Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 351 REA STREET 4/30/2018 (2)t,k -�G L% by J� Lot & Street T!!�F/--? Map/Parcel CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL Has plan review fee been paid: YES NO Permit- IN19 Plan Approval- Date: Approved by-__,,. — Designer: Plan Date- Conditions: Water Supply- To-wnDI - Well Permit: p/ p _.Driller: Well Tests: Chemical Date Approved Bacteria I Date -Approved Bacteria H Date Approved Plumbing Sign -Off Wiring Sign -Off: Comments: -- Form "V' Approval: Approval to -Issue: / `NO - czj e -c L Date Issued i © By: ( Conditions: Final Approval: All Permits Paid? YES NO Well Construction Approval? YES NO Septic System Construction Approval? YES NO Certification? YES NO Other YES NO Any Variance Needed? YES NO FINAL BOARD OF HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: APPROVED BY: SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION r J_r Is the installer licensed? NO Type of Construction: �C:_LW� REPAIR New Construction: --Certified Plot Plan ReviewYES NO --Floor Plan Review YES NO _— Conditions of Approval from Form U YES NO _Issuance of DWC permit: - _� NO _DWC Permit Paid? NO . --DWC=Permit # - Installer: Begin -Inspection:- — YES NO ,E.Ycavation Inspection: Needed: 9 ZZ pD - /? -'K 0 r4 va' I'-r.Av " ,Sn/L M A'il t b b —Passed: _ By: --- ._Construction Inspection: Needed: As -Built -Plan Satisfactory: YES: _ Approval of Backfill: Date: By: ---Final Grading Approval: Date: / z Z By: Final Construction Approval: Date - Certificate of Compliance: Approval: By: Date: • • r SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION r J_r Is the installer licensed? NO Type of Construction: �C:_LW� REPAIR New Construction: --Certified Plot Plan ReviewYES NO --Floor Plan Review YES NO _— Conditions of Approval from Form U YES NO _Issuance of DWC permit: - _� NO _DWC Permit Paid? NO . --DWC=Permit # - Installer: Begin -Inspection:- — YES NO ,E.Ycavation Inspection: Needed: 9 ZZ pD - /? -'K 0 r4 va' I'-r.Av " ,Sn/L M A'il t b b —Passed: _ By: --- ._Construction Inspection: Needed: As -Built -Plan Satisfactory: YES: _ Approval of Backfill: Date: By: ---Final Grading Approval: Date: / z Z By: Final Construction Approval: Date - Certificate of Compliance: Approval: By: Date: r4/ i� COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS FILE COPY EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TITLE 5 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM _ NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM FORM PART A x 0 �, 0, F!^, ;,�OY�,Ri Acv Bell i1�� Vi' i'^Er�LTH CERTIFICATION Property Address:,?) aiiU ee P Y � S � 1l o� � 0 4 t JUN 1 ®ZQQQ 1 I)Sa�nri r��_ o t 45 y S' �1g r . v� y Owner's Name: Yak < 6a a Vt Lhe � -- Owner's Address: .351 R o Q !Ski_o Date of Inspectic Name of Inspector: (please pri t) 1\moo A-uuC P S . Company Name: Mailing Address: "norA I ,rrnr►.d►<66y 7 1k ( AeA Telephone Number: 9- O� 6U CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that 1 have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported below is true, accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed based on my training and experience in'the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. I am a DEP approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR115.000). The system: cPsses onditionally Passes Needs Further Evaluation by the Local Approving Authority Fails Inspector's Signature: Date: -o O� The system inspector shall submit a copy of this inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or DEP) within 30 days of completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the DEP. The original should be sent to the system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving authority. Notes and Comments ****This report only describes conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different conditions of use. 4 , ., , . Title 5 Inspection Form 6/15/2000 page 1 Page 2 sof 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 36-/ La 5 i- �n . V) nc� p LLP r . I'Yl )q Owner: 1� f 6 e 5 Date of Inspection: 6 - —q - 0 - Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E / ALWAYS complete all of Section D A. System Passes: I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not evaluated are indicated below. Comments: B. System Conditionally Passes: One or more system components as described in the "Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon completion of the replacement or repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass. Answer yes, no or not determined (Y,N,ND) in the for the following statements. If "not determined" please explain. The septic tank is metal and over 20 ears * the septic tank (whether metal or not) is structurally sound, exhibits substantial infiltration r exfi tration tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as approved by the Board of Health. *A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound, not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available. �'� Nu l a �/1� g 4 L 13 u'T- ND explain: tl&>A`t 110-7 IF S �i191r1. Observation of sewage backup or break out or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s) or due to a broken; settled or uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health): (( broken pipe(s) are replaced IJ obstruction is removed _,44 distribution box is leveled or replaced ND explain: The system required pumping more than 4 times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of Health): ND explain: /V broken pipe(s) are replaced � obstruction is removed 2 2 Page 3 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: '2:5-1 Qp n 5 � Owner: r'a Date of Inspection., C. Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health: Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect public health, safety or the environment. 1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CMR 15.303(1)(b) that the system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health, safety and the environment: _ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh 2. System will fail unless the Board of Health (and Public Water Supplier, if any) determines that the system is functioning in a manner that protects the public health, safety and environment:,, _ The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) and the SAS is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply: ' _ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within a Zone 1 of a public water supply. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. _ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a private water supply well". Method used to determine distance - "This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form. 1 , : 1, 1 4 . L . 3. Other: Page 4 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMINSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 35_� )00= Owner' 9 f o e-5 Date of Inspection: G, -Q -d 3 D. System Failure Criteria applicable to all systems: You must indicate "yes" or "no" to each of the following for all inspections: Yes No vBackup of sewage into facility or system component due to overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool _je"bischarge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool Liquid depth in cesspool is less than b" below invert or available volume is less than 1/2 day flow -te- Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due to clogged or obstructed pipe(s). Number of times pumped _/'Any portion of the SAS, cesspool or privy is below high ground water elevation. _"Any portion of cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply., . I , . ., _ jAny portion of a cesspool or privy is within a Zone 1 of a public well. _A, -"Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. _"Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100 feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water supply well with no acceptable water quality analysis. iThis system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form.) _ (Yes/No) The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303, therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure. E. Large Systems: To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000 gpd- You must indicate either "yes" or "no" to each of the following: (The following criteria apply to large systems in addition to the criteria above) yes no — _ the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area - IWPA) or a mapped Zone II of a public water supply well If you have answered "yes" to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat, or answered "yes" in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department. t' Page 5 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION'FORM ' PART B CHECKLIST Property Address: fz,,c 5t s>rcj YVI )q - Owner: K (n P S Date of Inspection: d 3 Check if the following have been done. You must indicate "yes" or "no" as to each of the following: Yes o Pumping information was provided by the owner, occupant, or Board of Health n0� Q U YrnV49—C( / =res\0, 1/ Were any of the system components pumped out in the previous two weeks ? jZ— Has the system received normal flows in the previous two week period ? Have large volumes of water been introduced to the system recently or as part of this inspection ? V Were as built plans of the system obtained and examined? (If they were not available note as N/A) Was the facility or dwelling inspected for signs of sewage back up ? ✓ Was the site inspected for signs of break out ? Were all system components, excluding the SAS, located on site ? y _ Were the septic tank manholes uncovered, opened, and the interior of the tank inspected for the condition of the baffles or tees, material of construction, dimensions, depth of liquid, depth of sludge and depth of scum ? — Was the facility owner (and occupants if different from owner) provided with information on the proper maintenance of subsurface sewage disposal systems ? "T The size and location of the Soil Absorption System (SAS) on the site has been determined based on: Yes apo Existing information. For example, a plan at the Board of Health. Determined in the field (if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue approximation of distance is unacceptable) [3 10 CMR 15.302(3)(b)) 5 5"rc.c Q06 Page 6 of I I OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION Property Address: 3 5-1 Q q S Owner: K Date of Inspection: FLOW CONDITIONS RESIDENTIAL Number of bedrooms (design): q Number of bedrooms (actual): DESIGN flow based on 310 CMR 15.203 (for example: 110 gpd x # of bedrooms): y y 6 Number of current residents: 1,57- Does residence have a garbage grinder (yes or no Is laundry on a separate sewage system (yes or no : Qj�. [if yes separate inspection required] Laundry system inspected (yes or no): — Seasonal use: (yes or no : p� Water meter readings, if available (last 2 years usage (gpd)): Sump pump (yes or o: M Last date of occupancy:C-,A -c ![f loll- COMMERCIAWINDUSTRIAL Type of establis)unent: Design flow (based on 310 CMR 15.203): gpd Basis of design flow (seats/persons/sgft, etc.): Grease trap present (yes or no): _ Industrial waste holding tank present (yes or no): _ Non -sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5 system (yes or no): _ Water meter readings, if available: Last date of occupancy/use: OTHER (describe): GENERAL INFORMATION Pumping Records ` Source of information: D4 1 , y mW t s ' Lt Was system pumped as part o the inspection (yes or no : tb If yes, volume pumped: _gallons -- How was quantity pumped determined? Reason for pumping: TYPE OF SYSTEM _✓Septic tank, distribution box, soil absorption system Single cesspool Overflow cesspool _ Privy Shared system (yes or no) (if yes, attach previous inspection records, if any) _ Innovative/Alternative technology. Attach a copy of the current operation and maintenance contract (to be obtained from system owner) _ Tight tank _ Attach a copy of the DEP approval _ Other (describe): Approximate age of all components, date installed (if known) and source of information: TYN �)oV �S':5 0'0 Were sewage odors detected when arriving at the site (yes ori: nO Page 7 of I 1 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM°INSPECTION FORM ' PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address:', Q S f Owner: 1-,2e_5 Date of Inspection: (o -I - 03 BUILDING SEWER (locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Q n "� Materials of construction: _cast iron ✓0 PVC _other (explain): Distance from private water supply well or suction line: Comments on condition of joints, venting, evidence of leakage, etc.): SEPTIC TANK:ocate on site plan) Depth below grade: Material of construction: ✓><oncrete _metal _fiberglass __polyethylene other(explain) If tank is metal list age: _ Is age confirmed by a Certificate of Compliance (yes or no): _ (attach a copy of certificate) Dimensions: l0 '(,'";<S g' X �s-'�1 �� a 3 Tce.- Sludge depth: 9L-1' Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee of baffle: O �/ Scum thickness', Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle: Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: • � How were dimensions determined: M (k t 1 CJS, , Comments (on pumping recommendations, to et and d outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): GREASE TRAP:�Ikoocate on site plan) Depth below grade: _ Material of construction: _concrete _metal _fiberglass _polyethylene other (explain): Dimensions: Scum thickness: Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle: Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: Date of last pumping: - Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): Page 8 of I I OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 5 5 Owner: _Y, Date of Inspection: TIGHT or HOLDING TANK: _.[[a (tank must be pumped at time of inspection)(locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Material of construction: concrete metal fiberglass __polyethylene other(explain): Dimensions: Capacity: gallons Design Flow: gallons/day Alarm present (yes or no): Alarm level: Alarm in working order (yes or no): Date of last pumping: Comments (condition of alarm and float switches, etc.): DISTRIBUTION BOX: ✓ if present must be opened)(locate on site plan) 3"OvJ CJCQC�Q Depth of liquid level above outlet invert: Comments (note if box is level and distribution to outlets equal, any evidence of solids carryover, any evidence of leakage into or out of box, etc,): PUMP CHAMBER: (locate on site plan) Pumps in working order (yes or no): Alarms in working order (yes or no): Comments (note condition of pump chamber, condition of pumps and appurtenances, etc.): 8 J Page 9 of I 1 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM " PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 36-1 at Q S 11A , 1i Owner: f-nC-5 Date of Inspection: (, — Y-0 SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (SAS): Ae (locate on site plan, excavation not required) If SAS not located explain why: Type leaching pits, number: _ leaching chambers, number: leaching galleries, number: leaching trenches, number, length: _ i/ leaching fields, number, dimensions: overflow cesspool, number: innovative/alternative system Type/name of technology: Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, damp soil, condition of vegetation, CESSPOOLS:tguration: cesspool must be pumped as part of inspection)(locate on site plan) Number and con Depth — top of liquid to inlet invert: Depth of solids layer: Depth of scum layer: Dimensions of cesspool: Materials of construction: Indication of groundwater inflow (yes or no): Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): PRIVY:locate on site plan) Materialst struction: Dimensions: Depth of solids: Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): A. Page 10 of I I OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) :S Property Address: 7"Owner:)<. Kf6jos 'Date -of Inspection: SKETCH OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM -Provide a sketch of the sewage disposal system including ties to at least two permanent reference landmarks or ibenchmarks. Locate all wells within 100 feet. Locate where public water supply enters the building, 1 44- 40 7.. lor=7163 Al7 TP -3 P-2 70. 09, 7 CIS W OWN rt.=67.49 USGS too rr ZONE, e N or J70 PIAN 15 IV A WARRAA 10 • Page 11 of 1 I 4 . OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C - 1; , , SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 3 S Ro p 5 , K Owner: �— . KroP� Date of Inspection: SITE EXAM Slope 0\0wn on 3 s��llLS Surface water o.t�. �'ra�n�r - � e h Pane Check cellar d+'YY10 . `� `^^� Shallow wells ,� �✓ ,. A_ Estimated depth to ground water q feet Please indicate (check) all methods used to determine the high ground water elevation: L, -`Obtained from system design plans on record - If checked, date of design plan reviewed: 200_ _,L,�-Ohserved site (abutting property/observation hole within 150 feet pf SAS) t/Checked with local Board of Health-explain:roy t: f'e, Checked with local excavators, installers- (attach documentation) Accessed USGS database -explain: mus` describe how you established the high ground water elevation: TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER BOARD OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE DATE OF COMPLIANCE 02/08/01 This is to certify that the individual subsurface disposal system constructed (X ) or repaired ( ) by Tom Sawyer at 351 Rea Street has been installed in accordance with the provisions of Title V of the State Sanitary Code and with the North Andover Board of Health regulations. The Issuance of this certificate shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function satisfactorily. Board of Health Inspector M-■ ELEVA TIONS DESIGN AS—BUILT INV OF PIPE OUT OF HOUSE 70.28 70.45 INV. OF PIPE AT SEPTIC TANK INLET 70,06 0 1, INV. OF PIPE AT SEPTIC TANK OUTLET 69.81 69.86. .L 69,51 69.46 INV. OF PIPE AT D—BOX OUTLET AREA -142,804 69.28. INV. AT BEG. OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE i 69:26 69.19 INV. AT BEG, OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 2 tilot 69.21 INV. AT BEG, OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 3 69:26 69.28 INV AT BEG. OF D/STRIBUT/0N PIPE 4 69.26 69.21 INV, AT BEG. OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 5 69.26 69.21 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 1 69.08 69.10 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 2 69:08 69.09 WV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 3 69M 69.08 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 4 69.08 69.07 lNV AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 5 yy 69.08. IS 25' 200 FT RIPARIAN �, TP -3 ELEVA TIONS DESIGN AS—BUILT INV OF PIPE OUT OF HOUSE 70.28 70.45 INV. OF PIPE AT SEPTIC TANK INLET 70,06 70.11 INV. OF PIPE AT SEPTIC TANK OUTLET 69.81 69.86. INV. OF PIPE AT D—BOX INLET 69,51 69.46 INV. OF PIPE AT D—BOX OUTLET 69.34 69.28. INV. AT BEG. OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE i 69:26 69.19 INV. AT BEG, OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 2 69.26 69.21 INV. AT BEG, OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 3 69:26 69.28 INV AT BEG. OF D/STRIBUT/0N PIPE 4 69.26 69.21 INV, AT BEG. OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 5 69.26 69.21 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 1 69.08 69.10 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 2 69:08 69.09 WV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 3 69M 69.08 INV. AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 4 69.08 69.07 lNV AT END OF DISTRIBUTION PIPE 5 69.08 69.08. ff / `-jp 14.01 TBM 7 C\ S 12' BIRCH EL.=67.49 USGS -- ' 100 FT WETLANDS BUFFER ZONE' PLAN SCA! SCALE. C=20' TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSTALLATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certify that the Sewage Disposal System) constructed; ( ) repaired; by located at was installed in conformance with the North Andover Board of Health approved plan, System Design Permit # , dated , with an approved design flow of gallons per day. The materials used were in conformance with those specified on the approved plan; the system was installed in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.000, Title 5 and local regulations, and the final grading agrees substantially with the approved plan. All work is accurately represented on the As -built which has been submitted to,the Board of Health. Bed inspection date: /l 2 40 Final inspection date: Ze:10 L Installer: Z< Lic.#: 7f% Engineer Representative �- ~Engineer Representative Date: / ' 8 - ZODC7 Design Engineer -.2 Date: lam- a 2©a D 0 0 i I rA rA s•� 1141. \N �� r �I O ►Z E O F=4 � LIJ z CL a lo o n U w o w A o O� i w V a � wz Q v ov w Cl) o o :c a oG U w rZ w o v a4 cn iw o w w o 5 b cry cn cn r �I O ►Z E O F=4 � LIJ z CL z O U Cl) co 0 0 0 v Z o o. CD CO) O � CO CM I O C On m m CD �_ CL CD 0 G O L ca � O d �Q 0 C Ccc v J .0 o. o D c Z CD C CL /V CO) l� C c_ — s _cc 0. is v c o 1 orn • :�: c A o O� w V CL= AN m L:oa N M m c E vii o mo a mm3N N �C m W � �O C 2 � N � m cm m C2 cc cm _� O a N s dCZ E � m m O t O ®' v y —y ' Z O cm = a O •O h m O ~ r-� N mCOO W 00 4;:s .0 .... r *, C •ra -LD � LU N a � c . O m •N Z O V ca cm m O m C „~r y O. m 'O O M h .= O _ F- v s 4-aOm a z O U Cl) co 0 0 0 v Z o o. CD CO) O � CO CM I O C On m m CD �_ CL CD 0 G O L ca � O d �Q 0 C Ccc v J .0 o. o D c Z CD C CL /V CO) l� C c_ — s _cc 0. is INSTRUCTIONS: This form is used to verify that all necessary approvals/permits from Boards and Departments having. jurisdiction have been obtained. This does not relieve the applicant and/or landowner from compliance with any applicable or requirements. FILS OUT THIS APPLICANT PHONE C$,-2-7,63 LOCATION: r.ssessors flap Number 2 PARCEL SUBDIV1SiON LOT (S) 7 STREET P E t? S ( ST. NUMEER /,j7- -2 USE ONLY***tt***-"1***** ****<* * * RECOMMENDATIONS OF TOWN AGENTS: 41YQ C'n' 3 ! 1P° AV/ C' NSERVATION ADMINISTRATOR DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED i COMMENT S%';� `� Al) l ', _ TOWN' ANNER �G DATE APPROVE;` DATEREJECTED lG? IZ/0 0 COMMENTS C -h7 ,A FOOD INSPECTOR -HEALTH DATE APPROVED DATE REJECTED 7i f SEPTIC INSPECTCR-HEALTH DATE APPROVEDZ2vc� DATE REJECTED ` COMMENTS f4-• � PUBLIC WORKS - SEW=RJ`PJATER CONNECTIONS A% DRIVE kJAY PERMIT�— �C/ F!RE DEPART ME, RECEIVED BY EUILDING !NSPECTOR DATE Revised 9107 jm T Expiration Date ^z Q AS -BUILT CHECKLIST LOT NUMBER, STREET NAME ,j ASSESSORS MAP & PARCEL NUMBER �--' LOT LINES & LOCATION OF DWELLINGS LOCATIONS & DIMENSIONS OF SYSTEM, INCLUDING RESERVE TIES TO LOT LINES & DWELLING, WELLS a. FROM SEPTIC TANK b. FROM LEACH AREA i LOCATIONS OF DEEP HOLES & PERC TESTS ELEVATIONS OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM j' TOP OF FDN ELEVATION LOCATIONS OF WELLS, DRAINS, WATERCOURSES WITHIN 150' OF SYSTEM LOCATION OF WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC LINES, CABLE -'� DISTANCES FROM CORNERS OF HOUSE TO CENTER OF TANK & D -BOX ORIGINAL STAMP & SIGNATURE IMPERVIOUS AREAS - DRIVEWAYS, ETC. NORTH ARROW i/�� LOCATION & ELEVATIONS OF BENCHMARK USED INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR SEPTIC SYSTEMS Yes NO Initi s A. Bottom of Bed 1. Excavation to proper depth 2. With trenches, sides of excavation are beneath B horizon 3. Edge of excavation specified distance from foundation, etc. L---- Comments: /Comments: A) yc-�� -, - -,0 J -Lo, B. Retaining Wall 1. Wall height and width as specified 2. Waterproofed 3. Wall minimum 10' to leaching facility 4. Wall meets specifications of plan Comments: C. Building Sewer 1. Pipe diameter minimum 4" 2. Schedule 40 pipe 3. Watertight joints 4. Inlet to tank cemented 5. Slope minimum 0.01 or 1/8" per foot minimum 6. Pipe properly set on compact firm base 7. Pipe laid on continuous grade in straight line 8. Cleanouts precede all change in alignment and grade 9. Manholes at any 90° change 10. 10' minimum offset to waterline Comments: D. Septic Tank 1. Level 2. 1,500 gal minimum 3. Gas baffle present on outlet 4. Manhole to grade 5. Manholes over center and each tee 6. 3-20" manholes 7. Inlgt tee minimum 12" under invert 8. Outlet tee minimum 14" under invert 9. Outlet line cemented 10. Air space 3" above tees 11. 2" - 3" drop from inlet to outlet 12. Pipe set 13. Compact base with 6" of V crushed stone under tank 14. Tank is watertight Comments: Yes NO E. Pump Chamber 1. If separate from tank, compact base with 6" of 3/4" stone underneath 2. Minimum 2" pipe to d -box if gravity system 3. 20" access manhole 4. Tank level 5. Watertight 6. Tank size agrees with plan specification 7. Manhole to grade 8. Check valve and bleeder hole present 9. Alarm in building on separate circuit 10. Alarm functions 11. Manual operating switch 12. Pump delivers liquid to d -box Comments: F. Distribution Box 1. D -box level 2. Minimum 0. IT' (2") drop from inlet to outlet r/ 3. Minimum 6" sump 4. Outlet pipes show equal distribution L� 5. Compact base with 6" of stone beneath box 6. Box is watertight 7. All lines cemented with hydraulic cement 8. Schedule 40 pipe Comments: G. Soil Absorption system 1. All stone double -washed - 3/4" -1 ''/2" - pea stone Bucket test done? 2. Minimum 2".ofpea stone above distribution lines ✓ 3. Minimum 6" stone beneath pipe V 4. Distribution lines capped or connected together - 5. Grading meets 3:1 slope 6. 7. Minimum of 9" of fill graded over system �- Toe of slope stops minimum 5' from edge of property; if not, then swale. Comments: H. Leach Trenches 1. Minimum 2 trenches 2. Length of trenches agree with plan. (Max. length 100') 3. Width of trenches agree with plan - Minimum 2% maximum - 4'. 4. Vent present if <50 feet or specified 5. Distance between trenches minimum 4' and maximum of 6' 6. Minimum distance between trenches 10' 7. Pipe slope minimum 0.005 or 6" per 100' 8. Depth of trenches below outlet invert minimum of 6". r 9. Pipes set on stable base. Comments: I. Leach Field 1. Maximum length of field 100' 2. Pipe slope minimum 0.005 or 6" per 100' 3. Separation between pipe 6' maximum 4. Pipes connected at end 5. Separation between adjacent fields 10' minimum 6. Pipes set on stable base 7. Maximum 4' separation from edge of field to first line 8. Minimum two distribution lines 9. Maximum perc rate 20 mpi Comments: I Leaching Pits 1. Minimum inlet pipe 4" 2. Pits of concrete 3. Sidewall between 12" and 48" wide 4. Access manholes on each pit 5. Pipes cemented with hydraulic cement Comments: K. Final Grade 1. Slope over soil absorption system minimum 0.02 2. All system components covered by at least 9" soil :7 3. Cover soil free of stones larger than 6" 4. Grading slopes away from dwelling 5. No areas over system that may pond Yes NO —K APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERIIMIIT DAMSPU" /2r woo CT1=iNT LNSTALLER'S LICEISEr-,-' %/Z% Q LOCATION: mea Ste. LICENSED ENSTALLER: A),Vhi n Sir,,✓.* SIGNATURE: tlTELEPHONE, CHECK ONE: REPAIR: NEW CONSTRUCTION: IF NEW CONSTUCTION, PLEASE ATTACH FOUNT DATION AS -BUILT. 575.00 Fee Attached? Foundation As-Buiit? Floor Plans? Approval Administrative Use Only Yes o Yes Lz No Yes ,2 Date: 7 3. 4. INSTALLER PROJECT MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS As the North Andover licensed installer for the construction of the septic system for the property at /�P�_ST. relative to the application of`,/`/�,y,� �p rAE'r dated ,� 7�J for plans by,, _and dated ,z J,,,, / g with revisions dated I understand and agree to the following obligations for management of this project: As the installer I am obligated to call for any and all inspections. If homeowner, contractor, project manger, or any other person not associated with my company schedules an inspection and the system is not ready then item two shall be applicable . As the installer I am required to have the necessary work completed prior to the applicable inspections as indicated below. I understand that requesting an inspection, without completion of the items in accordance with Title 5 and the Board of Health Regulations may result in a $50.00 fine being levied against my company. a) Bottom of Bed — generally first inspection unless there is a retaining wall which should be done first. Installer must request the inspection but does not have to be present. b) Final Inspection — Engineer must first do their inspection for elevations, ties, etc. As -built or verbal OK from engineer must be submitted to BOH, after which installer calls for inspection time. Installer must be present for this inspection With pump system all electrical work must be ready and able to cause pump to work and alarm to function. c) Final Grade — installer must request inspection when all grading is complete. Does not have to be on site. As the installer I understand that persons or companies not associated with my company may not perform the work required by my company to complete the installation of the system identified in the attached application for installation. I further understand that work by others unlicensed to install septic systems in North Andover can constitute reasons for denial of the system, and/or revocation or suspension of my license in the Town of North Andover plus significant fines to all persons involved. As the Installer I understand that I must be on site during the performance of the following construction steps: a) Determination that the proper elevation of the excavation has been reached b) Inspection of the sand and stere to be used. c) Final inspection by Board of Health staff. d) Installation of tank, D -box, pipes, stone, vent, pump chamber, retaining wall and other components. 5. As the installer I understand that I am solely responsible for the installation of the system as per the approved plans. No instructions by the homeowner, general contractor, or any other persons shall absolve me of this obligation. Undersigned License Septic Installer - 12 Date: SAO T, !2., 299-69 Town of North Andover OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 30 School Street WILLIAM J. SCOTT North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Director MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 1998 TO: Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner FROM: Sandra Starr, Health Administrato J- /L, CC: Michael D. Howard, Consevation Commission Administrator William Scott, Director of Community Development RE: Calf Pasture Definitive Subdivision This memo comes in response to Phil Christiansen's letter of June 4, 1998 concerning the setbacks to a tributary to a surface water relative to Mosquito Brook. I am inclined to agree with Mr. Christiansen's argument that the 325 foot setback to a tributary to a surface water supply in the local regulation does not apply to Mosquito Brook since the Ipswich River is considered a Class B water supply. However, to date, the Board of Health has held to the policy of disallowing the installation of septic systems, except in those repair cases where there is no alternative, within the 200 foot buffer area to streams and rivers as determined by the Rivers Act. As depicted on the definitive subdivision plan, Lot 2 is located entirely within this 200 foot setback to the Riverfront Area of Mosquito Brook. In reference to the memo from Michael D. Howard dated 6-11-98, concerning the statement no feasible alternative: the feasible alternative exists that Lot 3 only be developed. Therefore, Lot 2 remains unbuildable without variances. There is, however, a limited area on Lot 3 that is available for soil testing and possible septic system installation. The fact remains that as yet there have been no soil tests performed on the site. Please be advised that soil tests were scheduled for today, June 161', but were cancelled by the engineer, as I understand it, at the request of Ralph Joyce, due to the fact that the area was under water. A. y° •' �L o BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 pvy COLER & COLANTONIO z ENGINEERS ANC SCIENM37S May 29, 1998 _ Ms. Kathleen Colwell Planning Director 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Preliminary Engineering Review Calf Pasture Definitive Subdivision Plan Dear Ms. Colwell: In response to your request, Coler & Colantonio, Inc. has reviewed the submittal package for the above referenced site. The project has been reviewed for conformance to the submission requirements of the "Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land" in North Andover. The submittal package included the following information: • Plan set entitled: "Definitive Subdivision Plan - Calf Pasture located in North Andover, Mass." consisting of seven sheets dated 4/20/98, Prepared by Christiansen & Sergi. • Drainage Analysis — Calf Pasture Rea Street, North Andover, dated April 20, 1998. • Driveway Covenant and Covenant Not to ,Further Subdivide, prepared by Milltown Development Corporation, Old Yankee Realty Trust, dated May 21, 1998. • A Notice of Intent for Calf Pasture, in North Andover, Massachusetts, dated May 1997, latest revision date August 6, 1997. Prepared by Wetlands Preservation Inc. Received December 22, 1997. • Wetland Impact and Mitigation Plan for Calf Pasture, dated July 24, 1997. Prepared by Wetlands Preservation Inc. • Wildlife Habitat Evaluation dated July 2, 1997. Prepared by Wetlands Preservation Inc. • Order of Conditions, Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act dated September 11, 1997. We offer the following comments: Planning Board Regulations: 1. Section 3.) C.) 3.) c-) 5&4pne Test Data —Two test pits have been indicated on the plans, although no information has been provided for them. The plans indicate septic systems and drainage basins, we recommend tests be performed in these locations to confirm suitability for soil infiltration areas and retention facilities. 101 Accord Park Drive 7B1 982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Fax: 781-982-5490 2. Section 3.) C.) 3.) d.) Drainage Analysis — The Rules and Regulations of the town of North Andover require the drainage analysis to include analysis for the 2,10 and 100 year storms for roads and lot drainage. Only the 2 and 100 year storms were provided. Providing the attention ponds can adequately control the 2 and 100 -year storms, the ten-year storm should also be controlled. There is insufficient back up to verify the retention pond capacity. Data on storm sewers should be provided. The proposed crossing impacts should be justified by standard methods for river crossings. 3. Section 3.) C.) 3.) e.) Ownership/Encumbrances —The subareas indicated on the Drainage Analysis drawings do not indicate flow paths or control points. 4. Section 3.) C.) 3.) f.) Construction schedule —No construction schedule was provided with the submittal_ 5. Section 3.) C.) 3_) g.) Soil Map - No soil maps were provided with the submittal. 6. Section 3.) C.) 3.) j.) Erosion Control Plan -No erosion control plan was provided with the submittal. 7. Section 3.) C.) 3.) k.) 5.) The legend does not include hatching symbols. It is unclear what each hatch indicates. S. Section 3.) C.) 3.) k.) 9.) The proposed utility easements are not indicated on the plans. 9. Section 3.) C.) 3.) k.) 16.) The profile does not include proposed water mains and appurtenances thereto. 10. Section 3.) C.) 3.) k.) 19.) It is unclear if the existing property is serviced by town water and sewer. 11. The proposed span is over 200 feet long_ The Planning Board may desire a specialized review by the State Highway Department or other bridge specialists_ Based on a discussion with the Massachusetts Highway Department, there are additional requirements for bridges that may not be addressed by this submittal. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient ;for your needs. We would be pleased to meet with the Board or the design engineer to discuss this project at your convenience. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER & COLANTONIO, INC. John C_ Chessia, P.E. xc Christiansen & Sergi Inc. Juin Rand Mee/JCC MEMORANDUM DATE: May 29, 1998 TO: Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner FROM: Sandra Starr, Health Administrator, .G' ' RE: Calf Pasture Definitive Subdivision Plan I have reviewed the proposed definitive subdivision plan of Calf Pasture and have the following comments: No soil tests have been performed on this site. Local regulations require a minimum of 325' between a septic system and a tributary to a surface water supply, in this case Mosquito Brook and the Ipswich River. With this setback, lots 2 and 3 are entirely within the buffer and are not buildable without variances. Title 5 states there must be a minimum of 200' between a septic system and a tributary. This leaves one small potential area for a possible septic system. As noted above, however, there have been no soil tests. Based on these facts, I recommend that the definitive subdivision plan for Calf Pasture, dated April 20, 1998, not be approved. MILLTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OLD YANKEE REALTY TRUST ELLIS BUILDING 95 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MAO 1845 RALPH R. JOYCE June 16, 1998 (978) 685-4555 FAX (978) 685-3148 Town of North Andover BOARD OF HEALTH 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: CALF PASTURE SUBDIVISION REA STREET MAUREEN J. JOYCE, APPLICANT Dear Sirs: Please accept this letter as my request to be on the agenda of the Board of Health for your meeting scheduled for June 25, 1998. The action I request from your Board is as follows: 1. To withdraw the administrative memo of Sandra Starr addressed to the Planning Board recommending disapproval of the above-cited subdivision. 2. To dismiss Ms. Starr from further involvement with the subdivision and to appoint a qualified individual to review the plan and regulations and to further advise your Board. 3. Upon receipt of such advice to make a proper recommendation of approval or disapproval of the subdivision pursuant to the subdivision control laws. 4. To schedule appropriate testing of septic systems for the lots shown on the subdivision. 5. To direct such further action as the Board feels appropriate for the circumstances. A brief description of events preceding this letter is as follows: Approximately a year and one half ago Mrs. Joyce approached the Planning Board and Conservation Commission to subdivide her eight acre parcel on Rea Street. The Planning Board procedures were deferred until the Conservation Commission reviewed a Notice of Intent and the Commission subsequently issued an Order of Condition to allow the development of the parcel the principle feature of which provided a limited access crossing of Mosquito Brook as it flows through the parcel to access and develop the uplands. During this process a request for septic testing dated April 17, 1997 (copy enclosed) was filed with your Board and despite several telephone messages to Ms. Starr, none of which where returned, an office visit by me, and several inquiries by my engineer, Mr. Christiansen, no scheduled testing was forthcoming. The first time Ms. Starr broke silence was at a Technical Review Committee meeting on May 28, 1998. At that time she indicated that she was going to apply a 325' set back requirement from Mosquito Brook because it was a tributary to a water supply. Mr. Christiansen advised her of the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standard 310 CMR 4.00. Ms. Starr indicated she would review a formal submission by Mr. Christiansen before further action which was submitted on June 4, 1998 (copy enclosed) but, not withstanding the same, Ms. Starr issued here memo dated May 29, 1998 (copy enclosed) recommending disapproval of the subdivision. This memo is without statutory authority as recommendations for subdivisions are required of the Board of Health and is a gross misapplication and disregard for regulations and our property interests. It constitutes gross negligence and unprofessional conduct by the Board's agent and subjects us to substantial risk. When this scheme did not work, Ms. Starr next tried to invoke the Rivers Act, so-called, and informed various parties that a 200' set back from Mosquito Brook was now the standard to be applied. I spoke to Mr. Howard and brought to his attention (with the understanding that he was to meet with Ms. Starr) the provisions of 310 CMR 10.03 (copy enclosed) which define that the Rivers Act (in conjunction with Title V) requires a 50' set back from the brook. When local regulations are applied, the proper set back requirement for this subdivision is 1001 . As of the date of this letter, there has been no acknowledgement from Ms. Starr regarding her intent to apply the proper regulations or agreement to test two and not the one lot she in her sole discretion feels is allowed. Her gross misapplication of regulations and lack of responsible administration has undermined any confidence that our property interests are being properly addressed and, accordingly, I request the Board's intervention as described in the beginning of this letter before any irreparable harm is suffered. Ve t r y you , Ralph R. J c cc: Robert Halpin, Town Manager William Scott, Community Development Director Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner Philip Christiansen, Engineer Sandra Starr Memo To: Sandra Starr, BOH Agent From: Michael D. Howard, Conservation Administrator CC: Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner Date: 6-11-98 RE: Calf Pasture. You have requested from this Department an opinion specific to the placement of new septic systems within the Riverfront Area. I have reviewed the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act and Regulations and, in summary, it appears as though a subsurface sewage disposal system could be constructed if the following performance standards are satisfied: 1. There is no feasible alternative whereas the system could be located outside the Riverfront Area (310 CMR 10.58(4));- 2. Assuming the above has been satisfied, the soil absorption system must be set back at least 50' horizontally from the boundary of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland (301 CMR 10.03(3) or a greater distance as may be required by more stringent local ordinances... 3. In addition, the soil absorption system must be greater than 100' from the bank (or mean high water elevation —whichever is greater) of the perennial stream in question ... (310 CMR 10.03)(3); 4. Total Riverfront Area alteration for the site is less than 5,000 s.f. or 10% of the Riverfront Area. 0 Page 1 If the applicant submits a plan which depicts a proposed location for the septic system that would meet these above referenced performance standards, than I would suggest we coordinate soil testing in the field. I would not, however, encourage the Board of Health to grant valances of the local ByLaw as Mosquito Brook is perhaps North Andover's greatest riparian corridor and in need of stringent protection. Furthermore, the applicant' site exists within the limits of Estimated Habitat for Rare Wetlands Wildlife and it is vitally important that we proceed cautiously with additional septic systems. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. 0 Page 2 This departments has the following comments: Bridges - A major portion of this proposed roadway is made up of a series of arch bridges. This Department does nor recommend the construction of bridges for town roadways. The proper maintenance is very expensive and the potential liability is very high. There is also the question of design standards and who will review the plans. This proposal may require both State and Federal review. 2. Road Grade - The slopes for a major portion of the road are 1 %. The developer has connected a series of 1 % slope. This type of design results in an actual slope of 0.05% and does not work in in the field. We are currently having problems on another subdivision that has this same type of design. 3. Water Main - The water main is not shown on the plan. Also, there is insufficient vertical height over the proposed bridges for a water main. 4. "Scupper Detail" The scupper proposes a 4" in size pipe as a discharge. The minimum acceptable size is 12 inches. 5. Drain Manhole & Catch Basin - need revisions. 6. "Vortex" type unit - This type of unit has NOT been approved for general acceptance as part of the Town's drainage system. We are beginning an evaluation of these systems and will not have the results for over one year. This proposed subdivision does not meet our minimum requirements and is unacceptable to this Department. cc: J. William Hmurciak, P.E. Michael Howard, Conservation John Chessia, P.E. C;IAMIPROWIISCCALFWEMOI CHRISTIANSEN & SERGI, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 160 SUMMER STREET HAVERHILL, MASSACHUSETTS 01830-6318 (978) 373-0310 FAX: (978) 372-3960 June 4, 1998 Ms. Sandra Starr Town of North Andover Health Administrator 30 School Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: "Calf Pasture" Definitive Subdivision Plan Dear Ms. Starr: In response to your May 29, 1998 memorandum to Town Planner Kathleen Colwell regarding the above referenced project, I would like to clarify certain points regarding the issue of the required setbacks from a Tributary to a Surface Water Supply. Specifically, the setbacks should not be applied to this project because Mosquito Brook is not, according to the applicable regulations, a Tributary to a Surface Water Supply. According to the Town of North Andover Minimum Requirements for the Subsurface Disposal of Sanitary Sewage (April 1997), a Surface Water Supply is defined as Any lake, pond, reservoir, or impoundment designated as a public water supply in the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00 and Lake Cochichewick." Likewise, Title 5 defines a Surface Water Supply as "Any lake, pond, reservoir, or impoundment designated as a public water supply in the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00." According to the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00, the Ipswich River, from its source to the tidal portion of the river, is designated as a Class B water. As defined in 310 CMR 4.05 (3)(b), Class B waters "are designated as a habitat for fish, other aquatic life, and wildlife, and for primary and secondary contact recreation. Where designated they be suitable as a source of public water supply with appropriate treatment. They shall be suitable for irrigation and other agricultural uses and for compatible industrial cooling and process uses. These waters shall have consistently good aesthetic value." In order for a surface water to fall within the local bylaw or Title 5 definition of a Surface Water Supply, it would have to be designated as a Class A water in the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards. Since the portion of the Ipswich River Basin in which Mosquito Brook lies is designated as Class B water, the "Calf Pasture" project falls outside of the jurisdictional requirements for the more stringent offsets between septic system components and Tributaries to Surface Water Supplies. The project, as designed, leaves ample space available for the construction of the septic systems outside of all of the applicable setback distances required by local bylaw and Title 5. No waivers or variances from required setback distances would be necessary. It should also be noted that if this portion of the Ipswich River Basin was designated as Class A waters, a large portion of the Town of North Andover (all of the town that is drained by Mosquito Brook, Boston Brook, and the Skug River) would be subjected to the more stringent setback requirements. When these areas are combined with the Lake Cochichewick watershed, a vast majority of the town's area would be subject to these requirements. We do not believe it was the intent of the Board of Health to subject a vast majority of the town's area to the more stringent setback requirements, nor are we aware of any instances where these more stringent requirements have been enforced within the Ipswich River Basin. Enclosed are copies of the portions of the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards that define the surface water classifications and describe the Ipswich River Basin. You will note that in Table 27 none of the designated Public Water Supplies in the Ipswich River Basin are fed by Mosquito Brook. I hereby request that you review this information and reconsider the comments you made in the afore -mentioned memorandum to Ms. Colwell. I would appreciate it if your revised memorandum to Ms. Colwell could be completed by June 12, 1998. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you require any additional information. Additionally, we should schedule the soil testing for "Calf Pasture" for two lots, rather than only one, as we had previously planned. LVA C.C. William Scott, Director of Planning and Community Development Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner Ralph Joyce h ♦I� 1 O I Wlot Y _ O ♦1�`1 O �1 � W � O '► I♦ _ I 0 Q e�a�k W G ^ 1 / 2 I ♦♦I W v \ O_ _ F O - - WIL Co i� P28 < 111111f111tsallsolls Y♦i • tt / • O I O O Y _ O ♦1�`1 O �1 � W � O '► I♦ _ I 0 / /� '♦♦ v \ O_ _ F O Co i� P28 111111f111tsallsolls Q V O N b O .V C V r L� N 14) LLM �1/ F• 1 a cO33723980 A Y PC2 �w-1i� �r�--r+. /F p°.^^- '"... r �+u••� "iwi-.rr-.-.+.t++.`+ras w r -r--+. - H �...q. .. .. _ _ _ .� "'-wr' . e - _ti z ' 1 _ _ , ' _ _ ..o - it- •. YDATE Mai; 29. 1TO8 TO Kathleen Cclwe'l, Town Planner FROM. Sandra Starr. Health AdmInistrato- R.L Calf PS-stitre Defiaiu: e iubdivigion Pian I have revicwcd the Frcposcd deftniti\r subdivision p'sn of Calf Pasture am. have :fie fcllowinb comments: No -Oil tests have been performed on Pius site. :. Local re8ulatiors reSuire a minimum of 325' between a septic systern and a tritutary to a surface water supply, in ihis cast Mosquito Brook and the IpT,'wich R ver With this setback, lots Z and 3 are entirety within the buffer and are not buildable without variances 3. = Title 3 states ttete mur, he a minimum of 200' betv+een a seprc system and a xibut. ri This leaves one small potential arca for a possibk sepoe SVstern. As noted above, I owever, there have . Based on these facts. I mcorrmend that tf:c definitivesubdi�•isien plan for CalfPasture. dated Apri: _ • 20, 1998, uut In gpioved. y WILLIAM J. SCOTT Director (978)688-9531 Town of North Andover OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 February 23, 1999 Christiansen & Sergi 160 Summer Street Haverhill, MA 01830-6318 Re: Lot 2, Rea St N. Andover, MA 01845 Dear Mr. Christiansen, This is to inform you that the proposed plans for the site referenced above have been approved for a dwelling with a maximum of 9 rooms. Fax(978)688-9542 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the Board of Health Office at the number below. Sincerely, Sandra Starr, R.S. Health Administrator SS/rel cc: Maureen Joyce File BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 CHRISTIANSEN & SERGI, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 160 SUMMER STREET HAVERHILL, MASSACHUSETTS 01830-6318 February 8, 1999 Ms. Sandy Starr, R.S. Health Administrator North Andover Board of Health 30 School St. N. Andover, MA. 01845 Re: lot 2, Rea St. Dear Ms. Starr: (978) 373-0310 FAX: (978) 372-3960 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER/ BOARD O�LTH FS a Per a phone conversation with your office on Jan. 27, 1999, we have revised the SSDS design for the above referenced lot per the recommendations of Port Engineering's review. Please find enclosed a revised plan which includes: 1. The finished grade over the septic tank has been lowered to 6" above the tank thereby not requiring a manhole to grade. reg. # 15.228 (2). 2. slope of pipe from tank to D -box has been changed from "s=0.02" to "s=0.015" 3. spot elevations for proposed driveway grades have been added. Should you have any further questions in the above matter, we are available at your convenience and can be reached by phone at, 978-373-0310. Since y, ip G. stiansen, P.E. PGC/epw cc: File #96063 Jan -14-99 10:02A Paul D. Turbide, PE/PLS PORT ENGINEERING, Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors One Harris Street Newburypor4 MA 01950 (978)46S-8594 January 14, 1999 Sandra Starr North Andover Board of Health Administrator Office of Community Development and Services 30 School St. North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Title V review for Lot 2, Rea Street Dear Sandra, 508-465-0313 P.031 I Enclosed find the "Checklist for North Andover Septic System Plans" for the above- mentioned site. The following minor notes and observations are offered. • The design of the septic tank must include one childproof 24 -inch riser/manhole raised to final grade. 310 CMR 228(2) • The elevation of the proposed driveway must be shown. NA 8.02(t) The following minor point is noted: • In the Profile, the slope of the pipe between the septic tank and d -box is listed as 2"/c, however the invert elevations indicate that it is in fact a 1.5% slope. This is also an acceptable slope, but should be clarified on the plan so there is no misunderstanding. The following observation is offered: • General Note 10 states that if the reserve area is constructed, an impervious barrier must be designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.255(2). It appears that there is room for the fill and impervious barrier if the building and driveway are built according to plan, and therefore this statement would be adequate. If these minor changes are made on the plan, then I do not need to review this system again. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Since fr� Carlton A. Brown, PE/PLS RALPH R. JOYCE LAW OFFICES OF RALPH R. JOYCE ELLIS BUILDING 95 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01645 April 17, 1997 (508) 665 - 4555 FAX 6135 - 3148 Town of North Andover BOARD OF HEALTH 156 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: 357 REA STREET -' \ 41s Dear Sirs: Enclosed please find the following items required to perform water tests on the above-cited property: 7S5 1. Check in the amount of $VS-0�00 2. Copy of deed 3. Plot plan Kindly contact my office with a test dam,',. RRJ:mjj enc. Very/, t rt,YyApg-, 1ph R. .ro AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize Ralph R. Joyce and the North Andover Board of Health to conduct water tests on my property at 357 Rea Street. ), a reen J. Jo SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTAL FORM LOCATION: 7L 2 Z'L St_4 NEW PLANS: YES - REVISED PLANS: YES SITE EVALUATION FORMS INCLUDED DATE: l z 3 0 I�J_2 3F 49Y 3 $125.00/Plan �'— $ 60.00/Plan YES NO DESIGN ENGINEER:_; �, �l� ; �7Gt�r�fh few r DATE TO CONSULTANT:�71 r *If you want your plans expedited, please submit four plans and included a stamped envelope with the correct amount of postage to mail plans to Port Engineering. When the submission is all in place, route to the Health Secretary. � MORTIy L a • y *,SSACMUSE�� Town of North Andover, Massachusetts BOARD OF HEALTH Form No. 2 DESIGN APPROVAL FOR SOIL ABSORPTION SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Applicant MI okC-69L) j Test No. Site Location �4T v� T,5,Q Reference Plans and Specs. f�/c�/`57/ri/V6 NEER DE Permission is granted for an individual soil absorption sewage disposal system to be installed in accordance with regulations of Board of Health. Fee��✓, 06 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF HEALTH Site System Permit No. 16417 No. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS FEE BOARD OF HEALTH M N T OF NORM 4� OV64- APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Application for a Permit to Construct ` Repair ( ) Upgrade ( ) Abandon ( ) - ❑ Complete System ❑ Individual Components Loc ion �O nc 's Nam Map/Parcel # Address Lot # Te phone # 60S7�7G(/t�S't'�rt Installer's Name Desi gne 's me r .16o Su rn �r Sf ! I)Me Address Address 17 13 73 _o , iy Telephone # Telephone # Type of Building: w �aW, Lot Size I �d Sq. feet Dwelling — No. of Bedrooms Garbage Grinder ( ) Other — Type of Building No. of persons Showers ( ), Cafeteria ( ) Other fixtures Design Flow (min. required) T gpd Calculated design flow gpd Design flow provided l gpd Plan: Date Number of sheets Z Revision Date Title 7t Description of Soil(s) u Sale Soil Evaluator Form No. !/ 12, Name of Soil Evaluator ` Date of Evaluation DESCRIPTION OF REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS Th unders' dgeo=tall the above described Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of TITLE nd rrationuntil a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Board of Health. Signed7 Date fI Inspections Inspe FORM t - APPLICATION FOR DSCP DEP APPROVED FORM 5/96 9 Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No. 1 NORTH A BOARD OF HEALTH 6 � y� 6 OA19 0� \;a�ADRATED WPPa.'�y APPLICATION FOR SITE TESTING/INSPECTION Applican Site Loco Engineer i1r%rvic AUUKtn I ELEPHONE Test/Inspection Date and Time , 1/a lGT % f qk _CHA MAN, BOARD OF HEALTH Fee -17t). Test No. S.S. Permit No. D.W.C. No. C.C. Date Plbg. Permit No. i BOARD OF HEALTH 14,6 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. 01845 APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: _ 611 / 7 /�'� LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS/ Assessor's map & parcel number:__ TEL. 688-954,0 OWNER: _4-7,4U f ,F,6y T TEL. NO. -Z, ADD RES S : �� ENGINEER: l7( L TEL. NO.. 7j CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: Intended uss of land: residential subdivision, single ,fil home,commercial THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM: 1. Proof of Iland ownership (Tax bill, deed, or letter from owner permitting tests) - 2. Plot plan - 3. Fee of $175.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the two deep holes - and two percolation tests required for each lot. Fee of $75.60 per lot for repairs or upgrades_ GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. 3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system. 4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (no smaller than V-1 shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. �. LAW OFFICES OF RALPH R. JOYCE ELLIS BUILDING 95 MAIN STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01645 RALPH R. JOYCE April 17, 1997 (508) 665 4555 FAX 665 3148 7'01,,�n of North Andover BOARD OF HEALTH 156 Main Street �� �.1 1, 0184 And� 5 Dear Sirs: Encl()sed please find the following items required tQ perform water tests on the above-cited property:. E 1. Check in the amount"of $150.00 2. Copy of deed 3. Plot plan Kindly contact my office wi)Ver, st d tr o'I R. o RRJ:mjj enc. AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize Ralph R. Joyce and the North Andover Board of. Health to conduct water tests on my property at 357 Rea Street. b/ A -,a " � I a reen J. Jo�ee, 0 e No. FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page I of 3 13 Commonwealth of Massachusetts - NWfl4 rINOOV&C , Massachusetts ff 010, - A lr^10 f)"—CitO KOW1 Date: i1)098 V I Performed By: E, � ........................................... Date: J -09/m... L ... Q�WNN . ................................................................................................................... .......................... Witnessed By: ........ ANW ........ $.I.- oww's Nam. �1 Lmaimn Address -LOT ?_ tzf Iq STVLfT Address, IM MAt-4tZ1FEA) La I rq�AN ANOW&IL Tel*= I gE 19 , S -r r.,_ELr I t+'�taj G 16,- , 4,StS:' ew Construction [3 --Repair ❑ Office Review Published Soil Survey Available: No El Yes Scale P X5.1•• j..W Soil Map Unit C -C-. . ... .... Year Published �.] ... Publication. Sc .... Cfq r14 ........................................................................... Drainage Class 0 4.L...L Soil Limitations- ............ .. Surficial Geologic Report Available: No 2— Yes ❑ Year Published Publication Scale Geologic Material (Map Unit) ........................................................................ Landform.......................................................................................... Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No 2'Y'es ❑ Within 500 year flood boundary No []Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No []Yes Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) or - Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal MNormal ElBelcwNormal M Other References Reviewed: DEP APPROVED FOPUNI - 12107195 I FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 2 of 3 Location Address or Lot No. LO 12 ST121 E On-site Review � o Deep Hole Number Date:. //�P ..516 Time: Weather Location(idertify on site plan) :.::::..::::,.::.,,..:.::::.:.:, ::.:.::..::....... ::.,.:::.::.:::::......... .:..;...r....:.....:.:..::::::.,.v::.......... .:..:....::.::, o Land Use.:::.:::t,,,1..c2G.E?._..�...:.:.:: _ Slope (/01 .3.-8 Surface Stones Vegetation :.::..0. . L.:: :I CK.•�::1�I:W.14 < .�::.Iw.,: ,PINE Landform......_.:.:.:...:.:.:: .:::..::::::..::::::,:..::: :...:::._::.............. Position on landscape (sketch on the back) , ::::... :_:. ::...:.:.:.:..:....: ,:.:..:.::.:..::::..: ::.:..::.:: .. ...:.. .. __.. Distances from: Open Water Body . 2- U feet Drainage way :., ..:... feet Possible Wet Area feet Property Line .:..3. feet Drinking Water Well :::::::.::....::: feet Other ..:..:... DEEP. OBSERVATION HOLE LOG� Depth from Surface (Inches) Soil Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Color (Munsell) Soil Mottling Other (Structure, Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % Grave0 — 65T. P i=. S . C . lnYrz5/ G R r9 N yr lwi.VL / PCIi4 9 LE 6- L M#g4.5Ivi! ,' 2b - 36 G a, .MI✓U 2,Sy S/� •7'SfK (# 104 t4 inL, PYU/+s Lk �6 " 7 .3 C7, f.e- ". M? 1� Mr4JJ���� YUr�vL ggL0l,J z.sys/l� Z��� M�S�►vr�, ✓�vcy ��sc.�. 13 " 10 (� G 3 ��H,�;v cAr�ns�. Parent Material (geologic) S4NI)y 7—ILL- DepthtoBedrock: 06 Depth to Groundwater Standing Water in the Hole: (� S Weeping from Pit Face: ai Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: DEP APPROVED FORM - 12/07/95 FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 2 of 3 r Location Address or Lot No. COT Z 12,E 14 On-site Review Deep Hole Number Z Date:.(I/L9..ly7 Time: ll; 3G Weather �.. S�9N✓✓`� ¢.jr" Location(identify on site plan)`2 ....::...:.....:::::.:::::.:::::..:.:::.::::::.::.....::::.:::::..::.:::....:...::....:::.:..:.:,::..::,.:.::::...::: i L d Land Use Slope (%) 3.'4>. Surface Stones 3:. �.... Vegetation.:Q 1.: Bia.cv.a.:,M. W 10.441..:. J::.::.!N.....� . ►' 1S3.b..:::..:::::::..,....:..::::..:::..:.:::...::.:::.::::..:::.._ .......... Landform::._:..:....,.. _:.............,............ ........_ ......... . Position on landscape (sketch on the back) ....:::...:.::. :. .:.....:::::.:...:::. Distances from: Open Water Body zic feet Drainage way feet Possible Wet Area .:.: l 2.0 feet Property Line ..:.35.:. feet Drinking Water Well .::.- .. - .:.. feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG* Depth from Surface (Inches) Soil Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Color (Munsell) Soil Mottling Other (Structure, Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % Gravel) FS, U1 lovi23/L G h wN� , f=121 crt 7.SHvt��B 5.. L (3�,j; Gl2.t .SA, 75-yY41�, cy7l3 MZ� Z,'6- $ G, GKN �u�►2 z,s�6 14, III&Wl,� "jam -1 I's ouL101& MINIMUM UI' L HULLb KLUUIMtU HI tv tnr rnvrwcu NIJr%w0^ Parent Material (geologic) 1) L/ ► 1(-L DepthtoBedrock: Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from Pit Face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: 7-7 �l DEP APPROVED FORM - 12/07/95 Location Address orLot No. FORM 11 .SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 2 of 3 On-site Review // 0 /5 DeeD Hole Number Date:. Time: /I. f? Weather Location fidertifyonsite plan) ��—��`—'—�--~ Land Use Slope � Surface Stones -' ...... - Vegetation Landfornn._._~.. Position onlandscape (sketch onthe back) Distances from: Qpmn VVeter Bmdy ?/[] feet Drainageway - _- . ' feet Possible Wet Area - 1 feet Property Line -. feet Drinking Water Weil __'''.... feet Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE L Depth from Surface (inches) Soil Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Color (Munsell) Soil Mottling Other (Structure. Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % juvi m 2,'57L/5/� ?-�l G# C, (3 0, Al ZA 617-00 10 ^ MINIMUM ut- z nuLLb nLuw/vW*/ tvum, rnvrvQc""=,"=~`"""" ' ^/ y' Parent Material (geologic) 15A N LH 7-1 LLI DepthtoBedrock: -70 Depth to Groundwater- Standing Water in the Hole- Weeping from Pit Face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: ao DEP APPROVED FORM '12mno `'. it FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 3 of 3 Location Address or Lot No. Lf)T CUO . S T Determination ,dor Seasonal Hieh Water Table Method Used: ❑ Depth observed standing in observation hole inches Z/'Depth pth weeping from side of observation hole .................. inches to soil mottles ..Z-Cz.. inches ❑ Ground water adjustment ................... feet Index Well Number .................. Reading Date ................... Index well level ................... Adjustment factor ................... Adjusted ground water level ..................................... Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? y If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on .v 154- (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Depa tment of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signature Date —ItIl W- DEP APPROVED FORM - 12/07/95 V FORM 12 - PERCOLATION TEST Location Address or Lot No. (.i)( Z IZt-w -ST-re-1 U% COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS N06W fq!` 90UGL , Massachusetts Percolation Test* Date:........ ..l.I /1.0L-'! Observation Hole # Z Depth of Perc 34+ 5 f Start Pre-soak 1 4-01 P 3 Z End Pre-soak 1r%�¢ li-47 Time at 12" I ; Time at 9" I / QC1 it : Time at 6" li-lS.`i� 1L=1� Time (9"-6") r Rate Min./Inch * Minimum of 1 percolation test must be performed in both the primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed L3' Site Failed ❑ ..............................................................................................:......................................_._............._ Performed By: Lb m'ou- O'C_ 'V"Vf'&e - Witnessed By: V� 9`1 410TbL Comments: DEP APPROVED FORM - 12/07/95 Z7 -i4 's i (. fl T,J x Illlllr.�,l!1l����il ; 1111111111111111111 i ' h= tv PPRO !'1111!lIIIC11 �owi REIJ11C111111II1i1111 T ` -}� 1 111lloan 1ill 111111 MAIN" Yr11 v n: �Ir.11N��1111a1�'1111� �c r.' IIIIf ir7IN ILS i�l�l111111111111111 � ' Ell lllllllililllll y,t30 tt_ H1111111111 l X1 1 10111111111111 � z� y Illlllnllllllllllll . �0 „k F , 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII r P r �,.,�r Illnnlllllllllllll � 111111111111111111 F y T st��� t 1 fI tYy 5 � ,.ryr 43.Y`,p IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ` y x 17 Lei,'`5, 11111111111111111111IXm a DATE: � LOCATION: 3 5 - - • R E i4 15- /�^'� (`-LTJ" �' V iF ✓moo _ r N G I N E BOH WITNESS: PE,zRCOLAITION lTNESS: PEaCOLATION TEST _ BOi i OM DEP T OF PL,RC TEST: r� /X tC TIME OF SOAK: _ �b (At lees 1 minutes Icnc) TIME AT12" d l o TIME AT TIMEAT CVE,NIC-'HT SOAK TIME ST/-RTED _D NEXT DAY SOAK. T1N1E ;�T 112 TIME AT c" TIME AT (.^,t Ie_s 1 _ -rinu,.es) DATE: % l- 1 v_ q 8 LOCATION. ENCINEE1 -- - — - - - BOH WITNESS: PERCOL."NTION TEST = _ B0. i i OM DEPTH Or PERC TEST: TIME OF SOAK: _ ! .3 (At least 1 minutes long) TIME AT 12" TIME AT c" f TIME _"J i -* CVE .NIGH✓ T SOAK TIME ST,= r � t WILLIAM J. SCOTT Director Town of North Andover OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 30 School Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 NOTICE OF DECISION Any appeal shall be filled within (20) days after the date of filling this Notice in the Office of the Town Clerk. Petition of Maureen Joyce Date May 4, 1999 Date of Hearing 2/16/99, 4/6/99,4/20/99, 4/29/95 Premises affected Rea Street Lots 1 & 2 Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw Section 2.30.1 so as to allow to establish a common driveway to service lots 1 & 2 Rea Street. After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted to APPROVE the SPECIAL PERMIT -COMMON DRIVE based upon the following conditions: Signed u CC: Director of Public Works Richard S.Rowen, Chairman Building Inspector Natural Resource/Land Use Planner Alison Lescarbeau, V. Chairman Health Sanitarian Assessors John Simons, Clerk Police Chief Fire Chief Richard Nardella Applicant Engineer Joseph V. MahoneyV. Mahoney Towns Outside Consultant File Planning Board Interested Parties CONSERVATION - (978) 688 9530 • HEALTH - (978) 688-9540 • PLANNING - (978) 688-9535 *BUILDING OFFICE - (978) 688-9545 • *ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - (978) 688-9541 * *146 MAIN STREET CERTIFICATE OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO: Maureen Joyce FROM: North Andover Planning Board RE: Special Permit Approval for a Common Driveway pursuant to Section 2.30.1 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaws, Common Driveway Plan Entitled "Subdivision of Calf Pasture & Common Driveway Plan located in North Andover, MA prepared for Maureen J. Joyce"; Plan dated 6/30/98, revised 7/9/98, 7/13/98, 8/19/98, 10/22/98, 3/3/99 and 4/5/99; Drawn by Christiansen & Sergi, 160 Summer Street, Haverhill, MA DATE: April 30,1999 At their regularly scheduled meeting of Thursday, April 29, 1999, the North Andover Planning Board voted to APPROVE the above -referenced common driveway plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Any changes made to these plans must be approved by the Town Planner. Any changes deemed substantial by the Town Planner would require a public hearing and a modification by the Planning Board. 2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE: ti a) The location of the driveway must be marked in the field and reviewed by the Town Planner; b) All erosion control devices must be in place as shown on the plan; c) Tree clearing must be kept to a minimum. The area to be cleared must be reviewed by the Town Planner; d) A performance guarantee of five thousand ($5,000) in the form of a check must be made out to I the Town of North Andover must be in place in accordance with the plans and the conditions of this decision and to ensure that the as -built plans will be submitted. c 3. PRIOR TO FORM U VERIFICATION: a) Easements pertaining to the rights of access for and agreements pertaining to the maintenance of the driveway must be recorded with the Registry of Deeds and a certified copy of the recorded documents filed with the Planning Office. Specifically, this would include the conveyance of open space to the Town of North Andover, common driveway maintenance agreement, and easement to the Town of North Andover for Private Way and Pedestrian Access to the land noted as Open Space. 4. PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUANCE: a) The proposed dwelling on Lot 2 shall have a residential fire sprinkler system installed as required by the North Andover Fire Department. 5. The contractor shall contact Dig Safe at least 72 hours prior to commencing any excavation. 6. Gas, telephone, cable and electric utilities shall be installed as specified by the respective utility companies. 7. No open burning shall be done except as is permitted during the burning season under the Fire Department Regulations. 8. No underground fuel storage shall be installed except as may be allowed by Town Regulations. 9. The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to and be binding upon the applicant, its employees and all successors and assigns in interest or control. 10. The applicant will ensure that the deeds for lots 1 and 2 in the Calf Pasture Subdivision has language stating "the driveway being utilized for access to lots 1 and 2 does not conform to the Town's standards for purposes of utilization as a street, nor will the driveway be accepted by the Town as a street unless said driveway is upgraded and then conforms to the requirements of a street as defined in the Town of North Andover Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land". In addition, the applicant will also place a note on the plan that states the above which is to be recorded in the Essex North Registry of Deeds. It s 11.This permit shall be deemed to have lapsed after a two (2) year period from the date on which the Special Permit was granted unless substantial use or construction has commenced. Therefore, the special permit will lapse on 4/29/2001. Cc: Conservation Administrator Director of Public Works Health Administrator Building Inspector Police Chief Fire Chief Assessor Applicant Engineer Community Development Director File '� "° •'t� BOARD OF HEALTH ss^cNusE NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. APPLICATION FOR WELL AND PUMP PERMIT Permit # Date ,�' - 3 -06 A permit is requested to: drill a well V install a pump LOCATION • '35-1 � t�) e 5'f ; Lot # f Owner -Fe rt- V 'J-'n1lG P_ Address Z iA)CO/ j 5_� Tel ?7,?'- GSoZ -?�1"?'3 �� gg earfe��u1.J Well Contrctr_(�esiAA) UJe co. Add.,3AAW&)d Nf, Tel 9Qo- 1074?_ 7�� ��- Pump Contrctr Pb U.4 (,fie(( I Powaci. Add. rvtaoX`�QQ�C% cls Tel - c�� / ****************** ************************************************** WELLS (To be completed at time of pump test.) r Type of well 5,"V4 `--- � Use c5! V4 (e �" 'iW A 0,-- Diameter of well Size of casing z i Depth of bed rock '?0 r Depth casing into bedrock /s Seal been tested? Yes No (_) Date of test 00• Depth of well Water -bearing rock N\,4:cl r,el!� Z Depth to water �0 Delivers GPM for 7'40cJ,E'3. (how long?) Drawdown_ feet after pumping urs at GPM Date of completion c5��— -00 S' nature of well contractor PUMPS (To be filled in before installation.) Name & size of pump Type /17 Size of tank 40-1 Pump delivers / -1,3 GPM Pipe used in well: Cast iron (_) Galvanized (_) Plastic () Sleeve used to protect pipe? Yves _) No Type well seal 166�'de Date Signature f pump installer Date water analysis report submitted to Board of Health umbing inspector Wiring inspector Board of Health -9 Route 28 • P.O. Box 900 Windham, NH 03087-0900 (603) 898-4232 • Fax (603) 898-9581 (800) 992 -PUMP Terry Joyce Sample Number 10348 50 Second St. No. Andover, MA 01845 978 682-7633 SAMPLE FROM: 351 Rae St. No Andover, MA 01845 Received (05/10/00 ) --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * = Over MCL MaxLnum Contaminant Level pH---------------------------- 8.25 (6.5-8.5 EPA Sec Std) Hardness (as CaCO3)----- 5.0 (75 PPM EPA Sec Std) Chlorides -------------------- 39.0 (250 PPM EPA Sec Std) Sodium --------------------- 65.0 (250 PPM EPA Sec Std) Nitrates --------------------- <0.20 (10 PPM EPA Pri Std) Iron ----------------------- <0.10 (0.3 PPM EPA Sec Std) Manganese --------------- <0.05 (0.1 PPM EPA Sec Std) E -Coli Bacteria ------------ A (0 PPM EPA Pri Std) Coliform Bacteria -------- A (0 PPM EPA Pri Std) Screen Alpha --------------- <10 .(15 PPM EPA Sec Std) Tested by New Hampshire Certified Lab # Results entered by: This sample meets EPA safe drinking standards based on the tests listed above. If you have any questionsplease call Policy Well & Pump at 603-898-4232 Page 1 of 1 Providing Professional Water Service Since 1966 WATER SYSTEMS Artesian Wells Pumps Booster Jet Submersible Sump Motor Controls Parts & Accessories Pipe & Fittings Water Tanks SEWAGE SYSTEMS Alarm Systems Alternating Panels Pumps Effluent Sewage Parts & Accessories Pipe & Fittings WATER TREATMENT Aeration Filters Cartridge Filters Chemicals Softener Salt Well Sanitizer Neutralizers Reverse Osmosis Sand Separators Water Conditioners SERVICES 24 Hr. Emer. Serv. Portable Puller Hoist Truck Water Testing FROM : POLICY PHONE NO. May. 16 2000 10:09AM P4 FRA ME11 el /,,Wtit 'WELL It I Addrea Ma,AvameniVDIVIsion 0-, Water A930Lm&s WELL COMPLF-TION REPORT r r 4v of 2% Wall turner Ac OV 60010 of Health paFftj h7kr-,4!- W D:ynsstc iK P";5r,C) Ie0vNIQ1 Z] Total woo [ Melnod'lfli Id rock hffcwcNida(4od maie -al. D*ce Orilled ar—'s To Tir-e Le 701 it. Oba(M)') jn. Lengv,. Wdo bedrock V.,rkreed: "favive well sew: Screen: :�.­))( _—, dr svknc WATiR LEVEL (III wpl �..... •Octarc water 6vel .-vllw kvui Sumacs ft, L_Ate_&W�0 Dirawcown SGS ft. after pumping QPM How rn&2zwf0d_Ai&_ necovery-"x—ft. after mom. M LOU. FC;j�.jol 9 ";6 40 mrmx 06drart + IDMLLER dCWY NORTly Ot,"aO �• BOARD OF HEALTH 'SSACHusEt NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. APPLICATION FOR WELL AND PUMP PERMIT Permit # Date �— .3 — O d A permit is requested to: drill a well V install a pump LOCATION • 3 Jr' ( � A e 5 +- Lot # Owner_-Te,r V '�T-6�c e Address s� ���clCvltJ S Tel 1? 71?-- Gjo1-7wl33 UJ� g corye�aul.J ' Well Contrctr V e�,� i`�esi_e eKo. Add.Ajae'' g� Tel F-(, Pump Contrctr(=D �cc Z Oe, PompCd. Add. P6?e, IJ,.JGm A#Te1 e?4� 7F( ****************** ************************************************** WELLS (To be completed at time of pump test.) Type of well r)�vr u Use Diameter of well Size of casing Depth of bed rock Depth casing into bedrock Seal been tested? Yes (_) No (_) Date of test Depth of well Water -bearing rock Depth to water Delivers GPM for (how long?) Drawdown feet after pumping hours at GPM Date of completion Signature of well contractor PUMPS (To be filled in before installation.) Name & size of pump Type Size of tank Pump delivers GPM Pipe used in well: Cast iron (_) Galvanized (_) Plastic (_) Sleeve used to protect pipe? Yves (_) No (_) Type well seal Date Signature of pump installer Date water analysis report submitted to Board of Health Plumbing inspector Wiring inspector Board of Health