HomeMy WebLinkAboutVISSERING, CARL Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection Wetlands
WPA Appendix E - Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40
A. Request Information
Important: 1. Person or party making request(if appropriate, name the citizen croup's representative):
When filling See attached list of
out forms on requesting parties c/o Carl Vissering
the computer, Name
use only the 30 Anne Road
tab key to Mailing Address
move your North Andover, MA 01845
cursor-do Cityrrown -' State Zip Code
not use the
return key. Phone Number Fax Vjmber(if applicable)
Project Location
North Andover - Lincoln Lab Line #2378
Mailing Address
" North Andover, MA 01845
City/Town State Zip Code
2. Applicant(as shown on Notice of Intent(Form 3),Abbreviated Notice 1 Resource Area Delineation
(Form 4A); or Request for Determination of Applicability(Form 1))
Massachusetts Electric Co, c/o George Danek
Name
1101 Turnpike Street
-
Mailing Address
North Andover MA- 01845
Cityrrown State" Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number(if applicable)
3. DEP File Number:
242 - 1185
B. Instructions
1. When the Departmental action request is for(check one):
® Superseding Order of Conditions
❑ Superseding Determination of Applicability
❑ Superseding Order of Resource Area Delineation
Send this form and check or money order for$50.00, payable to the Comm=onwealth of Massachusetts to:
Department of Environmental Protection
Box 4062
Boston, MA 02211
wpeform5.doc•Appendix E•rev.5/14/03 Page t of 2
LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection- Wetlands
WPA Appendix E — Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40
B. Instructions (cont.)
2. On a separate sheet attached to this form,state clearly and concisely the objections to the
Determination or Order which is being appealed. To the extent that the Determination or Order is
based on a municipal bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations,
the Department has no appellate jurisdiction.
3. Send a copy of this form and a copy of the check or money order with the Request for a Superseding
Determination or Order by certified mail or hand delivery to the appropriate DEP Regional Office (see
Appendix A).
4. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the
Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant.
i
wpeform5.doc•Appendix E•rev.5114103 Page 2 of 2
OBJECTIONS TO ORDER
1. The North Andover Conservation Commission failed to
require and obtain sufficient data or consider data or give the
objectors sufficient time to present data or give the objectors
sufficient time to present data for a proper Alternate Route
Analysis to be made.
2. The North Andover Conservation Commission did not have
evaluated the wetlands and river front impact of the work done by
the applicant in November, 2002 which work was done in anticipation
of the filing, but whose impact was not considered in their
determination.
3. The North Andover Conservation Commission ruled that an
alternative to the proposed work was required. Though two
alternatives were ultimately presented by the applicant, the Board
ruled incorrectly that the alternatives were the choice of the
applicant whereas the opponents argued a best alternative scenario
was required. The vote of the Board did not produce sufficient
data to make a reasonable alternative choice.
4 . The proposed work impacted a river front and was work "on
a distribution line or connective line not reviewed by the Energy
Facilities Citing Council" and therefore an alternative proposal
was mandated.
5. The North Andover Conservation Commission waived its plan
requirements for the proposed project and there was no reliable
requ P P P 7
ted as to the location of the ed
certified data presented es of g
resource areas nor was there any data before the Board upon which
the actual impact of the project on the wetlands resource areas and
the river front areas could be determined.
6. The requestor's assert that the applicant failed to
properly notify interested parties as required by the enabling
legislation and the regulations under the act.
7. The requestor's assert.that the Lincoln Line, so called,
was initially erected in the early 60's prior to any requirements
for consideration of Wetland issues. The Applicant's proposal
would extend the life of an existing line which would no longer be
approved even though a demonstrably less environmentally damaging
solution was and is available utilizing existing and upgradable
lines on public ways. The North Andover Conservation Commission
failed to take these factors into account when comparing and
evaluating possible alternatives to the proposed project.
8. The North Andover Conservation Commission majority found
that the long term environmental impact of the alternative proposal
was significantly less than the proposed project, but erroneously
ruled that the only thing they could consider was the present
impact presented by the proposed project. The board's ruling gives
new and extended life to an environmentally inferior solution to
.............. ....._....
. ....._........._. ............
78 Line ROW
Existing
rMECa Alternative
kt Abutter.Alternative
ttNew Feed
Exlsting2378 Line ROW
t
i
.�.!
,.S
The !'09te b Prtv�e ex l
eslsUog
•� - �!'mere noted. AN ober rentes are iN j The prbnar�reneon for
M1
'the Public way. I think MECO only Protect seems to be
I r owns port{ous of>be t/Rv�aB Road. get power Oros
�'7' /her• {; o :t 1 �� ' j, ,1, i,, V.r l7 .1 i J !/:
Woodchuck BM to lid.
New 13kV Overhead = `' t ! ' .,"Ihe>te be tie rota
Construction Alon t?1 S` 1 y�j WaOdehYek Hi d ak!
. Public way very rear future.
rr,�� '.•� ���7 �",���`��i . 't r ,: '. � �.' �'� `std ��"�. � �t�3 a�^`j,s •'
,t IA741
4
f r fit.
,r' 1
-The Ejdattng Ronk is +
rivate except this
•�. �� !,
ecdon of Brook St.
Exla�ti �$Lige ROW ..Y,
]� i/ "y� iM� j Nil � `.'} E ➢ r:.� 1
LOCUS MAP FIGURE 1
SOURCE., U.S.Geological Survey.7 Minute Topographical
North Andover-4incoln Lab line#2378
Quadrangle.1919.Lawrence,Massachusetts-New Hampshire. Massachusetts Electric Company
Noft Andover,MAI
Scale 1,:xs goo N ot�t A
ME IMI, CHIM, INb" .Dss
Town of North Andover
Office of the Zoning Hoard of Appeals
Community Development and Services Division
27 Charles Street
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845
D. Robert Nicetta Telephone(978)688-9541
Building Commissioner Fax (978)688-9542
Date U
TO: Town of North Andover
Zoning Board of Appeals
27 Charles Street
North Andover A 01845 �
M -=
t+)
Please be advised that I have agreed to waive the time constraints for the lVrthF-
Andover Zoning Board of Appeals to make a decision regarding the granting of a`,, Yyy
w
Cn
Variance
Special Permit-
Comprehensive
ermitCo rehensive Permit (40B)
- hm
for property located at:
l
STREET: r ' W d
TOWN: v1 � 1dDye
TO MEETING DATE(S): L tai- o10D_3
NAME OF PETITI �v�q ��� Q J ti v� �a Q/ � o�/k►a v-S
Signed: ar
Petiti r(or petitioner's representative) '^ 1 Lqn }
r/
WAIVER
peals 978-688-9541 Building 978-688-9545 Conservation 978-688-9530 Heahh 978-688-9540 Planning 978-688-9535
1 JUN 1 0 200111
1
oARD Or APP�AI_S
Town of North Andover
Office of the Conservation Department '
Community Development and Services Division _
Heidi Griffin, Division Director
27 Charles Street sc
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Telephone 688-9530
Julie Parrino .978 p ( )
Conservation Administrator Fax(978)688-9542
Modification to Ord
The NORTH ANDOVER CONSERVATION COMMISSION agreed to accept
Applicant: ri A E leer;G. - A44n: fit,0NtII
101 i W110 J4L S+-e e.+
, 9 ld3
r 31J/0 3
as a Modification to the Order of Conditions issued in F 4 -rafted / d and
recorded in Book# and page
Issued by the NORTH ANDOVER CONSERVATION COMMISSION:
On this % of ,S' D 3 before me personally appeared Scott Masse to me
day m nth/yr
known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed.
&�W/t 110145k,� i)714X) q
Notary Public MC94nmission Expires
A receipt from the Lawrence Registry of Deeds must be submitted to this office showing
that this Modification has been recorded and referenced to the book and page numbers.
BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535
14
Z
Town of North Andover NORTH
O`y�a:eo 46}tiB
Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals ?
Community Development and Services Division # _
27 Charles Street
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 'Ss�cHus�
D. Robert Nicetta. Telephone(978)688-9541
Building Commissioner Fax(978)688-9542
September 5,2001
Zoning Board of Appeals
27 Charles Street
North Andover,MA 01845
Meetinghouse Commons at Smolak Farms
185 Hickory Hill Road
North Andover,MA 01845
Regarding: Comprehensive Permit application
Dear Mr.Zahoruiko,
Your application of August 30,2001 regarding the Comprehensive Permit for Meetinghouse Commons at
Smolak Farm is incomplete;therefore, it is invalid at this time.
It is not in accordance with the Comprehensive Permit Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Board of
Appeals for the Town of North Andover dated March 13,2001,a copy of this document is attached.
Please be advised that Section 3 of the Rules and Regulations pertaining to:Filing,Time Limits and Notice
has not been properly addressed per your Comprehensive Permit application.
I suggest that you consult with the Building Commissioner,Mr.D.Robert Nicetta,because of the
complexity and incompleteness of the Comprehensive Permit application to make sure that all the areas of
Section 3 has been addressed properly.
Please provide a new application with the proper number of copies and date stamped by the Town Clerk's
office.
Thank you in advance for your immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
William J.Pullivan,Chairman
Attachment Zoning Bo d of Appeals
Cc: Robert Nicetta/Building Commissioner
Joyce Bradshaw/Town Clerk
Ml/comppennit post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date pages
To From
BOARD CSF: PEA S 688-9541 BUILDING 588-9545 CONTSEI Co.
CoMept.
Phone# rpt Phone VISI b 01
Fax#g Fax# `�
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
Comprehensive Permit Rules and Regulations .
of the
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Section
1.00 . Purpose and Context
-2.00 Definitions
3.00 Filing, Time Limits and Notice
4.00 Review of Applications and Review Fees
5.00 Public Hearing and Decision
6.00 Appeals
' 7.00 Effectiveness
' I
1.00 Purpose and Context
i
These.rules establish the procedures of applications to the Zoning Board-of Appeals for
comprehensive permits, under MGL Chapter 40B, Sections 20-23 (Chapter 774 of the Acts of
1969,the "Act"). The rules are required by MGL Chapter 40B; Section 21, as amended by Stat.
1989, c. 593, and by CMR 31.02.
These rules are to be read in conjunction with, and implemented in, a manner consistent
with the complete regulations of the Housing Appeals Committee, 706 CMR 30.00 and 31.00,
and with the Guidelines for Local Review of Comprehensive Permits,published periodically by
the Department of Housing and Community Development. In addition,.the Board's general rules
for conduct of hearings under MGL Chapter 40A apply to comprehensive permit applications.
In case of inconsistency or conflict between those general.rules for conduct and these rules, these
rules shall govern.
2.00 Definitions
(a) "Board"means the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals.
(b) "Local board"means any local board or official, including, but not.limited to any
board of health; planning board; conservation commission; historical commission; fire
department; police department; building inspector; board of selectmen; and housing partnership
committee.
3.00 Filing, Time Limits and Notice
3.01 The application for a comprehensive permit shall consist of:
sAwp51\work\n-andove\permit rvles.doc
j� `
(a) preliminary site development plans showing the locations and outlines of proposed
buildings, the proposed locations, general dimensions and materials for streets, drives, parking
areas, walks and paved areas; and proposed landscaping and open areas within the site. An
applicant proposing to construct or rehabilitate four or fewer units may submit a sketch of the
matters in sections 3:01(a) and 3.01(c), below, which need not have an architect's signature. All
structures of five or more units must have site development plans signed by a registered
architect.
(b) a report on existing site conditions.and a summary of conditions in the surrounding
ureas, showing the location and nature of existing buildings, existing street elevations, traffic
patterns and character of open areas, if any, in the neighborhood. This submission may be
combined with the information required in section 3.01(a) above;
(c) preliminary, scaled, architectural drawings. For each building the drawings shall be
signed by a registered architect, and shall include typical floor plans,typical elevations, and
sections, and shall-identify construction type and exterior finish;
(d) a tabulation of proposed buildings by type, size (number of bedrooms,floor area) and
ground coverage, and a summary showing the percentage of the site to be occupied by buildings,
b parking, b paved vehicular areas access roads and drivewa s and b open areas-
Y.p g� Y P ( Y )� Y p � .
(e) where a subdivision of land is involved,a preliminary subdivision plan; .
(f)- a preliminary utilities plan showing the proposed location and types of sewage,
drainage and water facilities, including hydrants;
(g) documents showing that the applicant fulfills the jurisdictional requirements of 760
CMR 31.01,.that is,
(i) the applicant shall be a public agency, anon-profit organization, ora limited
dividend organization,
(ii) the project shall be Rindable by a subsidizing agency under a low and moderate
income housing subsidy program, and,
(iii) the applicant shall control the site;
(h) a list of requested exceptions to local requirements and regulations, including local
codes, ordinances, by-laws or regulations;
(i) all plans shall be on sheets 24 inches by 36 inches (24"x 36") in size,.at a scale of
one inch equals forty feet (1"=40'). Detailed areas may be at one inch equals twenty feet(1"_
20');
(j) applications shall be made on forms provided by or obtained from the Zoning Board
of Appeals office;
.,3
(k) at lease twelve (12) copies of all plans and documents required under this section
shall accompany an application for a comprehensive permit;
3.02 The application shall be accompanied by an advertising fee in the amount of$130.00, and
a filing fee based upon the number of proposed housing units of
(a) for limited dividend organizations $50.00 per unit
(b) for non-profit organizations $25.00 per unit
(c) for public agencies and local Non per-unit fee
There shall be no filing fee for any application proposed as a Local Initiative project
pursuant to 760 CMR 45.00.
3.03 Within seven (7) days of the filing of an application for a comprehensive permit, the
Board shall notify each local board of the application by sending such board a copy of all plans,
documents and other information required by section 3.01 above. The Board may request
fcomments, reports or recommendations in wir ting.from local boards:which.have reviewed the
3
application, and such comments,reports or recommendations shall-be included in the record of
the proceedings (the hearing). .
4.00 Review Fees
4.01 If, after receiving an application for a comprehensive permit,the Board determines that a
proper review of the application requires technical assistance unavailable from municipal
employees or local boards, or upon advice and recommendation of a local board, the Board may
employ or retain outside consultants to perform such reviews. Whenever possible the Board will
work cooperatively with the applicant to identify appropriate consultants and to negotiate
payment of part or all of theconsultant fees by the applicant. Alternatively, the Board may, by
majority vote,require.that the applicant pay a reasonable review fee for the employment of
outside consultants chosen by the Board alone.
4.02 A review fee may be imposed only if: (a) the work of the consultant consists of review
of studies prepared on behalf of the applicant; and not of independent studies on behalf of the
Board; (b) the work is in connection with the applicant's specific project; and (c) all written
results and reports are made part of the record before the Board.
4.03 A review fee maybe imposed only after the Board has complied with the-Uniform
Procurement Act, MGL Chapter 30B, Sections 1-19, and the following additional requirements:
(a) For services in an amount less than $25,000 the Board shall issue an invitation for
bids conforming to the requirements.of MOL Chapter 30B, Section 5 or a request for proposals
(RFP) conforming to the requirements of MGL Chapter 30B, Section 6, or shall obtain three (3)
quotations;
(b) For services in an amount of$25,000 or more, the Board shall issue a request for
proposals (RFP) conforming to the requirements of MGL Chapter 30B, Section 6.
(c) For all services, whether in amounts less than or greater than$255000.
(i) the applicant shall be given three (3) days notice and opportunity to attach
written comments to the invitation for bids, or request for proposals, or
quotations;
(ii) the applicant shall be given three (3) days notice and opportunity to comment
on all bids, or proposals or quotations prior to the selection of the consultant and
the award of a contract.
(d) A bona fide bid or proposal shall include:
(i) the name of each person performing the work;
(ii) the educational and professional credentials of each person performing the
Work;
(iii)the work experience of each person performing.the:work;
(iv)a description of the work to be performed;
(v) the hourly rate charged by each person performing•the work, and .
(vi) all other expenses to be incurred.
4.04 All fees assessed pursuant to this section shall be reasonable in light of
(a) the complexity of the proposed project as a whole,
(b) the complexity of particular technical issues,
(c) the number of housing units proposed,
(d) the size and character of the site,
(e) the projected construction costs, and
(f) fees charged by similar consultants in the area.
As a general rule, the Board will not assess any fee greater than the amount which might
be appropriated from town funds to review a similar town project.
4.05 Any invitation for bids or request for proposals shall indicate that award of the contract is
contingent upon payment of a review fee. If the applicant fails to pay the review fee within ten
(10) days of receiving written notification of selection of a bidder or offerer, the Board may deny
the comprehensive.permit. (The Board will select the consultant after reviewing both the bid or
proposal and any comments received from the applicant pursuant to section 4.03(c)(ii), but'it will
not formally award the contract until the review fee has.been received and paid).
4:06 Prior to paying the review fee, the applicant may appeal the selection of the consultant to
the Board of Selectmen. The grounds for such an appeal shall be limited to claims that the
consultant selected has a conflict of interest or does not posses the minimum, required
qualifications. The minimum qualifications shall consist of either an educational degree in or
related to the field at issue (traffic, drainage, etc.) or three or more years of practice in the field at
issue or a related field. The required time limits for action on the comprehensive permit
application by the Board shall be extended by the duration of the appeal. In the event that no
decision is made by the Board of Selectmen within one (1)month following the filing of the
appeal, the selection made by the Board shall stand.
4.07 Each review fee shall be deposited in a special account established by the town treasurer
j r pursuant to MGL Chapter 44, Section 53G. Funds from the special account may be expended
only for the purposes described in section 4.02; above, and in compliance with the Uniform
Procurement Act, MGL Chapter 30B, Sections 1419. Within thirty (30) days of the completion
of the project or of such time as the applicant formally withdraws the proposal, the applicant
shall receive a final report of funds in the special account and shall be paid any unspent excess in
the account, including accrued interest. The town accountant shall submit annually a report of
the special account to the Board.of Selectmen and the Town Manager for their review. This
review shall be published in the town's annual report.
5.00 Public Hearing and Decision
5.01 The Board shall hold a public hearing on.the application for a comprehensive permit
within thirty (30) days of its receipt. The provisions of MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11. shall
apply to the hearing. The Board may request the appearance at the hearing of such
representatives of local boards or officials as it considers necessary or helpful in reviewing the
application, or the Board may request comments,reports, or recommendations in writing from
local boards of officials. In making its decision on the application,the Board shall-take into
account the recommendations of local boards or officials.
5.02 The Board shall render a decision based on a majority vote of the Board, and shall file
such decision in writing with the town clerk within forty(40) days after termination of the public
hearing, unless such time is extended by written agreement of the Board and the applicant. Such
extension shall be filed with the Town Clerk. The hearing is deemed terminated when all public
testimony has been received and all information requested by the Board has been received,
including the reports of any outside consultants retained for review of the project, and the Board
has voted, by majority vote, to close the hearing.
5.03 The board may dispose of the application for a comprehensive permit in the following
manner:
(a) approve a comprehensive permit on the terms and conditions set forth in the
application;
(b) deny a comprehensive permit as not consistent with local needs, or
(c) approve a comprehensive permit with conditions with respect to height, site plan,
size, shape or building materials that do not render the construction or operation of such project
or such housing uneconomic.
6.00 Appeals
6.01 If the Board approves the comprehensive permit, any person aggrieved may appeal the
decision within the time period and to the court provided in MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17.
6.02 If the Board denies the comprehensive permit or approves the permit with unacceptable
conditions or requirements, the applicant may appeal to the Housing Appeals Committee as
provided in MGL Chapter 40B, Section 22.
7.00 Effectiveness
These rules are hereby adopted by the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals and
made effective on. 3,o IS -'*to$ 1. The Rules and any subsequent amendments made thereto
shall be filed with the North Andover Town Clerk.
Dated: -�.aj
Chairman _
7
A
CYJ rn _>
N
-low,
._ '
WILLIS AND WILLIS ; t SsF
ATTORNEYS A LAW p�{
ia PO aGE.
1 7,17
160 PLEASANT STREET
NO. ANDOVER, MA 0184 (��µ
'` 7r1L.SERVICE
7051 3220 0009 9262 7984 92F)-q ,C7�
01895 00082602-10
4,e North Andover Conservation Commission
M �—= c% Joyce Bradshaw, Town Clerk
' ---- 120 Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
z
i f4-:.5-+249l :36 1111111,11114111fit 1141111111$141111111111111,1if"bl"1111,1
OBJECTIONS TO ORDER
1. The North Andover Conservation Commission failed to
require and obtain sufficient data or consider data or give the
objectors sufficient time to present data or give the objectors
sufficient time to present data for a proper Alternate Route
Analysis to be made.
2 . The North Andover Conservation Commission did not have
evaluated the wetlands and river front impact of the work done by
the applicant in November, 2002 which work was done in anticipation
of the filing, but whose impact was not considered in their
determination.
3 . The North Andover Conservation Commission ruled that an
alternative to the proposed work was required. Though two
alternatives were ultimately presented by the applicant, the Board
ruled incorrectly that the alternatives were the choice of the
applicant whereas the opponents argued a best alternative scenario
was required. The vote of the Board did not produce sufficient
data to make a reasonable alternative choice.
I
4 . The proposed work impacted a river front and was work "on
a distribution line or connective line not reviewed by the Energy
Facilities Citing Council" and therefore an alternative proposal
was mandated.
5. The North Andover Conservation Commission waived its plan
requirements for the proposed project and there was no reliable
certified data presented as to the location of the edges of
resource areas nor was there any data before the Board upon which
the actual impact of the project on the wetlands resource areas and
the river front areas could be determined.
6. The requestor's assert that the applicant failed to
properly notify interested parties as required by the enabling
legislation and the regulations under the act.
7. The requestor's assert that the Lincoln Line, so called,
was initially erected in the early 60's prior to any requirements
for consideration of Wetland issues. The Applicant's proposal
would extend the life of an existing line which would no longer be
approved even though a demonstrably less environmentally damaging
solution was and is available utilizing existing and upgradable
lines on public ways. The North Andover Conservation Commission
failed to take these factors into account when comparing and
evaluating possible alternatives to the proposed project.
8. The North Andover Conservation Commission majority found
that the long term environmental impact of the alternative proposal
was significantly less than the proposed project, but erroneously
ruled that the only thing they could consider was the present
impact presented by the proposed project. The board's ruling gives
new and extended life to an environmentally inferior solution to
the transmission of power within North Andover when denial in favor
of a reasonable alternative solution would allow for the phasing
out of the existing line at the end of it's structural life and
place the power transmission in accessible public ways instead of
through wetlands and river front areas.
9. The North Andover Conservation Commission failed to
address the issues required by the regulations to be evaluated in
determining the viability of an alternate solution and the
Applicant failed to present data on all alternate routes available
to satisfy their transmission needs. (See attached locus map
(figure 1) showing some viable alternative routes which were not
properly evaluated.
y�m0
125 � %
A�
�—
#1EAr F�
FOR REGISTRY USE �.-�, STREET
��s ,� 133 \WASHINGTON
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
BOXFORD
S 18'35'4"E
I IM.�.- 755-67'
N01?Tff ANDOVER s.
6 3S.411,
4.
� 41
rev \ 213.69, E S30.56'04"W
o � �
100.56'
DRILL
HOLE
FOUND z PORTION ,OF, THE, TOWN
OF BOXFORD TO BE
N18.42'53"E-�' ti� ANNEXED ` WITH TO
164.17 LINE TABLE
��• \r.OWN` OF, `NORTH
GRANITE BOUNDLINE BEARING, DISTANCE
0 BE SET (TYP.) °°�S `�F ANDOVER L1 soo•39'40"w 51.
N
20
\ \ 7 \ \ � L2 S13'S6'16"W 85.86
HOLE � 1,105,073 Sq.Ft. N BOXFORD
BOXFORD FOUND \25.369 Ac.± BOXFORD L3 o MAP 4 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 SO4'30' "»09E 86900
u
MAP 4 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 MAP 4 BLOCK 1 LOT 3.1 L4
,aN• � .71
L5
S21'06'06"E 330.72
ca L6 S21'55'41 "E 146.92
L7 S22'49'37"E 315.84
PROPOSED
L8 S23'11 '38"E 173.30
TOWN LINE
PORTION OF THE TOWN L9 S25'16'35"E 47.04 L10 S06'06'30"E 272.29
OF NO
RANITE TOWN ANDOVER TO L11 S11'01'43"E 80.89
rFOUND
j
BE ANNEXED WITH THE L12
NE BOUND N74•02'35"E 245.12
AT EDGE r V DRILL
_ TOWN OF BOXFORD HOLE BOXFORD L13 S71*47'46"W 134.27
F BARKER `� MAP 4 BLOCK 1 LOT 4
STREET .M cv, •1'�``,. 1� PROPOSED 548,866 Sq.Ft. FOUND
TOWN LINE 12.600 Ac.t
S21'01 '29"E _ '
BOXFORD �-
- - 1407.76' i » r.
OR
S21 01 29 E `� S20'52'16"E _ ^ N
NORTH ANDOVER - _ -� - - s2o•52'1 s"E
538.41' / .��\222.78' - - _ _ _ 1757.96' - ?
NORTH ANDOVER NORTH ANDOVER S_20 52 16"E
MAP 61 LOT 10 _ -
MAP 62 LOT 2 S68'04'09"W BOXFORD
�,�� � `�_""'_._---------._.--___._-_,,,___.�,�__�____
<DCDCDCD
0 224.45' PORTION OF EXISTING NORTH ANDOVER 2541.41 '
OWN LINE TO BE ..._._.._._„_
;BRADFORD ELIMINATED
NORTH ANDOVER �
PORTION OF EXISTING MAP 62 LOT 138 GRANITE TOWN)
NORTH ANDOVER LINE BOUND
L1 / MAP 90C LOT
NORTH ANDOVER TOWN LINE TO BE BOXFORD cv 21 FOUND AT EDGE
MAP 61 LOT 9 ELIMINATED L2 L4 - L - OF POND
4'xs"x3.5'H
L3 STREET
GRANITE BOUND
FOUND AT EDGE STREET NORTH ANDOVER L9 C o J
OF WOOD ROAD —
PROPOSED %
T
NORTH ANDOVER OWN LINE L11
MAP 62 LOT 5 NORTH ANDOVER NORTH ANDOVER
MAP 62 LOT 139 MAP 62 LOT 8
NilNOTES: CERTIFICATIONS:
1) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF A FIELD SURVEY BY THIS OFFICE 1) 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY AND PLAN CONFORMS TO THE ETHICAL, TOWN BOUNDARY RELOCATION PLAN
ON JUNE 10, 2002. PROCEDURAL AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF
2) THE INTENT OF THIS PLAN IS TO ADJUST THE TOWN LINE BETWEEN
LAND SURVEYING IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. BRADFORD STREET BOXFORD & NORTH ANDOVER. 2) 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE BOXFORD & NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF PREPARED FOR:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. THIS PLAN DOES NOT RE UI TARA LEIGH DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Q RE APPROVAL THIS PLAN DOES NOT REQUIRE APPROVAL 185 HICKORY HILL ROAD
PLAN REFERENCES: UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845
1) NORTH ESSEX COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS PLAN #13207. TOWN OF N. ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF BOXFORD PLANNING BOARD
GRAPHIC SCALE ,� ,; 103 Stiles Road, Sate one
200 ® -�
2 NORTH ESSEX COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS PLAN #13181. ,� Salem, New Hampshire 03079.�
o goo zoo +oo eoo
(603) 893-0720
IN FFM MHF Design Consultants, ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS
SCALE: 1 "= 200' DATE: AUGUST 30, 2002 DRAWING NAME
inc = ft
1109TOWN.DWG
CHRISTOPHER FRANCHER, P.L.S. DATE DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. SHEET NO.
CCC CMF 110900 1 OF 1