HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-021~ - ~iareh 2, 1~4
Regular Meeting & ~earing
The Planning B~ard held their regular meeting on Monday evening, March 2, 1964
at 7:30 P.M. in the Town B~t~St,E. The following members were present and voting:
~ames ~ Bashan, Ch~r,~-; Robert J. Burke, Secretary; George Farley, Howard Otlma~
and Will, Am Chepulis.
~ARING: MacXay Construction Co. & Sidney Rea.
Mr. Farley made a motion to dispense with the reading of the lengthy deecription of
the legal notice. Mr. Burke seconded the motion and the vote was 'mm~tw~mlS.
Mr. G~mn made a motion to adjourn the hearing for 10 minutes in order to take up
the w~tter of the acceptance of Glencrest Drive and Meadow Lane, since the Board of
Selectmen were conducting hearings on the same and required the Board's decision
immediately.
Mr. Burke w~_~e a motion to accept Glencrest Drive, since a letter recca~ending
was received from the Highway Dept. Mr. Farley seconded the motion and the vote was
There ~as no correspondence received from the Highway Dept. regarding Meadow Lane and
a motion was made to hold their reco~nendation ~nBJ~ct to hearing from the Righ~ay Dept.
Motion was seconded and voted un~mously.
A letter sho~g the recommendations of the Plap~ Board was immediately taken to
the Selectmen'~ meeting.
The hearing the~ proceeded.
Maclay Construction Co. end Sidney Rea petitioned to sub-divide a parcel of
north of Dale Street and east of Winter Street, near the Boxford to~n line,
prising about 73 acres. Mr. MaoXay, Mr. Rea and Mr. George Hayes, Engineer, were
present. There 12 abutters present.
Mr. Barman read a letter from the Board of Public Works concerning the water supply
situation in the Dale Street - Winter Street area "we advise you that the quantity
'of water presently available there is ~dequate to provide fire protection and
domestic consumption for additional housing developments.~ The letter went on to
explain about pressure, required fire flow& etc.
Mr. Hayes, E~gineer, said they have the Definitive p~s but that.the Profiles are
not ready. The Board agreed to carry on with the hearing and to have them su~t
the Profiles later. Mr. Hayes went on to explain the Definitive plans. These plans
have one extra lot then was shown on the Preliminary plans. The ~ub-diviaion is
~ahown in two sections to make it easier to handle and to record at the Registry.
There are 59 lots in the Sub-division. ~e exploited the lots and the roads ~-~ the
distance frc~ the abutter's property, drainage, etc. 'A culvert on Dale Street will
take care of water in a Certain section. The lots vary in size from 1 acre to
66,000 sq. ft., etc. One abutter asked if they would take the responsibility where
the water problem is bad. One part of Winter Street at ti~es is 18e deep. Mr.
Hayes explained they are not putting any excess water on Winter Street - they are
draining away from it.
Mrs. Ward asked what changes they are ~king in the co,tour of the hill. Mr. Hayes
said they are not changing the b~l, Just putting in a road.
Mr. MecXay is putt~8 in 8" pipes.
February 17, 1964 -. Co, at.
MeCLa~,:
~ir. Burke made a motion to GRAh~ the petition.
Mr. Farley, Mr. Burke and Mr. G~lmn voted yes.
Mr. G~mn seconded the motion.
Mr. B~a~ and Mr. Oh.pulis voted No.
Mr. Barman explained that if he isn't granted approval at Town Meeting, he will have to
wait the necessary 2 years.
Mr. Burke made a motion to deny the petition _and give the petitioner leave to withdraw.
Mr. Gilman seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. Next year, if he desires,
he can come in again.
A motion was m~_de to adjourn the meet~r~.
Mr. Burke then m~de a motion to reconsider the first hearing. Mr. B~a~ said it was
out of order, because the meeting was adjourned. Mr. Burke said the meet~ was not
adjourned since no vote was taken.
Mr. Burke again made a motion to reconsider the first hearing. Mr. O41,~;seconded the
motion and the vote was unanimous.
Mr. Burke made a motion to accept the petition. Mr. Gilman seconded the motion.
Burke, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Farley and Mr. Oh.pulis voted yes. Mr. Banyan voted no.
Majority vote in favor.
2. MeLay:
Mr. G~l-~ ,~de a motion to accept the petition. Mr. Burke seconded the motion.
Burke, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Farley and Mr. Oh.pulis voted yes. Mr. B~n~an voted no.
as4-1 majority vote in favor.
Mr.
It was
Mr. Farley ~de a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Burke seconded the motio~ and the
vote was ~m~n.i~us. The meeting adjomm~l, at 10~00 P.I~
March 2, 1964 - Cont.
The heart_~E was again adjourned. Mr. Willis brought a letter concero~nE ~eadow Lane
that the Selectmen had received from the Highway Dept. Mr. Barman read the letter
with the following information "Surface drains have been installed on ~eadow I~ne,
but only one coat of hot top, instead of the two coats required, has been spread."
Mr. Willis said he had been informed by Mr. Carry that a letter would be sent to the
P1A-e~m8 Board regarding Maadow Lane. (No~hing ~as received by this Board). There
is a performance bond covering the f~shing of the road. Mr. W~ll~s asked if the
letter which was sent to the Selectmen from the Highway Dept. was adequate for the~
to make a ree_~w~ndation.
Mr. Burke made a motion to reoo~end acceptance of Meadow Lane as a Fmblic way,
subject to the inst-lletion of a fi~ coat of hot-top, subject to the performance
bond now on file with the Town Treasurer. t/r. Chepulis seconded the motion and the
vote was unanimous.
A letter was w~itten and immediately taken to the Selectmen for further action.
The hearing was again rest. This consisted mostly of discussions between the
abutters and Mr. MacXay and Mr. Bayes; such as sizes of lots, placement of houses,
culverts on streets, bed spots on Dale Street, etc. There ~as no opposition to the
Sub-division.
Mr. Burke made a motion to take the petition usder advisement. 1/r. Gilman seconded
the motion and the vote was unan~a.
Since parts of some lots are in Boxford, the petitioner will give B~xford. the neoessary
plans. Mr. Maclay will contact Town Counsel for the covenant. The Planning Board has
to get a letter ~ the Board of Health for approvals. Roads wa~t he hot-topped.
Mr. Burke made a motion to approve the ~ub-division plans, subject to their presenti~
proper Profile plans and subject to the following conditions. Mr. Gilman seconded the
the motion and the vote was unanimous.
The conditions are as follows:
1. Approval granted subject to filing of covenant satisfactory to the Tow~ Counsel.
2. Water and sewer according to the rules and regulations of the Board of Public Works.
3. Surface drains and street bounds must be ins+Ailed; construction of street a__~d
driveways subject to the approval of the High~ay Department.
4. Approval subject to the requirements of the local or state Dept. of Public Health
regarding sanitary disposal systems.
5. Roads ~ust be hot-topped.
Atty. ~ohn Willis was present and discussed with the Board their deeiaica regarding
the re-zoning for A,~ Realty. Mr, Willis s_~d he was very disturbed at the Board's
decision. Mr. Burke then made a motion to re-consider the B~bchar Boy artiole.
Mr. G~w~- said that at the previous meeting it was understood that a ,~A-t-~ms vote
was necessary in order for the article to be taken up again in one year. Mr. Barman
l~reh :2, lCj~ - Cont.
said that he did not say a ,m,p4w~us vote was required - that a majority vote is
necessal~,
The ~revious m~utes were consulted and found that they said a ,man4m~us vote was
required. There was some discussion as to whether or not the minutes were accurate.
Hoover, nothing further was done on the Angus Realty re-zomfng matter.
The ~oard signed the fol ~owing bills:
N.E. Tel. & Tel. Co.
A~m~ D~nahue
$ 8.35
57.00
A letter w~ he sent to Town Counsel to see if it is possible to make an *.~n~w~nt
to the Zoning By-Laws designating certain types of restrictive Business without
definitely locat~ any area. More discussion will be held at the next meeting
concerning By-law amendments.
The election of officials will take place at the next meeting.
Mr. Chepulis made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. O4'~w~'o seconded the motion
and the vote was U~A~O'AS.
The meet!n~ adjourned at 9:00 P.~