Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous - 1049 SALEM STREET 4/30/2018 (3)
r �,���T�����EI i � '�I NO THIS PLAN & CERTIFICATION IS NOT A WARRANTY OF THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. IT IS A RECORD OF THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM COMPONENTS. "I HEREBY CERTIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, TIES, COVER MATERIAL; EXPOSED COMPONENT COVERS ETC., SHOWN ON THIS AS -BUILT SUBSTANTIALLY AGREE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE BREAK OUT ELEVATIONS, IF APPLICABLE, HAVE BEEN MET." APPROVED DESIGNS PLANS. SIGNATURE OF DESIGNER DATE N/F NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY AS BUILT PLAN OF SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM LOCATED IN NORTH ANDOVER, MASS./1049 SALEM STREET AS PREPARED FOR JEFFCO CORP. TM:' 104D DATE: 6-20-14 TL 70 SCALE: 1°=40' 0 20 ao ao MEftftIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES 68 PARK STREET ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810 ij c� 0 X co0 r co r CJ Ile Nwr-- - ci ol LO-re7o pif s / AREA=18,190 S.F. r =0.4176 -.AC. - 301.33' NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY OA - RECE ' D, SEP 3 U 2013 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOV174 HEALTH DEPARTMENT PLAN OF LAND IN NO. ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS DRAWN FOR 1049 SALEM STREET REALTY TRUST 1049 & 1053 SALEM STREET SCALE: 1"=40' DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES 66 PARK STREET ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810 a SUMMARY OF INVERTS SEWER ® FDTN. 153.19 SEPTIC TANK IN 152.88 SEPTIC TANK OUT 152.65 DIST. BOX IN 152.60 DIST. BOX OUT 152.46 BEG INV. #1 152.46 BEG INV. #2 152.46 BEG INV. #3 152.46 END INV. #1 152.22 END INV. #2 152.22 END INV. #3 152.22 BUILDING TIES BLDG. CORNER A B C D NO THIS PLAN & CERTIFICATION IS NOT SEPTIC TANK OUT 39.4 25.1 - - A WARRANTY OF THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DIST. BOX 46.0 18.8 - - SYSTEM. IT IS A RECORD OF THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM COMPONENTS. "I HEREBY CERTIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, TIES, COVER MATERIAL.- EXPOSED ATERIAL;EXPOSED COMPONENT COVERS ETC., SHOWN ON THIS AS -BUILT SUBSTANTIALLY AGREE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE BREAK OUT ELEVATIONS, IF APPLICABLE, HAVE BEEN MET." APPROVED DESIGNS PLANS. AW1 W142 U096Z SIGNATURE OF DESIGNER DATE N/F NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY AS BUILT PLAN OF SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM LOCATED IN NORTH ANDOVER, MASS./1049 SALEM STREET AS PREPARED FOR JEFFCO CORP. TM:' 104D DATE: 6-20-14 TL: 70 SCALE: 1"=40' o zo ao so MEBRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES 66 PARK STREET ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810 44 of NORrH qti � 5 �gSSgCHus� � PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT Town of North Andover Community Development Division CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE As of: 10/1/2014 This is to certify that the individual subsurface disposal system received a SATISFACTORY INSPECTION of the: Complete Construction of an On -Site Sewage Disposal System By: Rob Daigle At: 1049 Salem Street Map 104.D Lot 0070 North Andover, MA 01845 The Issuanc of this certiiic shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function satisfactorily. Susa 'Sawyer. public Health Agen 1600 Osgood Street, North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Phone 978.688.9540 Fax 978.688.8476 Web www.townofnorthandover.com I ttOTH 0 `Ef.C/449yE; PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT Community Development Division TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER SEPTIC DISPOSAL SYSTEM — INSTALLATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certify that the Sewage Disposal System ( ) constructed; ( ) repaired; By: J 02 Okla Le (Print Name) Located at: 0_4'1_ �ry lj�• (Installation Address) Was installed in conformance with the North Andover Board of Health approved plan, originally dated and last revised on �/ -1 zj , with a design flow of gallons per day. The materials used were in conformance with those specified on the approved plan; the system was installed in accordance with the provisions of 310. CMR 15.000, Title 5 and local regulations, and the final grading agrees substantially with the approved plan. All work is accurately represented on _ the As -built which has been submitted to the Board of Health. c Bottom of Bed Inspection Date:, Engineer Representative (Signature) And - Print Name Final Construction Inspection Date: ( LI✓ U Ij 1,0q) Iii And - Print Name ,-\ (Signature) Enginer: �& Signature) r Engineer Representative (Signature) Date: And - Print Name Date:-�{�-��� And - Print Name 1600 Osgood Street, North Andover, Massachusetts 01 845 - Phone 918.688.9540 Fax 970.688.8476 Web http://www.townofnerthandover.com North Andover Health Department Community Development Division ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES LOCATION INFORMATION ADDRESS: 1049 Salem St. MAP: 104.D LOT: 0070 INSTALLER: Rob Daigle DESIGNER: Merrimack Engineering PLAN DATE: 10/21/13, rev. 12/16/13 and 12/17/13 BOH APPROVAL DATE ON PLAN: 1/24/14 INSPECTIONS TANK INSPECTION: 6/16/14 DATE OF BED BOTTOM INSPECTION: 6/16/14 DATE OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION: 6/23/14 DATE OF FINAL GRADE INSPECTION: SITE CONDITIONS Comments: SEPTIC TANK NA Contractor reports any changes to design plan NA Existing septic tank properly abandoned ® Internal plumbing all to one building sewer ® Topography not appreciably altered ® Building sewer in continuous grade, on compacted firm base NA Cleanouts per plan X Bottom of tank hole has 6" stone base X Weep hole plugged X 1500 gallon tank has been installed H-10 loading X Monolithic tank construction ® Water tightness of tank has been achieved by visual testing ® Inlet tee installed, centered under access port ® Outlet tee installed, centered under access port (effluent filter) ® 20" inch cover to finish grade installed over outlet access port ® Neoprene boots on inlet & outlet Comments: DISTRIBUTION -BOX X ® Installed on stable stone base ® H-20 D -Box NA Inlet tee (if pumped or >0.08'/foot) ® Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlets ® Observed even distribution Z Speed levelers provided (not required) ® Schedule 40 PVC Pipe Comments: SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (General) X Bottom of SAS excavated down to C soil layer, as provided on plan X Size of SAS excavated as per plan X Title 5 sand installed, if specified on plan NA 40 Mil HDPE barrier installed ® Laterals installed and ends connected to header (and vented if impervious material above) ® Elevations of laterals and chambers installed as on approved plan NA Retaining wall (boulder / concrete / timber/ block) ❑ Final cover as per plan Comments: 5' deep @ TP2, 7'6" @ TP1, 26'x50'6" with overdig; 15'x40' staked FINAL GRADE Loamed Seeded Cover per plan Comments: DO ,UMENTS NEEDED r Certification of Installation Form submitted y engineer and signed and dated by Engineer and installer As -Built Plan BM = 154.00 HR= 2.60 HI = 156.60 SYSTEM ELEVATIONS ROD ELEVATION AS -BLT INVERT ELEV DESIGN INVERT ELEV Benchmark Building Sewer OUT 2.97 153.27 153.10 Septic Tank IN 3.33 152.92 152.90 Septic Tank OUT 3.56 152.69 152.65 Distribution Box IN 3.60 152.65 152.60 Distribution Box OUT 3.74 152.51 152.43 Lateral 1 TOP 3.78/4.00 Lateral 1 INVERT 152.47 / 152.25 152.40 / 152.20 Lateral 2 TOP 3.78/4.00 Lateral 2 INVERT 152.47 / 152.25 152.40 / 152.20 Lateral 3 TOP 3.78/4.00 Lateral 3 INVERT 152.47 / 152.25 152.40 / 152.20 Bottom of Bed 4.87 151.73 151.70 CRITICAL SETBACK DISTANCES Mark those distances checked in the field against the design plan and regulatory setback ' Suction line 222(2) 2 100 feet is a minimum acceptable distance and no variance is allowed for a lesser distance (NA 5.02). 3 As defined in 310 CMR 10.55, 10.32, 10.54, and 10.30, respectively, pursuant to 15.211(3), also by NA wetland bylaws Tank SAS Sewer ® Property line 10 10 -- ® Cellar wall 10 20 -- ® Inground pool 10 20 -- ® Slab foundation 10 10 -- ® Deck, on footings, etc 5 10 -- ® Waterline 10 10 10' ® Private drinking well 75 1002 50 ® Irrigation well 75 100 ® Surface Water 25 50 ® Bordering Vegetated Wetland Salt Marsh, Inland / Coastal Banka 75 100 ® Wetlands bordering surface water supply or trib. (in Watershed) 150 150 ® Trib. to surface water supply 325 325 Public well 400 400 ® Interim Wellhead Prot. Area ® Reservoirs 400 400 ® Drains (wat. supply/trib.) 50 100 ® Drains (intercept g.w.) 25 50 Z Drains (Other) Foundation 10 (5) 20 (10) ® Drywells 20 25 ' Suction line 222(2) 2 100 feet is a minimum acceptable distance and no variance is allowed for a lesser distance (NA 5.02). 3 As defined in 310 CMR 10.55, 10.32, 10.54, and 10.30, respectively, pursuant to 15.211(3), also by NA wetland bylaws SIEVE ANALYSIS 7/2/2014 OF WIC/S KINGSTON MATERIALS A Division of Torromeo Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 2308, Methuen, MA 01844 978-686-5634 Kingston Plant at 18 Dorre Road, Kingston, NH Methuen Plant at 33 Old Ferry Road, Methuen, MA ......................... ... .................. ........ . . . ....... . ....... ....... ...... ...................................... ............................. ....... ................... ... ............... ... -- ............ .................. ....... ..... : . .. ...... ...................................... ........ ....... ......... ............ ........ ................ .... ................. : ::: ---U --' -T ......... ....................... ........ .... .......... .. * ...... ... ....... ............. ..................... .............. ........... . " * ....... .......... ........ .......... ... ........ ........... . . . . . . . . .. ....... ................................. . .. ................. ............... .................................... ............ .................. ................... .......... ................ ............ ........ ...... .......... ..... ERCE .................. ......................................... E....-' -.T..-::: 'E ....... ....................... T.'".U.. ....... ... 0*. .A . ..................................... ....... ................ . ............. ......... .................... ...... .... ....... . :::::::P---'R--0JE .. ....... ....... 'k ... ...... ............ .................. .............. ....... ..... ............. . :1 : : .................... ............... ...................................... ..................... ............... ...................................... G: - T' H iiWl . : ...... ....................... .... ....... . ................ ....... ....R .. ...... ............. . .. ....... .......... . ... ...................... ...................................... ....................... . ... . .. : ....................... ........ ....................... . ............... I ... .................................... ............................... ... .......................... `::>: REG:... ...... ........... ........... � .::.: ... ....... ...................................... 3/8" 0 0 0 100 100 TO 100 #4 0.9 0 0 100 95 TO 100 #8 ill 10 10 90 80 TO 100 #16 162.4 14 24 76 50 TO 85 #30 208.8 18 42 58 25 TO 60 #50 347.5 30 72 28 10 TO 30 #100 233.6 20 92 8 2 TO 10 #200 81.8 7 99 1 0 TO 5 PAN 11.3. 1 ITOTALS 1157.31 1001 .. . ...................... . ....................... .. . ......... ................................ .............................................. ...... ........ ........ ........ .* 4"" ....... ........ . .............. . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . ................................ ........ ............................... ... .... 120 100 co 80 60 40 R) j 20 0 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF WICIS ISI *TOTAL % PASSING --M-MIN. DEVIATION X MAX. DEVIATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SIEVE SIZES] SAND DELIVERED TO: 1049 SALEM STREET N.ANDOVER, MA I RECEIVED J�'J'L. 0 9 2014 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Blackburn, Lisa From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:S8 PM To: aputterl@aol.com' Cc: Blackburn, Lisa Subject: 1049 Salem Street Attachments: 201409301701.pdf Mr. Ahern, please find attached, the as -built check list for as -built submitted today for 1049 Salem Street that is dated 6- 20-14. The circled items are the identical items that were noted missing on 1053 Salem Street a few months ago; which has yet to receive a Certificate of Compliance for their septic system. As soon as a complete as -built is received, Lisa will be ready to issue the COC for 1049. Subsequently, I request that the same be submitted for 1053 as soon as possible; so we may close these files. Thank you - Susan -----Original Message ----- From: noreply@townofnorthandover.com [mailto:noreply@townofnorthandover.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:01 PM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Message from "ComDev-Health-Ricoh" This E-mail was sent from "ComDev-Health-Ricoh" (Aficio MP C3002). Scan Date: 09.30.201417:01:00 (-0400) Queries to: noreply@townofnorthandover.com /®Y7 Town of North Andover — Septic System - AS -BUILT CHECKLIST 1) � All changes to the design plan have been reflected on the as -built 2) LXIs of suitable scale; (one inch = 40 feet or fewer for plot plans and one inch = 20 or fewer for details of system components) 3) Lot number, Street Name, Assessors Map and Parcel Number 4) _ZLot Lines and Location of Dwellings served by the system 5) Locations, Elevations and Dimensions of system, including reserve (if applicable) 6) Ties to dwelling or Permanent Structure & Wells /a. From Septic Tank & Distribution (D) Box V b. From Leach Area Ties to Lot Lines from leach area 8) Locations of Deep Holes & Peres 9) Top of Foundation Elevation 10 Locations of Wells, Drains, Watercourses within 150 feet of system 11) Location of water, gas, electric lines, cable 12) Location of Structures within 6 Inches of Finished Grade 13) Zoriginal Stamp & Signature 14) Location and holder of any easements which could impact the system 5 Impervious Areas; Driveways, etc 16) / North Arrow 1' Location & Elevations of Benchmark used 18) STATEMENT -C& PLAN (NA 5.3) a. "I certify the locations, elevations, ties, cover material; exposed component covers etc., shown on this as -built substantially agree with the approved plan and ha ve determined that the break out elevations, if applicable, have been met." Signature of Date b. I;Wf a $_PL_ nU L WALL IS PRESENT (NA 4.9) a Letter or statement on the as -built indicadag the E ificaticns." Signature of Designer Date As of: Friday, April 29, 2011 Map -Block -Lot Commonwealth of Massachusetts 104.D0070 ,w w ---------------------- ,:�,- BOARD OF HEALTH Permit No BHP -2014-0641 North Andover -------------------- FEE P.I. $250.00 F.I. ------------------- S CONSTRUCTION PE, M -1T DISPOSAL WORKS Robert . Daigle, Jr . - Permission is hereby grantedKDle--------- - '°-�� j ----------------------------------- to (Upgrade) an Individual Sewage Disposal System. at No --1049 --SALE--fo DE Disposal Works Construction Permit No. BHP -2014-064 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- --- - as shown on the application p ---- Dated .-- June 10, ---- 2014 --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Issued On: Jun -10-2014 BOARD OF HEALTH P 40"'K°��� Application for Septic Disposal System bj&q Of S�4ae .��h0 TODAY'S 6ATE Construction Permit -TOWN OF $ 250.00 — Full Repair ORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 $125.00 - Component Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. ILEI ADDlicatior'is hereby made for a permit to: Construct a new on-site sewage disposal system* ❑ Repair or replace an existing on-site sewage disposal system* ❑ Repair or replace an existing system component — What? A. Facility Information L Address or Lot # Cityrrown 2.- *TYPE OFAEPTIC SYSTEM*: ❑ Pump Z Gravity (choose one) ***If pump system, attach copy of electrical permit to application*** Conventional System (pipe and stone system) ❑ Infiltrator or Biodiffuser (Gravel -Less) (Attach a copy of your certification to install this type of system. ❑ Pressure Distribution S.A.S. (No D -Box) (Attach Draft Maintenance Agreement) ❑ Pressure Dosed (D -Box Present) S.A.S. 2. Owner Information Name �G d3aa Address (if different from above) .1n, n,Je 0 d F/0 CitylTown State Zip Code Telephone Number 3. Installer Information • 6 7, r Name Name of pany Address /V7k CJQ/Ylt 7^�/ �//� �. City/Town State yee - 6 - Telephone Number (Cell Phonesible please) 4. Designer Information Name Name o Company Address Cityfrown Stag Zip Code Telephone Number (Best # to Reach) Application for Disposal System Construction Permit • Page 1 of 2 ✓ ( J Application for Septic Disposal System TODAY'S DATE AConstruction Permit —TOWN OF ORTH ANDOVER MA 01845 $125.00 - Component SSgCHuSE PAGE 2OF2 A. Facility Information continued.... 5. Type of Building: ❑Residential Dwelling or ❑Commercial B. Agreement The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore -described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code, as well as the Local Subsurface Disposal Regulations for the Town of North Andover, and not to lac the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has beeliss ed by this Bo d f a1th. �* Narfie 0 Date Application Approved By: (Board of Health Representative) Name Date Application Disapproved for the following reasons: For Office Use Only: 1. Fee Attached? Yes No 2. Project Manager Obligation Form Attached? Yes 3. Pump System? If so, Attach copy ofElectrical Permit Yes_ 4. Foundation As -Built? (new construction ronly): Yes (Same scale -as appro.yed plan) 5. Floor Plans? (new construction only) Yes No No No No Application for Disposal System Construction Permit • Page 2 of 2 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLER PROJECT MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS As the North Andover licensed installer for the construction for the septic system for the property at: (Address of septic system) For plans by / (Engineer) Relative to the application of (Installer's name) V And dated 4/a/ e Dated o ay s ate With revisions dated I understand the following obligations for management of this project: (Last revised date) 1. As the installer, I am obligated to obtain all permits and Board of Health approved plansrn for to performing any work on a site. I must have the approved plans and the permit on site when any work is being done. 2. As the installer, I must call for any and all inspections. If homeowner, contractor, project manager, or any other person not associated with my company schedules an inspection and the system is not ready, then item three shall be applicable. 3. As the installer, I am required to have the necessary work completed prior to the applicable inspections as indicated below. I understand that reauesting an instiection_ without comtiletion of the items in accordance with Title 5 and the Board of Health Regulations may result in a $50.00 fine being levied against me and/or my company a. Bottom of Bed — Generally, this is the first (1'� inspection unless there is a retaining wall, which should be done first. The installer must request the inspection but does not have to be present. b. Final Construction Inspection — Engineer must first do their inspection for elevations, ties, etc. As -built of verbal OK (or e-mail to: healthdept(@townofnorthandover.com) from the engineer must be submitted to the Board of Health, after which installer calls for an inspection time. Installer must be present for this inspection. With a pump system, all electrical work must be ready and able to cause pump to work and alarm to function. c. Final Grade - Installer must request inspection when all grading is complete. Installer does not have to beton-site. 4. As the installer, I understand that only I may, perform the work (other than simple excavation) and I am required to complete the installation of the system identified in the attached application for installation. I further understand that work done by others unlicensed to install septic systems in North Andover can constitute reasons for denial of the system and/or revocation or suspension of my license to operate in the Town of North Andover, significant fines to all persons involved are also possible. 5. As the installer, I understand that I must be on-site during the performance of the following construction steps: a. Determination that the proper elevation of the excavation bas been reached. b. Inspection of the sand and stone to be used. c. Final inspection by Board of Healtb staff or consultant. d. Installation of tank, D -Box, pipes, stone, vent, pump chamber, retaining wall and other components. 6. As the installer. I understand that I am solely responsible for the installation of the system as per the approved plans. No instructions by the homeowner, general contractor, or any other persons shall absolve me of this obligation. Undersigned Licensed Septic Installer: (Today's D e) t, 4amCe'— Prin—(Naffie —.Signed) Ccipv�or �ut{9 �ltm �: North Andover Board of Health Meeting Minutes Thursday — January 23, 2014 7:00 p.m. 120 Main Street, 2nd Floor Selectmen's Meeting Room North Andover, MA 01845 Present: Thomas Trowbridge, Larry Fixler, Joseph McCarthy, Susan Sawyer, Michele Grant, Lisa Blackburn I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:05 pm. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. PUBLIC HEARINGS IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting minutes from December 19, 2013 were presented for signature. MOTION was made by Mr. Fixler to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr. McCarthy. All were in favor and the minutes were approved. V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 1049 Salem Street — Request for a variance by Bill Dufresne of Merrimack Engineering representing Jeffco Corp. The request is to allow a reduction in the distance from the soil absorption system, of an onsite septic system, to the bordering vegetative wetlands from 100 feet to 71 feet. This is a local variance to the Town of North Andover Subsurface Disposal Regulation; section 3.9, that requires a 100 foot separation. Mr. Dufresne presented to the Board the reasons for the variance request. A discussion ensued regarding the lot (1049 and 1053 Salem St.) which includes two existing homes that are going to be torn down and replaced by one new four bedroom home. The Board members reviewed the proposed septic plan. Mr. Dufresene stated that the plan was already approved by Conservation and Mrs. Sawyer confirmed that it was. The local upgrade on the plan has been reviewed and approved by the Health Director. Setback from S.A.S. to garage slab from 10' t 5' and Setback from S.A.S. to foundation from 20' to 10'. MOTION was made by Mr. McCarthy to approve the variance presented for 1049 Salem St. as listed on the plan and Mr. Fixler seconded the motion. All were in favor to grant the variance according to the plan and local upgrades. B. Cynthia Sanborn, owner of Cow's Rock, located at 5 Johnson St. was given the opportunity by Susan Sawyer to attend the BOH meeting to discuss some of the violation items after receiving a Plan January 23, 2014 North Andover Board of Health Meeting Page 1 of 3 Board of Health Members: Thomas Trowbridge, DDS, MD, Chairman; Larry Fixler, Member/Clerk; Francis P. MacMillan, Jr., M.D.; Joseph McCarthy, Member; Edwin Pease, Member Health Department Staff: Susan Sawyer, Health Director; Debra Rillahan, Public Health Nurse; Michele Grant, Public Health Inspector; Lisa Blackburn, Health Department Assistant Review disapproval letter from the Health Department (dated 1/22/14). Ms. Sanborn's concerns specifically included the Health Departments requirements of a new floor, hand sink and prep sink. Mrs. Sawyer stated that the Food Establishment Plan Review for Cow's Rock was received on 1/14/14. The applicant, Ms. Sanborn, had met with Mrs. Sawyer a week prior to submitting the Plan Review to work through some questions before the application was submitted. A disapproval letter was issued to Ms. Sanborn on 1/22/14. Mrs. Sawyer and Ms. Grant presented the Board members with applications from previous ice cream establishments to show that the same requirements have been made in the past. After reviewing the applications, Mr. McCarthy noticed the similarities of the same requirements given to other ice cream establishments in town. Corinne Willis, manager of Cow's Rock, spoke to the Board and stated she met with their architect regarding the flooring and he wanted to know how the Health Dept. can overrule the Building Dept. on allowable flooring. Ms. Willis wanted to be shown exactly where this is stated in the code book so she could show it to her architect. Ms. Grant pointed out that the Building Dept. and Health Dept. work by different codes, and the pertinent clause was indicated. A discussion ensued regarding types of flooring used in different types of businesses vs. restaurants. The Food Code clause on flooring puts emphasis on cleanliness and safety on allowed floor types. The applicant wants to keep the current floor in the food prep area and no documentation about the material has been provided. Ms. Willis stated that a new floor would be a huge expense and could possibly stop the plans of opening the store. Dr. Trowbridge stated that the Board looks out for public health and cannot approve changes solely because of an expense to a business owner. Ms. Willis stated that they are willing to work with the Board and do things properly however she needs to give clarification to the architect regarding the code. Ms. Sawyer again indicated that it is the obligation of the architect to provide documentation of the floor type. Mr. Fixler stated that since this is just the first review, the requirements should be worked out between the Health Dept. and the applicant and that there is nothing tonight for the Board to take action. Ms. Grant stated that the Health Dept. is there to guide the application through the process and make suggestions. Ms. Willis then questioned the placement of the hand sink and quoted a code regarding where a hand sink can be placed. Mrs. Sawyer explained the reasons for the hand sink placement and reviewed the proposed plan with the Board members showing where the sink needs to be placed. Applicants are encouraged to look at the big picture since most food establishment owners usually add additional items to their menu that would require a prep sink. Preparing for it in the build -out process prevents future expenses. The Health Dept. is consistent with all food establishments. The applicant disagreed about the requirement for a prep sink, since no food items will be prepared on- site. Ms. Sawyer pointed out that the initial design shows a coffee, area which requires a prep sink. Again, since establishments are issued a food permit that allows all types of food, they should plan for future growth, rather than risk greater costs if retrofitting plumbing items. Mrs. Sawyer informed the Board that a TRC meeting was held in September 2013. It wasn't until December 2013 that a permit was requested for this business, however, no application was ever submitted up until then. Mrs. Sawyer explained the frustration on how much time had gone by from the TRC in September until the December permit request. Ms. Willis stated that they are not opposed to meeting with the Health Dept. to work things out. Ms. Grant reviewed the process for a building permit approval (U form). It is strongly suggested that an applicant doesn't start building until there is approval from all departments. Each department has their own codes that need to be followed. Mr. McCarthy stated that there was nothing presented for the BOH to vote on. Dr. Trowbridge stated that Cow's Rock architect is welcome to call the Health Dept. to get the answers to any questions he may have. Ms. Sanborn will call the Health Dept. to set up a time to work on the 1/22/14 disapproval letter. VII. COMMUNICATIONS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, AND DISCUSSION A. Ms. Sawyer introduced Karen Farris who will be interning for the Health Department. Ms. Farris stated that she has been a resident of North Andover for 26 years and is working on her Masters in public Health degree. She is currently a 19 year employee of the Department of Public Health in the Radiation Control Program and the Supervisor of the X-ray and Mammography licensing program. Ms. Farris stated that she is required to do a 100 hr. internship as a requirement for her degree. She had previously done a 10 to 15 page term paper on Disparities in one of her classes which intrigued her. She stated that she wanted to do research within her own community to see if there were any disparities in North Andover. She narrowed the subject down to school aged immunizations. She wanted to see if there are any problems and what are the concerns and causes of children not receiving their immunizations during the elementary school years. She will be looking at the community health assessment tool kit along with records that are available without getting involved with HIPAA, talking to children or anything that would need parental permission. She will be working with the school nurses and the public health nurse to find out why immunizations aren't being done and what can be done to help. A discussion ensued regarding her experiences and why she is going for her Master's degree. Dr. North Andover Board of Health Meeting Minutes Thursday — January 23, 2014 7:00 p.m. 120 Main Street, 2"a Floor Selectmen's Meeting Room North Andover, MA 01845 Trowbridge asked if she could provide us with a copy of the paper she wrote on Disparities. She will submit a copy for the Board. She is looking forward to her internship. B. Discussion of 2014 Mosquito Control — A discussion ensued on whether Jack Card from Northeast Mosquito Control is going to be present at the February BOH meeting. Dr. Trowbridge asked Mrs. Sawyer if Northeast Mosquito Control has a prepared presentation to give or any significant changes. If not, then it is not necessary for him to attend. Mr. McCarthy gave a reminder that requests to opt out of spraying need to be received by the town by March 1, 2014 (Mr. Fixler referred to chapter 333 CMR 13.03 — Exclusions for Application). Mr. Card will be given the option to attend February's BOH meeting to give an informal presentation. The Health Department's website will have information and forms needed for opting out of spraying. Residents are encouraged to call the Health Dept. with any questions. Mr. McCarthy suggested perhaps there could be a Power Point presentation on Lyme Disease. Mrs. Sawyer stated that Deb Rillahan, public health nurse, is working on presenting information to the Board regarding Lyme Disease. C. A basic discussion on food poisoning and its effects will be discussed by Mr. Fixler at next month's February 27, 2014 BOH meeting. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE /NEWSLETTERS IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION made by Mr. McCarthy to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Fixler seconded the motion and all were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 8:29 pm. Prepared by: Lisa Blackburn, Health Dept. Assistant Reviewed bv: All Board of Health Members & Susan Sawyer, Health Director Signed b r Larry F' er, l rk of the Board January 23, 2014 North Andover Board of Health Meeting ;Z Date Signed Page 3 of 3 Board of Health Members: Thomas Trowbridge, DDS, MD, Chairman; Larry Fixler, Member/Clerk; Francis P. MacMillan, Jr., M.D.; Joseph McCarthy, Member; Edwin Pease, Member Health Department Staff: Susan Sawyer, Health Director; Debra Rillahan, Public Health Nurse; Michele Grant, Public Health Inspector; Lisa Blackburn, Health Department Assistant Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of F Local Upgrade Approval Form 913 G1M DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health if they choose to do so. The Local Upgrade Approval is to be completed by the local Board of Health and a signed copy provided to the system owner. A. Facility Information Important: When filling out forms 1. Facility Name and Address on the computer, use only the tab 1049 Salem Street Realty Trust Residence c/o Jeffco Corp key to move your Name cursor - do not PO BOX 802 use the return key. Street Address Andover MA 01810 Cityrrown State Zip Code 2. Owner Name and Address (if different from above): Name Street Address City/Town State Zip Code Telephone Number 3. Type of Facility (check all that apply): ® Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Commercial ❑ School 4. Design flow. per 310 CMR 15.203: : 440 gpd Vladimir Nemchenok 5.- System Designer: ® PE ❑ RS Name 66 Park Street Andover MA 01810 Address City/Town State, ZIP B. Approval 1. Local Upgrade Approval is granted for: ® Reduction in setback(s) — specify: setback from s.a.s. to a foundation from 20 ft to 10 ft, setback from s.a.s. to a slab from 10 ft to 5 ft ❑ Reduction in SAS area of up to 25%: 1049 Salem Street 9b 12.18.13 • rev. 7/06 SAS size, sq. ft. % reduction Local Upgrade Approval* Page 1 of 2 Commonwealth of Massachusetts W City/Town of a a Local Upgrade Approval Form 9B GSM 5y 0 B. Approval (continued) ❑ Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater: Separation, reduction ft. Percolation rate min./inch Depth to groundwater ft ❑ Relocation of water supply well (explain): ❑ Reduction of 12 -inch separation between inlet and outlet tees and high groundwater ® Use of only one deep hole in proposed disposal area ® Use of a sieve analysis as a substitute for a perc test List local variances granted not requiring DEP approval per 310 CMR 15.412(4): reduction to reduce the setback from a leach field from a wetland from 100 feet to 50 feet List variances granted requiring DEP approval: Approving Authority Susan Sawyer December 18, 2013 Print or TypeName and Title gnature Date 1049 Salem Street 9b 12.18.13 • rev. 7/06 Local Upgrade Approval* Page 2 of 2 P SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTAL FORM Date of Submission: 10 - ?Z' Site Location: 61 1 � �( ' � _6 Engineer: hu, (%IM S / j�� ,C, 'i� •, New Plans? Yes $r225/Plar� Check #(includes 1st review only) RECE Revised Plans?Yes $75/Plan Check # OCT 31 2013 Site Evaluation Forms Included? Yesy No TOWN T NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT Local Upgrade Form Included? Yes v No Telephone 4� j 2@ ' - 'j Fax E-mail: L g::Q Q r-' )��Ca" C,& ' 12 Homeowner Name: 1091 e7ALZP1 G! -F, rzL:I `l' TVdJ �1,Lily oe 12 &rC)4�G H -Li 4H C-5 OFFICE USE ONLY When the submission is complete (including check): ➢ Date stamp plans and letter ➢ Complete and attach Receipt ➢ Copy File; Forward to Consultant ➢ 1/�Enter on Log Sheet and Database TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Office ol: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES f HEALTH DEPARTMENT,Tfo,.,4 1600 OSGOOD STREET; SUITE 2035 NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 978.688.9540 — Phone Susan Y. Sawyer, REHS/RS 978.688.8476— FAX Public Health Director E-MAIL: healthdept@townofnorthandover.com WEBSITE: http://www.townofnorthandover.com SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTAL FORM Date of Submission: 10 - ?Z' Site Location: 61 1 � �( ' � _6 Engineer: hu, (%IM S / j�� ,C, 'i� •, New Plans? Yes $r225/Plar� Check #(includes 1st review only) RECE Revised Plans?Yes $75/Plan Check # OCT 31 2013 Site Evaluation Forms Included? Yesy No TOWN T NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT Local Upgrade Form Included? Yes v No Telephone 4� j 2@ ' - 'j Fax E-mail: L g::Q Q r-' )��Ca" C,& ' 12 Homeowner Name: 1091 e7ALZP1 G! -F, rzL:I `l' TVdJ �1,Lily oe 12 &rC)4�G H -Li 4H C-5 OFFICE USE ONLY When the submission is complete (including check): ➢ Date stamp plans and letter ➢ Complete and attach Receipt ➢ Copy File; Forward to Consultant ➢ 1/�Enter on Log Sheet and Database W ►�: Q I_ > 0 CO2 t{ .. n w - w' v Edi• � � y o M o .y 0 ., z ... PC O' H O C4 a 0. 10) 104 b CD rA LrJ ®p y tt C I O c (n CA O o. �� N •1 0 C o_ w C1 CD y .�,... y�t H "^In, T PV ID En CA oCD C o iFa d O a =' y C) -- a � � g ITI c col)w O ~. Qy a E G dQ O� ` vn O � co a x � 0CD d 'b CD0 co c crti CV9 .d 0 C El cr C9 i r I_ > 0 CO2 e � �.o v Edi• � � y o .y 0 v H a 0. LrJ ®p y c (n CA O �� N •1 0 C o_ w C1 y�t H "^In, T En y a CV9 .d 0 C El cr C9 i r I_ > 0 CO2 � � y 11 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of North Andover a Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval wM DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. Form 9A is to be submitted to the Local Board of Health for the upgrade of a failed or nonconforming septic system with a design flow of less than 10,000 gpd, where full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. aftn System upgrades that cannot be performed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405, or in full compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.000, require a variance pursuant to 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.415. NOTE: Local upgrade approval shall not be granted for an upgrade proposal that includes the addition of a new design flow to a cesspool or privy, or the addition of a new design flow above the existing approved capacity of an on-site system constructed in accordance with either the 1978 Code or 310 CMR 15.000. A. Facility Information 1. Facility Name and Address: 1049 Salem Street Realtv Trust Residence c/o Jeffco Cor Name PO Box 802 Street Address Andover MA 01810 Citylrown 2. Owner Name and Address (if different from above): 1049 Salem Street Realty Trust Name North Andover Citylrown 01845 Zip Code 3. Type of Facility (check all that apply): ® Residential ❑ Institutional 4. Describe Facility: State Zip Code 1049 Salem Street Street Address MA State Telephone Number ❑ Commercial ❑ School 1 Existing 3 bdrm house and 1 existing 1 bdrm house (2 dwellings on one lot) 5. Type of Existing System: ❑ Privy ❑ Cesspool(s) ❑ Conventional ® Other (describe below): UNKNOWN 6. Type of soil absorption system (trenches, chambers, leach field, pits, etc): UNKNOWN t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 1 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of North Andover ao Form 9A — Application for Local Upgrade Approval ^M DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. A. Facility Information (continued) 7. Design Flow per 310 CMR 15.203: Design flow of existing system: Design flow of proposed upgraded system Design flow of facility: B. Proposed Upgrade of System J1►1:/01161TWY N' gpd 440 gpd 440 gpd 1. Proposed upgrade is (check one): ® Voluntary ❑ Required by order, letter, etc. (attach copy) ❑ Required following inspection pursuant to 310 CMR 15.301: date of inspection 2. Describe the proposed upgrade to the system: Total Replacement (see plan) 3. Local Upgrade Approval is requested for (check all that apply): ® Reduction in setback(s) — describe reductions: Setback from s.a.s. to a slab (garage) from 10' to 5' ❑ Reduction in SAS area of up to 25%: SAS size, sq. ft. % reduction ❑ Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater: Separation reduction ft Percolation rate min./inch Depth to groundwater ft t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval, Page 2 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of North Andover Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval ^M DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. B. Proposed Upgrade of System (continued) ❑ Relocation of water supply well (explain): ❑ Reduction of 12 -inch separation between inlet and outlet tees and high groundwater ❑ Use of only one deep hole in proposed disposal area ❑ Use of a sieve analysis as a substitute for a perc test ❑ Other requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 that cannot be met— describe and specify sections of the Code: If the proposed upgrade involves a reduction in the required separation between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the high groundwater elevation, an Approved Soil Evaluator must determine the high groundwater elevation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(1)(h)(1). The soil evaluator must be a member or agent of the local approving authority. High groundwater evaluation determined by: Evaluator's Name (type or print) Signature C. Explanation Date of evaluation Explain why full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. (Each section must be completed) 1. An upgraded system in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible: Limited space, presence of wetlands 2. An alternative system approved pursuant to 310 CMR 15.283 to 15.288 is not feasible: Not warranted given the site conditions t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 3 of 4 .� Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of North Andover a o Form 9A — Application for Local Upgrade Approval ^M y DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. C. Explanation (continued) 3. A shared system is not feasible: No area on an adjacent lot to provide a better solution, shared or not. 4. Connection to a public sewer is not feasible: None Available 5. The Application for Local Upgrade Approval must be accompanied by all of the following (check the appropriate boxes): ® Application for Disposal System Construction Permit ® Complete plans and specifications ® Site evaluation forms ❑ A list of abutters affected by reduced setbacks to private water supply wells or property lines. Provide proof that affected abutters have been notified pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(2). ❑ Other (List): D. Certification "I, the facility owner, certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments, to the best of my knowledge and belief, are true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there may be significant consequences for submitting false information, including, but not limited to, penalties or fine and/or imprisonments deliberate violations." Print Name Bill Dufresne/Merri Name of Preparer 66 Park Street Preparer's address MA/01810 State/ZIP Code 10-31-13 Date ineering Services 10-31-13 Date Andover City/Town (978) 475-3555 x-20 Telephone t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 4 of 4 4 - North Andover Health Department Community Development Division November 13, 2013 Vladimir Nemchenok Merrimack Engineering Services 66 Park Street COPY Andover, MA 01810 Re: Subsurface Sewaee Disposal Svstem Plan for 1049 Salem Street (Map 104D, Lot 70) Dear Mr. Nemchenok: The proposed wastewater system design plan for the above site dated October 21, 2013 and received on October 31, 2013 has been reviewed. Unfortunately, the plan cannot be approved until the following items are corrected. The specific section in Title 5: 310 CMR 15.000, or North Andover regulation that is not met by this design follows each item. 1. A Local Upgrade Approval for being less than 20' from the soil absorption system to the cellar wall must be requested. Please revise the Form 9A and note the Local Upgrade Approval request on the design plan (3 10 CMR 15.405(1)(k)). 2. A riser to within 6.inches of finish grade -is required above the distribution box if greater. than 9 inches below grade. Magnetic tape cannot be used as an alternative to providing a riser. Please modify the note in the "Graphic Scale on sheet 2. 3. On sheet l of 2, the existing system(s) are not depicted on the site plan. Please show the existing system(s) (NA 3.2). 4. Please indicate the required maintenance for the proposed effluent filter (3 10 CMR 15.227(7)). 5. The soil and percolation test results are required to be submitted on current DEP forms 11 and 12 (NA 3.2). 6. On sheet 1 of 2, it does not appear that the breakout elevation is met on the northern and western sides of the leach field. Please demonstrate the breakout elevation will be met with proposed spot elevations (3 10 CMR 15.255(2)). 7. The breakout elevation on the high end of the leach field (152.90) is not depicted on the design plan. This elevation should be used as the breakout elevation on the high end of the leach field. Page 1 of 2 North Andover Health Department, 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035, North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978.688.9540 Fax: 978.688.8476 8. The limit of soil removal beneath the leach field is not indicated on the design plan. This should be shown or depicted in order for the installer to be aware of what layers of soil need to be removed prior to the installation of sand fill. Although not reasons for disapproval you may wish to consider the following: Moving the proposed driveway beyond the 5' sand overdig. - Considering the close proximity of the driveway proposing boulders or other means along the edge of the leach field area will help to prevent vehicular traffic on the leach field. Please feel free to contact the office with any.questions you may have. We look forward to working with you to obtain a wastewater treatment and dispersal system which will be in compliance with all regulations and assure protection of public health and the environment of North Andover. Sincerely, S an Y. er, I S Public Health Director cc: Jeffco Corp. file Page 2 of 2 North Andover Health Department, 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035, North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978.688.9540 Fax: 978.688.8476 MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • : LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS 66 PARK STREET r ANDOVER, MA 01810 • (978) 475-3555, 373-5721 • FAX (978) 475=1,448 • E-MAIL lnfb@merdmatkengineedng.com November 14, 2013 Susan Sawyer Public Health Diiector 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035 North Andover, MA 01845 RE: ;1049 Salem Street (Map 1041), Lot 70) Dear Susau; nn V We are m receipt of youe.review letter dated November 13 2013 for the above referenced' ; site: With regard to item #1, the soil absorption system setback to the foundation is riot yv applicable, because the elevation ofthe cellar floor is above the breakout elevation of the s.a.s., the setback'to a slab applies not the setback to,a foundation: The setback from the soil abs o :prion system to a slab is 10' and has been met.41 Q `�✓ ,`� With regard to item #3, we have no knowledge nor:are there records of the existing i V " l systems. Notes 12 & 13 s ec' what action is to be taken relative to the existing system s. F i' Y p �Y g With regard to item #5, DEP form 11 is lengthy; time consuming to prepare, and requires 1� Q�� research from many other sites relative to geology, water resources and other criteria which play no role in the septic.system, design process, as such, shorter forms have been ?I developed and accepted by DEP and local;Boards of Health and are 1. commonly used. The form submitted with our plan has been accepted in NA m the past and meets the t ® w equirements of Title 5,15.103,(1 ). We' have had this discussion iii the past, is it no longer acceptable in North Andover? "j v �/f With regard to item #6 & #7, the design does meethigh and low breakout elevations` 15 eet from the system and the 152 contour demonstrates this, however we did add proposed spot elevations to the plan to further demonstrate this. w With regard to item 98, adequate information exists on the plan which indicates what soil is to be removed beneath and within.5 feet of the system. The 5 foot around area is shown, the elevation of soil removal is indicated at the test pits, and note 4 specifies the material removal requirements. Additionally both the designer and the Town perform an , excavation inspection to assure proper soil removal beneath the system, and lastly, anyone who possesses an installers license has demonstrated their knowledge of this and many other requirements of Title 5': P 'z OF NOAry qtiocopy SSACH�75� North Andover Health Department Community Development Division February 25, 2014 Jeffco Corp. PO Box 802 Andover, MA 01810 Re: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Plan for 1049 Salem Street, Map 104D, Lot 70 Dear Property Owner, The proposed wastewater system design plan for the above site dated October 21, 2013 with a final revision dated December 16, 2013, received on December 17, 2013 has been approved as submitted by Merrimack Engineering Services. The design has been approved for use in the construction of a new upgraded onsite septic system, designed for a 4 -bedroom (maximum 9- room) home. This plan is good for 3 -years from the date of approval. During this time, a licensed septic system installer must obtain a permit and complete this work, and a Certificate of Compliance be endorsed by the installer, designer and the Town of North Andover or the plan approval will be voided. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Health, this plan received the following approvals by the members. 1. Local upgrade -Setback from S.A.S. to garage slab from 10' to 5' 2. Local upgrade -Setback from S.A.S. to foundation from 20' to 10' 3. Local regulation variance -Setback from S.A.S. to a wetland from 100' to 71' This approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the Disposal Works Installers Permit, the applicant must submit a foundation as -built at the same scale as the approved plan. 2. Prior to the issuance of the Disposal Works Installer's Permit, the applicant must submit the floor plans of the home showing no greater than four bedrooms or a total of nine rooms. Page 1 of 2 North Andover Health Department, 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035, North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978.688.9540 Fax: 978.688.8476 1049 Salem Street February 25, 2014 3. If site conditions are found in the field to be different from those indicated on the design plan and/or soil evaluation, the originally issued Disposal System Construction Permit is void, installation shall stop, and the applicant shall reapply for a new Disposal Systems Construction Permit (3 10 CMR 15.020(1)). 4. It is the responsibility of the applicant and/or the applicant's septic system designer, septic system installer or other representative to ensure that all other state and municipal requirements are met. These may include review by the Conservation Commission, Zoning Board, Planning Board, Building Inspector, Plumbing Inspector and/or Electrical Inspector. The issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit shall not construe and/or imply compliance with any of the aforementioned requirements. Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to working with you to install a wastewater treatment and dispersal system which will be in compliance with all regulations and assure protection of public health and the environment of North Andover. Sincere , i� Sus Y. Sa er, -S/RS '1SPu is Heal Di ctor Encl. N Andover Installer's list cc: Merrimack Engineering Services File Page 2 of 2 North Andover Health Department, 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035, North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978.688.9540 Fax: 978.688.8476 O N N N z 00� 00 �� � O 000 O �n N O ~O 000 -- O O O C /� 00 N 00 .4 pMp O C7 00 O W M O O N 00 00 O 00 O 00 O W O N CT `"' 0 (01)0O oo 0 O 00 O CJ W H H H Q w W 0 0 0 0 H W a W W O H H 00 ='O WWO �C� 9 RJR ZO�Oa� T�H-AZO 000 0Z�ZZWW�aC/5�Qd¢ Z�9Q cn ZZo O M -- 00 to M kn 00 N \O O\ kn 00 \O 'zl- kn V- r- t- r� N � r'- r'- - O 00 M O - \O O O = O � l- O 00 N M O � O d O N [- M M a\ \O Cy r-� N Q\ .1 [� D\ N M O V1 00 V7 l� l� M M M O \O to , r- M d Ln O l'- N N '? O\ 00 O q�F' \o CT 00 O \D 1%0w oo in � V 1 � d � M � \O ,� N � 00 � v1 � N N r- � tn \o l� 00 DD � M � r- l� v) M 01 l� � Vn N �-, � \o N � ,_ \O \O M \p M � r- Cl N M d' � M M N 00 O\ \p 01 N d cF 00 \D \D 00 00 00 00 M 00 .--i M 0000 r --r- 00 l� M O 00 l� 00 l� 00 l- 00 l� 00 l� M O M O 00 l- 00 [- 00 r- 00 l� M O Q1 01 O\ 01 lD \O O\ O\ O\ Z CT O\ C*,O\ O\ \p \p C1 CT Q\ O\ \p W J J O y y N C W cc m O ti N O O W W O, N U_ O 3 a) ..°n Q a o° C a a) a) o H ZScW Cd -(C:zQ �x _ �,cd Z .2�--n ob l �tia ¢,� � ani �Q� bA ob ani :. O W W �-e.� bA ¢aaUQQQtiti"" - M m > m w U w ° a� rA� °��aP4 U .., U ; 0 0 0 U 0 u �; . o� .� IP404J5C6HH� _ : � _�- ill :� �; Grant,, MiAele From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:09 AM To: Grant, Michele Subject: FW: repairs asked Claire a ? see below. So, in regards to the Salem Street lots we are testing for on Thursday. If they choose they can demolish the (2) homes that have a total of 4 -bedrooms and build (1) 4 -bedroom home and still be considered "a repair" From: Golden, Claire (DEP) [mailto:claire.aolden@state.ma.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 9:48 AM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: RE: repairs Hi! And the answers are: 1) No. 2) That being said, the scenario you have described still qualifies as a repair - 2 two-bedroom dwellings being replaced by 1 four-bedroom dwelling. However please note that the opposite does not constitute a repair —1 four-bedroom dwelling being replaced by 2 two-bedroom dwellings. Consistent with the definition of new construction there can be no increase in the number of dwelling units. Claire From: Sawyer, Susan [mailto:ssawyer@townofnorthandover.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 9:18 AM To: Golden, Claire (DEP) Subject: repairs Hi! Hope all is well. I have a question and I know you have the answer. 1) Does any part of a home have to stay, when a repair system is being proposed? 2) If the above answer is no, what about; If there are 2 houses on one lot with a total flow of 4 -bedrooms altogether... can a new 4 -bedroom be built in place of the 2 houses and still be called a repair? Sandy used to require "new construction" standards for any renovation over 75% 1 think, but we removed that from our local regulation. I wasn't sure how the state looks at it. thx Susan Sawyer Public Health Director Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street Suite 2035 North Andover,�/IA 01845 Phone 4978.688.9540 Fax 978.688.8476 Email mailto:ssawyer@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: hftp://Www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 Sawyer, Susan From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:15 AM To: wrdufresne@comcast.net Subject: RE: Salem Street Bill, We agree, "Since 4 bedrooms already exist, they can build a new 4 bdrm house under the upgrade regulations since no increase in flow is proposed". I expect that this option would blend better with the new lot next door; grading wise, landscaping etc. . See you on Thur. Susan From: wrdufresne@comcast.net [mailto:wrdufresne@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 12:36 PM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Re: Salem Street Susan The original proposal was to demolish both homes, then construct 2 new homes on the 2 separate lots. Conservation approval was obtained, Planning Board was not required as both lots currently exist. The 2 - 2 bdrm houses both sit on one lot #70. The 2nd lot #69 is vacant. .. Town sewer was proposed however complications have precluded that from happening. Lot 70 cannot adequately support a fully compliant septic design as they relate to your local regulations so they are going to upgrade the systems for each house and rehab them unless you interpret the code (title 5) that since 4 bedrooms already exist, they can build a new 4 bdrm house under:the upgrade regulations since no increase in flow is proposed. That is how many Towns interpret Title 5. If you allow that, they may build a new house and tear down the existing ones in which case we will be performing new construction test pits. What is your opinion on that matter? From: "Susan Sawyer"<ssawyer(a)_townofnorthandover. com> To: wrd ufresne(a)-com cast. net Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:05:38 AM Subject: RE: Salem Street was wondering what the thought process was. Thank you for the heads up. I wasn't clear on the plan. So they are keeping the houses? The one I was in on a complaint awhile back is in sorry shape and very tiny. From: wrdufresne@comcast.net[mailto:wrdufresne(&comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:52. AM 1 To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Re: Salem Street Susan I expect the soils to be the same, which were very sandy but with large stones and boulders. Lets do Tuesday, I will start at 8:30, you can come out at 9:30 unless you care to watch us dig, in which case come at 8:30. You do realize there are 2 houses on one lot? My intention is to design 2 systems, one for each home if soils and space allow for it, otherwise, l will do a common soil absorption system. That said, allow for more time than usual as we will need 4 deeps and 2 perc's. Thanks From: "Susan Sawyer" <ssawyer(cDtownofnorthandover:com> To: wrdufresne(cD-comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:41:30 AM Subject: RE: Salem Street It is RFP time for our consultant. I ran down on time and $$. Submissions are due today; we'll evaluate and award the contract soon. .So, until then we are supplementing from in-house. Could be me, Michele or me and Michele. Let's set it for Tuesday and watch the weather. Both days are good for us as well. First thing in the AM? For this site, do you anticipate the soils will be different from Lot 69. S From: wrdufresne@comcast.net [mailto:wrdufresne(a comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:04 AM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Re: Salem Street Susan I am free both of those times, so choose. whichever is best for you. Why are you coming out personally? It will be like old days, LOL From: "Susan Sawyer" <ssawyer(�.townofnorthandover.com> To: "Bill Dufresne" <wrdufresne(a)-com cast. net> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:41:40 AM Subject: RE: Salem Street If you can't do either of those dates, please throw out a couple and I will check the schedule. Thx Susan 2 From: Blackburn, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 8:13 AM To: Bill Dufresne Cc: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Salem Street Good Morning, Sue can do soil testing for 1049 and 1053 Salem Street next week either Tuesday 10/8 or Thurs 10/10 in the morning. Which works best for you? Lisa Blackburn Health Department Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035 North Andover, MA 01845 Phone 978-688-9540 Fax 978-688-8476 Email Iblackburn@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: hftp://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. i 3 I Sawyer, Susan From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 9:07 AM To: 'wrdufresne@comcast.net' Cc: Blackburn, Lisa Subject: RE: Lot 70 Salem Street Hello Bill, have been out a bit; Tom's father passed away and I have been on juryduty. For lot 69; Daigle says "someone is moving the wire" supposedly last week. I told him if he could not get the system in this week, the permit would be suspended and he most likely will have to hold off until spring. As of yesterday, I don't think it was moved. For lot 70; 1 sent the email below after your Nov. 15`h submission. I don't believe I have heard from you since on the issues. I was speaking to Claire Golden and she said that she was writing you an opinion on the question regarding the setback to the foundation above breakout issue. Are you resubmitting any changes soon? I have an approval letter waiting ready to go, if we can just clear up the items below, [would be happy to get it in the mail. Thank you Susan From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 5:50 PM To: 'wrdufresne@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Lot 70 Salem Street Thank you Bill, I have reviewed your letter with Mill River, but still have a few outstanding comments. With regard to the distance to the foundation. MA Regulation 15.211 states the SAS must be 20 feet from foundation or foundation drain. The structure of the foundation is fundamentally different from the structure of a slab; including the footing extending much deeper into the ground etc.. Therefore, though I do agree with the logic that views the distance to be from the breakout, I am not aware of that specific interpretation. Please submit an interpretation from DEP or an LUA in regards to the 20 feet to a foundation being reduced to 10. Regard to item 3; though you have no knowledge of the type of system, please indicate where your best professional inference may be in relation to any existing building sewers. A pipe line with a random bubble to assist the installer would assist them and is general practice. 'Regard to item #5; though time consuming the use of the DEP form has been practice for some time. I must note L/- that in 2013; all of Merrimack Eng. and all other engineer's submissions utilized this form. Please submit as required. For the future you may wish to check with DEP if you would have this alternate form that is ok'd by them. - Regard to item #8; You are correct that it is not specifically required, but Installers generally do utilize the direction of the engineer in addition to the soil log information. Though this may not be your regular practice or 1 the code, it has become so common that it was recently noticed by Mill River as good engineering practice. It was not that it was a new thing, but rather has become a regularly followed practice and still recommended, but not required. will be out of the office tomorrow if you have any response. From: wrdufresne@comcast.net rmailto:wrdufresne@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:34 PM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Re: Lot 70 Salem Street Susan, Attached please find my response letter for your review of 1049 Salem Street. Also attached is the perc test form, I am not sure If I submitted it to you. Who is the new review consultant? Is it still Mill River? Who ever it is, It appears they have some new ideas on what they want on a plan. Hopefully we can avoid redundant comments on every plan review in the future in an attempt to save everyone sometime and effort. Thanks, Bill From: "Susan Sawyer" <ssaw er townofnorthandover.com> To: "wrd ufres ne(cD-com cast. net" <wrd ufres ne(cDcom cast. net>.. Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:47;14 AM Subject: RE: Lot 69 Salem Street You are welcome and thanks for:the correction. I now know itis called a "guy" wire... Who knew! This is a new one for me, but I am sure you have seen it before. Thanks From: wrdufresne@comcast.net [mailto:wrdufresne@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:36 AM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: Re: Lot 69 Salem Street Susan 1 was not aware of the guy wire but I am now! If the guy wire is on the subject property and is not protected by easement, then the Utility Company has a responsibility to relocate it. i 2' If it is legally located there, then it should be evaluated as to exactly where it lies relative to the proposed s.a.s. The type of s.a.s. is trenches, so if the guy wire falls in between the trenches, then there is no issue, it is simply a rod extending down into the ground. If it lands within a trench, then some re -design or consideration must be given to it. I will contact Bill Henderson and determine what needs to be done. Thanks, Bill From: "Susan Sawyer"<ssawyer(cDtownofnorthandover.com> To: "wrdufresne(cD-comcast.net" <wrd ufresne(cD-com cast. net> Cc: "merreng(a)-aol.com" <merreng(cD-aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:05:31 AM Subject: RE: Lot 69 Salem Street Bill, I forgot to mention that Rob Daigle says that there is a guide wire, from a telephone pole, extending into the leaching area of the system. Are you aware and if so has this been resolved? Thank you. Susan From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:34 AM To: 'wrdufresne@comcast.net' Cc: merreng@aol.com Subject: RE: Lot 69 Salem Street Thank you, I expect you will send over a copy of the revision. We will now be able to move forward and issue the DWC to the installer. From: wrdufresne@comcast.net [mailto:wrdufresne@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:29 AM To: Sawyer, Susan Cc: merrenq@aol.com Subject: Lot 69 Salem Street Susan, I just received a revised Certified Plot Plan for the foundation at the above subject site from Steve Stapinski. An error occurred in the original survey. The foundation is located as designed & approved, as such, no changes are required on the septic system design. 3 m ca � c C N O N c E ca y � N >� E N 0 cu C C CD O > N > M cn �.0:. C. Q. O O co cu N C. > O c4 C t ._ >+ N .. 3 C'� L N C cu Qcu p } N 3 in ecu O a. ^f6 -C) W W E A O rf) Q N ate+ N N L r+ Mr O N. U CO > H -I O N p n> t6 a) N > to U 3 0 ai E E Q L 0 4-r 0 C 0 C C C > N v (6 U d O Wcn C O 7 z J v O O w as L N � E �, C �� L p >j � O .: . _ DM U +J i -i O M n E C'. C y-+ L � 0 �..1 V v 3 U co cOa > ?> O ' '� fcp LO "O N N .N L Ln m iD LL Z - M C r -I 0 w a) L 4— o° ch cn V o +S ri (n >% c6 L U 0 F Y CO U O O .� 4--+ M Z -� =Z C (0 41 N fo cn >+ i) N >; 0 C (c J - fa V) O N J N a)^�'' C cn w al "v c0 p -2 tfu d u i+ cn .� cv cn U O 0 � C = C O u 3� L. d O 7 0 � U Q (6 ) L = m OL LL. � u H a LL(AHcn Q. aa� H LHNN 0 aj 4- O U � O O) a) C L- 0 O^O 4-a) y--' W O N cd cn 7(n 0 m a) m - OA=! Q .. .. N cto Q U) O -C O a� C 0 cn i-•' - _C •t = - C O a) O cu41C _ t= O a) X - a) C U O Q U ai C CLQ1 aJ a) C n a) N O � m m -.Q a)EO U cn a)a) O U C w cn O Q. _ — C � o a) > o U 3 u U) U a) Q O C (a `� O O O (6 . O � U coE oA 3 C: V) O.: C C (� cnN a) C O O fn U L O. L a) L L a) D (� r 0 a) QL O O p 3 N -0 Q ►� O O a) V C M N H M a) �, U C a) cn Cl) > L+ '^ C) 4 , � N a) a) cn N a) C a) 05 a) a) Nco � I 2 a cn �, C cn V E C }' V) U) N O U C U fA L- V (n a) - V > (0 M -C O � C a) O O Z au cn 4 a) a) +' a) �+ U 1 ++ t O O N _ ca O >+ �- C �Z fO+� N cn UO O -O — — m O C J C o J y-+ cu c c LU w O M P L j � a� >+ p) a) N = CO N r 0 O) fo L. a)03 �i — +' 3: . C — O v d 3 - o U co E O O N D c9 O) o � t O L N d X O c N � O N � 3 N O L 7 c R i C E N m m D N L L w U N N D O N W C 3 U N� dr a U O L O L W _ (n C '. 'CU U > fl - O N C U co O a O � O L ...� U L cn c L > cn O C))cu. .:':•� .: .. a-+ c � C C l6 O U �+ C M cn U C _ N o cd ca O 4— N D) H VO +� � - U > Q - L O - O- Q O CUU t t C ^c __cxu > M CL.� "2 N0 (D0 0 0 °� 3C) a C v C o 42 O N O El N .� a� c o 4) � N cn ca N t L 4-1 L -j41aj . Ln N� C V) E,, E O 3 U E v O -1.1 co O L fa v Q) L U o o E CO ELn 0 O uO N O m 001 v Z O— cn O -Q U U l� U 4J �; U m a m v cn (0 , � c O O rO J CL l6 x v) Orn N L tD. 70 N O a-+ 0- cB W C V) V..� — 3 � Q% �:+ � C o i c6 W 3 02� °� w V) c� i o °0 2� J L �r /V, U W C N U `O J �- J V C L (� O C Y ° EU3E� 3 UcnE.�?, c6 'N M i W O U 3 s N i d O V 3 Q F- cn.. LL W H U Vf F- 1i th P U U) CO — O f— H m U co E O O N D c9 O) o � O L N d X O N � O N � 3 N O L 7 c R i C E N N O m m D N w U N N D O N W C 3 U N� dr a Blackburn, Lisa From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 3:49 PM To: Blackburn, Lisa Subject: Fwd: Title 5 Interpretation PIs put in 1049 Salem st septic file. Thx Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE exclusively from Sprint ----- Forwarded message ----- From: "Golden, Claire (DEP)" <claire.golden(a7_state.ma.us> To: "wrdufresne a�comcast.net" <wrdufresne(-comcast. net> Cc: "Sawyer, Susan" <ssawyer(@-townofnorthandover.com> Subject: Title 5 Interpretation Date: Tue, Dec 10, 2013 11:36 AM Sorry, Bill, I thought I had responded. Any dwelling level below ground surface (wholly or partially) is a cellar for purposes of the setback distances. Whereas MassDEP understands that topography may make this "cut -and -dry" interpretation inappropriate for all situations, it is appropriate for the vast majority. That being said, there is nothing to prevent an applicant, for upgrades, from applying to the local BOH for LUA when the setback distance cannot be set or from applying for a variance in cases of new construction. Currently,'I am still the T5 contact in NERO. However, I am committed to the surface water permitting program m for 60 of my time and must handle all my regional commitments (GW permitting, compliance and enforcement; NPDES compliance and enforcement; Title 5; and assorted other issues) in the remaining 40% of my time. As such, my responses on inquiries will normally take at a few days at a minimum. Claire 0 MassDEP Claire A. Golden, EEIV MassDEP Wastewater Management and Surface Water Permitting Programs 205B Lowell St Wilmington, MA 01887 978-694-3244 978-694-3499 (fax) claire.golden@state.ma.us From: wrd ufresne0comcast. net [mailto:wrdufresne(acomcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 10:24 AM To: Golden, Claire (DEP) Subject: Title 5 Interpretation 1 Claire, On November 20th, I sent an e-mail requesting a Title 5 interpretation. Do you have any progress on that matter? have a plan review pending that interpretation and the season in that town ends on December 1 for time in which to pull a construction permit. In the future, if I should be sending these requests to someone else at DEP, please inform me as to who, and I will be sure to direct these type of matters to the proper person. Thank you, Bill Dufresne. Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. m _ e TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER- W• Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1600 OSGOOD STREET; SUITE 2035 NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 Susan Y. Sawyer, REDS, RS 978.688.9540 —Phone Public Health Director 978.688.8476 — FAX www.townofnorthandover APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: 111Z�A;� I J MAP & PARCEL: ME SES' a') U 213 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH i1EPARTMEN-1 LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: 1011 d © '!�7 l �w OWNER: I i%t% /L1 -G VLGAL;A,�i `L_ ,� � ' APPLICANT: Er�C/�i eoContact #: �� I7K-) r r- i T- I C-0, ADDRESS: f 0! Zz Aij t a:; r-14 ILA -j at( I /e Contact ENGINEER: #: T�'T�-J ��i� CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: I i.L Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Ingle Family Ho a Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: V� Undeveloped Lot Testing: Upgrade for Addition: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM ➢ Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test) ➢ 8.511 x 11 "Plot plan & Location of Testing (Blease indicate test nit sites on the elan) A Fee of $425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of3$ 60.00 per lot for repairs or upgrades. GENERAL INFORMATION ➢ Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. ➢ Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. ➢ At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area. ➢ Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. ➢ Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. ➢ Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (no smaller than 1"-100') shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). ➢ Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. Please Do Not Write Below This Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval Date:-- Signature ojConservatron Agent. Date back to Health Department: (stamp in): I vim( ti Alvl V Ak- Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of North Andover Percolation Test Form 12 �M Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. RECERIED NOV `FOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER iiEALTH DEPARTMENT Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use. A. Site Information 1049 Salem Street Realty Trust Owner Name 1049 Salem Street Street Address or Lot # North Andover MA 01845 Citylrown State Zip Code c/o George Hughes, Jeffco, Corp. (978) 886-8408 Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number B. Test Results Bill Dufresne SE#640 Test Performed By: Susan Sawver Witnessed By: Comments: Test Passed: ❑ Test Failed: ❑ t5form 1 2.doc- 06/03 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1 10-10-13 10am Date Time Observation Hole # P-1 Depth of Perc 78" Start Pre -Soak 9.57 End Pre -Soak 10:12 Time at 12" 10:12 Time at 9" 10:18 Time at 6" 10:28 Time (9"-6") 10 4 Rate (Min./Inch) Test Passed: Test Failed: ❑ Bill Dufresne SE#640 Test Performed By: Susan Sawver Witnessed By: Comments: Test Passed: ❑ Test Failed: ❑ t5form 1 2.doc- 06/03 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1 CO 0 m d m 0' 0 to 0 0 m O 0 00 v O ❑ (Ji zz P. O O n Er > m m C 'O =—rO< 3c 00 N 0 3 N 3 (D O �• CL m = v (D m DCD r N O m n N SU O O N (cn D (D N N iU CD N < O 0 O (D (D n CD- O o(D O- CL o 0 0 -0 m a v n CL Q :3 J (7 C c O =3 v ❑ (D � Q. < N N .. 0 (D `G 3 "O O O O ® El0 m Tr N 3 O O O Ga w p N m v (Q c (D :cr. El D O (D z O N z O z 3 N N m W (D z O 3 m z 0 m C# (D CD nO 0 N (D O 7 O O J O Q a - O c CL •J ❑ ❑ 0) U) r v a 0 W Un c n ( cr (D S x Q � - m O O "9 �h << ❑ O < z CD m n J O cn ® O N N ® ❑ zz C O O Er 0 D aN N Q 3c (D =h CO m � r m 0 CD v a C CLCD c Q nni 0 CD d (n v c CD m O (D c W 0) a• � (D CL N O O O � W v C: 2. m N v' 0 0 CL CD O O � o O 0 rn (0 90 v O .. 1 lljjl•,,,�ollllilllilll�lllllll��ii 'iilllllllllllllllllllllll� I O 03 ' O CO) 0 0� 3 O D ~' i CL O 2 C / CD/� VI U) O 1 0 cn r! cCl) G v O CA 2) Y 9 N 02 Ti Er 0 D aN z`~, C fD� 3c y N Q - y (D _ m O (D r r O m N v' 0 0 CL CD O O � o O 0 rn (0 90 v O .. 1 lljjl•,,,�ollllilllilll�lllllll��ii 'iilllllllllllllllllllllll� I O 03 ' O CO) 0 0� 3 O D ~' i CL O 2 C / CD/� VI U) O 1 0 cn r! cCl) G v O CA 2) 0 m 0 a 0 0 CD CD A 0 —cn 0 < 0 CD a m O O =r CL c o 0 0 CD o ° m EnCD CD m N N O ® a Sr rn m 0 ❑ v CD Z v O N V ('o O cu O O a acr ;l -0(n ❑ J W m O C r D� { a=r(n O 0 0 0 C a- C 6 p 3 c� v v o ai C c a Op vi CD w C � m a m (D "O LO 0 (D (D m 0) N m CL (D „ w C CD m o O a) (D rQ fD< . p 6 c a) a) CCD 3 —cn 0 < 0 CD a m O O =r CL c o 0 0 CD o ° m EnCD CD m N N O ® a Sr rn m 0 ❑ v CD Z v O N V ('o O cu O O _ a acr ;l -0(n ❑ I I Q O C r D� '� a=r(n O 0 0 'O' C a- C 6 p ❑ur s c� v v o ai C c a Op vi CD w C � m a X (D "O LO 0 (D (D m 0) N ((C) p (D „ r C (D O a) (D rQ fD< . y c a) a) CCD 0) (D. 0 0 m 0 (D fD a (D C: U N o Z n =r(D CD❑ c 3 ° a U) = C C c O C) f -o N O O m PL (D (ND � 3 (D _ a acr ;l -0(n O w 3 Q O C O '� a=r(n O 0 0 'O' N co a- C 6 p ❑ur s c� CD 3 ai C c a Op vi CD w C � m a X (D "O LO 0 (D (D m 0) CD CD (D v O °* (D rQ fD< � O 0) (D. 0 0 m 0 o a (D C: U t o Z n =r(D c � ° a U) = C C c O O m PL � N CD 0 C) �. m Q 0 ', N :3 n w n (D CL (D (D a�l a0 C 0 `D 3 m 0 m fl. O y CD (D _ a acr ;l -0(n O w 3 Q O El Lin '� a=r(n O O 0 'O' N co C 6 p ❑ur s o N =CD ai CL ® (SD O : Z (o w C � (D Q (D "O LO 0 (D (D m 0) D m El O '� (q 0 N O LU ❑ur s o ai a m cp Z (o A' 0 (n m (Ti .a �1,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�� Ill�ll�� r , ;FAR. zt0 W O m Q C. 0 E Z O CD Ui v m CD O a U) m N O 7 O CD Z c 3 O• CD �0, W CD CD C 0 O C (D �I A. O 3 O C. Cr N N N N rF O 1 O Cl) rF D CA sm _v N� O N o °g o O Zrt O �. C D -h v 3 O N N A) CY S c N CD TA v co OD o 2. n W D l< o — M 3. O 7 Ea o — 3' c x U) n W O v OR V CL 0 x cn n o 0 c _? W d C V a y CP W o co cl)r rD» � V Q W O CA w N o a' W n O�c O c c 0 a 0 CM y tWA cn v G) 0 o c — N <_ n 0 :2. -n 0 3 N 0 2)M. O o CD CD (D O S W v m CD O a U) m N O 7 O CD Z c 3 O• CD �0, W CD CD C 0 O C (D �I A. O 3 O C. Cr N N N N rF O 1 O Cl) rF D CA sm _v N� O N o °g o O Zrt O �. C D -h v 3 O N N A) CY S c N CD TA cn O m o<i c w o' O rn a 0 G A O 00 N , n r G) r p 0 Q w C a � c a. o p CO) m m a' X CD w CD v o '°*' m v 0 < CD (j) �. o c a cD ClCD m c O c ° 3 h (D = CD :3O O_ � CD fD Q z� 3 ° VJ m m V m � E: co E; W r m o co 3 c N � N v — 3 mOL m cn CD m -" o v pEl mm 3 m y m o m c "�� _ °= co n m p -v p o s a O O -0 a G) � O m m � d O N CO Q � ® r O. (N c � fD c OW Q w G T � - L < c V7 v n = (DCD �_ Ch Z > V Q O m N m O n ❑ :. � 0 0 o �. CD o m r C m � O V rt 7 cr m CD c v0 0 3 NUl ❑ (D V N V O CD ~ w Q O ca M O N m Q v m p �W O n m -, � 6-0 C O fD ® m (n C O � o O m (rtD N m rn X- u, y CD m a ❑ y O 7 S m f0 a CLEl m o iu a n Z 0 X O CD o � 2 O fD N , n r G) r p 0 Q w C a � c a. o p CO) m m a' X CD w CD v o '°*' m v 0 < CD (j) �. o c a cD ClCD m c O c ° 3 h (D = CD :3O O_ � CD fD Q z� 3 ° VJ m m V m � E: co E; W r z� 3 ° VJ m m V m � E: co E; W r r Q 0 3 N Z O CD ;7 Ib 0 CD O cr N (D N 0 O (u Z C cr (D 71 N n O CA n O C (D CL O �1 0. C. e�h cr rF N W a O 1 O e.g. cCO) C _v N• O A) 00 O 3 o CD Z E O �. O ic OL O N C 0 Z N cD r; .ta W 0) N 00 O ID N OD OD 0)OD N 2. 21 C7 0o D < o �o 2 N K 2. O O Cil C 3 X W0) - O v m cn v S ;a ID a O k n C j 3 O ID � C W cn 3 M IIww V/ O r VJ C)M o r Dc m m m n gzw (D 0 °c to cr N N C/) N CO (D j n < n r O -n 0 y pe N �. (/1 (D jy' r. = 7 (D (D n ID 0 ID 0 CD O cr N (D N 0 O (u Z C cr (D 71 N n O CA n O C (D CL O �1 0. C. e�h cr rF N W a O 1 O e.g. cCO) C _v N• O A) 00 O 3 o CD Z E O �. O ic OL O N C 0 Z N cD r; O W O O rn c- v 0CD v v 0 C3 a) (D v a o CD S O m a o o 3 m --, CD O a (D m a v .3 �. O N 3 O �• � 3 o N � n (1)O v fl cQ N m o CD o :3 = =r O CL tv r -r N r m O C 0 3 7 O N -1 —0 N CD m' CD U) U) v ❑ v CD C ? .-,)6 = Z O m O '. y O m -� o acn d (D O CD O� N CD 0 J n v O (D v CD (D C O O N 7 Q (D X c W S (D \ _ N 0 N O a' N CD Q r a 0 o N 3 a O O Q C m O CD O 0 n W N 0) W U) \ (D Q C 0 O rt 3 CD N 0. O C. X CD z C 3 o' fD N v 0 C3 a) (D v a o CD S O m a o o 3 m --, CD O a (D m a a U) (D Q .3 �. O 3 CD co G CD m C (am 3 O �• � 3 o N � n m m O a CD v :3 a o v fl cQ N m o CD o :3 = =r O CL tv r -r r m (D 7 O 3 -1 —0 N CD m' U) U) N N �D O� � ID�D�D�D =r =r= CD U) tom/) N U) 7 CL x (D r m (D 7 7 3 7 —0 N al = U) U) N N po 3°0 0 'o O ear 0. � O _ D = O N �• (D 0) a C N CD y N -h O O V/ //(D Vn SD v1i _v O W e 0 v 0 co 0 Z� o0. 0)_ v v, p � 5 CD m OZ (D CD CD CL N a � a o 3 0 0 1 N a) fn 0 v 0 0) v 0 `CD W < d CD0 CL o (D a m o m Z (1)m (D CL 3 3 n °�' N 3 c CD Err ° o m o *k 0 m (D O < A O 0 m � o (D � r O m 7 S 0 N 0) ((DD O n S CID o 3 CD �N o a ,rn 3 N 3 lD M o o v v, p 5 CD m OZ (fl O 1 C) N a � =' 0 M <O � 0 1 O CD - 3 — W < d O M _ � C d 0 0 0 m x 3 7 0) O m 0 CID a m CID 0 CD CL 0 1 1 1 a vgE4 CO', & a N CL 3 =r (D 3. N v — aoCL3 S 3 C) � C co) �3m O N rt Cn 0) p 0) n N '10 CD — D) O 3 ;Lfl1 Q N N cr N n (OD N 0 XZC.v CD �=r(DID (n p�j 3 ID C) mrD C)CDort � c m m (Q O. 3 3 N < 0 33 O O O N CD N. N (D O C — (D C �3 Cn ac C Q Q N n � O a O O_ o (D �' 0 CD X n ijx ()� C- N O fn (D v v o mao CD a m 0 3 j o -n m = O WL B 'n "h n' -noo O �3 o Cc .i j C o O 0. 3 O D h i o ai N Cr ? N CD N O 1 O CCO) C CID _v N� O A) zt C) OD 0 00 c CA CD U U) CD CD 0 OL a v v O 3 Ch O CAC iw cr N N (D N N (D -h O 1 O 3 cD (D �u tQ cD _v ti' M O N 2) C%1