Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous - 1267 OSGOOD STREET 4/30/2018 (6)
h J G C� e �I ��s p sp HORTF� 3�0`,« 0 aitiOL 10 1SS^CHUS���� TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St.,North Andover, MA., on Tuesday the 9I` day of May, 2000 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless, PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services, 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 100, Westwood MA 02090, for premises at: 1267 Osgood St., North Andover, MA for a Variance from the requirements of Section 8.9.3.c.i. and 8.9.3. c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); Section 8.9.3. c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii (requiring dense tree growth to screen views); Section 8.9.3.c.v.1 (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue); Section 8.9.4.e.ii (requiring fully enclosed containment for use of any hazardous materials), Section 8.9.9.c and 8.9.11.a(requiring escrow accounts for removal and maintenance activities); in order to construct a telecommunications wireless service facility. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the West side of Osgood St. within the R-2 Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles Street, North Andover, MA Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals, William I Sullivan, Chairman W oC ro1°F-m m -rn� aoc -m oloc> �m�CM- -- -- _ N mmmp m�f!9 m�f m-¢�C mOCm�...-G...°Olt-UC O m �` CY WkQ vl .0 mn m< ���u)Z>�°?Fi m��`L 07 52U)Z c U��O�c`G c°i�m._ ��off' �_�mea¢ ��p m oN III TQ m .Ct'a U mm"O N .(13 > Q3 mD1L:NN SOI Gm�aD Cr-mOOm O'O L.. ° cd L m 70 m CD>E waa m Q. 0- m _ m c ° o a°m 0000.TZ -E TpGOJfn> >' t2- CS-mL 2«' ENGmC"-�.E_ mw._« tomV>L Z Op o cL mo 'r oE�$ G..°j=._`- . . m mi-G mo mcE `�c °n°i m¢lnt Z2=at p-0Z mr-N m m�j NC)3 m «�-�'�U O X C�OI.m j._L_`_ 'p� m t > CLO ql O'N E"N m'7 m O O m tN m 3aUW UZm raVm=Nao¢ m�o��.j�m;mYo�=?amc�mmUEH- y.3 y. cao .¢rn` _£ N px¢O`�on� °romna_m= °� to morn mm"o�a. mr oGcn�°a.c y '.E m3� mar° E _ ►-H<nC1 mm0_f- °m mO°n' .o�ri dpa >�m. aR>.o`�-U,m�.-�cK^mm. m>.� _ym�mr°o' ° .`_° .Q OQQ�Lo�u�oQomm3m3o0>. v,coo�ocamcUyooic_°'°?m`mNOmoOmmmm ' aCD amo�ymO)zaCa mda ¢ v 2�0°"L c m~ alN NO m L..- y m __� ol•• o=. 2 mr o or C.rm�o`o W M r G ~ODNN C C m c d��C m��m.°m G��O?C N O c'N.E•U 2 C In a~olca°�D m c E�m �O J 3. a��¢� o° I-o .-o�¢mEmt,mcnmoo,aoaroocc°�_clm-oEm'mmmin: NOON° mmin� WN �1OIWTN 0 Of 3? �• 0 f�o ,SS,ICHUSEtt� TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St.,North Andover, MA., on Tuesday the 9h day of May, 2000 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless, PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services, 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 100, Westwood MA 02090, for premises at: 1267 Osgood St., North Andover, MA for a Variance from the requirements of Section 8.9.3.c.i. and 8.9.3. c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); Section 8.9.3. c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii (requiring dense tree growth to screen views); Section 8.9.3.c.v.1 (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue); Section 8.9.4.e.ii (requiring fully enclosed containment for use of any hazardous materials), Section 8.9.9.c and 8.9.11.a(requiring escrow accounts for removal and maintenance activities); in order to construct a telecommunications wireless service facility. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the West side of Osgood St. within the R-2 Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles Street, North Andover, MA Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals, William I Sullivan, Chairman W. or--Val -,o"T--T'm¢ ••t= -.o�� CM2 OC _.m. rnoC> -N - V N>mrnN>�c�m,a�07�.`6CRE"�mry�"�cO OlamC"�-°O V C UCN= mp10&- _80 nQ>� O 4CC mNJ'o,n`�o nF o�f� o>Er? >rn m c«F °rn` c o° m m acv oL- mQornc�'m�3�v`L=mho° tea?-' �pOC�... O� ¢` moa X10>E> -- O U m m'O N d aD N ".-2 0 C 7 N C m C 0 y c:) m Waw m a _ o'-. m co C E� mw- U> on0co LLQO C OCOJ(n> > _m 3m CNNNNfa m 0)a) Q.rm� m %O-O L.. .D LO70 (na 216 E T -0 .. 'C.L m... EN CmC«. ., ttlm L IQmo30Lrooy-'�ypo0mom0"a.ao` �'"fix 4)-0 cm_o °�roE2 y me .�.o^�oFai mQmV Z ZZ=LL=�000y,04 "U y 3G� L«.-00 = yaNE;nN >OOLU O 0�. L NCLO 0 3QU 100 Zm tam- n °a~d�om�om3mYo0`>amE>,mm0 04N .m0 -QCMUI L a J SQAa0C, 0> N Co'. 2 0m (D U a '+4- 0ctn. U'0C—N E m30 OD 0 E _ Q �F-W'3 _I-oan morn Em -QC _wwoi- >0 U ��pc._mN OD 0' `o OQQULO(n�0000m3m30O"> CODomO�OCUNMCO�.`�r0i10 070.0000 naQ O(U ZTmd� Q Ca Z2O°"L C -ZF' OII�ON� L« Nm aO .rn >«....+>. OOLOOIC C t0�00 W mZm=ro'C °6O�o�o�o-.00, �cm�?0 m oL`r�mm�.0°'-0 J '0 Ot..-o�¢mEmZcaC/)nW-0vUi06CLcc�c°�o'C6aCi-�Ecco:rommw�«mwC��am ��°�' m wN oON mino2o ► p0RTH ?O4 t"10 "'. -0 O A �9SSACHUS�1 �h TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St.,North Andover, MA., on Tuesday the 9�h day of May, 2000 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless, PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services, 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 100, Westwood MA 02090, for premises at: 1267 Osgood St., North Andover,MA for a Variance from the requirements of Section 8.9.3.c.i. and 8.9.3. c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); Section 8.9.3. c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii (requiring dense tree growth to screen views); Section 8.9.3.c.v.1 (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue); Section 8.9.4.e.ii (requiring fully enclosed containment for use of any hazardous materials), Section 8.9.9.c and 8.9.11.a(requiring escrow accounts for removal and maintenance activities); in order to construct a telecommunications wireless service facility. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the West side of Osgood St. within the R-2 Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles Street, North Andover, MA Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals, William I Sullivan, Chairman V 0 O C D1L a) O O C T N U N -6,6 — - fnJ d�N> y U7 ropro_ EroV -'oro and NC O-OO COLIC ro'V 01ON O ¢ OaiCCN oo 0-da:o-tn n2> >cn UC>13'oq.--Uc ro W:n C't2 Om= �o 2 ro �ro ¢ COQ o ro m ro W>.Qro _C� roa) UN "O tq _ro m��a).cm O''i C' �%�.`..4 a) C�m OfnC 00 a)CON OOL O LL Waa ro ¢ ai m n _ 3��. rommro�nororo Q..ro T S a��o o-= Oo�naro.-6LC TOCOJCn>O� do �20 tyro cENcmcU E� ro romV otm a°pQinL2 Z O �a ro o U IL) roo v, J nO o a���ro ova nci_ o po x c"o»=c ro o`��a)E Z y c �y:_�aF- U ZZ=LL=�1]U O U)8 N rofn m 3 p`_'O �. = ro 0 y QN E-F,cv a)7�NL V O -2 O a) a).'C...-L >=N CrO Y -i LO 3aUONro � Zro raU�=y o¢ y�oC."6'a�3:2,2 =— >ZUE a"roUEoIN v_3 n^ ca -Qmti E a J sQ o o.� >aro d a�2 Og m� a" _o cn�U O 0 E a�3` ro- c _ Q O ro n n m U) U of a). U a� c _ E . m ar o 0 o ca ._ ~¢y¢0a)-oaSrj)C ro'C'n 5 �a�oamaom`>�Qoovo0.-DroN�cOro. ar3(nNt 0O'FL�m Q OQQ'o�ptn�0 a) m o0>� nm. �'oaomcUyco c" aiyamc6om�ro �arooO�ro�ZTrod0 2�OZ L c m� o0)N , r _ Nmri -� °>co m` yo: U3 �Q�o�cca3c'so�oo W m ro-N�¢�gc FO�NN�C a)CNONCa)U�OC>>000�c�roc y E��C Un OC NC(L.5 m �p J 34�2-oa._�¢�r -oma¢m E mt rotn m-o a,m CLcao-mai-oErom2ro n°>_ �oONO mmin02� w0 II ' Town of North Andover 40RTIy OFFICE OF 0 4 Al' o 0 5 e o COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RIND SERVICES � a ^ � 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01 S45 am I. SCOTT trector e 633-9f3I Fax (973) 633-9�ti �t L) 1 FAX Transmission FAX Number: Asa '/, �9. F,, ,OR Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals FAX: 978-688-95,12 i PHONE: 978-688-9541 DATE: /"S' a v o 0 SUEJEOT: A 7f- Totai number of pages: REMARKS.- Aftac,hed is a fax containing your legal notice. Asawar�ou are y C, uhe attached Ie�GI notice has to be pl2c1nd with the legal notic-a department of the Lawrenc-- Eagle-Tribune and itis your res ponsibiRy to do so as-soon-as-possible in order to meet the required deadline. Failure to place the legal notice in the paper within the required deadline wiil mean that you will not be able to be placed on the ZEA agenda for the upcoming meeting. The phone number for the Eagle Tribune is: 978-685-1000, ext. #412, should you require further assistance. TIMI/fax -7(_=_ Ci, r,S3 CC�j; %ORTh ( QfS, .0 '... - OL IL 4i.0✓�Sq'� SgACHUSfc NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St.,North Andover, MA., on Tuesday the 13th day of June, 2000 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal of AT&T Wireless, PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services, 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 100, Westwood MA 02090, for premises at: 1267 Osgood St., North Andover, MA for a Variance from the requirements of Section 8.9.3.c.i. and 8.9.3. c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); Section 8.9.3. c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii (requiring dense tree growth to screen views); Section 8,9.3.c.v.1 (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue); Section 8.9.4.e.ii (requiring fully enclosed containment for use of any hazardous materials), Section 8.9.9.c and 8.9.l l.b (requiring escrow accounts for removal and maintenance activities); in order to construct a telecommunications wireless service facility. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the West side of Osgood St. within the R-2 Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles Street, North Andover, MA Monday through Thursday from the hours of 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM. By order of the Board of Appeals, William J. Sullivan, Chairman Published in the Eagle Tribune on May 30 & June 6, 2000. BOARD OF.APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 � Mu I JUL 2 6 2000 i The Zoning Board of Appeals LLBOPI Town of North Andover � J�uly 25,2000 We would sincerely like to thank you for the vote on the AT&T Wireless facility petition at the special meeting on July 24, 2000. We were heartened by your unanimous vote, which unequivocally affirms your commitment to the preservation of the historic and rural setting of this beautiful town. The Barker farm area, which we all selected as the place to call home and raise our families, is only one of the few remaining places in North Andover that is rooted in history and represents in our minds the very spirit and beauty of this town. We felt that your deliberations were impartial, and well thought-out, and your denial of requested waivers underscored the unwavering adherence to the zoning by-laws that have been explicitly established with preservation of the town and properties as the primary objective. We feel as though we may have won this battle, we still need to be cognizant of the evolution and deployment of the wireless technology. We all recognize the benefits and utilize this medium in our daily lives. We have also serious health concerns about the technology which we feel have not been fully addressed to date and further research and data is needed to ascertain the true risks. It is imperative however that we as residents, the town and the wireless companies, collectively plan any and all future deployment of this technology in our community. We have requested the Board of Selectmen that a temporary moratorium be placed so all parties can mutually participate in and plan the future of this medium and how it is allowed to proliferate in the Town. Many communities across the country have used this vehicle and the FCC has provided a documented precedence for communities to exercise and explore this option While it would be imprudent to overlook the progress and the need of the technology, it would be even worse to sacrifice the very surroundings that nurture us and enrich our lives. Going forward, we would like to be apprised of any continuing development on this important topic and we would be happy to work with the Town, the neighbors, the community and the utilities to continue to explore all options that satisfy the needs of all, and above all, preserve the town and its history, the neighborhood and most of all our families which will be our future. Thank you once again for your show of support. Sincerely yours, Lynn Arvikar 125 Barker St. ba_ r__ Timothy Williams 103 Barker St. Stephen McManus 87 Barker St. copy to: Planning Board of Appeals Board of Selectmen Z-1 4 , North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 Phone(978)688-9541 M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M via F Fax(978) 688-9542 TO: Attorney Thomas Urbelis FROM: Mary Leary-Ippolito for William J..Sullivan, Chairman ZBA DATE: 8/30/2000 SUBJECT: Time Constraints Attached are documents relative to the petition of AT&T Wireless PCS. LLC d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services for premises at: 1267 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA. 1. The application date stamped 2000,Apr-6. 2. A letter delivered by hand to the Town Clerk's office dated May 10, 2000 confirming a request for a continuance which was date stamped by Town Clerk's office on 2000 May 10. 3. A request to waive the time constraints submitted at the ZBA meeting on 7/11/2000, by the attorney representing AT&T.. 4. A copy of the ZBA decision date stamped 2000 Aug 1. Please note:Although AT&T was placed on the ZBA May 9, 2000 meeting agenda,they were not heard on that date because of:a technicality(on their part)regarding a legal notice. The petition Was then placed on the ZBA June 20,2000 meeting agenda and was then heard by the Board. The petition was then placed on the ZBA July 11, 2000.meeting agenda and consequently continued (because of lack of quorum). The petition was then placed on the ZBA Special meeting agenda dated 7/24/2000 and was then denied, see decision. Let me know if you require further information, I can be reached Monday thru Thursday 9-2 PM, phone:#978-688-9541 Regards, Post-its Fax Note 7671 Date pages 7 T oai �e6 L.;t' From o Mary Co./Dept. Co. MI/timeconstraints Phone# Phone# Or/ Fax# ��, 33�,�� Fax# T LIST OI PAR I IES OI, iN I LRU) 1 : 1'AU11, I Ur L SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR# NAME ADDRESS 34 12 Dorothea C. Barker 1267 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 ABUTTERS: 34 10 George R. Barker, Jr. / 1267 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 34 11 Karen J. Barker / 1341 Osgood Street J North Andover, MA 01845- 34 1845-34 13 Arthur H. Forgetta t/ 3 Trinity Court ✓ North Andover, MA 01845 34 24 City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover,MA 01845 34 26 City of Lawrence Airport Commission 492 Sutton Street North Andover, MA 01845 34 30 Bartholomew W. J. Forgetta ✓ 1320 Osgood Street i/ North Andover, MA 01845 34 43 Daniel A. Forgetta 1292 Osgood Street Joanne E. Forgetta North Andover, MA 01845 34 46 Joseph M. Conto 189 Barker Street Ana D. Conto ✓ �' North Andover, MA 01845 34 47 Scott R. and Linda H. Freeland ✓ / 167 Barker Street North Andover, MA 01845 34 48 Liang Lan Chih Wang 155 Barker Street Laney L. Wang v North Andover,MA 01845 34 49 Forgetta Family Trust 1210 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 35 1 Marianne and John L. Green 115 Barker Street North Andover, MA 01845 THIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON THIS LIST OF NAMES & ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF I �E[ZEST WAS P ARED BY T1 E AP LICANT F ROM TIDE RECORDS OE 'THE ASSI�.SSORS O -IC . AS FI yr 1'l11" l IC.J VaAll a a.a\a.J a a lxv.. -. e SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP PAR# NAME ADDRESS 34 12 Dorothea C. Barker 1267 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 ABUTTERS: 35 2 David and Yuen Lan Yue P.O. Box 457 North Andover, MA 01845 _ 35 8 F. K. Realty Trust 1211 Osgood Street Frank& Kathleen Terranova, Jr North Andover, MA 01845 35 9 Forgetta Family Trust 1210 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 35 56 Norman J. &Nancy J. Wheaton 30 Old Farm Road North Andover,MA 01845 35 99 Kenneth Coco 137 Barker Street Gretchen Coco �/ f North Andover, MA 01845 35 100 Ram J. Arvikar 125 Barker Street / Lynn A. Arvikar V/ North Andover, MA 01845 / 35 101 Timothy J. Medlock 145 Barker Street ✓ J North Andover, MA 01845 35 102 Timothy Williams 103 Barker Street North Andover, MA 01845 35 103 Robert J. Cupka 111 Barker Street Stacey A. Cupka v North Andover,'MA 01845 35 104 Stephen A. D'Arrigo 95 Barker Street >/ North Andover, MA 01845 35 105 Steven M. McManus 87 Barker Street Teresa A. McManus J North Andover, MA 01845 35 106 Frank A. Altien 75 Barker Street Joanne T. Altieri V North Andover, MA 01845 35 107 Gareth D. Morfill 63 Barker Street Jane R. Circle `� North Andover, MA 01845 pn� THIS CERTIFIES ONLY THAT ON (J THIS LIST OF NAMES&ADDRESSES OF PARTIES OF INT ST WAS PREP D BY T E A LICANT FROM THE RECORDS OF THE ASSESSORS OFFIC . ASSESS OFFICE OFFICE 7 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 NOItUt William J. Scolt o�,,.•�;. Sao 'rcleplionc(978)688-9.531 Director }: • °e9 FAX (978)688-9542 �ss�cau�e� FAX TRANSMISSION DATE: 4/6/200 TIME: 1.00 PM NO.OF PAGES 5 TO: JEFFREY ROELOFS I FROM: D. ROBERT NICETTA, BUILDING COMMISSIONER SUBJECT: ZONING REVIEW FORM BUILDING DEPT FAX NUMBER 978-688-9542 SEND TO FAX NO.: 617-252-6899 REMARKS: PLEASE USE THE A-I-I'ACHED FORM FOR THE ZONING REVIEW AND INFORMATION FOR THE BOARD OF APPEALS PROCESS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ME. BOARD 01:APIII;'ALS 08-9541 IIUIL.DINCS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688.9530 1-11W.:LII 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 120 MAIN S I. 120 MAIN ST, 27 CIIARI.h:.S ST. 27 C'IIAItI,ES ST. 27 C IIARI TS ST. r NORTH ANDOVER%JRELESS BYLAW ` SECTIONS REQUIRING INTERPRETATION AND POSSIBLE VARIANCE OR WAIVER The following Sections of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw require interpretation as to how they apply to a proposed wireless ' communication facility, the antennas and cables for which will be camouflaged inside a flagpole within the meaning of Section 8.9.24 Section 8.9.3.b.ii, Section 8.9.3.c.i, Section 8.9.4.a.ii,and Section 8.9.4.d.1i. Withoul limitation, a determinalion needs to be made whether a variance or waiver is required for these Sections as indicated below. SECTION QUESTION FOR YESINO VARIANCE WAIVER INTERPRETATION REQUIRED ? REQUIRED ? 8.9.3.c.i Is the flagpole limited in height to 10'above average building height yds Yt`S within 300'? 8.9.3.6i Is the flagpole lunited in height to 10' above average tree canopy height? I 8.9.3.c.6 and Must the flagpole be "surrounded z, . -M' A-, � �� oPry%oti jot4 rrj-y W1 8.9.4.a.ii and by dense tree growth to screen 'rA Yt{ Foe- A*~1''� q- wt.�s� t-(-owa`p. T-�' �(ac Dep let 8.9,4.ci.ii views ...?" 8.9.3.c.v.I Must the flagpole be set back 2x its height from property (§ 8.9.3.c.v.3) boundaries? (The proposed /d7- /� (See Exhibit 8) flagpole is 120'. The nearest property line is 222' :E.) 89.3.c.v.1 Must the flagpole be set back 300' I�S yE-s from habitable dwelling or I (§ 8.9.3.c.v.3) business? (The flagpole is 142'+ (See Exhibit 8) from the Barker house.) r f, t SECTION QUESTION FOR YES/NO VARIANCE WAIVER NTERPRETATION REQUIRED ? RE UIRED ? 8.9.4.a_iii.2 Must the flagpole be painted gray Y-6 n or blue above the surrounding s ?t.— Zaj vegetation? (The flagpole would ordinarily be painted white.) 8.9.4.a.1v and Since the shelter will be 8.3.6.a.iii.d (p. surrounded by a landscaped, v� 105) stockade fence,must the cables /e between the speller and the flagpole be underground? 8.9.4.d.ii Is the proposed flagpole considered to be in an"open YC� areal*] ... visible from public roads ... or residential development ..."? Are sealed gel batteries located � over a concrete slab floor within the locked equipment shelter N c� within the fenced equipment compound considered to require "enclosed containment"? 8.9.5.d.ii.4 Is a waiver necessary to limit the T �\` required map to AT&T Wireless \ (§ 8.9.5.d.ix) Services' facilities? 2 SECTION QUESTION FOR M/NO VARIANCE WAIVER INTERPRETATION REQUIRED ? REQUIRED ? 8.9.5.d.iii.3 Are the enclosed plans sufficient ��ta.a►� t�jo,4,-z�� ? to depict the tree cover within 300' S t � �,(�� ��Yr�� (§ 8.9.5.d.ix) radius of the tlagpole, or is a waiver necessary? 8.9.5.d.i6.4 Are the enclosed plans sufficient —�� s,a l'u�'c rs .7r*�� ? to depict buildings within a 300' �>,r ..... (§ 8.9.5.d.ix) radius of tttc flagpole,or is a e- waiver necessary? S.9.5.d.v.3 Does the requirement for a"color . -T LV-_1 N N N Qt ? board"apply,and if so, is a waiver (§ 8.9.5.d.ix) appropriate? 8:9.5.d.v.7 For the Planning Board: qti,,� ,lk'O¢ 00 0 rrrzr . Schedule balloon/cranc test. 2. Is it necessary to notify abutters? 3. is newspaper notice necessary? 8.9.5.d-vi For the Planning Board: t't`'-c er— rle q-le,^ ? Since the only,noise associated S int. M,_., (2c—v, w (§ 8.9.5.d.ix) with the facility will be the HVAC g9 unit for the equipment shelter, will the Board waive noise filing requirements? 3 i SECTION QUESTION FOR YESINO VARIANCE WAIVER INTERPRETATION REQUIRED ? RE UIRED ? 8.9.5.d.viii.2 Does this Section apply to the '/�- ? sealcd batteries and thermostat? 8.9.9.c Will a removal bond suffice in •i4"' N iivCc 3o'4'zn ? lieu of cash7 8.9.1 La Will a performance bond suffice TIE- in lieu of cash? cr- aUln.anABark Mm�dainseN,wpd O --1 r Q b O r ANDERSON&KREIGER r Lp CONFIRMATION L/ Attorneys at Lazo COPY STEPHEN D.ANDERSON The Bulfinch Building ACHESON H.CALLAGHAN Also admitted in CT 47 Thorndike Street Of Counsel Cambridge,MA 02141 DOUGLAS H.WILKINS ARTHUR P.KREIGER (617) 252-6575 Of Counsel Also admitted in NY Fax: (617) 252-6899 PETER J.CURA GEORGE A.HALL,JR. RACHEL GRAHAM EVANS Also admitted in NH JEFFREY L.ROELOFS April 7, 2000 - ----- By Facsimile (978-688-9542 i�� APR I I 2000 Heidi A. Griffin Town Planner BOARD OF AP'?Ek! Town of North Andover Division of Community Development& Services 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: AT&T Wireless Services' April 6, 2000 Application for Site Plan Review and Waivers—Barker Farm, 1267 Osgood Street,North Andover Dear Ms. Griffin: I write in response to your April 5, 2000 letter to me relating to the above-referenced application of AT&T Wireless Services ("AWS"), in which you indicate that the Planning Board will not review AWS's application until the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") has acted on AWS's application for variances. As you know, on March 21, 2000, AT&T Wireless Services ("AWS") applied for a building permit in connection with its proposed wireless services facility at the Barker Farm. At the same time, AWS submitted copies of the application to you and requested that you schedule the Planning Board's Pre-Application Conference and Review under §§ 8.9.5.b and 8.9.5.c of the Zoning Bylaw at the Planning Board's next regularly scheduled meeting. On April 5, 2000, we received the Building Commissioner's denial of AWS's application, which specified the zoning relief that would be required. Yesterday, AWS filed an application with the ZBA for all variances that may be required. At the same time, not yet having heard from the Planning Board (I received your letter after the applications were submitted) and no Pre-Application Conference having been scheduled, AWS filed an application with the Planning Board for a Special Permit and Site Plan Approval and any necessary waivers. In your April 5 letter, you confirm that AWS will need certain waivers. You also Cj Printed on recycled paper R J Heidi A. Griffin April 7, 2000 Page 2 indicate, however, that the Planning Board will not act on AWS's application until after the ZBA has rendered its decision on AWS's variance application. As indicated in AWS's application materials, there is an interplay between the waivers that AWS requested from the Planning Board and the variances it seeks from the ZBA. AWS requested waivers or variances from many of the same requirements of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw. For those requirements, variances will be necessary only if the waivers are not or can not be granted. For these reasons, I believe the most efficient and sensible sequence of events is for the Planning Board to act on AWS's waiver requests prior to the ZBA's May 9, 2000 hearing. We understand that the Planning Board is meeting on May 2, 2000 and presumably could act on these waiver requests at that time. The ZBA will then be in a position to act only on those requests for variances for which a waiver is not or can not be granted. If the Planning Board wants to act on the Special Permit application after the ZBA acts on the variance request, that would be acceptable so long as the Planning Board does so within the applicable statutory deadlines. However, the Planning Board does not have the legal authority to refuse to act on AWS's application indefinitely. Please place AWS's application for waivers on the agenda for the Planning Board's May 2, 2000 meeting and call me to confirm the date,time and place and that you will post,publish and send any necessary notices. Sine rely, Step en D. Anderson sanderson@andersonkreiger.com cc: Taylor Whiteside (by email) Phil Posner(by email) Jim Wilson(by email) Zoning Board of Appeals (978-688-9542) att\n.andbarker\l\planningbd002.wpd ANDERSON &KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Law CO Printed on recycled paper 1 I I t 1 Town of North Andover Planning Board ME- . .... n"rE ......... Please type or print clearly. 1. Petitioner' AT&T Wireless PCS LLC d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services Address: 400 Blue Hill Dive, Suite 100 , Westwood, MA 02090 Telephone number: ( 7 81 ) 407-4500 2. Owners of the Land: George R. Barker and Dorothea C. Barker Address: 1267 Osgood Street Telephone number: ( 9 7 8 ) 688-5617 Number of years of ownership: King' s Grant If applicant is not the owner, please state interest in property: Lessee 3. Request for a Special Permit under Section 8 . 9 of the North Andover Zoning Bylawto construct a telecommunications wireless service facility and Site Plan Review under Section 8 . 3 , with waivers per the transmittal letter for this application and the list attarhA,jbQrQtQ 4. Location of Property: 1267. Osgood Street Zoning District: R2 Assessors: Map: 34 Lot#: 12 Registry of Deeds: Book#:: 4038 Page#:: 66 5. Existing Lot: Lot Area(Sq.Ft.): 19 . 3 acres f Building Height: varies Street Frontage: 1196 . 16 ' Side Setbacks: varies Front Setback: varies Rear Setback: varies_ Floor Area Ratio: N/A Lot Coverage: N/A 6. Proposed Lot (if applicable): Lot Area (Sq.Ft.): 19 . 3 acres ± Building Height: 120 ' flagpole; 10 ' shed Street Frontage: 1196 . 16 ' Side Setbacks: 336 ' Front Setback: 220 ' Rear Setback: 720 Floor Area Ratio: N/A Lot Coverage: N/A i Required Lot (as required by Zoning Bylaw): varies for wireless Lot-Area(Sq.Ft_): 1 acre Building Height: facilities (§ 8 . 9 . 3 .c) Street Frontage: 150 ' Side Setbacks: 3 0 ' Front Setback: 30 ' Rear Setback: 3 0 ' Floor Area Ratio: N/A Lot Coverage: N/A S. Existing Building(if applicable): N/A Ground Floor(Sq. Ft.): # of Floors: Total Sq. Ft.: Height: Use: Type of Construction: 9. Proposed Building: ( shed information) - - Ground Floor(Sq. Ft.): 240 #of Floors: 1 Total Sq. Ft.: 240 Height: 10 ' shed; 120 ' flagpole Use: equipment shed 'Type of Construction: ( see attached plans--) 10. Has there been a previous application for a Special Permit from the Planning Board on these premises? No . If so, when and for what type of construction? 11. Petitioner and Landowner signature(s): Every application for a Special Permit shall be made on this form which is the official form of the Planning Board. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or Planning Office does not absolve the applicant.from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all expenses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements, as cited herein and in the Planning Board Rules and regulations may result in a dismissal by the Planning Board of this application as incomplete. Petitioner's Signature:—' ' Steph n D. Anderson Print or type name here: Jeffrey L. Roelofs as attorneys for AT&T Anderson & Kreiger LLP Wireless Services 47 Thorndike Street Cambridge MA 02141 Owner's Signature: Print or type name here: ( see attached owner ' s consent) ZONING RELIEF REQUESTED FROM PLANNING BOARD Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for Wireless Service Facility (ZBL §§ 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3) and Waivers of the following Zoning Bylaw requirements (If and to the Extent Necessary, All Rights Reserved): A. § 8.9.3.c.v.1 (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300'from habitable dwelling or business); B. § 8.9.5.d.ii.4 (requiring map of all facilities in and within 1 mile of North Andover); C. § 8.9.5.d.iii.3 (requiring depiction of tree cover within 300'radius of flagpole); D. § 8.9.5.d.iii.4 (requiring depiction of all buildings within 300'radius of flagpole); E. § 8.9.5.d.v.3 (requiring "color board"); F. § 8.9.5.d.vi (noise filing requirements); G. § 8.9.5.d.viii.2 (hazardous waste identification filing requirement). i 2 3 4 �� EXHIBIT 4 Abutter Labels - See Original 5 I EXHIBIT 5 Stamps for Mailing - See Original SII 6 i i i I ** LZ•3Jdd -16101 ** K w r PLAT N0.61 �^ d Db to 113 9 VZ 2G J f.7�5A n.e•-+• 7.�G�e STREET / 43 i 49 � i t$ 0 `ra I Z O' I � 1 J I a W ul cn i � Zs I r• AO , Z2 ( _. - cc»w T M 15t I N ?(-I CT -l.T M2, q2 ?IHW ..- \ •+ "�:sr R p A p a• /q 142 r� / / \ J, �T 35 22 33 -?3 / ` g ".070 Sy3 SF � 1-t p 7 tt 1 L` 14 47 718 tf rc `l' TT fF � o _ ■ w +�`NU ny N TTS T/ 43 728 S.f. 64 42 66 xs $6 ff 77 49 °• /7 � i (04 •,5,� ` N;S�2 S.r lI t /) 41 -97 7r. f0 47.90,S, / al 44 25.3! 44.1].Sl cn • u� a/ 3 1O 68 � ! � b r51 •]§ s 4 43.E e 1 1 36 4 14.250 t.f 4{.250ip 28 Z • T./ I I 2 3,� h d D 4S.00 T.r 45,00°S f ` 4 3 t,. ' o �0 J rF �234c $6 ^ Q S/ /o 1' to SQ � O 73 S3 A 9 0✓F o S.f ..°eo 1.f. '3 Bae 2 9J ui 110 TT w 7 =�qA„e.7 L�S7B 4ac�3b 2e 4. c 45.112].f. J�x• lal 4'G t: FR=NCH !Ob \ Jo 0 ��•• r 2( \ �Z704•Pc 948 CL ' b .e � •�x , o O o 11'1 LJILLI \\ o i � � \ �, \\ 11I '` .rte•-s'�-��,� V \ SO ul SEC- PLAT NO. 99 - ' \✓�;�� \ SE=- PLAT' NO- 74 S PLA' \o SCALE 200,-EZT I INCH NO. 76 ��� 7 I ' I North Andover Zoning w 1:� t t' f aai:f 6„ 1 1 UU I ? Qj u I 1 I d o O - 6 r t Legend Tovm Boundary Roads E Q Rail Line(Active) Rail Line(Abandoned)Aiq,or \ LOU', j B Lakes,Rivets,Ponds,Sounds and Reservoirs - 1 N Streams Zoning Q Business District 1 Muiness District 2 _--^�- - • Business District 3 Business District 4 � EM General Business District Q Industrial District 1 . O Industrial District 2 Industrial District 3 - Industrial S District Residential District 1 Residential District 2 ®Residential District 3 Q� 0 Residenfial District Residenfial District5 - Residential District ©Vlingc Commercial District 'Faz a c Villn o Residential District 9S - 1y0lxrl Districts Historic District r i watershed Protection District 0 m�d5 Adult Entertaimnent District Overlaying districts zoned as undeRying color i scale F-3331' 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 51100 Fed • f = y,y 1 0•MOaTM 11 �ttx�r • Data Sdaces:Deaforthis map xas provided M'a Esecu6ve oltice ofFnv'vammael Affain�RaassGlS(FAFA/ntasscis). Merrinack Valley Pimmiig Cmanission(MVPO mid b.. - dd.provided yLIS S.D Road d o NiTd Hydro�apliy dmnprovided by USGS.Road data derived Bom Rn'm Road Invadory Files.Roods con trd usbig digital athaph.tographs aascale ort:5000(1"=117).Newroadslocmdlusing GPS(Global Positianirg Systars).Additioml IrtFiRRIMACI: 9ratlistingsprovidal 6y the TownorNatlsaning The irs imaemdaaYomId limpisf gaming VAW.ES�V V pmpasesmly.ltrivyiiotbeadequmef legmlwiatamy Note:The Flood Plain District isdefinedinthe y Q PLANNI;IC � 1" aefinrtian cr ragttlatay inlaptxlation ZoningBylaw and foundon the orth Andover ,l)- COMMISSION ld ihN Pnpmdl I16 M Main naxk Valicy PlanndIA 018tdssion Flood Insurance Rate Maps dated June 2,1993. (MVPC),160 Main Sltttt,Hnahia,RLl 01630. 8 I 1 11 �. OWNER'S CONSENT TO MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex I, George R. &Dorothea C. Barker owners in fee of the subject property known as 1267 Osgood Street, Lot 10 in the Town of North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts, grant the applicant, AT&T WIRELESS PCS, LLC,by and through its agent,AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,with offices at 15 East Midland Avenue,Paramus,New Jersey 07652,the authority to make the within zoning application and the undersigned hereby consents to the making of same. By. Name: Ge e R. Barker Date: M By: ��2e Name: Dorothea ,Barker Date: Subscribed and sworn to before me on this J day of , 2000. Notary Public My Commission expires: SUSAN.L.JOHNSON Notary Public My Commission Expires Febftim 23,2005 � D • • • • • • • • Slit�e • ` f1267 OsdoddS,treet • • • t r7l) u March 13, 2000 Prepared for aAT&T Wireless Services 400 Blue Will Drive Suite 100 Westwood, MA 02090=2160 Site Number E-445 l� Prepared by: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C. 4 West Main Street Suite 401 �} Northborough, MA 01532 L Office (508) 393-7411 Fax (508) 393-4740 Job No. 1943.E-445 1 WEERING TECTONIC CONSUL iAN S P.C. U i{ Li 1..J I �.J I I I i I t7-:) C:7i� C:�3- C7_) C r.? E—� L 1 3 C_3 C C--:I LL) C� C---] �7 Topographic Map Symbols 4ri,oary iii jr„Yy.P,ef�i fJtaZS....... : .. :. .. T'—•+-"�•"""T 5jv0dsty lughwly,had sY:{,aa USOS QUADRANGLE LAWRENCE, MA- VIEWABLE LOCATIONS ��6Ytyf d,kard ar vnP:asmd aarfaca..... {Iri:ifafCtPG fdSd;ifak . . .. .., - -- -- •- Nuto m:fwc U.U,5:411 , . . ihAir>;d,atiiidstd PaAa:irerfaw'tlel FYsicroga;arat•:tsf.raarpaP3 .. �"f ,�...,.,.iTM QYdcup aru;xis taiaaad iandrarY 6Yddia59 stYl'.;n. a`�"�'�`�'� iluam:Bary;CHUNS;WWI,taiga strawd J 1 /......� r .i. ' •• 1 r.• p... �' 3a” it - k4s}t<� �.,., '•. QOY�ary. Y. t ! ,.n I//i '�..y.I, 1 �P ��.ti - �' 1'•w ^L . . eyltk{ iii a'SI,Yflt$mBfivR&71 i { !` +"r T. z, !� .'f-`I' �s. �•. t 'l.' .+•( / d •' / °� si',4 nt'r, r w' t!_ •. �.. _}\1� '. -�.i��..! EL:Fdy patch .., mm--�'--� 4 :M_ L ✓ —�"Y. .Q mearodritecav;"a0ps.twn :,.. ,.. _ ....� •�.`.. `l ti'•� r iJebnail of Qrlre 199IN imh.twit 11h ° �•��• orf °l s.':1 �` �+ O Y r T •r +a�i A f ! r � - �,;r i L11d§taitt�rlh fl:Lwiitll;Idf1iL;fliafl 0111181, �f u •- ( s a J !y�/' ,�e= ! +wfr#'(// r , �'\ �1 1 �y�i-j Q9,Aid knds€u.%*,(VA tu AOrp,asclw:f. � +.; r r 0 �X � "'�. !� (, � F �✓ ,� '\ f•- Qer.6e:rr.•rdr�p.ut»rat Wws,tucni ar apgror:msu - T, L • �� G'! ��" j1 .Al .. ...... ..•. . ., Peasa w Paltl afa • f, ?ki �•'�T,+1,N a Vd� t r`.-••: -' } ° €or.c tnrs.nss,er.m t ,a y. ''. ."`' ,. -C �ti, .r r+...y. t; , .t.,1 f✓rr .,s a �7 v+• !. ..,\� .� '`�; Qaia,Om wh lothIlk ., .. •'yam h - ��� . r w , �s0 _- t \ Cas at h Placa Q! �IYC3tb + -f 'a 1 1 f a inv altla'U S 10--ow mmwenm. a , 1. ahs ,P L I rL. �'�, r •'`�+ L,.,yy 1 1 n• Z`wy� . ,•Jlf,hlivil,pf"Pe,a,o. ar �r 1•"'�t •'r••.��` �� r.,J �5 1' , '•�� �IlOIO .(yy_,�,NYJ'•! "i. aa�.-,-w w• J.'1x. .!•-...,a 1'+• 1:5na 3tblt,P;JSpatT dd,.ar'Gfu .. ,. .... _ �"° r r„( f '• ` •C .l I /• ... - �'-_"•�,' •r .1ta twmarml iWl Jn wow glawfl;Spot ef"vi in, -qua f 1. ,.� CaRidarn.nayx,meerm.d:,ta,su�jila7:e�iiary,uaC,�sSmn F +.•,s. ?. '.."f J� t ��'�. �{Ft RI t " �✓ - ;.rte_t Y }��'.'+ {d _ +_ 1 '/' 9,9MM Mike.ofnp "d �� � "�,;• � , j-� -r� 1 i�. ����s, �• ss4^ r ! 'r 1( �'i=c�� Qap yertUeEc-tilers mEax;,akrmsn am i^'- :�;i •r � fJ1 i •w:. \ - - wo strai"xncrmnfayt f to au6 snaam 5_ • �yy ` - `f +4�"����,•.k,•� kyr +�•,'0,.. ��'.aP�Ef.ibMo and amr6 1.115,liia0 aad E",sl! Photo 1 �it r ",; -. T• sQuoilrod UJii, P undfuNtal T� la eomfaflaA faUndnnni vrcadiaEdr -AI : ' `y� .rti\tia°-art xti bfefiara,,narerl. Photo ` Photo 4 e a• i �_ ,�- .r .a', ♦ s s , t f,a # A►. Y1 ,Jf/ ..t•. ' a is �v'�-""+. �TM� Viewable Location Symbols SiteLaoaGdn......:...:...............•........................ Q ,. t� S t 'v t •. 1>'C �;„ "� f {�y� `ti w fr. Yested Area-Hen WiNd Lodatlons. ... .t,, 's1, �'; f� 11�r,' ,,f '� -rte —t.. � • ,fir , 0 Tedidd Area<Vlelald Lomidng.,,...., IL ' •fi • �i 1 'ti 'i,' \ t - `a t'ihdwraph ath"m a Lddadit:............ I-htlttr 1 1 Mq IU NR—M! h 4 PROJECT NARRATIVE: AT&T Wireless Services is ,proposing to install a stealth flagpole on property owned by George and iDoddie Barker, located at 1267 Osgood Street in North Andover, MA. By the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaws, the requirements for a ,proposed wireless facility are as follows: 1) Preexistent photographs of what can currently be seen from public roads and residential dwellings and 2) Proposed photographs to show what will be seen from public roads and residential dwellings if the proposed wireless facility is built. All photos included in this set have a preexistent and proposed ;photograph for each location. Photos one, two, and three are meant to meet the aforementioned requirements by showing views from different areas of Barker Street. Photo six represents the nearest house Li north of the site on Osgood Street. Photos four, five, and seven are included in this set to show the proposed wireless facility from different locations around the n site. In addition to the requirements mentioned above, a one-mile viewing radius was tested. A balloon was flown .at the site for the predetermined height of the l proposed stealth flagpole. Once the balloon was flying, a road test of all ;public roads within one mile of the site was ,performed. Based upon this road test, a map of the locations where the proposed stealth flagpole will be visible has 'been created.. Areas where the proposed stealth flagpole is expected to be visible have been marked as "Visible Locations" on the map. The location of each iphoto in the set has also been marked on the map. U �.1 �J C n PHOTOGRAPHJ: v Photograph number one (PHOTO 1), was taken from the access road to the site, �q looking northwesterly towards the site. The first photo from this location v represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The second photo from this location represents the after condition and is labeled "Proposed". The proposed stealth flagpole .is visible over the covered addition to the barn. V l_J J u C' I i 7 SCD y �tF..yCD y f Photo taken from the access road to the site r� r,. � � - Proposed 120'stealth flagpole with antennas contained within t ri Sol ♦ fff I t i 1 ..- .... L �J Proposed 1 n U �f PHOTOGRAPH 2: r� L Photograph number two (PHOTO 2), was taken from 155 Barker Street, looking { southwesterly towards the site. The first photo from this location represents the 1 before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The second photo from this location represents the after condition and is ilabeled "Proposed". The proposed stealth flagpole and fenced compound are visible to the side of the covered addition to the barn. I-� v I � � I f� �.1 V t f ' I 'I takenLi Lphotoi Barker 4 mile northeast of the f_ Li lY res .. • __ -. � � .�1 �G�GI1f IG CONSU TANi� rn r r • en 155 fromBarkeri mile northeast ' r' e. s ... -e t flagpole with antennas contained within Lj PropostA MT-shelter in i L/ • compound r ,y ••• -• r-� r PHOTOGRAPH 3: Photograph number three (PHOTO 3), was taken from the intersection of Old r� Farm Road and 'Barker Street, looking northerly towards the site. The first photo i '`4 from this ilocation represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The secondphoto from this location represents the after condition and is labeled "Proposed". The proposed stealth flagpole is visible to the left of the light posts over the store. n r� �.J Ln C Com, C� � E -3 C_� C� C-� C� C C_F sr Photo taken from the intersection of Old Farm Fid. and Barker St., 0..2 miles south of the site 1 " ' reexfstent ter_. - — :.- • Photo taken from the intersection of Old Farm Rd. and Barker St., 0.2 miles south of the site Proposed M'stealth flagpole with antennas contained within i f t`i -r �t , �� ! F .Iir: ti (' i 'i r �}�� (� .y. t•r f ';t..= r.. VAWk �;e t t� 1 I ` I PHOTOGRAPH 4: Photograph number four (PHOTO 4), was taken from 163 Old Farm Road, looking northwesterly towards the site. The first photo from this location represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The second photo �.i from this location represents the after condition and is labeled "Proposed". The ;proposed stealth flagpole is visible over the houses and tree line. J n rn U s`1 R U r L.J r1 'J V7 n U n V n I ' f�1 I ' C� C-�I C7D C C-D C--D C`-) C7n C- C-3 C7 C� C-73 C L7) Photo taken from 163 Old Farm Road, 0.4 miles southeast of the site }' �r +i v +� w Preexistent Y- Y t / C� C� C= Cn C773 L--D C--:) r� C7-:) C= - C--) Photo taken from 163 Old Farm Road, 0.4 miles southeast of the site Proposed 120'stealth flagpole with.antennas contained within 1 r + +r- so �^ n !�'+: ;r p'.+{ '1aTT '��, a3 { ,,,,��,w.'••!�e , RW. ,i �}�I INI� ', a1'. .S+Y to ■ ,,:. I PHOTOGRAPH & Photograph number five (PHOTO 5), was taken from Clark Street, looking northeasterly towards the site.. The first photo from this location represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent'. The second photo from this Ulocation represents the after condition and is labeled "Proposed". The proposed n stealth,flagpole is visible over the tree line. l� Li � II � I I 'J I C� C� ED C= C-D C:) C,3 C--3 I= C C= CD C-73 C------i c- ---) a. Photo taken from Clark Street, 0.5 mile southwest of the site r Jig Al . I w • ) ,ff' .. L p �Ilralr'r... ti ......`•� S c ty4 '� Preexistent __ C3 C CL-3 C-:) C710 C D C�. C_7 C7 C3 C C`7 C�:D Photo taken from Clark Street, 0.5 miles southwest of the site r Proposed 120'stealth flagpole , ' with antennas contained within = p '` 'fir � � '' l� - 5 }; . :r .� � ' � t •, ,;rtt _t — IL i ..4�Y � 1 Mill � c y r r • v I II PHOTOGRAPH & Photograph number six (PHOTO 6), was taken from Osgood Street, looking U r1 northwesterly towards the site from the nearest house. The first photo from this location represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The second photo from this location represents the after condition and is labeled "Proposed". The proposed stealth flagpole is visible behind the barn. U D u n U n �� U Photo taken from Osgood Street, 0.25 miles north of the site 1rY � y1. Photo taken from Osgood Street, 0.25 miles north of the site ...• ...F wfth ariterinas cont9ined withm C, w� i r• � Y� f .-- r • •'� r IL t• y , n Lj II I PHOTOGRAPH 7: r, Photograph number seven (PHOTO 7), was taken from the intersection of Barker Street and Bradford Street, looking southwesterly towards the site. The first photo from this location represents the before condition and is labeled "Preexistent". The second photo from this 'location represents the after condition n and is labeled "Proposed". The proposed stealth flagpole is visible over the tree 'bine and the distant horizon. r-� iJ M. J r� ,� ,n v M u Ir- U U IU n C71 C--7 C73 O C_-::] U�D C-3 C- 3 C_:i:) C --I C`13 C:-,3 C= =7 �hrte taken near the intersection of Barker- St, and Bradford St., 0.8 miles northeast of the site ti ENGINEERING TECT Preexistent 1 . -3 C �'�Q C-3 Photo taken near the intersection of Barker St.. and Bradford 8trs 0.8 miles northeast of tete sits n r -M ---,� Proposed 1 M stealth flagpole ' .. _ with aAtenmaS cunWned Wlthifl f. _ r.•„a.,Z i �,{. 14q rte;- +�,. g,V._}`'4'', `y 7 _ TECTONI �I 12 i i 13 PAUL J . FORD AND COMPANY S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R S 250 East Broad Street • Suite 500 • Columbus, Ohio 43215 March 14, 2000 Tectonic Engineering PC 4 West Main St. Northborough, MA 01532 ATTN: Gregory Allen/Project Manager RE: 120-Ft Flag Pole with Cellular Antenna Concealment Cylinder - Located in North Andover, MA:AT&T Wireless Site E445: Barker Farm (PJF project number: 31900-014, ATTW-00143C-02 ) Dear Mr.Allen: We understand that there is some concern on the part of local building officials regarding the potential for failure of communication poles. Communications structures are designed in accordance with the Electronic Industries Association Standard EIA-222-F, "Structural Standard for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." This is a nationally recognized standard which is modeled after the American National Standards Institute document ANSI A58.1. The ANSI standard is based upon equations that were developed using wind tunnel testing to accurately predict the effect that wind has upon poles. This ANSI standard is now known as ASCE-7. The EIA standard was produced by professional engineers experienced in the design of communication structures, to more thoroughly address all of the design criteria specifically applicable to steel communications structures. Much of this specific design criteria is often not available in local building codes. The wind loading requirements in ASCE-7 are also the basis for all of the national building codes throughout the United States. Paul J. Ford and Company designs poles for the code required wind velocity. This design wind velocity should statistically occur once every 50 years. The basic design wind velocity is not a peak gust velocity but is a "fastest mile" wind velocity. That means it is an average velocity based upon the time it takes the fastest wind to travel one mile. A gust factor is also included in the wind pressure calculations. The wind velocity is measured at 33 ft. (10 meters)above grade with escalation factors which, in essence, increase the wind velocity with the height of the pole. Poles, like other properly designed structures, will safely withstand the full design wind velocity and still maintain an additional load capacity known as a"safety factor." The 120-ft flag pole will be designed to be what they refer to as a "bend-over" pole for"this site. This means that the bottom 60-ft of the pole will be intentionally overdesigned in an attempt to limit the fall radius of the pole. This pole will be designed with the top 60-ft meeting the minimum design wind criteria, and the bottom 60-ft designed to resist considerably more than the minimum design wind loads. In the unlikely event that this pole should collapse, the upper 60-ft of the pole would be overstressed first and would buckle. The upper portion of the pole would then swing down and hang from this level or,'at worst, break off resulting in a fall radius of approximately 60-ft. Once the upper portion is no longer upright catching the full force of the wind, the stresses in the lower portion of the pole are reduced, making a further collapse of the pole unlikely. The safety factors used to design communication poles are the same safety factors used in building design. A safety factor of 1.25 is specified by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and a factor of safety of 1.3 is specified by the American Concrete Institute (ACI). These safety factors will be incorporated into the pole and foundation design. A 1.25 safety factor means that the pole would have to be subject to 25% more load (than the design load)before failure would theoretically occur. COLUMBUS, OHIO ATLANTA, GEORGIA • ORLANDO, FLORIDA (6 14) 221-6679 (404) 2 66-240 7 (40 7) 898-9039 I Fax (614) 221-2540 Fax (404) 869-4608 Fax (407) 897-3662 0 www.pjfweb.com 9 �I March 14, 2000 Page 2 of 2 Tectonic Engineering PC ATTN: Gregory Allen/Project Manager RE: 120-Ft Flag Pole with Cellular Antenna Concealment Cylinder Located in North Andover, MA:AT&T Wireless Site E445: Barker Farm (PJF project number: 31900-014, ATTW-00143C-02 ) Paul J. Ford & Company is a firm of structural engineers who have been designing communication structures (and buildings) for over thirty years. The 120-foot flag pole will be properly designed with all of the applicable safety factors as required by the code. Communication poles are safe structures with a long history of reliable operation. This pole will be ne more likely to fall than any of the other properly designed structures in the area. I hope that this answers your questions adequately. If you are in need of any additional information, please call. Sincerely, PAUL J. FORD AND COMPANY (NOF MASs9cti _ gRICHARD W. u, HOFFMAN R`1 v STRUCTURALco No.42531 -o�9FGISTE��o��e AL /Y/00 3i/Yro0 Kurt J. Swarts, P.E. Richard W. Hoffman, P.E. Project Engineer Massachusetts License #42531 e-mail: kswarts@pjfweb.com G.\COMMOMW ORD\KU Ri\Stealth\31900014 L001.doc Copy: Tom Cann istra/Stealth f 14 i i 4 l oil SUHNER® PLANAR ANTENNA . FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION Technical Data Electrical Properties Frequency range 1850- 1990 MHz0. . x Impedance 500 � VSWR 1.3 Polarization linear,vertical Gain 15.5 dBi 3 dB beamwidth horizontal 85° Radiation Pattern 3 dB beamwidth vertical 70 Downtilt 20 : -,W ° Front to back ratio 20 dB Permitted power on entrance 250 W (CW) at 25 °C -30 Mechanical Properties " -30 -ZD an a a Dimensions 1292 x 110 x 39 mm (50.87"x 4.33"x 1.54") Weight 3.2 kg (7.06 lbs.) Housing material Aluminium anodized Radome material ASA Radome color RAL 9002 (grey-white) horizontal Operating temperature range -40*C to+ 80°C Storage temperature range -400 C to+ 80°C Windload 106 N at 160km/h (100mph) ,=p 60 Available Types „o �o 1319.17.0054 N female 1319.41.0062 7/16 female -20 Mounting Hardware so .30 9091.99.0076 downtilt bracket Mast and wall mounting material (2 metal bands) included, m mast diameter 45-90 mm (1.77'-3.54") vertical l SUHNER® PLANAR ANTENNA DIMENSIONS (ems SPA 1900/85/16/2/V 10 50 L4 Ln I o I � Cl) 1.. I 135 fr1 m °m° J SUHNER° PLANAR ANTENNA,:; .FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION Technical Data Electrical Properties Frequency range 1850- 1990 MHz Impedance 500 VSWR 1.3 °Z Polarization dual linear, ±45'slant , . Gain 15.5 dBi 3 dB beamwidth horizontal 850 ' Radiation Pattern 3 dB beamwidth vertical 70 Downtilt 20 z -1W Front to back ratio' 25 dB t Isolation between ports 30 dB _T� .150 Permitted power on entrance 250 W(CW) at 25 °C h' _W -10 0 Mechanical Properties Dimensions 1292 x 1 10 x 39 mm (50.87"x 4.33"x 1.54") Weight 3.2 kg (7.06 lbs.) Housing material Aluminium anodized Radome material ASA horizontal Radome color RAL 9002 (grey-white) Operating temperature range -40°C to+ 80°C Storage temperature range -40*C to+ 80°C 120 60 Windload 106 N at 160km/h (100m h ) P 00 Available Types 1319.17.0079 N female _20 -10 1319.41.0079 7/16 female -110 -30 Mounting Hardware 9091.99.0076 downtilt bracket -100 Mast and wall mounting material (2 metal bands) included, 90 mast diameter 45-90 mm (1.77" -3.54") vertical SUHNER® PLANAR ANTENNA DIMENSIONS SPA 1900/85/16/2/DS 10 50 Ln L o 70 115 I mco m �' m �x amo 15 � l AT&T WIRELESS MODULAR EQUIPMENT SHELTER GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND OPTIONS: SITE: DRAWING LIST: STANDARD BOSTON REV ATTB 122001 0 COVERSH EET MASSACHUSETTS ATTB122002 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ATTB 122003 ' 0 FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT ATTB122004 0 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS TYPE: ATTB122005 0 REFLECTED CEILING ATTB122006 0 FRAMING AND SECTIONS AGGREGATE ATTB122007 1 ROOF FRAMING AND ROOF PLAN LAYOUT ATTB122008 0 BILL OF MATERIALS US12063 0 PIER FOUNDATION PLAN US13002 0 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULE BUILDING DIMENSIONS 12' x 20' MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES : LAND SITE STEEL FRAME MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE SHELTER SIXTH EDITION (780 CMR) 1996 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE NOTES : 1 ) NOT INTENDED FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY. 2) ONLY INTENDED TO BE USED -FOR THE SHELTER OF EQUIPMENT. THE SHELTER DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS : WILL ONLY BE OCCUPIED BY THE UTILITY A — FLOOR LIVE LOAD OF 150 PSF SERVICE PERSONNEL FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. INCLUDING WEIGHT OF EQUIPMENT. 3) CONSTRUCTION TYPE 5B. B — ROOF LIVE LOAD OF 80 PSF. 4) USE GROUP U. — C — WIND LOADING : 90 MPH UP TO 5) MORE THAN 3 CURRENT CARRYING CONDUCTORS 15' ABOVE GRADE, EXPOSURE C INSTALLED IN A RACEWAY SHALL BE DERATED s D — SEISMIC LOADING: AV < 0.15, PER NOTE #8 OF TABLE 310-16 OF NEC. N SEISMIC PERF. CATEGORY "C" a a n jThis document and all information contained herein aro the DESIGN 02 08/99 CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG N0. 0 sowAr UNITED STRUCTURES INC date •� 4odi � of Mil-� �Ste• �, (�, 1e1b ppap,Q,tt B 0000 ATTB122001 of adJnlelt ed.used theed! In containwmfww ed hereto COVER SHEET O1 A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY o any extentbe Prow(except by or to War inn Systems. Me.) APPR APPR SHEET: �'��• BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 Systems.Ina°''°""'`t'" °""'°r`�°t'°"a"�'"' u1di"9 `PPR APPR (� NO SCALE STANDARD 01 OF 08 3/4" 0 HOOKED NOTES: J BOLTS 1. THIS DRAWING IS SUPPLIED FOR 1'-6" "C" "C., 1'-6" REFERENCE ONLY. CABLE ENTRY AND ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE VERIFIED io FOR EACH SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. w 2. VERIFY QUANTITY AND LOCATIONS OF d• PLATES WITH BUILDING MFR. DRAWINGS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.. • *12- 3. MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESIVE STRENGTH 3" FOR CONCRETE OF 3,000 PSI. X 12" X 1/2" 4. ALL STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL CONFORM BEARING PLATE 12" TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED BARS. (6 REQ'D) 5. FOUNDATION PLAN IS FOR REF. ONLY GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS MUST BE VERIFIED 1/2"L ON A SITE SPECIFIC BASIS. 6. THE FOUNDATION IS DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM a FRAME LINE �— ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 3500 _ (REF) I PSF.ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY AT THE PROPOSED SITE SHALL BE VERIFIED BY A COMPETENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 30" 0 CAISSON (6 REQ'D) . . I 3" ------- ------- BEARING PLATE DETAIL SEE CAISSON DETAIL AND SECTION A—A FOUNDATION PLAN LAYOUT 3" t ALL CAISSONS LEVEL 3" CRUSHED STONE TO SAME ELEVATION BUILDING SIZE "A" DIM "B" DIM "C" DIM # OF PLATES WELD LENGTH /PLATE ABOVE SUB—GRADE 7'--2" X ll'-2" 6'-6" 1 l'-2" NA 4 3/16" FILLET WELD 3- LONG PER PLATE 8 #6 REBAR EQ. SP. 7'-10" X ll'-10" 7'—4" 1 2'—4" NA 4 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE 30" 0 CA*1550N '/" " OKED 8'-0" X 12v-0" 7'-6" 12P—O" NA 4 3/16- FILLET WELD 3- LONG PER PLATE n a ° Z 3 TIE 24" 0 10'-0" X 10'-0" 9'-4" 10'-0" NA 4 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE :• # ® 6" O.C. 0 10'-0" X 14'-0" 9'-4" 14'-0" NA 4 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE 10'-0" X 16'-0" 9'-4" 16'-0" NA 4 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE A. 10'-0" X 18'-0" 9'-4" 18'-0" 7'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATEa 10'-0" X 20'-0" 9'-4" 20'-0" 8'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE10'-0" X 30'-0" 9'-4" 30'-0" 13'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 5" LONG PER PLATE 8 #6 REBAR2" X 1/2" EQ. SP. BEARING PLATE 2'-6- 12'-0" X 20'-0" 1 1'-4" 20'-0" s'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE CAISSON DETAIL SECTION A-A 12'-0" X 24'-0" 1 1'-4" 24'-0" 10'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE NTS , „ , » ,. , „ NTS 1 2 —0 X 28 —0 1 1 —4 28 —0 12'-6" 6 3/16' FILLET WELD 3" LONG PER PLATE 12'-0" X 30'-0" 1 1'-4" 30'-0" 13'-6" 6 3/16- FILLET WELD 5" LONG PER PLATE 12'-0" X 32'-0" 1 1 '-4" 32'-0" 14'-6" 6 3/16" FILLET WELD 5" LONG PER PLATE 12'-0" X 40'-0" 1 1 '-4" 40'-0" 12'-4" 8 3/16" FILLET WELD 6" LONG PER PLATE Thb da+mdo and op las , I oordain°d "n on d,. FOUNDATION PIER LAYOUT DESIGN "''� Ct B PROJECT: DWG NO. U SI2063 0 ssum7EDsnxcltm&yjr UNITED STRUCTURES INC. r°'"',�: �. ao M ��►�� M�.p,adu.d. o<dYolw.d �, n.w A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY m a,y sasot( by w WAr of mu nK.1 APP DO NOT SCALE SHEET Ol OF Ol BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 ""' "'"°�"°"�°'""°""'"`� AND DETAIL ��uC�tQol. PANEL SPECIFICATIONS PANEL SCHEDULE MANUFACTURE: SQUARE D MODEL- #QO140M200 SERVICE: 2- C. (3) /3/0 AWG, /6 AWG GRD LOAD PER LOAD PER LOAD PMASE(VA) PHASE(VA) LOAD LEFT BANK RIGHT BANK UNI I UNIT VOLTS: 120/240. PHASE: 10 MAIN BUS AMP: 200 A MAIN CB AMP: 200 A WIRE: 3W MOUNTING: SURFACE DESCRIPTON OTY1 V.A. A B POLES C.B. A 8 A 6 C.B. POLES A B V A QTY DESCRIPTON NEMA TYPE: ONE NEUTRAL BAR: YES GROUND BAR: YES KEY LOGO: YES MB GFCI: NO AIC: 10,000 A RECTIFIER #i 1 4320 2160 2 30 1 2 100 2 SURGE ARRESTOR NOTES: 2160 3 4 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AIC RATING OF UTILITY DOES NOT EXCEED 10,000 A. 2160 5 6 20 1 576 96 6 INT/EXT LIGHTING 2) ALL WIRE IS COPPER, THHN AND RATED 90'. RECTIFIER 02 1 4320 2 30 11 3) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS GROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 250. 2160 7 B 20 1 180 180 1 RECEPT. WALL 8 4) ALL CIRCUITS ARE IN 1/2- CONDUIT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RECTIFIER #3 1 4320 2160 2 30 9 10 20 1 360 180 2 RECEPT. WALL A do D ONE LINE SPECIFICATIONS 2160 11 12 20 1 360 360 1 TELCO QUAD RECEPT. 2160 13 14 20 1 180 180 1 GFl RECEPTACLE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURE PART RECTIFIER r+ 4320 2 30 # RATING COMMENTS 2160 ,s 16 20 , 240 120 2 SMOKE DETECTORS UTILITY FEED N/A N/A 200A.120/24OV,10, 3W BY UTILITY RECTIFIER i5 1 4320 2160 2 17 1B 20 1 330 330 1 EXHAUST do LOUVER GENERATOR N/A N/A N/A N/A 2160 79 20 35 2784 ENC. BREAKER N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 5568 1 HVAC UNIT /1 2784 SAFETY DISCONNECT SQUARE 0 0224N 200A. 24OV, 10, FUSED BY USl RECTIFIER /6 1 4320 2160 21 22 2 30 2160 23 24 GEN. RECEPTACLE APPLETON AR20033RS 200A, 600V BY USI 25 26 TRANSFER SNATCH SQUARE D 82254 200A, 24OV.10. 2—POLE BY USI 27 28 SURGE ARRESTOR A.C. DATA P12XXV 2000k, 240V BY USI 29 30 31 32 33 34 UTILITY EMERGENCY FEED GENERATOR 35 T3a NEC 230 NEC 250. 445, 700 37 GEN39 2- C. 41 (3) #3/0 AWG LEFT BANK SUB TOTAL 12960 12960 176A 4230 3564 RIGHT BANK SUB TOTAL 7794 #6 AWG GRD GENERATOR TOTAL PANEL AMPS: 1.25 X (TOTAL VA/2401' (33714)/240)X1.25-175.59375 LEFT BANK SUB TOTAL 25920 ENCLOSED RECEPTACLE BREAKER NEC 410—L NEC 240,710 CIR # 1.3.5,7,9,11 PANEL TOTAL LOAD 33714 pR / 13.15,17.19,21,23 GR /18 TRANSFER SWITCH NEC 380 GR X16 GROUNDING CIR # NEC 250 � GR /2,4 2- C. (3) 03/0 AWG GR /14 GR g10 /6 AWG GRD PPI GR #20.2 = SURGE -- 120/240V ARRESTOR 10.3W NEC 280 0200A 3 N MCB O C in DISTRIBUTION CIR /12 PANEL v NEC 384 GR IF6 B D W ONE LINE DIAGRAM CIRCUIT DIAGRAM a UNITEDSTRUCTURES INC THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE PROPERTY OF DESIGN o2 o9/ss CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OF THIS ELECTRICAL -Bh,►1," US13002 - UNR>�SIW/CTIfS DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR � 0000 0 .,", A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PPR APPR iS BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. itltaa� �,,,, sITE:STANDARD TEET 01 OF 01 53 9 10 8 4 L r_j it t LIFTING PLATE-/ 6 5 2 12 (4 REQ'0 PATCHED IN FIELD) WALL B WALLA 54 14 01 u /-c .. NB D O a: 12 13 N WALL D WALL C a A N - - n rn THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE PROPERTY OF DEQ 0210 CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. R� rm ��L�,, UNITED STRUCTURES INC. UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART DF THIS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS IPPR IPPR maim, B o000 ATT13122002 LOOM VWX A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN SCALE: SITE: SHEET: �; BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. rf � ��, f8 1 4" = 1• STANDARD 02 . OF 09 20'-1 1/2' 19'-3 1/2' _ _ _ 53 A 8 C A B C SECTOR A SEC OR 8 38 SECTOR C 9 0 0 10 ( 1 c N co /S COMPACT 30 — P 0 22 24V 28 m 1 '1 11 � 0 22 12 1 --;T 1'� 41 27 I 17 31A 318 24 25 23 y2l72 16 19 26 78 GNB 1 - 2X 41A 7 m 1 1 M iV t0 2 20 54 3'-7 5/8' 2'-11 5/8' 8 NOTES. B.-1 5/8' 5'-7 5/8.' 1. 17" X 17" R.O. FOR INTAKE AND EXHAUST FANS 2. 22 1/2 W. x 18 1/2'H. R.O. FOR MICR &T CABLE ENTRY 3. GROUND HALO OF #2 COPPER WIRE WITH FOUR CORNER DROPS 4. 1/2' PVC CONDUIT THROUGH FLOOR AT EACH CORNER FLOOR PLAN N C _N a B D / N 0 A co/ rn THIS DESIGN AND DRAWNG ARE PROPERTY OF DESIGN 0�2p/09/99 CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV UNITED STRUCTURES INC. UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OF THIS FLOOR PLAN dJtanu►1a. LOUCR/IOIb UG6Uo/tG B 0000 ATTB122003 0 �, A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY DESIGN OR DRAVANG MAY BE COPIED OR / REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPR APPR SCALE: SITE: SHEET: ii BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. Aan 1/4" = 1' STANDARD 03 . OF 09 HVAC 41A 2 16 17 25 78 54 GRILLE 41 10 9 4: I I r• a � "CSC' I � � ® L4 I ao E i� co c m m 31A 318 LETTER DIMS 19 5 72 21 23 24 ARE FOR R.O. 22 DIMENSIONAL DATA WALL A WALL B 5- 76 3/4' 85 3/4- 7Q- PARTIAL VIEW OF 18' NIDE CABLE RACKING 20 28 27 26 NOTES: 1. FANS TO BE HARED TO SMOKE DETECTORS FOR EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN. 2. HOFFMAN ALARM BOX INCLUDES: HI do LOW TEMPERATURE CONTROLS SMOKE DETECTORS INTRUSION DOOR ALARMS POWER FA LURE a � o i1 LZ s d � o dc ® o 1_ 1/2- PVC CONDUIT 30 22 TYPICAL (4) B D v 0 UN " d a WALL C WALL D A N N n co THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE PROPERTY OF DESIGN GN 02/0/99 CHECKS SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV UNITED STRUCTURES INC. UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OF THIS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS IPPR &U�CAA" UAfPAPWR/W Maiolil B 0000 ATT13122004 0 01 UV!lr�S7AllCT1A4ESI�G DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR ."'. A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY REPRODUCED WATHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN q�� � SCALE: SITE: SHEET: BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. ll(IC/,A�Q,� ,�,n, 1 4" = 1 STANDARD 04 . OF 09 20'-1 1/2- 19'-3 1/2" 9'-7 7/8' 6'-0' 38 2'-6- V-6- 10• 43 ro I Cl a �o I in N � O O 1 1 O 10 IE a - I I f I f I a 42 44 REFLECTED CEILING N n a n N n co THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE PROPERTY OF DESIGN 02/09/99 CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV UNITED STRUCTURES INC. UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OF THIS REFLECTED CEILING °�'�""'�' �" t B o00o ATTB122005 0 uMr><ns>aucTTxlFs A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY ��� OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED NATHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPR, I APPR SCALE: SRE SHEET: BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. `micjwa� �a,�, 1 4" = 1' STANDARD 05 . OF 09 20'-0' 4' W8 X 15 BEAMS 4'-0' O.C. 4- 12* x 12' x 1/8' VINYL COMPOSITE TILE. 4' LIGHTWEIGHT 4000 PSI - CONCRETE FLOOR - = Z: 6' X 6' 16 WIRE MESH 1 1/2' 20 GA GALVANIZED --- - - COMPOSITE METAL DECKING 2' R-14.3 RIGID INSULATION 11 111111 IN -_ -_- -_ =Z:= MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO DECKING = = === = - W12 X 22 FULLY WELDED - -- - - - END BEAMS (2 REQ'D) ----- 1/2' PVC CONDUIT (SEE NOTE #6) W8 X 15 FULLY WELDED INTERMEDIATE BEAMS W12 X 22 FULLY WELDED LIFTING PLATES (4 REQ'D) MAIN BEAMS (2 REQ'D) (4 REQ'D) FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: 3 0 � 1) ALL STEEL GRADE A36 OR BETTER 0 2) INTERMEDIATE BEAMS FULLY WELDED N TO MAIN BEAM j 3) ALL STEEL TO BE FULLY PRIMED AND PAINTED. 0 4) 6' X 6' WIRE MESH TO BE PULLED m UP AFTER CONCRETE IS POURED 5) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, STRUCTURE IS TO BE SUPPORTED CONTINUOUSLY o ALONG MAIN BEAMS. a 6) PROVIDE FOUR 1/2' PVC CONDUIT THROUGH FLOOR, ONE AT EACH CORNER. A N m Ol W s THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE PROPERTY OF DESIGN 009/99 CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV IMIEDommmUNITED STRUCTURES INC : UNITED STRUCTURES INC NO PART OF THIS FLOOR FRAMING IPPR uCAPuj*,& VAGPOPGRo/aL B o00o ATTB122006 0 "� A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR / .,,'. REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN SCALE: SITE: SHEET: 0 BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. ` �Laa� pi. �, 1 4" = 1' STANDARD 06 _ OF 09 20'-0" NOTES: 6" 16 GA. STEEL JOISTS SPACED ® 16" O.C. SEE DETAIL A 1) SEE DETAIL B FOR JOIST CONSTRUCTION. i i i i 1/16 1-12 i WEB STRAIGHT ROOF JOIST i i i PITCHED ROOF \ JOIST _CO 1 i SEE DETAIL "B" BOTTOM FLANGE 1/16. 1/16 Li 6" 16 GA. STITCH,WELDED 6" 16 GA. STITCH WELDED STRUCTURAL STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL 6" TRACK (2 REQ'D) JOISTS (32 REQ'D) " STRUCTUAL STEEL TRACK \ kL ROOF FRAME 9 NOT SHOWNFARSSIDE DETAIL A 12 GA. STEEL ROOF SHEETS 6" 16 GA. WORKING POINT OVERLAPPED 4" MINIMUM, WELDED ASTEC CERAMIC ROOF STEEL JOIST I ® TOP FLANGE TO JOISTS USING 1/4" STITCH COATING AND PRIMER OVER WELDS ® 12" O.C. 12 GA. STEEL SHEETS �- -- - - --- - - - - - - - -- - - - ---- -, I ,-- - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - ---- I I I J = I I FOR A ROOF SLOPE =1/2"/FT I i a I I THIS DIMENSION IS 1/4 I it I n uj a � ( I ©1/2 " II N � it I I I I o I I > I FULL DEPTH WELD ® WEB N I ~ UJ I & WELD BOTTOM FLANGE I EXTERIOR WALL a d INTERIOR WALL ( I THE FULL LENGTH N i tIL- LINE (REF) N \ LINE (REF) I I K I --- � DETAIL B NL — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - J ROOF PLAN LAYOUT PITCHED ROOF JOIST DETAIL En I THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING ARE REV UNITED STRUCTURES INC. UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OFETHISOF DESIGN p ���gg CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG N0.ATTB1 22007 O ROOF FRAMING AND .t7tMVl1[t. 1.tGP/W,tb VGOIW/t4 A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR B 0000 0 0 0 REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN A�PyyP�R� � I APPR ROOF PLAN LAYOUT ii BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. //f/CIIaQb An m C SCAL1 4" = 1 STANDARD SHS: 07 - OF 09 r NOTES: ROOF TRACK WELDED TO 1. ALL EXTERIOR SEAMS BETWEEN STEEL STUDS AND JOISTS WITH SHEETS TO BE CAULKED. 1/4 WIDE WELDS. 2. RUST INHIBITOR PRIMER APPLIED TO ALL STEEL. 3. STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR ASTEC CERAMIC ' A. FLOOR LIVE LOAD OF 150 PSF 12 GA. STEEL SHEATHING ROOF COATING B. ROOF LIVE LOAD OF 80 PSF WELDED TO ROOF JOISTS USING 1/4- 2 COATS ` C. WIND LOADING OF 90 MPH STITCH WELDS ®12"_O.C. `\ 4. WELD ELECTRODES: E70 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS. 6" FIBERGLASS R-19 " + BATT INSULATION 6 16 GA. STITCH WELDED STRUCTURAL STEEL JOISTS SPACED 016" O.C. STEEL FASCIA XXVA V Xx \\r--SEE DETAIL A / i 3 1/2- R-11 BATT FIBERGLASS INSULATION X 1 LAYER 5/8" \ / CDX PLYWOOD 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X CABLE 3 5/8 18 GA. STRUCTURAL SHEETROCK SPACKLED RACKING7 TRACK TOP AND BOTTOM _- " AND PAINTED WHITE WELDED TO STUDS WITH STEEL STUDS 16 O.C. WITH ONE LAYER OF 5/8" 1/4" WIDE WELDS. TRACK TOP AND BOTFOM TYPE "X" SHEETROCK DETAIL A = NTS 14 GA. STEEL SHEATHING 8 z WELDED TO STEEL STUDS USING >< w 1/4" STITCH WELDS 012" O.C. u XJ N 1/8" WHITE FIBERGLASS d ,i X �\ TRACK ATTACHED TO REINFORCED PANELS (FRP) - LZ in b MAIN AND END BEAMS WITH TRIM MOLDINGS I a -�-I WITH 1/4" PUDDLE MAX. FLAME SPREAD VALUE o+ cn o WELDS 12" D.C. OF 200, MAX. SMOKE DEVELOPED I w VALUE OF 450 cO z SUNSET BEACH AGGREGATE 1'2" X 12" X 1/8" VINYL AGGREGATE SIDING EXTERIOR FINISH COMPOSITION TILE 4" VINYL 14 GA. STEEL W12 X 22 FULLY X / COVE BASE SHEATHING a WELDED MAIN BEAMS 1 1/2" 20 GA. GALV. COMPOSITE METAL _ DECKING ANCHOR BUILDING TO FOUNDATION I WITH 10" X 3/16" FILLET WELDS - AT EACH 12" X 12" X 1/2" \ / STEEL PLATE EMBEDDED IN THE It I FOUNDATION i 4" REINFORCED LIGHTWEIGHT + CONCRETE FLOOR WITH 6" X 6" SEE DETAIL B J �r W8 X 15 FULLY WELDED W12 X 22 FULLY NO. 6 WIRE MESH INTERMEDIATE BEAMS WELDED END BEAMS J CHANNEL n CONCRETE FOUNDATION 22 GA. GALV. STEEL 2" R-14.3 RIGID INSULATION -`-- (FOR REF. ONLY) SHEETS FULLY WELDED MECHANICALLY FASTENED PROVIDE A 10" X 3/16" FILLET co TO THE UNDERSIDE TO DECKING WELD AT EACH 12" X 12" X 1/2" WALL SECTION STEEL PLATE EMBEDDED IN THE DETAIL B co FOUNDATION - NTS co THIS DESIGN AND j „SII'S• UNITED STRUCTURES INC■ UNITED STRUCTURES R INC. NO PART PROPERTY OF THIS DESIGN 02�pg�gg CHECK SIZE PROJECT: DWG NO. REV wim WALL SECTION a o00o ATTB122008 0 A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY DESIGN OR DRAMANG MAY BE COPIED OR APPR APPR ."', REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN SCALE: SHEET: o BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. �,�, ($ 11 2" = 1 STANDARD 08 OF 09 BILL OF MATERIAL BILL OF MATERIAL ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MODEL # ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MODEL # 1 1 MARVARI 36,000 BTU HVAC UNIT W/ECONOMIZER AVP36ACA-OSC 31A 1 DAYTON HIGH TEMP CONTROL 2E-206 2 1 3'-0" X 7'-0" 18 GA. INSULATED, PRIMED AND PAINTED STEEL DOOR VC307OM81C 31B 1 DAYTON LOW TEMP CONTROL 2E-206 3 1 SIMPLEX LOCKSET WITH ANTIPICK GUARD 38 1 SIX RECTIFIER DROPS IN TWO 3/4" SEAL-TITS 15' FLEX WHIPS US16006 4 1 DOOR HOOD US1415 41 1 HONEYWELL THERMOSTAT T874A 8 1 HIGH PRSSURE SODIUM EXTERIOR LIGHT W/MOTION DETECTOR WPR150HPS 42 2 BRK IONIZATION SMOKE DETECTOR 4919 9 1 MICROFLECT TWELVE PORT CABLE ENTRY PANEL 81118 43 4 4'-0" X 10" WIDE FLUORESCENT TWO BULB LIGHT FIXTURE OWL142-120ESB 10 2 4" X 23" X 1/4" GROUND BAR W/MOUNTING KIT RMJ-BB-D101 44 - 18" WIDE CABLE RACKING W/ACCOMPANYING HARDWARE RMJ-CR-0101-8 11 1 EXTERIOR GFI RECEPTACLE GFR5342-2 53 1 16" DAYTON HOODED EXHAUST FAN 2C713 12 1 APPLETON 200 AMP GENERATOR RECEPTACLE AR20033 54 1 16" DAYTON HOODED MOTORIZED INTAKE LOUVERS 4C557, 2CB31 13 3/8" STONE AGGREGATE FIBERGLASS POLYMER COMPOSITE PANELS US16001 78 1 HOFFMAN ALARM BOX HOFFA1212CH 14 ALUMINUM TRIM US16002 15 12 GA. STEEL FASCIA, PAINTED TO MATCH DOOR AND BASE US16003 16 1 PRESCOLITE EXIT SIGN EDS 2 17 1 PRESCOLITE EMERGENCY LIGHT ELM 2 I 18 1 PARKER DOOR CLOSER E2002-00-00 GENERAL NOTES: 19 1 HALATRON HAND HELD FIRE EXTINGUISHER 1.) ALL EXTERIOR EQUIPMENT IS WEATHERPROOF. 2.) HVAC UNIT HAS AN ECONOMIZER ANDA 5 KW HEAT STRIP. 20 HALO GROUND WITH #2 COPPER WIRE AND 4 CORNER DROPS USI6004 3.) INTERIOR HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE IS 9'-0". 21 1 LIGHT SWITCH W/DUPLEX RECEPTACLE IVORY PHENOLIC COLOR 1201-I 4.) CABLE RACK IS 8'-0" FROM FINISHED FLOOR. 5.) ALL EQUIPMENT & CABLE RACK ARE TO BE GROUNDED DIRECTIONALLY 22 2 120 VOLT 20 AMP. DUPLEX RECEPTACLE IVORY PHENOLIC COLOR 5252 BACK TO MASTER GROUND BAR. 23 1 120 VOLT 20 AMP. IVORY PHENOLIC QUAD RECEPTACLE 5252 24 1 4' X 8' X 3/4" PAINTED TELCO BOARD US16005 25 1 2" X 13 1/2" X 1/4" MASTER GROUND BAR W/MOUNTING KIT RMJ-BB-0104 SPECIAL NOTES: 26 1 SQUARE D 200 AMP SAFETY DISCONNECT D224N 27 1 SQUARE D 200 AMP MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH 82254 a 28 1 SQUARE D 200 AMP MAIN POWER PANEL WITH 40 BREAKERS Q0140M200 0 N 30 1 A.C. DATA SYSTEMS METAL CASE SURGE ARRESTER P12XXV 04r a cq N n / 4m j ,.L„ UNITED STRUCTURES INC• THIS UNITED STRUCTURES INC. NO PART OF THIS DESIGN 02/0 x/99 CHS iCK1 SIZE PROJECT: DWG N0. REV O1 llrlfEDsmvjAESIYG DESIGN OR DRAWING MAY BE COPIED OR BILL OF MATERIAL d7tOnu►1A. �ttGe/ b UGOUQ/iG B 0000 ATTB122009 0 A MILLER BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPANY / WAY'N. REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPR APPR SCALE: SITE: SHEET: ii BINGHAMTON, NY 13904-0194 (607) 772-9810 CONSENT OF UNITED STRUCTURES INC. � ,n, 1 4" = 1' STANDARD 09 . OF 09 I' 16 LDF4-50A Cable Ordering Information Attenuation and Average Power DescriptionPower ft dB/100m kW Standard Cable '- /100 1/2"Standard Cable,Standard Jacket LDF4-5_0A 0.5 0.046 0.152 40.0 Fire Retardant Cables 1 0.066 0.217 35.1 1/2"Fire Retardant Jacket(CATVX) LDF4RN-50A 1.5 0.081 0.266 28.6 1/2"Fire Retardant Jacket(CATVR) LDF4RN-50A 2 0.094 0.308 24.8 10 0.211 0.692 11.0• Low VSWR and Specialized Cables 20 0:300 0.985 7.75 1/2"Low VSWR,specify operating band LDF4P-50A{••) 30 0.369 1.21 6.31 Cable for Cellular,standard jacket 50 0.479 1.57 4.85 824-960 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,.max. LDF4P-50A-1 gg 0.641 2.10 3.63 880-960 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,max. LDF4P-50A-2 100 0.684 2.24 3.39 ` Cable for Cellular,fire retardant jacket(CATVR) 824-894 MHz, 1.20 VSWR 41690-74 108 0.712 2.34 3.26 Qualified to MIL-C-28830/3 . 202071-1 150 0.845 2.77 2.75 Phase Stabilized and Phase Measured Cable See page 585 174 0.914 3.00 2.54 Jumper Cable Assemblies 200 0.983 3.23 2.36 Standard Jumper Assemblies See page 545 300 1.22 4.00 1.91 1.42 4.66 1.64 Low VSWR Jumper Assemblies for Cellular See page 46 400 - Low VSWR Jumper Assemblies for Microwave See page 171 450 1.51 4.96 1.53 500 1.60 5.26 1.45 Insert suffix number from"Low VSWR Specifications"table. 512 1.62 5.32 1.43 600 1.77 5.80 1.31 Characteristics 700 1.92 6.31 1.21 800 2.07 6.79 1.12 Electrical 824 2.10 6.90 1.10 Impedance,ohms 50:t 1 894 2.20 7.22 1.05 Maximum Frequency,GHz 8.8 960 2.29 7.51 1.01 Velocity,percent 88 1000 2.34 - 7.68 0.994 Peak Power Rating,kW - 40 1250 2.65 8.69 0.878 do resistance,ohms/1000 ft(1000 m) Inner 0.45(l.48) 1500 2.93 9.61 0.793 Outer 0.58(l.90) 1700 3.15 10.3 0.738 do Breakdown,volts 4000 2000 3.45 11.3 0.673 Jacket Spark,volts RMS 8000 2300 3.74 12.3 0.621 Capacitance,pF/ft(m) 23.1 (75.8) 3000 4.38 14.4 0.532 Inductance,p/ft(m) 0.058(0.190) 4000 5.18 17,0 0.448 Mechanical 5000 5.93 19.5 0.392 Outer Conductor Copper 6000 6.64 21.8 0.351 Inner Conductor Copper-Clad Aluminum 8000 7.94 26.06 6. 0.293 Diameter over Jacket,in(mm) 0.63(16) 8800 8.42 27.66 0.276 Diameter over Copper Outer Conductor,in(mm) 0.55(14) Standard Conditions: Diameter Inner Conductor,in(mm) 0.189(4.6) For Attenuation.VSWR 1.0,ambient temperature 24"C(75"F). Nominal Inside Transverse Dimensions,cm 1.11 For average power,VSWR 1.0 ambient temperature 40"C(104•F),inner Minimum Bending Radius,in(mm) 5(125) conductor temperature 100"C(212"F),no solar loading. Number of Bends,minimum(typical) 15(50) Bending Moment,Ib-ft(Nem) 2.8(3.8) Cable Weight, Ib/ft(kg/m) 0.15(0.22) Tensile Strength,Ib(kg) 250(113) Flat Plate Crush Strength,IbAn(kg/mm) 110(2.0) •U.K.0800-250055 •Republic of Ireland 1-800-535358 •Australia 1800-803 219 •New Zealand 0800-441-747 DREW® 461 Coaxial Cables E 17 i t ' I I li I LDFS-50A i Cable Ordering Information . Attenuation and Average Power PowerDescription Type No. Frequency Attenuation Attenuation Average MHz rrdB/100m kW Standard Cable 7/8"Standard Cable,Standard Jacket LDF5-50A 0.5 0.025 0.0804 91.0 1 0.035 0.115 78.9 Fire Retardant Cable 1.5 0.043 0.141 64.3 7/8"Fire Retardant Jacket(CATVR) LDFSRN-50A 2 0.050 0.164 55.6 Low VSWR and Specialized Cables 10 0.112 0.367 24.6 7/8"Low VSWR,specify operating band LDF5P-50A-(*•) 20 0.160 0.525 17.3 Cable for Cellular,standard jacket 30 0.197 0.646 14.0 824-960 MHz, 1.10 VSWR,max. LDF5P-50A-9A 50 0.257 0.843 10.7 Cable for Cellular,fire retardant jacket,(CATVR) 88 0.345 1.13 8.01 824-894 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,max. 41690-75, 100 0.369 1.21 7.49 Qualified to MIL-C-28830/4 202071-2 108 0.384 1.26 7.19 Phase Stabilized and Phase Measured Cable Seepage 585 150 0.458 1.50 6.04 •'Insert suffix number from"Low VSWR Specifications"table. 174 0.496 1.63 5.58 200 0.535 1.76 5.18 Characteristics 300 0.666 2.18 4.15 400 0.781 2.56 3.55 Electrical 450 0.834 2.74 3.32 Impedance,ohms 50:t 1 500 0.883 2.90 3.13 Maximum Frequency,GHz 5.0 512 0.896 2.94 3.09 Velocity,percent 89 600 0.979 3.21 2.83 Peak Power Rating,kW 91 700 1.0.7 3.50 2.59 do Resistance,ohms/1000 ft{1000 m) 800 1.15 3.78 2.40 Inner 0.32(1.05) 824 1.17 3.85 2.36 Outer 0.32(l.05) 894 1.23 4.03 2.25 do Breakdown,volts 6000 960 1.28 4.20 2.16 Jacket Spark,volts RMS 8000 1000 1.31 4.30 2.11 Capacitance, pF/ft(m) 22.8(75.0) 1250 1.49 4.90 1.85 Inductance, pH/ft(m) 0.057(0.187) 1500 1.66 5.45 1.66 1700 1.79 5.87 1.54 Mechanical 2000 1.97 6.46 1.40 Outer Conductor Copper 2300 2.15 7.05 1.29 Inner Conductor Copper 3000 2.53 8.31 1.09 Diameter over Jacket, in(Tm) 1.09(28) 4000 3.03 9.94 0.914 Diameter over Copper Outer Conductor,in(mm) 0.98(24.9) 5000 3.50 11.5 0.792 Diameter Inner Conductor,in(mm) 0.355(4.0) Nominal Inside Transverse Dimensions,cm 2.11 Standard Conditions: For Attenuation. VSWR 1.0 ambient temperature 24°C(75°F). Minimum Bending Radius, in(mm) 10(250) For Average Power,VSWR 1.0,ambient temperature 40°C(104°F),inner Number of Bends, minimum(typical) 15(50) conductor temperature 100°C(212°F),no solar loading. Bending Moment,Ib-ft(N-m) 12(16.3) Cable Weight, Ib/ft(kg/m) 0.33(0.49) Tensile Strength, Ib(kg) 325(147) Flat Plate Crush Strength,Ib/in(kg/mm) 80(1.4) 'A 75-bhm 7/8°diameter cable is available.Contact Andrew for further information. •U.K.0800-250055 •Republic of Ireland 1-800-535358 •Australia 1800-803 219 •New Zealand 0800-441-747 0NDREW. 465 HELIAXO Coaxial I V. I LDF7-50A Cable Ordering Iq'ormation Attenuation and Average Power DescriptionPower Standard Cable MHz '- dB/100m 1-5/8'Standard Cable,Standard Jacket LDF7-50A 0.5 0.015 0.048 231 1 0.021 0.069 163 Fire Retardant Cable 1.5 0.026 0.085 133 1-5/8"Fire Retardant Jacket(CATVR) LDF7RN-50A 2 0.030 0.098 115 Low VSWR Cables 10 0.068 0.223 50.8 20. 0.097 0.319 35.6 1-5/8"Low VSWR,specify operating band. LDF713-50A-(•*) 30 0.120 0.394 28.9 Cable for Cellular,standard jacket 50 0.156 0.512 22.1 i 824-894 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,max. LDF7P-50A-1A 88 0.210 0.690 16.4 880-960 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,max. LDF7P-50A-3A 100 .0.225 0.738 15.3 870-960 MHz, 1.10 VSWR,max.(up to 300 ft) LDF7P-50A-2A 108 0:235 0.769 14.7 Cable for Cellular,fire retardant jacket(CATVR) 150 0.280 0.919 12.3 174 0.304 0.997 11.3 ` 824-894 MHz, 1.20 VSWR,max. 41690-73 200 0.328 1.08 10.5 Qualified to MIL-C-28830/5 202071-3 300 0.411 1.35 8.42 "Insert suffix number from"Low VSWR Specifications"table. 400 0.482 1.58 7.17 i 450 0.515 1.69 6.71 Characteristics 500 0.547 1.79 6.31 512 0.556 1.82 6.23 Electrical 600 0.607 1.99 5.69 .I Impedance,ohms 50t 1 700 0.664 2.18 5.20 Maximum Frequency,GHz 2.5 800 = 0.718 2.36 4.81 'I Velocity,percent gg 824 0.731 2.40 4.73 i� Peak Power Rating,kW 315 894 0.767 2.52 4.51 ' do Resistance,ohms/1000 ft 96.0: 0.8002.62 4.32(1000 m) 1000 0.819 2.69 4.22 Inner 0.21 (0.69) 1250 0.936 3.07 3.69 Outer 0.10(0.33) 1500 1.05 3.44 3.30 do Breakdown,volts 11000. 1700 1.13 3.72 3.06 Jacket Spark,volts RMS 10000 2000 1.25 4.10 2.76 I Capacitance,pF/ft(m) 23.1 (75.8) 2300 1.37 4.48 2.53 Inductance,pH/ft(m) 0.058(0.190) 25001.44 4.72 2.40 Mechanical Standard Conditions: For Attenuation.VSWR 1.0 ambient temperature WC(75"F),atmospheric Outer Conductor Copper pressure,dry air. Inner Conductor For Average Power,VSWR 1.0,inner temperature 100°C(212T),ambient Copper temperature 40°C(104°F),atmospheric pressure,dry air,no solar loading. Diameter over Jacket, in(mm) 1.98(50) Diameter over Copper Outer Conductor, in(mm) 1.83(46.5) Diameter Inner Conductor,in(mm) 0.681 (17.3) i Nominal Inside Transverse Dimensions(cm) (4.05) i Minimum Bending Radius,in(mm) 20(510) j Number of Bends,minimum (typical) 15(50) Bending Moment, Ib-ft(N-m) 50(68) i Cable Weight, Ib/ft(kg/m) 0.92 (l.36) Tensile Strength,Ib(kg) 1000(455) Flat Plate Crush Strength,Ibrn(kg/mm) 150(2.7) 474 00ANDREW. Customer Service Center-Call toll-free from: •U.S.A.,Canada and Mexico 1-800-255.1479 i II 17 M'-AR. -15' 00(WED) 16:33 ERICSSON INC. TEL;:78,1-169-4595 P. 002 MAR-15-2000 16:11 SAC COMN I CAT I ONS'; 703 643 1842 N.Mt/Wm GNB BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET L Product Idendficatlon Cimmioal/Trade Name(Identity used on label); Chel'tcal Fami1y1C1aBeitiwuon: ABSOLY'TE IIP/CHAMPION 5eeled Lead Acrd Battery r tb kit.Storage Batten, Company Name Addids; ONE Battery Tcchnolo es ".829'P4rh%aesv Bouleverd Division or Deput ment Lorritierd►.IL 60148-3Z4p j Industrial Buggy Com am•-Stationary Contact =Tat" one Number Quostiorts combing MSDS Dept 770.675.2470'=: Contact Environmontal Assurance D artment •Biwa Ennaiotu Transportation Emergencies; 24 boors:' CIIEMTREC '800=424-9300 II. Hazardous Ingredients °h by Welghl CAS Epoeutd Limits MATERIAL o Volume NOI, R 05HA AC©IH Laid 67.77 7439.92-1 .05 mo/m-, .15 male' Electrolyte: l (Sulitiuic Acid) 18.23 7664.93.9 . l,mg/nt3 1 mg/m3 �•y Case Material; I Polypropylene 215 9003.07-0 NJA N/A Separator 2-3, NIA 2 N/A:. . , N/A Copper <1 . 7440.50.8 1 tttg/m3 f XfA Tin 40.2 N!A NIA Cadmium 0.2-0.3 7440-43-9 0;05 m8/00,05 mg/m3 Andmonv 0:2-0.4 7440.36.0 �;5 m "I 0.5 10963 I13L Physical Data Materiels(at nornml temperatures) Appeerente and Odor Elecuoi)ic is a clear liquid with a sharp, Elaotmlvte tietratlJt , ontodor.:;;; Boiling Point(at 760 MM Hg) :Melling Point 203°F Specific Gravity(H20-1) Yapor--Sessure(mm Hg at 20°C) 1.33 -1.350 • l0 ' Vapor Density(AIR-1) Solubittti-in Water 0mater then 1 100�/b ( 516 Volatiles bt,Weight Eviporetion Rate(Bund Acetatc-l) N/A 'Less.than I Mai'6. 1996 a2pmsds. i .i MAn. -15' OO(WED) 16:33 ERICSSON INC, TEG:181-769-4598 P. 003 MAR-15-2000 16:11 SAC COMMUNICATIONS 703 643 1842 P.rdid.5/um) IV, Health Hazard Information ROUTES AND METHODS OF E4MY Inhalation; ; Sul tic Acid vapors or mist may cause severe tospirator iriitatititi, Lead dust or.f antes may cause irritation of upper respiratory t a or lunas. , Sicto Contact: Sulftic Acid may cause severe Irritation.burns and ulceration. lead Compandsare net absorbed through the skin. SkinFAbsoMdon: 5 r10 Acid Is not madil�,absorbed throuih throw' the skin. Lead Co ` ' unds amzot�absorbed through the skin, Eyeontact: S tic Acid vapors or mist can cause severe irritation,burns;soiree.dapgc and.possible blindness. Lead Compounds ms, caul eye itrltation. InsUOn: Sulf iric Acld may cause severe irrii'atlon of mouth,throat,esopand stonikh.°,Lead Compounds may cause abdominal pain, rizu,an.wmitin .diarrhea and sevetc ctsm lag. Acute in a tion-ahould be treated by yhyfician. SIGNS AND SYWT0M45.0F OVE YPOSURE Acu a fitrects: Su rle Acid may cause severe skin Iniratiam banns,damage to ccrAda."d possible blindnoss and upper respiratoryIrritation. Lead-Compounds mail cause abdominal pairt.nausea,hew tic n d h .•.vontJp ,diarrhoea sere cram In �• Chr nic Effects end dl ltatlty In sleoping. Sul ric Acid may lead to sc�rring of the carnes,inflammation of,ihc'nti6i~thrca�-t lid Vtonchial tubes and possible erosion of toot enarnel. Lea ,. L Compounds Bray cause anemia.damage to the kidneya"and<iietvous sYstem. Meyycause reproductive changes In both males and males. POTENTIAL T • A 0'C [ISE SCAN CEk": Lac has been tested for abllla,to cause cancer. The ret;ult0h6ivcd'il►aiting lnsuitlelent cAdenee to show that lead can or Canr of cause cancer, 11,MGENCY ANDFIKST AID PkOCEDURES Iulr ation: Sulf iric Acid-Remove to fresh air immediately, if brettthGtg it diftl oIL git% ory ea: Lca Compounds-Remove from ex osure;jaTtle.wash nose antl:eves and consult P,�stelan, Skir: Sulf iric Acid-flush with large amounts of water Ibr at leasi iS minutes.-renrovo any contaminated clothing and do not"oar agai until cleaned. If acid is splashed on shoes.remove and discard if they contain leather. Lead Compounds are not absorbed thiYoUrb the skin. Sul ria Acid-flush immedfete •jvIth cool«star for at least IS-minutes, consult Lea Compounds-Aush immed stely with cool water for at:leaet'IS minutes.thenconpult physician. ,01-1. Inge tion: Sul ric Acid-give large quantities of%-jLcr.�0 q in Lea themconsultphrslcian. Lea Compounds-consult a ph sician. MAR 15 'nPi ,c;:cn _ >f MAA, -15' OMEN 16:34 ERICSSON INC, TEL ,1;81'-169-4598 P. 004 . ;. m AR-15-2000 1611 SAC COMMUNICATION$•" 783 643 1842 P.004/W., V. ItIre and Explosion Data Flasj point: Flammable Limits; NoL 6plicable. :Lower 3.1% ydroaon s1 UgM 74.1% Extiguishing Media, CO , faint:dry chemical. Spot al Flit Fighting Proacdures; ; lfba rias on charge.turn ofl•power. Use poddve pressure;Ball Atafindbreathing apparatus, Water applied to electrolyte tea heat and causes it to anlaner. Wear acid resistant'clottlin Un l hire and Explosion Hazard: Hydr gest and Osygat gusts are produced and recombtned in the•cellsduring normal batten•operation or when on charge. These gale do not normally enter the air as they are scaled inside..t?MAirging tnay causo these SSases to enter the air through the saht P relief valves. To avoid risk of fire or ecplodon,keep sparks end othersoeupes bflgnition away f1mm the battery. Do not SHOT metallic material to simultaneously contact both the pot(thb.:I d negative:tettrilnttl o[batterles. Follow manathetur e L.knstr Lctions for installation. VI. Reactivity Data ;.. Stab'lily, Condiddns to Avoid: 0=Unstable ■a Stable Sparks and other so=es of Ignition. Pr616ed over charge. Incoi apatibility(Material to Avoid): Cam Anadon of sulhuic Acid%filth combustibles,and organic materials may muse f?e end explosloa. Also avoid strong reducing agen S.most metals,carbides,-chlorates,nitrates,picrate.. Lead com ound: Potmsslum.Irarbldes.sulfidei.Peroxides. hisrus end atdfitr. er"% Haoua Decomposition Products: ! ' "Haztirdous Polyntcrindon: SWD ria Acid: Hydrogen sulfur dioxide,sulfur trioxide 130 May Occur ■ Will Not Oavr and sulfuric acid mist. VII Coatrol Measures'' Eng( caring Controls: Stor and handle lead acid 6atcerios in wall ventilated trees:: Wo Practices: [Do, of remove safety relief vah•es in top cot-er. :.Do not Allow metallicmiatedals'.toslsaliltaneously contact both the podtive and nega five terminals of the batlerit:s, Place a minimum of tws>la,111 of taiftatd between lavers of batteries. Do riot stack mote than three layershigh. Use the Proper lilting equipment to lift the battery. Avaid donm t Mth internal components of the batt les. �.; PEMNAL PRO'Pl3 ,. ' CT'IVE EQU1PIi+MENT-., Res story Protection: Non are required under norittrsl.eondltlons, if concentrations of tultl fle acid mist are known to exceed FEL.use NIOSH or M5 At► rmed respiratory protection. E} and Face: Non are required under normal conditiosu, If eleMokle ie•c.\*ted due to damage to the all.wean chemical splash goggles or a face Feld. Ran s,Arm.Bode: Non arc required under normal conditions, if electrolvie is:cxposed due to damage to the cell.wear tubber or plastic acid renis 1L-210ves�+Ith elboNv length eauntlet. " OLh r Spedal Clothing and Ec tdpment: Non under normal condillons, lrelecuohte is ox sod dtte.,to ttia e_to.thc;oell.:►rear_an weld resistant apron. MAR 1S SAA lc-ac ' 4 A -15' ONWED) 16:34 ERICSSON INC. TELV•781-769-4598 P. 005 MAR-15-2000 16:12 SAC COMMUNICATIONS, 703 643 1842 P.005i005 V111. Sore Hanvdling Precautions Hylifne Practices: Wash hands thoroughly before eating,drinking or smokin -eQce.hs!n Ila batteries. Protebtive Itleasdres to be taken during non-routine tacks inciuding equipment"rnai*Mrice: Not JpAlicable,. I i SPILL OR LEA{t:PAd6F* DURES. Protxllvc measures to be taken if material is released or spilled:' Rema combustible materials and all sources of ignition, soda ash.etc, Make certain mixture is n l titan collect residue and place in a drum or other suitable container%tih s label_speciftiag'contains hezardou,agate•or (if uncertain.cell distributor regarding proper labeling prdecdures);Qispoaa ales hererdous Haste. If battery is leaking,place batte y in a heavy duty plastic bag. Wear acid redstantboots, ecbshldd.chem"ieel splash goggles and acid rmistant gloves, DO I 10TRELEASE UNIQL71 ALIZED ACID. Was Disposal Methods: Sul tic Acid Neutralize as descTibcd aborti fbr it split.collect tesidut and place in a contolner labeled as containing hazardous mast . Dispose of as a hazardous waste. If uncertain about;labeling procedut s,call your local battery distributor or contact listed at be lnnletc FDO OT FLUSH LEAD CONTAMINATED ACID TO SEWER' Batt ries: Send to lead smatter fbllotixin a licable lederal:state and,loml-re latiorm' IX. Other NFP Hazard rating for Stltfuric Add: Fla mability (Red) = h Heal ($ul e _..... ) 3 r Rea +vlty 'allow) = 2 US IJOT identiilcation and description for this battery is: Bat ries.wet,non-spillable..Eledde Storage 8, 2800,PG IQ,Label: CoiToslvc (Etc !tons 173,159.paragraph(d),C.F.R.49) For Ir shipments,reference inti=tlonal Air Transportation Aceociet!®n(OU Dangerous Goods Regulations Manual,refer to spec I provisions A48 and A-67. For oeesn shipments,refs[ence,lAtetttatipnal Maruime Dangerous Goods Regulations,Page 8121r Amendment 027, This is to conZ.,that the"Novi.-Spillable batteries an capable of-Ai6tandin j.the Vibnttien and Pressure Differcntlal Teat,and at a Ian 1peroture of 33°C, the electtohte ail! not flow from a titpcured•Or ctsc id oese. The batteries have beta protected against sh circuits and securely p&ckaged, The batteries and outik pddlk ing_mUtt11 04aihtrc marked"Non•Spilloble"or "No •5 .Alable batters". - - Sul ria Acid is water reactive i(:concentrated.Batteries ire_reguletad under applkeble US DOT,RCRA,CERCLA and EPCRA. If vo I hava env questions.please contact the An ldrommpnul Assurance D inmcnt,of GNH Tcchnot ee•it 770.573-2470, The ntemationat Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC)has e>ossified."srrong„ln-T341tkocid mist containing soMric acid"as e Care OTT1 carcinogen,a substance that Is eardnogenic to humors., This classification does not apply to liquid forms of sulfuric acid r sulfuric acid solutions contained nithin a battery, Inorganic acid mist(sulfuric acid mist)is not generated under normal use f this roducc„t Mtsuse of the eroduci.such as mvmhai In�:titw however result in the generation of sulfuric acid mist, AW ten Is manufactured using lead.CAS No. 7439.92.1 a"nd sulfuric acid.CAS No. 7tS64.93-9 tvhlcl►are subject to the re lain re uiremen s of EP,CRA Section 313 40 CFR 372 . i 18 4 SRS ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS, INC. Applying Technology 75 Clark Lane,Colchester,CT 06415 Phone:(860)537-6647 Fax: (860)537-6647 E-mail: stan_s@cyberzone.net V-mail: (860)722-3398 April 3,2000 Letter Ser.No.:0403-001 Robert Watkins Senior Radiation Scientist Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Public Health Radiation Control Program 174 Portland Street _ Boston, MA 02114 Dear Mr. Watkins: I am pleased to submit form MCRP 122.021-1 for the Wireless Radio Link PCS Station located at 1267 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA. This site is AT&T site number E- 445. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at (860) 537- 6647. Thank you again for your assistance. Sincerely, Stan Sherman NARTE Certified EMC Engineer cc: File (AT&T, Westwood) THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH RADIATION CONTROL PROGRAM 305 SOUTH STREET,JAMAICA PLAIN,MA 02130 NOTIFICATION OF NONIONIZING RADIATION SOURCE Fixed Communication Installations For Radiation Control Use: Date Rec'd Reviewer: Approval: _ • FULL • PROVISIONAL Combined request for approval under 105 CMR 122.000 and employer notification under 453 CMR 5.000. A. Owner of the structure on which the antenna is located and the location of the antenna: Name of owner of the structure on which the antenna is located: George and Dorothea Barker Address of structure owner: 1267 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA Telephone number: (978) 688-5617 Date of installation of the structure: Spring, 2000 City/town of antenna location: North Andover Local name of location (i.e. street name and number): 1267 Osgood Street Latitude: 42-43-17.4 N Longitude: 71-06-37 W Are there other transmitting antennae located on the same structure? ❑ yes ® no Are there other transmitting antennae located within 300 feet? ❑ yes None known ® no Anticipated date of installation of antenna: Spring, 2000 B. Owner of the antenna: Name of the owner of the antenna: Wireless PCS, Inc. dba AT&T Wireless Services Address of antenna owner: Joe Sweet, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 400 Blue Hill Drive, Westwood, MA 02090 Telephone number: (781)407-4520 1 C. Owner of the location on which the transmitter is located and the location of the transmitter: : ® same as antenna Complete only if transmitter location is different than antenna location Name of owner of the structure on which the transmitter is located: Address of structure owner: Telephone number: Local name of location (i.e. street name and number): Cit /town of transmitter location: Latitude: Longitude: Anticipated date of installation of transmitter: D. Owner of the transmitter: : ® same as antenna Com Tete only if transmitter owner is different than antenna owner. Name of the owner of the transmitter: Address of transmitter owner: Telephone number: E. Technicalspecifications: FCC class (or type) of service: PCS A-BLOCK FCC call letters: KNLF216 Operating frequency of transmitter: 1930-1945 MHz Type of modulation: DQPSK Average power output of transmitter: N/A Peak power output of transmitter: 30W Power into the antenna: 30W Maximum Antenna manufacturer: Huber Suhner Antenna model: Sectors Model: Dn. Tilt Gain Huber Suhner 30 deg. dBd Huber Suhner 150 deg 1900/85/16/2/DS 0 deg. 13.3 Huber Suhner 270 deg.. 1900/85/16/2/DS 0 deg. 13.3 1900/85/16/2/DS 0 deg. 13.3 Antenna type: Cross-Polar PANEL ANTENNA Antenna radiating pattern: See attached Beam Patterns Polarization of radiation from antenna: 45 Degrees Effective radiating power: 1,905 W ERP per sector 2 F. Power density information: The power density values presented in F.1 were: ® calculated using; ❑ measured using; ❑ FCC Tech Bulletin Instrument (manufacturer): ® Other: (specify): model: robe: SRS Engineering Date of most recent calibration: Applications Spread Sheet F.1 Parameter. Distance in Power,density in (To meet the intent of this submittal, meters (feet) microwatts per property boundary ts,considered the square centimeter border d (µW/ctri2 21 ccupiewith pace which can be:o ) b the 'eneral ublie) A: Horizontal distance to nearest place 6 (20) NA where faoility empleyees wer4 ef anyone can congregate: A: Radial distance to nearest place 33 (110) 0.26 where fars lity bY,•,pleyees we--k Ew anyone can congregate: B: Horizontal distance to nearest location 85 (280) NA on the property boundary: B: Radial distance to nearest location on 91 (300) 0.16 the property boundary: C: Horizontal distance to the location entre 268 (880) NA prepei4y boundar-ywhere the highest power- exposure level is anticipated (6'AGL): C: Radial distance to the location en the 270 (886) 0.55 preperty bennduy where the highest power density exposure level is anticipated (6'AGL): D: Horizontal distance to nearest location 126 (414) NA regularly occupied outside the property boundary: type of facility ® home ❑ school ❑ office ❑ manufacturing facility ❑ other(specify): D: Radial distance to nearest location 130 (428) 0.13 regularly occupied outside the property boundary: type of facility ® home ❑ school ❑ office ❑ manufacturing facility ❑ other(specify): 3 F.2 Attach all assumptions and calculations used to determine the values listed in F.1. G. Attach a layout drawing showing the various areas in which employees associated with the nonionizing source work and the predicted or measured RF(power density) levels at these locations. N/A H. List the areas in which employees have been classified as nonionizing radiation (NIR) workers: ® There are no areas that have been classified for NIR workers. ❑ There are areas that have been classified for NIR workers. Such areas are listed below. Location Maximum Doweri :Number of density( WIC m2 em loyees I. All workers that are classified as NIR workers have been instructed in nonionizing radiation health and safety policies and procedures? ❑ yes ❑ no ® N/A Date that the most recent NIR safety training was provided: ® N/A 4 I CERTIFY THAT: 1. I have read, understand.and will comply with the requirements of 105 CMR 122.000 and 453 CMR 5.000 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements made and information disclosed in this registration application are true, complete, and correct. 3. If any of the disclosed information changes, I will provide updated written information to the Radiation Control Program of the Department of Public Health within 30 days of the change. 4. I will provide additional information as may be required by the Radiation Control Program of the Department of Public Health. SIGNED UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, 4/4/00 Date Signature of Registrant Applicant (Owner or person duly authorized to act on behalf of the owner). Stanley Sherman, Principal Engineer SRS Engineering Applications NARTE Certified EMC Engineer Print Name and Title Date Signature of Registrant Applicant Designee (If applicable) Print Name and Title 5 SPA_1900_85_16_2_V 0 � Horizontal Beam Pattern 4-degree radials-Gain is in dBd SPA_1900_85_16_2_V Vertical Beam Pattern 4-degree radials- Gain is in dBd 0 6 s e < Flat Earth�Po iAii Density'Fall Off With 1=Degree Reno; utio n . Q. 0. N� 0.7 0.6 0.5 z .� 0.4 �A 0.3 3 '0.2 0 0 , 0: a 250,•^ 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750> 2000 . 'F 2250 ^ 2500 � �= � Dis.tanc'e (Feet) Power Density 6' AGL Power Density 16' AGL t Angle from Correction Vertical antenna Degrees Antenna Height Main Beam Atten. Atten. Factor for gain+Horizontal Transmit above Radial Including From From Maximum Horizontal Radial Offset From Building 10'LOG[1/(4Pi rA2)]: antenna gain+Building Power Distance from Distance Horizontal Atten. Propogation Loss attenuation+Reflected Density Center ground Distance Mechanical Vert. Horiz. Possible 2 Antenna (cm) Main Lobe (d6) (d6) wave (UW/CM ) (Feet) (Feet) Down Tilt Offset (CCW) Offset Reflected correction+Propogation (degrees) Wave(dB) loss(d6) meters feet meters feet 114 6 6.1 20 33 109.8 3347.8 -79.5 -25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 -81.5 -100.8 0.2612 114 6 85.4 280 91 300.1 9147.3 -21.1 -18.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 -90.2 -103.0 0.1577 114 6 268.2 . 880 270 886.2 27011.2 -7.0 -3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 -99.6 -97.5 0.5526 114 6 126 414 130 427.9 13041.0 -14.6 -16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 -93.3 -103.7 0.1346 Total Watts ERP/Sector: 1,905 Antenna Model: SPA_1900_85_16_2_V H=Antenna height Total Watts EIRP/Sector: L23,124 d=Horizontal distance from the Antenna Assumptions: I=Height above the ground power density is determined 1. Ground Wave is negligible r=Radial distance from the antenna=(dA2+(H-I)A2)A.5 2. Worst case contribution from reflected wave is+6 dB a=angle from antenna mast to point at which power density is determined 3.Clear path between antenna and point of interest and between reflected b=90-a=angle from horizontal from antenna to point at which power wave and point of interest(ie. no obstructions) Except 10 dB attenuation density is determined through building exterior wall or roof. Power Density Calculation: Pd=(EIRP'Losses)/(4`PI'rA2) F Where: Losses=EIRP reduction due to obstructions or horizontal or verticalangle from antenna Pd=Power densityd EIRP=Effective Isotropically Radiated Transmitted Power 5-1 r=radial distance from the Antenna 8 ........ ......... ... . .... ... .......... 3'. ................ W s � G / \'POST EI_EVAT;OiN 9 Oi w" ' 1 .../a ,tee. ; �a ,� � ,... ' �, •rr" "' i.. �,_ �• i•• �a •,w,n s ...,...mss �..®d ,i i i\ - ....._.....�ti• _ i 19 • Please Type or Print on This Form Form Approved OMB No.21204001 Failure To Provide All Re uested Information Ma Dela Processin of Your Notice FOR FAA USA ONLY 9 Y Y 9 A.rr.thwl ft.hr roMf toles/A lation Transportation Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration Fed�ral Avhtler Adminlstrrtlon 1. Sponsor(person,company,etc.proposing this action): _42 0 43 17,4 S.Latitude: — Attn.or:_Pete Jeffrey, Name:—AT&T Wireless Services,Inc. 10.longitude: —71-0-06—'— 37 Address:-400 Blue Hill Drive 11.Datum: W NAD 83 ❑NAD 27 ❑Other Suite 100 12.Nearest: City:—North Andover State: city: Suite state:_MA_2ip:_02090 2161 Telephone:—(781)_407-4646 Fax:_(781)_407-4656 13.Nearest Public-use(not private-use)or Military Airport or Heliport: LWM:LAWRENCE MUNI 2.Sponsor's Representative(if other than itf): 14.Distance from#13.to Structure:—1914 ft. Attn.cf:_Stanley Sherman Name:_SRS Engineering Applications,Inc. 15.Direction from#13.to Structure: 65 degrees Address: 75 Clark Lane _ 16.Site Elevation(AMSL): _170 ft. City:—Colchester state:_CT_zip:_06415 17.Total Structure Height(AGL): _130 R. Telephone:—(860)_537-6647 Fax:_(M)_537-6647 18.Overall Height(08.+#17.)(AMSL): _300 ft. 19.Previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number(d applicable): 3.Notice of: (, New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Existing OE 4.Duration: (d Permanent ❑ Temporary(_months, days) 20.Description of Location: (Attach a USGS 7.5 minute S.Work Schedule: Beginning End Quadrangle Map with the precise site marked and any certified survey,) 6.Type: fX-) Antenna Tower ❑ Crane ❑ Building ❑ Power Line The site is located at 1267 Osgood Street(Rte 125), North ❑ Landfill ❑ Water Tank ❑ Other Andover, MA. 7.Marking/Painting and/or Lighting Preferred: The site is located 3,251'at a bearing of 234 degrees from the intersection of Bradford and Barker Streets. ❑ Red Lights and Pain ❑ Dual-Red and Medium intensity White ❑ White-Medium Intensity ❑ Dual-Red and High Intensity White The site is also located 1,786'at a bearing of 161 degrees ❑white-High Intensity ❑ Other from the intersection of Osgood Street(Rte 125)and Holt Road. 8.FCC Antenna Structure Registration Numbei(if applicable): Topographical Map is attached. 21.Complete Description of Proposal: FrequencylPower(Kw) •The total Effective Radiated Power(ERP)will be less than 1.9kW/sector for each of 3 120 degree-spaced 11930-1945M11.91<WIERPIS sectors. The 1.9kW is based on 15 channels at 127 W ERP each with no one frequency being broadcast at a power of greater than 140 W ERP. The assigned frequency band for all transmit frequencies from this site is 1930-1945 MHz. The antennae are mounted within a flag pole-style structure with radiation centers at 114 feet AGL. The top of the tower is at 120'AGL and the top of the lightning rod could be up to 130'AGL. •The antennae used are Huber-Suhner antenna model number SPA/1900/85/16/2N cross-polar panel antennae. (antenna patterns are attached). Notice is required by 14 Code of Federal Regulations,Part 77 pursuant to 49 U.S.C..Section 44716. Persons who knowingly and willingly violate the notice requirements of part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of$1.000 per day until the notice is received,pursuant to 49 U.S.C.,Section 46301(a). 1 hereby certify that all of the above statements made by me are true,complete,and correct to the best of my knowledge.In addition,I agree to mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking&lighting standards as necessary. Date Typed or Printed Name and Title,of Person Filing Notice signet 04/03/2000 Stanley Sherman FAA Form 7460-1(11-98)Supersedes Previous Edition NSN:005200.012.0008 FAA PROPOSED STRUCTURE 2-C SURYEY CERTIFICATION Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services 400 Blue Hill Dr., Suite 100 Westwood, MA 02090 Site Name: Barker Farm Site Number: E-445 Site Address: 1267 Osgood St. North Andover, MA Horizontal Datum: R1 GPS Survey ❑ Ground Survey Vertical Datum: NAVD 1988 (AMSL) LTJ GPS Survey Structure Type: ❑ New Tower ❑ Existing Tower ❑ Roof Tor ❑ Water Tank 0 Smoke Stack ' ❑ New Monopole ❑ Existing Monopole Ef Other Flag-Pole Latitude: N 429 43117.4" Longitude: W 710 06' 37.0" Ground Elevation: 170 AMSL Elevation (in feet) Requested Height: 120' AGL (Max.) Overall Height: 290 AMSL Elevation (in feet) This is to certify that the above information is provided to the following arr..jimry: The latitude of N 42°43' 17.4" and Lhe longitude of W 71°06' 370' are accurate to within* 50 feet horizontally and the site elevation of 170 AMSL is accurate to witliiii±20 feet vertically. With a structure height of 1201, the overall height will be 290 AMSL. The horizontal datum(coordinated) is in terms of the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)and is expressed in degrees, mini iteq and seconds to the nearest tenth of a second. The vertical datum (height) is in terms of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 and is expressed in feet above mean sea level to the nearest foot. Company: John A. Halnon Co. gµOF Surveyor Signature/Seal: Jahn alnon, PLS#MA 36380 Np,8�8q Date: March 16, 2000 �tl�i SPA_1900_85_16_2_V 0 Horizontal Beam Pattern 4-degree radials- Gain is in dBd SPA_1900_85_16_2_V Vertical Beam Pattern 4-degree radials- Gain is in dBd 0 a VII 4 j 34,de site.: deg to qq IN EN 'b 4 >' y y 3. �� Y �.y.��y'�J+A " ��p ��� i� i i � � �• �'�T»� �`� 3 i •�v ,fir'� � �' - >� � k. a f ¢°� � �, IN � �� ��� � '`w. � j ��✓ r r"" i'"�`""°w �=a ,� rte° � �.�: �� ti ,��t�� low- JO r dxa r g 1 �t _. ii 20 I I i 21 A ANDERSON &KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Law STEPHEN D.ANDERSON The Bulfinch Building ACHESON H. CALLAGHAN Also admitted in CT 47 Thorndike Street Of Counsel Cambridge,MA 02141 DOUGLAS H.WILKINS ARTHUR P.KREIGER (6t7T) 252-6575 Of Counsel Also admitted in NY Fax`'161-7-)-252-6899 PETERJ.CURA GEORGE A.HALL,JR. RACHEL GRAHAM EVANS Also admitted in NH JEFFREY L.ROELOFS April 6, 2000 BY HAND BY HAND Zoning Board of Appeals Heidi A. Griffin Town of North Andover Town Planner Office of Community Town of North Andover Development & Services Office of Community 27 Charles Street Development & Services North Andover, MA 01845 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Applicant: AT&T Wireless PCS LLC by and through its Agent AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services Owner: George &Dorthea Barker Site: 1267 Osgood Street, North Andover Map/Lot: Map 34, Lot 12 Relief Sought: (1) From Planning Board: Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for Wireless Service Facility(ZBL §§ 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3) and Waivers of the following Zoning Bylaw requirements (If and to the Extent Necessary, All Rights Reserved): A. § 8.9.3.c.v.I (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); B. § 8.9.5.d.ii.4 (requiring map of all facilities in and within 1 mile of North Andover); C. § 8.9.5.d.iii.3 (requiring depiction of tree cover within 300' radius of flagpole); D. § 8.9.5.d.iii.4 (requiring depiction of all buildings within 300' radius of flagpole); E. § 8.9.5.d.v.3 (requiring "color board"); F. § 8.9.5.d.vi (noise filing requirements); G. § 8.9.5.d.viii.2 (hazardous waste identification filing requirement). (2) From Zoning Board of Appeals: Variances from the following Zoning Bylaw Sections (If and to the Extent Necessary, All Rights Reserved): t0 Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 2 A. §§ 8.9.3.c.i and 8.9.3.c.ii (restricting height to 10' above the average building height within 300' or, if no such buildings, 10' above average tree canopy height); B. §§ 8.9.3.c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii (requiring dense tree growth to screen views); C. § 8.9.3.c.v.I (requiring flagpole setback 2x its height and 300' from habitable dwelling or business); D. § 8.9.4.a.iii.2 (restricting color above vegetation to light grey or blue); E. § 8.9.4.e.ii (requiring fully enclosed containment for use of any hazardous materials) F. §§ 8.9.9.c and 8.9.1 La (requiring escrow accounts for removal and maintenance activities) Dear Board Members: I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Town of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw, AT&T Wireless Services PCS LLC, by and through its agent'AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., d/b/a AT&T Wireless Services ("AWS") applies for any necessary zoning approvals to permit the installation and operation of a proposed wireless communication facility at the Barker Farm, 1267 Osgood Street, North Andover. Specifically, AWS seeks a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval and Waivers from the Planning Board pursuant to §§ 8.3, 8.9 and 10.3 of the Zoning Bylaw and, if and to the extent necessary, variances from the Zoning Bylaw provisions referenced above pursuant to § 10.4 of the Zoning Bylaw. The proposed installation will consist of antennas and cables "camouflaged" inside a flagpole within the meaning of§§ 8.9.2.d, 8.9.3.b.ii, 8.9.3.c.i, 8.9.4.a.ii, and 8.9.4.d.ii of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The proposed flagpole will be located behind an existing barn situated east of Osgood Street and northwest of Barker Street. The proposed flagpole will be 120' tall (exclusive of any necessary and appropriate decorative ball and/or lightning rod) and will be capable of accommodating either AWS alone or AWS together with a second carrier. (The diameter of the flagpole will be larger for the two-carrier installation compared to the one- carrier installation.) The facility will also involve a landscaped, fenced equipment area at the base of the flagpole within which will be AWS' proposed 12' x 20'equipment shelter. Coaxial cables will be run inside the flagpole and underground to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter. The fenced area will also be sufficient to accommodate the ground equipment for the co-locating carrier for the two carrier installation. ANDERSON( GT KMGER LLP Auomeys at Law �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 3 Additional details of the proposed wireless services facility, including electrical, mechanical, foundation, equipment and related information, are set forth below and in the enclosed plans. II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS Pertinent to these applications, enclosed are three checks made out to the Town of North Andover in the amount of$25 for the Zoning Board of Appeals' ("ZBA") application filing fee, $100 for the Planning Board's application fee and$2,000 for the Planning Board's site plan review fee. Also enclosed are 20 copies of this letter and the following materials (11 copies for the ZBA and 9 copies for the Planning Board): 1. Completed Board of Appeals Application For Relief From The Zoning Ordinance; 2. Completed Planning Board Application for Special Permit with Site Plan Approval; 3. Certified Abutters List; 4. Two sets of address labels for each Board of all abutters identified on the Certified Abutters List; 5. 56 stamps for each Board, totaling (number of abutters +2) x 2 ( for mailing of legal notice to abutters, the applicant and the engineer); 6. Assessor's Maps numbered 34 and 35; 7. Zoning Map; 8. Plans for the proposed 120' one-carrier flagpole prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C., consisting of the Title Sheet (T-1), Site Plan (C-1), Site Plan & Site Detail Plan (Z-1), North &West Elevations (Z-2), South &East Elevations (Z-3), Site Line Profile & Site Details (Z-4), and Landscape Plan and Landscape Details (Z-5), with one set of stamped/signed Mylars as requested by the ZBA; 9. Plans for the proposed 120' two-carrier flagpole prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, P.C., consisting of the the Title Sheet (T-1), Site Plan (C-1), Site Plan & Site Detail Plan (Z-1), North & West Elevations (Z-2), South & East Elevations (Z-3), Site Line Profile & Site Details (Z-4), and Landscape Plan and r re Landscape Details (Z-5), with one set of stamped/signed Myla s as requested by ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attomeys at Lam �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board Apri16, 2000 Page 4 the ZBA;t-/ 10. An RF report, with coverage charts, demonstrating (1) the need for the facility, (2) the coverage it will provide, (3) "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under § 8.9.3.b.9, and(4) the other existing AWS facilities in North Andover and outside North Andover within one mile of its boundary; 11. Notarized Owner's Consent to Municipal Development application; 12. View Shed Analysis prepared by Tectonic Engineering dated March 13, 2000; 13. Letter dated March 14, 2000 from Paul J. Ford and Company, Structural Engineers, to Tectonic Engineering regarding the "bend-over" design of the flagpole; 14. Specifications for the antennas; 15. Specifications for the equipment shelter; 16. Specifications for the cables and cable runs; 17. MSDS for the batteries to be used for backup power; 18. Report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health certifying that the maximum allowable frequencies, power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the facility; 19. Notice to the Federal Aviation Administration of the proposed construction; 20. Facsimile from the North Andover Building Commissioner dated April 5, 2000, specifying the zoning relief required for the proposed facility; 21. Four color photographs of an actual AWS installation in front of the Southborough Town Hall consisting of a 110' single-carrier flagpole; and 22. Three color photographs of an actual AWS installation at the former Ponkapoag I/ Both sets of plans have been revised since they were first submitted to the Building Department and the Planning Board on Marchi 21,2000. The sets now include additional elevation information in Z-1,a revised scale in Z-4,and a new plan labeled Z-5.to depict the proposed landscaping in greater detail. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attonteys ataal Law �? Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 5 School property in Canton, consisting of a 115' two-carrier flagpole. III. APPLICATION FILING REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Sections 8.9.5.d of North Andover's Wireless Service Facilities Zoning Bylaw, AWS provides the following informationzt: A. General Filing Requirements Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 100 Westwood, MA 02090 Attorneys for AWS: Stephen D. Anderson Jeffrey L. Roelofs Anderson &Kreiger LLP 47 Thorndike Street Cambridge, MA 02141 (617) 252-6575 24-hour emergency contact: New England Network Operation's Center Paramus, NJ (201) 986-2690 Local emergency contact: Richard Swisher Technical Operations Manager AWS (781) 407-4515 Co-Applicant: George &Doddie Barker(owner) 1267 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Owner's Consent: See Exhibit 11. 2/ The information provided in and with this application also satisfies the filing requirements for Site Plan Review pursuant to Section 8.3.5 of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw. If and to the extent any information required by Section 8.3.5 is not provided in and with this application,AWS requests a waiver of such requirement pursuant to Section 8.3.5.E of the Zoning Bylaw. �� ANDERSON( �j KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Lara �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 6 B. Location FilingRequirements Subject Property: Barker Farm (Map 34,Lot 12) 1267 Osgood Street North Andover, MA Zoning Designation: Residential District 2 Locus Map: See Exhibits 8 and 9. Other Preexistent/Approved Wireless Services Facilities: The RF report at Exhibit 10 contains a map showing AWS' preexisting and approved wireless facilities in North Andover and outside of North Andover within one-mile of its boundary. If and to the extent Section 8.9.5.d.ii.4 requires a map showing facilities owned or operated by other wireless service providers, AWS requests a waiver of that filing requirement, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix, because such information is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed AWS facility and is not readily available to AWS from its competitors. C. Siting Filing Requirements The Site Plans included in Exhibits 8 and 9 provide the information required by Section 8.9.5.d.iii (Siting Filing Requirements) and Section 8.3.5 (Information Required for Site Plan Review) of the Zoning Bylaw. If and to the extent the plans do not provide sufficient information to meet the requirements of Section 8.9.5.d.iii.3 (requiring the plans to show tree cover on the subject property and all abutting properties, by dominant species and average height) and Section 8.9.5.d.iii.4 (requiring the plans to show an outline of all existing buildings and uses on subject property and all abutting properties), AWS requests a waiver of those filing requirements, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix, because given the detailed information submitted herein, any additional information regarding tree cover and the use of distant buildings is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facility. D. Site Lines and Photographs The Site Plans included in Exhibits 8 and 9, the View Shed Analysis included in Exhibit 12, and the photographs included in Exhibits 21 and 22 provide the information required by Section 8.9.5.d.1v of the Zoning Bylaw. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Law LJ Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 7 E. Design Filing Requirements The brochures and specifications included in Exhibits 14 through 16, the View Shed Analysis and photographs included in Exhibits 12, 21 and 22, and the Site Plans included in Exhibits 8 and 9 contain detailed design information regarding the proposed facility. Those materials provide information regarding, among other things, the materials, specifications, dimensions, and appearance of the flagpole, antennas, mounts, equipment shelter, cables, cable runs, and security barrier, as well as the proposed landscaping. Except for a small security light on a motion sensor, the proposed facility is not required to include and will not include any exterior lighting, unless required by the FAA pursuant to the Notice submitted as Exhibit 19. With respect to colors, the proposed shed and shed roof will be painted to match the corresponding colors of the nearby barn. AWS will discuss with the Planning Board and owner an appropriate color for the surrounding stockade fence. AWS proposes to paint the flagpole white, as is customary. A "color board" is not included with this application, as provided in Section 8.9.5.d.v.3. A waiver of that filing requirement is requested, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix, because a "color board" is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facility. If requested by the Planning Board during the public hearing process, AWS will schedule a balloon or crane test at the proposed site to illustrate the height of the proposed facility pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.v.7. F. Noise Filing Requirements: uirements: — The only noise associated with the proposed facility will be the HVAC unit for the equipment shelter, which will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence and landscaping and will be more than 200' from the property boundary. AWS has not submitted any detailed information regarding projected noise levels, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.vi. A waiver of that filing requirement is requested, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix, because it is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facility. G. Radio Frequency Radiation Filing Requirements: The report to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health included in Exhibit 18 demonstrates that the maximum allowable frequencies, power levels and standards will not be exceeded for the proposed facility. The letter from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approving the site for this facility will be forwarded to the Planning Board upon receipt. ANDERSON&"-EIGER LLP Attorneys at Law �^� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 8 H. Federal Environmental Filing_Requirements: An Environmental Assessment is not required for the proposed facility. With respect to hazardous materials, the battery that will be'used for back-up power may contain hazardous materials. An MSDS for the battery is included in Exhibit 17. As indicated on the MSDS, the battery is certified to be "non-spillable" pursuant to US Department of Transportation standards. It is also possible that negligible amounts of hazardous materials will be present such as in the thermostat (potential mercuey) and/or the smoke detector(potential low level radiation) that will be used at the facility. Given these negligible amounts and the Building Commissioner's indication that Section 8.9.5.d.viii.2 did not apply to such materials under these circumstances, AWS has not submitted a detailed list of the location, type and amount of such de minimus hazardous materials. If and to the extent necessary, a waiver of that filing requirement is requested, pursuant to Section 8.9.5.d.ix, because it is not needed for a thorough review of the proposed facility. To the extent that the Planning Board determines that any of the filing requirements set forth in Sections 8.9.5 (for Wireless Service Facilities) or 8.3.5 (Site Plan Review) have not been met, AWS requests a waiver of such requirements pursuant to Sections 8.9.5.d.ix and 8.3.5.f. The information provided herein is all that is needed for a thorough review of the proposed facility. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIRELESS SERVICES BYLAW (ZBL § 8.9) The proposed facility complies with the purpose and intent of the North Andover Wireless Services Bylaw, Section 8.9.1, and each of the criteria set forth in the Bylaw, as follows: A. Pu[pose r� The proposed facility is designed to minimize the visual and environmental impacts as P P Y g well as any potential deleterious impact on property value, of wireless services facilities..." The proposed facility is also located and designed to "encourage appropriate land use, environmental protection, preservation of North Andover's rural character and the provision of adequate infrastructure development in North Andover." The flagpole, equipment shelter, fencing and landscaping have been located and designed to camouflage the wireless communication devices and to blend with the surrounding landscape and nearby architecture, as discussed further below. B. Use Regulations The RF report included in Exhibit 10 demonstrates that "the proposed facility is necessary in order to provide adequate service to the public." There are no feasible preexistent structures ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Lara �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 9 upon which AT&T can locate its facility to address its coverage needs. The proposed facility also satisfies the requirements for site plan approval and a special permit, except to the extent any variances may be required and have been requested. C. Location In compliance with Section 8.9.3.b, AWS has demonstrated that it is not feasible to locate on preexistent structures to address its coverage needs (Exhibit 10). Moreover, the proposed flagpole and equipment shelter have been camouflaged to the greatest extent possible, including but not limited to use of compatible building materials and colors, screening and landscaping to blend in with the surrounding landscape and nearby structures. The facility will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence, which itself will be concealed by the existing barn and proposed evergreen shrubs. The antennae themselves will be concealed within the proposed flagpole, which will be painted in the traditional color white. AWS has obtained the right to install and use the proposed facility, as evidenced by the consent letter attached as Exhibit 11. D. Height If and to the extent necessary, AWS is applying for a variance from the height requirements provided in Section 8.9.3.c of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. See below. E. Setback The proposed facility is set back approximately 222' from Osgood Street, 336' from Barker Street, 720' from the easterly property line and 615' from the northerly property line. As such, the proposed installation complies with the setback requirements for R2 districts. Section 8.9.3.c.v of the Wireless Services Facilities Bylaw sets forth additional setback requirements. If and to the extent necessary, AWS is applying for a variance from those setback requirements. See below. F. Design Standards The proposed facility conforms to the applicable design standards of Section 8.9.4 as follows: 1. Camouflage (ZBL § 8.9.4.a.i The proposed flagpole and equipment shelter have been concealed to the greatest extent possible by existing features, including the existing barn. In addition, the facility has been designed to utilize compatible building materials and colors, screening and landscaping to blend ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attm"s as at Lav �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 10 in with the surrounding landscape and nearby structures. The facility will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence, which itself will be concealed by the existing barn and proposed evergreen shrubs. The antennae themselves will be concealed within the proposed flagpole, which will be painted in the traditional color white. The equipment shelter will match the color scheme of the nearby barn. Coaxial cables will be run inside the flagpole and underground to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter. The facility will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence, which itself will be concealed by the existing barn and proposed landscaping. If and to the extent the proposed landscaping does not satisfy the vegetative buffer requirements of Sections 8.9.3.c.ii., 8.9.4.a.ii. and 8.9.4.d.ii, AWS is applying for a variance from those setback requirements. See below. 2. Lightin and nd signage The proposed facility is not required to include and will not include any exterior lighting. Signage at the site will be limited to one sign no greater in size than three square feet and will include the identification of the owner/operator of the facility. The facility will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence, which itself will be concealed by the existing barn and proposed evergreen shrubs. As such, the proposed facility complies with the lighting, signage and barrier requirements of Section 8.9.4.b. 3. Historic Buildings The site is not in an historic district. Nor will any historic buildings be altered or impacted. 4. Scenic Landscapes and Vistas The facility is not located within 300 feet of a Scenic Road. If and to the extent necessary, AWS is applying for a variance from the requirement.provided in Section 8.9.3.c.ii, 8.9.4.a.ii and of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw that facilities located in open areas visible from public roads be surrounded by a buffer of dense tree growth. See below. ANDERSON&KMGER LLP Attomeys at Law �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 11 5. Environmental Standards The proposed facility conforms with the environmental standards of Section 8.9.4.e. The facility is not located in wetland resource areas or buffer zones. The facility will not include any _ outdoor storage or any solid waste receptacles. The proposed facility is unmanned and, therefore, does not require a means of water supply or sewage disposal. There will not be any discharges of hazardous wastes from the facility. The battery that will be used for back-up power may contain hazardous materials. However, as indicated on the MSDS for the battery (Exhibit 17), the battery is certified to be "non-spillable"pursuant to US Department of Transportation standards. If and to the extent necessary, AWS is applying for a variance from the "containment" requirements provided in Section 8.9.4.e.ii of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. See below. The facility will have a negligible effect, if any, on storm-water runoff at the site. Any storm-water runoff related to the facility will be managed in accordance with DEP's Storm Water Management regulations. The only noise associated with the proposed facility will be the HVAC unit for the equipment shelter. That shelter will be surrounded by an 8' stockade fence and landscaping and will be more than 200' from the property boundary. The facility will not generate noise in excess of 50dB at the property boundary. 6. Safety Standards The facility meets all applicable FCC guidelines, as demonstrated in the reports and filings to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and Federal Aviation Administration included in Exhibits 18 and 19. The facility is also structurally sound as demonstrated in the letter included in Exhibit 13. G. Co-Location and Need for Facility Pursuant to Section 8.9.3.b.9 and 8.9.6, AWS. has made a good faith effort to co-locate with other carriers. The RF report included in Exhibit 10 discusses the need for this particular facility and the coverage it will provide. It also demonstrates "that there are no feasible preexistent structures upon which to locate" under § 8.9.3.b.9. Consistent with the co-location provisions at Section 8.9.6, AWS is proposing a flagpole capable of accommodating either AWS alone or AWS together with a second carrier. The principal difference in appearance between the two is that the diameter of the flagpole will be larger for the two carrier installation compared to the one-carrier installation. ANDERSON( GT REIGER LLP Attorneys at Lara �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 12 H. Escrow Requirements for Removal and Maintenance Activities If and to the extent necessary, AWS is applying for a variance from the requirement provided in Section 8.9.9.c (requiring an escrow account for removal activities) and 8.9.1 La (requiring an escrow account for maintenance activities) to allow the use of performance bonds rather than cash for this purpose. See below. IV. SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. Section 10.3.1 Special Permit Criteria The proposed facility conforms to the conditions for approval of special permits set forth in Section 10.3.1 of the Zoning Bylaw for all of the reasons described elsewhere in this application and as follows: a. The specific site is an appropriate location for such a use, structure or condition; The site is extremely large, topographically higher than the surrounding area, and contains a variety of farm structures, fields, and agricultural improvements (such as the house, the barn, and the agricultural fields and related areas) with which the proposed American Flagpole-style facility will blend for an aesthetic and understated wireless communication installation. AWS has investigated other potential sites in this area of North Andover and determined that this site is a feasible and appropriate site to meet its coverage needs. b. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood; The proposed use is completely passive and unobtrusive, requires no employees or customers on the premises and has no characteristics that are incompatible with the site or nearby properties. The design and location of the flagpole minimizes the visibility of the wireless communication devices to the surrounding landscape. The equipment shelter will blend with the color scheme of the barn and will be screened from view by the barn, a surrounding fence and evergreens. AWS will work with the Boards to develop a reasonable additional landscaping plan for the proposed facility, if deemed necessary by the Boards. C. There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians; ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attorneys at lav �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board Apri16, 2000 Page 13 There will be no offensive lighting, odors, smoke, noise, sewage, or refuse materials associated with the proposed use. The facility is not located in wetland resource areas or buffer zones. The facility will not include any outdoor storage or any solid waste receptacles. The visual appearance of the proposed equipment area is effectively camouflaged from view by its design and location, by the barn and the expansive agricultural areas, and by the proposed stockade fence and proposed landscaping. The proposed use generates essentially no traffic, as it has no employees, customers or regular visitors. After construction, the only traffic will be in connection with scheduled maintenance (one vehicle approximately once per month) and emergency maintenance as needed. The facility will be served by standard electrical and telephone service and requires no water, sewer or other town services. Accordingly, it will have no traffic impacts. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 makes it unlawful for any municipality to impose regulations "on the basis of the environmental effects of the radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communication] Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." 47 USC § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). The proposed installation fully complies with those regulations. d. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use; The proposed flagpole, antennas, cables, and equipment area are described in detail on the plans and exhibits submitted herewith. The proposed equipment shelter will be an unoccupied, unmanned, specialized area for the wireless communications equipment. The installation will be served by telephone and electric service. The proposed PCS wireless facility will enhance wireless telephone service to the residents and businesses of North Andover. The proposed facility requires no water, sewer or other town services. e. The Special Permit Granting Authority shall not grant any Special Permit unless they make a Specific finding that the use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Bylaw. The proposed facility is designed "to minimize the visual and environmental impacts as well as any potential deleterious impact on property value, of wireless services facilities..." The proposed facility is also located and designed to Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 14 "encourage appropriate land use, environmental protection, preservation of North Andover's rural character and the provision of adequate infrastructure development in North Andover." The flagpole, equipment shelter, fencing and landscaping have been located and designed to camouflage the wireless _ communication devices and to blend with the surrounding landscape and nearby architecture. The proposed facility will enhance the safety, convenience and welfare of the people of North Andover by providing improved wireless telephone services within the Town, without having a negative impact on nearby properties or the Town as a whole. By proposing either a one-carrier or two-carrier flagpole, the present application helps to minimize the overall number and height of wireless communication facilities in the Town by allowing for the collocation of other wireless communication facilities on the same flagpole and equipment area. 2. Section 8.3.6 Site Plan Review Criteria/Desian Guidelines a. General The proposed facility conforms with all applicable special permit provisions of the Zoning Bylaw as demonstrated herein. Moreover, as discussed above, the facility has been designed and located to protect abutting properties from detrimental site characteristics. b. Environmental The proposed facility has been designed to maintain the rural character and history of the farm and the Town with an understated and tasteful flagpole design. It will be an unmanned facility with no offensive lighting, odors, noise, dust, smoke, vibration, sewage; or refuse materials associated with the proposed use. The facility is not located in wetland resource areas or buffer zones. The facility will not include any outdoor storage or any solid waste receptacles. The visual appearance of the proposed equipment area is effectively camouflaged from view by its design and location, by the barn and the expansive agricultural areas, and by the proposed stockade fence and proposed landscaping. C. Design The proposed facility is appropriately located with respect to setbacks, entrances, exits and landscaping. The facility has been designed to relate harmoniously with ANDERSON( G�KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Law �) Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 15 the surrounding structures and landscape. Antennas of AWS (and a secondary lessee for the two-carrier design) will be concealed within the flagpole. The proposed equipment shelter will be within a fenced and landscaped area. Coaxial cables will be run inside the flagpole and underground to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter. Standard underground electric and telephone utilities will service the installation. d. Traffic/Parking c/Parking The proposed use generates essentially no traffic, as it has no employees, customers or regular visitors. After construction, the only traffic will be in connection with scheduled maintenance.(one vehicle approximately once per month) and emergency maintenance as needed. The facility will be served by standard electrical and telephone service and requires no water, sewer or other town services. Accordingly, it will have no traffic impacts. 3. Criteria Identified in Planning Department Instructions For the reasons discussed in the preceding two sections and elsewhere in this application, the proposed installation satisfies the specific criteria identified in the Planning Department's application instructions, to the extent applicable to the proposed facility, of: a. Encouraging the most appropriate use of land; b. Preventing overcrowding of land; C. Conserving the value of land and buildings; d. Lessening congestion of traffic; e. Preventing undue concentration of population; f. Providing adequate light and air, g. Reducing the hazards from fire and other danger; h. Assisting in the economical provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; i. Controlling the use of bodies of water, including watercourses; j. Reducing the probability of losses resulting from floods; and k. Reserving and increasing the amenities of the Town. ANDERSON&KMGER LLP At"s as at Cato CO Printed on r yded paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 16 V. VARIANCES AND WAIVERS A. Why may a variance or waiver be needed? AWS proposes to install a 120' one-carrier or two-carrier, flagpole style monopole, complete with the American flag, behind the barn of the Barker Farm. Antennas of AWS (and a secondary lessee for the two-carrier design)will be concealed within the flagpole. Next to the flagpole, AWS will construct a 12' x 20'equipment shelter within a fenced and landscaped area. Coaxial cables will be run inside the flagpole and underground to connect the antennas to the equipment within the equipment shelter. Standard underground electric and telephone utilities will service the installation. Waivers or variances from the following dimensional and related requirements may be necessary for the proposed facility:3' • The proposed installation is a 120' free standing flagpole which may exceed both 3/ AWS applies for dimensional variance relief without waiving its position that such a variance is not lawfully required. Without limitation,to the extent that the Town adopted the height,setback and other requirements referenced below based on concerns about alleged health impacts from wireless communications facilities,these setback requirements violate the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which provides as follows: No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement,construction,and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations,concerning such emissions. 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(iv). In addition,the Board may not base a decision on alleged health effects of emissions from a proposed facility. E.g.,Cellular Telephone Co.v.Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.2d 490,494-495 and cases cited,&n.3(2d Cir. 1999)("health concerns expressed by residents cannot constitute substantial evidence";"environmental effects"and"health concerns"are interchangeable); AT&T Wireless PCS Inc.v.City Council of Virginia Beach, 155 F.3d 423,431 n.6(4th Cir. 1998);Smart SMR of New York Inc v.Zoning Commission of the Town of Stratford,995 F.Supp. 52,58(D.Conn. 1998). Further,it would be erroneous for the Board to apply these requirements to prohibit the proposed facility. To do so would largely negate the authorization of special permits in the Wireless Services Overlay District and would violate the Telecommunications Act of 1996 because the Bylaw would then"prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(i)(11). ANDERSON[ GT KREIGER LLP Atta"s a s att Lara Cj Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 17 the "General" height limit!'and the "Ground-Mounted Facilities" height limits'of Section 8.9.3.c of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw; • AWS has.proposed screening and landscaping which may differ from the vegetative buffer requirements of Sections 8.9.3.c.ii `8.9.4.a.ii;'and/or 8.9.4.d.ii"of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw; 4/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"General"height limit: Height,General.Regardless of the type of mount.wireless service facilities shall be no higher than ten feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility.In addition,the height of a wireless service facility shall not exceed by more than 10 feet the height limitations of the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located,unless the facility is completely camouflaged such as within a flagpole,steeple,chimney,or similar structure. Wireless service facilities may locate on a building that is legally non-conforming with respect to height,provided that the facilities do not project above the existing building height. $/ Section 8.9.3.c provides the following"Ground-Mounted Facilities"height limit: Height,Ground-Mounted Facilities. Ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average building height or,if there are no buildings within 300 feet,these facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height,measured from ground level(AGL).If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site of the facility,all ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions.These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. 6/ Section 8.9.3.c.ii.provides the following"dense buffer"requirement: If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed site of the facility,all ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions.These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. 7/ Section 8.9.4.a.ii.provides the following"Camouflage by Vegetation"requirement: Camouflage by Vegetation.If wireless service facilities are not camouflaged from.public viewing areas by existing buildings or structures,they shall be surrounded by buffers of dense tree growth and understory vegetation in all directions to create an effective year-round visual buffer.Ground-mounted wireless service facilities shall provide year-round vertical,evergreen vegetated buffer of 50 feet,or 75%of the overall height of the structure,in all directions. Trees and vegetation may be existing on the subject property or installed as part of the proposed facility or a combination of both.Vegetation should be natural in appearance and consistent with surroundings. 8/ Section 8.9.4.d.ii.provides the following"dense tree growth buffer" requirement: Wireless service facilities shall not be located within open areas that are visible from public roads,recreational areas or residential development. As required in the Camouflage section above,all ground mounted wireless service facilities that are not camouflaged by existing buildings or structures shall be surrounded by a buffer of dense tree growth. ANDERSONvvr KREIGER LLP Attomeys at Lara j Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 18 • The proposed flagpole is 222' from the nearest property line and 142' from the nearest dwelling on the Barker Farm (and less to the barn behind the dwelling), which may not be sufficient depending on the interpretation of the set back requirements of Section 8.9.3.c.v.1'of North Andover's Wireless Services _ Facilities Zoning Bylaw; • AWS proposes to paint the flagpole the traditional color white, which differs from the color requirement of Section 8.9.4.a.iii.210'of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw; • Other than scaled back-up batteries, only negligible levels of hazardous materials will be used at the facility, in fully enclosed and sealed pieces of equipment. The equipment shelter will have a concrete slab floor, will be locked and alarmed, and will be situated within a locked and fenced equipment compound. However, its design may differ from the containment req>jirements of Section 8.9.4.e.ii"'of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw; • AWS is proposing to use removal and maintenance performance bonds to ensure 9/ Section 8.9.3.c.v.1 provides the following"setback"requirements: In order to ensure public safety,the minimum distance from the base of any ground-mounted wireless service facility to any property line,shall be 2x the height of the facility/mount.including any antennas or other appurtenances.This set back is considered the"fall zone".In addition,a minimum setback of 300 feet from any habitable dwelling or business is required.... Section 8.9.3.c.v.3 authorizes waivers of the setback requirements as follows: The SPGA may reduce the required setback distance by as much as 50%,if such set back provides adequate safety, promotes co-location or improves design,and will not significantly impact the character and appearance of the neighborhood. In making a request for a reduced setback,the manufacturer or qualified licensed designer shall certify that the tower is designed to collapse upon itself in the event of failure.AWS has submitted the requisite report and requests a waiver or variance of this requirement as may be applicable. 10/ Section 8.9.4.a.iii.2 provides the following"color"requirement: To the extent that any wireless service facilities extend above the height of the vegetation immediately surrounding it, they must be painted in a light gray or light blue hue which blends with sky and clouds. 11/ Section 8.9.4.e.ii.provides the following"containment"requirement: If any hazardous materials are to be used on site,there shall be provisions for full containment of such materials.An enclosed containment area shall be provided with a seated floor,designed to contain at least 110%of the volume of the hazardous materials stored or used on site. Applicant must comply with all federal,state and local regulations governing hazardous materials. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attorneys at Law C.1 Printed on recycled paper • i Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 19 that funds will be available for any future removal or maintenance activities. Such performance bonds differ from the cash/escrow requirements of Sections 8.9.9.c" and 8.9.11.a"of North Andover's Wireless Services Facilities Zoning Bylaw. If and to the extent necessary, AWS seeks waivers and/or variances from the foregoing sections of North Andover's Zoning Bylaw. B. What are the special conditions relating to the soil condition, shape or topography of the land or structures for which the variance is requested,which especially affect the land or structures but do not affect generally the zoning district in which it is located? The special conditions related to the Barker Farm property, that do not generally affect the zoning district, are that (1) it is an extremely large, irregularly shaped property, (2) it is topographically higher than the surrounding area, (3)because of its centuries of use as a working farm, it has a sparse tree canopy, and (4) it contains a variety of farm structures, fields, and agricultural improvements (such as the house, the barn, and the agricultural fields and related areas) which gerrymander the usable area of the site for a wireless communication installation. These special conditions are pertinent to the height, the setback, and the related variances which are sought here. C. Why does the applicant believe that the variances requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw? The requested variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Bylaw because the proposed use is passive, requires no employees on the premises, and has no characteristics that are incompatible with the nearby residential neighborhood. Specifically, it 12/ Section 8.9.9.c provides the following escrow requirement for future removal activities: As a condition of any special permit for the placement,construction or modification of a wireless service facility,a carrier shall place into escrow a sum of money to cover the costs of removing the facility from the subject property. 13/ Section 8.9.1 l.a provides the following escrow requirement for maintenance activities: Funds,sufficient in the opinion of the SPGA to cover annual maintenance of the facility,shall be placed into escrow and shall be held by the independent escrow agent who shall be authorized to expend the funds for the maintenance of the facility on terms to be agreed upon by the carrier and the SPGA as a condition of approval of the special permit. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Atto s as at Law �� Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 20 will generate only about one vehicle trip per month, will be served by standard electrical service, and requires no water, sewer or other town services. The design and location of the flagpole and the fenced, landscaped equipment shelter(1) minimizes the visibility of the wireless communication devices to the surrounding landscape, (2) blends with the architecture of the barn and will be screened from view by the barn and the surrounding expanse, (3) presents a creative and aesthetic alternative to a traditional monopole or tower design, (4) presents an environmentally secure facility for which further containment would be unnecessary, and (5) affords appropriate protections against failure. AWS will work with the Board to develop reasonable additional landscaping plan for the proposed facility, if deemed necessary by the Board. D. What is the substantial hardship,financial or otherwise, to you, which would result from a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw? The applicant and property owner would suffer substantial hardship if the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw were literally enforced to preclude the proposed use on the subject property. The applicant requires a location for its communications antennae in this area of North Andover. The applicant has been attempting to secure a site to serve this area for quite some time. Its efforts have been stymied by the adoption of the Town's very restrictive Wireless Services Bylaw which, as applied to this area of Town, may effectively prohibit the installation of a suitable facility. Further, a literal enforcement of the height, setback and related requirements would effectively eliminate the Barker Farm site from consideration for a wireless communication facility. In view of the requirements of the federal Telecommunications Act, this Board is obliged to apply the Bylaw in a way that avoids this result. The proposed site is the most appropriate site to serve this area of North Andover. The location of the Barker farm and the existing non-residential uses of the property further support the appropriateness of the proposed facility here. Finally, the owners of the farm would suffer substantial hardship by being deprived of the revenue associated with the proposed use. Since this revenue can assist the owners of the farm in continuing the property in active agricultural use, both the owners and the Town will benefit from the proposed facility by helping to maintain the rural character and history of the farm and the Town with an understated and tasteful flagpole design. ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attm"s as at Zaw �- Printed on recycled paper Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board April 6, 2000 Page 21 VI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, AWS respectfully requests that the Boards schedule this application for a public hearing at their next regularly scheduled meetings for which proper notice can be given and that the Boards grant the foregoing relief and any other zoning relief that may be just and proper for the installation and operation of the proposed facility. Sincerely, Ste en D. Anderson sanderson@andersonkrei2er.com Enclosures cc: Rick Carey, Vanasse, Hangin, Brustlin, Inc. (by mail w/encl.) Taylor Whiteside (by email w/out encl. and Federal Express w/encl.) Phil Posner (by email w/out encl. and Federal Express w/encl.) Jim Wilson (by email w/out encl.) att\n.andbarker\1213 A006.wp d ANDERSON&KREIGER LLP Attomeys at Law �> Printed on recycled paper :�: -.$ �� � ''� � _w �M -� �'�' '"j,ri� 1 x i � r, �,�,,� .<��� �. `� .�:, m.,. S.- '_ F � � v�. . � 1 �i "tf 1�f ,, � :� r �.. S. t; 'fit - F� �y`. i 'y *.4 - _`Lt ,�hq• � a '` r r, A � Ra1 �T �t1��- 4;',, �� s,,,, � 'd �,. .. �x oY'; F..' 1 .� i _ ',^(: ,, y�. 4 ;l, �. '[ �, :.)R e at 4 p � �_ AT},yt � `� a Y •a • �� �° ..f: �.� is - ,a.. �� '• �" ,ale.. .tr �Jt±'. �e'.�Sit�� � ' t t , OF IF OFF 09, y�1irk �►` t - 41 LIP I AL N mm * tkl� !•�.' � i�'' ��4fV i t ",� .�."•�-�� •_•9.�'�t �,• ��. 'JY•.St JI•. rr t� ZVI ey l Lt�y1 vy. fit. 44 57, Ilk IC SURNAMED &�mz r1!!"•�,z.. ,,,ate, ;5..'�.."""`.. _..-�..^•,.r.zws .•... '- � .....� .� -`' � i r I f M Z� 1 vx ti AV I 4�f Will M IL 4 Oh j� ig 4� ` � rye• +i IPWI J t 9 t, t, in A s i' i i i i i i 22 t�►""�I..�..:'1t ya rte. ,s 101—7 1p oft A AW 01 fry •," - �� ' �I'.is'.�' J �r la � Ci r.��,���• •G y�-�.k 1���t rd�h�i � . Vw�' � �',��4�►A,,1`.d'�:�.•��,�.��#fit, A !`!tom It� •\ - /1�y��'+�,'i, � yfI`�!� ,� � z ' 'a'Yhjl, �.. '.•r' �0!-'.t'r`4i �ts. 5+'' f. � (�) t��f P `i�. •�. .ra,�,G de t Y • ,re•�r,���'�—', •r � �.,�., a {I,��l:L�• i F�y��. r�- r aq► j f` �' 'QCT 0 .� • ',,Toro `}• `' V t i 1 i ' b •1''�%f �� F , � fig; � ( `, iai r :y i rf courtsl des gh- Hi .court sides with neighbors XXTV nei ghitbO�� M CELL TOWER. : ;�. Cellular One and Sprint Spec- Lawlises argued the town had violat- Continued front Page 1 tram have agreed to pay Littleton ed the state's zoning statute when it phone companies, amounting to sev- $793,032 over a 10-year lease period changed the use of land,which origi- e-ral thousand dollars. and to build a soccer field for the nally had been taken by enriitent do- 0�er Cefl tower "The expense of litigation is one town's Recreation Department in ex- main-for a water storage,tank. threat telecommunications compa- change for use of the Water Depart- Additionally, the residents ar- tiies know they have in their favor, inept land.., gued that the town couldn't fairly ad- h6cause they can afford attorneys In the initial round of Planning judicate their coriiplaint because it Littleton case widens appeal rights and afford court-ordered legal costs Board hearings,' Roberts and the CELL TOWER,Page 11 granted to the opposing party, and most private individuals.can't," Sib- By Caroline Louise Cole bison said. The Superior Court ac- GLOBE CORRESPONDENT `We are proteet><ng tion,she added,"is the kind of court decision that had an immediate, ■CELL TOWER Residential property owners tak- our property rights chilling effect on private citizens con- Continued fr•onz Page 9 ing exception to the construction of and everyone else. sidering challenging decisions made cellular telephone antenna towers was earning money from the lease'of by their town governments." the property and was therefore bi- near their homes have been granted W110 1S aggrieved by Alex Parr and Louis Levine, two a new tool to fight local siting deci- ased. In their complaints,they noted an ltn ro ger decision Acton attorneys who argued the case sions. improper for the cellular telephone companies, that at the same time the town was The state's_highest court has of their town making money by leasing town land did not return several telephone to a commercial entity,the residents ruled that abutters who appeal a lo- government.' calls seeking comment. gal_zonuig,decision are entitled to a '' In March 1997,Cellular One filed were losing money from reduced full judicial review"of-their.com- property values.- ROBERT LA W L I S a 'request with the Littleton Plan- It was clear to us from the be- plaint,including presentation,of new Hing Board for a special permit to evrdenc'e'in a trial setting, as is the Plazntifj`�in Littleton suit �.. ginning the town'had made a deci- construct a..100-foot lattice antenna sibn to site the towei behind us and case with any other zoning dispute. tower on a small rectangle-of land on ! the considered-our__com Taints an The ruling by Supreme Judicial Court. "It will also ensure that mu- Newtorvn.Hill owned byAhe Little I- ;- -- - p Court Justice Margaret Marshall anno'yance," Robert Lawlis said. nicipalitieg properly enforce their ton Water Department.Sprint Spec- came late last month in a case The{neighbors appealed the zoning bylaws and'that cellular com; trum was later granted a p@i init to tow_n's decision to Middlesex Superi- brought by three Littleton residents parties have not run roughshod over. add its own antenna to the tower. or_Co.ur't-last year. Judge R. Mal- against Cellular One, Sprint Spec- Littleton is among several com- - -r P P the right of property owners. cqh _Graham sided with the cell titan and the town of Littleton two Sibbison said the ruling was par= munities around the state, including ni - years ago. The plaintiffs live next to phone companies, ruling that the titularly momentous because Massa= Tewksbuiy, that have.attempted to federal`'Ielecoinmunication Act ex- a proposed town cellular antenna chusetts is the first state to make it conttbl the placement of these struc- site. tures b limiting them to town- empte_d cellular telephone disputes clear to the telecommunications in= y g from the state's so-call de novo re- In their case before the high dustry it .cannot ignore local and owned property. Towns then collect die I pi oceas used in other zoning court, David Roberts and Jean and state zoning statutes. In.several oth_,' revenue by leasing space on the Robert Lawlis were appealing cases. " ppealing a pri- er instances,_cell telephone compa; tbwers to these companies. In overturning Graham's deci- or judgment against them in Middle- Hies have argued that under.the-fed Other communities, including cion,Marshall wrote,]"Congress was sex Superior Court. eral Telecommunications Act of 1950 ! Chelmsford and Wilmington, have explicit that the [Teleco grecs wa- "What this decision does is helps cirnsi ned the towers to land zoned tions'Act] does not preempt state p only federal laws apply. g to level the playing field for ordinary In her ruling,Marshall also over- for industrial uses. and local authority with respect to citizens fighting these giant compa- ttu•ned the lower court's order re; 1 f These new local zoning restt•ie- any zoning and land use issues pen- nies," said Wendy Sibbison, the que•ing Roberts and thelawlises to! 1 tions followed on the heels of con- Greenfield attorney who represent- essional legislation that prohibited taming to personal wireless service p pay the courts cost of both the Town p facilities." ed Roberts and the Lawlises in the of Littleton and the cellular tele- communities from outlawing cellular .... .ill unresolved is the abutters' case before the Supreme Judicial CELL TOWER,Page 9! telephone facilities outright. ,,,+.,,,+:,,., +1,..+ +ham +.,...,, ;� ,,,,.,,.,.,_ - 9 A r ----------- AT&T Wu less Services 400 Blue Hill Drive Suite 100 Westwood,MA.02090 Town of North Andover Municipal Building 120 Main Street North Andover,MA.01845 April 5,2000 Dear Members of the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals, This letter is being submitted as part of AT&T Wireless Services' application for a Wireless Service Facility that is to be located at Barker Farm in North Andover. This report provides an inventory of AT&T Wireless Service's facilities that exist or have some level of approval within the Town of North Andover and within one mile of the Town boundary,identifies pre- existing structures that were considered before choosing the Barker Farm location,discusses the coverage that the proposed facility will provide and discusses the need for the proposed facility. Also,there are attached maps that demonstrate AT&T's coverage in the surrounding area,both existing and proposed. AT&T Wireless Services is licensed to provide wireless phone coverage throughout the Boston MTA(Metropolitan Trading Area). The MTA includes the Town of North Andover and the surrounding communities. Wireless phone coverage is provided by the construction of a number of low power sites in a certain area. The sites are placed so that the coverage from any given site will overlap with the adjacent sites. The overlap is required to support a call that is in motion, such as a vehicle or pedestrian. While the phone is in a call on any site,it monitors the strength of all of the adjacent sites. When the call can be better served by one of the adjacent sites it is transferred to that site, ideally without interruption of the call. If the overlapping coverage is weak or nonexistent,the call will become garbled and probably drop. Map l: The first map that I have attached shows all of AT&T's antenna locations within the Town of North Andover,as well as within one mile of the Town boundary,that have been constructed or have some level of Town approval. Also included is the proposed location at Barker Farm. The sites that are shown are located on a combination of buildings, signs,and towers (most towers consisting of co-location with other carriers). The Town of North Andover has been highlighted in green. The locations of these installations are as follows: E 101—6 Commonwealth Drive,Lawrence MA. E 111 — 111 Canal Street,Lawrence MA. E116—224 Winthrop Ave,Lawrence MA. E 117R—MainStreet, Andover MA. E120—Pleasant Valley Street,Methuen MA. E121 — 12 Rogers Road,Haverhill MA. E424—Boston Hill Road,North Andover MA. E425—Main Street, Andover MA. E445—Proposed Barker Farm Site It can be seen on the map that there are no sites indicated to the east of the Town of Andover. At this time AT&T has no existing or approved sites located in this area. A comprehensive list of all other carriers' locations is not normally public information. Therefore,sites that are not being used by AT&T were not included in the attached map. r Map 2 The second attached map is a theoretical,computer generated model of AT&T's existing coverage. Although there is a symbol on the map for E445—Barker Farm,the coverage that E445 is expected to provide is not shown on the second map. It was generated by a computer-modeling program that takes in account terrain,antenna model,antenna height,and RF power output. The areas shown in yellow are quality coverage areas that are provided by existing and approved sites. If a phone travels outside of the area indicated in yellow,the call will degrade or drop,with possible loss of service. It can be seen on the map that the north end of town has coverage holes,especially along Route 125. This was the general area chosen for improvement. Once a general area has been determined,a Real Estate Specialist visits the area. Any existing structure is examined for feasibility first,with the construction of a new tower being the last resort. All potential candidates are then tested with the computer modeling software to see if they are feasible for use. Any candidate that passes is then tested with test transmitter at the various heights. Data is recorded by the test van during the test and is analyzed for coverage and overlap. The primary existing structure is a water tank that is located on Barker Hill. This candidate passed the computer- modeling phase,but failed during the drive test. The sides of the hill block consistent coverage from reaching Route 125 and the surrounding areas,so an installation on the tank would still leave areas of degraded coverage. No other existing structures were found that would provide coverage in the desired area. The Barker Farm location is located down on the side of the hill,low enough to prevent signal blockage from Barker Hill. It provides or strengthens coverage on Route 125,Route 133,and much of the surrounding area. The site also has good overlapping coverage with AT&T's existing sites along Route 495,which will provide a smooth transition between sites within that portion of North Andover. ' Map 3 The third attached map was generated with the same computer modeling software as the previous one,but it includes coverage that would be provided by the proposed facility(highlighted in red). It can be seen that this location will provide coverage to a significant portion of the northern corner of the town. The flagpole structure was chosen due to its low visual impact. There are a number of flagpoles possible with varying opportunity for coloration. The antennas that were chosen will operate in either of the flagpoles presented with no modification to the antenna or the change in the coverage provided. I look forward to meetink you in the near future and providing you with any additional information that you may require. Regards, n- / t� James Wilson RF Engineer � I ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 11 1 .•,' o � � U, ��'�±��!;�/, ate`S�� � i — �' �� •�!. m�;iiyt�l�t`�l 1 , 1 '1 �� �,�' �1►► - "'t •, .� IIS � VA. ����`=i��!��►a;�' Vii; 0 emo op 46 :� r �� •.. /'-: 171.• 'I•�;�. IO a "M/fit,/ inn lililliv" om tF ��%i`��I,: •!=�;1M ice.:/j����� a16���� , �7f/•�, �,..._\ate' "'' ` /ti`..%.► ; �. FA `i '' � .•..,,tom r n r !.RmIk /jN� OF IMF \A0� ' •:3i��U�'�` �i%!��, lam= :�'=�:'��n1�•�J��//t� � ;.,�,���. : -x,11 �i:•.!.:<,1�1. 1 Ub ff � �.at�i.' /I� to ` .• 04 �SPRII.-S, -Mt ilq RE, IF CP ��. + ®► ~� J ► r 10