HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 336 Great Pond Roadi
r`
( 1R� OF N&a-ll
NaI�TN Aupovc-I-,, MA,
APP,�o\jt✓v P rt'
LOT ID fbQ PoA%�0 R ►�
So pNV Q
>cPt') c Sti sTEXA VSt OJ
LL
4PRW1N6 AuTlyoi?iTy
P(A&) Fav P14Tl�
D15,APmv5p Co��Ir�o�s
R�4SoNS
Dw� SrPT'I Sv5TEM I JSiAILQTIOAJ
EYCAV4T(aIJ Q P/�SFAIL-
T-10 0
AIL-
rlo0 PIPE FR) &A H006 -FO K Pry S5 `Q f /S)L
4PPROOEP QWC j� /SPPi�)vwG,gvr+to���ry
I NS %�O��i
�4�1�(TjOIJAt- I�St�-I IONS �1�- A►'�Y) ,
DISH PP)OvFIP
Rj�Oejo tis
RAL APPROVAL
DArC
APP)3w vJ6 4 u i HoRl -ty G -;s/,
.1,A 111111/1'I'1.11('i
I
Stevens Wate r Analysis
311 Monivnln Avnllttn 0 Slonoltnllt, MA ();)I no • Mann. (617)1.111 G III • SnIoln, IJ.I I. (603) 093.3106
I-All(iltllPORY NUMDEJ11t 2449. "AM1'lr1? HAITI 1/17/86
�lI1IM1.'1"1'RD IlYt 1411.tIiN1;r0111 PIMP !;111'1'1.x'
111,19 1Jo11u1-11 !,I t 1,1.1
141II►tln{;1on, MA 0111111
ii11h11'lli+, iil)Ultl;l+;I Nvw wall - ;;.tt. tltlltil;, 1N1;., Mi. n►►Ilrrvnr, MA - Iml: # 10
' I
AI'I1111Y;1.1.� 1 11t►ttat'd i tt(; Lu �; L;ttltlrl ►. tl Mr' l.Ilc�tlll c.► I' W,1. Lor r�.ttd IV a l,ew tar
ui l a1n _
'Po (;ti.l. I;U.L,I. I't►1.'Itl . . . . . . . . . 0 pvt, 100 1111
UI1.I.or.I don . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 IIlf./t.
1►Ii . . . . ..
6.6
•Y
v
IInrdIkorin . . . . . . . . . . 40
Mlutl;nttana , 0.02
S,od11.1111 . . . . ji.7 m1;/lY
bolt . . . . .
N11:.t.�nl:a. . . . . . . . . . ',� 0.10 tllph
N11;t-1 Lo . . . , ,
I%l1Mivlit;N'I' 1
1.110 rent) i hn of, 1 1►vnr. I ho Codr-r-til nnrl ni iii e
nYnuttnl-dn .ror drl►►Ir Ini; �onl rel ,
1,111hir yunlll:y 411111 vnry of{;nlrl`nn1 Iv r►Ilnl 1 I1111" to t.Imn- t1►tn.
It, vtlrinun tor111 r-n11r111 11111►►. I, -In nrltiI!►nlrIr. to I►nvo your
W111'er Uvritt'rl III r►IrlrroM 1111111 r I y n I r I o I WI- I kit' milli -lin I o
tlet'n1'In1110 nny ►'1►rtl►{�o In w"11 (,I' r1ll;►IIIV
I;II��m�trf %Pllrrohlolo{� inl
STEVENS WATER ANALYSIS
38 MONTVALE AVENUE
STONEHAM, MASS. 02180
Tel. (Stoneham) 617.438.6114
Tel. (Salem, N.H.) 603.893-3106
Interpretation of Test Results
TOTAL COLIFORM
The coliform test is used to determine the possible presence of septage pollution and pathogenic organisms in water.
The U.S. Public Health Service has established that the coliform concentration should not exceed 0 per 100 milli-
liters in public water supplies. An absence of coliform bacteria eliminates the possibility that septoge pollution and
pathogenic organisms ore present in water.
HARDNESS
Hard waters are generally considered to be those waters that require considerable amounts of soap to produce a foam
or lather and that also produce scale in hot water pipes, heaters and boilers. Specifically, hardness is a measure-
ment of the calcium and magnesium concentration in water. These hardness minerals are responsible for ring and
sediment buildup in bathtubs and sink bowls and many other domestic problems. From an economic standpoint, hard
water can increase water heating costs due to the scale build up in boilers and also increase detergent con-
sumption. Waters are commonly cla§sified in terms of the degree of hardness as follows:
0-75 mg/1 Soft
75-100 mg/1 Moderately hard
150-300 mg/l Hard
300 up mg/1 Very hard
PH
Water with a pH of less than 7.0 is considered acidic. Water with a pH above 7.0 is, considered alkaline or basic.
A pH of 6.0 to 6.6 is moderately acid and may eventually corrode plumbing fixtures and water using appliances.
A pH of 4.0 to 5.9 is considered very acidic and corrosion could be even more extensive.
CHLORIDES
Chlorides in reasonable concentration are not harmful to humans. However, they can give a salty taste to water
which is objectionable to many people. For this reason the U.S. Public Health Service recommends that chlorides be
limited to 250 mg/l in supplies intended for public use. Salting of nearby -highways is often the cause of high
chloride concentrations in water supplies.
IRON AND MANGANESE .
Iron and Manganese can cause problems with staining during laundering operations, import objectionable stains to
plumbing fixtures, and cause difficulties in distribution systems by supporting growth of iron bacteria. Such waters
when exposed to the air become turbid and highly unacceptable from the aesthetic viewpoint. Iron imports a taste
to water which Is detectable at very low concentrations and can be very objectionable of higher concentrations.
Iron can also change the taste and color of beverages and food. For these reasons the U.S. Public Health Service
Standards recommend that public water supplies should not contain more than 0.3 mg /I of iron or 0.05 mg/1 of
manganese.
SODIUM
Sodium in high concentrations can promote hypertension or high blood pressure in humans. Some individuals ore
more susceptible to the effects of sodium than others. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that sodium be
limited to 20 milligrams per liter in public water supplies.
Note:
ml = milliliters
mg/L = milligrams per liter
NTTRATF. STANDARD: 10 mg/L
ARSENIC STANDARD: 50 ppb
Massachusetts Water Resources Commission / Division of Water Resources
e
WATER WELL COMPLETION REPORT
WELL LOCATION
Address
City/Town
G.S. Quadrangle Map
Grid Location
Owner 1 ' -
Address_
WELL USE
Domestic Public ❑ Industrial ❑
Other
METHOD DRILLED
Rotary (type)'rr' "j it r I Cable ❑
Other
CASING
Length i Diameter
Type
CONSOLIDATED WELL
Type of Water -bearing Rock
-t : >!
Water -bearing Zones
1) From '
To
2) From
To f
3) From
Tc
4) From
To
Depth to Bedrock
UNCONSOLIDATED WELL
STATIC WATER LEVEL Water -bearing Materials
Feet below land surface /• Sand: fine ❑ medium ❑ coarse❑
Date measured Gravel: fine ❑ medium ❑ coarse[]
GRAVEL PACK WELL
Yes ❑ No n
WATER QUALITY TESTS MADE
Chemical ❑ Biological ❑
Screen:
Slot * length from to
Split Screen (or 2nd screen)
Slot# length from to
Depth To Bedrock
PUMP TEST
Drawdown feet after pumping days hours at GPM.
How measured Recovery feet after hours.
LOG of FORMATIONS COMMENTS: (On well or water)
Materials From To
n
DRILLER
Firm
Address
City , • � !
Registration No.
Aerator s SignaturF
10M-8181.164843
Board of Health
tior:.Y::ane:.:)vergMaa3
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DF,SIGN CHECK LIST
LOT (0F�KrN��,
APPROVED DATE 11 -2E c. f DISAPPROPED DATE S S 7 '
Provided: Reasonst
t2�3
Title V FAIL OK
Reg 2.5 The submitted plan must show as a minimum:
a) the lot to be served-area,dimensions lot # abutters
b locat3.on and log deep observation hoes -distance to ties
c location and results percolation tests -distance to ties
d design calculations & calculations showing required leaching area
(e) location and dimensions of system -including veserve area
f) existing and proposed contours
(g) location any wet areas, vAth3n 100' of sewage disposal system or
disclaimer -check wetlands mapping
(h) surface , and subsurface drains within 1001 of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer
(i) location any drainage ''easements within IW I of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer -Planning Board files
(j) known sources of water supply'xithin 2002 of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer ..
(k) location of any proposed well to serve lot -1001 from leaching. facility
(1) location of water lines on property -101 from leaching facility
(m) location of benchmark
(n) driveways
(o) garbage disposals
(p) no PVC to be used in construction
(q) profile of system -elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank,
distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and
Other elevations
(r) maximum ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system
(s) plan must be prepared by a Professional Engineer or other
professional authorized by law to prepare such plans
Reg 6 Septic Tanks
(a) capacities- 50% of flog, water table, tees, depth of tees,
access, pumping
I(b) cleanout
(e)
3.01 from cellar vain or inground swtmndzg pool
(d) 251 from subsurface drains
Reg 10.2 Distribution Boxes
I(a) pe greater 0.08
Reg 10.4 b) sump
8 '
\
\
Board of Health
North AndoVer�x,�Ss•
I i� DATE
- �3 (o
l�
SEPTIC STSTEH
INSTALLATICK CHECK LIST
r
Rea -gons t
1. Distance TO:
a. Wetlands
b. Drains
C.. We11
2. Water Line Location
`
LOT
X AVATI CN OK FAIL
3. No PVC Pipe
4. Septic Tank
a. Tees o --Length do To Clean Out Covers
b. Cement Pipe to Tank - Oa Both Sides of Tank
5. Distribution Box
a. Covers & Box - No Cracks
b. All Lines Flo ging Equal Amounts
c. No Back Flow
6. , Leach Field or Trench
a.
Dimensions
b.
Stone Depth
c.
Capped Inds
d.
Clean Double Washed Stone
7. Leach Pits
a.
Dinensions
b.
Stone Depth
c.
Splash Pads
d.
Tees
e.
Cement Pipe to Pit - Both Sides
f.
Clean Double Washed Stone
8. No Garbage Disposal
9. " _Final Grading Inspection
10. Barricading Covered System
11. As Built Submitted
a. Lot Location
b. Dimensions of System
c. Location with Regard -to Pere Test
d. 'Elevations
e: Water Table
M
11i.1Q
.zaauiaug
�uPo.TddV
-idea Aumg2ZH
syJoM oiT•gnd
ggTeaH 3o pzeog
pavog 2uiuuPTd
:oq quas saidoO
S86T `ZZ gSn-.ili uo uazzIz0 •V•N aqi ui aouo unx
ODf1id 'ui:,w.rLi.'g0
sUDOTA •D :AQ
pa, adpzg @Lt -r l S -qoj pup ppog gopooa PjS/:jS uogaT d 98 ;o7 IV PagPooT puPT
•o`O uoigonajsuo3 uoTagqpoaQ 3o jsanbag uoiluutw.zajea puPTlaM aq-
uo VW 'aanopud glaON '19a.zIS uTP14 OZT 'woog $uilaaN �?uipTTng_„
Umol aqi aP 'Y1'd 00:8 IV S861 `8Z gsnVnV uo
2uiqaaL1 oiTgnd t; pTotl TTTM uotsszwwoO uoiIPAlasuo0 zanopud 41ION
aqa 'MPT AQ uoTJoajo.zd ..puvTlaM s I .zanopuV IlIaON 30 UmOl aLP pup
'papuawP sP '017 uoTIoaS `T£T .zagdugo sMPZ lvaeuag sgjasngoessPyl
'Iota uoT�oa �o,id spuPT�al+�. age 30 �C�Y.zol{�i1e agl oq juensand
1pll.H
SOIL -£89 3NOHd3'131
HLa0N
NOISSIWW00 NOIIVA'83SNOJ -.
JO BOU110
,s113snH7vssvw 'tl3AOaNV 'HlMON JO NMOL
BOARD OF.HEALTH
No.Andover, Mass. _.
SJBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN CHECK rST
LOT I D ShPI-A 1K'S j''JA Di
APPROVED DATE 7-(� ,S DISAPPROVED DATE
Provided: /' Reasons: �\
Title V FAIL OK
Reg 2.5 The submitted plan must show as a mini mi
a) the lot to be served-area,dimensione 'ot #,abutters
_'jb location and log deep observation hoi;a-distance to ties
c location and results percolation testi-distance to ties
d design calculations & calculations shcdmg required leaching area
(e) location and dimensions of system-inc!iding reserve area
f) existing and proposed contours
(g) location any wet areas within 1001 of sewage disposal system or
disclaimer -check wetlands mapping
IN surface and subsurface drains within L I1 of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer
(i) location any drainage easements within 7001 of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer -Planning Board files
(j) known sources of water supply within 2001 of sewage disposal e
system or disclaimer,
(k) location of any proposed well to serve lot -1001 from leaching facility
(1) location of water lines on property -101 from leaching facility
(m) location of benchmark
(n) driveways
(o) garbage disposals
(p) no PVC to be used in construction
(q) profile of system -elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank,
distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and
Other elevations
(r) maximum ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system
(s) plan must be prepared by a Professiona:.Engineer or other `
professional authorized by law to prep;ire such plans
Reg 6 Septic Tanks
(a) capac t es -I50% of flow, water table, ees, depth of tees,
access, pumping
(b) cleanout
(c) 101 from cellar wall or inground s,,, Ig pool
(d) 251 from subsurface drains
Reg 10.2 Distribution Boxes
(a) slope greater 0.08
Reg 10.1 {b}
SUMP
t
} e
e
E
e
Stevens Water Analysis
38 Montvale Avenue • Stoneham, MA 02180 • Mass. (617) 438-6114 • Salem, N.H. (603) 893-3106
LABORATORY NUMBER: 161438 SAMPLE DATE: 10/24/85
SUBMITTED BY: R.T. REALTY TRUST
1 Elm Square, Suite 1B
Andover, MA 01810
SAMPLE SOURCE: New Artesian Well/collected from pump
Lot #10 Sharpners Rd., No. Andover, MA
ANALYSIS: According to Standard Methods of Water and Wastewater
Analysis, 15th Ed.
Total Coliform . . . . . . . . 0 per 100 ml
Chlorides . . . . . . . . . . .
pH. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hardness . . . . . . . . . . .
Manganese . . . . . . . . . . .
Sodium . . . . . . . . . . . .
Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nitrate. . . . . . . . . . . .
Nitrite. . . . . . . . . . . .
9.mg/L
7.7
72 mg/L
0.17 mg/L
4.8 mg/L
1.30 mg/L
less than 0.10 mg/L
less than 0.10 mg/L
COMMENT: The results of these analyses meet the required
federal and state standards for drinking water.
However, the iron and manganese concentrations
exceed the recommended, standards.
Although iron and manganese are not harmful to
your health, they can affect the taste, color and
odor of your water. Iron and manganese are fre-
quently found at elevated levels in new wells;
however, it is likely that the concentrations
will decrease when the well is put into regular
use. '
d M__ -
11114AAVjj2,,Az,
Che ist/Microbiologist
;I
er-
EXtsr
-FA►JK Oc)r =
i32.62 -
D - Bo �( ► rJ =
132-S-7
D
in. 4 l
_
132-. 11
PIP": E"D
(31.97
=
►31. R7
EXIST
D#k
. AS - BUILT
OF
Aup
�. LOT
s� IN
A rJ i:>ovi5k, 1-4
AS DRAWN FOR
ZEALTy T,ZVY7
DiPRETE • MARCHIONDA & ASSOCIATES INC.
ENGINEERING a PLANNING CONSULTANTS
185 New Boston Street RF.D. •3
Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 Manchester, New Hampshlre 03103
(617) 938.1037 (603) 434-8725