The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBuilding Permit #Exception - 10 FOSTER STREET 5/1/2018 • OORT" BUILDING PERMIT TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER ---- ----- ------ - - -------APPL-!CATION FOR PLAN EXAMINATION------- ;� ; Permit NO: Date Received . Date Issued: ACH IMPORTANT:Applicant must complete all items on this page t k :LOCATION s. Pant PROPERTYOWNER fA7T -0S! MAP NO `��6tQLPARCEL 327ZONING DISTRICT �� Histonc District yes Q� ;44 Machine Shop UMage yes ro _z TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED USE; Residential Non- Residential ❑New Building 151zkJ1'V i5 One family ❑Addition ❑Two or more family ❑ Industrial ❑Alteration No. of units: ❑Commercial ❑ Repait replacement ❑Assesso ryBldg ❑ Others: ❑ Demolition ❑Other ❑Sej tic D'Well _ T-1.loodplain w I Wetlands ❑ Wates etl District r-�'n '0�"s`av a � .:s"a'�aC �.rte �`'��' i�.€a� s t"'-s-•,..G�'-k '*'❑Water/Sewer , ns s Y x{ � � � � ° Identification Please Type or Print Clearly) OWNER: Name: _ PR IF[G AAA-1" TI-OT Phone: Address: CONTRACTOR Name . } ig, a a r r Phoheu � �} xs ,i ,f + t}' x i•f' ti,y. g -"+= x' 4 - Y? 4.it. Address 3 y -n-; - ,� ' x s. G e t }:: w,*"' -• as-vy r ry k r - ' r. 'Fr '?�.r�> Supervisorrs Construction License Ex Date f K F ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Phil`o h"SPK Phone: Cq_70a -.� 73--63r2) Address: rfv cr?a-J S' ilb Kammot_ 4aReg. No. PE ?,�:3� FEE SCHEDULE.,SULDING PERMIT.$12.00 PER$1000.00 OF THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST BASED ON$125.00 PER S.F. Total Project Cost: $ FEE: $ Check No.: Receipt No.: NOTE: Persons contracting wi ,in ' to contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund i_ Signature of Agent%Owne Signature ofcontractor Plans Submitted ❑ Plans Waived ❑ Certified Plot Plan ❑ Stamped Plans ❑ TYPE OF SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Public Sewer Tanning/Massage/Body Art ❑ Swimming Pools Well ❑ Tobacco Sales ❑ Food Packaging/Sales D Private(septic tank,etc. ❑ Permanent Dumpster on Site ❑ THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY INTERDEPARTMENTAL SIGN OFF - U FORM DATE REJECTED DATE APPROVED PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ❑ ❑ COMENTS CONSERVATION ❑ ❑ COMMENTS DATE REJECTED DATE APPROVED HEALTH ❑ ❑ COMMENTS Zoning Board of Appeals:Variance, Petition No: Zoning Decision/receipt submitted yes Planning Board Decision: Comments Conservation Decision: Comments Water& Sewer Connection/Signature&Date Driveway Permit Located at 384 Osgood Street FIRE DEPARTMENT Temp Dumpster on'-site yes no Located At124 Mam Street.-Fire,Department signature/date COMMENTS Dimension -----Number of Stories: -- - - Total square feet of-floor area;-based on Exterior-dimensions: - -- - - - Total land area, sq. ft.: ELECTRICAL: Movement of Meter location, mast or service drop q PP requires approval of Electrical Inspector Yes No DANGER ZONE LITERATURE: Yes No MGL Chapter 166 Section 21A—F and G min.$100-$1000 fine NOTES.and DATA—(For department use) i I ❑ Notified for pickup - Date Doc.Building Permit Revised 2012 CHRISTIANSEN & SERGI, INC CS' PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 160 SUMMER STREET,HAVERHILL,MA 01830 tel: 978-373-0310 www.csi-engr.com fax 978-372-3960 July 13, 2015 Mr. Gerald Brown Inspector of Buildings Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street Building 20, Suite 2035 North Andover,MA 01845 Dear Mr. Brown: The owners of land identified by the Town of North Andover Assessor as Map 140D Parcels 32 and 47 wish to subdivide the property. However, owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape, and topography of the land and structures thereon and especially affecting such land or structures but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the by-law would involve substantial financial hardship. Therefore we are requesting that Parcel 32 and a portion of Parcel 47 be subdivided according to the dimensional requirements of the R-3 zoning district rather than the requirements of the R-1 district in which it lies. Attached are a proposed Variance Plan, and an Analysis Plan which outlines the hardship of subdividing by the R-1 standards and compares the proposed plan to existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. We anticipate that following your denial we will file the plans with the Zoning Board of Appeals. j .E. DEVELOPMENT UNDER EXISTING ZONING 1.-.PARCELS 32 AND.47 HAVE A COMBINED: AREA OF 8.3 ACRES. 2.AS NOTED ABOVE:A PORTION'OF PARCEL 47 IS LOCATED:WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AE AS DEPICTED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS COMMUNITY-PA NEL=NUMBER 25009C 0237E&REVISED THROUGH JULY 3, 2012. PARCEL 32 IS NOT IN THE FLOOD ZONE 3.THE PARCELS LIE WITHIN THE R-1ZONINGDISTRICT T1 AT HAS A REQUIREMENT OF 87,120 SQUARE FEET PER LOT WITH A FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT OF 175 FEET. 4 ZONING REGULATIONS ALSO REQUIRE THAT EACH,LOT HAVE 65,340 SQUARE FEET OF CONTIGUOUS UPLAND AREA. 5 THE COMBINED AREA OF THE LOTS IS ADEQUATE FORS LOTS _15-THE FRONTAGE AVAILABLE ON FOSTER AND SALEM STREETS IS ADEQUATE FOR THE CREATION OF TWO LOTS:THAT CONFORM TO R-1 ZONING REQUIREMENTSI_ 7 FRONTAGE FORA THIRD LOT CAN BE CREATED BY A NEW ROADWAY. 8. EACH"OF,THREE LOTS CAN*BE CONFIGURED SO THAT EACH HAS THE.REQUIRED CONTIGOUS BUILDABLE AREA. 9.A CONCEPTUAL LOTCONFIGURATION IS SHOWN ON THE ADJOINING PLAN t HARDSHIPS CAUSED BY=LOT SHAPE AND TOPOGRAPHY BY DEVELOPING UNDER E"XISTING ZONING 1.AS NOTED;ABOVE A PORTION OF PARCEL 471S ,LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD.ZONE'AE AS:DEPICTED.ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 250090 7 .-:&REVISED THROUGH JULY 3,2012.. EACH OF THE LOTS DUE TO TOPOGRAPHY.AND LOT SHAPE WOULD:BE IN.THE FLOOD:HA7JIRD ZONE: THEREFORE EACH WOULD BE SUBJECT;TO HIGH FLOOD,INSURANCE 2.THE:LOT S RAPE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LOT AREA AND CONTIGUOUS BUILDABLE AREA. WOULD REQUIRE_`THAT-THE EXISTING HOUSE WOULD.NOT B_Ea' COMPLIANCE WITH°THE BUILDING OFFSET REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING DISTRICT:; 3:A ROADWAY WOULD NEED TO BE.CONSTRUCTED TO-PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ..FRONTAGE 4.WETLANDS:NEED TO.BE FILLED TO" NSTRUCT THE.RCA DWAY. i i COMPARISON WITHEXISTING=LOTS AN:THE NEIGHBORHOOD 1.`THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE LIST 16OTS>IN THE'NEIGHBORHOOD THAT DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED AREA OF THE DISTRICT.. 2'THE 15 LOTS HAVE AN AVERAGE LOT SIZE OF 0 66 ACRES OR:28952.S.F. 3 THE PROPOSED LOTS'HAVE AN AVERAGE A_REA OF 0 75 ACRES OR-33,003 S.F. 4 THE SMALLEST:OF THE PROPOSED LOTS,2C, IS LARGERITHAN 1Q,OF THE LOTS ON THE LIST 5}THE AVERAGE FRONTAGE OFTHE LOTS LISTED IN THE'TABLE IS 143 FT. 6: THE AVERAGE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPO SED LOTS IS 1.71 FT 7 ONLY TWO 0F THE LOTS LISTED IN"THE TA.BLE;130/6OF THE TOTAL. HAVE THE FRONTAGE RF01 IIRFn IN VARIANCE REQUEST IT IS PROPOSED THAT PARCEL 32 BE DIVIDED INTO 3 LOTS AND THE MAJORITY OF PARCEL 47 WILL REMAIN AS PERMANENT OPEN SPACE. AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE ATTACHED PLAN PARCELS 47 AND 32 WHEN COMBINED CAN MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT THE REQUEST IS BEING MADE THAT THE PROPOSED LOTS WILL CONFORM TO R-3 ZONING REQUIREMENTS RATHER THAN R-1. THE VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED ARE FOR FRONTAGE, AREA AND SET BACK THIS REQUEST IS.MADE,AS EXPLAINED ON THE ATTACHED DRAWING BECAUSE OF LOT SHAPE AND TOPOGRAPHY THE PROPOSED LOTS WILL CONFORM TO DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL 47-NOT NEEDED FOR THE LOT DEVELOPMENT WILLREMAINAS OPEN SPACE.(APPROXIMATEL-Y 6-ACRES)------------ -- -- - THIS WILL ALLOW DEVELOPMENT 1.THAT IS MORE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD 2.THAT WILL PRESERVE OPEN SPACE 3.THAT WILL PROTECT Wff ND RESOURCES - 4.THAT WILL NOT REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL ROADWAYS I i