HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 178 STONECLEAVE ROAD 4/30/2018 (2)a
i
,a
�a�
N m
o m
a ;;u
o O
C)
OT ram M^., l ooT
S`k,?EH - T1 is �► �CEcota OF 1-49 LaArvr.i
AW" E1•$ VNj }oj pf T+4& c.)b, *T I Nei yY"lp.+
T-2
49
LW -4-1
�c
weu-
�
170 rJ e- L i'.�, V E . �L_n '
�
l LTPLANAS
Of
st
AL S%TFmM
SPOSYc
LOCATED IN
40RT41 .4&.b6 yee- /'U55 / /7,9 sLL /9 f/L"
AS PREPARED FbR
_7.�l1/D Y
DATE: 04 7 /Y /,040
SCALE: , _tea 7�L /z9
O
�
r
Le =
C==
n
aso , _:
111
z
z
o
m
me
o
4-
v
OT ram M^., l ooT
S`k,?EH - T1 is �► �CEcota OF 1-49 LaArvr.i
AW" E1•$ VNj }oj pf T+4& c.)b, *T I Nei yY"lp.+
T-2
49
LW -4-1
�c
weu-
�
170 rJ e- L i'.�, V E . �L_n '
�
l LTPLANAS
Of
st
AL S%TFmM
SPOSYc
LOCATED IN
40RT41 .4&.b6 yee- /'U55 / /7,9 sLL /9 f/L"
AS PREPARED FbR
_7.�l1/D Y
DATE: 04 7 /Y /,040
SCALE: , _tea 7�L /z9
O
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • tAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS-'
66 PARK STREET • ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS 01610 4 TEL (617) 473-3353, 373-5721
I
�O
n
C==
n
0,0
111
z
z
o
m
me
o
4-
v
<
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • tAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS-'
66 PARK STREET • ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS 01610 4 TEL (617) 473-3353, 373-5721
I
Town of North Andover E NORTH
o�,,.,..° ,•lac
Office of the Health Department
Community Development and Services Division
27 Charles Street ` --
North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 'ss�cNusj
Susan Y. Sawyer, REHS/RS
Public Health Director
978.688.9540 - Phone
978.688.9542 - Fax
CE1�7IFICA7E o�F COW(i)CIAYCE.
As of:
August 9, 2004
ql is is to cert that
the individual subsurface disposal system
repaired (X)— Euf[System
by
Rocci lDeLucia, Jr.
at
178 Stonecleave Road
North Andover, 9WA 01845
has been installed in accordance with the provisions of Title V of the State Sanitary Code and
with the North Andover (Board of Yfealth regulations.
The issuance of this certificate shall not 6e construed as a guarantee that the system will
function satisfactorily.
Sus `Y. Sawyer, RE34S/R5
(Pu6fc Yfealth Director
BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535
RECEIVED
AUG 0 9 2004
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
INSTALLATION CERTIFICATION
The dersigned hereby certify that the Sewage Disposal System ( ) constructed;
( repaired;
by 1428v>.? a wc-t& Jam:
located at
was installed in conformance with the North Andover Board of Health approved plan,
System Design Permit # , dated with an approved design
flow of 44. gallons per day. The materials used were in conformance with those
specified on the approved plan; the system was installed in accordance with the
provisions of 310 CMR 15.000, Title 5 and local regulations, and the final grading agrees
substantially with the approved plan. All work is accurately represented on the As -built
which has been submitted to the Board of Health.
Bed inspection date: Mok)j�
Final inspection date:
Engineer Representative
Engineer Repr sentative
Installer: BCCI ���1tiV+ Oi Lic.#: Dat
Pesia Engineer: Date: Cf q )a4
1 W. 40706
O 4,
C�9i'SQ'�� Q
`� ,Zo.S.C"AtEVN
0
Page 1 of 1
I-
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Dan Ottenheimer [info@millriverconsulting.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Susan Sawyer; amcbrearty@millriverconsulting.com; 'Pamela Dellechiaie'
Subject: 178 Stonecleave
Sue and Pam,
Attached please find the construction inspection report for 178 Stonecleave Road. The job was performed well.
The only outstanding item is the need to install speed levelers to get more even distribution from the d -box. This
should be checked by you or us at final grade inspection.
Dan
n
Daniel Ottenheimer, President
Mill River Consulting
Septic System Management Services
2 Blackburn Center
Gloucester, MA 01930-2259
978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-3044
fax: 978-282-0012
www.millriverconsulting.com
info@millriverconsulting.com
6/25/2004
MILL RIVER CONSULTING
Septic System Management Services
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES
ADDRESS: 178 Stonecleave Road MAP: 104B LOT: 129
INSTALLER: Rocci Delucia, Jr.
DESIGNER: Merrimack Engineering
PLAN DATE: 5/2/03
BOH APPROVAL DATE ON PLAN: 12/12/03
DATE OF BED BOTTOM INSPECTION:
DATE OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION: 5/21/04
DATE OF FINAL GRADE INSPECTION:
SELECT SYSTEM TYPE Gravity Distribution
COMPONENT SUMMARY FROM PLAN
GALLON TANK = 1500
LOADING OF SEPTIC TANK = H-10
TYPE OF SAS = Field
DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS OF SAS: 20'x 45'
SITE CONDITIONS
®Existing septic tank properly abandoned
[-]Internal plumbing all to one building sewer
®Topography not appreciably altered
Comments:
Could not access house, installer reported internal plumbing all piped to one building
sewer.
5 Blackburn Center, Gloucester, MassaC7husetts 01930-2259
toll free 1.800.377.3044 978.282.0014 info@millriverconsulting.com
Page 1 of 3
MILL RIVER CONSULTING
D -BOX
Septic System Management Services
SEPTIC TANK
®
Bottom of tank hole has 6" stone base
®
Weep hole plugged
®
1500 gallon tank has been installed
Observed even distribution
H-10 loading Monolithic construction
®
Water tightness of tank has been achieved
Visual testing
®
Inlet tee installed, over access port
®
Outlet tee (gas baffle) installed, over access port
®
Manhole 24 inch cover to within 6" of final grade installed
® over one access port
❑ over outlet of tank if effluent filter is present
®
Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlet
Comments:
45 -degree angle joint just before outlet TEE.
D -BOX
®
Installed on stable stone base
❑
Inlet tee (if pumped or >0.08'/foot)
®
Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlets
®
Observed even distribution
®
Speed levelers provided (not required)
Comments:
Installer will
provide speed levelers, Lateral 4 appears to be high
SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM
❑ Bottom of SAS excavated down to soil layer, as provided on plan
® Size of SAS excavated as per plan
® Title 5 sand installed, if specified on plan
® 3/4-1 Y2" double washed stone installed
® 1/8-1/2" (peastone) double washed stone installed
® laterals installed and ends connected to header (and
vented if impervious material above)
® Orifices @ 5 & 7 o'clock positions
❑ Gravelless disposal systems: type, number and location as per plan
® Elevations of laterals installed as on approved plan
❑ 40 Mil HDPE barrier installed
❑ Retaining wall (boulder / concrete / timber/ block)
❑ Final cover as per plan
Comments:
Stone (both pea stone and leach stone) questionable as to whether double -washed
however material on the stone was mostly sand, no fines.
SYSTEM ELEVATIONS
5 Blackburn Center, Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930-2259
toll free 1.800.377.3044 978.282.0014 info@millriverconsulting.com
Page 2 of 3
f
MILL RIVER CONSULTING
Septic System Management Services
Benchmark: 132.00
Rod at Benchmark: 0.20
Height of Instrument: 132.2
INVERT ON DESIGN PLAN INVERT ELEVATION
Building Sewer OUT 129.17
Septic Tank IN
128.67
128.73
Septic Tank OUT
Pump handIN
128.42
128.35
Pump GhambeF OUT
Distribution Box IN
128.22
128.21
Distribution Box OUT
128.05
128.05
Manifold
Lateral 1 HIGH
128.02
128.03
Lateral 1 LOW
127.80
127.91
Lateral 2 HIGH
128.02
128.03
Lateral 2 LOW
127.80
127.93
Lateral 3 HIGH
128.02
128.05
Lateral 3 LOW
127.80
127.93
Lateral 4 HIGH
128.02
128.04
Lateral 4 LOW
127.80
127.91
5 Blackburn Center, Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930-2259
toll free 1.800.377.3044 978.282.0014 info@millriverconsulting.com
Page 3 of 3
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Map -Block -Lot
104.B- 0129 -
Board Of Health Permit No
North Andover - BHP -2004-0364 --
------------------
P•l• FEE
F.I. $250.00
---------------------
Disposal Works Construction Permit
Permission is hereby granted Rocci DeLucia, Jr.---_ -___----__
-- --------- -----------------
to (Repair) an Individual Sewage Disposal System.
at No 178 STONECLEAVE ROAD
as shown on the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No. 13HP-20047036 Dated December-1-2,2003-
11
ecember122003
Issued On:--ay-03-2004 B
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Board Of Health
North Andover
Map -Block -Lot
104. B- 0129 -
-----------------
Certificat f Complian
THIS IS TO CERTIEY,That the Individual isposal System (Repair)
by Rocci DeLu-cia, -Jr.
--------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Installer
at No 178 STONECLEA AD
bas been installed in rdance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of the State Environmental as described in the
application isposal Works Construction Permit No. BHP -2004-036 Dated December 1 2003
-------------- --
-------------------------------------- --------------------------
Printed On: May -03-2004 �oard Of Health j
f
cull IfIIVIIYYGQICIF VI W1CI00Q1-IIU11VU0
€
104.B- 0129 -
ii
Permit No 4
ivtii if I rtiitltive-i j
li
c)rn nn
t----------------------- 1
! !!^'!?^!l Ci7� lf1l llfV� ( fll�CTlFi il�Tl�!\ lt..��if'i'SFSE7 ,1
Ir
+� i�EVNVViAE f t VE E!V V Vf EVf.f �.l VLE VE E ! VE E E EEf< �I
1 Vf ltJ_FJJiV21 lil - _— __ _ ___
--- -
- t
{I �t
airun I ln\1iiN.-Hi�1.HA-VH YS!11-1.1i '1111!
!I t�
-----------------------------------
_____________________________________ _
il_i=: _-_iitii-: 'aiii :� i i:::xi:ai a ___ _ _ __ ___ __ _ __ _ _________________________ _ _' _ _ __ _______________________-_____
r_ �,
__!_ �L .._SSC__ _.-_ vi.: '� T^. '�r.� s n-_ f_ : -.
-�•_-__-_ _. -_`-y=.:J:ll�iiialiF.i ��iltlli i.t_ t,�jr-ia.}•::t-[r ,n ::BI.C�.: -____� �il,:r !!
tl a erc.�FFF c �.
M II
i
Issued On: May -03-2004
Board Of 1 ea?t?� 1
-
APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
DATE: 3 a CURRENT INSTALLER'S LICENSE#—-
LOCATION:v-
LICENSED INSTALLER, QOU��LtV%,(Ak"Sr
SIGNATURE: TELEPHONE# o V
CHECK ONE:
REPAIR: U NEW CONSTRUCTION:
��lo � oic�5g
IF NEW CONSTRUCTION, PLEASE ATTACH FOUNDATION AS -BUILT.
z �`� Administrative Use Only
0 D
$ .00 Fee Attached? Yes No
Foundation As -built? Yes No
Floor plans on file? Yes No
Approval
Date:
INSTALLER PROJECT MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS
As the North. Andover licensed installer for the construction of the septic system for the
property at 510 relative to the application
o (moi OAdated 6� for plans by Irrihnat�% Gnci�ttRt►�Gc and
/ Swu►v.s
dated �3 with revisions dated- O f � 03
I understand the following obligations for management of this project:
1. As the installer I am obligated to call for any and all inspections. If homeowner, contracto
project manger, or any other person not associated with my company schedules an inspectio
and the system is not ready then item two shall be applicable.
2. As the installer I am required to have the necessary work completed prior to the applicabl
inspections as indicated below. I understand that requesting an inspection,. withou
completion of the items in accordance with Tile 5 and the Board of Health Regulations mw
result in a $50.00 fine being levied against my company.
a) Bottom of Bed - generally first inspection unless there is a retaining wall which should be dons
first. Instafirrmust request the inspection but does not have to be present.
b) Final inspection — Engineer must. first do their inspection for elevations, ties, etc. As -built o
verbal OK from engineer must be submitted to Board of Health, after which installer calls fol
inspection time. Installer must be present for this inspection. With pump system all electrical
work must be ready .and able to cause pump to work and alarm to function.
c) Final Grade — Installer must request inspection when all grading is complete. Does not have to be
on site.
3. As the installer I understand that persons or companies not associated with my company may
not perform the work required by my company to complete the installation of the system
identified in. the attached application for installation. I further understand that work by others
unlicensed to install septic systems in North Andover can constitute reasons for denial of the,
system, and/or revocation or suspension of my license in the Town of North .Andover plus
significant fines to all persons involved.
4. As the Installer I understand that I must be on site during the performance of the following
construction steps:
a) Determination that the proper elevation of the excavation has been reached.
b) Inspection of the sand and stone to be used.
c) Final inspection by Board of Health staff. um chamber, retaining wall and other
d) Installation of tank; D -box, pipes, stone, vent, pump g
components.
5.
As the installer I understand that I am solely responsible for the installation of the system as
per the approved plans. No instructions by the homeowner, general contractor, or any other
persons shall absolve me of this obligation.
Disposal Works Construction Permit #
Date:
I
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
27 CHARLES STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845
Sandra Starr, R.S., C.H.O. •.
Public Health Director
(I
Bill Dufresne From: Pamela
To:
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING
66 PARK STREET
Andover, MA 01810
978-475-1448 Pages: `1211115Fax: / I
978-475-3555 Date: qD�
Phone: /
Septic Plan Response CC:
Re:
Telephone (978) 688-9540
FAX (978) 688-9542
❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Comments:
Attached is the response from the Health Agent regarding Septic Plans for the following property:
A copy has also been mailed to the homeowner.
Please call 978-688-9540 for assistance with any questions. Thank you.
Cc: File
Homeowner
0
N
d
3
0
d
It
4
I kn00
U
F3 CSI
(cn O ¢ O,
Y
rn
� w >
�
.�
N
•pt
i >-•
O I
¢voUl �
N
wwzwl
�z¢zl
a
cn
00
m ^� O I
9
�
y
N = m 0
C
b
c Q
O
.
c
°:
O
Y
'L
.a
�U
c0
y y 0.) 42' 00
n Em
«cw
ai
3
I
'd
I
rn cC C •� i
C U
cd
I i
81
y
I
Np
I I 01
I I rL1
M
O
I
H
�M
�i
E
w
o
NI
C
a.
U
I •CQ
I I
I
D
N
;
i
I y
i
o
c
c
3 o i-
v
Z c
L' CQ
R O Oi O
n
°
aAv�3.aa
w
I
c
I
=
y �n
N
a.0 6r4 44= 2 O '-D X 4"'
C_ b=L
S
O V]
la
Z
yl�k
�•
� Oil
L
�L O
0`�G71�
Ra'a
N� SIG
o
a
0
0
M
CD
Z o
LL m
Q
z
y LLJ
i
U
Y
rn
w -' vi
U C
�
.�
N
•pt
i >-•
N = m 0
b
c Q
0 L UE
U a c N o
Z•
c
°:
•� '
Y
�U
c0
y y 0.) 42' 00
n Em
«cw
ai
3
ti e
c�
'd
C7
rn cC C •� i
C U
cd
G `�
y
`
2
U
m
7 .D bA U i a d
y
L
c
c
3 o i-
v
Z c
o0
c
n
Y
N
a.0 6r4 44= 2 O '-D X 4"'
C_ b=L
S
O V]
3 c n 0 n
m°
=
un 'O
=
C N 4'. cC
°
p
o•
�+ v
� N
>
UE
� N y0 9 ... �� t
a >
� 9
C
L C '•
O
U
_ <'d 7 ay
C
U W
YO
M
C W s O tU. p m
'C <
tNj
m t C
OU
c c=a
o
� y a Q o E 2
cca o
•o '�
a c s
vi
L U
m
U < rn rJ M
3= 3 �_
C 3
=s
.O ' y cc
co
_
c
c0
O> O
a
2 H U L C U N
2
3
U
U
EO'
Uj
O L)
Q
C
N
U
E C
Or-
�0E C
=
r-
a5
y s
Y° v c
p•
T an
°
1a.
=
p •a'
Yum_
oo
'�
v °_° v °L' a
ao
v 3
e—
M •�
a
fV
O E o
�tn� °U.0c
3
oc
c=i
"O cu
'oZ
iN -S
-- WC
O, O
N �
4
1
2
1'
a o
0 0
oo
°�
N
>
a3
c�
ro
.
N
1- L
Y
T Z
N
roy
c
v 3
c
0
o
on
0
o
y
,
LL)
L
0
o
y
N
y °
°�
c
ej
o
3
O
Ob
O
W
b
a
p 't@
ai
c
ro a
c
o
c
0
o
ro U (0
9
0a
t
2
ro y
ro G
b
L y
ro
.0
M
i
m
m
co
Vi ro$
ro A
rn T
•i a. Y`
M
C
�
o
�z 3
>
Cd
a
ro
°
o 0
0-
abi
� ro NO
� �
0
.d
v
=
ro
c
bA
7�
F Y
F
3
a
N
O U
N
N
M
O W
M o
O O ai
M
O
O
M
0000i ,C
+s-�
O
h
O
n a0i
r W A
r
�o
o
�o
1'
N
0
N
ro
d
Y
,
L
0
�
3
c
0a
2
c
c a
>
i
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
L
U
y
L
i
G
S
v
O
�
iL+
O
V�
r
C
H
U
�
p
rig
rz
I
p
y
L
RS
V
q3j
°
en
va
va
Z
a
Y
�
O
L
O
y
O
O
O
N
$
�
N
_
D
9191
N
a
c
ro
I
❑.
cz.
O
O
p
p
p
0
0
91
y z
z
z
o
o
y v]
t7
U
on
0
0
m
a
m
7
M
O
O
O
i
N
N
N
�C
Q
0
O
N
Q
Q
3
r--It�D
N
o
cn
m
C
E
E
0
0
0
91
a
I n
Z o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
o
E d
a
d
d
E
V
U
=
ro
c
0
o
o
>
y
c
c
a
3
F
N
Q
T
U
0
C
O
U
>
ro
yn-.
c
o�
ci
U
CID
06lu
3
c
c
F
ori
L
0
ti
t
i
u
a ey
40 OD
00 O
vq� N 3 `0 OD 4 ty
U°bOW a0i z� O wo
aid ° � 41 $ q 3 cd foo
tw 0A 9
t w
q°�
m
b t -d a on OAC o a aSsi x on w
- w `s rn �'
" �' '�' mob' 0 5 � `'•� 'o ffi d 'S — d � o
o a a 0 c� d �� L
3 -o2 aw
Q
o a� g m, 0 p �" 0 O C'd
6. a zi o a 8
€bib ow `k' 0 ==v;
UPG�
oCbo n w'. y�'" �A c� Cti en M c^
00
_ o s o o
�N vOd
b
0
o
h
,It
v
N,
CD
-414
0
O
OO
4
>O
N
{J
W
UW U
O O
�
�0
a
00 op
�
O
n
V
�
�
v
x
o
0
II
C
O
Gm
m
O
'3Ari�
cri
b
�
U
3
h
d
M
O
N
N
U
d
w
o
rA
..
�
v
A
�+
�
N
O
�+
•~
O
�
b
Q
Z
�
1�
�tA
Qwl
Q
aAva3aa,�
N
O,
Cs
O
O
z
o
•u
y
O
.�
ti
'O
mu
:O.
LAI-
F
O
0
u
a ey
40 OD
00 O
vq� N 3 `0 OD 4 ty
U°bOW a0i z� O wo
aid ° � 41 $ q 3 cd foo
tw 0A 9
t w
q°�
m
b t -d a on OAC o a aSsi x on w
- w `s rn �'
" �' '�' mob' 0 5 � `'•� 'o ffi d 'S — d � o
o a a 0 c� d �� L
3 -o2 aw
Q
o a� g m, 0 p �" 0 O C'd
6. a zi o a 8
€bib ow `k' 0 ==v;
UPG�
oCbo n w'. y�'" �A c� Cti en M c^
00
_ o s o o
�N vOd
b
0
o
v
N,
O N
-414
4
N
{J
n
�
v
x
II
14
0
1-4
N'
n
0
0
V'1
0
00
A
0
a
O O
3
fD a;
�o�
s�
H
ow
E�
'9b
w
3
� o 0
0
a ti ti
°u
o
U
"
3
ami en
3
L
s
3a��
l
g iz
0
M M
C O
aha N N
A N
UD
o
a
d
d O 7,
r
5
Ci
^�
_
p"
g
o
o �
o
ss
0 0
M M
0.
o
U
a
� bb
•� U �
V
A
�
�
O
m k°, �d
p
�
a
3
4
OO
A
0
N
M
O
�i
�.�'
f/1
•�
b
�b�A
C
m
F
Fig
k td c°i
w o
m L" O
o
O
3
bD
•�
N d
E° %
H
a
nn
y
o A
Mo
♦+
�
N
O
0
°m
�
°
alp
pb
aAv�3aa�
.y
cs
O
—4
O
W)
b
�A°
aG7�aa�tV
0
0
0
A
a
a
3
a
�o�
s�
H
E�
'9b
w
o � �
z o 0
� o 0
0
a ti ti
U
'd 00
3
ami en
3
s
g iz
M M
C O
aha N N
A N
UD
o
a
d
d O 7,
r
5
Ci
^�
_
p"
g
o
o �
o
ss
0 0
M M
0.
a a
a
� bb
•� U �
V
A
�
�
�
m k°, �d
p
�
a
o
4
0
N
f"1
ei 9b
F
UWP
k td c°i
w o
m L" O
o
O
3
bD
•�
N d
E° %
H
a
o A
Mo
O
o
0
0
0
0
OUO
a
3
a
E�
'9b
w
o � �
z o 0
� o 0
C N N
a ti ti
U
O
3
g iz
M M
C O
aha N N
A N
d O 7,
r
Ci
.G
o
o �
o
0 0
M M
0.
a a
a
�
a
A
0
N
ei 9b
F
i
SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTAL FORM
LOCATION: 1.-7 J
NEW PLANS: � S/ $Plan U` to o-5
REVISED PLANS: YES $ 60.00/Plan
SITE EVALUATION FORMS INCLUDED: NO
DATE: JU►j 4
DESIGN ENGINEER:—
v J
i
DATE TO CONSULTANT:
When the submission is all in place, route to the Health Secretary.
r
MONTH
0:•��•o
0
,sSACMUStA
Town of North Andover, Massachusetts
BOARD OF HEALTH
DESIGN APPROVAL FOR
SOIL ABSORPTION SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
19
Form No. 2
Applicant���/�1L/{- �Tftl�'/C%� �C�c.P�l9 Test No. �fD3
Site Locationv
Reference Plans and Specs. �//17f4 �✓�''�°
��8-.,,Ix S IENGINEER DESIGN DATE
Permission is granted for an individual soil absorption sewage disposal system to be installed
in accordance with regulations of Board of Health.
Fee
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF HEALTH
Site System Permit No.�/"&
CHECKLIST FOR NORTH ANDOVER
SEPTIC SYSTEM PLANS
Job
The following is a checklist that incorporates all Title 5 and local regulations for septic plans.
Name of Applicant: Name of Designer:
Plan Date: u!a Revision Date: Date of Review: /cJ
c(il1t�•
Property Addres� l���1 Map: Lot:
BOH Reviewer: Type of.Plan(ne or upgrade): [�
Number of Bedrooms in Assessor's Records: gpd) Garbage Disposal Allowed:
General Information: N.A. = North Andover Septic Regulations
OProblem N/A
t/
Other numbers refer to Title 5
Street number and map/lot - 220(4)(u)
Maximum scale of 1 "=40' for plot plan - 220(4)
Maximum scale of 1 "=20' for profile and component details - 220(4)
Legal boundaries of the facility being served - 220(4)(a)
Names of abutters from recent tax map - NA 8.02j
Number of bedrooms, design calcs., - NA 8.02i
Name & address of record owner & applicant - NA 8.02k
Name & address of designer - NA 8.021
Holder and location of all easements - 220(4)(b)
Date plan drawn & any revision date - NA 8.02m
All dwellings and buildings, existing and proposed - 220(4)(c)
Location of all existing or proposed impervious areas - 220(4)(d)
All distances on site plan — NA 8.03a -c
Elevation of proposed driveway - NA 8.02t
Location and elevation of foundation drain - NA 8.02y
Location anddimensions of the system incl. reserve (new const.) - 220(4)(e)
Limits of excavation of leach area on site plan - NA 8.02z
Locus plan - 220(4)(t) (Not to. scale)
North arrow - 220(4)(g)
Existing and proposed contours - 220(4)(g)
Locations and logs of deep holes - 220(4)(h)
Locations and logs of percolation tests - 220(4)(i)
Date(s) of soil testing - 220(4)(h) & (i)
Existing grade elevation of each deep fiole - 220(4)(h)
Elevation: ofpercolationr tests — N.A. 8.02n
Name of approving authority representative - 220(4)(h) & (i)
Name of soil evaluator - 220(4)0)
Soil logs and perc test logs match BOH records
Locations of waterlines, drains, and subsurface utilities - 220(4)(m)
Observed and adjusted g.w. elevation in the vicinity of the system - 220(4)(n)
Complete profile of the system to scale - 220(4)(o), NA 8.02c
Cross section of leaching facility - NA 8.02w (Not to scale)
Location of benchmark(s) within 50-75 feet of facility - 220(4)(q)
Note listing all variance requests with proper citations - 220(4)(p)
Local upgrade approval request form submitted - 403(1)
On-site Soil and Groundwater Review
OK Problem N/A
II Proper deep observation hole logs on plan - 220(4)(h)
All deep holes and peres shown acluding aborted tests – NA 8.02n
Soil evaluation forms submitted within 60 days of field work - 018(2)
Proper percolation test log - 220(4)(i)
—� Ample deep observation holes in primary disposal area (minimum 2) - 102(2)
s/ Ample deep observation holes in secondary" disposal area (minimum 2) - 102(2)
Ample pere testing (one in each disposal.area, 3 in prim. > 2,000 gpd) - 104(4)
Deep hole testing conducted within two years – NA 7.05
Hole Identification Numbers:
ground elevation el.
/2
.
acceptable soil el.
l
7
9
Leach facility invert el.
M 7,
2
ground water el.
refusal. el:-
Original R.S./P.E. stamp, signature & date - 220(1) & (2)
bottom of leach facility el.
P.E., discipline specified within stamp. MGL C. 112 s. 81M
thickness of acceptable soil
sfc. supplies (w/in 400'), pub. wells (w/in 250'), pvt. wells (w/in 150=) - 220(4)(
before & after soil R&R
Location of watercourses, wetlands, wells, etc. Win .150' of system – NA 8.02r
separation to groundwater
Wetland disclaimer – NA 8.02s
separation to refusal
cf
RLS plan reference & certification required (prop line setbacks) - 220(3)
Plan contains designer's certification statement
✓'
Use approvals / standards checked for I/A system - DEP docs.,
>30 MPI
V
Perc rate - not allowed for new, LUA for upgrade - 245(1)&('3)
Perc rate > 60 MPI - must use modified tight tank or AA technology - 245(4)
✓
Proposed system qualifies as "shared" system - 002 (definitions)
t,-'
Flow is over 2,000 gpd - No M. allowed - 2200)
Design flow was set in accordance with code - 203
Existing system location and note on proper abandonment - 354
Leaching facility dt least F above Base. Flood elevation – NA 9.05
F/
All piping Sch 40 minimum – NA 10.01
Basement floor minimum F above groundwater elevation – NA 5.04
QFoundation
drain present with elevation – NA 8.02y
On-site Soil and Groundwater Review
OK Problem N/A
II Proper deep observation hole logs on plan - 220(4)(h)
All deep holes and peres shown acluding aborted tests – NA 8.02n
Soil evaluation forms submitted within 60 days of field work - 018(2)
Proper percolation test log - 220(4)(i)
—� Ample deep observation holes in primary disposal area (minimum 2) - 102(2)
s/ Ample deep observation holes in secondary" disposal area (minimum 2) - 102(2)
Ample pere testing (one in each disposal.area, 3 in prim. > 2,000 gpd) - 104(4)
Deep hole testing conducted within two years – NA 7.05
Hole Identification Numbers:
ground elevation el.
/2
.
acceptable soil el.
l
11Z • T . '
Leach facility invert el.
M 7,
ground water el.
refusal. el:-
bottom of leach facility el.
thickness of acceptable soil
before & after soil R&R
separation to groundwater
, 2
separation to refusal
soil class
2
I
perc rate
loading rate
septic tank below g.w. table
pump tank below g.w. table
l.f in fill
Z''2 WI
• '7
.4-1— (yes or no)
(yes or no)
-255(l)
Setback Distances (Given in feet)15.21 1
YES NO
OK Problem N/A
Is the lot in the Lake Cochiewick Watershed? NA 6.00 & 5.02
Septic Tank
Leach Facility
10
20
20
10
10
10
100
100
100
400
150
325
400.
200
100
SO
20-
10
25
15' to 3:1 slope
3
3
Property line
10
Cellar wall
10
JInground
10
pool
foundation
10
Slab
5
✓
Deck, on footings, etc.
10
V
Waterline
drinking
75
Private well
✓
Irrigation well
75
Wetlands
75
Public well
400
bordering.
150
p/
Wetlands surface
water.Supply or trib.
(in Watershed)
Trib. To: Sur -face Water. supply
...325.
V
Reservoirs
400
Tributaries to reservoirs
200
,•..Drains..(wat.
supply%trib.),
50,,
Drains;(intercept g,w j
25.
Foundation drains
10
�✓
Drains (Other)
5
Drywells
20
Downhill slope
Leach Facility
10
20
20
10
10
10
100
100
100
400
150
325
400.
200
100
SO
20-
10
25
15' to 3:1 slope
3
3
d
Building Sewer
OK Problem 7
Septic Tank
OKj Problem N/A
W/o barrier
Grease trap required for certain uses (check 230 for details)
Pipe diameter listed (4" minimum) - 2220)
Pipe schedule listed - 222(3)
Pipe cast iron or Sch 40 PVC —NA 11.02
Watertight joints specified - 222(3) & (4)
Pipe laid on compact, fin base - 222(5)
Pipe laid on continuous grade in straight line - 222(7)@
Cleanouts precede all changes in alignment and grade - 222(8)
Cleanout provided every 100 feet - 222(8)
Manhole at any 90 degree alignment change - 222(8)
Invert elevation at building: la% .
Invert elevation at septic tank:
Length of run: CQC5
Slope: Z) o Z) minimum of 0.01 - 0.02 desired) - 222(6)
10' offset to private well or suction line - 222(2)
Tank is accessible - 228(3)
No structures above tank — (228(3)
Tank can accommodate both primary & reserve — NA 9.04
200% of flow (required & provided given. 1500 min.) - 220(4)(0 & 223)(1)(a)
2-3" drop from inlet to outlet - 227(5)
Minimum of 4' liquid depth - 223(2)
3" air space above tees/baffles (minimum) - 227(4)
9"air space above flow line (minimum) - 227(4)
Tees are not to be replaced by baffles - 227(1)
Tees extend 6" above flow line- 227(1)
Inlet tee extends 10" below flow line (minimum)._ 227(6)
Outlet tee extends 14" bolow. flow line (mote foi°deeper tanks) - 227(6)
Cas baffle installed on outlet. - 227(4)
Access manhole'cover above center df tank &'each -tee (except 2 compart)
228(2)
3-20" manholes;- 228(2)
1 childproof'; 24" riser/manhole Win 6" of final grade if <I000gpd- 228(2)
Inlet and outlet tees on center. line _ 227(1)
Soil compaction below tank.specifiec:(soil is non-native) - 221(2).
6" of <=3/4"stone beneath lank `specified'= 221`(2) �& 22 8(l) . -
If > 1,000 gpd. AND not a single fam. dwell. must be 2 tks or 2 comp. - 223(1)(b)
If plan specifies disposal must be 2` tanks - series bi 2 compart.. tank - 223(1)(c)
Buoyancy cales. required iftank at or below water table - 221(8)
Tank is watertight - 221 (1)
9" of cover over tank (minimum) - 228(1)
H- 10 loading (min.) - H-20 if traffic - 226(3)
Top of tank <=36" below grade - 221(7)
All pumping to tank (if applies) in accordance with - 229
Tank is set to keep old system in service during install if possible
4
4
M
Tight Tank (Check here if not present: )
OK Problem N/A
500% of design flow or 2000 gallons provided — 260(2)(a)
3- 20" manholes — 228(2)
Soil compaction below tank specified (if soil non-native) — 221(2)
6" of <=3/4" stone beneath tank specified — 221(2) & 228(1)
Buoyancy calcs. Required if tank at or below water table — 221(8)
Tank is watertight - 221(1)
9" of cover over tank specified (minimum) — 228(l)
H 10: loading (min.) - 11-20 if traffic — 226(3)
Top of tank <= 36"below grade - 221(7)
All pumping to tank (if applies) in accordance with — 229
AN alarm set at 3/5 tank capacity — 260(2)(c)
Min. 1-24" frame w/cover at finished grade — 228(2)(1)
Year round access for pumping — 228(2)(g)
Distribution Boz (Check here if not present:
OK Problem N/A
17
Inlet elevation: 40L
Outlet elevation: - D
0.17' drop from inlet to outlet (minimum) - 232(3)(b)
6" suiAp (minimum) - 232(3)(e)
All outlets at same elevation - 232(3)(b)
Outletpipes laid level for first 2 ft. - 232(3)(c)
Pipe Sch 40 - NA 10.01
Number of outlets: fwd Number of laterals:
Size of outlets: v
Inlet baffiettee mm. 1" over outlet invert for all d -boxes - 232(3)(a),
Soil compaction below distribution box specified (if soil is non-native) - 221(2)
6" of stone beneath distribution box specified 221(2)
Box is watertight - 221 (1)
Top ofbox <36" below grade 221(7)
Buoyancy calculations reqs' ired if box is at or: below water table - 221(8)
Pump C.harim.bef (Che&here if not:gresent )
OK Problem . N/A '
Volume specified: Lf�� 220(4)(r)
Pump on elevation-) tl 220.(4)(r)
Pump `offelevation: J a r l0 220(4)(r)
Alarm on elevation: 123, 220(4)(r)
Number of cycles per day - 220(4)(r) (also 2540)(d) if gravity from d -box)
Minimum 2" delivery line to d -box if gravity - 254(1)( c)
1/ Pressure dosed l.f if flow >= 2,000 gpd - 254(1)(a) & 254(2)(a)
Cycles per day is consistent with chamber volume - 23 1
--T Volume calculations include flowback volume - 2') 1(2)
24 hour storage capacit above pump on elevation - 231(2)
Number of pumps: 2 if system serves >2 dwelling units - 231(6)
Capacity of pump(s) - //0 gpm @ �, ' TDH - 220(4)(r)
Pump can pass 1 1/4 "solids (minimum) - 231(7)
Pump controls specified - 220(4)(r)
Alarm equipment specified - 231(2)
l� Alarm is in building and powered on separate circuit from pump - 2') 1(9)
7 Pump sequence correct (off -lead on -lag on-alan-n on) 231(8)
Pump performance curves included - 220(4)(r)
Manual operating switch - NA 12.01
Check valve, bleeder hole - NA 12.01
1 childproof, 24" riser/manhole to final grade - 2'31(5),
Soil compaction beneath pump chamber specified (if soil is non-native) - 221(2)
6"of <=3/4"stone beneath chmbr. specified - 221(2) & 228(1),
Buoyancy calculations if chamber is at or below water table - 221(8)@
9" of cover over chamber (minimum) - 228(1)
H- 10 loading (min.) - H-20 if traffic - 226(')),
Chamber is watertight - 221 (1)
Top of chamber <=36" below grade - 221(7)
LeaehinLr Facility (general - complete for all designs)
OK Problem N/A
V
50% larger if garbage disposal - 240(4)
Trenches to be used whenever possible - 240(6)
No vehicle or imperv. area above 11 unless unavoidable - 240(7); NA 13.02 '
Vented if under impervious cover - 241 (1)
Vented through same pipes as distribution system - 241 (1)(a)
Vent protected from precipitation/animal entry - 241 (1)(b)
Vent is placed beyond traffic or impervious area - 24 1 (1)(c)
All lines connected to vent if bed or trenches - 241(1)(d)
9" cover over peastone - 240(9)
Reserve area provided (new construction) - 248(1)
Reserve 4' from primary leach area — NA 9.04
4' (5' if perc rate <=2 MPI) separation to g.w. - 212(a) & (b)
4' (down to 2' with variance or I/A - upgrades only) of natural soil under 11
GW separation is adjusted to highest existing grade if facility cuts into a hillside
Pipe slope minimum of 0.005 - 251(9)
Require 5' removal and replacement if in fill - 255(5)
Top of leach facility <= 36" below grade - 221(7)
Final grade over 1.£ minimum 0.02 ft/ft -240(1 0)
Surface & subsurface drainage away from 11. - 240(1 1) & 245(5)
Minimum design flow 440 gpd without deed restriction — NA 13.01
3:1 slope where grading required - 255(2)
Toe of fill slope stops 5' from property line or swale installed - 255(2)
Impermeable barrier if < 3:1 slope or < 15 feet to—3:lslope - 255(2)
.Impermeable barrier/retaining wall poured concrete — NA 9.02
Retaining wall stamped by P.E. - 255(2)(b)
Top of retaining wall >= top of peastone elevation - 255(2)(f)
10' offset from edge of leach facility to edge.of ret. wall - 255(2)(g)
Perc test(s) done in most restrictive layer - 104(2)
Perc test 4' below leaching elevation — NA 7.06
Design flow listed and required/provided leach area given - 220(4)(f)
Leach pipes SCH40 PVC — NA 10.01
Leach pipes minimum 4" diameter except for dosed system — NA 14.04
0
7
i
Leach lines capped, vented, or connected together - 251(9)
Pressure dosing guidance followed if pressure distribution 254(2)(c ),
Pressure dosing required over 2,000 gpd or with I/A remedial use -20 l(I)
Leaching Trenches (Check here if not present:
OK Problem N/A
Number of trenches:
Minimum of 2 trenches - NA 9.01(2)
Depth of trenches (max eff. 2'): -247(l)
Width of trenches (2' min., 4' max.): - 251(1)(b)
Length of trenches (100' max.): - 25 1 (1)(a)
Trenches are vented (when > 50') - 251 (11)
Trenches follow contour lines - 251(2)
Trench spacing 3 times effective width or depth minimum- 251 (1)(d)
In fill or reserve between trenches, 10' min. - NA 14.01& 14.03
Available Peach area given (Min. 500 s.f.) - NA 9.01(2)
Bottom = L x W x # _
Sidewall=L x x# x2=
Effective leach area given
Loading factor:
Effective area = total area s.f. x LTAR =
Effective area is >= design flow of facility being served
2"of 1/8"=1/2" 2x washed peastone.- 247(2)
Trench depth of 3/4" to 1 1/22"" double washed stone - 247(1)
Leaching Pits (Check here if not present: t/ )
OK Problem N/A
s.f
s. f.
g/day
# ofpitstpit systems: (dosing chamber if >1, 231 (1))
Dimensions of each pit or system: L W D
Depth of pits (max eff. 2'): - 253(1)(a)
Available leach area given
Bottom = L x W x # of systems = s.f.
Sidewall = L+ W x D x 2 x# of systems = s. f.
Total area = bottom + sidewall .. = s.f.
Effective leach area given
Loading factor:
Effective area<,=total area... s.f. x.LTAR=_g/day
Effective area is >= design flow -of facility being.served
Minimum of 2 pits at least 13'X16' — NA 9.01(3)
Distribution for galleries/chmbrs. in trench config. - pipe every 20' - 253(6)
Distribution for galleries/chmbrs. in bed config. ea.pipe serves <= 40 s.f.-253(6)
Spacing - 2. times the effective width._or: depth (the greater) " 253.(1)(c) ,
2" of 1/8''= /2 .Ix'wasl ed peastone.- 247(2) .
3/4" to 1 1/2" double washed stone - 2470)
Each pit has at -least one 20" access cover. 24" CI to glade over 2,000 gpd
-253(3) :.
Surrounding aggregate thickness between 1'. (min.). and 4' (max.) - 253(1)(b)
Vents, if necessary, extend under covers of pit(s) - 241 (e)
Leach Fields (Check here if not present:
OI� Problem N/A
Off Number of fields: (need dosing chamber if> 1, 231 (1))
A
Final Grading
OK Problem N/A
5/24/01
Length (100' max.): �- 252 (2)(b)
Width: . AO '
Total area: L i�- x W _ s. f.
Minimum 900 square feet - NA 9.01(1)
Distribution lines connected with solid pipe - NA 15.01
Effective Ieach area given
Loading factor: r '/Y
Effective area =total areas.fx LTAR f % �dav
Effective area is >= design flow of facility being served
Minimum of two distribution lines - 252(2)(a)
6' line separation (max.) - 252(2)(d)
4' maximum separation from edge of field to line - 252(2)(e)
10' minimum separation between adjacent leach fields - 252(2)(0
Between 6" d 12" of 3/4 - 1 1/2" stone beneath field - 252(2)(g) &247(2)
2"of 1/8"-1/2" 2x washed peastone.- 247(2)
Slope over leach area minimum of 0.02 feet/foot-240(10) .
Grading shall divert drainage away from leach area - 240(11)
Grading slopes away from dwelling
111
I
MERRIMACK
ENIGINEERING SERVICES INC.
Engineers • Surveyors • Planners
6@Park Street
,ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810
(978) 475-3555
Fax (978) 475-1448
6 -
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
MgvulgQ 0r VMHQ3IWty U l L%1L
ATTENTION
RE:
❑ Samples
JOB NO.
99
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
et
To'kv�v of rro�Tt� AND ny
nAtj
Az:! -:z 122
LTH
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For, approval
;14 your use
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑
❑
❑
❑
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections
❑
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
et
nAtj
Az:! -:z 122
COPY TO
SIGNED:( 1/
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
i
rage 1 ui 1
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Sandra Starr [sstarr@townofnorthandover.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Pamela DelleChiaie
Subject: Re: 178 Stonecleave Rd - Status of Septic Design - Call Required
I probably will not be returning any of these septic status calls and will expect you to respond after checking the
file or getting info. from me.
This plan has been reviewed but l forgot it at home and can't remember what the problems were. I think there
were some.
S
— Original Message —
From: Pamela DelleChiaie
To: Sandra Starr
Cc: Pamela DelleChiaie ; Heidi Griffin ; Brian LaGrasse
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: 178 Stonecleave Rd - Status of Septic Design - Call Required
Mrs. Patricia Burba called looking for status of design plan. Please call her at 978-682-5828. No file in active
drawer. Assuming Sandy has file.–p.d.
10/6/2003
Town of North Andover
Office of the Health Department
Community Development and Services Division
27 Charles Street
North Andover, Massachusetts 01845
Sandra Starr
Public Health Director
Bill Dufresne
Merrimack Engineering
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. Dufresne:
Telephone (978) 688-9540
Fax (978) 688-9542
July 17, 2003
Please be advised that the proposed plan dated 5/20/2003 for the upgrade of the septic system at
178 Stonecleave Road cannot be approved as submitted. Issues are as follows:
• Because there is a private well on this site and an individual subsurface sewage disposal
system, the site comes under Title 5's nitrogen loading rule as noted in 310 CMR
15.214(1-3). This section of Title 5 states that under nitrogen loading, a maximum of 4
bedrooms per acre of land is acceptable without additional treatment being required of
the septic system. The additional treatment treats the effluent and limits the amount of
nitrogen released to the ground. Under 310 CMR 15.217 some alternative technology
may be proposed for this site to allow additional flow. According to Claire Golden at
DEP NERO office, the RUCK system is approved for general use and a nitrogen credit.
However, it is approved for a maximum of 550 gpd, or 5 bedrooms. This is also the case
with the recirculating sand filter — 550 gpd. Those approved for provisional use, that is,
must go through DEP, and can be used for up to 660 gpd are the Bioclere, Micro
FAST, Modular FAST, Zenogem and the single home FAST. Those approved for
piloting are the Amphidrome, Singulair by Norweco and RSF. Please call Steve Coor at
DEP for further information and clarification.
Feel free to call if you have questions about the content of this letter.
Sincerely,
Sandra Starr, R.S., C.H.O.
Health Director
Cc: File
Homeowner
BOARD OF _APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNTNG 688-9535
rage i ui i
From: "Dan Ottenheimer' <info@milldverconsulting.com>
To: "Heidi Griffin"<hgriffin@townofnorthandover.com>;<blagrasse@townofnorthandover.com>;
<pdellechiaie@townofnorthandover.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:41 PM
Attach: Stonecleave Road #178 Plan Review Letter.doc
Subject: 178 Stonecleave
Heidi, Brain and Pam
Attached please find the plan review letter for # 178 Stonecleave Street. There are a
number of items in needs of attention. Most significantly the design uses a leach field
when in this instance the regulations would require leach trenches. There are also a
number of smaller things which I think are there because this is an older plan and
Merrimack hadn't yet made some of these corrections on some of their standard
drawings and notes. I also made two suggestions at the end for them to consider
which would reduce the cost of construction and maintenance.
Dan
Mitt River Consulting
Septic System Management Services
5 Blackburn Center
Gloucester, MA 01930-2259
978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-3044
fax: 978-282-0012
info@milldverconsuIting.com
10/6/2003
rage i or i
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Lagrasse, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:27 PM
To: DelleChiaie, Pamela
Subject: RE: Plans to be sent & Follow -Up
dan should have this one on his plate. i only signed off on the building permit application
-----Original Message -----
From: DelleChiaie, Pamela
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:25 PM
To: 'Daniel Ottenheimer (E-mail)'
Cc: Griffin, Heidi; Lagrasse, Brian
Subject: Plans to be sent & Follow -Up
Importance: High
Hi Dan,
It's the last day of the month, and guess what I have for you .... three more plan reviews. They are as
follows:
151 Abbott Street - Revision (NEES)
105 Sullivan Street - Revision (Engineering & Surveying Services)
191 Granville Lane - New (NEES)
I will be sending these in the mail today. Also, is Brian having you finish up on the 178 Stonecleave
review, or is he doing that? Let me know. Thanks.
Pamela DelleChiaie, Health Dept Assistant
Town of North Andover
Community Development & Services
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
pdellechiaie@townofnorthandover.com
Tel. 978-688-9540
Fax 978-688-9542
10/6/2003
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER f NORiq 1
Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES o?
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
27 CHARLES STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845
Heidi Griffin 978.688.9540 — Phone
Acting Health Director 978.688.9542 — FAX
September 30, 2003
Bill Dufresne
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road, Map 104B, Lot 129
Dear Mr. Dufresne:
The proposed septic system design plans for the above site dated May 20, 2003, and revised
August 18, 2003 have been reviewed. Unfortunately, the plan cannot be approved as submitted.
The following items are in need of attention prior to plan approval:
I. A note is required stating the building sewer shall be laid on a compact, firm base.
(310 CMR 15.222(5))
2. Please specify building sewer joints to be watertight. (3 10 CMR 15.222)
3. Tees on septic tank must extend 6" above flow line. (3 10 CMR 15.227(1))
4. Three (3) access manhole covers are required and are shown in the tank detail top
view but are not shown in the tank detail section
5. Inlet and outlet tees must be located on the centerline of the tank and it is not clear
from the plan that it shall be required. (3 10 CMR 15.227(1))
6. The septic tank, pump chamber and distribution box must be placed upon 6" of
stone which has mechanically compacted soil if is not native. Please indicate this on
the plan to provide greater clarity to the installer. (3 10 CMR 15.221)
7. Tees may not be replaced with "pre -cast concrete tees" as indicated on the design.
(3 10 CMR 15. 227(l))
8. The pump chamber must be state a loading on the plan (3 10 CMR 15.226(3))
9. The pump chamber must be specified to be watertight. (3 10 CMR 15.221)
10. The inlet elevation and details of construction of the distribution box have not been
provided. (3 10 CMR 15.220)
11. Watertightness of the distribution box has not been specified. (3 10 CMR 15.221)
12. Please provide pump calculations to demonstrate the findings achieved on the design
plan of 40 gpm at 6' TDH.
13. Please explain or modify pump note #7 which describes calculations for a 6
bedroom dwelling when other calculations are based on a 4 bedroom dwelling.
TiTor' I V MY) 10
w"a 17.2A 0 11 Tr"AP"( .1-14
.etw I 2?o-I,
r 14. Please provide detailed information and specifications for the control panel and
alarm. (3 10 CMR 15.220 and 23 1)
15. The system profile is not to scale. (3 10 CMR 15.220)
16. Trenches are the required type of soil absorption system when using pressure dosing
of effluent. (3 10 CMR 15.254)
17. Please provide the location and elevation of the foundation drain. If there is no
drain, please make a statement to that effect on the plan. (NA 8.02y)
18. Please indicate that removal of soil horizons Fill & B shall extend at least 6" into the
suitable soil of the C horizon. (NA 9.02)
19. Please provide distances from the septic tank and soil absorption system to the
dwelling and property line. (NA 8.03)
20. Please clarify the note which appears to read "scale waiver requested replacement in
same location". It is unclear if a variance is being sought from either state or local
regulations.
21. Please reference specifications for the sand fill to be imported for construction of the
soil absorption system. (3 10 CMR 15.255)
22. Final grade over the leach facility must indicate a slope of 0.02ft/ft minimum. (3 10
CMR 15.240(10))
While not a reason for disapproval, it appears you may be able to:
1. Utilize a smaller pump and reduce construction and operation costs. It
appears that the 0.5 horsepower pump specified could possibly be
replaced with a smaller unit.
2. Not designing based on 900 sq. ft. of soil absorption system but on the
design loading rate as specified in state and local regulations.
Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to
working with you to obtain a replacement septic system which will be in compliance with all
regulations and assure the protection of public health and the environment of North Andover.
Ynrian
ely,
Lagrasse
Health Inspector
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir.
File
Pn ae ? of ?
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS O LAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
66 PARK STREET • ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810 • TEL (978) 475-3555,373-5721 • FAX (978) 475-1448 • E-MAIL: merreng@aol.com
Mr. Brian LaGrasse
Health Inspector
Town of North Andover
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. LaGrasse:
November 17, 1003
ti NOV 1820
We are in receipt of your letter dated September 30, 200. We have revised the plans to
address all your concerns with exception to those pe . mng to the pump and specifications.
We have additionally reduced the height of the A.S. by 1 foot and are submitting a formal
application and request for a local upgrade Vproval.
Granting of this request will reduce th ound in the rear yard and eliminate the need for a
pump system thus reducing the over replacement cost by $4,000.00 to $5,000.00.
On behalf of our client, we
cd
request this design be approved as resubmitted.
Very truly yours,
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES
William Dufresne
Project Manager
FORM.A _ A
.9PPUcatfon for Local Upgrade Approval
Commonwealth of.Massachusetts
Town) E ,11ZaesachuSetts
plication for LOCAL
Title UJPGRADE APPROVAL
DFS A 5, 310 CMR 15.000
pproved Form Required by 310 CMR 15:403(1)
Form 9A is to be snbm
nonconforming septic itted.to the Local Board of
defined in 310 P system with a design flow of less thanes p,,, 0 r the upgrade of a failed or
CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. gPd, where full compliance, as
System upgrades that cannot be performed in accordance
..compliance with the requirements of 310 with 310
15.410 throe in
15.000 CMR 15.404 and 15.405, or in full
through 15.417. n .require a variance pursuant to 310 C1VIIt
n
NOTE: Local upgrade approval
new design flow to a cesspool 01
caPacitY of a septic system const
Faculty Address: I I G
Facility/System oa,ne
Address:
City/Town:
Telephone:
Tpe of Facility (check a
Describe facili at a
Type of existing system: n
an upgrade Proposal that includes the addition of a
f a new design flow above the existing
\\�a%� 197$ Code or 310 &M 1 approved
\\ SMR 15.000.
Type of soil absorption system (trench
es, chambers, leach field, piss etc 1
Design Flow per 310 ) F ck'
Design flow of CM 15.203: .
Design flow of egg system od gpd
Design flow of facility upgraded
upl�d system 4*0
`W gd
gpd
Proposed upgrade of system is: Q �ioluntary EIRequired by order letter, etc. (attach copy)
❑ Required following inspecti on pursuant to 310 C
Provide date of inspection MR 15301
/
FORM 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval
Department ofEn*onmental Protecdon
Page 1 of 3 DEP APPmvcd For, - 3/20/02
Describe'the proposed upgrade to the system
Local Upgrade Approval is requested for: _
❑ Reduction in setback(s) (Describe reductions)
❑ Percolation rate for 30 to 60 min/mch Percolation rate minlinch
❑ . Reduction in SA$ wea of up to 25°x6
(SAS size and % reduction) SAS sq ft Reduction %
Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater
Separation reduction ft Percolation rate mintinch
Depth to groundwater ft
❑ Relocation of water supply well (Explain)
❑ Other requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 that cannot be met
Describe and specify sections of the Code
.If the proposed upgrade involves a reduction in the required separation between the bottom of the soil
absorption system and the high groundwater elevation, an Approved Soil Evaluator must determine the
high groundwater elevation pursuant to 310 ChM 15.405(i)(i)(1). The soil evaluator must be a'member
or agent of the local aoaroving authority.
High groundwater .elevation determined by
-�4.A k! 29& 12IMa/ iza /03
Trint or type evaluator's Name) (Signature of evaluator) (Evaluation Date)
Explain why full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible.
(Each section must be completed)
1. An. upgraded system in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible: Ku w
" lY C,;,Y01—CHANP P, CMC F ' Vi N L W&q-i0ex�5;f fp
2. An alternative system approved pursuant to 310 CMR 15.283 to 15.288 is not feasible:
Department of Environmental protection
Page 2 of 3
DEP Approved Fom - 3/20/02
.7f- i;
14
FORM 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval
3. A shared system is not feasible: MQ
4. Connection to a public sewer is not feasible: 1-4
6
The Application for Local Upgrade Approval mast be accompanied by all of the following: .
(Check the appropriate boxes)
❑ Application for Disposal System Construction Permit
E3'/ Complete.plans and specifications
Site evaluation forms j aI,- i "fINiS 01-�AJ
❑ A list of abutters affected by reduced setbacks to private water supply wells or property lines.
Provide Proof that affected abutters have been notified pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(2).
❑ Other (List)
CERTIFICATION:
"I, the facility owner, certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, are true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there maybe
significant consequences for submitting false information including, but not limited to, penalties or
fine and/or imprisonment for delis violations.
Facility owner's sign ture�— , , Date
Print name 17h,,,-, 1 i/ �. __ 1. a :�
Name of preparer$I �� kt" i'�I X.0 , ZU A6 Date
Preparer's Address: 1Z wk--
City/Town: 11nA, State: M olg-�_ . Zip: 019/O
Preparer's telephone: j .1 5;- I=20
NOTE: 310 CMR 15.403(4) requires the system owner to provide a copy of the local upgrade
approval to the appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau
of Resource Protection, Division of Watershed Management, upon issuance by the local approving
authority and before commencement of construction.
pepartme It of Environmental Protection
Page 3 of 3
DEP Approved Form - 320/02
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER NORTH ,
Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES o
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
27 CHARLES STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 CH
E`
Heidi Griffin 978.688.9540 — Phone
Acting Health Director 978.688.9542 — FAX
December 8, 2003
Daniel Koravos, P.E.
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road, Map 104B, Lot 129
Dear Mr. Koravos:
The proposed septic system design plan for the above site dated May 20, 2003, and revised
August 18, 2003 and November 15, 2003 have been reviewed. Unfortunately, the plan cannot be
approved as submitted.
The following items are in need of attention prior to plan approval:
�J 1.
The septic tank, pump chamber and distribution box must be placed upon 6" of stone
and soil which has been mechanically compacted if the structure is not placed on
native soil. The distribution box is specified to be placed in an area of fill. (3 10 CMR
/
15.221)
J 2.
Note #14 does not appear accurate as you have depicted a water supply well 110'
from the proposed soil absorption system while the note indicates you have found no
wells within 150' of the proposed soil absorption system.
3.
It is unclear why 10" of leach stone is proposed beneath the soil absorption system.
/ 4.
It is unclear why the Local Upgrade Approval request for reduced separation from
the bottom of the soil absorption system to the estimated seasonal high ground water
b�
should be provided. The application submitted with the design plan indicates it is to
in design. However, it is apparent that the
avoid using a pump tank this septic system
building sewer is specified to be raised anyhow and the existing deck will be replaced
�.�
1�
with a porch thus making gravity flow and compliance with regulation a possibility.
Please amend the design plan to provide compliance with the regulations or provide
greater clarity as to why compliance is not feasible.
5.
It is unclear why the proposed soil absorption system is not in the location of the soil
and percolation testing performed on May 20, 2003.
v
While.not a reason for disapproval, it appears you may be able to not design based on 900 sq. ft.
of soil absorption system but on the design loading rate as specified in state and local regulations.
Lastly, you are encouraged to remove the undesired portions of the design plan rather than cross
them out as this might cause some. confusion for future plan viewers such as the owner, septic
installation contractor, or onsite wastewater maintenance personnel.
Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to
working with you to obtain a replacement septic system which will be in compliance with all
regulations and assure the protection of public health and the environment of North Andover.
Sin ly
Brian Lagrasse
Health Inspector
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir.
File
Page 2 of 2
1 "6%.' 1 WA 1
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Dan Ottenheimer [info@millriverconsulting.coml
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Heidi Griffin; Brian LaGrasse; Pamela Dellechiaie
Subject: 178 Stonecleave Road
Heidi, Brian and Pam,
Attached please find the plan review for the property at 178 Stonecleave Road.
Unfortunately the design could not be approved as submitted.
Dan
Daniel Ottenheimer, President
Mill River Consulting
Septic System Management Services
5 Blackburn Center
Gloucester, MA 01930-2259
978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-3044
fax: 978-282-0012
www.millriverconsulting.com
info@millriverconsulting.com
12/8/2003
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
LIQ 66 PARK STREET • ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01810 • TEL (978) 475-3555,373-5721 • FAX (978) 475-1448 • E-MAIL: merreng@aol.com
December 11, 2003
Mr. Brian LaGrasse
Health Inspector 1
Office of Community Development and Services
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: 178 Stonecleave Road
Dear Mr. LaGrasse:
We are in receipt of your review letter dated December 8, 2003 regarding the above
referenced site.
We have revised the plan to address items 1, 2 and 4. With regard to item #3, the plan does
not propose 10 inches of stone under the pipe but in fact requires 6 inches under the pipe with
an additional 4 inches to the top of the perforated pipe for a total of 10 inches as required by
Title 5 and the North Andover Board of Health Regulations.
With regard to item #5, test pits were conducted in as close a proximity as possible to the
proposed S.A.S. without interfering with the existing S.A.S. It was obvious to both the
Health Inspector and the Soil Evaluator at the time of testing that test pits could not be
performed within the existing S.A.S. (location shown on plan).
Given the above explanation, we feel this design meets all requirements of Title 5 and the
North Andover Board of health Regulations and that all your concerns have been addressed
and respectfully request that this design be approved as resubmitted.
Very truly yours,
MERRIMACK ENGINEERING SERVICES
William Dufresne
Project Manager
cd
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER NORrJJ
Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 3 h
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
. wvg.
27 CHARLES STREET ""
. •r/
Tf°+�,I
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 4
CNl75t<
Heidi Griffin 978.688.9540 — Phone
Acting Health Director 978.688.9542 — FAX
December 12, 2003
Daniel Koravos, P.E.
Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Re: 178 Stonecleave Road, Map 104B, Lot 129
Dear Mr. Koravos:
The North Andover Board of Health has completed review of the septic system design plans for
the above referenced property submitted on your behalf by Merrimack Engineering Services dated
May 20, 2003, REV December 10, 2003.
The design has been approved for use in the construction of a replacement onsite septic system.
This approval is valid for three years from the date of this letter and during this time a licensed
septic system installer must obtain a permit and complete this work, and a Certificate of
Compliance must be endorsed by the installer, designer and the Town of North Andover. The
time period for which this plan is valid is reduced to two years from the date of a septic system
inspection which did not meet the acceptable criteria in the state regulations. The time period for
which this plan is valid may be reduced by the North Andover Board of Health in the event an
imminent health problem such as sewage backup into the dwelling is occurring.
This approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. If site conditions are found in the field to be different from those indicated on the
design plan and/or soil evaluation, the originally issued Disposal System Construction
Permit is void, installation shall stop, and the applicant shall reapply for a new Disposal
Systems Construction Permit (3 10 CMR 15.020(1)).
2. It is the responsibility of the applicant and/or the applicant's septic system designer,
septic system installer or other representative to ensure that all other state and
municipal requirements are met. These may include review by the Conservation
Commission, Zoning Board, Planning Board, Building Inspector, Plumbing Inspector
and/or Electrical Inspector. The issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit
shall not construe and/or imply compliance with any of the aforementioned
requirements.
Your effort to provide a properly functioning septic system for your dwelling is greatly
appreciated. The Health Department may be reached at 978-688-9540 with any questions you
might have.
For future reference, you are encouraged to remove any undesired portions of the design plan
rather than cross them out as this might cause some confusion for future plan viewers such as the
owner, septic installation contractor, or onsite wastewater maintenance personnel.
a
se
Health Inspector
encl: List of licensed septic system installers
cc: file
Merrimack Engineering Services
cc: Homeowner
CD&S Dir.
File
Page 2 of 2
11/19/2003 14:10 978-744-8577
BURBA DENTAL PARTNER PAGE 01
v J
F A X Mduano mvet.h"b
PHONE:
FAX. PHONE: ?V 66 y�y�
REMARKS: Rlwacmcr . AWYO
FROM:
Stanley J. Burba D.D.S.
RaodaU Burba DM
129 Highland Avenue
Salem, MA 01970
78 .7575
(978) 744-8577
R8p'LY ASAA
(3nzmcmmmcr
0
sw
I
rage i of i
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Dan Ottenheimer [info@milldverconsulbng.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Heidi Griffin; Brian LaGrasse; Pamela Dellechiaie
Subject: 178' Stonecleave Road septic design plan
Heidi, Brian and Pam,
We have completed review of the design plan for 178 Stonecleave and wish to discuss
this with someone from your office too. Similar questions have arisen as on the 426
Summer Street design plan.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Ottenheimer, President
Mill River Consulting
Septic System Management Services
5 Blackburn Center
Gloucester, MA 01930-2259
978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-3044
fax: 978-282-0012
www.millriverconsulting.com
info@millriverconsulting.com
12/4/2003
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS
384 OSGOOD STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845-2909
Timothy J. Willett
Staff Engineer
March 18, 2002
Ms. Patricia Burba
178 Stonecleave Road
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: Drainage Plan
Dear Ms. Burba:
J. WILLIAM HMURCIAK, DIRECTOR, P.E.
Telephone (978) 685-0950
Fax (978) 688-9573
TGAIN OF NORTH L R/
BOARD OF HEA!
►�,AR i 8 2002
As you requested, enclosed is a copy of the subdivision plan for Stonecleave Road, showing the
proposed drain lines, structures, and easements. This is not an As -built Plan, as they were not required
in those days. Hopefully, the contractor who built Stonecleave Road installed the drainage system
according to plan.
Your contractor will need to secure a street opening permit from this office prior to any work. Also,
since you have a well and septic system, the North Andover Board of Health will have to approve the
proposed work with a "sign off' on the sketch of the proposed drain work.
If you have questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
Timothy J. illett
Staff Engineer
CC: Bill Hmurciak
Bob Beshara
Sandra Starr
Brian Legrasse
Julie Parrino
I
y 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L
BOARD OF HEALTH
- NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845
978-688-9540
APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS tfOQ3
DATE: MAP & PARCEL: 1�
LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS:
O WNER: �% Y6ti TEL. NO.:Co �'17/rj eq 2-6
ADDRESS: 1r70 `-rcwe n—i. loll✓
ENGINEER: 6I2,r4 P/1,i TEL. NO.:
CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR:--
Intended
VALUATOR:_ Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision amity Home Commercial
.Is This:
Repair Testing: Undeveloped lot testing:
g
In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No
THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM
1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test)
2. Plot plan & Location of Testing
3. Fee of $425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and
two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of $200.00 per lot for repairs or
upgrades. (If time is not critical, fee for repairs is $75.00)
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections.
2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans.
3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area.
4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the
BOH representative.
5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing.
6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (no smaller than 1 "A 00') shall be submitted to the Board
of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests).
7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shalt be submitted.
Please Do Not Write Below This Line
N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: _A�.' a�..
APR20M
Date Received: Check Amount: Ch Date:
fTr
. . . . . . . . . . . .
a-
..... . ....
'ORM -11-1�
.rO . 31171.7.
---------- -
mmrs
.... ....
M®ROI
ME
rg
_gg
c)-
Installer.
owner's Name: U a4
Addresr—ija
Tel#: 2 921f� New tsiA Repair d�
Date: 5� Wetlands=lone ll' Soll S bol a Soil Mame
Y� _ �1 Soil Class Ki,
Deep Observation Hole Logs
Elevation Depth Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color SotR hiottlin; % Gravel, Stones, etc:
Ar
VA a, Ld
Parent Material 1 !; V Depth to Bedro&- —' Standin= Water in the$ole: f iiffeepfn; from Pit Face 1t ESgGW;
a.
,yw q1
�04� - V.
Parent Material l L Depth to Bedroek Standin; Water hl the Hole:—QLWeepin; from Pit Face —@L_FS$GLY: 21M
Date 1%- 10 -t> l
Observation Hole # (2-1
Deptl
Start
Time
Time
Time
Time
Rate
. Percolation Tests
Performed By- �`'i , �%%3 �, � �t OeW L o
Witnessed B��
1
Ap
----------------------
CIS-_,:Ci—�►: �l'G`` .� �a�� �Urr
IF
Nita
NI._= T
1
►tib " ` f ,
0
T I ISI E`
_ .1 �4
0
Dk^ C-e-