Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 723 OSGOOD STREET Town of North Andover NORTM I� ,.,tiO of the Zoning Board of Appeals ``a' �p i © ty Development and Services Division 27 Charles StreetArlo �:I th Andover,Massachusetts 01845 ss�CHU Z 0 -' D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 ^August 11,2004 Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 Stephen D. Anderson,Esq. Brian S.Grossman,Esq. Anderson&Kreiger LLP 43 'Thorndike Street Cambridge,Massachusetts 02141 -x,764 RE: AT&T Wireless Services of Massachusetts,Inc.(Fk/a AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.d/b/a AT&T Wireless) for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Regarding your request for a six(6)month extension of your Variance: Please be advised that the Zoning Board of Appeals approved a six(6)month extension relative to the premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,Massachusetts. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted to extend for a period of six-months the Variances granted by the 2003-023 decision to and including March 15,2005(without the extensions,the variances would expire on September 15,2004-one year and 20 days after the filing in the Town Clerk's office,taking into account the appeal period.)at the regular August 10,2004 meeting upon a motion by Richard J. Byers and 2 a by Joseph D.LaGrasse. Mass.Gen.L.,ch.40A, §10 allows the Variance permit granting authority to"extend the time for exercise of such rights for a period not to exceed six months". Voting in favor: William J. Sullivan,Ellen P.McIntyre,Joseph D.LaGrasse,and Richard J.Byers. Ellen P.McIntyr VChair Zoning Board of Appeals cc: Town Clerk John J.Keene,Jr.,Esq. ZBA file M35P23 Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover Of NORTF� Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Commwnity Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street `°.• _ ^r ,.Isth Andover,Massachusetts 01.845 'ss,C,,s� D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 August 11,2004 Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 Stephen D.Anderson,Esq. Brian S.Grossman,Esq. Anderson&Kreiger LLP 43 Thorndike Street Cambridge,Massachusetts 02141 - 1764 RE: AT&T Wireless Services of Massachusetts,Inc.(fVa AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.d/b/a AT&T Wireless) for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Regarding your request for a six(6)month extension of your Variance: Please be advised that the Zoning Board of Appeals approved a six(6)month extension relative to the premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,Massachusetts. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted to extend for a period of six-months the Variances granted by the 2003-023 decision to and including March 15,2005(without the extensions,the variances would expire on September 15,2004-one year and 20 days after the filing in the Town Clerk's office,taking into account the appeal period.)at the regular August 10,2004 meeting upon a motion by Richard J.Byers and 2nd by Joseph D.LaGrasse. Mass.Gen.L.,ch.40A, §10 allows the Variance permit granting authority to"extend the time for exercise of such rights for a period not to exceed six months". Voting in favor: William J. Sullivan,Ellen P.McIntyre,Joseph D.LaGrasse,and Richard J.Byers. Ljj i Ellen P.Mclntyr ,Chair Zoning Board of Appeals cc: Town Clerk John J.Keene,Jr.,Esq. ZBA file M35P23 Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978)88-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 ANDERSON KREIGER LLP t, S° BRIAN S.GROSSMAN , a4 bgressman@anders-�nkreiger.com August 3, 2004 By Federal Express By Federal Express Town Clerk Board of Appeals Town of North Andover Town of North Andover 400 Osgood Street c/o Town Clerk North Andover, MA 01845 400 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 APPLICANT: AT&T Wireless Services of Massachusetts, Inc. (Fk/a AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless); and OWNER: Town of North Andover SITE: Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MAP/LOT: Map 35, Lot 23 RELIEF GRANTED: (1) §§ 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); and (2) § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue) Dear Town Clerk and Board of Appeals Members: This Board has granted variance relief from the height limitations and color requirements of the North Andover zoning bylaw to allow AT&T Wireless and Sprint Spectrum to construct, operate, and maintain a flagpole style wireless communications monopole and related facilities on the above property.' Sprint has recently constructed the monopole and its facility on the property and is in the process of obtaining electric and telephone utility installations for the facility. Once Sprint's work is completed, AT&T Wireless will be in a position to install its facility. However, this may not occur within one year from the grant of the 2003 variance. ' Variance relief was originally granted by decision filed with the Town Clerk on January 28,2002,and recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds for the Northern District on February 21,2002,in Book 6681,Page 320. After the 2002 Decision lapsed,the Board of Appeals re-established the variances pursuant to a decision filed with the Town Clerk on August 26,2003,and recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds for the Northern District on September 25, 2003,in Book 8256,Page 39.The 2003 Decision included a reference to updated plans D E C `�eVsegt ccommodate the location of a propane tank and generator in connection with the aviation safety lighting required I e Federal Aviation Administration..."(2003 Variance,p.2). AUG 5 - 43 'l horndike Street • Cambridge,MA 02141-1764 • (617) 252-6575 • Fax: (617) 252-6899 BOARD OF APPEALS C^s Printed on recycled paper Town Clerk Board of Appeals Town of North Andover August 3, 2004 Page 2 Sprint's construction may well have perfected both its rights and AT&T Wireless' rights as the variances were granted jointly to Sprint and AT&T Wireless, and Sprint has completed construction of the flagpole-style monopole to which the variances relate. In any event, the Variances may be extended for a six month period pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, §10,2 because the 2003 Decision re-established the variances granted by the 2002 Decision, and this is the first request for an extension of the 2003 Decision. Therefore, AT&T Wireless respectfully requests that the Board take one of the following actions: 1. Issue a finding that Sprint's installation of the monopole constitutes the exercise of the 2003 Variance on behalf of both Sprint and AT&T Wireless; or 2. If and to the extent necessary, extend fora period of six-months the Variances granted by the 2003 Decision to and including March 15, 2005 (without the extensions, the variances would expire on September 15, 2004 - one year and 20 days after the filing in the Town Clerk's office, taking into account the appeal period). Enclosed is the original for the Town Clerk and 7 copies of this memorandum and the following materials: 1. Copy of the Board of Appeals' decision filed with the Town Clerk on January 28, 2002; and 2. Copy of the Board of Appeals' decision filed with the Town Clerk on August 26, 2003. 2 G.L.c.40A, § 10 provides in relevant part: If the rights authorized by a variance are not exercised within one year of the date of grant of such variance such rights shall lapse;provided,however,that the permit granting authority in its discretion and upon written application by the grantee of such rights may extend the time for exercise of such rights for a period not to exceed six months. . .. (G.L.c.40A, §10(emphasis added). ANDERSON`./KREIGER LLP 4r,t Printed on recycled paper Town Clerk Board of Appeals Town of North Andover August 3, 2004 Page 3 If the Board determines that an extension is necessary, good cause exists to justify granting AT&T Wireless an extension of the 2003 Decision under G.L. c. 40A, §10: • At the time of the 2003 Decision,AT&T Wireless and Sprint were still required to obtain final AMC approval of the tower, including the FAA mandated marking and lighting. The MHC did not approve the proposed facility for over three months after the 2003 Decision was filed with the Town Clerk. • Sprint, not AT&T Wireless, is the owner of the monopole. Therefore, AT&T Wireless could not control the exact timing of the installation and construction of the tower and compound. Before AT&T Wireless could begin the installation of its equipment on the tower, it was necessary for the construction of the tower to be completed by Sprint. • Until necessary utilities are installed at the site, AT&T Wireless cannot commence construction of its facility. • Accordingly, AT&T Wireless will be unable to begin its installation before the expiration of the 2003 Decision. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the AT&T Wireless respectfully requests that the Board of Appeals find that Sprint's installation of the monopole constitutes the exercise of the 2003 Variance on behalf of both Sprint and AT&T Wireless, or in the alternative grant AT&T Wireless' request for a 6-month extension of the variances. Further, AT&T Wireless respectfully request that the Board of Appeals schedule this request for a vote at its next available regularly scheduled meeting. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP QfPrinted on reryded paper Town Clerk Board of Appeals Town of North Andover August 3, 2004 Page 4 Finally, please date stamp the enclosed copy of this application and return it to me. AT&T WIRELESS By its Attorneys, Stephen D. Anderson, Esq. (BBO#018700) Brian S. Grossman, Esq. (BBO#641159) ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP 43 Thorndike Street Cambridge,MA 02141 (617)252-6575 Enclosures cc: Catherine Blue (by email w/out encl. and mail w/encl.) Brian Orlandi (by email w/out encl. and mail w/encl.) Heather Castignaro (by email w/out encl. and mail w/encl.) AWN andStevensU\ZBA VarianceEXt00I ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP i, Printed on recycled paper 8K 6681 PG 320 Town of North Andover f NORr., Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals p f Community Development and Services Division Heidi Griffin, Division Director 27 Charles Street 'ss^c►euSt D. Robert Nicetta P (978 North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Telephone 688-9541 ) Building Conunissioner Fax(978)688-9542 ela,;ed from date of decision, Y .�.ont fih.v d an ap o `._.' ?ate o?/ o7OlJ.� •.► CD u�—C i-)yce A. rsw's;J us N C-,-56 Any appeal shall be filed Notice of Decision -� � c; within(20)days after the Year 2002 date of filing of this notice `•'' �' in the office of the Town Clerk. Property at: The Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Streefr NAME: AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and DATE: 1/25/02 through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS. ADDRESS: 400 Blue Hill Drive,Westwood,MA PETITION: 2002-001 02090 and; Crossroads Corporate Center, 1 International Boulevard,Suite 800,Mahwah,NJ R, 07495 HEARING- 1/15/02 x c ao The North Andover Board of Appeals held a public hearing at its regular meeting on Tuesday, „ January 15,2002 at 7:30 PM upon the application of AT&T Wireless FCS LLC by and through its Q Manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a &' Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA to Sl allow for variances from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300'or,if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height)and from Section 8.9,Paragraph 8.9A.a.iii(2)(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) in order to construct a two-carrier monopole with internal antennas. The following members were present: Raymond A.Vivenzio,Robert P.Ford,John M.Pallone, Scott A.Karpinski,and Ellen P.McIntyre. FEB 2 .'42 FP3:2� Upon a motion made by Robert Ford and 2'd by Ellen McIntyre,the Board voted to GRANT a height variance 13' from the requirements of 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10'above the average building height within 300'or,if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height)to permit the construction,operation,maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas, including the required FAA light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104' in accordance with the following Plans for the facility prepared by Greenman- Pedersen, Inc.,28 Lord Road,Marlborough,MA 01752 ATTEST: ,k True Copy BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9511 BUILDING 688.9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 6 S8-9535 BK 6681 PG 321 SHEET DESCRIPTION 2BO-E4457-Z01, Rawland Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev.2. 2BO-E4457-ZO2, Rawland Site—Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- rev.l. One Compound 2BO-E4457-ZO3, Rawland Site—Monopole With Shelter Site Plan-One rev.2. Compound 2BO-E4457-Z44, Rawland Site—Monopole with shelter Elevation-One rev. 1. Compound on paper dated and sealed by David A.Chappell,RPE,November 21,2001,and on mylar dated and sealed by Jeanne T.Gamache,RPE,January 15,2002:and a color variance from the requirements of 8.9.4.a.iii.2(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue)to permit the construction, operation,maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,including the required FAA light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104' in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K referred to in the FAA's determination for the proposed facility. Voting unanimously in favor: RAV/RPF/JMP/SAK/EPM. The Board finds that the variances the applicants have requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants submitted 21 documents to support their request; including the Planning Board Special Permit with 9 specific conditions and 14 waivers,the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approval,and Noise Analysis by Alactronics. Furthermore, if the rights authorized by the Variance are not exercised within one(1)year of the date of the grant, it shall lapse,and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Furthermore, if a Special Permit granted under the provisions contained herein shall be deemed to have lapsed after a two(2)year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced, it shall lapse-and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Town of North Andover � $ � d f , /f. Raymond A.Vivenz' ,Acting Chairman Decision2002-001 2 BK 6681 PG 322 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner. Town of North Andover Deed Reference: Book 4197,Page 63 Site: Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover Map/Lot: Map 35,Lot 23 Relief Granted: 1. 1 V 8.93.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height);and 2• ' 8.9. .a•iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) DATE: January 29,2002 Pursuant to public notice in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune,a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of North Andover,published on December 31,2001,and January 8,2002,and pursuant to notice sent by mail,postage prepaid, to all interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws,a public hearing was held on January 15,2002, in-the North Andover Senior Center on the petition AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC,by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.,d/b/a AT&T Wireless("AWS")and Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint")for any necessary zoning variances with respect to height and color to permit their respective installation and operation ofproposed wireless communication facilities at the Town- owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. The premises affected are located at 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MA in a Residence 1 Zoning District and is shown on Assessor,s Map 35,as Lot 23. Attorney Stephen D.Anderson represented AT&T Wireless and Attorney Scott Lacy represented Sprint at the public hearing. No member of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition. I. THE PROPOSED FACILITTES The Town of North Andover owns the historic Stevens Estate property. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for the proposed wireless communication facilities ties has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000;AWS and Sprint have each been awarded a 3 BK 6681 PG 323 lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids CUB");and the Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Consistent with the results of the IFB and Planning Board processes,AWS and Sprint have proposed to install and operate their wireless communication facilities at the Stevens Estate site on a 100'two-carricr monopole with internal antennasY The Federal Aviation Administration("FAA') has determined that the 100'pole must be marked and lighted to prevent a hazard to navigation given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. The carriers are also pursuing approval of the 100'two-carrier option by the Massachusetts Historical Commission("MHC'). The internal antennas and cables will be"camouflaged"inside the pole within the meaning of Section 8.9.2.d,8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.c.i,8.9.4.a.ii,and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed pole will be located in a densely wooded area northwest of the main Stevens Estate building and adjacent to an existing electric and telephone utility corridor serving the Estate. The proposed 100'pole will be capable of accommodating both carriers. The combined two-carrier facility involves a 40'x 30'fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. This area will be surrounded by an 8'stockade fence. Within the fenced compound will be a two-carrier,L-shaped equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Each carrier will have a separate 12'x 20'equipment area within the shelter. Coaxial cables will be run inside the pole and across an ice bridge/cable tray to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter.Each facility will be served by associated power/telephone connections. Additional details of the proposed wireless services facility are set forth in the plans and documents identified below. II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS AWS and Sprint submitted the following materials in support of their applications: I. Building Commissioner's determination that a height variance is needed; I/ The top of the pole is at 100'AGL. The top ofthe required FAA light is at 102'AGL. The top of the required lightning rod is at 104'AGL. The Planning Board's Special Permit takes into account the two necessary additions at the top of the pole. 4 BK 6681 PG 324 i 2. AWS r completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 3. Sprint,s completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 4. Certified Abutters List; 5. One set of addressed,stamped envelopes for all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 6. Assessor,s Map numbered 35; 7. Zoning Map; 8. The following Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,Inc., on paper dated November 21,2001,and on mylar dated January 15,2002: SHEET DESCRIPTION 2BO-E4457-ZOI, Rawland Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev.2. 2BO-E4457-ZO2, Rawland Site—Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- rev:l. One Compound 2BO-E4457-ZO3, Rawland Site—Monopole With Shelter Site Plan-One rev.2. Compound 2BO-E4457-ZO4, Rawland Site—Monopole with shelter Elevation-One rev. 1. Compound 9. AWSI RF report,with coverage charts,demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 10. Sprint,s RF report,with coverage charts,demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11. Notarized Owner,s Consent to Municipal Development application; 5 BK 6681 PG- 325 12. Two View Shed Analyses prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,Inc.,one dated December 4,2000,and the other dated December 19, 2001,based on crane tests conducted for AWS' IFB Response and for the carriers' variance applications; 13. AWS' Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 14. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health's approval of AWS' proposed facility; 15. Sprint's Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 16. AWS' Notices to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction; and 17. FAA Determination Regarding the proposed 100%two-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 18. FAA Determination Regarding a 90',one-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 19. FAA Advisory Circular 70n460-1K(the "1K Circular")referred to in these determinations; 20. Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics;and 21. The Planning Board Special Permit. III. THE PLANNING BOARD SPECIAL PERMIT Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover,s Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw,the Planning Board specifically found in its special permit decision that(a)the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation,(b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adversely affect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and(e)the project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3,8.9 and 10.3.". The Planning Board also imposed numerous specific conditions in its special permit regarding(1)discontinuance or abandonment,(2)performance guarantees,(3)the term of the special permit,(4)pre-endorsement requirements,(5)pre-construction requirements,(6)pre-building permit 6 BK 6681 FSG 326 requirements,(7)pre-occupancy requirements,(8)release of security requirements,and(9)a variety of additional conditions regarding the construction and operation of the facility. In addition,the Planning Board found that the application satisfied or was entitled to a waivers(in accordance with Section 8.9.3.c.v.3 and Section 8.9.5.d.ix)from the following criteria: (1)provision of RF coverage maps for other carriers,(2)compliance with siting filing requirements, (3)provision of a color board,(4)performance of a balloon or crane test,(5)compliance with hazardous material criteria,(6)compliance with watershed protection district criteria,(7) performance of a boundary survey,(8)designation of easements and legal conditions,(9) performance of storm water drainage calculations,0 0)compliance with signage requirements,(11) provision of a landscape plan,(12)performance of a drainage basin study,(13)performance of a traffic study,(14)provision of an erosion control plan,and(15)provision of a best management practices plan. IV. VARIANCES RELIEF IS APPROPRIATE A. Variances Sought Having received the foregoing approvals,AWS and Sprint applied for variances from the following height and color requirements for the following reasons: $ The proposed installation of 100'free standing pole plus the required FAA light and the lightning rod at the top of the pole exceeds both the "General"height limity and the "Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limitU of Section 8.9.3.e of North Andover,s Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from these provisions. There are no principal buildings within 300'ofthe proposed pole;the proposed pole will be situated on the side of the Stevens Estate hill,not on the top of the hill;the height(AMSL)of the tallest trees in the vicinity of the pole exceed the height(AMSL)of the pole;and the average tall tree canopy height in the vicinity of the pole is 81.0'feet. The top of the pole itself is at 100'AGL;the top of the required FAA warning light is at 102'AGL,and the top of the lightning rod is at 104'AGL. Therefore,since one can exceed the tree canopy by 2/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"general"height limit: Height,General.Regardless of the type of mount.wireless service facilities shall be no higher than ten feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility.In addition,the height ofa wireless service facility shah not exceed by more than 10 feet the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chimney,or similar structure.wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect to height,provided that the facilities do not project above the existing building height. 3/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limit: Height,Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average building height or,if there are no buildings within 300 feet,these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured from ground level(AGL).If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site of the facility,all ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility io all directions.These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. 7 Lala 6681 PG 32 10'as of right,a height variance of 9' is necessary for the pole;an additional 2'for the FAA light;and an additional 2'for the lightning rod, for a total height variance of 13' to the top of the lightning rod. Given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport,the FAA has determined that the pole must be marked and lit to avoid becoming a hazard to air navigation. As a result,AWS and Sprint propose to paint the pole in accordance with the requirements of the FAA,which differ from the color requirement of Section 8.9.4.8.iii.2"of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from this provision. 2. The Board finds that there are the special conditions relating to the soil condition,shape or topography.of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located. The special conditions related to the Stevens Estate property,that do not generally affect the zoning district,are that(l) it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property,(2)itis topographically higher than much of the surrounding area but on the side-not the top-of the hili,(3) it has an extensive tall tree canopy,(4)it contains a variety of significant historic structures,and(5)it is on the flight path to the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. These special conditions are pertinent to the height and color variances that are sought here. Section 8.9.4.aiii.2 provides the following"color"requirement: To the extent that any wireless service facilities extend above the height of the vegetation immediately surrounding it,they must be painted in a light gray or light blue hue which blends with sky and clouds. 8 BK 6681 FG 128 3. The Board finds that the variances requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The installation is in a location specifically approved by Town Meeting,the North Andover Board of Selectmen,the North Andover Wireless Subcommittee,the North Andover Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover s Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw,as the Special Permit Granting Authority for wireless communication facilities,the Planning Board has expressly found that(a)the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area,and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation,(b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town s Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adverselyaffect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and(e)the project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3.' The Board concurs with these fundings and further finds that the design and location of the facilities(1)buffer the wireless communication devices to the surrounding neighborhood by the significant size of the Stevens Estate property,(2)screen the facilities from view as much as possible by the tall,dense,natural tree canopy,(3)utilize an existing utility corridor on the property for access to the proposed facilities,thereby minimizing required tree cutting,(4)present an environmentally secure facility,and(5)afford significant revenue to the Town. 4. The Board finds that there is substantial hardship,financial or otherwise,to the Applicants and the Town,which would result from a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants and the Town as property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to preclude the proposed use on the subject property. AWS and Sprint both require a location for their communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The Planning Board has specifically found that the "carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public...". The applicants have been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for an extensive period of time. AWS has been denied a facility at the Barker Farm,and litigation is pending. The Town has directed AWS and Sprint to the Stevens Estate property as a viable location for their needed facilities. The Town,s recent adoption of the 600'setback amendment to the Wireless Bylaw leaves the Stevens Estate property as one of the only potentially viable sites in this area of North Andover. 9 8K 6681 PG 329 Further,a literal enforcement of the height requirements would effectively eliminate collocation by the carriers on a single pole. Given the tree canopy and the elevation of the hill which slopes upward of the facility,the carriers RF engineers have presented evidence that neither carrier can accept an antenna height less than 90'on the pole. If the height variance is denied,the purposes of the Bylaw to promote collocation and minimize the number of new towers in Town will not be advanced. The carriers would be forced to seek separate permits to construct separate 90'poles which would increase the amount of land area cleared of trees at the site and which would result in two striped and lit poles on the Stevens Estate hill. As the SPGA for wireless communication facilities,the Planning Board has,in its special permit decision,specifically sought to avoid this result The only way to do so is to allow the requested height variance. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act,this Board considers it appropriate to apply the height limits of the Bylaw in a way that avoids both effective prohibition of service and unlawful discrimination between carriers. The Board recognizes that Town Meeting,the Planning Board,the Selectmen,and the Wireless Subcommittee have determined that the proposed site is the most appropriate site to serve this area of North Andover. The remoteness of the facilities from surrounding residential uses furthers the purpose of Town Meeting in adopting the 600'setback requirement in the Bylaw. As for the color of the pole,the Board is aware that the First Circuit has recently held in Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems,Inc., d/b/a Cellular One, v. Todd,244 F.3d 51,62(1st Cir.2001), that it is impermissible for the Board to regulate the facility based on matters reserved to or controlled by the FAA(emphasis added): Finally,we note that the Board also based its...visual impact conclusion upon the fact that the tower would be painted in alternating red and white sections and would have a night beacon.The tower would only have these features because the FAA requires them. Though the Leicester Wireless Bylaw prohibits bright coloration and night lighting,it allows deviations from that prohibition when required by the FAA.To the extent that the Board's objection was based upon the failure to paint the tower a neutral color,the Board imuroperlyrelied u on this cvidence to justify its decision.Because we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the denial without the inclusion of this factor,it does not affect the outcome of this case. Federal law has effectively preempted the color of the pole,and accordingly a variance is appropriate to conform the Bylaw's color requirements to the mandate of federal law. 10 8K 6681 PG 330 Finally,the Board finds that the Town as owner would suffer substantial hardship by being deprived of the revenue associated with the proposed use. Since this revenue can assist the Town in continuing to maintain the historic structures on the property or for other important public purposes, the Town will benefit from the proposed facility by helping to maintain the historic character of the site. VI. CONCLUSION For the previous reasons,the Board unanimously voted to grant AWS and Sprint the variances. Decision2002-001 auW.ana�ewem�n�variancedecisionwpa 11 Town of North Andover Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals F� • ° ° Community Development and Services Division t w 27 Charles Street " °+ •- »-- 4q* +0+tY1p North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'SS,CNUSEt D. Robert Nicetta This is to certify that twenty(20)days Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner have elapsed from date of decision,filed Fax(978)688-9542 withoutfiiing of a .appeal• Date.�?I ATTEST: Joyce A. mdshaw A True Copy Town Any Any appeal shall be filed Notice of Decision within(20)days after the Year 2003 Town Clerk date of filing of this notice in the office of the Town Clerk. Property at: for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street NAME: AT AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its HEARING(S): August 12,2003 Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint PCS - ADDRESS: for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood PETITION: 2003-023 Street ' North Andover,MA 01845 TYPING DATE: August 18,2003 =:.:i , The North Andover Board of Appeals held a public hearing at its regular meeting on Tuesday,August 12,2003,atL� 7:30 PM in the Senior Center, 120R Main Street,North Andover,MA upon the application of AT&T Wireless; ;3 PCS,LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint;.; PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover requesting a Variance from CD Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii for relief of height requirements in order to construct one internal antenna monopole;and requesting relief of color requirements from Section 8.9,Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii in order to _ comply with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K. The said premise affected is property with frontage on the East side of Osgood Street within the R-I and R-2 zoning districts. r� The following members were present: William J.Sullivan,Walter F. Soule,John M.Pallone,Ellen P.McIntyre, (_n and Joseph D.LaGrasse. cn Upon a motion made by Joseph D.LaGrasse and 2 n by John M.Pallone,the Board voted to GRANT the Variance from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.6 for 13'relief from the requirements of§§8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting co height to I T above the average building height within 300'or,if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height)to permit the construction,operation,maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,plus the required FAA lighting to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104', all in accordance with the Plans referenced below;and relief for a color variance from the requirements§. 8.9.4.a.iii.2(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue)to the FAA-required red and white to permit the construction,operation,maintenance and use of a 1 00'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,including the required FAA light atop the monopole,in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K referred to in the FAA's determination for the proposed facility. The Plans are titled Sprint,Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845,Cascade Number:9S54XC860A by James R.Borrebach,Registered Professional Engineer #34332,Coler&Colantonio,Inc., 101 Accord Park Drive,Norwell,MA 02061-1685,dated 6/11/03. O W Ci Pagel of 3 �; N C/, N a Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688.9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover ,►ORT►+ Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals ' •`�' °gip Community Development and Services Division t 27 Charles Street .4 North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 CHust�as D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 "Plans" SHEETS DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plans&Elevation D-1 Notes&Drafts D-2 Details E-1 Grounding Plan&Elevation E-2 to E-4 Grounding&Electric Details E-5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc.AT&T N/A Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. and the following plans prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,lnc.,dated June 11,003: SrAM DESCRIPTION AT&T Compound Plan AT&T Site Details AT&T Antenna Schematic&One-Line Dia AT&T Construction Notes The above are collectively referred to as the"Plans". Compared to the plans originally approved by the previous decision 2002-001,the current Plans were revised to accommodate the location of a propane tank and generator in connection with the aviation safety lighting required by the Federal Aviation Administration,and to include certain construction details. Voting in favor: William J.Sullivan,Walter F. Soule,John M.Pallone,Ellen P.McIntyre,and Joseph D.LaGrasse. The Board finds that the variances the applicants have requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants submitted 12 documents to support their request;including the Planning Board Special Permit with Site Plan Approval,the previous Zoning Board of Appeals decision 2003-001,the Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics,and notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application. N C=J C_. N 1 Cil cr- Page 2 of 3 w r—> �rnor:. <,ocn :. N Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978.688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530.Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover f ViORTH , Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals ;j F 7p Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street " .•- North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'SS,CHUS�t D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Furthermore,if the rights authorized by the Variance are not exercised within one(1)year of the date of the grant,it shall lapse,and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Furthermore,if a Special Permit granted under the provisions contained herein shall be deemed to have lapsed after a two(2)year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced,it shall lapse and may be ro-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Town of North Andover Board of Appeals, William I Su livan,Chairman Decision 2003-023. Page 3 of 3 ti i b V <:v ��_L N Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978.688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover E NORrh, Office of the Planting Department Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street DA4TlY���. North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 cE,us�` htt. //www.townofnortha-ndover.com Town Planner. iwo-o&@to-wnofnorffimdover.com P (978)688-9535 J.Justin Woods F (978)688-9542 NOTICE OF PERMIT EXTENSION October 9,2003 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Amy Mower Stephen Anderson,Esq. Wellman Associates,Inc. Anderson&Kreiger,LLP 70 Broadway Street 43 Thorndike Street Westford,MA 01886 Cambridge,MA 02141 RE: AT&T and Sprint Telecommunications Facility&Site Plan Special Permit Extension Stevens Estate,7233 Osgood Street Dear Ms.Mower and Attorney Anderson At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Beard, duly poste, and held on October 7,2003,the North Andover Planning Board voted unanimously to grant an extension of the Site Plan Special Permit issued on November 14,2001 to AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless and Sprint Spectrum, LPs dtbla Sprint PCS, so as to allow the applicants to construct, operate, and co-locate on a 100' tall, two carrier wireless telecommunications service facility at the Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street, in the Residential 1 Zoning District. This extension is granted pursuant to Massachusetts General Law,Chapter 40A,Section 9 and Section 10.31..3 ofthe North Andover Zoning Bylaw, and will extend the above referenced Special Permit for a period of one year. This permit is now due to expire on November 15,2004. Since ly; J n Woods,Town Planner c-a f e North Andover Planning Board: � Alberto Angles,Chairman George White,Nice Chairman - John Simons ,0 Richard Nardella ,n James Phinney,Associate Member < ' r v `,`' cc: Town Counsel 4= _. Town Manager CD Building Commissioner Acting Stevens Estate Director Community Development Director BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 6&8-9545 CONSERVATION 688-4530 BEALT14.688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 Town of North Andover °< N°R*M Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street "',• — �`' °Area (� North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'ss,C,�„s� D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Any appeal shall be filed Notice of Decision within(20)days after the Year 2003 date of filing of this notice in the office of the Town Clerk. Property at: for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street NAME: AT AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its HEARING(S): August 12,2003 Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint PCS ADDRESS: for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood PETITION: 2003-023 Street North Andover,MA 01845 TYPING DATE: August 18,2,003 The North Andover Board of Appeals held a public hearing at its regular meeting on Tuesday,August 12,2003 at 7:30 PM in the Senior Center, 120R Main Street,North Andover,MA upon the application of AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover requesting a Variance from Section 89,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii for relief of height requirements in order to construct one internal antenna monopole;and requesting relief of color requirements from Section 8.9,Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii in order to comply with FAA Advisory Circular'70/7460-1K. The said premise affected is property with frontage on the East side of Osgood Street within the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts. The following members were present: William J. Sullivan,Walter F. Soule,John M.Pallone,Ellen P.McIntyre, and Joseph D.LaGrasse. Upon a motion made by Joseph D.LaGrasse and 2"a by John M.Pallone,the Board voted to GRANT the Variance from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.6 for 13'relief from the requirements of§§8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.e.ii(restricting height to 10'above the average building height within 300'or,if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height)to permit the construction,operation,maintenance and use of a 109 two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,plus the required FAA lighting to the height of 102' and the required lightning rod to the height of 104', all in accordance with the Plans referenced below,and relief for a color variance from the requirements§_ 8.9.4.a.iii.2(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue)to the FAA-required red and white to permit the construction,operation,maintenance and use of a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,including the required FAA light atop the monopole,in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K referred to in the FAA's determination for the proposed facility. The Plans are titled Sprint,Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA 01845,Cascade Number:BS54XC860A by James R.Borrebach,Registered Professional Engineer #34332,Coler&Colantonio,lnc., 101 Accord Park Drive,Norwell,MA 02061-1685,dated 6/11/03. Pagel of 3 NO Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover of �10RT11 Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division t 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'SSACH D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 "Plans" SHEET(S) DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plans&Elevation D-1 Notes&Drafts D-2 Details E-1 Grounding Plan&Elevation E-2 to E-4 Grounding&Electric Details E-5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc.AT&T N/A Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. and the following plans prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,lnc.,dated June 11,003: SHEET(S) DESCRIPTION ATT1 AT&T Compound Plan ATT2 AT&T Site Details ATT3 AT&T Antenna Schematic&One-Line Diagram ATT4 AT&T Construction Notes The above are collectively referred to as the"Plans". Compared to the plans originally approved by the previous decision 2002-001,the current Plans were revised to accommodate the location of a propane tank and generator in connection with the aviation safety lighting required by the Federal Aviation Administration,and to include certain construction details. Voting in favor: William J. Sullivan,Walter F. Soule,John M.Pallone,Ellen P.McIntyre,and Joseph D.LaGrasse. The Board finds that the variances the applicants have requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants submitted 12 documents to support their request;including the Planning Board Special Permit with Site Plan Approval,the previous Zoning Board of Appeals decision 2003-001,the Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics,and notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application. t a Cr- Page 2 of 3 ; C? C]r rj Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover of No pTH,ti Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division « 27 Charles Street " °* •- --• '° North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 c►wg�` D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Furthermore,if the rights authorized by the Variance are not exercised within one(1)year of the date of the grant,it shall lapse,and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Furthermore,if a Special Permit granted under the provisions contained herein shall be deemed to have lapsed after a two(2)year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced,it shall lapse and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Town of North Andover Board of Appeals, 6/ William J.S ivan,Chairman Decision 2003-023. Page 3 of 3 ca CD� ' Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK 120 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 Joyce A. Bradshaw, CMMC Telephone(978) 688-9501 Town Clerk Fax (978)688-9556 Of µORTh O ,JSACHUSEt FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE: ADDRESSEE: NAME: iyyL� FIRM: STREET: CITY: FAX NUM: / FROM: NAME: JOYCE A.BRADSHAW,CMMC DEPT.: TOWN CLERK 120 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 TELEPHONE: (978) 688-9501 FAX NUMBER: (978) 688-9556 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES,INCLUDING COVER LETTER: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PPPPP' Town of North Andover < NORT1, Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals op Community Development and Services Division 1 27 Charles Street " °-= —• North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 c►wg�t D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Legal Notice North Andover,Board of Appeals Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main Street,North Andover,MA on Tuesday the 8t`of July,2003 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless PCS,LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.and Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,d/b/a/Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street, North Andover requesting a Variance from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii for relief of height requirements in order to construct one internal antenna monopole;and requesting relief of color requirements from Section 8.9,Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii in order to comply with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K. The said premise affected is property with frontage on the East side of Osgood Street within the R-1 and R- 2 districts. P?lans are available for review at the office of the Building Department 27 Charles Street,North Andover, MA,Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals William I Sullivan,Chairman N Published in the Eagle Tribune on June 23&30,2003. t Legalnotice 2003-023 ®dCD Fri CD r, f - CD �- M 3? crl Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 Town of North Andover Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street "'.• — `,r North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'Ss,cNust` D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541 Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542 Legal Notice North Andover,Board of Appeals Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main Street,North Andover,MA on Tuesday the 8t'of July,2003 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of Lisa M.Wysocki and Timothy Sheehy,851 Forest Street,North Andover requesting a Variance from Section 7,Paragraph 7.3,and Table 2 for relief of front and rear setbacks for a proposed garage;and a Special Permit from Section 9,Paragraph 9.2 in order to allow the construction of a proposed garage on a pre-existing,non-conforming lot. The said premise affected is property with frontage on the Southwest side of Forest Street within the R-1 zoning district. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Department 27 Charles Street,North Andover, MA,Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals William J.Sullivan,Chairman Published in the Eagle Tribune on June 23&30,2003. CD Legalnotice 2003-025. rri r , 00 T>c� ' r`IA -0 ornorri e cn PJ u'1 Board of Appeals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Health 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER VARIANCE r ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Y€ low , v. Eta Procedure & Requirements For an Application for a Variance Ten (10) copies of the following information must STEP 6:SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND be submitted thirty (30) days prior to the first public PREPARATION OF LEGAL NOTICE: hearing. Failure to submit the required information The Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals schedules within the time periods prescribed may result in a the applicant for a hearing date and prepares the legal dismissal by the Zoning Board of an application as notice for mailing to the parties in interest(abutters) and incomplete. for publication in the newspaper. The petitioner is notified that the legal notice has been prepared and the The information herein is an abstract of more specific cost of the Party in Interest fee. ` requirements listed in the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations and is not meant to supersede them. Items that STEP 7: DELIVERY OF LEGAL NOTICE TO j are underlined will be completed by the Town. NEWSPAPER/PARTY IN INTEREST FEE: The petitioner picks up the legal notice from the Office STEP 1: ADMINISTRATOR PERMIT DENIAL: of the Zoning Board of Appeals and delivers the legal The petitioner applies for a Building Permit and receives notice to the local newspaper for publication. a Permit Denial form completed by the Building Commissioner. STEP 8: PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. STEP 2: VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM: The petitioner should appear in his/her behalf, or be Petitioner completes an application form to petition the represented by an agent or attomey. In the absence of Board of Appeals for a Variance. All information as any appearance without due cause on behalf of the required in items 1 through and including 11 shall be petitioner,the Board shall decide on the matter by using completed. the information it has otherwise received. Step 3: PLAN PREPARATION: STEP 9: DECISION: Petitioner submits all of the required plan information as After the hearing, a copy of the Board's decision will be cited in item 10 page 4 of this form. sent to all parties in interest. Any appeal of the Board's decision may be made pursuant to Massachusetts STEP 4: SUBMIT APPLICATION: General Laws ch. 40A sec. 17, within twenty(20)days Petitioner submits one (1) original of all the required after the decision is filed with the Town Clerk. information and 10 xerox copies to the ZBA Secretary. The original will be stamped by the Town Clerk Step 10: RECORDING CERTIFICATE OF DECISION certifying the time and date of filing. The remaining ten PLANS. copies will remain at the office of the Zoning Board of The petitioner is responsible for recording certification of Appeals secretary. the decision and any accompanying plans at the Essex County North Registry of Deeds, Lawrence STEP 5: LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST: Massachusetts,and shall complete the Certification of Once the petitioner submits all of the required Recording form and forward it to the Zoning Board of information,the petitioner requests from the Assessors Appeals and the Building Department Office. Office a certified list of Parties in Interest (abutters). IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS: q 978-688-9541 Zoning Board of Appeals Office %2964 A01 �o n Clerk's Office Department ti N, zz� i C-, 1JUN 1 2 200.E BOARD OF APPEAL �' Page 2 of 4 Application for a VARIAN C E Zoning Board of Appeals . Petitioner:. Name, addres and telephone number: Mcs LLLP �0 " Nut Ill-uta I -.,,q'1kMGih', ma Q NUd Stu4 U-):) I �►� oqq% *The petitioner shall be entered on the legal notice and the decision as entered above. i 2. Owners of Land: Name, Address and Telephone number and number of years under this ownership: LyJ h diel r;►LL60 iv - l Years Owned Land: fJX r7 Uri 3. Location of Property: a. Street: '123 OSciLD(:.",'d s9Yi L k Zoning DistricttD,,�I b. Assessors: Map number -:215 _Lot Number: 23 c. Registry of Deeds: Book Number y l97 Page Number 4. Zoning Sections under which the petition for the Variance is made. d�IryiqH L��4hin � Cf i�'n-) hU)i d1� 1D' k � e Bernal and Zoning By-Law Plan Review as supplied by the Bui ' g Commissioner t3.g.q.a -�)j.z &SYi0t09 COLA abOLA Ue5e-Jo � 1 j 5. Describe the Variance request d 1� 1 4 8A *The above description shall be used for the purpose of the legal notice and decision. A rnob detailed description is required pursuant to the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations as cited on page 4 of this application.Failure by the applicant to clearly describe the request may result in a decision that does not address the intent of the applicant. The decision will be limited to the request by the applicant and will not involve additional items not included above. 6a, Difference from Zoning By-Law requirements: Indicate the dimensions that will not meet current Zoning By-Law Requirements. (A and B are in the case of a lot split) Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking * Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear A. % B. % Page 3 of 4 Application for a VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals 6. b. Existing Lot: Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking * Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear c. Proposed Lot (S): Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking * Minimum Lot set Back Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear i d. Required Lot: (As required by Zoning By-Law) Lot Area Open Space Percent Lot Frontage Parking Minimum Lot set Back• Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Coverage Feet Spaces Front Side A Side B Rear 7. a. Existing Buildings: Ground Floor Number of Total Use of Square feet Floors Sq. feet Building* *Reference Uses from the Zoning By-Law.State number of units in building. b. Proposed Buildings: Ground Floor Number of Total Use of Square feet Floors Sq. feet Building* *Reference Uses from the Zoning By-Law.State number of units in building. 8. Petitioner and Landowner signature (s): Every application for a Variance shall be made on this form which is the official form of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or the Zoning Board of Appeals does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all a nses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements,as cited herein and in the Zoning Board Rules and Regulations may reo A' dismissal by th oning Board of this application as incomplete. Si nat f Type above na herew/n� k2P� f i� �, /�•��1�sc.S q� on �� rrin� L.�? �; �►- ����r PAGE 4 OF 4 VARIANCE 9. WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION Application for a variance must be supported by a legibly written or typed memorandum setting forth in detail all facts relied upon. When requesting a variance from the requirements of MGLA ch.40A, Sec. 10 C. FEATURES TO BE INDICATED ON PLAN: 10.4 of the North Andover Zoning By-Law all dimensional requirements A. Site Orientation shall include: shall be clearly identified and factually supported and addressing 1. North point each of the following points individually is required with this 2. zoning district(s) application. 3. names of streets 4. wetlands to be shown on plan (if applicable) A. The particular use proposed for the land or structure. 5. abutters of property,within 300 foot radius B. The circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape or 6. location of buildings on adjacent properties within topography of such land or structures especially 50'from applicants proposed structure affecting the property for which the variance is sought 7. deed restrictions, easements which do not affect generally the zoning district in B. Legend&Graphic Aids: which the property is located. 1. Proposed features in solid lines&outlined in red C. Facts which make up the substantial hardship, 2. Existing features to be removed in dashed lines financial or otherwise,which results from literal 3. Graphic Scales enforcement of the applicable zoning restrictions with 4. Date of Plan respect to the land or building for which the variance 5. Title of Plan is sought. 6. Names/addresses/phone numbers of the D. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief sought applicant, owner of record, and designer or will be desirable and without substantial detriment to surveyor. the public good. E. Facts relied upon to support a finding that relief sought 10 D. FURTHER REQUIREMENTS: may be given without nullifying or substantially Major Projects shall require that in addition to the above derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning features, plans must show detailed utilities, soils, and bylaw. topographic information. A set of building elevation and F. Submit RDA from Conservation Commission when interior of building plans shall be required when the Continuous Buildable Area is applied for in ZBA application involves new construction/conversion/and/or application. a proposed change in use. Elevation plans for minor projects including decks, sheds,&garages shall be 10. Plan of Land included with a side view depicted on the plot plan, Each application to the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be which includes a ground level elevation. accompanied by the following described plan. Plans must 11. APPLICATION FILING FEES be submitted with this application to the Town Clerk's Office and ZBA secretary at least thirty (30)days prior to A. Notification Fees: Applicant is to send by the public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. certified mail all legal notices to all abutters, and then supply proof of mailing to the ZBA secretary. 10 A. Major Projects Applicant is to supply stamps(appropriate Major projects are those which involve one of the following current postage)for mailing of decisions to all whether existing or proposed: a)five or more parking parties in interest as identified in MGLA ch. 40A, spaces, b)three or more dwelling units,and sec. 11 as listed on the application. ZBA Secretary c)2000 square feet or more of building area. will compute number of stamps. Minor projects that are less than the above limits shall B. Applicant is to supply one (1)set of addressed require only the plan information as indicated with an labels of abutters to ZBA Secretary who will mail asterisks (`). In some cases further information may be decisions to abutters and parties in interest. required C. Administrative fee of$50.00 per application. 10 B. Plan Specifications: a) Size of plan: Ten (10) copies of a plan not to exceed 11"x17", preferred scale of 1"=40'. A Variance once granted by the ZBA will lapse in b) Plan prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer one (1)year if not exercised and a new petition must and/or Land Surveyor, with a block for five (5)ZBA be submitted. signatures and date indicated on mylar. Town of North .Andover Off-ice of the Building Depaitanent Commurasly Development and Services Division 27 Charles 5trvet NOTth Anclover,Massdchmetts(T1845 ^CRUS I). Robert Nic:c as Telephone:(978)688-3645 Rtrilrlirrrg C t.tttttrtssrnrtf:r Fax(978)68S-9542 MEMORANDUM To: Heidi Griffin,Town Planner From: Robert Nicetta,Building Comtnissione R Date: September 14, 2001 Re: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.,0/a AT&T Wireless Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS Stevens Estate-723 Osgood Street T have reviewed the plans and accompanying memorandum for the sitting of wireless services at the referred location Pursuant to Section 8.9,Paragraph 3c(ii), which states in part "these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height, measured from ground level(ACL}'.As shown on the submitted site plan the one 100 feet two-carrier monopole or the two separate 90 feet monopoles arel9 feet and/or 9 feet above the average tree canopy height. As such,I am ofthe opinion that the applicant must petition the Zoning Board of Appeals for a height variance. M ll.N"41•if.l!4954G CO N'`I!l',r\ Al "'I li.:1:-')"fe if tA.'Tt i.;vS :=c!> WELLMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 70 BROADWAY STREET WESTFORD,MA 01886 (978) 589-9870 FACSIMILE (978) 589-9421 Am 12,2003 HAND DELIVERED Zoning Board of Appeals Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Re: Application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. with respect to a wireless communication facility at Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. Dear Town Clerk and Members of the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals: On behalf of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint PCS") and AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. ("AT&T Wireless"), please find attached an application requesting variance relief to allow for the installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street, North Andover. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000 and Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless have each been awarded a lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids. The Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Similarly, on January 29,2002,the Zoning Board of Appeals(the`Board"), granted relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed facilities. However,the site plans approved by the Planning Board and incorporated into the Board decision did not depict a propane tank and backup generator, which are required because the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") determined that the 100' pole must be marked and lighted. Although the FAA lighting requirement was known at the time of the original application, the approved plans did not delineate the backup power source for the site. On June 3, 2003,the Planning Board endorsed revised plans depicting the backup power source for the facilities. Unfortunately, the zoning relief previously granted by the Board expired. As such, Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless request variance relief with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. With the exception of the back-up power generator and associated propane tank,all facts and circumstances remain the same. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at 978 589-9870. Yours truly, ower, onsultant to Sprint PCS ASSENTED TO: AT&T Wireless, By its attorneys, Stephen D. Anderson Anderson&Kreiger, LLP 43 Thorndike Street Cambridge,MA 02141 617-252-6575 Attachments OWNER'S CONSENT TO VARIANCE APPLICATION TO: Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 APPLICANTS: (1) Sprint Spectrum L.P, d/b/a Sprint PCS;and (2) AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. OWNER: Town of North Andover SITE: Steven Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MAP/LOT: Map 35,Lot 23 RELIEF SOUGHT: Variance Relief for Wireless Service Facilities 1. §§ 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10'above the average building height within 300'or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height);and 2. § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue) DATE: June 12, 2003 Pursuant to the Town of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw,the Town of North Andover consents to the application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint PCS") and AT&T Wireless Services PCS, LLC, by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AT&T Wireless") for any necessary zoning approvals to permit their respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover in accordance with the following Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Coler&Colantonio,Inc., Inc.; dated April 8, 2003 as endorsed by the North Andover Planning Board: SHEET(S) DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plan&Elevation D1 Notes&Details D2 Details E 1 Grounding Plan&Elevation E2-E4 Grounding&Electric Details E5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. SHEETS) DESCRIPTION N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte,Inc. Without limitation, the Town consents to Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless each seeking variance relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to §§ 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 of the Zoning Bylaw. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2040, and Sprint PCS and AT&T Wireless have each been awarded a lease by the Town of North Andover pursuant to its Invitation for Bids. Notary =Rees, T R 2 Cam a, My commission expires:7S'o.�. a a,a o 0`�l v\-- . #50200162 v\1 -pareedo -y-y01!.doco -80563/2227 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Appeals Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 APPLICANTS: (1) Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS (2) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.- OWNER: Town of North Andover SITE: Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MAP/LOT: Map 35, Lot 23 RELIEF SOUGHT: 1. §§ 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); and 2. § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue) DATE: June 12, 2003 Pursuant to the Town of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw(the"Bylaw"), Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint PCS")and AT&T Wireless Services PCS Li_,C, by and through its member AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AWS")apply for any necessary zoning variances to permit their respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town-owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. Specifically, Sprint PCS and AWS each seek a variance with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for this purpose has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000; Sprint PCS and AWS have each been awarded a lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids; and the Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Similarly, the Zoning Board of Appeals, on January 29, 2002,granted relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. However,the site plans approved by the Planning Board and incorporated into the Zoning Board of Appeals decision did not depict a propane tank and backup generator, which are required because the Federal Aviation Administration("FAA")determined that the 100' pole must be marked and lighted to prevent being a hazard to navigation given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. Although the FAA lighting requirement was known at the time of the original application, the approved plans did not delineate the backup power source for the site. On June 3, 2003,the Planning Board endorsed revised plans,which are included with this application, that depict the backup power source for the pole. Unfortunately, the zoning relief previously granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals(the"Board") expired. As such, Sprint Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 2 PCS and AWS request variance relief with respect to the height and color requirements as set forth above. With the exception of the back-up power generator and associated propane tank, all facts and circumstances remain the same. Sprint.PCS and AWS hereby incorporated by reference all of the evidence and materials provided to the Board as part of their application filed with respect to the Board's previously filed decision(the"Decision")granting variance relief. I. THE PROPOSED FACILITIES As shown on the revised site plans,the required backup power source will be located within the previously approved fenced compound, and will be screened from view by 8' stockade fencing. Neither the size of the compound,fence height nor overall height of the previously approved pole will change. As such, there is no material change between the previously approved site design and proposed site design that depicts the backup power source. For reference purposes, a copy of the Decision has been included with this application. H. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS Enclosed is a check made out to the Town ofNorth Andover for the Board's application fee. Also enclosed are 11 copies of this memorandum and the following materials: 1. Building Commissioner's determination dated September 14, 2001 that variance relief is needed; 2. Board of Appeals Application on behalf of Sprint PCS and AWS for Relief from the Bylaw; 3. Certified Abutters List; 4. One set of addressed, stamped envelopes labels for all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 5. The following Revised Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Coler& Colantonio, Inc., Inc.': i These plans represent Sprint PCS's construction drawings for the posed facility on which AWS is collocating at the antenna height and in the shelter location shown. AWS will submit to the Board at or before the hearing appropriate detail sheets showing the details of its antennas(within the pole at the height shown on the enclosed plans),equipment cabinets(within the shelter at the location shown on the enclosed plans),coaxial cable tray and other similar details. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 3 SHEET(S) DESCRIPTION T-1 Title Sheet A-1 Site Plan&Notes A-2 Partial Site Plan&Elevation DI Notes&Details D2 Details Ell Grounding Plan&Elevation E2-E4 Grounding&Electric Details E5 Power&Antenna Schematic N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. N/A Sprint Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. N/A AT&T Shelter&Foundation Details by Trachte, Inc. 6. Notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application; 7. FAA Determination Regarding the proposed 100',two-carrier flagpole-style monopole; and FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K(the"1K Circular")referred to in these determinations; 8. Prior Zoning Board of Appeals Decision, dated January 29, 2002, granting relief from Sections 8.9.3.6, 8.9.3.c.ii, and 8.9.4.a.iii.2 for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities 9. As previously submitted, AWS'RF report,with coverage charts, demonstrating (1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide, (3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under § S.9.3.b.9, and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 10. As previously submitted, Sprint PCS's RF report,;with coverage charts, demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under§ Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 4 8.9.3.b.9, and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11. View Shed Analysis prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. based on crane/balloon test conducted for AWS' IFB Response; 12. Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics; and 13. The Planning Board Special Permit. IV. VARIANCES AND WAaM A. Why may a variance or waiver be needed? Variances from the following height and color requirements may be necessary for the proposed facility:3 • The proposed installation of a 100'free standing pole plus the required FAA light and the lightning rod at the top of the pole may exceed both the"General" height limit4 2/ As stated previously,the location and height of the pole has not changed and the additional equipment will be completely screened by the stockade fence. As such,the Viewshed Analysis,previously prepared by Greenman- Pedersen is an accurate representation of the proposed facility including the backup power equipment. 3/ AWS and Sprint PCS apply for variance relief without waiving their position that such variance relief is not lawfully required Without limitation,it would be erroneous for the Board to apply these requirements to prohibit the proposed facility. To do so would largely negate the authorization of special permits in the Wireless Services overlay District and would violate the Telecommunications Act of 1996 because the Bylaw would then"prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." 47 U.S.C.§332(cx7)(BxiXII). 4/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"General"height limit: Height,General.Regardless of the type of mount.wireless service facilities shall be no higher than ten feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility.In addition,the height of a wireless service facility shall not exceed by more than 10 feet the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chimney,or similar structure. Wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect to height,provided that the facilities do not project above the existing building height. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 5 and the"Ground-Mounted Facilities" height limits of Section 8.9.3.c of the Bylaw. Sprint PCS and AWS request variance relief from these provisions. There are no principal buildings within 300'of the proposed pole(s);the proposed pole(s)will be situated on the side of the Stevens Estate hill, not on the top of the hill; the height (AMSL) of the tallest trees in the vicinity of the pole(s)exceed the height(AMSL)of the pole(s); and the average tall tree canopy height in the vicinity of the pole(s)is 81.0'feet. The top of the pole itself is at 100'AGL, and the top of the required FAA warning light is at 102' AGL. Therefore, since one can exceed the tree canopy by 10'as of right, a height variance of 9' appears necessary for the pole and an additional 2'for the FAA light. Given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport, the FAA has determined that the pole must be marked and lit to avoid becoming a hazard to air navigation. As a result, Sprint PCS and AWS propose to paint the pole in accordance with the requirements of the FAA, which differ from the color requirement of tion 8.9.4.a.iii.26 of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. Sprint PCS and AWS request variance relief from this provision. A. What are the special conditions relating to the soil condition,shape or topography of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located? The special conditions related to the Stevens Estate property,that do not generally affect the zoning district, are that(1)it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property, (2)it is topographically higher than much of the surrounding area but on the side not the top-of the hill, (3)it has an extensive tall tree canopy, (4)it contains a variety-of significant historic 5/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limit: Height,Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall not project higher titan ten feet above the average building height or,if there are no buildings within 300 feet,these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured from ground level(AGL).If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site of the facility,all ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions.These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. 6/ Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 provides the following"color"requirement: To the extent that any wireless service facilities extend above the height of the vegetation immediately surrounding it, they must be painted in a light gray or light blue hue which blends with sky and clouds. Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 6 structures, and(5)it is on the flight path to the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. These special conditions are pertinent to the height and color variances which are sought here. B. Why does the applicant believe that the variances requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw? The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Bylaw. The installation is in a location specifically approved by Town Meeting,the North Andover Board of Selectmen, the North Andover Wireless Subcommittee,the North Andover Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of the Bylaw, as the Special Permit Granting Authority for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has expressly found that: 1. The specific site is an appropriate location for the project as the site is extremely large (153 acres),topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation. 2. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 3. The use will not result in any nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. 4. The plans meet the requirements of the By-law Section 8.9, as applied or as waived by the Planning Board. 5. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use, and each carrier's proposed equipment shelter will be an unoccupied, unmanned, specialized area for the wireless communications equipment. 6. Because this particular flagpole-style installation constitutes a camouflaged facility under Sections 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.2, 8.9.3.6, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii, the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views under Sections 8.9.3.c.it 8.0.4.a.ii and 89.4.d.ii do not apply. In any event, the proposed installation is situated in an area of dense natural tree growth on the Stevens Estate property, so that the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views are satisfied. 7. The project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3." Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 , Page 7 Thus, the design and location of the facilities(1)buffer the wireless communication devices to the surrounding neighborhood by the significant size of the Stevens Estate property, (2) screen the facilities from view as much as possible by the tall, dense, natural tree canopy, (3) utilize an existing utility corridor on the property for access to the proposed facilities, thereby minimizing required tree cutting, (4)present an environmentally secure facility, and(5)afford significant revenue to the Town. 8. What is the substantial hardship,financial or otherwise,to you,which would result from a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw? The applicants and the Town as property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to preclude the proposed use on the subject property. The applicants both require a location for their communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The Planning Board has specifically found that the"carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public ....". The applicants have been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for an extensive period of time. AWS has been denied a facility at the Barker Farm, and litigation is pending. The Town has directed AWS and Sprint PCS to the Stevens Estate property as a viable location for their needed facilities. Indeed, short of litigation, the recent adoption of the 600'setback amendment to the Wireless Bylaw leaves the Stevens Estate property as one of the only potentially viable sites in this area of North Andover. Further, a literal enforcement of the height requirements would effectively eliminate collocation by the carriers on a single pole. Given the tree canopy and the elevation of the hill which slopes upward of the facility, neither carrier can accept an antenna height less than 90'on the pole. If the height variance is denied, the purposes of the Bylaw to promote collocation and minimize the number of new towers in Town will not be advanced. The carriers will be forced to seek separate permits to construct separate 90'poles which would increase the amount of land area cleared of trees at the site and which would result in two striped and lit poles on the Stevens Estate hill. As the SPGA for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has, in its Decision, sought to avoid this result. The only way to do so is to allow the requested height variance. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act,this Board is obliged to apply the height limits of the Bylaw in a way that avoids effective prohibition and/or unlawful discrimination. Town Meeting, the Planning Board,the Selectmen, and the Wireless Subcommittee have determined that the proposed site is the most appropriate site to serve this area of North Andover. The remoteness of the facilities from surrounding residential uses furthers the purpose of Town Meeting in adopting the 600' setback requirement in the Bylaw. Board of Appeals June 12, 2003 Page 8 As for the color of the pole, the First Circuit has held in Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., d1b/a Cellular One, v. Todd, 244 F.3d 51, 62 (1st Cir.2001),that it is impermissible for the Board to regulate the facility based on matters reserved to or controlled by the FAA(emphasis added): Finally, we note that the Board also based its ... visual impact conclusion upon the fact that the tower would be painted in alternating red and white sections and would have a night beacon. The tower would only have these features because the FAA requires them. Though the Leicester Wireless Bylaw prohibits bright coloration and night lighting, it allows deviations from that prohibition when required by the FAA To the extent that the Board's objection was based upon the failure to paint the tower a neutral color,the Board improperly relied upon this evidence to justify its decision. Because we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the denial without the inclusion of this factor, it does not affect the outcome of this case. The color of the pole has been preempted by federal law, and accordingly a variance should be granted to conform the Bylaw's color requirements to the mandate of federal law. Finally, the Town as owner would suffer substantial hardship by being deprived of the revenue associated with the proposed use. Since this revenue can assist the Town in continuing to maintain the historic structures on the property or for other important public purposes,the Town will benefit from the proposed facility by helping to maintain the historic character of the site. VI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Sprint PCS and AWS respectfully request that the Board schedule this application for a public hearing at its next regularly scheduled meeting for which proper notice can be given and that the Board grant the foregoing relief and any other zoning relief that may be just and proper for the installation and operation of the proposed facilities. As stated previously and shown on the revised site plans,there have been no material changes to the location, pole height or site design since the Board of Appeals last reviewed the application for a wireless communication facility at the proposed site. Board of Appeals June 11, 2003 Page 9 Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS AT&T Wireless Services By its consultant, By its attorneys, l JAA y`'�1 o Stephe Anderson, Esq. Well*n& ssociates ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP 70 Broa way Street 47 Thorndike Street Westford, MA 01886 Cambridge, MA 02141 (978) 589-9870 (617)252-6575 Dated: June2003 Dated: June 2003 Enclosures cc: Town Clerk(By Hand) Edward D. Pare, Jr. Esq. (by email w/out encl. and Federal Express w/encl.) #50182384 v\2-!acyst0 -kz402!.doc❑ -8056312227 Federal Aviation Administration NEW ENGLAND REGION, ANE-520 AERONAUTICAL STUDY 12 NEW ENGLAND EXECUTIVE PARK No: 01-ANE-0876,,-0E BURLINGTON, MA 01803 PRIOR STUDY No: 01-ANE-0579-OE- :.,: ISSUED DATE: 03/01/02 �- VALER I E MOORE CR OSSROADS CORP CTR SPRINT SPECTRUM, L. P. 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD, SUITE 800 MAHWAH, NJ 07495 { ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has Completed an -aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S .C. , Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Description: ANTENNA TOWER 1870-1885, 1950-1965 MHz W/ 1.640 W ERP Location : N. ANDOVER MA Latitude : 42-42-28 .30 NAD 83 Longitude : 071-06-51.44 Heights : 128 feet above ground level (AGL) 380 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air zavion ofx facilities . Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) , if any, is (are) met : -As a condition to this determination, the structure should be marked and/or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K Change 3 Obstruction Marking and Lighting, Chapters 3 (Marked) , 4 , 5 (Red) , & 12 . -It is required that the enclosed FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: i✓ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part I) �Withln 5 days after construction reaches its greatest hei ht (7460-2, Part II) g -See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. This determination expires on 10/10/03 unless : (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office or ." I (b) the construction is subject to the licensing a t g uthori t o �� he Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction or on the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE, =As a result of this structure being critical to flight safety, it�'ds required that the FAA be kept apprised as to the status of this project . Failure to respond to periodic FAA inquiries could invalidate this determination. This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition on or before 03/31/02 . In the event a petition for review is filed 4 it must contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is made and be submitted in triplicate to the Manager, AIRSPACE & RULES DIVISION, ATA-400 Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 . This determination becomes final on 04/10/02 unless- a petition is timely filed. In which case, this determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase in heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such las cranes, derricks, etc. , which may be used during actual constructiwn of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a -height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the F.A.A. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect to air navigation. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any) , and the basis for the FAA' s decision 'in this matter can be found on the following page (s) . A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal CommuniCatio Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authori�_,y.' If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at 781-238-7S20 . On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876-OE. Patric T arra one (DNII) Manager, AIRSPACE BRANCH 7460-2 Attached Attachment Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876-OE LOCATION: The proposed antenna tower will be located approximately 0.69 nautical miles (NM) southeast of the airport reference point of the Lawrence Airport(LWM) in Lawrence, Massachusetts. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project is An antenna tower to house cellular frequency antennas. .r OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS EXCEEDED: ' The aeronautical study indicates that the structure exceeds the Obstruction Standards of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)Part 77 as follows: Section 77.25(a)by 82 feet, structures that exceed the horizontal surface. A horizontal plane 150 feet above the established airport elevation, the perimeter of which is constructed by swinging arcs of specified radii from the center of each end of the primary surface of the runway,as applied to LWM. The arcs are then connected by tangents. PUBLIC NOTICE COMMENTS: The aeronautical study was mailed out as a public notice on November 8,2001, with a closing date of December 15,2001. One letter containing aeronautical comments was received during the public notice period. The following is a summary of concerns received: Lawrence airport is a major training facility and there is a lot of jet traffic traversing in and o6of the airport. DISPOSITION OF COMMENTS: The antenna tower will not have any substantial impact on any Visual Ffight Rules (VFR) nor Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)aircraft traversing in, out,or through the airport traffic area provided it is properly marked and lighted SUMMARY OF EFFECTS: The aeronautical study found that the proposed antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on air traffic operations inbound to,outbound from,or enroute through LWM under VFR conditions. Aeronautical Study Number 0I-ANE-0876-OE i The aeronautical study found that the proposed antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on air traffic operations inbound to, outbound from, or enroute through LWM Y under IFR conditions. i The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect' on any LWM existing or planned runway length. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect t or derogation to LWM airport efficiency. z The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would not have a significant adverse effect on planned IFR and VFR LWM airport operations indicated by plans on file. The aeronautical study found that the antenna tower would be located within the LWM airport traffic pattern but would not have a significant adverse effect on traffic. Therefore, a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation is issued. This Determination of No Hazard is granted provided the following condition is adhered to: Section 77.35, the proposed construction or alteration would derogate the reliability df an aeronautical air navigation facility. Harmful interference to Lawrence,MA RIR may } exist if the proponents equipment meets only the minimum FCC requirements. We t, request a minimum spurious emissions tolerance of 92.0 dB from the proponents equipment within the 118-138 MHz frequency band. This determination is valid for frequencies 1870.0-1885.0 and 1950.0-1965.0 MHz at 1,640 Watts ERP each. Any changes in frequency or use of greater power will void this determination. A 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration is enclosed. Please fill out the form with the coordinates and submit for proper charting. This determination concerns the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance relating to laws, ordinances, or regulations required by other governmental bodies. Please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 01-ANE-0876 -OE in any correspondence. Town of North Andover Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals . ' Community Development and Services Division 1leidi Griffin, Division Director 27 Charles Streetk ' North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 relephone(978)688-954'1 D. Robert Nicctt<i Fax (178)688-9542 Ruilding Commissioner o _ L. CDrnfr N �n OO :r.r- appeal shall be filed Notice of Decision -0 {�CPC, within(20) days after the Year 2002 date of filing of this notice, in the office of the Town Clerk. Property at: The Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Streefr NAME: AT&T wireless PCS LLC by and DATE: 11/251M through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services lot. d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum LP: d/b/a Sprint PCS. ADDRESS: 400 Blue Hill Drive,Westwood,MA PETITION: 2002-001 02090 and, Crossroads Corporate Center,I International Boulevard,Strife 800,Mahwah,NJ 07495 1"- G: 1/15/02 The North Andover Board of Appeals held a public hearing at its regular meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 at 7:30 PM upon the application of AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc.d/b/a AT&T Wireless,and;Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS for premises affected at the Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover,MA to allow for variances from Section 8.9,Paragraphs 8.9.3.6 and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height)and from Section 8.9, Paragraph 8.9.4.a.iii(2)(restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) in order to construct a two-carrier monopole with internal antennas. The following members were present: Raymond A. Vivenzio,Robert P. Ford,John M. Pallone, Scott A.Karpinski,and Ellen P.McIntyre. Upon a motion made by Robert Ford and 2"d by Ellen McIntyre,the Board voted to GRANT a height variance 13' from the requirements of 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii(restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height)to permit the construction, operation,maintenance and use of 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas, including the required FAA light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104' in accordance with the following Plans for the facility prepared by Greenman- Pedersen, Inc., 28 Lord Road, Marlborough, MA 01752 1 ROARDOF APPEAT S 608-9541 RI TLDIN0 688-9545 CONSLKVATtON 688--9530 HEALTH 638.95•!4 rLANNiNGT 621.9$35 SHEET DESCRIPTION 2BO-E4457-ZOI, Rawland`Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev. 2. 2BO-E4457-Z02, Rawland Site–;Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- rev.1. One Compound 2BO-F,4457-203, Rawland Site-Monopole With Shelter Site Plan-One rev. 2. Compound 2B4-FA457-Z04, Rawland Site--Monopole with shelter Elevation-One rev. 1. Compound on paper dated and sealed by David A.Chappell,RPE,November 21,2001,and on mylar dated and sealed by Jeanne T. Gamache, RPE,January 15,2002:and a color variance from the requirements of 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting Color above vegetation to light gray or blue)to permit the construction, operation, maintenance and use of ai 100,two-carrier monopole with internal antennas,including the required FAA. light to the height of 102'and the required lightning rod to the height of 104'in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K referred to in the FAA`s determination for the proposed facility. Voting unanimously in favor: RAVIRPF/RvIPISAK/EPM— The Board finds that the variances the applicants have requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the;coning Bylaw. The applicants submitted 21 documents to support their request; including the Planning.Board Special Permit with 9 specific conditions and 14 waivers,the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approval,and Noise Analysis by Alactronics. Furthermore, if the rights authorized by the Variance are not exercised within one(1)year of the date of the grant, it shall lapse, and may be re-established only after notice,and a new hearing. Furthermore, if a Special Permit granted under the provisions contained herein shall be deemed to have lapsed after a two(2)year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substardial use or construction has commenced, it shall lapse and may be re-established only after notice, and a new hearing. Town of North Andover MA.ViYgenzfi Raymond ;, Alctl:n::�90, Airman Decision2002-00 l 2 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P.d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner. Town of North Aadover Deed Reference: Book 4197,Page 63 Site: Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover Map/I,ot: Map 35, Lot 23 Relief Granted: 1. ' ' 9.93.c.i and 8.93.cii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300. or, if no such buildings, TV above average tree canopy height); and 2. 1 8.9.4.a.iiL2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) DATE: January 29,2002 Pursuant to public notice in the Lawrence Eagle Tn`bune,a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of North Andover,published on December 31,2001,and January 8, 2002,and pursuant to notice sent by mail,postage prepaid,to all interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws,a public hearing was held on January 15,2002, in the North Andover Senior Center on the petition AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC,by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.,d/b/a AT&T Wireless("AWS')and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b(a Sprint PCS ("Sprint")for any necessary zoning variances with respect to and color to permit eir respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town- owned Stevens Estate, 723 Osgood Street,North Andover. The premises affected are located at 723 Osgood Strect,North Andover MA in a Residence I Zoning District and is shown on Assessor's Map 35,as Lot 23. Attorney Stephen D. Anderson represented AT&T Wireless and Attorney Scott Lacy represented Sprint at the public hearing. No member of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition. L ME )PROPOSED FACHXITES The Town of North Andover owns the historic Stevens Estate property. The lease of land within Stcvens Estate for the proposed wireless communication facilities has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in Dcccrnber 2000;AWS and Sprint have each been awarded a 3 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Speetrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS. property Owner: Town of North Andover Deed Reference: Book 4197,Page 63 Site. Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover Map/Lot: Map 35,Lot 23 Relief Granted: 1. 11 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10'above average tree canopy height); and 2. ' 8.9-4.a.iiL2 (restricting color above vegetation to light gray or blue) DATE: January 29,2002 Pursuant to public notice in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune,a newspaper of generat circulation in the Town ofNorth Andover,published on December 31,2001, and January 8, 2002,and pursuant to notice sent by mail,postage prepaid,to all interested parties pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws,a public hearing was held on January 15,2002, in the North Andover Senior Center on the petition AT&T Wire Services PCS LLC,by and through its manager AT&T Wireless Services,Inc., d/b/a AT&T Wireless("AWS")and Sprint Spectrum I—P.d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint")for any necessary zoning variances with respect to height and color to permit their respective installation and operation of proposed wireless communication facilities at the Town- owned Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover. The premises affected are located at 723 Osgood Street,North Andover MA in a Residence 1 Zoning District and is shown on Assessor's Map 35,as Lot 23. Attorney Stephen D.Anderson represented AT&T Wireless and Attorney Scott Lacy represented Sprint at the public hearing. No member of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition. I. TNI; PR+DP+DS) FACILITIES The Town of North Andover owns the historic Stevens Estate property. The lease of land within Stevens Estate for the proposed wireless communication facilities,has been expressly approved by a Special Town Meeting in December 2000; AWS and Sprint have each been awarded a 3 lease by the Town pursuant to its Invitation for Bids ("1FB");and the Planning Board has issued a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for the proposed Wireless Services Facilities. Consistent with the results of the IFR and Planning Board processes,AWS and Sprint have proposed to install and operate their wireless communication facilities at the Stevens Estate site on a 100'two-carrier monopole with internal antennas.y The Federal Aviation Administration ("FAX) has determined that the 100'pole must be marked and lighted to prevent a hazard to navigation given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Munici 1 A" The carriers are also pursuing approval of the 100'two-carrier option by t e Massachusetts.Ifistorical Commission("MHC'). The internal antennas and cables will be"camouflaged"inside the pole within the meaning of Section 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.c.L 8.9.4.a.ii,and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed pole will be located in a densely wooded area northwest of the main Stevens Estate building and adjacent to an existing electric and telephone utility corridor serving the Estate. The proposed 100'pole will be capable of accommodating both carriers. The combined two-carrier facility involves a 40'x 30'fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. This area will be surrounded bt�an 8'stockade fence. Within the fenced cormpound will be a two-carrier, L-shaped equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Each carrier will have a separate 12'x 20'equipment area within the shelter. Coaxial cables will be run inside the pole and across an ice bridge/cable tray to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter.Each facility will be served by associated power/telephone connections. Additional details of the proposed wireless services facility are set forth in the plans and documents identified below. II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS AWS and Sprint submitted the following materials in support of their applications: Building Commissioner's determination that a height variance is needed; 1/ The trip of the pole is at 100'AGL- The top of the rcquired FAA light is at 102'AGL The top of the required lightning rod is at 104'AGL, ne Planning Board's Special Permit takes into account the two necessary additions at the TOP of the pole. 4 2. AWS' completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 3. Sprint, s completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning p PPe Ordinance; 4. Certified Abutters List; 5. One set of addressed, stamped envelopes for all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 6. Assessor' s Map numbered 35; 7. Zoning Map; 8. The following Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., on paper dated November 21,2001, and on mylar dated January 15, 2002: SHEET DESCRIPTION 2BO-E4457-Z01, Rawiand Site-Monopole With Shelter Title Sheet rev.2. 280-E4457-Z02, Rowland Site—Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- rev.1. lan-rev.1. One Compound 2BO-F445'7-7.03, Rowland Site—Monopole With Shelter Sate Plan-One rev. 2. Compound 2BO-F,4457-ZO4, Rawland Site—Monopole with shelter Elevation-Ocie rev. 1. Compound 9. AWS' RF report,with coverage charts,demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 10. Sprint•s RF report,with coverage charts;demonstrating(1)the need for the facility, (2)the coverage it will provide,(3)"that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under 8.9.3.b.9,and(4)the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11 Notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application; 5 12. Two View Shed Analyses prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., one dated December 4,2000-,and the other dated December 19, 2001, based.on crane tests conducted for AWS' IFB Response and for the carriers, variance applications; 13, AWS, Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 14. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health, s approval of AWS' proposed facility; 15. Sprint,s Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 16. AWS' Notices to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction; and 17_ FAA Determination Regarding the proposed 100,two-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 18. FAA Determination Regarding a 90%one-carrier flagpole-style monopole; 19. FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-IK (the "l K Circular")referred to in these determinations; 20. Noise Analysis prepared by Alactronics;and 21. The Planning Board Special Permit. IIT. THE PLANNING BOARD SIPEC1rAL P_ RMIT Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover,s Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw,the Planning Board specifically found in its special permit decision that(a)the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation, (b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town,s Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adversely affect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and (e)the project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3.". The Planning Board also imposed numerous specific conditions in its special permit regarding(1) discontinuance or abandonment, (2)performance guarantees, (3)the term of the special Permit, (4) pre-endorsement requirements, (5)pre-construction requirements, (6)pre-building Permit 6 r_ uy requirements, (7)pre-occupancy requirements, (8)release of security requirements, and (9)a variety of additional conditions regarding the construction and operation of the facility. In addition, the Planning Board found that the application satisfied or was entitled to a waivers (in accordance with Section 8.9.3.c.v.3 and Section 8.9.5.d.ix) from the following criteria: (1)provision of KF coverage maps for other carriers, (2)compliance with siting fling requirements, (3)provision of a color board, (4)performance of balloon or crane test, (5)compliance with hazardous material criteria, (6)compliance with watershed protection district criteria, (7) performance of a boundary survey, (8)designation of easements and legal conditions, (9) performance of storm water drainage calculations,(10)compliance with signage requirements, (11) provision of landscape plan, (12)performance of drainage basin study, (13)performance of traffic study, (14) provision of an erosion control plan, and(15)provision of a best management practices plan. - !V. VARIANCES RELIEF IS APPROPRIATE A. Variances Sought Having received the foregoing approvals,AWS and Sprint applied for variances from the following height and color requirements for the following reasons: $ The proposed installation of a 100'free standing pole plus the required FAA light and the lightning rod at the top of the pole exceeds both the to General" height limitll and the "Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limit-V of Section 893.c of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from these provisions. There are no principal buildings within 300'of the proposed pole;the proposed pole will be situated on the side of the Stevens Estate hill, not on the top of the hill;the height(AMSL)of the tallest trees in the vicinity of the pole exceed the height(AMSL)of the pole; and the average tall tree canopy height in the vicinity of the pole is 81.0'feet. The top of the pole itself is at i 00'AGL;the top of the required FAA warning light is at )02'AGL,and the top of the lightning rod is at 104'AGL. Therefore,since one can exceed the tree canopy by 2/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"general-height limit: Haight,General Regardless of the type of mount.wireless service facilities shall be no higher thorn ten feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet ofthe proposed facility.in addmon,the height of a wireless service facility shall not exceed by more than 10 feet the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chiatoey,or similar structure.Wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally noir-conforming with respect to heigiii,provided that the facilities do not project above the existing building height. 3/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities"height littnit: Height,Groucd-Mouated Facilities. Ground-taounted wireless service facilities shall not pmjea higher than ten feet above the avtrage building height or,ifthere arc no buildings within 300 feet,those facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured from grrwnd Icvcl(ACL).irthere arc no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site orthe facility.all}found-roountcd wireless service fecilities shall be stuminticd by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions.These trees may be existing an the subject property or planted on site. 7 10'as of right,a height variance of 9' is necessary for the pole; an additional 2' for the FAA light;and an additional T for the lightning rod, for a total height variance of 13' to the top of the lightning rod. Given the proximity of the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport,the FAA has determined that the pole must be marked and lit to avoid becoming a hazard to air navigation. As a result, AWS and Sprint propose to paint the pole in accordance with the requirements of the FAA, which differ from the color requirement of Section 8.9.4.a.iiii.211 of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. AWS and Sprint have requested variance relief from this provision. 2. The Board finds that there are the special conditions relating to the soil condition, shape or topography of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located. The special conditions related to the Stevens Estate property, that do not generally affect the zoning district, are that(l) it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property, (2) it is topographically higher than much of the surrounding area but on the side- not the top of the hill,(3) it has an extensive tall tree canopy,(4) it contains a variety of significant historic structures,and(S) it is on the flight path to the Greater Lawrence Municipal Airport. These special conditions are pertinent to the height and color variances that are sought here. Section 8.4.4.a iii.2 provides the following"color~requirel=t: To the extent that any wireless service facilitiest extend above the height of the vegetation immediately surrmmding it,they must be painted in a light gray or light blue huc which blench with sky and clouds. 8 3. The Board finds that the variances requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. i i i The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The installation is in a location specifically approved by Town Meeting, the North Andover Board of Selectmen, the North Andover Wireless Subcommittee, the North Andover Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority,and the Federal Aviation Administration. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 of North Andover's Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw, as the Special Permit Granting Authority for wireless communication facilities,the Planning Board has expressly found that(a)the 153 acre site is an appropriate location for the project because it is topographically higher than the surrounding area,and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation, (b)the site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use,(c)the use will not adversely affect the neighborhood,and will not result in any nuisance or hazard,(d)the facility is necessary for each carrier to provide adequate service to the public,and(e)the project"is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3,8.9 and 10.3." The Board concurs with these findings and further finds that the design and location of the facilities (1) buffer the wireless communication devices to the surrounding neighborhood by the significant size of the Stevens Estate property,(2)screen the facilities from view as much as possible by the tall, dense,natural ince canotrv. (3)utilize an existing utility corridor on the property for access to propos i ides,thereby minimizi�_rra�uired tree cunine (4)present an environmentally secure facility, and (5}afford significant revenue to the Town. 4. The Board finds that there is substantial hardship, financial or otherwise,to the Applicants and the Town, which would result from a literal enforcement ofthe provisions of the Zoning Bylaw. The applicants and the Town as property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to precludethe proposed use on the subject property AWS and Sprint both require a location for their communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The Planning Board has specifically found that the "carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public....". The applicants have been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for an extensive period of time. AWS has been denied a facility at the Barker Farm,and litigation is pending. The Town has directed AWS and Sprint to the Stevens Estate property as a viable location for their needed facilities. The Town's recent adoption of the 600' setback amendment to the Wireless Bylaw Leaves the Stevens Estate property as one of the only potentially viable sites in this area of North Andover. 9 Further, a literal enforcement of the height requirements would effectively eliminate collocation by the carriers on a single pole. Given the tree canopy and the elevation of the hill which slopes upward of the facility,the carriers RF engineers have presented evidence that neither carrier can accept an antenna height less than 90' on the pole. If the height variance is denied, the purposes of the Bylaw to promote collocation and minimize the number of new towers in Town will not be advanced. The carriers would be forced to seek separate permits to construct separate 90'poles which would increase the amount of land area cleared of trees at the site and which would result in two striped and lit poles on the Stevens Estate hill. As the SPGR for wireless communication facilities, the Planning Board has, in its special permit decision, specifically sought to avoid this result. The only way to do so is to allow the requested height variance. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act, this Board considers it appropriate to apply the height limits of the Bylaw in a way that avoids both effective prohibition of service and unlawful discrimination between carriers. The Board recognizes that Town Meeting,the Planning Board,the Selectmen, and'the Wireless Subcommittee have determined that the proposed site is the most appropriate site to some this area of North Andover. The remoteness of the facilities from surrounding residential uses funthers the purpose of Town Meeting in adopting the 600'setback requirement in the Bylaw. As for the color of the pole,the Board is aware that the First Circuit has recently held in Southwstern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., d/b/a Cellular One, Y. Todd,244 F.3d 51, 62(1 st Ci x.2001), that it is impermissible for the Board to regulate the facility based on matters reserved to or controlled by the FAA(emphasis added): Finally, we note that the Board also based its...visual impact conclusion upon the fact that the tower would be painted in alternating red and white sections and would have a night beacon.The tower would only have these features becauso the FAA requires them. Though the Leicester Wireless Bylaw prohibits bright coloration and night lighting, it allows deviations from that prohibition when required by the FAA,.,To the extent that the Board's objection was based upon the failure to pAint the tower a neutral color,the Bo —dd improperly relied upon this evidence to justify its decision.Because we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the denial without the inclusion of this factor, it does not affect the outcome of this case. Federal law has effectively preempted the color of the pole,and accordingly a variance is appropriate to conform the Bylaw's color requirements to the mandate of federal law. 10 AUTWireless 10 Tara Boulevard Suite 500 Nashua,NH 03062 July 24,2001 Planning Board Office of Community Development 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 RE: Stevens Estate Wireless Facility Zoning Application Dear Members of the Board: This report discusses AT&T Wireless Services' need for a wireless communications facility at the above Site. 1. QUALIFICATIONS I am a Radio Frequency Engineer for AT&T Wireless Services. I have experience in the design and testing of AT&T Wireless Services' wireless communication facilities as part of its federally licensed network in Massachusetts. For example,I have participated in the design of the AT&T Wireless Services' network in the Greater Boston Area,evaluated zoning provisions applicable to wireless communication facilities in various communities, testified before local zoning boards in zoning hearings,prepared search areas for new installations,participated in drive tests and reviewed drive test results,participated in site visits,prepared RF designs for proposed installations,reviewed plans and prepared RF packages for zoning hearings,tested and evaluated new sites, I have been involved in AT&T Wireless Services' design of the proposed wireless communication facility at the Steven's Estate property. I have reviewed the coverage data for the proposed installation, and reviewed RF coverage information for AT&T Wireless Services' existing sites. a� Recycled Paper 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY Consistent with the results of the RFP process AWS (and its co-applicant Sprint) are proposing two alternative development options for their wireless communication facilities at the Stevens Estate site: (a) one 100'two-carrier monopole, with internal antennas, to accommodate both carriers, or(b) two separate 90'monopoles, each with internal antennas, to accommodate one carrier each. The carriers intend to pursue both options through permitting in light of the potential height limitations of the Federal Aviation Administration("FAA"), the Massachusetts Historical Commission ("MHC"), and the Zoning Bylaw. These permitting processes will ultimately dictate which choice of options is the chosen option. The internal antennas and cables will be"camouflaged"inside the poles within the meaning of§§ 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.6, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed pole(s)will be located in a densely wooded area northwest of the main Stevens Estate building and adjacent to an existing electric and telephone utility corridor serving the Estate. The proposed 100'pole will be capable of accommodating both carriers; in the alternative, the proposed 90'poles will be capable of accommodating one carrier each. In either case, AWS would occupy the 90' slot on the pole. (The diameter of the two-carrier pole will be larger compared to the one-carrier poles.) The combined two-carrier facility will involve a 40'x 30' fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. This area will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence. Within the fenced compound will be a two-carrier, L-shaped equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Each carrier will have a separate 12'x 20' equipment area within the shelter. The separate one-carrier facilities will each involve a 30'x 30' fenced equipment compound at the base of the pole. Each area will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence. Within each fenced area will be a 12'x 20' one-carrier equipment shelter with clapboard siding and a pitched roof. Coaxial cables will be run inside the pole(s)and across an ice bridge/cable tray to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment,shelter. Each facility will be served by associated power/telephone connections. The ground equipment will be connected to standard electric and T-1 telephone service. The public utilities providing these services will likely require an easement from the nearest public way(Osgood Street) to install the necessary utilities. That easement would presumably follow the existing electric and telephone utilities corridor at the Stevens Estate property. Vehicular access to the proposed facility along the existing driveway,parking lot and utility corridor at the property must also be provided by the Town. 3. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES' NETWORK AT&T Wireless Services is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to provide wireless phone service in areas across the country, including the Boston Metropolitan Trading Area("MTA"). The Town of North Andover is located within the Boston MTA and therefore AT&T Wireless Services is licensed to provide wireless phone service within the Town of North Andover and surrounding communities. Wireless phone coverage is provided by placement of a number of low-power antenna sites within a given area. The sites are spaced so that the coverage from each location overlaps with its neighboring sites. When a call is placed on a certain site, the phone monitors the signal from the serving site, as well as the signal of all of the adjacent sites. When the phone receives a stronger signal from an adjacent site,it requests a transfer from the site it is currently using to the stronger site. If there is seamless coverage provided by the carrier,the call will transfer without interruption. If there is a lack of appropriate signal strength at the transfer point, the call will degrade and possibly drop. 4. THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITY To demonstrate why the proposed use is necessary, I have attached two coverage maps of the Town of North Andover and the surrounding area within one mile of North Andover's boundaries (one map without the proposed facility and the other map with the proposed facility) showing the location(s) of AT&T Wireless Services' existing and currently Wireless Communications Facilities in and near North Andover shown in green.' Site 445 shown in green on this coverage chart represents the"best case"coverage anticipated from the proposed facility assuming AT&T Wireless Services is awarded the RFP for the site. These coverage maps were generated using an RF Propagation computer-modeling program. The software takes into account the geographical features of an area, antenna models, antenna heights, and RF transmit power. The maps represent existing and proposed antenna locations, and the areas that currently have quality wireless phone service based on these locations. Any phone that travels outside of the effective coverage area will have a high likelihood of a degraded and possibly dropped call. These maps show that there is currently a substantial coverage gap in the Stevens Estate 1 AT&T Wireless Services'proposed facilities are necessarily in a state of flux as zoning bylaws change,new sites are identified,RFPs are issued,leases or licenses expire,litigation is resolved,capacity needs increase,additional services are added to the system,and the like. The attached coverage charts must be read in this dynamic context. In addition,depending on the outcome of the RFP award by North Andover,the maximum height allowed by zoning for that site,and AT&T Wireless Services'relative position on that facility,AT&T Wireless Services'needs for sites in North Andover itself may change. area along Routes 125 and 133 and the areas adjacent to these roads. These are high-demand areas in which AT&T Wireless Services currently lacks adequate communications service. The proposed installation is necessary to address this substantial coverage gap. Given the high traffic/demand along these Routes, installation of a facility at the Stevens Estate property is a non-intrusive means for closing this significant gap in AT&T Wireless Services' coverage. In this context,AWS' investigations of the area in the vicinity of the site confirm that "there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate"under § 8.9.3.b.9 of the Zoning Bylaw. In addition,AWS' proposal for a flagpole-style facility at the Barker Farm has been denied by the Board of Appeals and is currently in litigation. 5. THE USE WILL NOT CAUSE A DETRIMENT The use will not result in a substantial detriment to the neighborhood for a variety of reasons: The Site has been specifically approved by the Special Town Meeting on December 11, 2001, for wireless communications purposes, and is reasonably adaptable to the proposed collocated wireless communication use. The proposed use is passive, requires no employees on the premises, and will generate only about one vehicle trip per month,will be served by standard electrical service, and requires no water, sewer or other town services. The facility will comply in all respects with RF emission standards established by the Federal Communication Commission and administered the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The facility will generate no objectionable noise,vibration, smoke, dust, odors,heat, glare or other effects. The only noise associated with the facility will be in connection with the air conditioning for the equipment shelter,which will not be observable in amounts objectionable or detrimental to the normal use of property or the adjacent properties. 6. CONCLUSION I hope that this information will assist the Town in its decision-making process. I am available to meet with you to discuss the information included in this report as well as providing any additional information that you may require. Sincerely, 4oseph Colarusso RF Engineer Planet DMS V2.2 Metapath Software International Ltd. gi + Y f � Tue Jul 24 10: 40: 53 2001 Centre Long: 71 05'01.8"W Lat: 42 41'5 kv. v TU Scale: 1: 75000 — Connecting Road s — Primary Road Signal (Block) dBm (� qy �CJS lid �h t 4 15 r� A r� ��, iii • ,,�� ,. tx r � i F. 4' M; 4 Planet DMS V2.2 sj, sh Metapath Software International Ltd. s Tue Jul 24 10: 36: 52 2001 Centre Long: 71 05'01.8"W Lat: 42 41''. Scale: 1: 75000 f — Connecting Road — Primary Road t Si nal (Block) dBm 9 a• ! M. e _ Y.Yw aavi ,h r [E:-J t a SS F t T1 x AFFIDAVIT of RADIO FREQUENCY EXPERT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, hereby states the following in support of the application by Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint Spectrum")to construct a 100' telecommunications flagpole and locate associated equipment cabinets (the"Project") on the property located at 723 Osgood Street (Assessors Map 35, Parcel 23), North Andover, Massachusetts, more commonly known as the"Stevens Estate" (the "Site"): 1. I am a Radio Frequency Engineer for Sprint Spectrum L.P. responsible for radio frequency design in Massachusetts. 2. The list of my qualifications attached to this affidavit is true, accurate, and complete in all material respects. 3. I have thoroughly reviewed the application for the proposed Project, as well as all radio frequency engineering studies, reports, and computer models prepared by Sprint Spectrum with respect to the Site. 4. Sprint Spectrum is a communications venture committed to providing a single integrated offering of wireless personal communications services by building a national wireless network using PCS technology. PCS technology is a new generation of wireless service that uses digital transmission to improve the services available. It provides a clearer connection and fewer dropped calls for its users, and better accommodates the requirements of computer and telecopier transmission. 5. In 1995, Sprint Spectrum was the highest bidder at the auction held by the Federal Communications Commission("FCC") for PCS wireless broadcast licenses in the Massachusetts and Rhode Island areas. This license, granted to Sprint Spectrum on June 23, 1995, encompasses the area defined by the FCC as the Boston Major Trading Area("MTA"). 6. In order to meet its obligations under the FCC license, Sprint Spectrum must, within the time established under the license, have in place a system of"cell sites" to serve portable wireless communication handsets and mobile telephones. These cell sites consist of an antenna mounted on a pole, building or other structure, connected to a small equipment cabinet located near the antenna. The antenna feeds the low power radio signal received from mobile communications devices through electronic devices located in the equipment cabinets and, ultimately, into an ordinary phone line from which the call can be routed anywhere in the world. 7. Cell sites are integral to Sprint Spectrum's PCS network. To maintain effective, uninterrupted service to a PCS telephone user traveling in a given area, there must be a continuous interconnected series of cells, which overlap in a grid pattern approximating a honeycomb. Additionally, each cell site must be located within a limited area so that it can properly interact with the surrounding cell sites and thereby provide reliable coverage throughout the cell. 8. In conformity with its FCC license, Sprint Spectrum is actively building its PCS network. As Sprint Spectrum began providing service to eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island in November of 1997, it continues to acquire interests in sites for additional facilities and is applying for, and obtaining local governmental approvals to construct the transmissions sites in order to eliminate gaps in service coverage. Any delays at this point in time severely curtail Sprint Spectrum's ability to satisfy both the federally mandated time requirements, and to achieve a market position that will allow it to compete for customers. 9. The Town of North Andover is critical to the overall engineering and technical plan of Sprint Spectrum's PCS network. This site will connect the adjacent sites in Andover, Methuen, and Lawrence, and will provide coverage to the residents of North Andover as well as the surrounding towns of Georgetown and/or Boxford, as well as those commuters who travel through North Andover. 10. To connect the remaining service in the area, Sprint Spectrum has designated the Site as the most appropriate location on which to construct a cell site. This conclusion was arrived at after Sprint Spectrum hired a site acquisition firm to review potential locations and/or development options in and around the Town of North Andover. 11. Based on the tests and surveys performed by the site acquisition firm, Sprint Spectrum determined that its network required a 100' tower to be placed on the Site in order to clear all obstacles, including the surrounding topography, structures and foliage, which can interfere with the transmission. 12. In my professional opinion, without a wireless transmission facility located at or near the Site, there will be a substantial gap in Sprint Spectrum's wireless personal communications services("PCS") coverage. This gap would adversely impact the service Sprint Spectrum is able to provide to the citizens of North Andover and the commuters traveling on the main roads through and around the Town, including State Routes 133 and 125 13. It is my understanding and belief that there are no feasible preexisting structures upon which Sprint Spectrum could install its antennas and related equipment and still be able to provide sufficient coverage to fill the gap in PCS coverage. 14. The result of such a gap will be an abrupt and complete loss of signal at the time that an individual enters the gap area. Unlike other wireless technologies, in which diminished coverage may result merely in a weaker, or less clear, transmission, PCS technology simply cuts off when encountering such a gap. The transmission is not restored when the gap is over. Rather, the individual must reinitiate the communication. 15. The radio frequency exposure levels to be generated by the proposed facility are substantially below the applicable health and safety standards established by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health("DPH"). 16. Based upon the best radio frequency technology, which is available to Sprint Spectrum at this time, it is my professional opinion that the proposed Project is at the optimum height, which is needed to ensure adequate PCS service to area residents and businesses in accordance with system specifications. Executed this /0 day of June 2001. Nooshin Zareian, RF Engineer COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS County of MN MN_E SES Subscribed and sworn to before me b ,,*Jthis /Sx� da of 1b ayNE Y Net s,�t,� Y 2001. (9a,.,j ,,$,,►Notary Public My commission expires: APs,I z - Candidate: Nooshin Zareian Skill Level: Senior RF Engineer Experience Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of a CDMA system for Boston. Engineer Responsibilities included: (currently since • Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. 12/98) • Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations. • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Attended zoning hearing. • Filed Department of Public Health applications. Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of a TDMA system for Memphis. Engineer Responsibilities included: (14 months) • Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. • Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Implementation of drive test procedures and equipment selection. • Led a team of engineers to design the TDMA system • Interference, intermodulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. • Filed FAA and FCC applications on new sites to ensure compliance with regulations. Senior RF Responsible for the RF design of Qualcomm's CDMA network in Nashville Engineer Tennessee. Contributions included: (2 months) • Primary design and propagation analysis. Site survey and candidate selection. RF Responsible for the RF design of a CDMA system for New York's Engineer Manhattan Island. Responsibilities included: (6 months) • Primary design,propagation analysis and candidate selection. • Drive test analysis and site surveys. • Final site approval,antenna design and construction recommendations • Evaluation of design for system capacity requirements. • Implementation of drive test procedures and equipment selection. • Performed link budget analysis. • Interference, intermodulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. page 1 of 2 t Nooshin Zareian, Senior RF Engineer(cont'd) RF Responsible for all aspects of design and performance of Nextel's ESMR Engineer network in Los Angeles. This effort included: (1 years) • Propagation analysis,site evaluation and recommendation,zoning and permitting. • Power budget analysis, antenna and feedline specification and system testing. • Filed FAA applications on new sites to ensure compliance with regulations. • Collection of RF drive test data and coverage, interference,handovers and overall system performance analysis. Generated optimization reports and plots. Provided solutions(design strategies, system parameter changes,etc.)to system problems. • Coordination with Operations and Customer care divisions to resolve system problems and customer complaints. • Interference, inter-modulation and isolation studies on new and existing sites. • Determination of drive test routes and supervision of drive tests for candidate sites. Associate Responsible for all aspect of design and performance of Nextel's ESMR Engineer network in Pittsburgh,PA including: (6 months) Frequency plan, frequency allocation and acquisition of frequencies from the analog market. • Updated and maintained ANET. • Performed frequency evaluation. • Coordinated system design issues. • Performed capacity studies for future expansion. • Led a team of engineers to trouble shoot hand over and call dragging. • Performed high to low site migration. Technology CDMA, GSM, iDEN,AMPS,PCS Hardware Nortel, Motorola,Lucent,Qualcomm Software Cel1CAD,ANET, PlaNET,CMA,RSAT,Mapinfo, QED, MS Windows 95/3.1,Word, Excel, UNIX, MS DOS,dBase, Fortran,Basic,Assembler Education M.S. in Electrical Engineering, City University of New York B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Science and Industrial University revised 10/26/99 page 2 of 2 Y TLC F S L n Frr a Iona ins .: _ - � HILL rat j.� T Ri ism �4"tl b r 1 a Al Y '� • � r �' ��"+ � t L rr��}..:�f away a / a�/�%{ S fiC ,•. '��htes °L s &+ ` (! JF , h g cta `c �4"d �rs�YI1 ( ; t overage , .r .; . ar s E=rate Site �"�� �- ,�; -�•ai �� �'n'����x�v #���Ms:. 1 a,� .�.3�` z3�4.p� 'ka �,�t /'. ' r&sem 4§, � r' ac \ c �xYIY f tiro :ilei-.C3� /J \t / y� \ f � t fit,• tisz Y? - , C BSMG 6 1", $-""�: SF• .A d \ � i t t u 1 } . 5 � � T NI{ Y ija'S.na '4 1 mc �1 s - r SAN j x l u VIEW SHED ANALYSIS AT&T Wireless Services-Stevens Estate Proposed Monopole Site Number: E 445.7 723 Osgood Street N. Andover, MA 01845 December 4, 2000 Prepared for. AT&T Wireless Services 400 Blue Hill Drive Suite 100 Westwood, MA 02090-2160 Prepared by: Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 28 Lord Road Marlborough, MA 01752 Office (508) 481-7200 Fax (508) 480-0645 Job No. 2000209_24 Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. AT&T Wireless Services is proposing an 89' one, two or three carrier Monopole at Stevens Estate, Osgood Street, North Andover, MA. On November 30, 2000 a crane was set at 84' in the approximate location of the proposed AT&T Monopole. The ground elevation was approximately 5' higher than the proposed location. A crane height of 84' was used at the higher elevation to simulate a pole height of 89'. The 84' elevation was set with a cloth tape. Pictures were taken by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Pictures were selected at various locations at a 1 mile radius from the site. Additional pictures were taken at major intersections, high ground locations and the 1 mile perimeter. The pictures are numbered and are referenced by their locations on the key map included at the back of this presentation. From the 43 locations shown here, the crane was visible from only 9 locations: • • Stevens Estate, First Floor (Picture #1 • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture #9) • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture #13) • Stevens Estate grounds (Picture #15) • Pumping Station, Great Neck Rd. (Picture #30) • China Blossom Restaurant, Osgood St .(Picture #31) • 58 Colgate Dr. (Picture #37) • 47 Moody St. (Picture #38) • Lawrence Municipal Airport entrance Rd (Picture #39) Photo renderings of these 9 locations were prepared showing simulations of the proposed AT&T Monopole and are included in this analysis. i Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. ,;�,r ,��;�� tr IP e -i t �� r �s �'i �'���,+�q a��'� ��, �a a�> ! A e.7 '• a R-� mr.• . 1 � t�Y s',� d°` �i° .•fir 4 lI, tr ` �aP � ��+g � ,1Pf! 1,4• 4 �n+7nC y-h Q`1y 0 �. R y�g a. Ka y .ate Ate.,. 1a>. itt�ti 14.,,e�r ^•+ "b•�4` y . . pr ^^11RRq r� Or ,+ Vie' ��a,,•.AEfitrf sP1 �Zr�, "���e. ��^y Y , '4• r• �1'1tNr��' ,�5t q������Q a �+1 g� �- 1�d�jcy ✓ ''1 f .PFw•t«• • • of • • • 4. �. x g r �• .�-� '' V � ��,��'� lar'."��tfi{ .� tri• L ' " , %'�`r- ",d••9Iv L IS v k4t7� ..• MAS Oral 46 0+r ' `;} y� I ` :i� ~ g 41 iiak r^ a". i •t 1• A't �- ''•'•1�1�1i1 • •-• !1'� - , t m- � 9 i �� r 1 � ��J,i r Ir f r r'. 4 .�-.nc r' •1^t 1� r ra <1 ". T t S sra p s g • fj • • • • • • '9p.�+'•,. �.� *i 41.'4. 1�*��+�. �.�1� � ? �,�- `'� '� Vii. � �� •,� . y .n 4F _ , EMEROMM,"0199 �J Vofin r , ...g`��` � ►.. `•' s .1. v �;�$,��� f•����,�tf-.3 *ice'.• � 33 �, •A _ ► ; • "r +..ti ,�i+• r y i d a14 ' t.,'L �+/� ':� ��,, ~ , 4r.. .�' �T •• i� +gyp " fit '} t E yyM�r�. � f 1#S�d �-' y I '• S � ^ � :7 ASM` � d�y t4 i � ,Ya '::A �c � ..A •�SnA � ., � 1 _- .: a r G„ az Tyr a1j ha. iii x... , fi �e 'a w!• x v AS "3 t itll � '• t T � iaw 1����• � ill+l7 �is iii 1 �� `A ���.a ! "{•f j Y}'+1 Yyv .�' 1 ] g kyr: .�� ;,•, �,'r �3- k — `; r ..K t. _.',- ��� � � �'i.:'is t •V„!'� " L • YP*i J , Y Itr t T` -.t•t '�• +tet � ���� 1��xy I,s log • � : i � � � I I 11 IT"M , dr a lf� ( �.. I.(�%I't A ,�„d �!",ld�•��19•,'� t ��y'•F,'''gy� '�'", ��'�)ins" '' ,� --�•� � • •-• :tr�.y .r1 X"N.+e�'.�liu fix�Re�.a" .v�sas.,A„� .'..Y-Lb.:_• �� � } e. �'Y r;,E.N,a'4.3' ! � vie' l a � e -+7""�srx r ric� i s•'w; s..K 4"x 7 �r,#+�a"`_^�&:�'� rsLx''I W, PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE �, �'} Ze'..n4�HJT �.�., � � ��•/wr.. �.•: ' 'tea' � ." w'XtNts3f�"� � a6tn- i s. Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA E 445.7 Northwest Elevation View from China Blossom Restaurant, Osgood Street looking Southeast Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. o .r. PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE r . tirb y i.Y $ G c r ` z� rc - .... -,.mss..:fir,t ,�.� - . +'• '.'. . Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate N. Andover, Ma. E 445.7 West Elevation View from 58 Colgate Drive looking East Greenman Pedersen, inc. L is TV w ' y PROPOSED AT&T MONOPOLE +....�- Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA E 445.7 West Elevation View from 47 Moody Street looking East Greenman ! Pedersen, Inc. • tis f PROPOSED AT&T (MONOPOLE N 311 s i r r. Yt .. "1FR SYY"I22mi hSLt.�.yry .i y --_.-..- ...._.. a 'M I Proposed AT&T Monopole Stevens Estate North Andover, MA E 445.7 Northwest Elevation View from Entrance Road to Lawrence Municipal Airport, Sutton Street looking Southeast Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. 1. View from 1 st. floor, Stevens Estate looking North 2. View from 2nd. floor, Stevens Estate looking North 41 ps . M1 . i i 3. View from 3rd. floor, Stevens Estate looking North ,.` :. 4. Front Entrance Stevens Estate looking North 14` ryy►. ,v S rti ♦4� d A ..+Y+ '.� i sf + I ue , z K'aF t " y s. r . r n, , • -." 4 zap: ' ""Y-w - ..LL �l� Jam' >'�. .A n, yT ♦a. t f .. V F » p., 9. Stevens Estate grounds looking North 10. Stevens Estate grounds looking Northeast- --'.. NO '�'es,`'.t r("1• -+qtr ��-;` �,, ``""; N-�� '"°' ~ta.,k•. *...NCft i.' * ,%, i "wa Yr-w:, e) 7 + sus."it r� � t4sT � r`jye� r � 7r/•,. �RifM s _ •h 1 if� n'�, �,; ,�3. � �SN 'Sf, �' 'J « •w „ N !d Ys@ 4 r�1 a r �w /Y�► ifr :F { li.F{e 1 " ,;�"' ?±.e ipy�-,.•'f''try r ,j.:,,. .r+- r ,'ca„,.'r .,N ., Vii ' .L tif a � f``yr.*�°�:i.q�"b�?""yp i .`.°�'r, .+r*S t �.S''�b' ••`$ .7+�., � i,'v r:�s �. 3 y �..� ,� * ,, � r��� 4^'`aN.Rd ... _[d .:xaA'w" �.r" µ ,f` ��, � ��� » ri �,l r y�• t� � j'P'Y'i ,�tl � �! ra;FI t ✓^_ �<�LD �.w. .:e4r..1":D - '^�`.,�,..Y�� �sl.� 's � v. r $�:1"�. pp lit .:; s'' t✓,� 4'F"I rte'ti ' i t t �•',Zj tte"7r �I »8 12. View from driveway leading to 3&�� • • _ 2t' f Stevens Estate looking Northeast •..r.+�.c�`.�'"a`f°''. 'd t : '. .-.r",. *�''xx�r�.z� s �" ,J .�•i`,} "t� Ft��= •+'z. [. j�r,- ,s 1l,z;�:� •, a _ ' 4Y i i s =sr fia f a 4 • t ' J / / ' 3 Y ? r:' a" �. r �,`y:�$� L �x�.t,-- ! "'--�•.-.: �„ 'r7 4x3 F � '7•-rt-'xx t �;/�` Y"-Z' z'S'.,.. "F - ,... ?p .'� `q,, Y r ..,-.s a _ ".-. � ...._ �." .:i s .�', `—�,. t; fry - �•• - r • r, _ 7 13. View from driveway leading to 14. View from driveway leading to Stevens Estate looking North Stevens Estate looking North -j •.err r ��,c.. `" h. � � - _y, i I r i'�, �E,�: �.u/ �,��� f I�, „�,'- Imo•" s ep k +� L9 '` "' .:�'' ?�f xh., .!� � �v,. ,•iii')- r� s a n _ I ' r 15. Stevens Estate grounds looking West 16. Driveway leading to Stevens Estate looking East _ �s- ^1. i . r . F �a a Y, K u, e. �.j r� 17. Entrance to driveway leading to Stevens Estate looking East 18. Osgood St. at Stevens St. looking North f ( 1 • t ` r � rtr� X pftt f 3 ,J r r' �1 19 Pleasant St at Stevens St looking North �` 20. Town Beach on Pleasant St. looking North .t �' �� � ,�• 1 gyp.., � �� • ^r.; tt t k h:1 IPPA :; W NOT [VIER n � - . - �{1) ' _ „__-� � -x.� _ .is _. .` .... ,� .-;. �+..,.:,•.,......,.'- � � rom VN •0� ••' • =-z + f(p tt�= Te xx 'l r ��jn :i: p..: �. r � sy i •;,.`�}!-!/-S"a --- � 'H � # .i .1 xr+ �i � .�(� _ � ,_ .�.. sem- ��yy, �•l� �+i'..i°3tr '. .� ,}. -.. S Rti ';1� � '�• �� �: r11 i r t , so ° r+ 'n �'.��0sf,��-'�r!'l'���1°��r,���, ti+""s++":,t'�r ,,,.,r}•�".ar• t .�Y�F `"'�,�� j f� � �, * '�� - `; ,.,�..'. �, +� ¢ ;r4^ ,,.-, F f,.,. - ♦rii r'" liN} r'A°+N-, x .w r .,m��O:.� i-i'i^'t,-r �.,,,•.-u�" �: r,y�q,ri.7 t*'r�"� s«'.� s • i .• • • �• • �• •• • TUMN •. Great P• • R• at Essex St. looking West .. � t t•u� c�. i.. t '�� art s�t z=.. � •i°i�• ,`C�'f� :i�} r ,1` A tai' n 2 r r o F § s 12 r 28. .!" - � *F err• }16, F.t'yk • •• • • t1 ; H • Campion •• Hardtcourt Estates looking Southwest ..a ,. s... ..,.. t, 29. Bridge, Great Neck Rd. looking Southwest ' 30. Pumping Station Great Neck Rd. looking Southwest t r s 31. China Blossom Restaurant 32. China Blossom Restaurant looking ' Osgood St. looking Southeast Southeast Y dr c i ,1 Y . 1 r r 33. Butcher • South i, 35. 75 Old Farm Rd. looking South .a41'C cr1f= v S �ik 36. 23 Colgate Dr. looking East a 37. 58 Colgate Dr. looking East 1. jJ A'Y 38. 47 Moody St. at Furber St. looking East ¢zn. 39. Entrance to Lawrence Municipal Airport looking Southeast • df 40. N. Andover Middle School, RT. 41. Heritage at N. Andover, RT. 125/133 looking 125/133 at Main St. looking North Northeast 1 42. N. Andover High School, Osgood St. looking 43. Edgewood Condominiums, Osgood St. looking North North i • 34 k e h 35 4 33 30 - r y3. a*" t 32-33 ; 28 36-37 16 r l t i 3841 r 17 I d "COC IC 62 65.18 24 40 'eth - ov e r 19 20 ... 21 22 23 FC Map indicates the Proposed AT&T Monopole site in the center, with a 1 mile radius shown from north. The numbers represent the locations where the pictures where taken and the corresponding picture number in this analysis. Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. .A lactro le 192 Worcester Street. Wellesley, MA 2481 Ie4. 781-239-0000 Far.- 781-431-871 Dare: Octabv 1, 1001 To: Mr.Andrey ,Tsi"naysky Bay State Design Associates;I ze. 70 77ower Office Park Wobwyt, MA 0]801 Fru: 781-932-9771 From: Bob Alar-h Sub: Norse re ort or S "a Mw BSS4 C860A-Stevens stare. Dean'Mr. Tsikanovsky, Here are the results of my not impact study for the Spint 13S54XiC960A Stevens Estate site to be located in NorthAnudo , Massachusetts. I acquired good field data at approximately 10:30PM on September 28, 2 I at the proposed site. The lowest ambient noise levels were measured at 50 dB& SigaiMsc noise events occurring during the measurement period were from passing vchkbes at 59 dBA as occasional airplanes at 63 dBA. Tho most significant noises xurce froza the Sprint I ATT equipment will be from au air conditioning system, mast lizely two Marvair 3.5 tau mounted to true oxterior walls of the_. equipment shelters. These unil i art similar,but smaller in size than most residential central air conditioner units. The noise ge larated by these unit is broadband in nature with no disting isbin tonality_ Using the noise data available the manu_fhensrer and calculating irr distance loss,rhe noise level from these units when r.mzbined at the seourity barrier (proposed wood fence), will be approximately 60 dbA or abo 10 dBA above the level t flowed by the DEP Section 8.9(4)(e). A, waiver from this requirement i, indicated as the noise levels drop to appax, . rely 34 dEA,at the nearest building,(approxiIItate 330 feet away), or 16 dBA below the lowest measured ambient • noise conditions. At the n property line. the levels will be eve, lower. Under these Conditions,the additional noiz4 cre cried will notbe audible andwillbe below the limdEs as defmcd in the DEP Section 8.9(4)(e). Tease feel free to call if you b ive any questions,or ifI can be of further assastw ce. Sincerely, Sob Alach 4 Town of North Andover , NoRTN Office of the Planning Department Community Development and Services Division K Ki + " 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 ?ss�c►+usEt� Telephone(978)688-9535 Fax(978)688-9542 Notice Of Decision o o CD -< Any appeal shall be filed o r m70.c grVj Within (20) days after the _ D-a-co,-; Date of filing this Notice o In the Office of the Town CDM�"� rq Clerk N 4 G Date: November 14, 2001 Date of Hearing: September 18, 2001, October 2, 2001 &November 13, 2001 Petition of: AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS Premises Affected: Stevens Estate 723 Osgood Street Referring to the above petition for a Special Permit with Site Plan ApprovaL The application was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Sections 8.9, 8.9, 10.3 and 10.3.1 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw and M.G.L. c.40A, sec. 9. So as to allow: to construct, operate and co-locate on a 100' tall two-carrier wireless telecommunications service facility in the Residential l Zoning District After a public hearing given on the above date,the Planning Board voted to APPROVE, the Special Permit with Site Plan Approval, based upon the following conditions: Signed: AA Jo Si ns,Chairman Cc: Applicant AlVerto Angles,Vice Chairman Engineer Richard Nardella, Clerk Abutters Richard Rowen DPW Felipe Schwarz, Associate Member Building Department Conservation Department Health Department ZBA BD NOV 16 2001 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688- I , TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD DECISION WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES - Carriers: (1) AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Manager AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless, and; (2) Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS. Property Owner: Town of North Andover Site: Stevens Estate,723 Osgood Street,North Andover Map/L-ot: Map 35,Lot 23 Relief Granted: Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals for Wireless Service Facilities (ZBL §§ 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3) and Waivers from certain Zoning Bylaw requirements,as set forth herein The Planning Board herein grants Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals to construct, operate and co-locate on a 100'tall two-carrier wireless telecommunications service facility' in the Residential 1 Zoning District to AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its agent AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AT&T Wireless") and to Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint PCS ("Sprint"). This application and additional documentation as cited herein was filed with the Planning Board on August 8, 2001, with subsequent submissions on file. The Planning Board makes the following findings as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Section 8.9: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The specific site is an appropriate location for the project as the site is extremely large (153 acres), topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains extensive forested land within which the proposed flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation. The site was approved by Town Meeting and by the Town's Invitation for Bids for the proposed use. The 100'height represents the height of the proposed monopole,exclusive of any necessary lightning rod and exclusive of any light that may be required by the Federal Aviation Administration. The carriers had,in the alternative,applied for two separate 90'installations at the site; however,at the public hearing and in its deliberations,the Planning Board has expressed a distinct preference for a single 100'monopole as compared to two separate 90'monopoles at the site. Accordingly, this Decision approves the 100'alternative at this time,without prejudice to the carriers right to reapply for two separate 90'monopoles in the event that a height variance is denied for the 100'monopole. 1 2. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood as indicated by the submittals and reports referenced at the end of this decision in Condition#11. 3. The use will not result in any nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. 4. The carriers have demonstrated that the facility is necessary for each to provide adequate service to the public as indicated by the submittals and reports referenced at the end of this decision in Condition#11. 5. The plans meet the requirements of the Wireless Service Facilities By-law Section 8.9, with the exception of the waivers granted hereby and listed in Condition#10. 6. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The proposed 100' flagpole-style monopole, antennas cables, equipment shelter and equipment area are described in detail on the plans and reports referenced herein. Each carrier's proposed equipment shelter will be an unoccupied, unmanned, specialized area for the wireless communications equipment. 7. The Board finds that,because this particular flagpole-style installation constitutes a camouflaged facility under Sections 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.2, 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii, the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views under Sections 8.9.3.c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii and 8.9.4.d.ii do not apply. In any event, the proposed installation is situated in an area of dense natural tree growth on the Stevens Estate property, so that the requirements for dense tree growth to screen views are satisfied. ' 8. Accordingly, the Planning Board finds that the project is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and generally complies with the requirements of the Bylaw as listed in Sections 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3,but requires conditions in order to be fully in compliance. The Planning Board hereby grants the Special Permits with Site Plan Approvals to the carriers provided the following conditions are met: 2 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Discontinuance or Abandonment a) At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of wireless service equipment, such carrier will notify the Town by certified US mail of the proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless service equipment shall be considered abandoned upon discontinuation of operations. b) Upon abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless service equipment placed on-, the site by the carder�,•ithin 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use; provided, however, that if the second carrier remains in operation at the site, the first carrier to discontinue shall not remove any common facilities in use by the second carrier until the second carrier has also discontinued or abandoned its operations at the site. "Physically remove" shall include, but not be limited to: (i) Removal of antennas, mount, equipment shelters and security barriers installed by the carrier(unless the same will continue to be used by the owner) from the subject property. (ii) Proper disposal of the waste materials generated by the carrier from the site in accordance with local and state solid waste disposal regulations. (iii) Restoring the location of the wireless service facility in its natural condition,except that any landscaping and grading shall remain the after-condition. C) As a condition of this special permit for the placement,construction or modification of their wireless service equipment at the site, the carriers shall place.into escrow a sum of money to cover the costs of removing the facility from the subject property. Said amount shall be certified by an engineer, architect or other qualified professional registered to practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Said funds shall be held by an independent escrow agent to be appointed by the carriers and the SPGA. The carriers shall authorize and, as necessary, shall obtain the authorization of the owner of the property to allow the escrow agent to enter upon the subject property to remove the facility if and when the facility has been abandoned or discontinued by both carriers. In the event the posted amount does not cover the cost of demolition and/or removal the Town may place a lien upon the property covering the difference in cost. 3 d) The equipment shall be deemed to be abandoned or discontinued if it has not been used for the purpose for which it was originally constructed for a period of six (6) months or more. Once abandonment or discontinuance by both carriers has occurred, the carriers shall remove o the equipment laced by the carriers from the subject property within ninety days. In the event that the carriers fail to remove the equipment, the town shall give notice to the carriers and the independent escrow agent that the equipment shall be removed by the escrow agent forthwith and the escrow agent, after affording written notice seven days in advance to the carriers, shall remove the facility. 2. Performance Guarantees a) Insurance in a reasonable amount(determined and approved by the SPGA after consultation.with Town Counsel or, at the expense of the carriers, after consultation with one(1) or more insurance companies) shall be in force to cover damage from the equipment on the structure, damage from transmissions and other site liabilities. Annual proof of said insurance must be filed with the SPGA. b) Funds, sufficient in the opinion of the SPGA to cover annual maintenance of the equipment on the facility, shall be placed into escrow and shall be held by the independent escrow agent who shall be authorized to expend the funds for the maintenance of the equipment on the facility on terms to be agreed upon by the carriers and the SPGA as a condition of approval of the special permit. C) Annual certification demonstrating continuing compliance with the standards of the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Aviation Administration and the American National Standards Institute shall be filed with the SPGA by the Special Permit holder. 3. Term of Special Permit. a) A Special Permit issued for any wireless service facility shall be valid for three (3)years. The special permit may be renewed under the same criteria as the original special permit, provided that the application for renewal of the special permit is made prior to the expiration date of the original or any renewed special permit. Additional measures governing the administration of the special permit are found in Section 10.3 of the Zoning Bylaw. b) After the equipment on the facility is in operation,the carriers shall submit to the SPGA, within 90 days of beginning operations and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit,preexistent and current RFR measurements. Such measurements shall be signed and certified by an RF engineer or other qualified person, stating that RFR measurements are accurate and are in compliance or why the 4 measurements fail to comply with all applicable FCC Guidelines as specified in Section 8.9(4)(c)(1) RFR Filing Requirements of this Bylaw. The measurements shall be submitted for both co-locators. C) After the wireless service facility is in operation the carriers shall submit to the SPGA; within 90 days of the issuance of the Special Permit, and at annual intervals from the date of issuance of the Special Permit, preexistent and current measurements of acoustic noise from the wireless service facility. Such measurements shall be certified and signed by an acoustical engineer, stating that noise measurements are accurate and meet the Noise Standards sub-section 6.13.14.5 of the Bylaw as measured from the Stevens Estate mansion as opposed to the perimeter of the equipment compound. The carvers shall forward to a separate consulting engineer, selected by the Town, the above materials for review. The carriers shall pay thy;reasonable costs of such review. d) Each carrier or its successors in interest shall maintain its wireless service equipment in good condition. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to painting, structural integrity of the flagpole-style monopole and maintenance of the buffer and landscaping, as applicable. 4. Prior to the endorsement of the plans by the Planning Board, the carriers must comply with the following conditions: a) The carriers shall provide a map indicating the intended locations for testing as required above. b) A bond in the total amount of$5,000 shall be posted for the purpose of insuring that a final as-built plan is provided to the SPGA showing the location of all on- site structures installed by the carriers. The bond is also in place to insure that the site is constructed in accordance with the approved plans. This bond shall be in the form of a check or checks made out to the Town of North Andover. This check will then be deposited into an interest bearing escrow account. C) The carriers shall provide the necessary escrow accounts and insurance as required in the above sections lc, 2a and 2b. 5. Prior to the start of construction: a) A construction schedule shall be submitted to the Planning Staff for the purpose of tracking the construction and informing the public of anticipated activities on the site. b) The carriers shall determine the preexisting conditions of the noise levels in the immediate vicinity of the Stevens Estate mansion to determine the baseline noise conditions of the site area. The noise survey will provide evidence of the origin of 5 surrounding noise and therefore a baseline condition from which the carriers determine their increases. The noise levels shall not increase the broadband level by more than lOdb(a) above the ambient levels or produce a"pure tone"condition as set forth in DAQC Policy 90-001, the guideline for 310 CMR 7.10. The carriers may use relevant professional sound emitting data from the prior building use to build a baseline based on prior use of the building and grounds. References to sources for data must be included in the material. 6. Prior to FORM U verification (Building Permit Issuance): a) The final site plan mylars must be endorsed and three (3) copies of the signed plans must be delivered to the Planning Department. b) A certified copy of the recorded decision must be submitted to the Planning Department. C) The carriers must have obtained a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the height of the proposed facility to be constructed at 100' above ground level, plus the height of any necessary lightning rod and FAA light. A recorded copy of the Zoning Board Decision certifying that the variance has been received must be provided to the Planning Department as proof of such. 7. Prior to verification of the Certificate of Occupancy: a) The carriers must submit a letter from the architect or engineer of the project stating that the construction and operations substantially comply with the plans referenced at the end of this decision as endorsed by the Planning Board. b) With the exception of any aviation warning lighting required by the Federal Aviation Administration, which shall be installed and maintained in accordance with applicable FAA guidance, all lighting placed by the carriers on the subject property shall have underground wiring and shall be so arranged that all direct rays from such lighting falls entirely within the site and shall be shielded or recessed so as not to shine upon abutting properties or streets. The Planning Office must approve any changes to the approved lighting plan as submitted by the carriers. 8. Prior to the final release of security: a) A final as-built plan showing final construction and location of the wireless hardware shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff. 9. Additional Conditions 6 a) Any stockpiling of materials (dirt, wood, construction material,etc.) must be shown on a plan and reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff. Any approved piles must remain covered at all times to minimize any dust problems that may occur with adjacent properties. Any stock piles to remain for longer than one week must be fenced off and covered. b) In an effort to reduce noise levels,the carriers shall keep their respective equipment in optimum working order, tturougti regular maintenance, any and all equipment that shall emanate sounds from the structures or site. C) No equipment or other equipment that will emanate noise-exceeding levels cited herein shall be placed on the exterior of the structure. Such equipment shall be enclosed as shown on the plans. d) All site lighting shall provide security for the site and structures however it must not create any glare or project any light onto adjacent residential properties. e) The contractor shall contact Dig Safe at least 72 hours prior to commencing any excavation. f) The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the carriers, and their respective employees, successors and assigns in interest or control. g) Any action by a Town Board, Commission, or Department that requires changes in the plan or design of the building as presented to the Planning Board, may be subject to modification by the Planning Board. h) Any revisions shall be submitted to the Town Planner for review. If these revisions are deemed substantial, the carriers must submit revised plans to the Planning Board for approval. i) This Special Permit approval shall be deemed to have lapsed after two years from the date permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced. Substantial use or construction will be determined by a majority vote of the Planning Board. As long as the carriers are diligently pursuing necessary governmental approvals for the proposed project, including without limitation the height variance identified in Section 6(c) above, the two year period shall be tolled during the pendency of any litigation challenging the grant or denial of any such governmental approval. 10. Waivers 7 The following waivers were granted in determining this decision in accordance with the authority designated by Section 8.9.3.c.v.3 of the Zoning Bylaw and Section 8.9.5.d.ix: a. Map of Other Preexistent/Approved Wireless Services Facilities: Each carrier's RF report each contains a map showing the carrier's respective preexisting and approved wireless facilities in North Andover and outside of North Andover within one-mile of its boundary. If and to the extent Section 8.9.5.d.ii.4 requires a map showing facilities owned or operated by other wireless service providers, the carriers have requested a waiver of that filing requirement,pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix. The SPGA has granted that waiver because such information is not needed fo:a thorough review of the proposed facilities and is not readily available to the carriers from their competitors. b. Siting Filing Requirements The carriers' Site Plans provide the information required by Section 8.9.5.d.iii (Siting Filing Requirements) and Section 8.3.5 (Information Required for Site Plan Review) of the Zoning Bylaw. If and to the extent the plans do not provide sufficient information to meet the requirements of Section 8.9.5.d.iii.3 (requiring the plans to show tree cover on the subject property and all abutting properties,by dominant species and average height) and Section 8.9.5.d.iii.4 (requiring the plans to show an outline of all existing buildings and uses on subject property and all abutting properties), the carriers have requested a waiver of those filing requirements, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix. The SPGA has granted that waiver because, given the detailed information submitted,any additional information regarding tree cover and the use of distant buildings is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facilities. C. Color Board Unless otherwise specified by the SPGA or the Massachusetts Historical Commission ("MHC"),the carriers' proposed equipment shelter will be sided with clapboard and painted white. The surrounding wooden fence will be left as natural wood. Unless otherwise specified by the FAA, the carriers propose to color the pole gray. Accordingly, the SPGA has granted a waiver of the"color board" requirement in Section 8.9.5.d.v.3 pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix,because a "color board"is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facilities. d. Balloon or Crane Test The SPGA has granted a waiver of a balloon or crane test at the proposed site required by Section 8.9.5.d.(v)7. The plans and visibility study provided by 8 the carriers contain sufficient information to evaluate the application, without the need for an additional crane test or balloon test. e. Hazardous Materials The SPGA has granted a waiver of the requirement to provide location, type and amount of any materials considered hazardous by the federal state or local government required by Section 8.9.5.d.viii.2. The carriers have listed the sources of negligible amounts of hazardous materials to be the thermostat (potential mercury) and the smoke detector(low level radiation). L Watershed Protection District As set forth in a letter from the carriers' consulting engineers, Greenman- Pederson Inc., dated September 14, 2001, the proposed facilities will be located more than 500' from the Lake and will not be located within 325' of wetlands, as defined in the local Wetlands Protection By-law. As a result, the SPGA has granted a waiver from any filing requirements of the Wetland and/or Watershed Protection District, as a watershed special permit is not required based upon the letter from Greenman-Pederson, Inc. dated 9/14/01. g. Boundary Survey The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.ii, which requires a survey of the lot parcel. The subject property contains in excess of 153 acres of land and the proposed facilities are centrally located on the parcel, hundreds of feet from any lot line. As a result, a boundary survey would be a significant and expensive undertaking, would serve no material purpose,would be commercially unreasonable, and is unnecessary for the Board to assess the merits of the type of development being proposed. h. Easements and Legal Conditions The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.iv, which requires all easements or legal conditions to be identified. The pertinent encumbrances have been marked on the Plans submitted with the Application. The Town owns the property. The material provisions of any access or utility easements will be determined during the final lease negotiations in consultation with Town Counsel and the Town Manager. i. Storm Water Drainage Calculations The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.vii,which requires storm water drainage calculations. Due to the minimal size of the 9 impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site, there will not be any material storm water runoff generated. j. Sims The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xii, which requires that all signs be identified. Pursuant to section 8.9.4.b.ii of the Wireless Service Facilities by-laws each carrier will provide a security sign that identifies the facility owner and warns against trespassing. However, this sign must be in accordance with the provisions of Section 6 , Signs and Outdoor Lighting regulations, of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw. Permission from the North Andover Planning Board is only for the aesthetic and site plan review purposes of the signage and does not exempt the applicant to obtain a sign permit if determined by the Building Commisioner_ k. Landscape Plan The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xv and subsection 8.3.6.a.ii.e, which require that a full landscape plan to be filed with the Application. Due to the dense woods in the area surrounding the proposed facilities. as well as the carriers' intention to clear only that vegetation that is necessary for the proposed construction, no aacutional landscaping will be required around the faclfil es: M. Drain Basin Study The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xviii which requires a drain basin study. Due to the minimal size of the impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site,there will not be any material storm water runoff generated. As a result, a drain basin study is unnecessary. n. Traffic Study The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.5.e.xix which requires a traffic study. As there will be minimal vehicle trips to the facilities, once constructed, no significant impact on traffic will be created. A Traffic impact study is therefore unnecessary. o. Erosion Control Plan The SPGA has granted a waiver from subsection 8.3.6.a.ii.f, which requires a full erosion control plan to be filed with the Application. Due to the distance to any significant wetland resources, an erosion control plan is not 10 necessary. Notwithstanding, a sample of the proposed erosion control methods have be identified on a supplementary plan sheet filed with the Board. P. Best Management Practices Plan The SPGA has granted a waiver from Section 8.9.4.e.iii to the extent it provides for a Best Management Practices plan for storm water during construction. Due to the minimal size of the impervious surfaces near the proposed facilities relative to the 153 acre site, there will not be any material storm water runoff generated. Prior to cutting or clearing trees associated with the construction, the carriers to the building will also submit a plan to the Building Commissioner showing the location of the erosion control measures along the limit of clearing/grading. 11. DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED: The following information shall be.deemed part of the decision: Application Cover Memorandum filed on August 8, 2001, from Stephen D. Anderson for AT&T Wireless and Christine Morrisey for Sprint; AT&T Wireless' completed Planning Board Application for Special Permit with Site Plan Approval; Sprint's completed Planning Board Application for Special Permit with Site Plan Approval; Certified Abutters List; Assessor's Maps numbered 35, 36,74, 91, 92, 99, 100; Zoning Map; Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. dated June 26, 2001 revised 7/11/01,9/17/01, & 11/06/01 consisting of the following: DRASWIN Y L -yrUP w 11 DRn.:AWA� ING'�7�'v PpNPEXr NQ t3 MIt f �< r 2BO-E4457-ZO1 Title Sheet 2BO-E4457-ZO2 Property Plan - One Compound 2BO-E4457-Z03 Site Plan - One Compound 2BO-E4457-Z04 Elevation - One Compund 2BO-E4457-Z05 Property Plan-Two Compounds 2BO-E4457-Z06 Site Plan -Two Compounds 2BO-E4457-Z07 Elevation -Two Compounds AT&T Wireless' RF report dated July 24, 2001,with coverage charts, demonstrating(1) the need for the facility, (2) the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under § 8.9.3.b.9, and (4) the other existing AT&T Wireless facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; Sprint's RF affidavit dated June 15, 2001,with coverage charts, demonstrating(1) the need for the facility, (2) the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate under § 8.9.3.b.9, and (4) the other existing AT&T Wireless facilities in 12 North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; Memorandum dated May 4, 2001, constituting the Town's consent to Municipal Development application; View Shed Analysis prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., dated December 4, 2000; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' antennas; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' equipment shelter; Specifications for AT&T Wireless' cables and cable runs; MSDS for AT&T Wireless' batteries to be used for backup power; Specifications for Sprint's antennas; Specifications for Sprint's equipment cabinets; Specifications for Sprint's cables and cable runs; MSDS for Sprint's batteries to be used for backup power; AT&T Wireless' Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health dated June 10, 2001, certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies,power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; The Massachusetts Department of Public Health's approval of AT&T Wireless' proposed facility dated June 21, 2001; Sprint's Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health dated June 29, 2001,certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies, power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; AT&T Wireless' Notices to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction dated May 29, 2001; Letter dated August 13, 2001, fro George W.Watson, III,enclosing Owner' Consent to Development Application dated July 18, 2001, executed by the Town Manager; 13 Memorandum dated September 25, 2001, from Stephen D. Anderson for AT&T Wireless and Christine Morrisey for Sprint(with enclosures), providing supplemental information related to the carriers' application; Letter dated September 14, 2001, from Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., specifying the distance of the proposed facility from wetlands and the lake; Letter dater October 1, 2001, from Alactronics,representing a Noise Report for the proposed facilities; Revised Plans for the proposed facility prepared by Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. dated September 17, 2001,consisting of the following: DRAMG IlDE 2BO-E4457-ZO2 Raw Land Site -Monopole with Shelter Property Plan- One Compound 2BO-E4457-Z05 Raw Land Site - Monopole with Shelter Property Plan -Two Compound 2BO-34457-Z08 Raw Land Site —Monopole with Shelter Landscape and Erosion Control Details Memorandum from Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. dated September 13, 2001, with attached engineering review report; Memorandum from Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., dated October 18, 2001; Memorandum from Town Planner to North Andover Planning Board, dated September 12, 2001. FAA Determination dated 11/05/01 Regarding the proposed 100', two- carrier flagpole-style monopole; FAA Determination dated 11/05/01 Regarding AT&T Wireless' proposed 90', one-carrier flagpole-style monopole; FAA Advisory Circular 7017460-1K(the"1K Circular")referred to in these determinations; and 14 Letter from Stephen Anderson and Jonathan Lazar submitting the FAA Determinations and Circular. 15 Town of North Andover,Zoning Board of Appeals APPLICANT'S PROPERTY: dist by map,parcel, name and address (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, USE BLACK INK) MAP PARCEL NAME ADDRESS 35 23 Town of North Andover(Stevens Estate) 723 Osgood Street ABUTTERS PROPERTY: list by map, parcel, name and address (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, USE BLACK INK) MAP PARCEL. NAME JADDRESS See attached. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED AT THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AND CERTIFIED BY THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE: BY: DATE: SIGNATURE,ASSESSOR,TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Re ired list of parties of interest Page one�_of t�rtified by Dale ! a/ Crkified c ward sensor North And Board of Assesso rth Andover °v ABUTTERS AND ABUTTERS TO ABUTTERS WITHIN 300 FEET Subject Property: Owned by: STEVENS ESTATE Town of North Andover 723 Osgood Street 120 Main Street North Andover, MA Map 35 Parcel 23 Parcel ID Location Owner and Mailing Address Map 35 Parcel 16 492 Sutton Street City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 19 1018 Osgood Street William Chepulis James Chepulis 1018 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 20 1025 Osgood Street Goodwin Trust c/o Russell Treadwell 3667 Huntington Place Drive Sarasota, FL 34237 Map 35 Parcel 24 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 25 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury,MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 26 665 Osgood Street Douglas N Howe Jr Janice W Howe 665 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 29 1060 Osgood Street R&M Realty Trust R C Stoddard,M A C Ikacz 1060 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 -7 Osrtified b (J (1-1 v3 Boar t A 7�v Certifie Dtsie SS-msor North AndoVl� Board f Assess orth Andover Map 35 Parcel 32 605 Osgood Street Albert F. Cullen,Jr. Maeve M Cullen 605 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 35 Parcel 33 Osgood Street Michael L. Kettenbach c/o RMD 881 East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 Map 35 Parcel 44 Great Pond Road Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 LLC- Map 35 Parcel 50 1003 Osgood Street tes I hoca5 P�' CheS PqY-)DJU mi4 z>)610 Map 36 Parcel 4 623 Osgood Street George W. Ousler,Jr. Deanna M Ousler 623 Osgood Street North Andover,MA-01845 Map 36 Parcel 21 Osgood Street Michael L.Kettenbach c/o RNID 881 East Street Tewksbury,MA 01876 Map 74 Parcel 2 492 Sutton Street City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 3 946 Osgood Street China Blossom Realty Trust Richard Yee,Tr 946 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 4 59 Surrey Drive F till P. ,fr. PGS O) S 59 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 5 980 Osgood Street John Ferreira 980 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 6 1000 Osgood Street Landers Building Condominium 1000 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Gertifie b t �° ` ( � Catified Board of Assesso rth Andover Bo of Assessor North Ando Map 74 Parcel 6 1000 Osgood Street U�(XP-oi ►3,d She►IC,- ffde($ 1©M os" i9° Map 74 Parcel 7 850 Osgood Street 850 Osgood Street Trust Anne Marie Ryan, Tr 850 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 12 177 Chadwick Street Gail E. Oja 177 Chadwick Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 13 838 Osgood Street Annina Faraci 838 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 15 Osgood Street China Blossom Realty Trust Richard Yee,Tr 946 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 22 159 Chadwick Street Kirk G.Olsen Janet D.Olsen 159 Chadwick Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 23 505 Sutton Street Knights of Columbus Association Inc. 505 Sutton Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 28 67 Surrey Drive David V. Smolag Lisa Smolag 67 Surrey Drive North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 29 75 Surrey Drive Testa Realty Trust Mary C.Testa,Tr 75 Surrey Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 30 83 Surrey Drive Armando J. Vera Maritza E. Vera 83 Surrey Drive North Andover, MA 01845 Map 74 Parcel 31 168-170 Chadwick Street Chadwick Street Nominee Trust V Scott Follansbee, Tr 79 Lucy Street / North Andover, MA 01845 T h U Cerkifie Dtsle attified by Date O/ Board Ass or orth Andover Boa Assessor North And er Map 91 Parcel 1 Osgood Street North Andover Housing Authority 310 Greene Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 3 800 Osgood Street Michael J. Walsh Linda Walsh 800 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 4 814 Osgood Street Blair Roberts Caren Jacobson 814 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 5 826 Osgood Street Mary M. Machado 826 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 6 790 Osgood Street rnG 1.4 , JW,4-1 m MC A 790 Osgood Street • North Andkwer,MA-01845 Map 91 Parcel 7 864 Chickering Road Ethel A. Curtin 864 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 8 30 Foulds Terrace Onofrio Casqburri Joyce P B Casgburri 30 Foulds Terrace North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 14* 15 Colgate Road Nina M.Gaffney 15 Colgate Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 15 14 Colgate Road Jeanett G. Sutton 1 Y Y- 14 Colgate Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 91 Parcel 19 25 Stacy Drive Henry F. Har Margaret Davis 25 Stacy Drive North Andover,MA 01845 Map 92 Parcel 8 140 Prescott Street Selco Service Steen Cpr p-x0-Iijn 11'7 pub -^ ------ c 6 114 101 �i Board f A ssor orth Andover comwbqA�seS,0-r Boa North Andov r Map 99 Parcel 1 841 Chickering Road Douglas E.Daher 841 Chickering Road North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 1 676 Osgood Street Q•J 5uGlin jrf MP Rockwetj T ivinsr RPvnr T,zst (91(o � 676 Osgood Street ,r North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 4 190 Prescott Street Josephine Palazzolo 190 Prescott Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 5 Prescott Street Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 6 696 Osgood Street Thomas P. Rockwell 696 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 7 Osgood Street 512 696 Q&geedStreet North Andover, MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 8 661 Osgood Street Aleen W. Tarro Kathleen R. Tarro 661 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Map 100 Parcel 9 657 Osgood Street t excq pard �- C-�a)�ney d PO ri_1[-T.T1�ZL US-) os srte.� rV D North Andover,MA 01845 att\nandstevens\n\abutters001.wpd �I OUN b � ova by Dale 8 Assess N And er Ass 9sor North Andove Cutifle Data Board f Assesso Andover w i P r I n 9 STEVEN S ESTATE 723 OSGOOD STREET N NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 >fi CASCADE NUMBER: BS54XC860A SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIG—SAFE AND ALL UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF PROJECT DIRECTORY GENERAL NOTES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. " 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL UTILITIES ARE NOT APPLICANT: SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. 1. ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS NOT STAFFED AND 3.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER.WATER,GAS.ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND OTHER CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 NOT NORMALLY OCCUPIED. UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK,SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. TIMES,AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, MAHWAH, NJ 07495 2. FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD "� _ Ot7T71f BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND PHONE: (201) 684-4075 SEE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT, "STANDARD NOTES OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTACT: DAVE BASS AND DETAILS". 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW:THIS A . WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT UMITED TO A)FAL.PROTECTION B)CONFINED SPACE - ENGINEER: 1 rth.pnrtovr'G r " C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY 0)TRENCHING&EXCAVATION COLER & COLANTONIO, INC. ZY02 YaMol iw ...•'E72r�2 Pbvi 3lcn 7eelncbgles •,•.:E.� 5.ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND STIPULATED 101 ACCORD PARK DRIVE . .PROJECT INFORMATION IN THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY. NORWELL, MA 02061-1685 . LOCATION MAP S.IF NECESSARY.RUBBISH,STUMPS,DEBRIS,STICKS,STONES AND OTHER PHONE: (781) 982-5400 1 REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. CONTACT: JAMES R. BORREBACH CASCADE: SS54XC860A ' 7.THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM. SITE ACQUISITION: SITE NAME: STEVEN'S ESTATE DRAWING INDEX REV. # THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 800 SITE ADDRESS: 723 OSGOOD STREET B.NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHAD.BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. ONE INTERNATIONAL BLVD. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 - FROZEN MATERIALS.SHOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR MAHWAH, NJ 07495 - EM6ANKMENT. - T1 TITLE SHEET 201 ' 1 PHONE: { ) 684-4325 COUNTY: ESSEX R1 RADIUS PLAN 11 9.THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM CONTACT: SCOTT LAMB TYPE OF BUILD: RAW LAND — FLAGPOLE Al SITE PLAN & NOTES 0 GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. POW . LAND OWNER: TOWN OF N. ANDOVER A2 PARTIAL SITE PLAN & ELEVATION 10 10.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS.ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY MAIN STREET I WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK.SHALL BE REMOVED N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 - Dl NOTES & DETAILS i 0 AND/OR CAPPED,PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH 1101 TURNPIKE STREET D2 DETAILS 0 WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION of THE WORK SUBJECT TO THE NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ASSESSORS: MAP 35, LOT 23 APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. PHONE: 978 725—i 479 { ) E1 GROUNDING PLAN & ELEVATION ':0 11.THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT CONTACT: JOE PLENTZAS ZONING CLASS: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1 E2 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS ! 0 - COVERED BY THE BUILDING OR DRIVEWAY.SHALL 13E GRADED TO A UNIFORM LATITUDE' 4Z" 42' 28.56" N E3 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS 1 0 SLOPE,FERTILIZED,SEEDED.AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. TELCOS LONGITUDE: 71' 06 ' ' 51.03" W E4 GROUNDING & ELECTRIC DETAILS 10 VERIZON E5 POWER & ANTENNA SCHEMATIC 10 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING PHONE: (978) 275-1282 i CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,IF REQUIRED DURING CONTACT: PAUL SZALAY - CONSTRUCTION,SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR ! EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. - DIRECTIONS FROM BOSTON 13.THE LEASED AREA NOT COVERED BY PCS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AS OESCRIBED IN THESE NOTES AND ROLLED.WOVEN FILTER FABRIC,AS SPECIFIED,SHALL BE PLACED OVER GRADED AREA AND COVERED - TRAVELING NORTH ON RT 3 CONTINUE ONTO 1-93 N, WITH 3"OF COMPACTED,3/4"WASHED,CRUSHED STONE.CRUSH STONE SHALL BE GRADED TO MATCH SURROUNDING GROUND SURFACE. - - TAKE 1-495 NORTH, EXIT #44A. CONTINUE ON 1-495 N ATTACHED: I TO EXIT #43, THE MASS AVE EXIT TOWARDS NORTH 1. TOWER AND TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY(8)COMBINATION LOCKS(MASTER LOCK 175LH, ANDOVER, CONTINUE ON MASS AVE. TO CHICKER(NG PLANS PREPARED AND STAMPED BY PART NUMBER 71649 39565)TO BE LEFT IN SHELTER. ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO CHICKERING ROAD, CONTINUE ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED I 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PUT A BEAD OF SILICON AROUND ALL MOUNTS STRUTS, - TO PRESCOTT STREET. TURN RIGHT ONTO PRESCOTT (EEO (1 SHEET) - ANCHOR$.AND OTHER STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS. STREET AND GO TO THE END OF THE STREET. THE 2. EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLANS (AT&T AND 16.CONTRACTOR TO PHOTOGRAPH KEY POINTS of CONSTRUCTION.OPEN ENTRANCE TO 723 OSGOODSTREET IS AT THE END OF SPRINT) PREPARED BY TRACHTE, INC. I TRENCHES,GROUNDING,STEEL CONNECTIONS.ETC. PRESCOTT STREET. (2 SHEETS) COLER STEVEN'S' ESTATE Sprint o cBeF Sprint' 101 Accord Pork Drive I ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION wu III; .Ila 4q COL/�N TON 10 z Norwell,MA 02061-1685 . 723 OSGOOD STREET ay0 ISSUED FOR CONSRIUCTION cFc 11s At8 q TITLE SHEET (787)982-5400 BOSTON MTA 1ssuEo FOR RLTnEw cac eIs Ree ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 N0. DATE REVl4oNa eT CKK ArF•o d00 N0. CASCADE N0. SHEET NUMBER REV SITE N0. BS54XC860A bNAL scaE: Na u) — ' 60 llw�j 17-160 1 BS54XC860A T-1 1 ABUTTERS TABLE PROPERTY MAP PARCEL OWNER BOOK/PAGE 35 23 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER 4197/ 63 ® 678/ 176 35 44 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER / t� � i /j///ii i { �•l \\\• ` TAKE OOpnCHEWICK ® 35 50 THOMAS PROPERTIES, L.L.C. 2338 220 1 35 20 GOODW N TRUST 1355/ 417 ! I UNIT 6 tANDERS BLDG. CONDO VINCENT & SHEILA ANDERS TRUST UNIT 1,3,4 2667/267 h \I 74 5 JOHN FERRREIRA 1943/ 317 J � LLss__ DENNIS V. DRINKWATER 2668/ 272 i 74 15 CHINA BLOSSOM REALTY TRUST 1032/ f.4 74 7 850 OSGOOD STREET TRUST 1032/ 64 v74 13 ANNINA FARACI 4044/ 53 91 5 MARY N. MACHADO / > 3189 :1 91 4 BIAIR ROBERTS & KAREN JACOBSON 3741 880 l� fi'�i �/ IONNOF_ NDOVEI2... ..- 91 3 MICHAEL J. & LINDA WALSH 42/ , - MAP -MAP-5 PAIAL.g41RICT 52 MAP-36 PARCEL 23 _- �� %�-^�l! ,I,I 91 6 VINCENT J. MCALOON & JEAN M. MCALOON 3741/ 88 BOOK 4107 PAGE 63�, :. @ 91 7 ETHEL A CURTIN 3018/ 168 /' / �1\l�,, 1`.. 1 •' �%,{// i.� �__.-:�__� /_ -=-�...�1.�- -- i r-- \ `.:\��./r},�� /\` ® 99 1 DOUGLAS E. DAHER 4893/ 333 ® 100 4 JOSEPHINE PALAZZOLO 905 / 119 ' \\1 / -�� ✓ ..%�`-` `^��` �"%i - \ \\ \` 100 7 THOMAS P. ROCKWELL JR. 1553/ 304 - /PROP --•�"''"i��i-..=' \\ `�a�'--�/:%�' %,ter _•��_ \� v� 100 6 THOMAS P. ROCKWELL 651 6�- , 266 35 26 JANICE W. HOWE& DOUGLAS N. HOWE JR. 5142/ 336 36 4 GEORGE W. JR. & DEANNA M.pUSLER \\'• ..��\� r. t(I / I / - //ice - = _ �� -"\\ ���\• 2089 .226 35 32 ALBERT F. JR., COLLEEN & MAEVE M. CULLEN 1591/ 167 \ \ \\ 35 33 MICHAEL L. KETTENBACH ' 1 \\, q•�_ �\ 1( + 7 ����� i' � .—._. Z'`_�,�.", � �i �%�fir-.:' �\\�\\ \\ � � 2400/ 310 1 ® 2400/ iN0 �\ \�\ 35 25 MICHAEL L. KETTENBACH { t V \\1:�, ����r /// �/� �`;���._ �._��.--.-_�,��1� /•-�`�� •. �'\\� � ® 35 24 MICHAEL L. KERENBACH 2400/ 310 RESIDENTIAL 1 ZONING ; DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS TABLE �„_,,•�,� 1 iI + ��\� `\ \ ,bili J / -\I �a Il \ TYPE REQUIRED ._..- '`\ r �_ �11 ��• t,'\;\�\1tl,:,r,}G� �--�.I NL PROPOSED \ SIZE $7,120 S.F. 6671 \ . FaowraoE 175' 3540'* \\\ \ SIDE SETBACK 30 8"'* * \\\X FRONT �!. 30' 7as'* i �� ��` 1,1�••t'�t� 1?t' `�` {��`�. Q j I �/�I 1 '�}�.�1\�\\t! \\\ � RFon SETBACK so' ,666'a NEK.M WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS TABLE TYPE TYPE PROPOSED HEIGI4T 10'MAX.ABOVE AVG BUILDING HEIGHT WnHN.100' NO BUILDINGS WITHIN 300'. ! HEIGHT IW MAX.ABOVE AVG.TREE CANOPY 81'AVG CANOPY\100'MONOPOLE A� © \ / SETBACK 200'FROM PROPERTY LUNE(2X STRUCTURE HOGHT) 749'* SETBACK 30D•FROM HABRABLE DWELLING OR BUSINESS 330'* \ t1fj 1. _ PREPARED CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4• \\ ® ' ANDNAT&T ISSUED ON 9%17/01 AS MMSEO ZZONINNG SDRAWING.ABUTTER TABLE WAS UPDA ODOR ON PCS INFORMATION RECU40 VIA FAX FROM WELLMAN ASSOCIATES.INC.ON 6/11/03. 2.THE PROPOSED COMPOUND IS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS-ZONE X'ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY WWAGEMENF AGENCY FLOOD MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO.250096 0005 C.DATED:JUNE 2,1993 AND IS OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR \ FLOOD BOUNDARY. /1 �-1 > 3.UNDERGROUND A D ARE INFORMATION SHOWII HEREON WAS COMPILED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND AVNUBLE RECORD PUNS AND ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.BEFORE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CMA.DIOSAFE AT PROPERTY PLAN N'SW'JU'�A MMMIUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANNED ACTIVITY. 4.THE OWNERSHIP LINES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE RESULT OF A UMITED FIELD SURVEY BY GREDwAN SCALE:,'200' PEDERSEN INC.ON 10//ZS//00 AND A COMPILATION OF THE CURRENT TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER A5�5SOWS PIANS, RECORDPIANS AND DEED§. GRAPHIC SCALE 200 100 0 200 400 t �- Sprint � Sprat LER �. STEVENS ESTATE -� M C O ,, 101 Accord Pork Drive - -- COL/1N TON 10 NOrwall,MA 02061-1686 _ RADIUS PLAN (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREETBOSTON MTA 0 I�Hi6a ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION _ aFa ITIS N,m - ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 N0. ORE REV90NI BY CIF4 MP•0 � JOB NO. CASCADE NO. SHEET NUMBER REV SITE NO. BS54XC860A ,oHALE soke As HMO DESMAD DwAWI (011110,3 17-160 1 BS54XC860A R-1 0 PROPOSED PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT . SHELTER ON CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDED BY TRACHTTE,INC.) (P)CARRIER PROPOSED LIMIT N PItOPOS1100'FLAG POLE Or NGG/GGR4MING / AT NEW TREE LINE \ PROPOSED S' \ \ \ STOCKADE FELE 40.00 u� 10.00' ! \ \ PROPOSED 40'X30' �z PROPOSED 10' IN R1aX40�LEASSE 1 UTILITY EASEMENT AREA \ - ' PROPOSED PROPOSED 12 ELECTRIC 30.00' GRAVEL ROAD UP #6 EXISTING OVERHEAD / o --rt",-- ,EXISTING ERHEAD I EROSION CONTROL oggq ECTRI_C) N EXISTING TREEL[NE WIRES CTE�Lj PROPOSED U/G N �• UP #7 ��_ _ f1-' UTILITY RUN vo r#B FINAL ROtMNG Or_A:S I WRESW�f TRt� �. PENDING CONFIRMATION BY ..� 'i � \ GAR POWER 4 TELCO COMPANY. GARAGE DMARC LOCATION MAY CHANGE1 , CtL!7FIj' ��EXISTING TREELI� ,� : -+ �'`�.. �I a J ` NNS W/TEICRISER I EXISTING OVERHEAD _,,WIRES CT�IE.)._• r r_.._. o Ll 1 SPRINT ACCESS EASEMENT CACCESS MOMENT TO 7OIEM ll. T 1 ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN TO�BPIaq.IC WAY �11 S FOLLOWING EXISTING FACILITY ACCESS ROAD). 36"NNW,FENCE POST / . (S7EEl•Y TYPE OR 2" NAROMUOD)oR1vEN axN. PROPOSED I8'CRUSHED STOLE xrTo GROUND,ro•aux O.C.a ACCESS DRIVE OVER THE TOP OF / THE EXISTING 10'CART PATH �. INRAFl FILTER FABRIC OR J APPROVED EWAL FASTEN W/TIES r - J Ij , A7 TtW AND N/DSECiNMI,EV£RY 24" - ' STAKED BALES END TO END INN. 2i I SPOIL TRON M I 'FLOW ADVANCED SITE PREP. - UP MIO ?� BALE iiTENCN I I CRAVE SPREAD NAY W/ LMYN571.gB£D GROUND. I 1 TACKIFTFR AY SEED W j - 11 Mi 7T-- cam' Aft II W a' EMBED FABRIC AND FENCE. - 8r NLN. 11BALES TO BE REV W/NO PLAS71C OR MIRE. ° Z NAY BALES TO BE SECURED W/MN.TWO(2)2-WOD MOSTAKES PER BALE.DRIVEN 18"NLN.INTO GRADE S SPREAD NAY TO BE APPLIED BY MECHANICAL SPREADER -AT RATE OF 1-7/2 TONS/ACRE W/SUITABLE ASPHALTIC TACKinFR(RATE AND T)PE 10 Be APPROVED BY - - - ENGINEER Nw ADVANCE OF APPLICATION). - HAYBALE WITH SlLMCE DETAIL ADD GRAPHIC SCALE NOT TO SCALE - 20 10 0 20 40 ' Sprint M4 Sprint COLER £y 101 Accord Park Drive STEMVENSI ESTATE COL/�N TON 10 Norwell. MA 02061-1685 /rte, ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ePc 765 AID SITE PLAN & NOTES _ 761 962-5400 723`OSGOOD STREET � � BOSTON MTAISSUED ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 A ` ' FIN`REVIEW "` '� ° SITE NO. BS43XC860A N0' °"TE R�ONS Br" m a« wP•o slo7ui / Woe No. I CASCADE No. sNEEr NuaaTER REv 7X%7E:As TKRm GLSIaIm ORANII (�(IMI09j 17-160 BS43XC860A A-1 0 ' N N �G�p�y9 Q� �Mot75 s HEIGHT WV*AGL PROPOSED SPRINT ANIENNAS k �.+ STOCKADE FENCE /---14tDPOM 3~ PROPOSED N dl CX7'CONCRETE PAD® SPRINT COMPOUND MI CDONN 2101 tION �BY (GEM.7D OE FR0IRDED BY$PRINT) c PROPANE TAMC/S65\ 9 �' p TBD.PART!7801791A ON 37 W CONCREIE PAD EROSION 40.00 CONIAOL HFICHT 66.5'1 AGL ,.00 Loo ,.o0 7 00 ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN FUTURE AT&T ANTENNAS NTS rO ® REFER TO FINAL ANTENNA RECOMMEND DATED 04/03/03 7.00 FOR ANTENNA TYPE,AZIMUTH h CABLE SIZE. too' 2.00 �E (BY EEO NOTE; GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PHOTO TOWER LIGHT 7S•ON FLAGPOLE DOWMENTARON OF ANTENNA MWMS, WEATHER PROOFING QN7s FACING Sam k COAX COLOR COD1NG AT TOP OF TOWER FUTURE =CARRIER AGL fU1URE CNtRNOE ANTENNAS 4.00 PRO ' PROPOSED SPRRNT 12.00 SMIADE CAM® N BRIDGE wo X 15' 0.92 CAISSON FOUNDATION PROPOSED 30.00 ® ATRT ( GANG METER BA1RC C\ ® A N ` SHELTER CRAWL ROAD UT 1l 3.26 +r 7� j 1 PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER 9.83 3. —I 3.50 1.00 1.72 FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY TRACHTE. SEE TRACHTE H I DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFICATIONS tO.00• AND ATTACHMENT DETAILS _. 3.06 .. 7RANSFOPoJER 9.83 17.0 L•_ CSC UPPER PORT AT RASE OF TONER TD FACE SPRINTS 1.00 1.00 - TO FACE ATN:TB SHELTER -. 3.00 PROPOSED SPMNT �7 CONTE�PAD PROPOSED CSO FLAGPOLE SEE CABINET ATTACHED DESIGN PROPOSED TELCO BY EB) RROCIII)AND PROVIDED ITH PROPOSED NTESPRINT o - (POWER SISHELDE ONLY) - PROPOSED EWIRENT sxELNTACHENEBW... TOWER Low (SEESEE ATTACHED DOW CONTROLLER ONIINOL (N� O �PROPds®18'NIDE ACM SPIDNT ICE BRDOE PROPOSED 5`11OW-Or PROPOSED GENERAWA WIDE CAISSON TOWER FOUNDATION ON 4W CONCRETE PAD®^ / SPPoNT i171UTY EASEMENT MESIGNED 8Y Em PROPOSEm T� PRP aPROPOSED SPRINT*> EQUIPUENT PROPOSED PROPOSED STOCKADE FENCE SPRINT PPO � , b DAN=NOT SHOW FOR CLARITY . ✓ PROI+OBFD NE'IFR BANK. t iRAl i I PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"=5'-0" /L GRAPHIC SCALE EAST ELEVATION �j GRAPHIC SCALE 5 2.5 0 5 10 5 2.5 0 5 10 SCALE. 1"=5'—O" �— Sprint �N Sprint COLER & TGT A�Park Drive STEVENS ESTATE R. z Norwell.MA 02061-1855 ° F0i"0N10t0N CP0 S`S '� PARTIAL SITE PLAN & ELEVATION COL/1N TON 10 (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA 4gb, ISSUED FOR REVIEW 00 m .m ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 ° SITE NO. BS54XC860A "0. OAW ' In C1Nc A0P'DQ NOB N0. CASCADE N0. I SHEET NUMBER I REV SMUM AS Norco DES04W ONMn+ (!!W(i� 17-160 8S54XC860A A-2 0 FINISHED GRADE, AC PAVING MATCH SLOPE FINISHED GRADE OR NEW HOT AND THICKNESS OF MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COAT OR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO MATCH COMPACTED BACKFILL CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS. AS TRENCH PERICABLE SICA ORK SAWCUT 1. CODE CONFORMANCE 1. CODE CONFORMANCE _ • TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST RECOMMENDATIONS OF THESE STANDARDS. – AISC– "SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION TACK COAT _ _ – AC1:301– "STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS" 1 -r:+.>_=-__ OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDING" 6" FOR ASPHALT 6" o- UNDISTURBED – ACI 306– "COLO WEATHER CONCRETING" t – AWS– 01.1 – 80 STRUCTURAL WELDING SPECIFICATIONS PAVEMENT III—I I( ---- - FINISHED GRADE OR MIN MIN N :j_r--_ –ACI 315– "DETAILING CONCRETE WORK" EXISTING ASPHALT OR 2" z_ _ – AG 318– "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE" 2. MATERIALS CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENTSPHALT ----------- II— BACKFILL ` – AG 322– "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE•' – STRUCTURAL SHAPES, PLATES– ASTM A36 REQUIREMENT �I I I—III (SAND OR NATIVE SOIL) – ACI 347– "FORM WORK" – PIPE COLUMNS– ASTM A53 – GRADE B – TYPE E OR S SCHEDULE 40 PER EARTHWORK 2. MATERIALS – BOLTS: CONNECTIONS – BEARING TYPE, GALVANIZED ASTM 325X —III SPECIFICATION • CONCRETE: ANCHORING– HOOK TWE, GALVANIZED ASTM A307 SLOPE TO SUIT –APPROVED, READY MIXED CONCRETE HAVING AN ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE – WELDING ELECTRODES– E70XX SERIES SOIL CONDITION III STRENGTH (f'c) OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, SLUMP 3-5 INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED – COATING: GALVANIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION ASTM A36 OR PROVIDE APPROVED PRIMER – 2 MILS THICK SHORING IN rr –D„ TELEPHONE CONDUITS I I I UTILITY WARNING TAPE • REINFORCING STEEL: ACCORDANCEUTILITY WARNING (MIN. 4"SCH 40 PVC) – ASTM A615 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. ASTM A185 WELDED WIRE FABRIC WITH STATE AND of � TAPE WHERE APPLICABLE 3. EXECUTION FEDERAL REGULATIONS to 1'-0" (1 ACTIVE, i SPARE FORM WORK: – FABRICATION: SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR STEEL MEMBERS PREPARED ? 5'-0" (MAX) CONDUIT AS REQUIRED) POWER CONDUIT (MIN. 4" PVC SMOOTH PLYWOOD FORMS FOR EXPOSED SLABS OR VERTICAL SURFACES. BOARD FORMS FOR FROM FIELD DIMENSIONS, FOR APPROVAL, BEFORE PROCEEDING HATH VERTICAL SCH 40) WHERE APPLICABLE FOOTINGS OR UNEXPOSED CONCRETE SURFACES. NO EARTH FORMS PERMITTED. FABRICATION. SHOP FABRICATE, TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, DEPTH W/O • GROUT: BY WELDING. PROVIDE ALL BEAM STIFFENERS, COLUMN CAPS AND BASES, BACKFILL PER SHORING FOR TRENCHING 6" MIN. EARTHWORK SEE DETAIL 2 – NONMETALLIC, NON–SHRINK GROUT UNDER BASE PLATES OR BEARING PLATES HOLES, AND CONNECTIONS. SPECIFICATIONS (TMP-) – ERECTION: PROVIDE ALL TEMPORARY SHORING AND/OR BRACING TO 4" MIN TO SECONDARY ELECTRIC 3. EXECUTION ERECT STEEL PLUMB AND SQUARE UNTIL ALL SLABS. FLOORS. OR WALLS 12" MIN TO PRIMARY ELECTRIC * • CONCRETE: ARE IN PLACE. – PLACE CONCRETE ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED METHODS OF ACI 304 – PRECAUTIONS: CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL PRECAUTIONS AND PROCEDURES TYPICAL PIPES 'k SEPARATION DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED STRENGTH (Vc) OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. SLUMP 3-5 INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER AWS 01.1 WHEN WELDING GALVANIZED METALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OR CONDUITS MIN WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS REINFORCING STEEL: a TOUCHUP ALL ABRASIONS, BURNS, AND SIMILAR DEFECTS ASSOCIATED – PLACE REINFORCING USING STANDARDS BAR SUPPORTS TO PROVIDE PROPER CLEARANCE WITH THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COATINGS USING SPRINT APPROVED AND PREVENT DISPLACEMENT DURING CONCRETE OPERATIONS. LAP CONTINUOUS BARS 40 COLA ZINC, "GALVANOX", "DRY GALV', "ZINC–IT", OR APPROVED TRENCH AS SHOWN JOINT SERVICE TRENCH • DIAMETERS. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVERAGE: EQUIVALENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES. BEDDING PER ON PLANS – CONCRETE PLACED AGAINST EARTH 3 IN. TOUCHUP DAMAGED NON GALVANIZED STEEL WITH SAME PAINT EARTHWORK BURIED CONDUIT – FORMED CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH, WEATHER, OR WATER 2 IN. APPLIED IN SHOP OR FIELD. SPECIFICATIONS – SLABS ON GRADE (MINIMUM FROM TOP) 1 IN. ELECT/TELEPHONE . – FRAMED SLABS (NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER) .75 IN. 4• QUALITY CONTROL FRAMED SLABS (EXPOSED TO WEATHER) 1 IN. – PROVIDE SERVICE OF LICENSED INDEPENDENT TESTING LAB FOR THEFOLLOWING: TYPICAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH 26 DETAIL o)INSPECTION OF BOLT INSTALLATION AND TENSION N.T.S. 2`„ , – PLACE DEFORMED BARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF CRSI b) VISUAL INSPECTION OF FILLET WELDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3 "RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR PLACING REINFORCING BARS". c)ULTRASONIC TESTS OF ALL BUTT WELDS NTS –ALL WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A185. LAP TWO SQUARES AT ALL JOINTS AND – INSPECTION SERVICES MAY OCCUR IN SHOP OR FIELD AS REQUIRED DETAIL AND TIE AT 3'-0"ON CENTER. 325 – PROVIDE(2) #5 BARS EACH SIDE OF ALL OPENINGS IN WALLS AND SLABS. BARS TO EXTEND 24- NTS - BEYOND EDGE OF OPENINGS. (FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF OPENINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS). - • FORM WORK: – PROPERLY BRACE AND SHORE FORM WORK TO MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT AND TOLERANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO ACI 347. - - DETAILS NOT SHOWN IN DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI DETAILING MANUAL(ACI 315). - 4. COLD WEATHER ° – BY DEFINITION'(ACI 306),COLO WEATHER CONDITIONS EXIST WHEN "FOR MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE DAYS. A" 250 GALLON PROPANE TANK THE AVERAGE DAILY TEMPERATURE IS LESS THAN 40'F AND THE AIR TEMPERATURE IS NOT GREATER THAN A 8 t (THICKNESS) 50'F FOR MORE THAN ONE–HALF OF ANY 24 HR. PERIOD." - - 10'-0' 3'-0" 6" EXISTING GROLIN • ACCELERATED EARLY STRENGTH GAIN - 12'-0" SURFACE, TYP. GENERATOR – TO OVERCOME DELAYED STRENGTH AND INITIAL SET DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH COLA WEATHER BACKFILL PE 3 - A 8 t (THICKNESS) CONDITIONS, ONE OR A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING MIX ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED: EARTHWORK 4" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE PER T(STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR 7'-0" 4'-0" 6" SPECIFICATION MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT SUBSTITUTING TYPE 1 WITH TYPE III CEMENT HIGHWAY AND BRIDGES" ITEM 402.1 `UNLESS SHOWN ADDITION OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE ADMIXTURES "m OTHERWISE ON - ADDITION OF NON-CHLORIDE ACCELERATORS - •r 2% - II� N - ^ INCREASING THE TYPE 1 CEMENT CONTENT 8Y 100-200 LBS. 3 -- PLACEMENT GUIDELINES - - o ° "o 00 CUT #3012"EA WAY – DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON A FROZEN SUBGRADE; UPON THAWING, UNEVEN SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING °Poe°°°a eo oo° o°o°evoopO^oeo oa°°O oo°OpO"pO° °°o'er° e o°000peeoeoO°oOeoO peO ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR. FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, &EMBEDDED FIXTURES MUST BE CLEAR OF SNOW&ICE – ❑ "e° o a oo° II' CONCRETE PAD AT THE TIME CONCRETE IS PLACED. - �' ITfi'-- o o='u, �,.• •,� �1 U (CAST–IN–PLACE –THE MINIMUM CONCRETE TEMPERATURE, AS PLACED AND MAINTAINED, MUST EXCEED 55'F. . . HOWEVER, 12",GRAVEL BORROW COMPACTEDbR PRECAST) CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED WITH CONCRETE TEMPERATURES ABOVE 75'F. TO 95% STD. MOD. PROCTOR PER EXISTING SUBGRADE - - – APPROPRIATE CURING AND COLD WEATHER PROTECTION MUST BE INCORPORATED TO PREVENT THE MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT #3012"EA WA CONCRETE FROM FREEZING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEATING EQUIPMENT TO HEAT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONCRETE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. ° HIGHWAY AND BRIDGES-ITEM # 151 3/4"CHAMFER • CURING AND COIR WEATHER PROTECTION SPEC M1.03.0 _t I I –TO DEVELOP THE STRENGTH, DURABILITY AND PERMEABILITY POTENTIAL OF:.T14E CONCRETE, CURING AND GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL FIN GRADE I — ----°6— PROTECTION DURING COLD WEATHER CONDITIONS ARE ESSENTIAL. THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES ARE RECOMMENDED UPON PLACEMENT- - THE CURING PERIOD MUST EXTEND A MINIMUM OF'7 DAYS (MAINTAINING THE 557E TEMPERATURE). DETAIL – DO NOT SEAL SATURATED FRESHLY NHGLY PLACED FREEZE/THAW 4 SEAL NG RETAINS WATER IN THE CONCRETE THEREBY KEEPING 321 „ 6" COMPACTED IT (TVP) CRUSHED STONE – COLD WEATHER PROTECTION IS BEST PROVJDED THROUGH INSULATING BLANKETS OR LOOSE STRAW OR GRAVEL ' (MINIMUM 12 INCHES DEEP) SANDWICHED 8 EEN A WATERPROOF COVER E.G. POLYETHYLENE. 5. QUALITY CONTROL COMPACTED FILLL – CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS TO HAVE R CYLINDERS CAST FOR EACH (50) CUBIC YARDS OF NATE. CONCRETE POURED OR FOR ANY ONE DAY OPERATION. i.USE GALVANIZED HILTI EXPANSION ANCHORS OR,APPROVED EQUAL, FOR EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE. –TESTING LABORATORY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING AND CURING SPECIMENS IN CONFORMANCE 2.VERIFY THE SIZE OF THE LEASED SPRINT PROPANE TANK TO ASTM C31 AND TESTING SPECIMENS IN ACCORDANCE TO ASTM C39. - AND FAA WARNING LIGHT EMERGENCY GENERATOR WITH –CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPOSED CONCRETE MIX DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPRINT STANDARD THE SUPPLIER. SPECIFICATION, FOR ANY POUR IN EXCESS OF 5 C.Y., TO CNSTRUCTION MANAGER A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR 3.FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF ANCHORS AND OTHER TO POUR. REQUIREMENT, SEE EQUIPMENT VENDOR DRAWINGS. OUTDOOR PAD FOR MINOR EQUIPMENT DETAIL 365 SCALE: 1"e: 2' J— I"III t SNS, Sprint 17 C O L_E R &' 101 Accord Park Drive STEVEN S ES TA TE P a z Norwell,MA 02081-1685 ISSUED MR CONSIRucnoN c°o ea � NOTES & DETAILS COL_/1N TON i0 723 osc000 STREET (781)982-5400. BOSTON MTA A ISSUED PDR REVIEW am on in 9 'A> a• ENGINEERS AND sglalnsTs NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ` SITE NO. BS54XC860A ND' °"" Imawn IN °"' r°°° ftw.;A Joe No. I cAseaDl:No. SHEET NUMIII:R Rev sem a Im>ED xvexeo oR,em `(W�63 17-160 BS54XC86OA D—1 0 a r 0 ' CORNER, TERMINAL UNE POST OR PULL POST 6'-0• 6'-0• ^w� Qyt o j N r °oo 0 TYPICAL ts FORK LATCH W/Loan(Fs) ELEV 0 IENSION BRACING OR COMPRESSION BRACING TOP OFFAGUT/WE ! 'i 2• NCE 1X4 BOARDS--\ -2X4 4X4 POST " p io o� EXTERIORPRO,ECT i•ABOVE 7X4(TYP) 1X4 BOARD GROUND AND SLOPE (NP) �-- ALL AROUND(TYP) m FIN GRADE OR �N TE STAY TCP OF PAVEMENT STOCKADE WOOD, GATE. 1 i/2•MAX TERMINAL OR ,PULL POST (MOD-CELL) FOUR CABINET LAYOUT WOODEN SWING GATE, SINGLE ISOMETRIC VIEW FROM GRAM POST FOOTING DETAIL DETAIL NTS 343A 466 tm EXISTING CHANELS BACK TO BACK TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED 1/4'4 TEK SCREW - TYP. OF 3 W/2 1/2"EMBEDMENT, TYP.OF 6 ' STOCKADE WOOD FENCE , ?ROVEXI BY 9'X4'BACK9'X47£12 SU OARD DETAIL 341 NTS �(I 1-6 1 1 PROPOSED B-UNE CHANNEL, POWER CABINET B22,CUT LENGTH TO SUIT A AND DRILL HOLES AS POWER CABINET REQUIRED, TYP.OF 2 SEC11ON A ( PROPOSED STUD NUT W/SPRING, ® - PROPOSED 1/4.6 LAG SCREW SN228, (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) W/2 1/2"EMBEDMENT, TYP.OF 6 TYP.OF 4 POWER CABINET n ; SHELTER WALL . U sj EXISTNJG 9'X4'BACK BOARD 'v PROVIDED BY SHELTER SUPPLIER - Ll EXISTING 04ANELS O BA 16• 2'-2 3/4" 2'-2 3/4" TYP.OF 3 To X-3 1/2" 2'-3 1/2" - 1 O PROPOSED B-UNE CHANNEL,622,CUT LENGTH TO SUIT AND DRILL HOLES AS FIEXENT FIEXENT BATTERY BATTERY 2...0• REWIRED, TYP.OF 2 2'-0 5/8" CABINET CABINET CABINET CABINET 2'-0 5/8". 2-62 1/2" .J FRONT VIEW- POWER REAR VIEW- POWER OOO ° PROPOSED SND NUT RESPRING, 9 1/2" RE SN228, (LENGTH AS QUIRED) LL� TIP.OF 4 fV 62 i/2' 9 1/2" 61 1/2" 62' 9 3/4„ FROM 61 3/8" BOTTOM VIEW- POWER PCS MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS (MOE&ELLS WALL MOUNTED POWER PROJECTION CABINET BOLT PATTERN FOR PPC MOUNT FOUR CABINET LAYOUT DETAIL DETAIL 372 DETAIL 422 373 NTS NTS Sprint COLER & 1D7 Accord Pats Drive m STEVEN'S ESTATE Sprin t NA � � G Norwell,MA 02061-1685 - *SUED° FOR cot'srRucnoN a" ess i1XB COLAN'TON 10 i (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA A ^� ISSM FOR RLVIEw CPO � m Po DETAILS ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A N0' WE "PAS0N3 B1' `W AP" 408 N0. CASCADE N0. I SHELT NUMBER I REV srxc�a xmm ocacrn uwana (u�03 17-160 BS54XC860A D—Q 10 t— "]�" ._ © NP-1 SFNNiTW/CONTINUOUS PICK ANGLE 2/g°.STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS SILICONE NOTCHED CLOSURE 0 WIDE.2"MGH SEAMS) 2'STANDING SEAM ROOF CUP .. 4'BUILDING FRAMEWORK REINFORCED PURUN LOCATION OF 12'%6'KNOCK-OUT 1/2"CHAMFER MDUNG 12 2'x 2'PURUN SUPPORT FOR POWER AND TELCO STUB-UPS ENTRE FOUNDATION WALL LINER. INSIDE NEOPRENE CLOSURE 2�.- FOR SPRIM BUILDING PERIMETER(BY OTHERS) EAVE TRRI SOLID WEB TRUSS 24ga.FLOOR TRIM �D C CLOSURE TRIM CEILING SUPPORT 1/2"C K FO MOUND MEMBER 24ga.CEIUNG TRIM ENTRE FOUNDATION PERIMETER By OTHERS) CEIL.ULOSE INSULATION. FAVE STRUT 5.1'DEEP(R-Ig) W/6'HEEL 4 MIL.NSQUEEM 3'WIDE VINYL SIGN G OVER VAPOR BARRIER 1/2'COX PLYWOOD ANCIWR BOLT •. .e< 24gI.CEILING LINER 1'FIBERGLASS BLANKET OVER ENTIRE BUILDING FRAMEWORK e.. (R-3) D 4'x 4'x S/16' CONCRETE(BY OTHERS) - PERIMETER ANCLE 3 1/2"INSULATION H.D.(R-13) NECESSARY FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS BUILDING ANCHORING DETAIL 4 BUILDING FRAMEWOW 4 MIL VISQUEEN iOUNDATON DIM II K S VAPOR BARRIER LENGTH IAI WIDTH SFRIM iT-0 9-f0 24ga.WALL LINER WALL LINER 5"MN.CLEARANCE FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION TO GRADE (3)/4 E.CONTINUOUS 2'MIN. Jr. ANCNORNG DETR ... _ y: SrooP NOTE 1 I .y•.. 1 CONCRETE'28-4AY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3000-4000 '♦ .. GRADE �.TYPICALI.Y 6 BAGS OOMMERCIAL-RFAOY W CONCRETE I _ :..t:`.,�•• v.•• ,' • 2)T11E iCVNMTKN 1.50 BELOW OLIN ASSUMES A IONIUM SOIL 1 . ". .. THE SOI CAPACITY UNG CA 1.500 IS LESS PER SQUARE FOOT. • PROVIDE `1,• GO SQUARE ROIL OT.CU CAPACITY Is LESS iww i.R A POUNDS PER SOUNDA FOOT.WS70MER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ALTEf3MiTE - FpINR4T10N DESK7L CLEARANCE BUILDING SECTION BY OTHERS AROUND ENTIRE FOUNDATION SPRINT CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 24ga. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WAVEGUIDE 12 2�— EAVE TRIM HVAC UNIT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT CORNER TRIM Q 000000 O VINYL SIDING OVER 0 0g0 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD ° ° PERIMETER ANGLE 3/4x 7/0 DOOR INTAKE HOOD HVAC DISCONNECT/GFI RECEPT. SPRINT SHELTER SPRINT SHELTER WEST VIEW (A) NORTH VIEW (Dj DETAIL 500 DETAIL 5� 1- Sprint SPRINT STEVEN'S ESTATE SHELTER & FOUNDATION DETAILS 723 OSGO00 STREET BOSTON MTA BY TRACHTE, INC. " NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. SS54XC860A NO, CASCADE 140. SHEEP NUMBER REV N/A N/A N/A U-CHANNEL W/CONTNUOUS PICK NP-1 SEALANT 24g.STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS SILICONE NOTCHED CLOSURE (18"WIOE,2"HIGH SEAMS) ` 4"BUILDING FRAMEWORK 2"STANDING SEAM ROOF CLW REINFORCED PURIM 1/r CHAMFER AROUND 2 L� 2"x 2"PURLN SUPPORT EARTRE FOUNDATION WALL LINER INSIDE NEOPRENE CLOSURE - 1/2"CHANTER AROUND PERIMETER(BY OTHERS) EAVE TRIM SOLID WEB TRUSS ENTIRE FOUNDATION PERIMETER.(BY OTHERS) 24ge.iLOOR TRIM A NO C 9•-10" CLOSURE TRIM CEILING SUPPORT LOCATION OF 12"X6"KNOCK-OUT MEMBER FOR POWER AND TELCO SNB-UPS 2190.CEkING TRW FOR ATdIT SHELLER CELLLULOSE INSULATION, EAVE STRUT S.1"DEEP(R-19) W/6"HEEL ° 4 MIL VISOUEEN 3"WIDE VINYL SIDING OVER x 4". d'.. .a VAPOR BARRIER I'FIBERGLASS 2-COX PLYWOOD KET OVER ANCHOR BOLT 2490.CEILING LINER "a_. ENTIRE BUILDING FRAMEWORK - (R-3) D 4••4"x 5/16- 'd� CONCRETE(BY OTHERS) - PUMETER ANGLE - 3,/r INSULATION H.D.<R-13) NECESSARY FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS BUILDING ANCHORING DETAIL 4"BUILDING FRAMEWORK FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS 4 MIL.VNEN LENGTH D N10Ni A ` VAPOR WBALLRIER A 8:T 20-0 9-1 2490.WALL LINER WALL LINER 5"MIN.CLEARANCE FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION TO GRADE • (3)/4 R.CONTINUOUS �..F "MN. ANCHORING DETAIL •}' x _71 i)CONCRETE:28-DAY COM STRENGTH 3000-4000 GRADE i ..•a'. P51.TYPICN.LY 6 HAGS COMMERCIAL-READY ARX CONCRETE .�.:.�. ''.:.i•' i.�.'� . {...C`'.'.',•'.: '.. a)THE FOUNDATKIN SHOWN BELOW ASSUMES A MINIMUM SOL • .... , BEARING CAPACITY OF 1.500 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. IR (• COMPACTED THE SPL BEARING CAPAGGY IS LESS TWIN 1.500 POUNDS PER PROVIDE "I 1f GRAVEL/SAND SQUARE FOOT,CUSTOMER,S RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ALTERNATE FOUNDATION DESIGN.CLEARANCE BUILDING SECTION NDATmN BY G.. AROUND ENTIRE FOUNDATION ` SPRINT CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 24go. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS HVAC UNIT 12 2r HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT EAVE TRIM GENERATOR RECEPT. WAVEGUIDE CORNER TRIM INTAKE HOOD °o°o°o° ' 0000°0° 0 00 00°0 0 008009° VINYL SIDING OVER oogegog$g 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD ° PERIMETER ANGLE Eli Ir 3/4x 7/0 DOOR HVAC DISCONNECT/GFI RECEPT. AT&T SHELTER AT&T SHELTER NORTH VIEW (Cl EAST VIEW (D) A- Sprint AT&T S TE VENAS, ESTATE —7 SHELTER & FOUNDATION DETAILS ` 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA BY TRACHTE. INC. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. SS54XC860A JOB W. I CASCADE W SHAT NUMBER REV N/A N/A N/A t FOUNDATION LOADING MATERIAL LIST MATERIAL REQ'D. PER ASSEMBLY NOIAENT 29240 AD-ft ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION GALV.MT. ow.1 IIEM I MK NO. �D=SHIP=ON SHEAR 5.50 1 { 2 1/4'0 x 8'-0'(A6t5-48.]5)ANCHOR BOLTS 1 1 SHAFT ASSY.(TOP SECTION AXIAL 540 Kb3 2 t8 48 REBAR x 15'-6'(ASTM AW1 M.60) -- 1 2 SHAFT ASSY.(BOTTOM SECTION) ' • ] 18 NS REBAR x 151-6'(ASTM A615-G9.60 IT[•tVnPRA m ooetc[mirmx'rAM UOPs+a 1] 18 0.33 3 ; (4) HARDWARE w__F AS FOLL(IW9r v wuxrKrc r5 ice ome[ acres 1E nslwilA Nv RMOzw.¢wrys� 2.64 3H P-MOBN r MSnd01E(DVw rlA2 a nFlwct4 MS"aw Vzv 133.82 { 5 -ABBOBE-S Biotin"�SM�iOxWMM.�rSM�fef�Axcgc VOL CONOIETE O KGG PM(TYPE B CEMENT) 13D PM3 9 m ro•i o.e.Svc aPe • 42ae 1 6 O nsld.rM 1( 9638 2 ) 4-37.4-2250 SETTING TEMPLATE STEEL(ASTM 4613-OR.60) 1040.0 M 4 4 Srrteim j 0.40 6 8 GSlW20 3/8.0 KELLUMS HOOK ASSY. B ] q �Kv�[r��Gun x•s sm ���,„111 lu sxrw•rs`of•iniac vua"e - K 1 t0 1.ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE ATTACHED 4 n VrF Bv0150L. IT ITT 1 11 w/(2)1&X NU18 TO BOTX TE)A%ATES m`rvu i?os Sal 2NANCIbn MB OT��� A[tm N .UP. Mw �)rA M N�VIEW 'A-A' ri 1 L3 ML0190 ��y�°Yf'-raRA 1 14 P0LYI5x85 15'x 25'AMERICAN FLAG 730 1 IS K10062 a-BUSS BAR KIT MOM BOLT PR ON e O g � 1 16 GALLON TDUCH-UP PAINT 1 17 79017014 2101 M-2 DOUBLE OBSTRUCTION 141 2 I/4'f z B'-0'LG. ' - ANCHOR BOLTS ON A -- 37'0 DOLT CIRCLE -0.0 `1 -- 1 18 5991865 ISO'S➢CORD a° rs e en ri.lsiro°i`w - - ANCHOR BOLTS ARE wirASn As4,rKA.>< 13 CENTERED{1NOER ACCESS PORTS SEE Slit.DMO GS5�18 VIEW"A-A" (TEMPLATE NOT SHOM) TOTAL GALV. STR. & ACCES. WT;_#__ TOTAL ANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE WT 79-15L I im NB REBAR.L"I5•-6' - - - EQUALLY SPACED ON A r '49.0 CIRCLE IEDHlM SIM a' _ 3 } e"�Nv'•°tl1cv 4 vt'MPAAi°"0N'O.fAw 9iKo m�Y-hf Z 4I— 4•NON •�' e r-a•aacv PIER 0»6e• COtNtAEIE COVER TION •R-B• . SECTION"B-Ir -Mss ro F2�W�°�RiAc Meta m ��erc"� Vpy I�[• r.ENERM.NOTES B m-elf—sa meM4AN. APZff vRp6 R OESNS[0 N AICOMVME VIM 1M.DA•5ffi Fm b 1lHI MEN afi RAOML NRyS fYl-�w�[M1WYAa[mw M M COMIIMCC YIM Ybfrt TaKA O4 a VIm9l AP.mr»t/HEA M fE»Yf[[ ieWl�.K•1ra6�.iM[YN1malMM1VOMY.bEW'•TlK /,��y O »Ma4gF ixALL NC Mi DV f6V/1530 Mp ASM Arta AXI illw MSM23lWLR 11.0.1 O 9Y- M B[M iC�9F�r KVCV 4•'i AfFMLi i MCIAM M9ZMM[AIOt 10IIbi4tix6 M 4 MIS Sim � a/��•YH• uTB M M OtlwtAtMl b M Fadpf MW.R VpPM3 Alm ip MRT.•7M O M MXG- 71• )NS REDAL L"1S'-6• N N;rMN 6 M HvaFina Hwy)c.N v1R,EMN VIM A MRSM.IT47Q i C DF mAW ATM 'fit 'Krae"D'mr s�[tamRN i"c'r�.TM1.3 mM'0a`'rt .LQUM mwMc[..xB wus m A n Foe ManBc Mrgi Aivta4'Mi 4 r NeMIDNIA 141s 5[AS 4M A Mm AFX RRNrMMB w uw aPFt q - y �w�aw irvu i[MMmu..w Mee a M srsr»cc iw1Ow.e Mau A Mw vertu - WON ��MmM, {ry1 lAMp1® a C YR 201,16419[.Nape XttM6 N¢ila!ME lAAtti M so—e6)WI MI5 P4 NmPAOLCT6M to a Smior� SECTION 'C-C' MyL�1�i rn.rNeelMI.Sar� IpMa )^i•wMa�54�iA pA,ue'"arvn._y4LMe"°avmNrai m aOf Y"rFIR.MIE NWJ N AW I WMii At��IFO 51'M M 9GdPoMTpli M ggiL Me ANR AM 1f N VIEW Mau a swMm v rc4asAn.M PMN YAL M sAYip Sr LSI. _ M NiXTRA MLR Pett E T Arra N ILAAIB IV a mann %aw; s'x�i"��nE �DmavmlMl, Y Mx.,cuL awMxf s wSMcvN.Mo x.Mm ac Mnaro 1 ,oma °wamMM ,,y� mmt�" iMf ' GENERAL NOTES: ""OYup °Vol�fa•aaxo RMB AS>oou wM en a a ixi MiebM T1°'wowM. m w e%�f v M) tel"Ar1[xrr )c IMr:� v1m A rm•MwM L FOUNDATION DESIGN 15 BASE GE THE FOLLOWING EEI ADN M-O APRIL 0,GS349I8 eifoe amaiAr v Bn• AmerMm a Deep M iAnrMp AA A®AM®. O1°^ M i,c'S a MArzm KRMpiMuruao&`xW"ot'wmM°u Mvr '[xoruc°Ef SON.DEPORT BY JAVONSK!FA:OTkCN,INC..REPORT N0.OE25SG-APR0.23.2002 Ia vMB iAMp.elMb)M,.I♦. E FOLINDATION DIN TE%IL SHOWN.SH THE GRAND LEVEL AT THE TIME DI SOL FROM THOSE AS DEPETEO T,THE SOR REPORT.SHOULD THE ACTUAL SCO.CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM TIFIE IN THE REPORT,THE OCOTECTHE%ENGINEER AND FOUNDATION DESIGNER SIUIED BE NOTIFIED O ORDER TO RE-EVALVATE 71E FINMOATEp OESIOI S 500.REPORT MMD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO COMSTRUCTIWL STEEL CAISSON OR SLURRY METHODMY . REMOVED REQUIRED COMPLETION OF NSOIL FROM G O,IF LEWING FT INTHEGROUND.ALL THE RIBS SSON TISK CAISSON SMALL BE FILLED WITH PRESSURRED GROUT.THE CONTRACTOR 19 SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR AL CONSTRUCTION MEANS,METHODS.TECHNIQUES,SEQUENCES,AND PROCEDURES. 0. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION SMALL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS S SPECIAL INSPECTION OF REINFORCEMENT,ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLATION.ANO ftEi'E,.F4 REQUIRED PER 199]UBC/199B CBC.FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHOR BOLTS SIMLL I,Mnpc� �)7 )e - - BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. - 6. RERIFONCIHO STEEL SHALL.CONFORM TO ASTM A615-87,Fy+6p Nd.RE%L ffMENT SRW"BE Rv arFrm ASSEMBLED USING STEEL WIRE.WEI.OM IS IMF PCIpITTEp.MD([MJN SPLI(S LENGTH FOR v45[0 Pyyl'r'0iaylayiA s Na 6 BARS AND SMALLER-44 x)bars FOR NR,7 BARS AND LARGER-55 x ob—. p MM,T e 4 tuts•a u MRI20NTAL TIES SWA.L BE STAGGERED WITH HO MORE THAN 5OX OF SPLICES IN ONE PLACE. 7. CONCRETE MO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTBBH PROCEDURE SH N-L BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AO 318-99,ACI 386.38-93,90 ALL APPLICABLE STATE AM LOCAL CODES. ITT r HINMBN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 4000 W AT DB DAYS USE TYPE H CEMENT ULESSSTATED OTHERWISE. b CONCRETE MIX SHOULD HAVE A SLUMP OF 7'( )FOR GULLED PER AND 3•(51') Ar ATimAb nsm AARm13FOR HMT FOUNDATIONS. ase-i413c-FOR DRILLED PIERS O LY TIE CONCRETE OVER THE ENTIRELENGTH OF ANCHOR BOLTS SRW L UNBE VIBRATED.FOR MAT FODATIONS ALL CONCRETE SHWA.BE VIBRATED. WM ANCHOR DOLT ORIENTATIONREQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT.THE CONTRATOR'SHOULD arp •'y i 0 s �TM�•q ME as CONSULT THE SITE PLAN AND MONOPOLE DRAWING FOR PROPER ACCESS PORT ORIENTATION IP PROVISION.IIJACKING DETAIL FLAG TR K DETAIL Apr rue Nelel NM �-( rMcwNAN MM. STEVEN'S ESTATE SprIn t SHELTER & FOUNDATION DETAILS � 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA BY TRACHTE, INC. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 SITE NO. BS54XC860A •ATB NO. I CASCADE NO. I SHEET NUMBER REV N/A N/A N/A p PROPOSED 3~ 16�k W HM STOWX FENCE GROUNDING GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED 3O'A40` SPRINT COMPOUND 1. ALL DETAILS ARE SHOWN AS A DIAGRAM, ACTUAL GROUNDING INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC 6 PROPOSED PROPANE TANK CONDITIONS TOO BE PROM @Y SPpNTT 2. ALL EXTERIOR GROUNDING AND TOP OF GROUNDING RODS SHALL ' BE BURIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4'-0" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. �S (PROPOSED C � <0> ELECTRIC METER GROUND ROD EXCEPTED. OM 4'X7'CONCRETE PROPOSED GROUND ROD PAD (GEN PROVIDED » . AT t0'O.G FOR A4 3.ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE #2 SOLID TINNED COPPER ' GROUND RINGSJ WITH MIN. 1' RADIUS BEND. PROPOSED 2101 M2-DOUBLE HEIGHT-O&W*AOL OBSTRUC710N UIGHT RECON BY 4. GROUND SYSTEM MUST BE TESTED AND SHALL HAVE A RESISTANCE £ PROPOSED SPRINT ANTENNA IBD.PART 0 79017MA OF 10 OHMS OR LESS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT AN INDEPENDENT"FALL POTENTIAL"TESTING REPORT. 5. NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF THERE ARE ANY DIFFICULTIES INSTALLING THE GROUNDING SYSTEM DUE TO SITE/SOIL CONDITIONS. ' atm—am- (END--am�am-®-am am am—am—am—Ow—am---a2PJ am�—}am—®—¢aD— N9—4189—am 11 6.ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTORS ARE TO BE CADWELD Fq C$9 GAS—GAs �S—GAS—GAS—GAS—GAS—64S GA a ALL ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING SHALL BE CADWEID OR MECHANICAL 8 o AS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS.I HEIGHT e A GL 6 7. ALL GROUNDING INSTALLATION IS TO.BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE £ vRovosED AT&T T&r ANTENNA SPRINT SPECIFICATIONS. 8. GROUNDS ARE TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 2'-0" FROM SHELTER CP OR TOWER FOUNDATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9 d \c? PROPOSED 100' I 9. CONTRACTOR TO HANG DIG IN AREAS AROUND EXISTING UTILITIES. V d�a ` FLAGPOLE Ed) (BY 10. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE ENCOMPASSES INA 4" X 2" BED PROPOSED OF TERRAFILL GROUNDING BACKFILL BEFORE BACKFILLING CONDUCTOR .� a� FOUNOATION TRENCHES. c b FLAGPOLE £ HEIGHT=76.5'*ACL (DESIONED BY EEI) 11. ALL INSTALLATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA oy5 ! 12. CONTRACTOR TO PNOTOORAPHWUY RECORD.ALL UNDO MM141) �-a TOWER UONT COROUTING CCIINEC110NS AND CADWEID3. a NTROLLER PROPOSED GPS AT 7W PROPOS[D GPS LOCATED AT �7�FACING 75 FAGIO SWTH ab9 "-C.,RlI—G.RD—rRD Pd° PROPOSED GROUND fU6LDStIEITERPROPOSED e INDE �T 1OGRDMt6 PROER EDUCED 22PROPOSED AT&T94ELI RGRD GRD!—GRD—GRD PROPOSED WO` RAGPOLE(SEE gym GRD p _ all I V EX I� BATTERY TTI ( TRANS. TOM UGHT n II OOMIROUM o+m w"Ossog (SEE ATTI iRAdIM -- � PROPDSED�A'fOR ON 4'XT CONP,NEIE PAD® Ell - ON MOP OONCIPAD PROPANE NE J E0tpP1FNf PROPOSED S! d araauDE FacE�® ---P —8--- i PROPOSED saRar PPC . GRD GRD-�GRD—GRD—GRDGRD—GRD--GRD GRD GRD 11—"GRD 17 PROPOSED CSR) E3 ff PROPOSED SPRINT PROPOSED TELCOEQUIPMENT MOUNIVID BACKBOARD PROMED CA9tJ&T CONOE PAD WTH IRAOM SH:LlER I PROPOSED SPRINT WIDE/ PPR MOIR7fED iD FRVAL RlAnINO BPENMG F Ui'ILITTES I VIMETY EASEMENT 4�4� �® WALL POWER k TELCO COMPANY. PROPOSED V/O U11U11ES ( SDE OM.1� DMARC LOCATIOE MAY lkRAtR$ FROM V/P lA _T ) )IL F 1 CABINET NOT SHOYM FOR CLAR11Y ate-�--H B--�cae— PROPOSED Inas' CARSON TOTER GRAPHIC SCALE PARTIAL Sl TE PLAN FOU'°AMO" 2.5 1.25 0 2.5 5 EAST EL E VA TION GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE: 1'--2.5'-0" 5 2.5 0 5 10 SCALE: 1"=5'_O" -J`— ,Sprint PA,OF Sprint COLER & 101 Accord Park Drive STEVEN'S ESTATE COLAN TON!O ? (7oge11.MA 02061-1685 QO ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CFa IMS .qe I B£CIRDAL <78tj g82-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTARo. GROUNDING PLAN & ELEVATION ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 A IssuED FOR REOTEw CPO TSS Are cM SITE NO. SS54XC860A Iw DATE mmm W oW AWD bJ ,roe NO. I CASCADE No. I SHELT NUMBER REV S7iD As HOSED DEDG"M aM.N - 17-160 1 BS54XC860A E-1 10 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS #6 AWG FROM ® GROUND ROD WITH ACCESS ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT e AT GROUND ROD (SEE DRAWING ® GROUND ROD ES FOR CABLE 5 QUANTITIES) 4 2 DISCONNECT SWITCH ® METER ON METER/BREAKER UNIT ® 7/16" /4" O 0 i"(MIN.) IT GROUND BAR 2 a o a a® HEAT SHRINK 1/8- MIN CIRCUIT BREAKER O / (MIN.) GE GENERATOR ONVE ANTON WALL ENNA 0 0 o a O�O a 0 0 a S/S NUT 1/4" MIN.) ■ CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION S09 �0 0 o}'a 1 0 S/S LOCK WASHER COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION O - ---- GROUNDING WIRE O O O O O O O O � i � COPPER BUSS S/S FLAT WASHER DO NOT HEAT SHRINK x REPRESENTS DETAIL NUMBER S/5 BOLT SCONNECT XXx --REF. DRAWING NUMBER O DD NOT dSCONNECT O LEGEND (TYP. OF 2) LABEL ABBREVIATIONS "DO NOT DISCONNECT"TAG ON ALL 1- TINNED COPPER GROUND BAR, 1/4" X 4" X 20", NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. GROUND BAR INTERCONNECTS AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE o - LABEL "DO NOT DISCONNECT" B-6142. HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION GENERAL LUG DETAIL AND EQUALIZERS TCW TINNED COPPER WIRE - 2- INSULATORS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CAT. NO. 3061-4 BCW BARE COPPER WIRETWO HOLE LUG, TO BE 3- 5/8" LOCKWASHERS• NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3015-8 NOTES; GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE KOPR-SHIELD USED WITH #2 AWG 4- WALL MOUNTING BRACKET, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT NO. A-6056 1) ALL HARDWARE 18-8 STAINLESS STEEL INCLUDING LOCK PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET - (THOMAS& BETTS) ON ALL LUG TCW TO BUILDING 5- 5/8-11 X 1" H.H.C.S.BOLTS. NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT NO. 3012-1 WASHERS. COAT ALL SURFACES MATH ANTIOXIDANT RWY RACEWAY CONNECTIONS OR GROUND RING _ COMPOUND BEFORE MATING (S/S) /) / 2) ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL 5 S 318" DIAMETER OR LARGER. TYP. TYPICAL 3)FOR GROUND BOND TO STEEL ONLY: INSERT A DRAGON RCS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL TOO WASHER BETWEEN LUG AND STEEL, COAT ALL SURFACES DWG DRAWING ELECTRICAL METALLIC Tue1"G INSTALLATION OF GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR GROUNDING —BAR DETAIL WITH ANnoxloANr coMPouNO BEFORE MATING. . IGR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) GROUND BAR DETAIL MIGB MASTER ISOLATED GROUND BAR CIGBE COAX ISOLATED GROUND BAR EXTERNAL DETAIL GEN GENERATOR GR GROWTH DETAIL 0 DETAIL 509 NTS 509 SSLP SPRINT SPECTRUM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NTS DETAIL 5 NTs 00 12"APPROX- . A ANTENNA ( ANTENNA CASE) TO ANTENNA FLAGPOLE GR UOD BAR (CtGSE) I SEE NOTE 1. gg EENCABLEWAVE 416132 CABLE GROUND KIT - SEE DETAIL�� CRG(TPP . } TED V V (SIMILAR) 3"TYP. #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND LUG WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) STANDARD COMPRESSION GROUND KIT(TYP.) CONNECTOR ( - GROUND LUG SHINER NOT �(TPP, ) SUPPORTS TO BE ° CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT nT1i GROUND KR TYP.) 4/0 GREEN INSULATED TO EXCEED 1/8" RADIUS BEND 1'-0" USED EVERY 2'-0" TO GPS ANTENNA CABLE NOMINAL FOR HALO GROUND. ANTENNA GROUND BAR(GIGUE) RADIUS BEND 0'-8" BOTTOM OF FLAGPOLE MINIMUM - SEE NOTE 1. (TYP. ) SEE DETAIL ' 12"�APPRO�X. ,{ - - (SIMILAR] HORIZONTAL NONDIRECTIONAL zMAX. DIA. 2" s• ,� � COAX CABLE SPLICE FOR CONNECTI MNA (I-. FOR ALL) LUG SUPPLEMENTARY BUS I CABLEWAVE 816132 LUG CABLE GROUND KR TO EQUIPM (2) #2 AWG BCW NA TRAY OR ICEBRIDGE HORIZONTAL OMNI-DIRECTIONAL FLAGPOLE PIER SPLICE FOR CONNECTIONS: 2 AWG BCW 1. SUPPLEMENTARY BUS TO #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND NG GROUND SUPPLEMENTARY BUS WIRE(GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) #2 AWG BCW (TYP OF 4) 2. SUPPLEMENTARY BUS TO PRIMARY PERIPHERAL INTERIOR BUS HORIZONTAL , - CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT - - -- -�---s NONDIRECTIONAL TO ANTENNA CABLE SPLICE ISO EMC VIEW OF ANTENNA CABLE GROUNDING - FLAGPOLE VERTICAL NONDIRECDONAL NOTE: DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND DETAIL NOTE' AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN `.1. NUMBER OF GROUND BARS MAY VARY GROUND HALO INSIDE SHELTER SPLICE CORNER INSTALLATION- TO GROUND BAR. 5Z6 NUMBER ON THE TYPE OTOW PROVIDED BY SHELTER FABRICATOR, NF TOWER, TS- ANTENNA LOCATION AND CONNECTIONR, 7RA��'IM ORIENTATION. PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. DETAIL• 2 SEPARATE GPS ANTENNA F ER REQUIRED. E USED NTS 513 DETAIL 511 NTS COLER 101 Accord Park Drive STEVENS ESTATE � Sprint sprint COLAN TON IO ? Norwell,MA 02061-1685 T" ISSUED FOR co"smuanoN `°` erS w° GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS (781)1982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA0 ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 a cvc ers A ISSUED FOR RENEW .wa g SITE NO. BS54XC860A NO. al DATE REMOMs sr aAP" 106 N0. CASCADE NO. SHEEP NUMBERI REV srra rs NOIEe otsuallo ovAxN Te 17-160 BS54XC860 E-2 0 FROM ANTENNA NOTE: 00 NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KR AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT X RX GROUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE Tx R SUPPORT POST + BRACKET FOR 27" CHANNEL (3-9") PART #802225 (PIROD Tx li INC OR EQUAL) CUT POST LENGTH TO FLAGPOLE WEATHER PROOFING KR SUIT BY REMOVING UNCAPPED END JUMPER REQUIRED GROUNDING KR SUPPORT POST FOR ICE BRIDGE 27" ICE BRIDGE 3-9" CHANNEL x10' PART # 124470 (PIROD INC. OR AN EENNECe VOLE(TYP) EQUAL) CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL LENGTH TO SUIT (SEE NOTE). IER PROOFING KIT CABLES FROM FLEXENT CABINET THROUGH BUILDING PORT 6 INSULATED AWG HANGER BRACKET TYPE DOUBLE CABLE-� LEVEL CHANNEL/27" BRIDGE PART SEPOR CTOR CICBE (1 TYP.)E #802257 (PIROD INC OR EQUAL) HAND OLE FROM ANTENNA MAXIMUM CABLE SPAN 3'-0" TYP. CIGBE FRAME SUPPORT EQUIPSIDE b (FOR CABLE HANGER #2 AWG TCW #2 AWG TCW SEE TABLE BELOW PCS/GPS ANTENNA W CABLES-ARRANGEMENT •o o• UPPER CIGBE kit BY CONTRACTOR. #2 AWG TWC BONDED To �— FLAGPOLE TOWER 4/0 INSULATED AWG - #2 AWG BCW TO FOUNDATION EQUIPMENT GROUND #2 AWG BCW 8t CONC. PIER SECTION THEU •° •• LOWER CIGBE RIGID STEEL RING ICE BRIDGE EL DMOICE BRIDGE CONDUIT PLUG RIGID STEEL ANTENNA CABLE #2 AWG,TCW TO GROUND RING CONDUIT BENDING RADIUS COUPLING DETAIL PER MANUFACTURER'S 576�r, STANDARDS GROUNDING - STANDARD DETAIL 6. GRADE "TS CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRES TO GROUNDING BAR (CIGBE DETAIL RIGID 522 STEEL Ifs CONDUIT PVC SCHEDULE 40 RIGID STEEL SIZE AS SHOWN TO PVC ADAPTOR ON LAYOUTS . RACEWAY - STANDARD DETAIL CABLE CABLEWAVE MANUf. MIN. G` UNDERGROUND CONDUIT STUB-UP CABLE NOMINAL NDT a R NUM BEND RADIUS CC 1/2" 810918-001 915659 5" _ DETAIL _ C66 _ LONG BAR El TYPE TWO-HOLE FITTING, 1 5/8" X810920-001 915594 22" DING o NTS J 0.75"O.C.LUGS(FOR#2 AWG - SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR) CADWELD PROVIDE 3/8`FILUSTER-HEAD BOLTS,LOCK WASHERS AND NUT.FOR - ATTACHMENT OF CABLE HANGERS TO SUPPORT BRACKET TO COMPOUND GROUND RING - #2 AWG TCW�_ — TO MONOPOLE GROUND RING (NUMBER OF KITS AS REQUIRED) NOTES: #2 AWG TCW 1. WHEN USING RROD COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS MA)IMUN ALLOWABLE SPAN SHELTER dtOUND�X�IM .BETWEEN SUPPORT ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION OF MOM CHANNEL SHALL BE t9 FEET PROVIDED BY NIM deer ewxn FOR 20 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL OR 9 FEET FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL RING GROUND FABRICATOR,TRp 2.WHEN USING PIROD COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTION&THE SPLICE SHORD ' #2 AWG TCW 3� L SA BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT.P POSSIBLE,OR AT A MA)GMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. TYP. & WHEN USN°PIROD CLOSECOMPONENTS.SUPPORT SHALL BE PRONDEO AS CLOSE AS VOSSIBLE TO THE . ENDS OF�BRIDGES,WALT A MAXIMUM CANTILEVER DISTANCE.OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. 4• THE EMS TO THE ORIGINAL C/ANNE4 OR EQUIVALENT, SHIED WITH A NATERIAI.TO RESTORE CHANNELCUT BROCE SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW AWG STRANDED COPPER O GROUND ROD COPPERWELD CABLE WITH GREEN — — — — & K BRIDGES MAY CONSTRUCTED WNH COMPONENTS FROM MANUFACTURERS OTHER THAN PROD. 5/8"0X10'-0"LONG THWN INSULATION FOR #2 STRANDED GREEN INSULATED PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER•ED VAIN COMTION ONENTS FR ARE MANUFACTURERS EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE BOND PROPOSED GROUNDING LINE COPPER CABLE(TYP) (TYP.) BOND TO ALL METALS FRAMES - & DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS.ARE PERMITTED WITH THE RESPECTIVE • FAN, LOWERS, ETC. WITH 02 STRANDED 4"It 20"x 1/4"TINNED COPPER MANUFACTURER'S AND EIMEER'S APPROVAL NO i. ENLARGED MIGB IS SHOWN FOR CLARITY TO DEPICT THE REQUIRED GREEN INSULATED WIRE MAIN GROUND-BAR(MCB).MOUNT MGs ON - 7. DEWATIONs FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS OR STANDARD DETAILS T>~ QU CABLE TRAY/WAVEGUIDE SUPPORT SYSTEM.(TYP.) REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL CONDUCTORS TO THE BAR. GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL 2. LOCATION OF THE MIGB•S x CIGB•s TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD AND MAY BE LOCATED AND SUPPORTED AS CLOSE TO EQUIPMENT AS FEASIBLE AND ICE COAX CABLE SUPPORT DETAIL GROUND ROD PRACTICAL To ACHIEVE THE DESIGNED CONFIGURATIONS. GROUNDING - STANDARD DETAIL EQUIPMENT f BRIGS DETAIL DETAIL69- DETAIL En NTS 503 P s 4 Mrs 76C i COLE R s 101 Accord Pork Drive;v, STEVEN'S ESTATE SP Tin t OF sPr=Ar IWC .' z Norwell,MA 02061-1685 ° V�, ISSUED FOR G°NSTRM°n°" `F° '�• GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS COL/�N TON 10 (781)962_5400 723 OSGOOD STREET ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 BOSTON MTA A ISS FGR REVIEW en NRB PN.. a�. SITE NO. BS54XC860A Wa DAreWASOIS - :: er CIM APWD �� JOB NO. CASCADE ND. SHEET NUMBER RLv SeAAE:As NDIED DES•EI) 66M _ 17-160 1 BS54XC860A E-3 0 B. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES (WAVE GUIDE): NOTE: THE RF TRANSMISSION LINE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE PRIMARY RADIO CABINET MONOPOLE " (PRC), FURNISHED BY LUCENT, AND THE ANTENNA CONSISTS OF A COAXIAL CABLE, - SOMETIMES REFERRED TO AS A WAVEGUIDE. GPS ANTENNA 1. ALL ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES AND JUMPERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT LOOPS (SUPPLIED BY LUCENT) AND/OR PIGTAILS. CHAIN MOUNT(ACCOMODATES MONOPOLE - 2. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KITS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON THE JUMPER BETWEEN DIAMETERS FROM 6 1/2"-367 THE ANTENNA AND MAIN LINE CABLE. 3. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KITS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS CLOSE TO THE CONNECTOR AS POSSIBLE AT EACH ANTENNA. IF THIS IS NOT FEASIBLE, THE GROUND KIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BEND ON THE FIRST STRAIGHT RUN OF THE CABLE. THE GROUND KIT SHALL BE,INSTALLED ON STRAIGHT SECTION OF CABLE ONLY f"I 1 AND NOT ON BENDS. 4. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE MANUFACTURERS MINIMUM BEND RADIUS SPECIFIED BELOW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL RACEWAY 2 FOR COAXIAL CABLE USING THE PROPER FITTINGS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THE CABLE TO PIPE CONNECTOR MINIMUM BEND RADIUS REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. I I BURNDY TYPE GAR I I (TYP 2 PLCS) COAXIAL CABLE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS III MANUFACTURERCABLE TYPE CABLE SIZE 0 MINIMUM BEND MINIMUM BEND RADIUS IN 4 Q - MOUNTNC TILT HOLES FOR.ADJUSTMENT RADIUS INTRAY OR B'CONDOR BRACKET PLATE SEE DETAIL "A" CABLEWAVE FLC 12—SOJ 1 2" 5" ip III 4 CABLLWAVE FLC 158-50.1 1 5 8 20" 28' o ILI ca�=X=r PROPOSED 5. THE GPS ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS CABLE RUN, FROM THE GPS MOUNT VALMONT GPS 3 CONNECTOR AT THE ANTENNA HEAD TO THE CONNECTION AT THE BTS CABINET, WITHOUT JUMPERS. CHAIN MOUNT POST 7. ALL ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES SHALL BE MARKED AND TAGGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEE DETAIL 806 SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. #2 AWG TCW I C. EMERGENCY GENERATORS 2' STANDOFF (TYP 3 PLCS) GROUNDING KIT 1. THE GENERAC EMERGENCY GENERATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2HOLE LUG (TYP 1/2"0 COAX CABLE MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE SHIPPED WITH THE UNITS. MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER 2.THE STARTUP OF THE GENERAC EMERGENCY GENERATOR SHALL BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED CIGBE MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (CED) OR ANOTHER FACTORY AUTHORIZED AGENT. THE FIELD GROUND BAR. #g SHALL COORDINATE THIS EFFORT WITH TOM CARROLL OF CED (1-800-727-9119)TO ENSURE 2/0 INSULATED—" — "2/0 GREEN INSULATED CABLE (PROVIDEDGROUNDING K KYf} THAT THE SAFETY AND WARRANTY ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED. AWC BCW MAY BE ATTACHED IN—UNE TO AND 2 3/8"ODX9"MOUNTING AREA FOR SUPPORTING A GPS - THE 4/0 GREEN INSULATED . DOWN CONDUCTOR FROM THE UPPER CIGBE WITH A LONG - BARREL HIGH COMPRESSION ELEVATION VIEW WEARTHER ROOFED(SIMILAR TO VALMONT GPS CHAIN MOUNT (PART NO. 82069 GROUND 1<m GPS ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKET NOTE DETAIL 806 1.THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE CPS ANTENNA SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL RIF REPORT. 2.THE GPS ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD 1-1/4"DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE.THE PIPE MU 7 THEN MOUNT END. THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A - — HAND OR ROTARY PIPE CUTTER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR CUT. A HACK $HALL NOT BE USED. THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL- AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE ANTENNA MOUNT. CELL SITE INSTALLATION NATES 3, THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRICATED AS SHOWN AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE USING U—BOLTS, THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN BE ATTACHED TO THE THE FOLLOWING INSTALLATION NOTES HAVE BEEN COMPILED FROM THE EXISTING PROJECT B. FERROUS METAL CUPS WHICH COMPLETELY SURROUND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL NOT BE USED. CUPS OF THE MOUNTING PLATE USING THE OVERSIZE U—BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOW ADJUSTMENT. R IS CRITICAL DOCUMENTS(i.e. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.SPRINT STANDARD PRACTICE, LUCENT DOCUMENTS. - FOLLOWING MATERIALS AND TYPES MAY BE USED TO FASTEN AND SUPPORT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS. THAT THE GPS ANTENNA IS MOUNTED SUCH THAT IT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICAL AND THE ETC.) FOR USE. THESE NOTES SHALL.BE UTILIZED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CELL SITES BASE OF THE ANTENNA IS WITHN 2 DEGREES OF LEVEL, TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROJECT DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. PLASTIC CLIPS A. GROUNDING 1.ALL METAL CONDUIT FOR GROUNDING DOWN CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND SYSTEM AT BOTH ENDS. METAL CUPS WHICH DO NOT COMPLETELY SURROUND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR. BILL OF MATERIALS 2. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE MAIN WATER PIPE USING A SURNDY TYPE GAR—TC CLAMP. 3. KOPR—SHELD ANTI—OXIDATION COMPOUND SHALL BE USED ON ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 4. ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CADWELWPROCESS.. < 5.ALL CADWELDSXSHALL BE INSTALLED USING THE PROPER CONNECTION/MOLD ANMATERIALS FOR THE PARTICULAR ' MARK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY CONNECTION AND/OR.APPLICATION._ (wch) 9. STANDARD BUSS BARS (GGBES AND MIGBS) SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED, THEY SHALL NOT BE FABRICATED TE CONN CTION SWEEP CONNECDO POST OC NN CE TION OR MODIFIED iN THE FIELD. 1 1-1/4 4 SCHEDULE 40 X 18"LG. MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE 1 /ANTENNA POST 10.THE GROUNDING CONNECTION TO THE POWER AND TELCO CABINETS OF THE PPC SHALL BE MADE BY CONNECTING THE CONDUCTOR FROM THE GROUND RING TO THE FACTORY FURNISHED BUSS BAR IN EACH COMPARTMENT, 2 1/2"9 X 2 1/2 X 4 U—BOLT ASSY y LD CADWELD CAOWELD 11. ALL GROUNDING WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT LOOPS (PIGTAILS)AND SHARP BEND RADIUS. LW 1/2."MEDIUM LOCKWASHER 6 Ip2 AWG iCW /2 AWG TCW HN - 1/2 A563 OR A HEX NUT 4 AL2 AWG TCW 6.ALL BOLTED GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCK WASHER UNDER THE NUT. HARDWARE FOR BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/8" DIAMETER AND SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL - 7. GROUNDING WIRE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED OR ROUTED THROUGH HOLES IN ANY METAL OBJECTS OR SUPPORTS TO PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A "CHOKE"POINT. A2 AWG TCW . ill DEPICTS CHOKE POINT (NOT ACCEPTABLE) _ SPrin t COLER & 101 Accord Park Drive STEVENS ESTATE --� _ Spint. COLAN TON IO No-oll, MA 02061-1685 °s ISD FOR LON5TRUCMN CPG GFSQvpW AL GROUNDING & ELECTRICAL DETAILS (781)982-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS - NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 BOSTON MTA ISSUED FOR RENEW cm ars mn SITE NO. BS54XC860A No. Dm rxim" a'' M A" J .Na CASCADE NO. SHEET NUMBERIM 90%mmmom ocwc�E� 17-160 1 BS54XC860A I E;-4 101 ------------ ANT GPS ANTENNA GPS ANTENNA FROM EXISTING U/P #A7 NOTES: FURNISHED BY LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 1. SERVICE:POWER SHALL BE 240VAC, 400A, 11, 3W. 7/16" DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR (ANTENNA) 7/16" DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR (ANTENNA) PROPOSED PROPOSED TELCO BOX PAD MOUNTED 2. A 200AMP METER AND A NEMA 3R DISCONNECT FLEXWELL 1/2" LOW LOSS CABLE 7/16 DIN MALE CABLE CONNECTOR TRANSFORMER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE PROPOSED METER BANK.THE PREMIUM JUMPER ASSEMBLY (S–FLC12) CABLEWAVE E CAB 4" SCHED. 40 PVC FOR NUMBER OF JAWS IN THE METER SOCKET AND THEIR SECTOR CIBGE CABLEWAVE 815396-003P AT&T SHELTER TELCO ARRANGEMENT DEPENDS ON THE VOLTAGE SERVICE. 806 TO BE STUBBED UP CONSULT UTILITY COMPANY FOR VOLTAGE SERVICE THROUGH FOUNDATION 2-750 AWG+ 1-1/0 AWG AVAILABILITY. 508A GROUND – KNOCKOUT GND IN 4"SCHED. 40 PVC - ' BAR PROPOSED METER BANK 4" SCHED. 40 PVC FOR AT&T 3. POWER SERVICE SHALL BE AS SHOWN TO PROPOSED (NEAR ANTENNA) DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR CABLEWAVE FLEXWELL CABLE PROPOSED METER SHELTER POWER TO BE STUBBED METER BANK. CABLEWAVE 734754 FLC 12-50J 810918-001 W/DISCONNECT (NOTES 1,2,3) UP THROUGH FOUNDATION .. KNOCKOUT 4. FOR COMPLETE INTERNAL WIRING AND ARRANGEMENT, 508A GROUND GROUNDING KIT REFER TO VENDOR PRINTS PROVIDED BY PPC CABLEWAVE 916388 3-3/0 AWG+ 1–#4 AWG MANUFACTURER. BAR GROUNDING KIT (1) 25 TWISTED PAIR, GND IN 4" SCHED. 40 PVC LOWER CIBGE CABLEWAVE 916382 24 GAUGE SOLID WIRE 5. POWER CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR = CABLEWAVE FLEXWELL CABLE IN (2) – 4"SCHED. ao UP TO PROPOSED METER BANK. SEE SHEET NUMBER A-2 FLC 158=5W 810916-001 PVC (ONE ACTIVE,ONE SPARE) ATS GEN AS PER FOR ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LAYOUT. SEE TRENCHING ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY (NOTE 9) MANUFACTURER'S DETAILS 325 & DETAIL 326 ON SHEET D-1. GROUND BAR =\ SPECIFICATIONS 6. TELCO SOURCE TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR UP (AT EQUIPMENT)fA DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR CIGBE CASLEWAVE 734754 POWER POWER PROTECTION TO PROPOSED TELCO BOX. (INCLUDE NYLON PULL WIRE TELCO FOR TELCO USE). PANEL PANEL CABINETFLEXWELL 1/2" LOW LOSS FOAM CABLE NOTE 4 (PPC–MOD7. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PREMIUM JUMPER ASSEMBLY (FLC12) THE MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRICAL CODE. CABLEWAVE 826032-004P 4–#z AWG, 1–#6AWGNEUTRAL. 1–#6 AWG GND 8• 25 PAIR CABLE SHALL BE CATEGORY 5 RATED DIN MALE CABLE CONNECTOR (1) 25 TWISTED PAIR, IN 2" EMT CONDUIT24 GAUGE SOLID WIRECABLE FOR DATA TRANSFER. - - - CABLEWAVE 734750 CABLE, IN 2" ROS CONDUIT 2–#SAWG, 1–#BAWG_ _ _ __ FLEXENT CABINET NEUTRAL. 1–#10 AWG GNDg• CONTRACTOR Tp FURNISH AND INSTALL 2-2P 80 AMP, T —— — —— — — — — — (NOTE 9) IN 1"EMT CONDUIT 1-2P 60 AMP (SHELTER PANEL) AND 1-1P 20 AMP 1 — SECTOR (TYP.) I (TOWER BEACON) BREAKERS FOR THE PPC. BY OTHERS NOTES: 1 FLEXENT SEE ELECTRICAL LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR ANTENNA LOCATIONS 45A SSHHELTER 10. POWER AND TELCO CONDUITS ONLY TO BE INSTALLED 2. DO NOT INSTALL ANTENNA GROUND KIT ON CABLE BEND " CABINET PANEL SHELTER I FROM CSC AND METER BANK TO AT&T SHELTER ALPHA MECHANICAL BETA MECHANICAL GAMMA MECHANICAL I FAA TOWER LIGHT 11. CONTROLER PANEL TO BE MOUNTED TO FLAG POLE DOWNTILT- 2' DOWNTILT= 2' DOWNTILT= 4" GPS ANTENNA COAX LENGTH (FT)* COAX LENGTH (FT) * COAX LENGTH FT * COAX LENGTH ONTROLER YJlT71 STAINLESS STEEL BAND CLAMPS. CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE (FT)* — I 3–#12 AWG IN GRADE LEVEL C FROM/TO TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX TYPE/SIZE RX/TX RX TYPE/ CPS POWER & TELEPHONE RISER DIAGRAI�1 3/4"EMT CONDUIT ANTENNA TO CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE JUMPER CABLE FLC12 3 3 FL6– 3 3 FL6– 3 3 N/A N/A G2 Al At = ALPHA FACE, RED (SINGLE STRIPE) ASSEMBLY 8153962003 81531/2003P 8153962003P RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY JUMPER CABLE TO CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE 290' 50' A2 = ALPHA FACE, RED/RED DOUBLE STRIPE) ANTENNA CABLE FLC 158-50J 110 110 FLC 158–SOJ 1t0 ,t0 FLC 158-50J 110 110 FLC 12-50J gp LEFT ANTENNA A5 VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY COVER ASSEMBLY 810916-001 810916-001 810916-001 810918-001 1 1/4- 1 1/4" 1 1/4" 1/2" St = BETA FACE WHITE (SINGLE STRIPE) ANTENNA CABLE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE CABLEWAVE RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED MILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY COVEROPRIMARY BIY FlC 12 4 4 FLC 12 4 4 FLC 12 4 4 N/A N/A B2 = BETA FACE WHITE/WHITE (DOUBLE STRIPE) RADIO CABINET 826032-004 826032-004P 826032-004P G7 A2 LEFT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY (BY SPRINT 1/2" 1/2" 1/2 62 81 GI = GAMMA FACE, BLUE (SINGLE STRIPE) * ESTIMATED LENGTHS FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION. RIGHT ANTENNA AS VIEWED WHILE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY NOTES: 1. TYPES AND SIZES OF THE ANTENNA CABLES ARE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED LENGTH OF THE CABLES. CONTRACTOR G2 = GAMMA FACE, BLUE/BLUE (DOUBLE STRIPE) TO VERIFY THE ACTUAL LENGTHS IN THE FIELD BEFORE INSTALLATION AND NOTIFY THE FIELD ENGINEER FOR LEFT ANTENNA AS VIEWED ULE LOOKING AT THE FACE OF THE ARRAY VERIFICATION OF SIZES OF THE CABLES. REFER TO FINAL ANTENNA RECOMMEND FOR ANTENNA TYPE AND AZIMUTHS. 2.FIELD ENGINEER TO UPDATE THE LENGTH OF CABLES ON AS–BUILT DRAWINGS 175'IC BOSTON MARKET COAX CABLE COLOR CODES' TYPICAL ANTENNA CABLE CONFIGURATION CONTRACTOR NCE OF TCOLOR CODING AT TOP O SUPPLY HOF FLAGPOLE. ITEM III _ DESCRIP71ON PART NUMBER QUANTITY LENGTH TOTAL LENGTH GPS (EACH) (FEET EACH) FEET ORDERED ANTENNAS ANTENNA SECTOR 1 GAMMA SECTOR: ALLEN TELECOM DB932DG65T4E–M , – – ANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT 2 ALPHA AND BETA SECTORS: ALLEN TELECOM D89320065T2E–M 2 – – #6 INSULATED AWG 3 MECHANICAL DOWNTILT KIT DB390, OB5098 3 – – 1 1/4" COAX CABLE FOR ALPHA, BETA &GAMMA SECTORS SECTOR CIGBE/UPPER CIGBE GND BAR GND BARI GPS CIGBE 4 (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 810916-001 6 110 730 5 1/2" COAX CABLE FOR GPS(CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 810918-001 1 90 100 2/0 GREEN INSULATED 8 1 1/4" UNATTACHED DIN–FEMALE CONNECTOR FOR ALPHA, BETA & GAMMA 734754 13 _ _ (1) 4/0 GREEN ANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT (FLEXWELL/CABLEWAVE) INSULATED AWG 7 1/2" UNATTACHED DIN–MALE CONNECTOR FOR GPS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 734750 2 – – #6 INSULATED AWG 3' JUMPER CABLES FOR ANTENNA/COAX CONNECTION – DIN MALE & DIN–MALE 815396-003P 6 3 18 8 CONNECTORS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 53 \ jIGNDBAR LOWER CIGBE 9 1 1/4" GROUND KIT (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 916388 18 – – 10 1/2"GROUND KIT(CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) 916382 3 l - _ #2 AWG BARE TINNED it PPC (200A) NS2S2–W2O, 1 ANTENNA COAX GROUND KIT 12 GPS ANTENNA – – – – – – –– – – PROVIDED BY LUCENT 13 WEATHER PROOF KIT 916132 6 #6 INSULATED AWG 14 CABLE HOISTING GRIPS (1 1/4", 1/2") 916534-114, 6, 1 - GND BAR CDA CIGBE - 916534-012 15 4' JUMPER CABLES FOR ANTENNA/COAX CONNECTION – DIN MALE/DIN MALE 926032–Q04P 7 4 28 #2 AWG BARE TINNED CONNECTORS (CABLEWAVE/FLEXWELL) THIRD PARTY BILL OF MATERIALS GROUNDING SUPPLEMENTAL c SPRINT G SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM GROUNDING--SYSTEM A,­ ,J I"II2 t sprint • C OL_E R � ,o, Accord Pork Drive STEVENS ESTATE __VP COLAN TON 10 2Norwell,MA 02061–IsBs E0 (781)91ssuFOR CONSTRUCTIONeno ccs E` a POWER & ANTENNA SCHEMATIC 82-5400 723 OSGOOD STREET BOSTON MTA ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 A MUM FOR�� cvo ers are SITE NO. BS54XC860A N0 Ronsms m w .aro ��. JOB No. CASCADE NO. I SHEET NUMBER aEv saau noity cesioxee onan+ f'_ 17-160 BS54XC860A E—rJ I 0 N PROP. 30'x40' PROP. 8' STOCKADE COMPOUND (BY SPRINT) FENCE (BY SPRINT) PROP. GENERATOR PROP. PROPANE TANK PROP. HAYBALE AND ON 4'x7' CONC. PAD ON 3'x10' CONC PAD SILTFENCE (BY SPRINT) (BY SPRINT) (BY SPRINT) z � °u4 o o o PROP. A ATT Att ICE BRIDGE i ON ----------- --- ---- - 1119 POWERPROP. 100'-0" ' °'i I NU PANEL FLAGPOLE (BY OTHERS) I \\ A MUI A Z PROP. AT&T ANTENNAS 'fill _ T RBS 2106 2 PROP. T W/IN FLAGPOLE /// `� ANTENNA HOUSING I lilt 9 PROP. SPRINT ICE BRIDGE 1? -11 11 `\ `' CABLE ACCESS HOUSING N ' \1 PROP. 2-GANG METER\\ i BANK (BY SPRINT) , 1 PROP. AT&T METER � MOUNTING PIPE CHASE 1 i t1 �" / - AND DISCONNECT I —FLAGPOLE n PROP. SPRINT EQUIPMENT \\ ( I i ---g� IN PROP. SHELTER PROP. PROP. 12' WIDE l I COAX CABLES (TVP) TRANSFORMER GRAVEL ROAD (BY 1 i • W j ( (BY SPRM ) SPRINT) I 1 �" S > I n m PROP. C CABINET \t E (BY SPR NT) 1 I OUTSIDE SHIELD ALLGON 7262.02 (TYP OF 3) PROP, AT&T UTILITIES IN FUTURE I CONDUIT SEE SHEET ATT3 � MOUNTINGPIPE CHAS E F - E DIAGRAM PVC I = 270' 1 j ANTENNA MOUNT (TYP) I INSIDE � POLE NOTE: i FOR COMPLETE DIMENSIONS OF THE l \ g SECTION A-A PROPOSED FACILITY, REFER TO SHEET A-2 "PARTIAL SITE PLAN do ELEVATIION". PROP, SPRINT 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT . ,1 NOTE: FOR COMPLETE ANTENNA SCHEMATIC AND UP \ BOM, REFER TO SHEET ATT3. AT&T,,ANIENNA MOUNTING DETAIL r2_"� AT&T COMPOUND PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" _ nt S _. _ GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Boo S" WM STKU GPIGREENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE -" AT&T M1017W.MA 020+8 Engineers,Archbecls,Covai uction EngineAR1ers&inspectors SITE NO.08-007 , fE Sin W/ ANTENNAS IN 100—FLAGPOLE msoun1Msmw 0 09/11/03. W"rOR_numa .art. JMT AT&T COMPOUND PLAN marts 723 OS0000 STREET AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 "MMMW BY CHK pa ep oae.ls rucesll 1 02M W10WN `� G 24445 912-008-007A-ATT1 0 i i SUPPORT POST + BRACKET FOR 27" CHANNEL HANGER BRACKET TYPE (3-9") PART #802225 (PEROD INC OR EQUAL) DOUBLE LEVEL CHANNEL/27- CUT POST LENGTH TO SUIT BY REMOVING BRIDGE PART #802257 C FLAGPOLE UNCAPPED END (PEROD INC OR EQUAL) 2'-0" MAXIMUM CABLE MAX [SPAN = 4'-0" TYP i 27" ICE BRIDGEFf 3-9" CHANNEL x10' PART # 124470 (PEROD INC. OR EQUAL) CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL LENGTH TO SUIT 5,..4" (SEE NOTE) SHELTER z Li FOUNDATION 30 FOR CABLE HANGER � CONIC. PIER SEE TABLE BELOW� (TYP) ANTENNA N 4 ,y FIN. GRADE - CABLES-ARRANGEMENT r J- o BY CONTRACTOR. #2 AWG BCW SOLID INSTALL DRIP LOOP o I ( CONCRETE PIER TINNED TO EQUIPMENT ON ANTENNA CABLES. n lJ (2500 PSI) O GROUND RING BENDING RADIUS PER ` 0 MANUFACTURER'S A' Q STANDARDS 4 s Q SF cyeiNFBgSF ry�pp P ELEVATION SECTION BTS SUPPORT FRAME SEE DETAIL 3 NOMINAL CABLE CABLE HANGER MANUF. MIN. e CABLE SIZE rn'E TYPE NUMBER BEND RADIUS NUMBER ERICSSON RBS 2106 CABI ET le 2 7/8" LDFS-50A 206706-2 10" NTS ATT 1 1/4" LDF6-50 206706-3 15 1 5/8" t.DF7-50A 206706-4 20" Qi ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. ERICSSON RBS 2106 DIMENSIONS NOTES : Q RECOMMENDED CABINET MOUNTING ANCHORS ARE HILTI KWIK CABINET HEIGHT x WIDTH x DEPTH HOLE DIAMETER AT A MIN. 2.75"EMBED. 1. WHEN USING PIR00 COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS BOLT 11 5/8"MAXIMUM 63 1/2"Hx57 3/16"Wx37"D ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION OF R85 2106 (1614mm x 1300mm x 940mm) BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 19 FEET FOR 20 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL OR 9 FEET FOOTPRINT 63 1/2"Hx51 3/16-Wx28"D FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL. (INCLUDING INSTALLATION FRAME) (1614mm x 13ODmm x 710mm) 2. WHEN USING PIROD COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE ERICSSON RBS 2106 WEIGHT & FLOOR LOADING SPLICE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, IF POSSIBLE, OR AT A MAXIMUM APPROX. MAX. FLOOR OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. CABINET MAX. WEIGHT. LOADING 3. WHEN USING PEROD COMPONENTS, SUPPORT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE ASe e RBS 2106 (yEICHT WITHOUT BATTERIES) (WEIGHT WITH BATTERIES)1213 LBS 1301 LBS POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES. WITH A MAXIMUM CANTIIIVER DISTANCE 2 OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. `w CABINET ANCHORING BY ERICSWN SHALL BE BASED ON A PEAK ACCELERATION VALUE OF 0.120. M 4. CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL. OR EQUIVALENT, ERICSSON RBS 2106 MINIMUM CLEARANCES FINISH. USB 2001 2 BAY 5. ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM MANUFACTURERS 2 9/16. DIRECTION MINIMUM CLEARANCE OTHER THAN PEROD, PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. 415/1,.- ZZ CABINET FRONT 52" n " 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PERMITTED25 19/32" n "; CABINET REAR 2" WITH THE RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL. _ n 7• DEVIATIONS FROM !CE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS �=411 5/8'9/32" CABINET RIGHT. r N/A OR STANDARD DETAILS REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL. CABINET LEFT 36" ICE BRIDGE AT FLAGPOLE W/SHELTER ABOVE THE CABINET 40" QUAI 576 NTS BASE MAME F-001PRIhi 3 M NTS '� OF GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. 800 S"G REENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE , MSA o o a Engineers,Aadtitetxs,C011struc§m Engineers&Mspeckn SITE NO.08-007 AT&T N0.941C8 OCATE SITE W/ ANTENNAS IN 100' FLAGPOLE "OSOUTHMAMSTREJET Errs 723 OSG000 STREET 0 09/11/OS SUED FOR FILING JUT MT AT&T SITE DETAILS GPIMASS AT&T LESS SERVICES tMri t1Ev190F+4 W, cw in M6 90110110¢WASH wEv NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 400 am HILL DRIVE ,AS SHINN JUT • Yrt �L 24445 912-008-007A-ATT2 0 TO UP #A7 SECTOR A SECTOR 6 SECTOR C TOTAL ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION AZIMUTH 30' AZIMUTH 150' AZIMUTH 27V QUANTITY TRANSFORMER NO. (SEE NOTE 1) BY SPRINT) RXi/T%1 R%2 RX1/TXf RX2 RX1/TX1 Rn COLOR CODE ONE GREEN TWO GREEN ONE BLUE TWO BLUE ONE WHITE TWO WHITE TELCO SERVICE ANTENNA (BY SPRINT) .METER BANK 1 (SEE NOTE 3 & 4) ALACON 7262.02 ALLGON 7262.02 ALLGON 7262.02 3 (BY SPRINT) AS-Bulli SERIAL MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0' 0• ly r __ 1 ANTENNA JUMPER (ANDREW) L4A-POMDM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 L4A-PDMOM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 L4A-PDMDM-4 6 I r �- -I--METER AND DISCONNECT 2 (LENGTH) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) (4 FEET) TELCO 200AI (BY CONTRACTOR) 200A, ATTACHED MALE DIN CONNECTOR INCIV 2A DEO INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED MtCLUOED DEMARCATION BOX �% J W/ITEM '2 W/ITEM �2 W/ITEM �'2 W/ITEM /2 W/ITEM #2 W/ITEM #2 (CSC OR EQ.) L L_= J— 2-POLE (ANDREW) 3 MAIN COAX (LENGTH) IA-0 (110 FT) IY."e 110 FT) lY"e 110 FT) 14"e (110 FT) AVO 110 FT) AVO (110 FT) 660 FT (ANDREW) LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-5OA LDF6-50A LDF6-50A LDF6-SOA UNATTACHED FEMALE DIN 4 CONNECTOR (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) L5PDF-RPC (2) LSPDF-RPC 12 4" PVC CONDUIT 200A APPLETON GENERATOR (ANDREW) W/PULL STRING RECEPTACLE (PROVIDED BY 5 CONNECTOR UNATTACHED E DIN (BY SPRINT) GENERAL CONTRACTOR) (ANDREW) (2) LSPOM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) LSPDM-RPC (2) ISPOM-RPC (2) lSPDM-RPC (2) LSPOM-RPC 12 COAX SURGE ARRESTOR 6 (ANDREW) __.N/A N/A N/A.. N/A N/A N/A 0 3-#3/0 t to LMU ANTENNA KATHREIN 738-454 OMNI I 1-#3 GND, IN LMU COAX(LENGTH) 1/2'e (10 FT) 10 FT 200A 200AI 2" CONDUIT 7 (ANDREW) LOF4-50A -� 4 MI 8 UNATTACHED CONNECTOR TBD t I 4'x8' TELCO ( f_j0A 9 GPS ANTENNA MATSUSHITA VIC 100 i BACKBOARD CUTLER—HAMMER P/N ( #PRLlA120OT42CSlRNlR 10 UNATTACHED—CONNECTOR L4PNM—RC 2 (PROVIDED BY BECHTEL) 11GPS COAX (LENGTH) 1/2"e (,0 FT) t0 FT (ANDREW) LDF4-50A 12 UNATTACHED-CONNECTOR TSO RX1/TX1 2" CONDUIT e (3) #10 AWG AND (1) RX2 W/PULL STRING _ _ _ #10 AWG GROUND IN A i (WIRING BY RADIO r - 2" EMT TO RBS 2106 NOTES EQUIP VENDOR) 1 1. ALL MATERIALS ON THE ABOVE TABLE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THEDUAL POLE RBS 2106 I SUBCONTRACTOR FOR INSTALLATION. SECTOR ANTENNA 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOT EXCEED THE CABLE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING SHELTER ( I WITHOUT RF ENGINEERING APPROVAL. 7/16" DIN TYPE FEMALE 1 � CONNECTOR (ANTENNA) 3. CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR RX1/TX1 RX2 TOP JUMPER CABLE L_____J FABRICATION. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL AS—BUILT CABLE LENGTHS AND PROVIDE ANTENNA SERIAL NUMBERS ON RED—LINED DRAWINGS. (IF REQUIRED) va 4. ANTENNAS SHALL BE PROCURED AND INSTALLED WITH DOWNTILT BRACKETS AND HEAVY DUTY 9 2 CLAMPS SUPPLIED BY ANTENNA MANUFACTURER. POWER AND TELCO ONE—UblE DIAGRA 2A MAIN COAXIAL CABLE 5. THE BOTTOM JUMPER SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE BTS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER. NOT TO SCALE — TBO CONNECTOR 10 4 GROUND BAR (NEAR ANTENNAS) 508 509 6. COLOR CODE ALL MAIN CABLES AT TWO LOCATIONS: 3 NEAR ANTENNAS NEAR EQUIPMENT GROUNDING KIT NOTES: 7. ANDREW COAX GROUND KITS, ANDREW COAX WEATHER PROOFING, ANDREW SNAP-IN HANGER ADDITIONAL GROUND 15 REQUIRED IF ANTENNA CLAMPS, AND ANDREW HOISTING GRIPS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO IS NOT LOCATED NEAR BTS EQUIPMENT 1• SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A. SINGLE PHASE, 200 AMP, 3 WIRE, 120/240 VAC, 60HZ SERVICE FOR AWS THE SUBCONTRACTOR FOR INSTALLATION. SITE. GROUND BAR 506 . SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. POWER 7 (BOTTOM OF STACK)11 AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. 3. FOR COMPLETE INTERNAL WIRING AND ARRANGEMENT REFER TO DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY PPC MANUFACTURER. COAX GROUND BAR NEAR EQUIPMENT 509 4. ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE N.E.C. AND UTILITY COMPANY AND LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. ANTENNA SCHEMA11C AND BOM 2 5. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 36" OF FLEX CONDUIT WITH ALL CONDUIT FITTINGS (NUTS, REDUCING NOT TO SCALE BUSHINGS, ELBOWS, COUPLINGS, ETC.) NECESSARY FOR CONNECTION TO THE BTS CABINET. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT WITH FAULT CURRENT RATINGS GREATER THAN THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT FROM THE POWER UTILITY. B 4 7. Amm c� POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR 12 (SEEM s1 (#14 AWG AND LARGER), 600V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED RX1/ RX2 FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION; LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED. GPS LMU TX1 8. CUT, COIL AND TAPE A 10 FOOT PIGTAIL FROM END OF FLEX CONDUIT FOR TERMINATION BY ERICSSON. A.AAd (TYP.) OF GREENMAN—PEDERSEN, INC. GREENMAN- PEDERSEN, INC. STEVEN'S ESTATE AT&T Mme,MA 02048AIN ' GPIEngineers,AmMilects,Cwwftc n E,lgineets&Mqm t m SITE NO.08-007 No.34706 OCATE SITE W/ ANTENNAS IN 100' FLAGPOLE no SOUTH Um SIRW 0 /11/03 BMW FOR nUNG ,w, JMf &T ANTENNA SCHEMATIC AND ONE-UNE DIAGRAM M Ar tn•wSSACHUSU TS 723 OSGOOD STREET a AT&T WIRELES8 SERVICES GATE eY Cwt 4a No onlrleNo 1111Medt tLctr NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 IMA / Y 02MAS Sf10YtN jw 24445 912-008-007A—ATT3 0 GENERAL NOTES: SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS 1, THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301,ACI 318.ACI 336,ASTM SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL.STATE,AND LOCAL FACILITY CONSISTING OF COLOCATING ON AN PROPOSED FLAGPOLE WITH THE START OF CONSTRUCTION (IF REO'D) A184.ASTM A185 AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCM.AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION(AHA) FOR THE LOCATION. THE EDITION OF THE AHJ ADOPTED CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE Of ANTENNAS AND THE PLACEMENT OF OUTDOOR EOUIPMENT CABINETS CONTRACT AWARD SHALL GOVERN THE DESIGN. IN A PROPOSED SHELTER BUILDING CODE: 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER, CAS,ELECTRIC.AND OTHER UTILITIES BOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CAGE 1999 WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH O ELECTRICAL CODE: NATIONAL 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL BE UNMANNED AND DOES HOT - 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NATIONAL FIRE ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIRE POTABLE WATER OR SEWER SERVICE. AND WHERE D AS DID FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. SHALL AMERICAN CONCRETE 04SSTITUTE(ACI)31S. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL tE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD � USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS I REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60,DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED CONCRETE 3. THE PROPOSED FACILITY K UNMANNED AND IS NOT FOR HUMAN OTHERWISE. WELOCO WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WIELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION(AISC), MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION.ASD, HABITATION. (NO HANDICAP ACCESS IS REQUIRED). AROUND OR NEM UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS *B'AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE NINTH EDITION TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW, THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE STANDARD U„O TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (TIA) 222-F. STRUCTURAL STANDARD FOR LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C)ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL ANTENNA TOWER AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES •. OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION, INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)81,GUIDE FOR MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 2 TIMES PER MONTH, BY AT&T TECHNICIANS. SAFETY D)TRENCHING& EXCAVATION, EARTH RESISTIVITY,GROUND IMPEDANCE,AND EARTH SURFACE POTENTIALS OF A GROUND SYSTEM IEEE 1100(1999) RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR POWERING AND GROUNDING OF ELECTRONIC 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL RE PROVIDED FON REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS EOUIPMENT 5. NO NOISE. SMOKE. DUST OR ODOR WILL RESULT FROM THIS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: IA 60 COMMERCIAL BUILDING GROUNDING AND BONDING REOUIREMENTS FON PROPOSAL. SPECIFICATIONS. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH.......3 IN. TELCORDIA OR-1503 COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS 4, IF NECESSARY. RUBBISH. STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS.STONES AND OTHER CONCRETE EXPOSED 70 EARTH OR WEATHER: FOR ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF LISTED CODES AND STANDARDS REGARDING MATERIA.. 6. OUTDOOR STORAGE AND SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS ARE NOT METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS.THE MOST RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT PROPOSED. REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN A GENERA.REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC /6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. REQUIREMENT,THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN. 5, THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER 70 FLOW AWAY I5 AND SMALLER &WWF ,,,,,,,,,1 1/2 IN, 7. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE FURNISHED AND WORK SHALL BE FROM THE BTS EOU1PMENT AND TOWER AREAS. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED 70 EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: 6. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIASHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. & SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR SLAB AND WALL ........................3/4 IN. DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION, EMBANKMENT. BEAMS AND COLUMNS ...............1 1/2 IN. 5, A CHAMFER 3/4'SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNO, IN 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL 7. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. PERMITS AND INSPECTION REOIRED FON CONSTRUCTION. UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. TO. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM THE 6. 94STALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEOCE ANCHOR.SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S 8. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER,WATER.CAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES. WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE.THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO SITE ON A ONLY BASIS. WITCH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SHALL DE REMOVED MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR.AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ANO/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH NO RESAR SHALT. BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DMLUNG HOLES IN 11. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS WAS OBTAINED FROM SITE WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WOW,SUBJECT TO THE CONCRETE. EXPANSION BOTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY RAMSET/REDHEAD OR APPROVED EQUAL. VISITS AND ORMY04GS PROVIDED BY THE SITE OWNER. .APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING.OWNER AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. S. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY 711E TOWER, EOUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY,SHALL.BE GRADED TO A 12. NO WHITE STROBIC LIGHTS ARE PERMITTED.LIGHTING. IF REQUIRED. UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE WILL MEET FAA STANDARDS AD REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT.SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES &302 13. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CALL DIG—SAFE FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY 10. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING MARKOUT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. T—800—DIG—SAFE. CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IF REQUIRED DURING 14, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR IS CONSTRUCTION. SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES t!£CHTEI. SUBCONTRACTOR IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. CONSTRUCTION AD OWNER IS AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 300 STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND M ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO ASC AND AWS 01.1.WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN.PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE 42.4 IN THE MSC 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION`.97H EDITION. PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE ASTM A325 BOLTS (3/4 OA)AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. NON—STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8'DIAL ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS AND EPDXY ANCHORS SHALL SE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MMAMWACTLRER'S REQUIREMENTS. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES,SHALT.BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. MANUFACTURER'S MINIMUM CONCRETE EDGE DISTANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING INSTALLATION. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 301 OF GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. INC.GREENMAN- PEDERSEN, ISTEVENS ESTATE 800 SOUTH MAIN STREET GPI &Wwm Ate,CwwhHC m EngM"m a SITE NO.08-007AT&TMNffi oP MA 02M NOSOUTH MAIM,arRt<xT 0 U/11/033 SUED FOR FILING j ,� TE STANTENNAS Ni TTE00' MGPOIE 723 OSGOOO STREET AT&T WWR ESS SERVII;ES AT&TdcCONSTRUCTION NOTES MANSFIELD.agm aNA9sAOlxTseTTs NORTH ANDOVER. MA 01845 401 SIP'ME u i� �': JDa NIT... WMSEI. KV •AS SHOWN JMI JMT It o 24445 1 912-006-007A—ATT4 I 0