Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 109 MAIN STREET 4/30/2018 (2) 109 MAIN STREET - 2?0/02'�000 0 TOWN OF .NORTH ANI) OVER MASSACHUSETTS '� Any appealshall be filed A within (20) days after the '°•' ` ''�� date of filin 9g,:of this Notice 'SS,C USEt in the.0ffice of the Town Clerk. NOTICE OF DECISION November 20, 1989 Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Date of Hearing . November. . . . . . . . . . . .,• . . . I � Petition of Sanlau Realty Trust . . . . . Premi$es affected .109-123 Main Street . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :'!,::.Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements of,the'. North Andover Zoning Bylaw - Section 8.36 - Revisions to Approved Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . modify SO as,:to modify# ,the .Site Plan ,approved • May 12•,• 1986• for• back• enbankment• of .landsca�ing.and �rip-rap wall.• .. . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted .Conditionally to 4PrPV9. . . . . . . . .the . . .$ite.Plan Modification • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • _ • . • • • • • • • • based upon the following conditions : Sign d �)> y a a, � .cc: Director of Public Works Perna Jr. , Chairman Board of Public Works GggK9 .e . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'Highway Surveyor Conservation Commission 4Q4 •n • •Simons• • • • •,• •Clerk• • • • • • • . • • . . . . . . • • • Board of Health Erich Nitzsche BuildingInspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assessors •Graham Police Chief, Fire Chief . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Applicant, Engineer John Draper File, Interested Parties • • • • • • • •151allnill.. • . . . . d • • • • • ' OF AORTI, .1".. OFFICES OF: Town of 120 Main Street BUILDING North Andover CONSERVATION NI, NORTH ANDOVER assachuselts 01845 HEALTH CHU$ DIVISION OF (508)682-6483 PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAREN H.P. NELSON, DIRECTOR Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Town Hall 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Dear Mr. iLong : The North Andover Planninq 13 , 1989, upon the application ol- Street, North Andover, 14A, Review Modification, pursuant to lj"i1.)r1.) j i 1;j- c. Andover Zoning Bylaw, Slection I. Plan. The hearing was duly adverti:T.ed in 1b) Lt cit on June 22 and June 29 , 1989 aric! notified. The following member-s Chairman; John Simons , Clerk; flir - s'--il" The petitioner seeks modii"'.,-ation ot 1,0 d :'ltd` 1 ,111 Review. John Simons read the legal Lo Letters were read from Chris Bob Nicetta, Building Inspector. Chris Huntress explained to I i, proposing on the modification tho o.ff from the order of Conditions , 111)e was supposed to be built. I I e w 11; retaining wall to hold back t.he hearing were Santo Messina, Ai!n 1!--'s li,—. -tn(t architect for the Housing A lengthy discussion tofD�f. C)1 1 C)11 position of the building buil!1- by f the applicant and the architect. and !..he Page 2 : George Perna stated that I-lie is_,;ue being and should be resolved with the Bui.ldiiiq lnspeCtOi' . An updated As-Built Plan is needed 1_ic,fore 1A ;it-r, v .!.,;j 1. . needed are documents for easements atict/or land Skllaf_) . A Motion was made by John simolls LD ,wit hearing. The motion was seconded )i)y Erich ti o.-.Zsr.�,o I)d '1 unanimous by those present. On August 10, 1989 , the 111aiiiii iiq BoEird The following members were present.: GE101-cle Perna , J .r . (_'I)a i rni n Erich Nitzsche and Jack Graham . Fa,,il. '-t-ctstrolql John Simons was absent. A motion was made by Jack G ,. aham hearing until the Board had a (Itiol:11111 . On August 24 , 1989 the Piaririin( Hoard tie Id I re.,iu The following members were present: George Pe.rna, J i John Simons, Clerk; Erich Nitzsche :grid Jack Graham . John Simons read a letter 1.hat wis sent to ttie n t .1 Chris Huntress, Planner. The letter was on the n r r t had expressed. George Perna stated what the Bo--.rd i1: the retaining wall as it was oricfi_ii;.i1!y )11 the E1p1D,-f)­ocI Santo Messina spoke to the Boa­(,i as it relates to the retaining wall , cit.inq that=. Mr. Messina stated that erosion ftom 1,-Ile Il(jusino A111,11— reason for the conditions on s_ite . 11r. juniper trees to control the site . The L :k wall , eight feet high. Hope Minnicucci, HOUSinCl lUltil0rity Dir1,ct_(_)1:, Board on the easements not being recorded . A motion was made by John r,,-1;, i :i hearing and set up a site visit j.—I e be September 6 , 1989 . Chris fhintres*s to st t,I e v Hope Minnicucci, Anna O ' Connor , Si:iiito llessliia , Alii) H Hmurciak. The motion was seconded I-)y unanimous by those present. On October 19, 19 1 14 , meeting. The following members Chairman; John Simons, Clerk; Nitzsche arrived at 8: 15 p_fil . Page 3 : John Simons read a lett-- ,L extension on the public hearing . A motion was made by John' hearing to November 16 , 1989 . ""he rlotion il"', :3 e c Y Nitzsche and voted unanimous by thos(' On November 16 , 1989 the meeting. The following members, s,ieir, Chairman; John Simons , Clerk. Erich 0 d Draper. Chris Huntress, Planner, sL.--Led thntl- nc plans of the retaining wall but thec 7 v,,ere riot: drai Mr Messina stated that the lland--c,� IDe pl;-�Ii 'I — t addressed because he was going to crass . Chris Huntress gave the Bo;7rd a (--(.)I:)y ol, The Plans need to be drawn to scale and a Surveyor stamp is needed. Erich Nitzsche asked of the 1--,,--)una,1rV liles, Chris Huntress asked that the fire lane and no ['arkillq on the way behind the building. 1;1'i '11I 'j. L---'Sc he van te d in the decision relative to the trees being replan ed ii. s-11culd die . Chris Huntress to find the technic-a- L name for vj - '-�t. ' - retaining. wall that will be used in the 1),--ick of the A motion was made by Erich hearing and approve the draft decisi,,Ji as seconded by John Draper and voted utiaiiimous j)-y thri':: -, P 1.a r I n0-1 02oo (2 h i.1 i CC: Director of Public Works Board of Public Works Highway Surveyor Conservation Commission Board of Health Building Inspector Assessors Police Chief Fire Chief Applicant Engineer File SAN LAU REALTY TRUST Site Plan Review Modification. The Planning Board makes the following findings regarding this Special Permit as required by section 8. 3 of the Zoning Bylaws: 1. The proposed use and site design for this lot are appropriate, due to it's location in Town. 2 . Adequate vehicular and pedestrian access into the surrounding site has been provided. 3 . The applicant has met the requirements of the Town for Site Plan Review as stated in Section 8. 3 of the Zoning Bylaw. 4. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use. The Planning Board finds under Section 8. 35 of the Zoning Bylaw that the proposed site plan, together with the following conditions, complies with the Town Bylaw requirements. Upon reaching the above findings, the Planning Board approves this Special Permit based upon the following conditions which shall be submitted to the Board prior to signing the documents to be filed with the North Essex Registry of Deeds. 1. The final plans, which shall be filed with the North Essex Registry of Deeds, shall include the following in one packet: a. Proposed Retaining Wall for San Lau Realty Trust. Dated November 14, 1989. (With appropriate revisions as noted in this decision) b. Landscape Plan, as approved by the Town Planner. All plans shall be on 24" x 36" sheets 2 . All Planning Board Order of Conditions, issued herein, are to be placed upon the recorded Final Plans, ( Cover Sheet ) prior to endorsement and filing with the Registry of Deeds. 3 . Any Plants, Trees or Shrubs that have been incorporated into the Landscape Plan approved in this decision, that die within one year from the date of this approval, shall be replaced by the owner. If the applicant fails to comply with this condition a modification to this approval shall be required by the Planning Board. 4 . All prior conditions, that are not herein modified by this decision, are to remain in full force and effect. i 5. The roadway behind the buildings shall maintain a twenty two (22) foot width at minimum, and in no instance shall the wall or curbing be brought closer to the building than as shown on the approved plans. 6. Prior to the endorsement of the record plans a final landscape plan shall be submitted to, and approved by the Town Planner. Said plan shall be part of the record plans and shall be filed with the North Essex Registry of Deeds. 7. All construction shall commence by May 1, 1990, and shall be complete by July 1, 1990. 8. The Plan entitled Proposed Retaining Wall for San Lau Realty Trust, Dated 11/14/89, is not drawn to the scale shown on the plan. The plan shall be redrawn to scale and approved by the Planning Board prior to endorsement and filing with the Registry of Deeds. 9 . A Fire Lane shall be delineated on the ground along the entire back portion of the project and shall be approved by the NAFD. This is to keep vehicles from blocking the 360 degree access to this site. Any vehicles found unattended in this lane shall be subject to a ticket or tow. 10. Final Site Plan shall be stamped and signed by a , Professional Land Surveyor, certifying that all buildings, property lines and retaining walls are shown as found on the site. 11. Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for any structures, the site shall be reviewed by the Planning Board. Any additional screening as may be reasonably required by the Planning Board shall be added at the owners expense. cc: Director of Public Works Board of Public Works Highway Surveyor Building Inspector Board of Health Assessors Conservation Commission Police Chief Fire Chief Applicant Engineer File TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Site Review Checklist Prepared By : Minco Development Corporation For: Sanlau Realty Trust I . 8 . 3 Site Plan Review : 1 . Site Plan Review. Requested by Sanlau Realty Trust for the rehabilation of approximately 32,000 sq/ft of retail space and the addition of approximately 19,500 sq/ft .pf new two story retail space. 2. Most advantageous use of the properties . In full compliance with Downtown Revitalization Strategy prepared by Urban Systems Research & Engineering, Inc. , 36 Boylston Street, Cambridge, MA. 3. Reasonable protection of legitimate interests of adjoining owners and occupants . Please see site plan and artist rendition. 4. Site Plan a) Registered Architect Stamp . - Eric Brainerd A.I.A. b) Registered Engineer. - Ronald Buia c) Landscape Architect . - Peter Hornbeck 5. Recording at Registry of Deeds upon approval of Planning Board. Developers will comply with this requirement and will site plan. V II . Procedure : 1 . (9) Copies of the Site Plan. Completed. 2. Public Hearing. Posted and held on May 4, 1986 continued . 3. Recommendation of department Heads . Please see letter, Buddy Cyr, Board Of Health, Building Inspector and Fire Chief. All departments were informed of project at two develop- mental Town Meetings. Developer has made every attempt to incorporate their requirements. III . Plan Requirements : 1 . Compliance with requirements for parking and loading spaces . a) Frontage . 125' Project Complies 321 ' b) Yards. 25 ' Project Complies at least 251+ c) Heights . 45' Project Complies 40 +/- d) Coverage of building. 357 Project Complies 307 +/- e) All other provisions of Bylaw. Drawing will conform to Massachusetts state building codes as certified by architect. Required by zoning .by-law 1172 spaces. Provided - 180 spaces. *Note amount of parking is reduced by 507 because site is within 300' of municipal parking. 2. Convenience and Safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement on the site. Separate pedestrian on site walkway provided as per drawings and vehicular traffic and firelanes provided as per site plan. 3. Location of driveway openings in relation to street traffic. Same as required by town's Master Traffic Plan. No changes proposed to existing curb cuts. til � III . Plan Requirements (cont. ) : 4. Arrangement , design and appearance of proposed building , structure . a) Freestanding or ground signs . b) Screening and principle landscaping . c) Lighting. d) Planting showing size and kind of plants . a) Existing pylon signs and sign as per drawings. b) See landscape plan. c) Colonial in nature-see plan. d) In accordance with landscape architect plan prepared by Peter Hornbeck. 5. Adequacy of methods of the site for waste disposal . Area for (3) dumpsters located at rear of buildings. Sewage to tie into existing municipal system. 6. Surface and sub—surface drainage . Developers do not anticipate any increased drainage requirements. Existing site is presently entirely paved. No drainage problems currently exist, with exception on service driveway which will be paved and (3) new catch basins installed. 7. Location of wetland. No wetland on site-see engineered site survey. 8. Existing and proposed topography . No proposed topography changes with the exception of retaining wall as per plan.