HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 154 JOHNSON STREET JOYCE EfWl :.A
CLEFON
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER NORHHANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
NOV Z7 II co A '9 ��-
PLANNING BOARD ,
APPLxCATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
NOTICE: This application must be typewritten
Applicant: John J. Burke Address: 71 Sutton Hill Rd.
North Andover, .Mass. 01845
I. Application is hereby made
(a) For a SpecialPermit- under Section 7 ' Paragraph 2.2
of the Zoning Bylaw.
2 (a) Premises affected are land x and buildings
numbered 154, 164 Johnson St Street.
(b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the
North South East x West side ' of
Johnson Streets known .as No. on St
Street,
(c) Premises affected are in Zoning ,District u I ark
the premises affected have an area of w .,41 9 cFt
and frontage of 350. 17 feet.
3. ownership:
(a) Name and Address of owner' (if ,joint ownership, give a111
names)
sgood
Date of purchase Previous owner
(b) If applicant is not owner, check his interest in the
premises:,
X Prospective purchaser
Leasee
Other (explain)
4 Size of proposed building: front: feet deep
Height: stories: feet.
(a) Approximate date of erection
(b) occupancy or use (of each floor)
(c) Type of construction
5 . Size of Existing Building: feet front: feet deep
Height: stories feet.
(a) Approximate date of erection
(b) occupancy or use (of each floor)
Has there been ' a previous application for a Special Permit
from the Planning Board on these Promises? N
If so, when
7 . Description of purpose for which Special Permit is sought on
this petition: To create a fr xcentjan,lot aA. allowed hu go P Uon
7.2.2 of the North Andover Zoning b 1a
2354 20
8 . Deed recorded in the Registry of Deeds in Book i4a Page 144
or Land Court Certificate No.. Book Pare
9 . The principal points upon which I base may, applicacion are
as follows (must be stated in detail) . This type of lot is allowed and
there is not - ` lv a outage.
I , agree to pay for advertising in new and postage fee for
mailing legal notices to "P rti s in Interest" .
i
(P itioner, ign ure)
Every application for action by the Board shall be made on a form
approved by the Board. .: These forms shall be furnished by the
Clerk upon request. Any communication supporting to be an
application shall be treated as more notice :of intention to seek
relief until such time as it is made on the official application
form. All information called for 'by the form shall be furnished
by the applicant in the manner therein.
Every application shall be submitted with a . list of "Parties in
Interest" which shall include the petitioner, abutters, owners of
land directly opposite on any public or private street or, way 'and
abutters to the abutters within three hundred (300) feet of the
property line all as they appear on the most recent applicable
tax list, notwithstanding that the land of such .owner is located
in another city or town, the Planning Board of the Town and the
Planning Board of every abutting city or town.
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST
NAMES ADDRESS
Add additional sheets if necessary
Any question should be directed to the Planning Office
IST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST PAGE—�_OF—(--
UBJECT PROPERTY
AP PARCEL JNAME JADDRESS
97 V 6 ry e e AACS`! /V- fl v�•-�-
b B e r,')cL Sf- '/v.
ABUTTERS '
MAP PARCEL 'NAME ADDRESS
c r., 1? L 3-o nSa,. S xe'F'" Al. IQ'
! 2 8 �f ve, a n�,�sa.. S{ �e e`f
Z tZ��� r SS I.. s ve e` - ,
vltin LAJ- Piz r t(s� Z �affil l t' r-� S F% !V
C 1� -1 li a C ry G—
CQ
0 �� t,v�tl a C.-. ke l''ls /rl A
+ / ` .t I2 ,.
�iV,JNe1s0 N.
I ,�1, ru er- j7, It 51: '
i
-----------------
� f
li i
l� vnd-G�v ��
�G�'�C� �� ��
RE.GE 1yi
DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE YO R G S 11uA M
RK
APROFESSIONALCORPORAi YiVATTON ��fi ����##,�,
�dViG�11�
in
ONE BOSTON PLACE
BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 02108-"70 MAR 15 2 Q2 PP %
Julian J.D'Agostine Alan L.Stanzler Harold G.Clarke,Jr.
C.Michael Maim Grover S.Parnell,Jr. Robert Z Diettrich
Harold R.Davis Robert J.Galvin J.Gavin Cockfield
Frank P.Conrad Peter Myerson Ellen Donovan McCann
William E Griffin,Jr. John D.Chambliss Thomas S.Fitzpatrick TTELEPHONE:(617)367-2500
Paul E.Levenson Carol R.Cohen Robert E.Richards,Jr. 'TELECOPIER(617)523-6215
Robert C.Gerrard Howard P.Speicher Lori H.Freedman
John G.Serino Paul L.Feldman Laurie M.Ruskin
John R.Berman Kevin F.Long
Sidney J.Wartel Peter L.Koff
Gary S.Matsko Gary M.Feldman March 14, 1996
Judith Ashton John A.Dziamba
John T.Lynch George A.Hewett
HAND DELIVERED
Joyce A. Bradshaw, Town Clerk
Town Hall
120 Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: John J Burke v Town of North Andover Planning Board
Dear Ms. Bradshaw:
You are hereby notified pursuant to G.L.c. 40A, Section 17 that the plaintiff in the
above-referenced matter on March 13, 1996 filed an action in the Land Court appealing the decision
of the North Andover Planning Board,which was filed with the Town Clerk on February 28, 1996
purporting to deny a special permit with respect to the property at 154-164 Johnson Street,North
Andover. A copy of the complaint is attached hereto.
Please acknowledge the date of the receipt of this letter on the copy provided as well as
on the original and give the copy to the person delivering this letter.
Very truly yours,
Howard P. Speicher
HPS/mtd
Enclosures
cc: John J. Burke
Received:
By:
J:1SPEICHERWRKEIT0WNCLRK.SRV
00
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
ESSEX, ss . URT
MISC. NO.
JOHN J. BURKE,
Plaintiff
V.
JOSEPH V. MAHONEY, RICHARD
ROWEN, ALISON LESCARBEAU, COMPLAINT
RICHARD A. NARDELLA and JOHN
SIMONS, as they are the
members of the PLANNING BOARD
OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, r--
Defendants
c:: A
INTRODUCTION
C-)
1 . This is an action pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, §17 appealing a
decision of the Town of North Andover Planning Board denying
an application for a special permit .
PARTIES
2 . Plaintiff John J. Burke is a resident of North Andover,
Massachusetts and is the applicant for a special permit for
the properties known as 154-164 Johnson Street, North Andover,
Massachusetts (the "Property") .
3 . The individual defendants are the members of the North Andover
Planning Board (the "Planning Board") . Their names and
addresses are as follows:
Joseph V. Mahoney
24 Mill Pond
North Andover, MA 01845
Richard Rowen
102 Bearhill Road
North Andover, MA 01845
Alison Lescarbeau
68 Laconia Circle
North Andover, MA 01845
Richard A. Nardella
63 Haymeadow Road
North Andover, MA 01845
John Simons
25 Ironwood Road
North Andover, MA 01845
FACTS
4 . The Property is comprised of two contiguous parcels totaling
141, 415 square feet and with 350 .17 feet of frontage in an R-3
zoning district under the Town of North Andover Zoning By-law
(the "By-law" ) .
5 . Plaintiff applied to the Planning Board for a special permit
for a "frontage exception lot" on the Property pursuant to the
provisions of Section 7.2 .2 of the By-law.
-2-
6 . Section 7.2 .2 of the By-law permits the granting of a special
permit for an exception to the lot frontage and lot width
requirements of the By-law provided certain conditions are
met . The conditions are as follows:
a. The area of the lot exceeds by three (3) times the
minimum area required for that district;
b. The lot has a minimum continuous street frontage of not
less than fifty (50) feet and a width of not less than
fifty (50) feet at any point between the street and the
site of the dwelling;
C . There is not more than one other such lot with frontage
contiguous to it;
d. The lot is so located as not to block the possible future
extension of a dead end street;
e . The creation of the frontage exception lot will not
adversely affect the neighborhood; and
f. The creation of the frontage exception lot is in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the By-law.
7 . The application submitted to the Planning Board by the
plaintiff proposed the division of the Property into three
lots, two of which meet all of the dimensional requirements of
the By-law and one of which (the "frontage exception lot") has
-3-
_ w
less than the 125 feet of frontage and lot width required, but
which has more than 100 feet of frontage and lot width.
8 . The frontage exception lot proposed by the plaintiff to the
Planning Board meets all of the requirements for the granting
of a frontage exception lot special permit, as follows:
a. The proposed frontage exception lot has over 75, 000
square feet of area, more than three times the required
area of 25, 000 square feet in the R-3 zoning district;
b. The proposed frontage exception lot has a continuous
street frontage of not less than fifty feet and a width
of not less than fifty feet at any point between the
street and the site of the dwelling proposed for the lot;
C . There is no other frontage exception lot contiguous to
the proposed frontage exception lot;
d. The lot is located so as not to block the possible future
extension of a dead end street. There is sufficient area
on the lot exclusive of the area for the dwelling so as
to accommodate the possible future extension of a
subdivision roadway on the adjacent land of John and
Linda Parker. The adjacent land of Parker is in any
event the site of an approved subdivision which does not
-4-
provide for or require any extension through the frontage
exception lot proposed by the plaintiff;
e. The creation of the frontage exception lot proposed by
the plaintiff will not adversely affect the neighborhood
and
f. The creation of the frontage exception lot proposed by
the plaintiff is in harmony with the general intent of
the By-law.
9 . The Planning Board held a hearing on the plaintiff's
application for a frontage exception lot special permit on
January 2, 1996, and continued the hearing to January 16, 1996
and closed the hearing on February 6, 1996. On February 20,
1996, the Planning Board voted to deny the application.
10 . The Planning Board issued a written decision memorializing its
denial of the plaintiff' s application. The decision was dated
February 28, 1996 and was filed with the Town Clerk on the
same date. A true copy of the decision, certified by the Town
Clerk, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
-5-
CLAIM FOR RELIEF G.L. c. 40A, 517
11 . Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate as if stated herein the
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 10 of the
Complaint .
12 . The denial of the special permit by the Planning Board was an
abuse of the Planning Board' s discretion, exceeded the
Planning Board' s authority and was on grounds that are legally
untenable, unreasonable, whimsical, and arbitrary and
capricious, for reasons including but not limited to those
stated in the following paragraphs.
13 . The proposed frontage exception lot met all of the dimensional
requirements of the By-law for approval of such lots, and had
more than twice the minimum required frontage and width.
14 . The Planning Board found that theproposed frontage exception
lot will adversely affect the neighborhood on the ground that
it would be the only such lot in the neighborhood. This is in
direct contradiction to the standards for the granting of a
frontage exception lot special permit, which require, in
Section 7.2 .2 (c) , that there not be other such lots nearby.
15 . The Planning Board found that the proposed frontage exception
lot would not be in harmony with the general intent of the By-
law on the ground that it would be a "non-conforming lot . "
-6-
Since the only nonconformity proposed, frontage and width, is
exactly what the By-law contemplates in permitting approval of
frontage exception lots, it is inconsistent with the By-law,
an error of law and arbitrary and capricious to deny a special
permit because of the very condition for which the By-law
contemplates approval.
16 . The plaintiff' s application fully complied with all of the
requirements for the issuance of the requested special permit.
17 . The plaintiff is aggrieved by the decision of the Planning
Board.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs request that the Court grant the
following relief
1 . Hear the evidence and annul the decision of the Planning Board
denying the special permit requested by the plaintiffs;
2 . Enter judgment ordering the issuance of the requested special
permit, or in the alternative remand the matter to the
Planning Board with an order for the Planning Board to take
action consistent with the Court ' s decision; and
-7-
i
5 . Such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
JOHN J. BURKE,
By his attorney,
Howard P peicher/BBO#474380
DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE, P.C.
One Boston Place
Boston, MA 02108
Dated: March 14, 1996 (617) 367-2500
-8-
r�ECE6',';:G
JOYCE 9f�AGS'AW
NORTH ANDOVER
TpWN OF NORTH ANDOVER z
Any appeal shall be filetl H A S S A C H t� S E T T S Fj3 (� �� r5 AM a
within (20) days after the T
date of filing of this Notice of"°:';�,, a
in the Office of the Town AVEM
Clerk. .. . • ATrneCOPY
` 1, '••..,,✓•..,� ILII /��r�_._
ACMU
Town Clerk
NOTICE OF DECISION
Date. . . 28_, 1996
1/2%96, 1/16/96
Date of Hearing 2/6/96.. 2x20/96, ,
Petition of .John.J..Burke. '
Premises affected • 154•... . . .Johnson,street_
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements
of the , North.Andover Zoning.Bylaw.Section.7:2.2 . _ . , _ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
so as t0 c,�e�t #c allo,.a,frontage•exception_lot on•land.located at .154.164 .Johnson St.
:after a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted
DENY ,the special permit
to . . . . . . . .
based upon the following conditions:
CC: Director of Public Works
Building Inspector
Natural Resource/Land Use Planner
Health Sanitarian Signed
Assessors
Police Chief Joseph, v., . ... . . Chairman, , , , ,
Fire Chief
Applicant
Richard. Rowen.,vice• Chairman. , , ,
Engineer
Alison Lescarbeau,. Clerk, , , , ,, , ,
File .
Interested Parties
Richard la, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
. . . . . . .
John Simons .. . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . .pi? .nr�ine'�__Board
Town of North Andover t AO*Tbt
OFFICE OF o:
0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES .
146 Main Stredt ' r'
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 �'SSAc►+ust�`�
(508)688-9533
February 21, 1996
Ms. Joyce Bradshaw
Town Clerk
120 Main Street
No. Andover, MA 01845
Re: Special Permit - 154 - 164 Johnson St. Frontage Exception Lot
Dear Ms. Bradshaw,
The North Andover Planning Board was scheduled to hold a
public hearing on December 19, 1995. Due to a snow storm, that
meeting was postponed.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
January 2 , 1996 in the Senior Center behind the Town Building, upon
the application of John J. Burke, 71 Sutton Hill Road, No. Andover,
MA. 01845 for a special permit under Section 7.2.2 of the North
Andover Zoning Bylaw. The legal notice was properly advertised in
the North Andover Citizen on November 29 and December 6, 1995 and
all parties of interest were duly notified. The following members
were present: Joseph Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, vice
Chairman, Alberto Angles, Associate Member, Richard Nardella and
John Simons.
Mr. Rowen read the legal notice to open the public hearing.
Atty. Howard Speicher was present representing Ben Osgood, Jr. and
Jay Burke.
Atty. Speicher stated that the proposed lot is in Residential - 3
district, is located directly on Johnson Street, doesn't block any
property, has 125 feet of frontage and over 175, 000 square feet of
area. He feels it meets the requirements of the Planning Board.
Peter Rodriques, 128 Salem Street, a very close abutter, stated
that he is adamently opposed to the granting of the special permit.
Feels he has been kept in the dark and wonders what exactly is the
intent here, one house or a future subdivision with many houses?
Concerned about a water table hazard, traffic hazard, and
additional noise due to more auto traffic if the land is allowed to
1
BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUMZING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535
Julie Parriao D.Robert Nicena Michael Howard Sandra Star Kathleen Bradley Colwell
be developed. The reason he bought his property is for the privacy
and feels that would be jeopardized if the land were developed.
Julie Crocker, an abutter at 145 Johnson Street, is also in
opposition and fully supports the Rodriques and other neighbors.
Steve Marsand, 93 Johnson Street, asked if the special permit was
essentially relief for the owners of the property?
Ms. Colwell replied in the negative, that relief would come from
the Zoning Board of Appeals. The special permit from the Planning
Board is for the creation of a lot.
Atty. Speicher explained to the many abutters that were present,
that the application before the Board tonight was for the creation
of just one lot, not a subdivision.
Mr. Mahoney explained that if all the criteria are met, the Board
could not deny the special permit. He also suggested that the
parties involved speak privately regarding their concerns and is
sure an agreement could be worked out.
Discussion of this item continued until January 16, 1996.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
January 16, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alberto Angles,
Associate Member, Alison Lescarbeau, Clerk, John Simons and Richard
Nardella.
Ben Osgood, Jr. and,Atty. Howard Speicher were present with updates
on this plan. In response to questions asked at the last meeting
Atty. Speicher stated that the site distance going away from the
old center is 450 feet, and going towards the old center it is 500
feet. The grade is 36 feet from front to back. Some issues with
the Rodriques have been resolved, and some are continuing. Mr.
Osgood would agree to creating a berm with white pines planted on
top along the boundary with the Rodriques. They have hired an
attorney and are all working together. Mr. Osgood has spoken with
three neighbors who are not direct abutters, and he is addressing
their concerns also.
Mr. Simons stated that the Planning Board is trying to maintain
some symmetry in Town, and feels this is stacking up one house
behind the other. He suggests putting the house closer to the
property line and positioning it in line with the other home. Mr.
Osgood stated that he does not want an adverse effect with the
neighbor, that the proposed home will have a "street scape" to
Johnson Street
Mr. Mahoney spoke of a letter the Board received from Judy Crocker
stating her opposition to the proposed house.
2
Ms. Lescarbeau stated that she did not believe this lot fits in
with the intent of the bylaw.
Continued until the February 6, 1996 meeting.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
February 6, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph V.
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alberto Angles,
Associate Member, Alison Lescarbeau, Clerk, Richard Nardella and
John Simons.
The applicant requested a continuance until this meeting. At the
last meeting the Board strongly encouraged the applicant and the
abutters to meet and find some common ground. Mr. Osgood stated
that he made several calls to the Rodriques and they were not
returned.
Atty. Philip Niman was present representing the Rodriques, abutters
to the property in question. He stated that at the last meeting
reference was made to a lawsuit stating that if all requirements
are met the Planning Board must grant an affirmative vote. Mr.
Mahoney maintains that is not correct but, the Board must not act
capriciously or whimsically in making a decision.
An abutter asked if this special permit is granted, would the
neighbors have any say in the special conditions? Mr. Simons
stated that is what we're trying to do now. Mr. Osgood stated that
if the lot was sold, the seller would maintain some control over
the style of home placed there. Atty. Niman wants to know who
everyone is. If the applicant is the purchaser, who is the owner?
Mr. Nardella stated that we grant to an applicant; it's up to them
to be of good standing. Atty. Niman stated that you can't grant
unless it is a proper party.
Mr. Rowen stated that the Board is trying to eliminate stacked
housing; and he asked at the last meeting if the home could be
moved.
Mr. Nardella asked how does a lot become conforming? Ms. Colwell
replied that 25 more feet of frontage is needed. The subdivision
rules and regulations state that a builder needs only 50 ' to build
a road. Mr. Nardella stated that a builder could put a road and a
small subdivision in.
On a motion by Ms. Lescarbeau, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board
voted unanimously to close the public hearing and directed staff to
draft a decision for the February 20, 1996 meeting.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
February 20, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph V.
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alison Lescarbeau,
Clerk and Alberto Angles, Associate Member.
3
At the last meeting Ms. Colwell was directed to draft a decision
upon which the members would vote at this meeting.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Ms. Lescarbeau, the Board
voted to accept the DENIAL decision as written by Ms. Colwell. The
vote was as follows:
Mr. Rowen yes
Ms. Lescarbeau yes
Mr. Angles yes
Mr. Mahoney No
Attached please find the special permit DENIAL.
Sincerely, KAP
Aa�66 V 'xx�
oseph V. Mahon y, Chairman
North Andover Planning Board
4
154-164 Johnson street
Special Permit - Frontage Exception Lot
The Planning Board herein denies this request for a special permit
to allow
the creation of a frontage exception lot under Section
7.2.2 of the Zoning Bylaw. This application was submitted by John
J. Burke, 71 Sutton Hill Road, North Andover, MA 01845, dated
November 27, 1996.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The area of the lot exceeds by three (3) times the minimum lot
area required for that district. The R-3 Zoning District
requires a minimum lot size of 25,000 S.F. The proposed lot
contains 75,026 S.F therefore the size of the lot is
sufficient.
2. The lot has a minimum continuous street frontage of not less
than fifty (50) feet and a width of not less than fifty (50)
feet at any point between the street and the site of the
dwelling.
3. There is not more one other such frontage exception lot
contiguous to it.
4. The lot is located so as to block the possible future
extension of a dead-end street. There is a proposed
subdivision on the adjacent property owned by John W. & Linda
E. Parker. The proposed roadway is a dead-end as there is not
sufficient available land on the property to construct a
connecting road. If this lot is created it will preclude the
possibility of the roadway connecting through.
5. The creation of the frontage exception lot will adversely
affect the neighborhood. There are not other frontage
exception lots in the neighborhood. The house would be placed
to the rear of all of the homes along the street, contrasting
significantly with the site design and placement of the
existing dwellings in the neighborhood. This will detract
from the overall character of the neighborhood and this
section of the community.
6. The creation of the frontage exception lot is not in harmony
with theenera t
g 1 intent of this Bylaw. The creation of this
lot would violate the intent and spirit of the Bylaw through
manipulation of property to essentially manufacture a non-
conforming lot. The creation of this lot would overcrowd the
land in creating a "second tier" of homes in the neighborhood.
The value of adjacent land and buildings would not be
conserved as the lot would be aberrant to the neighborhood.
Given the above the Findings the Planning Board herein DENIES this
application for a frontage exception lot.
cc: Director of Public Works
Building Inspector
Health Agent
Assessor
Conservation Administrator
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Applicant
Engineer
File
Johnson.exc
PUA�� [ hG 80A00T - '
Any appeal shall be fileTc w N O F NORTH A N D O V E R
NSR NNANDOMER
MASSACHUSETTS ��EBC I 15 A�f 'J6
within (20} days after.the
date of filing of this Notice
in the Office of the Town ?
Clerk.
SSA�MUSt''4.
NOTICE OF DECISION
Date. . ,February 28,, 1996 . , .
1/2/96, 1/16/96
Date of Hearing
Petition Of .John J._Burke. . . . . . . .
Premises affected , .154. . 164.Johnson Street. . ,
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements
of the
North.Andover.Zoning.Bylaw.Section.7.2.2 . , .
so as to gtumiK allow.a frontage exception lot,on land .located at ,154.164 ,Johnson St.
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted
to .DENY . . . . . . . . . .the .special permit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
based upon the foliocving conditions:
CC: Director of Public Works
Building Inspector
r
Natural Resource/Land Use Planner
Y
Health Sanitarian Signed `
Assessors
Police Chief Joseph, . .. Mahoney.. Chairman. , , , ,
Fire Chief
Applicant Richard_Rowen.. Vice. Chairman. , ,
Engineer
File Alison. Lescarbeau: Clerk. , . , ,
interested Parties
Richard Nardella , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
John Simons
.Planning . Board
Town of North Andover NORTN
OFFICE OF ��Og SE O 6 11OOL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES p
146 Main Street
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845
�9S34CNUS���
(508)688-9533
February 21, 1996
Ms. Joyce Bradshaw
Town Clerk
120 Main Street
No. Andover, MA 01845
Re: Special Permit - 154 - 164 Johnson St. Frontage Exception Lot
Dear Ms. Bradshaw,
The North Andover Planning Board was scheduled to hold a
public hearing on December 19, 1995. Due to a snow storm, that
meeting was postponed.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
January 2,1996 in the Senior Center behind the Town Building, upon
the application of John J. Burke, 71 Sutton Hill Road, No. Andover,
MA. 01845 for a special permit under Section 7.2 .2 of the North
Andover Zoning Bylaw. The legal notice was properly advertised in
the North Andover Citizen on November 29 and December 6, 1995 and
all parties of interest were duly notified. The following members
were present Joseph Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice
Chairman, Alberto Angles, Associate Member, Richard Nardella and
John Simons.
Mr. Rowen read the legal notice to open the public hearing.
Atty. Howard Speicher was present representing Ben Osgood, Jr. and
Jay Burke.
Atty. Speicher stated that the proposed lot is in Residential - 3
district, is located directly on Johnson Street, doesn't block any
property, has 125 feet of frontage and over 175,000 square feet of
area. He feels it meets the requirements of the Planning Board.
Peter Rodriques, 128 Salem Street, a very close abutter, stated
that he is adamently opposed to the granting of the special permit.
Feels he has been kept in the dark and wonders what exactly is the
intent here, one house or a future subdivision with many houses?
Concerned about a water table hazard, traffic hazard, and
additional noise due to more auto traffic if the land is allowed to
1
BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535
Julie Parrino D.Robert Nicetta Michael Howard Sandra Stair Kathleen Bradley Colwell
be developed. The reason he bought his property is for the privacy
and feels that would be jeopardized if the land were developed.
Julie Crocker, an abutter at 145 Johnson. Street, is also in
opposition and fully supports the Rodriques and other neighbors.
Steve Marsand, 93 Johnson Street, asked if the special permit was
essentially relief for the owners of the property?
Ms. Colwell replied in the negative, that relief would come from
the Zoning Board of Appeals. The special permit from the Planning
Board is for the creation of a lot.
Atty. Speicher explained to the many abutters that were present,
that the application before the Board tonight was for the creation
of just one lot, not a subdivision.
Mr. Mahoney explained that if all the criteria are met, the Board
could not deny the special permit. He also suggested that the
parties involved speak privately regarding their concerns and is
sure an agreement could be worked out.
Discussion of this item continued until January 16, 1996.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
January 16, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alberto Angles,
Associate Member, Alison Lescarbeau, Clerk, John Simons and Richard
Nardella.
Ben Osgood, Jr. and Atty. Howard Speicher were present with updates
on this plan. In response to questions asked at the last meeting
Atty. Speicher stated that thesitedistance going away from the
old center is 450 feet, and going towards the old center it is 500
feet. The grade is 36 feet from front to back. Some issues with
the Rodriques have been resolved, and some are continuing. Mr.
Osgood would agree to creating a berm with white pines planted on
top along the boundary with the Rodriques. They have hired an
attorney and are all working together. Mr. Osgood has spoken with
three neighbors who are not direct abutters, and he is addressing
their concerns also.
Mr. Simons stated that the Planning Board is trying to maintain
some symmetry in Town, and feels this is stacking up one house
behind the other. He suggests putting the house closer to the
property line and positioning it in line with the other home. Mr.
Osgood stated that he does not want an adverse effect with the
neighbor, that the proposed home will have a "street scape" to
Johnson Street.
Mr. Mahoney spoke of a letter the Board received from Judy Crocker
stating her opposition to the proposed house.
2
Ms. Lescarbeau stated that she did not believe this lot fits in
with the intent of the bylaw.
Continued until the February 6, 1996 meeting.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
February 6, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph V.
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alberto Angles,
Associate Member, Alison Lescarbeau, Clerk, Richard Nardella and
John Simons.
The applicant requested a continuance until this meeting. At the
last meeting the Board strongly encouraged the applicant and the
abutters to meet and find some common ground. Mr. Osgood stated
that he made several calls to the Rodriques and they were not
returned.
Atty. Philip Niman was present representing the Rodriques, abutters
to the property in question. He stated that at the last meeting
reference was made to a lawsuit stating that if all requirements
are met the Planning Board must grant an affirmative vote. Mr.
Mahoney maintains that is not correct but, the Board must not act
capriciously or whimsically in making a decision.
An abutter asked if this special permit is granted, would the
neighbors have any say in the special conditions? Mr. Simons
stated that is what we're trying to do now. Mr. Osgood stated that
if the lot was sold, the seller would maintain some control over
the style of home placed there. Atty. Niman wants to know who
everyone is. If the applicant is the purchaser, who is the owner?
Mr. Nardella stated that we grant to an applicant; it's up to them
to be of good standing. Atty. Niman stated that you can't grant
unless it is a proper party.
Mr. Rowen stated thattheBoard is trying to eliminate stacked
housing; and he asked at the last meeting if the home could be
moved.
Mr. Nardella asked how does a lot become conforming? Ms. Colwell
replied that 25 more feet of frontage is needed. The subdivision
rules and regulations state that a builder needs only 50 ' to build
a road. Mr. Nardella stated that a builder could put a road and a
small subdivision in.
On a motion by Ms. Lescarbeau, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board
voted unanimously to close the public hearing and directed staff to
draft a decision for the February 20, 1996 meeting.
The North Andover Planning Board held a regular meeting on
February 20, 1996. The following members were present: Joseph V.
Mahoney, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Vice Chairman, Alison Lescarbeau,
Clerk and Alberto Angles, Associate Member.
3
At the last meeting Ms Colwell was directed to draft a decision
upon which the members would vote at this meeting.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Ms. Lescarbeau, the Board
voted to accept the DENIAL decision as written by Ms. Colwell. The
vote was as follows:
Mr. Rowen yes
Ms. Lescarbeau yes
Mr. Angles yes'
Mr. Mahoney No
Attached please find the special permit DENIAL.
Sincerely,
V
oseph V. Mahoney, Chairman
North Andover Planning Board
4
154-164 Johnson Street
Special Permit - Frontage Exception Lot
The Planning Board herein denies this request for a special permit
to allow the creation of a frontage exception lot under Section
7. 2.2 of the Zoning Bylaw. This application was submitted by John
J. Burke, 71 Sutton Hill Road, North Andover, MA 01845, dated
November 27, 1996.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The area of the lot exceeds by three (3) times the minimum lot
area required for that district. The R-3 Zoning District
requires a minimum lot size of 25, 000 S.F. The proposed lot
contains 75,026 S.F therefore the size of the lot is
sufficient.
2 . The lot has a minimum continuous street frontage of not less
than fifty (50) feet and a width of not less than fifty (50)
feet at any point between the street and the site of the
dwelling.
3 . There is not more one other such frontage exception lot
contiguous to it.
4. The lot is located so as to block the possible future
extension of a dead-end street. There is a proposed
subdivision on the adjacent property owned by John W. & Linda
E. Parker. The proposed roadway is a dead-end as there is not
sufficient available land on the property to construct a
connecting road. If this lot is created it will preclude the
possibility of the roadway connecting through.
5. The creation of the frontage exception lot will adversely
affect the neighborhood. There are not other frontage
exception lots in the neighborhood. The house would be placed
to the rear of all of the homes along the street, contrasting
significantly with the site design and placement of the
existing dwellings in the neighborhood. This will detract
from the overall character of the neighborhood and this
section of the community.
6. The creation of the frontage exception lot is not in harmony
with the general intent of this Bylaw. The creation of this
lot would violate the intent and spirit of the Bylaw through
manipulation of property to essentially manufacture anon-
conforming lot. The creation of this lot would overcrowd the
land in creating a "second tier" of homes in the neighborhood.
The value of adjacent land and buildings would not be
conserved as the lot would be aberrant to the neighborhood.
Given the above the Findings the Planning Board herein DENIES this
application for a frontage exception lot.
cc: Director of Public Works
Building Inspector
Health Agent
Assessor
Conservation Administrator
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Applicant
Engineer
File
Johnson.exc
t
t V1
FORM C ,JOYCE 8�tas
TOWN
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN N0�0'
Nov 19 34M
November 8. 19 6
To the Planning Board of the Town of North Andover:
The undersigned, being the applicant as defined under Chapter 41, Section
81-L, for approval of a proposed subdivision shown on a plan entitled
Old Center Lane Definative Subdivision Plan Prepared For John a. Burke fi Raneamin C
Osgood, Jr of lap n
on Johnson Street North Andover, l
by New Eland -Engineeringng +erviceg Tn�r ated Sept �0. l99(, Revised Nov 6, l�
being land bounded as follows: West by Johnson street, on the North by. Jami of
Rodrigues, on the East by land of Parker, and on the 5outh by land of Cal-Mal Realty
trust _
hereby submits said plan as a DEFINITM plan in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the North Andover Planning Board and makes application to the
Board for approval of said plan.
2350 20
Title Reference: North Essex Deeds, Book 1,1408_, Page 144_; or
Certificate of Title No. i, Registration Book , page ; or
Other:
Said plan has( has not( ) evolved from a preliminary plan submitted to
the Board of May 3 19 96 and approved (with modifications)
disapproved ( OR .Tunes , 19 96 .
The undersigned hereby applies for the approval of said DEFINITIVE plan
by the Board, and in furtherance thereof hereby agrees to abide by the Board's
Rules and Regulations. The undersigned hereby further covenants and agrees
with the Town of North Andover, upon approval of said DEFINITIVE plan by the
Board:
1. To install utilities in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Planning Board, the Public Works Department, the Highway Surveyor, the
Board'of Health, and all general as well as zoning by-jaws of said Town,
as are applicable to the installation of utilities within the limits of
ways and streets;
2. To complete and construct the streets or ways and other improvements shown
thereon in accordance with Sections Iv and V of the Rules and Regulations
of the Planning Board and the approved DEFINITIVE plan, profiles and cross
sections of the sauce. Said plan, profiles, cross -sections and construction
specifications are specifically, by reference, incorporated herein and made
a part of this application. This application and the covenants and agree-
ments herein shall be binding upon all heirs, executors, administrators,
successors, grantees of the whole or part of said land, and assigns of the
undersigned; and
3. To complete the aforesaid installations and construction within two (2)
years from the date hereof.
Received by Town Clerk:
Date: rur e Applicant
Time:
Signature: Address ~_
Notice to APPLICANT/TOWN CLERK and Certification of Action of Planning Board
on Definitive Subdivision Plan entitled:
I
By: dated , 19
The North Andover Planning Board has voted to APPROVE said plan, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the record owners of the subject land forthwith execute and record
a "covenant running with the land", or otherwise provide security for the con-
struction of ways and the installation of municipal services within said sub-
division, all as provided by G.L. c. 419 S. 81-U-
2. That all such construction and installations shall in all respects
conform to the governing rules and regulations of this Board.
3. That, as required by the North Andover Board of Health in its report to
this Board, no building or other structure shall be built or placed upon Lots
No. as shown on said Plan without the prior
consent of said Board of Health.
4. Other conditions:
In the event that no appeal shall have been taken from said approval within
twenty days from this date, the North Andover Planning Board will forthwith
thereafter endorse its formal approval upon said plan.
The North Andover Planning Board has DISAPPROVED said plan, for the following
reasons:
NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD
Date: By:
8. 1996 12:31AM F 1
FROM R.C. TANGAPD ATES PHONE No. 617 334 0115
140U 67 '96 16:85
P.p2
FORM p
DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATE
TO THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER!
In preparing the plan entitled old center Lane datiaatjXp gittiA Yl n .
I hereby cer-tify that the above named plan and accompanying data is true
and correct to the accuracy required by the current Rules and Regulation !
Governing the Subdivision of Lancs in North Andover , Massachvsetts , and
my source of information about the location of boundaries shown on said
plan were one or more of the Following :
1 . Deed from to
dated and recorded in the
Registry in Book , Page .
z. Other plans , as follows Survey 121atn Pretared for John 1`R„rka_& Ra is
C. Osgood, Jr NOv 24, 1995 by New England Engineering Saxvices Inc.
3. Oral information furnished by
4. Actual measurement on the ground from a starting point established
by
5. Other Sources
Signed
(Seal of Engineer or (Registered Professional Engineer or
Surveyor) Registered Land Surveyor)
ti OF
RICE,n..D saAddress
4 N
M
TAPiGf•zo o
:.•?K];•:.•{?v •'•:O.'{:r9irf{6::fA'-:?•:•.v}:rf}:•{::.v:r:4'•:•'•}}'•Yxi^}•{:••r{•}':i{:•}}'v.}:\'{Ov:{' :
•:•:n\,::?•h�9:i:°:?':`:,:}::...::v.\ f `.,.. :.v:i•$;:,•...•}. :..7....:...../. :.$ }:..:: .:. }r .v v.yf.:•:>$$$$$:}:•i':}il.'•'fY}:S:
. y�.;� '€' ....r.. iv.. ..y.':. .:f{...... ...f....•..:..v... }{•.i v.{•vv� v:�yf..r�v{s}y}
Q•f.(..
.t�Yl��.� :`•:: •##EI�L} 1w 3: .. y�..:•' $':}6Yd�:•:':•;�s•�f.°t•i:}:�A•ry::f.:;{.:;:;.:?'?}:.r;
....::::•:•::::::::::.�:::::::::.,:•.,i,,..,,.:::�•.,:,•.:..•.,-::,:?t•:•,o-:{:,}yfa,:iR•:•�f�„•::.',\•::.ai•..,,,..,n•:: •.::•::::::.,.}:::::}::::::::::fi•:.::.,•:::::::x•:::.a}X.:-�.•:tf,":::C�:f,v.:{•::.ti•.,:.r..::.•..{•::.
Town of North Andover Planning Board
This form represents the schedule for allowing the following lots to be considered as eligible for
buil -
i din permits under the Town of North Andover Growth Management by-law Section 8.7 of
9p 9 Y
the Zoning by-law. Pursuant to 8.7 .5 this Development Schedule must be filed in the Registry of
Deeds and be referenced on the deed of each of the lots below and be filed with the Planning
Board prior to the issuance of any building permit or permit for construction.
Name and Address of Applicant for Lots: Name of Development:
John J. Burke & Benjamin C. Osgood JrOld Center Lane
Map and Parcel of Original Lot: Map 97 Parcels 38 & 6
Date of Application for Lots Division: May 3 1996
Lots Covered by this Schedule: All lots prior to bylaw
The Planning Board by their signature below, or a signature of a duly authorized representative,
do hereby establish for the above named development the following Development Schedule for
the purpose of Section 8.7 of the Growth management By-Law.The applicant,their assignees,
successors and or subsequent property owners shall conform to the following schedule that limits
the eligibility of the following lots for building permits. This form must be filed in the Registry of
Deeds by the property owner or representative and be referenced on each deed for each of the
following lots. Such deed reference for the deed of each tot shall at a minimum reference the
book and page in which this Development Schedule is filed and contain the language : "This lot
is subject to a Development Schedule pursuant to the Town of North Andover Zoning By-Law all
owners, representatives, and future purchasers should avail themselves of said restriction by
reviewing the approved Development Schedule as filed in Book insert here and Page insert here.
The fact that a lot is eligible for a building permit is subject to the limitation of the number of
building permits per year pursuant to section 8.7.2.d of the Zoning By-Law."
The Planning Board hereby schedule the lot(s)for the above development as follows:
Year Eligible Number of Building Office Use Building Office Use
Lots Eligible Date Lot Eligibility Notes
CompletelyUtilized
Signature of Planning Board member or Authorized Representative
Date
Signatur f Pro rty er or thorized Representative
Date
/� /9 /moi•�' •-�-�.
IST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST PAGEOF
UBJECT PROPERTY
AP IPARCEL INAME JADDRESS
38 ruee mC,,r I 5•`f
0=oo..9 ,v. A..�
,BUTTERS
!AP PARCEL INAME ADDRESS
2 R�bi fs8 1.. s e(-,q 7 n
C r7 L.U .(u u w VA. C N VIS- 1V. .t
V t,vn 4
J A)C 5� N.
i
i I
i
1
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER FE$ 6 4 02
MASSACHUSETTS
PLANNING BOARD
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
NOTICE: This application must be typewritten
Applicant. John J. Burke Address: 71 Sutton Hill Rd.
North Andover, Mass. 01845
1. Application is hereby made
(a) For a Special Permit under Section 4 ; Paragraph 4.136
of the Zoning Bylaw.
2 . (a) Premises affected are land X _ and buildings
numbered 154, 164 Johnson St Street.
(b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the
North South East X West side of
Johnson Street, known as No. on St.
Street. Watershed
(c) Premises affected are in Zoning District R 3 , a".1
the premises affected have an area of 141 ,41% s"- Rt-
and
tand frontage of 350.17 feet.
3 . Ownership:
(a) Name and Address of owner (if joint ownership, give all
names) :
Qld_ Centereal Ly �Tr�1,s154) ._R�+n;�n r ncgao J.- _g,-J• M nsgood (164)
Date of purchase x 1/97 12/86 Previous owner Crawford/ Howes
(b) If applicant is not owner, check his interest in the
premises:
Prospective purchaser
Leasee
other (explain)
i
4 . Size of proposed building: front: feet deep
Height: stories: feet.
(a) Approximate date of erection
(b) Occupancy or use (of each floor)
(c) Type of construction
5. Size of Existing Building: feet front: feet deep
Height: stories feet.
(a) Approximate date of erection
(b) Occupancy or use (of each floor)
6. Has there been a previous application for a Special Permit
from the . Planning Board on these premises? xNwx YES
If so, when 1996 for frontage exception lot
7. Description of purpose for which Special Permit is sought on
this petition: For creation.of a.new surface discharge o stormwat-er
that drains from a roadway into a detention pond, then out of the pond
into an upland area.
2350 20
8. Deed recorded in the Registry of Deeds in Book 1_40 Page 14G
or Land Court Certificate No. Book Pags
9. The principal points upon which I base may application are
as follows: (must be stated in detail) . The watershed_ will not be
adversely affected because op lution attenuation will occur in the
detention pond as well as in the upland aha where the discherze
water will run over the ground. The wetlands are approximately 250 feet
away from the discharge point. The discharge is spread over-a-15 foot
area to closely approximate sheet flow.
I agree to pay for advertising in newspaper and postage fee for
mailing legal notices to "P rties in Interest" .
Al C
i
(P ' itioner ign ure)
Every application for action by the Board shall be made on a form
approved by the Board. These forms shall be furnished by the
Clerk upon request. Any communication supporting to be an
application shall be treated as mere notice of intention to seek
relief until such time as it is made on the official application
form. All information called for by the form shall be furnished
by the applicant in the manner therein.
Every application shall be submitted with a list of "Parties in
Interest" which shall include the petitioner, abutters, owners of
land directly opposite on any public or private street or way and
abutters to the abutters within three hundred (300) feet of the
property line all as they appear on the most recent applicable
tax list, notwithstanding that the land of such owner is located
in another city or town, the Planning Board of the Town and the
Planning Board of every abutting city or town.
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST
NAMES ADDRESS
Add additional sheets if necessary
Any question should be directed to the Planning Office
-IST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST PAGE _OF_ t____
SUBJECT PROPERTY
AAP PARCEL (NAME �.. ?�sfi JADRESS
y 7 6 g����a„.•.,.� C p s�o._.� Srt ��H S�h.�+-s�.� S f- Av
kBUTTERS '
SAP PARCEL NAME ADDRESS
.� W• c w•
4
AJ
t-
rot.,, W.. Gi rCc(.r Z
i- Af
Al.
K. Akedicv,
`jo 1n.IA S-h ill A
I
(
i
i
I
i