" = 1500' showing the subject property and all properties within 300 feet and the location of all buildings, including accessory structures on all properties shown. Enclosed, please find Enclosed, please find the final construction plans prepared by Coler&Colantonio,Inc. Engineers and Scientists dated 11/16/06. (4) A map showing the other preexistent and approved wireless service facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary. Enclosed, please find a map depicting the Applicant's existing facilities within the Town of North Andover and within one mile of its corporate limits. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from the requirement of showing all existing personal wireless service facilities as the Applicant is not privy to the locations of competing carriers' facilities. (5) GPS all equivalent system locating by latitude and longitude wireless service facilities The proposed wireless service facility GPS location is 42'-42'-28.56" North Latitude and 71°-06'-51.03"West Longitude. iii) Siting Filing Requirements. A one-inch-equals-40 feet plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts showing the following: For clarity purposes and in an effort to fit the plan on one page, the plan has been designed with a scale of a one-inch equals 200 feet. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from the one-inch-equals 40 feet scale. (1) Property lines for the subject property. Please seethe enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio,Inc.Engineers and Scientists. (2) Property lines of all properties within 300 feet of the proposed location. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. Please note that there are no properties within 300 feet of the existing monopole and proposed compound (3) Tree cover on the subject property, by dominant species and average height. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the subject property consists of approximately 153 acres of land. Please see the enclosed plans prepared by Cofer & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists demonstrating the average tree height surrounding the existing pole and compound. (4) Outline of all existing buildings, including purpose (e.g. residential buildings, garages, accessory structures, etc.) on subject property and all properties adjacent to the subject property. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler&Colantonio,Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (S) Proposed location of antenna mount and equipment shelters(s). Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio,Inc. Engineers and Scientists. Please note that the Applicant is not proposing a shelter. (6) Proposed security barrier, indication type and extent as well as point of controlled entry. The existing installation is enclosed within the compound that was expanded upon the granting of the Applicant's original permit. The facility is secured within a stockade fence. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (7) Location of all roads, public and private, on the subject property and on all adjacent properties within 300 feet including driveways proposed to serve the wireless service facility. Enclosed, please find site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. Please note that there are no other properties within 300 feet of the existing pole. (8) Distances, at grade,from the proposed wireless service facility to each building on the vicinity plan. This standard is not applicable as there are no buildings within 300 feet of the installation. Please see the enclosed site plan prepared by Coler & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (9) Contours at each 2 feet AMSL for the subject property and all adjacent properties within 300 feet. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The existing facility is located inside the existing monopole and within the compound. The appearance of the exterior of the monopole was not altered. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (10) All proposed changes to the preexistent property, including grading, vegetation removal and temporary or permanent roads and driveways. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler&Colantonio,Inc. Engineers& Scientists. (11) Representations, dimensioned and to scale, of the proposed mount, antennas, equipment shelters, cable runs, parking areas and any other construction or development attendant to the wireless service facility. Enclosed, please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (12)Lines representing the sight line showing viewpoint(point from which view is taken and visible point(point being viewed)from `Sight Lines"subsection below. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The existing facility is located within the existing monopole and the associated base station equipment is concealed within the stockade fenced-in compound. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (13) Location of all wetlands on the subject property and within 100'of the proposed facility as approved by the Conservation Commission. Enclosed, please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. There are no wetlands within 100' of the existing facility. iv) Sight lines oto and P hhs as described below: �'aP (1) Sight line representation. A sight line representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closest faVade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point (visible point) of the wireless service facility. Each sight line shall be depicted in profile, drawn at one-inch equals 40 feet scale. The profiles shall show all intervening trees and buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300 feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or public roads, if any. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard as there are no public roads within 300 feet of the installation. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (2) Preexistent (before condition)photographs. Each site shall be illustrated by one four-inch by six-inch color photograph of what can currently be seen from any public roads and residential buildings if the proposed wireless service facility is built. Enclosed,please find photographs of existing conditions of the wireless facility. (3) Proposed (after condition) photographs. Each of the preexistent condition photographs shall have the proposed wireless service facility superimposed on it to show what will be seen from public roads and residential buildings if the proposed wireless service facility is built. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit. The existing conditions photographs also represent the post-installation conditions. (4) Siting elevations or views at grade from the north, south, east and west for a 50- foot radius around the proposed wireless service facility plus from all preexistent public and private roads that serve the subject property. Elevations shall be at either on-quarter inch equal one foot or one-eight inch equals one foot scale and show the following: The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The existing installation is located within the existing monopole and concealed behind stockade fencing. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (a)Antennas, mounts and equipment shelter(s), with total elevation dimensions and average ground level(AGL) of the highest point. All future proposed antennas, mounts and equipment shelters if any must be shown in order to be included in the Special Permit. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc. Engineers P g and Scientists. (b)Security barrier. If the security barrier will block views of the wireless service facility, the barrier drawing shall be cut away to show the view behind the barrier. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. The antennas are mounted within the existing monopole, and the base station equipment is enclosed within the compound that is secured with a chain and combination lock. (c)Any and all structures on the subject property. Please see the enclosed site plans prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (d)Preexistent trees and shrubs at current height and proposed trees and shrubs at the proposed height at time of installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as there was no removal of any trees or shrubs upon installation. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (e) Grade changes, or cuts and fill, to be shown as original grade and new grade line, with two foot contours AW. The requirement is not applicable as the installation did not require any grade changes or cuts and fill. v) Design Filing Requirements (1) Equipment brochures for the proposed wireless service facility such as manufacturer's specifications or trade journal reprints shall be provided for the antennas, mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. Enclosed please find construction plans detailing installed equipment and its specifications. (2)Materials of the proposed wireless service facility specified by generic type and specific treatment(e.g. anodized aluminum stained wood,painted fiberglass, alloys, etc.) these shall be provided for the antennas, mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. The antennas are constructed of aluminum and the equipment cabinets are constructed of steel and are installed inside the compound enclosed within a stockade fence. (3) Colors of the proposed wireless service facility represented by a color board showing actual colors proposed Colors shall be provided for the antenna mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (4) Dimensions of the wireless service facility specified for all three directions: height, width and breadth. These shall be provided for the antennas, mounts, equipment shelters and security barrier, if any. Enclosed please find plans prepared by Coler & Colantonio, Inc. Engineers and Scientists. (5)Appearance shown by at least two photographic superimpositions of the wireless service facility within the subject property. The photographic superimposition's shall be provided for the antennas, mounts equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any,for the total height, width and breadth. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement.The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (6) Landscape plan including preexistent trees and shrubs and those proposed to be added, identified by size of specimen at installation and species. The Applicant did not perform any landscaping; therefore respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. (7) During the public hearing process the applicant shall schedule with the Planning Board a balloon or crane test at the proposed site, at the expense of the applicant, to illustrate the height of the proposed facility The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement. The existing installation is concealed within the existing monopole and there was no increase in height.Additionally,the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit (8)If lighting on the site is required by the FAA, the applicant shall submit a manufacturers computer generated point-to point printout, indicating the horizontal foot-candle levels at grade, within the property to be developed and twenty-five (25)feet beyond property lines. The printout shall indicate the locations and types of luminaries proposed. This requirement is not applicable as the Applicant did not increase the height of the pole. The existing monopole currently has lighting as required by the FAA. vi)Noise Filing Requirements (1) the applicant shall provide a statement listing the preexistent and maximum future projected measurements ofnoise from the proposed wireless service facilities, measured in decibels Ldn(common logarithmic scale, accounting for greater sensitivity at night),for the following: (a)Preexistent or ambient:the measures of preexistent noise (b)Preexistent plus proposed wireless service facilities: maximum estimate of noise from the proposed wireless service facility plus the preexistent noise environment. (c) Such statement shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet DEP requirements and Section 8.9(4)(e). Enclosed,please find an environmental sound assessment of the existing facility prepared by Modeling Specialties dated January 13,2010. vii) Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR)Filing Requirements (1)All telecommunications facilities shall be operated only at Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designated frequencies,power levels and standards, including FCC designated frequencies,power levels and standards, including FCC Radio Frequency Emissions standards. The applicant shall provide certification demonstrating that the maximum allowable frequencies; power levels will not be exceeded Certifications shall include technical specifications, a written explanation of those specifications, and, if necessary, field verification. The Permit Granting Authority may condition any Special Permit granted under this section upon a periodic submittal of certification of compliance with said standards. (2) In order to determine compliance with applicable FCC regulations, the applicant shall provide a statement listing the preexistent and maximum future projected measurements of RFRfrom the proposed wireless service facility, including all co-locators,for the following situations: (a)Preexistent or ambient, the measurement of preexistent RFR (b)Preexistent plus proposed wireless service facility plus the preexistent RFR environment. (c) Certification, signed by a engineer, stating that RFR measurements are accurate and meet FCC Guidelines as specified in the Radiofrequency Radiation Standards subsection of this Bylaw. Enclosed please find RFR reports prepared by Donald B. Haes, Jr. dated December 29,2009. (3) Applicant must submit a copy of the letter from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approving the site for this facility as required by 105CMR 122.000 requires that the Department of Public Health approve all sites for wireless facilities with respect to emissions. This standard is no longer applicable. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit and a statement from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health was filed with the original special permit application. viii) Federal Environmental Filing Requirements (1)At the time of application f ling, an Environmental Assessment(EA) that meets FCC requirements shall be submitted to the Town for each wireless service facility site that requires such an EA to be submitted to the FCC (2) The applicant shall list location, type and amount (including radiation trace elements) of any materials proposed for use within the wireless service facility that are considered hazardous by federal, state or local government The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit and an EA was filed with the original special permit application. 8.3.5.(e)(ii) SURVEY OF LOT/PARCEL: A boundary survey conforming to the requirements of the Essex County Registry of Deeds Office. The survey shall be dated and include any revision made to the survey or site plan. Any change in the survey shall be recorded before site plan approval may be granted The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the subject parcel consists of over 153 acres of land and the existing facility is centrally located on the parcel, hundreds of feet from any adjacent lot lines. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. Additionally, in support of our request for a Special Permit, lease find the following enclosed information: 1) Special Permit Application; 2) List of Requested Waivers; 3) Certified abutters list; 4) Application Fee; 5) Construction Compliance Affidavit; 6) Radio Frequency Engineer Affidavit; and 7) Coverage plots of the depicting the Applicant's existing coverage. We look forward to meeting g with the Board at its next available meeting. there be questions concerning this renewal application in the meantime, please call me at (978) 846.4954. T-Mobile looks forward to continuing to provide superior wireless communications service to the businesses and residents of Town of North Andover. Sincerely, 0'' Gin Vilante Agent for T-Mobile Northeast,LLC Cc: Gerry Marquis January 28,2010 Town of North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street Bldg 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover,MA 01845 RE: T-Mobile Northeast,LLC Special Permit Renewal—Wireless Facility at: 723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA Dear Members of the Board: In addition to the Special Permit renewal application package and letter,the Applicant submits the following list of waivers requested: 8.9.5(d)(ii)(2)Identify the Zoning District designation for the subject parcel. Submit a copy of the Town zoning map with parcel identified Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit, and this requirement was filed with the original special permit application. 8.9.5(d)(ii)(4) A map showing the other preexistent and approved wireless service facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary. Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from the requirement of showing all existing personal wireless service facilities as the Applicant is not privy to the locations of competing carriers' facilities. 8.9.5(d)(M) Siting Filing Requirements. A one-inch-equals-40 feet plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts showing the following: For clarity purposes and in an effort to fit the plan on one page, the plan has been designed with a scale of a one-inch equals 200 feet. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from the one-inch-equals 40 feet scale. 8.9.5(d)(ui)(3) Tree cover on the subject property, by dominant species and average height. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the subject property consists of approximately 153 acres of land. 8.9.5(d)(W)(9) Contours at each 2 feet AMSL for the subject property and all adjacent properties within 300 feet. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(W)(12) Lines representing the sight line showing viewpoint (point from which view is taken and visible point(point being viewed)from `Sight Lines"subsection below. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(1) Sight line representation. A sight line representation shall be drawn from any public road within 300 feet and the closest fagade of each residential building (viewpoint) within 300 feet to the highest point (visible point) of the wireless service facility. Each sight line shall be depicted in profile, drawn at one-inch equals 40 feet scale. The profiles shall show all intervening trees and buildings. In the event there is only one (or more) residential building within 300 feet there shall be at least two sight lines from the closest habitable structures or public roads, if any. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard as there are no public roads within 300 feet of the installation. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(3) Proposed(after condition)photographs. Each of the preexistent condition photographs shall have the proposed wireless service facility superimposed on it to show what will be seen from public roads and residential buildings if the proposed wireless service facility is built. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit. The existing conditions photographs also represent the post-installation conditions. 8.9.5(d)(iv)(4) Siting elevations or views at-grade from the north, south, east and west for a 50 foot radius around the proposed wireless service facility plus from all preexistent public and private roads that serve the subject property. Elevations shall be at either on- quarter inch equal one foot or one-eight inch equals one foot scale and show the following: The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this standard. The existing installation is located within the existing monopole and concealed behind stockade fencing. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)ft)(4)(d) Preexistent trees and shrubs at current height and proposed trees and shrubs at the proposed height at time of installation, with approximate elevations dimensioned. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as there was no removal of any trees or shrubs upon installation. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(v)(3) Colors of the proposed wireless service facility represented by a color board showing actual colors proposed Colors shall be provided for the antenna mounts, equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(v)(5) Appearance shown by at least two photographic superimpositions of the wireless service facility within the subject property. The photographic superimposition's shall be provided for the antennas, mounts equipment shelters, cables as well as cable runs, and security barrier, if any,for the total height, width and breadth. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. The facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(v)(6) Landscape plan including preexistent trees and shrubs and those proposed to be added, identified by size of specimen at installation and species. The Applicant did not perform any landscaping;therefore respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. Additionally,the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. 8.9.5(d)(v)(7) During the public hearing process the applicant shall schedule with the Planning Board a balloon or crane test at the proposed site, at the expense of the applicant, to illustrate the height of the proposed facility. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement., the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit 8.9.5(d)(vii)(3) Applicant must submit a copy of the letter from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approving the site for this facility as required by 105CMR 122.000 requires that the Department of Public Health approve all sites for wireless facilities with respect to emissions. This standard is no longer applicable. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit and a statement from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health was filed with the original special permit application. 8.9.5(d)(viii)Federal Environmental Filing Requirements (1) At the time of application filing, an Environmental Assessment (EA) that meets FCC requirements shall be submitted to the Town for each wireless service facility site that requires such an EA to be submitted to the FCC (2) The applicant shall list location, type and amount (including radiation trace elements) of any materials proposed for use within the wireless service facility that are considered hazardous by federal, state or local government The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the application is for renewal of a Special Permit and an EA was filed with the original special permit application. 8.3.5.(e)ri) SURVEY OF LOT/PARCEL: A boundary survey conforming to the requirements of the Essex County Registry of Deeds Office. The survey shall be dated and include any revision made to the survey or site plan. Any change in the survey shall be recorded before site plan approval may be granted. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver from this requirement as the subject parcel consists of over 153 acres of land and the existing facility is centrally located on the parcel, hundreds of feet from any adjacent lot lines. Additionally, the facility is currently existing as this application is for renewal of the Special Permit. Sincerely, IGGVilante Agent for T-Mobile Northeast,LLC Cc: Gerry Marquis Abutter to Abutter( ) Building Dept. ( ) Conservation ( ) Zoning ( ) REQUIREMENT: MGL 40A,Section 11 states in part"Parties in Interest as used in this chapter shall mean the petitioner, abutters,owners of land directly oppositeon any public or private way,and abutters to abutters within three hundred(300)feet of the property line of the petitioner as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list,not withstanding that the land of any such owner is located in another city or town,the planning board of the city or town,and the planning board of every abutting city or town." Subject Property: MAP PARCEL Name Address 35 23 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER 120 MAIN STREET,NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 STEVENS ESTATE Abutters Properties Map Parcel's Name Address 35 24/25/33/44/110 Town of North Andover 120 Main Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 32 Douglas Keith 605 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 20,2B,36,413,7B Great Pond Crossing LLC 865 Turnpike Street,North Andover 35 20113 BVAS Realty Trust 1019 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 20.56 R.Jude Realty,LLC 1007 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 20.613 Peter Devlin,DMD 1009 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 19 William Chepulis 1018 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 29 Tiam Realty,LLC 7 Ridge Hill Way,Andover,MA 01810 35 50 1003 Osgood Street,LLC 865 Turnpike Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 26 Douglas Howe 665 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 35 16 Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street,North Andover,MA 01845 36 4 George Ousler 623 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 3&15 China Blossom Realty Trust 946 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 4 Patrick Duffy 59 Surrey Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 74 5 John Ferreira 980 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 6.1,6.3,6.4 Landers Family Trust 1000 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 6.02 Dennis Drinkwater 13 Old Salem Path,Magnolia MA 01930 74 7 850 Osgood Street Trust 850 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 12 Gail Oja 177 Chadwick Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 11 Dorothy O'Connor 165 Chadwick Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 22 Kirk Olsen 159 Chadwick Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 53 Michael Ryan 880 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 52 James Titcomb 870 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 23&54 Knights of Cloumbus Association,Inc 505 Sutton Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 28 David Smolag 67 Surrey Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 74 13 Annina Faraci 838 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 74 29 Gregg Gilligan 75 Surrey Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 74 30 Armando Vera 83 Surrey Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 74 31 Chadwick Street Nominee Trust 79 Lacy Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 1 North Andover Housing Authority 310 Greene Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 3 Michael Walsh 800 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 4 Blair Roberts 814 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 5 Mary Machado 826 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 6 Vincent McAloon 790 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 91 7 Patrica Curtin 864 Chickering Road,North Andover,MA 01845 91 8 Onofrio Casaburri 30 Foulds Terrace,North Andover,MA 01845 91 15 Jeanette Sutton 14 Colgate Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 91 14 Nina Gafney 15 Colgate Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 91 19 Henry Her 25 Stacy Drive,North Andover,MA 01845 92 8 Prescott Nursing Home 101 East State Street,Kennett Square,PA 19348 Page:1 of 2 This certifies that the names appearing on the records of the Assessors Office as of Certifted by' ate Abutter to Abutter( ) Building Dept. ( ) Conservation ( ) Zoning ( ) REQUIREMENT: MGt.40A,Section t t states in part"Parties in Interest as used in this chapter shall mean the petitioner, abutters,owners of land directly oppositeon any public or private way,and abutters to abutters within three hundred(300)feet of the property line of the petitioner as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list,not withstanding that the land of any such owner is located in another city or town,the planning board of the city or town,and the planning board of every abutting city or town." Subiect Property: MAP PARCEL Name Address 35 23 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER 120 MAIN STREET,NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 STEVENS ESTATE Abutters Properties Map Parcel's Name Address 99 1 Douglas Daher 841 Chickering Road,North Andover,MA 01845 100 1 676 Osgood Street Truast 676 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 100 4 Stephen Adiconis 190 Prescott Street,North Andover 100 5 Town of North Andover 120 Main Street,North Andover,MA 01845 100 6 Thomas Rockwell 696 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 100 7 Thomas Rockwell,Jr. P.O.Box 512,North Andover,MA 01845 100 8 Allen Tarro 661 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 100 9 Yuthica Galiney 657 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845 94 3 North Andover High School/TNA 120 Main Street,North Andover,MA 01845 Page 2 of 2 This certifies that the names appearing on the records of the Assessors Office as of -0 Certified b _ Date. -",�.�� T-Mobile Northeast, LLC 15 Commerce Way, Suite B, Norton, MA 02766 Phone: (508) 286-2726 Fax: (508) 286—2899 January 12, 2010 Planning Board Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood St. Bldg. 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Special Permit Renewals—Telecommunication Facilities at: l.) 1st Calvary Baptist Church, 586 Massachusetts Avenue, N. Andover, MA 2.) 4BS0345—Media One Tower, 691 Johnson Street, N. Andover, MA 3.) 4BS0658—Sprint-Stevens Estate Tower 723 Osgood Street, N. Andover, MA Applicant: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC(fka Omnipoint Communications Inc.) Honorable Members of the North Andover Planning Board: Be advised, T-Mobile Northeast, LLC has authorized the firm of Wellman Associates, Inc. to act as our agent in the signing and submission of all required zoning permit applications and documents relevant to the renewal/granting of permits for the above referenced communication facilities. This authorization includes the representation, in association with T-Mobile's legal advisers, Prince Lobel, Glovsky and Tye, LLP, before the North Andover Planning Board and all other agencies having relevant jurisdiction in said granting. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Respectfully, J L - Gerald P. Marquis Real Estate and Zoning Manager New England Regional Cc: Peter Cook Craig Tateronis MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Nfemorandum of Agreement is entered into on this_Uday ofKk-V__ , 20(f by and between Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, with an office'at 6391 Sprint Parkway, Mail stop !,.S P T0 1 0 1-22550,Overland Park,KS 66251-2650,(hereinafter referred to as"Licensor")and Omnipoint Communications, his i Delaware limited liability corporation, with an office at 12924 SE 38"Street,Bellevue,WA 9806(hereinafter referred to as 1. Licensor and Licensee entered into a Site License Agreement("Agreement")on the JV day of 141 Q44 20%V,for the purpose of instatting,operating and maintaining a radio commun cations facility and other improvements.All of the foregoing are set forth in the Agreement. 2. The term of the Agreement is for five(5)years commencing on ,200_ and ending on with four (4) successive five (5) year options to renew. If all options to renew I are exercised,the term of this Agreement will expire twenty-five(25)years after the Commencement Date(as defined in the Agreement). The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. That portion of the Land_ being leased to Licensee("Premises")is described in Exhibit B annexed hereto. IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above LIC'E,NS011: LICENSEE: SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY COMPANY,L.P. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS,INC. /�-Ai A _ [r` By: By: Najue; islichael Procopio Name: Title: 'i'crwer Portfolio Manaser Title: Date: Date: Onmipoint Site Reform 4BS-0658-D Sprint Site Reterence:BS54XC860-02/Sftvm's Estate j t i l STATE OF V t Rpt f4COUNTY OF`rAtMrA04 } )5S. I c.ertii'y that i know or have satisfactory evidence that fftr-OPt0 is the person who appeared before me.. and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the ins'rr.rrrt;nt,and acknowledged it as the 164A*4AWpi e- of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrumem Dated; •`•'S�s 07 1�` Commonwealth of Vlrglnia Natm Pt Notary Pu rc JO"M,C"tM Print Name 1/31/201 My commission expires (Use ibis space for notary stamp/seal) ST PKI E,OF • )s COUP+TY€?F ) j_ [ 2 f certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -,irk- is the person who appeared before me. and said person acknowledged that he/she sighed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the j ria 7)t-r-c,4t rn of to-rn o b:i 2 - to be the free and voluntary act of srtcit party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. a blic Print Name '�- My corntnissicxt expires My Conurission Expires April 11,2014 (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) tlrrruipoint Site Retereace:4BS-U658-U Sprint Site Reference:BS54XC86M/Steven's Estift EXMBff A Legal D esaiptii Mte Pings Site situated in the Town of Nora;Andover,County of Eswx,Couwmwe4tb of Massachusetts,located at 723 Osgood Street and shown on No.Andover's Assessor's Mag No.33 as Pa mel 23,and being more particularly described as fullaws: E i Leval Dcs�t�tcon: A portion of that omrbun parcel of teal property described in an reccrdad with the Essen(North District)Regstry of Deeds at Book 4197,Page 63. Sketch of Site: SEE PLANS/DRAWINGS ATTACHED HERETO)AND INCORPORATED HERON. C I Town Initials AV Tenant Initials^�_ i i { it 't � I � µ EXHIBIT B { ( j R ANTENNAS (BY OTHER I i *( LWA,9 and, - ( na►be MOod PW WOMM0141 0 0 r 6 4 (E) UNIP%E -H M 'n 0 PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE 0 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT SUER. cx a PROPOSED B?S CAGW (TOTAL OF 3) m . w PROPOSED POWER/TELCO 8 CABW (E) EIWPMENT SY- I CARRIERS NOT SHM FOR shevr _ 7 t �, a A 'lltidil.I'lCL' tJ ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY LESSEE/LICENSEE'S STRUCTURAL do RF ENGINEERS. LOCATIONS OF POWER { U TELEPHONE FACILITIES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY f s UTILITY COMPANI PROPOSED BTS CABINET PROPOS@E (TOTAL OF 3) BRIE PROPOSED BATTERY LPEASE RSEGO 9'X22' CABI+NE7 i PROPOSED U/ - - -- — -Hw POWER/ Co -- s -� (E) FENt TO BE REMOVED -,�, SERVICES _ / \ (E) PROPANE TANK PROPOSEI i POWER/TELCO (E) cSC J CABINET (E) MIXTI—c,ANG l4 / � s' WIDE METER BANK *^ Ile I ` r r -- (E) 100' DIPOLE (E) AT&T SHELTER (E) SPRW FENCE STOCKADE (E) GENERATOR 40' i G RF APPROVED: .� _ E� sPECII�AT ��► AAMUTILITY EASEMENTS ASS REt]U1RED BY TELCD AND r ANTENNA AZIMUTHS: POWER Cowmy. SECTOR A= 317 ACCESS EASEMENT TO PUBM WAY AS DETEFUNED BY SECTOR 9= 150 F910 CONDMONS SECTOR C= 270 rnoc,pw FLAN REV. s: 04/27/06 REV. 5: 4/19/06 - No REV. 4: 4/6/44 s 5I TE 485-0658—Dors IPolrn its, mc. SITE TYPE: 40NOP01LE DATE: S, a I r E NAME: SPRINT STEVENS ESTATE GO—LOCATE 12/30'/03 ADDRESS- 723 OSGO©D S7 w N. ANDMER, MA 01845 E45r PW40M 0,02914 DRAWN BY:_OOC SCAM NTS I , f SMI. 4JJ ..ii Federal Communications Commission �3 Page t of 2 t�,t*baa Wireless Telecommunications Bureau f7 Radio Station Authorization LICENSEE NAME: T-Mobile License LLC FCC Registration Number(FRN) DAN MENSER 0001565449 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC 12.920 SE 38TH ST. Cal Sign File Number SELLEVU= WA 98006 KNLF954 0002991471 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Grant Date Effective bate Expiration Date Print Date 06-05-2007 06-05-2007 06-27-2017 06-06-2007 i Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BTA051 0 0 Market Name: Boston, MA 1 st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3M Buld-Out Date 4th Buld-out Date 06-27-2002 SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS This authorization is subject to the condition that, in the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory (Canada/United States), future coordination of any base station transmitters within 72 km (45 miles) of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any 'harmful interference to operations in the ad;acent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. ("Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions" continued on next page ...) Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h)of the Communications Act of 199,as amended,47 U.S.C.Section 309(h),this!cense is subject to the following conditions:This license shall not vest in the license*any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the form thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license not the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C.Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by Section 705 of the Communications Actgff 1934,gis amended, See 47 1.14,C.Section 606. C To view the geographic areas associated with the Beene,go to the Universal Licensing System(ULS)homepage at ht1p:0wireiess.fcc.9ov/uis and select*License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB February 2006 Page 2 of 2 Lcensee Name. r-Mobile License LLC Call Sign He Number Print Dc" KNLF954 0002991471 06-06-2007 Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions This authorization is subject tothecondition that the remaining balance of the winning bid amount will be paid in accordance with Part 1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 1. FCC 601-M$ .�°�_ s 4 lo Iwo- 14 i A"+ty �"g `` k �i.{�`"•„� b E,� �F�uugg�4� ��n�. �r !•'�!�A e�� Y PI t° ilk !� fit, vgt fi l y ; i 3 i X31. 'i" �� icy �1� z `" �¢ 4` � 'i j "fi!. � '���6f B�t �,, � 'it ���z ��y• �� '7 R �y�4ti 1� al a e*+ +E " ! toj " } t 3 a , � ^Rte' Lit jO 723 Osgood Street - Stevens Estate Existing Conditions r 3. r h . (r- u, 34 Hemingway Dram rt„ ADVANCED East PrWWence,RI 02915 Ph:508-342-5339 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.C. Fax:508-342-5303 January 15,2010 Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE:Engineers Inspection Affidavit T Mobile Equipment Installation 723 Osgood Street North Andover,MA T-Mobile Site Reference:4BS0658D(Bufiding Permit No.:86) To Whom it May Concern: In accordance with Section 116 of the Massachusetts State Building Code,on January 14,2010 this office performed an inspection of the T-Mobile equipment installation at the above-referenced location. The purpose of the inspection was to establish compliance of the completed project with with the approved design pians by Coler Colantonio entitled`Sprint Stevens Estate,Site No.:4BS-0658-D,Co-locate/Unipole,dated 11-15-06,Rev 0",and applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Based on the inspection performed,I,Marc Chrefien,licensed professional engineer number 40313,hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge,information and belief,the work has been done in accordance with the approved plans and the provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Very truly yours, OF AN MARC 'U s R. Marc R. Chretien, P.E. CHRETIEN Advanced Engineering Group. P.C. CIVIL H No.40313 49SOOM-CCA t t Donald L. Haes, Jr., Ph.D., CHP Radiation Safety Specialist MA Radiation Control Program Health Physics Services Provider Registration#65-0017 P.O.Box 368,Hudson,NH 03051 Voice:603-303-9959 Fax:603-386-6315 Email:donald—haes—Cbp@myfairpoint.net December 29,2009 Re: T-Mobile personal wireless services antennas mounted on the existing monopole located at 723 Osgood Street in Nortb Andover,MA. PURPOSE I have reviewed information pertinent to the installation at the above location. In order to determine regulatory compliance,actual field measurements of existing ambient radio-fiequency [RF] fields have been obtained The ineasurements included ambient RF fields from all FCC- licensees, and the contribution from T-Mobile only. The physical conditions are that T-Mobile personal wireless services directional panel antennas forth=Federal Communications Commission [FCC]-licensed PCS technologies are mounted on the monopole located at 723 Osgood Street in North Andover, MA (See Figure 1). The measured values of RF field levels are presented as a percent of current Maximum Permissible Exposures [%MPE] as adopted by the FCC 1,2 (With< 100%signifying an acceptable amount). SUMMARY The measured existing ambient RF field levels for all FCC-licensed activities indicate the maximum to be less than one percent of the current State and Federal maximum permissible RF exposure guidelines. The RF field contributions solely from T-Mobile indicate the maximum to be less than one-tenth of one percent of the current State and Federal RF exposure guidelines. These RF measurements are accurate,and meet both FCC and the MDPH guidelines. Based on my extensive experience with personal wireless services facilities, and the RF fields I have measured, it is my expert opinion that the T-Mobile personal wireless services installation complies with FCC RF emission requirements of the 1946 Telecommunications Act,and regulatory guidelines for RF exposure. Note:The professional analyses,conclusions and opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions of this particular site;existing monopole at 723 Osgood Street in North Andover,MA.Utilization of these professional analyses,conclusions and opinions for any personal wireless services installation,existing or proposed,other than the aforementioned have not been sanctioned by the author,and therefore should not be accepted as evidence of regulatory compliance. 3 r yep y C Yp Y w � a,;, # y":yam * N .,, y�r�. r fs� •"� � 3 4T r t y� 7 a. v -44 Figure 1: Monopole located at 723 Osgood Street in North Andover,MA (Picture courtesy Microsoft Virtual Earthy"and may not represent current conditions) RF EXPOSURE LEHM AND GUIDELINES The RF exposure guidelines adopted by the FCC are a combination of the standards published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 3 and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP)4. Also applicable are those published by the MDPH 3. The RF exposure guidelines are divided into two categories:"Controlled/Occupational areas"(those areas restricted to access by RF workers only)and"Uncontrolled/Public Areas"(those areas unrestricted for public access). Listed in Table 1 below are the applicable RF exposure guidelines for uncontrolled areas as they pertain to the operating frequency band of the PWS industry. Table 1:Maximum Permissible Exposure Values for Uncontrolled/Public Areas Frequency Band: Maximum Permissible Exposure: 300- 1500 MHz fl 1.5 in pW/cm2 1500- 100,000 MHz 1000µW/cm2 ' Note: 1 pW=0.000001 Watt 'For equivalent plane-wave power density,where f is the frequency in MHz(I C6 Hz). Page-2- r PERTINENT SECTIONS OF THE TOWN OF North Andover ZONING BYLAWS* §8.9 Wireless Service Facilities (8)Monitoring and Maintenance a)After the facility is in operation,the applicant shall submit to the SPCA,within 90 days of beginning operations and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit,preexistent and current RFR measurements.Such measurements shall be signed and certified by an RF engineer, stating that RER measurements are accurate and are in compliance or why the measurements fail to comply with all applicable FCC Guidelines as specified in Section 8.9(4)(c)(1) RFR Filing Requirements of this Bylaw. The measurements shall be submitted for both the applicant and all co-locators. b)After the wireless service facility is in operation the applicant shall submit to the SPGR;within 90 days of the issuance of the Special Permit,and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit, preexistent and current measurements of acoustic noise from the wireless service facility. Such measurements shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet the Noise Standards sub-section 6.13.14.5 of this Bylaw. c) The applicant and co-applicant or their successor in interest shall maintain the wireless service facility in good condition.Such maintenance shall include,but shall not be limited to,painting,structural integrity of the mount and security barrier and maintenance of the buffer and landscaping. d)Failure to obtain the information required in this subsection 8.9(8)of the Bylaw shall result in a fine of not more than$300 dollars for each offense.Each day that such violation continues shall constitute a separate,offense. * ZONING BYLAW,TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Page-3- MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL RFeld measurements urements were obtained on December 26, 2009, using accepted scientific procedures.s•6 The temperature was 37°F with overcast skies. The measuring equipment included a Narda model SRM-300 Electromagnetic Radiation Meter/Spectrum Analyzer with model 3AX 75M-3G Broadband Isotropic Probe. The instrumentation can provide a meter reed-out in%MPE (percent FCC 1997 Maximum Permissible Exposure)for members of the general public within the frequency band from 75 MHz to 3 GHz. The readings can be obtained in two different modes: (1) A "Safety Analysis" mode, where the total RF field can be examined within each frequency band licensed by the FCC(88 MHz to 3 GHz)',along with the total of the entire band 75 MHz to 3 GHz. The inti mre ntation provides a meter rear-out in percent FCC 1997 Maximum Permissible Exposure for members of the general public. This "Safety Analysis" mode was used to obtain the RF field values representing the "current RFR measurements"as outlined in§ 8.9 fta)of the Zoning Bylaw,Town of North Andover. See results,Table 2. (2)A"Spectrum Analysis"mock,where the total RF field can be examined with a visual representation of the spectrum and the value of each peak identified by frequency. In this manner, information regarding the contributions from T-Mobile only can be obtained by examining the RF field values within the FCC-licensed frequencies (both PCS bands) operated at the site by T-Mobile. When this value is subtracted from the total RF field values obtained in the "Safety Analysis" mode, the resultant value then represents the RF field values absent of T-Mobile;and represent the"preexistent RFR measurements"as outlined in§ 8.9(8)(a)of the Zoning Bylaw,Town of North Andover. See results,Table 3. The RF field measurements were obtained during normal use of the existing transmitters at the various locations(See Figure 3). The results within each band are listed in Tables 2 and 3 for the"current RFR measurements"and"preexistent RFR measurements",respectively. Page-4- ijr R : WF- or N 1 • a d ,� rr r. I » ., 5 • v v 0 4 , s z r 41 , � r '•s 1` IL 411 2 t F= Figure 3: Locations of RF Field Measurements 723 Osgood Street Surrounding Area in North Andover,MA Page-5- RESULTS Table 2:Results of RF Field Measurements Representing the"Current RFR Measurements" 723 Osgood Street and Surrounding Area,North Andover,MA Location Number Percent Public Maximum Permissible (See Figure 3) Exposure(%MPE)* 1 0.38 % 2 0.349% 3 0.105% 4 0374% 5 0-w% 6 0.233% 7 0.261% 8 0.295% 9 0.258% 10 0.279% *Total,75 MHz•3 GHz:%MPE Members of the Public Page-6- Table 3:Results of RF Field Measurements Representing the-Preexisting RFR Measurements" 723 Osgood Street and Surrounding Area,North Andover,MA Column 2 minus Total Percent Public Column 3; Total Contributions Location Number Maximum Representing from T Mobile Only; (See Figure 3) Permissible Exposure (%MPE) - Preexisting RFR (%A4PE)* Measurements" %WE 1 0.388% 0.056% 0.332%® 2 0.3490/9 0.062% 0.287%a 3 0.105% 0.046% 0.059% 4 0.374% 0.024% 0.350% 5 0.307% 0.020% 0.287% 6 0.233% 0.028% 0.205% 7 0.261% 0.026% 0.235%® 8 0.295% 0.0I7% 0.277% 9 0.258% 0.011% 0.247% 10 0.279% 0.007%e 0.272% * Total,75 MHz-3 GHz:%WE Representing the"Cuffent RFR Measurements";Table 2 Page-7- CONCLUSION The measured existing ambient RF field levels for all FCC-licensed activities indicate the maximum to be less than one percent of the current State and Federal maximum permissible RF exposure guidelines. The RF field contributions solely from T-Mobile indicate the maximum to be less than one-tenth of one percent of the current State and Federal RF exposure guidelines. These RF measurements are accurate,and meet both FCC and the MDPH guidelines. Based on my extensive experience with personal wireless services facilities, and the RF fields I have measured, it is my expert opinion that the T-Mobile personal wireless services installation complies with FCC RF emission requirements ofthe 1996 Telecommunications Act,and regulatory guidelines for RF exposure. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Donald L.Haes,Jr.,A.D Certified Health Physicist Note:The professional analyses,conclusions and opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions of this particular site;existing monopole at 723 Osgood Street is Nortb Andover,MA.Utilization of these professional analyses,conclusions and opinions for any personal wireless services installation,existing or proposed,other than the aforementioned have not been sanctioned by the author,and therefore should not be accepted as evidence of regulatory compliance. Page-8- Donald L. Haes, A, Ph.D., CHP Radiation Safety Specialist MA Radiation Control Program Health Physics Services Provider Registration#65-0017 P.O.Box 368,Hudson,MA 03051 Voice:603-303-9959 Fax:603-386-6315 Email:donald—haes_chp@myfairpoint.net STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION 1. I certify to the best of my knowledge and belies;the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. 3. 1 have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 4. My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined energy level or direction in energy level that favors the cause of the client, the amount of energy level estimate,the attainment of a stipulated result,or the occurrence of a subsequent event. 5. This assignment was not based on a requested minimum environmental energy level or specific power density. 6. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions,or conclusions in,or the use of this report. 7. The consultant has accepted this assessment assignment having the knowledge and experience necessary to complete the assignment competently. 8. My analyses,opinions,and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the American Board of Health Physics[ABHP] statement of standards of professional responsibility for Certified Health Physicist. December 29,2009 Donald L.Haes,Jr.,y .D Date Certified Health Ph Physicist Page-9- ENDNOTES 1 . Federal Register,Federal Communications Commission Rules;Radiofrequency radiation; environmental effects evaluation guidelines Volume 1,No. 153,41006-41199,August 7, 1996. [47 CFR Part 1;Federal Communications Commission]. 2 . Telecommunications Act of 19%,47 USC; Second Session of the 104"'Congress of the United States of America,January 3, 1996. 3.ANSM EEE C95.1-1999:American National Standard,Safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields,from 3 KHz to 300 GHz(Updated in 2005). 4 .National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements(NCRP);Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,NCRP Report 86, 1986. 5. ANSVWEE C95.3-2002:American National Standard,Recommended Practice far the Measurement of Potential Electromagnetic Fields-RF and Microwave. 6. NCRP Report No. 119:National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1993; A Practical Guide to the Determination of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields. 7 . FCC Licensee Lower Band(MHz) User Band(MHz) FM Radio 88 108 Paging 152 159 TV Ch. 7-13 174 216 TV Ch. 14-69 470 806 SMR Transmit 806 821 Private Land Mobile 821 824 Cellular AMPS 824 849 ESMRILand Mobile 849 869 Cellular AMPS 869 894 Aeronautical Mobile 894 896 Private Land Mobile 8% 901 PCS Narrowband 901 902 Land Mobile&Armature(Ham) 902 930 PCS Narrowband 930 931 Paging 931 932 PCS Narrowband 940 941 Public Land Mobile 941 960 PCS Broadband 1,850 2,500 Page-10- odeling Specialties fiW x rrA*MYY-A& Doug She" 0,.GCM 30 Map*Road Westford,MA O1S88 f j'- ". (978)392-5817 '-+ "7 Rs: (978)392.5818 eatwl;cKhaidel�r'!todipeC:Can January 13,2010 The Town of North Andover,Massachusetts RE: Environmental Sound Assessment—T-Mobile Wireless Communication Equipment Stevens Estate T-Mobile Wireless operates wireless communication equipment in the Stevens Estate,located at 723 Osgood Street in North Andover. Modeling Specialties, an environmental consulting firm located in Westford,Massachusetts, has conducted an assessment of environmental sound that results from the operation of the communication equipment of T-Mobile USA,Inc.who commissioned this study. T- Mobile provided the site details and access necessary to identify their equipment and evaluate its sound emissions. The purpose of this letter is to describe the equipment and the results of the survey. The communication equipment inches antennae located on the unipole, two installed BTS equipment cabinets, and a cable tray to connect the equipment. There are also two existing equipment shelters with HVAC condensers controlled by other carriers,AT&T and Sprint. However, because the partial operation of the shelter HVAC was intermittent,it was possible to exclude it from the study. In this way,this assessment is limited to the T-Mobile equipment. Orientation views of the site area and equipment are provided in Figures 1 through 4. A site visit was conducted on Tuesday January 12, 2010 to evaluate the equipment sound The site evaluation was requested to determine whether the equipment meets the requirements of Town of North Andover bylaw. Section 8.9.4(e) addresses environmental standards for wireless service facilities, including sound generated by the facility equipment. Section 8.9.4(e)(iv) provides that, "Ground-mounted equipment for wireless service facilities shall not generate acoustic noise in excess of 50 dB at the security barrier." The sound level measurement convention is used in this study, whereby "ground level' is taken to be 5 feet above the ground, representing the ears of a standing person. It is the purpose of this report to address these requirements. There is a generator installed at the site which is operated by others. The site survey took place at a time when there was no generator operation. There was, however, one shelter mounted HVAC unit which occasionally cycled on its heating fan. The only source of sound at the site with a continuous character was the T-Mobile BTS equipment cabinets. This evaluation is based on these T-Mobile sound emissions. There is no sound associated with the antennas or cabling. Compliance sound level measurements were made at the security fence line at various points surrounding the facility. Detailed measurements included various statistical metrics and 1/3 octave band frequency analysis. However, the results are limited to combined A-weighted levels consistent with the By Law requirements. During the equipment activity, it was not possible to distinguish its sound from other sources of continuous ambient sound such as distant traffic along I-495. But even though the measurements include sound from ambient sources, they still meet the requirement at the facility. During these times,the T-Mobile equipment was the dominant source of sound at the security fence line. The T- Mobile equipment produced sound levels below the criterion at all locations. The measured sound levels of are shown in Table 1 and graphically in Figure 3. Table 1: Measured Ground Level Sound Levels in the Site Area Measurement 12:80 AM,1/12/10 Dominant Location d$ Sources Observed East Gate(only T-Mobile) 44 T-Mobile BTS cabinets, distant traffic and I-495 North Fence Line 48 Dominant T-Mobile BTS cabinets West Fence Line at BTS 48 Dominant T-Mobile BTS cabinets South Fence Line 41 T-Mobile BTS cabinets over distant I-495 sounds Conclusion:T-Mobile equipment meets By Law Standards There is one section of the fence was damaged and open directly behind BTS equipment cabinets. When measured right at this opening,several feet from the equipment,the sound level reached 57 dB. When measured from a similar distance at a closed fence, the sound level remained below 50 dB, While the design of the facility is confirmed to meet the North Andover requirements, the survey notes the need for maintenance on two small sections of the fence that were apparently damaged by limbs dropping from nearby trees. These measurements were made using a Rion NA-28 sound level meter that meets the requirements of ANSI SIA Type I —Precision specification for sound level meters. The meter was mounted on a tripod approximately 5 feet above the ground. The microphone was fitted with the factory recommended 3-inch foam windscreen. The meter was programmed to take measurements and store the processed statistical data. The statistical levels were documented for use in this analysis. Various statistical metrics were collected, but the A-weighted L90 is presented to represent the background sound level that includes the continuous sound from the BTS equipment cabinets. I certify that the analysis of sound levels is accurate and consistent with methods that are common to the acoustic analysis of such sources and as described in this statement. I am qualified to make this statement based on training and experience in conducting analyses of environmental sounds. I am a Certified Consulting Meteorologist with more than 20 years experience conducting environmental analyses in the technical areas of air quality,noise, and visual aesthetics. I am a technical expert on the noise committee of Air & Waste Management Association headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I have published many refereed papers on various aspects of environmental noise. I have analyzed the noise emissions of major industrial projects such as power plants, wastewater treatment plants and manufacturing facilities. Related to these analyses,I have testified as a technical expert before the Energy Facility Siting Boards of Massachusetts and Rhode Island. I have also testified before many regional and municipal approval boards in Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Maine, New York, Michigan, Illinois, California and Massachusetts, including before the Planning Board and ZBA of North Andover. Thank you for your attention. Respectfully, Modeling Specialties Dou as . Sh 1 C L eade CCM Principal IMP �+. _°,, Ak ! + el s ` �r N .x t A. }} A g 4 !A x "t Y ! c y,} y y, F ems} st - # � 4 Ar '4 � �tl AL Figure 1: Aerial Image of Site Area Showing the Distant Community Locations . F r y, s: i 3 i Figure Z: Site Iinage of Compound Showing only the Unipole and the Top of Shelters over an 8 ft Stockade Fence 8 ft Stockade f=ence 48 -Mob qui abs Propane Tank '} (Others) CSG Cab4t*t s •- Power 100' Unpole ,� G AT&T ate Equipment Shelter Sprint Generator Equipment (©thers) j Shelter Graphic Scale Feet o ao Sift Stock encs � Figure 3: Detail of T-Mobile Ground Mounted.Equipment in the Context of Other Site Equipment and Sound Levels I II 's I I .c � I V _ tl 4 III 9 IIsi' � p II I; M x? s s y. �r Figure 4: Field Image of the Two T-Mobile BTS Cabinets(Right) s ,� � � ,�"� -Its � �!'. ,•`w�-, s. r _w .g i 7777 01 The z } 4aefl1(J4KaDWI1 Ctitl�+°�1}'i'.fi�iyr+�"kkE4' i i �' r; 3E!'tu-t-�"3r't ~t�~att�.�si'."EC •#$". -t���, -1B"aQ �F , A"',44,Cot +�,weakm „r err SIR, Boxford 4bilo J iF , 1103-12 m n 1Et.rtt IlvFs 4[bE,4itl f. 1! a6o EG15+JA a ,a miles ? v �. AFFIDAVIT Of RMIQ FREQUENCY EXPERT The undersigned,hereby states the following in support of the renewal application of Omnipoint Communications, Inc.a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA,Inc. (hereinafter referred to as"T-Mobile")for existing wireless communications facility consisting of a three(3)panel antennas,and appurtenant radio equipment at the property located at 723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845(the"Wireless Communications Facility'): 1. I am a Radio Frequency Engineer employed by T-Mobile USA, Inc.responsible for radio network design in Massachusetts. 2. The list of my qualifications attached to this affidavit is true, accurate,and complete in all material respects. 3. As enabled under its Federal Communications Commission(FCC)license T-Mobile seeks to design its wireless network in order to provide reliable wireless services to its customers, whether those customers are on the street,in a vehicle,or in a building. Providing reliable service to its customers in each context is critical for T-Mobile to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand, and to meet the objectives of Congress that a robust,competitive and low cost wireless communication capacity be developed to serve the entire nation. 4. I have thoroughly reviewed the radio frequency engineering studies,reports, and computer model prepared by T-Mobile with respect to the subject wireless communications facility. I used a propagation modeling software by Aircom named Asset. This software calculates frequency strength over distance taking into account geographical,and topographical land features and other contributors to signal loss. Finally, this calculation has also been adjusted by empirical data obtained from field measurement. 5. In order to meet its obligations under the radio license T-Mobile must have in place a network of base station antennae facilities to serve portable wireless communication devices and mobile telephones.These facilities consist of antennas mounted on a pole,building,or other structures that are connected by cables to a small equipment cabinet located near the antenna.These antennas transmit voice and data to subscribers within a defined area of coverage.Likewise,the antenna receives the radio signal from mobile transmitters(such as telephones)which then goes to equipment located in the cabinet and to ordinary phone lines from which the transmission may be routed anywhere in the world. 1/3 6. Wireless antenna facilities are integral to T-Mobile's network. Each facility, servicing only a limited area,must be carefully located so that it can properly interact with surrounding facilities.To maintain reliable and-uninterrupted service to a wireless telephone user living and/or traveling in a given area serviced by multiple antenna facilities,there must be a continuous interconnected series of facilities,which in-part overlap in a grid or"cellular"pattern. 7. In compliance with its FCC license,T-Mobile is actively building its PCS network to provide service in Massachusetts. In order to meet its goal of providing reliable, seamless and uninterrupted service T-Mobile must continue to acquire interest in property for additional facilities,and is applying for and obtaining local governmental approvals to construct the facilities in order to eliminate gaps in reliable service coverage. Any delay at this point in time severely curtails T-Mobile's ability to achieve a market position that will allow it to compete for customers,which is in the public interest. 8. Using precise computer prediction model and following a thorough review of the RF engineering studies and reports prepared by T-Mobile it is determined that existing facility in proximity to Osgood Rd, and SR133/SR125 in the Town of North Andover is critical to the overall engineering and technical plan for T-Mobile's network. 9. Without existing wireless transmission facility located at or near this location, a significant area of inadequate,unreliable coverage will be added in T-Mobile's wireless network in the vicinity of the existing installation. This lack of service area or"gap"in coverage would adversely impact the service T-Mobile is able to provide to businesses and residents of Chadwick St, as well as travelers along SR133/SR125, Great Pond Rd,and other primary roads through and around the Town of North Andover. 10.The result of such a"gap"will be an inability for the T-Mobile customer to reliably initiate,receive,or maintain voice and data connections, including 911 emergency calls,from the time that subscriber leaves the service area until that subscriber reaches that point where a quality signal is available to reinitiate the communication link. 11. All existing wireless communications equipment will continue to be maintained and operate in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations, including,but not limited to: the radio frequency emissions regulations set forth in the 1996 Federal Communications Act, applicable regulations administered by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA),Federal Communications Commission (FCC),Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission and the Massachusetts Department of Health.All equipment is authorized b the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the �l p Y g Environmental effects of Radio Frequency Emissions.The radio frequency exposure levels generated by the proposed facility are substantially below the maximum allowable health and safety standards established by the FCC. In addition,existing 2/3 equipment and transmission characteristics are in compliance with standards set forth by the American National Standards Institute(ANSI)and the National Council of Radiation Protection(NCRP). Based upon the best radio frequency technology that is available to T-Mobile at this time, it is my professional opinion that the proposed project is necessary to ensure adequate PCS service to area residents and businesses in accordance with system specifications. Signed under the penalties of perjury this 25th day of January,2010. a r tiGf + it Shaikh`shake'Mahmood,RF Engineer Mobile tSA.,INC. 15 Commerce Way, Suite B Norton,MA, 02766 (508)286-2770 Shaikh.Mahmood@T-Mobile.com 3/3 OKMPOMT COMMUMCA110NS INC. . - A'MOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF T-MOBILE USA,INC. - ®75OMIERCAAY.SUI B NORTON, 766 100 TLLEY SWEET . BOF iOCpd{:11,CT 906 00 . FAR• (860}692-7159 COL.ER 6 COL AN TON 10 a SPRINTSTEVENSSTATE A� NIBTS S 55 Bobda Road Hdsokb MA 01040 (4133)313-0700 723 OSGOOD STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NUMBER - 4BS - 0658 - D tN OF R, 3 LLY N SITE TYPE: COLOCATE / UNIPOLE I IM N= APPROVALS LANDLORD LEASING R.F. GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX PROJECT SUMMARY ZONING 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT4 { SHT. REV,. CONSTRUCTION _ WITH ALL LAWS,ORDINANCES,RULES,REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL DESCRIBED HEREIN.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY �f u. DESCRIPTION. SITE NUMBER: . 4BS-0658-D ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY,MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY RESPONSIBLEFORALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS.METHODS. � �. � NO. NO. A/E COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS,AND LOCAL AND STATE TECHNIQUES,SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND.FOR JURISDICOONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE T-1 TITLE SHEET 0 SITE NAME: SPRINT STEVENS ESTATE WORK,THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE CONTRACT.. MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL, BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS,AND ORDINANCES. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROWDINC o:{ &� .. 5. SITE ADDRESS: 723 OSGOOD STREET PROJECT NO: 17-3263 ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION CONTROL SURVEYS,ESTABLISHING '� t .QS A-1 PLOT PLAN & NOTES 0 NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 2. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET AND MAINTAINING ALL UNES AND GRADES REQUIRED TO - .DRAWN BY: BDJ FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTON AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE CONSTRUCT ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREIN. COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK.THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING THE y' t z ASSESSOR'S MAP-&LOT :. MAP: 35; LOT 23 JOB IS NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGf 'R A-2 PARTIAL SITE PLAN, ELEVATION O ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SWILL NOT ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ' CHECKED BY: KK/TEJ IXQUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROTECT THE WORK BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER,THESTATE,COUNTY OR � x/'w ;� & DETAILS ZONING DISTRICT: RESIDENTIAL-i' AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY. THESE DOCUMENTS. - .: i. ''I �W - SUBMITTALS 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO CONSTRUCTION TYPE: COLOCATE/UNIPOLE 3. THE CONTRACTOR OR BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE PROTECT VC(STING IMPROVEMENTS,EASEMENTS,PAYING,CURBING, S-1 STRUCTURAL NOTES, SECTIONS 0 RESPONSISIUTY OF NOTIFYING(IN WRITING)THE LESEE/LICENSEE ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION,UPON COMPLETION OF WORK,THE - ;t REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY CONFLICTS,ERRORS,OR OMISSIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE & DETAILS STRUCTURE OWNER: SPRINT PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL OR OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 535 EAST CRESENT AVENUE PERFORMANCE OF WORK.IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES THEx�*"' h w• SUITE 625 CONTRACTOR SHAD.PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR.EXTENSIVE .. °O'er•`: RAMSEY;NJ WORK,UNLESS DIRECTED IN WRITING OTHERWISE. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA �j, : E-1 ELECTRICAL& GROUNDING NOTES, RISERS 0 CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE 4. THE SCOPE OF WORK-SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL OF ALL DIRT,DEBRIS,RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT - }(.: & DETAILS PROPERTY OWNER: TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY.PREMISES SHALL BE /s >: t MAIN STREET 0 11/15/06 CONSTRUCTION LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROTECT LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS,DUST, NORTH.ANDOVER,MA 01845 AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION,DESIGN. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA SCALE: 1°=1500' PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED YORK OF 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO THE APPLICANT, OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS,INC.ANY SUBMISSION OF BIDS OR PERFORMING WORK TO FAMILIARIZE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT O(PRESS HIMSELF WITH THE FIELD CONDITIONS AND TO VERIFY THAT THE LESSEEAICENSEE& 15 COMMERCE WAY, SUITE B WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PROJECT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PROJECT OWNER'S FA Ll PROJECT OWNER: NORTON, MA 02766 DUPLICATION AND 115E BY GOVERNMENT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. REPRESENTATIVE WHERE A CONFLICT OCCURS ON ANY OF THE AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO ORDER 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED MATERIAL OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK THAT IS IN CONDUCTING THEIR!AWFULLY AUTHORIZED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM CONFUCT UNTIL CONFLICT IS RESOLVED BY THE PROIS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWEJECT REGULATORY AND ALLOWED. FUNCTIONS D. NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/ OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 46S-0658—D 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND ELEVATIONS, PROPERTY LINES,ETC.ON THE JOB. MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S/VENDOR'S 17. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION WAS DETERMINED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS SPRINT STEVENS CODESSPECIFICATIONSORRORDINANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL FROM SURFACE INVESTIGATIONS AND EXISTING PLANS OF RECORD, CODES RDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING FY THE PRO 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A FULL SET OF THE FIELD PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK.CALL THE FOLLOWING FOR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AT THE SITE UPDATED WITH THE ALL PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION 72-HOURS PRIOR TO ANY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL 723 OSGOOD STREET LATEST REVISIONS AND ADDENDUMS OR CLARIFICATIONS EXCAVATION ACTIVITY:DIG SAFE SYSTEM(MA ME,NH,RI,VT): PROJECT OWNER'S REPRESENORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 AVAILABLE FOR THE USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH 1-886-344-7233 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG(CT): 1-800-922-4455 OF IMMEDIATELY NOOTITIFY2EPAN PRO BEFORE PROCEEDING E TH THE THE PROJECT. WORK OR'8E RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME: TITLE SHEET sHWWMBO T- 1 s M:74 P:20 ABUTTER - OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS,INC. P:6 M:35 PROPERTY NOTES: ABBRk1fIATIONS A WHOLLY-MWD SUBMIARY OF . mM:7y� Q M:35 P:44 LINE,TYP. 1, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION T-MOBILE USA,NO P:5 _S, P:50 CONTROL SURVEYS AND MAINTAINING ALL UNES AND GRADES REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT 15 COMMERCE WAY STATE B ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREIN, 0 NORTON,MA WETS 2 ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN THUS 1 ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY 286-700 .. M:74 GG 1141 `\ ALL DIMENSIONS TO AND VERIFY ELEVATIONS VAALL DIMENSIONSHIGH EFFECT THE HECT CONTRACTORS OWNER PRRS WORK. . AD.1 ADJUSTABLE MTL METAL FA%:100 fl.^'°r''W8 P:2 8 D ' `3B� A'i8 \)s, .LAKE. COCHICHEWIC LUEY STREET CONSTRUCTION. AGI. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL . NIC NOT IN CONTRACT C3 SCO EMFIE(L��8 2 . 3 NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON PLANS REFERS TO APPROXIMATE TRUE NORTH. PRIOR TO APPROX APPROXIMATE NTS MOTTO SCALE fAX: {860)-892-7159 \ THE START OF CONSTRUCTION,ORDERING OR FABRICATING OF ANTENNA MOUNTS, / \ CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH PROJECT-OWNER'S RF ENGINEER AND FIELD VERIFY ARL ABOVE ROOF LEVEL GC ON CENTER ALL ANTENNA SECTOR LOCATIONS AND ANTENNA AZIMUTHS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR AND OR HIS SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR C. CONDUIT OPP OPPOSITE COLER R. OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE WORK BY THE ARCBTECT/ENGINEER,THE STATE. COUNTY OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONC CONCRETE (P) PROPOSED COLAN TON 10 1L 0 1 \♦ AUTHORITY. CONT CONTINUOUS SF SQUARE FOOT ENGINEERS AND SM IM �. S. ANTENNA INSTALLATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY FIELD CREWS EXPENENCEO IN THE ASSEMBLY AND ERECTION OF RADIO ANTENNAS TRANSMISSION LINES AND SUPPORT CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT SHT SHEET 55 SoEoia Road LOCUS \ STRUCTURES Hot q MA 01040 PROPERTY 6. COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTORS AND TRANSMITTER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY DIA DIAMETER SM SIMILAR (41313-0100 LINE, TYP. ��__ THE PROJECT OWNER AND IS NOT INCLUDED IN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS,A - 1 SCHEDULE OF PROJECT OWNER SUPPLIED MATERIALS IS ATTACHED TO THE BD DWG DRAWING SEL STEEL DOCUMENTS(SEE EXHIBIT 3).ALL OTHER HARDWARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE \ CONTRACTOR.CONNECTION HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL EGB EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR TOC TOP OF CONCRETE M:74 ` ♦��� \ 7. WHEN"PAINT TO MATCH"IS SPECIFIED FOR ANTENNA CONCEALMENT,PAINT PRODUCT FOR ANTENNA RADOME SMALL BE SHERWIN YAWAMS COR07HANE E SURFACE EA EACH TOM TOP OF MASONRY P:3 3\ 1 PREPARATION AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ELEC ELECTRICAL TYP TYPICAL MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT OWNER'S GUIDELINE'S. \ LOCUS: EL ELEVATION VIF VERIFY IN MELD & COORDINATION,LAYOUT,AND FURNISHING OF CONDUIT,CABLE AND ALL ,A \ 723 OSGOOD STREET APPURTENANCES REWIRED FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL AND EO EQUAL UON UNLESS OTHERWISE . TELECOMMUNICA71 N SERVICE SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARCEL:23 CONTRACTOR EQUIP EQUIPMENT NOTED yJ 6,671,200 SFt 9.ALLUITILITY SSD ALLSPEBE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL.UTILITY COMPANY WWELDED WERE FABRIC WOF 023' 1Q ALL(E)ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,EE AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE (E) EXISTING W/ WITH EL ED 1BPRO CTED AT ALL TIMES, S \ ` 7TRE PROBER EXECUTION OF THEYXAbI,SNALLBE REQUIREDR RELOCATED AS ENOWINTEEXT EXTERIOR j LE v1 BTS BASE TRANSMISSION 9 DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR FF FINISHED FLOOR STATION \ WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR M:74 ` SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. FG FINISHED GRADE. LNA LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER Fgq Pil5 11.ALL(E)INACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES,WHICH INTERFERE GA GAUGE PCS PERSONAL WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK.SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED,PLUGGED COMMUNICATIONS OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE GALV GALVANIZED SERVICES L *^ \ EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS 0 M:74 �. �m \ ENGINEERING. GC .GENERAL CONTRACTOR A-2 ANTENNA MARK N0. P,7 \ 12. THE AREAS OF THE PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE LG LONG PL PLATE \\\ EQUIPMENT.DRIVEWAY OR GRAVEL.SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE FERTILIZED,SEEDED AND COVERED WI7H MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MAX MAXIMUM k AND 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION -LANDLORD \ CONTROLS AT ALL TIMES WRING CONSTRUCTION. MECH MECHANICAL ® AT 14. PER FCC MANDATE,ENHANCED EMERGENCY(Egli)SERVICE IS REQUIRED TO MEET MFR MANUFACTURER LEASING L..-._f NATIONWIDE STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS PROJECT OWNER'S - 300'FACILITY IMPLEMENTATION REQUIRES DEPLOYMENT OF EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS GENERALLY MG8 MASTER GROUND BAR R.F. OFFSET DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN;ATTACHED TO OR MOUNTED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CHAONpC,�ST 1 (P)9 0x22'-0" BTS RADIO CABINETS PROJECT OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE REASONABLE MIN MINIMUM ZONING LEASE AREA,SEE MODIFICATIONS TO E911 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS TECHNOLOGY EVOLVES TO MEET 1 REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. 1 PARTIAL SITE PLAN / CONSTRUCTION M: - / - SYMBOLS AND MATERIALS A/E M: ° 1 883'* / \ ern INS / PROJECT NO: 17-3263 M:91 1 (BTS). GROUT OR PLASTER P:4 I NEW ANTENNA M:35 �. 'b-' P:24 g EXISTING ANTENNAS C===== (E)eRlac DRAWN BY: BDJ //� V5y \♦\ ASPHALT (E)MASONRY FCIH�S 10 VADE{� EASEMENT W TY i� \ / - M:35 NEW ACCESS EASEIdfNT = ��ETE CHECKED BY: KK/TEJ weuoROW To ` �e P:33 CONCRETE EARTH SUBMITTALS M:91 1 FOLLOW(E)OH P:3 VTIL111E$ \� R / ELECTRIC BOX GRAVEL Q ` �STR/ M:35 P:25 ❑e P. "•H7AZ� h1� IplVl D TIA�T LIGHT POLE PLYWOOD 0lg7RlC 2 Yom.„� .' SAND A� .91 \ -�` ® FN0.MONUMENT ® WOOD CONT. SPOT ELEVATION ' P:36 ® SET PONT ® woo0 BLOCKING 0 11/15/06 CONSTRUCTION - ' pp0 ® REVISION STEEL THIS..DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION.DESIGN, to,V40E ACCESS PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF M:l I I PUBLIC ROW TO \ DUNDUPLPODIT COR USE WITKO INC.ANY \ GRID REFERENCE CENTER.LINE P:1 ♦ I AUT EXPRESS OCCESS LLOW DRIVE �6 WRITENnCONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. \ M:38 DETAIL REFERENCE PROPERTY LINE DUPUCATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT M:100 W P:32 - AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF P:4 %/ P:46 ^ IS SPECIFIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS vs--.r. STEPPED O0� O0 \ � ELEVATION MATCH UNE IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. upTT 5t O ` WORK PONT —G— GROUND w1RE 4BS-0658-D /// SH 1�JJJ SPRINT STEVENS P:7 O \ SECTIONS&DETAILS COAXIAL CABLE ESTATE M:35 10o P.26 723 OSGOOD STREET P:6. NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 ANTENNA ORIENTATION KEY ® PLOT PLAN SETBACK SUMMARY TABLE SHEET TITLE N SCALE: 1"=200'-O' A-i ZONING DISTRICT: RESIDENTIAL-1 TOWER LOCATION /t PLOT PLAN & GRAPHIC SCALE ASSESSORS MAP:35 LOT: 23 LAT: 42'42' 28.56" f(�i SECTOR A NOTES 700 100 0 200 400 (P)USE: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY LONG: 71'06'51.03" 30' DIMENSION: REQUIRED MINIMUM j PROVIDED BTS FRONT YARD SETBACK 30' 883'1 SECTOR C SHEET NUMBER PLOT PIAN NOTEc: 270' 1)PLOT PLAN BASED ON INFORMATION COMPILED FROM TOWN BTS SIDE YARD SETBACK 30'30' 1670'1 1670' OF NORTH ANDOVER REAL ESTATE LOT MAPS. - SECTOR B 2)FACILITY IS LOCATED VATHIN THE RESIDENTIAL-1 DISTRICT. BTS REAR YARD SETBACK 150• A- 1 - 1 OMNPOINT COMMUNICATION$INC. A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF T-MOBLE USA.NG 22'-0" 15 COMMERCE WAY SUITE B NORTON,MA yOg"27�2✓667 (P)BTS EQUIPMENT (P)BBU CABINET _1V_2 OFA� 1 X: (WBJ-286- 100 FILM STREET CABINET AND BLOOMFELD.CT'08002 (P)9'x22' BATTERY BASE UNIT 1 2 3 p DIM- (H)_=710DO � EQUIPMENT 1 1 (P)ICE BRIDGE FAX: 880 (EASE AREA (TOTAL OF 3) a (E)ANTENNAS(BY TOP OF(E)UNIPOLE OTHER,CARRIERS) - - a E3 E3 (P)e•wcNi COLER 6 _ STOCKADE FENCE POWER/TELCO SERVICE 3 91 COQ AN TON IO 1 4 \ VMZIRL AND 8404116111 E PROPANE 58 Bobola ROM (E)CSC CABINET \ TANK O 3'X10' ;II¢ HOHyok%MA 01040 i E / CONCRETE PAD o I TOP OF(P)PANEL ANTENNAS(TOTAL 3 (413)313-0100 j, AVERAGE TREE CANOPY I? OF 3.CONCEALED WITHIN UNIPOLE E 12'WIDE (E)FENCE TO BE �sEcroR A a • GRAVEL DRIVE REMOVED 30• ' CABINET— SECURED A L R DTOBACK _ e OF(P)METER BANK I EXTENSION 10 / {!I+' SECTOR C \ -/I I I \ / "yN OF.xq (E)MULTI-GANG \ (P)10'WIDE ACCESS _ vi METER BANK TOEASEMENT TO TOP(P)E9i`_—_ i 1 BE EXTENDED TO PUBLIC R.O.W. TO 4 GPS/GSM ANTENNAS i N ACCOMMODATE(P) SECTOR a FOLLOW(E)DRIVE -H METER- (E)AT&T 150' e.I i (P)ICE BRIDGE o EQUIPMENT I OVAL SHELTER (E)CSC CABINET 4 o 5 (E)MULTI-GANG APPROVALS (P)E911 GPS/GSM—METER BANK TO BE 541 ANTENNAS iII EXTENDED TO B ro MECOMMODATE(P) TER 8 (E)8'HIGH - (E)SPRINT � I P PPC CABINET STOCKADE FENCE LANDLORD (E)100'HIGH EQUIPMENT - ! ( ) UNIPOLE SHELTER-. - .. I�I(E)AT&T SECURED TO BACK 8 II!j OF(P)METER BANK 1 LEASING A ¢ EQUIPMENT SHELTER (III EXTENSION R.F. o ; I II! (P)INE EQUIPMENTt ZONING (E) GENERATOR CABINET AND ON 4'x7' (E)SPRINT EQUIPMENT tBATTERY BASE UNIT CONCRETE PAD I. (TOTAL OF 3) CONSTRUCTION _ SHELTER. I Ili 40'-0" � (P)BBU CABINET p�E "II (£)GENERATOR N 4•x7 N CONCRETE PAD III STOCKADE FENCE 41 © I ! PROJECT NO: 17-3263 PARTIAL SITE PLAN I' SCALE:1"=5,—Q A_2 is i! GRAPHIC SCALE _- (E)PROPANE TANK N DRAWN BY: BDJ 8 bo B 10 SFORLYO.NOTHOWNCARITCHECKED BY: KK/TEJ SPECIALLANDLORD NO L (P) , . O POWER/ 3 9 FOR THLESSEEE(PURPOSES OCENSEE F DETERMINING TOWER/MONOPOLE ANTENNAS ARE IC TED TELCO SERVICE 1 SUBMITTALS STRUCTURAL CAPACITY,OBTAINING ZONING APPROVALS AND ELEVATION BUILDING PERMITS.SUBSEQUENT ENDORSEMENT OR 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF THIS DRAWING BY THE TOWER OWNER IS NOT SCALE:1"=10'-Os A-2 TO BE CONSTRUED AS PERMISSION OR APPROVAL TO INSTALL "FUTURE"ANTENNAS THAT EXCEED"PROPOSED"OR ACTUAL GRAPHIC SCALE EQUIPMENT LISTED IN THE LESSEEAICENSEE LEASE AGREEMENT. 1.0 s 0 is 20 NOTE: 0 11/15/06 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OWNER ISRESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A GLOBAL STRUCTURAL STABILITY ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE CAPACITY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION.DESIGN, AND SUITABIUTY Of EXISTING ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE /—FD-061342-00 GPS/GSM ANTENNA MOUNTED PROPERIY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF TO SAFELY CARRY ALL ADDITIONAL LOADS IMPOSED BY TO STANDOFF.WITH MOUNTING OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS,INC.ANY SECTOR A PROPOSED EQUIPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE BRACKET TP P/N: DUPUCATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS 30' RESPONSIBLE FOR INCORPORATING ALL REWIRED STRUCTURAL AND U—BOLT WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRMY PROHIBITED. MODIFICATIONS INTO THEIR SCOPE OF WORK. P/N: 3066T33. TOP OF GSM DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT RFS CLUSTER ANTENNA TO BE 50'-0"AGL pUS FORCTING HTHi PURPOSES L PURPOSESOF LY PUTHORIZED DIRECT MOUNT KIT PANEL ANTENNA REGULATORY AND AOMINISIM17VE FUNCTIONS P/N: APM70-3C (TOTAL OF 3) 14' IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. NOTE_ I CHA STANDOFF ON EXISTING ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURES WITH FAA CHAIN MOUNT, OBSTRUCTION MARKING,PAINT ANTENNAS,MOUNTING VALMONT P/N 82069 4BS-0658-D O ABLE RUNS TO MATCH EXISTING HARDWARE PATTERN DWARE,AND EXPOSED VERTICAL C(AVIATION ORANGE 1/Z"COAX AND �Z-0 I UNIPOLE o UNIPOLE OR WHITE). SPRINT STEVENS SECTOR C O SHROUD GROTO PLND ATTACHED IPE EXTENSION I ESTATE - 270' WITH STANDOFF KIT I I 723 OSGOOD STREET CENTER MOUNTING PIPE NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 INSTALL HANDHOLE I I \SE�T-Ei IN ACCORDANCE W/ I I SHEEr1ITUB MANUFACTURER'(P)ANTENNA AMPLIFIERS50 S RECOMMENDATIONS i I TO BE MOUNTED TO CENTER PARTIAL SITE PLAN, PIPE BELOW ANTENNAS ELEVATION SC DETAILS SHEEr Homm © E9'11 GPS/GSM ANTENNA PLAN 3 ANTENNA MOUNT A-2 SCALE: NTS A-2 SCALE: NTS A-2 STRUCTURAL NOTES OMIPOINT WMMUNICABONS,INC. x4 WOOD FENCE A WHOLLY-01WfD SUBSIDIARY OF BOARD T-MOBLE USA,INC .. 1. DESIGN.REQUIREMENTS ARE PER STATE BLNLDMG'CODE AND APPLICABLE 15 OOMMERM WAY SUITE 8 - SUPPLEMENTS,ANSI/ASCE7,EIA/M-222-G STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL NORTON,MA 0'2766 (3)2z4 OFfNO (508x186-270(1. ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. _ FAX (506)-486-2693 BOOSTER CABINET DIMENSIONS: 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO 100 FlLLEY STREET 37"Hx15"Wx18"D FABRICATIO AND ERECTION OF ANY MATERIAL ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE [3BLOOUFEID,CT O06002OFFICE: (860)-692-7100 (TOTAL OF 3) w REPORTED TO THE ATTENTION Of THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: FAO (860)-692-7159 x 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE PPC CABINET, a 4x4 TIMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION"SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN, DIMENSIONS: 54"Hx30"Wx10'D. a POST FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS". COLER & (LOCATED IN FOREGROUND M PIPE CA 4. STRUCTURAL.STEEL WIDE-FLANGE SHAPES SHALL CONFORMTOASTM 992A. ALL CO"NTON10 2 SECURED TO BACK OF(P)METER OTHER SHAPES AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36 UNLESS BANK EXTENSION W/(4) 1/2"0 EN49i�s BOLTS TO(P)UNISTRUT) o OTHERWISE NOTED. 55 Bobdo Road BATTERY BACK-UP _ CABINET DIMENSIONS:. 1-4" m 5. STEEL PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500'COLD-FORMED WELDED do SEAMLESS Hair MA 01040 68"Hx28"Wx31"D 3/8" U-BOLT 1"CROWN CARBON STEEL STRUCTURAL TUBING',GRADE A,OR ASTM A53 PIPE STEEL BLACK (413)313-0100 (E)GRADE AND HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATED WELDED AND SEAMLESS TYPE E OR S,GRADE S. PIPE SIZES INDICATED ARE NOMINAL ACTUAL OUTSIDE DIAMETER IS LARGER. ® ® S r 6. STRUCTURAL CONNECTION BOLTS SHALL TR HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS(BEARING TYPE) AND CONFORM i0 ASTM A325 `HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS, INCLUDING SUITABLE.NIRS AND PLAN HARDENED WASHERS". ALL BOLTS SHALL BE �I EXTENDED T TRANSMISSION UNE 5/8"DIA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. - 0 II 11 O HANGER BRACKET 7. ALL STEEL MATERIALS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE ® LAG ® - 3 1/2"0 SCHEDULE 40 SUPPORT CONCRETE POST �t WITH ASTM A123"ZINC (HOT-DIP GALVANIZED)COATINGS ON IRON AND STEEL POST AND BRACKET ASSEMBLY c PRODUCTS'.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. (MAX. SPACING 8'-0"D.C.)I� b 8. ALL BOLTS,ANCHORS AND MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN 6 CABLE OPTION COMBINER ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153 -ZINC-COATING(NOT-DP)ON IRON AND STEEL H �I DUPLEXERS AS SPECIFIED BY Tn HARDWARE",UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FCM MOUNTED ON T-BRACKET 4 KELY yN 9. FIELD WELDS,DRILL HOLES,SAW CUTS AND ALL DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES SHALL BE REPAIRED WITH AN ORGANIC ZINC REPAIR PANT COMPLYING WITH a ® ® ANCHORED INT 72.0 REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DU GALVANIZING REPAIR VAMR SHALL HAVE 65 PERCENT CONCRETE EQUIPMENT ZINC BY WEIGHT.ARP BY DUNCAN GALVANIZING,GAIVA BRIGHT PREMIUM BY CROWN PAD/MONOPOLE OR EQUAL. THICKNESS OF APPLIED GALVANIZING REPAIR PAINT SHALL BE NOT NOT r. ? •, n. -�_:,,.._ FOUNDATION W/5/8"0 LESS THAN 4 COATS(ALLOW TIME TO DRY BETWEEN COATS)WITH A RESULTING '_y'•• .� ANCHOR BOLTS 4 TOTAL 3/16 COATING THICKNESS REQUIRED BY ASTM A123 OR A153 AS APPLM.ABLE. FENCE NOTES: 12"X12'X1/2" 1.FENCING MATERIALS SHALL BE 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH AWS CODE FOR PROCEDURES,APPEARANCE AND APPROVALS PLATE(TYP.) OF PRESSURE TREATED PINE, QUALITY OF WELDS,AND FOR METHODS USED IN CORRECTING WELDING.ALL GRADE"A"MATERIAL, U.N.O.. WELDERS AND WELDING PROCESSES SHALL BE QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS 6"GRAVEL SURFACE W/YA=ED RECAST STANDARD QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES".ALL WELDING SHAU.BE DONE USING E70XX BTS SUB-BASE FRAME BLOCK UNDERLAYMENT WITHIN` CONCRETE PAD CONCRETE PAD ••r••` 2.FENCE FITTINGS SMALL BE ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO NSC AND 01.1.WHERE FILLET WELD MOUNTED TO SLAB W/(4)5/8" (P)LEASE AREA DIMENSIONS: < GALVANIZED STEEL. SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC 0 x3-3-3/4"HILTI KWIK BOLT - - 10'-5"Lx5'-6"Wx8"H _i o - 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION',9TH EDITION. LANDLORD 11 ANCHORS. SHIM if REQUIRED BTS CABINET.AND BATTERY (TOTAL OF 2) 'v 3.POSTS SHALL BE SPACED TO LEVEL SUB-BASE FRAME. BASE UNIT DIMENSIONS: EQUIDISTANT BUT NOT MORE 11.INCORRECTLY FABRICATED.DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE MLSFITTING OR NONCONFORMING LEASING - •!; N (TYPICAL AT EACH CABINET.) 83"Hx52"Wx28"D m THAN 8'-0"O.C. MATERIALS OR CONDITIONS SHAD.BE REPORTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (TOTAL OF 3) 4-e4- - PRIOR TO REMEDIAL OR CORRECTIVE ACTION.ANY SUCH ACTION SHALL REQUIRE RF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER APPROVAL: 12.UNISTRUTS SHAT BE FORMED STEEL CHANNEL STRUT FRAMING AS MANUFACTURED BY ZONING SECTION AT UNISTRUT CORP.WAYNE, MI OR EQUAL.STRUT MEMBERS SHALL BE 1 5/8"x1 - SECTION AT ICE 5/8'X1 A UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,AND SHALL BE HOT-DIP GALVANIZED AFTER CONSTRUCTION FABREQUIPMENT PAD BRIDGE/CABLE TRAY TYPICAL FENCE DETAIL A/E S-07 .T� 13.EPDXY ANCHOR ASSEMBLY SHALL CONSIST OF 1/2"LY THREADED STAINLESS STEEL S-1 SCALE: NTS -5-1 SCALE: NTS S-1 - ANCHOR ROD WITH NUTS 8: WASHERS. O INTERNALLY THREADED INSERT,A SCREEN LUBE AND A EPDXY ADHESIVE THE ANCHORING SYSTEM SHALL BE THE HILT-HIT HY-20 AND OR HY-150 SYSTEMS(AS SPECIFIED ON DWG.)OR ENGINEERS APPROVED EQUAL WITH 4-1/4"MIN.EMBEDMENT DEPTH. PROJECT NO: 14.EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL SPECIFTCATON FF-S-325,GROUP 11 BOOSTER CABINET - TYPE 4,CLASS N,HILTI KWIK BOLT II OR APPROVED EQUAL INSTALLATION SHALL Si DRAVM BY: BDJ DIMENSIONS: BTS CABINET AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.MINIMUM 3IMENSIONS.B"D 2"TELCO UNIT DIMENSIONS: EMBEDMENT SHALL BE THREE AND ONE HALF(3 1/2)INCHES. (TOTAL OF 3) CONDUIT 83"Hx52"WX28"D 15.GRAVEL SUB BASE ANO CONCRETE SHALE BE PLACED AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL CHECKED BY: KK/TEJ (TOTAL OF 3) 16.CONCRETE FOR FENCE AND ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT SHALL BE 3000 PSI AR ENTRAINED(4%-6%)NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE SUBMITTALS C RID BATTERY BACK-UP - 4•-0" 17.ALL CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AG 318 AND AG 301. L-i Li CABINET P PIPE (E)STEEL ( ) DIMENSIONS: � POT S 1 FO MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER OVER REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS 68"Hx28"Wx31"D CAP(TVP.) F 8.THE SLOWING MU 8TS EQUIPMENT BTS EQUIPMENT BTS EQUIPMENT SBU FOLLOWS UNLESS NOTED AGAINST T CABINET CABINET CABINET CABINET CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH R 3 INCHES. (P)24OV, 10,3W KWN CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WATER MANUAL BY-PASS METER 6 AND LARGER..................2 INCHES MILBANK U2272RL OR EQUAL) I - S AND SMALLER................1 1/2 INCHES 0.17/15/06 CONSTRUCTION ( ALL EXPOSED EDGES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A 3/4"z3/4"CHAMFER UNLESS - - -- --- - - -- W/200A.2P TENANT CIRCUIT DIMENSIONS TO BE NOTED OTHERWISE. BREAKER AND LOCKABLE I VERIFIED PER THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION,DESIGN, Fr Ilk / / t / BREAKER DOOR O MANUFACTURER'S 19.LUMBER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF / / / / SPECIFICATIONS TIMBER CONSTRUCTION AND THE NATIONAL FOREST PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION'S OMNIPOMT COMMUNICATIONS,INC. ANY \-�� _ -- - -�/ / / .PRESSURE TRONAL FATEDPAI-0GD SHALL BE RWOOD SFRi1CTURAL CONSTRUCTION. 2 ORLUMBER BERER.SHALL BE EN SENTION OR T S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. - (P)2"CIRC CONDUIT DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT TO(P)PPC r2OO I o AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED IF ASSUMED(E)CONDITION DIFFERS THAN SHOWN. RECAST (P) 2" CIRC CONDUIT °D ENGINEER MUST BE INFORMED OF ACTUAL FIELD CONDITION REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. CONCRETE PAD FROM(E)DISTRIBUTION I / / 41000(TVP•)p BOX i, -- - DIMENSIONS: ( ) UNISTRUT 10'-5"Lx5'-6"Wx8"H (TOTAL OF 2) (P)3"0 SCH. 40 GALV.-�, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND 4BS-0658-D II�r THREADED OSTEND ELEVATIONS WNICH EFFECT THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK. SPRINT STEVENS 1"ELECTRICAL Al CONDUIT ESTATE / FINISHED GRADE _...0 723 OSGOOD STREET -- 0 D PPC CABINET NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 (2) 2"TELCO CONDUIT - UNDERGROUND TO _ LEAD TO GROUND RING - TELCO DEtaARC o. (TVP.OF 2) 9NF9TWWt (SEE DETAIL 3/E-1) 12"0 PLAINS e PPC CABINET METER BANK CONCRETE PIER �,f: J h_.:� I STRUCTURAL NOTES, DIMENSIONS: EXTENSION �' 11 - 54"Hx30"WxIO"D SECTIONS & DETAILS PLAN AT EQUIPMENT PAD METER BANK DETAIBNLRNUULG SCALE: NIS S-1 SCALE: NTS S-t S- 1 „” (P)240Y III3N KWH MANUAL ELECTRICAL LEGEND OMVDNT OWNED COMMUNICATIONS,INC E911 CPS ANTENNA GSM ANTENNA COWITELCO MAKE ALL CONNECTIONS AS PER UTURY CDMPANYS REQUIREMENTS. BY-PASS METIER MLBANK A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY AIRY OF P/N:85081808 U2272RL(OR MUM)w/200k ANEW UGWrT2 A�1MIBM LoaG18LE RBIk'.VfRSUGERER ' NEW PANEL BOARD,SURFACE MOUNTED 45 COMMERCE WAMA Y,,t7�B EXISTING PANS.BOARD,SURFACE MOUNTED ® 0 r21MAD ANTENNA MOUNT GROUND '. FAX: (508)-288-2893 (P)STEEL Pon (E)STEEL POST (E)STEEL POST TQ DRY TYPE TRANSFORMER ,Op ILD. STREET ROROUN GDDINGLLKITS (q TENANT ® .METER BLOOIf4.D.CT 06002 �� 00 - � MErEas CE: (aeo}692Too —� ORCNT BREAKER FAX: 1880)-892-7159 CAD WELD ® - MUN-FUSBUE DISCONNECT (gip O SNITCH,MOUNTED 54"A.F.F. Uig _ u-BONG P/N:3088733 (P)8X3 0 DISTREre)ilTloto M fENEMiIDR ay FUSIBLE DISCONNECT SWITCH,MOUNTED SCA.FF. COLER SA ® Ea18OffENS mX TR smMAX CU�R ® COL/�N TON IO iRAIENT WYTAt$SDRC{SUPPRESSOR WITIR CADwEm BUILT-IN FUSES SURFACE.MOUNTED E4W4=AND MOM=(P)END �C DUPLEX OUTLET,SURFACE MOUNTED, 85 BoLala Road TO GROUNDING RING ® 20 AMPS,125 VOLTS SINCE PHASE Holyoke,MA 01040 (Lam EGB) OJ JUNCTION BOX,SURFACE MOUNTED 18'A.F.F. (413)3T3�-0100 "-1 EXPOSED WRING m + q(E)(S)SEKVME HOME FUNS,MINIMUM 2110+111OG IN 31V - CONDUIT U.O.N. MOUNTING BRAO(ET P/N:fl)-08-J42-DO (3)13/O d(1)14 GNO (q(2)CC A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR EQUIPMENT a 16.,noG N rD Y-0'STANDOFF CHAIN IN Y CRC . GROUNDING MT CAD W POST 2 U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWEATHERPROOF NOTED CAD WELD GROUND BAR(EGB) �� SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 J 18,t ltoc w T'C � MO�� MINIMUM IW DING RADIUS PERC"U (2)d'mC0 CONWrt GF] MOUND FAULT INTERRUPTER MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD 12 AwG BCW , W TELCO W/PULL-lEN6TH PULL RAPE A AMPERE ' "r 16 AND GROUNDING KW FROM EDB GINNER SHOWN DIAD VVT)LT OF ON 3 vV I CABLE(PROVIDED WITH BIT) GROUND OAR GROUNDING RISER ONGRMQ-\` POWER RISER DIAGRAM KIM KILOWATT-HOUR� � ELL �c i0 MKIB— 12 AND SIGN(EXTENDS) 1 SCALE N.T.S E-1 C CONDUIT 61 ' N ORIN�GREEN NBUUTm SPARES CIRC GALVANIZED RIGID,O]MUI7 GPS/GSM ANTENNA G GROUND MOUNTING DETAIL , 1 GROUNDM6�Mw MASTER GROIIID BAR � �CONNEDTION SCALE N.T.S. E-1 1 -CADWELD CONNECTION TO GROUNDING KITS TD(E)SERVICE EGO EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR oMECHANK:&CONNECTION APPROVALS 24011,1 A 3W MANUAL BY-PASS METER W-11 1CADNELD CONNECTION _ 6'DIA SCH 40 INSPECTION UANUM.TRANSFER SWTGH —G— (HOUND COPPER WIRE,SIZE AS NOTED SLEEVE W/THREADED PVC COVER SITE FINISH GRADE (D ® PPC EXPOSED ABLE CUAEPL CABLE LANDLORD -------------- 12YM EXTERN/.RAN/ BIS ' I CROAT N 3/4'NON- EQUIPMENTQ 5/r.5COPPER CLAD STAINLESS STEEL GROUNDROD ® O j 20OA-ar METALLIC CaNDUO CABINET ,�. )D E A LEASING M a i s ; (3)p e(T)ODIC Arc PPC POWER PROTECTION CABNE7 R.F. . CADWELD CONNECTION(TMP.) CADWELD (J)12/0 d i ) (3)16 d(1)11OG IN PC SYS ig OMR-NRECTWNAL ELECTRONIC MARKER SYSTEM(EMS)BALL ZONING To GROUND RING (1)� EOUP 1122 AWG SOLID,TINNED AT GROUND ROD GENERATOR 50.1-g+ ; c3)PF d(t)dKOCG N 7'C - CABINET ELECTRICAL AND GROUNDING NOTES CONSTRUCTION i`APPER GROUND WINE GENRECERATOR 1PICTAILi 1"X10•'NOTCH SLEEVE FOR ANDREW UGSKIT OR EQUAL WITH HOLE i ACLE MM-2P i (J)IN d(t)DOG IN 1'C I 1 t. ALL ELECTRIC-AL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 1FE NATIONAL ASE PASSAGE Cf RMG NIRS - PATTERN AND STANDOFF INSULATORS 1 ELECTRICAL CODE(NEC)AS WELL AS APPUCABLE STATE AND LOCAL OOOES '� MAINTAIN INTERIOR OF AND MOUNTING BRACKETS AS SHOWNi 20A-IP SITS 9EEVE DEBRIS FREE. i - I I i EOUPMENi 2. ALL ELECTRICAL ITEMS SHALL BE U.L.APPROVED OR LISTED AND PROCURED PER ® EBwEi CABINET SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS PROJECT N0: 17-3263, vBWEHG L--- ----- ----r Ec--- 5/8"COPPER CLAD m GROUND RING OR. STAINLESS STEEL GROUND ROD AT EDMUND ROD 3. THE ELECTRICAL WORK IN INCLUDES IM ALL LABOR OAND MATERIAL DESCRIBED BY DRAWINGS A --SERVICE CROLND PER AND OVER ELECT I&SYSTEM. 1NdDENTAt{WRQ:TO PROVIDE.COIPIETE OPERATING AND APPROVED ELECTRICAL SY'TELI. DRAWN BY: BDJ ® 4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY FEES FOR PERMITS,AND IS.RESPONSIBLE FOR GROUND ROD OBTAINING SAID PERMITS AND COORDINATION OF INSPECTIONS. CHECKED BY: KK/TEJ TEST WELL DETAIL MASTER GROUND BAR MGB 5 ONE LINE DIAGRAM S. ELECTRICAL WATER TELCO WIRING FIXING A BUILDING ANDEXPOSEDSCHEDULE TO WEATHER0P"OSHALL BE IN WATER 71CO GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUITS G SCIWULE 80 PVC(AS SCALE: N.T.S. E-, SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 PERMITTED BY CODE)AND WHERE�QURFD IN LIQUID TIIWHT FLEXIBLE ATTAIN.OR SUBMITTALS (E)UNEOLE nNTEMNa _ NONMETALLIC CONDUITS 6. BURIED CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. ANRMd1 MOUNT MONIES. 7. ELECTRICAL MARINO STALL BE COPPER PATH TYPE X1NW,1HWN,CB THHN WSULA7IOJ. J2' NNTENNA ANPLFlER i.GASE BID 70 IN ORIZ NTAL CHEMIC aF(6)GROUND R00SOR SINGLE XiT HOR120NTAL CHEMICAL ROD AS OETERMWED � 8. RUN ELECIACAL CODOT OR CASE BETWEEN ELECIRICA UTILITY DEMARCATIONTWO HOCABLLBY FIELD CONDITIONS ADDITIONAL RODS AS REWIRED TO POINT AND PROJECT OWNER CELL SITE PPC AS INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING. OMPRESSION GEROGROUNDING Nrt 16G ACHIEVE 5 OHMS NE9STANCE, - PROVIDE fULL LENGTH PULL ROPE COORDINATE NSTAlLA110N MATH U1A1tt COMPANY. UPPER EDB BONDED 2.MAXIMUM VERTICALMORIZO14TAL DISTANCE BETWEEN CABLE � 9. RUN TELCO CONDUIT OR CABLE BETWEEN TELEPHONE UTRJTY DEMARCATION PONT AND 0 11/15/06 CONSTRUCTION CLEAR HEAT-SHRTO (E)MPO E GROUNDING KITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET.INSTALL PROJECT OWNER CBL SITE I=CABINET AND.BTS CABINET AS INDICATED ON U2INSULATION MEND12G ADDITIONAL KITS AS REQUIRED BY FIELD CONDITIONS ORAWANG PROVIDE FULL LENGTH PULL ROPE IN INSTALLED TELCO CONDUIT.PROVIDE /4'OVER LUG AND - GREENIEE CDHOUR MEASURING TAPE AT EACH END. THIS DOCHIAENT IS THE CRfATON,DESIGN, CPS CABLE GROUNDING KROVERCASE(MAPROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF GSM CABLE GROUNDING Mr ICE BRIDGE/CMILE Tw,Y 10. NNERE COOOT BETWEEN RTS AND PROJECT OWNER CELL SITE PPC AND BETWEEN RTS APYIOMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS. ANY GRONDING CAA MOB(GADNFID LOAM AREA PAVED ARE PROJECT OWER CELL SITE TELCO SERVICE CABINET ARE UNDERGROUND USE PVC,SOMME OMNIPOIION M UNI INIONS.INC,.I EXPRESS (FADS AND CONNECT 40 CONDUIT ABOVE THE GROUND PORTION OF THESE CONDUITS SHALL BE PVC CONDUIT. A 6 CABLE OPTION OOMBNER/OUPLEXERS AS TWO CWRSE6 OF WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIDITED. GROUND TD GROUND RUG) SPECIFIED BY ICN,MOUNTED ON T-BRPL•KU t-t/2"BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 11. ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE SHALL HAVE NEMA 3R ENCLO91RE. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT ELEVATION BONDING JUMPER EGO AT BTS PUNTH BNL YELLOW WANING TAPE AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AT sPl¢E JOIMS 12. PPC SUPPLED BY PROJECT OWER. CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED _.._.._..__._..—_._.__..—.._..—.___.—_._ G G SBU NET FINSN GRADE 'NIGH VOLTAGE CGANA CABLE SAW-CUT TO SiRAGHT EVEN 13, GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WAIN NEC ART. 250. ADDITIONALLY,GROUNDING BONDING REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNCTIONS EDN A BBV PLINTH - EDGE BEFORE PAVNG AND UGHTMNG PROTECTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH"T-MOBLE BTS SITE IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. CABLE GROUND IS Mr PPC CABINET GROUNDING STANDARDS". FLAT WASHER.TYP. FIAT WASHER,TYP. (LOCATE ABOVE PONTSpPPOST OTS UNIT To ,j'A+<;�%� 8^GRAVEN BASE 14, GROUND COAXAL CABLE SHIELDS MINIMUM AT B01H LIDS USING MANUFACTURERS COAX 48S-0658—D HORIZONTAL BEND) n•PMAL ttP.OU 3 `: :gip:�;I.j CABLE GROWDNG KITS SUPPLIED BY PROJECT OWNER. LOCK WASHER TYP. 3/8^XI-1/4'HEX BOLT G LOWER EGB BONDED)UN 12c 15 USE 16 COPPER STRANDED CURE WITH GREEN COLOR INSULATION FOR ABOVE GRADE KMT•TLP. TO(q URPOLE CABLE 12"6" GROUNDING(UNLESS OTHERWSE SPECIFIED)AND 12 SOLID TINNED BARE COPPER WARE SPRINT STEVENS GROUNDING KIT GRADE FOR BELOW GRADE GOUNDING AS INDICATED ON THE ORAWINC ESTATE 30'MIL _ 12"MN. CADWElD oowxNFAo . G G 12G 12G _ B'MN, COMPACTED BACKFILL 16. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS TO BE BURNDY HYGROUND COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTORS 723 OSGOOD STREET AND BONDING.LIMPER 12G G G G G G 12G C EGB A7 iTLCO PLINTIL OR CADWELO EXOTHERMIC MELD. DO NOT ALLOW BARE COPPER WIRE TO BE N CONTACT EMS BALL - G-�- -- -J-----__- COMPACTED WITH GALVANIZED STEEL NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 GROUND BAR EXPOSED BARE COPPER ro BE GROUPINGUNIPOLE RING t 17. ROUTE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS ALONG THE SHORTEST AND STRAIGHTEST PATH POSSIBLE, REPT TO BARE COUTE PER TO r -G---- -' I G - 4 iw1�GRIALL EL.SIDEXCEPT AS OTHERWISE INDICATED. GROUNDING LEADS SHOULD NEVER BE BENT AT RICHT 9 NO INSULATION ALLOWED WITHIN ' `, GROUNDING CASE THE COMPPESS AL TERMINALWEWIT i + ' , ANGLE ALWAYS MAKE AT LEAST tY RADA15 BENDS 16 VIRE CAN BE BENT AT 6' 1 }' RADIUS WHEN NECESSARY.BOND ANY METAL OBJECTS W9THIN 6 FEET OF PROJECT (TYPIRAL). 0 G---- ------ G I 5/ak 8'COPPER CLAD STAINLESS SCHEDULE 40 CONDUITS FOR NEW NOTE-. OWNER EQUIPMENT OR CABINET TO MASTER GROUND BAR OR GROUNDING RING. ELECTRICAL CYC _ II.� ELECIWCA AND TELEPHONE NEW DETAIL AS SHAW IS FOR GROUNDING NOTES, _ t STEEL GROUNDING S(QUANTITY ELECTRODE to CONNECTIONS TO GROUND BARS SHALL 1T MAGE WPO TWO HOLE COMPRESSOR SECTION A-A _ ---- -- - T I _TMP.OF S.(ouwnn As SEE APPROVED AND SITE PVNS PROVIDE SECONDARY ELECTRIC SERVE. TYPE CpppBR LUGS APPLY OXIDE INHISTNG COMPOUND TO ALL LOCATIONS 12G L A'D COO PULL BOXES AS REQUIRED, PRIMARY HIGH CONCRETE SERVICE RiSER & DETAILS MOIESG 1 12 AWG UNDERGROUND CELL SIZE REQUIRED) ANDY COORDINATE INSTALLATIONFOINIW/ALL REQUIRES 4'CONCRETE 19. POND ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKETS,COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KITS.AND ANNA TO EGO I "WUBLING M'OR'STACKWC OF CONNECTION 6 NOT PERMITTED. GROUNDING RING SET T EOLQPMEYOND UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INTERFACING ENCASEMENT. 2. OXIDE INHIBITING COMPOUND TO BE USED AT ALL LOCATIONS. PFPIMEIER OF CONCRETE EDUPMENi PAD PLACED NEAR THE ANTENNA LOCATION. 3. CWY&U.DOWNLEDS FROM-UPPER EGA,LOWER EGO AND MGB. GROUNDING CONNECTION UM-DIRECTONAL GROUND ROD TEST AT G HNPULL PESPOIN0 PROVIDE FULL GROUNDING WELL(3 REQUIRED) LENGTH PULL ROPES(TYPJ, 20. APPLY OXIDE INHIBITING COMPOUND TO ALL COMPRESSION TYPE GROUND CONNECTIONS CONNECTION - 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL OMNI DIRECTIONAL ELECTRONIC MARKER SYSTEM BXFFTNUMe01 TYPICAL GROUND ((EMS)BALLS OVER EACH GROUND ROD AND BONDING PONT BETWEEN EXISTING TOWER/ BAR CONNECTIONS DETAIL ��� GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAM �� BURIED CONDUIT DETAIL �� (E)MONOPOLE GRID LADING RING AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDING RING. SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. E-1 22 CONTRACTOR E-OU TEST MENTACOMPLIONTED MOUND5OHSYSTEMTNI AMD RECORD RESULTS FOR E- 1 PROJECT CLOSE-OUT DOCUMENTATION. 5 OHMNS MINIMUM RESISTANCE REQUIRED. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT ANTENNA COAX,AND LNA RETURN-LOSS AND DISTANCE- TO-FAULT MEASUREMENTS(SWEEP TESTS)AND RECORD RESULTS FOR PROJECT CLOSE OUT. Notice to APPLICANT/TOWN CLERK of Action of Planning Board on Preliminary Subdivision Plan entitled: Preliminary Subdivision Plan of Land in North Andover, Ma, drawn for Evergreen management Co. , 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311, No. Andover, MA 01845 v; Merrimack Engineering Services dated October 15, 1994 2. The North Andover Planning Board has disapproved said plant for the following reasons: SEE ATTACHED 3• C)' tom.:, ,�►�:�' U1 Very truly yours, NORTHPLANNING BOARD •,e .�a. o $fir Richard A. Nardella, Chairman Date: December 6, 1994 TO14 NOP, � rR FORM B '` APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN OCT Z 2 40 ..October 24 � 19 94_ To the Planning Board of the Town of North Andover: The undersigned, being the applicant as defined under Chapter 41, Section 81—Lq for approval of a proposed subdivision shown on a plan entitled Preliminary Subdivision Plan of Land in North Andover, MA, drawn for Evergreen Management Co. , 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311, No. Andover, 01845 By Merrimack Engineering Services dated October 15 9 1994 being land bounded as follows: scale I" = 2 0 C Northerly by lands of N/F Cyr Assoc. & N/F Town of No. Andover, ..� ..AP- Eastetl`y ''by Lake Cochichewick, Southerly by Larids of N%F K�t. nbach, N/F Cullen, N/F_. Charrette, and N/F Gonya, Westerly by Osgood Street and Great Pond Road. hereby submits said plan as a PRELIMINARY subdivision plan in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the North Andover Planning Board and makes application to the Board for approval of said plan. Title reference: North Essex Deedss Book77 1 PaP ;e 177• or Certificate of Title No. , Registration Book , Pa.ge ; or Other: Applicantisddre`ss tur Received by Town Clerk: u- Date: ApplicantEvergreenManagement Corp. 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311 Time: ----- = North An over, MA . 01845 Signature: Owner's e d address if not the applican Bosto University Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA i Boston University Conference Center Preliminary Plan Disapproval The Planning Board herein disapproves a seventy three (73) lot Preliminary Subdivision Plan known on the Boston University Conference Center site off of Osgood Street. The application was submitted by Evergreen Management Corp. , 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311, North Andover, MA 01845, dated October 24, 1994. The area affected contains approximately one hundred sixty five (165) acres. The majority of the property is located in a Residential- 1 (R-1) Zone with a small section located within the Residential - 2 (R-2) Zone. The R-1 portion of the property is located within the Lake Cochichewick Watershed Protection District. Findings of Fact The Planning Board makes the following findings: 1. The applicant failed to review the information submitted with the Town Planner prior to the FORM B receiving a time stamp from the Town Clerk as required by Section 3 (B) (2) (b) of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land, North Andover, Massachusetts, Revised February, 1989. 2 . The plan was not properly submitted as the applicant failed to provide the following information as required by Section 3 (B) (3) of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land, North Andover, Massachusetts, Revised February, 1989: a. Sufficient information about the subdivision has not been submitted in order to allow the Planning Board to form a clear basis for discussion and for the preparation of the definitive plan. b. A plan at l" = 40' scale which includes the following information was not provided: i. Name and address of the owner of record ii. Flood Hazard Areas as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Administration iii. Title under which the proposed subdivision is to be recorded with the Town Clerk iv. Proposed street names, curves, and preliminary street profiles V. The total area and contiguous buildable area of each lot shown in square feet vi. Topographic contours at five (5) foot intervals 3 . The applicant failed to comply with the design standards as set forth in Section 7 of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land, North Andover, 1 Massachusetts, Revised February, 1989: a. The proposed street is not continous and in alignment with existing streets b. Provisions have not been made for proper projection of streets into adjacent property t 7 P P Y C. Information as to the grade of the road was not provided. d. Shoulder width information was not provided. e. The lots shown on the plan do not comply with the area, frontage, and other requirements of the Zoning Bylaw. Information as to total area and contiguous buildable area was not submitted.- The frontage on lots 19 to 23, 26 to 30, 33, 35, 38, 39, 49, 58 to 60, 66 to 70, and 72 is less than the minimum required. No information as to the frontage and area of Lot 51 was submitted. f. Drainage information was not submitted. g. Due regard has not been shown for all natural features which if preserved would add attractiveness, distinctiveness and value to the subdivision and the Town. 4 . A request for determination has not been filed with the North Andover Conservation Commission therefore the wetland lines cannot be confirmed. 5. Location of proposed homes and driveways have not been shown on the plan. 6. The applicant should review the site under the Planned Residential Development Bylaw. 7 . The applicant must review the proposed street names with the E-911 Coordinator. Conclusion Based on the above findings, the Planning Board herein disapproves this Preliminary Subdivision Plan. The following plans are included as part of this decision: Plan titled: Preliminary Subdivision Plan of Land in North Andover, MA Drawn for: Evergreen Management Company 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311 North Andover, MA 01845 Date: October 15, 1994 Scale: 1" = 200 ' Drawn by: Merrimack Engineering Services 66 Park Street Andover, MA 01810 BU.prelim 2 r� NOR FORM B Orr APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN 3� e -October 24 + 19 94 To the Planning Board of the Town of North Andover: The undersigned, being the applicant as defined under Chapter 41, Section 81—L, for approval of a proposed subdivision shown on a plan entitled Preliminary Subdivision Plan of Land in North Andover, MA, drawn for Evergreen Management Co. , 733 Turnpike Street, Suite 311, No. Andover, 01845 By Merrimack Engineering Services dated October 15 1494 being land bounded as follows: scale 1" = 2 0 C Northerly by lands of N/F Cyr Assoc. & N/F Town of No. Andover, Easterly by Lake Cochichewick, Southerly by Lands of N/F Kettenbach, N/F Cullen, N/F-, Charrette, and N/F Gonya, Westerly by Osgood Street and Great Pond Road. hereby submits said plan as a PRELIMINARY subdivision plan in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the North Andover Planning Board and makes application to the Board for approval of said plana Title reference: North Essex Deeds, Book771 , Page 171; or Certificate of Title No._t Registration Boob , Page ; or Other: Applicant' s tur Received by Town Clerk: Date: Applicant's ddress Evergreen Management Corp. 733 Turnpike Street, ° Suite 311 Time. North An over, 'MA .01845 Signature: Owner's e d address if not the applican ; Bostok Un versity Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA Notice to APPLICANT/TOWN CLERK of Action of Planning Board on Preliminary Subdivision Plan entitled: By: dated I. The North Andover Planning Board has tentatively approved said plan, with- out any modifications thereof. 2. The North Andover Planning Board has disapproved said plans for the following reasons: I . 3. The North Andover Planning Board has tentatively approved said plans subject to the following modifications thereof: i Very truly yours, NORTH ANDOVER PLANNIM BOARD By • Date: - LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST PAGE-OF- SUBJECT AGEOFSUBJECT PROPERTY :MAP ;PARCEL !'NAME ;ADDRESS ABUTTERS lMAP PARCEL 'NAME ADDRESS iW, ai ol r— it { C� < CV 417 ir- LA i ( i i r I i I i I j , I Town of North Andover of ao of Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division 41 27 Charles Street ` °* =�•�`' " North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'S$ACHUS ` D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Legal Notice North Andover,Board of Appeals Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main Street,North Andover,MA on Tuesday the 12th of August,2003 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover requesting a Variance from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii for relief of height requirements in order to construct one internal antenna monopole;and requesting relief of color requirements from Section 8.9,Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii in order to comply with FAA Advisory Circular 7017460-1K. The said premise affected is property with frontage on the East side of Osgood Street within the R 1 and R- 2 2 zoning districts. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Department 27 Charles Street,North Andover, MA,Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals William J.Sullivan,Chairman Published in the Eagle Tribune on July 28&August 4,2003. Legalnotice 2003-023 e+..r w C71C.3�.1... } ]i✓ Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978.688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER VARIANCE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS �+ VON Procedure & Requirements For an Application for a Variance Ten (10) copies of the following information must STEP 6: SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND be submitted thirty 30 days prior to the first public PREPARATION OF LEGAL NOTICE: hearing. Failure to submit the required information The Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals schedules within the time periods prescribed may result in a the applicant for a hearing date and prepares the legal dismissal by the Zoning Board of an application as notice for mailing to the parties in interest(abutters) and incomplete. for publication in the newspaper. The petitioner is notified that the legal notice has been prepared and the The information herein is an abstract of more specific cost of the Party in Interest fee. requirements listed in the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations and is not meant to supersede them. items that STEP 7• DELIVERY OF LEGAL NOTICE TO are underlined will be completed by the Town. NEWSPAPER/PARTY IN INTEREST FEE' The petitioner picks up the legal notice from the Office STEP 1: ADMINISTRATOR PERMIT DENIAL: of the Zoning Board of Appeals and delivers the legal The petitioner applies for a Building Permit and receives notice to the local newspaper for publication. a Permit Denial form completed by the Building Commissioner. STEP 8: PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: STEP 2: VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM: The petitioner should appear in histher behalf, or be Petitioner completes an application form to petition the represented by an agent or attorney. In the absence of Board of Appeals for a Variance. All information as any appearance without due cause on behalf of the required in items 1 through and including 11 shall be petitioner,the Board shall decide on the matter by using completed, the information it has otherwise received. Step 3: PLAN PREPARATION: STEP 9: DECISION: Petitioner submits all of the required plan information as After the hearing, a copy of the Board's decision will be cited in item 10 page 4 of this form. sent to all parties in interest. Any appeal of the Board's decision may be made pursuant to Massachusetts STEP 4: SUBMIT APPLICATION: General Laws ch.40A sec. 17,within twenty (20)days Petitioner submits one (1)original of all the required after the decision is filed with the Town Clerk. information and 10 xerox copies to the ZBA Secretary. The original will be stamped by the Town Clerk Step 10: RECORDING CERTIFICATE OF DECISION certifying the time and date of filing.The remaining ten PLANS. copies will remain at the office of the Zoning Board of The petitioner is responsible for recording certification of Appeals secretary. the decision and any accompanying plans at the Essex County North Registry of Deeds, Lawrence STEP 5: LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST: Massachusetts, and shall complete the Certification of Once the petitioner submits all of the required Recording form and forward it to the Zoning Board of information,the petitioner requests from the Assessors Appeals and the Building Department Office. Office a certified list of Parties in Interest (abutters). a:7 IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS: C- QtT7G�r. 978-688-9541 Zoning Board of Appeals Office > "C 978-688-9501 Town Clerk's Office ' :A 978-688-954 g Department o m - - -- 3 JUN 12 2003 BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 of 4 Application for a VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals Petitioner:. Name, addres§ and telephone number: UV �LvoIC LL 1 _61300ci mv� n z��R-3 M N7: vr7g95 *The petitioner shall be entered on the Legal notice and the decision as entered above. ' 2. Owners of Land: Name, Address and Telephone number and number of years under this ownership: _ Years Owned Land: _ (L�4 r7 ' 3. Location of Property: a. Street: `123 Zoning District b,5 ' b. Assessors: Map number �zro `Lot Number: 2-3 c. Registry of Deeds: Book Number qPage Number:tA5 4. Zoning Sections under which the petition for the Variance is made. c 1 G it .13 C . YlPI( `14 k> I Q' t �-fiy GUeFt��. Via.► Uig n(';A}'1.1 �iOhln � ' OfI 'f-) buil incl 1L 'C 1e 4�tl�prac � oc�. *R r t Permit EMnial and Zoning By,Law Plan Review as supplied by the Build" g Commissioner l w 9•`l,C;L.ii1.2 &SMC nq Co 1011 abotie, Lje5 ��� �0 �i w 5(e L'r6)W. 5. Describe the Variance request . d t h.P 'aht aLd Cj- A /L L1 � ry�Pr'l fy *The above description shall be used for the purpose of the legal notice and decision. A mofe detailed description is required pursuant to the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations as cited on page 4 of this application.Failure by the applicant to clearly describe the request may result In a decision that does not address the intent of the applicant. The decision will be limited to the request by the applicant and will not involve additional items not included above. 6a, Difference from Zoning By-Law requirements: Indicate the dimensions that will not meet current Zoning By-Law Requirements. (A and B are in the case of a lot split) Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking * Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear A. % B. % Page 3 of 4 Application for a VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals 6. b. Existing Lot: Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking * Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear % c. Proposed Lot(S): Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear % d. Required Lot: (As required by Zoning By-Law) Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot set Back` Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear % 7. a. Existing Buildings: Ground Floor Number of Total Use of Square feet Floors Sq.feet Building* *Reference Uses from the Zoning By-Law.State number of units in building. b. Proposed Buildings: Ground Floor Number of Total Use of Square feet Floors Sq.feet Building* *Reference Uses from the Zoning By-Law.State number of units in building. 8. Petitioner and Landowner signature (s): Every application for a Variance shall be made on this form which Is the official form of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. it shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or the Zoning Board of Appeals does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for ailmnses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements,as coed herein and in the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations may red k' dismissal7mg Board of this application as incomplete. 1 Si nal Type above nai here rte' on J?�'� U /�I �? L-/? 6�`'O 'fes►-»'Cc-c f r PAGE 4 OF 4 VARIANCE 9. WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION Application for a variance must t be supported by a legibly mitten or typed memorandum setting forth in detail all facts relied upon. When requesting a variance from the requirements of MGLA ch.40A,Sec. 10 C. FEATURES TO BE INDICATED ON PLAN: 10.4 of the North Andover Zoning By-Law all dimensional requirements A. Site Orientation shall include: shall be clearly identified and factually supported and addressing 1. North point each of the following points individually is required with this 2. zoning district (s) application. 3. names of streets 4. wetlands to be shown on plan (if applicable) A. The particular use proposed for the land or structure. 5. abutters of property, within 300 foot radius B. The circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape or 6. location of buildings on adjacent properties within topography of such land or structures especially 50'from applicants proposed structure affecting the property for which the variance is sought 7. deed restrictions, easements which do not affect generally the zoning district in B. Legend&Graphic Aids: which the property is located. 1. Proposed features in solid lines&outlined in red C. Facts which make up the substantial hardship, 2. Existing features to be removed in dashed lines financial or otherwise,which results from literal 3. Graphic Scales enforcement of the applicable zoning restrictions with 4. Date of Plan respect to the land or building for which the variance 5. Title of Plan is sought. 6. Names/addresses/phone numbers of the D. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief sought applicant, owner of record, and designer or will be desirable and without substantial detriment to surveyor. the public good. E. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief sought 10 D. FURTHER REQUIREMENTS: may be given without nullifying or substantially Major Projects shall require that in addition to the above derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning features, plans must show detailed utilities, soils, and bylaw. topographic information. A set of building elevation and F. Submit RDA from Conservation Commission when interior of building plans shall be required when the Continuous Buildable Area is applied for in ZBA application involves new construction/conversion/and/or application. a proposed change in use. Elevation plans for minor projects including decks,sheds,&garages shall be 10. Plan of Land included with a side view depicted on the plot plan, Each application to the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be which includes a ground level elevation. accompanied by the following described plan. Plans must 11. APPLICATION FILING FEES be submitted with this application to the Town Clerk's Office and ZBA secretary at least thirty (30)days prior to A. Notification Fees: Applicant is to send by the public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. certified mail all legal notices to all abutters, and then supply proof of mailing to the ZBA secretary. 10 A. Major Projects Applicant is to supply stamps(appropriate Major projects are those which involve one of the following current postage)for mailing of decisions to all whether existing or proposed: a)five or more parking parties in interest as identified in MGLA ch.40A, spaces, b)three or more dwelling units,and sec. 11 as listed on the application. ZBA Secretary c)2000 square feet or more of building area. will compute number of stamps. Minor projects that are less than the above limits shall B. Applicant is to supply one (1)set of addressed require only the plan information as indicated with an labels of abutters to ZBA Secretary who will mail asterisks (*). in some cases further information may be decisions to abutters and parties in interest. required C. Administrative fee of$50.00 per application. 10 B. Plan Specifications: a) Size of plan: Ten (10)copies of a plan not to exceed 11"x17", preferred scale of 1"=40'. A Variance once granted by the ZBA will lapse in b) Plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer one (1)year if not exercised and a new petition must and/or Land Surveyor,with a block for five (5) ZBA be submitted. signatures and date indicated on mylar. Town North o ___•,a vek Office of the- Building Departanent Commuraily Development and Services Division 27 Charles Stri!et North Andover.Ivt.7ssat husrtts(YIS45 wCNt)5 D. Robert Nic:eaa Telephone(CY78)658-0545 Ruilrtiu = tiartnttsstnnl.r Fox(978)68S-9542 lS MEMORANDUM To: Heidi Griffin,Town Planner From Robert Ncetta,Building Commission �5) Date: September 14, 2001 Re: AT&T Wireless Services,, Inc.,d/b/a AT&T Wireless Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS Stevens estate-723 Osgood Street I have reviewed the plans and accompanying memorandum for the sitting of wireless services at the referred location.Pursuant to Section 8.9,Paragraph 3c(ii),which states in part"these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height, measured from ground level(ACL)".As shown on the submitted site plan the one 100 feet two-carrier monopole or the two separate 90 feet monopoles arel9 feet and/or 9 feet above the average tree canopy height. As such,I am ofthe opinion that the applicant must petition the Zoning Board of Appeals for a height variance. ;;O%90t It: 11'111 NJ. It ISt tt!?lVf.ibt`.:.1$yS (;(1.'1'`1At,AFON AI ''t ti:.�':"t2 i1 ?..rt!a•¢c.\�:lc ? s WELLMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 70 BROADWAY STREET WESTFORD,MA 01886 (978)589-9870 FACSIMILE (978)589-9421 ,June 12,2003 HAND DELIVERED Zoning Board of Appeals Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Re: Application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. with respect to a wireless communication facility at Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. Dear Town Clerk and Members of the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals: On behalf of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprnrt PCS") and AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. ("AT&T Wireless'),please find attached an application requesting variance relief to allow for the installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street, North Andover. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000 and Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless have each been awarded a lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids. The Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Similarly,on January 29,2002,the Zoning Board of Appeals(the"Board"), granted relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii,and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed facilities. However,the site plans approved by the Planning Board and incorporated into the Board decision did not depict a propane tank and backup generator, which are required because the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") determined that the 100' pole must be marked and lighted. Although the FAA lighting requirement was known at the time of the original application,the approved plans did not delineate the backup power source for the site. On June 3,2003,the Planning Board endorsed revised plans depicting the backup power source for the facilities. Unfortunately, the zoning relief previously granted by the Board expired. As such, Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless request variance relief with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. With the exception of the back-up power generator and associated propane tank,all facts and circumstances remain the same. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at 978 589-9870. Yours truly, ower, onsultant to Sprint PCS ASSENTED TO: AT&T Wireless, By its attorneys, 2&L,I2 r) ► c am, Stephen D. Anderson Anderson&Kreiger, LLP 43 Thorndike Street Cambridge,MA 02141 617-252-6575 Attachments I OWNER'S CONSENT TO VARIANCE APPLICATION TO: Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 APPLICANTS: (1) Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS; and (2) AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. OWNER: Town of North Andover SITE: Steven Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MAP/LOT: Map 35, Lot 23 RELIEF SOUGHT: Variance Relief for Wireless Service Facilities 1. §§ 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10'above the average building height within 300'or,if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height);and 2. § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue) DATE: June 12, 2003 Pursuant to the Town of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw, the Town of North Andover consents to the application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint PCS") and AT&T Wireless Services PCS,LLC,by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AT&T Wireless") for any necessary zoning approvals to permit their respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover in accordance with the following Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Coler& Colantonio,Inc.,Inc.; dated April 8,2003 as endorsed by the North Andover Planning Board: SHEET(S) DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plan&Elevation DI Notes&Details D2 Details E I Grounding Plan&Elevation E2-E4 Grounding&Electric Details E5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. SHEETS) DESCRIPTION N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. Without limitation, the Town consents to Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless each seeking variance relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to §§ 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 of the Zoning Bylaw. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000, and Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless have each been awarded a lease by the Town of North Andover pursuant to its Invitation for Bids. Notary TO F NO DOVER �9?1 t1 "a My commission expires:-Spy. QA,GLboq H. Rees, T Manager #50200162 v\1 -pareedo •y-yOlLdoco -80563/2227 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Appeals Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 APPLICANTS: (1) Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS (2) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. OWNER: Town of North Andover SITE: Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MAP/LOT: Map 35,Lot 23 RELIEF SOUGHT: 1. §§ 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10'above the average building height within 300'or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); and 2. § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue) DATE: June 12, 2003 Pursuant to the Town of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw(the`Bylaw"), Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS("Sprint PCS")and AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC,by and through its member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AWS")apply for any necessary zoning variances to permit their respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. Specifically, Sprint PCS and AWS each seek a variance with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000; Sprint PCS and AWS have each been awarded a lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids; and the Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Similarly, the Zoning Board of Appeals, on January 29, 2002,granted relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. However,the site plans approved by the Planning Board and incorporated into the Zoning Board of Appeals decision did not depict a propane tank and backup generator, which are required because the Federal Aviation Administration("FAA")determined that the 100' pole must be marked and lighted to prevent being a hazard to navigation given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. Although the FAA lighting requirement was known at the time of the original application, the approved plans did not delineate the backup power source for the site. On June 3, 2003,the Planning Board endorsed revised plans,which are included with this application,that depict the backup power source for the pole. Unfortunately, the zoning relief previously granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals(the`Board")expired. As such, Sprint Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 2 PCS and AWS request variance relief with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. With the exception of the back-up power generator and associated propane tank, all facts and circumstances remain the same. Sprint.PCS and AWS hereby incorporated by reference all of the evidence and materials provided to the Board as part of their application filed with respect to the Board's previously filed decision(the"Decision")granting variance relief. L THE PROPOSED FACILITIES As shown on the revised site plans,the required backup power source will be located within the previously approved fenced compound, and will be screened from view by 8' stockade fencing. Neither the size of the compound, fence height nor overall height of the previously approved pole will change. As such, there is no material change between the previously approved site design and proposed site design that depicts the backup power source. For reference purposes, a copy of the Decision has been included with this application. II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS Enclosed is a check made out to the Town of North Andover for the Board's application fee. Also enclosed are 11 copies of this memorandum and the following materials: 1. Building Commissioner's determination dated September 14, 2001 that variance relief is needed; 2. Board of Appeals Application on behalf of Sprint PCS and AWS for Relief from the Bylaw; 3. Certified Abutters List; 4. One set of addressed, stamped envelopes labels for all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 5. The following Revised Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc., Inc.': I These plans represent Sprint PCS's construction drawings for the proposed facility on which AWS is collocating at the antenna height and in the shelter location shown. AWS will submit to the Board at or before the hearing appropriate detail sheets showing the details of its antennas(within the pole at the height shown on the enclosed plans),equipment cabinets(within the shelter at the location shown on the enclosed plans),coaxial cable tray and other similar details. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 3 SHEETS) DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plan&Elevation DI Notes&Details D2 Details Ell Grounding Plan&Elevation E2-E4 Grounding&Electric Details E5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. 6. Notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application; 7. FAA Determination Regarding the proposed 100',two-carrier flagpole-style monopole; and FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K(the"1K Circular")referred to in these determinations; 8. Prior Zoning Board of Appeals Decision, dated January 29, 2002, granting relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities 9. As previously submitted, AWS'RF report,with coverage charts, demonstrating (1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide, (3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under § 8.9.3.b.9, and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 10. As previously submitted, Sprint PCS's RF report,with coverage charts, demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under§ Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 4 8.9.3.b.9, and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11. View Shed Analysis prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. based on crane/balloon test conducted for AWS' IFB Response;2 12. Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics; and 13. The Planning Board Special Permit. IV. VARIANCES AND WAIVERS A. Why may a variance or waiver be needed? Variances from the following height and color requirements may be necessary for the proposed facility:3 • The proposed installation of a 100'free standing pole plus the required FAA light and the lightning rod at the top of the pole may exceed both the"General" height limit4 2/ As stated previously,the location and height of the pole has not changed and the additional equipment will be completely screened by the stockade fence. As such,the Viewshed Analysis,previously prepared by Greenman- Pedersen is an accurate representation of the proposed facility including the backup power equipment. 3/ AWS and Sprint PCS apply for variance relief without waiving their position that such variance relief is not lawfully required Without limitation,it would be erroneous for the Board to apply these requirements to prohibit the proposed facility. To do so would largely negate the authorization of special permits in the Wireless Services Overlay District and would violate the Telecommunications Act of 19%because the Bylaw would then"prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." 47 U.S.C.§332(cx7)(BxiXH). 4/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"General"height limit: Height,General.Regardless of the type of mount wireless service facilities shall be no higher than ten feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility.In addition,the height of a wireless service facility shall not exceed by more than 10 feet the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chimney,or similar structure. Wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect to height,provided that the facilities do not project above the existing building height. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 5 and the"Ground-Mounted Facilities" height limits of Section 8.9.3.c of the Bylaw. Sprint PCS and AWS request variance relief from these provisions. There are no principal buildings within 300'of the proposed pole(s);the proposed pole(s)will be situated on the side of the Stevens Estate hill, not on the top of the hill;the height (AMSL) of the tallest trees in the vicinity of the pole(s)exceed the height(AMSL)of the pole(s); and the average tall tree canopy height in the vicinity of the pole(s) is 81.0'feet. The top of the pole itself is at 100'AGL, and the top of the required FAA warning light is at 102' AGL. Therefore, since one can exceed the tree canopy by 10'as of right, a height variance of 9' appears necessary for the pole and an additional 2'for the FAA light. Given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport,the FAA has determined that the pole must be marked and lit to avoid becoming a hazard to air navigation. As a result, Sprint PCS and AWS propose to paint the pole in accordance with the requirements of the FAA, which differ from the color requirement of Section 8.9.4.a.iii.26 of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. Sprint PCS and AWS request variance relief from this provision. A. What are the special conditions relating to the soil condition,shape or topography of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located? The special conditions related to the Stevens Estate property, that do not generally affect the zoning district, are that(1)it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property, (2)it is topographically higher than much of the surrounding area but on the side-not the top-of the hill, (3)it has an extensive tall tree canopy, (4)it contains a variety-of significant historic 51 Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limit: Height,Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average building height or,if there are no buildings within 300 feet,these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured from ground level(AGL).If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site of the facility,all ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions.These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. 6/ Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 provides the following"color"requirement: To the extent that any wireless service facilities extend above the height of the vegetation immediately surrounding it, they must be painted in a light gray or light blue hue which blends with sky and clouds. Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 6 structures, and (5) it is on the flight path to the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. These special conditions are pertinent to the height and color variances which are sought here. B. Why does the applicant believe that the variances requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw? The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Bylaw. The installation is in a location specifically approved by Town Meeting, the North Andover Board of Selectmen, the North Andover Wireless Subcommittee,the North Andover Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of the Bylaw, as the Special Permit Granting Authority for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has expressly found that: 1. The specific site is an appropriate location for the project as the site is extremely large (153 acres),topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation. 2. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 3. The use will not result in any nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. 4. The plans meet the requirements of the By-law Section 8.9, as applied or as waived by the Planning Board. 5. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use, and each carrier's proposed equipment shelter will be an unoccupied, unmanned, specialized area for the wireless communications equipment. 6. Because this particular flagpole-style installation constitutes a camouflaged facility under Sections 8.9.2.4, 8.9.3.b.2, 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii,the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views under Sections 8.9.3.c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii do not apply. In any event, the proposed installation is situated in an area of dense natural tree growth on the Stevens Estate property, so that the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views are satisfied. 7. The project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3." Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 7 Thus, the design and location of the facilities(1)buffer the wireless communication devices to the surrounding neighborhood by the significant size of the Stevens Estate property, (2) screen the facilities from view as much as possible by the tall, dense, natural tree canopy, (3) utilize an existing utility corridor on the property for access to the proposed facilities, thereby minimizing required tree cutting, (4)present an environmentally secure facility, and (5)afford significant revenue to the Town. 8. What is the substantial hardship,financial or otherwise,to you,which would result from a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw? The applicants and the Town as property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to preclude the proposed use on the subject property. The applicants both require a location for their communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The Planning Board has specifically found that the"carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public ....". The applicants have been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for an extensive period of time. AWS has been denied a facility at the Barker Farm, and litigation is pending. The Town has directed AWS and Sprint PCS to the Stevens Estate property as a viable location for their needed facilities. Indeed, short of litigation, the recent adoption of the 600'setback amendment to the Wireless Bylaw leaves the Stevens Estate property as one of the only potentially viable sites in this area of North Andover. Further, a literal enforcement of the height requirements would effectively eliminate collocation by the carriers on a single pole. Given the tree canopy and the elevation of the hill which slopes upward of the facility, neither carrier can accept an antenna height less than 90'on the pole. If the height variance is denied,the purposes of the Bylaw to promote collocation and minimize the number of new towers in Town will not be advanced. The carriers will be forced to seek separate permits to construct separate 90'poles which would increase the amount of land area cleared of trees at the site and which would result in two striped and lit poles on the Stevens Estate hill. As the SPGA for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has, in its Decision, sought to avoid this result. The only way to do so is to allow the requested height variance. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act,this Board is obliged to apply the height limits of the Bylaw in a way that avoids effective prohibition and/or unlawful discrimination. Town Meeting,the Planning Board,the Selectmen, and the Wireless Subcommittee have determined that the proposed site is the most appropriate site to serve this area of North Andover. The remoteness of the facilities from surrounding residential uses furthers the purpose of Town Meeting in adopting the 600'setback requirement in the Bylaw. Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 8 As for the color of the pole, the First Circuit has held in Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., d/b/a Cellular One, v Todd, 244 F.3d 51, 62 (Ist Cir.2001),that it is impermissible for the Board to regulate the facility based on matters reserved to or controlled by the FAA(emphasis added): Finally,we note that the Board also based its ... visual impact conclusion upon the fact that the tower would be painted in alternating red and white sections and would have a night beacon. The tower would only have these features because the FAA requires them. Though the Leicester Wireless Bylaw prohibits bright coloration and night lighting, it allows deviations from that prohibition when required by the FAA. To the extent that the Board's objection was based upon the failure to paint the tower a neutral color, the Board improperly relied mon this evidence to justify its decision. Because we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the denial without the inclusion of this factor, it does not affect the outcome of this case. The color of the pole has been preempted by federal law, and accordingly a variance should be granted to conform the Bylaw's color requirements to the mandate of federal law. Finally, the Town as owner would suffer substantial hardship by being deprived of the revenue associated with the proposed use. Since this revenue can assist the Town in continuing to maintain the historic structures on the property or for other important public purposes,the Town will benefit from the proposed facility by helping to maintain the historic character of the site. VI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Sprint PCS and AWS respectfully request that the Board schedule this application for a public hearing at its next regularly scheduled meeting for which proper notice can be given and that the Board grant the foregoing relief and any other zoning relief that may be just and proper for the installation and operation of the proposed facilities. As stated previously and shown on the revised site plans, there have been no material changes to the location, pole height or site design since the Board of Appeals last reviewed the application for a wireless communication facility at the proposed site. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 9 Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS AT&T Wireless Services By its consultant, By its attorneys, yj ow V Steph Anderson, Esq. Well n& ssociates ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP 70 Broa way Street 47 Thorndike Street Westford, MA 01886 Cambridge, MA 02141 (978) 589-9870 (617)252-6575 Dated: June 2003 Dated: June 2003 Enclosures cc: Town Clerk(By Hand) Edward D.Pare,Jr. Esq. (by email w/out encl. and Federal Express w/encl.) #50182384 v12-lacysf0 -I¢402l.d0c0 -8056312227 i Federal Aviation Administration NEW ENGLAND REGION, ANE-520 AERONAUTICAL STUDY 12 NEW ENGLAND EXECUTIVE PARK No: 01-ANE-08760E = BURLINGTON, MA 01803 PRIOR STUDY No: 01-AN - _ r E 057 . 9. OE ISSUED DATE: 03/01/02 VALERIE MOORS CR , CROSSROADS CORP CTR SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD, SUITE 800 MAHWAH, NJ 07495 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an under the pro -aeronautical study visions of 49 U.S.C. , Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: ? Description: ANTENNA TOWER 1870-1885, 1950-1965 MHz W/ 1640 W ERP I i Location: N. ANDOVER Mp, Latitude : 42-42-28 .30 NAD 83 Longitude: 071-06-51.44 Heights : 128 feet above ground level (AGL) 380 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of -fhb navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigatign facilities . Therefore, hereby determined that therstructuresuant tothe wouldtnot lbe aelehazarddtooaime r, it is i navigation provided the following condition(s) , if any, is (are) met : i -As a condition to this determination, the structure should be marked and/or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K Change I Obstruction Marking and Lighting, Chapters 3 (Marked) , 4 , 5 (Red) , & 12 . -It is required that the enclosed FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: AZA At least 10 days prior to start of construction /(7460-2, Part I) V Within 5 days after construction reaches its greatest height ('7460-2, Part II) -See attachment for additional conditions) or information. This determination expires on 10/10/03 unless: (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office or (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority ok the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for cOmpletion .of construction or on the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAY'S PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. 1 -As a result of this structure being critical to flight safety, itk.is required that the FAA be kept apprised as to the status of this project . Failure to respond to periodic FAA inquiries could invalidate this determination. ' This determination is subject to review if an interested art .files a 7 party review is ed petition on or before 03/31/02 . In th vent a petition for re i filed - ee e it must contain a full statement of the basis-, upon which it is made and be submitted in triplicate to the Manager, AIRSPACE & RULES DIVISION, ATA-400 Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 . This determination becomes final on 04/10/02 unless a petition is timely E filed. In which case, this determination will not become final pending 5 disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, ! including increase in heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. i . This determination does include temporary construction equipment such gas cranes, derricks, etc. , which may be used during actual constructikon of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect to air navigation. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any) , and the basis for the FAA' s decision in this matter can be found on the following page (s) A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Commuitatio Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority.` If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at 781-238-7520 . On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876-OE. Patric arra ane (DNH) ( " Manager, AIRSPACE BRANCH 7460-2 Attached Attachment t Aeronautical Study Number 0l-ANE-0$76-OE LOCATION: The proposed antenna tower will be located approximately 0.69 nautical miles (NM)southeast of the airport reference point of the Lawrence Airport(LWM) in Lawrence, Massachusetts. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: f The proposed project is An antenna tower to house cellular frequency antennas. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS EXCEEDED: l ' The aeronautical study indicates that the structure exceeds the Obstruction Standards of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)Part 77 as follows: Section 77.25(a)by 82 feet, structures that exceed the horizontal surface. A horizontal plane 150 feet above the established airport elevation, the perimeter of which is constructed by swinging arcs of specified radii from the center of each end of the primary surface of the runway,as applied to LWM. The arcs are then connected by tangents. PUBLIC NOTICE COMMENTS: The aeronautical study was mailed out as a public notice on November 8,2001, with a closing date of December 15, 2001. One letter containing aeronautical comments was received during the public notice period. The following is a summary of concerns received: Lawrence airport is a major training facility and there is a lot of jet traffic traversing in and o4,of the airport. DISPOSITION OF COMMENTS: The antenna tower will not have any substantial impact on any Visual Flight Rules(VFR)nor Instrument Flight Rules(IFR)aircraft traversing in, out,or through the airport traffic area provided it is properly marked and lighted SUMMARY OF EFFECTS: The aeronautical study found that the proposed antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on air traffic operations inbound to,outbound from,or enmute through LWM under VFR conditions. I F Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876-OE The aeronautical study found that the proposed antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on air traffic operations inbound to, outbound from, or enroute through LWM under IFR conditions. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect' = on any LWM existing or planned runway length. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect or derogation to LWM airport efficiency. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on planned IFR and VFR LWM airport operations indicated by plans on file. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would be located within the LWM airport traffic pattern but would not have a significant adverse effect on traffic. Therefore,a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation is issued. This Determination of No Hazard is granted provided the following condition is adhered to: Section 77.35, the proposed construction or alteration would derogate the reliability df an .; aeronautical air navigation facility. Harmful interference to Lawrence.MA RTR may exist if the proponents equipment meets only the minimum FCC requirements. We � request a minimum spurious emissions tolerance of 92.4 dB from the proponents equipment within the 118-138 MHz frequency band. This determination is valid for frequencies 1870.0-1885.0 and 1950.0-1965.0 MHz at 1,640 Watts ERP each. Any changes in frequency or use of greater power will void this determination. A 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration is enclosed. Please fill out the form with the coordinates and submit for proper charting. This determination concerns the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance relating to laws, ordinances, or regulations required by other governmental bodies. Please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876-OE in any correspondence. z Town of North Andover f NORTi , Office.of the Planning Department � ''� ° Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street ' North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 . �CHU Telephone(978) 688-9535 Fax(978)688-9542 Notice Of Decision o Any appeal shall be filed o r' Within (20) days after the < ==WC-) D �;7 Date of filing this Notice <�)o In the Office of the Town �v Clerk N rnrn t Date: November 14, 2001 un Date of Hearing: September 18, 2001, October 2, 2001 &November 13, 2001 Petition of. AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. dfb/a AT&T Wireless and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS Premises Affected: Stevens Estate 723 Osgood Street Referring to the above petition for a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval. The application was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Sections 8.9,8.9, 10.3 and 10.3.1 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw and M.G.L. e.40A, sec. 9. So as to allow: to construct, operate and co-locate on a 100' tall two-carrier wireless telecommunications service facility in the Residential 1 Zoning District After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted to APPROVE, the Special Permit with Site Plan Approval, based upon the following conditions: Signed: AAf J04 S' ns,Chairman Cc: Applicant AlVerto Angles,Vice Chairman Engineer Richard Nardella, Clerk Abutters Richard Rowen DPW Felipe Schwarz,Associate Member Building Department Conservation Department Health Department ZBA D NOV 1 6 2061 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BCRLDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688- t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner: Town of North Andover Site: Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover Map/I_•ot: Map 35,Lot 23 Relief Granted: Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals for Wireless Service Facilities (ZBL §§ 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3) and Waivers from certain Zoning Bylaw requirements,as set forth herein The Planning Board herein grants Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals to construct, operate and co-locate on a 100'tall two-carrier wireless telecommunications service facility' in the Residential 1 Zoning District to AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its agent AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AT&T Wireless") and to Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint"). This application and additional documentation as cited herein was filed with the Planning Board on August 8, 2001, with subsequent submissions on file. The Planning Board makes the following findings as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Section 8.9: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The specific site is an appropriate location for the project as the site is extremely large (153 acres),topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation. The site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use. The 100'height represents the height of the proposed monopole,exclusive of any necessary lightning rod and exclusive of any Iight that may be required by the Federal Aviation Administration. The carriers had,in the alternative,applied for two separate 90'installations at the site; however,at the public hearing and in its deliberations,the Planning Board has expressed a distinct preference for a single 100'monopole as compared to two separate 90'monopoles at the site. Accordingly, this Decision approves the 100'alternative at this time,without prejudice to the carriers right to reapply for two separate 90'monopoles in the event that a height variance is denied for the 100'monopole. 1 4 2. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood as indicated by the submittals and reports referenced at the end of this decision in Condition#11. 3. The use will not result in any nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. 4. The carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public as indicated by the submittals and reports referenced at the end of this decision in Condition#11. 5. The plans meet the requirements of the Wireless Service Facilities By-law Section 8.9,with the exception of the waivers granted hereby and listed in Condition#10. 6. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The proposed 100' flagpole-style monopole, antennas cables, equipment shelter and equipment area are described in detail on the plans and reports referenced herein. Each carrier's proposed equipment shelter will be an unoccupied,unmanned, specialized area for the wireless communications equipment. 7. The Board finds that,because this particular flagpole-style installation constitutes a camouflaged facility under Sections 8.9.24 8.9.3.b.2, 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii, the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views under Sections 8.9.3.c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii do not apply. In any event, the proposed installation is situated in an area of dense natural tree growth on the Stevens Estate property, so that the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views are satisfied. 8. Accordingly,the Planning Board finds that the project is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirerrients of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3,but requires conditions in order to be fully in compliance. The Planning Board hereby grants the Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals to the carriers provided the following conditions are met: 2 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Discontinuance or Abandonment a) At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of wireless service equipment, such carrier will notify the Town by certified US mail of the proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless service equipment shall be considered abandoned upon discontinuation of operations. b) Upon abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless service equip:uert placed c-'a the site by the carder v ithin 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use; provided, however, that if the second carrier remains in operation at the site,the first carrier to discontinue shall not remove any common facilities in use by the second carrier until the second carrier has also discontinued or abandoned its operations at the site. "Physically remove" shall include, but not be limited to: (i) Removal of antennas, mount,equipment shelters and security barriers installed by the carrier(unless the same will continue to be used by the owner) from the subject property. (ii) Proper disposal of the waste materials generated by the carrier from the site in accordance with local and state solid waste disposal regulations. (iii) Restoring the location of the wireless service facility in its natural condition,except that any landscaping and grading shall remain the after-condition. C) As a condition of this special permit for the placement,construction or modification of their wireless service equipment at the site, the carriers shall place into escrow a sum of money to cover the costs of removing the facility from the subject property. Said amount shall be certified by an engineer, architect or other qualified professional registered to practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Said funds shall be held by an independent escrow agent to be appointed by the carriers and the SPGA. The carriers shall authorize and, as necessary, shall obtain the authorization of the owner of the property to allow the escrow agent to enter upon the subject property to remove the facility if and when the facility has been abandoned or discontinued by both carriers. In the event the posted amount does not cover the cost of demolition and/or removal the Town may place a lien upon the property covering the difference in cost. 3 d) The equipment shall be deemed to be abandoned or discontinued if it has not been used for the purpose for which it was originally constructed for a period of six (6) months or more. Once abandonment or discontinuance by both carriers has occurred, the carriers shall remove the equipment placed by the carriers from the subject property within ninety days. In the event that the carriers fail to remove the equipment, the town shall give notice to the carriers and the independent escrow agent that the equipment shall be removed by the escrow agent forthwith and the escrow agent, after affording written notice seven days in advance to the carriers, shall remove the facility. 2. Performance Guarantees a) Insurance in a reasonable amount(determined and approved by the SPGA after consultation with Town Counsel or, at the expense of the carriers, after consultation with one (1) or more insurance companies) shall be in force to cover damage from the equipment on the structure, damage from transmissions and other site liabilities. Annual proof of said insurance must be filed with the SPGA. b) Funds, sufficient in the opinion of the SPGA to cover annual maintenance of the equipment on the facility, shall be placed into escrow and shall be held by the independent escrow agent who shall be authorized to expend the funds for the maintenance of the equipment on the facility on terms to be agreed upon by the carriers and the SPGA as a condition of approval of the special permit. C) Annual certification demonstrating continuing compliance with the standards of the Federal Communications Commission,Federal Aviation Administration and the American National Standards Institute shall be filed with the SPGA by the Special Permit holder. 3. Term of Special Permit. a) A Special Permit issued for any wireless service facility shall be valid for three (3) years. The special permit may be renewed under the same criteria as the original special permit, provided that the application for renewal of the special permit is made prior to the expiration date of the original or any renewed special permit. Additional measures governing the administration of the special permit are found in Section 10.3 of the Zoning Bylaw. b) After the equipment on the facility is in operation,the carriers shall submit to the SPGA, within 90 days of beginning operations and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit,preexistent and current RFR measurements. Such measurements shall be signed and certified by an RF engineer or other qualified person, stating that RFR measurements are accurate and are in compliance or why the 4 measurements fail to comply with all applicable FCC Guidelines as specified in Section 8.9(4)(c)(1) RFR Filing Requirements of this Bylaw. The measurements shall be submitted for both co-locators. C) After the wireless service facility is in operation the carriers shall submit to the SPGA; within 90 days of the issuance of the Special Permit, and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit,preexistent and current measurements of acoustic noise from the wireless service facility. Such measurements shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet the Noise Standards sub-section 6.13.14.5 of the Bylaw as measured from the Stevens Estate mansion as opposed to the perimeter of the equipment compound. The carriers shall forward to a separate consulting engineer;selected by the Town, the above materials for review. The carriers shall pay thy:reasonable cost of such review. d) Each carrier or its successors in interest shall maintain its wireless service equipment in good condition. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, painting, structural integrity of the flagpole-style monopole and maintenance of the buffer and landscaping, as applicable. 4. Prior to the endorsement of the plans by the Planning Board,the carriers must comply with the following conditions: a) The carriers shall provide a map indicating the intended locations for testing as required above. b) A bond in the total amount of$5,000 shall be posted for the purpose of insuring that a final as-built plan is provided to the SPGA showing the location of all on- site structures installed by the carriers. The bond is also in place to insure that the site is constructed in accordance with the approved plans. This bond shall be in the form of a check or checks made out to the Town of North Andover. This check will then be deposited into an interest bearing escrow account. C) The carriers shall provide the necessary escrow accounts and insurance as required in the above sections Ic, 2a and 2b. 5. Prior to the start of construction: a) A construction schedule shall be submitted to the Planning Staff for the purpose of tracking the construction and informing the public of anticipated activities on the site. b) The carriers shall determine the preexisting conditions of the noise levels in the immediate vicinity of the Stevens Estate mansion to determine the baseline noise conditions of the site area. The noise survey will provide evidence of the origin of 5 surrounding noise and therefore a baseline condition from which the carriers determine their increases. The noise levels shall not increase the broadband level by more than I Odb(a) above the ambient levels or produce a "pure tone"condition as set forth in DAQC Policy 90-001, the guideline for 310 CMR 7.10. The carriers may use relevant professional sound emitting data from the prior building use to build a baseline based on prior use of the building and grounds. References to sources for data must be included in the material. 6. Prior to FORM U verification (Building Permit Issuance): a) The final site plan mylars must be endorsed and three (3) copies of the signed plans must be delivered to the Planning Department. b) A certified copy of the recorded decision must be submitted to the Planning Department. C) The carriers must have obtained a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the height of the proposed facility to be constructed at 100' above ground level, plus the height of any necessary lightning rod and FAA light. A recorded copy of the Zoning Board Decision certifying that the variance has been received must be provided to the Planning Department as proof of such. 7. Prior to verification of the Certificate of Occupancy: a) The carriers must submit a letter from the architect or engineer of the project stating that the construction and operations substantially comply with the plans referenced at the end of this decision as endorsed by the Planning Board. b) With the exception of any aviation warning lighting required by the Federal Aviation Administration, which shall be installed and maintained in accordance with applicable FAA guidance, all lighting placed by the carriers on the subject property shall have underground wiring and shall be so arranged that all direct rays from such lighting falls entirely within the site and shall be shielded or recessed so as not to shine upon abutting properties or streets. The Planning Office must approve any changes to the approved lighting plan as submitted by the carriers. 8. Prior to the final release of security: a) A final as-built plan showing final construction and location of the wireless hardware shall be submitted to,reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff. 9. Additional Conditions 6 a) Any stockpiling of materials (dirt,wood,construction material,etc.) must be shown on a plan and reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff. Any approved piles must remain covered at all times to minimize any dust problems that may occur with adjacent properties. Any stock piles to remain for longer than one week must be fenced off and covered. b) In an effort to reduce noise levels,the carriers shall keep their respective equipment in optimum working order, fhrough regular maintenance, any and all equipment that shall emanate sounds from the structures or site. C) No equipment or other equipment that will emanate noise-exceeding ' levels cited herein shall be placed on the exterior of the structure. Such equipment shall be enclosed as shown on the plans. d) All site lighting shall provide security for the site and structures however it must not create any glare or project any light onto adjacent residential properties. e) The contractor shall contact Dig Safe at least 72 hours prior to commencing any excavation. f) The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the carriers, and their respective employees, successors and assigns in interest or control. g) Any action by a Town Board, Commission, or Department that requires changes in the plan or design of the building as presented to the Planning Board,may be subject to modification by the Planning Board. h) Any revisions shall be submitted to the Town Planner for review. If these revisions are deemed substantial, the carriers must submit revised plans to the Planning Board for approval. i) This Special Permit approval shall be deemed to have lapsed after two years from the date permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced. Substantial use or construction will be determined by a majority vote of the Planning Board. As long as the carriers are diligently pursuing necessary governmental approvals for the proposed project, including without limitation the height variance identified in Section 6(c) above,the two year period shall be tolled during the pendency of any litigation challenging the grant or denial of any such governmental approval. 10. Waivers 7 The following waivers were granted in determining this decision in accordance with the authority designated by Section 8.9.3.c.v.3 of the Zoning Bylaw and Section 8.9.5.d.ix: a. Map of Other Preexistent/Approved Wireless Services Facilities: Each carrier's RF report each contains a map showing the carrier's respective preexisting and approved wireless facilities in North Andover and outside of North Andover within one-mile of its boundary. If and to the extent Section 8.9.5.d.ii.4 requires a map showing facilities owned or operated by other wireless service providers, the carriers have requested a waiver of that filing requirement, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix. The SPGA has granted that waiver because such information is not needed fo:a thorough review of the proposed facilities and is not readily available to the carriers from their competitors. b. Siting Filing Requirements The carriers' Site Plans provide the information required by Section 8.9.5.d.iii (Siting Filing Requirements) and Section 8.3.5 (Information Required for Site Plan Review) of the Zoning Bylaw. If and to the extent the plans do not provide sufficient information to meet the requirements of Section 8.9.5.d.iii.3 (requiring the plans to show tree cover on the subject property and all abutting properties,by dominant species and average height) and Section 8.9.5.d.iii.4 (requiring the plans to show an outline of all existing buildings and uses on subject property and all abutting properties), the carriers have requested a waiver of those filing requirements, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix. The SPGA has granted that waiver because, given the detailed information submitted, any additional information regarding tree cover and the use of distant buildings is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facilities. C. Color Board Unless otherwise specified by the SPGR or the Massachusetts Historical Commission ("MHC"),the carriers' proposed equipment shelter will be sided with clapboard and painted white. The surrounding wooden fence will be left as natural wood. Unless otherwise specified by the FAA, the carriers propose to color the pole gray. Accordingly,the SPGA has granted a waiver of the "color board" requirement in Section 8.9.5.d.v.3 pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix,because a "color board"is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facilities. d. Balloon or Crane Test The SPGA has granted a waiver of a balloon or crane test at the proposed site required by Section 8.9.5.d.(v)7. The plans and visibility study provided by 8 the carriers contain sufficient information to evaluate the application, without the need for an additional crane test or balloon test. C. Hazardous Materials The SPGA has granted a waiver of the requirement to provide location, type and amount of any materials considered hazardous by the federal state or local government required by Section 8.9.5.d.viii.2. The carriers have listed the sources of negligible amounts of hazardous materials to be the thermostat (potential mercury) and the smoke detector(low level radiation). L Watershed Protection District As set forth in a letter from the carriers' consulting engineers, Greenman- Pederson Inc., dated September 14,2001, the proposed facilities will be located more than 500' from the Lake and will not be located within 325' of wetlands, as defined in the local Wetlands Protection By-law. As a result, the SPGA has granted a waiver from any filing requirements of the Wetland and/or Watershed Protection District, as a watershed special permit is not required based upon the letter from Greenman-Pederson, Inc. dated 9/14/01. g. Boundary Survey The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.ii, which requires a survey of the lot parcel. The subject property contains in excess of 153 acres of land and the proposed facilities are centrally located on the parcel, hundreds of feet from any lot line. As a result, a boundary survey would be a significant and expensive undertaking, would serve no material purpose, would be commercially unreasonable, and is unnecessary for the Board to assess the merits of the type of development being proposed. h. Easements and Legal Conditions The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.iv, which requires all easements or legal conditions to be identified.The pertinent encumbrances have been marked on the Plans submitted with the Application. The Town owns the property. The material provisions of any access or utility easements will be determined during the final lease negotiations in consultation with Town Counsel and the Town Manager. i. Storm Water Drainage Calculations The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.vii,which requires storm water drainage calculations. Due to the minimal size of the 9 impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site,there will not be any material storm water runoff generated. j. Sims The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xii, which requires that all signs be identified. Pursuant to section 8.9.4.b.ii of the Wireless Service Facilities by-laws each carrier will provide a security sign that identifies the facility owner and warns against trespassing. However,this sign must be in accordance with the provisions of Section 6 , Signs and Outdoor Lighting regulations, of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw. Permission from the North Andover Planning Board is only for the aesthetic and site pian review purposes of the signage and does not exempt the applicant to obtain a sign permit if determined by the Building Commisioner_ k. Landscape Plan The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xv and subsection 8.3.6.a.ii.e, which require that a full landscape plan to be filed with the Application. Due to the dense woods in the area surrounding the proposed facilities. as well as the carriers' intention to clear only that vegetation that is necessary for the proposed construction, no'aacuti6nat landscaping will be required around trie factfIies: in. Drain Basin Study The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xviii which requires a drain basin study. Due to the minimal size of the impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site,there will not be any material storm water runoff generated. As a result, a drain basin study is unnecessary. n. Traffic Study The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xix which requires a traffic study. As there will be minimal vehicle trips to the facilities, once constructed,no significant impact on traffic will be created. A Traffic impact study is therefore unnecessary. o. Erosion Control Plan The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.6.a.ii.f,which requires a full erosion control plan to be filed with the Application. Due to the distance to any significant wetland resources, an erosion control plan is not 10 necessary. Notwithstanding, a sample of the proposed erosion control methods have be identified on a supplementary pian sheet filed with the Board. p. Best Management Practices Plan The SPCA has granted a waiver from Section 8.9.4.e.iii to the extent it provides for a Best Management Practices plan for storm water during construction. Due to the minimal size of the impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site,there will not be any material storm water runoff generated_ Prior to cutting or clearing trees associated with the construction, the carriers to the building will also submit a plan to the Building Commissioner showing the location of the erosion control measures along the limit of clearing/grading. 11. DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED: The following information shall be.deemed part of the decision: Application Cover Memorandum filed on August 8, 2001, from Stephen D. Anderson for AT&T Wireless and Christine Morrisey for Sprint; AT&T Wireless' completed Planning Board Application for Special Permit with Site Plan Approval; Sprint's completed Planning Board Application for Special Permit with Site Plan Approval; Certified Abutters List; Assessor's Maps numbered 35, 36,74, 91, 92, 99, 100; Zoning Map; Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,Inc. dated June 26, 2001 revised 7/11/01,9/17/01, & 11/06/01 consisting of the following: 11 x ` �� a 2BO-E4457-ZO1 Title Sheet 2BO-E4457-ZO2 Property Plan -One Compound 2BO-E4457-ZO3 Site Plan - One Compound 2BO-E4457-ZO4 Elevation - One Compund 2BO-E4457-ZO5 Property Plan -Two Compounds 2BO-E4457-ZO6 Site Plan -Two Compounds 2BO-E4457-ZO7 Elevation -Two Compounds AT&T Wireless' RF report dated July 24,2001,with coverage charts, demonstrating (1)the need for the facility, (2) the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under § 8.9.3.b.9, and(4) the other existing AT&T Wireless facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; Sprint's RF affidavit dated June 15, 2001,with coverage charts, demonstrating ( )1 the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate under § 8.9.3.b.9, and (4) the other existing AT&T Wireless facilities in 12 North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; Memorandum dated May 4, 2001,constituting the Town's consent to Municipal Development application; View Shed Analysis prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., dated December 4, 2000; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' antennas; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' equipment shelter; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' cables and cable runs; MSDS for AT&T Wireless' batteries to be used for backup power; Specifications for Sprint's antennas; Specifications for Sprint's equipment cabinets; Specifications for Sprint's cables and cable runs; MSDS for Sprint's batteries to be used for backup power; AT&T Wireless' Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health dated June 10,2001, certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; The Massachusetts Department of Public Health's approval of AT&T Wireless' proposed facility dated June 21, 2001; Sprint's Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health dated June 29, 2001,certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies, power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; AT&T Wireless' Notices to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction dated May 29, 2001; Letter dated August 13, 2001,fro George W.Watson, III,enclosing Owner' Consent to Development Application dated July 18, 2001, executed by the Town Manager; 13 Memorandum dated September 25, 2001, from Stephen D. Anderson for AT&T Wireless and Christine Morrisey for Sprint (with enclosures), providing supplemental information related to the carriers' application; Letter dated September 14, 2001,from Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., specifying the distance of the proposed facility from wetlands and the lake; Letter dater October 1, 2001, from Alactronics,representing a Noise Report for the proposed facilities; Revised Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. dated September 17, 2001, consisting of the following: DRAG IIDEK 2BO-E4457-Z02 Raw Land Site- MonopoIe with Shelter Property Plan- One Compound 2BO-E4457-Z05 Raw Land Site -MonopoIe with Shelter Property Plan-Two Compound 2BO-34457-Z08 Raw Land Site Monopole with Shelter Landscape and Erosion Control Details Memorandum from Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. dated September 13, 2001, with attached engineering review report; Memorandum from Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc.,dated October 18, 2001; Memorandum from Town Planner to North Andover Planning Board, dated September 12, 2001. FAA Determination dated 11/05/01 Regarding the proposed 100', two- carrier flagpole-style monopole; FAA Determination dated 11/05/01 Regarding AT&T Wireless' proposed 90', one-carrier flagpole-style monopole; FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K(the"1K Circular")referred to in these determinations; and 14 Letter from Stephen Anderson and Jonathan Lazar submitting the FAA Determinations and Circular. 15 Town of North Andover 6 f Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division I loidi Ckiffin, Division Director 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 relephone(97;;)688-954'1 D. Robert Nicctt<1 Fax (178)688-9542 Ruilding Commissioner cor-�- c) n rn Any appeal shall be filed Notice of Decision c::) zcn within(20)days after the Year 2002 date of filing of this notice, in the office of the Town Clerk. Property at: The Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Streefr NAME: AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and DATE: 1/25/02 through its Manager AT&T W-weless Services,,Ing d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum L l? d/b/a Sprint PCS. ADDRESS: 400 Blue Hill DriYe,Westwood,MA PETMON: 2042-001 02090 and; Crossroads Corporate Center,l International Boulevard,Suite 800,Mahwah,NJ 07495 HEARING: 1/15/42 The Noah Andover Board of Appeals held a public hearing at its regular meeting on Tuesday, January 15,2002 at 7:30 PM upon the application of AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA to allow for variances from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or,if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height)and from Section 8.9, Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii(2)(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) in order to construct a two-carrier monopole with internal antennas. The following members were present: Raymond A. Vivenzio,Robert P. Ford,John M. Pallone, Scott A.Karpinski,and Ellen P.McIntyre. Upon a motion made by Robert Ford and 2"d by Ellen McIntyre,the Board voted to GRANT a height variance 13' from the requirements of 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300'or, if no such buildings, ]0'above average tree canopy height)to permit the construction, operation,maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas, including the required FAA light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104' in accordance with the following Plans for the facility prepared by Greenman- Pedersen, Inc., 28 Lord Road, Marlborough, MA 01752 l ROARDOt"AMAT S 6Q8-9541 RUnDING 685-9545 CONSLRVArtON 685=9530 HEnt.T11 c58-9540 PLINNINCI M-9535 SHEET DESCRIPn0N 2BO-E 45'7-ZOI, Rawland Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev. 2. 2BO-64457-Z02, Rawland.Site—Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- ow Compouxx 2BO-E4457-ZO3, IC:awlan& iWe Monopole With ShelterSite Plan-One rev. 2. Compound 2B0-FA457-Z04, Rowland SI to"—Monopole with shelter Elevations One rev. 1. Compound on paper dated and sealed by DavidA.Chappell,RPE,November 21,2001,and on mylar dated and sealed by Jeanne T. Gamache, RPE;January 15,2002:and a color variance from the requirements of 8.9.4A.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or Niue)to permit the construction, operation, maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,including the required FAA light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the bight of 104'in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 7017460-lK.referred to in the FAA,s determination for the proposed facility. Voting unanimously in favor: RAVMPF/JW/SAK/EPM. The Board finds that the variances the applicants have requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose ofthe Zoning Bylaw. The applicants submitted 21 documents to support their request; including the Planning Board Special Permit with 9 specific conditions and 14 waivers,the Massachusetts Depsartrnent of Public Health approval,and Noise Analysis by Alactronics. Furthermore, if the rights authorized by the Variance are not exercised within one(1)year of the date of the grant, it shall tapse, and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing.deemedto Furthermore, if a Special Permit granted ut�provto onh the Special Permitiwhiecontained herein ll be ovas Sxanted unless have lapsed after a two(2)year period from substantial use or construction has commenced, it shall lapse and may be re-established only after notice, and a new hearing. Town of North Andover f Raymond A.Vivenz* ,Acting Chairman Decision2002-00 I 2 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by 2nd through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P,d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner. Town of North Andover Decd Reference: Boole 4197,Page 63 Site: Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street, North Andover Map/Lot: Map 35, Lot 23 Relief Granted: 1. ' ' 8.93.e.i and 8.93.cii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 304' or, if no such buildings, W above average tree canopy height); and 2. 1 8.9.4.a.iiL2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) DATE: January 29,2002 Pursuant to public notice in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune,a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of North Andover,published on December 31,2001,and January 8,2002,and pursuant to notice sent by mail,postage prepaid,to all interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws,a public hearing was held on January 15,2002, in the North Andover Senior Center on the petition AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC,by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.,d/b/a AT&T Wireless ("AWS')and Sprint S estrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprirrt")for any necessary zoning variances with respect to and color to permit t eir respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town- owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. The premises affected are located at 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MA in a Residence 1 Zoning District and is shown on Assessor's Map 35,as Lot 23. Attorney Stephen D. Anderson represented AT&T Wireless and Attorney Scott Lacy represented Sprint at the public hearing. No member of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition. L Iff PROPOSED FAC 1MES The.Town of North Andover owns the historic Stevens Estate property. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for the proposed wireless communication facilities has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000;AWS and Sprint have each been awarded a 3 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner: Town of North Andover Deed Reference: Book 4197,Page 63 Site: Stevens Estate,'723 Osgood Street,Korth Andover Map/Lot: Map 35,Lot 23 Relief Granted: 1. ' ' 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.cii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if Do such buildings, lo' above average tree canopy height); And 2. , 8.9_4.2.iiL2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) DATE: January 29,2002 Pursuant to public notice in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune,a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of North Andover,published on December"31,2001,and January 8,2002,and pursuant to notice sent by mail,postage prepaid;to all interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws,a public hearing was held on January 15,2042, in this North Andover Senior Center on the petition AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC,by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.,d/b/a AT&T Wireless("AWS")and Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint")for any necessary zoning variances with respect to}eight and color to permit their respective installation and operation of.proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town- owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. The premises affected are located at 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MA in a Residence 1 Zoning District and is shown on Assessor's Map 35,as Lot 23. Attorney Stephen D.Anderson represented AT&T Wireless and Attorney Scott Lacy represented Sprint at the public hearing_ No member of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition. L TwE PROPOSED FACILITZS The Town of North Andover owns the historic Stevens Estate property. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for the proposed wireless communication facilities.has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000; AWS and Sprint have each been awarded a 3 lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids ("IFB");and the Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Consistent with the results of the IFB and Planning Board processes,AWS and Sprint have proposed to install and operate Their wireless communication facilities at the Stevens Estate site on a 100'two-cattier monopole with internal antennas.y The Federal Aviation Administration ("FAX) has determined that the 100'pole must be marked and lighted to prevent a hazard to navigation given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Munici 1 Airport. The carriers are also pursuing approval of the 100'two-carrier option by t e Massachusetts historical Commission("MHC'). The internal antennas and cables will be"camouflaged" inside the pole within the meaning of Section 8.92.d, 8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.c.L 8.9.4.a.ii,and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed pole will be located in a densely wooded area northwest of the main Stevens Estate building and adjacent to an existing electric and telephone utility corridor serving the Estate. The proposed 100'pole will be capable of accommodating both carriers. The combined two-carrier facility involves a 40'x 30'fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. This area will be surrounded by an 8'stoekad_e fence. Within the fenced compound will be a two-carrier, L-shaped equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Each carrier will have a separate 12'x 20'equipment area within the shelter. Coaxial cables will be run inside the pole and across an ice bridge/cable tray to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter. Each facility will be served by associated power/telephone connections. Additional details of the proposed wireless services facility are set forth in the plans and documents identified below. II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS AWS and Sprint submitted the following materials in support of their applications: Building Commissioner's determination that a height variance is needed; 1/ The top of the pole is at IW AGL. The top of the required FAA light is at 107 A61- The top of the required lightning rod is at 104'AGL. The Planning Board's Special Pcrmit takes into account the two necessary additions at the top of the pole. 4 2. AWS' completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 3. Sprint,s completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 4. Certified Abutters List; 5. One set of addressed, stamped envelopes for all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 6. Assessor's Map numbered 35; 7. Zoning Map; 8. The following Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., on paper dated November 21,2001, and on mylar dated January 15,2002: SHEET DESCRIPTION 2BO-E4457-Zt11, Rawiancl Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev.2. 2SO-E4457-Z02, RaEwland Site—Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- rev.l. One Compound ZBC}-F�4457-203, Rawlard Site—Monopole With Shelter Site Plan-One rev.2. Compound 2BO-E4457-Z04, Rawland Site—Monopole with shelter Elevation-One rev. 1. compound R. AWS' RF report,with coverage charts,demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 10. Sprint,s RF report,with coverage charts;demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11 Notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application; 5 12. Two View Shed Analyses prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., one dated December 4,2004,and the other dated December 19, 200), based on crane tests conducted for A WS, IFB Response and for the carriers' variance applications; 13. AWS' Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 14. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health' s approval of AWS' proposed facility; 15. Sprint's Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 16. AWS' Notices to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction; and 17. FAA Determination Regarding the proposed 100, two-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 18. FAA Determination Regarding a 90',one-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 19. FAA Advisory Circular 70n460-IK(the "IK Circular")referred to in these determinations; 20. Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics;and 21. The Planning Board Special Permit. III. THE PLANNING BOARD SPECIAL P)FRMIT Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover's Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw,the Planning Board specifically found in its special permit decision that(a) the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation, (b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adversely affect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and(e)the project -is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3,8.9 and 10.3.-. The Planning Board also imposed numerous specific conditions in its special permit regarding(1) discontinuance or abandonment, (2)performance guarantees, (3)the term of the special permit, (4) pre-endorsement requirements,(5)pre-construction requirements, (6)pre-building permit 6 requirements, (7) pre-occupancy requirements, (8)release of security requirements, and (9)a variety of additional conditions regarding the construction and operation of the facility. In addition, the Planning Board found that the application satisfied or was entitled to a waivers (in accordance with Section 8.9.3.c.v,3 and Section 8.9.5.d.ix) from the following criteria: (1)provision of RF coverage maps for other carriers, (2)compliance with siting filing requirements, (3)provision of a color board,(4)performance of a balloon or crane test, (5)compliance with hazardous material criteria, (6)compliance with watershed protection district criteria, (7) performance of a boundary survey, (8)designation of easements and legal conditions, (9) performance of storm water drainage calculations,(10)compliance with signage requirements, (l 1) provision of a landscape plan, (12)performance of a drainage basin study, (13)performance of a traffic study, (14)provision of an erosion control pian,and(15)provision of a best management practices plan. 1V. VARIANCES RELIEF IS APPROPRIATE A. Variances Sought Having received the foregoing approvals,AWS and Sprint applied for variances from the following height and color requirements for the following reasons: $ The proposed installation of a 100'tree standing pole plus the required FAA light and the lightning rod at the top of the pole exceeds both the •General" height limit-L and the "Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limitJ1 of�ion 893.c of North Andover,s Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from these provisions. There are no principal buildings within 300'of the proposed pole;the proposed pole will be situated on the side of the Stevens Estate hill, not on the top of the hilt;the height(AMSL)of the tallest trees in the vicinity of the pole exceed the height(AMSL)of the pole;and the average tali tree canopy height in the vicinity of the pole is 81.0'feet. The top of the pole itself is at 100'AGL;the top of the required FAA warning light is at 102'AGL,and the top of the lightning rod is at 104'AOL. Therefore,since one can exceed the tree canopy by 2/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"general"height limit: gel&,Gesersl Regardless of the type of mount.wireless service facilities shall be Do higher than ten feet above the avcagc height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility.In addition,the height of a wireless service facility shall not exceed by more than 10 fat the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chimney,or similar structure.Wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect to height,provided that the 6acilitics do not project above the existing building height. 3/ Section 8.0.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities-height limit: Heigh,Groun&PIouated Facilities. ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average building height or,ifthere arc no buildings within 300 feet,these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured Sturm grnund level(AGL).inhere arc no huildlogs within 300 feet of the proposed site orthe facility.all ground-mounted wircicss service raciiities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to sc'recrt views ol'the facility in all direction..These trees May be existing on the subject propetry or planted on site. 7 10'as of right,a height variance of 9' is necessary for the pole; an additional 2'for the FAA light;and an additional T for the lightning rod, for a total height variance of 13' to the top of the lightning rod. Given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport,the FAA has determined that the pole must be marked and lit to avoid becoming a hazard to air navigation. As a result, AWS and Sprint propose to pant the pole to accordance with the requirements of the FAA, which differ from the color requirement of Section 8.9.4.a.iii.21'of North Andover,s Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from this provision. 2. The Board finds that there are the special conditions relating to the soil condition, shape or topography of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located. The special conditions related to the Stevens Estate property,that do not generally affect the zoning district, are that(1) it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property, (2) it is topographically higher than much of the surrounding area but on the side-not the top- of the hill, (3) it has an extensive tall tree canopy,(4) it contains a variety of significant historic structures,and(S) it is on the flight path to the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. These special conditions are pertinent to the height and color variances that are sought here, Section 5.9.4.e di.2 provides the following"color"requirement: 'fo the extent that any wireless service facilities cxtmd above the height of the vegetation immediately surrounding it,they must be painted in a light gray or light blue hue wAich blends with sky and clouds. 8 3. The Board finds that the variances requested may be panted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. + I I The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The installation is in a location specifically approved by Town Meeting, the North Andover Board of Selectmen, the North Andover Wireless Subcommittee, the North Andover Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover,s Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw, as the Special Permit Granting Authority for wireless communication facilities,the Planning Board has expressly found that(a)the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area,and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation, (b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adversely affect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and(e)the project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3,8.9 and 10.3." The Board concurs with these findings and further finds that the design and location of the facilities (1)buffer the wireless communication devices to the surrounding neighborhood by the significant size of the Stevens Estate property,(2)screen the facilities from view as much as possible by the tall, dense,natural tree caro , (3)utilize an existing utility corridor on the property for access to propos i sties,thereby minimizing mired tree cuttiny, (4)present an environmentally secure facility, and (5)afford significant revenue to the Town. 4. The Board finds that there is substantial hardship, financial or otherwise„to the Applicants and the Town,which would result from a literal enforcement ofthe provisions of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants and the Town as property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to preclude the proposed use on the subject Property AWS and Sprint both require a location for their communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The Planning Board has specifically found that the "carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public.....". The applicants have been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for an extensive period of time. AWS has been denied a facility at the Barker Farm,and litigation is pending. The Town has directed AWS and Sprint to the Stevens Estate property as a viable location for their needed facilities. The Town,s recent adoption of the 600'setback amendment to the Wireless Bylaw leaves the Stevens Estate property as one of the only potentially viable sites in this area of North Andover. 9 Further, a literal enforcement of the height requirements would effectively eliminate collocation by the carriers on a single pole. Given the tree canopy and the elevation of the hill which slopes upward of the facility,the carriers RF engineers have presented evidence that neither carrier can accept an antenna height less than 90'on the pole. If the height variance is denied,the purposes of the Bylaw to promote collocation and minimize the number of new towers in Town will not be advanced. The carriers would be forced to seek separate permits to construct separate 90`poles which would increase the amount of land area cleared of trees at the site and which would result in two striped and lit poles on the Stevens Estate hill. As the SPGR for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has, in its special permit decision,specifically sought to avoid this result. The only way to do so is to allow the requested height variance. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act,this Board considers it appropriate to apply the height limits of the Bylaw in a way that avoids both effective prohibition of service and unlawful discrimination between carriers. The Board recognizes that Town Meeting,the Planning Board,the Selectmen, and'the Wireless Subcommittee have determined that the proposed site is the most appropriate site to serve this area of North Andover. The remoteness of the facilities from surrounding residential uses furthers the purpose of Town Meeting in adopting the 600'setback requirement in the Bylaw. As for the color of the pole,the Board is aware that the First Circuit has recently held in South%esiern Bell Mobile Systems,Inc., d/b/a Cellular Ono v. Todd,244 F.3d 51, 62(I st Ciur.200I}, that it is impermissible for the Board to regulate the facility based on matters reserved to or controlled by the FAA(emphasis added): Finally, we note that the Board also based its...visual impact conclusion upon the fact that the tower would be painted in alternating red and white sections and would hive a night beacon. The tower would only have these features because the FAA requires them. Though the Leicester Wireless Bylaw prohibits bright coloration and night lighting, it allows deviations from that prohibition when required by the FAA.To the=nt that the Board's objection was based upon the failure topaint the tower a neutral color,the Bo rid impMerly MWeA up—on this evidence to iustfy its decision Because we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the denial without the inclusion of this factor, it does not affect the outcome of this case. Federal law has effectively preempted the color of the pole,and accordingly a variance is appropriate to conform the Bylaw's color requirements to the mandate of federal law. 10 AUTWireless s 10 Tara Boulevard Suite 500 Nashua,NH 03062 July 24, 2001 Planning Board Office of Community Development 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Stevens Estate Wireless Facility oning Application Dear Members of the Board: This report discusses AT&T Wireless Services' need for a wireless communications facility at the above Site. 1. QUALIFICATIONS I am a Radio Frequency Engineer for AT&T Wireless Services. I have experience in the design and testing of AT&T Wireless Services' wireless communication facilities as part of its federally licensed network in Massachusetts. For example,I have participated in the design of the AT&T Wireless Services' network in the Greater Boston Area, evaluated zoning provisions applicable to wireless communication facilities in various communities, testified before local zoning boards in zoning hearings,prepared search areas for new installations,participated in drive tests and reviewed drive test results,participated in site visits,prepared RF designs for proposed installations,reviewed plans and prepared RF packages for zoning hearings,tested and evaluated new sites, I have been involved in AT&T Wireless Services' design of the proposed wireless communication facility at the Steven's Estate property. I have reviewed the coverage data for the proposed installation, and reviewed RF coverage information for AT&T Wireless Services' existing sites. Recycled Paper 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY Consistent with the results of the RFP process AWS (and its co-applicant Sprint) are proposing two alternative development options for their wireless communication facilities at the Stevens Estate site: (a) one 100'two-carrier monopole,with internal antennas, to accommodate both carriers, or(b)two separate 90'monopoles, each with internal antennas, to accommodate one carrier each. The carriers intend to pursue both options through permitting in light of the potential height limitations of the Federal Aviation Administration("FAA"), the Massachusetts Historical Commission ("MHC"), and the Zoning Bylaw. These permitting processes will ultimately dictate which choice of options is the chosen option. The internal antennas and cables will be"camouflaged"inside the poles within the meaning of§§ 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.6, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed pole(s)will be located in a densely wooded area northwest of the main Stevens Estate building and adjacent to an existing electric and telephone utility corridor serving the Estate. The proposed 100'pole will be capable of accommodating both carriers; in the alternative, the proposed 90'poles will be capable of accommodating one carrier each. In either case,AWS would occupy the 90' slot on the pole. (The diameter of the two-carrier pole will be larger compared to the one-carrier poles.) The combined two-carrier facility will involve a 40'x 30' fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. This area will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence. Within the fenced compound will be a two-carrier,L-shaped equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Each carrier will have a separate 12'x 20' equipment area within the shelter. The separate one-carrier facilities will each involve a 30'x 30'fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. Each area will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence. Within each fenced area will be a 12'x 20' one-carrier equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Coaxial cables will be run inside the pole(s) and across an ice bridge/cable tray to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment,shelter. Each facility will be served by associated power/telephone connections. The ground equipment will be connected to standard electric and T-1 telephone service. The public utilities providing these services will likely require an easement from the nearest public way(Osgood Street)to install the necessary utilities. That easement would presumably follow the existing electric and telephone utilities corridor at the Stevens Estate property. Vehicular access to the proposed facility along the existing driveway,parking lot and utility corridor at the property must also be provided by the Town. 3. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES' NETWORK AT&T Wireless Services is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to provide wireless phone service in areas across the country, including the Boston Metropolitan Trading Area("MTA"). The Town of North Andover is located within the Boston MTA and therefore AT&T Wireless Services is licensed to provide wireless phone service within the Town of North Andover and surrounding communities. Wireless phone coverage is provided by placement of a number of low-power antenna sites within a given area. The sites are spaced so that the coverage from each location overlaps with its neighboring sites. When a call is placed on a certain site, the phone monitors the signal from the serving site, as well as the signal of all of the adjacent sites. When the phone receives a stronger signal from an adjacent site, it requests a transfer from the site it is currently using to the stronger site. If there is seamless coverage provided by the carrier,the call will transfer without interruption. If there is a lack of appropriate signal strength at the transfer point, the call will degrade and possibly drop. 4. THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITY To demonstrate why the proposed use is necessary,I have attached two coverage maps of the Town of North Andover and the surrounding area within one mile of North Andover's boundaries (one map without the proposed facility and the other map with the proposed facility) showing the location(s)of AT&T Wireless Services' existing and currently Wireless Communications Facilities in and near North Andover shown in green.' Site 445 shown in green on this coverage chart represents the"best case"coverage anticipated from the proposed facility assuming AT&T Wireless Services is awarded the RFP for the site. These coverage maps were generated using an RF Propagation computer-modeling program. The software takes into account the geographical features of an area, antenna models, antenna heights, and RF transmit power. The maps represent existing and proposed antenna locations, and the areas that currently have quality wireless phone service based on these locations. Any phone that travels outside of the effective coverage area will have a high likelihood of a degraded and possibly dropped call. These maps show that there is currently a substantial coverage gap in the Stevens Estate 1 AT&T Wireless Services'proposed facilities are necessarily in a state of flux as zoning bylaws change,new sites are identified,RFPs are issued,leases or licenses expire,litigation is resolved,capacity needs increase,additional services are added to the system,and the like. The attached coverage charts must be read in this dynamic context. In addition,depending on the outcome of the RFP award by North Andover,the maximum height allowed by zoning for that site,and AT&T Wireless Services'relative position on that facility,AT&T Wireless Services'needs for sites in North Andover itself may change. area along Routes 125 and 133 and the areas adjacent to these roads. These are high-demand areas in which AT&T Wireless Services currently lacks adequate communications service. The proposed installation is necessary to address this substantial coverage gap. Given the high traffic/demand along these Routes, installation of a facility at the Stevens Estate property is a non-intrusive means for closing this significant gap in AT&T Wireless Services' coverage. In this context, AWS' investigations of the area in the vicinity of the site confirm that "there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under § 8.9.3.b.9 of the Zoning Bylaw. In addition, AWS' proposal for a flagpole-style facility at the Barker Farm has been denied by the Board of Appeals and is currently in litigation. 5. THE USE WILL NOT CAUSE A DETRIMENT The use will not result in a substantial detriment to the neighborhood for a variety of reasons: The Site has been specifically approved by the Special Town Meeting on December 11, 2001, for wireless communications purposes, and is reasonably adaptable to the proposed collocated wireless communication use. The proposed use is passive,requires no employees on the premises, and will generate only about one vehicle trip per month,will be served by standard electrical service, and requires no water, sewer or other town services. The facility will comply in all respects with RF emission standards established by the Federal Communication Commission and administered the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The facility will generate no objectionable noise,vibration, smoke, dust, odors,heat, glare or other effects. The only noise associated with the facility will be in connection with the air conditioning for the equipment shelter,which will not be observable in amounts objectionable or detrimental to the normal use of property or the adjacent properties. 6. CONCLUSION I hope that this information will assist the Town in its decision-making process. I am available to meet with you to discuss the information included in this report as well as providing any additional information that you may require. Sincerely, � lr 4oseph Colarusso RF Engineer u° a « Planet DMS V2.2 MetaPath Software International Ltd. '1 Tue Jul 24 10: 36: 52 2001 Centre Long: 71 05'01.8"W Lat: 42 41'' Scale: 1: 75000 — Connecting Road Primary Road t4 Signal (Block) dBm JON 7 j Y-0 £r3� ;ate i a. .a n t m P Planet DMS V2.2 Metapath Software International Ltd. 1 `,\ Tue Jul 24 10: 40: 53 2001 e" Centre Long: 71 05'01.8"W Lat: 42 41'5 h" Scale: 1: 75000 Connecting goad Primary Road a Signal (Block) dBm z - S air } i l r r T � AFFIDAVIT of RADIO FREQUENCY EXPERT The undersigned,being first duly sworn, hereby states the following in support of the application by Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint Spectrum")to construct a 100' telecommunications flagpole and locate associated equipment cabinets (the"Project") on the property located at 723 Osgood Street (Assessors Map 35, Parcel 23), North Andover, Massachusetts, more commonly known as the"Stevens Estate"(the "Site"): 1. I am a Radio Frequency Engineer for Sprint Spectrum L.P. responsible for radio frequency design in Massachusetts. 2. The list of my qualifications attached to this affidavit is true, accurate, and complete in all material respects. 3. I have thoroughly reviewed the application for the proposed Project, as well as all radio frequency engineering studies, reports, and computer models prepared by Sprint Spectrum with respect to the Site. 4. Sprint Spectrum is a communications venture committed to providing a single -- integrated offering of wireless personal communications services by building a national wireless network using PCS technology. PCS technology is a new generation of wireless service that uses digital transmission to improve the services available. It provides a clearer connection and fewer dropped calls for its users, and better accommodates the requirements of computer and telecopier transmission. 5. In 1995, Sprint Spectrum was the highest bidder at the auction held by the Federal Communications Commission("FCC")for PCS wireless broadcast licenses in the Massachusetts and Rhode Island areas. This license, granted to Sprint Spectrum on June 23, 1995, encompasses the area defined by the FCC as the Boston Major Trading Area("MTA'). 6. In order to meet its obligations under the FCC license, Sprint Spectrum must, within the time established under the license, have in place a system of"cell sites" to serve portable wireless communication handsets and mobile telephones. These cell sites consist of an antenna mounted on a pole,building or other structure, connected to a small equipment cabinet located near the antenna. The antenna feeds the low power radio signal received from mobile communications devices through electronic devices located in the equipment cabinets and, ultimately, into an ordinary phone line from which the call can be routed anywhere in the world. 7. Cell sites are integral to Sprint Spectrum's PCS network. To maintain effective, uninterrupted service to a PCS telephone user traveling in a given area, there must be a continuous interconnected series of cells, which overlap in a grid pattern approximating a honeycomb. Additionally, each cell site must be located within a limited area so that it can properly interact with the surrounding cell sites and thereby provide reliable coverage throughout the cell. 8. In conformity with its FCC license, Sprint Spectrum is actively building its PCS network. As Sprint Spectrum began providing service to eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island in November of 1997, it continues to acquire interests in sites for additional facilities and is applying for, and obtaining local governmental approvals to construct the transmissions sites in order to eliminate gaps in service coverage. Any delays at this point in time severely curtail Sprint Spectrum's ability to satisfy both the federally mandated time requirements, and to achieve a market position that will allow it to compete for customers. 9. The Town of North Andover is critical to the overall engineering and technical plan of Sprint Spectrum's PCS network. This site will connect the adjacent sites in Andover, Methuen, and Lawrence, and will provide coverage to the residents of North Andover as well as the surrounding towns of Georgetown and/or Boxford, as well as those commuters who travel through North Andover. 10. To connect the remaining service in the area, Sprint Spectrum has designated the Site as the most appropriate location on which to construct a cell site. This conclusion was arrived at after Sprint Spectrum hired a site acquisition firm to review potential locations and/or development options in and around the Town of North Andover. 11. Based on the tests and surveys performed by the site acquisition firm, Sprint Spectrum determined that its network required a 100' tower to be placed on the Site in order to clear all obstacles, including the surrounding topography, structures and foliage, which can interfere with the transmission. 12. In my professional opinion, without a wireless transmission facility located at or near the Site, there will be a substantial gap in Sprint Spectrum's wireless personal communications services ("PCS") coverage. This gap would adversely impact the service Sprint Spectrum is able to provide to the citizens of North Andover and the commuters traveling on the main roads through and around the Town, including State Routes 133 and 125 13. It is my understanding and belief that there are no feasible preexisting structures upon which Sprint Spectrum could install its antennas and related equipment and still be able to provide sufficient coverage to fill the gap in PCS coverage. 14. The result of such a gap will be an abrupt and complete loss of signal at the time that an individual enters the gap area. Unlike other wireless technologies, in which diminished coverage may result merely in a weaker, or less clear, transmission, PCS technology simply cuts off when encountering such a gap. The transmission is not restored when the gap is over. Rather, the individual must reinitiate the communication. 15. The radio frequency exposure levels to be generated by the proposed facility are substantially below the applicable health and safety standards established by the Federal Communications Commission("FCC") and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health("DPH"). 16. Based upon the best radio frequency technology, which is available to Sprint Spectrum at this time, it is my professional opinion that the proposed Project is at the optimum height, which is needed to ensure adequate PCS service to area residents and businesses in accordance with system specifications. Executed this !Q day of June 2001. Nooshin Zareian, RF Engineer COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS County of �X%o D1_E SES Subscribed and sworn to before me b t,,wthis !S�N da of l4duE by � Y 2001. `Rit t-4oj Gnq",.,*Notary Pubiic My commission expires: Apr I/ S svY Candidate: Nooshin Zareian Skill Level: Senior RF En ineer Experience Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of a CDMA system for Boston. Engineer Responsibilities included: (currently since • Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. 12/98) . Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations. • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Attended zoning hearing. • Filed Department of Public Health applications. Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of a TDMA system for Memphis. Engineer Responsibilities included: (14 months) . Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. • Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Implementation of drive test procedures and equipment selection. • Led a team of engineers to design the TDMA system • Interference,intermodulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. • Filed FAA and FCC applications on new sites to ensure compliance with regulations. Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of Qualcomm's CDMA network in Nashville Engineer Tennessee. Contributions included: (2 months) • Primary design and propagation analysis. Site survey and candidate selection. RF Responsible for the RF design of a CDMA system for New York's Engineer Manhattan Island. Responsibilities included: (6 months) . Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. • Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Implementation of drive test procedures and equipment selection. • Performed link budget analysis. • Interference,intermodulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. page 1 of 2 Nooshin Zareian, Senior RF Engineer(cont'd) RF Responsible for all aspects of design and performance of Nextel's ESMR Engineer network in Los Angeles. This effort included: (I yam) • Propagation analysis, site evaluation and recommendation,zoning and permitting. • Power budget analysis,antenna and feedline specification and system testing. • Filed FAA applications on new sites to ensure compliance with regulations. • Collection of RF drive test data and coverage,interference,handovers and overall system performance analysis. Generated optimization reports and plots. Provided solutions(design strategies, system parameter changes,etc.)to system problems. • Coordination with Operations and Customer care divisions to resolve system problems and customer complaints. • Interference,inter-modulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. • Determination of drive test routes and supervision of drive tests for candidate sites. Associate Responsible for all aspect of design and performance of.Nextel's ESMR Engineer network in Pittsburgh,PA including: .(6 months) • Frequency plan, frequency allocation and acquisition of frequencies from the analog market. • Updated and maintained ANET. • Performed frequency evaluation. • Coordinated system design issues. • Performed capacity studies for future expansion. • Led a team of engineers to trouble shoot hand over and call dragging. • Performed high to low site migration. Technology CDMA,GSM, iDEN,AMPS,PCS Hardware Nortel,Motorola,Lucent, Qualcomm Software CellCAD,ANET, PlaNET,CMA, RSAT,Mapinfo, QED,MS Windows 95/3.1,Word,Excel, UNIX,MS DOS,dBase, Fortran,Basic,Assembler Education M.S. in Electrical Engineering, City University of New York B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Science and Industrial University revised 10/26/99 page 2 of 2 _ J PLANET V2.8 I Metaath Softwar= P _ International Inc Coverage at 90' 02/07/01 �Ra AMx " ^. w•eW, VA t n 4i i�y f AC PLANET v2.a Metapath Software International Inc w Ao� Coverage without Steven's Estate Site 141 n 27/06/01 / r h F-_ ` - -i w N' f z � �J a th Andover Rt125 .r �Y l PLANET V2.8 Metapath Software International Inc 4 t Coverage at 100' z n 02/07/01 i y �Y Y k t kr lt% a5T iQ y { .1 . _ � .. .. VIEW SHED ANALYSIS AT&T Wireless Services-Stevens Estate Proposed Monopole Site Number: E 445.7 723 Osgood Street N. Andover, MA 01845 December 4, 2000 Prepared for: AT&T Wireless Services 400 Blue Hill Drive Suite 100 Westwood, MA 02090-2160 Prepared by: Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 28 Lord Road Marlborough, MA 01752 Office (508) 481-7200 Fax (508) 480-0645 Job No. 2000209 24 Greenman - Pedersen, Inc.. AT&T Wireless Services is proposing an 89' one, two or three carrier Monopole at Stevens Estate, Osgood Street, North Andover, MA. On November 30, 2000 a crane was set at 84' in the approximate location of the proposed AT&T Monopole. The ground elevation was approximately 5' higher than the proposed location. A crane height of 84' was used at the higher elevation to simulate a pole height of 89'. The 84' elevation was set with a cloth tape. Pictures were taken b Green -Pedersen, Inc. Pictures were selected at various locations at a 1 mile radius from the site. Additional pictures were taken at major intersections, high ground locations and the 1 mile perimeter. The pictures are numbered and are referenced by their locations on the key map included at the back of this presentation. From the 43 locations shown here, the crane was visible from only 9 locations: • Stevens Estate, First Floor (Picture #1) • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture#9) • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture #13) • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture #15) • Pumping Station, Great Neck Rd. (Picture #30) • China Blossom Restaurant, Osgood St .(Picture #31) • 58 Colgate Dr. (Picture #37) • 47 Moody St. (Picture #38) • Lawrence Municipal Airport entrance Rd (Picture #39) Photo renderings of these 9 locations were prepared showing simulations of the proposed AT&T Monopole and are included in this analysis. Greenman Pedersen, Inc. t � �'{� ; ,..� +�{r,,�,d`�� �'�a"[tom �'.s�'� �+ � ., ��+y ��, '✓ "r a �' ��1«t wx `�p�p 1'"z 1'*w'F =yg"�" '�. 6"tv►'ti �"� �'�i'��` {d.�"�1+� r q #+h 7 ; Pa ab,�,edd.ti��•*eS,' ,+y�4'� 1 �d r LL !SY i �^ i�TLF.`,+ �+AYc� li.• i`a�n�W,'`"t �•.. �' � '+�, �. �, * `mss "-���+ '�•" �:� D" r••w -s p a I� -3 } � ALL jo k P �rr t .. F 41 71 �f �• "' Yr �t � -Rig's ' - r y we r pts• �•4•'' a t���`E(. ��i.'� /�"` -°� t¢`P 1 '� r of 41 /a. r a, r PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE Y, z }wx i +y — 3 yY� It 3 Proposed AT&Tono ole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA 445.7 South Elevation View a Stevens Estate first floor looking North Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE + �4 4 3 ts��t h. k�• 7� 7 zProposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA 445.7 South Elevation View Stevens Estate grounds looking North Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. t. out , f �r� �' 1�.!i. � "M xis,. !`' 2"�`�* * -�, •• x+ .' �. "x ¥� 4�a � '�,"� $` r� ; � *to •a �+«. '(�Y`! �" � ,' �, ,� o.�. rAr Pfl i >s : Tn c L j•t ti , _� ;• fir.+ i PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE if zn OM1. x � ] �y +a t� i t� _ _ Jnr�. _ _. ,.�;_— ,• �, tr Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA Y 445.7 East Elevation View Stevens Estate grounds looking West Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. -14 47 FAIR C ME- W d x '_ y - `-F',�-x. 7. •e'er � .•. - ��+,-.?>, � �..� s .���' � -.:,,.-.�-, tt. • i PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE 1 6 ki� t 't '.} r� Fk- Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA E 445.7 Northwest Elevation View from China Blossom Restaurant, Osgood Street looking Southeast Greenman - Pedersen, Inc, t,��Fd 1 r� •;� wr 4, POSED AT&T MONOPOLE ^a =rte+ Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate N. Andover, Ma. E 445.7 West Elevation View from 58 Colgate Drive looking East Greenman - Pedersen, Inc, • - � y'4 i i .t i. •r� PROPOSED AT&T Mr OPOLE -: { £ av; d�} Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA E 445.7 West .Elevation View from 47 Moody Street looking East Greenman Pedersen, Inc. y i +,,(� �4 PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE v- 0 y y M^A k ii� x# Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA 445.7 Northwest Elevation View from Entrance Road to Lawrence Municipal Airport, Sutton Street looking Southeast Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. r t; ? a I x a e ' w 9 1. View from 1st. floor, Stevens Estate looking North 2. View from 2nd. floor, Stevens Estate looking North Itj dl 4. NO u w '✓�,'yu '"sq' ,y � '�s + '_. b . - >'w` I y , ,ilr� G , �.7F „ 3. View from 3rd. floor, Stevens Estate looking North x 4. Front Entrance Stevens Estate looking North I y� r f , Y :r r qq v a w „ w + a f r� k . J Tp— u� 5. Stevens Estate grounds looking West 6. Stevens Estate grounds looking West e y N # a ma .. w ,. 7. Stevens Estate main parking loft looking North 8. Stevens Estate main parking loft looking North t - ✓r � fur `°� � f } - y �& n^'�e M`�°' �' .i f� I� u ,�, r t m ��.�'• I '.,,,,et Fl.s ,- �.r���R.� .�, ��.iy • 4 - , f I G" 77 Ir P wi 9. Stevens Estate grounds looking North ��� �y ���?`,� �� 10. StevensEstategrounds looking Northeast Alt41 xv :d I i4 t ^7 r I. � y w r �Y •4. TT y i J � r, k � ��� 17. View from dnvewa ieadin t � � 12. View from driveway leading to ve SteE t� king East � �{ Stevens Estate looking Northeast �, ., ns state loo 1, d:�` �; " ..,,, .:- a,-` '3 :.� iTMi.: �✓ 7 :'W .5}../ ��F�- .;d'R /�':) '��a^_� _ .j� �J4 � 1 a t�' �O h.�� '� ��,r `I�y�y�d d '� '7` I�yl,.�r�°� C �� r,,l� •� �,.�t �-; ';.c., r' r r Y i � ��,,. ,��3'IM M� y � � �� ��4 �X d�1X •'d � �. � 1!1 M' � pyo/ '4�'' $-' /f '4 R„ + �n� r t�9S �, �^ 4..,,? ., �,, ,�� -•;'"+ �y�N �. ��� r'' "�-� _ f� f" :r 1:��'� T � IJ_ Y*`�, s E t� ��4,f. .r ` . 9 Af •1 �f i� �, J.�,q al� _'h �:•' �� N�� q;i',�' 1'"8 ,'� �![/7�+ Y }S , 13. View from driveway leading to 14. View from driveway leading to Stevens Estate looking North Stevens Estate looking North 1 17 • r� ,�,^}. �. „� ,5a{ I-;rte. "it �.,r � �y �jl ,�11 j�j!•�7 � � ,4 ���H d � Lam/»�: �a x y ' � j ! I � * � r •,� �'�..� `� �.. 'nr� .li� +.cam-r:�.�,�,x'� w ,r r � a :, � "�'. '�' - 1 .�, -. 5ce� ,„"i,n., { 1"*`�r'ro, • ... _� sS y,� n �9"�", � � �,. _, ..:.,. .. .. _. . �.. ,. ".,�e >�",°-sr fes.;. 15. Stevens Estate grounds looking West /. 16. Driveway leading to Stevens Estate looking East } !'_+s � .♦ ��, i S.. ♦� S �, i� � ) 1 /t .Y C. ,�4 ti'"�fi � }s" iv 1 i1,���` ~ l» v.a.i �•������i Str{ ti� �ih••, a -. '�" Vis; � ° '� 'tr � S".� � F f� ,s t t s� .�rf,e � 2 t f T ' F.. y^"" 1r Y• Vii. 'c. � 7. ! '�:. Y _ r�� as t r;�{ .:�t .;�� _� •°`� �. 4„ J f j}fff 7 � � 4 t � i f r 3 i r. 4 17. Entrance to driveway leading to r_,,, ffi Stevens Estate looking East 18. Osgood St. at Stevens St. looking North .m�r,:s3 se>�s.=Ws�aysc:aa>z `»s"•"a:`^^, ...', ... tu:�'.a ,.4w," si�f 2� aw�r',r��' "y r✓ �` 19 Pleasant St at Stevens St looking North w „, 20. Town Beach on Pleasant St. looking North r x. '�,�� ��'� /' .'�' �'.� -.! � r �. � 'ef" •yrlt�j.��' tl t��rtff�� fl, f ••� r M r JJ t f,: 1 4 t z #j tl � f� r jig Om IN OPP tea 2 • 21. Pleasant St. at Great Pond Rd. looking Northwest 22. Great Pond Rd. at Marbleridge Rd. looking Northwest m v _. 24. Entrance to Rolling Ridge Conference 23. Golf Course, Great Pond Rd. looking Northwest Center looking Northwest " tt i" r .. r M. r 5 a kma 25. South Bradford St. at Great Pond Rd. looking West 26. Great Pond Rd. at Essex St. looking West r . FtPond"' Brooks School, Gr r. xr Rd. looking Southwest 28. 95 Campion Rd., Hardtcourt Estates looking Southwest 1 w� r 29. Bridge, Great Neck Rd. looking Southwest „ 30. Pumping Station Great Neck Rd. looking Southwest 241 31. China Blossom Restaurant 32. China Blossom Restaurant looking Osgood St. looking Southeast Southeast 4 :•a r 4 _ • . a f z r,= 33. Butcher Boy Market, Rt. 125/133 looking South 34. 1267 Osgood St. looking South s- 35. 75 Old Farm Rd. looking South { d g r $a" JIM r x, i 36. 23 Colgate Dr. looking East 37. 58 Colgate Dr. looking East , r , L 38. 47 Moody St. at Furber St. looking East r "' ;` 39. Entrance to Lawrence Municipal Airport looking Southeast r : to n� i 40. N. Andover Middle School, RT. 41. Heritage at N. Andover, RT. 125/133 looking 125/133 at Main St. looking North Northeast 1g �t tilt t ✓ , 4±� r . r :f =u« x i y 42. N. Andover High School, Osgood St. looking 43. Edgewood Condominiums, Osgood St. looking North North y 34 •. i e 35 39 4' 33 30 . 71= . 28 36-37 z , 16 '. 38 Fi 0 17 4i X41 43 C.0 C hild- 1wt y • r �_�' 25 40 �. 24 K z_ -o e r r # M 1 i tfd�r .M ' U bn 19 20 21 22+ 23 i � ;�, Map indicates the Proposed AT&T Monopole site in the center, with a 1 mile radius shown from north. The numbers represent the locations where the pictures where taken and the corresponding picture number in this analysis. Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Alactronic 192 *orcesrer Street, Wellesley, M4 2481 Zeb 981-Z39-0000 Far: 781-431-871 Date: October 1, 2001 To: Mr. Audrey Tv kanaysky Bay State Design Associates,I w. 70 Tower Office Park Wobum MA 01801 Fax: 781-932-9771 From: Bob Alach Sub: Noise report for Sprint date BSS4 C860A-Stevens Eitare DearM. Tsikanovsky, Mere are the results of my not impact study for the Sprint 13S54XC860A-Stevens Estate site, to be located in NortE , Massachusetts. 1 acquired good field data at approximately 10:30PM on Septemb , 2 1 at the proposed.site. The lowest n=bi mt noise Ievels were measured at 50 dBA. Snoise events acctrtling during flue measuremem perfod were fro= passing vehicles at 59 occasional airplanes at 63 d8A, The most significant noises ce. from the Sprint ! A7T .equigmeant will be from an air conditioning system, most li Cely two Matvair 3.5 'taxa mounted to the exterior walls of the_. equipment shelters. These unil s arc similar,but smaller in size duan most residential central air conditioner units. The noise ge acraWd by these twit is broadband in nature with no distinguishing tonality. Using the noise data available the Manu ewrer and calculating for distance loss, the noise level fiom these units when combined at the scourity barrier (proposed wood fence), will be approxinwoly 60 dbA or abo 10 dBA above the level allowed by the DEP Section 8.9(4)(e).A, waiver from this req irc t i, indicated as the noise levels drop to 34 dBA,at the nearest building,(approximate y 330 feet away),or 16 ctBA below the lowest measured ambiens noise conditions. At the me west property line. the levels Will be even loa+et: Unfits these conditions,the additional noise creatod will notbe audible and will be below The limits as defined in the DEP Section 8.9(4xe). Please feel free to call if you b ive any questions,or if I can be of fttx*h r sssistan c: Sincerely, Bob Alach Town of North Andover,Zoning Board of Appeals APPLICANT'S PROPERTY: list by map, parcel, name and address (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, USE BLACK INK) MAP PARCEL NAME ADDRESS Town of North Andover 723 Osgood Street 35 23 (Stevens Estate) ABUTTERS PROPERTY: list by map, parcel, name and address (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, USE BLACK INK) t MAP PARCEL I NAME JADDRESS See attached. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED AT THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AND CERTIFIED BY THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE: BY: DATE: SIGNATURE,ASSESSOR,TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Re ired list of parties of interest Page one_�of Guam by 3a o °a �i certified Board sensor North Andov Board of Asseaso rth Andover ABUTTERS AND ABUTTERS TO ABUTTERS WITHIN 300 FEET Subject Property: Owned by: STEVENS ESTATE Town of North Andover 723 Osgood Street 1120 Main Street North Andover, MA Map 35 Parcel 23 Parcel ID Location Owner and Mailing Address Map 35 Parcel 16 492 Sutton Street City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 19 1018 Osgood Street William Chepulis James Chepulis 1018 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 20 1025 Osgood Street Goodwin Trust c/o Russell Treadwell 3667 Huntington Place Drive Sarasota, FL 34237 Map 35 Parcel 24 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury,MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 25 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury,MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 26 665 Osgood Street Douglas N Howe Jr Janice W Howe 665 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 29 1060 Osgood Street R&M Realty Trust R C Stoddard,M A C Ikacz 1060 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845(0 A r Cu ified b lJ Dft Certifie B08 f,Assessor North Andove -�4 01-11 Boarda�f Assess orth Andover Map 35 Parcel 32 605 Osgood Street Albert F. Cullen,Jr. Maeve M Cullen 605 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 33 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 44 Great Pond Road Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 50 1003 Osgood Street £3fR omsocie es teras PrL des �-�-C- -P sex 217 Q.O. ZX 6OS91 PKX)C)1U M44 D)610 Map 36 Parcel 4 623 Osgood Street George W. Ousler,Jr. Deanna M Ousler 623 Osgood Street North Andover,MA'01845 Map 36 Parcel 21 Osgood Street Michael EK c%RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury,MA 01876 Map 74 Parcel 2 492 Sutton Street City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 3 946 Osgood Street China Blossom Realty Trust Richard Yee, Tr 946 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 4 59 Surrey Drive P ►C6 S 59 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 5 980 Osgood Street John Ferreira 980 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 6 1000 Osgood Street Landers Building Condominium 1000 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 a Gertifieb Dt�e �° ` OrtiW D* / Board o Assesso rth Andover Bo of Assessor North Artdov d Map 74 Parcel 6 1000 Osgood Street U%(NC eni , 5 i Imo. A&(5 10 x� os�axa S� i:\-nCA6jU MA o;_,� IS Map 74 Parcel 7 850 Osgood Street 850 Osgood Street Trust Anne Marie Ryan, Tr 850 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 12 177 Chadwick Street Gail E. Oja 177 Chadwick Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 13 838 Osgood Street Annina Faraci 838 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 15 Osgood Street China Blossom Realty Trust Richard Yee,Tr 946 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 22 159 Chadwick Street Kirk G.Olsen Janet D.Olsen 159 Chadwick Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 23 505 Sutton Street Knights of Columbus Association Inc. 505 Sutton Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 28 67 Surrey Drive David V. Smolag Lisa Smolag 67 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 29 75 Surrey Drive Testa Realty Trust Mary C. Testa, Tr 75 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 30 83 Surrey Drive Armando J. Vera Maritza E. Vera 83 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 31 168-170 Chadwick Street Chadwick Street Nominee Trust V Scott Follansbee, Tr 79 Lucy Street North Andover, MA 01845 o� Cwtifie Cffffw byDate4r / Board Ass or orth Andover Boa Assessor North And e Map 91 Parcel 1 Osgood Street North Andover Housing Authority 310 Greene Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 3 800 Osgood Street Michael J. Walsh Linda Walsh 800 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 4 814 Osgood Street Blair Roberts Caren Jacobson 814 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 5 826 Osgood Street Mary M. Machado 826 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 6 790 Osgood StreetVifXe-Cts 7. r c 07W-n m me A t-m,n 790 Osgood Street i North Andover,MA'01845 i M- Map 91 Parcel 7 864 Chickering Road Ethel A. Curtin 864 Chickering Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 8 30 Foulds Terrace Onofrio Casqburri Joyce P B Casqburri 30 Foulds Terrace North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 14 15 Colgate Road Nina M.Gaffney 15 Colgate Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 15 14 Colgate Road Jeanett G. Sutton E t 1 Y Doll 1 t- 14 Colgate Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 19 25 Stacy Drive Henry F. Har Margaret Davis 25 Stacy Drive North Andover, MA 01845 Map 92 Parcel 8 140 Prescott Street Selco Service Station Car(,kw0AiUn 1.g ubfiec 6 Pfe5c,-A+"" f 1 1 ...,i !'STT A A_1 1 iLl�� �•��� v''""� Qete r a5 C' Board f A ssor orth Andover Cw6Sed by pate Ll <30 Boa P"Sessor North And0V r Map 99 Parcel 1 841 Chickering Road Douglas E.Daher 841 Chickering Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 1 676 Osgood Street T M2 P RackweIl T ivinu R nuic T.4st LCILo 95rS� 66 7 Osgood ood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 4 190 Prescott Street Josephine Palazzolo 190 Prescott Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 5 Prescott Street Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 6 696 Osgood Street Thomas P. Rockwell 696 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 7 Osgood Street TKWZLS P. 2 ctt, SIA &)>4 612 -69--9sgeedee — North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 8 661 Osgood Street Aleen W. Tarro Kathleen R.Tarro 661 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 9 657 Osgood Street t QxGoPaed :TGqL- ^P(L David A- ,-Tr �} (6-1 ©5 North Andover, MA 01845 att\nandstevens\mlabutters001.wpd (D fi bCZ)- Date �/ Orrt�fi by B Asse N And er r North Andove L Board f Assesso Andover l_ i I r b k"'71) Pllll 9 STEVEN S ESTATE 723 OSGOOD STREETN z ,.� t�!7, "`41111111111 7 NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ° . R CASCADE NUMBER: BS54XC860A V Grp .dTt�Rd � 13 SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIG—SAFE AND ALL UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF PROJECT DIRECTORY GENERAL NOTES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. - 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL tMUTIES ARE NOT _ APPLICANT: SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. 1. ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS NOT STAFFED AND 3.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND OTHERCROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 NOT NORMALLY OCCUPIED. UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK,SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL ° ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. TIMES,AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, MAHWAH, NJ 07495 2. FOR ADDITIONAL.GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS �'w • ,r SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD s } otldf BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND PHONE: (201) 684-4075 SEE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT, "STANDARD NOTES , �{ OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTACT: DAVE BASS AND DETAILS". 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW.THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT UMTTED TO A)FALL PROTECTION B)CONFINED SPACE ENGINEER. - 1 h rKd►ves G C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY 0)TRENCHING&EXCAVATION COLER & COLANTONIO, INC. "2ao2Yahwl x I ®2802 Nav ,Dy;T S.ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND STIPULATED 101 ACCORD PARK DRIVE PROJECT INFORMATION IN THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY. NORWELL, MA 02061-1685 - LOWION MAP B.R NECESSARY,RUBBISH,STUMPS,DEBRIS,STICKS,STONES AND OTHER PHONE: (781) 982-5400 I CONTACT: JAMES REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. - R. BORREBACH CASCADE: 8SS4XC86OA 7.THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLAW AWAY FROM SITE ACQUISITION: - SITE NAME: STEVEN'S ESTATE DRAWING INDEX REQ. THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 SITE ADDRESS: 723 OSGOOD STREET 9.NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 FROZEN MATERIALS,SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR MAHWAH, NJ 07495 EMBANKMENT. T1 TITLE SHEET PHONE: (201 684-4325 COUNTY: ESSEX i 1 R1 RADIUS PLAN , 1 9.THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM CONTACT: SCOTT LAMB TYPE OF BUILD: RAW LAND — FLAGPOLE Al SITE PLAN & NOTES I 0 GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. i POWER: A2 PARTIALN 0 .SITE PLAN & ELEVATIO LAND OWNER: TOWN OF N. ANDOVER I 10.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY MAIN STREET WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SHALL BE REMOVED N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 - D1 NOTES & DETAILS I 0 AND/OR CAPPED,PUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH 1 101 TURNPIKE STREET D2 DETAILS -0 WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SUBJECT TO THE NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ASSESSORS: - MAP 35, LOT 23 APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. - PHONE: (978) 725-1479 E1 GROUNDING PLAN & ELEVATION ! 0 JOE PL£NTZAS ZONING CLASS: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1 . it•THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT CONTACT: E2 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS I 0 - COVERED BY THE BUILDING OR DRIVEWAY,SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM - LATITUDE: - 42' 42' 28.56" N E3 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS 0 SLOPE,FERTILIZED,SEEDED,AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE - I 0 SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. TELCO: E4 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS VERIZON LONGITUDE 71' 06' 51.03" W E5 POWER & ANTENNA SCHEMATIC 0 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE WRING Y PHONE: (978) 275-1282 CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,IF REQUIRED DURING CONTACT: PAUL SZALAY ' CONSTRUCTION,SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR j EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL •�1 i 13.THE LEASED AREA NOT COVERED BY PCS EQUIPMENT SHAD.BE GRADED TOA DIR,tICTIONS FROM BOSTON i UNIFORM SLOPE AS DESCRIBED IN THESE NOTES AND ROILED.WOVEN FILTER - FABRIC.AS SPECIFIED,SHALL BE PLACED OVER GRADED AREA AND COVERED WITH 3.OF COMPACTED.3/4•WASHED,CRUSHED STONE.CRUSH STONE TRAVELING NORTH ON RT 3 CONTINUE ONTO 1-93 N. SHALL BE GRADED TO MATCH SURROUNDING GROUND SURFACE. TAKE 1-495 NORTH, EXIT #44A. CONTINUE ON 1-495 N ATTACHED: TO EXIT #43, THE MASS AVE EXIT TOWARDS NORTH 1. TOWER AND TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY(a)COMBINATION LOCKS(MASTER LOCK 175LH. ANDOVER, CONTINUE ON MASS AVE. TO CHICKERING PLANS PREPARED AND STAMPED BY PART NUMBER 71649 39565)TO BE LEFT IN SHELTER. ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO CHICKERING ROAD, CONTINUE ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PUT A BEAD OF SILICON AROUND ALL MOUNTS STRUTS. TO PRESCOTT STREET. TURN RIGHT ONTO PRESCOTT - (EEI) (t SHEET) ANCHORS,AND OTHER STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS. STREET AND GO TO THE END OF THE STREET. THE 2. EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLANS (AT&T AND 16.CONTRACTOR TO PHOTOGRAPH KEY POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION,OPEN ENTRANCE TO 723 OSGOOD STREET IS AT THE END OF SPRINT) PREPARED BY TRACHTE, INC. HES TRENC .GROUNDING.STEEL CONNECTIONS,ETC. -- - PRESCOTT STREET. (2 SHEETS) � i s -�— AOF Sprint' co�ER s Sprint ,Di Aced P Drive STEVE`NS ESTATE —v , FOR CONSTRUCTION . Ii3 X11 Norwell,MA 0206,-1685 ° - °%, ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION on ers 'ss TITLE SHEET COL/�N TON 10 a (gat)sae-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 BOSTON MTA °�egN ISSUED FOR REIAEW ere m are ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS 1 SITE NO. 8S54XG860A Na CAN Rewons ar aIK ,wvro E JOB N0. CASCADE NO. I SHEET N ER RLV scar:As wren osacNm — 17-160 BS54XC860A T—1 1 it K"7) P rl n ' STEVEN' S ESTATE 723 OSGOOD STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845R � CASCADE NUMBER- BS54XC860A G't � RCr SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIG-SAFE AND ALL UTILITIES.A MINIMUM OF PROJECT DIRECTORY GENERAL NOTES �- 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ' 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL UTILITIES ARE NOT APPLICANT: SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. 1. ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS NOT STAFFED AND 3.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND OTHER CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 NOT NORMALLY OCCUPIED_ UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED N THE WORK.SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. TIMES,AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. MAHWAH, NJ 07495 2. FOR. ADDITIONAL.,GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS �r SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD 6E usEO.BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND - PHONE: (201) 684-4075 SEE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT, "STANDARD NOTES : OR NEAR UTILITIES' CONTACT: DAVE BASS 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY-TRANNG FOR THE WORKING CREW.THIS AND DETAILS". WILL INCLUDE SLIT NOT LIMITED TO A)TALI PROTECTION B)CONFINED SPACE • ENGUdEER: ° A C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY 0)TRENCHING&EXCAVATION 1 h-.47tdever' COLER & COtANTONiO, INC. 3@02 Yahool lnc. :029D2 ttv' Ewt Ta9v�opies f,.rT:: b.ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND STIPULATED 101 ACCORD PARK DRIVE - PROJECT INFORMATION N THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY. NORWELL, MA 02061-1685 LOCATION NAP S.IF NECESSARY,RUBBISH,STUMPS DEBRIS,STICKS.STONES AND OTHER PHONE: (781) 982-5400 REFUSE SNALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. CONTACT: JAMES R. BORREBACH CASCADE: BS54XC860A 7.THE SITE SHALL BE GRADESITE ACQUISITION. SITE NAME: STEVEN'S ESTATED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY .... .: DRAWING INDEX REQ. # THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 SITE ADDRESS: 723 OSGOOD STREET 8.NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 FROZEN MATERIALS,SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR MAHWAH, NJ 07495 EMBANKMENT. COUNTY: ESSEX T1 TITLE SHEET 1 PHONE: (201) 684-4325 R1 RADIUS PLAN ; 1 9.THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM p - CONTACT: SCOTT LAMB TYPE OF BUILD: RAW LAND — FLAGPOLE Al SITE PLAN & NOTES 10 GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. POWER: LAND OWNER: TOWN OF N. ANDOVER A2 PARTIAL SITE PLAN & ELEVATION + 0 10.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER.WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, MAIN STREET ' WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK.SHALL BE REMOVED MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 D1 NOTES & DETAILS 0 AND/OR CAPPED.PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH 1101 TURNPIKE STREET WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SUBJECT TO THE DZ DETAILS 0 APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 .ASSESSORS: - MAP 35, LOT 23 PHONE: . JOE PLENTZ 79 ZONING CLASS: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1 E1 GROUNDING PLAN & ELEVATION i 0 11.THE AREAS of THE OWNERS PROPERTY olsnmBED BY THE WORK AND NOT CONTACT: JOE PLENTZAS E2 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS 0 COVERED BY THE BUILDING OR DRIVEWAY.SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORMI SLOPE,FERTILIZED,SEEDED,AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE LATITUDE: - 4T 42' 28.56" N E3 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS E 0 SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. TELCO: E4 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS I 0 VERIZON LONGITUDE: 71' 06' 51.03" IN E5 POWER & ANTENNA SCHEMATIC 0 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE WRING PHONE: (978) 275-1282 ! CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,IF REQUIRED DURING .CONTACT: PAUL SZALAY ' CONSTRUCTION,SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR '" EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 13.THE LEASED AREA NOT COVERED BY PCS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE GRADED TOA ,;,1, - DIRECTIONS FROM BOSTON UNIFORM SLOPE AS DESCRIBED IN THESE NOTES AND ROLLED.WOVEN FILTER FABRIC.AS SPECIFIED,SHAD.BE PLACED OVER GRADED AREA AND COVERED WITH 3"OF COMPACTED,3/4•WASHED,CRUSHED STONE.CRUSH STONE TRAVELING NORTH ON RT 3 CONTINUE ONTO 1-93 N. SHALL BE GRADED TO MATCH SURROUNDING GROUND SURFACE. TAKE 1-495 NORTH, EXIT #44A. CONTINUE ON 1-495 N ATTACHED: TO EXIT #43, THE MASS AVE EXIT TOWARDS NORTH 1. TOWER AND TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN 14.CONTRACTOR SMALL SUPPLY(8)COMBINATION LACKS(MASTER LOCK 175LH, ANDOVER, CONTINUE ON MASS AVE. TO CHICKERING PLANS PREPARED AND STAMPED BY PART NUMBER 71649 39565)TO BE LEFT N SHELTER. ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO CHICKERING ROAD, CONTINUE ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PUT A BEAD OF SILICON AROUND ALL MOUNTS STRUTS, TO PRESCOTT STREET. TURN RIGHT ONTO PRESCOTT - (EEI) (i SHEET) ANCHORS,AND OTHER STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS. STREET AND GO TO THE END OF THE STREET. THE { 2. EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLANS (AT&T AND 16.CONTRACTOR TO PHOTOGRAPH KEY POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION.OPEN ENTRANCE TO 723 OSGOOD STREET IS AT THE END OF SPRINT) PREPARED BY TRACHTE, INC. TRENCHES.GROUNDING,STEEL CONNECTIONS.ETC. - - PRESCOTT STREET. (2 SHEETS) � i S Tint. i COLEft s STEVEN'S ESTATE Sprint p 101 Accord Park Drive _ t "i FOR CONSTLUCTION hcA 81 JRB COL/-\N TON 10 z (781)1,MIA2— 4 0sl—/Bas J (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA O s�0%a ISsuEo REw CONSnVJCTM a0 ers TITLE SHEET I ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 , . SITE NO. BS54XC860A -.. No. DME REMSOM by cwc ssP•o fONAt JOB NO. ICASCADE NO. SHEET NUMBER REV .,. so.Az"am DOOMM CRAYN 40 U�6� 17-160 1 BS54XC860A T-1 1 w - 11 ®\ ® ' ABUTTERS TABLE PROPERTY MAP PARCEL OWNER BOOK/PAGE ® 35 2.3 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER 4197/ Fi3 t 1 V � ® 878/ 178 r �•� / J / , \ 35 44 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER 35 50 THOMAS PROPERTIES, L.L.C. 2338/ 220 35 20 GOODWIN TRUST 7355/ 417 i ! - . 7� _� ,� j ; `i -\l m UNIT 6 LANDERS BLDG. CONDO VINCENT & SHEILA ANGERS TRUST UNIT 1,3,4 _2667/ 267 1 J/ I /1 i l I r i- f �'v / ® 74 5 JOHN FERRREIRA1943/ 317 ® DENNIS V. ORiNKINATER 2668/2.72 V"') ' \ �\-\.' \_ /' �... ,'\ _ /^.. 6 74 CHINA BLOSSOM REALTY TRUST 1032/ 84 1 ® 74 75 850 OSGOOD STREET TRUST 1032/ 64 V��� v v ��/ / _ ® 74 13 ANNINA FARACI - 44/ 5 � r 91 as 3 5 MARY N. MACHADO 3189/ 210 91 4 BIAIR ROBERTS & KAREN JACOBSON 3747/ 88 Z01lEO:-RESCEMIIA1..0191I9CT1 -� -� '�/�7;;��\ /J•j\ tai 7�r ® 97 3 MICHAEL J. & LINDA WALSH 5242/ i 1 k?• A MAP 45 PARCEL 23 w _ -� �� _ /� �, ' �- t i r(i% ® 91 6 VINCENT J. MCALOON & JEAN M. MCALOON 3741 88 / ., T�1 )�{i �/ _ - ��`\__ ��- %'� ✓ i J/�� i ® 91 7 ETHEL A. CURTIN 3018/ 168 ` ) 99 7 DOUGLAS E. OAHER 4893/ 333 100 4 JOSEPHINE PALAZZOLO 905/ 119 100 7 THOMAS P. ROCKWELL JR. 7553/504 }Y 100 6 THOMAS P. ROCKWELL 1651/ 266 JANICE W. HOWE& DOUGLAS N. NOWE JR. 5742/336 \ 36 4 GEORGE W. JR. & DEANNA M.OUSLER 2089/ 226 �R `�� ; \ _ 35 32 ALBERT F. JR., COLLEEN & MAEVE M. CULLEN 1591 167 MICHAEL L. KETTENBACN 2400 :510 1 t 1 Si tt4, r`� 35 25 MICHAEL L. KEFfENBACN 240p/ 310 , rte? i' , \ l?\\\� -01 ® 35 1 24 MICHAEL L KETTENBACH 24 DO 310 ZZ. '—g RESIDENTIAL 1 ZONING REQUIREMENTS UIREMENTS TABLE Q TYPE- R PROPOSED 512E 87.120 S.F. 8.671.200 S.F.3-(153.2 ACJ FRONTAGE 175' 3810'1 P� �l I I•1� � ,' v A FRONT SETBACK so esa� � \ \ \ 510E SETBACK JO' 749'1 t,'�,�\��•\��;�\�`� \ � WAR SETBACK leas'* HEIGHT(�f��l" 30' 35' 700, ,� � , ,, �_ - �, �� it �� ill 11•,.��\\�\ \\ . ,�, \\ , (I \\ �t : t rl' /� ;, ,\,,i i;1t \ \. i \\�� WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY �' t.-_-___ ���f \�� \'' \\�\ �\ 1\ �\ ✓.;' r '�' t�'t`1�t,�, �;�'}� DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS TABLE TYPE TYPE PROPOSED . HEIGHT 10'MAX.ABOVE AVG BURRING HEIGHT WITHIN 300' NO BUILDINGS w LDINCS WRW 300 HEIGHT 10'MAX.ABOVE AVG.TREE CANOPY er a+�cawoPr\loo'MONOPOLE __ LINE(2X' ' i ,•1 1 1 \\1I1;'� © -- '"- ��-"- /-`-�� \ � sEreacK 300'FROM HABrtABLE ox�Ewrac STRUCTURE EEss 3so't I 1 \ 1 1.THIS PUN WAS WHOLLY COMPILED FROM DRAWINGS PREPARED BY ON CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR SPRINT PCS AND AT&T ISSUED ON 9/17/01 AS REVISED NZONINGASS DRAWINGS.ABUTTER TABLE WAS UPDATED BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED WA FAX FROM WELI,MM ASSOCUTL$,INC.WON 6/11/03. 2.THE PROPOSED COMPOUND IS W EL AREA DESIGNATED 005 C. ATM JI ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD Y. COMMUNITY PANEL NO.250099 0005 C.WTED:JIM 2.1995 AND IS OUTSIDE TFff 500 YEAR F1A00 BOUNDARY. 3.UNDERGROUND UMM WFORMATMN SHOM HEREON WAS COMPRED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND AVALMLE RECORD PLANS 1-900-372-4644 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR OPLPLANNE D CONSTRUCTION CALL DIGSAFE AT PROPERTY PLAN 4.THE GWNERSIIM LINES$HOWN ON TRIS PLM ARE THE RESULT OF A LIMITED FIELD SURVEY BY GREENMAN 1 SCALE:.1'.200 PEDERSEN INC.ON 10 /00 AND A COMPIUTXM THE CURRENT 70WN OF NORTH ANDDYER ASSESSOR'S PLANS._ ,✓� 1� \ \\�--�\,., � I � - RECORD PIANS MD DEEDS. GRAPHIC SCALE 1 zoo Too o zoo 400 -�- Sprin t Sprint COLER & 101 Accord Pak Drive S'TEVENS ESTATE -� COLAN TON 10 = Norwell,7A 201-1685 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTAyO3 ISSUED MR CONSTRUCTION00 9rs am RADIUS PLAN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS- NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ,q, DATE RM91pIF aY p4I APwo \ JaB NO. CASCADE NO. SHEER NUMBER REV SITE NO. BS54XC860A E9P SCALE:AS KIM omom mAVN (01110.3 1 17-160 1 BS54XC860A I R--'I 0 /^ PROPOSED PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER ON CONCRETE SLAB. ED BY TRACHTE,INC.) O L N PROPOS CF>C�A�E PROPOSED OF CLEARING/ GRADING o AT NEW TREE LINE PROPOSED S' STOCKADE FENCE ---� \ \ J 10B0' 1 • � � - PROPOSED 40'X30' —f SPRINT COIPOLIND �t ---- UTILITY IN 40'X40'LEAS AREA \ PROPOSED ELECTRIC 30.00' GRAPE ROO \\\ \ \ WITH DROP UP 06 EXISTING OVERHEAD (/ PRIED \ WIRES�ELECTRI`) CONTROL I EROSION J N EXISTING TREELINE WIRESPROPOSED U/6 - ALM 47 UTILITY RUN - - l W` sw FINAL.ROTTING�UTILITIES � - �• POWER 4 TELCO COIPANY. \ ` \ GARAGE DMARC LOCATIOI NAY CHANGE � _ / �' �f7S`� �"'•� in m N EXISTING TREELI�s9 �LIP a9 b b ! / tiTEL RISER EXISTING OVER4IEAD _}/IREHS CTFTIE.) _r PROPOSED I5SPRINT ACCESS EASEMENT (ACCESS EASEMENT To EXTEND / Ramoo1itAL D T I FOLLOWING EXISTING FACILITY ACCESS ROAD)6 I I I JB"WN.FENCE POST (STEEL r TTPf oR r HAROMYwD)OMVEIr A6N.19^ PROPOSED IE'CRUSHED STONE MTO GROUMD,TD'MAX D.G ACCESS DRIVE OVER THE TOP OF / THE EXISTING UY CART PATH / AGPAFI FX MR FASMC CA' APPROVED EQUAL FASTEN W/TIES AT TOP AND ANDSECTION,EVERY 24" STAKED BAILS END - TO END f 20' MIN. i 1 - t 11 SPOIL FmR BALE TRENCH 1 I FLOW �CRAVANCED DE 517E PREP. UP a10 L I SPREAD NAY W/ IRMISTURBED GROUND 1 I TACKIFlER ON SE'EO aq.v 1 W' 16^ i I ,�, ARIL DARED1( �j ' - FASMC AND FENCE Ail molm 1.BALES TO BE DED W/NO PLAS77C OR WRE 2 MAY BALES TO BE SECURED W/MIN.TIN)(2)2'X2' WOO STAKES PER BALE OMVEN 19'MIN.KITO GRADE:' - 1 SPREAD HAY TO BE APPLIED.BY MECHANICAL SPREADERAT RATE OF - TACKBIER(RA1TE AND TYPE TO BCREE APPROVELT BSPHALRC . ENGINEER IN ADVANCE OF APPUCA71ONX HAYBALE WITH SILMCE DETAIL 700 GRAPHIC SCALE NOT TO scar 20 10 O 20 40 -` Sprin t AMG + Sprint COLER s 101 Accord Park Drive STEVEN'S ESTATE --� — COLAN TON 10 " NorWaM,MA 02061-1885 ISSUED FOR SIRI,OTION CPG Are a _ (761)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA A �iq ISSUED FOR W �Pc 1n AmI'll � SITE PLAN &"NOTES ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS - NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 - SITE NO. BS43XC860A N0• cmTWMWS W. CHK ''""'a 9EGI� t Joe No. I CASA NO.. SHEET NUA/8ER REN SCNE:M Nam DESKMm 6NAwN V(Hfo3 17-160 1 BS43XC860A A— 0 FINISHED GRADE, AC PAVING MATCH SLOPE FINISHED GRADE OR NEW HOT AND THICKNESS OF MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COAT OR EXISTING CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO MATCH COMPACTED BACKFILL EXISTING CONDITIONS, AS TRENCH PER SITEWORK SAWCUT APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS 1. CODECONFORMANCE1. CODE CONFORMANCE " • TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST RECOMMENDATIONS OF THESE STANDARDS. - AISC - "SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION TACK COAT - ACI 301 "STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS" OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDING" 6" FOR ASPHALT 6 0•1 .)�I—III _^_=r=-___ III �II UNDISTURBED - ACI 306- "COLD WEATHER CONCRETING" - AWS- 01.1 - 80 STRUCTURAL WELDING SPECIFICATIONS FINISHED GRADE OR MIN PAVEMENT MIN iv 7 —ACI 315— "DETAILING CONCRETE WORK" EXISTING ASPHALT OR 2"(MIN) ASPHALT 1 z (_ -BACKFILL o - ACI 318- "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE" 2. MATERIALS CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT �* ` - ACI 322- "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE" - STRUCTURAL SHAPES.PLATES- ASTM A36 - REQUIREMENT I I—I (SAND OR NATIVE SOIL) - ACI 347- 'FORM WORK" - PIPE COLUMNS- ASTM A53 - GRADE B- TYPE E OR S SCHEDULE 40 PER EARTHWORK 2. MATERIALS - BOLTS: CONNECTIONS- BEARING TYPE, GALVANIZED ASTM 325X —� I SPECIFICATION CONCRETE: - ANCHORING- HOOK TYPE, GALVANIZED ASTM A307 SLOPE TO SUR - APPROVED, READY MIXED CONCRETE HAVING AN ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE - WELDING ELECTRODES - E70XX SERIES SOIL CONDITION IIIII STRENGTH (f"c) OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, SLUMP 3-5 INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - COATING: GALVANIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION ASTM A36 OR PROVIDE •_O^ III I I SHORING IN TELEPHONE CONDUITS • REINFORCING STEEL: APPROVED PRIMER - 2 MILS THICK ACCORDANCE w UTILITY WARNING # UTILITY WARNING TAPE VC) . - ASTM A61 (MIN. 4" 5 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. ASTM A185 WELDED WIRE FABRIC WITH STATE AND o o TAPE WHERE APPLICABLE 40 P CABLE 3 EXECUTION FEDERAL REGULATIONS 1'-0" (1 ACTIVE, i SPARE FORM WORK: - FABRICATION: SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR STEEL MEMBERS PREPARED n Z 5'-0" MAX) CONDUIT AS REQUIRED) POWER CONDUIT (MIN. 4" PVC - SMOOTH PLYWO00 FORMS FOR EXPOSED SLABS OR VERTICAL SURFACES. BOARD FORMS FOR FROM FIELD DIMENSIONS, FOR APPROVAL, BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH m VERTICAL SCH 40) WHERE APPLICABLE FOOTINGS OR UNEXPOSED CONCRETE SURFACES. NO EARTH FORMS PERMITTED. FABRICATION. SHOP FABRICATE, TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. DEPTH W/O • GROUT: BY WELDING. PROVIDE ALL BEAM STIFFENERS, COLUMN CAPS AND BASES, BACKFILL PER SHORING FOR TRENCHING 6' MIN. - NONMETALLIC, NON-SHRINK GROUT UNDER BASE PLATES OR BEARING PLATES HOLES, AND CONNECTIONS. EARTHWORK SEE DETAIL 2SPECIFICATIONS - (TMP' 3. EXECUTION - ERECTION: PROVIDE ALL TEMPORARY SHORING AND/OR BRACING TO 4" MIN TO SECONDARY ELECTRIC ERECT STEEL PLUMB AND SQUARE UNTIL ALL SLABS, FLOORS, OR WALLS 12" MIN TO PRIMARY ELECTRIC"* • CONCRETE: ARE IN PLACE. - PLACE CONCRETE ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED METHODS OF ACI 304 -PRECAUTIONS: CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL PRECAUTIONS AND PROCEDURES TYPICAL PIPES6" * SEPARATION DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED STRENGTH (f'e) OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, SLUMP 3-5 INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER AWS'DIJ WHEN WELDING GALVANIZED METALS CONTRACTOR SHALL OR CONDUITS MN - WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS • REINFORCING STEEL: TOUCHUP ALL ABRASIONS,BURNS, AND SIMILAR DEFECTS ASSOCIATED - PLACE REINFORCING USING STANDARDS BAR SUPPORTS TO PROVIDE PROPER CLEARANCE WITH THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COATINGS USING SPRINT APPROVED - AND PREVENT DISPLACEMENT DURING CONCRETE OPERATIONS. LAP CONTINUOUS BARS 40 COLD ZINC, "GALVANOX", "DRY GALY', "ZINC-IT",OR APPROVED TRENCH AS SHOWN JOINT SERVICE TRENCH DIAMETERS. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVERAGE: EQUIVALENT,IN.ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES BEDDING PER ON PLANS - - CONCRETE PLACED AGAINST EARTH 3 IN. TOUCHUP DAMAGED NON GALVANIZED STEEL WITH SAME PAINT EARTHWORK BURIED CONDUIT - FORMED CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH, WEATHER, OR WATER 2 IN. APPLIED IN SHOP OR FIELD. SPECIFICATIONS ELECT/TELEPHONE - SLABS ON GRADE (MINIMUM FROM TOP) , IN. 4. QUALITY CONTROL LSV - FRAMED SLABS (NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER) .75 IN. _ PROVIDE SERVICE OF LICENSED INDEPENDENT TESTING LAB FOR THE FOLLOWING: - TYPICAL 7�/PICAL UNDERGROUND UTI LI I 1 TRENCH - FRAMED SLABS (EXPOSED TO WEATHER) 1 IN. o)INSPECTION OF BOLT INSTALLATION AND TENSION N.T.S. DETAIL , - PLACE DEFORMED BARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF CRSI b)VISUAL INSPECTION OF FILLET WELDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - 326 "RECOMMENDED PRACTICE.FOR PLACING REINFORCING BARS" - c)ULTRASONIC TESTS OF ALL BUTT WELDS NTS -ALL WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A165. LAP TWO SQUARES AT ALL JOINTS AND - INSPECTION SERVICES MAY OCCUR IN SHOP OR FIELD AS REQUIRED DETAIL AND TIE AT S-O"ON CENTER. 325 - PROVIDE(2) #5 BARS EACH SIDE OF ALL OPENINGS IN WALLS AND SLABS. BARS TO EXTEND 24" NTS - BEYOND EDGE OF OPENINGS. (FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF OPENINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS). • FORM WORK: _ _ - - PROPERLY BRACE AND SHORE FORM WORK TO MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT AND TOLERANCES IN ACCORDANCE. TO ACI 347. - DETAILS NOT SHOWN IN DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI DETAILING MANUAL(ACI 315). 4. COLD WEATHER - BY OEFINITION'(ACI 306),COLO WEATHER CONDITIONS EXIST WHEN "FOR MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE DAYS. A« 250•GALLON P-RO7PANE TANK - THE AVERAGE DAILY TEMPERATURE LS LESS THAN 4TF AND THE AIR TEMPERATURE IS NOT GREATER THAN A B a WTHICKNFSS) 50'F FOR MORE THAN ONE-HALF OF ANY 24 HR. PERIOD." 10'-0'3-0" 6' EXISTING GROUND _ ACCELERATED EARLY STRENGTH GAIN - 12'-0" SURFACE, TYP. GENERATOR - - TO OVERCOME DELAYED STRENGTH AND INITIAL SET DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH COLD WEATHER - BACKFILL PE3- A 1 B 1 t (THICKNESS CONDITIONS, ONE OR A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING MIX ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED: EARTHWORK 4" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE PER II- 7'-O` 4'-O" 6" SPECIFICATION MASSACL-IUSEfTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT « SUBSTITUTING TYPE 1 WITH TYPE III CEMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY AND BRIDGES" ITEM 402.1 UNLESS SHOWN ADDITION OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE ADMIXTURES I PLANS ON R -ADDITION OF NON-CHLORIDE ACCELERATORS � - INCREASING THE TYPE i CEMENT CONTENT BY 100-200 LBS. 1F " •,�:.. R• I_ Iil� . PLACEMENT GUIDELINES -..' 'ooVooelo°o go=o'oo 000'-oe o00�1 CUT X3012"FA.WAY - 00 NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON A FROZEN SUBGRADEt UPON THAWING, UNEVEN SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING °�oo"o°o° °"o 0 0;^o°ooe`oo° o°oo°o"eoo° o°a I ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR. FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, &EMBEDDED FIXTURES MUST BE CLEAR OF SNOW & ICE o 0 0 ° o CONCRETE PAD AT THE TIME CONCRETE IS PLACED. 1 I 1 -°IpOeoo uo°-� o o _lu•—•�` -Rf!'�II Luiif'(CAST-IN-PLACE - THE MINIMUM CONCRETE TEMPERATURE,AS PLACED AND MAINTAINED, MUST EXCEED 55•F. . . HOWEVER, 12",GRAVEL BORROW COMPACTED pO OR PRECAST) - CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED WITH CONCRETE TEMPERATURES ABOVE 75'F. TO 95X STD. MOD. PROCTOR PER EXISTING SUBGRADE - APPROPRIATE CURING AND COLD WEATHER PROTECTION MUST BE INCORPORATED TO PREVENT THE MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $3®l2" EA WA CONCRETE FROM FREEZING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEATING EQUIPMENT TO HEAT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR - 3'4"CHAMFER THE CONCRETE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA a HIGHWAY AND BRIDGES"ITEM 111 151 • CURING AND COLD WEATHER PROTECTION SPEC M11.03.0 ` - TO DEVELOP THE STRENGTH,DURABILITY AND PERMEABILITY POTENTIAL OF THE CONCRETE,CURING AND GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL FIN GRADE I ---_'S-- PROTECTION DURING COLD WEATHER CONDITIONS ARE ESSENTIAL. THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES ARE - RECOMMENDED UPON PLACEMENT: I� -THE CURING PERIOD MUST EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS (MAINTAINING THE 5TF TEMPERATURE). - DETAIL - DO NOT SEAL FRESHLY PLACED CONCRETE. SEALING RETAINS WATER IN THE CONCRETE THEREBY KEEPING 321 6"COMPACTED IT SATURATED DURING FREEZE/THAW CONDITIONS. NTS 4"(TYP) CRUSHED STONE - COLD WEATHER PROTECTION IS BEST PRO EO THROUGH INSULATING BLANKETS OR LOOSE STRAW OR GRAVEL (MINIMUM 12 INCHES DEEP) SANDWICHED7EEN A WATERPROOF COVER EG. POLYETHYLENE. UNDISfURBEO OR 5. QUALITY CONTROL - NOCOMPACTED FILL - CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS TO HAVE CYLINDERS CAST FOR EACH (50)CUBIC YARDS OF 1.USE GALVANIZED HILTI EXPANSION ANCHORS OR,APPROVED CONCRETE POURED OR FOR ANY ONE DAY OPERATION. - EQUAL, FOR EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE. - TESTING LABORATORY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING AND CURING SPECIMENS IN CONFORMANCE 2.VERIFY THE SIZE OF THE LEASED SPRINT PROPANE TANK TO ASTM C31 AND TESTING SPECIMENS IN ACCORDANCE TO ASTM C39. AND FAA WARNING LIGHT EMERGENCY GENERATOR WITH -CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPOSED CONCRETE MIX DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPRINT STANDARD - THE SUPPLIER. SPECIFICATION, FOR ANY POUR IN EXCESS OF 5 C.Y., TO CNSTRUCTION MANAGER A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR - _. 3.FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF ANCHORS AND OTHER TO POUR. - - REQUIREMENT, SEE EQUIPMENT VENDOR DRAWINGS. OUTDOOR PAD FOR MINOR EQUIPMENT DETAIL 365 SCALE. I" 2' i Sprint coL_ER ,D, Accord Pcrk oYl�e STEVENS ESTATE --� Sprint _ - mss, U Nor . MA 02061-1685 �0I'a 1$%IED FOR CONSTRUCBOH cx °f5 '"� COL_/�N TON 10 723 OSGOOD STREET NOTES & DETAILS (787)982-54� BOSTON MTA q Issued MR RLVIEw cvc ers .Lae a• I ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC86OA N0' WE er d°` a" SfOkPV JOB N0. I CASCADE NO. SHEET NUMBER REV sous:RIs xonro aL'slckm L(ptIO3 17-160 1 BS54XC86OA D—1 0 8-0" r ° - CORNER, TERMINAL UNE POST OR PULL POST 6'-0' 6'-0" ^v� y �y P �s > °oo,O P) t _ FORK LAT0H°OOOOe°°0 - LEV ON w/LOC`(FS) 4, D TENSION BRACING OR COMPRESSION BRA pNG TOP OF FACILITY SIDE 2" FENCE1X4 BOARDS-,,, 3-2X4 •� 04 POST e O e PROJECT 1"ABOVE VGATE 1%4 BOARD E%TER OR m GRIND AND SLOPE (T>P) SID ALL AROUND BOVE 1•-0" MIN STAY m TOP OF AVEMENT T1P STOCKADE WOOD, GATE. MAX TERMINAL OR PULL POST WOODEN SWING GATESINGLE (MOD—CELL) FOUR CABINET LAYOUT FROM . ISOMETRIC VIEW POST FO0071tlG DETAIL 43 DETAIL 466 MIN NTS INS _ EXISTING C44TO NELS BACK BACK TO BACK TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED 1/4-0 TEK SCREW TYP. OF 3 W/2 1/2"EMBEDMENT, TYP. OF 6 STOCKADE WOOD FENCE EXISTING 9•X4•BACK BOARD DETAIL PROVIDED BY SHELTER SUPPLIER . NTS 341 ,•_6" PROPOSED B-LINE CHANNEL, POWER CABINET 622,CUT LENGTH TO SUIT A REQU RED•TYP.AND DRILL HOLES 2 POWER CABINET PROPOSED STUD NUT W/SPR111G, ® PROPOSED 1/4"0 LAG SCREW SN228, (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) - - W/2 1/2" EMBEDMENT, TYP. OF 6 TYP,OF 4 POWER CABINET . 0 r SHELTER WALL 1 EXISTING 9'X4'BACK BOARD a PROVIDED BY SHELTER SUPPLIER EXISTING CHANELS 3'-6" e BACK BACK OF 3 i.> 2'-3 1/2" 2•-3 iJ2" 16" 2'-2 3/4" 2'-2 3/4" O PROPOSED B-LINE CHANNEL.622,CUT LENGTH TO SUIT AND DRILL HOLES AS FLEXENT FI.EXENT BATTERY BATTERY 2•-0" REQUIRED, TYP.OF 2 _ 2'-0 5/8" CABINET CABINET CABINET CABINET 2'-0 5/8" 2-02 1/2-- / .Nil- I I FRONT VIEW— POWER REAR'VIEW— POMIER Ipl000 PROPOSED STUD NUT W/SPRING, 9 1/2 SN228, (LENGTH AS REWIRED) s TYP. OF 4 i iV 02 1/2" AA2" 01 1/2" 02" 9 3/4" FRONT 01 3/8" BOTTOM MEW-- POWER . PCS MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS (MOD—CELL) WALL MOUNTED _PQWER PROTECTION CABINET BOLT_PATTERN FOR PPC MOUNT FOUR CABINET LAYOUT DETAIL 373 DETAIL 372 DETAIL 422 INTTS NTS -` Sprint W Atq Sprint C OL E R & 101 Accord Park Drive STEVEN S .ESTATE �' Norwell,MA 02061-1685 - °�iwD FaR coNslRucrKx4 °'� °� +Re R �� COL/�N TON 10 (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET _ " DETAILS ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS BOSTON MTA - NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. SS54XC860A ND' pA1E FOR "61 0N9 eY u« mft ro JOB NO. CASCAM No. SHEET NUMBER REV sac m Ioesom orAw (ukc3 17-160 8S54XC860A —2 0 U-OW*IEL W/CONTINUOUS ` B NP-L SEALANT PICK AWTE 2411.STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS NOTCHED CLOSURE (18' 4 WIDE,2'HIGH SEAMS) S ILICONE DING FRAMEWORK Y STANDING SEAM ROOF CUP - REINFOROEO PURUN LOCATION OF 12X6'KNOCK-OUT 1/2'CHAMFER AROtXRJ 2 2"x 2'PURLIN SUPPORT FOR POWER ANO TELCO SNB-TIPS ENTRE FOUNDATIONLL LINER IAStDE NEOPRENE CLOSURE 12 FOR SPRINT BUILDING PERIMETER(BY OTHERS) EAVE TRIM SOLO WEB TRUSS 2451.FLOOR TRIM j A 5�9 w INTCIFD NRA C CLOSURE TRIM 1/2'CHA.IFER AROUND CEILING SUPPORT ENTRE FOUNDATION MEMBER 2411.CEILING TRIM PERIMETER (BY OTHERS) CELLLULOSE INSULATION, ���� 5.1'DEEP(R-18) W/6HEEL4 MIL.NSOUEC4 mor'NYL SIDING OVER VAPOR WRIER - N/2'CDX PLYWOOD BOLT2411.CEILING LINER 1'FIBERGLASS BLWREf OVER ENTIRE BUILDING5/16ONCRETE(BY OTHMS)PERIMETER MICI 3 1/2'INSULATION H.D.(R-13) NECESSARY FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS BUILDING ANCHORING DETAIL 4'BUILDING FRAMEWORK POUNOiTON DIMENSIONS - 4 MIL ASOUEEN IEHGlH A WIDTH 8 VAPOR BARRIER SPRINT 1]-0 9-1 O 2411.WALL LINER WALL LINER 5'MIN.CLEARANCE FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION TO GRME (3)/4 Rem CONTRIUOLIS r- - ANCHORkIG DETAIL A 1• st" NOTE R1 j ) i)CONCRETE'28,-OXY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3000-40W _ '4 GRADE :• .-•:) :- P54 TYPMALLY 6 BAGS COMMERCIAL-READY MIX CONCRETE _ — — :..... - _ Z)THE iCUACITY SHOWN BELOW ASSUMES A MINIMUM$OIL FF--�� BFARNG CAPACITY 1,500 POUNDS PER SOIURE F00T, D' I—I I I— . Y P R O V I U E �I „ •. •CPAVEI•5AP10 THE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY 1S LESS THAN 1.5DO POUNDS PER SOLMAE FOOT,CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ALTERNATE FOUNDATION DESIGN. CLEARANCE BUILDING SECTION Du DAnoN o HERS AROUND ENTIRE FOUNDATION SPRINT CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 24go. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WAVEGUIDE 12 2)—— EAVE TRIM HVAC UNIT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT CORNER TRIM 0- °%o0g% °o°ac° p oao 0 000 00000 VINYL SIDING OVER ° 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD PERIMETER ANGLE 3/4x 7/0 DOOR INTAKE HOOD HVAC DISCONNECT/GFI RECEPT. SPRINT SHELTER SPRINT SHELTER WEST VIEW (A) NORTH VIEW (D) DETHIL 500 DMts ETAIL �- Sprin t �'rr�+�-r��-r�T �'F�rr� r�+�r SPRINT ST VEN'S L'S TA TE —1 SHELTER 8c FOUNDATION DETAILS 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA BY TRACHTE, INC. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A U0R N0. CASCADE NO. SHEEP NUMBER I REV N/A N/A N,/A U-CHANNEL W/OONTINUOUS ` B .. NP-i SEALANT PICK ANGLE 24ge.STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS g4" NOTCHED CLOSURE (18"WIDE.2"HIGH SEAMS) DING FRAMEWORK 2"STANDING SEAM ROOF CLIP REINFORCED PURLW 1/2"CHAMFER AROUND 2�12 2"x 2"PURUN SUPPORT 1/2"CHAMFER AROUND 'PERIMETTERE(BY FOUNDATION LL LINER INSIDE NEOPRENE CLOSURE EAVE TRIM SOLID WEB TRUSS ENTIRE FOUNDATION 24ga FLOOR TRIM PERIMETER(BY OTHERS) Aram C 9'-10" CLOSURE TRW CEILING SUPPORT LOCATION OF 12"X6'KNOCK-OUT MEMBER FOR POWER AND TELCO STUB-UPS 249a.CEILING TRIM TOR AT&T SHELTER CEU.IULOSE MISUATIpN, EAVE STRUT Oman /6"HEEL 4 MIL WSOLEEN 3"WIDE CONY.SIDING OVER 4' VAPOR BARRIER 1/2"COX PLYWOOD ANCHOR BOLT 249e.SUNG LINER T"FIBERGLASS MARKET OVER ENTIRE BUILDING FRAMEWORKD4'v 4"x s/1CONCRETE(BY OTHERS) (R-3)ANG 3 1/2"INSULATION N.D.(R-T3) NECESSARY FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS BUILDING ANCHORING DETAIL 4"BUILDING FRAMEWORK FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS 4 MIL.VISOVEEN LFNGM D WIDTH A VAPOR BARRIER AT&T 20--0 249..WALL LINER WALL LINER S"MRL CLEARANCE FRON TOP OF FOUNDATION TO - GRACE (3)/4 KEW CONTINUOUS •MRN. �- ��• ANCHORING DUAL NOTE STOOP GRADE 1)CONCRETE:26-DAV COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3000-4000 1 PST.TYPICALLY 6 BAGS COMMERCIAL-READY MIX CONCRETE ".. ".. N 2)THE FOUNDATION SHOWN BELOW ASSUMES A MINIMUM SOL . BEARING CAPACITY OF 1.500 POLR40S PER SWAM POOL F THE SOL BEARING CAPACITY IS LESS THAN 1.500 POUNDS PER PROVIDE `1" „ RAVEL/ SOW RE FOOT.CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE MR AN ALTERNATE FOUNGg71pN DESIGN. CLEARANCE BUILDING SECTION NOAA'IONB'OTHERS AROUND ENTIRE FOUNDATION ` SPRINT CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 24go. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS HVAC UNIT 12 2 r _- HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT LAVE TRIM GENERATOR RECEPT. WAVEGUIDE CORNER TRIM fill Q egoaeg9oeoeBG%eo INTAKE HOOD p oc�$e$G°oe 000 OoO O O O O 00000°0 VINYL SIDING OVER oo°000000 1/2CDX PLYWOOD 3'-3' PERIMETER ANGLE 3/4x 7/0 DOOR HVAC DISCONNECT/GFT RECEPT. AT&T SHELTER AT&T SHELTER NORTH VIEW (Cl EAST VIEW (Q) Sprint AT&T S'TEPVETNVS ESTATFi —1 SHELTER & FOUNDATION DETAILS ` 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA BY TRACHTE, INC. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A JOB NO. CASCADE NO. I SHEET NUMBER IREV N/A N/A N/A FOUNDATION LOADING MATERIAL LIST MATERIAL REQ'D. PER ASSEMBLY ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MOMENT 292.00 Np-R GALV.W. ON. ITEM MK,NO. DE-TXN �� 55 0 Na 1 4 2 11VO x 8•-0'(A615-GR.75)ANCHOR BOLTS 1 t ___ SHAFT ASSY.(TOP SECTION) AXAL SAO Aq 2 18 k8 BEGAN x 13'-6•(ASTM AGI5%60) 1 2 SHAFT ASSY.(BOTTOM SECTION) 3 16 65 REBOR x 151-6'(AST.A615-GRAW 4.53 3 3 CIN69 is w v0.s i w iUr v"An�"cvs xmc ws, m Hw(.µs swwtc aesmerm(wrtwc C! Is�B� wxx[is r0a 4 HARDWARE AS F0.LOWyS CRs Ax 12 sysrM�Wvi4w xs"a[IX "firA Z64 3 P-IOBll r Br 14 x Im sa4Ji veA 133ME s• 4 5 tSMBWDE-5 ON -I_ 410. s)w•n W ss> VOL CCRETE O 4000 Pa"E B CFMONT) IU„IS - an 1 6 STEEL(ASTM A615-FR.60) 10400 4f O IN�srti./i v0OUuc sv H e 9I 9638 2 ] 4-37.00-2250 SETTING TEMPLATE 0.40 6 B GS33220 3/8'0 KELLUNS HOOK ASSY. 1 9 R$�{� ¢nuM wir Ave sR 10 ni`rsii. WiMroi ue B�7S' 1.ANCHOR BOTS SMALL BE ATTACHED O MYA a,O1BM t 11 y �py P�^�R sn) ��/�(v7�f1OR NUTS N BOTH TEMPLATES ` O 1 ANCNbR BOLiS SHAL 0.INSTAtLEO " t O r rAS AgTsmlr Ali a nr.x.4x */LONGER IHREADW ENO UP. tt srirM n vt+M1"iO�Nruic VIEW A-A' 1 l3 HIgL0198 ' ` ��nTR4 awx A Axe rtlw o sox Q.w 1 14 POLYI5x25 IS'rx 25'AMERICAN FLAG 7.50 1 15 KIOD 2 20'BUSS BAR KIT ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION " - O. 1 16 GALLON TOUCH-Li PAINT 1 (4)2 1/4.0 x 8-0•LG ANCHOR BOLTS ON A '�_6 1 177NI701A 2101 0.-2 DOUBLE OBSTRUCTION ' -- 37.0 HMT CIRCLE `2 -- 1 IB 5991865 150'SO CORP ANCHOR 80.75 ARE13 AO�CEPPRRNMrare AswxN.r - E - STB.DR3 OSSISIB VIEW"A-A" (IDMPLaTE MDT SHOWG TOTAL GALV. STIR. & ACCES. WT:_#__ TOTAL ANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE WT.7-9-05__ 3 .. 9 (18)#8 REBAR,L=15'-6' _ - (I EQUALLY SPACER OM A Y '49'0 CIRCLE HEDRUM SAND 3 war A; 4vrx r AP4 .4 _`•• 2 MEN If •= PER P.W � # SECTION 'B-B']ex P SECTION"B-B" - "B" "B" imo -15A .e rtrwuNW it M war4LLR MINERAL NOTES D w,0b0.E p T[9RRB a AORBIeMR A7ATP6 YOB 9H,al MDµP�y--- �' VmVFt lMw¢f ~ µlRy 0511-(WwCywyxWTRgTa XSq(R Wy1�1O10.1wft VIM MwRr mlFf w6W%0"TRNS#W BNIKW. b1 . O3 ,;( �� a V1MIw'MMWar M[11"N� NYidl"�wMtl�.I[M M[flM�TRIOMNMMII IAM,V6R 13 Na � p sOV¢T waVt 5[Im m OrLVA50Rd sLB A7M 4Mf xM rx01 NRHIEO 0uq LW 6000 ' A N mMIPlt1�� r KVN({TS AIipYN a BRCTIOx IWtmUI1C wIM m BArbibO flE t./ - 0.Miert f�18 � Wl!1 W"KefY r Y-R• G60R)gl ]T )BS REQAR,L=13'-6• w ,)e wnauiHox a,xt IIHerRIA wMA Bi YaFMf Alma m oMplwl ae M rue e rt0igtl OF 1HE NeIORL elaYJ.rt AKXtl TOrtYWR VDN A JKNKG A0.ff N.sHe tld .. �� �• a �i111�ifN R�C(0N 16iA�Nm{aY a FNM SRKL LUwM 10.WMS8.aO �P {• ari ast m A N(mr(1wRcyarywKuyn n'rwAMw�emM.w.s rxN.4ea�.uz rM""aMm+wKmfrrc�OAON +w(M«RBx n /MO,f " W90K 4w.1 K.al(!f!B 0010 sly![i M arttrM- -IUP- Kao N4f a>i MW x••p IAN 5 of fIB's AOM"a i . _ ualsel°0�e .�xnv ] •�1 wy wQmis 4' 4"°Duvt axe"�navwR��,rt�,a�Qe acrsw iaanu re RauTo a orrosec vs(m(sRnR an7wN ieOaOlm .. - - �6ii•"-�')`�Fp1y� ry•mml O SECTION "C-C' �pR�{5�4ECTna vrmwR�A>�s ar{o1l�p���pvyn p,r:rtALmieII(Yo(�a�wppA0�a1fR (ion%g A(R gOtD N M1M0 t RNa�086 H RIE M1.YRtdR1WMf M MuxRTX.waftMn® rt wwRs s wassµr.,Hc ANwn rHN.rt war RECTION VIEW Iw aKr,w a.R PaaA w:,Ienem aicA rK mwcruR w N.MA a.a mnlw x�awu rt GENERAL NOTES: I aA exrt w.:R 'E - NOHE F.pM IMbYIIrm.'aSOOLY www •I;r sv n( xo51Aaaga. wRpiY m.r pA�y m ws Fa-w v"rxunii u al mr w s"a'mNl�.r°late FEwc".wxNPX Nt OETAa a+naR,aLi of(D.wrt x4100. ne.m`R°a0w.r AtlX,`aA sew w rK KsiTRM6 MLWwwe w wlr la,xm MMwr rM wme afxP,x s sr IKM InrQIR a MxwwR4 Due"wAs wo.-aL 1a ev mn ae ne�wPu�mpayBd Ayg�T�/>,axe yyAg vuR wr x�y�p wM A L iDUROA7I0N DESIGN 13 BASE OM THE f0.1.UV,7NG EEI JOIN!it/85.CANTOR 6534518 wlA as Hsaon a AAOlnsll aN xMDI(9o. mPJr IRlsllsl ,0 eISIBwE TPT blil IQCS RerN0151K rt� 500.REPORT BY JAVO25K7 GEOIIOXt,TNG,REPORT 1O.022336-APRIL 23,2002 Mmwa'"nl ilc 0qc r(AR E. FOUNDATION EMBEDMENT IS UOVN nXBI THE GROUND LEVEL AT THE TINE OF SOIL IMVLSTIOATIOM ro1S ra9B-fbssW,a. AS DEPICTED IN THE SOIL REPORT.SHOULD THE ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS DIETER FROM THOSE IN THE REPORT,THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND FGONOATION DESIGNER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IN ORDER TO RE{VALUATE THE FOUNDATION DESIG. 3. SOL REPORT EO STEEL CAISSON 13R METHOD My BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SOIL FROM CAVINGPAMCICONSTRUCTURL THE CAISSON SHOULD SHOU.D BE. . BEHOVED AFTER COMPLETION O•CONCRETING UR.I'LEFT IN THE GROUND,ALL WIDE AROUND THE CAISSON SHAD BE FILLED VITH PRESSURI7ED GROUT.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS.METHODS,TECHNIQUES,SEWENCES.AND PROCEDURES. 4. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REUBMRCENENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS 5. SPECIAL INSPECTION O'REDiORCEMEW.ANCHOR BOLT IMSTAA.ATIOM,MND OOCRETEIIS _ REWIRED PER 1997 UBC/1998 CBG FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT AND ANCNR BOLTS SNA.L BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. 6 REINFORCING STE0.STALL CONFORM TO ASTM A813�7.Fy.6p MRI REOFORCEIENT SHN.L K ASSEMBLED USING STEEL VIRE NELDING h NOT PERMTPEA MOIM)M SPLICE LENGTH fOt ysy Q 4 No.6.BARS AND SMRLLLR-44 x Obar)FOR Na 7 BARS AND LARGER-35 K Ober. w rt HORIZONTAL TES SMALL BE STAGGERED WITH NO HOW THAN 508 O•SPLICES IN ORE PLACE T. CONCRETE MIT(DESIGN AO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE VIM ACI 318-99.ACI 386.3R-93.AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAs.CODES. IB MINIM �Gnp w�Lr il�ara 4M COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-4000 0,0AT 2B DAYS U&TYPE l[CEMENT W=EfS O STAT ,OA Zs9,NAB]o1s STgTEO OTHERWISE. AF T F IXSHn�D HAVE A SLUMP W 7'(21•)FOR DRILLED ED PIER AND (tiy 'O"rB'Ow1�OwR A OaIY M aAY x Nr La r4Re xm Pf1Ci1W rwZowfi'. 13 laaram naNwr c FOR DRILLEDUNRATC PIERS ONLY UR CONCEAL OVER 711E ENTIRE LENGTH VI OF ANCHOR BOUTS SMALL tglgc sxu eoO BE VIBRATE0.FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS AL1.CONCRETE SHALL 1E VIBRATED. aEMAYQII�i)ALD i1/a ep IOr a4ilp�N,�A@sARKB Wwu a 000.W vW1m ey¢aaN 8. ANCHORSU 80.E ORIENTATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE OPER ACCE THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD >' 5 y Q CONSULT THE SITE PUN AND NgNpPOLE OKAYING FOR PROPER ACCESS PORT ORIENTATION, ViY'a�N T0"Fa MTs c a 0 MRSi a 0 > . CLIP JOINT JACKING PROVISION DETAIL FSAfj TRUCK D TAI Rx�VLxS�wxo.'M" x STEVEN'S ESTATE _- SpI"I12 t SHELTER & FOUNDATION DETAILS 723 OSGOOD STREETBY TRACHTE, INC. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 BOSTON MTA SITE NO. BS54XC860A JOB NO. CASCADE NO. %M NUMBER I REV N/A N/A N/A N PROPOSED 34%W V HIGH STOCKADE FORCE li�y'Icy GROUNDING GENERAL NOTES SPRINT COMPOtINID PA 1.ALL DETAILS ARE SHOWN AS A DIAGRAM,ACTUAL GROUNDING INSTALLATION"AND CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC PROPOSED PROPANE TANK .,CONDITIONS ON 3AW CONCgEIE PAD 70 BE PRONDFD BY SPRINT 2.ALL EXTERIOR GROUNDING AND TOP OF GROUNDING RODS SHALL BE BURIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4'-0' BELOW FINISHED GRADE, PROPOSED Gm* t7OR ELECTRIC METER GROUND ROD EXCEPTED. OSED QROtWD ROD ON 1 CONGO PAD SAT 1� ALL 3.ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE#2 SOLID TINNED COPPER ® PROPOSED 2101 OL2-DOIIaIE _ (DEN.W BE PROVIDED BY SPRNn OROTRA(TTNCS WITH MIN. 1• RADIUS BEND. HEIGHT t>6.5t AGI. OBSTRUCTION LIGHT RECON By - 4.GROUND SYSTEM MUST BE TESTED AND SHALL HAVE A RESISTANCE £ PROPOSED SKINT A71mm MD.PMT f 790179IA OF 10 OHMS OR LESS. CONTRACTOR'TO SUBMIT AN INDEPENDENT"FALL POTENTIAL'TESTING REPORT. 5. NOTIFY CONSTRUCRON MANAGER IF THERE ARE ANY DIFFICULTIES INSTALLING THE GROUNDING SYSTEM DUE TO SITE/SOIL CONDITIONS. dw-aaD aaD-aaD--4raag-®-aw--aw-Taw-aaa-aw -�Io-DIGIT--m-lam am-"-aa,- v _ 6.ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTORS ARE TO BE CADWELD ' GAS-GAS-s GAS---GAS-GAS-GAS-GAS Af ALL ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING SHALL BE CPDWELD OR MECHANICAL •y AS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. _ I - HEIGHT m 86.51 AOL � 7.ALL GROUNDING INSTALLATION IS TO.BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 4 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA zu SPRINT SPECIFICATIONS. e ff� S. GROUNDS ARE TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 2•-0" FROM SHELTER OR TOWER FOUNDATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MPROPOSED i0• L\� 9, CONTRACTOR TO HAND DIG IN AREAS AROUND EXISTINGUDUTIES (BY EELS) [ 10.ALL CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE ENCOMPASSES IN A 4"X 2"BED v J� RI OF TERRAF'ILL GROUNDING BACKFILL BEFORE BACKFILLING CONDUCTOR C TRENCHES. . KAQP= rc £ HEIGHT-76.5t ACL (DESIGNED BY em u. 11.ALL RJSTAUATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. FUTURE CARR>ER ANTENNA ` aye am qy f 12.CONTRACIDR 70.maromwwmv REOORD.ALL SOUND Totter UIBHT R. trM TIONS NO CADYELOS CONmoMER ` ES ON MCPOtFA 1 r 7V SOU*EAST ®. O \ I a>flOftoum \ / °m 1RACNil DNC.PROPOSED W VIDE (. NRn GR Fa 1aOOp &Q \ om n PROPOSED AT&T � SHELIR . GRD--IlGO D�GRD-GRD !RH GRD-GRH GRD ( .. PROPOSED 100' n� Cl ARASPOUE aN BY f op aa„ an d 1 GRD d 1 1 �ff CASOCT v ` FLF �T � �,. ( TRANS. I rx PROPOSED SWJWEENT- 6� - (SES ATTAMIED CUM BY TRAdifE) PROPOS®6FIIBtA'POR PROPOSED I 18"IDLE ON 470'OMMIE PAD® a SPRNT ICE BRIDGE PROPOSEDON SX[OC NORPROPANE PM \9 ! BOUPE6IE �/ S � >; __ � .. PROPOSED SPIN.PPC • .GRD GRD-GRp-GRO-TAiD q2D-CRD-GRD TRD CRD 0-GRD-LRD--GRD 0 ptD TiRD 7]1V ff PROPOSED SPNNT PROPOS'®Ts.00 CABRW W OOHORRIE PAD INAI 7RAMM SHELMR fMWP0.5®SPWCT . / PPC COMOARD W yo V EASEDEIY 1TRI1 LW COMPANY.PROP D tl/0 IMgI71kSQPOW SIDE Of" TIDM MAY CHANGE J PROM VR to q �4 bn8 "G 5RH-ff MR CL411 PROPOSED VfAW • CAISSON TOTER GRAPHIC SCALE PARTIAL SITE PLAN Paul"" 2.5 1.25 0 2.5 5 - "EAST EL E VA TION GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE: 17--2.5'-0". - 5 2.5 0 5 10 SCALE: 1"_-5'—O" -�- Sprin t _-_ Sprint C©LER �, STEVEN'S ESTATE' C /�N ONO 101 Accord Pork Drive z NaweE.MA 02061—tt385 ^Sp QED FO1�" 10N G"` "� "D PERI, GROUNDING PIAN & ELEVATION OL T ( (761}s62-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA A' ISSUED FOR REVLON aa' as in h ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. SS54XC660A M°` EWE MASIONS av o" 1-W • JOB NO.IT 0kSCAOE Na SHELF eaAeER 1tEV " Gomm,s, aEsalm oaalN 17-160 6S54XC860A E-1 0 ELEMICAL SYMBOLS t6AZ FROM ® GROUND ROD WITH ACCESS CABGROUND Krr e XRT GROUND ROD SEE DRAWING - FOR GABLE S ® to . GROUND ROD QUANTITIES) 4 0 2 Lj DISCONNECT SWITCH ® METER ON METER/BREAKER UNIT - 0 7/16' /4 p o 1" (MIN.) • CIRCUfT BREAKER GROUND BAR -, 2 O 0 0 00 HEAT SHRINK 1/8"(MIN.) ON WALL OR 0 p p - p p ON GE GENERATOR OWER�""A {[ / p O O O u 0 0 o O SWA NUT 1/4" ■ CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION $QJ - 3 -/P"' �0 p o� 1 5/5 LOCK WASHER -__ _-- COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION O - GROUNDING WIRE O O O O O O O O � � � COPPER BUSS QO O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 S/S FLAT WASHER DO NOT HEAT SHRINK REPRESENTS DETAIL NUMBER S/S BOLT Cr xX _REEF. DRAWING NUMBER O DO NOT DISCONNECT O LEGEND (TYP. OF 2) LABEL ABBREVIATIONS "DO NOT DISCONNECT-TAG ON ALL AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE ~ LABEL"DO NOT DISCONNECT" 1 B-6142.COPPER CENTERS TO SMA CH NEMA DOUBLE UGOCON INSTRUMENT caT•NO. GENERAL LUG DETAIL GROUND,�2E�INTERCONNECTS TCW TINNED COPPER WIRE 2- INSULATORS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CAT. NO. 3061-4 3- 5/8" LOCKWASHERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3015-8 % BCW BARE COPPER WIRE TWO HOLE LUG, 70 BE 4- WALL MOUNTING BRACKET,NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT N0.A-6056 1)ALL HARDWARE 18-8 STAINLESS STEEL INCLUDING LOCK CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE KOPR-SHIELD USED WITH /2 AWG WASHERS. COAT ALL SURFACES WITH ANTIOXIDANT GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 5- WALL M X 1' BRAC ET,N.NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO.CAT N0.30 6 PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET (THONE�CTIONBETTS)ON ALL LUG TCW TO BUILDING COMPOUND BEFORE MATING_ OR GROUND RING 2)ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL(S/S)3/8" • RWY RACEWAY DIAMETER OR LARGER. TYP. TYPICAL - 3)FOR GROUND BOND TO STEEL ONLY: INSERT A DRAGON RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL TOO WASHER BETWEEN LUG AND STEEL,COAT ALL SURFACES EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING INSTALLATION OF GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR WITH ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUND BEFORE MATING. DWG DRAWING GROUNDING - STANDARD DETAIL IOR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) GROUND BAR DETAIL - MIGB MASTER ISOLATED GROUND BAR CIGBE COAX ISOLATED GROUND-BAR EXTERNAL DETAIL GEM GENERATOR 509 GR GROWTH DETAIL 50 DETAIL 509 NTS SSUP SPRINT SPECTRUM UMTfEO PARTNERSHIP mm DETAIL 500 NTS 12 APPROX. 3 3/4" 6" _ t f/4'bleu ANTENNA TO ANTENNA FLAGPOLE —ANTENNA BOR(G TOP OF FLAGPOLE SEE.. CAB VE 916132 1 CABLE GROUND KIT SEE DDE°fML1• 2 AWG INSULATED (SIMILAR) UG 3"TYP ( •) #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WIRE(GROUNDED O GROUND BAR) STANDARD GROUND KIT(TYP.) GROUND LUG SHINER NOT CONNECTOR CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT p6 AWG((PRowoEo TO EXCEED 1/8" (TYP ) SUPPORTS TO BE WITH &W KTT TYP.) 4/0 GREEN INSULATED M UM Raaus BEN 1—o" usEO EVERY z'—o' TO GPS ANTENNA CABLE ANTENNA GiouNo BAR (ciceE) mus BEND 0•-8~ FOR HALO GROUND 8=pM OF�P� SEE NOTE I . SEE DETAIL (SIMILAR) - 12"APPROX. . HORIZONTAL NONDIRECTIONAL L2iA111/2"GA z' e� COAX CABLE SPLICE FOR CONNECTING ANTEriNA (I-- FOR ALL) Luc cAeLE I� CABLEWAVE 916132 1 LUG CABLE GROUND KR O EQUIPME (2) /2 AWG BCW VIA TRAY OR ICEBRIDGE HORIZONTAL OMNI-DIRECTIONAL # FLAGPOLE PIER SPLICE FOR CONNECTIONS: RING GROUND 1. SUPPLEMENTARY SUS O COPPER GROUND W6 AM D° IRE(GROUNDED ROUND BAR) #2 AWG BCW(TYP OF 4) SUPPLEMENTARY 8115 2. SUPPLEMENTARY BUS TO PRIMARY PERIPHERAL INTERIOR BUS I�RizoNTAI rEWff T - CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND K� —— —— No0TO ANTENNA CABLE ANTENNA SABLE GROUNDING - FLAGPOLE VERLIC�L NONDIRECIlONAL N0� ptDOjp�ALWgY4S ECT f�,ftDUN° 0 NMRE DOWN BEND DETAIL I. NUMBER of GROUND BARS MAY VARY 6ROUt+�HM.O SFLELTER SPLICE CORNER N'ISTALJ,�110N TO GROUND BAR. 526. DEPENDING O DN THE TIFF OF OWER, ' PROVBED 8T-SMELTER FABRICATOR, NTSANTENNA LOCATION AND CONNECTION ORIENTATION. PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. DETAIL. 2 A SEPARATE GROUND BAR M BE USED FOR GPS ANTENNA IF REQUIRED. HTS 513 DETAIL 511 NTS mumSprint FM pONSiR iN � s COLER S 101 Accord Pmk Drove STEVEN'AS ESTATE —� I5tOAm Print COLAN TON 10 ? N- $2A 66 1`16723 OSGOOD STREET aea>I GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS BOSTON MTA EN S AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 A ISSUED wrs w cve ers aw 11M SITE NO. BS54XC860A N°• we w m "pop 55i M- SITE NO. SW srxE amw lommm oar '� 17-160 $S54XC860 0 1 FROM ANTENNk� , / NOTE: 00 AT INSTALL CABLE GROUND 107 AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE - R SUPPORT POST + BRACKET FOR 27" CHANNEL (3-9") PART #802225 (PIROD Tx R INC OR EQUAL) CUT POST LENGTH TO FLAGPOLE WEATHER PROOFING KIT SUIT BY REMOVING UNCAPPED END JUMPER REQUIRED GROUNDING KIT SUPPORT POST FOR ICE BRIDGE 27" ICE BRIDGE 3-9" CHANNEL x10' PART # 124470 (PIROD INC. OR EQUAL) CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL TO CAB'BLLE�BUNDLE (TYP.) LENGTH TO SUIT (SEE NOTE). IER PROOFING KIT ' CABLES FROM FLEXENT CABINET THROUGH BUILDING PORT NEL 6 INSULATED AWG HANGER BRACKET TYPE DOUBLE CABLE—f LEVEL CHANNEL/27" BRIDGE PART PORT/ I SECTOR CIGBE(T TYP.) _ #802257 (PIROD INC OR EQUAL) HANDHOLE 00 MAXIMUM CABLE SPAN 3'-0" TYP. CIGBE oLi FROM SUPPoar EQUIPSIDE I FOR CABLE HANGER /2 AWG iCW /2 AWG TCW SEE TABLE BELOW PCS/GPS ANTENNA CABLES—ARRANGEMENT •o o• Upper LyGBg� L BY CONTRACTOR. �2 AWGND.TTYC TOWER TO 4/0 INSULATED AWG FLAGPOLE #2 AWG BCW TO FOUNDATION EQUIPMENT GROUND 1#2 AWG BCW 8I,CONC, PIER SECTION THRU •o o• LOWER CIGBE RING RIGID L ICE BRIDGE ELEVATION ICE BRIDGE CONDUIT PLUG =Durr EL ANTENNA CABLE - /2 AWG.TCW TO GROUND RING COUPLING BENDING RADIUS - DETAIL PER MANUFACTURER'S GROUNDING - STANDARD DETAIL 6" GR NTS 576C STANDARDS CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRES TO GROUNDING BAR (CIGBE) DETAIL 522 RIGIDHTS STEEL CONWR PVC SCHEDULE 40 'FMC)STEEL SIZE AS SHOWN TO PVC ADAPTOR ON LAYOUTS RACEWAY — STANDARD DETAIL NAL GABLE CABLENAVE MANUF. MIN. GRADE UNDERGROUND CONDUIT STUB—UP CABLE'SIZE NUMBER �E NLiNA eER 0 `n 1/2" 810918-007 915659 5" D�AIIDE{ RESSION TYPE TWO-HOLE 566 LONG BARREL GROUNDING FITTING, 870920-007 915594 22" . c NTS 0.75"O.C.LUGS(FOR 02 AWG - v S000 COPPER CONDUCTOR) CADWEI.D PROVIDE 3/8'FILUSENO R-HEAD BOLTS.LOCK WASHERS D MAS.FOR .ATTACHMENT OF CABLE HANGERS TO SUPPORT BRACKET TO COMPOUND GROUND RIM - /2 APFG TCW�-- — TO MONOPOLE GROUND RING (WAIVER OF itli5 AS REGIRTED) NOTES: /2 AWG TCW t. WEN USING PAW COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS.MAMAN ALLOWABLE$PAN SHELIM QROLW HALOee.1O"cr w:R. -BETWEN SUPPORTS ON A CM47RAMS VAGUE SIFCRON OF BRIDGE CAMEL.SHALL PE 19 FEET PROVIDED BY SHEI.IER FOR 20 FEET BRIDGE CHAMIEL OR 9 FEET FOR 10 FEET MUDGE.CHANNEL. RING GROUND FABRCATOK TRAC ITE.m. 0 2..THEA USM POW O MPM04M FOR SPUCHO OHAMIEL SECTIONS.THE SPLICE SHOULD /2 AWG TCW BE PROVIDED AT INE SIPPORT.IF POSSIBLE OR AT A MA MBNA OF 2 FEET.FROM THE SUPPORT. TYP. 3. WHEN USING PROD ODIV-47%SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS PO6VBI.E TO TIE ENDS OF ICE OMDGM WIN A MA)IAUM CANIREVER OISTANCE.OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO ppy. THE FREE END OF THE NE MUDGE. • /2 AWG STRANDED CAPPER 0'Sj 4. CIT MUDGE CHNYIEL SWIMM SMALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WIN A MAMA&70 iESTORE GROUND R00 CAPPERWELD CABLE WITH GREEN — — _ N I E WOES TO THE ORMAL*M EL.OR EOMWALENT,FINISH. 5/8"9x7 ROD"LANG CARL INSULATION FOR - S ICE BRNOES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM MANUFACTURERS ODER THAN PROD. . EQUIPTHWNMENT ENCLOSURE BOND PROPOSED GROUNDING LINE COPPER CP,BI.E2 STR �(TEYNP)INSULATED PROVIDED THE NANUFACIURER's INSTALLATION Cl9DElUNES ARE FOAOWEO. EQUIP BOND TO ALL METALS FRAMES 9. OEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS TOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PEWBTIED WITH THE RESPECTNE FAN. LOUVERS. ETC.WITH/2 STRANDED 4'x 20"x 1/4'TINNED OPER � MANUPACTUROR'S AND ENONEERS.APPROVAL - GREEN INSULATED WIRE MAN GROUND BAR(MGB).MWNT Mw ON`C�". 7. DEMAUONS FROM ICE MUDGE FOUNIDARONS SHOWN ON S7E SPEOM DRAWNOS OR STANDARD DETAILS NOTE: 1. ENLARGED MIGB.�SHOWN FOR CLARITY TO DEPICT THE REQUIRED CABLE TRAY/WAVEGIIDE SUPPORT SYSTEM.( ) REQUIRE 04MMEWO APPROVAL. - ` CONDUCTORS TO THE W. GROUNDING STANDARD DETAIL 2. LOCATION OF.THE MIGB'S eL CIGB'S TO BE DETERMINED N FIELD AND MAY BE LOCATED AND SUPPORTED AS CLOSE TO EQUIPMENT AS FEASIBLE AND ICE BRIGEI(COAX CABLE SUPPORT DETAIL GROUND ROD PRACTICAL To ACHIEVE THE DESIGNED CONFIGURATIONS. GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL EQUIPMENT DETAIL 503 DETAIL DETAIL 5760 ----<� 69-4 ws V Of COMER TOT Ate,Park hive STE`VEN'S ESTATE` �► Sprint _ _ AW sprint NL Norm.",MA 02067-1685 _ GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS COL_/�N TON 10 (781)982-5e00 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA A °%, ISSUED FDR ROMA CFG 9rs V. ENGINEERS AND SCIEPITISTS NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A No D9E AEHgpl� ryY'�' " °" "°° y jos ma CASCADE N0 SHFEET NUMBER RLv 9ORE As WGIW iIEMNkD bIwMH .. 17-160 BS54XC860A E-3 10 B. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES (WAVE GUIDE): NOTE:THE RF TRANSMISSION UNE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE PRIMARY RAM CABINET (PRC), FURNISHED BY LUCENT, AND THE ANTENNA CONSISTS OF A COAXIAL CABLE, MONOPOLE (PRC), REFERRED TO AS A WAVEGUIDE. CPS ANTENNA 1. ALL ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES AND JUMPERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WRHOUT LOOPS (SUPPUEO BY LUCENT) AND/OR PIGTAILS. CHAIN MOUNT(ACCOMODATES MONOPOLE - 2. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KITS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON THE JUMPER BETWEEN DIAMETERS FROM 6 1/2"-367 THE ANTENNA AND MAIN LINE CABLE. 3.ANTENNk COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KITS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS CLOSE TO THE CONNECTOR AS POSSIBLE AT EACH ANTENNA IF THIS IS NOT FEASIBLE, THE GROUND KR SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BEND ON THE FIRST STRAIGHT RUN OF THE CABLE. THE GROUND KR SHALL BE,INSTALLED ON STRAIGHT SECTION OF CABLE ONLY 1 AND NOT ON BENDS. - 4.ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE MANUFACTURERS MINIMUM SEND RADIUS 2 I I FOR COAXIAL CABLE USING LITHE°PROPER FITTINGS NECESSAR. T14E Y TO LENSUN REETTHAT THEY i ( CABLE TO PIPE CONNECTOR MINIMUM BEND RADIUS REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. I B/�UR.pNDY TYPE GAR l"' 2 PLCS) COAXIAL CABLE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS f I MINMAW BIND MDOMUM BEND RADAIS IN MOUNTING ZLT HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT CABLE TYPE CABLE SIZE/ ��Ri TRAY - dt 6"CONDUIT BRACKET PLATE SEE DETAIL "A" CABLEWAVE FLC 12-50J 1 2" 5" 10" I I CAWWAE 70 158-50J 1 58" 20 28 a° III PROPOSED S. THE GPS ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS CABLE RUN, FROM THE VALMONT GPS 3 CONNECTOR AT THE ANTENNA HEAD TO THE CONNECTION AT THE BTS CABINET, WITHOUT JUMPERS. GPS MOUNT CHAIN MOUNT POST SEE DETAIL 806 SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 7•ALL ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES SHALL BE MARKED AND TAGGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE - REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT"SPECIFICATIONS. #2 AWG TCW f C. EMERGENCY GENERATORS 2' STANDOFF (TYP GROUNDING KIT 1. THE GENlBRAC EMERGENCY GENERATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1/2"i1 COAX CABLE MANUFACTURERS"INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE SHIPPED WITH THE UNITS. 2HOLE LUG(TYP 2. THE STARTUP OF THE GENERAL EMERGENCY GENERATOR SHALL BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED ` MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER CIGBE MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (CED)OR ANOTHER FACTORY AUTHORIZED AGENT. THE FIELD GROUND BAR SHALL COORDINATE THIS EFFORT WITH TOM CARROLL OF CID(1-800-727-9119)TO ENSURE E #5 AWG GROUNDING KIT THAT THE SAFETY AND WARRANTY ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED. 2/0 INSULATED AWG BCW "—lr„-2/0 GREEN INSULATED 98._(PROVIDED WITH KIT) 2 3/8_ODX9"MOUNTING AREA MAY BE ATTACHED IN-UNE TO FOR SUPPORTING A CPS THE 4/0 GREEN INSULATED DOWN CONDUCTOR FROM THE UPPER GGBE WITH A LONG BARREL HIGH COMPRESSION ELEVATION YIGFF BEAATHERPR OIEEDD AND (SIMILAR TO VALMONT GPS CHAIN MOUNT (PART NO B2069 GROUND KIT) GPS ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKET DETAIL 806 NOTE] NTS 1.THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE GPS ANTENNA SHALL 13E IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL"RF REPORT. 2.THE CPS ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD 1-1/4"DIAMETER.SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PINE. 13E THRE MOUNT ENO- THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH MINIMUM Of 13 INCHES USING A .HAND ORROTARY PIPE CUTTER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR CUT. A HACK SAW cNdi NOT BE USED. THE CUT PIPE END SHALT.BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL . AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE ANTENNA MOUNT. CELL SITE INSTALLATION NOTES . 3.THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRICATED AS SHOWN AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE THE FOLLOWING INSTALLATION NOTES HAVE BEEN COMPILED FROM THE EXISTING PROJECT SUPPORT STRUCTURE USING U-BOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN BE ATTACHED TO THE & FERROUS METAL CLIPS WHICH COMPLETELY SURROUND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL NOT BE USED. CUPS OF THE i MOUNTING PLATE USING THE OVERSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOW ADJUSTMENT. TI 5 CRTTIGL DOCUMENTS(ie. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.SPRINT STANDARD PRACTICE. LUCENT DOCUMENTS. - FOLLOWING MATERIALS AND TYPES MAY BE USED TO FASTEN AND SUPPORT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS. THAT THE CPS ANTENNA IS IMFD eNrH THAT R IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICI AND THE ETC.) FOR USE. THESE NOTES SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CELL SITES •[i.TI OF 19 ANTENNA I WITHIN 2 DEGREES(_><tFyc1 TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROJECT DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. PLASTIC CLIPS A. GROUNDING 1.ALL METAL CONDUIT FOR GROUNDING DOWN CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND SYSTEM AT BOTH ENDS. METAL CUPS WHICH DO NOT COMPLETELY SURROUND THE'GROtN CONDUCTOR. NU OF '�� 2.GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE MAN WATER PIPE USING A BURNDY TYPE GAR-TC CLAMP. - 3. KOPR-SHIELD ANTI-OXIDATION COMPOUND SHAH.BE USED ON ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. r•.� 4. ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CADWELD PROCESS. 5.ALL CADWELD %LALL BE INSTALLED USING THE PROPER CONNECTION/MOLD ANIS MATERIALS FOR THE PARTICULAR MARK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY CONNECTION AND/OR APPUCATI N.; (each) 9. STANDARD BUSS BARS (CIGBES AND MIGBS)SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED. THEY SHAH NOT BE FABRICATED ' TEE_CONNECTION SWEEP CONNECTION POST CDNNE CDON OR MODIFIED IN THE FIELD, 1 1-1/4 4 SCHEDULE 40 X 18'LG. MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE t /ANTENNA POST 10.THE GROUNDING CONNECTION TO THE POWER AND TELCO CABINETS OF THE PPC SHALL BE MADE BY CONNECTING THECON ` 11.ALLL°GROUNDING WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT LOOPS(PIGTAILS)ANOR FROM THE GROUND RING TO THE FACTORY aRNSHED BUSS D SHARP BEND RADIUS IN EACH ENI. 2 1/2.0 X 2 1/2 X 4 U-BOLT ASSN' 2 CApwLLD LW 1/2"MEDIUM LOCKWASHER 6 j2 AWG TCW 12 AWG TCW HN 1/2 A563 GR A HEX NUT 4 J2 AWGTCW 6.ALL BOLTED GROUNDING LONAIECTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCK WASHER UNDER THE NUT. HARDWARE FOR _ BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/8" DIAMETER AND SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 7.C1OUNDNG WIRE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED OR ROUTED THROUGH HOLES IN ANY METAL OBJECTS OR SUPPORTS TO - PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A"CHOKE"POINT., • g '//12 AWG TCW - DEPHCTS CHOKE PONE(NOT ACCEPTABLE) _ i S Cin t OF Sprint. COLER 101 Acwd Pa*Lxiv STEVEN'S ESTATE w' p Norwell.MA 02061-1685 - 'SSD F°"CONSTR1Ct0N CP° B15 A'S e3ecmeAi. GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS COL/�N TON 10 723 OSGOOD STREET «0. (781)962-54oD BOSTON MTA `�94a Issutu Pae Tttm1W sro aIs +o ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 m e,Nc NEWSKM w m Ap" Ah JW.NO. CASCADE NM SHM NUAMM CMV SITE NO. BS54XC860A Via' „ '. , 17-160 BS54XC860A E-4 0 1 ANT GPS ANTENNA GPS ANTENNA FROM EXISTING U/P #A7 NOTES: FURNISHED BY LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 1. SERVICE.POWER SHALL BE 240VAC, 400A, 11, 3W. S 7/16- DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR (ANTENNA) 7/16" DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR (ANTENNA) PROPOSED PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED 2. A 200AMP METER AND A NEMA 3R DISCONNECT TELCO BOX TRANSFORMER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE PROPOSED METER BANK.THE __FLEXWELL 7/2" LOW LOSS CABLE 7/16 DIN MALE CABLE CONNECTOR PREMIUM JUUMPER ASSEMBLY (S-FLC12) CABIEWAVE 734750 4"SCHED. 40 PVC FOR NUMBER OF JAWS IN THE METER SOCKET AND THEIR SECTOR CIBGE CABLEWAVE 81 5396-003P AT&T SHELTER TELCO ARRANGEMENT DEPENDS ON THE VOLTAGE SERVICE. To BE STUBBED UP CONSULT UTILITY COMPANY FOR VOLTAGE SERVICE 806 - THROUGH FOUNDATION 2-750 AWG+ 1-1/0 AWG AVAILABILITY. 508A KNOCKOUT CND IN 4" SCHED.40 PVC GROUND AR PROPOSED METER BANK a"scHtro. 40 PVC FOR AT&T 3. POWER SERVICE SHALL BE AS SHOWN TO PROPOSED (NEARBANTENNAjCABLEWAVE FLEXWELL CABLE PROPOSED METER SHELTER POWER TO BE STUBBED METER BANK. DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR FLC 12-50J 810918-001 N UP THROUGH FOUNDATION CABLEWAVE 734754 W/DISCONNECT (NOTES 1,2,3) KNOCKOUT 4. FOR COMPLETE INTERNAL WIRING AND ARRANGEMENT, 508A GROUND GROUNDING KIT 3-3/0 AWG+ 1-$4 AWG REFER TO VENDOR PRINTS PROVIDED 8Y PPC BAR CABLEWAVE 916388 GROUNDING KIT MANUFACTURER. LOWER CIBGE GROUNDING 916382 (1)25 TWISTED PAIR, GND IN a"SCHED. 4o PVC CABLEWAVE24 GAUGE SOLID WIRE 5. POWER CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR UP TO PROPOSED METER BANK. SEE SHEET NUMBER A-2 FLC 158 -----CABLEWAVE FLEXWELL CABLE s,! (z) - A CTIVE, OSCHEO. 40 ATS GEN PER FOR ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LAYOUT. SEE TRENCHING -50J 87 091 16 6-001 PVC (ONE ANE SPARE)" AS ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY (NOTE 9) `. MANUFACTURER'S DETAILS 325 & DETAIL 326 ON SHEET D-1. GROUND BARr- -- SPECIFlCATION ) DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR I T TELCO SOURCE TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR UP (AT EQUIPMENT CIGBE CABLEWAVE 734754 70 PROPOSED TELCO BOX. (INCLUDE NYLON PULL WIRE TELCO POWER POWER PROTECTION FOR TELCO USE). PANEL PANEL CABINET FLEXWELL 1/2" LOW LOSS FOAM CABLE NOTE 4 (PPC-MOD) 7. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PREMIUM JUMPER ASSEMBLY(FLC12) ( THE MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRICAL CODE. CABLEWAVE 826032-004P a-g2 AWG, 1-psAwG NEUTRAL, 1 qwc GND 8; 25 PAIR CABLE SHALL.BE CATEGORY 5 RATED DIN MALE CABLE CONNECTOR (1) zs TWISTED PAIR, IN 2"EMT CONDUIT za GAUGE Soup WIRE CABLE FOR DATA TRANSFER. CABLEWAVE 734750 CABLE, IN 2"RGS CONDUIT 2-06AWG, 1-#BAWG FLEXENT CABINET NEUTRAL 1-#n0 AWG GND 9. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL 2-2P 80 AMP, — ——————— — — ———_———— ——` —-- (NOTE 9) SECTOR (TVP.) IN 1"EMT CONDUIT �_. 1-2P 60 AMP (SHELTER PANEL) AND t-IP 20 AMP (TOWER BEACON) BREAKERS FOR THE PPC. BY OTHERS 45A SPRINT SHELTER 10. POWER AND TELCO CONDUITS ONLY TO BE INSTALLED NOTES, 1. SEE ELECTRICAL LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR ANTENNA LOCATIONS FLEXENT 2. DO NOT INSTALL ANTENNA GROUND KIT ON CABLE BEND - P TER FROM CSC AND METER.BANK TO AT&T SHELTER CABINET IL ALPHA MECHANICAL BETA MECHANICAL GAMMA MECHANICAL FAA TOWER LIGHT 11. CONTROLER PANEL TO BE MOUNTED TO FLAG POLE DOWNTILT= 2' DOWNTILT= 2' DOWNTILT= 4' GPS ANTENNA GRADE LEVEL CONTROIER WITH STAINLESS STEEL BAND CLAMPS. COAX LENGTH FT COAX LENGTH F ' COAX LENGTH FT • COAX LENGTH L ___ _�- — �V 3-#12 AWG IN CABLE CABLE CABLE CAP {FT)• -- FROM/TO TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX T1PE GPS POWER & TELEPHONE RISER DIAGRAM 3/4"FJAT CONDUIT SI ANTENNA TO CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE JUMPER CABLE FLC12 3 3 FLC12 3 3 FLC12 3 3 N/A N/A ASSEMBLY 8153962003 8153962"003P 815396-003P G2 Al Al - ALPHA FACE, RED (SINGLE STRIPE) RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY JUMPER CABLE TO CA13LEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE A2 - ALPHA FACE, REDf RED�((D�OUBLE STRIPE1 ANTENNA CABLE FLC 158-50J 110 110 FLC 158-50J 110 i}O. FLC 158-50J 110 110 FLC 12-50J 90 29O'� 50' LEFT ANTENNA AS VIEW/Eo WHILE LOOKIt3G AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY COVER ASSEMBLY 810916-001 810916-001 810916-001 810918-opt 1 114-. 1 1/4' 1 114* 1 .2 Bt = BETA FACE WHITE (SINGLE STRIPE) ANTENNA CABLE CABLEWVE CABIEWAVE CABLEWAVE RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY COVER ASSEMBLY FLC 12 4 4 FLC 12 4 4 FLC 12 4 4 N/A N/A 82 = BETA FACE, WHITE/WHITE (DOUBLE STRIPE) RADIOCABINETCABINET 26032-00 826032-004P 26032-004P G1 A2 LEFT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY (BY SPRINT) 1/2" 1/2" 1/2' GI = GAMMA FACE, BLUE (SINGLE STRIPE) * ESTIMATED LENGTHS FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION. B2 Bt RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED.WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY NOTES: 1. TYPES AND SIZES OF THE ANTENNA CABLES ARE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED LENGTH OF THE CABLES. CONTRACTOR G2 - GAMMA FACE, BLUE/BLUE (DOUBLE STRIPE) TO VERIFY THE ACTUAL LENGTHS IN THE FIELD BEFORE INSTALLATION AND NOTIFY THE FIELD ENGINEER FOR LEFT ANTENNA AS MEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY VERIFICATION OF SIZES OF THE CABLES. REFER TO FINAL ANTENNA RECOMMEND FOR ANTENNA TYPE AND AZIMUTHS. -/ 2. FIELD ENGINEER TO UPDATE THE LENGTH OF CABLES ON AS-BUILT DRAWINGS CONTRA175' BOSTON MARKET COAX CABLE COLOR CODES` TYPICAL ANTENNA CABLE CONFIGURATION EVIDENCE OF AOR CODING PHOTOGRAPHIC FLAGPOLE. 3 ITEM 0 DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER QUANTITY LENGTH TOTAL LENGTH GPS (EACH) (FEET EACH) FEET ORDERED ANTENNAS ANTENNA SECTOR 1 GAMMA SECTOR: ALLEN TELECOM B932DG65T4E-M 1 - - ANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT 2 ALPHA AND BETA SECTORS: ALLEN TELECOM B932DG65T2E-M 2 - - #6 INSULATED AWG i 3 MECHANICAL DOWMTIL7 K17 06390, DB5098 3 - - SECTOR CIGBE/UPPER CIGBE GND BAR GND EAR] GPS CIGBE 1 1/4" COAX CABLE FOR ALPHA, BETA & GAMMA SECTORS 810916-001 6 110 730 ' (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 2/0 GREEN INSULATED E66 1/2" COAX CABLE FOR GPS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 810918-001 1 90 100 i 1/4" UNATTACHED DIN-FEMALE CONNECTOR FOR ALPHA, BETA & GAMMA (1) 4/0 GREEN 734754 13 - _ 'AANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT (FLEXWELL/CABLEWAVE) - - INSULATED WG1/2" UNATTACHED DIN-MALE CONNECTOR FOR GPS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 734750 2 #6 INSULATED AWG 3' JUMPER CABLES FOR ANTENNA/COAX CONNECTION - DIN MALE & DIN-MALE 815396-003P 6 3 18 GND BAR s8 CONNECTORS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) LOWER CIGBE 91 1/4" GROUND KIT(CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELI) 916388 18 - -10 1/2" GROUND KIT(CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 916382 3 X12 AWG BARE TINNED it PPC (200A) . NS2S2-W201 1 ANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT 12 GPS ANTENNA - - - - - -- -PROVIDED BY LUCENT /6 INSULATED AWG 13 WEATHER PROOF KIT 916132 6 14 CABLE HOISTING GRIPS (1 i/4", 1/2") 916534-114. 6, 1 GND BAR CDA CIGBE 916534-012 - 15 4' JUMPER CABLES FOR ANTENNA/COAX CONNECTION - DIN MALE/DIN MALE 826032-004P 7 4 28 #2 AWG BARE TINNED CONNECTORS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) THIRD PARTY BILL OF MATERIALS S' NDEiNNG GROUNDING SCHEMATIC 06RAM GR0UN0lNG-'•SYSTEM sp�>?t coLER & 101 Accord Perk Drive STEVEN'S ESTATE' Sprint � Nor"".MA 02061-1685 Fa Ce °G e� '"� POWER 8c ANTENNA SCHEMATIC COLIaN TON IO 723 ANDOVER, STREET (781)982-5400 BOSTON MTA - w ts�Tae 11E17EW enc ws .me . ENGINEERS AND SM71STS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A "a �mxs or aK iav'o `'� .Lae tta CaScnuE NO. I g#V auMeEa IftV a e owea y 17-160 BS54XC860A I E-5 lo, N PROP. 30'x40' PROP. 8' STOCKADE COMPOUND (BY SPRINT) FENCE (BY SPRINT) PROP. GENERATOR PROP. PROPANE TANK PROP. HAYBALE AND 9 ON 4'x7' CONC. PAD ON 3'x10' CONC PAD SILTFENCE (BY SPRINT) BY SPRINT) (BY SPRINT) z ocu a$ 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 o—c c—o 0 0 0 a� 5760 PROP. AT&T -- -s— o ATT ICE BRIDGE __ __--------------------------- pU POWER PROP. 100'-0" ' _ 1114 I PANEL FLAGPOLE (BY OTHERS) a of A. I1q A 2 PROP. AT&T ANTENNAS � Inn 2 PROP. AT&T - W/IN FLAGPOLE j �N, k4 I ATT RBS 2106ROP. SPRINT ICE ANTENNA HOUSING UN i 6- P -���� BRIDGE c dig \\\\` ��\\ � CABLE ACCESS HOUSING & 1 PROP. 2-GANG METER` �\ BANK (BY SPRINT) �1 ` I1 PROP. AT&T METER 1MOUNTING PIPE CHASE I 1 o--1 AND DISCONNECT t I —FLAGPOLE it N PROP. SPRINT EQUIPMENT — I" --"--�----�y IN PROP. SHELTER `1 PROP. ^~� PROP. 12' WIDE COAX CABLES (TYP) 1�Oy ; TRANSFORMER GRAVEL ROAD (BY i I ♦ ---11W (BY SPRIN ) SPRINT) I 1 ' r <` -s wm 1 PROP. C CABINET i (BY SPR NT) uc/r `�� uc/T �� uc/r UcA 0 0 o I j OUTSIDE SHIELD j ALLGON 7262.02 / (TYP OF 3) PROP. AT&T UTILITIES IN FUTURE i PVC CONDUIT SEE SHEET ATT3 F NE AGRAM MOUNTING PIPE CHASE - it I 270' ANTENNA MOUNT (TYP) i IDE POLE NOTE: �} t FOR COMPLETE DIMENSIONS OF THE t1 X SECTION A—A PROPOSED FACILITY, REFER TO SHEET z A-2 "PARTIAL SITE PLAN & ELEVATIION'. PROP. SPRINT 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT � NOTE: UP FOR COMPLETE ANTENNA SCHEMATIC AND � BOM, REFER TO SHEET ATT3. AT&T COMPOUND PLANri_� laAANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILK�2�, 1/4" = 1'-0" _ � nt S 1i� GREENMAN-�PEDERSEN, INC. GREENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC, STEVEN'S ESTATE AT&T cm y 800 SOUTH MAIN STREET Engineers,Architects,Construction Engineers&Inspectors SITE NO.08-007 MMISFIELo, MA S N48 No.34708 LOCATE SITE W/ ANTENNAS IN 100' FLAGPOLE Soo SOUTH MAIN STREET 0 06/11/03 ISSUED FOR.FRINC T Mr AT&T COMPOUND PLAN GPIMANSFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 723 OSGOOD STREET AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 0204s WE REVISIONS BY CHK .IDS Ko. oawr.w NIBE MIe RLv NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 4W xuc� A� WESTWOoo.w 02090 AS SHOWNSI;Aw.JMT NST 24445 912-008-007A-ATT1 0 SUPPORT POST + BRACKET FOR 27" CHANNEL HANGER BRACKET TYPE (3-9") PART {802225 (PIROD INC OR EQUAL) DOUBLE LEVEL CHANNEL/27" FLAGPOLE CUT POST LENGTH TO SUIT BY REMOVING BRIDGE PART #802257 UNCAPPED END (PIROD INC OR EQUAL) 2 MAXIMUM CABLE I(' MAX -II SPAN = 4'-0" h,P 27" ICE BRIDGE Ff 3-9" CHANNEL x10' PART # 124470 (PIROD INC. OR EQUAL) CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL LENGTH TO SUIT _ 5•-4" (SEE NOTE) SHELTER z FOUNDATION I 9 FOR CABLE HANGER CONC. PIER SEE TABLE BELOW (�) N ANTENNA 4 u fIN. GRADE - CABLES-ARRANGEMENT " i• - BY CONTRACTOR. #2 AWG BCW SOLID L INSTALL DRIP LOOP o An ( I CONCRETE PIER 6-3/4" TINNED TO EQUIPMENT ON ANTENNA CABLES. LJ (2500 PSI) O GROUND RING BENDING RADIUS PER } Q MANUFACTURER'S L s O STANDARDS ELEVATION SECTIO E BTS SUPPORT FRAME SEE DETAIL CA 3 NOMINAL BL CABLE HANGER MANUF. MIN. CABLE SIZE NTYPE UMBER TYPE NUMBER BEND RADIUS ERICSSON RBS 2106 CABI E T I/ 2 7/8- LDF5-50A 206706-2 10" NTS ATT 1 1/4" LDF6-50 206706-3 15" 1 5/8" LDF7-5OA 206706-4 20" Q1 ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. ERICSSON RBS 2106 DIMENSIONS NOTES : RECOMMENDED CABINET MOUNTING ANCHORS ARE HILTI KWIK CABINET HEIGHT x WIDTH x DEPTH 1. WHEN USING PIROD COMPONENTS AS SHOWN NV STANDARD DETAILS, MAXIMUM BOLT 11 5/8"HOLE DIAMETER AT A MIN. 2.75-EMBED. 63 1/2-Hx57 3/78"Wx37"O ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION Of RBS 2106 (1614mm x 1300mm x 940mm) BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 19 FEET FOR 20 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL OR 9 FEET FOOTPRINT 63 I/2-Hx51 3/16-Wx26"0 FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL. (INCLUDING INSTALLATION FRAME) (1614mm x 1300mm x 710mm) 2. WHEN USING PIROD COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE ERICSSON RBS 2106 WEIGHT & FLOOR LOADING SPLICE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, IF POSSIBLE, OR AT A MAXIMUM APPROX. MAX. FLOOR OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. CABINET MAX. WEIGHT LOADING 3. WHEN USING PIROD COMPONENTS, SUPPORT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS a 1213 LBS 1301 Les POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES, WITH A MAXIMUM CANTILIVER DISTANCE 2 Res 217xs (WEIGHT WITHOUT BATTERIES) (WEIGHT WITH BATTERIES) OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. a CABINET ANCHORING BY ERICSSON SHALL BE BASED ON A PEAK ACCELERATION VALUE Or 0.126. 4. CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL, OR EQUIVALENT, FINISH. ERICSSON RBS 2106 MINIMUM CLEARANCES e 5. ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM MANUFACTURERSDIRECTION USB 2001 2 BAY OTHER THAN PIROD. PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES 2 9/16• MINIMUM CLEARANCE ARE FOLLOWED. 4 15/76- CABINET FRONT 52" n it \ ZZ 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PERMITTEDi., CABINET REAR 2" WITH THE RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL. 25 19/32"— n 7- DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS 45 9/32 CABINET RIGHT. r N/A OR STANDARD DETAILS REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL. 48 5/8' CABINET LEFT 36" ICE BRIDGE AT FLAGPOLE WZSHELTER ABOVE THE CABINET 40" NTS I AZ BASE FRAME FOOTPRINT 3 NTS — OF GREENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE MMIGREEN8SOUTH EPE�ER�T INC. GPIEngineers,Architects,Construction Engineers&Inspectors SITE NO.08-007 �_AT&T �'� TE SITE W/ ANTENNAS IN 100' FLAGPOLE ON SOUTH MAIN STREET 0 06/11/03 WAD FOR FILING JMT JMtT ,e� AT&T SITE DETAILS MANSFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 723 OSGOOD STREET AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DATE R EWSOIS Br CHK 'Y aoe No owwnG xweER REV 02M NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 4GG SIM MLL ORn1' WESTWWD.„A 02090SHOYrN SK.NED: �T :,NAT jt 24445 912-008-007A-ATT2 0 TO UP JA7 SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR C TOTAL ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION AZIMUTH 30' AZIMUTH 150' AZIMUTH 270' QUANTITY TRANSFORMER NO. Rxt/Txt Rx2 Rx1/Txt RX2 axt/Txt RX2 (SEE NOTE 1) (BY SPRINT) COLOR CODE ONE GREEN TWO GREEN ONE BLUE TWO BLUE ONE WHITE TWO WHITE TELCO SERVICE ANTENNA (BY SPRINT) METER BANK 1 (SEE NOTE 3 dt 4) ALLGON 726202 ALLGON 7262.02 ALLCON 7262.02 3 (BY SPRINT) AS-BUILT SERIAL # MECHANICAL DOWNTIIT 0' 0' Q ANTENNA JUMPER (ANDREW) L4A-PDMDM-d L4A-POMOM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 l4A-PDMDM-4 L4A-POMOM-4 I -1 —.�.—METER AND DISCONNECT 2 (LENGTH) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) 6 TELCOI 200A I (BY CONTRACTOR) 200A, ATTACHED MALE DM CONNECTOR INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED DEMARCATION BOX L 2-POLE (ANDREW)L`—/— —J— J—J 2A W/ITEM #2 W/ITEM 02 W/ITEM N2 W/ITEM 12 W/ITEM #2 W/ITEM 12 (CSC OR EQ.) MAIN COAX (LENGTH) tY."f (110 FT) 1Y"0 110 FT) IY"f 110 FT) IYi f ((110 FT) IY."f 110 FT) IYs"f (I 10 FT) 660 FT 3 (ANDREW) LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-5OA UNATTACHED FEMALE DIN 4 CONNECTOR (2) L5POF-RPC (2).L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC 12 4" PVC CONDUIT 200A APPLETON GENERATOR (ANDREW) RECEPTACLE (PROVIDED BY UNATTACHED MALE DIN W/PULL STRING 5 CONNECTOR (BY SPRINT) GENERAL CONTRACTOR) (ANDREW) (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC 2 L POM-RPC 12 6 COAX SURGE ARRESTOR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 11 (ANDREW) 3-#3/0 + IA LMU ANTENNA KATHREIN 738-454 OMNI I 1-—— ——, 1--— — —-) 1-03 GNO, IN LMU COAX (LENGTH) 1/2-0 (10 FT) 10 FT 200A 200AI 2" CONDUIT 7 (ANDREW) DF4-50A -- -- ------_- ------ ------ -_-. --____ ___- - --------- -- --___- --- --_-{ -____. ------- ---__- -__-_ -__-- ------ -- ------ -_-- - ----- ----_ -___-_. ____----__ ----- ---_—__ .._------ —_.I --_------{-_ { I ----- 8 UNATTACHEOCONNECTOR T80 I ` 4'x8' TELCO ' I RG1 9 GPS ANTENNA MATSUSHITA VIC 100 1 BACKBOARD ) CUTLER-HAMMER P/N OA ( #PRLl Al200T42CSIRNIR 10 UNATTACHED-CONNECTOR L4PNM-RC 2 ' I I (PROVIDED BY BECHTEL) 11 GPS COAX (LENGTH) 1/2"f (10 FT) 10 FT (ANDREW) LDF4-50A ` I 2OKA TVSS 4 12 UNATTACHED-CONNECTOR TOO 1 L--------) 1-------j RX1/TX1 2" CONDUIT (3) #10 AWG AND (1) RX2 W/PULL STRING #10 AWG GROUND IN A 1 (WIRING BY RADIO — 2" EMT TO RBS 2106 NOTES: EQUIP VENDOR) 1. ALL MATERIALS ON THE ABOVE TABLE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE DUAL POLE RBS 2106 I SUBCONTRACTOR FOR INSTALLATION. SECTOR ANTENNA 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOT EXCEED THE CABLE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING 7/16- DIN TYPE SHELTER I ' WITHOUT RF ENGINEERING APPROVAL. CONNECTOR (ANTENNA)FEMALE 3. CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR RX1/TX1 RX2 L——_——J FABRICATION. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL AS—BUILT CABLE LENGTHS AND PROVIDE ANTENNA 2A TOP JUMPER CABLE SERIAL NUMBERS ON RED—LINED DRAWINGS. LIM (IF REQUIRED) 4. ANTENNAS SHALL BE PROCURED AND INSTALLED WITH DOWNTILT BRACKETS AND HEAVY DUTY 9 1 2 CLAMPS SUPPLIED BY ANTENNA MANUFACTURER. POWER AND TELQO ONE—LINE DIAGRA 5. THE BOTTOM JUMPER SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE BTS EQUIPMENT 2A MAIN COAXIAL CABLE MANUFACTURER. TBD 4 �C5�_08 509Spg NOT TO SCALE •— CONNECTOR 10 GROUND BAR (NEAR ANTENNAS)` �.3' 6. COLOR CODE ALL MAIN CABLES AT TWO LOCATIONS: 3 "'ttt333""�c,�� ✓Y" NEAR ANTENNAS NEAR EQUIPMENT GROUNDING KIT NOTES 7. ANDREW COAX GROUND KITS, ANDREW COAX WEATHER PROOFING, ANDREW SNAP-IN HANGER ADDITIONAL GROUND 15 REQUIRED IF ANTENNA CLAMPS. AND ANDREW HOISTING GRIPS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO IS NOT LOCATED NEAR BTS EQUIPMENT 1• SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A. SINGLE PHASE, 200 AMP, 3 WIRE, 120/240 VAC, 60HZ SERVICE FOR AWS THE SUBCONTRACTOR FOR INSTALLATION. SITE. GROUND BAR 508 2. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. POWER 7 (BOTTOM OF STACK)TU AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT SHALL 13E PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. 11 3. FOR COMPLETE INTERNAL WIRING AND ARRANGEMENT REFER TO DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY PPC MANUFACTURER. COAX GROUND BAR NEAR EQUIPMENT 509 4. ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE N.E.C. AND UTILITY COMPANY AND LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. ANTENNA SCHEMA11C AND BOM .Z 5. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 36" OF FLEX CONDUIT WITH ALL CONDUIT FITTINGS (NUTS, REDUCING NOT TO SCALE — BUSHINGS, ELBOWS, COUPLINGS, ETC.) NECESSARY FOR CONNECTION TO THE BTS CABINET. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT WITH FAULT CURRENT RATINGS GREATER THAN THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT FROM THE POWER UTILITY. 8 4 7. WER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG AND LARGER), 12 eollaw 6 THHN OR FOR 90-C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION;ERATION• LISTEDTHDE OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY CABLE YSYSTEMUSED D. GPS LMU RX1/ RX2 1 i TX1 CUT, COIL AND TAPE A 10 FOOT PIGTAIL FROM END OF FLEX CONDUIT FOR TERMINATION —v BY ERICSSON. (TYP,) w�� �C�"" GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. GREENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE AT&T c 800 sour" MaN STREET 048 Engineers,Architects,Construction Engineers&inspectors SITE NO.O&007 No.347M MANSFIELD, MAS IN GPIOLOCATE SITE W/ ANTENNAS N 100' FLAGPOLE 800 SOUTH MAIN STREET - 0 06/11/03 ISSUED FOR f11.111C �+T dcT AN SCHEMATIC AND ONE—LINE DIAGRAM MANSFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 723 OSGOOD STREET 0204E AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES GATE REVISIONS BY CNK Joe IIa ortlww¢NI.1BeR 11EV NORTH IWDOVER, AAA 01845 400 eIUE HMU.A 0DIM2 �57w00e 1w o2ola :�SHOWN JMT :JMT 24445 912-008-007A—ATT3 0 GENERAL NOTES: SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS 1. THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301.ACI 318.ACI 336,ASTM SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL, STATE,AND LOCAL A184,ASTM A185 AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION(") FOR THE LOCATION. FACILITY CONSISTING OF COLOCATING ON AN PROPOSED FLAGPOLE WITH THE START OF CONSTRUCTION (IF REO'D) THE EDITION OF THE AP4 ADOPTED CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF ANTENNAS AND THE PLACEMENT OF OUTDOOR EOUIPMENT CABINETS CONTRACT AWARD SHALL GOVERN THE DESIGN. IN A PROPOSED SHELTER BUILDING CODE: 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS, ELECTRIC,AND OTHER UTILITIES 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF SOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CODE 1999 WHERE ENCOUNTERED N THE WORK. SHALL BE PROTECTED AT All TIES, ELECTRICAL CODE: 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL BE UNMANNED AND DOES NOT . NOTED OTHERWISE. ANO WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SWILL 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYSUNLESS NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NEPA) 70 - 9958.NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIRE POTABLE WATER OR SEWER SERVICE. BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (AG)318. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR OR&LING PIERS 3• REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60. DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED CONCRETE aNSntviE pF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (RISC). MANUAL Of STEEL CONSTRUCTION•ASD, 3, THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND 15 NOT FOR HUMAN OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPUCES SHILL BE CLASS-B'AND AL HOOKS SHALL BE NINTH EDITION HABITATION. (NO HANDICAP ACCESS IS REQUIRED). TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT � TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (TIA) 222-F. STRUCTURAL STANDARD FOR STANDARD. LINO. STRUCTURAL ANTENNA TOWER AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRICTURES LIMITED TO A) FAA. PROTECTION B)CONFINED SPACE C)ELECTRICAL. INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (EEE)81.GUIDE FOR MEASURING 4, OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION. SAFETY D)TRENCHING A EXCAVATION. STH RESISTIVITY. �COMMIMPEDANCE. EO PRACTICE FOR POWERING POTENTIALS NOF AGROUND SYSTEM APPROXIMATELY 2 TIMES PER MONTH, BY AT&T TECHNICIANS. ELECTRONIC 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS OAXATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT 4• THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS EOUIPMENT 5. NO NOISE. SMOKE. DUST OR ODOR WILL RESULT FROM THIS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: TIA 607 COMMERCIAL BUILDING GROUNDING AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL. SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH........3 IN. TELCORDIA GRT 1503 COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS 4. If NECESSARY. RUBBISH, STUMPS. DEBRIS. STICKS.STONES AND OTHER CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: FOR ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF LISTED CODES AND STANDARDS REGARDING MATERIAL. 6. OUTDOOR STORAGE AND SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS ARE NOT METHODS OF CONSTRICTION, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT PROPOSED REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC /6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. REQUIREMENT. THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN. /5 AND SMALLER&WWF ....... 7• AL MATERIAL SHILL BE FURNISHED AND WORK SWILL BE 5. THE SITE SWILL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY ..1 1/2 IN. PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. CAS AGAINSST TE RDND,.EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT 8. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY 6. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BC SLAB AND WALL PLACED IN ANY FILL OR ..••.^.••..•.•.........3/4 IN. DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. EMBANKMENT. BEAMS AND COLUMNS ...............1 1/2 IN, 5• A CHAMFER 3/4'SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE. UNO. IN 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL 7. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. PERMITS AND INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. UHIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. f0. _SUSCONTRACTOR-SHALL-REMOVE ALL_TRASH ANO-DEBRIS FROM THE ----$.--JLLL-EXISTNG_-NNACT&E SEWER_MATER_S.AS. ELECTRIC ANpOTHER UTILITIES. _ ----___ - ----6.. WRITTEN�Cq ME CONCRETE EOED XPANSION/WEDGE N/ DGE NR HOLT DOWEL OR SHALL SHALL BE PER rURER'CONFORl1 TO SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SHALL BE REMOVED MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON-THEE MND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN I1. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE ORAWINGS WAS OBTAINED FROM SITE WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SUBJECT TO THE CONCRETE. EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY RAASET/REOHEAD OR APPROVED EQUAL. VISITS AND DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY THE SITE OWNER, APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING.OWNER AND/OR LOCA.UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 9. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWNER. EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY,SHALL BE GRADED TO A 12. NO WHITE STR081C LIGHTS ARE PERMITTED. LIGHTING.IF REQUIRED. UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE WILL MEET FAA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING.._STEEL NOTES 302 13. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CAL DIG-SAFE FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY 10. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING MARKOUT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 1-800-DOG-SAFE. CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IF REQUIRED DURING 14. FOR THE PURPOSE Of CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR IS SEDIMENT CONTROL.CONSTRUCTION. SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCA.GUIDELINES - BECHTEL. SUBCONTRACTOR IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. FOR EROSION AND CONSTRUCTION AND OWNER IS AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES. SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 300 STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ALIO IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE RIOTED. 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO ASC AND AWS 01.1.WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE NSC 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTIOI'.97H EDITION. PAINTED SURFACES SHAH. BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL. USE BEARING TYPE ASTM A325 BOLTS (3/4- OIA)AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4, NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8-DAL ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS AND EPDXY ANCHORS SHAT BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. MANUFACTURER'S MINIMUM CONCRETE EDGE DISTANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED _ DURING INSTALLATION. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 301 OF GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. G REENMAN- PEDERSEN INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE -AT&T 800 S01T' ""'" SWET Engineers,Architects,Construction Engineers&Inspectors SITE NO.08-007 AT&T X10' 02048 GPI �� OCATE SITE W/ ANTENNAS IN 100' FLAGPOLE I00 SOUTH MAIN STREET D 06/1 1/03 ISSUED FOR Fx,I4G JMt .IFR AT&T CONSTRUCTION NOTES MANSFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 723 OSGOOD STREET 02M NORTH WIRELESS SERVICES DAA REVISIONS BY CHT Job H0. NMRIER WEv NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 4W 8UR MLL ORAEtt wTsrw000,w 02MAS SHNOWWN 0 Wr ,,� it Q 24445 912-008-007A-ATT4 O PROPOSED DRAINAGE' EA SEMEN r (JO liI PROPOSED APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF WETLANDS afDETEN TION 'Q° \ \ I AREA PROPOSED SEWER EA SEMEN I j \ --- _ _ `r / Y _ _ _ _ �_ - - L A K E PROPOSED SA NI rA R Y SEWER CO CHICHE WICK rilf L A K L, PUMP STA TION MICHAEL KETITNBA CH-___ -2400IJ10- C 0 C TI / '" C I CHL WI C K - _ _ _ - \ \\ \ � � / � ��- /moo -_I __ $!p, _.__._ -_ -- ` \ ��\ � \ \ �\\ Wr 240 Q0. 0 6 TOM OF 1� / 1, - 0 �VrB NORTH ANDOVER I 101011878 0 OZO 2�3 6� 60 / % I ` l d - — \ \\ \ \ —_ _ \ \ \ \ \ ` �_ A 0 3 1, 6�2 1.1 0 250' SETIBA FROM LAKE: NO BUIL ONE n1 P C>vc 21 130 "76 36 /1 41, _6�ICHAEL XqTENR,�CN, _2400,/Jla,�'_ \ \ \, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P�DA \ A \ n1f CYRASSOCfA TES 23481220 / '3 E \ \ \ \ \ W. 19 Z" TQ BE/ �Eb 34� cAD n11 VINCENT 3), 91 IT Jc SWEIL\A 0\ RIB 6 LANDERS 3 11701206 / �' I / .J 1�� \ \ / \ \ \ \ PaB 4U 1701 la , V v �v,/�\ \� \ v\ Vv / / ) ) // / n1f 7 JOHN FERREIRA n1f 194JIJ17 BERT C b D 41/ Z n1f 6 MICHAEL KFFTENUAI�6 ~--24330 z' SrA E 49 4 r A PR OSED DR AGE EMEN r 4 P a B 6 s, \ \ �\ a 4 NOTES: kf z�5 1A 41 n1f WrC 13 �4 1802 '17 / / / / 0 CHARETTE 14951304 TOPOGRAPHY DIGITIZED FROM U.S.G.S. 7.5 MIN. QUADRANGLE MAP (/ / / SCALE 1: 25,000). Vv- 7� n1f <73 Wr B V ROPOSED 50' RIGHT OF 2. SOILS INFORMATION DIGITIZED FROM S-C-S SOILS MAP FOR BLOSSO T_-_ — WAY ESSEX COUNTY (MAPS 23 AND 30) (SCALE 1: 15,840). W1 TN 28 WIDE PA VEMEN-T-WH Pa- —CURB; 3. PROPERTY LINE (EXCEPT FRONTAGE ALONG OSGOOD ST.), STONE n1f------ \ \ �- SLOPED GRA NI TE WALLS, ACCESS PATHS, BUILDINGS, LAKE EDGE FRONTAGE DIGITIZED RD RYAN JR.� '�q 1,1811203 DEWALK FW0 SIDES WA r FROM ESSEX NO. DISTRICT REGISTRY OF DEEDS PLAN 2606 (BOOK I \\\\ X P aj) 771, PP. 177, 178) DATED 12/16/52 (SCALE 1"=200') 490, 4. OSGOOD STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DERIVED FROM 1911 COUNTY LAYOUT (SCALE 1"=40'). C E R. 5. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS AND RELATIONSHIP ARE APPROXIMATE L A A. nlr 7 n1f ZT, IM \ - — ...... AND COMPILED FROM EXISTING PLANS AND RECORDS. CHARLES 6 7 -37 ARTHUR GPNY,4-- c C�AIACHADO- 0 V58/49 6. ZONING DISTRICT R-2 REQUIRES 43,560 S.F. LAND AREA WITH n f --------- 0 / 0 150' FRONTAGE PER LOT. R-1 REQUIRES 87,120 S.F. LAND AREA PHOPOSED BLAIR' 5 PROPOSED DiYNAr' WITH 175 FRONTAGE PER LOT. 9 'R;BER FS"' �' _ROAD 1�1TO CONNECT TO EXIST. 7. TOTAL LOTS SHOWN=73; TOTAL RQOADWAY=7,250 L.F. 4 PIPELINE n1f DRAIN DORo n-1EA _300, 8. OWNER OF RECORD AT TIME OF SUBDIVISION PLAN FILING, IS BOSTON 14.URPH Yn _w� UNIVERSITY, COMMONWEALTH AVE., BOSTON, MA. L ON 9. ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE A MINIMUM LOT AREA WHICH MEETS r7 MIL Y n n1f 0 T GEORGE DARER JOSEPH n r OR EXCEEDS LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RESPECTIVE ZONE, AS SET n1f 1313/361 PALAZZOLI R= n FORTH IN THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER ZONING BY-LAW. 3741 ETHEL 9051119 ]NOMAS ROCKWELL CORTIN 16311266 3 0181168 LEGEND PROPOSED GRA V/TY Aye �, WI B ECB CATCH BASIN SANITARY SEWER FO CONNECT TO EXISILNG D DRAIN PIPELINE A 0 SEWER-PIPEtIIVE_ ODMH DRAIN MANHOLE PRE LLVINAR Y SUBDIVISION 0 A_�, FES FLARED END W/ RIP-RAP PLAN OF LAND U PROP PROPOSED IN 0 w WATER MAIN NO��III ANDO VAR, -%1A DRAWN FOR SEWER MANHOLE ;Ott I" Yf HYDRANT RAA_ ETAWGRA'EN MANAGEMENT COMPANY I TA K ------- ----------- 733 TURNPIKE STREET p SUITE 311 0 NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 0 8 r ?' � ) ` C' - D GATE VALVE Ar HP—M-- HIGH POINT OCTOBER 15, 1994 J+__ TEE SCALE.• 1"_200' 0 4- TP TEST PIT / PERC TEST 4 WIETLAND BOUNDARY 0' 100' 200' KEY MAP 400' 800' — S GRAVITY SEWER PIPELINE MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES 000' a Or), —�?00' _F FORCEMAIN (SEWER PIPELINE) 66 PARK STREET k ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810