Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-07-02 The PLANNf~ BOARD met on No~ eveaiag, July 2, 1973 at 7=30 P.~. ia the To~n Office B,,~l~ meeting rob. The following ~e~bere were preeeat a~d votimg= WilLta~ Chepulis, Chairman; ~eh~ J. Monteiro, Vice Cheiraan; Penl R. Laa~rey, Clerk; Doaald N. Keiretead and Fritz Ostherr. There were about 35 people present for the aeeting. ~ Mr. Ostherr ~ede a action to accept the m~utae of the previous meeting; Mr. Monteiro seconded the ~ion and the Veto ~as uuania~us. BARBAGALLO SUBDIVISION= A letter was received fre~ the Board of Health stating the necessary perc tests must be made per their reqn4~eaonts. Mr' Barbagalle and Mr. Hurrell were present and sub. it%ed corrected plans. The,Board mmbere checked ~ver the'plans to see if all,requirements were met. Discussion was held on the ab41~ty to use the ponds for fire protection. Mr. Mo~teire made a motio~ te approve the subdivision plans subject te the usual conditi~ns; ~eetiug the Board of Health requirments and going before the Coneerva- tio~ C~iesion ~ith respect to the sweaR, land ia the area. Mr. Ostherr seconded the ~otioa and the vote wa~ umani~ous. Mr' Ootherr made a motion t~ table ite~ 8 of the agenda, chich Kell~"~ ~ s~et~ ~ ree~ f~ t~ ~c~ocase. ~ act~ ~:~ he t~ t~s ~ s~e the Bo~ ~ ~t ~ ~fici~t t~ to stu~ t~ mate~. He stat~ t~t ~ere is ~ before us f~ t~ ~c~oc~e~ we s~h4~2 offici~ c~s ~ore us or the t~ ~as aw~. ~e ~~ c~es before us; ~t~ ~d be rasolv~ ~ b~o~ us ~. ~. ~s add~ that ~ t~ a~ c~e ~ to t~ m~ ~t he~ th~ e~e~ to acce~ ~ ~te~ ~ ~ su~t. vote Was m~al.lt.'f, mous. Mr. Ostherr ~ade a action that itea 9 of the agomd_a be acted upe~[ Mr. Keiretead seconded the motion a~d the vote was unanimous. Ite~ 9 is a "Notice o~ Appeal" by Albert C~atee aad others against the B~ilding Inspector for the ieeuauce of a building per.it to Viacer~ Lan~ers for 152 towahouse units on the Stevens ~ property. July 2, 1973 - cont. Mr. Keiretead said he does not see where the p1...4.~ Board is involved in this action and made a motion to receive the notices Mr. Monteiro seconded %he notion and the vote.was "nmn'ieou$* . Atty. Demonic Scalise and Arthur Collins were present. A request had been made for the release of lot ~2,'the last let' be4w2 held by the Board. Mr. a~nteiro Said he check_ad the subdivision and found that there are no stone ~igh~ey 3urveyer Cyr said there are 20 hounds yet to he placed. He receeaemde that $2f000 he posted for that item. A letter vas received frog ~1 C~ D~ statTM that. Mr, COllg:Wa hes fulfilled his obligation es far as the Fire Dept. is concerned. Ne explained that the inntallntions were made but that when the ut~l~%ies dug for services, they must have bremen the wire 4. several places. Mr. Col~s feels that he should not be held reapcaeible, since he made the proper ino~*l~atiens and thnt ~ebody else caused the wires to be breM~ He feels: he has met all of.the requirenonts. He would like to eubetitoto tho necessary amount of money for the installation of the stone hounds and have the last lot released. He stated that ~ithin the next 12-18 months the final lets ~ be built After acme discussion, ~r. Xeireteed made a matie~ that a be~d be sub mitred in the amoun~ of $2500 for the reloase of Lot ~2, with the ccn~_tion that 8X~ stone bound8 be ino~-~led by November 1, 1~%. Mr. Ontherr seco~___ed the motion and the vote was 3 members - yes and Mr. Lamprey and Mr. Ohe~,~- ~ No. Mr. Bonoon showed a corrected plan of the "Johnson Circle" eubdivieiea, which shews the circle brought back approx. 50 ft. because of the orders of the Conserva- tion ~:ssien. They rill lose lot ~ of the develolmen~. They are now asking the p1ann~n2 Board to allow the enended plan. Discussion was held as to whether or not a public hearinS was necessary. Mr. Lenprey feels there should be a public hearing. ~he ~ard docided it was not necessary to have a hearing. Mr. Be~$on and Atty. WilLis explained t~at they have to get Planning Board approval for the chengo in plans and then go hack to the Conesrvation Comiasion. Hr. Ohapulis said we can ~ive conditiona~ approval; then they can go back to the Oe~servetioa Oomuiesien. Mr. Xeiretead made a matiem that the Plsm-~-~ Board send a letter to the Oe~erva- tien Co~saion indienting its approvalt in principle~ of the subdivioie~ plan as revised June 2l, 1973~ indicnting that if this revision ia acceptable to the Cc~. C~ma., it is the intent of the Plammiag Beard to approve it folleeiag the release of this co~diti~n by the Ce~aervation Cc-'---iasion. Mr. Ostherr seconded the matiea and the vote was uno,sous. Ju~v 2, 1~73 - coat. Atty. Russell Carl was present ia place of Vieter Hatea eh~ eas ~aable to attend. Letters were reeeived fr~a the ~oard of Health and Board of Peblie ¥orks. Atty. Carl requested approval of the pre~ plan aad that adate for the public hear~ug be set by the Beard. ~r. Chepulis said a public hearing canaet be ealled until the problems of the development have been resolved. Discussion was held end ~r. Oatherr ~ade a ~eti~a that c~ditio~l appreval be given to the preli~ plans; Mr. Menteire eee~aded the metien and the vote was The conditions are as fellews; 1. The oucceasful ce~pletien of the lift stati~a desiga to the satiefaetion of the Board of Public Works a~d Board of Health. 2. The water sySto~ te be built ia ec~for~uce ~ith the regalatiuns of the Beard of Public Work~. 3. The Board ~ · gran~ slopes in eye_ess of oar rog~lations 'en the cendi~ion that sloped granite curbing sB~ll be installed ia aceordenee with the re~uirenents of tho Highway Surveyor. The dr-4-~ge sy~tea shall be in cenfor~unee with the ~ighway Departaent re- q-~e~ents and specifications. 5. 25 ft. leve~u~-off 8pet8 at all iatersectiena shall be accer~-~ to the re~lations. Mr. £eiretead them made a motien to aend a letter t~ the developer requee$tn~ that he put ia writing the off-site i~prevenente that he agreed to; such as, the e~lvert under Johnson Street and the straight~n~ and flattening of Sa~dra Lane at its present termination. Mr. Menteiro seconded the motion and the vete was unanimous. PLAIIS ~ P~t~ APPI~OVAL~ The Board v~ted upem a~d ~igned the followiag pl~ as "Not Requiring Approval under the Subdivisioa Central La~. 1. Chee~ Rill AsNc. '- Turnpike Street. 2. Feorge Farr - ~alem Street. 3. L~-~.ela Giles- Oegeed St. at the ~averhill July2~ 197~ -conto BOARD OF APPEALS D~CI$IO~S & ltF~,IliG~ Notice of a public hearing to be held by the Boa~d of Appeal8 upc~ the Petition of Ruth T~ for a division of land on Dale Street, was received. Atty~ Ha~old Morley spoke to the Board as repreasntin8 Hrs. T~mons and pl~4ued that she wants the land divided ~ tee lots so that.her ash eau on the lot. ~r. Xei~atead made a motion ~o reco~ to the Board of Appeals that the Peti%ic~r be .notified that the proPer course ~f action is to submit a sub- division plan to the pltw-4~i Board since this plan clearly shews a subdivision as defined in the state statute. Mr. Oatherr seconded the motion and the vote was l~ll~qn'~ m~tlS. HIS~S HATTERS ~ A letter wes received fron a Raleigh Tavern Lane resident relative to a bond being held by the Planning Board and requesting the ~ not to release any part of it because Ben Osf~Jd has not kept his promises as to WOrk to be done on the readwa~. Hr. Xeiratead made a u°tion that a sPecial ceemittee (La~prey & Keirstead) be created to review all existing subdivisions and make a coaprehensive report to the Board in 3epteuber to bring these matters to a conclusion. Mr. Nouteiro seconded th· motion and the VOte was unanimous. : The Capital Outlay Conmittea report was received. Mr. Xeiretead suggested that· this be referred to the Administrative ~ub-cc~ittas for repor~ at the next meeting. Hr. Oatherr suggested that the Planning Board work with the Board of Public Wo.rks re sewer lift stations and with the Capital Budget Conmittee. Mr. ~oiratead said the Long R~nge Planning &ab-co~m!ttee (Ostherr & LamPrey) should get together with the other departments re the lift stations. A letter vas received fron a Hr. Marine, property ounor off Andever B~-Pass, reei~4ng in Florida; requesting information es to the re-zoning of his property and how access to it would be affected since it is a limited access road. A letter wt~ 1 be sent notifying 'hin that the re-zoning is an appropriate land use and that due notice was given 'of the re-s~ning. We have no control over access .and that resi- dantial access is protected as lo~ as it is used in that way. The meeting adJouraed at 10..00 P.M.