Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSRW INCORPORATED MUM flifl TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS f pORTI, 4 i4 LU 390 '34 ka O tt�ao �•'�•�. GD Any appeal shall be filed «i (20) days after the within date of filing of this Notice �cMustt in the Office of the Town NOTICE OF DECISION Clerk. Date. , April •26: 1994 ` . 'deb: '16; Date of Hearing Apr.• . . . . .. . . . .prl 1994 Petition of , , .SR INCORPORATED . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Premises affected , .Easterlyside of Forest Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements of the , .North.Andover.Zoning,Bylaw.+• .Section.8.5...Planned Residential.Development SO as to permit , the• construction.of. 6.single family dwellings• . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . CONDITIONf1LLYlic hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted t0 ,APPROVE. . . . . , ,the , • • • • • .SPECIAL PERMITFORAPLANNEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT. based upon the following conditions: cc: Director of Public Works Building Inspector Signed 1&4kMz1 Conservation Administrator Richard A. Nardella Chairman Health Sanitarian • •• • Assessors Joseph Mahoney, Clerk Police Chief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Fire Chief Richard Rowen Applicant . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Engineer John Daghlian File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interested Parties Planning • Board` . . . . . . �`_\ / � ..... ter !/ � ` �' .. l � vV C v I� KAREN H.P.NELSON 0 r' °9 Director Town of 120 Main Street, 01845 ' NORTH ANDOVER (508) 682-6483 BUILDING �; R CONSERVATION ss4C.0 < DIVISION OF PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 25, 1994 Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Town Building 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Special Permit PRD - Seven Oaks Dear Mr. Long: The North Andover Planning Board held a public hearing on March 1, 1994, in the Senior Center behind the Town Building, upon the application of SRW Incorporated, 1 Sundial Avenue, Manchester, N.H. , requesting a Special Permit under Section 8.5 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw- Planned Residential Development. The legal notice was duly advertised in the North Andover Citizen on February 9 and February 16, 1994 and all parties of interest were properly notified. The following Board members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, Richard Rowen and John Daghlian. John Simons was absent. The petitioner was requesting a Special Permit for the construction of 6 new single family dwellings on a plan that shows 8 lots. Mr. Mahoney read the legal notice to open the public hearing. Ms. Colwell gave the Board an overview of the plans, and read a letter from D.P.W. outlining D.P.W. comments. Mr. Philip Christiansen, Christiansen & Sergi, presented conventional plan with 6 two acre lots and presented PRD Plan with 6 new lots which would extend Sugarcane Lane, limits amount of pavement and tree cutting. double catch basins discharge into leaching basins in the island in the cul-de-sac sidewalks proposed because Sugarcane Lane will have sidewalks (Ms. Colwell to confirm) 50ft buffer zone in open space - 18 acres of open space created I , Page 2: Mr. Rowen: If 8 new lots created, with 7 new houses, what happens with Lot 2 - Can a house be built? Mr. Christiansen: no because designated as open space fifteen 500 gallon leaching tanks will be provided Mr. Nardella asked what is D.P.W. Is opinion of leaching tanks? Mr. Christiansen reply to Mr. Nardella was that EPA recommends use of leaching tanks because all oil, grease, sand, salt and acid rain are filtered prior to entering the environment. Water flows out of the bottom of leach pit, designed for a 100 year storm. Mr. Nardella asked what is D.P.W. 's opinion? Mr. George Perna, D.P.W. told the Board that pert tests will have to be done to show that basin will work. Mr. Nardella stated that the Planning Board had walked the site in the fall. Mr. Mahoney asked who is responsible for cleaning out leach pits? Mr. Christiansen answered, D.P.W. Mr. Daghlian questioned the ground water table. Mr. Christiansen answered, 8 ' to 91 . Mr. Rowen - Therefore leach pit will be above ground water table. Mr. Nardella asked why PRD? Mr. Christiansen: o shorter roadway, limit disturbance of land provides open space for the Town all the conventional lots perc and conform to zoning Mr. Rowen - What is the spacing between the homes? Does it have the same "look and feel" of existing Sugarcane Lane? Mr. Christiansen - Yes, it will look like Sugarcane Lane. Mr. James Grifoni, developer, told the Board that 3,500 minimum sq. ft. homes will be built. Page 3: Mr. Nardella - How would drainage be mitigated with conventional plan? Mr. Perna - D.P.W. will be more diligent about run-off from individual homes and water rushing down driveways. Mr. Thomas Lyons, abutter to the project: concerned about covenants on the property was not notified about public hearing concerned that house size be consistent with what is on Sugarcane Lane Mr. Nardella: We will ask the developer to provide house plans to the Board for review. Mr. Nicholas DiNatale, 45 Sugarcane Lane bought house thinking that land adjacent to 2 acre zoning concern that houses will be too large for the lots too many house lots in a concentrated area Mr. Nardella - look at conventional plan - would houses be sited any differently? Mr. Christiansen - Yes because roadway is shorter but houses on lots 1 and 3 would be in the same location. Discussion that in a R-1 Zone lots can be 1/2 acre in size (21, 780 sq. ft. ) Planning Board should change this at Town Meeting. R-1, 2 acre should have 1 acre PRD lots. Mark Dudman asked why no 50' buffer zone along Lot 8? Mr. Christiansen told Mr. Dudmah that the 50' buffer zone should be added on the plan around the entire property. Ann Perry, 31 Sugarcane Lane wants to see covenants on the subdivision to make sure that it looks the same as Sugarcane Lane. Mr. Nardella asked Mr. Grifoni if he was willing to put covenants on homes? Mr. Grifoni told Mr. Nardella that he would commit to size of house, design and materials to be used. Page 4: Mr. Nardella: Construct the home to fit the topography Mr. Grifoni: everyone has their own privacy because of 50ft. buffer all houses oriented to look into the woods, not into other houses can move house on Lot 7 away from Lot 8 Mr. Dudman: concern that trailers will be parked in existing cul-de- sac Planning Board decision can limit amount of trailers/construction equipment in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Daghlian: 26 ' needs to be shown on street detail On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to March 15, 1994. On March 15, 1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, John Simons, Vice Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, and John Daghlian. Richard Rowen was absent. Mr. Phil Christiansen was present. The Board requested responses to D.P.W. concerns in letter dated March 1, 1994. Mr. Christiansen responded to D.P.W. concerns. sidewalks needed remove existing cul-de-sac pavement Mr. Daghlian would recommend use of leach pits in the subdivision. Mr. Nardella ask that D.P.W. follow up on response to Mr. Christiansen' s letter, staff to facilitate. Staff to revisit issue with D.P.W. Planning Board does not see need to create 35 ' pavement. Cannot fit sidewalks in under pavement widths D.P.W. requires. Mr. Nardella suggested ending sidewalk at edge of cul-de-sac. Page 5: Amy Lyons, Sugarcane Lane, asked when will cul-de-sac be removed? Ms. Colwell told her at the end of the construction. Covenants will be reviewed at next meeting. On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Daghlian, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to the April 5, 1994 meeting. On April 5, 1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, John Simons, Vice Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, and Richard Rowen. John Daghlian was absent. Mr. Phil Christiansen, Christiansen & Sergi, told the Board that the infiltration system for groundwater has been reviewed and approved by D.P.W. The cul-de-sac island will be 40 ' with 35' of pavement. On the issue of sidewalks, it was recommended that the same language be used as that which appears in the Jerad II decision. Ms. Colwell read from the Jerad II decision and it was unclear whether sidewalks are required, they are not shown on the plan. D.P.W. would not recommend sidewalks on this site. Mr. Rowen stated that if sidewalks are not required on the existing Sugarcane Lane, they should not be required on this subdivision. Mr. Nicholas DNatele, 45 Sugarcane Lane, told the Board that the road has eroded away along the edge of the lawns. He wants sidewalks and curbing to protect the lawns. Mark and Carolyn Dudman, 72 Sugarcane Lane, told the Board that if there are no sidewalks on Candlestick Road, then no sidewalks should be built on Sugarcane Lane. Mr. Hmurciak, D.P.W. stated that at the time when Jerad II was approved, D.P.W. and the Planning Board did not put sidewalks in the subdivision, no bond money was set up for sidewalks and they were not on the plans. The developer is not expecting to put in sidewalks. Ms. Colwell was asked to show exactly what streets were created through the Jerad II plan. Mr. Nardella said that if sidewalks are constructed in Jerad II then sidewalks should be constructed in Seven Oaks. I Page 6: Mr. Christiansen has provided six ('6) house designs. Exterior treatments have been provided. Covenants on house size will be recorded by the developer. Lamp post will be installed at the end of driveways. Houses to be tailored to the. topography. All houses will be constructed according to the plans submitted. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to close the public hearing. Mr. Nardella also voted. The Board will meet on April 12, 1994 and will discuss this decision at that time. On April 12 , 1994, the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, Richard Rowen and John Daghlian. John Simons was absent. The Board reviewed the Jerad II plan and discussed sidewalks. Mr. Rowen and Mr. Mahoney stated that there was no need for sidewalks on Seven Oaks. Mr. Nardella stated that the wording of the decision for Jerad II can be read to require sidewalks. Mr. Nardella wants sidewalks in all subdivisions. Mr. Daghlian stated that there was low traffic flow in the area, there was no need for sidewalks at this site. Ms. Colwell stated that D.P.W. recommends that sidewalks not be constructed and instead a contribution be made to the sidewalk fund. Mr. Nardella did not want D.P.W. to decide on where sidewalks are going to go in Town. Mr. Rowen wanted added to the decision that the location of the home on Lot 7 should be pulled away from Lot 8 home. Ms. Colwell to check with Town Counsel on shortest time period the Planning Board can impose for endorsement of plans. Mr. Nardella had questions about regulations on propane tanks and distances from the lot line. Ms. Colwell to check with the Fire Department on the standards. Mr. Nardella concerned about tanks along the side of the road. The Board asked the developer to mark the 50ft. buffer zone in the field along Lot 3, 4 and 8 prior to cut. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to approve the subdivision as amended. Page 7: On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to approve the Special Permit for a PRD as amended. Attached are those conditions. Sincerely, NWth lover Planning Board RNa la, C air0- (g cc: Director of Public Works Building Inspector Conservation Administrator Health Sanitarian Assessors Police Chief Fire Chief Applicant Engineer File Seven Oaks Special Permit Planned Residential Development Conditional Approval The Planning Board herein approves the Special Permit for a an 8 lot Planned Residential Development known as "Seven Oaks" . This approval is for the creation of 8 new lots with 6 new homes. There is an existing home on Lot 1, Lot 2 is designated as open space, Lots 3 , 4, 5, 6, ' 7, and 8 are newly created lots . This Special Permit was requested by SRW Inc. , 1 Sundial Avenue, Manchester, NH, 03101, on February 4, 1994 . The Planning Board makes the following findings as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Sections 8: 5 and 10 . 3 : A. The specific site is an appropriate location for a Planned Residential Development as it is approximately 24 acres in size in an R-1 zone. B . The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood as it is an extension of an existing subdivision. C. There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians . D. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The Planning Board also makes findings under Section 8 . 5 of the Zoning Bylaw that this PRD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Bylaw and that the PRD contains residential development and open space in a variety to be sufficiently advantageous to the Town and promotes the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town of North Andover. In particular, the Planning Board finds that this project will : A. Promote the more efficient use of land in harmony with its natural features by preserving additional open space, reducing the amount of clearing and excavation normally associated with the construction of residential dwellings on a site such as this; B . Encourage the preservation of open space. The applicant has dedicated 18 . 1 acres of the property as Open Space; C. Permit greater flexibility and more attractive and efficient design of residential development; D. Meet the Town' s housing needs by promoting a diversity of 1 housing types . The Planning Board also finds that a base density of 7 lots with six new homes is appropriate for the PRD. There is an existing home on Lot 1 . This number of lots has been determined from a Preliminary Conventional Subdivision Plan provided to the Planning Board which satisfies the Town' s requirements for submission of such a plan. This Preliminary Plan is described as follows : Plans entitled: Conceptual Plan of "Seven Oaks" Land in North Andover, MA Prepared for: SRW Incorporated Prepared by: Christiansen & Sergi 160 Summer Street Haverhill, MA 01830 Dated: 10/18/93 Scale : 1" = 40 ' Finally, the Planning Board finds that the Definitive Subdivision complies with Town Bylaw requirements so long as the applicant complies with the following conditions : 1 . Prior to endorsement of the plans by the Planning Board and recording with the Registry of Deeds the applicant shall adhere to the following: a. The applicant shall post (per agreement with the North Andover Planning Board) a Performance Guarantee in the amount of eight thousand ($8,000) dollars to be held by the Town of North Andover in an interest bearing escrow account . The Guarantee shall be in the form of a check made payable to the Town of North Andover escrow account . This amount shall cover any contingencies that might affect the public welfare such as site- opening, clearing, erosion control and performance of any other condition contained herein, prior to the posting of the Performance Security as described in Condition 3 (c) of the Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval . This Performance Guarantee may at the discretion of the Planning Board be rolled over to cover other bonding considerations, be released in full, or partially retained in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Staff and as directed by the vote of the North Andover Planning Board. b. Applicant shall provide Planning Staff with a sample deed for review and approval of language contained therein reflecting the 50 foot no-cut requirement shown on the PRD plans, it being the intent that each deed to individual lots must contain such language approved by the Planning Staff . 2 designated open space parcel, must be donated to the Town of North Andover through the Conservation Commission. 8 . The applicant shall adhere to the following requirements of the Fire Department : a. All structures shall contain residential fire sprinkler systems the design of which will be approved by the Fire Department . b. Smoke alarms must be installed. 9 . This special permit approval shall be deemed to have lapsed after April 26, 1996 (two years from the date of filing this decision with the Town Clerk' s Office) unless substantial construction of the roadway and utilities has commenced. Substantial construction will be determined by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 10 . The provisions of this Special Permit shall apply to andbe binding upon the applicant, its employees, contractors and subcontractors and all successors in interest or control . 11 . This Special Permit approval is based upon the approval of a Definitive Subdivision Plan. The Special Permit and Definitive Subdivision approvals are both based upon the following plans : a. Plans entitled: Definitive P.R.D. Subdivision Plan Seven Oaks located in North Andover, MA Prepared For: : SRW Incorporated 1 Sundial Ave Manchester, NH 03101 Prepared By: Christiansen & Sergi, 160 Summer Street, Haverhill, MA Dated: 1/24/94 Sheets : 1 through 8 Scale : as noted on plans CC . Conservation Administrator Director of Public Works Health Administrator Building Inspector Police Chief Fire Chief Assessor Applicant Engineer File SevenOaks . PRD 4 C . The fifty foot buffer zone must be added to the plan along the property line of Lot 8 . 2 . The plans must be endorsed within sixty (60) days of the filing of the decision with the Town Clerk. If the plans are not endorsed within this time period this approval will automatically be rescinded. 3 . Prior to construction or clearing of lots: a. Tree cutting shall be kept to a minimum throughout the project to minimize erosion and preserve the natural features of the site. The Town Planner and/or Tree Warden must be contacted prior to any cutting on site . Efforts to protect all trees on site must be made. Yellow hazard tape must placed in the field the fifty foot buffer zone along lots 3 , 4 and 8. b. Construction trailers and equipment must not be stored on the existing cul de sac . 4 . Prior to any lots being released from the statutory covenants, the conditions outlined in the Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval must be followed. 5 . Prior to FORM U verification (Building Permit Issuance) for an individual lot : a. The house designs must conform to the designs presented to the Planning Board. These designs are described as follows : i . 34 x 46 Colonial, 3 , 556 sqft, Plan No. SP1018 ii . 28 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 738 sqft, Plan No. SP1008 iii . 28 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 597 sqft, Plan No. SP1027 iv. 30 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 634 sqft, Plan No. SP1033 V. 28 x 42 Colonial, 3, 506 sqft, Plan No. SP1002 vi . 28 x 40 Colonial, 3 , 561 sqft, Plan No. SP1002 b. Copies of all recorded covenants for the subdivision must be submitted. 6 . Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for an individual lot, the conditions outlined in the Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval must be followed. 7 . Prior to the final release of security, Lot 2, the 3 i Notice to APPI.I UA OWN CLERK and Certification o tion of Planning Board ' on Definitive Sub4sion Pian entitled: "Seven Oaks By: Christiansen & Sergi, Inc. dated Jan. 24, 1 19 94 The North Andover Plannig Board has voted to APPROVE said plan, subject tothe '- following conditions: 1. That the record owners of 'the subject land forthwith execute and record a "covenant running with the land", .or otherwise provide security for the con— struction of ways and the installation of municipal services within said sub division, all as provided by G.L.- c. 41,_S. 81-U. 2. That all such construction and installations shall in all respects conform to the governing rules and regulations of this Board. 3. That, as required by the North Andover Board of Health in its report to this Board, no building or other structure shall be built or placed upon Lots ' No. as shown on said Plan without ,the prior consent of said Board of Health. 40. 'Other .conditions: SEE ATTACHED —°} In the event that no appeal shall have been taken from said;approval w!�6in twenty days from this .date, the North Andover Planning Board will fort th thereafter endorse itsformal approval upon said plan s�ee�e+ NORTH PC�N �� �l= Date: April 12, 1994 By: Richard A. Nardella, Chairman 0 FORM C a APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFIVr ;'LAP7 TOw ORTtt ��kG� 27 SFr' :994. Hr� � To the Planning Board of the Town of Nortldoeft The undersigned, being the applicant as defined under Chapter 41# Section 81-L, PP for approval of a proposed subdivision shown on a plan entitled "2even Oaks" by Christiansen & Sergi , Inc. _ dated Jana 24 , 1994 being land bounded-as follows: westerly by Forest St . & Hahesy ; northerly by Miller , Rae , Janusz ; easterly by Cavallare; southerly by Clarke Constr . and Hanseller hereby submits said plan as a DEFINITIVE plan in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the North Andover Planning Board and makes application to-the Board for approval of said plan. Title Reference: North Essex Deeds, Book , Page ; or s Certificate of Title No. 11661 Registration Book � <Tage i or Other: Said plan has( ) has not(X) evolved from a preliminary plan submitted to the Board of 19 and approved (with modifications) ( ) disapproved ( on e 19 • r The undersigned hereby applies for the approval of said DEFINITIVE plan by the Board, and in furtherance thereof hereby agrees to abide by the Board's =Rules and Regulations. The undersigned hereby further covenants and agrees with the Town of North Andover, upon approval of said DEFINITIVE plan by the Board: 1. To install utilities in accordance urith the rules and regulations of the Planning Board, the Public Works Departmer_t, the Highway Surveyor, the Board of Health, and all general as well as zoning by-laws of said Town, as are applicable to the installation of utilities within the limits of ways and streets; 2. To complete and construct the streets or ways and other improvements shown thereon in accordance with Sections Iv and V of the Rules and Regulations of the PlanningBoard and the approved DEFINITIVE plan, profiles .and cross sections of the same. Said plan, profiles, cross sections and construction specifications are specifically, by reference, incorporated herein and made a part of this application. This application and the covenants and agree- ments herein shall-be binding upon all heirs, executors, administrators, successors, grantees of the whole or part of said land, and assigns of the undersigned; and 3. To complete the. aforesaid installations and c7s ,&7tion within two (2) years from the date hereof. Received by Town Clerk: C 1z -Date: Si tore of Appli.c Time: 1561 r1G�l�ifQ/I? lyf)�,r_ f �3�o� Signature: Address F Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval The Planning Board herein approves an 8 lot Definitive Subdivision known as "Seven Oaks" . Lot 1 has an existing house, Lot 2 is designated as open space, Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are newly created lots . This Subdivision Approval was requested by SRW Inc . , 1 Sundial Avenue, Manchester, NH, 03101, on February 4, 1994 . The Planning Board makes the following findings regarding this subdivision as required by the Zoning Bylaws in effect at the time of this approval : A. The Definitive Plans, dated 1/24/94 include all of the information indicated in Section 3 of the Rules and Regulations concerning the procedure for the submission of plans . B. The Definitive Plan adheres to all of the design standards as indicated in Section 7 of the Rules and Regulations . C. The Definitive Plan is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the Subdivision Control Law. D. The Definitive Plan complies with all of the review comments submitted by various town departments in order to comply with state law, town by-laws and insure the public health, safety, and welfare of the town. Finally, the Planning Board finds that the Definitive Subdivision complies with Town Bylaw requirements so long as the following conditions are complied with: 1 . Prior to endorsement of the plans by the Planning Board the applicant shall adhere to the following: a. The applicant must meet with the Town Planner in order to ensure that the plans conform with the Board' s decision. b. A detailed construction schedule must be submitted as part of the plans . C . A covenant (Form I) securing all lots within the subdivision for the construction of ways and municipal services must be submitted to the Planning Board. Said lots may be released from the covenant upon posting of security as requested in Condition #3 (c) . d. Right of way dedication easements for the proposed roadway shall be provided to the Planning Office and must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds . e . The applicant must submit to the Town Planner a FORM M for all utilities and easements placed on the subdivision. The Board will sign the document and it must be recorded at the Essex North Registry of Deeds . f . All drainage and water facility designs shall be approved by the North Andover Division of Public Works . Subject to the review and approval of revised design plans, the Division of Public Works will allow the installation of an infiltration system to mitigate the increase in runoff for this subdivision. The infiltration system will be constructed of large diameter perforated HDPE pipe and will include a method of emergency overflow and adequate provisions for future maintenance. g. All application fees must be paid in full and verified by the Town Planner. h. A detailed street tree planting list shall be prepared listing specific material to be used. This list shall indicate quantity and size of all proposed material . All documents shall be prepared at the expense of the applicant, as required by the Planning Board Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land. Endorsement of the plans is proof of satisfaction of the above conditions. 2 . The plans must be endorsed within sixty (60) days of the filing of the decision with the Town Clerk. If the plans are not endorsed within this time period this approval will automatically be rescinded. 3 . Prior to the start of construction or clearing of lots: The record plans must be endorsed by the Planning Board and recorded by the applicant at the Essex North Registry of Deeds . Three (3) copies of the recorded plan must be submitted to the Planning Office for distribution to the Division of Public Works and the Building Department . 4. Prior to any lots being released from the statutory covenants a. All site erosion control measures required to protect off site properties from the effects of work on the lot proposed to be released must be in place. The Town Planning judge Staff shall 'ud e whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this provision prior to each lot release. b. The applicant must submit a lot release FORM J to the Planning Board for signature. C . A Performance Security in an amount to be determined by the Planning Board, upon the recommendation of the Department of Public Works shall beP osted to ensure completion of the work in accordance with the Plans approved as part of this conditional approval . Items covered by the Bond may include, but shall not be limited to:• i . as-built drawings ii . sewers and utilities iii . roadway construction and maintenance iv. lot and site erosion control V. site screening and .street trees vi . drainage facilities vii . site restoration viii . final site cleanup d. All proper documents and easements required through Condition 1 shall be in place. 5 . Prior to a FORM U verification (Building Permit Issuance) for an individual lot, the following information is required by the Planning Department: a. The applicant must submit a copy of the recorded FORM M referred to in Condition i (e) above to the Planning Office. b. Two (2) copies of all documents containing registry of deeds stamps must be submitted to the Town Planner as proof of filing. C . A plot plan for the lot in question must be submitted, which shows all of the following: i . location of the structure, ii . location of the driveways, iii . location of the septic systems if applicable, iv. location of all water and sewer lines, V. location of wetlands and any site improvements required under a NACC order of condition, vi . any grading called for on the lot, and vii . all required zoning setbacks d. All appropriate erosion control measures for the lot shall be in place . These measures may include haybales and/or silt fence along the edge of the lot to prevent erosion off site during construction . Final determination of appropriate measures shall be made by the Planning Board or Staff . e . All catch basins shall be protected and maintained with hay bales to prevent siltation into the drain lines during construction. f . The lot in question shall be staked in the field to show the location of any major departures from the record plan. The Town Planner shall verify this information . The proposed layout shall be in conformance with the recorded plans. g. Lot numbers, visible from the roadways must be posted on all lots . 6 . Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for an individual lot, the following shall be required: a. The roadway must be constructed to at least binder coat of pavement to properly access the lot in question. Prior to construction of the binder coat, the applicant shall ensure that all required inspection and testing of water, sewer, and drainage facilities has been completed. The applicant must submit to the Town Planner an interim as -built, certified by a professional engineer, verifying that all utilities have been installed in accordance with the plans and profile sheet . b. All necessary permits and approvals for the lot in question shall be obtained from the North Andover Board of Health, and Conservation Commission. C . Permanent house numbers must be posted on dwellings and be visible from the road. d. All slopes on the lot in question shall be properly stabilized, as judged by the Planning Staff . e . There shall be no driveways placed where stone bound monuments and/or catch basins are to be set . It shall be the developer' s responsibility to assure the proper placement of the driveways regardless of whether individual lots are sold. The Planning Board requires any driveway to be moved at the owners expense if such driveway is at a catch basin or stone bound position. f . The Planning Board reserves the right to review the site after construction is complete and require added site screening as necessary and reasonable . g. The site must be raked, loamed and seeded or sodded. 7 . Prior to the final release of security retained for the site by the Town, the following shall be completed by the applicant : a. An as-built plan and profile of the site shall be submitted for review and approval . b. The applicant shall petition Town Meeting for public acceptance of the streets . Prior to submitting a warrant for such petition the applicant shall review the subdivision and all remaining work with the Town Planner and Department of Public Works . The Planning Board shall hold a portion of the subdivision bond for continued maintenance and operations until such time as Town Meeting has accepted (or rejected in favor of private ownership) the roadways . It shall be the developer' s responsibility to insure that all proper easements have been recorded at the Registry of Deeds . C . The Town Planner shall ensure that all planning, conservation commission, board of health and department of public works requirements are satisfied and that construction was in strict compliance with all approved plans and conditions. d. Monuments shall be set on the exterior street line as required by Section 7 (P) of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations . e . Two to two and one half inch caliper (2-2 . 511 ) street trees are to be placed every fifty (501 ) feet along both sides of all new roadways. f . The existing cul-de-sac must be removed and the area loamed raked and seeded. A standard roadway cross- section must be established. 8 . The Town Planner will review any signs utilized for this project . The applicant must obtain a sign permit as required by Section 6 of the Bylaw. The Planning Board will review any entrance structures . 9 . The applicant shall adhere to the following requirements of the Fire Department : a. open burning is allowed by permit only after consultation with the Fire Department . b. Underground fuel storage will be allowed in conformance with the Town Bylaws and State Statute and only with the review and approval of the Fire Department and Conservation Commission. 10 . There shall be no burying or dumping of construction material on site. 11 . The contractor shall contact Dig Safe at least 72 hours prior to commencing any excavation. 12 . Gas, Telephone, Cable, and Electric utilities shall be installed as specified by the respective utility companies. 13 . Any action by a Town Board, Commission, or Department which requires changes in the roadway alignment, placement of any easements or utilities, drainage facilities, grading or no cut lines, may be subject to modification by the Planning Board. 14 . The subdivision must comply with the current Subdivision Rules and Regulations unless items have been specifically waived by the Planning Board. The following waivers have been granted by the Planning Board: a . Section 7 (D) : Sidewalks will be required if the Planning Board determines that sidewalks will be constructed on the existing section of Sugarcane Lane, part of the Jared Place II subdivision. If sidewalks are not required to be constructed, the developer is encouraged to donate to the sidewalk fund an amount equal to the cost of constructing sidewalks along one side of the roadway. b. Section 7 (A) (2) (d) Cul-de-sac Turnarounds with Islands : The street right-of-way is approved at one-hundred (100) feet in diameter with an island forty (40) feet across at the center of the turnaround. The pavement around the island shall be thirty-five (35) feet wide. 15. Construction of the ways and installation of the utilities as shown on the plan must be completed within two (2) years of the date of filing this decision with the Town Clerk or the definitive plan approval is automatically rescinded. 16 . This Definitive Subdivision approval is based upon a Special Permit granted in accordance with Section 4 . 125, 10 . 3 and 10 . 31 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The Special Permit and Definitive Subdivision approvals are both based upon the following information: a. Plans entitled: Definitive P.R.D. Subdivision Plan Seven Oaks located in North Andover, MA Prepared for: SRW Incorporated 1 Sundial Ave Manchester, NH 03101 Prepared by: Christiansen & Sergi 160 Summer Street, Haverhill, MA Dated: 1/24/94 Sheets : 1 through 8 Scale : as noted on plans b. Supplemental Information for the Definitive PRD Subdivision Plan "Seven Oaks" located in North Andover, MA; Record owner and applicant : SRW Incorporated Sundial Ave Manchester, NH 03101 Date : 1/24/94 Prepared by: Christiansen & Sergi 160 Summer Street Haverhill, MA 01830 CC. Conservation Administrator Director of Public Works Health Administrator Building Inspector Police Chief Fire Chief Assessor Applicant Engineer File Sevenoaks . Sub MUM fflfl TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER = MASSACHUSETTS Moarw L'� S� F, ` `1 O A Any appeal shall he filed within (20) days after the ,SSACMUSES date of filing of this Notice in the Office of the Town Clerk. NOTICE OF DECISION Date. • ,April 26, 1994 •Feb: •ln; •D•1ar: 'j5, Date of Hearing Apr. •5,• April •12, 1994 Petition of . . .SRW.INCORPORATED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of Forest Street Premises affected , .Easterly•side• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements North AndoverZoningBylaw . Section8.5•. PlannedResidentialDevelopment of the . , • • • • • • • • so as to permit • the• construction of. 6. single• family.dwellings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :after a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted CONDITIONALLY to ,APPROVE the , • SPECIAL PERMIT• FOR. A. PLANNED. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. • . based upon the following conditions ZD cc: Director of Public Works Building Inspector Signed Conservation Administrator d A. Nardel a Chairman Richard 1 , Health Sanitarian • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • Assessors Joseph Mahoney, Clerk Police Chief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fire Chief Richard Rowen Applicant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Engineer John Daghlian File . . . . . interested Parties • • - • • • • •planning• . Board• • • • . . . ORTN KAREN H.P. NELSON 0 Drrcctor Town of 120 Main Street, 01846 BUILDING NORTH ANDOVER (608) 682-6483 CONSERVATION 5:,�� 9E` DIVISION OF ?4EALTH PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 25, 1994 Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Town Building 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Special Permit PRD - Seven Oaks Dear Mr. Long: The North Andover Planning Board held a public hearing on March 1, 1994 , in the Senior Center behind the Town Building, upon the application of SRW Incorporated, 1 Sundial Avenue, Manchester, N.H. , requesting a Special Permit under Section 8. 5 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw —Planned Residential Development. The legal notice was duly advertised in the North Andover Citizen on February 9 and February 16, 1994 and all parties of interest were properly notified. The following Board members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, Richard Rowen and John Daghlian. John Simons was absent. The petitioner was requesting a Special Permit for the construction of 6 new single family dwellings on a plan that shows 8 lots. Mr. Mahoney read the legal notice to open the public hearing. Ms. Colwell gave the Board an overview of the plans, and read a letter from D.P.W. outlining D.P.W. comments. Mr. Philip Christiansen, Christiansen & Sergi, presented conventional plan with 6 two acre lots and presented PRD Plan with 6 new lots which would extend Sugarcane Lane, limits amount of pavement and tree cutting. double catch basins discharge into leaching basins in the island in the cul-de-sac sidewalks proposed because Sugarcane Lane will have sidewalks (Ms. Colwell to confirm) 50ft buffer zone in open space - 18 acres of open space created Page 2 : Mr. Rowen: If 8 new lots created, with 7 new houses, what happens with Lot 2 - Can a house be built? Mr. Christiansen: no because designated as open space fifteen 500 gallon leaching tanks will be provided Mr. Nardella asked what is D.P.W. Is opinion of leaching tanks? Mr. Christiansen reply to Mr. Nardella was that EPA recommends use of leaching tanks because all oil, grease, sand, salt and acid rain are filtered prior to entering the environment. Water flows out of the bottom of leach pit, designed for a 100 year storm. Mr. Nardella asked what is D.P.W. ' s opinion? Mr. George Perna, D.P.W. told the Board that perc tests will have to be done to show that basin will work. Mr. Nardella stated that the Planning Board had walked the site in the fall . Mr. Mahoney asked who is responsible for cleaning out leach pits? Mr. Christiansen answered, D.P.W. Mr. Daghlian questioned the ground water table. Mr. Christiansen answered, 8 ' to 91 . Mr. Rowen - Therefore leach pit will be above ground water table. Mr. Nardella asked why PRD? Mr. Christiansen: shorter roadway, limit disturbance of land provides open space for the Town all the conventional lots perc and conform to zoning Mr. Rowen - What is the spacing between the homes? Does it have the same "look and feel" of existing Sugarcane Lane? Mr. Christiansen - Yes, it will look like Sugarcane Lane. Mr. James Grifoni, developer, told the Board that 3, 500 minimum sq. ft. homes will be built. Page 3 : Mr. Nardella How would drainage be mitigated with conventional plan? Mr. Perna - D.P.W. will be more diligent about run-off from individual homes and water rushing down driveways. Mr. Thomas Lyons, abutter to the project: concerned about covenants on the property was not notified about public hearing concerned that house size be consistent with what is on Sugarcane Lane Mr. Nardella: We will ask the developer to provide house plans to the Board for review. Mr. Nicholas DiNatale, 45 Sugarcane Lane bought house thinking that land adjacent to 2 acre zoning concern that houses will be too large for the lots too many house lots in a concentrated area Mr. Nardella - look at conventional plan - would houses be sited any differently? Mr. Christiansen - Yes because roadway is shorter but houses on lots 1 and 3 would be in the same location. Discussion that in a R-1 Zone lots can be 1/2 acre in size (21, 780 sq. ft. ) Planning Board should change this at Town Meeting. R-1, 2 acre should have 1 acre PRD lots. Mark Dudman asked why no 50 ' buffer zone along Lot 8? Mr. Christiansen told Mr. Dudman that the 50 ' buffer zone should be added on the plan around the entire property. Ann Perry, 31 Sugarcane Lane wants to see covenants on the subdivision to make sure that it looks the same as Sugarcane Lane. Mr. Nardella asked Mr. Grifoni if he was willing to put covenants on homes? Mr. Grifoni told Mr. Nardella that he would commit to size of house, design and materials to be used. Page 4: Mr. Nardella: Construct the home to fit the topography Mr. Grifoni: everyone has their own privacy because of 50ft. buffer all houses oriented to look into the woods, not into other houses can move house on Lot 7 away from Lot 8 Mr. Dudman: concern that trailers will be parked in existing cul-de- sac Planning Board decision can limit amount of trailers/construction equipment in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Daghlian: 26 ' needs to be shown on street detail On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to March 15, 1994 . On March 15, 1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, John Simons, Vice Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, and John Daghlian. Richard Rowen was absent. Mr. Phil Christiansen was present. The Board requested responses to D.P.W. concerns in letter dated March 1, 1994 . Mr. Christiansen responded to D.P.W. concerns. sidewalks needed remove existing cul-de-sac pavement Mr. Daghlian would recommend use of leach pits in the subdivision. Mr. Nardella ask that D.P.W. follow up on response to Mr. Christiansen ' s letter, staff to facilitate. Staff to revisit issue with D.P.W. Planning Board does not see need to create 35 ' pavement. Cannot fit sidewalks in under pavement widths D. P.W. requires. Mr. Nardella suggested ending sidewalk at edge of cul-de-sac. Page 5: Amy Lyons, Sugarcane Lane, asked when will cul-de-sac be removed? Ms. Colwell told her at the end of the construction. Covenants will be reviewed at next meeting. On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Daghlian, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to the April 5, 1994 meeting. On April 5, 1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, John Simons, Vice Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, and Richard Rowen. John Daghlian was absent. Mr. Phil Christiansen, Christiansen & Sergi, told the Board that the infiltration system for groundwater has been reviewed and approved by D.P.W. The cul-de-sac island will be 40 ' with 35 ' of pavement. On the issue of sidewalks, it was recommended that the same language be used as that which appears in the Jerad II decision. Ms. Colwell read from the Jerad II decision and it was unclear whether sidewalks are required, they are not shown on the plan. D. P.W. would not recommend sidewalks on this site. Mr. Rowen stated that if sidewalks are not required on the existing Sugarcane Lane, they should not be required on this subdivision. Mr. Nicholas DiNatele, 45 Sugarcane Lane, told the Board that the road has eroded away along the edge of the lawns. He wants sidewalks and curbing to protect the lawns. Mark and Carolyn Dudman, 72 Sugarcane Lane, told the Board that if there are no sidewalks on Candlestick Road, then no sidewalks should be built on Sugarcane Lane. Mr. Hmurciak, D.P.W. stated that at the time when Jerad II was approved, D.P.W. and the Planning Board did not put sidewalks in the subdivision, no bond money was set up for sidewalks and they were not on the plans. The developer is not expecting to put in sidewalks. Ms. Colwell was asked to show exactly what streets were created through the Jerad II plan. Mr. Nardella said that if sidewalks are constructed in Jerad II then sidewalks should be constructed in Seven Oaks. Page 6: Mr. Christiansen has provided six (6) house designs. Exterior treatments have been provided. Covenants on house size will be recorded by the developer. Lamp post will be installed at the end of driveways. Houses to be tailored to the topography. All houses will be constructed according to the plans submitted. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to close the public hearing. Mr. Nardella also voted. The Board will meet on April 12 , 1994 and will discuss this decision at that time. On April 12 , 1994 , the Planning Board held a regular meeting. The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, Richard Rowen and John Daghlian. John Simons was absent. The Board reviewed the Jerad II plan and discussed sidewalks. Mr. Rowen and Mr. Mahoney stated that there was no need for sidewalks on Seven Oaks. Mr. Nardella stated that the wording of the decision for Jerad II can be read to require sidewalks. Mr. Nardella wants sidewalks in all subdivisions. Mr. Daghlian stated that there was low traffic flow in the area, there was no need for sidewalks at this site. Ms. Colwell stated that D.P.W. recommends that sidewalks not be constructed and instead a contribution be made to the sidewalk fund. Mr. Nardella did not want D.P.W. to decide on where sidewalks are going to go in Town. Mr. Rowen wanted added to the decision that the location of the home on Lot 7 should be pulled away from Lot 8 home. Ms. Colwell to check with Town Counsel on shortest time period the Planning Board can impose for endorsement of plans. Mr. Nardella had questions about regulations on propane tanks and distances from the lot line. Ms. Colwell to check with the Fire Department on the standards. Mr. Nardella concerned about tanks along the side of the road. The Board asked the developer to mark the 50ft. buffer zone in the field along Lot 3 , 4 and 8 prior to cut. on a motion b Mr. Mahone seconded b Mr. Rowen the Board Y Y. Y voted to approve the subdivision as amended. Page 7: On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to approve the Special Permit for a PRD as amended. Attached are those conditions. Sincerely, No thdover Planning Board de?,RichardNarde la C airman cc: Director of Public Works Building Inspector Conservation Administrator Health Sanitarian Assessors Police Chief Fire Chief Applicant Engineer File Seven Oaks Special Permit Planned Residential Development Conditional Approval The Planning Board herein approves the Special Permit for a an 8 lot Planned Residential Development known as "Seven Oaks" . This approval is for the creation of 8 new lots with 6 new homes . There is an existing home on Lot 1, Lot 2 is designated as open space, Lots 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7, and 8 are newly created lots . This Special Permit was requested by SRW Inc . , 1 Sundial Avenue, Manchester, NH, 03101, on February 4, 1994 . The Planning Board makes the following findings as required by the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Sections 8 . 5 and 10 . 3 : A. The specific site is an appropriate location for a Planned Residential Development as it is approximately 24 acres in size in an R-1 zone. B . The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood as it is an extension of an existing subdivision. C . There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians . D. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use . The Planning Board also makes findings under Section 8 . 5 of the Zoning Bylaw that this PRD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Bylaw and that the PRD contains residential development and open space in a variety to be sufficiently advantageous to the Town and promotes the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town of North Andover. In particular, the Planning Board finds that this project will : A. Promote the more efficient use of land in harmony with its natural features by preserving additional open space, reducing the amount of clearing and excavation normally associated with the construction of residential dwellings on a site such as this; B . Encourage the preservation of open space . The applicant has dedicated 18 . 1 acres of the property as Open Space; C . Permit greater flexibility and more attractive and efficient design of residential development; D . Meet the Town' s housing needs by promoting a diversity of 1 housing types . The Planning Board also finds that a base density of 7 lots with six new homes is appropriate for the PRD. There is an existing home on Lot 1 . This number of lots has been determined from a Preliminary Conventional Subdivision Plan provided to the Planning Board which satisfies the Town' s requirements for submission of such a plan. This Preliminary Plan is described as follows : Plans entitled: Conceptual Plan of "Seven Oaks" Land in North Andover, MA Prepared for: SRW Incorporated Prepared by: Christiansen & Sergi 160 Summer Street Haverhill, MA 01830 Dated: 10/18/93 Scale : 1" = 40 ' Finally, the Planning Board finds that the Definitive Subdivision complies with Town Bylaw requirements so long as the applicant complies with the following conditions : 1 . Prior to endorsement of the plans by the Planning Board and recording with the Registry of Deeds the applicant shall adhere to the following: a . The applicant shall post (per agreement with the North Andover Planning Board) a Performance Guarantee in the amount of eight thousand ($8, 000) dollars to be held by the Town of North Andover in an interest bearing escrow account . The Guarantee shall be in the form of a check made payable to the Town of North Andover escrow account . This amount shall cover any contingencies that might affect the public welfare such as site- opening, clearing, erosion control and performance of any other condition contained herein, prior to the posting of the Performance Security as described in Condition 3 (c) of the Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval . This Performance Guarantee may at the discretion of the Planning Board be rolled over to cover other bonding considerations, be released in full , or partially retained in accordancewith the recommendation of the Planning Staff and as directed by the vote of the North Andover Planning Board. b. Applicant shall provide Planning Staff with a sample deed for review and approval of language contained therein reflecting the 50 foot no-cut requirement shown on the PRD plans, it being the intent that each deed to individual lots must contain such language approved by the Planning Staff . 2 c . The fifty foot buffer zone must be added to the plan along the property line of Lot 8 . 2 . The plans must be endorsed within sixty (60) days of the filing of the decision with the Town Clerk. If the plans are not endorsed within this time period this approval will automatically be rescinded. 3 . Prior to construction or clearing of lots: a . Tree cutting shall be kept to a minimum throughout the project to minimize erosion and preserve the natural features of the site . The Town Planner and/or Tree Warden must be contacted prior to any cutting on site . Efforts to protect all trees on site must be made. Yellow hazard tape must placed in the field the fifty foot buffer zone along lots 3 , 4 and 8 . b . Construction trailers and equipment must not be stored on the existing cul de sac . 4 . Prior to any lots being released from the statutory covenants, the conditions outlined in the Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval must be followed. 5 . Prior to FORM U verification (Building Permit Issuance) for an individual lot : a . The house designs must conform to the designs presented to the Planning Board. These designs are described as follows : i . 34 x 46 Colonial, 3 , 556 sqft, Plan No . SP1018 ii . 28 .x 42 Colonial,, 3 , 738 sqft, Plan No. SP1008 iii . 28 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 597 sqft, Plan No. SP1027 iv. 30 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 634 sqft, Plan No. SP1033 V. 28 x 42 Colonial, 3 , 506 sgft, Plan No. SP1002 V1 . 28 x 40 Colonial , 3 , 561 sqft, Plan No . SP1002 b. Copies of all recorded covenants for the subdivision must be submitted. 6 . Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for an individual lot, the conditions outlined in the Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval must be followed. 7 . Prior to the final release of security, Lot 2 , the 3 designated open space parcel, must be donated to the Town of North Andover through .the Conservation Commission. 8 . The applicant shall adhere to the following requirements of the Fire Department : a. All structures shall contain residential fire sprinkler systems the design of which will be approved by the Fire Department . b. Smoke alarms must be installed. 9 . This special permit approval shall be deemed to have lapsed after April 26, 1996 (two years from the date of filing this decision with the Town Clerk' s Office) unless substantial construction of the roadway and utilities has commenced. Substantial construction will be determined by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 10 . The provisions of this Special Permit shall apply to and be binding upon the applicant, its employees, contractors and subcontractors and all successors in interest or control . 11 . This Special Permit approval is based upon the approval of a Definitive Subdivision Plan. The Special Permit and Definitive Subdivision approvals are both based upon the following plans : a . Plans entitled: Definitive P.R.D. Subdivision Plan Seven Oaks located in North Andover, MA Prepared For: : SRW Incorporated 1 Sundial Ave Manchester, NH - 03101 Prepared By: Christiansen & Sergi, 160 Summer Street, Haverhill, MA Dated: 1/24/94 Sheets : . 1 through 8 Scale : as noted on plans CC . Conservation Administrator Director of Public Works Health Administrator Building Inspector Police Chief Fire Chief Assessor Applicant Engineer File SevenOaks . PRD 4