Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 336 Great Pond Roadi r` ( 1R� OF N&a-ll NaI�TN Aupovc-I-,, MA, APP,�o\jt✓v P rt' LOT ID fbQ PoA%�0 R ►� So pNV Q >cPt') c Sti sTEXA VSt OJ LL 4PRW1N6 AuTlyoi?iTy P(A&) Fav P14Tl� D15,APmv5p Co��Ir�o�s R�4SoNS Dw� SrPT'I Sv5TEM I JSiAILQTIOAJ EYCAV4T(aIJ Q P/�SFAIL- T-10 0 AIL- rlo0 PIPE FR) &A H006 -FO K Pry S5 `Q f /S)L 4PPROOEP QWC j� /SPPi�)vwG,gvr+to���ry I NS %�O��i �4�1�(TjOIJAt- I�St�-I IONS �1�- A►'�Y) , DISH PP)OvFIP Rj�Oejo tis RAL APPROVAL DArC APP)3w vJ6 4 u i HoRl -ty G -;s/, .1,A 111111/1'I'1.11('i I Stevens Wate r Analysis 311 Monivnln Avnllttn 0 Slonoltnllt, MA ();)I no • Mann. (617)1.111 G III • SnIoln, IJ.I I. (603) 093.3106 I-All(iltllPORY NUMDEJ11t 2449. "AM1'lr1? HAITI 1/17/86 �lI1IM1.'1"1'RD IlYt 1411.tIiN1;r0111 PIMP !;111'1'1.x' 111,19 1Jo11u1-11 !,I t 1,1.1 141II►tln{;1on, MA 0111111 ii11h11'lli+, iil)Ultl;l+;I Nvw wall - ;;.tt. tltlltil;, 1N1;., Mi. n►►Ilrrvnr, MA - Iml: # 10 ' I AI'I1111Y;1.1.� 1 11t►ttat'd i tt(; Lu �; L;ttltlrl ►. tl Mr' l.Ilc�tlll c.► I' W,1. Lor r�.ttd IV a l,ew tar ui l a1n _ 'Po (;ti.l. I;U.L,I. I't►1.'Itl . . . . . . . . . 0 pvt, 100 1111 UI1.I.or.I don . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 IIlf./t. 1►Ii . . . . .. 6.6 •Y v IInrdIkorin . . . . . . . . . . 40 Mlutl;nttana , 0.02 S,od11.1111 . . . . ji.7 m1;/lY bolt . . . . . N11:.t.�nl:a. . . . . . . . . . ',� 0.10 tllph N11;t-1 Lo . . . , , I%l1Mivlit;N'I' 1 1.110 rent) i hn of, 1 1►vnr. I ho Codr-r-til nnrl ni iii e nYnuttnl-dn .ror drl►►Ir Ini; �onl rel , 1,111hir yunlll:y 411111 vnry of{;nlrl`nn1 Iv r►Ilnl 1 I1111" to t.Imn- t1►tn. It, vtlrinun tor111 r-n11r111 11111►►. I, -In nrltiI!►nlrIr. to I►nvo your W111'er Uvritt'rl III r►IrlrroM 1111111 r I y n I r I o I WI- I kit' milli -lin I o tlet'n1'In1110 nny ►'1►rtl►{�o In w"11 (,I' r1ll;►IIIV I;II��m�trf %Pllrrohlolo{� inl STEVENS WATER ANALYSIS 38 MONTVALE AVENUE STONEHAM, MASS. 02180 Tel. (Stoneham) 617.438.6114 Tel. (Salem, N.H.) 603.893-3106 Interpretation of Test Results TOTAL COLIFORM The coliform test is used to determine the possible presence of septage pollution and pathogenic organisms in water. The U.S. Public Health Service has established that the coliform concentration should not exceed 0 per 100 milli- liters in public water supplies. An absence of coliform bacteria eliminates the possibility that septoge pollution and pathogenic organisms ore present in water. HARDNESS Hard waters are generally considered to be those waters that require considerable amounts of soap to produce a foam or lather and that also produce scale in hot water pipes, heaters and boilers. Specifically, hardness is a measure- ment of the calcium and magnesium concentration in water. These hardness minerals are responsible for ring and sediment buildup in bathtubs and sink bowls and many other domestic problems. From an economic standpoint, hard water can increase water heating costs due to the scale build up in boilers and also increase detergent con- sumption. Waters are commonly cla§sified in terms of the degree of hardness as follows: 0-75 mg/1 Soft 75-100 mg/1 Moderately hard 150-300 mg/l Hard 300 up mg/1 Very hard PH Water with a pH of less than 7.0 is considered acidic. Water with a pH above 7.0 is, considered alkaline or basic. A pH of 6.0 to 6.6 is moderately acid and may eventually corrode plumbing fixtures and water using appliances. A pH of 4.0 to 5.9 is considered very acidic and corrosion could be even more extensive. CHLORIDES Chlorides in reasonable concentration are not harmful to humans. However, they can give a salty taste to water which is objectionable to many people. For this reason the U.S. Public Health Service recommends that chlorides be limited to 250 mg/l in supplies intended for public use. Salting of nearby -highways is often the cause of high chloride concentrations in water supplies. IRON AND MANGANESE . Iron and Manganese can cause problems with staining during laundering operations, import objectionable stains to plumbing fixtures, and cause difficulties in distribution systems by supporting growth of iron bacteria. Such waters when exposed to the air become turbid and highly unacceptable from the aesthetic viewpoint. Iron imports a taste to water which Is detectable at very low concentrations and can be very objectionable of higher concentrations. Iron can also change the taste and color of beverages and food. For these reasons the U.S. Public Health Service Standards recommend that public water supplies should not contain more than 0.3 mg /I of iron or 0.05 mg/1 of manganese. SODIUM Sodium in high concentrations can promote hypertension or high blood pressure in humans. Some individuals ore more susceptible to the effects of sodium than others. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that sodium be limited to 20 milligrams per liter in public water supplies. Note: ml = milliliters mg/L = milligrams per liter NTTRATF. STANDARD: 10 mg/L ARSENIC STANDARD: 50 ppb Massachusetts Water Resources Commission / Division of Water Resources e WATER WELL COMPLETION REPORT WELL LOCATION Address City/Town G.S. Quadrangle Map Grid Location Owner 1 ' - Address_ WELL USE Domestic Public ❑ Industrial ❑ Other METHOD DRILLED Rotary (type)'rr' "j it r I Cable ❑ Other CASING Length i Diameter Type CONSOLIDATED WELL Type of Water -bearing Rock -t : >! Water -bearing Zones 1) From ' To 2) From To f 3) From Tc 4) From To Depth to Bedrock UNCONSOLIDATED WELL STATIC WATER LEVEL Water -bearing Materials Feet below land surface /• Sand: fine ❑ medium ❑ coarse❑ Date measured Gravel: fine ❑ medium ❑ coarse[] GRAVEL PACK WELL Yes ❑ No n WATER QUALITY TESTS MADE Chemical ❑ Biological ❑ Screen: Slot * length from to Split Screen (or 2nd screen) Slot# length from to Depth To Bedrock PUMP TEST Drawdown feet after pumping days hours at GPM. How measured Recovery feet after hours. LOG of FORMATIONS COMMENTS: (On well or water) Materials From To n DRILLER Firm Address City , • � ! Registration No. Aerator s SignaturF 10M-8181.164843 Board of Health tior:.Y::ane:.:)vergMaa3 SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DF,SIGN CHECK LIST LOT (0F�KrN��, APPROVED DATE 11 -2E c. f DISAPPROPED DATE S S 7 ' Provided: Reasonst t2�3 Title V FAIL OK Reg 2.5 The submitted plan must show as a minimum: a) the lot to be served-area,dimensions lot # abutters b locat3.on and log deep observation hoes -distance to ties c location and results percolation tests -distance to ties d design calculations & calculations showing required leaching area (e) location and dimensions of system -including veserve area f) existing and proposed contours (g) location any wet areas, vAth3n 100' of sewage disposal system or disclaimer -check wetlands mapping (h) surface , and subsurface drains within 1001 of sewage disposal system or disclaimer (i) location any drainage ''easements within IW I of sewage disposal system or disclaimer -Planning Board files (j) known sources of water supply'xithin 2002 of sewage disposal system or disclaimer .. (k) location of any proposed well to serve lot -1001 from leaching. facility (1) location of water lines on property -101 from leaching facility (m) location of benchmark (n) driveways (o) garbage disposals (p) no PVC to be used in construction (q) profile of system -elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank, distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and Other elevations (r) maximum ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system (s) plan must be prepared by a Professional Engineer or other professional authorized by law to prepare such plans Reg 6 Septic Tanks (a) capacities- 50% of flog, water table, tees, depth of tees, access, pumping I(b) cleanout (e) 3.01 from cellar vain or inground swtmndzg pool (d) 251 from subsurface drains Reg 10.2 Distribution Boxes I(a) pe greater 0.08 Reg 10.4 b) sump 8 ' \ \ Board of Health North AndoVer�x,�Ss• I i� DATE - �3 (o l� SEPTIC STSTEH INSTALLATICK CHECK LIST r Rea -gons t 1. Distance TO: a. Wetlands b. Drains C.. We11 2. Water Line Location ` LOT X AVATI CN OK FAIL 3. No PVC Pipe 4. Septic Tank a. Tees o --Length do To Clean Out Covers b. Cement Pipe to Tank - Oa Both Sides of Tank 5. Distribution Box a. Covers & Box - No Cracks b. All Lines Flo ging Equal Amounts c. No Back Flow 6. , Leach Field or Trench a. Dimensions b. Stone Depth c. Capped Inds d. Clean Double Washed Stone 7. Leach Pits a. Dinensions b. Stone Depth c. Splash Pads d. Tees e. Cement Pipe to Pit - Both Sides f. Clean Double Washed Stone 8. No Garbage Disposal 9. " _Final Grading Inspection 10. Barricading Covered System 11. As Built Submitted a. Lot Location b. Dimensions of System c. Location with Regard -to Pere Test d. 'Elevations e: Water Table M 11i.1Q .zaauiaug �uPo.TddV -idea Aumg2ZH syJoM oiT•gnd ggTeaH 3o pzeog pavog 2uiuuPTd :oq quas saidoO S86T `ZZ gSn-.ili uo uazzIz0 •V•N aqi ui aouo unx ODf1id 'ui:,w.rLi.'g0 sUDOTA •D :AQ pa, adpzg @Lt -r l S -qoj pup ppog gopooa PjS/:jS uogaT d 98 ;o7 IV PagPooT puPT •o`O uoigonajsuo3 uoTagqpoaQ 3o jsanbag uoiluutw.zajea puPTlaM aq- uo VW 'aanopud glaON '19a.zIS uTP14 OZT 'woog $uilaaN �?uipTTng_„ Umol aqi aP 'Y1'd 00:8 IV S861 `8Z gsnVnV uo 2uiqaaL1 oiTgnd t; pTotl TTTM uotsszwwoO uoiIPAlasuo0 zanopud 41ION aqa 'MPT AQ uoTJoajo.zd ..puvTlaM s I .zanopuV IlIaON 30 UmOl aLP pup 'papuawP sP '017 uoTIoaS `T£T .zagdugo sMPZ lvaeuag sgjasngoessPyl 'Iota uoT�oa �o,id spuPT�al+�. age 30 �C�Y.zol{�i1e agl oq juensand 1pll.H SOIL -£89 3NOHd3'131 HLa0N NOISSIWW00 NOIIVA'83SNOJ -. JO BOU110 ,s113snH7vssvw 'tl3AOaNV 'HlMON JO NMOL BOARD OF.HEALTH No.Andover, Mass. _. SJBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN CHECK rST LOT I D ShPI-A 1K'S j''JA Di APPROVED DATE 7-(� ,S DISAPPROVED DATE Provided: /' Reasons: �\ Title V FAIL OK Reg 2.5 The submitted plan must show as a mini mi a) the lot to be served-area,dimensione 'ot #,abutters _'jb location and log deep observation hoi;a-distance to ties c location and results percolation testi-distance to ties d design calculations & calculations shcdmg required leaching area (e) location and dimensions of system-inc!iding reserve area f) existing and proposed contours (g) location any wet areas within 1001 of sewage disposal system or disclaimer -check wetlands mapping IN surface and subsurface drains within L I1 of sewage disposal system or disclaimer (i) location any drainage easements within 7001 of sewage disposal system or disclaimer -Planning Board files (j) known sources of water supply within 2001 of sewage disposal e system or disclaimer, (k) location of any proposed well to serve lot -1001 from leaching facility (1) location of water lines on property -101 from leaching facility (m) location of benchmark (n) driveways (o) garbage disposals (p) no PVC to be used in construction (q) profile of system -elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank, distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and Other elevations (r) maximum ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system (s) plan must be prepared by a Professiona:.Engineer or other ` professional authorized by law to prep;ire such plans Reg 6 Septic Tanks (a) capac t es -I50% of flow, water table, ees, depth of tees, access, pumping (b) cleanout (c) 101 from cellar wall or inground s,,, Ig pool (d) 251 from subsurface drains Reg 10.2 Distribution Boxes (a) slope greater 0.08 Reg 10.1 {b} SUMP t } e e E e Stevens Water Analysis 38 Montvale Avenue • Stoneham, MA 02180 • Mass. (617) 438-6114 • Salem, N.H. (603) 893-3106 LABORATORY NUMBER: 161438 SAMPLE DATE: 10/24/85 SUBMITTED BY: R.T. REALTY TRUST 1 Elm Square, Suite 1B Andover, MA 01810 SAMPLE SOURCE: New Artesian Well/collected from pump Lot #10 Sharpners Rd., No. Andover, MA ANALYSIS: According to Standard Methods of Water and Wastewater Analysis, 15th Ed. Total Coliform . . . . . . . . 0 per 100 ml Chlorides . . . . . . . . . . . pH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hardness . . . . . . . . . . . Manganese . . . . . . . . . . . Sodium . . . . . . . . . . . . Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nitrate. . . . . . . . . . . . Nitrite. . . . . . . . . . . . 9.mg/L 7.7 72 mg/L 0.17 mg/L 4.8 mg/L 1.30 mg/L less than 0.10 mg/L less than 0.10 mg/L COMMENT: The results of these analyses meet the required federal and state standards for drinking water. However, the iron and manganese concentrations exceed the recommended, standards. Although iron and manganese are not harmful to your health, they can affect the taste, color and odor of your water. Iron and manganese are fre- quently found at elevated levels in new wells; however, it is likely that the concentrations will decrease when the well is put into regular use. ' d M__ - 11114AAVjj2,,Az, Che ist/Microbiologist ;I er- EXtsr -FA►JK Oc)r = i32.62 - D - Bo �( ► rJ = 132-S-7 D in. 4 l _ 132-. 11 PIP": E"D (31.97 = ►31. R7 EXIST D#k . AS - BUILT OF Aup �. LOT s� IN A rJ i:>ovi5k, 1-4 AS DRAWN FOR ZEALTy T,ZVY7 DiPRETE • MARCHIONDA & ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERING a PLANNING CONSULTANTS 185 New Boston Street RF.D. •3 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 Manchester, New Hampshlre 03103 (617) 938.1037 (603) 434-8725