Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous - 116 SHERWOOD DRIVE 4/30/2018 (2)
116 Sherwood Drive ' t i� 1 � a 1 r LOT & STREET4r- 9 J &7LcOob �/Z, MAP/PARCEL Qj-e 114- CONSTRUCTION /¢CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL HAS PLAN REVIEW FEE BEEN PAID? YES NO PLAN APPROVAL: rDATE APP. BY DESIGNER: ��I/G PLAN DATE CONDITIONS WATER SULY: TOWN WELL WELL PERMIT DRILLER WELL TESTS: CHEMICAL DATE APPROVED BACT A I DATE APPROVED BACTERIA II DATE APPROVED PLUMBING SIGNOFF WIRING S OFF COMMENTS: FORM U APPROVAL: �gv�l�l� APPROVAL TO_ ISSUE YES NO DATE ISSUED BY CONDITIONS: FINAL APPROVAL: ALL PERMITS PAID YES NO WELL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL YES NO SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL YES NO OTHER YES NO ANY VARIANCE NEEDED YES NO FINAL BOARD OF HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: BY: r i SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION IS THE INSTALLER LICENSED? YES NO TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: EW REPAIR NEW CONSTRUCTION: CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN REVIEW YES NO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL YES NO (FROM FORM U) ISSUANCE OF DWC PERMIT YES NO DWC PERMIT PAID? YES NO DWC PERMIT NO. lD INSTALLER:l' BEGIN INSPECTION YES NO: EXCAVATION INSPECTION: NEEDED: PASSED 3 By l/ a CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION: NEEDEP: AS BUILT PLAN SATISFACTORY: r YES: APPROVAL TO BACKFILL: DATE: 7 J By rI FINAL GRADING APPROVAL: DATE 9�/ FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL: DATE: By TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE DATE OF COMPLIANCE: 09/27/99 This is to certify that the individual subsurface disposal system constructed ( x) or repaired () by Ray Fraser at Lot 9 116 Sherwood Drive has been installed in accordance with the provisions of Title V of the State Sanitary Code and with the North Andover Board of Health regulations as described in the Design Approval Site System Permit# 892 dated 4/6/98. The Issuance of this certificate shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function satisfactorily. Board of Health Inspector I TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSTALLATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certify that the Sewage Disposal System (X) constructed; ( ) repaired; < — by Pa—Y r,-a s e,.- located at L.oT 9 - )Ito 56erw000k 1Dr;ye was installed in conformance with the North Andover Board of Health approved plan, System Design Perinit mT-2- , dated V- L - yi with an approved design flow of 1-14,10 gallons per day. The materials used were in conformance with those specified on the approved plan; the system was installed in accordance with the provisions of 310 CNIR 15.000, Title 5 and local regulations, and the final grading agrees substantially with the approved plan. All work is accurately represented on the As-built which has been submitted to the Board of Health. Bed inspection date: ill 3199 Q ,,,,, Engineer Representative Final inspection date: 7 f I5��19 'y✓1 s-c,,,., Engi eer Representative Installer: LIC.rr: Date: Zj Design Engineer:,,,, Date: 23/99 I AS-BUILT CHECKLIST v LOT NUMBER, STREET NAME ASSESSORS MAP & PARCEL NUMBER LOT LINES & LOCATION OF DWELLINGS LOCATION & DEMENSIONS OF SYSTEM, INCLUDING RESERVE TIES TO LOT LINES & DWELLING, WELLS 3. FROM SEPTIC TANK b. FROM LEACH AREA y LOCATIONS OF DEEP HOLES & PERC TESTS ELEVATIONS OF D ISPOSAL SYSTEM C/ TOP OF FDN ELEVATION LOCATIONS OF WELLS, DRAINS, WATERCOURSES W/IN 150' OF SYSTEM LOCATION OF WATER,-GAS, ELECTRIC LINES, CABLE DISTANCES FROM CORNERS OF HOUSE TO CENTER OF TANK & D-BOX STAMP & SIGNATURE (/ IlVIPERVIOUS AREAS - DRIVEWAYS, ETC. NORTH ARROW FINAL CONTOURS V LOCATION & ELEVATION OF BEN 1 t CHl ARK USED �/ LOCUS PLAN NORTH 1 LE Town . of over . . -5- No. - o� -C "NrTpo dover, Mass., I OCF / ADRATED C2 BOARD OF HEALTF. E T RMIT Food/Kitchen Septic System q/'7 THIS CERTIFIES THAT...7.A N A W BUILDING INSPECTC R TQ ....:..:...... .................. .................... , Foundation .1"C6_ has permission to erect.............. ......................... buildings on ..�►Q '..�(..... .� W0 bt Rough,40e} 71_lalQ / to be occupied as..S..NB..!�.......�'A NA I. 1.�.!...! C!t A�� *4!1�4 Chimney provided that the person accepting this permit shal in every respect conform to the terms of the application on file in Final this office; and to the provisions of the Codes and By-Laws relating to the. Inspection, Alteration and Construction of Buildings in the Town of North Andover. PL —��sPE c► VIOLATION of the Zoning or Building Regulations Voids this Permit. u7�� rtav 0%A to PERMIT EXPIRES IN. 6 MONTHS UNLESS CONSTRUC TS ELECTRICECT VW BUILDING INSPECTOR Occupancy Permit Required to Occupy Building GAS INSPECTOR 13©q I —� . Rough Display in a Conspicuous Place on the Premises — . Do Not Remove i No Lathing or Dry Wall To Be Done FI E DEPARTMENT' Until Inspected and Approved by the Building Inspector. Burner Street No. - SEE REVERSE SIDE Smoke De Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No.3 BOARD OF HEALTHVkORTH �• O ,�i' re NO - J 19 '0- A �•�'�e,,,,••�scy DISPOSAL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT • SSACHIJS Applicant TELEPHONE NAME /J ADDRESS Site Location o Permission is hereby granted to Construct or Repair ( ) an Individual Soil Absorption Sewage Disposal System as shown on the Design Approval S.S. No. /2— - CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF HEALTH • Fee D.W.C. No. APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DATE: CURRENT INSTALLER'S LICENSE# LOCATION: LOT 9 S 1J,E uznD ,D?l i)C LICENSED INSTALLER: AAy1w0Na T ) jQSF-R Z SIGNATURE: TELEPHONE# 979-774-8/48 CHECK ONE: Ef Pf)6E1.? 978-3/6-5501 REPAIR: NEW CONSTRUCTION: IF NEW CONSTUCTION, PLEASE ATTACH FOUNDATION AS-BUILT. Administrative Use Only $75.00 Fee Attached? Yes ✓ No Foundation As-Built? Yes No Floor Plans? es Le*'� No Approval Date: TOWN OF NOR'T'H ANDOVER/ BOARD OF HEALTH MAY 2 51999 pvcqqo� FORM U - LOT RELEASE FORM �i —1 o(' (-t) f ekv, �ec,� INSTOUC,TIONS: This form is used to verify that all necessary approvals/permits from Boards and Departments having jurisdiction have been obtained. This does not relieve the applicant and/or landowner from compliance with any applicable or requirements. *****************************APPLICA-NT FILLS OUT THIS SECTION******************" APPLICANT �/�� rJ t�'�' PHONE— LOCATION: Assessor's Map Number a PARCEL SUBDIVISION 0-C T-z c" LOT (S) STREET S 'Lf-uJoon ST. NUMBER *****************************************OFFICIAL USE ONLY*********************************** fA EC /C o ti RECOMMENDATIONS OF TOWN AGENTS: CONSERVATION ADMINISTRATOR PATE REJECOTED to ��-' COMMENTS J - J r«d ��f'Cd�w TOWN PLANNER DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED COMMENTS FOOD INSPECTOR-HEALTH DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED /.SEPTIC IN CTOR-HEALTH DATE DATE APPROVED TED / r COMMENTS PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER/WATER CONNECTIONS DRIVEWAY PERMIT FIRE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED BY BUIL-DING INSPECTOR DATE Revised 9197 jm FORM U - LOT RELEASE FORM INSTRUCTIONS: This form is used to verify that all necessary approvals/permits from Boards and Departments having jurisdiction have been obtained. This does not relieve the applicant and/or landowner from compliance with any applicable or requirements. *******A"********T** *********APPLICANT FILLS OUT THIS SECTION************* APPLICANT PHONE_Z26- S-ZrS LOCATION: Assessor's Map,Number PARCEL SUBDIVISION _ tJ('�rzo LOT (S) _ STREET derwoc,6 ST. NUMBER USEONLY******************* RECOMMENDATIONS-OF TOWN AGENTS: CONSER 'AT ON ADMINISTRATOR DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED / COMMENTS l U v'y,P0 c4 TOWN PLAT& R DATE APPROVED Z DATE REJECTED COMMENTS FOOD INSPE,0TOR-HEALTH DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED -SEPT JC INs�.E�ETOR-HEALTH DATE APPROVED . , DATE REJECTED COMMENTS PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER/WATER CONNECTIONS DRIVEWAY PERMIT FIRE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED BY BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE FORM U - LOT RELEASE FORM INSTRUCTIONS: This form is used to verify that all necessary approvals/permits from 1 Boards and Departments having jurisdiction have been obtained. This does not relieve the applicant and/or landowner from compliance with any applicable or requirements. , l / n �1 Ir rl eln n�i►r/�al#** �*��}��.*##..*��.*�. t�rrLlCHfv s FILLS vU 1 M10 ac%.Hurn APPLICANT moi✓, � �, PHONE I n�+A 1 B J.` PA�/�CI L 'C ,TION: Assessor's "V aN Nul �b2r ,- s Ir• SUBDIVISION I �`i�, { ; 1,� — LOT (S) STREET `� ( ;r)��j;% 11,� �; CTN'111"BER 'a I> 1 ** ***mak*********** * * * *O F F IC IAL U v E RECVflI11V1ENDATi0NYS VF I QV 041 Al3ENY 1 S.- CONSERVATION, .- CONSERVATIONADMIN! TRATOR DATE APPROVED /v n ATC OC fC/+TCn DATE L REJEC 1 E COMMENTS uJ n TOWN PLANNER DATE APPROVEDi n A T1- nC IC/ITrn Ln 1 L I�LJLV 1 LV COMMENTS FOOD INSP OR- LTH DATE APPROVED nATC nC It-JLrTCn �. Uft/L RLV 1 LU f P C 1 SPECTOR-HIEALTH DATE APPROVED M ATOC Mel cm DA 1 L REJEC 1 LV COMMENTS PUBLIC WORKS -SEWER/WATER CONNECTIONS nn1I/CI AIA nCnaA1T vlvVr_VVnI r�./vV/I1 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACnC 11 TO BY nl IHLI OIPG Ia1N Rr/+T/11'► nwTC f%L-%0& V 1-U U I /JVI ✓ 1%%J 11\JI`1-V I V fX up%I L. P Town of North Andover HORTh OFFICE OF 3�oy t e o •1�O L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES A 30 School Street North Andover Massachusetts 01845 WILLIAM J. SCOTT 9SSACHUS�� Director April 6, 1998 Mr.Thomas Neve 447 Old Boston Rd. Topsfield, MA 01983 Re: Lot 9 Sherwood Dr. N. Andover, MA 01845 Dear Tom: This is to inform you that the proposed plans for the site referenced above have been approved. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the Board of Health Office at the number below. Sincerely, Sandra Starr, R.S. Health Administrator S S/rel cc: R.L.I. Corporation File BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 THOMAS E. NEVE ASSOCIATES, INC. [U�44[En OIF 4 o n M19MILJ ULM Engineers • Land Surveyors • Land Use Planners 447 Boston Street US #1 TOPSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01983 DATE JOB NO. (508) 887.8586 FAX (508) 887-3480 ATTENTION SAt-tDY 'STAR TO RE: SANDY STARFZ L.ot 9 — 51,QC�.1oad �f i✓e 14Cv MAIiJ STREE']- IJ or t1-% And►oJ c r . M R O VT 45 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via thegollowng items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples. ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTIONC 3 R" zz 9"I 149-9 5A�•31 TAtLy PIS FOSAL S-Y:5TEM low THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS T]EA2 SANpY t�Jfr A1ZE Ina RECEIPT of Yay2 11-7 f 97 1>1SAP FR-o—At,. t..6nTSR Fbrz T NG ABD%/S l26SFSQt0Pc.ED TIME Fot ,-.o0 t.3 fr g a%j 1610 IS J- .*t\,;' Fge,,j MADE To THE P til BAS EM64T Ft002 2AISEt> To 2S. 1.3' 141Crt46iz THAI THE -I00 EA 1Z Ft�ooD >r L,IS�-/A T tom Atjj> A LLGSS L ki I M 0 E DCO S SF-T 15�` of 510ISH &rZADE AS ?ec 310 C.t NZ ISoo21�a���d�aa MS rZ, It be pra✓+dt.d -{p -tkt 0 j2Pr-V"%Q 0.t�-}1.or }1.c ^J t-1>f r a'� bed t'ct,..< it, foac' I� / ...�J' 410►. any s.�eS'�w�S p�ty&p aND Ao-F' h•Si j:gjj 16 COPYTO _89h JAf%V5P 5+�+ccce.1y g�q RECYCLED PAPER: Contents:40%Pre-Consumer-10/Post-Consumer SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. Town of North Andover f NORT1 , OFFICE OF 3?° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 146 Main Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 WILLIAM J.SCOTT 9SSACMUS�� Director January 7, 1997 Thomas Neve Neve Associates 447 Old Boston Road Topsfield, MA 01983 Re: Lot #9 Sherwood Drive Dear Tom: This is to inform you that the proposed plans for the site referenced above have been disapproved for the following reasons: 1. Basement floor is not minimum of 1 foot above base flood elevation. (N.A. 4.17 2. Insufficient leaching. (3 10 CMR 15.002, definition of bedroom - 10 rooms = 5 bedrooms) 3. Need manhole within 6 inches of grade. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the Board of Health Office at the number below. Sincerely, Sandra Starr, R.S., Health Administrator SS/cjp BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST ADDRESS-,4 , '/' J/7-1"- JOL)A ENGINEER I)FI-1c GENERAL 3 COPIES STAMP (/ LOCUS 1"� NORTH ARROW l/ SCALEy CONTOURSPROFILE C---' SECTION L/ BENCHMARK C.----' SOIL & PERCS ELEVATIONS WETS. DISCLAIMER WELLS & WETS WATERSHED?J/ DRIVEWAY Z-' (Elev) WATER LINE- y FDN DRAIN SCH40 b-' TESTS CURRENT?. SOIL EVAL SEPTIC TANK �D MIN 1500G 1� �=MANHOLE�Z P � GARB. GRINDER�(2 comps +200) -2 10 ' TO FDN I� ELEV C,-� GW 1/ ## COMPS. GB D-BOX SIZE ## LINES o�z FIRST 2 ' LEVEL STATEMENT 1 . INLET4o?(• o0 - OUTLET.", UTLET = C� (2" OR . 17 FT) TEE REQ'D?A/_0 LEACHING MIN 440 GPD? V RESERVE AREAL"/41 FROM PRIMARY? �2% SLOPE 100 ' TO WETLANDS ----'100 ' TO WELLSy 4 ' TO S .H.GW �- ( N) 20 ' TO FND & INTRCPTR DRAINS L-"� 400' TO SURFACE H2O SUPP �J 4 ' PERM. SOIL BELOW FACILITY &,-- MIN 12" COVER ILL? �15 ' ) BREAKOUT MET? G/ �y TRENCHES J�5Z) U MIN 440 gpd SLOPE (min .005 or 611/1001 ) �� SIDEWALL DIST. 3X EFF. W OR D (MIN 61 RESERVE BET/WEEN TRENCHES?L--' IN FILL?✓ MUST BE 10 ' MIN. 4" PEA STONE? L- VENT? 5 i!� (>3 ' COVER; LINES >501 ) BOT 466 + SIDE-7-00 X LDNG�2-�- = TOT_444--' 4-1Z) (L x W x #) (DxLx2x#) (G/ft2) �Copyright 0 1996 by S.L. Starr 1�e/W5 4¢v /, -1-i COLER & COLANTONIO Z ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS i September 15, 1995 i95 �1 PLANNING QQAP Ms. Kathleen Colwell Mr. Michael Howard Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Supplemental Engineering Review Jared Place Phase II - Revised Plans Planned Residential Development Dear Ms. Colwell: Coler & Colantonio, Inc. is in receipt of revised plans and calculations from Thomas E. Neve Associates, Inc. (TENA) dated September 1, 1995 and September 5, 1995 respectively. The revisions represent a modification to the original submittal. Specifically, the entrance to the subdivision has been altered and the number of lots has been reduced. The drainage calculations have been revised to incorporate the above modifications and to address some of our concerns in previous correspondence on the project. We reference our previous correspondence of July 18, 1995 and June 16, 1995. This correspondence is intended to address issues in previous correspondence and any issues which may have resulted from the modifications to the plans. Where a comment has been satisfactorily addressed we have so stated. If additional information is required, the comment has not been addressed satisfactorily or a new comment is required we have described our concerns. We offer the following comments: 1. No response required. 2. Satisfactory. 3. No response. 4. We defer to the Planning Board and Conservation Commission with regard to �.t g g J showing the FEMA line on the plans. A properly labeled FEMA line should not 101 Accord Park Drive, Suite One 617-982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Fax: 617-982-5490 confuse future reviewers of the plan. The FEMA flood plain is required to be shown under the Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Wetlands Regulations. 5. The limits used to develop the hydrology study for the project should be acceptable yyen the extent of the downstream wetland system. 6 The length and slope of the storm drain outlet near Pond 3 has been indicated on the plans, however, the inverts have not been indicated. 7. Satisfactory. 8.1 appears that the proposed retaining walls have been removed from the revised plans. In two locations the proposed slope is identified as 1:1. This is not a stable slope. No rip rap revetment or other structural stabilization is proposed for these areas. TENA should address how this slope is to be stabilized and provide a detail of their proposed stabilization method. 9. est pit data has been provided with a legend to identify abbreviations used in the log book. The log book names are not consistent with the identification numbers on the plans, therefore we cannot check specific areas. The logs indicate that most of the soils are pervious sands with gravel, which is consistent with the assumptions used in the model. We recommend test pits be excavated in the proposed retention basins. Without test pit data in the location of the basins, it is not known if the proposed retention basins will be in groundwater or if suitable soils exist to accommodate the � infiltration of runoff into the ground. This information is also required under the _ subdivision regulations. Test pits in the proposed retention basins should be performed by a certified soil evaluator and include information on estimated maximum groundwater elevations in the area. Wetland vegetation adjacent to proposed retention basins exists at the same elevation as proposed for the bottom of the retention basins. Groundwater is usually close to the surface in wetland areas. The Planning Board and Conservation Commission could approve the project subject to soil testing, however, the applicant should be made aware that a filing for a modification to the subdivision plan may be required if soil testing does not concur with the original assumptions. 1 . The proposed retention basins have been modified to include a subdrain trench at the bottom. This should provide a means for water to infiltrate into the surrounding soil and avoid ponding in the basin. This subdrain trench will require some maintenance to assure that it does not become clogged over time. This seems to be a reasonable solution, we recommend that the operation of the facilities be observed over time to evaluate their effectiveness. Q )would The revised basin design is satisfactory from a slope and top width standpoint. We recommend that details of the overflow spillway including stone size, w construction requirements, etc. and dike cross section indicating materials slope treatment and compaction requirements be provided. 12),ccording to TENA, a"V-Notch" weir was used to model outflow from the retention // basin since it gives conservative results, i.e. predicts a higher outflow, over using a V channel or broad crested weir model. We have compared the discharge rates predicted for a V-Notch weir vs. a triangular channel and find that the V-Notch weir has a similar discharge at very low depths (up to 0.3 feet). At depths greater than 0.3 feet, modeling the spillway as a channel would result in greater discharge. We assumed the same configuration as used by TENA with a manning's n of 0.017 and a slope of 0.005 feet per foot for the channel. For this project, the 100-yr. flood elevation in the pond is within the tolerance range for flows through the V-Notch weir for all ponds except Pond 3 which has a 0.4 depth during a 100 year storm. It will be difficult to construct the spillway to the tolerance used in the model, i.e. to a tenth of a degree angle. 13.)We recommend that the outlet inverts into retention basins be lowered to the 10-yr. storm flood elevation. The impact of backwater into the drainage system will be infrequent and insignificant if the invert into the nearest upstream manhole is unchanged from the current design. No support calculations to substantiate the proposed design of the rip rap have been provided. 14. ime of Concentration (Tc) calculations have been revised to reflect a maximum sheet flow length of 100 feet. We still have concerns with some of the assumptions used to develop Tc values. The previous calculation package indicated that the majority of the woods were considered "light woods" from a Soil Conservation Service (SCS) perspective. In the revised calculations, most wooded areas are identified. as "dense woods." This may reduce the predevelopment and post development Tc values somewhat. We do not anticipate a significant impact to the model, however, this should be considered in future submissions. SCS personnel have informed me that dense woods is not typical in New England. In the proposed case flow along the edge of roadways has been identified a shallow concentrated flow in an unpaved section. In addition, some of the flow paths are shown adjacent to driveways although the grading indicates the slope pitching into the driveway. In both cases using a paved surface in the Tc calculations will result in a shorter Tc and a higher peak rate of flow. We have discussed typical construction standards used for subdivision roadways with the DPW and have reviewed the subdivision regulations with respect to the typical cross section required and disagree with the assumption. According to the DPW, flow occurs along the pavement in the majority of roadways built in conformance with the regulations and in fact the gravel section becomes planted with grass. The subdivision regulations require that the section between the right of way and the pavement pitch to the pavement. For these reasons we recommend that flow paths in these locations should be considered paved. This may not have a significant impact on the design where flow discharges to a retention basin, however, it should be evaluated. In addition to the areas described above, we disagree with the Tc values for proposed subareas 3, 20 and 23. Subareas 3 and 23 should have shorter Tc based on a comparison of predevelopment subarea 1 Tc and the flow paths used. Subarea 20 the flow paths are inconsistent with the proposed grades. The limits of subarea 4 and resultant Tc is not consistent with the grades on the plans. 15. TENA has provided an average of the Tc values for the majority of the subareas. This is beyond the requirements of our comment. Our concerns were specific to the long narrow subareas at the edges of the upland peninsular. TENA should consider this in future projects. 16. Drywells have been eliminated from the proposed design. 17.We would be satisfied with easements being added to the plans at the final stage of the project. We recommend that no permanent structures, i.e. buildings, pools etc. be installed in easements and that easements be located as discussed in our letter of June 16, 1995 18.Wastewater disposal systems have been removed from the power line easement. 19. This project proposes an increase in the runoff rate from the site for most storm events. Adjusting the Tc values as discussed above may further increase the peak rate of runoff from the site. The regulations require no increase in runoff rate from the site after development. We acknowledge that there are significant wetlands surrounding the site. Historic flooding data, if available, should be reviewed to determine if flooding occurs downstream of the site which may be exacerbated by the proposed project. 20. The storm drain pipes in reaches 13 and 20 would be surcharged in a 100 year storm event. Since this would be an infrequent condition, we do not anticipate any problems with the above storm drains. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER& COLANTONIO, INC. C John C. Chessia, P.E. xc Thomas E. Neve Associates ,, NE ASS0CLATLES�,,1NC@ June 22, 1995 7n JUN 2 6 1995 Mr. John Chessia Coler &Colantonio PLANNING BOAR 101 Accord Park Drive Suite One Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Re: Engineering Review Jerad Place Phase IV - Planned Residential Development Dear Mr. Chessia: We are in receipt of your report dated June 16, 1995, and have the following comments or additional information to offer in hopes to receive your positive recommendation as to the drainage design of this subdivision. The numbering format of your report has been reproduced for ease of reference. 1. Narrative in form, needs no response. 2. Any reference to Lot 29 will be removed from the interior contents of the plans. Lot 28 is the highest lot number being created. 3. Narrative in form, needs no response. 4. We have analyzed the FEMA flood zone in the proximity of this subdivision. We have "digitized" the FEMA line and have superimposed same on our drawings. As you know, the line is a line estimated and is without detailed study. The digitized line resembles the toe of slope of the peninsula being developed as the PRD Subdivision. Our design clearly shows that alterations will not occur near any flood plain or BVW line. Putting the FEMA line on our drawings will only confuse anybody who reviews the plans in the future. This issue was discussed with the Conservation Commission and they seemed to be comfortable from our plans that no alteration of BLSF would occur. The FEMA line has been added to the Key Map on the Title Sheet. No work for the PRD portion of this subdivision shall take place within the FEMA 100 year flood plain. • ENGINEERS • • LAND SURVEYORS • • LAND USE PLANNERS • 447 Old Boston Road U.S. Route #1 Topsfield, MA 01983 (508) 887-8586 FAX (508) 887-3480 +� John Chessia Page 2 June 22, 1995 5. We have selected to use the wetland and property line boundaries as our design points. The wetland and beyond to the streams which conduct wetland flow to downstream properties are outside the scope necessary to determine this subdivision drainage impacts. Since it has been determined and agreed that wetland resource areas will be altered, including BLSF, selecting the BVW line and property lines in some instances, as the design points is appropriate. We see no need to expand this study beyond the limits if the purpose has been achieved. — 6. Information regarding the existing storm drain on Boxford Street, near Pond #3 is attached. This information has been added to the Definitive Subdivision Plans. 0Alternatives as to the design of the roadway sideslopes in the vicinity of wetland flags A82 and A86 have been requested by the Conservation Commission. The final treatment of this sideslope shall be settled through our negotiations with the Planning Board and Conservation Commission. The roadway will not be moved. Shoulders may be reduced and retainment structures may be built in order to increase the separation from the toe of any new slope to the existing BVW edge. 8. We have added a stone retaining wall detail to the subdivision plan (find attached a copy of the wall detail). This design shall be employed as required in order to meet the grading requirements of Lots 17, 18 & 19. 9. Find attached copies of our field books which indicate the soil excavations which were done on the site. We have included a representative sample of logs which have been verified by our soil scientist and soil evaluator as being equal to the SCS soil types shown on our plan. No test pits were dug in any proposed retention ponds, however, a bottom of pond elevation has been selected which in our opinion will be approximately 2 feet above the seasonal high water table. Excavations can be made in the spring of 1996 and the top of pond elevations can be raised if necessary in order to .provide the cumulative storage of our design (I do not expect this to be necessary, however). 10. Retention ponds shall be loamed and hydroseeded typical of any other altered areas within the subdivision. I do not recommend installing any structure below the bottom of the ponds since I want to maintain a filter medium between the bottom of the pond and the seasonal high water table to control water quality. 11. We have constructed ponds of this type in several subdivisions over the past few years. We would be happy to show you some. The berms are typically built with parent material with the use of a large excavator. An experienced backhoe operator can easily shape the sideslopes and top of berm with the use of the flat portion of the bucket. The stability is excellent and the quality of the work meets or exceeds our design. Some hard work is required in order to establish a top of pond elevation. The ponds are then hydroseeded and maintained until a stable turf is established. The ponds are designed ,r. John Chessia Page 3 June 22, 1995 with rip-rap spillways which will require no maintenance. Piping leading to these ponds can be easily cleaned from a manhole being provided upstream of these locations. 12. The V-Notch weir used in our hydrologic model is not a thin plate structure. We have created cross-sections at each restriction in the surface ground contour and have mathematically calculated, using statistics, the intersection of two "best fit" lines to determine the notch angle. Many of our designs of the past have employed these techniques and it has proven to be a reliable method. We see no need to install a thin metal plate in the ground at these locations. We do not agree that the outlets should be modeled as a broadcrested weir. 13. Lowering any inlet culvert would create a submerged condition which would create backwater into the designed drainage system. The peak velocity at the most aggressive outlet is 7 FPS. This velocity can easily be controlled as to not create erosion of the sideslopes of the pond. Rip-rap (heavy 12-24" diameter with smaller stones as grout) shall be used from the inlet of all ponds to the bottom of all ponds. 14. We have checked our flow paths and find that the selection of flow length is appropriate. It is our opinion that sheet flow will exist throughout the subcatchment and shallow concentrated flow characteristics will not occur. We are not inclined to change our design. 15. We had discussed this issue in the last subdivision that we designed and you had reviewed. It is clear from TR55 that the selection of the flow path that generates the longest time of concentration is appropriate in this case and that is what was used. 16. The dry wells have been added to the design plans. Find attached a detail of the dry well being selected in order to control roof runoff on Lots 2, 14, 15, 16 & 17. We are confident that these dry wells will mitigate roof runoff as design. 17. All easements are added to the subdivision plans prior to endorsement, this has been our policy for 18 years. This prevents changes to the easements as designs are being reviewed and sometimes revised. Easements are provided for maintenance purposes. _I_t is our o inion that the drain line can be maintained and replaced if required even though the dwelling is proposed within the easement area. (18) Our lawyers have indicated to us that as long as the grant of easement to NEPCO is not interfered with then the land, owned by the developer, can be used for My purpose which does not interfere with said grant. We have several situations where sanitary disposal systems ave een uilt under power line easements in the Town of North Andover. These systems are underground and do not interfere with NEPCO's rights under their easement. John Chessia Page 4 .rune 22, 1995 I trust that these responses satisfy your concerns. The Planning Board is meeting on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, and I would appreciate your final response to this matter. Very truly yours, THOMAS,E:INEVE ASSOCIATES, INC. r Thomas E. Neve, PE, PLS President, CEO TEN/km cc: North Andover Planning Board North Andover Conservation Commission #1449 COLERMPS r , r 1E:%95 16: 12 COLEN. 'OLANTnJ,JIC1 Y 5086622996 NO. 564 IP02 COLOR �rJ�lh•JF��G^.nlu �r;':�Fi'J-I'i�Y� ' �1 191995 June 16, 1995 �_.R1�N1NG BOAR Ms, Kathleen Caldwell Planning Director 1.20 Main Street North Andover, MA 01134.5 RE: Engineering Review Jared Place Phase lI Planned Residential Development Dear Ms. Caldwell: Coler& Colantonio, Inc. has visited the above site and reviewed the submittal package as described in our proposal of April 12, 1994. Our review has been limited to drainage design and associated issues. We also compared the design assumptions and calculations with standard practices outlined in SCS runoff calculation documents and other standard engineering references. We have previously prepared a memorandum on the project which addressed our initial brief review of the project. This correspondence is our complete review of material submitted to date and includes our comments on the submittal package. The submittal package included the following h forniation: Plans Entitled: • "Planned Residential Development Modification of a Definitive Subdivision Plan of Lot 29 -Jared Place Phase II"Sheets I through 10 dated 3/31/95 Desigaed for Robert J. Janusz, Prepared by Thomas E,Neve Associates Inc. • "Pre-Development Hydrology' 2 Sheets • `Post-Development Hydrology" ) Sheets Also included was a report entitled "Hydrologic Analysis of A Planned Residential Development Modification of a Definitive Subdivision Plan o Loot 29 - Jared Place Phase II" dated March 31, 1995 We offer the li)llowing corrinlel7ts: 1E: 12 COLEE=- -_�OLHNTONIO NO. 564 903 The site is located on the easterly side of on the south side oi'Boxford Road. A stream tributary to Fish Brook flows from the westerly side of the property,around the south side of the parcel. Additional wetland areas are located on the easterly side of the property. NEPCQ wwns an easement, currently used for electrical transmission lines, �vhicb pins in a north-south direction through the site. A portion of the site has been mined for gravel. The site currently consists of wetland areas, wooded areas, and the remains of file open pit gravel mining operation. Twenty seven house lots are indicated on the plans. It is our understanding that one additional lot would be developed on Sugarcane Lane, an abutting developed road west of.'the site. The total land area of the parcelis reported to be 96.02 acres of which 50.68 are included in the Planned.Residential Development Subdivision. Lot numbering is inconsistent on the plans. The cover sheet indicates 28 numbered lots, one Open Space Parcel, Parcel A and Parcel B. The"Survey - Lotting" plans indicate a Lot 29. Since the"Survey - Lotting"plans do not encompass the entire site it is not clear if this is a.typo or if another lot is proposed. 03. The Planning Board and the Applicant may wish to consider shortening the length of the Cut De Sac. it appears that the Cul De Sac could be shortened without impacting the number of developable lots. This would reduce construction cost to the Applicant and maintenance cost to the Town. -�j 4. Portions of the site appear to be located in a FEMA flood zone. The FEMA Zone A limit_ are not indicated on, the plans. The FEMA flood zone-is indicates! on FIRM maps graphically, however, no flood elevation has been determined in the area by FEMA. ,, No information has been provided regarding the existing stream which forms part of the property lane of the site. The limits of the hydro ..gy study were outside of the stream. The drainage subareas developed for the Report extend to the property line or wetland limits. This method of defining subareas is not typically reconunended by the SCS to develop hydrologic reports. Typically, subareas are identified which are tributary to a control point such as a stream or culvert, if one exists. This allows the designer to assess flooding impacts in the vicinity of the development. We note that analysis of runoff to the edge of a wetland is frequently requested by Conservation Commissions to assess the impact of site development to the wetland itself. We recommend that the Engineer provide descriptive information including: estimated stream flow, area tributary to the stream, etc, sufficient to demonstrate that a study inclusive of the stream should not be required as part of this project. C() No information has been provided on the existing storm drain outlet near Pond 3. Jit ,16 . 5 16: 13 COLE* C.OLANTON I O 50:36822996 1-10. 564 904 7. It wrill be difficult to construct the roadway in the,vicinity of wetland flags A82 and A86 without altering;the wetland. The proposed slope is indicated to be IS horizontal to 1' vertical. This is not an acceptable slope without rip rap stabilization. No stabilization has been proposed. The Applicant should consider adjusting the roadway to the west in this area to provide room for grading. 8. Three retaining walls are indicated on the plans. One of the retaining walls is eight feet high and another is ten feet high, exposed face height. No details have been provided to indicate the construction of these walls. We recommend that details, stamped by a professional engineer, be provided for retaining walls. Walls over six feet in height should be given particular attention.. 9. No test pit data has been provided with the "Hydrologic Analysis" (Report). This in-formation is useful to compare field information with Soil Conservation Service (SCS)mapping of the area. In addition,test pits should be excavated in the proposed retention basins, without test pit data it is not known if the proposed retention basins will be in groundwater or if suitable soils exist to accommodate the infiltration of rtmoff into the ground. This information is also required wider the subdivision regulations. Test pits in the proposed retention basins should be performed by a certified soil evaluator and include information on estimated maximum groundwater elevations in the area. We recommend this information be provide prior to approval since the retention basin design is a significant aspect of the proposed plan. 10. A detail of the surface treatment of the retention basins should be provided. We are concerned that the retention basins may not drain properly between storm events depending upon the treatment proposed in the base. We recommend providing a low spot with a drop inlet leaching pit to provide positive recharge into the ground. 11, No details have been provided for construction of the dike for the retention basins. It appears that the top of the dike is less than two feet wide in some locations. This is insufficient for the top width from both a stability and construction quality standpoint. Hand operations would be required to properly compact a strip of this width. Hand operations would be complicated since the narrow width and steep side slopes would tend to make control of compaction equipment difficult. In addition, access for equipment to the inlet and outlet should be provided. We recommend a width of 10 feet be provided for access to the spillway and inlets. A narrower width of six feet could be provided in areas not proposed for access. 1.2. The hydrologic model uses a"V-Notch"weir as the outlet for both existing ponding areas and for proposed retention basins. No details of the "V-Notch" weirs have been pro,,.dd.ed in the plans. A "V-Notch" weir is a thin plate structure. The plans and site walk did not indicate this structure at the existing ponding areas. The outlets should be modeled as a broad crested weir which will change the outflow. 16: 14 COLEk `nLAhIT_�hJIO � 50868-,-,99G. NO. 564D05 13. The plans indicate that the storm drain outlet inverts into retention basins are located near the top of the basins. The basins have a 2;1 slope dawn from the outlet into the basin. The retention basins should be normally dry prior to a storm event to provide the storage necessary to mitigate runoff impacts. Our experience with this type ol" design is that erosion at the outlets will be a problem. We recommend that the outlet inverts be lowered and that the rip-rap erosion protection be sized to accommodate the flow frons the outlet. Support calculations to substantiate the design should be provided, 14. Time of Concentration(Tc)calculations indicate sheet flow lengths of up to 300 feet in several instances. We have discussed this issue with SCS personnel and the SCS has issued a guidance which states that sheet flow is typically in the range of 50 to 100 feet except in rare cases. It does not appear from the contours and surface types indicated on the glans that a sheet flow length of 300 feet is appropriate in this case, 15. Some of the subareas are narrow, 50 to 100 feet wide, and several hundred feet long. Runoff from these subareas flows overland to the wetlands across the entire edge of the subarea. To assess the impact of this flow pre and post construction we recommend investigating several flow paths for the time of concentration and using a reasonable average Tc. 16. The report identifies mitigation to be provided for lots 2, 14, 15, 16 and 17 via on- site drywells. 'these dry wells would reportedly capture roof runoff for recharge into the ground. Neither the plans nor the report indicate any information on proposed drywells. The calculations did not account for the area of the houses for the lots listed above under proposed conditions as discussed in the report since recharge via drywell is proposed, however, no calculations of the capacity of the drywells or details of their construction has been provided. It is difficult for the Town to be assured that this type of system will remain functional. The future homeowner could abandon, the system if it becomes plugged with no recourse available to the Town. 17. No easements have been indicated on the plans for proposed drainage facilities. Easements encompassing the limits of grading associated with retention basin construction should be provided and a 20 foot wide easement centered on drainage pipes should also be provided. Note that the proposed house on Lot 19 is within three feet of the proposed storm drain. This is not acceptable from a maintenance standpoint. The house should be outside the required easement area. Existing low areas utilized for storage should also be encompassed by easements so that future owners do not fill the area and limit the storage capacity of the natural depressions. • 16/95 16: 15 COLEk-V:G iJL dTL�hIIC! ,� _— NCS. 564 D06 18.Wastewater leaching areas for Lets 12 and 13 are in the New England Power Company (NEPCO) Easement, The Applicant should provide written documentation from NEPCO that this is acceptable. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the P1aiu)ing Board on this project and Hope that this information is sufficient for your 2leeds. It is anticipated that some of the issues raised in this correspondence may be addressed by the Applicant providing copies of support.data used in the development of the calculations. We would be pleased to meet with the Board or the design engineer to discuss this project at your convenience. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER& COLANTONIO,INC. John C. Chessia, P.E. r IG,. 95 1 i:20 C iLER JLHNTON 10 50815822996 NO. 421 IP02 MEMORANDUM Date: 199505 16 To: Kathleen Caldwell. Planning Director From: Coler & Colantonio John C. Chessia Subject: Jared Place Residential Development As we discussed, I am forwarding our preliminary findings on the above referenced site. At this time our review of the project has not been completed and additional comments will be included in our formal review correspondence. This memorandum is intended to assist you in discussions at the Planning Board hearing scheduled for this evening. Comments: 1. Portions of the site appear to be located in a FEMA flood zone. The FEMA Zone A limits are not indicated on the plans. The FEMA flood zone is indicated on FIRM maps graphically, however, no flood elevation has been determined in the area by FEMA. 2. No test pit data has been provided with the "Hydrologic Analysis" (Report). This information is useful to compare field information with Soil Conservation Service (SCS) mapping of the area. In addition, test pits should be excavated in the proposed retention basins. Without test pit data it is not low if proposed retention basins will be in groundwater or if suitable soils exist to accommodate the infiltration of runoff into the ground. 3. No information on infiltration capacity of the basins has been presented in the report, therefore, it is not clear that they will function properly. 4. Time of Concentration (Tc) calculations indicate street flow lengths of up to 300 feet in several instances. We have discussed this issue with SCS personnel and the SCS has issued a guidance which. states that sheet flow is typically in the range of 50 to 100 feet except in rare cases. It docs not appear from the contours and surface types indicated on the plans that a sheet flow length of 300 feet is appropriate: in this case. "-CILEF - -RAT H Iii 5086322996 NO. 421 P03 r.,1.. g 4 S. The hydrologic; model uses a "V-Notch" weir as the outlet for both existing ponding areas and for proposed retention. basins. No details of the "V-Notch." weirs have been provided in the plans. A "V-Notch" weir is a thin. plate structure, The plans do not indicate this structure at the existing ponding areas. It. is more likely that the outlets should be modeled as a broad crested. weir. This will be determined during our site walk, to be scheduled. 6. The drainage subareas developed for the Report extend to the property line or wetland limits, This method of defining subareas is not typically reconunended by the SCS to develop hydrologic reports, Typically, subareas are identified which are tributary to a control point such as a stream or culvert, if one exists. This allows the designer to assess flooding impacts in the vicinity of the development. We note that analysis of runoff to the edge of a wetland is frequently requested by Conservation Commissions to assess the impact of site development to the wetland itself. Field inspection of the site and discussion with the Commission niay clarify where the limits of subareas should be in this case. 7. Some of the subareas are narrow, 50 to 100 feet wide, and several hundred feet long, Runoff from these subareas flows overland to the wetlands across the entire edge of the subarea. To assess the impact of this flow pre and post construction we reconunend investigating several flow paths for the time of concentration and using a reasonable average Tc, 8. No details have been provided for construct'ioti of the dike for the retention basins. It appears that the top of the dike is less than two feet wide in some locations. This is insufficient for top width from both a stability and construction quality standpoint. Ilam operations would be required to properly compact a strip of this width. bland operations would be complicated since the narrow width and steep side slopes would tend to make control of compaction equipment difficult. In addition, access for equipment to the inlet and outlet should be provided. 9. A slope of 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical is proposed adjacent to wetlands. This is not a stable slope without rip rap protection. No rip rap is indicated on the plan. J.O. Leaching areas for hots 12 and 13 are in the ;New England Power Company (NEPCO) Easement. The Applicant should provide documentation from NEPCQ that this is acceptable. DelleChiaie, Pamela From: DelleChiaie, Pamela Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 10:41 AM To: Starr, Sandy Cc: Lagrasse, Brian Subject: 116 Sherwood Drive Importance: High Note: File is in your inbox with a copy of this e-mail Sandy, At 9:50 a.m.today, I received a call from Jane Armstrong of 116 Sherwood Drive. She bought this property in 1999. The septic was ceritified by the BOH on 9/27/99. Last year, she received a plot plan from the Assessor's office, and they told her that she could not have a septic system on an easement. The easement is part of NEPTO (New England Power Supply Co.). NEPTO told Ms.Armstrong that they would grant her a variance if she paid them $500. Ms. Armstrong's question is this: If she goes to sell her house, or needs an upgrade or work done on her septic, etc., is she going to run into any problems? She does not know what the correct answer is, as she has a COC from the BOH, yet the Assessor's office told her she could not have the septic on an easement. Please call Ms.Armstrong at: 978-686-2289 to follow-up on her questions. Thank you. Pamela DelleChiaie, Health Dept. Assistant Town of North Andover Community Development& Services 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 pdellechiaie@townofnorthandover.com Tel. 978-688-9540 Fax 978-688-9542 For No.2 Town of North Andover, Massachusetts NpRTM BOARD OF HEALTH 9 ^�^ '�1 .... 3?''A. �•pot • H A . DESIGN APPROVAL FOR • � "�'�`•'# ;'S•�•� �� SOIL ABSORPTION SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SACHUSE ' Test No. Applicant �-a-z�-- Site Location Reference Plans and Specs. ENGINEER DESIGN DATE ' Permission is granted for an individual soil absorption sewage disposal system to be installed in accordance with regulations of Board of Health.. CHAIRMAN,BOARD OF HEALTH �` �� a- ' w / Site System Permit No. Fee SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTALS LOCATION: NEW PLANS: YES $60.00/Plan REVISED PLANS: YES $25.00/Plan DATE: Q- �- DESIGN ENGINEER: �; v-�Mimol { Cy When the submission is all in place, route to the Health�Secretary J SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTALS LOCATION: �-�-- NEW PLANS: YES $60.00/Plan REVISED PLANS. YES $25.00/Plan DATE: a- 3 �� ---. DESIGN ENGINEER: When the the submission is all in place, route to the Health Secretary ! Z FOR-NI 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 1 of 14 No. I�-`� - c-:1 Date: 6 ice Commonwealth of !Massachusetts tilc�rzTH A►�°��Mas�s�c#iu`s""efts Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal Performed By: . ���•1C�', Date: . . ................. ...................... ........ . .. Witnessed By: .............. ......... ......................... oW�:�.�. -nM$EQ,I-P��p g�.11�.-pE(LS, 1►JG . E Lorsuoo Adgd�cs at `, s Aadtni. -�o ��' Qa,zss-r ex>Ge- e:CA� 11{ Tele�twrc! okglo yew Constructicn ,Repair r (5 08� q'l5 - 8� ►S Office Review. Published Soil Survey Available: No ❑ Yes �.... Publication Scale �"- . Soil Mao Unit Year Published E�c�55►.fEe+�{ Drainage Class DeAu-lG�ep•............ Soil Limitations .. Surficial Geologic Report Available: No X Yes ❑ Year Published Publication Scale GeologicMaterial (Map Unit) ............................................................................................................................... ............ ._ .... .............._..... - Landform Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No []Yes Within 500 year flood boundary No 0Yes ❑ Within 100 year flood boundary No ZYes ❑ 1 Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) .............................. ................................................ . Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (moo unit) ................. Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal ❑Normal KBelc •r Normal Other References Reviewed: DEP APPROVED FORD!•12107195 r FOR 111 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 2of16f Location address o Lot i io. �14-k�IG-u3ao� On-site Review Deep Hole Number Date:. i�.l.°a�9`7 Time: P• Weather �2 Location (identify on site plan) 'jam Land Use Slope M lS-2.� Surface Stones Vecetation Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) Distances from: Open Water Body 4�* IZs�feet Drainage way tJ/A feet Possible Wet Area 125± feet Property Line SO feet (VC-°'v1 Drinking Water Well 14/A feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE =0G' Oepth from I Soil Horizon ` Soil Texture Soil Color I Soil Other Surface (Inches) I (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones, Boulders. Consistency, % Gravel) f (ms� r3I C24 4g k; I I i MINIMUM n Lc6 mtUUIHtu A i EVERY PROPOSEDAL AREA Parent Material (geologic) OeprMoSedrock: 1—zyv- do A Oeoth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: —tip Weeping from Pit Face: ►-r m-� u Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: DEP APPROVED F0101- 12101195 i FORM 11 - SOIL LVALUATOR FOR.Nj Page 3 of $4. Location ,-address Determination .for Seasonal High Water Table Method Used: Depth observed standing in observation hole.... . inches Q Depth weeping from side of observation hole ........ . inches ❑ Depth to soil mottles inches Q Ground water adjustment .................. feet Index Well Number ................. Reading Date ........... ..... Index well level . . . . .. Adjustment factor ................. Adjusted ground water level ..... . ................ ......... ........ Deoth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist ingl�-l�areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on ll 19 Li (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and thatthe above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signatura�uua� . Date /2 & /co DEP APPROVED FORM. 12107/95 r � FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 4 of J4 No. � `� - Date: 12 - Y'o Commonwealth of !Massachusetts tsDeI14 PPA Massachusetts Soil Suitability Assessment,for On-site Sewage Dis QSal Performed By: . .S"r �"� , . ............................. Witnessed By: oWrcr:���.�C"ilMB�b2L.�*-� $t✓1tL.�p62S 1...� L=uoo Asara:or Teams, rciM Taipot �4 0 LlewConsr-r.ucricn �,lb lIE ;lReoair ❑ (SUPS 41S -- 8115 Office Review, �-� Published Soil Survey Available: No ❑ Yes >?Si Year Published ��-Ss'?�...... Publication Scale SoilMao Unit �... .-.. El�SS�vGa.T Soil Limitations �a��!'GY[-��........�...`�--cam-. .................................................. E Drainage Class peA%" P........... - Suriicial Geologic Report Available: No 9 Yes ❑ Year Published Publication Scale Geologic Material (Map Unit) Landform ................................................................................................................... . ............._.....—._. .�..-`�.................................................... Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No []Yes Within 500 year flood boundary No Yes ❑ Within 100 year flood boundary No Yes ❑ 1 Wetland Area: National Wetiand Inventory Map (map unit) .............................. Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) .. ..................................................................... Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal QNormal )KBelc,N Normal ❑ Other References Reviewed: DFP APPROVED FORM• 12107/95 r FORNI 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 5 of 3+ Location .address On-site Review Deep Hole Number Date:. �Ig l� Time: PM Weather Location (identify on site plan) 4j¢�� Land UseSlope (°'o) 151"25; Surface Stones V ecetatio n. . Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) ��C� � �►t�R�-`� �ls�S(�t— �>4�� ' Distances from: Open Water Body 1�55r—t feet Drainage way N A feet Possible Wet Area �\5} feet Property Line 4ee— feet (Pgzp,rv� e' L-t -) Drinking Water Well V.-A feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE ' OG* -Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface (Inches) I (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure, Stones. Boulders, Consistency, % Gravei) kk MINIMUM OF i L M Ltd rtt Fjjh"cn A, cvEhY PRUFOSEDAl-AREA Parent Material (geologic) (Q'U-TL- ` L4 DepthtoSedrock: Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: Z Weeping from Pit Face: 4 Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: DEP APPROVED FORM-1.107/95 FORM 11 - SOIL LV ALUATOR FORM Paae 6 of 1,+ Location Address o Lot __a._ Determination for Seasonal High Water Table Method Used: Depth observed standing in observation hole . inches ❑ Depth weeping from side of observation hole ...... . inches ❑ Depth to soil mottles inches ❑ Ground water adjustment .................. feet Index Weil Number ................. Reading Date .......... .... Index well level .... Adjustment factor ................. Adjusted ground water level ........... ...................... ........ Deoth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in �a�l'�reas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? ``tt If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on 1119 (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signatur, at DEP APPROVED FOR.Nt• 12/07/95 �• �•� alp utr fyUkiHMAST REGICNrL P.02 r + FORM 12 -PERCOLATION TEST o-F Ig- Location Address. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS { . � -1 ~ v , Massachusetts Percolation Test' Date: � 'oO Time: PITA Observation Hole M �--7 - 9 Depth of Perc ` (_Qp Lt Start Pre-soak 1 End Pre-soak WwLx2 tftT VV 9 Time at 12" y I I Time at 9" Time at 6" Time Rate Min./Inch 2- Minimum Minimum of 1 percolation test must be performed in both the primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed Site Failed ❑ Performed By: Witnessed By:'. -"2P0-5'Y2YAA' Comments: _.._.. _ att XPMOvm roam-wm/" FOR�,1 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORNI Paged of 3 4- D a t e: Date: 12(Q Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Soil Suitability Assessment ,for On-site Sewage Disposal Performed By: . �• b� � Date: ............. ....................... . . Witnessed By: .. ....G 'P........ l�cauon Addtaa or [lewConstrruccion % )2� Repair ❑ (5bP,) 4-1r, ►5 Office Review, Published Soil Survey Available: No ❑ Yes L ( l Published ����v�...... Publication Scale `......��'� Soil ylap nit Year P e Class Draina� AZA Soil Limitations .. E :....�.S. J . ........................................._...._ Surficial Geologic Report Available: No 2 Yes ❑ Year Published :.::..:::.,-.. Publication Scale Geologic Material (Map Unit) ............._- - Landforrn .................................................................................................................................................... .............._....._._. Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No [-]Yes Within 500 year flood boundary No Yes ❑ Within 100 year flood boundary No 0'Yes ❑ Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) ............................... ......................................................................- Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) ................. .............................................................................. Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal ❑Normal %Be!avNormal ❑ Other References Reviewed: DEP APPROVED FORM-12107195 FORA-1 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 9 of Location .address o On-site Review Deep Hole Number t34Z . Date:. ..����95 Time: 14v"A WeatherL Location (identify on site plan) Land Use V.C-5pkp5a-',<�PI'4— Slope (%) Irj-Z.7 Surface Stones Vecetation Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) G Distances from: Open Water Body \C2D'r feet Drainage way N A feet Possible Wet Area tcjO'�' feet Property Line feet (voN� 'Q-V Lam, Drinking Water Well t-% Pc feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG~ Depth from Soil Horizon ` Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surrace (Incnes) I I (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure.Stones.BoauVedl,rs, Consistency, -71 C- MINIMUM OF 2 ri Lc3 riE .777ERY PROPOSCOAL AREA Parent Material (geologic) ckj tom"" J4 OepthtoBedrock: oeoth to Groundwater Standing Water in the Hole: VU V Weeping from Pit Face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: ��`► U DEP APPROVED FORM- 12107/95 FORA 11 - SOIL LVALI:ATOR FORM Page 0 of Location ,address Determination efor ,Seasonal High Water Table Method Used: ❑ Depth observed standing in observation hole........... inches ❑ Depth weeping from side of observation hole ........ . inches Depth to soil mottles ..C& inches ❑ Ground water adjustment .................. feet Index Weil Number ................. Reading Date ........... .... Index well level ...... .. Adjustment factor .................. Adjusted ground water level ............................... .... .......... Deoth of Naturally Occurrina Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? `{ if not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signature 1 Date /ZLZq(' DEP APPROVED FOP-%t- IJ07t95 L� ;M MA.( =.3e rb1= Utr' NUkIr'•tA5T REGICN-L P.02 FORM 12 -PERCOLATION TEST PQ�e t I o f 14 Location Address of:Lot No. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Percolation Test' Date: g loc> Time: /l Observation Hole » 5,Z2 Depth of Perc ` U u 1 Start Pre-soak 2 End Pre-soak Time at: 12" Time at 9" Time at 6" Time (9"-6") 1 Rate Min./Inch Z ` Minimum of 1 percolation test must be performed in both the primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed Site Failed ❑ Performed By: ��> > 101I�h Witnessed By Comments: pQ APMOvm MAM•tvvrlf! FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 12af J+ Date: 12 (p Commonwealth of Massachusetts V4MTH h-Arz0utTZ,y Massachusetts S0 Z Suitability Assessment,dor On-site Sewage Disposal Performed By: . ��'C -�. J..'.....fl.- e ... . .. ........ Dace: Pc+�D'2A ... _�'C1 �L—...................................... Witnessed By: .. .... ............ tewConstruccion r AddfCSf.Ind _I✓ �' `/i�r' �J M. J ��.�,�/'� XeQair ❑ (�0� 4-1s— g1�5 Office Review Published Soil Survey Available: No ❑ Yes l —5 ��J� Soil Ma nit N�"� 011...... ---S Year Published � �..... Publication Scale ...... P .�SSt�Et-� Soil Limitations `� u2.E.....�... C, ......................................... _....... Drainage Class y�At►- .� Surficial Geologic Report Available: No\ Yes ❑ Year Published Publication Scale GeologicMaterial (Map Unit) ....................................................................................................................---.......__. ............._..._ Landform .................................... .............._... -- Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No ❑Yes Within 500 year flood boundary No KYes ❑ Within 100 year flood boundary No Eyes ❑ l i Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) ........................................................... ........................................ Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) .. Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal ❑Normal %Below Normal Other References Reviewed: DEP APPROVED FORM•12107/95 r FOR 111 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM I: Pagel3 of 34- Location 4Location .address Lot ,vo. � St '���• On-site Review Deep Hole Number Date:.4. 11 c)�95 Time: P�'A Weather Location (identify on site plan) :. 1-Cpr4-f Pus,.PO-"P� ?c.� Land Use Slope M 15-75 Surface Stones Vegetation 1AlCuY260. Landform �G Lj6(L- Position on landscape (sketch on the back) Distances from: Open Water Body ('qot- feet Drainage way �IN feet 11 Possible Wer Area tAo' feet Property Line L015 feet (VIAT&k Or Drinking Water Well ',IA feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE =0G' Ceoth from. Soil Horizon fI Soil Texture Sod Color Soil Other Surface(Inches) I I (USOA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % Gravel) f co ; 2211- lob, L S l0`tx� \!62-< C�2P�v Et.v-f s►�c,L� i GT(ro�n.,v�.�-ctYc�, 9O►( MINIMUM OF i l M LaS n i cvbriy PROPOSEL) L Parent Material (geologic) cwIAJr-611,-} OepthtoSedrock: CY✓�� u Oeoth to Groundwater Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from Pit Face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: DEP APPROVED FOIW-12107195 FORM 11 - SOIL LVALUATOR FORM Page N of �4 Location ,-address o �tN D Pak V' Determination for Seasonal High Water Table Method Used: Q Depth observed standing in observation hole .......... .. inches Q Depth weepino from side of observation hole ........ . inches Depth to soil mottles in ❑ Ground water adjustment .................. feet Index Well Number ................. Reading Date ........... .... Index well level ..... . . . Adjustment factor ................. Adjusted ground water level ....... .. .............. _....... ......... Deoth of Naturallv Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exisin��areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system. If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on ! I ��� (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination j approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signat re DatelZAN, DEP UPROVED FORM-12107/95 eP BOC Form A-MB&9/1/33 7 7 WE, Francis B,. Kittredge and Mazy -P9 Kittredge husband and wife, both A -..........................I............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................................ ........................................................................................................................... ................................. .............................................................................................................. .24 a. North Andover Essex of....................................... ................................................................................ .......I.....................................................11,.....................................County, Massachusetts, being..............................manied (hereiinaftir called the Grantor-A for consideration paid, NEW ENGLAND PORTER COMPANY antto............................................................................ .................................... ....................................................................:.... ...................... a Massachusetts corporation (hereinafter called the Grantee), its successors and assigns, with :warranty ,,'covenants, the perpetual right and easement to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, operate and patrol, for the transmission of high and low voltage electric current and for telephone use, lines of towers or poles .or both (which may be erected at different times). �ith wires and cables strung upon and from the same, and all necessary foundations,, anchors, guys, brac4, fittings, equipment,and appurtenances, including-a buried ground wire, over, across and upon a stri our ......................land........... ..............feet in width .pl'of................................ Essex in..........North Andover................................................................................0 .........................................::................County, Massachusetts. Said strip to commence Helen Steponnitis and/or land now or formerly of atland now or formerly of........a............ ................ . ........... .........I.. ................................... .................... MU BolealRus I. Brank and extena to r land of other owners landnow or formerly of HAir-P ...,p......................................................................................................... ................ .................... ..................................... ..... ... ... ...... .... .... ...... ....................................... survey thereof. and to become established by and upon the recording of a plan of the Grantee's final su ey ther f. Also the perpetual right and easement from time to time, without payment therefor, to clear and keep cleared said strip of trees, underbrush and structures:(the first clearing may be for less than the full width and may be widened from time to time to the full width), and to renew, replace, add to and otherwise change the lines, and each and every part thereof, and the location thereof within said strip, and to pass along said v. Y'strip to and from the adjoining lands and to pass over the Grantors land to and from said 9trip'as reasonably required. It is agreed that the lines shall remain the property of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, and that .!.--the Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall pay all tales assessed thereon. This deed is given also in release of any and all dower, curtesy and homestead interests and all other interests by statute or otherwise of the GrantorP hereto'. VVITNESS our..................band....P and seal this ................. ................................day of............v. ... 3 a. .......................... itt I ........................ ............ 161- 1 - VY . ............. .............. ....... .. . ... .. ....... ......... ............................................ ....................................................................................... W. ............- .. ..................................................................................................................................... .................... counuo"Wralt4 of Massachusetts Essex 5 ................. 3 ...........Sc .................... .._....................................................................................................................................................................... Francis.. ......i� Fran . Kittredge 3 1?D .............. Then personally appeared before me the above-named............................................................................................. . ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be ;.h:Lo...........................free act and deed............................ ?tK .0 .................. ............ Notary Public. U. S. Federal Revenue Stamps Massachusetts Deed Excise Stamps in sum o.f in sum of affixed and cancelled on this affixed and cancelled on this instrument. nstrument. Essex,ss. Recorded July 219 1953 at 55m past 8A.M. �.•VOTID that the president and the vice presidents of the Company BOOK are each authorized alone to sign in the name and on behalf 8 1 8 of the Company and to affix its seal to releasee of property held by it as trustee under indentures of trust, mortgages, PAGE declarations of trust and other trust instruments (herein- after collectively called indentures) securing the lssue,of I (. corporate bonds, notes or other securities and the signature 4 n .) of any said officers on any release given by the Company as trustee under any such indenture shall be conclusive evi- dence that said release has been authorized by this vote. The above named officers shall each alone have authority to approve counsel, engineers and accountants by whew certifi- cates or opinions are required by the terms of any such . indentures. In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand as Secretary of The,New England.Trust, Company this 21 st, day of Secretary , Essex,ss. Recorded Aug. 23, 1955 at 10m past 12P.M. #609 KNOW ALL MFN BY 7HFSE PRMFI115 that, NDI ENGLAND POWER COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, having a usual place of business in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, for consid- eration paid, grants to FRANCIS B. KIIT*GE of North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts, with quitclaim covenants, a certain parcel or lot of woodland i 4' and swamp containing about 17 acres situated off the southerly side of Boxford Road in said North Andover, bounded: . Northerly by land now or formerly of 11arry L. Cole; Easterly by land formerly of Nathaniel Stevens, land formerly x of Putnam Ingalls and land formerly of Elizah Long; Southerly and Southwesterly by-land now or formerly of Francis B. Ki'ttridge; Westerly by land formerly of Moses Foster and by land formerly of Nathaniel Berry. It being all that land described as IfWades Neck" in a deed from Rebecca Fuller to Abijah P. Fuller dated May 29, 1860, recorded in Essex South 3 081 District Registry of Deeds in Book 608, Page 8. UCEPITW,, AND RESERVING unto the Grantor, its successors and assigns, the perpetual right and easement to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, operate and patrol for the transmission of high and low voltage electric current and for telephone use, lines of towers or poles or both (which may be erected at ?I different times), with wires and cables strung upon and from the same, and all �• necessary foundations, anchors, guys, braces, fittings, equipment and appurten- 1 u ances, including a buried ground wire, over, across and upon a strip of said R•:. i land of n width. Said strip to commence at land now or formerly of varying l Kittredge and emend to land now or formerly of Harry L. Cole R Francis B. 'WW ENGLAND Parte SF,RVICE plan entitle 8 and is shown as a shaded area on a P Mp,SS. PLAN SHOWING � �� ELECTRIC SYSTEM BOSTON, i �cF COMPANY PART OF N EItVID NEW � MASSACHUSETTS TO BE RES 9 2 CATION OF EASEMENT IN NORTH ANDOVER, KITTR�DOE SCALE 111-2001 DATE TO FRANCIS B. � ENGLAND POM COMPANY IN DEED here- ENGLAND a copy of T,,,ch is attached hereto and made a P 3/15/55 L-5451", of and to which reference is hereby had* ALSO EXCEPTING AND RESUVING unto the Grantor, its successors and assigns, .the perpetual right and easement from {fie to time, to clear and keep (the first clearing m&11' clearedunderbrush and structures .said.strip of trees, a to the full for less:.than the full width and may be widened from time to time � e the lines, and each add to and otherwise char d to renew, replace, to pass width), an. , said strip, and and every part.thereof, and the location thereof within oining lands and to pass over the Grantee's along said strip to and from the adj reasonably required.d from said strip as of the Grantor, land to an he property the lines shall remain t It is agreed that its Successors and assigns, and that the Grantor, its successors and assi.gns� 1 shall pay all ta7WS assessed thereon. COMPANY WITNESS WfiERhas caused its corporate EOF, NEW ENGLAND PMM s ned in its name and behalf seal to be hereto affixed and these presents to be and by its Vice President Alfred S. Walker being thereunto by . , its Treasurer a, •r�Hanson } 1955• duly authhorized, this 29t� ...r dayof Aril rE1l ra`IDAJIY NA1 RjGLVD PC1u A + t ff�. By q .Arrcr�nn�WvCctn"M%C� � _ identVice res A-; To FORM By'C' er Tre _ ,.� cf;tcu;lo 1: ! g n r rtt��S AVS' - .0 +i"�(un~, Trpf�� r '�'>yy uM•€d �'1'�li J- �x .' l�av ",��Jtul „Shit 1 I �I -.�r� 11r•,, �"�... L.,, i Qx,'t }5 ,: �', `r. ,y '�y t ;Ir s IN. �r 1: � � w �r n1 3 u,�i� ym ti 1 + ,.g �,.�'?+r � �r d ,. �� �t,�t•+�,,�r"r o n ISI ((4;e��,,t� '. ,r3r ✓'�: .�i 9 �' k°- M�;G� 1 ' t ',, e y'., i t 4$� ' Zb r �t a �4k t� X+�¢S i�t�i ,�(t '+ra4r�t rar+iJFt.' i1 8.x�+r} t , yy y �pqq yggyyypyy i�..r � 4 f iqy v rJ ilETr�� xe,i1Z i��� i t +. 1 t n �. rin 13-I,ya +Y;6a P # S)'.a. + `:; Sir r .sr H 'i P� 3 1 I ...___, , ,,x E� `. ��yy..�� 1,u 'J4 rd .,.rzF k key�a - FR 4�r , EST"t� t�} it4 A t .e�a� `C! ' I'ri '" z'4'+fia�riL Fr��-`` �i� .. }yy F 1e.) �,4 Ay f e .t N), a'h rhA .?.7.n w ;.,r e^ r'f ! , pk v$f. °tat i+I"i 1 •'� i i'! S{;i'�19 31r r vt r P ^ FA °f' Pt 4 h t t r.. � s} yrµ e x I a $lbw A .� ! r RS x R h { ptl !, f t 46{' , a � { 1 F'S '..irk t >t' � Yz �` ,1rJi' J { Na I a tialir., S" a '." 1 t �c�J ifl 1 �;.,, I' a I r � i Yh�9lg4 ►}4 x > I .i t 3>rt Jt`T:rI,��' "t e l ht.,r t , r"`!'.; !1 4;:?' .,I+rr 6 j1 ,{, J r s,q r P r�.j+y 4 s t n.i w + el , e o 'tR.jn r? a:Tl l d �' w1 ryy,��1 to y,rift I! h a'.1 V•rd1_5 rrr�W k i'..17f Y. '1 ��q �dvr 1`74..4-d K r` + i }Sp U p i7 e e,.'�' 1{°R"�w1'. by J'15 y m t y t t 2 q # ie:, F g n' o Y 1 J , r! 9 1 -;, y. : i ro'�.h7�+, 5.'f y' 1I� R r l,'�':1 ( 7 l- ''� Ir�z$I,c $' 1y'Ss i R )t {�'i. v i1 i�f.r'f - `n+t' r .,Jz I a , 1 II r tgg Y t,y y y ,1 .x 1_ , tn t .�rl dlt �,'{ dJ °, h"` Yq �'t s A i �'S S 'M 1'�tey `�1? # s i G. S f Z t91t 7t' L a S 14 -Y ! / ! l W t O 4"' I i , r Fr� F ! S`} 4 .� `� H •h.b j i �O y q "`c' f t. Q' 1 F *A, I :9 i� 0 r_ 3 tl I. , , t I +(f �! � { V h rll :p� i' I� FtAI,.. r 71t 1 1 3h ; i ti{. t.l JN�'' e rbfi! ! 4 f i7 ^,.rn Y}r. h <¢ p �''4 �. p 4i r # t 71 " 4 , 'I 9 y c ! �f ;- 70! y- 1;r �y d inn. { ,y t �,..;,- lea` irw,Q ,', (+ r !"Trr • t '1.� ♦ .r r W t�! i �} ,��. .I yAr i. 4,.r!-j0_1.,,1" i,iFi z f�P Q'�F�{v ! 1 a �.,,�". („) U �1 i tl r,Po 1 21 11;7 S }Bh! min u! n rt Tih O 4 .N Q Q w li x t; 9�` z, 1 r"`{},, wfi �i i`si41f j dL{ '^'meg .? 1•�'p � �''�j ':� h. �.` VI `'� S' ' �Tr tS. I d i q 1 ra �7 p i n1; li, � t I Er I�1 Ti;'' y o'• , ,'� �, �'' JI IPI• ,:I ,,. �i � "..,) "� k ; , X�g{� a n Si ! ,!r•: 3 r!' I. k,, i; f' „'"" �j.? "Q J r .}F r ''R -. I ti I- V atilt{5A q�G^+.1 i lAJ� ,'r F ��,aS'4 s, 'tN .X_ r f5��, T +:r '!*.Rq <:(� 1S V Q ',;.� Q � � tk ,�i:,. 'i7. I �'44&,� �r 1N+7 1� ! Pi r /}r k i !+� qr Jt-i r {{ tii { i4 y r p:.• eFy > kiyr,i", ,l ' a ! Q, �y t t"I / 0 4 ;!:!. E I :Q t/L+"'? � l aliN t I'��:;'�'} t� '' i Is':yr l w , Jr� " 'rl'v 'Iri, 3�'�Z T " (; L t4 �,�'�.8 z a - " h 71'H �! , ,� Sa w1,sl{I* rMl S1,?I. d z'�J4'-R f 1 ., y"d,.`Y 'V.' CVleV'C F V. Q a`, r, \ l``, r,i ; 1 Y o v 1 , tF 1 Ot a �J P e4. f �h 4i tltll ;+�"k a -,'F7��4at f 1h 4 a! j{I 'U .:z 't '• 1' a i Q 1 ...X Q Z I? rr f ,. p , !i, tf !, ! ,a V�'1 Q Z:F. a.W iFd i f� 1 cam' h a' d i1 i ! I '°k r R. 1 i (.I Of' � W V >' � `� p� ! kxk E � +� .rl '� 3S W_���'i t ii !F V gut l "t, f, 10,N y N N Q,7 � l. I—t i t k', if. I ' y� ; F °�' 3 3 1 ���g o D 74q 1�, a w� � ;t� , 7. , t 19( 1i i r 9 r Q t'Ei k S - V �/z `�'�wt ', p 11 a. s t C - 1 r 1� i y. IIr1� 't. 11 1 .•`t p tlV 7 1 � ,� 1i' . t [,.. .yr izyi^ Ir {y 'r k Q r ? w �t�'. 4 1a` ,�S,r'1''a I 3ii - i 'i �' , t,w- �i rFf n;�a':" .i r, I :Z OFC rha' 0 7 N i g" y, h Z. t !h d I `♦ 2 . -^, . (� �r (yy�� �}.�T'{}g yy"i 1 +d 1!' p 1 >' y 7N F"tly UtYnF ljl .ff's ` _ - < •I 1`1r I.i ` P1! N'tZ ff id'ri It'l / s a i' ii, J1�j -�.r. ii.;<1j atr { In - r� `aYx t. z �S 1� �y k �.:W r" j i. e : 1 +.,� t a - ,.,r' II 19 �'�r J t l r , Q__,' y t ::J . m-t�".r l wF Y. �i L, f I J TV" hrr �a,; 4t 11 I h � x. r�f,y�t� ^,h i� io t"�''rli Y + ' 0 4�Fiw': Q t I I , I w u l v. I '?, (' vl r ,, �, t r A , 'y rA 2 a d t I rti I S r,..j�,,2 g7 1 y a I&{:21 I �i � 7'+d je 4t j y\ p J t! l F,f rl1P'I} s $r{1 Yrw[ r 1.} �ilfr � 6 \ *,I' 1P aT J�k t is Ns xr. �`k s� a �,' �n `t 6 i �' °i+Ja': d1 u't; Rt >'..k =r. lesl �H'c t+ ';4�nk nlf t ,ii l h.4.,r ys-,4 FY^R y !i E""`.2 ! 3`., a 4"{, Q �r� s s�I 'l l y ' v a 9 � �d x, XV i 1� , I F t YiA t r4 ��lq i �� w 9�r s It, � ; 1 e .z t i�l>j,l"r'. ," Y !r C t br,� �I 1 g, s a a ^ r �k f r l� i 0 � z„) f ,w a k�� "�" . �' dy 1t� n7 . -" is 1, ��.r >, M1? y `E P 1 -,, I n • r r it `ti^: t :9t 1' i'4 l 4 f �zt \ ��9 Ftd Wil ltt z,l n it yn1. r y �tt 111"I"11111"', 4 �I 55 �� k �,1� c , I w ) v * &Taat. t s'� # ,n, a a 3 V Yea I d { 5i �.roil r iPdh�J'1, �,. i 1 !1 1 i y sk1 a i' ,i r, ' I `'I C..W w � � 1o^I S e,l r f„t � ^ S r F i i F t'. �' z Rh: `� f., + i f I� I lr a , tl [ Ij1- I i`'�yq�z;� ro ,a 1 3 a 1a7 { p<,,zdl h , $ W. S , �. Xi 1 ,'��r,t a r61'"o s++.1 j!q, z1 lJ' A4 `�r^�"" ri'I sQir z�E ',� !4r* # s,at 4",'ti}j t z''E irsi fi i�::-,,r .�''`''j i. A f '`t i i . � ;`t 8,4� .US 3 ! ( r''� 1� 1P) I A r �v, r 1 {jE {� r ,,t rIC I w k p I : F Y, 5Y !rlY }l�?i t � . PF t 4 4 Ef'. �' 44 i 1�'y�)'ts'M ,:� t f I aF 1 a X t_.Qjl� ,' rah It l'' �1q 1i j Y 1y[}l s'a �'tu ...� f ri lr �..i t1 ::'{d a r4 Hr tli4 r "r1v�+ W rI. ,SP ; x cz t S11 rt , IXyk,' yy :1Q c 7``q vh Y(1i,{zty.� 7l, Vii. � 'A,}Er r i 1{:G.�i ,.y, r!Gn II n�F'N ilk qxh� �a ,.' tl r err 1 Y '( r 'i 1 r of F I' 1 7f J I 1 1 } { I 1 I . R 1 �,� ! i} �r4, E S.A ll t 1u Ndt z ,1 I 1 .Q r s n r k, 1 h , WP T Sr n 9$7 Te �'""' y,'1# � .� 1. ' x - v F I aas 11'i, a{ �,±� @I}� r i , i I , i e' v , a+ Wl °r �;� � I X11 k 1 w 1 a `a K6 +. , � ��`l i! 1;1�•3'R+fi 1° ilA Rn!aP;'kr i,vr,i M >i q w».«�4i. eM lwSqu't'u'h,El.�1, ^ / a', y ' '*w { +�+I :rfa4Ai 9- rr id'. Y I Y�� ,t x r t ,K f 1 i 'me w�"`AIrM" "1�y"07�4*.fp, 1 .11 .� `` ..�4¢ x �,;e1. m '�,p:W; ' 8 z' t t�.., rev !dy,�lrf' d #1 i i},z"1 x 1 W t i� k Ata, Fd� �' C a =ri!®tW'stdW p Pro,", Nts t p ^4r�` >1 r r c ' + , "t + , ' ' : x 11bLf' 1''r '\k a {n �Y all yrs , �. .h ►. n MI, P t �� w }:1 +'L t r 'l. 'FI u^b jf '.:J , 9,7 r 4* 'Y' L ;, = .,r f 6 l 'b r' '+ f .. 1 F+ 1 z � �11a au W 'qr '. ° Q W r f`S !3 IY.' t d vi IR n � 1 m h f ,m } �{ ,n. , ; A, s e t tIi y r 14 p f afi ;i { trrr r}! c:: I h�. a r i F la 1; wi � r"W 6$ 1 ,V' Y: -0 .`,a>Wg r i, J �(,..' W 'y'r.>'1 ! ! c ret ju !1" a9 r'� • F i7+t r W A In bi�• , G 1 tl tSk4� i1 Ic' Ia F h e r t;a rM boa 'y,'a.,r] r u 43 .; t I" .:\ � �'r, , s{r. a `fir ,- A r j ��. aP/IR i -s Q c9,s x lw +� E�i41"11�ilt.lf,l, . 1 Ia r r i `I , r1 a ,,,. 1, eG�a a .4 ;:C� a -4 I, �� rr x# r �' ! io f = y- �" dfr lf! a : ♦t t 4tl ! F �. " r, tt~", t 1 i ti! 11 SSM k Iii 5�° 1a�rF)## y . 4 r d t o I r2 I t�E.a' l i eM� 1 r s3z'- !, +K ?r �}'� Y k I Qtr , j4l jr, 4 T ! tlli ! �p Q 1�r ,nt4'� 1 y ea z y $+s�q r r@ a 9>..41 ' �p'7 �'E r i x b '[a Ar ix I.i, tV �) , 1,�;r q .rr,f yr 'r! O4 i,y,:A� '"t ,r� :iil. °71r `� '`'� x r ix., 1.I 11t '� 3} ,y d/.i d o a Q I 1 ( 'o 't 'I rl7 N'' I. r. YI a r 4 Y r y�ic $ `lila° t'i r; b 'i Q t , 1 , '�ad "*1i' iy, a Jf a l 1 I� y ..z ki ,� f"S'^; o, fy,., i 1 I li IS Y:i F ly �, :'E l I k a A 'Y 1* I 4^y t rPl : !R f Kd 1 ��� g 4 k r > ' F SI ii Y �" S ,Z a E r c jt 'A 1 .4,rlsir;. r f'tl' S �± w ,� 9 4, a' a tFMI kr (tlia R s x n t4 �q+� ik +"r, t h ' , ('4 s rf<z t5f's ad y t rr z ,1�. �': ,.i f A l r i rt,�ky♦'v'- i r I',n t IA,f r:�+ �: W ♦ '+ " Vji I`I 11`A �`,i;h�4k fi 'az..:' x " w S'I+ 7 r ,i !r � Ili " 1 0 i I H,s' , 's^ G m j, / zJi3vE �4 A t S ,� y cN" w f 9Y�y �lj I41 k{ t ,,r t r k � a Z ! E , Tt n 1041- v�x� ; I i3 �!i F�Y. '.,vglk 1 'r I ay tti- tr.j,4\.�� i -`'-•1 1. t w h r r' '�f , , 1 0 f 'Aet^AFF""rrl' ::r z I t t �' 4. 1z lilt,. f SI 4 1 r:� ,�1 �yr_ 1 11 ! i l r6 " I Ii }r .i£°t 4ift :e�r,. 1!%2 I'y'i �' art 4,r' 11 ?I ��t,y `�j , �� x,. c ; .. r r p! R� r y'c tt y .y " h t't Jj v off w!. F I 19 ',Irkr ! a + -� r a t ,1 'sat, t ,cl %,'.; + air. " ,, t j..rl trtl, kf r. .l It r 114'.yt', S.S. , yui 11 ,r > t ,rd.. .r. `. 1. 11 a'," ,lY�{2/ A ,i l il meq '. Y , 1 9 \ �+ ,6 / 1 \ 1 J G� O rJP F x r,_,,k t 4� k .;1 S r r 4"; j!of h ytt� i,t '� e tg _,r i 12`` ,.w G y. y `�l i"4 *'y t 1 1. 3 m{I�iii y lt3�*Ir p 4 W tX i �1 IFt ,I .t r ,t�'j,�,) t }� 1 d , F `�1r 11 r "', 1 H ;'t r '^,it� �1 4vl"t� k.,<,12* t s �' '$ar. R l4� k. ' + Y /^ t 1..: � iO ° ., 7J naa wtwG r IR}, t iib ..: 1 l 's r. ' gg `� I o , 1t,+'i"Y y r n �+': zi yi' {a t rir}yi, WEit i kt S\ f t� V t `" ,�x,1Y ilkl 4 i °y J'11 ,1 ... .r 'F !✓3'it Ik .J'k4',4' "'`,M ', ��vl,r , f ^�,' f'z 5 ly�f.: r i t ,,"IR.j r r6j K �.rRr :�1 „ : 1 to u ii, I'- L4 @ t'� •t a r 1 I11 _L,i l I �g. . f W +I",yI t ( ;,4' I ,� , 1�`rs,,,.1r t aj.St 7' w'1' '.."', t d'tl Swa yak s a1 r if t ,I{ �4 Q -l. y -l.IJP+p .1144.. �,+jr 5:. F r� 1 .� 14'o iw. *�. !I� �u'+'i�h-0{T. r ��a 7 t w f , ..�it � K 44'!S iA'p ' �i '�r CPa ViY 1, , ' .! 43,At O ,3: Y , I d 1 I F su w l y'�,'ta>< ,n I tg , '. y p• ti"k r - iI I. l . yJc A , F b 1. 1� N a t� ; F tail G `��' dY3 t g y I 1 r. �,�j 'W f"�;�J,IVi Ik .�t i x th kV r ;{ i d �r r. ,.! r,rr r1 t 'it ':Y'�` ISM A'i Y 1 F u-y it o '. j A! .f 5' ! r R� .f #(: 5 � Y u r H I a!t u ! sik 5" PS 11 $ ,, .ly p1 w1 i t ezz n l � , ' 1 r , 4, t r tt,r+d ` t r yl w^� f.. '#^," s f r, {,prod Sd ( t 1 J� E t 1 :`�.x ,� ' `� rJ 4 R .{ �y�., X 1 �R'i� f N r1% I -y{ it a 1 c d x p i 7� �� ea (Ij 1 1. ^� I t nE 11 'tfrrrE'k 9 y rt d 17, ,z 1 bf q i >< �i 1� k�t r ,r� t'�-air ` � t v yyIIy 4 ,tt { r� np >n 'R4�kt ri 4 si�ys r,4 5 + ;��,s 1 i17 l a 5 rjz7 J 'S- i11"k, } �, c 1 ��+,y I ,!°x &5'$.dF p. u e a 4°{ 1'► a P, i f { F 4 � � t S E 'A 1! d !I 4 t t� a a L �2 ^f Y S f 't , r -M� .0 ' f '1 ,tj P>fia tq1 x000 is yiJ.f�1*I ..r ai4w, has! S 67;.ErE { } !n , v 3! Nr1 ns w �tl �, _y y .li,�l4 �fi��x�,, Q ti > C t 1`� 'A r. Avg tI a w : ! ! t 4 a N".� !; - i y, 1 �rr 16,1, I' N q_ tl +"'-t " K-Pr ti Pwl °'" -T r a 'F t 1 E. ,i. w z�' {11'''" r a i' ,m,11 r' R �T t� W o- i* R z n fi `�"" a ,f a l4rr a ;, A r a T Nrta h, y I a,,! p y ,aa. '.;i 1 F I }�{ tr I �y1 1 L ,r ,, '.t d( t� 11M }'�,V } 1 ."n At ",:... Y�t 'r Y t r ! ! ;.�I .... f Y 4t 7�y� '•ypr ,�° If -■� i' �'Pk 1. t j'>1 4 w�y N ,� r! r } >''r �, l 9, '. .>pp_ '" tF bj�lfl th�ldS I 1°i"t`N°Y11'iy Y� S 1 �+Y'�y v -.i ac »ry I,7 R, , ayCa iy. 2 tl � II i5!)� >f r ,�. Id i"I' . � rv,., !w "S i '�h� a:.a@rS r t Dr '�N�J A°1RrS 1: y i .q .t iE �,rlfE q He '�, ' U. ppa. - �' or 1,1����"�xpr5� ee..(( z - 'i �hb'Sv: P ;.� 'o-r � '- 1ti� .. , T-"' ^r F t4!' riG.a.�i 7 .v,'" `may i-}`+ 9' `tT "4 a ,t =err Y"i"21.1);u`F ,x}z '<i {.; t 'F �a x1 r t - i y y a a {*yrs.. I r As,,t , ';a'Sr +s i l .� .z=r r { �.:£a It as7�'Z"s�.0",, �+� �' 's 1, Y,f JJ ,,�(r `1Np; c -s't,5�,''' ry �y $ y .1. t i= h! r ` 11 .!„1.I;..k�k4 K l ,,f�ylt: !"t".! ,It ",tS..�.fyy rrN,.4G i,l,,,A 1,{r.,i ti,,.t.t .i '. rA3 ,.'f. r o-l. t �Rrii ,, l 'i '. M's,r e ,4 ,'r v , r r-..r �. & a x .r2. a yr v r d �{ i� ` + ,, : , µi i. t.'' l.`r} t �� J ' �.r`a- x11. xS td - I.,. � u��s,, 'sr+� 1 i io S ll.d :.k kG, rt) 4� r' 4 1R " t'' t�sa laija}`. ! ' e J 1 'v Pty to 4'4c' '! i ! ! .tai t'.. a yr }f 1s ! i f ,^w fh y. 3Q° trhx i��'•'• '+'� t W, i La;ia,fr +.4,L Fal 4 1�6, ''I�.R . .li:;. l.z...w.:.�.,.;i ,:;., ti.l_..__.... n 4.1