Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 1830 TURNPIKE STREET 4/30/2018L) 0/ 00 (i/ a 7< DJK 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 Office: 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 REF: 732 August 15, 2007 North Andover Board of Health 1600 Osgood Street, Building 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning RE: Environmental Notification Form Proposed Commercial Building, North Andover, MA Dear Sir/Madam: RF(" EIVED AUG 2 7 2007 TOWN yr of ,,i T h ANDOVER HEAL71-1 DERARTMENT As required by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, we have enclosed one copy of the Full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) waiver request for a proposed commercial building to be located at 1820 -1830 -Turnpike Street (Route 114) in North Andover, MA. Upon your review of the enclosed wavier request, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions, comments, and/or you require any additional information. Sincerely, DJK ASSOCIATES, INC. Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE President Enclosure cc: File 730 -Waiver Letter -Distribution List.doc DJK 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 Office: 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 Ref: 730 August 16, 2007 Secretary Ian A. Bowles Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 Attention: Nickolas C. Zavolas Re: EOEA # 14066 Request for Full EIR Waiver Proposed Commercial Building Turnpike Street (Route 114), North Andover, MA. Dear Mr. Zavolas: Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning On behalf of the proponent, GFM General Contracting Corp. of Middleton, Massachusetts, DJK Associates, Inc. (DJK) is pleased to submit the following Request for Full Environment Impact Report (EIR) Waiver for the above referenced project in accordance with 301 CMR 11.11. Project History The Town of North Andover Planning Board approved a Site Plan Review Special Permit and Common Driveway Special Permit for the project on August 7, 2007. The North Andover Conservation Commission issued a Wetlands Order of Conditions approving the Project on July 3, 2007. The Site Plans, Traffic Impact and Access Study and additional supporting documentation were peer reviewed by the Town's peer review consults, VHB, Inc., on behalf of the Town of North Andover Planning Board prior to project approval. No impacts to wetland resource areas are proposed for the proposed project. The Proponent has prepared a buffer zone enhancement plan that has been designed to enhance altered site conditions adjacent to the wetland resource area by diversifying the landscape with shrub and tree species having a high wildlife value. The Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, has reviewed and commented on the Project ENF as evidenced by a letter to the MEPA Office, dated August 13, 2007, which stated: "The NHESP had determined that this project, as currently proposed, would not adversely affect the actual Resource Area Habitat of state—protected rare wildlife species and would not result in a prohibited 'take' of state -listed rare species." With respect to the proposed Project curb cut off of Route 114, the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) District 4 issued a comment letter dated July 5, 2007 on the proponent application for a Highway Access Permit that requested the proponent file an Environmental Notification Form (ENF). The actual comment letter is reproduced in Attachment #1 to facilitate your review of this project. An ENF, Site Plans, Traffic Impact and Access Study and additional supporting doucementation were filed on July 16, 2007 with the MEPA office. Once a certificate from the MEPA office is received on this project the remaining MHD District 4 comments, which are minor in nature, will be addressed to MHD satisfaction during the actual permitting review process. 730-Wa iverLettertoM EPA DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Secretary Bowles August 16, 2007 Page 2 Review Threshold The daily traffic volumes in the initial ENF and Traffic Study were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) trip generation rates and ITE internal multi-purpose trip rates. Based on ITE trips rates only for 5,549 SF of specialty retail use, 4,090 SF convenience market use and 11,392 SF medical office use (not adjusted for internal multi-purpose trips within the project parcen, the proposed project would generate a total of 3,544 vehicle -trips per day. The specialty retail use, convenience market use and medical office use would generate 2761, 3,0182 and 2503 vehicle -trips per day respectively. Please note that the convenience market daily trips are based on a convenience market which is open 24 hours per day. The proposed convenience market is planed to be opened 15-16 hours per day however the ITE trip generation manual does not provide daily trip rates for convenience markets that are open 15-16 hours per day. The initial Traffic Study reduced the 24-hour convenience market trip rates by 10%. Consequently, the above daily trips are conservative because of the available 24 hour convenience market trip rates as well as no adjustments were made for internal multi-purpose trips. The based on the unadjusted vehicle trip generation of more than 3,000 new average daily traffic (adt), and the requirement of a State Highway Access Permit from the MHD, the proposed project requires a mandatory EIR pursuant to 301 CMR 11.03(6)(a)(6). As requested, Pages 2 and 10 of the ENF were revised to reflect the above noted unadjusted 3,544 vehicle -trips per day. Pages 2 and 10 of the ENF are reproduced in Attachment 2 with all revisions shown in bold type print. Criteria for Waiver Section 11.11(1) of the MEPA regulations provides that a waiver may be granted upon a finding that strict compliance with the regulations will result in undue hardship and will not serve to avoid or minimize damage to the environment. These findings are based on a determination that (1) the project is likely to cause no damage to the environment, and (2) ample and unconstrained infrastructure facilities and services exist to support the project. Waiver Request The proponent is requesting a waiver from the requirement to prepare and file an EIR because the preparation and filing of an EIR would represent an undue hardship as a result of undue project delay and other factors and will not serve to avoid or minimize damage to the environment. This determination is based on the findings that the project will cause no damage to the environment and ample and unconstrained infrastructure facilities and services exist to support the project for the following reasons: 1 Source: Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC 2003, Land Use Code (LUC) #814 Specialty Retail Center. 2 Source: Trip Generation, 70 Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC 2003, LUC #831 Convenience Market Open 24 Hours. Please note Convenience Market Open 15-16 Hours LUC #852 does not provide daily trip rates. The proposed Convenience Market is proposed to be open 15 to 16 hours. 3 Source: Trip Generation, 7t' Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC 2003, Land Use Code #710 Medical Office. 730-MEPA Waiver Letter 6.16.07 v.2 from JTS.doc Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Secretary Bowles August 16, 2007 Page 3 No impacts to wetland resource areas are proposed for the project development. The Proponent has prepared a buffer zone enhancement plan that has been designed to enhance altered site conditions adjacent to the wetland resource area by diversifying the landscape with shrub and tree species having a high wildlife value. The MassWildlife Division of Fisheries & Wildlife has reviewed and commented to MEPA in a letter dated August 13, 2007 that stated: "The NHESP had determined that this nroiect, as currently proposed, would not adversely affect the actual Resource Area Habitat of state—protected rare wildlife species and would not result in a Prohibited "take" of state -listed rare species." 2. Ample and unconstrained infrastructure exists to support the project. Through the town's review and approval of the proposed project, both directly through the Town's planning, engineering and conservation staff as well as through the Town's peer review consultant, the Town has determined that there is ample and unconstrained water, sewer and transportation infrastructure and services to support the project. 3. The MHD District 4 comment letter on the MHD Curb Cut Application indicates that once the MEPA review process is complete, the proposed curb cut will be approved subject to minor engineer details which will be addressed to the satisfaction of MHD during the curb cut permit review process. Additional Findings 1. The ENF, Traffic Impact and Access Study, and all supporting documentation already filed with the MEPA Office fully describes and analyzes the project's impacts on the environment, including both those impacts that would fall within MEPA's jurisdiction as well as those impacts that would not fall within MEPA's jurisdiction if the preparation and filing of an EIR were required. 2. The Traffic Impact and Access Study already submitted to the MEPA Office conforms to the EOEA/EOTC guidelines for form and content. Discussion with MHD Boston supports the waiver request. 3. Preparation of an EIR would not result in either new or additional meaningful information on water, sewer, wetland, and/or traffic impacts or additional mitigation requirements. The traffic impact assessment (which was previously reviewed by the Town's traffic peer review consultants) demonstrates that the traffic impacts of the project will prove to be insignificant. As requested, this Full EIR Waiver request is being circulated to all those agencies that received the initial ENF with the actual Circulation List reproduced in Attachment 3. 730-MEPA Waiver Letter 8.16.07 v.2 from JTS.doc DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Secretary Bowles August 16, 2007 Page 4 If you should have any questions regarding the enclosed information and/or if you require any additional information in order to complete your review of the proposed project, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, DJK ASSOCIATES, INC. i Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE President cc: Gino Fodera, GFM General Contracting Corp. John Smolak, Smolak, Smolak & Vaughan, LLP Julie Vondrak, Epsilon Associates, Inc. James MacDowell, Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. File 730-MEPA Waiver Letter 8.16.07 v.2 from JTS.doc Attachment 1: MHD District 4 Comment Letter dated July 5, 2007 730-MEPA Waiver Letter 8.16.07 v.2 from JTS.doc y yy0°]f 0" Decal L. Paoli Tinioth�P Murray Bemad Cohen WOUTA u t July 5, 2007 Mr. Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE DJK Associates, Inc. 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864 Re: North Andover, Route 114 ("Turnpike Street) Proposed Retail/Office. Building Dear Mr. Kelly: Luisa Pa��sk , MASSACNussr7S EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION C& ASSOCIATES 41"" This is written in response to the permit application, plan and supporting materials submitted for the subject proposed project. The District Permit section has reviewed this submission and requests the following: 0 Please submit the appropriate $00.00 permit fee for the proposed access with the next submission. The District Planning Coordinator has reviewed this submission and requires the following additional information: According to the trip generation table, the convenience store alone would generate over 2000 vehicle trips per day. It is not plausible that the addition of a medical office and another retail store will decrease the overall trips to and from the site. The proponent must file an Environmental Notification Form (ENF) under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) or submit documentation from the MEPA Unit indicating that no further environmental review is required. The District Projects Section has reviewed this submission and has the following comments and recommendations: + Site Drainage - Under existing conditions the land is basically undeveloped. Due to the soil conditions that allow most of the storm water to infiltrate, there is relatively little runoff from the site. The runoffthat does occur flows towards an existing drainage ditch located in the easterly portion of the property and away from the state highway layout. The site development plan includes storm water management systems that are designed to treat site runoff from four sub -catchment areas by the use infiltration systems. All other site runoff will continue to flow away from the state highway layout and post - development peak ninoff is expected to be kept at or below pre -development levels. Therefore. no drainage impacts to the state highway layout are anticipated. Masscachiasetts fl gh� t,qY Departaaictit• District 4+519 Appletraaa Street, Arlhka,Ioar, AIA 01476 • (781) 641-8300 • Curb Cut Plan (DJ:K Plan) — a. The berm shown on the typical sections is labeled as a Type "A" berm with a width of 1 foot and the MassHighway standard width for Type "A' Berms (C.S. M/E 106.1.0) is 20 inches. if a nonstandard modified width is being proposed, provide a detail. b. Label type of proposed edge treatment on plan view and label begin and end points. • Site Development Permit Plan/Site Grading Plan (sheet 4) - a. The proposed Catch Basin (#108) in the driveway should be located at a low point to prevent any sheet flow onto state highway. Please provide proposed spot grades. b. Provide a site drive profile. The driveway should be graded in accordance with MassHighway Const. Std. M/E 107.8.0, Section A -A (i.e. 1.5% path of travel cross slope, minimum Y-3" wide). Site Development Permit Plan/Site Utility Plan (sheet 5) - The plan shows the use of a CBSN/Stormceptor (#108) in the driveway opening. This type of structure is not allowed within the state highway layout. Use a deep sump catch basin instead (as shown on sheet 7, details). The District Traffic Section has reviewed this submission and has the following comment: Based upon die proximity of adjacent driveways, we reconunend using a standard commercial driveway approach with a 25 -foot throat (adjusted from MassHighway's 24 - foot standard in order to meet local requirement) and 30' radii rather than the curb cut shown with acceleration/deceleration lanes. Once these items are addressed the District will continue with the processing of this application. Please direct any questions relative to this correspondence to Michael Formichella, District Permit Engineer, at 781.641.8451. Sincerely, Patricia A. Leavenworth, P.E. District Highway Director JMB/jmb Attachment 2: Revised ENF Pages 2 and 10 730-MEPA Waiver Letter 8.16.07 v.2 from JTS.doc Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ❑ Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ® Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ❑ Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical & Archaeological Resources Summary of Project SizeI Existing & Environmental Impacts Total site acreage 12.03 Change I Total New acres of land altered 1.60 Acres of impervious area 1.25 1.25 0 Maximum height (in feet) TRANSPORTATION Square feet of new bordering 0 vegetated wetlands alteration 44.0'+/_ Square feet of new other wetland alteration 0 Acres of new non -water 3,544 dependent use of tidelands or 0 waterways Gross square footage 10 121,031 +/- 121,031+/ - Number of housing units 0 0 0 Maximum height (in feet) TRANSPORTATION 0 44.0'+/- 44.0'+/_ Vehicle trips per day 0 3,544 3,544 Parking spaces WASTEWATER -- 119 a 119a Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 0 2,300 GPD 2,300 GPD GPD water withdrawal 0 0 0 GPD wastewater generation/ treatment 0 2,300 GPD 2,300 GPD Length of water/sewer mains (in miles) 0 250' 250' a 96 outdoor surface spaces and 23 spaces in garage under the proposed building. State Permits & Approvals Order of Conditions ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions ❑ Chapter 91 License ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ® MHD or MDC Access Permit ❑ Water Management Act Permit ❑ New Source Approval ❑ DEP or MWRA Sewer Connection/ Extension Permit ❑ Other Permits (including Legislative Approvals) — Specify: CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No -2- 730-ENF2 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _ Yes X No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and describe the relationship of the project to the plan TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION I. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The estimated traffic generation is 1, 908 adt, however MassHighway District 4 Office has requested that the proponent file an Environmental Notification Form. B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? X Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: Highway Access Permit. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces 0 119 119 Number of vehicle trips per day 0 3.544a 3,544 'Source: Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 2003, Land Use Code (LUC):# 814 Specialty Retail, LUC #851 Convenience Market and LUC# 710 Medical Office. The above vehicle trips were not adjusted for multi-purpose trips, impulse trips and/or diverted trips. The Convenience Market trips are based on a 24-hour Market since there are no ITE daily trip rates for Convenience Market Opened 15-16 Hours which is the current proposal. B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existinga Change° Total 1. Turnpike Street north of the Site 21,338 +1.950 23.288 2. Turnpike Street south of the Site 21.338 +1.594 22.932 'Source: DJK Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact & Access Study, dated November 16, 2006. Fifty-five percent of the total driveway trips generated to/from the north and 45% toffrom the south. C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: The site is designed to encourage the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Pedestrian ramps are incorporated into the plans. Ill. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities -10- 730-ENF2 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Attachment 3: CIRCULATION LIST 730-ENF2 CIRCULATION LIST This Environmental Notification Form (ENF) is being distributed to the following persons and agencies, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1). Secretary Ian A. Bowles Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 (Two copies) Mr. James Stergois Undersecretary for Policy c/o Nancy Gabriel-Sacjue 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 DEP/Northeast Regional Office Attn: MEPA Coordinator 205B Lowell Street Wilmington, MA 01887 Massachusetts Highway Department Public/Private Development Unit 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116-3973 Mass Bay Transit Authority Attn: MEPA Coordinator 10 Park Plaza, 6t' Floor Boston, MA 02116-3966 Massachusetts Historical Commission Attn: MEPA Coordinator The MA Archives building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 North Andover Conservation Commission 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 North Andover Board of Selectman 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 730-ENF2 Department of Environmental Protection Commissioners Office One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Executive Office of Transportation (EOT) Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 Boston, MA 02116-3969 MHD — District #4 Attn: MEPA Coordinator 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02174 Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Attn: MEPA Coordinator 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 Boston, MA 02116-3969 Merrimack Valley Planning Commission 160 Main Street Haverhill, MA 01830 Mr. Lincoln Daley Town Planner Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 North Andover Board of Health 1600 Osgood Street, Building 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Commonwealth of Massachusetts Route 135 Westborough, MA 01581 e+c;'Ulm tt Town of North Andover _...,t -Co EIvEo r� Office of the Planning Depar n►ent Community Develo nt and Services MAW `9 PM 4: 00 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 NORTH ANDOVER hASSACH SET f NOTICE OF DECISION Bk 10744 P'9174 Z-30622 Any appeal #hall be Mod 14-18-2047 & 04 : 08P within (20) days aft the date of fUq this notice in the offm of the Tomos Clerk Date: Augast 8, 2007 Dak of Hearing& 2/f/079 6/S/i079 7/17/07 Date of Dedi ion: Aagust 712007 ?add" of: GFM General CestraWag Corporation 325 North Main Sbut, No. 19B MUldetw► MA 01949 Pftwiaes Afleete & 1812,1820-1830 Tarnpiike Street, North Andover, MA 01845, within the General Batbm Zoning Dishict, Asa mrs Map 100, Parade 46 and 47. Referring to the above petition far a Site Play Special Permit from the requiromeffis of the Noith Andover Zoaiag Bylaw, Sections 8.3,10.3, and 10.31 and MOL C.40A, Sec. 9 So as to allow: the ooatnmtion of 38,430 s.£+/- of ntaWoffice building, p ddmg, ubiWm site lighting, landscape improvements, and other improymmts within the General Buse= Zoning District. After 4 public heading given on the above date, the Planning Board voted unanimously to APPROVE A SITE PLAN REVIEW SPFCIAL PERMIT based upon the following conditions: This is to cef ify that twenty (a) clays have eiapsed hom date of decision, Bled without fil Da #appeal. Joyce A. Bradshaw , Town Cirrlc cz;:� -4Q..a, North Andover a Board Richard Nardeila, Ghairmaa John Simons, Vice ChaiQmam Richard Rowen, regular member Jennifer Kusdc, mpk member Tim Selbeit, **mate member ATTEST: i True"w- o Town Clerk, Bk 10944 Pg 175 #30622 191; MO -1830 Turnpike Street Map 106b, PWWh 46 and 47 Site Plan Review Spectai Permk Anput 7, 2007 ',7CEIVED On Au 7 2007 �,;"i?' gust upon a motion made by John Simons and seconded by l�icha�d Rowen, the Planning Board herein APPROVED the Site Plan Review Special Permit for the =3a.W- of nrtar7/off building, 119 panting spaces, utilities, site lighting, extensive leen and work and other improvements shown on the "Pleas" as defined below. The project inclufts#hFreadon of a parking and driveway Easement located on 1812 Turnpike Street as shown 14 1061), Pamel 47. Tlw purpose of which is to create common driveway access located""T&wn as 1812 Turnpike Street, shown on Assessor's Map 106D, Parcel 47 which shall service both 1812 Turnpike Street and I SM -1830 Turnpike Street in connection with the `project" as defined below. A recorded mainteneace agreement for the common driveway access shall be fled with the Registry of Deeds. The project lies in the General Business Zoning District and is located on real property shown on the North Andover Assessors Map 106D, Pawl 46 and 47 and consists of approximately 88,245 s.£ (1.026 acres) and 38,332 s.£+4 (.88 =us) respectively with frontage on Turnpike Street and Daffy Street. The Special Permit was requested by the Applicant, GPM General Contracting Corporation, 325 North Main Street, No. 15B, Middleton, MA 01949. This application was filed with the Planning Board on January 4, 2007. The Applicant submitted a complete application which was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Sections 8-3, 10.3, and 10.31 of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and MGL c.40A, sec. 9. The Applicant has Sled with the Planning Board all plans and reports required under the North Andover Zoning Bylaws, including but not limited to the information requited under Section 8.3 and 10.31 of the North, Andover Zoning Bylaws. During the review process, the Applicant and its professional consultants Alm submitted various revisions to the plans along with various supplemental memoranda and aorreapondencc in response to requests by the Planning Board, the Board's peer review consultants, and by the various departments within the Town of North Andover that reviewed the project. All of these plans, reports and correspondence are contained in the Planning Board's files and am hereby incorporated by rehrenee into the public record for this hearing. The Planning Board makes the following findings as roquimd by the North Andover Zoning Bylaws Section 8.3 and 10.3, as well as Section 9 of M.G.L. c. 40A: FINDINGS OF FACT: I ) The specific site is an appropriate location for the project as it is Iocated in the General Business Zone and involves the construction of permitted uses within this zone. Spedfuatlly the General Business District permits both "retail stores and wholesale atoms, as well as `restaurants, dining mom or lunch room". Presently, the site contains approximately 88,245 s.f, of undemttlizod land area. The project provides goods and services to compliment the surrnnmding uses, expands the economic base within the town, and improves the character and integrity of the abutting residential neighborhoods. 2) The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood as a sufficient buffer has been provided. The landscaping and lighting plane approved as part of this plan meet the requirements of Section 8.4 as amended by the Plamring Board, of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The lighting plan consists of a combination of shielded downcast lighting and ornamental lighting that has been, arranged to provide adequate safety for the business and shall not impact abutting properties on Turnpike Strout and Sm Street. The landscaping has been placed so as to enhance the appearance along the frontage of Turnpike Street, Bary Street and the commaroial and residential abutting properties. All plantings and screening depicted on the approved plans referenced herein shall remain in perpetuity over the life of the project 3) There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. The proposed parking lot Bk 10944 Pg 176 #30622 1812,1820`1830 Tomp&t Street Map 106D, Paraek 46 and 47 Site Plan Revkw Speciiul Permit August 7, 2007 design and access/egress drives provide for adequate internal and external traffic How, safety, and suifl'icient pedestrian connections throughout the project, and will not result in a significant increase in vehicle trips from the site. 4) The landscaping approved as a part of this plan meets the requirements of Section 8.4 of the Nortb Andover Zoning Bylaw. The Planning Board has determined that the site plan meets the spirit and intent of Section 8.4 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. 5) The site drainage system ad storm water management design are designed in ac= dance with the Town Bylaw requirements and Best Management Practices, and has been reviewed by the outside consulting engineer, Vanasse, Haagen Dnistlin, Inc. (VHB). 6) The Applicant has mot the requirements of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw for Site Plan Review, including all Sling requirements as stated in Sections 8.3 and 10.31 of the Zoning Bylaw. 7) Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use, and the use is in harmony with the gendaai purpose and Went of this Zoning Bylaw. The project will provide for municipal water, sewer and utilities on the property to adequately address the needs of the project The Colonial style of the building has been designed in a manner to blind into the existing area architectural style and will complement the m mounding neighborhood. The storefronts and office areas contain numerous pedestrian scaled elements that provide ft improved visual and physical acxss to the goods and services within the building. Tire project also oontains a tasteful lighting plan throughout the site to enhance the pedestrian feel of the project while maintaining sufficient lighting. 8) Finally the Planning Board finds that this pmjcct generally complies with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw requirements as listed in Section 8.3 and 1031 bot requires conditions in order to be fully in oompliance. The Planning Board hereby unanimously votes to both grant the requested waivers as descrl'bod in the Applicant's application, and also unanimously votes to grant approval of the Applicant's proposed project as described in the `Plans" and other supporting information descrlbed in the public record, provided the following conditions are met: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1) Permit Defrottfons: a) The "Locus" refers to the 88,245 s.f. (2.026 acres) and 38.332 s.f. (.88 acres) respectively with fiontage ov TumpOm Street and Barry Street as shown on the North Andover Assessors Map 1061), Parcel 46 and 47. b) The "Plans" refer to the plans prepared by Entem Land Survey Associates, Inc.,104 Lowell Street, Peabody, MA 01960 dated October 21, 2007, Revised 5/7/07, 5/30/07, 6/21/07, 7/9/07 entitled "Site Development Permit Plan For GFM General Contracting Corporation 1820 —1830 Turapke Shvet in North Andover, Massachusetts" cons'is'ting Sheets 1 through 7. c) The "Project" or "1812,1820-1830 Turnpike Stied" refers to the construction a 38,430 s.f. raWYoff building, It 9 pad* spaces, utilities, site lighting, extensive landscape and grading wort and other W4xvvemeiuts as shown on the Pians. Bk 10944 Pg 177 #30622 1812,1820-1830 Turnpike Street Map 100, Parcels 46 and 47 Site Plan Review Special Permit August 7, 2007 d) The "Applicant" refers to OFM General Contracting Corporation, the applicant for the Special Permit. e) Tike "Project Owner" refers to the person or endty holding the fee interest to the title to the Locus from time to time, which can include but is not limited to the Applicant, developer, and owner. f) All artificial lighting used to illuminate the parking lot and access ways shall have underground wiring and shall be so arranged that all direct rays from such lighting falls substantially within the parking, loading or driveway area, and shall be shielded or recessed so as not to shine upon abutting pttoperdes. 2) Eavironmental Monitor. The developer shall designate an independent Favironmental Monitor who shall be chosen in consultation with the Planning and Community Development Staff The Environmental Monitor must be available upon four (4) hours notice to inspag the site with the Plaming Board designated official. The Environmental Monitor will be required to inspect all such devices and oversee cleaning and the proper disposal of waste products if applicable. 3) Condmdion Mom t►r: The Applicant shall designate an independent construction monitor who shall be chosen in consultation with the Planning Department, The construction monitor must be available upon four (4) hours notice to inspect the site with the Planning Board designated offitdaL The construction monitor shall make weekly inspections of the project and file monthly reports to the Planning Board throughout the duration of the project. The monthly reports shall detail areae of non- compliance and actions talcm to resolve such issues. The designated monitor may not be applicant and/or developer. Tice weakly inspections and monthly reports provided to the Planning Department shall include the following.- a) ollowing:a) Site clearing; b) Erosion control;- c) ontrol;c) Drainage and detention structures; d) On-site water and sewer utilities; e) Padang spaces and related pavement; Curb cuts; S) Retaining walls; h) Site screening, landscaping and street trees; i) Site restoration; j) Final site cleanup; k) Dtmtpsters shown on the Plans shall be screened at all times; and 1) Temporary storage of construction debris, dirt, and equipment. 4) PRIOR TO THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE PLANS BY TSE PLANNING BOARD, THE APPLICANT MUST COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: a) The final plans must be reviewed and approved by the DPW and the Planning Department and be endorsed by the Planning Board. The final Plans shall be modified to include a Planning Board endorsement block and must be submitted for review within Mndy (90) days of filing the decision with the Town Cleric. Failure to submit and obtain Planning Board endorsement within the 90 -day period will automatically cause the approval to become mull and void. b) The final site drainage system must be designed in aeoordam with the Town Bylaw requirements and reviewed by the Division of Public Works. All storm water drainage control Bk 10944 Pg 178 #30622 1812,1820-1830 Turnpike Suet Map 106D, Pareds 46 cad 47 site Plan Review Speclal Permit Augurt 7, 2007 facilities utilized by the site shall be shown on the site plan. Storm water drainage calculations which support the design of the control facilities shown on the plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Written oonfiruation of said review and approval by the Deputnent of Public Works must be submitted to the Planning Department. c) A bond in the amount of fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars must be posted for the purpose of insuring that a final as -built plan showing the location of all on-site Utilities, structures, curb cuts, pmbq spaces, topography, and drainage facilities is submitted. The bond is also in place to insurc that the site is constructed in accordance with the approved plan. The form of security must be acceptable to the Planning Board. d) All site plan application and escrow fees must be paid in M and verified by the Town Planner. 5) PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION: a) A construction schedule shall be submitted to the Planning Staff for the purpose of tracking the construction and informing the public of anticipated activities on the site. b) All applicable erosion control measures must be in place and reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. e) It shall be the responsibility of the developer to assure that no erosion on the site shall occur which will cause deposition of soil or sediment upon 4ment propm ies or public ways, except as normally ancillary to off-site sewer or other off-site construction. Off-site erosion will be a basis for the Planning Board making a finding that the project is not in compliance with the plan; provided, however, that the Planning Board shall give the developer written notice of any such finding and ten days to cure said condition. d) A pre -construction meeting M1 be held with the developer, their congaw; ion employees, Planning Deportment„ Building Department, Conservation Department, Town Engineer, and Polis Department to discuss scheduling of inspections, the construction schedule, and the proceWmethod of informing the public of the anticipated activities on the site. The applicant will also discuss the traffic mitigation and any possible road closures, which may occur as a result of the construction. The applicant will coordinate with the North Andover Police Depart ne nt if the construction of the project necessitates Police traffic details. Minutes of the meeting must be submitted to the Planning Board prior to the start of ca usftwuon. e) The deve2aper shall provide the Planning Board with copies of permits, pians and decisions received from all other North Andover Lead -Use Boards or departments. In addition to receipt of these plans, the Applicant shall supply the Town Planner with a leiter outlining any and all revisions resulting from said permits, plans and decisions. r=ved from other town boards, commissions and departments that differ from the approved plans refeceuced in Condition 24. 6) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: a) Three (3) copies Of the sigaod, recorded plans must be delivered to the Planning Department. b) One certified copy of the recorded decision must be submitted to the Planning Department. 6 Bk 10944 Pg 179 #30622 1912, IM -I630 Turnpike Strut Map 106D, Pwv& 46 and 47 Site Plan Review Speeded Permit August 7, 2007 c) The project owner shall adhere to the following requirements of the North Andover fire Department and the North Andover Building Department: 1. All structures must contain a commercial fire sprinkler system. The plans and hydraulic calculations for each commercial system shall be submitted for review and approval by the North Andover Fire Department. Plans and hydraulic calculations for each commercial system must also be supplied to the Building Department. 7) DURING CONSTRUCTION: a) During construction, the site must be kept clean and swept regularly throughout the construction process. Dust mitigation, dewatering and roadway cleaning must be pm meed weekly, or more frequently as dictated by sits and weather conditions and as directed by the Town Planncr. b) The plans for the stookpiliug of materials (dart, wood, construction material, etc.) must be shown on a plan and reviewed and approved by the Town Plamrer. The developer will make every offort to locate stockpiles on Ore site and away from residential properties. Any approved piles must retrain covered at all times to minimize potential dust and the project owner will be required to install appropriate erosion control measures. c) In an effort to reduce noise levels, the developer shall keep in optimum working order, through regular maintenance, any and all equipment that will emanate sounds from the structures or site. d) The Town Planner will perform monthly ingxxbons ofthe site during construction to ensure that the developer is adhering to the conditions set forth in the decision. 8) PRIOR TO TSE ISSUANCE OF A CERTi>K'iCATE OF OCCUPANCY: a) The Applicant must submit a letter from the architect and engineer of the project s%ft that the butidlog, landscaplag, iigttting and trite layout substantially comply with the plans referenced at the end of this decision n as endorsed by the Planning Board. Alternatively, the Applicant and/or property owmr may provide a bond, determined by the Planning Board, to cover the fuhl amount of tine landscaping materials and mstallabon if weather conditions do not permit the completion of the leadsoaping prior to the use of the parking area. b) The Planning Staff shall approve all artificial Holing used to ilhrminate the site. All lighting shall have underground wiring and shall be so arranged that all direct rays from such lighting falls entirely within the site and shall be shielded or recessed so as not to shine upon abutting properties or streets. The Planning Staff sball review the site Doting plan. Any cbanges to the approved fighting plan as may be reasonably regtti W by the Planing Staff stall be made at the owner's mcpense. The Applicant must submit a letter fi om the architect and engineer of the project stating that the building, signs, landscaping, lighting and site layout substsaWy eeruply with the Plans refinmeed at the and of this decision as endorsed by the Planning Board All site lighting shall provide security for the site and structma, however, it must not create any glare or project any light onto adjacent residential properties. c) The commercial fire sprinkler systems must be installed in accordance with referenced standard NFPA 13D and in accordance with 780 CMR, Chapter 9 of the Massachusetts State Building Bk 10944 Pg 180 #30622 1811,1820-1830 Turnpike Street Map 106D, Parcels 46 and 47 Site Plan Review Special Permit Aw* 7, 2007 Code. Certification that the systema have been installed properly in aovomdanee with the above referenced regulations mast be provided from both the North Andover Fire Department and the North Andover Building Department to the apphean t. The Applicant must then provide this certification to the North Andover Planning Department. d) Any and all signage plans for the site, which Have been provided to the Planning Board during the site plan review process, were presented for the purpose of demonstrating signage materials only. Any signage plans must conform to Section 6, Signage and Outdoor Lighting Regulations of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw, as amended, and must be approved by the Building Department. in no way is the Project Owner to construe that the Planning Board has reviewed and approved the signage plass for Zoning Compliance as that is the jurisdiction of the Building Department. All additional permits must be obtained by the Project Owner priorto construction. 9) PRIOR TO THE FINAL RELEASE OF ALL SECURITY AND ESCROWED FUNDS a) The Planning Staff shall review the site. Any screening as may be reasonably required by the Planning Staff will be added at the Project Owner's expense. b) A final as -built plan showing final topography, the location of all on-site utilities, stuctures, aub cats, parking spaces, and drainage structwa and facilities must be submitted to the Planning Department. The Applicant roust submit a letter from the architect and engines of the project stating said items substantially comply with the plans referenced at the end of this decision as endorsed by the Planning Board. 11) All site work and adernal construction activity shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:10 p.m. Monday through Friday and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saduday. 12) Any plariN trees or shrubs that have been incorporated into the Landscape Plan approved in this decision that die shall be replaced immediately by the owner (if seasonally feasiiile). All plantings and suing depictod on the approved plans shall remain in pa pawAy over the lift of the project. Reasonable substitutions may be allowed as determined by the Town Planner, but size and coverage must be maintained throughout the duration of the project. 13) The contractor shall contact Dig Safe at least 72 hours prior to commencing any excavation. 14) On, Telephone, Cable and Electric utilities shall be installed underground as specified by the respective utility companies. 1S) No open burning shall be done accept as is permitted during burning season under the Fire Department regulations. 16) The use of permanent or temporary trailers for storage of goods and products associated with the operations of any business within the project arra is prohibited. 17) No underground fuel storage shall be installed except as may be allowed by Town Regulations. 18) The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the applicant, its employees and all successors and assigns in interest or control. Bk 10944 Pg 181 #30622 1812,1820-1830 Tarnpike Street Map 106D, Parcels 46 and 47 Site PLn Review Special Permit August 7,2M 19) Snow removal may be stored on the designated storages area shown on said plans referenced below to the extent possible, but shaU be trucked off site wheacvcr snow excceds onsite storage capacity. 20) Tenants shall use diligent efforts to retrieve shopping carts from the common areas and return them to the "gaged area specified by the owner. Project Owner will ensure that best efforts shall be made by all tenants to prevent the use of its shopping carts in the center from interfering with the use of the parkiag lot. Present and scheduled removal must be complied with in order alleviate safety concerns. 21) Truck deliveries for goods and merchandise shall occur only between the hours of 6 am. and I 1 p.m. seven days a week. Trash pickup from the dumpster shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 am to 9 pm., seven days a week. The dumpster and dumpster enclosure shall remain closed except when trash deposit, removal and pickup operations are being conducted. 22) The Pbuning Somal requites that the project be built in accordance with the herein referenced plans and specifications and in full accmtdaace with the design elements and features displayed and discussed during the Public Hearings and in strict accordance with all conditions contained herein. Any revisions shall be submitted to the Town Planner for review in accordance with Section 8.3.8 of the Zoning Bylaw. If the Town Planner in his/her sole discretion deems these revisions to be substantial as defined in Section 8.3.8, the applicant must submit revised plans to the Planning Board for approvaL 23) This Special Permit approval shall be deemed to have lapsed after August 7, 2009 (two years from the date permit granted) unless substautW use or oou gtracd m has commenced Substantial use or conmcdon will be determined by a majority vote of the Planning Board 24) The following information shall be deemed part of the decision: a) Fleas titled: Site Development Permit Plan For GFM General Contracting Corporation 1820 -1830 Turnpike Street in North Andover, Massachusetts Prepared For. GFM General Contracting Corporation 325 N. Main Street, #15B Middleton, MA 01949 Prepared by: Eastern Land Survey Associates, Tac. 104 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Scale: 1't=20' Plan Date: October 21, 2007, Revised S/7/07, 5/30/07, 6/21/07.7/9/07 Sheets: 1 through 7 b) Plans titled: Site Development Permit Plan For GFM General Contracting Corporation 1820 -1830 Turnpike Street in North Andover, Massachusetts Prgxu ed For. GFM General Contracting Corporation 325 N. Main Street, #15B Middleton, MA 01949 Prepared by: Bay State Design Associates f Bk 10944 Pg 182 #30622 1812,1820-1830 Turnpike Street Map 106A Pareek 46 and 47 Site PIn Review Special Permit August 7, 2007 70 Tower Office Park Woburn, MA 01801 Scale: 1"=20' Plan Date: 7/9/07 Sheets: T001, A200 — A204, A401- A403 c) Plans titled: Landscape & Lighting Plan 1820 —1830 Turnpike Strad North Andover, Massachusetts Prepared For: GFM General Contracting Corporation 325 N. Main Street, #15B Middleton, MA 01949 Prepared by: Huntress Associates, Inc. 17 Tewksbury Street Andover, MA 01810 Scale: 1"=40' Plan Date: May 23, 2007, Raised 6/12/07.6/21/07, 7/10/07 Sheets: 2 d) Report titled: Trafhc Impact & Access Study Proposed Commercial Development Project North Andover, Massaebusetts Prepared For: GFM General Contracting Corporation 325 N. Main Street, #15B Middleton, MA 01949 Prepared by. Dermot J. Kelly Associates Inc. 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North heading, MA 01864 Date: November 16, 2006, Revised 5/10/07. e) Report titled: Storarwater Mauagemetn Report 1820-1830 TurnpUz Strad North Andover, MA Prepared For. GM General Contracting Corporation 325 N. Main Street, #15B Middleton, MA 01949 PhTared by: Eastern Land Survey Associates, be. 104 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Data: October 2006, Revised May 2007 APPEAL: Any person aggrieved by this Decision by the Plarming Bond, if any, may file an appeal of this Decision by bringing an action wifl»n twenty (20) days atter the Decision has been filed in the Office of the Town Clm'ic patmtant to Section 17 of Maas. Gen. Laws Chapter 40A. cc: Applicant Building Department 9 1812,1820-1830 Turnpike Street Map 106D, Pme[c 46 and 47 Site no Review speew Permit August 7, 2007 Conservation Department Fire Department Bk 10944 Pg 183 #306221 CEIvED, rr 1 ; .i.' 1� DJK 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 Office: 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 REF: 732 July 16, 2007 North Andover Board of Health 1600 Osgood Street, Building 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning RE: Environmental Notification Form Proposed Commercial Building, North Andover, MA Dear Sir/Madam: REC'-E---IVED JUL 19 2007 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER ALT�p�ARTMENT As required by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, we have enclosed one copy of the Environmental Notification Form (ENF) for a proposed commercial building to be located at 1820-1830 Turnpike Street (Route 114) in North Andover, MA. Upon your review of the enclosed ENF, please do not hesitate to contact me with questions, comments, and/or you require any additional information. Sincerely, DJK ASSOCIATES, INC. Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PT E President Enclosure cc: File Environmental Notification Form PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING Turnpike Street (Route 114) North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent GFM General Contracting Corp. RECEIVED JUL 19 2097 TOWN v; _R HEALTH u DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING Turnpike Street (Route 114) North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent GFM General Contracting Corp. North Andover, Massachusetts July 16, 2007 Prepared by Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 730-ENF1.doc ENFCommonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ■ MEPA Office Environmental Notification Form The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. e: Proposed Commercial Building Turnpike Street Route 114 FUniversal Municipality: North Andover Watershed: Merrimack River nsverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 420 38.120' North Lon itude: 710 04.428' West Estimated commencement date: August 2007 Estimated completion date: April 2008 Approximate cost: $2,10,000.00 Status of project design: 10 %complete Proponent: GFM General Contracting Corp. Street: 325 North Main Street, 15B Municipality: Middleton State: MA Zi Code: 01949 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE Firm/Agency: DJK Associates, Inc. Street: 280 Main Street, Suite 204 Municipality: North Reading State: MA =Zip Code: 01864-1300 Phone: 978-664-2205 1 Fax: 978-664-2444 1 E-mail: dkellvna.djkinc.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑ Yes ® No Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EDEA No. ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EDEA No. ) ®No Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requestin a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301 CMR 11.os)❑Yes No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes No Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): None Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: (1) North Andover Planning Board Special Permit, (2)North Andover Conservation Commission Order of Conditions, (3)MassHighway Highway Access Permit, (4) Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Review, (5) U. S. EPA NPDES Stormwater N01 and (6) Various Local Permits, including Building Permit Water, Sewer, Occupancy Permit, etc. -t- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited; for information call 617-626-1020. Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ❑ Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ® Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ❑ Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ ACEC R Reaulations F1 Historical & Archaeological Resnurrac Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals Order of Conditions Total site acreage 2.03 ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions New acres of land altered 1.60 ❑ Chapter 91 License ❑ 401 Water Quality Acres of impervious area 1.25 1.25 Certification ® MHD or MDC Access e feet onew borderng 0 R egated wetlands alteration Permit Square feet of new other ❑ Water Management wetland1UH.lteration 0 Act Permit Acres of new non -water ❑ New Source Approval dependent use of tidelands or 0 waterways STRUCTURES ❑ DEP or MWRA Sewer Connection/ Extension Permit Gross square footage 0 21,031 +/- 21,031 ❑ Other Permits +l_ (including Legislative Approvals) – Specify: Number of housing units 0 0 0 Maximum height (in feet) 0 44.0'+/- 44.0'+/- 4.0'+/- -A TRANSPORTATION -•- • Vehicle trips per day 0 1,908 1,908 Parking spaces t11ga 119 a WASTEWATER Gallons/day (GPD) of water 0 2,300 2,300 use GPD GPD GPD water withdrawal 0 0 0 GPD wastewater generation/ 0 2,300 2,300 treatment GPD GPD Length of water/sewer mains 0 250' 250' —] (in miles) 96 outdoor surface spaces and 23 spaces in garage under the proposed building. CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No -2- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, or watershed preservation restriction? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? ® Yes. The project site is mapped within estimated and priority habitat of the Blandings Turtle. NHESP has determined that project activities will not affect the actual resource area habitat of the state -protected wildlife species (See attached NHESP letter dated June 8, 2007). HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes (Specify ) ® No PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.) The existing project parcel is currently vacant and undeveloped. The project proponent presently is planning for the construction of approximate 21,031 square feet (SF) of gross leasable commercial office and retail floor space to be located at 1820-1830 Turnpike Street (Route 114) in North Andover, Massachusetts. The proposed project would be constructed in a single building having 9,639 SF of floor space on the first floor. On the first floor 5,549 SF would be dedicated to specialty retail use and 4,090 SF would be dedicated to convenience market use. On the second floor 11,392 SF would be dedicated to medical office use. There is also 6,007 SF of attic space and an 11,392 SF of basement space designated for parking of vehicles. The proposed main site access drive would be located on Turnpike Street with two secondary drives located along Berry Street. Wetland resource areas are located along the western property boundary. No impacts to wetland resource areas are proposed for the project development. The Proponent has prepared a buffer zone enhancement plan that has been designed to enhance altered site conditions adjacent to the wetland resource area by diversifying the landscape with shrub and tree species having a high wildlife value. A buffer zone enhancement plan is being implemented for areas within 50 -feet of the western edge of the stream channel located on the project site. The applicant proposes to install woody vegetation within areas of the 50 -foot No -Build Zone and within the 25 -foot No -Disturbance Zone (local Bylaw zones) with high quality buffer zone species chosen to enhance wildlife habitat. NHESP has reviewed the project and has provided recommendations to protect potential habitat of state listed species mapped on and adjacent to the site, which have been incorporated into the project design. The Applicant has prepared a buffer zone enhancement plan that has been designed to enhance altered site conditions adjacent to the wetland resource area by diversifying the landscape with shrub and tree species having a high wildlife value. The following Table 8-1 identifies the proposed species to be planted within the 50 -foot No -Build and 25 -foot No -Disturbance Zones. The Applicant will permanently mark the edge of the 25 -foot No -Disturbance Zone with signs or markers spaced evenly every 25 to 50 feet incorporating the following text: "Protected Wetland Resource Area". This will designate the sensitivity of the down gradient resource area and assure no further inadvertent encroachment into the wetland. -3- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. The following measures will be implemented to prevent sedimentation into the No -Disturbance Zone and buffer zone during construction activities. Prior to construction, siltation barriers composed of double - staked hay bales and trenched silt fence will be installed along the limit of work. These siltation barriers will demarcate the limit of work, form a work envelope and provide additional assurance that construction equipment will not enter the resource area. All barriers will remain in place until disturbed areas are stabilized by vegetation. Prior to on-line implementation, catch basin inlets will be protected with appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures to prevent sediment or demolition debris from entering the drainage system. Filter fabric or Silt Sacks"m will be inserted into the catch basins just below the grating. All catch basin structures will be inspected after every rain storm and repairs made as necessary. If the need for dewatering arises during project construction, all water will be pumped to a constructed haybale containment area located greater than 25 -feet from wetland resource areas. Snow will be stockpiled in designated areas as displayed on the attached landscaping plan. Snow will not be stockpiled on top of catch basins and snow removal will be conducted in accordance with the DEP, Bureau of Resource Protection Snow Disposal Guidance. In summary, the project has been designed in accordance with applicable state and local performance standards. The ability of on-site wetland resource areas to provide those functions and values presumed significant under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act and North Andover Wetland Protection Bylaw, will not be impaired including the ability of BVW and Bank to provide: flood control, storm damage prevention, protection of public and private water supplies, protection of groundwater, wildlife and wildlife habitat, fisheries habitat and prevention of pollution, erosion and sedimentation. Wetland resource area impacts have been avoided and buffer zone area impacts have been minimized and mitigated to the best extent practicable. LAND SECTION - all proponents must fill out this section 1. Thresholds / Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) _Yes X No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings 0 11,000 SF 11,000S Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 0 40,000 SF 40.000 SF Other altered areas (describe) (Stormwater Mgmt) 0 5,400 SF 5,400S Undeveloped areas 32,000 SF - — 32.000 SF B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years? _ Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils) will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? _ Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM -approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?_ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? _ Yes _ No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: -4- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B? Yes _ No X ; if yes, describe: H. Describe the project's storm water impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: There are no storm water management devices existing on the site. The Proponent will install catch basins with 4' sumps and gas/oil traps, Stormceptor or Vortechnics treatment units, storage tank oil/gas separators at truck loading areas, and roof and site storm water infiltration system for groundwater recharge, stormwater detention areas with forebays. I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes _ No X ; if yes, what is the Release Tracking Number (RTN)? J. If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware, or Wachusett subwatershed? _ Yes X No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation under the Watershed Protection Act? Yes X No K. Describe the project's other impacts on land: Post -development run-off rates for the 21 25, and 100 year storm will be mitigated, LID techniques will be provided where possible, enhanced landscaping and plantings throughout site will be provided. The proposed retail use will maximize tax and economic return to the community without negatively impacting community services, i.e., schools, police, fire. The Proponent will provide improved access and improved traffic circulation in project area. III. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): The current municipal comprehensive land use plan has zoned this property as "General Business District", the current use is undeveloped and the proposed use will be retail. Therefore, the project is consistent in use with the existing zoning and comprehensive land use plan. B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: The proponent has met with appropriate representatives of MHD to review this project and find no conflicts relative to Regional Planning Policy. The traffic improvements will enhance traffic circulation in the area, which is consistent with regional planning policy. C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e. text or map amendment, special permit, or variance)? Yes X No _ ; if yes, describe: Planning Board Special Permit Approval and Conservation Wetlands Commission Order of Conditions. D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? X Yes _ No; if yes, describe: Planning Board Special Permit Approval and Conservation Wetlands Commission Order of Conditions. RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds i Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _ Yes X No -5- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)?_ Yes _ No. If yes, 1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat (contact: Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information): (unknown at this time) 2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? _ Yes _ No; if yes, please include the results of your survey. 3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? —Yes _No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _ Yes _ No B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _ Yes _ No; if yes, describe: C. Will the project alter "significant habitat" as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.30)? _Yes _No; if yes, describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts (for example, storm water runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth habitat): None known WETLANDS. WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes _ No; if yes, specify which permit: North Andover Conservation Commission issued an Order of Conditions on July 3, 2007 which was dated June 27, 2007. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on the site plan: Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Bank associated with an intermittent stream is located in the southwestern and western sections of the project site. B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: No impacts to resource areas are proposed for this project. Coastal Wetlands Area (in square feet) or Length (in linear feet) Land Under the Ocean No impact Designated Port Areas No impact Coastal Beaches No impact Coastal Dunes No impact Barrier Beaches No impact -6- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Coastal Banks Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Inland Wetlands Bank Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact C. Is any part of the project 1. a limited project? _ Yes X No 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _ Yes X No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters?_ Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in square feet): D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131A)? X Yes _ No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of Conditions issued? X Yes _ No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number: 6/27/07, DEP File #242 1382. Was the Order of Conditions appealed? _ Yes X No. No appeal has been filed to date, however the appeal period will expire on July 18, 2007. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations? _ Yes X No. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes _ No 2. alter any federally -protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law? —Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)? F. Describe the projects other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): No impacts to wetland resource areas are proposed. III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands) that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? _ Yes X No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 license or permit affecting the project site? _ Yes X No; if yes, list the date and number: B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? _ Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non -water dependent use? Current _ Change _ Total C. Is any part of the project 1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: 2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _ Yes X No; if yes, volume of dredged material 3. a solid fill, pile -supported, or bottom -anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other waterways? _ Yes X No; if yes, what is the base area? -7- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. 4. within a Designated Port Area? _ Yes X No D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: The project does not include impacts to waterways or tidelands.. IV. Consistency: A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _ Yes X No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? —Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: B. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer Municipal or regional water supply B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? _ Yes _ No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, 1. have you submitted a permit application? _ Yes _ No; if yes, attach the application 2. have you conducted a pump test? —Yes _ No; if yes, attach the pump test report D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)? N/A Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_ Yes _ No E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? Yes X No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Water supply well(s) (capacity, in gpd) Drinking water treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Water mains (length, in miles) F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? N/A G. Does the project involve 1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? _ Yes _ No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _ Yes _ No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? -s- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. 3. a non -bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _ Yes _ No H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on water resources, quality, facilities and services: III. Consistency — Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater (see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: Sewer Extension Permit C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation -- Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00): Existing Chane Total Discharge to groundwater (Title 5) Discharge to groundwater (non -Title 5) Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? Yes _ No; if no, describe where capacity will be found: C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_ Yes _ No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased: C. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _ Yes _ No. _ If yes, describe as follows: New extension from Computer Drive and on site Existing Change Total Wastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Sewer mains (length, in miles) Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual materials? _ Yes _ No; if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day): -9- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: Ill. Consistency — Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _ Yes X No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and describe the relationship of the project to the plan TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))?_ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The estimated traffic generation is 1, 908 adt,� however MassHighway District 4 Office has requested that the proponent file an Environmental Notification Form. B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? X Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: Highway Access Permit. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces 0 119 119 Number of vehicle trips per day 0 1.908" 1.908 "Source: Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 2003, Land Use Code (LUC):# 814 Specialty Retail, LUC #851 Convenience Market and LUC# 710 Medical Office. B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existing a Change Total 1. Turnpike Street north of the Site 21.338 +1.050 22,288 2. Turnpike Street south of the Site 21,338 +858 22,196 "Source: DJK Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact & Access Study, dated November 16, 2006. Fifthy-five percent of the total driveway trips generated to/from the north and 45% to/from the south. C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: The site is designed to encourage the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Pedestrian ramps are incorporated into the plans. Ill. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities -to- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. and services: The proposed project is designed to encourage transit, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed.any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II. Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Length (in linear feet) of new or widened roadway Width (in feet) of new or widened roadway Other transportation facilities: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? —Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. 11. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existinci Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) Length of fuel line (in miles) Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_ Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe the projects consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_ Yes _ No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day) of. Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: 111. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION 1. Thresholds I Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits -12- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste? _ Yes _ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste? _ Yes _ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re -use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? _ Yes _ No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency --Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds / Impacts A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _ Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? _ Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: C. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? —Yes _ No; if yes, attach correspondence E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: II. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: -13- 730-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail right-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy (8-%2 x 11 inches or larger) indicating the project location and boundaries 4. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 5. Other: CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Name) (Date) Lawrence Eagle Tribune 2. This form has been c0 ulat Agencies and Persons in accor ce with 301 C R 11.1 2 07/16/07 ' 07/16/07 Date Signature of Responsible Officer Date Signature of person reparing E or Proponent (if different from above) Gino Fodera Name (print or type) GFM General Contracting Corp. Firm/Agency 325 North Main Street. 15#13 Street Middleton, MA 01949 Municipality/State/Zip 1-978-777-8007 Phone Dermot J. Kellv. PE. PTOE Name (print or type) DJK Associates, Inc. Firm/Agency 280 Main Street. Suite 204 Street North Reading, MA 01864 Municipality/State/Zip 978-665-2205 Phone -I- 691-ENF1 Revised 11/00. Comment Period is limited, for information call 617-626-1020. Attachment 1: Existing Conditions Site Plan 730-ENF1 W0116H A(WAWAO L.1 .1003'Of AMr'a erstovw n►ataao►ri N` -ld SNOI114NOO JNIISIX3 0 z r 1ooa 2 Avw7 snn►sr�ar trio—►rs (w) tests Nlvw w sai� S113snHOVSS�'/W `2GAOONV 'ON w b G1 Door 'tr ammoo Wva oseto IS V 0" u a"074v% iot � �uov�e►�oo s -rd w►�v b �vaw� ,van►�ar, � JNIQ11f18 I`dIOd3WWOO 43SOdOdd � c=n N oil 0z'u► , wy A ws °-' �3 N`d-ld IIM:13d LN3NdOl3A3C) 311S ,0i - .t 37YX5 sib v M\ IVLLNKIS321 30VI A SI IDI&SIO ONINOZ to\ \,gkpl0 _bjv g3AOONv 'aN t33yis 3.vidNyn.L tz&, u213JYH 3S383H1 -P NHOr JIN �- Iu A,^ i f � d � p W I o \ ; _Q) u- 1 / c C. c \�r ; a s o a O Z m r T L d C, 0 Z w ^ ' V w J N W U W iY ILLw (x UZ Fs %' � W `-� N (DCL �- 00 ° n �o v. a 0 . Q -41 -H -H� O O N 02 LL OQ. 0 M � O a N d ON s 2O W rQ a Y, h IS, I v M\ IVLLNKIS321 30VI A SI IDI&SIO ONINOZ to\ \,gkpl0 _bjv g3AOONv 'aN t33yis 3.vidNyn.L tz&, u213JYH 3S383H1 -P NHOr JIN �- Iu A,^ i f � d � p W I o \ ; _Q) u- 1 / c C. c \�r ; a s o a O Z m r T L d C, 0 Z w ^ ' V w J N W U W iY ILLw (x UZ Fs %' � W `-� N (DCL �- O ° n I v. a 0 . Q -41 -H -H� O O N 2 LL OQ. 0 M � O N d W � s U'l W rQ a Y, h IS, I O ra Z U,)} Q 2s � J NrN OJ i O W OI N 'nU,c 0,04= T C 3p P n C2 O 2 O li a 00Q=Wy,� m A YQ M Y-coO Q T J J W O� O __-z W Z 72mz�'» xzczipwp°°� 0 QY QJi NO US 0 W 3In0Q UUODUUOnJ zzzzzzz>>� FFFFFFFFwCrU tnN NN N(nNJ l- RxxxxX%FIYOW W WwWWWW�NUIw 2 2 0 0 1 N O O O J4 00 ®&110 r -- o W to G jy `a � t�0 Q (DCL �- O ° N �al I v. a 0 . Q Q pO �cFui S -H -H� O O N n ?� 0 W N `r�0 ` N N F vw) o } oc6a \ Q` I U,)} Q 2s � jr, U N 'nU,c 0,04= N r, n C2 W ti0 li a 00Q=Wy,� Z x � tipp a* M Y-coO Q ? J N tMMy < Z 0 as�`� w w V you h a�wtn yj� VfOVQtn 2 OW . N N N S �uOQW UO Q2ow �uQ U 0R 01 w N U_ C5 ^ w w 0 N it w w N G a. N p r -- o W to G jy `a U: W N I O ° 00 N V F m I v. __. . - ...­MT q . Q Q pO �cFui S -H -H� O O N n ?� oy�W W N `r�0 ` ,^• N 060N U oc6a \ Q` I I Q 2s � jr, U ?�¢Ow \ a 1 O ti0 OQW SnSQ In Q O O JJ u W p 2 Vi�h;j U- 2Q 2 u JO r-.7 QW OWN V you h a�wtn yj� VfOVQtn 2 OW U )`O�z �`Ottnn, 4W �vSV N S �uOQW a � Q2ow �uQ toy 01 w (Z6'L91 3,t0,B1•0N C5 ^ I I w a ,r Wb3B •118 a= W N Q S= ° C1 4$ I v. __. . - ...­MT q . Q Q pO �cFui S LU LU n ?� oy�W � W ,^• k W W U z O Wacno° W� Q� 2 0.z W jr, U ?�¢Ow CR0�20 a G5 2d w.Rl O ti0 OQW SnSQ In Q O O W�Qj2_ �Lti y?� w a ,r Wb3B •118 a= W N Q S= ° C1 4$ 2�Q WgPi+ Q404� �O1�tuu iu3��3 2 xOxOLZ z�N Q pO �cFui S LU LU O0. ?� y> stnv WW k W W wo0(n 2y y k ppppO tn0.Q CR0�20 2 h O N �q tH0 m�w MK t�fWU� Ntl �w O 2�Ll O� O W�Qj2_ �Lti y?� W p 2 Vi�h;j 2Q 2 QW�O� JO �� UZWQ r-.7 QW OWN V you h a�wtn yj� VfOVQtn 2 OW U )`O�z �`Ottnn, 4W �vSV N S �uOQW a � Q2ow �uQ toy 01 w C5 ^ N h U i�v 112 Oti ZO w a ,r Wb3B •118 �O O N Q NO 16 CD a � N ti! yZuZy11= 61N .o - -o- D a= W N Q S= ° 39 Q ,OJ LU LU �O O N Q NO 16 CD a � N ti! yZuZy11= 61N .o - -o- D Attachment 2: Future Conditions Site Plan 730-ENF1 LOOZWAMZ 2003 2 AW 7 Snas43Y 09610 Yl9 -(aoa-d 7S //9 07 t01 9002 'lZ M36g100 31Y0 STd *//ON b-4do;sjj J ob Oz 0 yW "oorry davroS pun? —003 ,0Z - ,1 37YOS ;,(8 P—dowwd a� w` z �n W W 'O cv D �Q p O 02 O 2 O~CX J U- W om a z m�! z V 6x610 vw AM37�� Nb'1d Lno kV -1 311S N m 133a s N/Yw N Or Sl13snH3VSS` V4 'iJ3AOoNV 'ON � da0'iv3N30IW ONIG-line IV1083NNOO o3SOdOad #4 LL jn3 pwn NV-ld lIV483d LN3V4d0-l3A3C] MIS IVUNNIS3?1 30VIIIA SI 10181SIG ONINOZ 0110 VH 21340ONV W 1S 3HIdNY(U tiL81 Al d3DVH 3S3d3H1 -7 NHOP JIN W � •� � WO 5 c -( b� \ 6 _ OF 0 j VA m " �! o T. o I I o j �s \ Q> Iz / N CD d 5� UQ �_ W W J 0 x 1 M a w I �a m C, Lk' D OJ R U hQ J t` a \\ J O cW3 o Ofa IIV808Vf10 o3SodOHd \ II d" `\ 7 S M O M N ^ C4 Q W Ir r \ N p n 00 T. aN pp � m h ,6 O S30 dS a O Jy� U UU W oma° �mm JAL WW�O tl .o eano 311NV80 b � h� c W d\ 0�\ ;1 v-" `n0 3e TIVHS ON1003 03SOdO2ld IjV MW => LtC Do r , p z x W 3 z S owa 0 o F y0s, zwi \\ !OO she \ '• \ `. Iv. 0 N 0 L� h 0 a n�1 s z t -N z z U z \ '(.r It 1L `Zff~ II sa�z o. a p \ .8-,66 o � \\\ W � •� � WO 5 c -( b� \ � m " \\ I1 \ \\ I OF 0 j VA m " �! o T. o I I o j �s \ o Iz / N CD d 5� UQ �_ W W J 0 x 1 M a w I W Q. O� O �N W N V N 0. < Q= Q tyyz`11 cep, X z 121 is "o =o N Z a m JW F= U z v �r O 0 s a On t1m�� a 0 m .yii00ro�S�x OF a O~i 7 0: oz Wa W VI N Z *y tpp (A Ua. OZ QZ4Q O Ua WaU (na.CL0-- v�JO � •• J J W J 4 w Iii a o a o 3 W Z V O W U O m N> O W i W- U, F N W U, O aOaO O'oE W V) ¢ C p K J Z Q m W W aiam�az o Ja o o t`1 ri W Z O: $ 'dS lb 1^ It N V F- 0 O JONNC) O 00 N a o\ z0 a OF 0 j VA 2 O W 2 �% w Q 202`< f1 °W� S�2° 'O k o �a m C, Lk' D OJ R U hQ J t` a .... ..._o_..i=-- _ rn ri t O cW3 o Ofa N N Q m uu Y S M O M N ^ C4 Q W Ir r \ N p n 00 T. aN pp � m h 1µ~y� a a O Jy� U UU W oma° �mm JAL WW�O tl THS y V)v w � h� c W W W H N �� W X m2 {O� INS, m®O T MW I-- m J => LtC ¢Q OC� 4W fA •- O 0 0 1 d on jy p W m W Iv. 0 N 0 L� h 0 a � Z z W `o N'o W $ 'dS lb 1^ It N V F- 0 O JONNC) O 00 N a o\ z0 a OF 0 j N N U WNW d Q U U 1.N4J�Vl V W a m W 1411 N 1� V) N a aas a aNN to N Of U a s yy o �a m u d D r O a .... ..._o_..i=-- _ rn ri t O cW3 o Ofa N N Q m uu Y S M O M N ^ C4 Q W Ir r \ N p n 00 T. aN pp � m h 1µ~y� a a O O a, U N w^a ZQ. Zj oma° �mm i m V) o v� ` Y y <a a Z ON W i OR m2 {O� INS, m®O T MW I-- m J _ _ O W .'... K N W a oC N n II fA •- O 0 0 1 d on jy p W m W Iv. 0 N 0 L� h 0 a � Z z W 9.0 N'o W It 1L tWy7 Q (J w OC N N wo WWWV Wmg mui Qa 1•Wm¢} z o Z mmo 9m o O 0 U yW Q WON in mzW Nj SO J U Z QUN Op so N ? o F>g� 8 � � c3 8F Z0 - zc�a N O O YDN VU a�Wg m}e O ONi Wd } a 2'm aoow o @I z ozza� x 7$ $ 'dS lb 1^ It N V F- 0 O JONNC) O 00 N a o\ z0 a OF 0 j J z .\ W a m W w V) a O O o �a m u d U) z r O a N O cW3 o Ofa N N Q m uu Y M .�.. $ 'dS lb 1^ It N V F- 0 O JONNC) O 00 N a o\ O O a Z 0 j 1 O 0 a W w o a O O Qw SI 1I u d In FI m M r at N OD v[ ,OZ Sz Q N O ,901 r \ N o T. HIVM'3NO3'118 170. 00 C ,BL ,SZ ,8t ,9l ,SZ ,BL } t 3 o o W J Z m S U II J II Z & y! m p N V 0 O WO 3 Z~ m 0 O a w ^ C a a W - O (D mz it O W Q U a O a O U 'g' 0 a 3 ¢ w AN a , o g J 0 a ° $ ,Z6•L9l 3.£0,84.OfN 0 52 �D' C & 1l \ d W PROPOSED GUARDRAIL -O- - EMT"- _ _ _ _ - - - ^ - PROP, STONE MASONRY RET. WALL n W O � a W O 0 s r v[ _ Q wane 11e O a II o O t Y � 00 - EMT"- _ _ _ _ - - - ^ - PROP, STONE MASONRY RET. WALL n Z O a $ a 0 s r a. m Q wane 11e O t Y � 00 a ea 39� Zj oma° �mm Naz W m2 0 m c a 0 v C Q 0 z V 0 Q -O- d Z n W O V Y d U 3 — r2 Attachment 3: USGS Locus Map 730-ENF1 Figure 1: Site Location Map SFQ�E6fi j[ •� ..~ > -✓ Iii ! , `'�° � ,''`' ..moi:.• -J` _ s �4 • - -. �� ` • tit'^ �. r'� • � ',',�,o- u _ �. �O' •+csr\Jr /�� .�, \,,., 7 It , .^,� � ^� (�` � ` � r ©� ��T11 • ��`�' tom' ' ��,, , ,� . '/�. J` •' �,` i i+ `' " ♦:.-tea` Q �- `% BAA �i.6 J «• �� , r �``' � \ �� r - —" • •_ � � � •+Y �.., ++ tom- ��. �r' �'� t ' �'{�/ ' � l.� ! \ /' S �r SITE , I ri , r, o '!• t � 'F RE' ,�, n _ ' l p' ✓ %'r.1� !«\ % \',V�� 111ROM �, �`��J.-=� ``•Y�' i � A .r AT ��9\tom. ��� TU ` ` I Q(j „`,�, ,�a ,, . _�� ;, � �,•• �%�� ��, 114' . ;� :o,d,�, ;�- ----T: p µ v / - _ 4I .' j•, •.» f i V 0 1000 2000\\ J'%t� y o` -a 7a 1L ~ ` s t^ •_ �.. - _� �^�y)1/l/ "� � �-- " a.-1, ��� c 1\ X30 ` \i ♦ +•• , \ Scale in Feet ! '�J r . ; `.:i`-� ,. udd DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2006 By OJK. All rights reserved. 730FIG1 Attachment 4: Circulation List . 730-ENF1 CIRCULATION LIST This Environmental Notification Form (ENF) is being distributed to the following persons and agencies, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1). Secretary Ian A. Bowles Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 (Two copies) Mr. James Stergois Undersecretary for Policy c/o Nancy Gabriel-Sacjue 100 Cambridge St., Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 DEP/Northeast Regional Office Attn: MEPA Coordinator 205B Lowell Street Worcester, MA 01608 Massachusetts Highway Department Public/Private Development Unit 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116-3973 Mass Bay Transit Authority Attn: MEPA Coordinator 10 Park Plaza, 6t' Floor Boston, MA 02116-3966 Massachusetts Historical Commission Attn: MEPA Coordinator The MA Archives building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 North Andover Conservation Commission 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 North Andover Board of Selectman 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 730-ENF1 Department of Environmental Protection Commissioners Office One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Executive Office of Transportation (EOT) Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 Boston, MA 02116-3969 MHD — District #4 Attn: MEPA Coordinator 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02174 Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Attn: MEPA Coordinator 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 Boston, MA 02116-3969 Merrimack Valley Planning Commission 160 Main Street Haverhill, MA 01830 Mr. Lincoln Daley Town Planner Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 North Andover Board of Health 1600 Osgood Street, Building 20, Suite 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Commonwealth of Massachusetts Route 135 Westborough, MA 01581 Attachment 5: NHESP Letter Dated June 8, 2007 7/13/07 730-ENF7 Page 23 of 71 730-ENF1... Q NDIV Sion ofFisheries,& Wildlife Wayne F. MacCallum, Director North Andover Conservation Commission June 8, 2Q07 Town Building, 120 Main St. North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Applicant: Gino Fodera Project Location: 1812 Turnpike Street Project Description: Construction of a commercial building and parking. NHESP Tracking No. 06-20748 DEP File No. 2421382 Dear Commissioners: The applicant submitted revised project plans (dated 10/21/2006, revised 5/7/2007) to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) in compliance with the inland rare wildlife species section of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations (310 CMR 10.58(4)(b) & 10.59). The NHESP also received the MESA Review Checklist and supporting documentation for review pursuant to the MA Endangered Species Act Regulations (MESA, 321 CMR 10.18). MA WETLANDS ftcrrwrIQN ACT Based on a review of the information provided and the information currently contained in our database, the NHESP has determined that this project, as currently proposed, will not adversely affect the actual Resource Area habitat of state -protected rare wildlife species. Therefore, it is our opinion that this project meets the state -listed sPEcies Rerformance standard for the issuance of an Order of Conditions. Please note that this determination addresses only the matter of rare wildlife habitat and does not pertain to other wildlife habitat issues that may be pertinent to the proposed project. MASSACHUSETTS ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT MESA Based on a review of the information that was provided and the information that is currently contained in our database, the NHESP has determined that this project, as currently proposed, will not result in a prohibited "take" of state -listed rare species. Any changes to the proposed project or any additional work beyond that shown on the site plans may require an additional filing with the NHESP pursuant to the revised MESA regulations (321 CMR 10.00). Information regarding these revisions can be found on our website ham://www.nhesp.or& under "Regulatory Review". -If w physical work is commenced on the proposed project within three -years from the date of issuance of a decision of "no take" or there is a material change in the plans that were submitted to the NHESP, the project may be subject to further review by the NHESP. This evaluation is based on the most recent information available in the Natural Heritage database, which is constantly being expanded and updated through ongoing research and inventory. Should your site plans change, or new rare species information become available, this evaluation may be reconsidered. If www.masswiL4i e. or Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Field Headquarters, One Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581 (508) 389-6300 Fax (508) 389-7891 An Agency of/tic Department of Fisheries. Wildlife & Environmental Low Enforcement 7/13/07 Page 24 of 71 730-ENF1... Page 2 you have any questions regarding this review please contact Rebecca Skowron, Endangered Species Review Assistant, at (508) 389-6343. Sincerely, Tomas W. French, P - D. Assistant Director cc: Gino Fodem Julie Vondrak, Epsilon Associates DEP Northeastern Region, Wetlands Program 7/13/07 Page 25 of 71 730-ENF1... Attachment 6: Transportation Component 7/13107 Page 26 of 71 730-ENFI 730-ENF1... TRAFFIC IMPACT & ACCESS STUDY Proposed Commercial Development Project North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent GFM General Contracting Corporation November 16, 2006 Revised May 10, 2007 prepared by Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 Office: 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 730-TIS2.doc 7/13/07 Copyright 02007 by DJK. All rights reserved. Page 28 of 71 730-ENF1... TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae EXECUTIVESUMMARY..................................................................................................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................1 ALTERNATIVE STUDIES..............................................................................................1 STUDYAREA................................................................................................................ 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS............................................................... 2 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS................................................................. 2 Background Traffic Growth......................................................................................... 2 Site -Generated Traffic................................................................................................ 3 TripDistribution.......................................................................................................... 3 TRAFFIC OPERATION ANALYSIS............................................................................... 3 Route 114 at the Site Drive........................................................................................ 3 MITIGATION MEASURES............................................................................................. 3 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................ 5 PROPOSAL................................................................................................................... 5 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT............................................................................... 6 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT............................................................................ 6 THE EXISTING BUILT ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................... 7 FIELDSURVEY............................................................................................................. 7 GEOMETRICS............................................................................................................... 7 Route114................................................................................................................... 7 TRAFFIC VOLUMES..................................................................................................... 8 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES......................................................10 VEHICLE SPEEDS......................................................................................................11 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS..................................................................13 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................13 VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION...................................................................................14 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT...................................................................15 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS......................................................................................................16 TRAFFIC FLOW AND OPERATION CHARACTERISTICS.........................................16 7/13/07 730-TIS2.doc Page 29 of 71 Copyright ®2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................17 Levelof Service........................................................................................................17 Unsignalized Intersections.......................................................................................17 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS..................................................................................18 Route 114 at the Site Drive......................................................................................18 SIGHTDISTANCE..........................................................................................................19 SIGHTDISTANCE.......................................................................................................19 APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 21 II 7/13/07 730-Tis2.doc Page 30 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. (DJK) has conducted a Traffic Impact and Access Study for a proposed commercial development project to be located adjacent to and northeast of Route 114 and south of Berry Street in North Andover, Massachusetts. Figure 1 graphically presents the site location in relation to the local and regional roadway network. This report identifies existing traffic operating parameters on the adjacent roadway system, evaluates the potential traffic -related impacts associated with the proposed project and identifies potential traffic mitigation measures necessary to minimize the impact of the proposed project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proponent presently is planning for the construction of approximate 21,031 square feet (SF) of commercial office and retail floor space in North Andover, Massachusetts. The proposed project would be constructed in a single building having 9,639 SF of first floor space, of which 5,549 SF would be dedicated to specialty retail use and 4,090 SF would be dedicated to convenience market use. The second floor, 11,392 SF, would be dedicated to medical office use. The proposed main site access drive would be located on Route 114 with two secondary drives located along Berry Street. ALTERNATIVE STUDIES For the purposes of this report, the following alternatives were evaluated: • No -Build - The No -Build alternative was examined to establish the 2011 baseline traffic -volume conditions. The incremental impacts of the proposed project may be determined by making comparisons to the No -Build alternative. The No -Build alternative assumes that the project is not built. 7/13/07 730-TIS2.doc Page 31 of 71 Copyright ©2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... Figure 1: Site Location Map ZUKTraffic Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2006 By DJK. All rights reserved. 730FIG1 Build - The Build alternative includes the development of the proposed project. The Build alternative is evaluated in this report and is compared to the No -Build analysis condition. The Build condition represents the increase in traffic from the previous condition to the proposed condition (i.e., the delta impact). The Build condition includes the construction of the proposed commercial retail and office development project. STUDY AREA The study area includes Route 114 adjacent to the site and the intersection of the Proposed Site Access Drive with Route 114. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS Analysis of the recent traffic counts indicates that weekday volumes averaged 21,338 vpd (vehicles per day) along Route 114 adjacent to the site during November 2006. During the two peak travel demand periods, which generally occurred between 7 and 9 AM and between 4 and 6 PM an average of 1,824 and 1,810 vph were observed along Route 114 during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, respectively. FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS Background Traffic Growth To represent future 2011 No -Build traffic -volume conditions, the existing traffic volumes were increased to account for background traffic growth. Accordingly, the existing traffic volumes were increased to account for the development of the following other projects: • Completion of the residential condominium development project located along Route 114 opposite Sharpner's Pond Road; • Old Salem Village located along Route 114 north of the Project Site; • Boston Hill residential condominiums to be located along Route 114 opposite Johnson Street; • Merrimac Commons located along Route 114 south of the Project Site; and • Senior Housing located along Route 114 north of Berry Street. Additionally, the existing traffic volumes along Route 114 were increased by +1.0 percent per year up through 2011. 2 7/13/07 730-ris2.doc Page 33 of 71 Copyright O 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... Site -Generated Traffic Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates, it is anticipated that the 21,031 SF commercial retail/office development project would generate approximately 1,908 vehicle -trips per day. This daily volume would be split evenly with 954 vehicle -trips entering and 954 vehicle -trips exiting the site over the course of the entire 24-hour day. More importantly, during the weekday evening peak hour, the proposed development project would generate a total of 197 vehicle -trips with 91 vehicle -trips entering and 106 vehicle -trips exiting the project site. The remaining vehicle -trips would occur over the course of the day. Trip Distribution Trip -distribution patterns were developed specifically for this study and are summarized as follows: • Route 114 to/from the North 55% • Route 114 to/from the South 45% TOTAL 100% TRAFFIC OPERATION ANALYSIS Unsignalized intersection capacity analysis was performed for the study area intersections. The capacity analysis is summarized below by location. Route 114 at the Site Drive Under 2011 Build with development traffic volume conditions, the left -turn entering movement would operate at LOS B and the left- and right -tum exiting movements would operate at LOS E during the evening peak hour. MITIGATION MEASURES The final phase of the analysis process is to identify the mitigation measures necessary to minimize the impact of the project on the transportation system. The proponent has made a commitment to implement all mitigation measures listed below. • At the driveway intersection with Route 114 the egress movements are suggested to be under stop sign control with a painted STOP bar. A double yellow painted centerline is suggested to be provided within the driveway opening. Overhead street lighting should be considered in the vicinity of the proposed driveway location. • The main site access driveway is suggested to consist of a minimum 24 -foot wide cross section with one 12 -foot wide lane for entering traffic and one 12 -foot wide lane for exiting traffic. Intersection corner radii are suggested to be 30 -foot radius. The driveway is proposed to be 25 feet wide and the corner radii are 30 feet within the State Highway Layout. 3 7/13/07 730-TIs2.aoc Page 34 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... To enhance the overall sight distances at the proposed intersection of the Proposed Driveway with Route 114, it is recommended that roadside vegetation and topographic ground elevations adjacent to the accesslegress driveway be maintained such that sufficient safety sight lines are provided in both directions throughout the life of the project. Along Route 114 the triangular area across the project frontage should extend to a minimum of 14.5 feet back from the existing edge of the roadway (representing an existing vehicle) and extend to a maximum possible location (453 feet minimum) to the north and to the south in each direction along Route 114 representing an approaching vehicle. CONCLUSIONS Based on the traffic analysis presented in this study, there is sufficient capacity at the Proposed intersection to accommodate the proposed development project. The overall traffic -related impacts will not create any adverse impacts on traffic operations that would require any additional roadway improvements at the Proposed Site Drive. The location and number of driveways especially along Route 114 have been minimized to reduce the number of turning movements and hazardous exits and entrances. The Route 114 driveway has been located along the project frontage to maximize the spacing between adjacent driveways serving the Equestrian Shop to the north and Amberville Road to the south. Internal site pedestrian and traffic circulation has been designed to maximize traffic safety. 4 7/13/07 730-TIS2.doe Page 35 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSAL The project proponent presently is planning for the construction of approximate 21,031 square feet (SF) of commercial office and retail floor space in North Andover, Massachusetts. The proposed project would be constructed in a single building having 9,639 SF of first floor space, of which 5,549 SF would be dedicated to specialty retail use and 4,090 SF would be dedicated to convenience market use. The second floor, 11,392 SF, would be dedicated to medical office use. The proposed main site access drive would be located on Route 114 with two secondary drives located along Berry Street. 5 7113/07 730-TIS2.doc Page 36 of 71 Copyright 02007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT For the purposes of this report, the following alternatives were evaluated: • No -Build - The No -Build alternative was examined to establish the 2011 baseline traffic -volume conditions. The incremental impacts of the proposed project may be determined by making comparisons to the No -Build alternative. The No -Build alternative assumes that the project is not built. • Build - The Build alternative includes the development of the proposed project. The Build alternative is evaluated in this report and is compared to the No -Build analysis condition. The Build condition represents the increase in traffic from the previous condition to the proposed condition (i.e., the delta impact). The Build condition includes the construction of the proposed commercial retail and office development project. 6 7113107 730-TIS2.doc Page 37 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... THE EXISTING BUILT ENVIRONMENT FIELD SURVEY A comprehensive field inventory of the adjacent roadway system was conducted during November 2006. The field inventory included collection of existing roadway geometrics, traffic volumes, and safety data for the roadway adjacent to the site. Traffic volumes were measured by means of an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) counter along Route 114. Safety inventories included vehicle speed observations and a detailed evaluation of the safety sight lines at the site driveway location along Route 114. Route 114 Route 114 in the immediate vicinity of the site is generally a three -lane roadway with one through lane for each direction of travel and a dual use center left -turn lane located opposite the site. The travel lanes are generally 12 feet wide with a 6 -foot to 10 -foot gravel shoulder on each side of the roadway. Route 114 provides access/egress to numerous adjacent highway retail and commercial land uses as well as residential land use along its entire length. Route 114 consists of bituminous concrete pavement in fair condition with no major pavement break-up of edge raveling noted during the field inventory period. Horizontal and vertical alignments are fair along Route 114 with the roadway passing the site driveway over relatively level/tangent alignment. Vehicular movements along Route 114 7 7/13/07 730-TIs2.doo Page 38 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENFI ... in the vicinity of the site are generally uncontrolled with side streets and driveways under STOP control. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Recent traffic volumes were recorded mechanically over a 48-hour period, during Wednesday and Thursday, November 1 and 2, 2006. These traffic volumes were reviewed to determine average daily and peak -hour traffic volumes along Route 114 adjacent to the site. Table 1 summarizes the 2006, 2005 and 2000 traffic -volume data collected along Route 114 adjacent to the site. The actual 2006 traffic volume data is reproduced in the appendix of this report. Analysis of the recent traffic counts indicates that weekday volumes averaged 21,338 vpd (vehicles per day) along Route 114 adjacent to the site during November 2006. During the two peak travel demand periods, which generally occurred between 7 and 9 AM and between 4 and 6 PM an average of 1,824 and 1,810 vph were observed along Route 114 during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, respectively. Figure 2 graphically presents the results of the traffic volume inventory for the weekday evening peak hours. 8 7/13/07 730-ns2.doc Page 39 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR Z) 0 9 0 N CO 1 w w W w Y a z cr *a Schematic Figure 2: 2006 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SITE DRIVE SITE 0 DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2006 By DJK. All rights reserved. 7/13/07 Page 40 of 71 730-ENF1... 730—Nett TABLE 1 Monday 2/28/00 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY 4:45-5:45 PM 1,858 Daily Traffic Tuesday Peak -Hour 7:15-8:15 AM Location/ (24 hour) Peak Traffic Volume K Time Period (vpd)a Hour (vph)b Factorc Route 114 Adjacent to 9.7 3/1/00 4:45-5:45 PM the Project Site: 9.3 Thursday 23,130 7:15-8:15 AM Wednesday 21,282 7:00-8:00 AM 1,803 8.5 11/1/06 9.2 5:00-6:00 PM 1,862 8.7 Thursday 21,394 7:00-8:00 AM 1,844 8.6 11/2/06 8.6 4:30-5:30 PM 1,757 8.2 Average 21,338 Morning 1,824 8.5 Weekday Evening 1,810 8.5 Route 114 South of 9.9 3/6/00 4:45-5:45 PM the Project Site: 9.3 Average 22,778 Morning Monday -- - - - 2/7/05 8.9 5:00-6:00 PM 1,808 - Tuesday 20,705 7:00-8:00 AM 1,900 9.2 2/8/05 5:00-6:00 PM 1,786 8.6 Wednesday - 7:15-8:15 AM 1,985 - 2/9/05 5:00-6:00 PM 1,783 - Average - Morning 1,943 -- Weekday Evening 1,793 -- Monday 2/28/00 -- 4:45-5:45 PM 1,858 - Tuesday 21,611 7:15-8:15 AM 2,130 9.9 2/29/00 4:45-5:45 PM 1,938 9.0 Wednesday 23,815 7:15-8:15 AM 2,304 9.7 3/1/00 4:45-5:45 PM 2,223 9.3 Thursday 23,130 7:15-8:15 AM 2,207 9.5 3/2/00 5:00-6:00 PM 2,129 9.2 Friday 22,958 7:15-8:15 AM 1,899 8.3 3/3/00 4:45-5:45 PM 1,985 8.6 Saturday 19,290 3:15-4:15 PM 1,706 8.8 3/4/00 Monday 22,376 7:00-8:00 AM 2,214 9.9 3/6/00 4:45-5:45 PM 2,080 9.3 Average 22,778 Morning 2,151 9.4 Weekday Evening 2,036 8.9 'Vehicles per day. bVehicles per hour. cPercent of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour. 9 7/13/07 730-rns2.doe Page 41 of 71 Copyright®2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Annual average daily traffic (AADT) data available from MassHighway permanent traffic count station located on Route 114/125 in North Andover north of the Andover By -Pass indicates that the AADT from 1998 through 2003 has increased by a total of 0.5 percent or an average 0.1 percent per year. Table 2 summarizes the AADT data and the resulting growth rate. TABLE 2 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARYa Time Period AADTb Annual Growth (From Year to Year) Cumulative Growth Compared to 1998 Average Growth Rate from 1998 1998 41,496 — --- 1999 41,837 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 2000 41,651 -0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 2001 43,481 4.4% 4.8% 1.6% 2002 40,909 -5.9% -1.4% -0.4% 2003 41,708 2.0% 0.5% 0.1% Source: Massachusetts Highway Department Permanent Traffic Count Station No. 502, Route 114/125, North Andover Borth of the Andover By -Pass. No data was reported for this location for 2004 and 2005. AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic. 10 7/13/07 730-TIS2.doc Page 42 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... VEHICLE SPEEDS Speed measurements were taken by a standard traffic engineering procedure called the "floating car method." Vehicle speeds were measured by means of an observation car traveling through the study area at a speed consistent with the flow of traffic on the roadway. A limited number of these observations were made over the field inventory period along Route 114 adjacent to the site. The limited numbers of speed observations were obtained to gain a meaningful value of an average and typical vehicle traveling through the area. The results of the speed measurements are summarized in Table 3. As shown, the speeds varied along Route 114 with speeds recorded in the range of 40 to 55 mph in both the northbound and southbound directions. The posted speed limit is 45 mph along Route 114. TABLE 3 OBSERVED ROADWAY SPEED SUMMARY Location/ Posted/Official Observed Direction Speed Travel of Travel Limit (mph) Speed (mph) Route 114 South of the Project Site: Northbound 45 40 to 55 Southbound 45 40 to 55 mph = miles per hour. Spot speeds were also recorded by an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) placed along Route 114 over a 48-hour period during November 2006. The results of the speed measurements are summarized in Table 4. As shown, the mean speed along Route 114 southbound was recorded at 47 mph. With the 85th percentile speed was recorded at 52 mph. Northbound, the mean speed was recorded at 46 and 47 mph with the 85th percentile speed recorded at 52 mph. The pace speed was 40-49 mph for both the southbound and northbound directions of travel. The actual November 2006 speed data is reproduced in the appendix of this report. The recent November 2006 speed data is consistent with the speed data collected immediately south of the site during February 2005. 11 7/13/07 730-ris2.doc Page 43 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... 12 7/13/07 730-Tis2.doc Page 44 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... TABLE 4 VEHICLE SPEED SUMMARY Posted Mean 85th Total Location/ Speed 50th Percentile 10 mph Number Direction Limit Percentile Speed Pace of of Travel (mph)b Speed (mph) (mph) Speed Observations Route 114 Adjacent to the Project Site: Southbound Wednesday, 11/1/06 45 47 52 40-49 10,266 Thursday, 11/2/06 45 47 52 40-49 10.364 Total -- -- -- — 20,630 Northbound Wednesday, 11/1/06 45 47 52 40-49 11,016 Thursday, 11/2/06 45 46 52 40-49 10.030 Total — — — — 22,046 Southbound Monday, 2/7/05 45 47 52 45-54 4,788 Tuesday, 2/8/05 45 47 52 45-54 10,234 Wednesday, 2/9/05 45 48 53 45-54 9.280 Total — — -- -- 24,302 Northbound Monday, 2/7/05 45 46 51 40-49 5,582 Tuesday, 2/8/05 45 46 51 40-49 10,471 Wednesday, 2/9/05 45 46 51 40-49 9,096 Total — — -- — 25,149 amph = miles per hour. 12 7/13/07 730-Tis2.doc Page 44 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS INTRODUCTION This section of the report determines the future traffic volume levels along the study area roadways and intersections. To determine the impact of site -generated traffic volumes on the roadway network under future conditions, the existing traffic volumes in the study area were projected to the year 2011 to be consistent with Massachusetts State guidelines for Traffic Impact Assessments. Traffic volumes on the roadway network at that time will include all existing traffic, background traffic growth, and the site -generated traffic volumes. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH Traffic growth on area roadways is a function of the expected land development in the immediate area as well as the surrounding region. Several methods can be used to estimate this growth. A procedure frequently employed is to identify the location and type of new developments planned to occur during the designated planning horizon, estimate the traffic to be generated and assign it to the area roadway network. This method usually produces a realistic estimate of growth for local traffic. The surrounding area was investigated during the preparation of this Study to identify existing and projected development projects anticipated to occur by 2011. Based on this information and other background information, it was assumed for traffic planning purposes that the following projects are constructed and operational by 2011: Completion of the residential condominium development project located along Route 114 opposite Sharpner's Pond Road; Old Salem Village located along Route 114 north of the Project Site; 13 7/13/07 730-Tis2.doc Page 45 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... Boston Hill residential condominiums to be located along Route 114 opposite Johnson Street; Merrimac Commons located along Route 114 south of the Project Site; and Senior Housing located along Route 114 north of Berry Street. In addition to the development projects noted above, existing traffic volumes were increased by 1% per year up through 2011 to account for background traffic growth which may occur from other development projects not anticipated at this time. Figure 3 graphically presents the 2011 No Build Weekday Evening Peak -hour traffic volumes. VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION Traffic volumes generated by commercial retail/office development projects normally follow well established patterns with respect to magnitude and temporal distribution. Measurements of numerous such developments conducted by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) have established trip generation rates which have been standardized for analysis purposes. The rates at which commercial projects generate vehicle -trips depend on the type of commercial project; i.e., specialty retail versus convenience market versus office development project. Accordingly, the ITE Trip Generation Manual was researched with the appropriate vehicle -trip generation characteristics applied to the proposed project. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates, it is anticipated that the 21,031 SF commercial retail/office development project would generate approximately 1,908 vehicle -trips per day. This daily volume would be split evenly with 954 vehicle -trips entering and 954 vehicle -trips exiting the site over the course of the entire 24-hour day. More importantly, during the weekday evening peak hour, the proposed development project would generate a total of 197 vehicle -trips with 91 vehicle -trips entering and 106 vehicle -trips exiting the project site. The remaining vehicle -trips would occur over the course of the day. Table 5 summarizes the peak -hour and daily project -generated traffic volumes for the entire project. 14 7/13/07 MJIS2.doc Page 46 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR D 0 D: v O O O 1 W W f5 V) W Y a z o: t ASchematic Figure 3: 2011 No Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SITE DRIVE j SITE Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. 7/13/07 Page 47 of 71 DJKTraffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 730-ENF1... Copyright © 2006 By DJK. All rights reserved. 730—Nett TABLE 5 VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Proposed Time Period/ Development Project Direction of Travel (21,031 SF) Weekday Evening Peak Hour Entering (vph)a 91 Exiting (vph) 106 Total (vph) 197 Average Weekday Entering (vpd)b 954 Exiting (vpd) 954 Total (vpd) 1,908 vph = vehicle -trips per hour. bvpd = vehicie-trips per day. TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT Directional distribution of generated trips to and from the proposed development is expected to follow existing traffic patterns which, in turn, is a function of population densities, shopping opportunities, areas of employment and recreational activities. Accordingly, the directional split of the new trips originating from, or destined to, the development were based on existing traffic patterns as observed for this study. The site -generated traffic volumes were superimposed onto the 2011 No Build traffic volume networks creating the 2011 Build traffic volume networks. Figure 4 graphically presents the 2011 Build weekday evening peak -hour traffic volume networks. 15 7/13/07 730-ris2.doc Page 48 of 71 Copyright m 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... Figure 4: 2011 Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR �r 0 v O t0 0(0 42(42) (. SITE 1 `48(32) SITE DRIVE In (91 ? Out (106 I (� Total (197) �n N W w (n lil Y a - z X Legend: xx Total Vehicle Trips Schematic (xx) Site Generated Trips Only DJK Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. 7/13/07 Page 49 of 71 Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 730-ENFl... Copyright © 2006 By DJK. All rights reserved. 730—Nett TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Previous sections of this report have summarized existing traffic patterns, future peak - hour traffic -volume levels, expected traffic generation, and expected trip distribution and assignment for the proposed development project under weekday evening peak -hour traffic -volume conditions. The next step in the study is to determine the impact the proposed development project will have on the adjacent roadway system. The analysis assumes no roadway improvements in the study area except for the construction of the proposed access driveway located along Route 114. TRAFFIC FLOW AND OPERATION CHARACTERISTICS Traffic flow and operating characteristics are measured in terms of level of service both without and with the proposed development project. The without development traffic volumes were developed from the traffic -volume data collected specifically for this study. Traffic -volume data collected during November 2006 were summarized to produce a composite picture of the existing peak -hour traffic -volume conditions. The existing 2006 traffic volumes along Route 114 were increased to account for five other known development projects discussed earlier plus an additional +1.0 percent per year increase in traffic to account for background traffic growth that may occur up through 2011 (project filing year plus 5 years). The Build, with -development, traffic volumes include the existing peak -hour traffic volumes, plus background traffic growth, plus the site -generated peak -hour traffic volumes. 16 7/13/07 730-ns2.doo Page 50 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. .730-ENF1... METHODOLOGY Level of Service The primary result of capacity analysis is the assignment of level of service to traffic facilities under various traffic -flow conditions.' The concept of level of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and/or passengers. A level -of -service definition provides an index to quality of traffic flow in terms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, safety, and convenience. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility. They are given letter designations from A to F, with level -of -service (LOS) A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Since the level of service of a traffic facility is a function of the traffic flows placed upon it, such a facility may operate at a wide range of levels of service, depending on the time of day, day of week, or period of year. Unsignalized Intersections The level of service for unsignalized intersection is determined by the application of a procedure described in the HCM 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.2 The procedure accounts for lane configuration on both minor and major approaches, conflicting traffic stream volumes, and type of intersection control (STOP versus YIELD). First, theoretical maximum or capacity flow of vehicles for each minor approach lane is calculated. The capacities are then compared to the demand at the respective minor approaches. The delay is then calculated based on the critical gap time, move -up time as well as other various factors. Table 6 summarizes the relationship between level of service and expected delay to minor street traffic. TABLE 6 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR STOP -CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONSa Level Average Of Control Delay Service (Seconds/Vehicle) A <10 B >10-15 C >15-25 D >25 - 35 E >35 - 50 F >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. 'Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. 2Highway Capacity Manual, (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. 17 7/13/07 730.TIs2.doc Page 51 of 71 Copyright © 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS Capacity analyses have been conducted at the study area intersection. Results of these analyses are summarized below by intersection and are tabulated in Table 7. Route 114 at the Site Drive Under 2011 Build with development traffic volume conditions, the left -turn entering movement would operate at LOS B and the left- and right -turn exiting movements would operate at LOS E during the evening peak hour. TABLE 7 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL -OF- SERVICE SUMMARYa 2006 Existing 2011 No -Build 2011 Build Location/Peak Hour/ LOSb ADc v/cd LOS AD v/c LOS AD v/c Approach Route 114 at the Proposed Site Drive: Weekday Evening Peak Hour Left Tums Entering - --- – - — – B 11.3 0.06 Left & Right Turns Exiting - -- – - — -- E 42.2 0.48 aThe critical gaps were not reduced by 1.0 to 1.5 seconds as suggested by the New England Section ITE Technical Committee. bLevel of service. cTotal Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle). dv/c = volume to capacity ratio. 18 7/13/07 730-Tls2.doc Page 52 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... SIGHT DISTANCE SIGHT DISTANCE In the vicinity of the proposed project site, Route 114 approaches the Proposed Site Drives over a generally level/tangent alignment adjacent to the site. Detailed Sight Distance measurements were conducted with respect to the Route 114 approaches to the proposed intersection to identify any potential mitigation measures, which would enhance the available Sight Distance. Sight Distance considerations are basically divided into two criteria: (1) Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and (2) Intersection Sight Distance (ISD). Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) SSD is the distance required for an approaching vehicle to perceive and react accordingly to an exiting or entering vehicle. The values are based upon a perception and reaction time of 2.5 seconds and a braking distance calculated for wet level pavement. When the roadway is either on an upgrade or downgrade, grade correction factors are applied. Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) ISD is based upon a perception and reaction time and the time required to complete a desired exiting maneuver after the decision to do so has been made. Values for ISD represent the time required to: (1) turn left or right and to accelerate to the operating speed of the street without causing approaching vehicles to reduce speed by more than 70% of the initial/design speed and (2) upon turning left, or crossing the major roadway, to clear the roadway without conflicting with vehicles approaching from the left. When a grade exists in the roadway or when larger speed reduction values are acceptable, correction factors are applied. 19 7/13/07 730-ris2.doc Page 53 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... SSD is far more important as it represents the minimum distance required for stopping, while the ISD criteria is based only upon acceptable speed reductions to the approaching traffic stream. Table 8 compares the measured SSD with the minimum SSD requirements for both the observed vehicle speeds as well as the posted speed limit along Route 114 in the vicinity of the site. As can be seen in Table 8, the available SSD exceeds the minimum SSD requirements for the posted speed limit of 45 mph as well as the observed prevailing speed (85th percentile) of up to 52 mph. TABLE 8 SUMMARY OF STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS 86, Posted Percentile SSD Requirements Speed Observed Measured (feet) for Location/ Limit Speed SSDb Desian Saeed Conditionc Direction of Travel (mph)a (mph) (feet) 45 mph 52 mph Route 114 at the Proposed Site Drive: North of the Site Drive Vehicle B Approaching Looking South 45 52 SB +500 360 453 Vehicle A Exiting Looking North 45 52 SB +500 360 453 South of the Site Drive Vehicle A Exiting Looking South 45 52 NB +500 360 453 Vehicle B Approaching Looking North 45 52 NB +500 360 453 Miles per hour. bSSD measurements assume the recommendations contained in this report are implemented. cSource: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO): a Edition, 2004. 20 7/13/07 730-Tis2.doc Page 54 of 71 Copyright 0 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. 730-ENF1... APPENDICES A. TRAFFIC VOLUME AND VEHICLE SPEED DATA B. VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION TABLES C. CAPACITY ANALYSIS 21 730-TIS2.doc 7/13/07 Copyright ® 2007 by DJK. All rights reserved. Page 55 of 71 730-ENF1... A. TRAFFIC VOLUME AND VEHICLE SPEED DATA 7/13/07 SPage 56 of 71 ao risz.doc 730-ENF1... 7/13/07 Page 57 of 71 730-ENF1... PRECISION Turnpike Street (Route 114) D A T A 60869Avolume east of Berry Street INDUSTRIES, UC Site. Code: 730 PO. Box 301 Be IK #M 01503 City, State: North Andover, MA Ofice:SUAS13949 fax:SM.545.1234 Client: DJK/D. KBEEy Y EmRii:datarequws#pddkcom Stan ES WB Combined 01 -Nov - 06 Time A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Wed 12:00 15 137 50 119 65 256 1215 9 124 53 128 62 252 12:30 11 138 50 158 61 296 12.45 5 40 133 532 38 191 135 540 43 231 268 1072 01:00 10 131 28 131 38 262 01:15 6 125 16 149 22 274 01:30 8 135 12 139 20 274 01:45 5 29 137 528 15 71 134 553 20 100 271 1081 02:00 7 152 10 139 17 291 02:15 5 151 8 160 13 311 02:30 2 153 11 155 13 308 02:45 1 15 147 603 5 34 203 657 6 49 350 1260 03:00 6 194 9 206 15 400 0315 10 186 8 186 18 372 03:30 8 187 4 225 12 412 03:45 7 31 183 750 9 30 264 884 16 61 447 1631 04:00 15 181 9 196 24 377 04:15 22 197 12 237 34 434 04:30 20 220 17 208 37 428 04:45 31 88 196 794 14 52 230 871 45 140 426 1665 05:00 27 213 22 234 49 447 05:15 64 214 42 272 106 486 05:30 72 191% 44 296 f 116 487 05:45 103 266 202 820 V 54 162 240 1042 J 157 428 442 1862 06:00 148 191 67 196 215 387 06:15 211 195 103 211 314 406 06:30 223 154 140 139 363 293 06:45 232 814 127 667 186 496 121 667 418 1310 248 1334 07:00 269 91 193 103 462 194 07:15 250 80 257 110 507 190 07:30 213 87 237 93 450180 07:45 166 898 79 337 218 905 94. 400 384 1803` 173' 737 08:00 152 84 231 87 383 11'12 k 171 08:15 185 90 243 83 428 E L 4 5' 173 08:36 142 63 213 67 355 ISS -0 130' 68:45 152 631 74 311 246 933 74 311 398 1564 148 622 09:00 138 62 169 94 367 156 09:15 163 61 140 93 303 154. 09:30 180 60 147 53 327 113 09:45 149 630 46 229 121 577 60 300 270 1207 106 529 10:00 136 48 114 59 250 107 10:15 131 54 128 56 259 110 10:30 132 33 120 46 252 79 10:45 117 516 39 174 139 501 46 207 256 1017 85 381 11:00 121 23 92 38 213 61 11:15 126 28 124 44 250 72 11:30 105 15 144 37 249 52 11:45 138 490 7 73 131 491 25 144 269 981_ 32 217 Total 4448 5818 4443 6573 8891 12391 Percent 50.0% 47:0% 50.0% 53.0% Day 10266 Total Peak 06:30 Vot, 974 RH,F. 0,905 Page 1 11016 21282 04:30 07:15 05:00 06:45 05:00 843 943 1042 1837 1862 > 0.958 0.917 0.880 0.906 0.956 7/13/07 Page 58 of 71 730-ENF1... PRECISION Turnpike Street (Route 114) D A T A 60869Avolurne east of Berry Street iNOUSTRIES,LLC Site Code: 730 City, State: North Andover, MA Off :58.4813999 fax 08W5123a Client: DJK/D. Kelly start E8 WS Combined 02 06 6 Time A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Thu 12:30 .9 133 19 130 28 263 12:1.5 11 124 21 136 32 260 12:30 13 142 10 131 23 273 12:45 12 45 138 537 12 62 132 529 24 107 270 1066 01:00 11 118 9 154 20 272 01:15 6 151 4 133 10 284 01:30 6 126 4 132 10 258 01`45 4 27 142 537 6 23 136 555 10 50 278 1092 02:00 9 140 7 155 16 295 02:15 8 160 7 168 15 328 02`.30 4 168 6 124 10 292 02:45 4 25 155 623 2 22 207 654 6 47 362 1277 03:00 5 186 2 203 7 389 03:15 10 180 3 227 13 407 03:30 13 164 10 215 23 379 03:45 7 35 178 708 8 23 270 915 15 58 448 1623 04:00 11 183 10 238 21 421 04:15 14 203 7 221 21 424 04:30 20 201 12 259 32 460 04:45 25 70 185 772 19 48 229 947 44 118 414 1719 05:00 34 208 26 223 60 431 05:15 59 225 24 227 83 452 05:30 80 185 52 247 132 432 05:45 101 274 181 799 59 161 254: 951 160 435 435 1750 06:00 122 172 82 233 204 405 06:15 211 205 107 149 318 354 06.`30 260 116 150 157 410 273 06:45 222 815 136 629 171 510 121 660 393 1325 257 1285. 07:00 250 101 194. 140 444 241. 07:15 250 108 246 126 496 234 07:30 229. 105 237 99 466 204 07:45 172 901 77 391 266 9431/72 437 438 1844 149 828 08:00 167 104 239 88 406 192 08:15 191 119 235 76 426 195 08:30 162 74 269 90 431 164 08:45 167 687 56 353 216 959 71 325 383 1646 127 678 09:00 162 70 227 77 389 147 09:15 180 68 136 64 316 132 09:30 147 50 145 59 292 109 09A5 140 629 41 229 121 629 62 262 261 1258 103 491 10:00 128 48 105 52 233 100 10:15 128 44 105 47 233 91 10:30 106 38 126 60 232 98 10:45 120 482 45 175 143 479 54 213 263 961 99 388, 1'1:00 114 24 127 42 241 66 11:15 123 35 137 49 260 84 100 163 21 158 32 321 53 11:45 124 524 17 97 151 573 27 150 275 1097 44 _ 247 Total 4514 5850 4432 6598 8946 12448 Percent 50.5% 47.0% 49.5% 53.0% Day 10364 Total Peak 0630 Vol. 982 PAF, 0.944 Page 2 11030 21394. 04:30 07:46 03:45 07:00 04:30 819 1009 988 1844 1757 0.910 0.938 0.915 0.929 0.955 7/13/07 Page 59 of 71 730-ENF1... Turnpike Street (Route 114) PRECISION east of Berry Street D A T A 60869Aspeed , City, State: North Andover, MA (NDUSTRIESLLC Site Code: 730 Clien: DJK/D, Kelly Orme SO&oat, 3099 sar508.154505234 C 4M Emad:datareques4ftdiik.com Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total MPH 11/011 63.3% Mean Speed(Average) : 47 MPH -- 06 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 12 13 6 2 0 0 40 50 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 11 8 3 0 2 0 29 50 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 5 1 1 0 0 15 50 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 8 6 1 0 0 31 50 04:00 0 0 1 1 0 1 9 32 31 11 1 1 0 88 .49 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 43 112 88 19 2 0 0 266 49 06:00 1 7 10 24 21 46 165 374 148 18 0 0 0 814 45 07:00 0 0 0 0 4 26 172 450 228 17 1 0 0 898 47 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 11 82 312 182 41 3 0 0 631 48 09:00 0 1 0 4 3 18 106 278 170 43 6 1 0 630 48 10:00 0 1 .0 0 10 40 183 215 57 10 0 0 0 516 45, 11:00 0 0 1 3 2 20 134 231 88 10 1 0 0 490 46 12 PM 0 0 0 0 5 23 101 282 105 15 1 0 0 532 47 13:00 0 0 0 0 2 10 85 272 140 16 3 0 0 528 48 14:00 0 0 1 2 5 19 117 321 116 20 1 1 0 603 47 15:00 0 0 0 0 3 15 133 393 183 21 0 1 1 750 47 16:00 0 0 1 1 3 33 227 383 129 17 0 0 0 794 46 17:00 0 0 0 1 17 54 316 349 71 12 0 0 0 820 45 18.00 0 0 0 1 12 39 175 303 117 19 0 0 1 667 46 19:00 0 0 0 0 3 6 70 158 82 17 1 0 0 337 47 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 15 50 143 89 12 0 0 1 311 48 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 32 115 58 17 1 0 0 229 48 22:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 22 79 49 17 2 1 1 174 49 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 32 23 7 2 0 0 73 49 %ile 15th Percentile: Speed 42 MPH 50m Percentile : 47 MPH 85th Percentile : 52 MPH 95th Percentile: 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 40-49 MPH Number in Pace: 7119 Percent in Pace : 69,3% Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 6501 Percent of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 63.3% Mean Speed(Average) : 47 MPH 7/13/07 Page 60 of 71 730-ENF1... Page 1 Turnpike Street (Route 114) PRECISION east of Berry Street D A T A 60869Aspeed City., State: North Andover, MA INDUSTRIES,LLC Site Code: 730 Client: DJK/D. Kelly Off"" 088..48] sal a> 58545,1234 EB 156 Email:datarmeszOpdilkxo- start 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Ave. Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total MPH 11102/ 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 20 10 6 2 0 1 45 50 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 11 8 2 0 0 0 27 48 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 8 2 0 0 0 25 48 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 12 6 3 0 0 35 51 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 28 19 3 1 0 70 52 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 112 100 38 10 2 1 274 51 06'00 2 1 1 5 18 43 169 395 151 25 3 1 1 815 46 07:00 0 0 0 0 12 60 336 407 77 9 0 0 0 901 45 08-00 0 0 0 0 5 20 160 380 ill 10 0 0 1 687 46 09:00 0 0 0 0 9 28 172 312 94 14 0 0 0 629 46 10:00 0 0 0 3 13 28 124 222 82 8 2 0 0 482 46 .11:00 0 0 0 0 3 20 128 259 99 15 0 0 0 524 47 12 PM 0 0 0 1 2 21 81 270 135 25 1 1 0 537 48 1100 0 1 0 0 2 12 68 258 178 18 0 0 0 537 48 14:00 0 0 1 4 7 11 118 292 155 34 0 1 0 623 47 15:00 0 0 0 1 6 17 152 357 150 23 2 0 0 708 47 16:00 0 0 0 3 3 35 200 352 156 21 0 1 1 772 46 17:00 0 0 0 1 25 52 272 348 88 13 0 0 0 799 45 18:00 0 0 1 1 6 20 157 335 99 9 0 0 1 629 46 19:00 0 0 0 1 2 18 74 169 91 35 1 0 0 391 48 20:00 0 0 0 2 4 7 63 178 84 13 1 1 0 353 47 21:00 0 0 0 0 2 5 53 110 46 13 0 0 0 229 47 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 4 22 72 52 20 2 1 0 175 49 23:00 0 0 0 1 1 6 11 29 38 10 1 0 0 97 49 Total 2 2 3 24 122 _ 409 2391 4925 2052 388 31 9 T�6 10364 % 0.0% OA% 0.0% 0.2% 1.2% 3.9% 23.1% 47.5% 19.8% 3.7% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% %de 15th Percentile: 42 MPH Speed 50th Percentile: 47 MPH 85th Percentile: 52 MPH 95th Percentile: 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed; 40-49 MPH Number in Pace : 7316 Percent in Pace: 70.6% Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 6426 Percent of Vehicles > 45 MPH: 62.0% Mean Speed(Average) : 47 MPH 7/13/07 Page 61 of 71 730-ENF1... Page 2 A-~ V .a Turnpike Street (Route 114) PRECISION east of Berry Street D A T A 60869Aspeed City. State: North Andover, MA INDusrRlrs,i.Lc Site Code: 730 PA Mx 301 Be1in. MA 01503 Clienp QJK/D. Kelly offte.'5M48139" rax508545r1234 WD J At A EmaiLdatarequesnDpdak.<om T"1 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total MPH 11/011 60.7% Mean Speed(Average) : 46 MPH 06 1 0 0 0 1 10 32 75 50 19 1 2 0 191 48 01;00 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 19 19 10 2 1 1 71 49 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 13 6 0 0 1 0 34 46 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 9 12 1 1 0 6 30 48 04;00 1 0 0 0 2 3 2 11 21 11 1 0 0 52 49 05:00 0 0 0 2 2 2 8 70 53 20 5 0 0 162 50 06:00 0 0 0 2 15 26 88 224 116 23 2 0 0 496 47' 07:00 0 0 1 0 4 48 192 454 183 23 0 0 0 905 47 08:00 0 0 0 1 11 49 237 460 159 16 6 0 0 933 46 09:00 2 1 1 2 3 22 102 281 133 27 3 0 0 577 47 16:00 2 4 2 1 8 35 110 234 88 17 0 0 0 501 46 11:00 0. 0 1 1 7 28 80 198 155 17 4 0 0 491 47 12 PM 0 0 0 2 5 19 115 242 135 22 0 0 0 540 47 13:00' 0 0 1 1 7 16 83 254 157 32 1 0 1 553 48 14:00 0 0 0 1 6 24 115 328 164 18 1 0 0 657 47 15:00 0 0 1 4 5 45 242 401 154 29 0 0 0 881 46 16:60 0 0 0 1 17 73 221 427 125 7 0 0 0 871 45 17:00 3 5 3 25 37 138 379 386 62 4 0 0 0 1042 43 18:00 0 0 0 11 7 22 193 319 104 10 1 0 0 667 46 19:00 0 0 0 2 0 16 86 172 105 19 0 0 0 400 47 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 22 64 128 77 1.7 1 0 1 311 47 21'.00 0 0 0 0 0 5 40 144 90 18 3 0 0 300 48 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 9 44 88 51 12 2 0 1 207 48 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 37 58 21 2 0 0 144 5o %ile 15th Percentile: Speed 41 MPH 50th Percentile 47 MPH 85th Percentile: 52 MPH 95th Percentile.: 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 40-49 MPH Number in Pace:, 7464 Percent in Pace; 67.8% Number of Vehides > 45 MPH; 6687 Percent of Vehides > 45 MPH; 60.7% Mean Speed(Average) : 46 MPH 7/13/07 Page 62 of 71 730-ENF1... Page 3 Turnpike Street (Route 114) PRECISION east of Berry Street 41 MPH Speed 50th Percentile: 46 MPH D A T A 95th Percentile: 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 40.49 MPH Number in Pace: 60869Aspeed City, State: North Andover, MA Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 6462 Percent of Vehides > 45 MPH : INDUSTRIES, LLC Mean Speed(Average): 46 MPH Site Code: 730 Client DAID. Kelly P.O. Box 301 Win, MA 01$03 016c&MA81-"" ca)c506 5.1234 WBf A) lb Ewil;daureaums&W kwm Start 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Ave. Time /4 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total MPH 1'i1021 _ 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 16 26 12 1 0 0 62 51 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 10 5 0 0 0 23 SO 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 6 3 2 0 0 22 50 03:00 0 0' 0 0 0 1 2 3 7 7 3 0 0 23 53 04:00 1 0 0 0 0. 1 5 11 13 13 3 0 1 48 51 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 54 56 41 4 0 0 161 51 06:00 0 0 1 4 8 22 48 254 123 44 5 1 0 510 48 07:00 0 1 0 19 42 73 350 392 61 5 0 0 0 943 44 68,00 0 0 0 4 23 80 349 428 59 15 1 0 0 959 44 09:00 0 0 1 0 4 32 186 321 71 13 1 0 0 629 46 10:00 2 1 7 10 15 20 94 236 82 12 0 00 479 45 11:00 0 0 1 1 10 43 127 284 91 12 3 1 0 573 46 12 PM 0 0 0 0 4 18 111 226 140 27 3 0 0 529 47 13:00 0 1 0 2 8 12 68 271 156 36 1 0 0 555 48 14:00 0 0 0 4 19 40 106 277 168 37 2 1 0 654 47 15:00 0 0 0 0 4 23 212 486 164 25 0 1 0 915 47 16:00 0 0 0 1 14 83 243 431 156 18 1 0 0 947 46 17:00 0 0 0 0 12 104 313 438 74 10 0 0 0 951 45 18:00 2 4 4 5 16 47 173 309 85 13 1 1 0 660 45 19:00 0 0 0 0 7 14 95 183 118 18 2 0 0 437 47 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 10 90 147 61 16 1 0 0 325 47 21:00 0 0 0 0 2 8 30 108 97 16 1 0 0 262 49 22:00 0 0 0 0 1 7 23 89 71 21 1 0 0 213 49 23.00 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 46 57 28 1 0 1 150 50 %ile 15th Percentile: 41 MPH Speed 50th Percentile: 46 MPH 85th Peroenble : 52 MPH 95th Percentile: 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 40.49 MPH Number in Pace: 7674 Percent in Pace : 69.6.% Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 6462 Percent of Vehides > 45 MPH : 58,6% Mean Speed(Average): 46 MPH 7/13/07 Page 63 of 71 730-ENF 1... Page 4 B. VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION TABLES 7/13/07 Page 64 of 71 730-ENF1... 730-TIS2,doe 0JK Associates, Inc. 3 _ V TRIP TABLE Retail -1 Retail -2 Office -1 5,549 SF 4,090 SF Total Project Specialty To/From To/FromMarket Convenience (Open - To/From To/From 11,392 SF To/From To/From Adjusted for Time Period/ Retail Retail -2 Office -1 24 Hours) Retail -1— Office -1 Medical RetaU 1 Retail -2 Internal Multi - Direction of Center tUC0e51 •• Office Use Internal Travel LUC#84 Adjusted LUC#710 Trips reekday amfng _Peau ntenng Ki_ting.. _ Vital ' r'eekday vening Peafc ' V i .. .. ... _ t. ... ..... ... .. .._ ntenn . _ _.15 20%q 3 13% 2 109 20% 22 13% : 14 11 13% 1 13%; 1 91 Kiting ___ .._ ....,. __ :20OA: d 13%' . 2 105 _ 20% 21 13% 14 - 31 13% 4 13% 4 . .. , 106 Ttal . ....__34,.. _ 7-- 4 214 _.. _. _ 43 28.. ...._.. 42 _. .. _ _ �a 5- - 5-- 107. .. . leekday Daily ntenng - ... 138 30% 41 13% - 17 1,358 30% ; 407 13%! 176 125 13ek 16_ 13% 16 954 K R9 ... _ . 138 3AO4 . _ 41 13% 17 1 8 _ 30°/a 407 1,3% 170 125 13% . 16 13% 16 954 ?taL ._. _. 276 _ ... 83 ._ . _ 35. _ 2,716 815 _ 340 250 — 31 31 _. _ .. 1 908 . - .. _I atuMay i s tiddayPeak ntering otai aturdaX Daily n otat Source: 1) Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2003. 2) Trip Generation Handbook, Second dition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2004, Table 7.1 Unconstrained Internal Capture Rates for Trip Destination Within Multi -Use Development - _ For this project the daily trips for the 24 Hour Convenience Store were reduced by 10% to reflect the fact that the Proposed Convenience Store 7/13/07 Page 65 of 71 730-ENF1... Qw WK FIiesVOve Sobsibb Wond,730 GFM, NwW AndevenTnp Genemtton - Mu"wAA-3.7J0.As 511ol2007 DJK Associates, Inc. TRIP TABLE - LUC 814 - Specialty Retail Center Equation _ — _ Average Trip Rates# of Ave. Ave. ! Trip Rates Proposed Surd- - ._. .._ Size Trite} RXR I Stand. ' Proposed ?Project les KSF -_ - - _Rate - Devi.�1__. Project s 5,549 !KSF 1 5.549 Weekda. Morning Peak Hour between 7 AM and 9 PM j Entering &LtinANo Data Available Total WeekdayEve rn� ak Nou between 4 PM and 6 PMj 1 Entering � 1 _........... - ---_ _ - 7 _ - Exiting 19.49 156%1 6.27 ,� <----�� Calculated ? 8 Total E 34.80_a_I 5 1 69 1 2.71 10.98 1.8 T (2.40'(X)+21.48) Weekda Entering€ 137.52 ' 5,0° ; --- 123 Exitin ;;-13 5 !a X49.57-1 <--- ------j Calculated 1 123 7otai 275 05 45 - 44.320.69 15:52 ;T=(42.78*(X)+37.66) 246 Weekday Mom g Peak Hour of Generator i Entering 1 69 148%1 i�� 18 Extin4 1 74 52% 1 25.74 ' <----- _- I --,--- ':Calculated 1_20 Total �( 143b 4 60 6.84 0.90 3.55 -��--�38 - 1 Weekday Eveningr Peak Hour of Generator ! __ 16 Entering ?1 156% i Exiting Not44%' NA <- .� -- Calculated 12 Total ! Given Ib 3 75 5.02 - **** i 2.31 INotGiven _ i 28 Saturday Midday Peak Hou -,r Entering Exiting No Data Available Total � --.._ i _-..�_� _— ' i Saturday -i Entering 50%+ ( 117 Exiting Not 50% F NA <----- }Calculated 117 _1 _ _ Total 1 Given R 3-28 42.04**** 31 9 iNot Gwen 233 1 i _. Source: Trip Generation, An Informational Report, 7th Edition, Institute of Trans ortation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2003. (a) Peak Hour of Adjacent Street between 7 and 9 AM or between 4 and 6 PM - — fib) Peak Hour of Generator ��� �I 11130/05 Updated by DJK 7/13/07 Page 66 of 71 730-ENF1... 814 Specialty Retail CenterAs Page 1 5/10/2007 DJK Associates, Inc. LUC 851 Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours) --- Equation Average -j---- Trip Rates ! Trip Rates_ --�--- # Ave. �-; -_ Proposed Proposed i of L ; -"-Stud- Ave. i Trip; RXR _ Stand. 1 -� i Project Project_ ,, . i ies I Size Rate Devi.-_ 4.090 4.090 SF ! i Weekday Morning Peak Hour between 7 AM and 9 PM ' Entering i 137 150% Ex_ 137 50% ; <----- a 33 3 67.03 , '*" j - --------- Calculated _ 33.78 T=67.03*(X) Total I --- 274 Weekday Evening Peak Ho- between M and 6 PM - Entering --- 1091 ° { /o � I Exitin i --- 105 _ 49% < --- Calculated Total --- I 214 _ _ _ a 33 1 3 1 52.41 I'""" 21.41 E T=52.41* X INeekdaY y _ Entering y _- 1,509 50% Exiting j - 1.50_9_ 500% j_ < - Calculated Total _ _ a 8 2 j 737.991 ""' 336.24 T=737;99'(X) Weekday Morning. Peak our of rator _ Entering _ ..fig I Total I i 1 ! I Weekday Evening Peak Ifour of Generator Entering I ; Total Saturday Midday Peak Hour I j Total Saturday Daily I Total i Source: Trip Generation, An Informational Report; 7th Edition, - Institute of Transportation En rneers Washin ton.2003.1_ 9' 9 D.C., 2003 ^_� (a) Peak Hour of Adjacent Street between 7 and 9 AM or between 4 and 6 PM (b) Peak Hour of Generator 07/24/06 Updated by DJK 1- 7/13/07 Page 67 of 71 730-ENF1... 851 Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours).xis Paqe 1 5/10/2007 DJK Associates, Inc. LUiC 720 Medical -Dental Office Building Equation Average Trip Rates # of Ave Ave. Trip Rates Proposed n, ... Stud- No. Trip RXR , Stand. Proposed Project. ies . Units Rate-- ate Devi. Project _. 11.392 11.392 KSF 11.392 Weekday Morning Peak Hour between 7 AM and 9 PM - - Entering -- 79%0 22 ting `' 21%` < Calculated 6. Total a 21 39.0 248 - 1.94 T=(2.48"(X)) 28 Weekday Eve ing Pea_ k Hour etween 4 PM and 6 PM Entering 11 Evwt!ng 31 73% 3.67 <—, Calculated 31 . ........._ _ _ :. _ Total 42 a 1 '30.0' 3.72 f-0.77 2.50 Ln(T)-(0.93Ln(X)+1 47) 42 Weekday ily _ -1-2 Entering 125 50% 206 _ _ Exiting 125 500 22.02 '. <----- ---±Calculated 206 Total 251 10 45.0 36.13 0.90 ; 10.18 T -(40.89"(X}-214.97) 412 Weekday in ak our of Generator Entering Total Weekday Evening Peak Hour of Generator Entering _.. _ Ex�tin4 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Entering F Total Safdrday Daily f Entering Ex,t,ng , Total Source _T_ -6 Generation, An Informational Report, 7th Edition, institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2003. (a) Peak Hour of Adjacent Street between 7 and 9 AM or between 4 and 6 PM jb) Peak Hour of Generator 8/05 Updated by DJK 7/13/07 Page 68 of 71 730-ENF1... 720 Medicat-Dental Office BuildingAsAs Page 1 5/10/2007 X Table 7.1 Unconstrained Internal Capture Rates for Trip Origins within a Multi -.Use Development WEEKDAY p.m,. PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT DAILY MEET TRAFFIC from OFFICE to Office 2% 1 % 2°l0 to Retail 20% 4.--' 230% 8-f 22% to Residential 01yo 2% 290 from RETAIL to Office 3% k' - Z 3% 5--2- 3% to Retail 29% 20% 30% to Residential 7% 12% 11% from RESIDENTIAL. to Offide N/A N/A NIA to Retail 34% 53% 38% to Residential N/A N/A N/A Caution.The estimated typical internal capture rates presentedin this table rely directly on data collected at a limited number of muff► -use sites in Florida. While ITE recognizes the limitations of these data, they represent the only known credible data on mufti -use internal capture rates and are provided as illustrative of typical rates. It local data an inter' nel capture rates by paired land uses can be obtained, the local data may be green preference. NIA -Not Available; logic indicates there is some interaction between these two land Uses; however, the limited data sample on which this table is based did not record any interaction. 1 231 2z�% 1 � 1 i f 7/13/07 Page 69 of 71 730-ENF1... Top Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition Chapter 7 • ITE 93 C. CAPACITYANALYSIS 7/13/07 Page 70 of 71 730-ENF1... 7304 ,dcc Rights Reserved NCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University or Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 t Version 4.1 f 7/13/07 Page 71 of 71 730-ENF1... 6-11, TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period Dermot Kelly, PE, PTOE DJK Associates, Inc. May 9, 2007 Weekday Evening Peak Hour intersection Jurisdiction nalysis Year Turnpike Street at Site Drive North Andover, MA 2011 Build Project, Description 730 GFM, North Andover East/West Street: Proposed Site DrivePorth/South Street: Tumpike Street Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 `5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 1114 41 36 906 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate, HFR 0 1114 41 36 906 0 t Hea Vehicles 0 – – 0 -- – n Type Undivided annelized Enes 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 uration TR L T am Si nal 0 0 Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 48 0 42 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 48 0 42 0 0 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 T Channelized 0 0 nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 figuration LR la Queue Len th and Level of Service proach NB 313 Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration L LR (vph) 36 90 (m) (vph) 612 186 lc 0.06 0.48 5% queue length 0.19 2.66 ontroi Delay 11.2 42.2 OS B E proach Delay – – 42.2 P—Oproach LOS -- – E Rights Reserved NCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University or Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 t Version 4.1 f 7/13/07 Page 71 of 71 730-ENF1... 6-11, �k ` PRINTED BY: Pamela DelleChiaie - PLEASE LEAVE IN PRINT-DUT TRAY....... THANK YOU. DelleChiaie, Pamela From: DelleChiaie, Pamela Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:28 AM To: Sawyer, Susan Subject: North Andover Board of Assessors Public Access -- 1820 Turnpike Street -- http://csc-ma.us/PROPAPP/displgy.do?linkld=1519283&town=NandoverPubAcc Hi Susan, Gino Fodera is the owner of 1820 Turnpike Street. He is the man who was just in this morning with the rolled plans for the Adult Day Health. His e-mail is: ginofodera7kyahoo.com, and his phone number is: 617.877.9963. You stated that you hoped to have a chance to do a preliminary review by this Friday, but they were just at the TRC on Wed., (Thurs. Holiday - CLOSED). Paperwork was processed/entered/folders made and done on Monday, and you were out on Tuesday for a training. He was told 45 day review and tenants were told at meeting, though we try to get them out sooner. — "No Pressure" Susan—LOL–! ! These applicants need to be reasonable and allow for processing and other people's schedules!! Maybe we really need to emphasize that at all the TRC meetings!!— o" I OF I DelleChiaie, Pamela North Andover Board of Assessors Public Access it a 7 NORTI� ♦ i k �SSACHUSct Click Seal To Return Search for Parcels Search for Sales Page 1 of 2 North Andover Board of Assessors MATCHING PARCELS Click on a column title to sort data by that column 338 items found, displaying 301 to 338. [First/Prev] 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 Fiscal Year 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 Parcel ID StNo. Street 10/107.B-0080-0000.0 1801 TURNPIKE STREET 10/106.D-0047-0000.0 1812LOT TURNPIKE A STREET 10/106.D-0046-0000.0 1820- TURNPIKE 1830 STREET 10/107.B-0077-0000.0 1845 TURNPIKE STREET 10/106.D-0045-0000.0 1874 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0068-0000.0 2050 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0024-0000.0 2060 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0053-0000.0 2109 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0054-0000.0 2125 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0055-0000.0 2135 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0032-0000.0 2147 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0056-0000.0 2155 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0067-0000.0 2163 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0008-0000.0 2170 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0066-0000.0 2177 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0060-0000.0 2189 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0007-0000.0 2192 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0006-0000.0 2198 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0005-0000.0 2200 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0059-0000.0 2201 TURNPIKE STREET 10/108.C-0058-0000.0 2211 TURNPIKE STREET '10/108.C-0003-0000.0 2214 TURNPIKE STREET '10/108.C-0002-0000.0 2218 TURNPIKE STREET ;10/108.C-0057-0000.0 2225 TURNPIKE STREET :10/108.C-0061-0000.0 2230 TURNPIKE STREET !10/108.C-0034-0000.0 2237 TURNPIKE STREET !10/108.C-0001-0000.0 2240 TURNPIKE STREET !10/108.C-0036-0000.0 2241 TURNPIKE STREET !10/108.C-0050-0000.0 2245 TURNPIKE Owner Name 'ING & RETIREMENT CENTER OF ATT. ACOUNTS PAYABLE JLX, JEAN P R, NEWALL PLAZA,LLC, QING, YARONG YOUNG 'ERTY, JOHN W, GEORGE HWA-CHING, JOO HYONG, ITEHOUSE, JOHN, KAREN /ATTERS, JOHN F, HEIDI F WATTERS HLEAPAS, JAMES J, ANN CHLEAPAS TEAR, GEORGE A, CAROL A MEAR 'ONWELL, MICHAEL R, CAROL CASEY- ONWELL ,DAMS, DARCEY L EPISTO, ADAMS, )AVID W ATEL, JAYESH B & DAMINI N, !ASEY, JOSEPH P, ALICE J CASEY :00, ILWOONG , KIM, MYUNGA !ONROY, RICHARD C, KATHLEEN E LANG, JANE P, ACY, LAWRENCE A, JR, PRISCILLA A .YES LLINS, RICHARD, PATRICIA L ;JESUS, RECARDO A, LRINE, JAMES J, JUDITH A PELRINE .VAO, AUGUSTO J, GILDA PAVAO :ADOWS, RANDY D, MARYJANE C ABOOBACKER, IKER, LORI -ANN, RA, GUEM JOO, ROSTEN, DORIS M, SAWYER, MICHAEL, http://csc-ma.us/PROPAPP/newSearch.do?noOwner--027%3BO84%3 BO59%3B 136%3B... 11/17/2010 North Andover Board of Assessors Public Access d , *% 2010 210/108.C-0035-0000.0 2251 -TRE] 2010 210/108.A-0009-0000.0 2302 TURN CE JAMES -MORGAN REALTY TRUST, LLC, STRE] 2010 210/108.C-0037-0000.0 2303 TURN DIGRAZIA, TR CE STRE] 2010 210/108.A-0008-0000.0 2324 TURN U-2 TRUSTEE CE U-3 STRE] 2010 210/108.A-0006-0000.0 2350 TURN STRE] 2010 210/108.A-0007-0000.0 2370 TURN STRE] 2010 210/106.D-0017-0001.0 " 1980 TURD STRE] 2010 210/106.D-0017-0002.0 " 1980 TURD STRE] 2010 210/106.D-0017-0003.0 1980 TURN STRE; 338 items found, displaying 301 to 338. Page 2 of 2 _.. RICHARDS, GUY N, EMILY E RICHARDS CE MURPHY, KEVIN, MURPHY, ELIZABETH CE MEADOWS REALTY TRUST, THEODORE & FLORENCE MEADOWS, TR CE JAMES -MORGAN REALTY TRUST, LLC, C/O SALEM FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK CE NOMID TRUST, JOSEPH DI GRAZIA, TR CE NOMID REALTY TRUST, JOSEPH DIGRAZIA, TR CE FOUR H COMPANY, LLC, C/O CAPRI U-1 PRIVATE EQUITIES, LLC CE BMB REALTY TRUST, MORLEY, BONNIE U-2 TRUSTEE CE U-3 JUSSE, INC, [First/Prev] 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 http://csc-ma.us/PROPAPP/newSearch.do?noOwner--027%3BO84%3BO59%3B 136%3B... 11/17/2010 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF SELECTMEN 120 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 f NORTH 1 Daniel P. Lanen, Chairman William F. Gordon ;, TEL. (978) 688-9510 Richard A. Nardella. FAX (978) 688-9556 ♦ i � i Rosemary Connelly Smedile -••-�• " ' Tracy M. Watson SSACHUSE BOARD OF SELECTMEN & LICENSING COMMISSIONERS AGENDA - 5:30 p.m. Executive Session - 6:00 p.m. Open Session NORTH ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL OSGOOD STREET I. CALL TO ORDER II. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Collective Bargaining III. RECONVENE AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. October 4, 2010 Executive Session B. November 1, 2010 Open Session V. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Annual Santa Parade VI. CONSENT ITEMS A. Parade Permit: North Andover Festival Committee and North Andover Police Association, November 27, 2010, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. B. Meeting Schedule, 1" half of 2011 C. Affordable Housing Resale 1. One Harvest Drive, Unit 303 2. , Unit 10- 180 Chickering Road, Unit 204C LICENSING COMMISSIONERS CA. Application for Retail Alcoholic Beverage License- LaBottega, LLC 1820 Turnpike Street VIII. USINESS A. Prepa IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Preparation for Tax Classification Hearing X. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT XI. PUBLIC COMMENT XII. SPECIAL TOWN MEETING XIII. ADJOURNMENT s 1 i � DelleChiaie, Pamela From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Thursday, May 12, 20119:28 AM To: Gino Fodera Cc: DelleChiaie, Pamela Subject: dumpster app Attachments: 20110512090749428. pdf Hi Gino, Thank you for contacting me, in response to my emails, about your plans for your dumpsters. I have attached your application. For clarification for the file, can you please identify the location of the 2 dumpsters that you mentioned on the site plan. We will come and view the area prior to installation if you like, or we will wait for your call. Thank you Susan SI.GJan Smmp% Yah& Neafth Diud" 1600 Uagood Stud J3e4 2U, unit 2-36 rVn& Qndaaex, .Ma VIS45 mice 97S 6SS-9540 fax 978 68S-5476 All email messages and attached content sent from and to this email account are public records unless qualified as an exemption under the [ http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm ]Massachusetts Public Records Law. Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/prelpreidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Tal"' M f -T . 4, 4 EIVICE OA -IWPA*t* SON-Y.AwYO, Mks, 246 600.1" 5 Milo Rom Diftator uOR. A6-aei, 9181,688,9140. fax,-- 071;680416 riiall.oil t MIT., `1 A, LIO I -C 'k -F. A pUpStJAN!T PO &C.PlaN 31.4 AND 311 OF CHAPTER III ; *LAWS, ANDAMRS AM kEGULATIONS OF ?'HE THE GENERA I NOR TH AND 6 VWR. BOA RD OF HEPA L TH DATE: 3/�. 7 /1/ AiVRoatiot is hereby mWe for a pennit to mdhWn a dut4pger(s) on -property located at 0 4 in accordsioe with the idles and r6gulaflofts-6fthi Aftd of Hbalth. 43 IV Ad4iam q-ZS� 6�Meua_ "4IR Tik im 617 7 7 — 9 cJ Dumoar-Con pany., Tdophob": - On- the bwk:d.&Ii fem io sketiksit' i A6W-*9 the pi-00—sed I FOM of the Give dfitifig6brki dub*sterto-iftef.bWid ItifUn" or baukdaflu. - .#09ble lo: To -Am -of North Andover, . LATE' lk'AAM JANUAY -lot WILL. BP, DOTJBUO - $120000 vieiie note fat all Contact information sad the associated fee It rooked *Ii application submittal. pap 1 of t 144 rave r v. 'MiKA.1 S"WoaqumN NV'ld 1nOAV'1 3115 .m•r.v,aaRW .aasumr+r S1138nHOVSSVW 'M3AOONV qx 4[laD]tfP oew ec.b y.j� y.y' AA MM "'°°� ONI011nB 1V19?13WWO9 Q35OdOZ1d 4 n 30vamv NV'ld LIMU iNRW013A30 31,IS R-- 'fVUMdWO 30VT1N SI 1D1b1S10 04MZ mra YIf Wow w u 9a5'•PMN ILD! ' • � - 22 A M M IAAY yy lvuw gg4 g .�'•. 4 t 1 1 1 1 1 E-' ad �r 6 4 • � i � � • L' w �r s •+% a 1 X .r+ ` 5� Wills HE��, R so19 , ;8 91oR !3 i of „OR71� , ; 5 3/ 0 0 J" i Town of North Andover i'•�;, ;p::�i HEALTH DEPARTMENT ,SSACHUsi� CHECK LOCATION: A/ o �y✓f') dUl H/O NAME,,6m- <L/ CONTRACTOR NAME: 4e - Type of Permit or License: (Check box) $ ❑ Animal $ ❑ Body Art Establishment $ ❑ ❑ Body Art Practitioner Dumpster $ ❑ Swimming Pool $Z�o ❑ Food Service - Type: $ ❑ Funeral Directors $ ❑ Massage Establishment $ ❑ Massage Practice $ ❑ Offal (Septic) Hauler $ ❑ Recreational Camp $ ❑ Sun tanning $ ❑ Swimming Pool $ ❑ Tobacco $ ❑ TrashlSolid Waste Hauler $ ❑ Well Construction $ SEPTIC Systems: ❑ Septic - Soil Testing $ ❑ Septic - Design Approval $ ❑ Septic Disposal Works Construction (DWC) $ ❑ Septic Disposal Works Installers (DWI) $ ❑ Title 5Inspector $ ❑ Title 5 Report $ ❑ Other: (Indicate) $ Health'A� eht Initials White - Applicant Yellow - Health Pink - Treasurer A i SERVICES `< < w 5t y: 9ayor, REHS/i�8 1iI'r6!, 61TJIT 2'-3i public Health Dft=tor NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 phone, 978,6n.'9540 Fax; 978:688:8476 E-maii1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 31A AND 31.9 OF CHAPTER III OF THE GENERAL LAWS, AND AMES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NORTHANDOVER: BOARD OF HEALTH Application is hereby made for a permit to maantaln a dpster(s) on property located 'at 9 9, 0 7�� r u, h e S in accor&me with the rules and regulations of the g-rard of Health. 1 T me off' Ce ct: �� n erv� Owners .Address: -3 2 5 /V S,� Adder: ,,, S/- 43/Clg9 61-7-g77- q G 3 Federal- or SSS: MI6 3 9 7 Dumpater Company:: R rYl Pim-1:Tp Mede e -. fill .o o a On to .back of thk fad, pr a skew Aft oudhit 6fprojwrty, showing the proposed Brien of the Avapstter(s). Give d. it ee from dvmpster to other bugd1up and let liras or boundaries. Anita °i MPMer'Pe tt Fee per eftwhholtilt ptyameto: Tow li of North Andover. LATE #ft A ERIANUAI+ Y Is' WILL BE DOUBLED - $120.00 "°please note that all contact inforinaion and the associated fee is required r pori application submittal. Page 1 of 1 mv-1d inoAv-i 3115 s113snH3VSSVV4 '2l3A'ON N ONimine ivioLnrvyoo 03SOd02id NVIA 11V4?J3,d IN3Vid0_13A30 MIS J I IVLLN30IS38 30V*nA S1 10RUS10 ONINOZIf I I•. I T It< 21, M10 WN '"Camy w is 3MA.NN #%eql ubwvj4 Mam * MHGr .61N I DelleChiaie, Pamela From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Thursday, May 05, 20114:05 PM To: Gino Fodera Cc: DelleChiaie, Pamela; Grant, Michele Subject: dumpster at 1820 Turnpike Street Attachments: IMG00244-20110505-1208.jpg Hello Gino, We were checking on the progress on your dumpster area in regards to your permit application. From this photo we can see that the area is not enclosed and it appears closer than 20 to the building. Is this the same location shown in your diagram, which did not include a distance from the building. Before you install the permanent fencing, please make sure that your application accurately reflects what you submit to this office. You can find the regulation at the link below. Lastly, we'd like to have a time line as to when the work will be completed so we can move this permit process forward. Thank you, Susan http://www.townofnorthandover.com/Pages/NAndoverMA Health/dumpsterregs pdf Susan Sawyer Public Health Director 1600 Osgood Street Bldg 20, unit 2-36 North Andover, MA 01845 office 978 688-9540 fax 978 688-8476 Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. I U ki ice/ i" ~ J • 1 F