Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 379 BOXFORD STREET 4/30/2018v ,ii North Andover Board of Assessors „T 00`Access Page 1 of 1 OE No orM '�a 9SSACMUSet Click Seal To Retum Search for Parcels Search for Sales Summary Residence Detached Structure Condo Commercial North Andover Board of Assessors 0341, 741Property Record Card Location: 379 BOXFORD STREET Owner Name: KAUSER, SEEMA Owner Address: 3854 UNIVERSITY DRIVE City: FAIRFAX State: VA Zip: 22030 Neighborhood: 5 - 5 Land Area: 1.15 acres Use Code: 101-SNGL-FAM-RES Total Finished Area: 2240 sqft ASSESSMENTS CURRENT YEAR PREVIOUS YEAR Total Value: 413,700 428,100 Building Value: 215,200 229,600 Land Value: 198,500 198,500 Market Land Value: 198,500 Chapter Land Value: http://csc-ma.us/PROPAPP/display.do?linkld=1707473&town=NandoverPubAcc 5/13/2011 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of a System Pumping Record Form 4 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. The System Pumping Record must be submitted to the local Board of Health or other approving authority. A. Facility Information 1. System Location: Left front of house, right front of house, left side of house, right side of house, Left rear of house, right rear of house, left side of building, right rear of building, under deck. �31q �Ux z T Cityrrown State Zip Code 2. System Owner: Name Address (if different from location) City/Town B. Pumping Record 1. Date of Pumping 3. Type of system: ❑ Date Cesspool(s) ❑ Other (describe): 4. Effluent Tee Filter present? ❑ Yes No 5. Condition of Sy�s�te�m: 6. System Pumped By: Neil J. Bateson Name Bateson Enterprises Inc. Company 7. Loca where contents were disposed: Signature offHabler State — 5-� Zi Code telephone Number — 2. Quantity Pumped: Septic Tank Galfons ❑ Tight Tank If yes, was it cleaned? ❑ Yes ❑ No F5821 Vehicle License Number Date t5form4.doc• 06/03 System Pumping Record • Page 1 of 1 Owner information is required for every page. Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. ILEI A 12 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary leo 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owners Name North Andover City/Town MA 01845L State Zip Code AUG ZU 0i1 D! Nq TH ANDOVeR Date of Inspection results must be submitted on this form. Inspection forms may not be altered in any way. Please see completeness checklist at the end of the form. A. General Information 1. Inspector: Neil James Bateson Name of Inspector Bateson Enterprises Inc. Company Name 111 Argilla Road Company Address Andover City/Town 978-475-4786 Telephone Number B. Certification MA State S115 License Number 01810 Zip Code I certify that I have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported below is true, accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed based on my training and experience in the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. I am a DEP approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000). The system: ® Passes ❑ Conditionally Passes ❑ Fails ❑ Needs Furth r Evaluation by the Local Approving Authority 8/22/2011 Inspe r Signat a Date The system inspector shall submit a copy of this inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or DEP) within 30 days of completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the DEP. The original should be sent to the system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving authority. ****This report only describes conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different conditions of use. t5ins • 11/10 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 1 of 17 Owner information is required for every page. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner's Name North Andover MA 01845 8/22/2011 Citylrown State Zip Code Date of Inspection B. Certification (cont.) Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E / always complete all of Section D A) System Passes: ® I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not evaluated are indicated below. Comments: After permit from B.O.H., install new d-box#1, jet pipe to d-box#2, inspection from B.O.H., septic system now passes Title 5 Inspection. B) System Conditionally Passes: ❑ One or more system components as described in the "Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon completion of the replacement or repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass. Check the box for "yes", "no" or "not determined" (Y, N, ND) for the following statements. If "not determined," please explain. The septic tank is metal and over 20 years old* or the septic tank (whether metal or not) is structurally unsound, exhibits substantial infiltration or exfiltration or tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as approved by the Board of Health. * A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound, not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available. ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): t5ins - 11/10 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 2 of 17 Owner information is required for every page. Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do.mot use the return key. _,kA f f :rew:x ISI Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for pgRooffing 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner's Name North Andover City/Town M �t TOWN OF NORYM ANDOVER MA H rMe.%M-rhm11 State Zip Code Date of Inspection Inspection results must be submitted on this form. Inspection forms may not be altered in a way. Please see completeness checklist at the end of the form. A. General Information 1. Inspector: Neil J. Bateson Name of Inspector Bateson Enterpri Company Name 111 Argilla Road Company Address Andover Cityfrown 978-475-4786 Telephone Number B. Certification Inc. Ma State S115 License Number 01810 Zip Code I certify that I have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported below is true, accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed based on my training and experience in the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. I am a DEP approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000). The system: ❑ Passes ® Conditionally Passes ❑ Fails ❑ Needs Further Evaluation by the Local Apprcving Authority A4jj�) &, � � �- 6/20/2011 Inspectors Signatu Date The system inspector shall submit a copy of this inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or DEP) within 30 days of completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the DEP. The original should be sent to the system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving authority. ****This report only describes conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different conditions of use. t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurfaos Sewage Disposal System - Page 1 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owners Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. Citylrown State Zip Code Date of Inspection B. Certification (cont.) Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E / always complete all of Section D A) System Passes: ❑ I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not evaluated are indicated below. Comments: B) System Conditionally Passes: ® One or more system components as described in the "Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon completion of the replacement or repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass. Check the box for "yes", "no" or "not determined" (Y, N, ND) for the following statements. If "not determined," please explain. The septic tank is metal and over 20 years old* or the septic tank (whether metal or not) is structurally unsound, exhibits substantial infiltration or exfiltration or tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as approved by the Board of Health. * A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound, not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available. ❑ Y ® N ❑ ND (Explain below): t5ins - 09108 Title 5 official Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 2 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspe Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name nformtiis North Andover required for every page. Cityrrown B. Certification (cont.) B) System Conditionally Passes (cont.): ❑ Observation of sewage backup or break out or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s) or due to a broken, settled or uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health): ❑ broken pipe(s) are replaced ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): ❑ obstruction is removed ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): ® distribution box is leveled or replaced ® Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): D -Box & 1 Needs to be replaced. ❑ The system required pumping more than 4 times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of Health): ❑ broken pipe(s) are replaced ❑ Y ® N ❑ ND (Explain below): ❑ obstruction is removed ❑ Y ® N ❑ ND (Explain below): C) Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health: ❑ Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect public health, safety or the environment. 1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CMR 15.303(1)(b) that the system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health, safety and the environment: ❑ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water ❑ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh t5ins • 09108 Title 5l>ffcial Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 3 of 17 ction Form Not for Voluntary Assessments MA 01845 6/20/2011 State Zip Code Date of Inspection ❑ Observation of sewage backup or break out or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s) or due to a broken, settled or uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health): ❑ broken pipe(s) are replaced ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): ❑ obstruction is removed ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): ® distribution box is leveled or replaced ® Y ❑ N ❑ ND (Explain below): D -Box & 1 Needs to be replaced. ❑ The system required pumping more than 4 times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of Health): ❑ broken pipe(s) are replaced ❑ Y ® N ❑ ND (Explain below): ❑ obstruction is removed ❑ Y ® N ❑ ND (Explain below): C) Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health: ❑ Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect public health, safety or the environment. 1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CMR 15.303(1)(b) that the system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health, safety and the environment: ❑ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water ❑ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh t5ins • 09108 Title 5l>ffcial Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 3 of 17 Owner information is required for every page. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner's Name North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 Cityrrown state Zip Code Date of Inspection B. Certification (cont.) 2. System will fail unless the Board of Health (and Public Water Supplier, if any) determines that the system is functioning in a manner that protects the public health, safety and environment: ❑ The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) and the SAS is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply. ❑ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within a Zone 1 of a public water supply. ❑ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. ❑ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a private water supply well**. Method used to determine distance: ** This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria indicates absent and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form. 3. Other: D) System Failure Criteria Applicable to All Systems: You must indicate "Yes" or "No" to each of the following for all inspections: Yes No ❑ ® Backup of sewage into facility or system component due to overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool ❑ ® Discharge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool ❑ ® Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool . ❑ ® Liquid depth in cesspool is less than 6" below invert or available volume is less ' than % day flow t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 4 of 17 ❑ ® The system is a cesspool serving a facility with a design flow of 2000gpd- 10,000gpd. ® The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303, therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure. E) Large Systems: To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000 gpd. For large systems, you must indicate either "yes" or "no" to each of the following, in addition to the questions in Section D. Yes No ❑ ❑ the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply ❑ ❑ the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply ❑ ❑ the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area — IWPA) or a mapped Zone II of a public water supply well If you have answered "yes" to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat, or answered "yes" in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department. t5ins • 09/08 Title 6 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 5 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. Citylrown state Zip Code Date of Inspection B. Certification (cont.) Yes No ❑ ® Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due to clogged or obstructed pipe(s). Number of times pumped: ❑ ® Any portion of the SAS, cesspool or privy is below high ground water elevation. ' El ® Any portion of cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a.surface water supply. ❑ ® Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within a Zone 1 of a public well. ❑ ® Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. ❑ ® Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100 feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water supply well with no acceptable water quality analysis. [This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for fecal coliform bacteria indicates absent and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis and chain of custody must be attached to this form.] ❑ ® The system is a cesspool serving a facility with a design flow of 2000gpd- 10,000gpd. ® The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303, therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure. E) Large Systems: To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000 gpd. For large systems, you must indicate either "yes" or "no" to each of the following, in addition to the questions in Section D. Yes No ❑ ❑ the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply ❑ ❑ the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply ❑ ❑ the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area — IWPA) or a mapped Zone II of a public water supply well If you have answered "yes" to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat, or answered "yes" in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department. t5ins • 09/08 Title 6 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 5 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. City/Town State Zip Code Date of Inspection C. Checklist Check if the following have been done. You must indicate "yes" or "no" as to each of the following: Yes No ❑ ® Pumping information was provided by the owner, occupant, or Board of Health a ❑ ® Were any of the system components pumped out in the previous two weeks? ® ❑ Has the system received normal flows in the previous two week period? ❑ ® Have large volumes of water been introduced to the system recently or as part of this inspection? ® ❑ Were as built plans of the system obtained and examined? (If they were not available note as N/A) ® ❑ Was the facility, or dwelling inspected for signs of sewage back up? ® ❑ Was the site inspected for signs of break out? ® ❑ Were all system components, excluding the SAS, located on site? ® ❑ Were the septic tank manholes uncovered, opened, and the interior of the tank inspected for the condition of the baffles or tees, material of construction, dimensions, depth of liquid, depth of sludge and depth of scum? ® ❑ Was the facility owner (and occupants if different from owner) provided with information on the proper maintenance of subsurface sewage disposal systems? The size and location of the Soil Absorption System (SAS) on the site has been determined based on: ® ❑ Existing information. For example, a plan at the Board of Health. ® ❑ Determined in the field (if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue approximation of distance is unacceptable) [310 CMR 15.302(5)] D. System Information Residential Flow Conditions: Number of bedrooms (design): 4 Number of bedrooms (actual): 4 DESIGN flow based on 310 CMR 15.203 (for example: 110 gpd x # of bedrooms): 600 t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 6 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments M 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner information is required for every page. Owner's Name Yes ❑ No ❑ North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 ❑ No ❑ Yes Cityrrown state Zip Code Date of Inspection No D. System Information Description: Number of current residents: 2 Does residence have a garbage grinder? ❑ Yes ® No Is laundry on a separate sewage system? [if yes separate inspection required] ❑ Yes ® No Laundry system inspected? ❑ Yes ❑ No . Seasonal use? ❑ Yes ® No Water meter readings, if available (last 2 years usage (gpd)): On well water Detail: Sump pump? ® Yes ❑ No Last date of occupancy: Current Date Commercial/Industrial Flow Conditions: Type of Establishment: Design flow (based on 310 CMR 15.203): Basis of design flow (seats/persons/sq.ft., etc.): Grease trap present? Industrial waste holding tank present? Non -sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5 system? Water meter readings, if available: Gallons per day (gpd) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No t5ins • 09108 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 7 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA every page. Cityrrown State D. System Information (cont.) Last date of occupancy/use: Other (describe below): 01845 6/20/2011 Zip Code Date of Inspection Date General Information Pumping Records: Source of information: Was system pumped as part of the inspection? If yes, volume pumped: How was quantity pumped determined? Reason for pumping: Type of System: unknown 1500 gallons Measured tank Inspect tank, baffle & tee ® Yes ❑ No ® Septic tank, distribution box, soil absorption system ❑ Single cesspool ❑ Overflow cesspool ❑ Privy ❑ Shared system (yes or no) (if yes, attach previous inspection records, if any) ❑ Innovative/Alternative technology. Attach a copy of the current operation and maintenance contract (to be obtained from system owner) and a copy of latest inspection of the I/A system by system operator under contract ❑ Tight tank. Attach a copy of the DEP approval. ❑ Other (describe): t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System •Page 8 of 17 Owner information is required for every page. I Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner's Name North Andover Cityrrown State Zip Code 6/20/2011 Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Approximate age of all components, date installed (if known) and source of information: 28 Years old, 12/27/1983, as built plan Were sewage odors detected when arriving at the site? Building Sewer (locate on site plan): Depth below grade: 2 feet Material of construction: ® cast iron ❑ 40 PVC ❑ other (explain): Distance from private water supply well or suction line: feet Comments (on condition of joints, venting, evidence of leakage, etc.): 4" Cast iron thru wall, 4" PVC in house, no leaks visible Septic Tank (locate on site plan): Depth below grade: Material of construction: ® concrete ❑ metal 1 feet ❑ Yes ® No ❑ fiberglass ❑ polyethylene ❑ other (explain) If tank is metal, list age: years Is age confirmed by a Certificate of Compliance? (attach a copy of certificate) Dimensions: 10'x 5'x 4' Sludge depth: AN ❑ Yes ❑ No t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 9 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts lugTitle 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. City/Town State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Septic Tank (cont.) Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee or baffle Scum thickness Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle 23" 4" 8e 19" How were dimensions determined? Tape Measure Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): Pumped septic tank. Inlet.tee ok. Outlet tee ok. Depth of liquid at outlet invert. No evidence of leakage. Grease Trap (locate on site plan): Depth below grade: Material of construction: ❑ concrete ❑ metal Dimensions: Scum thickness ❑ fiberglass Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle Date of last pumping: t5ins • 09/08 feet ❑ polyethylene ❑ other (explain): Date Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 10 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover every page. Cityrrown S 0 MA 01845 State Zip Code 6/20/2011 Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity; liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): Tight or Holding Tank (tank must be pumped at time of inspection) (locate on site plan): Depth below grade: Material of construction: ❑ concrete ❑ metal ❑ fiberglass ❑ polyethylene ❑ other (explain): Dimensions: Capacity: Design Flow: Alarm present: Alarm level: gallons gallons per day ❑ Yes ❑ No Alarm in working order: Date of last pumping: Date Comments (condition of alarm and float switches, etc.): ❑ Yes ❑ No * Attach copy of current pumping contract (required). Is copy attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No l5ins - 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 11 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. Cityrrown State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Distribution Box (if present must be opened) (locate on site plan): Depth of liquid level above outlet invert 0 Comments (note if box is level and distribution to outlets equal, any evidence of solids carryover, any evidence of leakage into or out of box, etc.): D -Box # 1 full of sand, found side of box badly corroded & box full of sand. Pumped d -box to clean. Pipe to d -box # 2 clogged. Needs to be power snaked. D -Box #2 level & distribution equal, Evidence of carryover, pumped d -box to clean. No evidence of leakage. Pump Chamber (locate on site plan): Pumps in working order: ❑ Yes ❑ No Alarms in working order: ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments (note condition of pump chamber, condition of pumps and appurtenances, etc.): Soil Absorption System (SAS) (locate on site plan, excavation not required): If SAS not located, explain why: t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System •Page 12 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. City1rown State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Type: ❑ leaching pits number: ❑ leaching chambers number: ❑ leaching galleries number: ❑ leaching trenches number, length: ® leaching fields 1 field 20'x 45' number, dimensions: ❑ overflow cesspool number: ❑ innovative/alternative system Type/name of technology: Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding; damp soil, condition of vegetation, etc.): Soil ok. Vegetation ok. No sign of ponding to surface. Cesspools (cesspool must be pumped as part of inspection) (locate on site plan): Number and configuration Depth — top of liquid to inlet invert Depth of solids layer Depth of scum layer Dimensions of cesspool Materials of construction Indication of groundwater inflow ❑ Yes ❑ No t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 13 of 17 Owner information is required for every page. I Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner's Name North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 City/Town State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): Privy (locate on site plan): Materials of construction: Dimensions Depth of solids Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): t5ins - 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Form: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 14 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. Citylrown State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Sketch Of Sewage Disposal System: Provide a view of the sewage disposal system, including ties to at least two permanent reference landmarks or benchmarks. Locate all wells within 100 feet. Locate where public water supply enters the building. Check one of the boxes below: ® hand -sketch in the area below ❑ drawing attached separately 'tom W�\� S244-`(�' I e_- i H UQ o t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official inspection Foran: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 15 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Form - Not for Voluntary Assessments M 379 Boxford Street Property Address Seema Kauser Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover MA 01845 6/20/2011 every page. Cityrrown State Zip Code Date of Inspection D. System Information (cont.) Site Exam: ® Check Slope ® Surface water ® Check cellar ® Shallow wells Estimated depth to high ground water: 4 feet Please indicate all methods used to determine the high ground water elevation: ® Obtained from system design plans on record If checked, date of design plan reviewed: 5/20/1983 Date ❑ Observed site (abutting property/observation hole within 150 feet of SAS) ® Checked with local Board of Health - explain: Design plan ❑ Checked with local excavators, installers - (attach documentation) ❑ Accessed USGS database - explain: You must describe how you established the high ground water elevation: As per test pit data on design plan Before filing this Inspection Report, please see Report Completeness Checklist on next page. t5ins • 09/08 Title 5 Official Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System • Page 16 of 17 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Owner Owner's Name information is required for North Andover every page. Cityrrown Title 5 Official Inspection Form Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Fo 379 Boxford Street rm - Not for Voluntary Assessments , Property Address Seema Kauser MA 01845 State Zip Code 6/20/2011 Date of Inspection E. Report Completeness Checklist ® Inspection Summary: A, B, C, D, or E checked ® Inspection Summary D (System Failure Criteria Applicable to All Systems) completed ® System Information — Estimated depth to high groundwater ® Sketch of Sewage Disposal System either drawn on page 15 or attached in separate file t5ins • 09108 Title 5 Official Inspection Forth: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System - Page 17 of 17 : Commonwealth of Massachusetts C. City/Town of System Pumping Record Form 4 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. The System Pumping Record must be submitted to the local Board of Health or other approving authority. A. Facility Information 1. S stem Loon: Left front of house, right front of house, left side of house, right side of hou Left rear of house! riaht rear of house, left side of building, right rear of building, under deck. 2 -6119 S4-- City/Town State System Owner: Name Address (if different from location) Citylrown B. Pumping Record 1. Date of Pumping 3. Type of system: Date ❑ Cesspool(s) ❑ Other (describe): State Telephone Number — 2. Quantity Pumped 2-S'eptic Tank Zip Code Zip Code lam/ Gallons ❑ Tight Tank 4. Effluent Tee Filter present? ❑ Yes D No If yes, was it cleaned? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Condition of System: 6. System Pumped By: Neil J. Bateson Name Bateson Enterprises Inc. Company 7. Location where contents were disposed: A-owellWaste Water F5821 Vehicle License Number 6—a (— if Date t5form4.doc• 06/03 System Pumping Record • Page 1 of 1 • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Map -Block -Lot + ° a � � � •� `oa 105.0001 I p BOARD OF HEALTH North Andover- ----------------------- PermrtNo 07 1---- ss------ yw ..a + P.I. ----P-20 FEE Too cHu�t�F F.I. $125.00 ----------------------- DISPOSAL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permission is hereby granted Todd -Bateson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- to (Repair -DISTRIBUTION BOX ONLY) an Individual Sewage Disposal System. at No 379 BOXFORD STREET as shown on the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No. BHP -2011-076 Dated --August-16,-201-1 Issued On: Aug -16-2011 ----- _-FILE-COPYARD pHEALTH ,j*RTj, Map -Block -Lot o+•„�p Commonwealth of Massachusetts 105.00011 BOARD OF HEALTH ----------------------- a North Andover �`�°••-�a-�`� CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 'lssACwtlBki THIS IS TO CERTIFY, That the Individual Sewage Disposal System (Repair -DISTRIBUTION BOX by Todd Bateson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Installer at No 379 BOXFORD STREET has been installed in accordance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of the State Environmental Code as described in the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No. -BB-P-201-17-076 --- 076 Dated August -162 6,_20 11 ------------------------ ----- Printed On: Aug -17-2011 --------------------------------------------------- --- - - - ------------------------------------------------ BOARD OF HEALTH MORTN t l 5586 3r o: • Town of North Andover ',�'•�,,,,o .. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ,sS4CNU5f� . �r V CHECK #: —�% DATE: LOCATION: H/O NAME: CONTRACTOR NAME: Type of Permit or License: (Check box) ❑ Animal $ ❑ Body Art Establishment $ ❑ Body Art Practitioner $ ❑ Dumpster $ ❑ Food Service - Type: $ ❑ Funeral Directors $ ❑ Massage Establishment $ ❑ Massage Practice $ ❑ Offal (Septic) Hauler $ ❑ Recreational Camp $ ❑ Sun tanning $ ❑ Swimming Pool $ ❑ Tobacco $ ❑ Trash/Solid Waste Hauler $ ❑ Well Construction $ SEPTIC Systems: ❑ Septic - Soil Testing $ ❑ Septic -Design Approval $ eptic Disposal Works Construction (DWC) $ ❑ Septic Disposal Works Installers (DWI) $ ❑ Title 5 Inspector $ ❑ Title 5 Report $ ❑ Other: (Indicate) $ Health Agent Initials White - Applicant Yellow - Health Pink - Treasurer Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return k_ey. Application for Septic Disposal Svstem Construction Permit - TOWN OF TH ANDO Application is hereby made for a permit to: / ❑ Construct a new on-site sewage disposal system* Y'j�_->/ TODAY'S DATE $ 250.00 – Full Repair $925.00 - Component ❑ Repair or replace an existing on-site sewage disposal system* &I�pair or replace an existing system component – What? _ _b, — CS p x A. Facility Information 17 `i e, Adoress or Lot # City/Town /V01 JV e 2 111A 2.- *TYPE OF SEPTIC SYSTEM*: 11 FEIVED E]Pump ravity (choose one) ***If pump system, attach copy of electrical permit to applicatio 2 Q Conventional System (pipe and stone system) TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER ❑ Infiltrator or Blodiffuser (Gravel -Less) (Attach a copy of your certificat ❑ Pressure Distribution S.A.S. (No D -Box) (Attach Draft Maintenance Agreement) ❑ Pressure Dosed (D -Box Present) S.A.S. 2. Owner Information warns Address (if different from above) CityiTown State Zip Code Telephone Number 3. Installer Information Name 4. /// A r j ; l/.9 lel . Address 4J City/Town Address Name of I pang 111 /� I Mmnur. .. ROAD State Zip Code Telephone Number (Cell Phone # if possible please) Name of Company State Zip Code Telephone Number (Best # to Reach) Application for Disposal System Construction Permit - Page i of 2 k i14 Application for Septic Disposal System 'AConstruction Permit - TOWN. OF `*'-•' ORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ,SSACHUSES PAGE 2OF2 A. Facility. Information continued.... 5. Type of Building:residential Dwelling or ❑Commercial B. Agreement ,9 —I; 1/ TODAY'S DATE $.250.00 — Full Repair $125.00 - Component The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore -described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code, as well as the Local Subsurface Disposal Regulations for the Town of North Andover, and not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued b his Board of Health. �rr�c 9 Name Date Applicatio(Approved By:`, and of Health Representative) Date App7icationNamDisa roved f- the following reasons: For Office Use Only: Z Fee Attached. Yes / No 2. Project Manager Obligation Form Attached. Yes I. No X Pump System? Ifsm Attach copv ofElectrical Permit. Yes No 4. FoundationAs-Built. (new construction ronl . Y v y) es No (Same scale as approved plan) n 5. Floor Plans? (new construction only). Yes_ No Application #or Disposal System Construction Permit • Page 2 of 2 • _' SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLER PROJECT MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS As the North Andover licensed installer for the construction for the septic system for the property at: 7 9 13ox F,,,,J s� . (Address of septic system) For plans by Relative to the application of Tw (Installer's name) And dated Dated _ a / it o ay s ate With revisiot I understand the following obligations for management of this project: 1. As the installer, I am .obligated to obtainall permits and Board of Health approved plans prior to performing any work on a site. I must have the approved:plans and the permit on site when anv work is being done. 2. As the installer, I,must call for any and all inspections. If homeowner, contractor, project manager, or any other person not associated with my company schedules an inspection and the system is not ready, then item three shall. be applicable. 3.As the installer, Id required to. have the necessary work completed prior to the applicable inspections as indicated below. I understand that rebuestin an insyection without completion of the items in arrnrrlanr my company. a. Bottom 16f Bed - Generally, this is the first (1s) inspection unless. there is a retaining wall, which should be. done:first. The installer must request the inspection but does not have to be present. . b. Final Construction Inspection — Engineer must first do their inspection for elevations; ties, etc. As -built of verbal OK (or e-mail to: healthdel2t@townofnorthandover com) from the engineer must be submitted to .the Board of Health, after which installer .calls for an inspection time. Installer must be present for this inspection. With a pump system, all electrical work :must be ready and able to cause pump to work and: alarm to function. c. Final Grade Installer must request inspection when all grading is complete. Installer does not have to be on-site. 4. As the installer, I understand that only I may perform the work (other than :ample excavation) and lam required to complete the installation of the system identified in .theattached application for installation. .I further .understand that work done b .others unlicensed .to install se .tics stems in NorthAndover can constitute reasons for denial of the system and/or revocation or suspension of my license to operate in the Town of North Andovm significant fines to all persons uivolved.are also possible. 5. .As the installer, I understand that I must be on-site during the performance of the following construction steps: a. Determination that .the proper elevation of the excavation has been reached. A Inspection of the sand and stone to be used. c. Final inspection by Board of.Health staff or consultant. d. Installation of tank, D -Box, pipes, stone, vent, pump chamber, retaining wall and other components. 6. As the installer,1 understand that Lam soleiby res onsible for the installation of the s stem as per the appof this -obligation. roved plans. No instructions by the homeowner, general contractor, or me -any other persons shall absolve Undersigned Licensed Septic Installer: j 9 J -J (Today's Date) North Andover Health Department Community Development Division ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES LOCATION INFORMATION ADDRESS: � �OJ D � MAP: LOT: INSTALLER: / DESIGNER: PLAN DATE: BOH APPROVAL DATE ON PLAN: INSPECTIONS TANK INSPECTION: DATE OF BED BOTTOM INSPECTION: DATE OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION: DATE OF FINAL GRADE INSPECTION: SITE CONDITIONS ❑ Contractor reports any changes to design pla ❑ Existing septic tank properly abandoned ❑ Internal plumbing all to one building sewer ❑ Topography not appreciably altered Comments: SEPTIC TANK ❑ Building sewer in continuous grade, on compacted firm base ❑ Cleanouts per plan ❑ Bottom of tank hole has 6" stone base ❑ Weep hole plugged ❑ gallon tank has been installed loading ❑ Monolithic tank construction ❑ Water tightness of tank has been achieved by testing ❑ Inlet tee installed, centered under access port ❑ Outlet tee installed, centered under access port (gas baffle/effluent filter) ❑ inch cover to within 6" of final grade installed over one access port ❑ Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlet Comments: PUMP CHAMBER ❑ Bottom of tank hole has 6" stone base ❑ Weep hole plugged ❑ gallon Pump Chamber installed ❑ loading ❑ Monolithic tank construction ❑ Inlet tee installed, centered under access port ❑ Pump(s) installed on stable base ❑ Alarm float working ❑ Pump On/Off floats working ❑ Separate on/off floats ❑ Drain hole in pressure line ❑ cover at final grade installed over pump access port ❑ Watertightness of tank has been achieved by testing ❑ Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlet Comments: CONTROL PANEL ❑ Alarm & Pump are on separate circuits ❑ Alarm sounds when float is tripped ❑ Location of control panel: basement Comments: El Alarm signal located inside: basement DISTRIBUTION -BOX X,4,5 C > ❑ Installed on stable stone base ©-----H--20 D -Box n�-iniet tee (if pumped or >0.08'/foot) ❑ Hydraulic cement around inlet & outlets D�Observed El Speed levelers provided (not�equired) Comments: / /p `� `= COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TITLE 5 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM FORM PART A CERTIFICATION Property Address: _379 Boxford Street_ _ North Andover_ Owner's Name: _Patricia Driscoll_ Owner's Address: _379 Boxford Street_ _ North Andover, MA 01845_ Date of Inspection: 7/10/2003_ Name of Inspector: _Neil J. Bateson_ Company Name: Bateson Enterprises Inc._ Mailing Address: _111 Argilla Road_ _Andover, Ma. 01810_ Telephone Number: _( 978 ) 475-0786_ AUG 5 2003 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that I have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported below is true, accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed based on my training and experience in the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. I am a DEP approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000). The system: Passes Conditionally Passes eeds urther Evaluation by the Local Approving Authority "s Inspector's Signature: Date: _7/10/2003_ The system inspector shall s st a copy o his inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or DEP) within 30 days of completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the DEP. The original should be sent to the system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving authority. Notes and Comments: ****This report only describes conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different conditions of use. Page 2 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover— Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E / ALWAYS complete all of Section D A. System Passes: _X I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not evaluated are indicated below. Comments: B. System Conditionally Passes: _ One or more system components as described in the "Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon completion of the replacement or repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass. Answer yes, no or not determined (Y,N,ND) in the for the following statements. If "not determined" please explain. The septic tank is metal and over 20 years old* or the septic tank (whether metal or not) is structurally unsound, exhibits substantial infiltration or exfiltration or tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as approved by the Board of Health. *A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound, not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available. ND explain: Observation of sewage backup or break out or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s) or due to a broken, settled or uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health): broken pipe(s) are replaced obstruction is removed distribution box is leveled or replaced ND explain: The system required pumping more than 4 times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of Health): broken pipe(s) are replaced obstruction is removed ND explain: Page 3 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover — Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ C. Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health: Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect public health, safety or the environment. 1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CMR 15.303(1)(b) that the system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health, safety and the environment: Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water _ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh 2. System will fail unless the Board of Health (and Public Water Supplier, if any) determines that the system is functioning in a manner that protects the public health, safety and environment: _ The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) and the SAS is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within a Zone 1 of a public water supply. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a private water supply well". Method used to determine distance "This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form. 3. Other: Page 4 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ _ North Andover Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ D. System Failure Criteria applicable to all systems: You must indicate "yes" or `no" to each of the following for all inspections: Yes No _No _ Backup of sewage into facility or system component due to overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool _No_ Discharge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool No — Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool _No Liquid depth in cesspool is less than 6" below invert or available volume is less than 1/2 day flow _No_ Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due to clogged or obstructed pipe(s). Number of times pumped _No Any portion of the SAS, cesspool or privy is below high ground water elevation. _No_ Any portion of cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply. No Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within a Zone 1 of a public well. _No_ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. _No_ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100 feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water supply well with no acceptable water quality analysis. [This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form.] No_ (Yes/No) The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303, therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure. E. Large Systems: To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000 gpd. You must indicate either `yes" or `�no" to each of the following: (The following criteria apply to large systems in addition to the criteria above) yes no _ _ the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area — IWPA) or a mapped Zone II of a public water supply well If you have answered "yes" to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat, or answered "yes" in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department. Page 5 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART B CHECKLIST Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover— Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: 7/1012003_ Check if the following have been done. You must indicate "yes" or "no" as to each of the following: Yes No Yes_ _ Pumping information was provided by the owner, occupant, or Board of Health _No Were any of the system components pumped out in the previous two weeks ? Yes_ _ Has the system received normal flows in the previous two week period ? No_ Have large volumes of water been introduced to the system recently or as part of this inspection ? Yes_ _ Were as built plans of the system obtained and examined? (If they were not available note as N/A) _Yes_ _ Was the facility or dwelling inspected for signs of sewage back up ? Yes _ Was the site inspected for signs of break out ? Yes _ Were all system components, excluding the SAS, located on site ? _Yes_ _ Were the septic tank manholes uncovered, opened, and the interior of the tank inspected for the condition of the baffles or tees, material of construction, dimensions, depth of liquid, depth of sludge and depth of scum ? _Yes_ _ Was the facility owner (and occupants if different from owner) provided with information on the proper maintenance of subsurface sewage disposal systems ? The size and location of the Soil Absorption System (SAS) on the site has been determined based on: Yes no _Yes_ _ Existing information. _No Determined in the field (if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue approximation of distance is unacceptable) [3 10 CMR 15.302(3)(6)] Page 6 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover – Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ FLOW CONDITIONS RESIDENTIAL Number of bedrooms (design): _4_ Number of bedrooms (actual): _4 DESIGN flow based on 310 CMR 15.203 (for example: 110 gpd x # of bedrooms): _600_ Number of current residents: _2 Does residence have a garbage grinder (yes or no): No Is laundry on a separate sewage system (yes or no): _ No Laundry system inspected (yes or no): _ Seasonal use: (yes or no): _No_ Water meter readings: _On well water_ Sump pump (yes or no): _No Last date of occupancy: _Current COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL Type of establishment: Design flow (based on 310 CMR 15.203): gpd Basis of design flow (seats/persons/sgft,etc.): Grease trap present (yes or no): _ Industrial waste holding tank present (yes or no): Non -sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5 system (yes or no): — Water meter readings, if available: Last date of occupancy/use: OTHER (describe): GENERAL INFORMATION Pumping Records Source of information: Pumped this year, owner_ Was system pumped as part of the inspection (yes or no): _No_ If yes, volume pumped: __gallons -- How was quantity pumped determined? _ Reason for pumping: TYPE OF SYSTEM X Septic tank, distribution box, soil absorption system _ Single cesspool _ Overflow cesspool _ Privy _ Shared system (yes or no) (if yes, attach previous inspection records, if any) _ Innovative/Alternative technology. Attach a copy of the current operation and maintenance contract (to be obtained from system owner) — Tight tank _ Attach a copy of the DEP approval Other (describe): _ Approximate age of all components, date installed (if known) and source of information: 20 years old, 12/27/1983, As built plan _ Were sewage odors detected when arriving at the site (yes or no): _No_ Page 7 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover– Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ BUILDING SEWER (locate on site plan) X Depth below grade: _24" Materials of construction –X–cast iron _40 PVC _ _other Distance from private water supply well or suction line: Comments (on condition of joints, venting, evidence of leakage, etc.): _4" Cast iron thru wall, no leaks visible. SEPTIC TANK: X locate on site plan) Depth below grade: _12"_ Material of construction: –X–concrete _metal _fiberglass __polyethylene _other(explain) If tank is metal list age: _ Is age confirmed by a Certificate of Compliance (yes or no): — (attach a copy of certificate) Dimensions: 101x 5' x 4' Sludge depth –111 _ Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: _2611 _ Scum thickness: _1"_ Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle: _8" Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: 20"_ How were dimensions determined: _ Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): _Inlet tee ok . Outlet tee ok. Depth of liquid above outlet invert, found clogged outlet pipe to d -box # 1. Power snake pipe to d -box, liquid level now normal. No evidence of leakage. GREASE TRAP: (locate on site plan) Depth below grade: _ Material of construction: _concrete _metal _fiberglass polyethylene _other (explain): Dimensions: Scum thickness: Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle: Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: Date of last pumping: Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.): Page 8 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street- - North Andover— Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ TIGHT or HOLDING TANK: (tank must be pumped at time of inspection)(locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Material of construction: concrete metal fiberglass polyethylene other(explain): Dimensions: Capacity: gallons Design Flow: gallons/day Alarm present (yes or no): Alarm level: Alarm in working order (yes or no): Date of last pumping: Comments (condition of alarm and float switches, etc.): DISTRIBUTION BOX: X (if present must be opened)(locate on site plan) Depth of liquid level above outlet invert: _0"_ Comments (note if box is level and distribution to outlets equal, any evidence of solids carryover, any evidence of leakage into or out of box, etc.): _D -boxes level & distribution equal. Evidence of carryover. No evidence of leakage._ PUMP CHAMBER: (locate on site plan) Pump in working order (yes or no): _ Alarms in working order (yes or no): _ Comments (note condition of pump chamber, condition of pumps and appurtenances, etc.): _ Page 9 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: _379 Boxford Street_ _ North Andover— Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (SAS): _X If SAS not located explain why: (locate on site plan, excavation not required) Type leaching pits, number: _ leaching chambers, number: leaching galleries, number: _ leaching trenches, number, length: _ X leaching fields, number, dimensions: —1 field 20' x 45'_ overflow cesspool, number: innovative/alternative system Type/name of technology: Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, damp soil, condition of vegetation, etc.): _Soil ok. Vegetation ok. No sign of ponding to surface. _ CESSPOOLS: (cesspool must be pumped as part of inspectionxlocate on site plan) Number and configuration: Depth — top of liquid to inlet invert: Depth of solids layer: Depth of scum layer: Dimensions of cesspool: Materials of construction: Indication of groundwater inflow (yes or no): Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): PRIVY: (locate on site plan) Materials of construction: Dimensions: Depth of solids: Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.): • Page 10 of l l OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street _ North Andover– Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: 7/10/2003_ SKETCH OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Provide a sketch of the sewage disposal system including fies to at least two permanent reference landmarks or benchmarks. Locate all wells within 100 feet. Locate where public water supply enters the building. Driveway Well Pipe ' House A B Porch Septic Tank - A to Tank = 2813" A to D -Boz # 1= 73' A to D -Boz # 2 =124' B to Tank = 49' B to D -Boz # 1 = 7214" B to D -Boz # 2 =119' D -Boz #1 45' � D -Boz #2 Page 11 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued) Property Address: 379 Boxford Street North Andover— Owner: _Driscoll_ Date of Inspection: _7/10/2003_ SITE EXAM Slope Surface water Check cellar Shallow wells Estimated depth to ground water 4 feet Please indicate (check) all methods used to determine the high ground water elevation: _X_ Obtained from system design plans on record - If checked, date of design plan reviewed: _5/20/1983_ Observed site (abutting property/observation hole within 150 feet of SAS) Checked with local Board of Health -explain: _ Checked with local excavators, installers- (attach documentation) Accessed USGS database -explain: _ You must describe how you established the high ground water elevation: As per design plan test pit Tel: (978) 475-4786 Fax: (978) 4755451 BATESON ENTERPRISES, INC. Excavating -Water.& Sewer Lines -Septic Systems & Pumping Service 111 Argilla Road Andover, Mass. 01810 Title 5 Inspection Report Property Address: 379 Boxford Street, North Andover Owner: Driscoll Date of Inspection: 7/10 /2003 My report contained herein does not constitute a guarantee of future usage and the functionality of the existing septic system. Such report issued herewith is merely based upon my observations, and I hereby disclaim any further operation of your current septic system. Bateson Enterprises, Inc. Commonwealth of Massachusetts �r ,vo/o Massachusetts •� P 2 2 2010 G �HEAL(TH DEpecTNDOVER mer cetma Date of Pumping: 2-13 0// 0 &stem Pum, pinz Record Quantity Pumped: gallons Cesspool: xo YJ Yes , ❑ Septic Tank: No ❑ Yes RAGGS SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. Sy stem Pumped by: d.b.a. E . A. COMEAU SEPTIC License Contents transferred to: WATER SOLUTIONS GROUP, TAUNTON 8 Date Inspector l3 �f d RAGGS SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. r. � Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS System Pumping Record .- Form 4 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boa s o ealth:,Th '� ,ysten i Pumping Record must be submitted to the local Board of Health or othe r approving authority. A. Facility Information APR ` Important: TOWN Or When filling out 1. System Location: HEAL7r: L.:'' forms on the computer, use 379 BOXPoRD STREET only the tab key Address to move your NORTH ANDOVER MA 01845 cursor - do not use the return CityfTown State Zip Code key. 2. System Owner: 4w -----ll SEEMA KAUSER Name ISI Address (if different from location) Cityrrown B. Pumping Record State Telephone Number Zip Code 1. Date of Pumping 10 g % 0 6 2. Quantity Pumped: 1500 CiateGallons 3. Type of system: ❑ Cesspool(s) ® Septic Tank ❑ Tight Tank ❑ Other (describe): 4. Effluent Tee Filter present? R] Yes ❑ No 5. Condition of System: 6. System Pumped By: RAGGS SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. Name If yes, was it cleaned? ® Yes ❑ No Vehicle License Number Company 7. Location where contents were disposed: WAYT.AND— SUDBURY TREATMENT PLANT Signature of Hauler Date http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/approvals/t5forms.htm#inspect t5form4.doc• 06/03 System Pumping Record • Page 1 of 1 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVE SYSTEM PUMPING REC 5 TE: 2/16/05 SYSTEM OWNER & ADDRESS KAUSER 379 BOXFORD STREET SYSTEM LOCATION (example: left front of house) BACK OF HOUSE DATE OF PUMPING: 1 / 21 / 0 5 QUANTITY PUMPED 12 o o GALLONS CESSPOOL: NO X YES SEPTIC TANK: NO YES X NATURE OF SERVICE: ROUTINE X EMERGENCY OBSERVATIONS: GOOD CONDITION X FULL TO COVER HEAVY GREASE BAFFLES IN PLACE ROOTS LEACHFIELD RUNBACK EXCESSIVE SOLIDS FLOODED SOLIDS CARRYOVER OTHER (EXPLAIN) SYSTEM PUMPED BY: RAGGS SEPTIC SERVICE I COMMENTS: CONTENTS TRANSFERRED TO: FITCHBURG TOWN OF P, SYSTEM PUMPING RECORDS `` 'E,er /' i V ',a ? � -3 2003 DATE: •'. SYSTEM OWNER & ADDR/ESS r)0-J �V - - L 1 -3r� 9 e)v?'-r w� s+ SYSTEM LOCATION (example: left front of house) 6-7 r -a 3-03 DATE OF PUMPING: QUANTITY PUMPED CESSPOOL: NO YES NATURE OF SERVICE: ROUTINE OBSERVATIONS: GOOD CONDITION HEAVY GREASE ROOTS EXCESSIVE SOLIDS SOLIDS CARRYOVER SEPTIC TANK: NO EMERGENCY YES FULL TO COVER BAFFLES IN PLACE LEACHFIELD RUNBACK FLOODED OTHER (EXPLAIN) SYSTEM PUMPED BY: Bateson Enterprises, Inc. COMMENTS: CONTENTS TRANSFERRED TO: 6 GALLONS ,1 Commonwealtp of Massachusetts A"A�i. ,Massachusetts System Pumping Record System Owner Date of Pumping: C `5 —,? 9 Cesspool: No [ Yes [I System Pumped by: Taed" System Location Quantity Pumped: /G—gallons Septic Tank: No [ ] License # Contents transferred to: Greater Lawrence Sanitary District Date: Inspector: Yes [4 iOWh]]^^OF Commonwealth of Massachusetts 4 MAR I 1 199 Massachusetts System Pumping Record System Owner b(\ SCJ Date of Pumping:. Cesspool: NOYes Yes System Location Quantity Pumped: S"y gallons Septic Tank: No FI Yes�- System Pumped by: Sli'`P,d4at .5IOA"Ov4ed License # Contents transferrred to : Greater Lawrence Sanitary District Date: Inspector: ri New England Environmental Technologies Corporation Gayton Osgood Cairman, Board of Health Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Notice of Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion for Property Located at: 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, MA. Site No. 3-0399, North Andover, MA Dear Mr. Osgood, April 15; 1999 In accordance with section 40.1.403 of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan 310 CMR 40.0000, Minimum Public Involvement Activities, MEET is notifying the Chief Municipal Officer and the Director of the Board of Health. NEET has completed the Licensed Site Professional Evaluation Opinion and has submitted the proper documents to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Information pertaining to the documents can be obtained by contacting David J. Stanton, Project Manager at New England Environmental Technologies by telephone at 978-521-111 l or by post at 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (978) 521-11 1 1. Sincerely, NEW ENGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES David J. Stanton Project Manager 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834 Telephone (978) 521-1111 Facsimile (978) 521-1760 —J i (DVNew England Environmental NEETTechnologies Corporation Rober J. Halpin Town Manager Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Notice of Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion for Property Located at: 379 Boxford Street; North Andover, MA. Site No. 3-0399, North Andover, MA Dear Mr. Halpin, April 15, 1999 In accordance with section 40.1403 of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan 310 CMR 40. 0000, Minimum Public Involvement Activities, NEET is notifying the Chief Municipal Officer and the Director of the Board of Health. NEET has completed the Licensed Site Professional Evaluation Opinion and has submitted the proper documents to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Information pertaining to the documents can be obtained by contacting David J. Stanton, Project Manager at New England Environmental Technologies by telephone at 978-521-1 111 or by post at 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (978) 52 1 -111 l . Sincerely, NEW ENGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES David J. Stanton Project Manager 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834 Telephone (978) 521-1111 Facsimile (978) 521-1760 v New England Environmental Al EE.T Technologies 1�/ Corporation Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Region 205 Lowell Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887 RE: Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion for Property Located at 379 Boxford. Street, North Andover,. Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 3-0399 New England Environmental Technologies Corporation (NEST) has completed a Licensed Site Professional Opinion for 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. The site has been listed as a Location to Be Investigated (LTBI) relative to a report of encountering a container of undefined material on the subject site during construction of a new structure in 1984. Surface contamination of solid waste material was also noted on the subject site. According to the present owner, these materials were deposited on the site by the former owner of the property. Review of reports at the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and an investigation of the site did not reveal any documentation nor evidence of a release to the soil, groundwater or any other environmental media on or near the subject property. NEET conducted a two projects to determine if hazardous waste was present on the site's surface or subsurface. This included a magnetometer survey and test pit excavation to determine if hazardous materials and associated wastes were buried on site in ferrous bearing containers. This survey and excavation report is located in the appendix of this report in support of this LSP Opinion. The. investigation of the site also included analysis of subsurface soil and shallow groundwater obtained from several borings and monitoring wells advanced. on the subject site. ."This location is NOT a Site where a Release of Oil(s) or Hazardous Materials) occurred that is subject to the notifications requirements of 310 CMR 40. 0000, and no further actions are required". If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact either of the undersigned at (978)521-1111 Sincerely, NEW ENGLAND ENV David J.tanton Project Manager Enclosure c.c. Paul Driscoll ONMENTAL TECHNOLOG S / John H. Clement, LSP President 310 Main Street. Graveiand, MA 01834 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION OPINION 379 Boxford Street North Andover, Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 3-0328 Prepared For: Paul Driscoll 72 Pleasantview Street Methuen, Massachusetts Prepared By: New England Environmental Technologies Corporation 310 Main Street Groveland, MA 01834 March 3, 1999 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil (Cont.) LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 Page 4 the samples analyzed. A summary of the results can be found in Table 2, in the table section of this report and the complete data set is located in the analytical section of this report. Upon review of the data obtained relative to the samples collected on November 5, 1998, it was determined that additonal samples would be needed to determine if the elevated readings in the Method 1 standard were due to a matrix interferent related to the extraction procedure or if the soil and groundwater had in deed been . impacted by the solid waste deposited ac the site. On January, 7, 1999, NEET advanced three additional borings at the subject property (B6 - B8). These borings were conducted within the immediate area of borings B2 and B3 (Figure 2 -Site Plan). The samples obtained were screened of .any plastic strips which allowed for representative soil analysis to be conducted. The resulting data showed that all B2 and BT samples analyzed were below the method detection limit clearly indicating that the prior soil analysis was unduly influenced by the methylene chloride digestion of the plasitc strips. Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil Select soil samples were also collected on November 5th and 6th and analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons. These samples, along with the EPH data, were used to determine if the subject site's soil or groundwater had been impacted by historical solid waste dumping. The samples were selected from boring B4 -S2 and B1 -S3. These two samples were reported as being below detectable limits on all.parameters assayed by the Method 1 VPH analysis. Volatile Organic Compounds for Soil Borings B 1 and B2 were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. However, after a stabilization period, NMI and MW2 were found to be dry. Auger and split spoon refusal were encountered at 14.5' in B 1/MW 1 and at 8.5' in B2/1N1W2. Soil samples gathered from the bottom of each respective boring were collected by split spoon samplers and were subsequently analyzed by utilizing EPA Method 502.2, modified for soils. Analysis of these soil samples, B I -S4 and B2 -S3, did not indicate the presence of any of the sixty-four Method 502.2 volatile organic compounds. RCRA Eight Heavy Metals for Soil Soil samples B2 -S2 and B5 -S3 were collected and analyzed for RCRA Eight Heavy -Metals. These two soil samples were collected on November 5, 1998. See Figure two for the areal locations of B2 and B5. Trace constituents were detected in these soil samples. However, no levels were above the reportable concentrations for S 1 soils. A summary of the results can be found in Table 7, in the table section of this report. The entire data report is loca�ed within the analytical section of this report. 2 v LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 1 �1 E E T Page 5 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYTICAL RESULTS On November 5th & 6th, 1998 the soil borings, B 1, B2, B3, 'B4 and B5 were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. These wells were leveled and samples were collected from monitoring wells MW -1, MW -2, MW -3 MW-4.and MW -5 on November 18, 1998. Upon bailing at least three (3) well volumes of standing formation water and allowing groundwater within the surrounding aquifer to recharge, representative groundwater samples were collected using decontaminated stainless steel bailers. Groundwater samples were preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4°C, and returned immediately to. NEET's certified laboratory (Mass. Cert. #M-MA1J0) for analysis for volatile organic compounds using EPA Method 502.2. Most components tested in EPA Method 502.2 (601/602 Components) were not detected in the groundwater samples. Trace elements of toluene (0.98 ppb) and xylene (2.38 ppb) were detected in MW3. .A summary of the results are in Table 5, in the table section of this report, and the complete list of compounds and their relative concentration are found in the analytical section of this report. Extractable and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Groundwater Monitoring wells MW3 and MW5 were sampled on November 18, 1998 and subsequently analyzed for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons inclusive of the target polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Analytical results pertaining to the water samples did not indicate any parameters being above the method detection limit. Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected for any of the method parameters with the exception of the C5 -C8 Aliphatics which were recorded at 13 parts per billion for both groundwater samples. All groundwater samples collected and analyzed were noted to be below the applicable EPH and VPH MCP reportable concentrations. Volatile Organic Compounds Groundwater samples were collected from MW3, MW4 and 1\/fW5 on November 18, 1998. These samples were analyzed in NEET's in-house certified laboratory (MA Cert#130) for EPA Method 502.2 purgable volatile organic compounds. MW4 and MW5 revealed that all method target analytes were below the method detection limit. MW3 indicated trace components of Xylene and Toluene. However, these concentrations are well below the reportable concentrations of the MCP. A summary of the results can be found in Table 5, in the table section of the report. The complete list is located within the analytical section of this LSP Opinion. RCRA Eight Heavy Metals for Groundwater On November 18, 1998, monitoring wells 3 and 5 were also sampled \for RCRA Eight heavy metals: These results are shown in Table 7, in the table section, and are also located in the analytical portion of this report. As shown .in the table, no reportable concentrations were exceeded for any of the eight heavy metals tested. D S, NET CONCLUSIONS LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 Page 6 During the 1920's, 30's, 40's, 50's and 60's, the previous owner of the subject site allowed solid waste dumping on the property including significant quantities of vinyl plastic waste. During the present ownership, other solid waste materials were -deposited on the subject site. These items included, metal. frames, masonry debris, landscaping debris and assorted metal debris. Other materials noted on-site that could be . potentially hazardous to the site's groundwater and soil included automobile storage and automotive parts. The magnetometer survey and test pit excavation executed in June of 1998 revealed solid waste in the subsurface as well as on the surface of the property. Investigation of the subsurface revealed that solid waste deposits were present. However, no evidence of drums or containers consistent with storage of hazardous materials/waste was noted. Further subsurface work at the subject site included the advancement of eight (8) soil borings, of which five (5) were developed into permanent groundwater monitoring. wells. Soil and groundwater analysis included extractable and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH &VPH), volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and RCRA Eight heavy metals. Although soil samples initially analyzed for EPH received an elevated reading, the readings were attributed to the Method 1 extraction protocol and directly related to the presence of solid waste plastic within the soil samples. The digestion of the plastic by methylene chloride in the analytical digestion process is believed to have a matrix problem resulting in the reporting of false positive readings. Subsequent sampling in the immediate area of the previoulsy reported elevated samples revealed no detectable concentrations for EPH and PAH. Groundwater analytical data obtained from the monitoring well installed in boring B3 (elevated soil EPH readings) were reported to be below detectable limits for all EPH and PAH ,parameters with only a trace of C5 -C8 Aliphatics being detected. The scope of work undertaken at the 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts property,, included a magnetometer survey and test pit excavation. The second phase .of work completed at the site included eight soil borings of which five were advanced into Li7roundwater monitoring wells. Analytical data compiled from site soil and groundwater samples has indicated that the solid waste present on the subject property has not impacted the sites soil or groundwater in terms of compliance with 310 CMR 40. 0000, the MCP.. v 11 n 117 i_ 71/� 'Al am �1.=,�/ /t✓� /��:._C�'//i /_� �f _ f � ice../��/i 11 n I� C ll u n v u NEST u n L n E, n n u n n n I L n n U 0 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION OPINION 379 Boxford Street North Andover, Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 3-0328 Prepared For: Paul Driscoll 72 Pleasantview Street Methuen, Massachusetts Prepared By: New England Environmental Technologies Corporation 310 Main Street Groveland, MA 01834 March 3, 1999 O New England Environmental TechnoNEE 1 Corporation Corporation Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Region 205 Lowell Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887 RE: Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion for Property Located at 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 3-0399 New England Environmental Technologies Corporation (MEET) has completed a Licensed Site Professional Opinion for 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. The site has been listed as a Location to Be Investigated (LTBI) relative to a report of encountering a container of undefined material on the subject site during construction of a new structure in 1984. Surface contamination of solid waste material was also noted on the subject site. According to the present owner, these materials were deposited on the site by the former owner of the property. Review of reports at the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and an investigation of the site did not reveal any documentation nor evidence of a release to the soil, groundwater or any other environmental media on or near the subject property. NEET conducted a two projects to determine if hazardous waste was present on the site's surface or subsurface. This included a magnetometer survey and test pit excavation to determine if hazardous materials and associated wastes were buried on site in ferrous bearing containers. This survey and excavation report is located in the appendix of this report in support of this LSP Opinion. The.investigation of the site also included analysis of subsurface soil and shallow groundwater obtained from several borings and monitoring wells advanced. on the subject site. "This location is NOT a Site ivitere a Release of Oil(s) or Hazardous Material(s) occurred that is subject to the notifications requirements of 310 CMR 40. 0000, and no further actions are required". If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact either of the undersigned at (978) 521-1111 Sincerely, NEW ENGLAND ENV ONMENTAL TECHNOS M David J. tanton (7John H. Clement, LSP Project Manager esident M Enclosure C.c. Paul Driscoll n 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834 Teleohone (978) 821.111'1 Facsimile (978) 521-1760 Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-110 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup n LICENSED SITE: PROFESSIONAL (LSP) Release Tracking Number EVALUATION. OPINION TRANSMITTAL FORM r; Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0600 (Subpart i=) 3 - 0399 I i i A. SITE OR LOCATION TO BE.INVESTIGATED {LTBI) INFORMATION: LJ; ! Provide the following information ait appears on the Transition List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations To Be Investigated. In ' site or LTBI Name: Driscoll. Property LJ street: 379 Boxford Street Location Aid: n ` citylTown: North Andover ZIP Code: Site Status: (check one) X Location To Be Investigated _ Unclassified Disposal Site ry� -ate First ! isted in Above Categ o 1283 i u Related Release Tracking Numbers that this LSP Evaluation Opinion Addresses: 3-0399 01845 Non -Priority Disposal Site without a Waiver n B. LSP EVALUATION OF SITE OR LOCATION TO BE INVESTIGATED: (check one of the following) u i _T Check here if this location is NOT a Site where a Release of Oil(s) or Hazardous Material(s) occurred that is subject to the notification requirements of 310 %MR 40.0303, and no further response actions are required. I — Check here if a Release cf Oi!(s) and Hazardous Matenai(s) subiect to the notification requirements of 310 CMR 40.0300 occurred or may have occurred at this iodation:. but Response Actions completed prior to the date of this LSP Evaluation Opinion meet the requirements - Class B Response Action Outcome. p e4 merits of o Class A or if this LSP Evaivatior. Cainion is checked, you must meet all appropriate Resoonse Action Outcome requirements described at 310 CMR 40.1000. You must include with this submittal documentation equivalent to a Response Action Outcome, including all supporting materials. ui I Indicate the class of the equivalent Response Action Outcome: �! Class A-1 Class A-2 ^ Class A-3 -� LJ!u `;-. Class 8-1 Class B-2 I You may choose to submit a completed Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC-104) and supporting documentation in lieu of an LSP Evaluation Opinion, provided that you make the submittal prior to the LSP Evaluation Opinion deadline. _ Check here if a Release subject to the notification recuirements of 310 CMR 40.0300 occurred or may have occurred at this location, and further Response Actions are necessary, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000, If this option is checked ,you must make one of the following submittals by the applicable LSP Evaluation Opinion deadline: (i) provide a Tier Classification Submitter T ansmittal Form (BW' SC -1 and, if necessary, a Tier i Permit Application; (ii) provide a Response Action Outcome i Statement (BWSC-104); (iii) or provide a Downgradient Property Status SUbmdt2l (BWSC-104). Check here if this location is a Site that is Adequately Regulated, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0110. Specify which other regulatory authority applies: L!� Response Actions at this Site, which are being conducted as a HSWA Corrective Action, are Adequate Regulated, pursuant to i 310 CMR 40.0112. IY i , I Response Actions at this Site, which is a 21 C facility under the RCRA Authorized State Hazardous Waste Program, are Adequately J Regulated under M.G.L. c. 21 C and 310 CMR 30.000, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0113. i Response Actions at this Site, which is a Solid Waste Management facility, are Adequately Regulated under M.G.L. c. 21 H, M.G.L. c. 111, M1 § 150A and/or 310 CMR 19.000, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0114. '--+ You must attach all supporting documentation for the LSP Evaluation Opinion indicated, including copies of I any Legal Notices and Notices to Public Officials required by 310 CMR 40.1400. of C. LSP OPINION. i attest under the pains and oenatties of perjury that 1 have personalty examined and am familiar with. this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of (i) the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1). (ii) the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2) and (3), and (iii) the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(5), to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this LSP Evaluation Opinion was developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L C. 21 E. and 310 CMR 40.0000. and the response action(s) uoon which this opinion is based, if any, were reasonable and appropriate to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set form in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000. 1 am aware that significant, penalties may result, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, if I submit information which I know to be false, inaccurate or materially incomplete. W Vl-' SECTION C IS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE. Supersedes Form BWSC-015 Do Not Alter This Form Page 1 of 2 , Massachusetts Department: of Environmental Protection BWSC-110 { Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL (LSP) Release Tracking Number EVALUATION.OPINION TRANSMITTAL FORM 3 _ 0399 Pursuant to. 310 CMR 40.0600 (Subpart F) _ C. LSP OPINION: (continued) Check here if the Resconse Actions) on which this opinion is based, if any, is (are) subject to any order(s), permits) and/or approvaim issued by DEP or EPA. if this box is checked, you MUST attach a statementidentlfying the applicable provisions thereof. LSP Name:John H. Clement LSP#: 510'� Stamp: y�NOFF'� di Telephone: 978-521-1111 Ext.: $' J0HN >^yGN H. FAX: (optional) 978-521-1760 - CLEMENT No. Signature: `� 9� / E' aI3TS Date: 5` / `7F�Si'1E PRC I D. PERSON SUBMI 1 i ING LSP EVALUATION OPINION: Name of Organization,: Paul F Driscoll Trust Name of Contact: Paul Driscoll Title: Street: 72 Pleasantview Street Cij!'own: Methuen state: MA ZIP Code: 01844 Teiephone: 617-539-1503 Ext.: FAX: (optional) E. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OR LOCATION TO BE INVESTIGATED OF PERSON SUBMITTING LSP EVALUATION OPINION: (check one) RP or PRP Specify: " Owner Operator Generator ice: Transporter Other RP or PRP: Fiduciary, Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21 E, s. 2) Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21 E, s. 50)) X Any Other Person Submitting LSP Evaluation Opinion Specify Relationship: Proposed Buyer f F. CERTiFICAT ION OF PERSON SUBMITTING LSP EVALUATION OPINION: j attest under the pains and penalties of perjury (i) that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information con;a nett in this suomrttai including anyana all documents accompanying this transmittal form. (ii) that, based on my inquiry of those indrvicuais immeciately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained in this submittal is, to the best of j my knowledge and belief, true. accurate and complete, and (iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for ibis sucmi;,al. i "he Penson or entity on whose behalf this subm-Mai is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties, including, =71 c utnolied to, e i and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incompiete; information. By: Titre: (s7;4VX- ure) For. Dp sco i -z - Date: c3 (print name of person or entity recoroea in Section D) =nter address of the person providing certification, if different from address recorded in Section D: Street: I City/Town: State: ZIP Code: Telephone: Ext.: FAX (optional) YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL. RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM, YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING 'A REQUIRED DEADLINE, AND YOU MAY INCUR ADDITIONAL COMPLIANCE FEES. 17 3130/95 -- - - - - - - - u —}�......... v.a , auu yrr�7V�V 14 Do Not Alter This Form Flage 2 of 2 n n o LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 Page N E E T INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 LJ BACKGROUND .................................................. 1 n SITE INVESTIGATION .......:.................................. 2 TASKI ..................................................... .. 2 iLJ nTASK H ... .......................................................3 u SOIL BORING ANALYTICAL RESULTS ......................... 3 HeadSpace VOC's............................................. 3 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons .............................. 3 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons ................................. 4 �► Volatile Organic Compounds ..................................... 4. L, RCRA Eight Heavy Metals ...................................... 4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS ....................... 5 Extractable & Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons . 5 Volatile Organic Compounds ..................................... 5 M RCRA Eight Heavy Metals 5 U CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 6 n REFERENCES .................................................. 7 ATTACHMENTS u Figures Li Figure 1 -Site Locus Figure 2 -Site Plan n Figure 3 -Assessors Map Tables n u Analytical Data �I Subsuraface Investigation Logs Appendix I - Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation, 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, MA, New England Environmental Technologies Corporation, July 6, 1998, Project 49806577 '� I. h Li v LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 Li N E L T Page 1 rj Licensed Site Professional .(LSP) Evaluation Opinion L, 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 3-0399 n LJ INTRODUCTION n New England Environmental Technologies (NEET) Corporation has conducted .an environmental i—' subsurface investigation for the property located at 379 Boxford street, North Andover, Massachusetts. This subsurface investigation included a magnetometer survey and a series of test pits to determine if ferrous bearing buried material, which may contain oil and/or hazardous material, was buried on the subject site. Eight soil borings were also advanced on the subject site. Of these eight borings, five were developed into permanent groundwater monitoring wells. Select soil and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for Extractable Petroleum LJ Hydrocarbons (EPH) and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH), as well as, Volatile Organic Compounds and RCRA Eight Heavy Metals. These samples were collected and analyzed to '`j determine if the solid waste present within the subsurface as well as on the surface of the site has impacted the soil or groundwater at the site. BACKGROUND The site consists of three parcels of land totaling 9.37 square acres in area. One parcel is developed with a residential house, and the two additional parcels are vacant land. Surficial deposits of solid waste were noted to be present throughout large portions of the property. The solid waste encountered included landscaping debris, plastic debris, masonry debris and lumber. Several abandoned vehicles were noted on the site in the initial inspection of the property. However, these vehicles have been removed from the subject site. According to a file review conducted at the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office in Wilmington, MA, and conversations with the present owners, historical land use information indicates that the property has been used as a pig farm and residential property. Mr. Farrell owned the property prior to 1973 at which time it was sold to the Driscoll's, the present owners. Mr. Farrell allegedly was compensated by the Bolter Company, now General Tire of Lawrence, to dispose of scrap plastic strips on his property. These disposal activities are said to have taken place from the 1930's through the 60's. According to Driscoll family members, a contractor involved in the construction of a new building on the site, allegedly unearthed a 55 gallon drum on the site. Review of the site files located at the MADEP did not confirm nor indicate that drums were present on the subject site. No evidece of involvement with or sampling of drums was noted during the site background investigation. . n Ui Li n LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 NEET E CGT Page 2 ��j SITE INVESTIGATION TASK I In June of 1998, MEET conducted a magnetometer survey and test pit excavation of the property. The report is provided in the appendix of this LSP Opinion. This survey was performed in order to determine if any ferrous bearing materials, potentially indicative of the presence of 55 gallon drums, were located in the subsurface and to evaluate the site in terms of a potential release- of hazardous materials to the environment. This magnetometer survey was conducted by sectioning the 9.37 acre subject property into a grid system of 30 feet by 30 feet per square. NEET personnel then systematicaly traversed each square with a magnetometer and recorded signals indicative of areas where buried ferrous material were most likely present. Once the magnetometer survey was complete and the areas marked on a site map, the areas of excavation were determined by the relative signal strength of the readings obtained by the magnetometer. On June 25, 1998, NEET personnel conducted excavations of the predetermined areas for test pitting. These test pits were conducted to determine if buried ferrous material on the subject site may have been related to improper disposal of oil or hazardous material. Ten test pits executed at the site revealed the presence of solid waste in the subsurface. However, no oil or hazardous material/waste was noted to be present. Material encountered in the excavations included metal pipes and rods, bed frames, plastic vinyl strips and other solid waste items. The complete report, including test pit logs is present in the appendix of this report. TASK H The second task of the subject property investigation included the, advancement of soil borings n and development of groundwater monitoring wells. Eight (8) soil borings in total were advanced, Li five (5) of which were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. The subsurface investigation was designed to provide for representative sampling and analysis of the subject property soil and groundwater. The following sections describe the borings and well installation process and the analytical work conducted to determine the integrity of the subsurface of the property. Site soil and groundwater samples were subjected to a series of analytical and screening protocols which included analytical methods for the determination of Extractable -and Volatile Li Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Volatile Organic Compounds and the RCRA Eight Heavy Metals. n {J .�1 LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 M E E T Page 3 SOUL BORING ANALYTICAL RESULTS On November 5 & 6, of 1998, five (5) soil test borings (B1 through B5) were advanced on the property in the locations shown on Figure 2 - Site Plan. The depths of the borings varied from 8' to 15'. Drilling operations were conducted using an Acker Soil Sentry mobile drill rig utilizing 4.25" ID, hollow stem augers. All equipment used during the drilling operations was steam cleaned prior to use. During drilling operations, subsurface soil samples were collected using a two foot split spoon sampler or directly from the auger flights at approximate 5 foot intervals. Split spoon sampling was conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard Method D 1586, Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils. These five soil borings were developed into permanent groundwater monitoring wells. Soil samples include three samples from borings B2, B3, B4 and B51 and four soil samples were collected from soil boring Bl. All soil samples were subjected to field screening techniques or analyzed for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. On January 7, 1999, three (3) additional soil borings were installed on the subject property (B6 - B8). Soil samples were collected from a depth of 4 feet. One sample per boring was collected and groundwater monitoring wells were not installed in these borings. Headspace VOCs for Soils All soil samples were screened at NEET's laboratory for the presence of total headspace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a Foxboro Century OVA 128 GC gas chromatograph/flame ionization detector. Prior to screening, this instrument was calibrated to benzene gas to yield total headspace VOCs in parts per million (ppm), as benzene. Soil screening results indicated total VOC readings ranging from below detectable limits (BDL) to 4.8 parts per million (ppm). These data are presented in Table 1 of the tables section, the attached VOC Soil Screening Log and graphically displayed in the Drilling Logs. Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil Two (2) soil samples were collected and analyzed utilizing the MA DEP Method, for the [� Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH). These two soil samples were LJ obtained from boring B3 -S1 (0' to 3') and boring B3 -S2 ( 5'-6.5'). These samples contained soils, sands, rocks and vinyl strips, which were deposited on site by the previous owner of the property. The analysis of these samples indicated reportable concentrations of C1 -C22 `—' Aromatics. Boring B2 and B3 indicated concentrations of 13,000 parts per billion (ppb) and 750 r ppb respectively. These elevated readings were attributed to the presence of plastic within the Li samples which acted as an interferent to the Method 1 analyitcal process. The use of methylene chloride in the sample digestion process is believed to have created matrix problem, giving the n sample a false positive reading. The EPH anlytical protocol included Polynuclear Aromatic u Hydrocarbons (PAH) determination for all samples analyzed. PAH's were not detected in any of n U O v LSP Opinion A� C T RTN 3-0399 1� E G 1 Page 4 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil (Cont.) the samples analyzed. A summary of the results can be found in Table 2, in the table section of this report and the complete data set is located in the analytical section of this report. Upon review of the data obtained relative to the samples collected on November 5, 1998, it was determined that additonal samples would be needed to determine if the elevated readings in the Method 1 standard were due to a matrix interferent related to the extraction procedure or if the soil and groundwater had in deed been impacted by the solid waste deposited at.,the site. On January, 7, 1999, NEET advanced three additional borings at the subject property (B6 - B8). These borings were conducted within the immediate area of borings B2 and B3 (Figure 2 -Site Plan). The samples obtained were screened of any plastic strips which allowed for representative soil analysis to be conducted. The resulting data showed that all B2 and B3 samples analyzed were below the method detection limit clearly indicating that the prior soil analysis was unduly influenced by the methylene chloride digestion of the plasitc strips. Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil Select soil samples were also collected on November 5th and 6th and analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons. These samples, along with the EPH data, were used to determine if the n subject site's soil or groundwater had been impacted by historical solid waste dumping. The I samples were selected from boring B4 -S2 and B1 -S3. These two samples were reported as being below detectable limits on all parameters assayed by the Method 1 VPH analysis. Volatile Organic Compounds for Soil Borings B 1 and B2 were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. However, after a stabilization period, MW 1 and MW2 were found to be dry. Auger and split spoon refusal were encountered at 14.5' in B I/MW 1 and at 8.5' in B2/IVIW2. Soil samples gathered from the bottom of each respective boring were collected by split spoon samplers and were subsequently analyzed by utilizing EPA Method 502.2, modified for soils. Analysis of these soil samples, B I -S4 and B2 -S3, did not indicate the presence of any of the sixty-four Method 502.2 volatile organic compounds. RCRA Eight Heavy Metals for Soil �-+ Soil samples B2 -S2 and B5 -S3 were collected and analyzed for RCRA Eight Heavy Metals. These two soil samples were collected on November 5, 1998. See Figure two for the areal locations of B2 and B5. Trace constituents were detected in these soil samples. However, no levels were above the reportable concentrations for S 1 soils. A summary of the results can be rI found in Table 7, in the table section of this report. The entire data report is located within the analytical section of this report. Li n LJ h v LSP Opinion A� RTN 3-0399 u i �l E E T Page s r, GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYTICAL RESULTS On November 5th & 6th, 1998 the soil borings, Bl, B2, B3, B4 and B5 were developed into groundwater monitoring wells. These wells were leveled and samples were collected from Lj monitoring wells MW -1, MW -2, MW -3 MW -4 and MW -5 on November 18, 1998. Upon bailing at least three (3) well volumes of standing formation water and allowing groundwater within the n surrounding aquifer to recharge, representative groundwater samples were collected using decontaminated stainless steel bailers. Groundwater samples were preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4°C, and returned immediately to. NEET's certified laboratory (Mass. Cert. #M-MA130) for analysis for volatile organic compounds using EPA Method 502.2. Most components tested in EPA Method 502.2 (601/602 Components) were not detected in the groundwater, samples. Trace elements of toluene (0.98 ppb) and xylene (2.38 ppb) were detected in MW3. A summary of the results are in Table 5, in the table section of this report, and the complete list of compounds and their relative concentration are found in the analytical section of this report. L Extractable and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Groundwater nMonitoring wells MW3 and MW5 were sampled on November 18, 1998 and subsequently `-' analyzed for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons inclusive of the target polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Analytical results pertaining to the water samples did not indicate any parameters being above the method detection limit. Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected for Lj any of the method parameters with the exception of the C5 -C8 Aliphatics which were recorded at 13 parts per billion for both groundwater samples. All groundwater samples collected and analyzed were noted to be below the applicable EPH and VPH MCP reportable concentrations. Volatile Organic Compounds Groundwater samples were collected from MW3, MW4 and 1VIW5 on November 18, 1998. These samples were analyzed in NEET's in-house certified laboratory (MA Cert9130) for EPA Lj Method 502.2 purgable volatile organic compounds. MW4 and MW5 revealed that all method target analytes were below the method detection limit. MW3 indicated trace components of !-! Xylene and Toluene. However, these concentrations are well below the reportable concentrations Li of the MCP. A summary of the results can be found in Table 5, in the table section of the report. The complete list is located within the analytical section of this LSP Opinion. RCRA Eight Heavy Metals for Groundwater On November 18, 1998, monitoring wells 3 and 5 were also sampled for RCRA Eight heavy metals: These results are shown in Table 7, in the table section, and are also located in the analytical portion of this report. As shown in the table, no reportable concentrations were exceeded for any of the eight heavy metals tested. u n Li Li J v LSP Opinion RTN 3-0399 N E S T Page 6 CONCLUSIONS During the 1920's, 30's, 40's, 50's and 60's, the previous owner of the subject site allowed solid waste dumping on the property including significant quantities of vinyl plastic waste. During the present ownership; other solid waste materials were deposited on the subject site. These items included, metal frames, masonry debris, landscaping debris and assorted. metal debris. Other materials noted on-site that could be potentially hazardous to the site's groundwater and soil included automobile storage and automotive parts. The magnetometer survey and test pit excavation executed in June of 1998 revealed solid waste in the subsurface as well as on the surface of the property. Investigation of the subsurface revealed that solid waste deposits were present. However, no evidence of drums or containers consistent with storage of hazardous materials/waste was noted. Further subsurface work at the subject site included the advancement of eight (8) soil borings, of which five (5) were developed into permanent groundwater monitoring. wells. Soil and groundwater analysis included extractable and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH &VPH), volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and RCRA Eight heavy metals. Although soil samples initially analyzed for EPH received an elevated reading, the readings were attributed to the Method 1 extraction protocol and directly related to the presence of solid waste plastic within the soil samples. The digestion of the plastic by methylene chloride in the analytical digestion process is believed to have a matrix problem resulting in the reporting of false positive readings. Subsequent sampling in the immediate area of the previoulsy reported elevated samples revealed no detectable concentrations for EPH and PAH. Groundwater analytical data obtained from the monitoring well installed in boring B3 (elevated soil EPH readings) were reported to be below detectable limits for all EPH and PAH ,parameters with only a trace of C5 -C8 Aliphatics being detected. The scope of work undertaken at the 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, Massachusetts 1--1 property,. included a magnetometer survey and test pit. excavation. The second phase of work L completed at the site included eight soil borings of which five were advanced into groundwater monitoring wells. Analytical data compiled from site soil and groundwater samples has indicated n that the solid waste present on the subject property has not impacted the sites soil or g=roundwater Li in terms of compliance with 310 CMR 40. 0000, the MCR F1 u u I u 1✓ C-1 Li n u n ►i n n Li n u M Li n r7 n u m u n u T_ G) C m cn w C� ES NEST 0 i FIGURES 20 t000 0 t000 2000 3000 4000 FEET Printed from TOPOI CIM WiWbower Pmduetions (www.topo.eom) New England Environmental FTechnologies cTCO : - ro . Figure 1 -Site Locus 379 Boxford Street North Andover MA STardinates 4,725,427 m N 332,585 m E Latitude/Lo 42" 39' 53" N 720 03' 28" W L E Gfavd Area L u ID**Qw 'rag Gran B�. .. —7 i / House IMW4 379 Boxford St. Wooded and Vegetated Area Im BOXFORD STREET r.m �\ I B6 ..r i.. i BI[MWI m = SoilBoring/ Blmmw-t Monitoring WeU • = Soil Boring 9W ENUMD ENVIROPiMENTAL TE HNOLOG ES, MUGUON Figure 2 _ Site Plan 310 CAIN MEET, GROVEiAND, W.S GM 379 Boxford Street NEET North Andover, MA E C C Li F7 L C n C n 1 Lj n Li r n u r L n n I Li I Li 7 u u n' u r. u n n u n u M u n n Li n n u n M u n u n u M u v n u ri 11 N W J m Q H ri J v � NEET TABLES n O v � NEET TABLE - 1 IF Soil Quality Volatile Organic Headspace Concentration Measured in Soil During OVA Scans. Depth B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 - 0'- 3.0' S1 BDL 4.2 2.5 BDL BDL 1.4 0.6 1 - 5' - 6.5' S2 BDL BDL 0.5 BDL BDL - <0.5 - - 10'- 11.5' S3 0.2 BDL 4.8 BDL 0.2 - - - -15'-16.5' S4 0.6 - - - - - - - Headspace concentrations in parts per million I BDL= Below Detectable Limit TABLE - 2 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons with Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Soil Parameter Sample ID/Depth RCS -1 B2 -S1 133-S2 B6 -S1 B7 -S1 B8 -S1 C9 -C.18 Aliphatics 17 3 3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1,000 C19-036 Aliphatics 230 150 <0.5 8.2 <0.5 2,500 C11 -C22 Aromatics 13,000 750 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 All PAH ND ND ND ND ND EPH and PAH concentrations in parts per million (ppm) Bold = Above Reportable Concentrations due to matrix interference Lj I Q Lj NEET rl u E, 0 J n u I C TABLE 3 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Soil Parameter Sample ED/Depth RCS -1 B2 -S1 B3 -S2 C5 -C8 Aliphatics <0.3 <0.3 .100 C9 -C12 Aliphatics <0.1 <0.1 1,000 C9 -CIO Aromatics <0.2 <0.2 100 MTBE BDL BDL 0.3 Benzene BDL BDL 10 Ethylbenzene BDL BDL 80 Total Xylene BDL BDL 500 VPH concentrations in parts per million (ppm) BDL = Below Detectable Limit TABLE - 4 EPA Method 502.2 Pugable Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) for Soil Compound B1 -S4 B2 -S3 RC i- Benzene ND ND 2 Ethylbenzene ND ND 80 Toluene ND ND 90 Total Xylene ND ND 500 All target compounds were non-detected Soil VOCs are reported in parts per million (ppm) TABLE - 5 EPA Method 502.2 Pugable Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) for Water Compound MW3 MW4 MW5 GW -1 Toluene 0.98 ND ND 1,000 Total Xylene (o+m+p) 2.38 ND ND 6,000 All other target compounds were non-detected Water VOCs are reported in parts per billion (ppb) Lj �1 u i n Lj TABLE - 6 RCRA Regulated Heavy Metals for Soil Chemical Borings Reportable Concentration _ B2 -S2 B5 -S3 RC S-1 Arsenic 6.11 12.2 30 Barium 42.2 22.7 1,000 Cadmium 4.33 <0.29 30 Chromium 3 8. 3 29.1 1,000 Lead 55.6 7.56 300 Mercury <0.25 <0.25 20 Selenium <11.1 <11.6 400 Silver <1.11 <1.16 100 All concentrations are in parts per million (ppm) TABLE - 7 RCRA Regulated Heavy Metals for Water Chemical Monitoring Well Reportable Concentration MW3 MW4 GW -1 Arsenic <0.005 <0.005 0.05 Barium 0.16 0.889 2 Cadmium 0.0009 0.003 0.005 Chromium 0.007 <0.03 0.1 Lead ND ND 0.02 Mercury <0.002 <0.0005 0.001 Selenium <0.0050 <0.0050 0.05 Silver <0.0010 0.001 0.007 II All concentrations are in parts per million (ppm) II n I Lj n L r Li F, V r F, n C Li n Q Lj NEE 1. TABLE 8 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Groundwater Monitoring Well Parameter RCS -1 MW3 MW5 C9 -C18 Aliphatics <7 <7 1,000 C19 -C36 Aliphatics <7 <7 5,000 C11 -C22 Aromatics <7 <7 400 All PAH parameters ND ND Benzene EPH and PAH concentrations in parts per billion (ppb) TABLE - 9 Volatile Petroleum :Hydrocarbons (VPH) for Groundwater 11 Parameter Monitoring Well GW -1 MW3 MW5 C5 -C8 Aliphatics 13 13 400 C9 -C12 Aliphatics <10 <10 1,000 C9 -C 10 Aromatics <10 <10 200 MTBE BDL BDL 70 Benzene BDL BDL 5 Ethylbenzene BDL BDL 700 Total Xylene BDL BDL 1,000 IIVPH concentrations in parts per billion (ppb) II BDL = Below Detectable Limit I Li C i r L p Li p L Fl n LJ Fl Li L Li n M u M n n u n n L-, n u M. u n Li n u n u n rM r -r u n Li n n Fl F LA n U H Q O J Q U Q Z a o 'J MEET n L Li E, ANALYTICAL DATA Ll 11 11 n u I, n Li C n Li n n L n Li n M U n Li Fl Li M L n n n n n Li Fl u New England n Environmental �, clesNEET Corporation n Lj .SITE: DRISCOLL 379 BOXFORD ROAD n NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. u n L N SOIL SCREENING LOG DOC ..FILE #: 9807601 DATE OF SAMPLING: 11/5&6/98 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 11/06/98 DEVICE: Century OVA 128 GC STANDARD: Benzene UNITS OF MEASUREMENT: PPM SCREENING METHOD: SPAN SETTING: SPECIES DETECTED: Jar Headspace 300 organic, volatiles SAMPLE ID DEPTH CONCENTRATION COMMENTS B1 -S1 0 - 3' BDL FLIGHT SAMPLE B1 -S2 5' - 6.5' BDL B1 -S3 10' - 11.5' 0.2 B1 -S4 14' - 14.5' 0.6 AUGER REFUSAL B2 -S1 0 - 3' 4.2 FLIGHT SAMPLE B2 -S2 5' - 6.5' BDL B2 -S3 7' - 8.5' BDL B3 -S1 0 - 3' 2.5 FLIGHT SAMPLE B3 -S2 5' - 6.5' 0.5 B3 -S3 7' - 8.5' 4.8 B4 -S1 0 - 3' BDL FLIGHT SAMPLE B4 -S2 5' - 6.5' BDL B4 -S3 10' - 11.5' BDL B5 -S1 0 -3' BDL FLIGHT SAMPLE B5 -S2 5' - 6' BDL B5 -S3 10' - 11..5' 0.2 E 11 1 1 1 / BDL = Below Detectabie Limit of 0.10 PPM Certif ied By: Lr Page 1 of 1 n �-' 310 Main Street, Groveiand, MA 01834 Telephone (978) 521-1111 Facsimile (978) 521.1780 Date: �z-'Zz 4��16 nn `i New England I� 171 Environmental NEETTechnologies Corporation SITE: DRISCOLL BOXFORD STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. SOIL SCREENING LOG VOC ..FILE #: 9807601 DATE OF SAMPLING: 1/07/99 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 1/07/99 DEVICE: -Century OVA 128 GC SCREENING METHOD: Jar Headsloace STANDARD: Benzene SPAN SETTING: 300 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT:, PPM SPECIES DETECTED: organic volatiles SAMPLE ID DEPTH CONCENTRATION COMMENTS B6 -S1 0 - 4' 1.4 FLIGHT SAMPLE B7 -S1 0 - 41 0.6 FLIGHT SAMPLE B8 -S1 0 - 4' 1.0 FLIGHT SAMPLE BDL = Below Detectable Limit of 0.10 PPM Certified By: u Page 1 of 1 n 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834 Telephone (978) 521-1111 Facsimile (978) 521-1760 Date: �. C . o r� o �--+ New England Environmental SOIL SCREENING LOG NEETTechnologies Corporation TPH SITE: DRISCOLL FILE #: 9807601 379 BOXFORD STREET - � DATE OF SAMPLING: 11/5&6/98 SS DATE OF ANALYSIS• 11/11/98 n NORTH ANDOVER. MA LJ B5 -S3 DEVICE: Foxboro/Miran-lA SCREENING METHOD: 418.1 (Infrared) STANDARD: Reference oil SPAN SETTING: 2930 cm -1 Petroleum UNITS OF MEASUREMENT: PPM (wt/wt) SPECIES DETECTED: Hydrocarbons SAMPLE ID DEPTH CONCENTRATION COMMENTS B1 -S4 14' - 14.5' 43 87% SOLIDS C B2 -S1 0 - 3' 267 83% SOLIDS Certified By: Page 1 of 16 V B3 -S3 7' - 9.5' 53 87% SOLIDS F1 B5 -S3 Lj a n C n Certified By: Page 1 of 16 V 10' - 11.5' 35 186% SOL•IDS L = Below Detectable Limit of 20.0 PPM 310 Main Street, Grovaland, MA 01834 Telephone (978) 521-1111.=acsimile (978) 521-1760 Date :� % Le M u n r Fl L rl u r Li C F-1 L F Li L F. of z u cE)c -a E C ca c G c ca Z W W I— U U aD w E Z N m c f° Q m Q c U 7 N C f0 m O. C W(O—m z m '� 2c k h �( k k 4 Q 15 r o. 'i `n `? ✓� 118 x c a F- �. ti ❑ Z ms. `J , S H cq of Z U y7` �o C _ _ R coo y It cc m 0 10 _ C y 'moi O n ^` • a ' M w �v ` � �► � m N N � � m a m m oCL+ _ ' t 14 rv,v t a OZ z -1 m � m a •� c L y m c a.0 a. J 0 n ti LJ 7 Li o N m ala LJ 01 z N T a � cc O U 2 N C U m d O N m C O a a7 xa o«p c X z m� m 18 s m m •a �� Z5 It c � � W .. 6 LLJ ❑cc a z m C _ _ ob .0 w 8 8 ac a: CD o¢ Q E E E S 2 vs E o In m r m 01 � C C m m m m 8 V1 V1O z V Z m T E S c a a m New England Environmental Technologies,ANALYTICAL REPORT Corporation EPA 502.2 Purgeable Volatile Organics MEDIUM LEVEL DETECTION PROTOCOL Project Number: 9807601 Project Name: DRISCOLL Sample Matrix:- Soil in Methanol Sample ID: DNA -BI -S4 Sample Container: 40 ml VOA vial Laboratory ID: 10895 Dilution Factor: 1 Date of Collection: 11/05/98 Concentration Units: mg/kg (PPM) Date of Analysis: 11/30/998 ND Dichlorodifluoromethane* ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Chloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND Bromomethane* ND Ethylbenzene ND Chloroethane ND m & p -Xylene ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND —o -Xylene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Total Xylenes (o+m+p) ND Methylene Chloride ND Styrene ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Isopropylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Bromoform ND 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND Chloroform ND n-Propylbenzene ND Bromochloromethane ND Bromobenzene ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 2-Chlorotoluene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Benzene ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Trichloroethene ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND Dibromomethane ND 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND n-Butylbenzene ND Toluene ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1,3-Dichloropropane ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND Tetrachloroethene ND Naphthalene ND Dibromochloromethane ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone* ND Methyl Isobutyl Ketone* ND Acetone* ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether* NO TARGET COMPOUNDS DETECTED `J 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane 104% Recovery: Internal Surrogate: Fluorobenzene .95% n L' Method Reference: US EPA SW -846, RCRA Method 8010, 8020, 5030: US EPA Method 502.21 September 1986 Lower Detection Limit established at 0.50 mg/kg X Dilution Factor PPM = Parts Per Million: NO = not detected: * = Detection Limit of 5.0 mg/kg: Lab. Cert. #MA130: Certified by: a Director D to u 310 ,Rain Strael. Groveiand, MA 01834 Te;ap"one ;8081 521-'1'•.1=acsirrile 1508) 521.1760 New England Environmental ANALYTICAL REPORT E E T Technologies, Corporation EPA 502.2 Purgeable Volatile Organics MEDIUM LEVEL DETECTION PROTOCOL Project Number: 9807601 Project..Name: DRISCOLL Sample Matrix: Soil in Methanol- Sample ID: DNA -B2 -S3 Sample Container: 40 ml VOA vial Laboratory ID: 10896 Dilution Factor: 1 Date of Collection: 11/05/98 Concentration Units: mg/kg (PPM) Date of Analysis: 11/30/998 ND Dichlorodifluoromethane* ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND - Chloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND Bromomethane* ND Ethylbenzene ND Chloroethane ND m & p -Xylene ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND o -Xylene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Total Xylenes .(o+m+p) ND Methylene Chloride ND Styrene ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Isopropylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Bromoform ND 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND Chloroform ND n-Propylbenzene ND Bromochloromethane ND Bromobenzene . ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 113,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 2-Chlorotoluene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Benzene ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Trichloroethene ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND Dibromomethane ND 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND n-Butylbenzene ND Toluene ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1,3-Dichloropropane ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND Tetrachloroethene ND Naphthalene ND Dibromochloromethane ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone* ND Methyl Isobutyl Ketone* ND Acetone* ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether* NO TARGET COMPOUNDS DETECTED 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane 112% % Recovery: Internal Surrogate: Fluorobenzene 99% Method Reference: US EPA SW -846, RCRA Method 8010, 8020,-5030: US EPA Method 502.2, September 1986 Lower Detection Limit established at 0.50 mg/kg X Dilution Factor PPM = Parts Per Million: D = not de ected: * = Detection Limit of 5.0 mg/kg: Lab. Cert. #MA130: Certified by: Director Date 310 Plain Street. 0rovGland, MA 01334 Telephone (508) 521-11'.' Facs+mmie (508) ;21-1760 Li a v New England Environmental C Technologies, G Corporation ANALYTICAL REPORT EPA METHOD 502.2 PURGEABLE VOLATILE ORGANICS Project Number: 9807601 Project Name: DRISCOLL Sample Matrix: Water Sample ID: DNA -MW -3 Sample Container: 40 ml VOA -vial Laboratory ID: 10899 Sample Preserved: X Yes No Dilution Factor: 1 Preservative Used: HC1 Date of Collection:11/18/98 Concentration Units: ug/L (PPB) Date of Analysis: 12/01/98 ND Dichlorodifluoromethane* ND Chloromethane ND Vinyl Chloride ND Bromomethane* ND Chloroethane ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Methylene Chloride ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 2,2-Dichloropropane ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Chloroform ND Bromochloromethane ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 1,1-Dichloropropene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND Benzene ND Trichloroethene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Bromodichloromethane ND Dibromomethane ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.98 Toluene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 1,3-Dichloropropane ND Tetrachloroethene ND Dibromochloromethane ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone* ND Acetone* ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Chlorobenzene ND 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND Ethylbenzene 1.49 m & p -Xylene 0.89_o -Xylene 2.38 Total Xylenes (o+m+p) ND Styrene ND Isopropylbenzene ND Bromoform ND 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND n-Propylbenzene ND Bromobenzene ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4-Chlorotoluene ND tert-Butylbenzene ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND sec-Butylbenzene ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND n-Butylbenzene ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND Naphthalene ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND Methyl Isobutyl Ketone* ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether* 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane 97% % Recovery: Internal Surrogate: Fluorobenzene 93% Method Reference: US EPA Method 502.2, September 1986 Detection Limit established at PPB = Parts Per BiLLion ND = not detected Certified by?Director 2 ug/L X Dilution Factor * = Detection Limit of 2.0 ug/L Lab. Cert. #MA130 310 Main Street, Grovsiand, MA 01,834 Telephone (508) X21-1111 Facsimile (503) 521.1760 Date M Li n n n u u n Li 7 Li Li n Li n n n r v New England Environmental NEETTechnologies. Corporation ANALYTICAL REPORT EPA METHOD 502.2 PURGEABLE VOLATILE ORGANICS Project Number: 9807601 Project Name: DRISCOLL- Sample Matrix: Water Sample ID:. DNA -MW -4 Sample Container: 40 ml VOA vial Laboratory ID: 10900 Sample Preserved: .X Yes No Dilution Factor: 1 Preservative Used: HCl Date of Collection:11/18/98 Concentration Units: ug/L (PPB) Date of Analysis: 12/01/98 ND Dichlorodifluoromethane* ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Chloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND Bromomethane* ND Ethylbenzene ND Chloroethane ND m & p -Xylene ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND—o-Xylene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Total Xylenes (o+m+p) ND Methylene Chloride ND Styrene ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Isopropylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Bromoform ND 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND Chloroform ND n-Propylbenzene ND Bromochloromethane ND Bromobenzene ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 2-Chlorotoluene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Benzene ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Trichloroethene ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND Dibromomethane ND 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND cis-1,3-Dichloroproperie ND n-Butylbenzene ND Toluene ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1,3-Dichloropropane ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND Tetrachloroethene ND Naphthalene ND Dibromochloromethane ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene .ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone* ND Methyl Isobutyl Ketone* ND Acetone* ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether* NO TARGET COMPOUNDS DETECTED 11 % Recovery: Internal Surrogate: 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane 97% Fluorobenzene 98% u Method Reference: US EPA Method 502.2, September 1986 Detection limit established at 0.2 ug/L X Dilution Factor PPB = Parts Per Billion ND = not detected F1 LJ Certified by: M Director * = Detection limit of 2.0 ug/L Lab. Cert. #MA130 n 310 Main Street. Groveland, MA 01334 7glephori9 .150?) 521-111.1 Facsimile (1,081521-17620 Z4Zo��s� Date n u n' Li n u n n u n u n Li n L, Li Fl Li n Li Z7 New England Environmental NEETTechnologies, Corporation ANALYTICAL REPORT EPA METHOD 502.2 PURGEABLE VOLATILE ORGANICS Project Number: 9807601 Project Name: DRISCOLL Sample Matrix: Water Sample ID: DNA -MW -5 Sample Container: 40 ml VOA -vial Laboratory ID: 10901 Sample Preserved: .X Yes No Dilution Factor: 1 Preservative Used:. HC1 Date of Collection:11/18/98 Concentration Units: ug/L (PPB) Date of Analysis: 12/01/98 ND Dichlorodifluoromethane* ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Chloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND Bromomethane* ND Ethylbenzene ND Chloroethane ND m & p -Xylene ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND o -Xylene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Total Xylenes (o+m+p) ND Methylene Chloride ND Styrene ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Isopropylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Bromoform ND 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND Chloroform ND n-Propylbenzene ND Bromochloromethane ND Bromobenzene ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 2-Chlorotoluene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Benzene ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Trichloroethene ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND Dibromomethane ND 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropete ND n-Butylbenzene ND Toluene ND 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1,3-Dichloropropane ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND Tetrachloroethene ND Naphthalene ND Dibromochloromethane ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone* ND Methyl Isobutyl Ketone* ND Acetone* ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether* NO TARGET COMPOUNDS DETECTED Recovery: Internal Surrogate: 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane 97%Fluorobenzene 89% Method. Reference: US EPA Method 502.2, September 1986 Detection limit established at 0.2 ug/L X Dilution Factor PPB = Parts Per Billion ND = not detected * = Detection limit of 2.0 ug/L Lab. Cert. #MA130 Certified by: Director L., n i v 310 Main Street, Groveland, MA 01834 Telephone (508) 821-1111 Facsimile (508) 521.1780 i�//AP- Date T r T T N U) O O ru �LU o 6 Q U W Ix aC y } O n f 0 CLLL cn �_♦ V �o 4 Z _'. ° a� U 0 0 a� m cts 2 O_ Ch I -i L' n r- (D o 0 E c c.0 o c �ZwwF- U v E aD u 2 N N ¢ E cc a U- +7i N C R U m a N' cc m W(2')A C O La�Z: � � .. VJ Y n CL w N # � Z �. cc m d N O O oo z U nJ IV N a m � L T ` w N m vJ a CL J 8 8 2 c m p j � P •� V; ct C � � r - CD r x � r o ci !' vi � L Z m O p a c N a _c . CL -r a cn cr a[ n r Li n u F, L 4 F L F L F Li C I i I, u L A, RJ.. AnalY tical t1 Specialists in Environmental Services CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New'England Environmental Tech _ Date Received: Li Attn: Mr. Dave Stanton Date Reported: 310 Main Street P.O. #: n Groveland, MA 01834 Work Order #: Lj 379 BOXFORD ST, N. ANDOVER, MA (SIX SOIL SAMPLES) Lj n "ubject sample(s) has/have been analyzed by our laboratory with the attached results. n �eference: !I u li tJ ,f you have All parameters were analyzed by U.S. EPA approved methodologies. The specific methodologies are listed in the methods column of the Certificate Of Analysis. 11/24/98 12/18/98 9807601 9811-09387 regarding this work, or if we may be of further assistance, please contact us. S Viceaure`siden Q=: Chaof ustody L 41 Illinois Avenue, Warwick, RI 02888 Tel: (401) 737-8500 Fax: '(401) 738-1970 A l J. inCo trol Coordinator 950 Boylston Street, Unit 102, Newton Highlands, MA 02461 Tel: (617) 965-5133 Fax: (617) 965-5624 to L-, n n L r Fl U n I !J J Page 2 of 7 �. R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/24/98 Approved by: Work Order # 9811-09387 .I. Analytical Sample #: 001 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B1 -S3 11/5/98 Lil SAMPLE DET. ANALYZED PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS METHOD DATE/T WE ANALYST VPH C5 -C8 Aliphatics(FID) <3.0 3.0 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS 1 C9 -C12 Aliphatics(FID) < 1.0 1.0 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS C9 -C10 Aromatics(PID) <2.0 2.0 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Total VPH <6.0 6.0 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Methyl-tert-butylether <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Benzene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Toluene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Ethylbenzene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS m,p-Xylene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS !llJJJ o -Xylene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS Naphthalene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS MOISTURE 27 % SM4500-F B,D 12/03/98 16:32 BMS SURROGATE RANGE 12/03/98 16:32 BMS 2,5-Dibromotoluene 109 70-130% MADEP 12/03/98 16:32 BMS All QA/QC procedures required by the VPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the VPH Method. n Lj `rl R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/24/98 Work Order # 9811-09387 Page 3 of 7 Approved by: AnalFtical 7 LA n u n n ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST MADEP Sample #: 002 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B4 -S2 11/5/98 MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS SAMPLE DET.. 17:16 BMS PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 VPH BMS MADEP 12/03/98 I-1 C5 -C8 Aliphadcs(FID) <3.0 3.0 mg/kg dry L_i C9 -C12 Aliphadcs(FID) < 1.0 1.0 mg/kg dry MADEP C9 -C10 Aromaties(PID) <2.0 2.0 mg/kg dry 12/03/98 Total VPH <6.0 6.0 mg/kg dry 17:16 Methyl-tert-butylether <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry lA Benzene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry Toluene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry Ethylbenzene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry m,p-Xylene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry o -Xylene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry Naphthalene <0.7 0.7 mg/kg dry MOISTURE 20 % u SURROGATE RANGE 2,5-Dibromotoluene 108 70-130% All QA/QC procedures required by the VPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the VPH Method. n v 7 LA n u n n ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS SM4500-F B,D 12/03/98 17:16 BMS 12/03/98 17:16 BMS MADEP 12/03/98 17:16 BMS L-+ P L n New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/24/98 Work Order # 9811-09387 Page 4 of 7 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Sample #: 003 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B2 -S1 11/5/98 E SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIM TT f _ / w Approved by: R.I. Analytical ANALYZED UNITS METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST 17 EPH/PAH f1 C9 -C18 Aliphatics 12/07/98 C19-06 Aliphatics JRN C11 -C22 Aromatics 0.5 Total EPH MADEP TARGET PAH ANALYTES Lj Naphthalene 13000 2 -Methylnaphthalene mg/kg dry Acenaphthylene 12/07/98 Acenaphthene JRN Fluorene n Phenanthrene MADEP Anthracene 9:33 Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene 12/07/98 Chrysene JRN Benzo(b)fluoranthene aBenzo(k)fluotanthene mg/kg dry MADEP Benzo(a)pyrene 9:33 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.4 Dibenzo(a,h)antitracene Lj Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 12/07/98 MOISTURE JRN SURROGATES 1 71 Chloro-octadecane u Ortho-terphenyl 9:33 FRACTIONATION SURROGATES <0.4 2-Fluorobiphenyl IJ 2-Bromonaphthalene f _ / w Approved by: R.I. Analytical ANALYZED UNITS METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST 17 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 230 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 13000 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 13247 1.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33. JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg. dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 39 % SM4500-F B,D 12/07/98 9:33 JRN RANGE 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 118 40-140% MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 101 40-140% MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN RANGE 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 81 40-140% MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN 59 40-140% MADEP 12/07/98 9:33 JRN n All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. I All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC `-' procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. V E. 'Li New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/24/98 Work Order # 9811-09387 n Page 5 of 7 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Sample #: 004 rl SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B3 -S2 11/5/98 SAMPLE DET. . PARAMETER RESULTS LIMPr E, EPH/PAH C9 -C18 Aliphatics C19-06 Aliphatics CII -C22 Aromatics Total EPH TARGET PAH ANALYTES Naphthalene 2 -Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene a Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene I j Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene n Benzo(k)fluoranthene LiBenzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene n Dibenzo(a,h)andmcene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene MOISTURE SURROGATES Chloro-octadecane u Ortho-terphenyl FRACTIONATION SURROGATES n 2-Fluorobiphenyl i-6 2-Bmmonaphthalene Approved by: .: Analytical UNITS METHOD 33 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 150 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 750 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 933 1.5 mg/kg dry MADEP <0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 <0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 4.1 <0.4 < 0.4 <0.4 < 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 30 111 93 139 98 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry mg/kg dry RANGE 40-140% 40-140% RANGE 40-140% 40-140`90 EAll QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. , All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. �-1 No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. I 7 U MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP SM4500-F B,D MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP ANALYZED DATE/TIME 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 12/07/98 6:47 ANALYST JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN Page 6 of 7 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech . Date Received: 11/24/98 Approved by: Work Order # 9811-09387 I. Analytical Sample #: 005 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B2 -S2 11/5/98 SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LBIaT UNITS n 5.56 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 TOTAL METALS MCC ARSENIC li BARIUM SW -846 6010 CADMIUM C CHROMIUM LEAD 4.33 MERCURY mg/kg dry SELENIUM 11/30/98 SILVER MCC 38.3 1.67 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 �J MCC n 2.22 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC <0.25 n mg/kg dry Lr 11/27/98 11:00 CDM < 11.1 11.1 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST 6.11 5.56 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC 42.2 0.28 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC 4.33 0.28 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC 38.3 1.67 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC 55.6 2.22 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC <0.25 0.25 mg/kg dry SW -846 7471A 11/27/98 11:00 CDM < 11.1 11.1 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC < 1.11 1.11 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:34 MCC n U New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/24/98 Work Order # 9811-09387 Page 7 of 7 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS n Sample #: 006 n SAMPLE DESCRIP'T'ION: B5 -S3 11/5/98 U SAMPLE DET.. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT Fill 5.81 u SW -846 6010 11/30/98 TOTAL METALS n ARSENIC `[ BARIUM SW -846 6010 CADMIUM 21:42 CHROMIUM <0.29 LEAD mg/kg dry MERCURY 11/30/98 SELENIUM MCC SILVER a mg/kg dry c 11/30/98 L MCC n 2.32 L� SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC <0.25 0.25 mg/kg dry �I 11/27/98 11:00 ' u 11.6 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 2�. Approved by: ytical ANALYZED UNITS METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST 12.2 5.81 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC 22.7 0.29 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC <0.29 0.29 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC 29.1 1.74 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC 7.56 2.32 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC <0.25 0.25 mg/kg dry SW -846 7471A 11/27/98 11:00 CDM < 11.6 11.6 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC < 1.16 1.16 mg/kg dry SW -846 6010 11/30/98 21:42 MCC u n u n u In n u n Li n Li n u n n Li n u • F 0 N 0 r 0 z � U `o 0 0 N N p, 'v M . 01 01 m E CL NL a z V ¢ a cn (n 1 d s � L N c �d y N _ d ¢. cf E E �- U F- U � d ad z� •d d d .� d o W � � s ob O cn r 00 O X d E �^ Q E E lv F I- F NO LO E a`no >t, a yCV) E v . r. ~ d d !— - oi 4 f N (n p o U �, / Ji a- p 2 J' V L O d d c d U ¢ v a v a a a R.I. Analytical Specialists in Environmental Services CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: Attn: Mr. David Stanton Date Reported: 310 Main Street P.O. #: Groveland, MA 01834 Work Order #: r-1 DESCRIPTION: DRISCOLL-379 BOXFORD ST., N. ANDOVER, MA (THREE SOILS) E; Subject sample(s) has/have been analyzed by our laboratory with the attached results. D Reference: All parameters were analyzed by American Society for Testing a and Materials approved methodologies. The specific methodologies are listed in the methods column of the Certificate of Analysis. G i Ell 1/07/99 1/18/99 9807601 9901-00146 ling this work, or if we may be of further assistance, please contact us. t• &i—Ho—h Quality COMM Coordinator C 41 Illinois Avenue, Warwick, RI 02888 950 Boylston Street, Unit 102, Newton Highlands, MA 02461 Tel: (401) 737-8500 Fax: (401) 738-1970 Tel: (61 7) 965-5133 Fax: (617) 965-5624 ri Li, Li, n New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 1/07/99 Lj Work Order # 9901-00146 Page 2 of 4 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Approved by_ R.I. Sample #: 001 - SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B6 -S1 1/7/99 @0900 SAMPLE DET. ANALYZED PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST EPH/PAH C9 -C18 Aliphatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN C19 -C36 Aliphatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN C11 -C22 Aromatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Total EPH <1.5 1.5 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN TARGET PAH ANALYTES 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Naphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN 2 -Methylnaphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Acenaphthylene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Acenaphthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Fluorene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Phenanthrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Benzo(a)anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Chrysene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Benzo(a)pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Dibenzo(a,h)anthmcene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN MOISTURE 10 % SM4500-F B,D 1/17/99 7:59 JRN SURROGATES RANGE 1/17/99 7:59 JRN Chloro-octadecane 112 40-1400 MADEP 1/17/99 .7:59 JRN Ortho-terphenyl 112 40-140% MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN FRACTIONATION SURROGATES RANGE 1/17/99 7:59 JRN 2-Fluorobiphenyl 111 40-1400 MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN 2-Bromonaphthalene 68 40-140% MADEP 1/17/99 7:59 JRN All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. n Li n n I 7 u Fl C r n L El New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 1/07/99 Li Work Order # 9901-00146 n Page . 3 of 4 R.I. Analytical. Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Approved L-, Sample #: 002 - SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B7 -S1 1/7/99 @0915 CSAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS n 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP u EPH/PAH JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 C9 -C 18 Aliphatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry C, C19 -C36 Aliphatics 8.2 0.5 mg/kg dry MADEP CII -C22 Aromatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry 1/17/99 Total EPH 8.2 1.5 mg/kg dry 8:40 TARGET PAH ANALYTES MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN Naphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP 2 -Methylnaphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry 1/17/99 Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene <0.4 <0.4 0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry mg/kg dry 8:40 Fluorene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry JRN Phenanthrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry n IL Anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry ! Fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry 8:40 Pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry n Benzo(a)anthracene < 0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry __J Chrysene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry 1/17/99 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry 8:40 Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene <0.4 <0.4 0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry mg/kg dry JRN Indeno(1,2,3-ed)pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MADEP Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry LI Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Li MOISTURE 12 1/17/99 % JRN SURROGATES RANGE Chloro-octadecane 104 40-140% Ortho-terphenyl 115 40-140% FRACTIONATION SURROGATES RANGE E2-Bromonaphthalene 2-Fluorobiphenyl 113 106 40-140% 40-140% All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. F-1 All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC L procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. F I✓ R.I. ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TIM ANALYST MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN SM4500-F B,D 1/17/99 8:40 JRN 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN .1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN MADEP 1/17/99 8:40 JRN n u n u r L n u n Fl L n Li n U F LJ n Li n u n L Page . 4 of 4- R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 1/07/99 Approved by Work Order # 9901-00146 R. Sample #: 003 - SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B8 -S1 1/7/99 @0930 SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS METHOD EPH/PAH C9 -C18 Aliphatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry C19-06 Aliphadcs <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry CII -C22 Aromatics <0.5 0.5 mg/kg dry Total EPH < 1.5 1.5 mg/kg dry TARGET PAH ANALYTES Naphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry 2 -Methylnaphthalene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Acenaphthylene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Acenaphthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Fluorene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Phenanthrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Benzo(a)anthmcene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Chrysene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Benzo(b)fluorandrene <0.4 0.4 , mg/kg dry Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Benzo(a)pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.4 0.4 mg/kg dry MOISTURE 11 SURROGATES RANGE Chloro-octadecane 104 40-140% Ortho-terphenyl 97 40-140% FRACTIONATION SURROGATES RANGE 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 54 40-140% All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP SM4500-F B,D MADEP - MADEP MADEP MADEP ANALYZED DATE/TIME 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 •9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 1/17/99 9:21 ANALYST JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN =° `0 c 0 a p 0 a U C O o s 0 d o `= a d E s E2 o 0 F v d 0C h Q Cr 1 t.� a O u S 0 d E �. to c d o d d ¢ E E E U F U m d Z 00 ■r . 00 a O u u u 00 N O a 3' o CC O l� r �c00 00 Yiyq Q ! ' `ap 1 a 7r AQ Q x E �✓! to ¢ LL. � � E E E t - a3 U W�of o^o c 00 - M. z . '" E d i_ � ►� s N \ � N \ O U ho a c o c - r L f-' F Li r r Li n r L F Li El R.I. Analytical. P. Specialists in Environmental Services i n CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS LJ n !i New England Environmental Tech - Date Received: 11/19/98 Attn: Mr. Dave Stanton Date Reported: 12/11/98 310 Main Street P.O. #: 9807601 Groveland, MA 01834 Work Order #: 9811-09243 DESCRIPTION: n I 379 BOXFORD ST, N. ANDOVER, MA (THREE GROUNDWATER SAMPLES) `-'Subject sample(s) has/have been analyzed by our laboratory with the attached results. n 7 LJ n Reference: All parameters were analyzed by U.S. EPA approved methodologies. The specific methodologies are listed in the methods column of the Certificate Of Analysis. ling this work, or if we may be of further assistance, please contact us. A Michael J. in Quality Co of Coordinator n 41 Illinois Avenue, Warwick, RI 02888 950 Boylston Street, Unit 102, Newton Highlands, MA 02461 L_.1 Tel: (401) 737-8500 Fax: (401) 738-1970 Tel: (617) 965-5133 Fax: (617) 965-5624 New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/19/98 Work Order # 9811-09243 Page 2 of 6 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS / Approved by_ R.I. Sample #: 001 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW3 11/18/98 @1300 CSAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMn UNITS METHOD <7 7 ug/l MADEP _ <7 EPH/PAH n C9 -C18 Aliphadcs LI C19 -C36 Aliphadcs ug/l C11 -C22 Aromatics aTARGET Total EPH PAH ANALYTES ug/l Naphthalene ug/l 2 -Methylnaphthalene n Acenaphthylene IIJI Acenaphthene 30 Fluorene MADEP Phenanthrene 0:09 Anthracene <5 Fluoranthene ug/1 Pyrene 12/01/98 Benzo(a)anthracene BMS Chrysene 5 Benzo(b)fluoranthene [1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene IU Benzo(a)pyrene <5 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 12/01/98 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene u SURROGATES 5 Chloro-octadecane MADEP Ortho-terphenyl 0:09 FRACTIONATION SURROGATES <5 2-Fluombiphenyl ug/l 2-Bromonaphthalene iJ 0:09 BMS VPH 5 C5 -C8 Aliphatics(FID) MADEP C9 -C12 Aliphatics(FID) 0:09 C9 -C10 Aromatics(PID) Total VPH . Methyl-tert-burylether Benzene Toluene I--1 Ethylbenzene Lm,p-Xylene o -Xylene <7 7 ug/l MADEP _ <7 7 ug/1 MADEP <7 7 ug/l MADEP <21 21 ug/l MADEP <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 51 61 77 46 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l RANGE 40-140% 40-140% RANGE 40-140% 40-140% MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP ANALYZED DATE/TIME 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/10/98 15:54 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/10/98 15:54 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 12/10/98 15:54 12/03/98 4:02 12/03/98 4:02 ANALYST JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN JRN 13 10 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <10 10 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS .< 10 10 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <30 30 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS <5 5 ug/l MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/19/98 Work Order # 9811-09243 Sample #: 001 Page 3 of 6 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Approved.by_ R.I. ANALYZED METHOD MW3 11/18/98 @1300. ANALYST MADEP SAMPLE DET. 0:09 BMS PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS u, 0:09 BMS MADEP Naphthalene <5 5 ug/l BMS SURROGATE RANGE n 2,5-Dibromotoluene 111 70-130`9 11/30/98 14:04 MCC EPA 200.9 TOTAL METALS 11:49 AIL ARSENIC <0.005 0.005 mg/1 15:53 BARIUM 0.155 0.005 mg/1 11/25/98 CADMIUM 0.0009 0.0005 mg/1 EPA 245.1 CHROMIUM 0.007 0.0020 mg/l CDM LEAD 0.021 0.002 mg/I 18:02 MERCURY <0.0020 0.0020 mg/l 11/25/98 SELENIUM <0.0050 0.0050 mg/I E SILVER <0.0010 0.0010 mg/1 All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. LJ No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. All QA/QC procedures required by the VPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. No significant modifications were made to the VPH Method. r1 L-A n L E ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TD.4E ANALYST MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS 12/01/98 0:09 BMS MADEP 12/01/98 0:09 BMS EPA 200.9 11/25/98 8:20 AIL EPA 200.7 11/30/98 14:04 MCC EPA 200.9 11/24/98 11:49 AIL EPA 200.9 11/25/98 15:53 AIL EPA 200.9 11/25/98 12:49 AIL EPA 245.1 11/27/98 11:00 CDM EPA 200.9 11/24/98 18:02 MCC EPA 272.2 11/25/98 11:25 AJL C . t1 Page 4 of 6 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. aCERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/19/98 Approved by: Work Order # 9811-09243 R.I. Anal lc / C _ l. Sample #: 002 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW4 11/18/98 01300 SAMPLE DET. ANALYZED PARAMETER RESULTS LB Tr UNITS METHOD DATE/TIME ANALYST �I TOTAL METALS ARSENIC <0.005 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.9 11/25/98 8:20 AIL BARIUM 0.889 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.7 11/30/98 14:07 MCC CADMIUM 0.0034 0.0005 m9/1 EPA 200.9 11/24/98 11:49 AJL n CHROMIUM 0.450 0.0020 mg/1 EPA 200.9 11/25/98 15:53 AJL LEAD 0.252 0.002 mg/1 EPA 200.9 11/25/98, 12:49 AJL MERCURY <0.0005 0.0005 mg/1 EPA 245.1 11/27/98 11:00 CDM SELENIUM <0.0050 0.0050 mg/1 EPA 200.9 11/24/98 18:02 MCC n SILVER 0.001 0.0010 Mg/1 EPA 272.2 11/25/98 11:25 AIL u C C C rl u u lu n C n I� �J P Lj F1 New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/19/98 Work Order # 9811-09243 Page 5 of 6 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Sample #: 003 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW5 11/18/98 @1300 Approved by_ R. SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMPT UNITS 'n 7 u EPH/PAH 12/03/98 C9 -C18 Aliphatics JRN C19 -C36 Aliphatics u CII -C22 Aromatics MADEP Total EPH n TARGET PAH ANALYTES i tJ Naphthalene ug/1 2 -Methylnaphthalene n Acenaphthylene JRN Acenaphthene 21 Fluorene MADEP Phenanthrene n JRN L! Anthracene Fluotanthene 12/03/98 Pyrene JRN Benzo(a)anthracene 5 Chrysene MADEP Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8:14 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <5 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 12/03/98 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene JRN Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5 SURROGATES MADEP Chloro-octadecane j� Ortho-terphenyl L FRACTIONATION SURROGATES ug/1 2-Fluorobiphenyl n 2-Bromonaphthalene V VPH 5 C5 -C8 Aliphatics(FID) MADEP C9 -C12 Aliphatics(FID) r_i C9 -C10 Aromatics(PID) <5 Total VPH ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 EMethyl-tert-butylether LBenzene <5 5 Toluene MADEP Ethylbenzene 8:14 m,p-Xylene u o -Xylene ANALYZED METHOD DATE/TIME' ANALYST <7 7 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <7 7 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <7 7 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <21 21 ug/l MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/I MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ugil MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 11g/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN RANGE 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 55 40-140% MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 63 40-140% MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN RANGE 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 67 40-140% MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 67 40-140% MADEP 12/03/98 8:14 JRN 13 10 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <10 10 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <10 10 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <30 30 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS <5 5 ug/1 MADEP 12/01/98 0:53 BMS Page 6 of 6 R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 11/19/98 Approved by_ Work Order # 9811-09243 R.I. Sample #:. 003 MW5 11/18/98 @1300. SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER ' RESULTS LIMC[T UNITS METHOD Naphthalene <5 5 ug/1 MADEP SURROGATE RANGE �I 2,5-Dibromotoluene 112 70-130% MADEP All QA/QC procedures required by the EPH Method were followed. All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. LJ No significant modifications were made to the EPH Method. All QA/QC procedures required by the VPH Method were followed. ;Lj All Performance/Acceptance Standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved or otherwise stated. n No significant modifications were made to the VPH Method. u LiII u n u n i■ U f ' u u ANALYZED DATE/TIME ANALYST 12/01/98 0:53 BMS 12/01/98 0:53 BMS 12/01/98 0:53 BMS Lm - n Li n n n Li 7 n LJ n Li F, LJ F Li n Lj Received: 12/ 4/98 5:20PM;. 401 738 1970 -> NEET Corp.; Page 7' Tl 12/04/98 FRI 1.7-:22 FAX 401. 738 1970 R L ANALYTICAL a 0 0 U N E 0 n U III n Li n° z Li U na u U 9 Li n L 3 r Q 007 `soe- f a' V i J U y 00 a 1� C 0 LL Y C1. H 1� • 1 1 $ 0 M 0. a ~� 3 3 200 ." O `A It ° �O a m plc d w W . a` 0 �� =h 1:3 8 ' t e z m o §� NA F m a e r U r CIO S Z�� s V U$ a w v o a n R.I. Analytical Specialists in Environmental Services !� CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS LJ New England Environmental 'tech - Date Received: Attn: Mr. Dave Stanton Date Reported: 310 Main Street P.O. #:_ Groveland, MA 01834 Work Order #: M `J DESCRIPTION: DISCOLL-379 BIOXFORD ST, N. ANDOVER, MA TWO WATER SAMP u n Subject sample(s) has/have been analyzed by our laboratory with the attached results. LJ M Reference: All parameters were analyzed by U.S. EPA approved methodologies. The specific methodologies are listed in the methods column of the Certificate Of Analysis. n 2/26/99 3/02/99 9807601 9902-01633 Li If you have qu stions r garding this work, or if we may be of further assistance, please contact us. n Appr ve n L' Ja ech Vic Presi nt M I, .L, enc:Cham' pf Custody It 41 Illinois Avenue, Warwick, RI 02888 950 Boylston Street, Unit 102, Newton Highlands, MA 02461 Tel: (401) 737-8500 Fax: (401) 738-1970 Tel: (617) 965-5133 Fax: (617) 965-5624 Ell E New England Environmental Tech Date Received: 2/26/99 Work Order # 9902-01633 Page 2 of R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Approved by: R.I.' Sample #: 001 SAMPLE DESCREMON: MW3 2/24/99 (81500 EI SAMPLE DET. PARAMETER RESULTS LIMJT UNITS u TOTAL METALS `n LEAD <0.04 0.04 mg/I 1� Sample #: 002 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW4 2/24/99 81500 SAMPLE DET. n PARAMETER RESULTS LIMIT UNITS I n TOTAL METALS CHROMIUM LJ LEAD L! n Li LJ . n u <0.03 0.03 mg/1 <0.04 0.04 mg/1 METHOD EPA 200.7 1 :tl EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 ANALYZED DATE/TIME ANALYST 3/02/99 14:32 RGM ANALYZED DATE/TIME ANALYST 3/02/99 14:34 RGM 3/02/99 14:34 RGM 0 C 0 f-�U 7 0 Z" i I O U I I U O o s o a � v v _ u a a ' A s � o. !° oc Q Q Q 0 F" d � i v d o: N a Q _ �M 1I € Z o'e r -0 t d E u v M ,� d v � v � Z 00 0 00 v. Wob rn O ° cn CAILL s a O�� Q U U- N �LO 0 cj N. >� d ..i � E" o t-17 a'I V0-0 O U3�1 U¢ a U a U n u n u n u n n U n u n u n u n LA n u Fl Li r -I u u CO) C7 W CD V LQL Z O cn Q N cr. C cn -J ti a x W C C o NET n L M SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOGS Li n C ill I� F u PW r Depth Project Notes Sample ID Driscoll Well ID: BI/MW-1 New England Environmental Project # 9807601 Technologies Corporation 379 Boxford Street PrepareDatelld/6 98David Stanton North Andover, MA Depth To Groundwater: NA Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOC's Sample Description -00- -01- -02- Bl-S1 FLIGHT BDL Black, GRAVEL, little Sand, little Organic Matter, Plastic Strips, Moist -03- -04- -05- B1 -S2 2-3-5 BDL Brown/Red SAND and GRAVEL, little Rock Fragment, little Silt, Damp. -06- -07- 08- -09- -10- B1-S3 14-13-13 0.2 ppm Gray, med to course SAND, some trace Cobbles. Drv. 11 -Gravel, -12- -13- -14- 15- 16- B1-S4 50 -Refusal 0.6 ppm may, med to fine SAND and ROCK FRAGMENT, little Gravel, Dry. -17- Auger and Split Spoon Refusal @ 14.5' -1s- -19- End of Boring rti 14.5" Water encountered @ NA _20_ GRANULARSOILS COHESIVESOILS LEGEND BLOW DENSITY BLOWS/ft. CONSISTENCE 4-10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10-30 Med Dense 4.8 Med Stiff 30.50 Dense 8-15 Stitt >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff >30 Hard BENTON ITE SEAL WELL SCREEN _ B A C K F I L L Depth Project Notes Sample ID Driscoll Well ID: B2/MW-2 New England Environmental 379 Boxford Street Project # 9807601 Prepared by: David Stanton Technologies Corporation North Andover MA Date: 11/6/98 Depth To Groundwater: NA Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOC's Sample Description -00- -01- / B2-S1 FLIGHT 4.2 pprn Black, PLASTIC STRIPS, Organic - Matter, and SAND Dry. -02- -03- -04- -05- X.- XXDark B2 -S2 3-5-5 BDL Brown. med to course GRAVEL and course SAND, little Plastic Strips, Dry.B2-S3 F-O6- 30-31-32BDLLight Brown. course SAND, little Gravel, little Rock Fragment. Moist. -09- Auger Refusal (.Ft. 8.5' -10- 10- -11- _11_ -12- -12- I -13- -13- -14- 15- _16_ -17- 7-18- - 18- -19- End of Boring @ 8.5' En Water encountered @ NA _20_ GRANULARSOILS COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND BLOW DENSITY BLOWS/ft. CONSISTENCE 4.10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10-30 Med Dense 4-8 Med Stiff 30-50 Dense 8-I5 Stitt' >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very stili' >30 Hard BENTONITE SEAL WELL SCREEN i//���/ - B A C is F I L L n Li 7 n LJ U n U u C Depth Pro j ect Notes Sample ID Dr1SC011 Well ID: B3/MW-3 New England Environmental Project # 9807601 379 Boxford Street Technologies Corporation North Andover, MA Deparid698DavidStanton Depth To Groundwater: 6' Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOCs . Sample Description -00- -01- -02- -03- B1 -S1 FLIGHT 2.5 m PP Dark Gray, ROCK FRAGMENT and GRAVEL, little Plastic Strips, Moist. -04- -05- -06- B3 -S2 29-28-33 0.5 ppm Gray, course SAND and tine GRAVEL, little Rock Fragment. Wet. GROUNDWATER -07- -08- -09- B3 -S3 7-7-8 4.5 ppm Gray, course SAND and fine GRAVEL, some Cobbles, wet. -10- -11- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- -17- -18- N2O End of Boring 8.5' Water encountered Cm 6' GRANULAR SOILS COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND BLOW DENSMY BLOWSIft. CONSISTENCE 4-10 Loose 2-4 1soft 10-30 Med Dense 4-8 Med Stiff 30-56 Dense 845 stiff >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff >30 Hud • S A N D P ,a C K - BENTONITE SEAL W E L L S C R E E N � / _ B 4, C K F I L L . Depth Project Notes Sample ID Dr1SCOIl Well ID: B4/MW-4 New England Environmental 379 Boxford Street Project 9 9807601 David Stanton Technologies Corporation North Andover, MA Date: 11/06/98 Depth To Groundwater: 7 Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOC's. . Sample Description -00- -01- -02- -03- -04- B4-81 FLIGHT BDL Black/Brown, fine SAND and SILT, - little Cobbles, little Gravel, Dry. -05- B4 -S2 4-4-5 BDL Brown/Red, CLAYEY SILT, trace fine Sand, Moist. -06- -07- -GROUNDWATER -08- -09- -10- B4 -S3 7-8-7 BDL Brown/Red, fine to course SAND. little Gravel, little Silt, Wet. 11- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- 17- -18- End of Bdring @ 10' water encountered @ 7- -19- -20 - GRANULAR SOILS COHESIVE SOI LS LEGEND BLOW DENSITY BLOWS/ft. CONSISTENCE 4-10 Loose 2-4 Sod 10-30 Med Dense 4-8 Med Stiff 30-50 Dense 8-I5 Stiff >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff///�/ >30 Hard - BENTON ITE S EAL WELL SCREE N B A C K F I L L Depth Project Notes Sample ID DriSC011 Well ID: B5/MW-5 New England Environmental Project # 9807601 Technologies Corporation 379 Boxford Street DPrepared: 11/06/98 avid Stanton North Andover, MA Depth To Groundwater: 8' Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOC's Sample Description -00- -01- -02- -03- / BS -S 1 FLIGHT BDL Brown, fine SAND and SILT, with Gravel, Moist. -04 -05- B5 -S2 9-I5-20 BDL Tan, med to course SAND, trace Gravel. trace Rock Fragment. Dry. -06- -07- -08- -09- -GROUNDWATER -10- B5-S3 9-15-10 0.2 ppm Light Brown/Green, tine SAND, little Gravel, Wet. -11- 12- -12- -13- -13- -14- -14- -15- -15- -16- -16- -17- _17_-18- -18- End End of Boring Q 10' Water encountered @ 8' 19- -20- GRANULARSOILS COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND BLOW DENSMY BLOWS/ft. CONSISTENCE 4-10 Loose 2.4 Soft`<;;:'i;%`:yi�2:iii;`i`i?: 1030 \led Dense 4.8 Med Stiff 30-50 Dewe 8-15 stiff >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff >30 Hard B E N T O N I T E S E A L \V E L L SCREE N _ B A C K F I L L 111 Depth j Well Const. -00- Project BLOWS/@. -01- Driscoll WellID: Project # 8 1 New England Environmental 379 Boxford Street Prepared by: David Stanton by: Da Technologies CorporationDate: North Andover, MA 1/07/98 Depth To Groundwater: NA 111 Depth j Well Const. -00- LEGEND BLOWS/@. -01- _ $ AND PAC 1. 9_q -02- BENTON ITE SEAL 4_9 -03- -04- - W ELL SCREEN 8-15 Sun' 15-30 -05- ����������i��������������% _ B A C K F I L L >30 Hard -06- -07- -08- -09- -10- .11- 1 -12- -13- -14- -16- -17- -18- -19- -20-GRANULAR SOLS BLOWS DENSITY J-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense 30-50 Dewe >50 Very Dense Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOC's B6 -SI I FLIGHT N/A Sample Description Browny med to course SAND, some Rock Fragment, med dense, dry. End of Boring @ 5' Water encountered @ N/A COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND BLOWS/@. CONSISTENCE _ $ AND PAC 1. 9_q Son BENTON ITE SEAL 4_9 Mad Stiff - W ELL SCREEN 8-15 Sun' 15-30 Very Stitt ����������i��������������% _ B A C K F I L L >30 Hard Depth Project Notes New England Environmental Dr1SC011 Well ID: B7 Project 9 9807601 Sample Description 379 Boxford Street ar1/0798David Stanton Technologies Corporation North Andover, MA D Depth. To Groundwater. NA Depth Well Const. Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total VOCs Sample Description -00- -01- -02- -03- -04- -05- -06- 06--07--08- TS W V♦_ 137-S 1 FLIGHT N/A Dark Brown, need to course SAND, some Rock Fragment, med dense, dry. -07- -08- -09- -09- O Z -10- 10- I1- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- -17- -18- 19- -20- End of Boring @ 5' Water encountered @ N/A GRANULAR SOILS COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND BLOWS DENSITY BLOWSM. CONSISTENCE 4-10 Louse 1-1 soft 10-30 Med Dense 4.8 Med Stift' 30-50 Dense 8-15 StffT >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very StitF >30 Hard P A C K BENTON ITE SEAL WELL SCREEN B A C K F I L L n C M M L G 0 0 Ell 7 U n u M ,i Depth Project Notes New England Environmental g Driscoll 379 Boxford Street Well ID: B8 Project # 9807601 Prepared by: David Stanton Technologies Corporation North Andover, MA Date: 1/07/98 Depth To Groundwater: NA Depth Well Const Notes Sample ID Blows per 6" Total Voc's Sample Description -00- -01- -02 -03- 03--04- -04- n� B8 -S 1 FLIGHT N/A Dark Brown, med to course SAND, some Rock Fragment, med dense, dry. -05- -05- -06- -07- -06--07-_Og_-09--10_-12- -08- -09- -10- -12- -13- -13-_lq__15_-16- -14- -15- -16- 17- -17- End of Boring @ 5' End Water encountered tr. N/A -19- -20- GRANULAR SOILS COHESIVE SOILS LEGEND 'BLOWS DENSITY BLOWS/ft. CONSISTENCE d -10 Looe 24 Soft 10.30 Med Dense 4-8 Med Stiff 30.50 Dense 8-15 Stiff >50 Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff >30 Hard E; - - BENTONITE SEAL W E L L S C R E E N /%�/%///�/���/���/�� - B A C K F I L L n � n n rn z L, v_ X n u n C n n n L-1 n n u n n r -I u r -I u n 8 0 z W CL CL Q APPENDIX I U n v Li n .I u n n U n Li n APPENDIX I ENE'x E El n u C n El E. E E E I in I! u NS GN TV Ni Lrz IER S-1 RN LN AN D TEST DIT LXX A V A?'T_0\ 3.9 Boxford Street Norm Andover. -Massachusetts Prepared For - %9 Box' Street Prepared By: ,10 Man_ Street - Urove anu_ MA 0' 8� Y"T NH. Mr. Mr. Paui Driscoii C, 379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA RE: Magnetometer Sun-ey and Tes: Pit Excavation for 379 Boxford Street. North Andover. Massachusetts, CDear fir. Driscoii, New England Envi oni:_eiltai ''moi! V!V_ieJ LLT '-t v . T i : , � 0. � has co�;_c.� ed a Magnetometer Survey Eand a test pit excavation for the property located at 379 Boxford Street in \orth Andover, Massachusetts. This assessment was performed in order to evaluate the site in terms of release(s) n of oil or hazarcous materials to the environment as defined within 'Massachusetts General Laws (MGL) Chapter 2 i E. and the Massac �usetts Contingency Plan (MCP` 3'_0 CMRI 40.0000. This survey .ncia;:cc a sr.e proiperty. a ma,Jnetometer survey within the giric anal testi. T„t excavation to cetermine the nature of naimetometer signal anomalies recoruet ._. ine SUC);, 7: -Ce. T e Iturie.' -c-rO "'are- -, ,,�-�rz �h�SlcallS' !Cietltitied in terms of tneir ootennai as a SO.'!rCe Oi -'lease of cl o-azardouS materials t0 the environment. Based on the information aati"tered dun.m: this investi_ation, it is \EST's opinion that the observed site subsurface conditions indicate that a potential for co-minalinu of solid waste and oil or hazardous materials exists a- the subject oroper-v. uowever. ohvsicalycharacterization of the materials encountered during Te -s- p stirs_ activities di_ confl= -ne presence of %4CP regulated oil or hazardous materials. in order to provide more detailed site terizatior: in support of L' addressing site compliance with M.G. L . c ^ i E or the "::CP. BEET recommends the conduct of n additional site assessment ac-:v._ies. a Task TT _ccs -- ;, _.-_c �� .ed . our rev;, « Should you have. anv questions concern. ttais r� �- ^4 ^' ^�, . poi _. e c �o , of :,esitate to ca�� either of the undersigned at 978` �� ' 1 ' ' _1 - Sincerely. NEW ENGLAND EN 'IRON NIENTAL TECH OLOGIE S M David Stanton Tu LSP uhf . l.,:c:-I- �, Geoioaist "-esident r a attachmen- iff n 31' gain Street uroveiand. v 0l4 ieiePii„ne 1503) 52' 11� ;=�Csm±lg;5rg; 521-176^ 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report Page # 1 New England Environmental Technologies ('_MEET) Corporation has completed a Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation for the property located at 379 Boxford. Street in North Andover, Massachusetts. This survey and excavation was performed in order to evaluate the site in terms of release(s) of oil or hazardous materials to the environment as defined within Massachusetts General Laws (MGL) Chapter 21E, and.the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) 310 CMR 40.0000. The site consists of three parcels of land totaling 9.37 sq. acre in area. One parcel is developed El with a house, and the two additional parcels are vacant land. Surface deposits of solid waste were noted to be present ..throughout large portions of the property. The solid waste encountered included, yard debris, plastic debris, metal debris, masonry debris, and lumber. The potentially 4 hazardous components. deposited at the surface of the property included abandoned vehicles, automotive parts, gas tanks, and house hold appliances. NEST also observed areas of fill on the property, indicating that oil or hazardous material may have been released to the subsurface of the El site from buried material. El The purpose of the test pit excavation was to determine if hazardous materials and associated wastes were buried on site. The property has a history of waste activities which included the removal of 55 -gallon drums during the construction of the house presently located on the site. El The subject property was sectioned into a 30 feet by 30 feet grid layout and each square was subjected to a magnetometer survey. This survey led to the excavation of ten (10) areas of n concern that were determined by the survey. Li Based on the information gathered during this investigation, it is NEET's opinion that the potential for a reportable release(s) of oil or hazardous materials exists at the subject property. These observations indicate that the potential exists that the subject site may be out of compliance Li with M.G.L. c. 21E and the MCP. NEED TABLE OF CON-: :-t El 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUM-NiARY. ............ a 2.0 SITE CH RACTERIZ-VTIO); 2 Site Locat_on an" Descr . o .. 2 _._ Surfidal Soi-o waste ............................. .3 Potentiai Oii and Hazardous Materia (OHM) at Surt"ace . 3.0 MAGNNE TO-�IE T ER GRID ND S1-- VE i ,.I Grid instanation ana System 3 vIa<_netor erer , , ev , 4.0 TEST PITT EXC VA-lriO� 4 4.0 CO`"CLiSIOtS 4.0 RECOMMEND :IONS 6.0 LrMITATIO S ATTACHv1E\TS FIGURES TEST PIT LOGS ..... .....� .. ...........6 7 Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report Page 4 2 C2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 2.1 Site Location and Description The site is located in'a residential district of -North Andover, Massachusetts. The site consists of three parcels of land totaling 9.37 acres. One parcel is developed with a house, and the two other parcels are vacant land. The undeveloped lots consist of short and tall grass, weeds, shrubs and El wooded areas. There are also streams and vegetated wetlands near or on the site. During- NEET's initial site walkover in June, there were many areas with six to twelve inches -of standing water due to unseasonably heavy rains. 2.2 Surficial .Solid Waste On June 16, 1998, NEET Geologist, David Stanton, performed a visual inspection of the subject property for evidence of oil and hazardous waste as well as solid waste. He noted that there were extensive areas of. dumping on the property which included large areas of landscaping debris, brush, leaves and grass clippings. Masonry deposits were also visible in large areas of the property which included concrete, bricks and masonry tools. Metal grating, bed frames, nuts and bolts, pipes, rods and beams are all visible at the surface. Extensive solid plastic waste is spread `-' throughout the site. Solid waste material is distributed over most of the 9 acres of land. n 2.3 Potential Oil and Hazardous Material (OHM) at Surface n The visual inspection of the site also include inspecting for potential Oil and Hazardous Material (OHM) above the surface. NEST discovered abandoned automobiles and auto parts. These parts included several gas tanks and 12 -Volt batteries abandoned near surface water. Empty gasoline storage containers were also observed. These waste products could be potential sources of soil and groundwater contamination on the site. n i� r 3.0 NIAGN E T ONIE T ER GRID D SURVE 1.. 3.1 Grid System Maunetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report Page T 3 � Technician Shawn June i i99S: G2olouist ]ay_' Stanton. and _:.^ .tonmenma Revnolds. organized a grid system on the subject property. This Arid consisted of wooden stakes located 30 feet from one anomer and oriented at right angles. Survey equipment was used to aid in the construction of the gna systen:. This grid system then was transposed onto a site plan of the property and column letters and row numbers were assiLmed to the grid. which is located in the attachments of this report This system enabled FEET to accurately perform its magnetometer survev of the sunsu, ace for buried ferrous material o~ site by accurately recording the areas of buned fe_; ous bearing material. 3.2 Magnetometer Survey L simz a Schenstedt lnstrume:ars He1ellx 1.1a--netic ar: Cable ` ocaTr. Model MAC -51 B. on June ?2 "998_ ravia Stanton anc Shawn Revno'.•ds comrieted a ma<=netometer survev of the subject property. Proceduraiiv. one individual traversed the grid while operatic. =the magnetometer. The n second team member recorded magnetometer activity onto the grid -clot. As the property was LI being survevea. areas of buned `errous material becar"e evident or. the grid. Once areas of buried material were derinec on theyrid paper, the area would be sur<; eyed a seconded time to identif`- the exact location and size cf the buried -fate—a-1. loc :tions of oncern were found throughout the site. These areas were then designated for excavation at a `tature date. La woodec area -e - :e east the ,louse, which abuts a smaii stream. was not assessable for surveying. The surface metal material was too dense to accomplish an effective r Tnetometer survey. Vehicle axles. rims and tires. motorcvcle frames. automotive frames, lawnmowers and snow blowers covered the area. Removal of all s>>r+ace -naterial would be necessary to accurately identify buried ferrous material Ar area on the western edge of the property. abuttimz the high power lines is a location that occupies three abandoned vehicles. These vehicles must also be removed to accurately identify., buried `errous Nater: a':. M `u Li n 'u n Li Li r1 Lj Fl Li n Li n iI 4.0 TEST PIT EXCA ATIO\ Maimetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report Pa( -Te - 4 On June 2.41. 998, _e0:o_IS7 Day. Sianton aic Environ- e:?ial TecL=ician Carl Eidam, excavated property areas previously designated for investigation duthe magnetometer survey. Using a small rubber tired backhoe. Mr. Eidam probed the subsurface of the site. The depths of excavation ranged from 4 feet to 8 feet in depth. Test pit logs are located in the attachments to the report. Materiais identified in time excavation include manv tunes or soiic waste. These .waste products . include piastics that have been dumped extensivelv throughout the site. The plastic waste was predominant throughout -he'proper:• and was :`bund ,r almost all test oits and on the site surface. Metal pipes. rods, oeams. bed =carnes. rates and ruts art',olts were also identi`ied throughout the site at the surface and throusnout the subsurface. Test pit , uncovered many buried coffee cans that have been reducing 'n the subsurface for an extensive period of time. Test pits 4 and 5 uncoverea inumple meta! 5 -gallon buckets wit-' Inds Mos - 'ids were not attached to the buckets. These buckets were not Identified as hazardous, althou<_'.- it isN-E-EE'T's recommendation that a soil boring and a permanent groundwater well be installed in the immediate vic'nity of test pits 4 and 5. Two areas on site were no: surveved byrET:e,e _reds ave exter:sive surface accumulations Or meta: ma-erlal wi?ic" -educes--e e eC.i�'eneSS of ..ie T r� a_netorneter The rnateriais invoived tnree abanconec vehicles on. -he 1.vestern e o the %roTJerty Near a wetland. NT -ET recommenas a soli bonne and groundwater monitoring well be advanced proximate to this area. On the eastern ed_e of t: -e properm near the existn_ house. many metallic parts are spread throughout the surface. Riles and tares. axles. vehicle frames. and snow blowers are dispersed throughout the area. Removal of the surface material followed b„ installation of soli boring, and development of a groundwater monitoring well in this area is reconl:nended. Many automotive parts and accessories were exposed during excavation of the subsurface. Axles. doors and car frames were al'::dertiFed on site. "lese :materials raise concerns relative to the release of oil and hazardous material into he subsurfacesot's and `groundwater f=urther subsur ace wort: is recommendec in the form of soil and groundwater analvsis to determine if measurable releases of OHNi ~nave occurred at the site. FuI?her recommendations are listed in section 6.0 recommendations. U ANN Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report EET Page 9 5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS NEST has completed a magnetometer psurvey and a shallow test pit subsurface investigation at 379 Boxford Street, North Andover, MA. Based on the evaluation of the data obtained during the course of this investigation and subject to the limitations as presented herein, NEST concludes the following: • Based on surface observations of discarded automotive parts and accessories, the potential for surface releases -of Oil and Hazardous Material impacting the subsurface exists at the subject property. • Based on subsurface test pit material classification, which includes buried automotive parts and C accessories, the potential exists for releases of OHM, which could impair surface and subsurface media at the property. E• Solid waste and fill material is evident throughout the site. • Further action to investigate the potential associated with a release(s). of OHM at the site is Crecommended by MEET. These recommendations are found in section 6.0. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, it is NEET's opinion. that the C potential for releases or threats of release of oil or hazardous materials exist at the site. Site compliance relative to MGL Chapter 2 1 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 can not be determined based on the limited scope of services performed and will require additional response actions to be conducted at the subject property. C G El C 10 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Magnetometer Survey and Test Pit Excavation Report Page 9 6 Based on the magnetometer survey and test pit excavations conducted at the subject property at 379 Boxford Street in North Andover, Massachusetts conducted in June 1998, NEET has put forth the following• recommendations for the subject property. These recommendations are focused on to determine if oil or hazardous material have been released on site, and the extent of possible releases. • A minimum of five (5) soil borings to be advanced at the property in areas that. have shown potential releases of OHM into the subsurface. • Soil samples should be collected. and analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Two soil samples should be selected. for Volatile & Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) and (EPH). Three soil samples should also be selected and analyzed for the RCRA eight heavy metals. • The soil borings should be developed into groundwater monitoring wells. Groundwater should be collected and analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). LJ A minimum of two groundwater samples should be collected and analyzed for VPH and EPH and the RCRA eight heavy metals (dissolved). Additional recommendations by MEET include the subsurface report generation, Tier Cclassification and DEP reporting if deemed necessary. The nature of the DEP reporting will be premised by the findings associated with the proposed additional site investigatory work. The goal of these efforts is to develop an acceptable Response Action Outcome (RAO) for the site if a 1 1 regulated release is determined to have occurred at the property. E. v El C `Got` �,. �1 • `.� = 5� �� _ �-:r-V� � ^� �:-� ,'�� �� \- �� — �. � -� _/- �-/ ' —• _rte.. ��... ������: ' �•% iS5 / ice. � ,.. _Ap- :� town Farm - ti.� Hilt• Yl � O 9 \c`: `•`-• ,,�`,� � "�' . - '1 • ' � :✓%•, .�� sem'. / � '' - ���, --,. _ � ,.. �\. �_ _ z ;��• •ate _ . � ���� %. ��__ �'_? .� - • �. \ ;^ � '- \�,.- ., �� - - ,�• _ `' • 940 - _ - - �/�-.��v; . - � � �' " _ _ � � �•� � _ � _ ,,;�...�. _\ _ _ wave* "_...j - - - . - _ - - - N 2 Al J -� � •, � .. r -•�� �� rte. •= �a t�`= `�• ',. � ,,��: '.. _�' •� -. - � � �_�• ��_ -, _ ,`/ � �. : r J, •� � Jam- � _=��7��"` 0^� k- .V.�\� � - '� ��� / �- — .:. � � � � '�� USGS Quad. La«Tence,? Scam. 1.25,000 pro". 980.16' ?? I LJ �v CNEET 0 t! ti IZ%T onp r u�te ,,: „.,, t�• \moi ' RE 1 - SITE LOCUS 379 Boxford Szeet North Andover, TMA New Eagiana Environmental Technologies Corporation i ES P111' LOG Prosect . Paul Driscoii 379 Boxford Street North Andover. 'VIA Pn)w;.t = 98064? - Prepared bv: David Manton Dat::: 00 39.98 Dern i To iirOLlnd%%aw,,: N A Site Description: An area in the center of a circular road. There are :tam` Automotive parts in - the immediate area of the site, including a gasoline tank. �`pt: Excavation Ef=on N: to Desc-notion Svii -i grass. metal pipes Course and fine GRAVEL and course ana auto tires and and medium SAND. !ittle fine sand. _ ._�.:ra� Moderate rings. Dn- Small Illetal parts i S,kN D GRA VEL SND ;ncd:unD. Moacraie and plastic solid trace fine sand. Dn- wasic ntetai pipes. and FILL. trace Pleistocene -03- Moderate uletallic pieces and; Medium and fine SAND. some silt_ Dn plastic solid waste deposes. trace B -Horizon No metal found.�l _ istoceac deposits and Plastic soiia �kasie ;sic SAND an -4 Sin.. r;zCe B -Horizon. trace FILL U - End of 7:%4z- P.. -06- -07- ' -08- End of D;,—,n 7: �' eater encountered a N/A El �® a NEE T u \ew.England Environmental Technologies Corporation, T r C1,1r DT T /� �+ i_ Tf i l l A. - V " Project. Paul Driscoll 379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA ...:o Proie::t = 9906:'- rerared hy: David Stanton Nate: 'iib 29 98 Depta o Ground%%ate-: N :\ Site Description: Area of tai: g7rass and a small birch tree. \o visible metal is at d e sur+ace, but solid plastic waste is at the surface. I i-xcavation i I oeott:, .. Notes Descr �tlor_ Soil F ffo!7 i Grass. «veects .and a ± i Dark ORGANIC 1lATTER, stnaii bircl? tree. I A-liorizo??. Top Soil gat Ease I Solid plastic waste I Cla}e� Silt No metal found. Dark fine SILT. some Organic Matter. �- �a'� + solid plastic waste I trace fine Sand '' B -Horizon. trace FILL o I End Of Test Pit -08- X09_ i I I I I _. end of Di_in_>><< 1 %%aier encounicrcd cr N; A Small metal coffee Dark medium and fine SAND, some 03 I Moderatei cans Silt. trace fine Gravel � F1LL 2titQ tril B -Horizon I I Decomposing Dark medium and fine SAND and SILT. -04- Moderate metal coffee cans. � ( FILL trace fine Gravel and other trace. ! f j 111-1 Dal -o=- I Moderate coffee cal Medium and fine SAND and SILT. (metal coffee cans. FILL and trace Pleistocene trace fine Gravel and clay and other trace - deposits -06- I 'roderaic Sn?all. decomuosedlI SILT and CLA`_'.:ttie Erne sang Pleistocene deposits and pans of cans FILL o I End Of Test Pit -08- X09_ i I I I I _. end of Di_in_>><< 1 %%aier encounicrcd cr N; A n �� Li BEET n u n u F L, A. A- i �i I, OG New England Environmental Project Paul Driscoll 379 Boxford Street ..a Tp - PreDaredb.: Da.idStanw:! Technologies Corporation North Andover- SIA iDaw: 06 p, 98 =xmn -o GrowlU%%UW \A Site Description: T'_e site is on a gravel road: and three abandoned vehicles are close to the site. Metal parts to automobiles are visible. Excavation Dcptn `otes Description Sol; Effort oo- GraNei with little Finc GRAVEL. some Cobbles. trace \e<(etatton. solid medium Sand- Dr-%- -o►- ! Moderate Dlastic waste Smat1 Nuts and `. )= Moderate Bolts for cine GRAVEL and course SAND. trace FILL Cobbles. Dn- automobues Metal pine and Medium to fine SAND. little fire Gra Vel FILL and trace Pleistocene i) %lodcratc plastic sorra \\astc trace Silts. Dr\- deposits No mctais Fine SAND. little Silt. trace Cobbles. o t- Moderate obscr\•cd Dr -,- Pleistoccnc deposits No metals Fine SAND and SILT. trace it ,, G_r..\'C_. i -Cu- Moderate obsen-ed _le Dra Picisioc::no a. --posits -06- End Of Test Pit _07_ -0R- 'tt'' ' End of Digging i'i: S i I mater encountered a N/A n i u n C n n Li F Li Li u n Li n IM M Li n i u 7 Li M New England Environmental Technologies Corporation i L 1 101 l L Pro: ect Paul Driscoil 379 Boxford Street North Andover. MA Protect = 9x06_'"' Prepared bx•: David Stanton. :Date: 06 30 98 DdOtl- iii Cir OLUICM ate-: $ Site Description: Tall grass and weeds surround the area, and several young trees are in to area: No visible solid waste is at the excavation site. De tr p Excavation ... Noies Description Soil Effor: -00- Tait Grass. News.: SILT and CLAY. some fine Sand. and small Tree. A -Horizon and FILL. Organic Matter. Dark. 'Moist 4)1-)t- EasN? solid Dlasttc waste No metal found. Fine SAN�i . some Silt and Cla%. Dari:. FILL -oz- Ease solid plastic waste Moist 3 -gallon Metal Medium SAND. some fine Gravel. -03- Moderate bucket and lid. trace Silt. Dark. Moist FILL solid blastic waste Multiple 5 -gallon ! Medium and fine SAND and fine i -e4- Moderate metal buckets. Gravel. Dark FILL solid plastic waste Pic, -es of nic:al. Fine SAND and SIL .. trace fin-, Gray e! solid plastic waste and clay. Moist 5 -gallon metal Medium and fine SAND. Little fine -06- Moderate bucket with lid. , Gravel and Silt. Moist FILL i solid blastic waste Fine and medium SAND and SILT- FILL and Pleistocene -a - Moderate Pieces of metal trace fine Gravel. Moist deposits Fine SANM and SILT. little CIay. Dark. Pleistocene debosits -OR- Moderate No metal,obset-�-cd vet GROUNDWATER -09- i End Of Test Pit End of Di _sine_ it 9 I water encountered Yi, 8' - New England Environmental Technologies Corporation TEST PIT LOG Protect Paul Driscoll '379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA Test Pit ID: TP-` Prgje�t = 9Ki)G:0_ Preaared bc: Da%id Stanton Dal.': iib 30 JK Depth To Gruundwater: K' Site Description; Tail grass and weeds. several young trees are in the area. Thirty feet from old road connectins the rear of the property. A large sheet of plywood is covering area to excavated. Excavation Notes Description v1= Sol!! c+Tort u 3 rl ET New England Environmental Technologies Corporation TEST PIT LOG Protect Paul Driscoll '379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA Test Pit ID: TP-` Prgje�t = 9Ki)G:0_ Preaared bc: Da%id Stanton Dal.': iib 30 JK Depth To Gruundwater: K' Site Description; Tail grass and weeds. several young trees are in the area. Thirty feet from old road connectins the rear of the property. A large sheet of plywood is covering area to excavated. Excavation Notes Description v1= Sol!! c+Tort .00_ 4,X8, sheet of pi,,i+ood and oilier SILT and CLAY. some fine Sand. A -Horizon. Top Soil Or;anic Matter. Dark. Moist -01- East discarded lumber 02- Ease No metal found. i Fine SAND. some Silt and Clay'. Dark. A_�lorlZon aIIQ IrLlee i 1LL solid plastic waste ' Moist { pieces of metal. Medium SAND. some fine Gravel. FILL -03- Moderate solid plastic waste ' trace Silt. Dark. Moist tiluiupie-gaiion Medium to course SAND and fine -04-'+ Moderate metal buckets. little Silt. Dark. Moist FILL solid plastic wasteGRAVEL. -c-- Moderate Multiple 5 -gallon Fine SAND. some fine Gra\-cl. little 211(j.FILL ,r, metal buckets SiIt.-Moist Small pieces of Medium and fine SAND. Little fine FILL and B -Horizon. trace -06- Moderate metal Gra%•el and Silt. Moist Pleistocene deposits I ! Fine and medium SAND and. SILT. Pleistocene deposits. -07- Ease No metal obsen-ed i trace fine Gravel. Moist trace FILL Fine SAND and SILT. little Clay. Dark. Pleistocenc deposits 08Ease No metal observed : Vet GROL NDWATER ;�• End Of Test Pit End of Di a ). water encountered rt 3' New Engiand Environmental Technologies Corporation I TLST PST LOG Project . Paul Driscoll 379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA Trst Pit !D: TP -6 'Project = 9806577 Prepared b%-: David Stanton Date: 06 30 98 i Depth To Crrounduater: N A EI Site Description: Near old road connectins rear of property. Tall grass and weeds. edge of wooded area. Solid plastic waste is visible at surface. L1 c y E F Lj Li 'u E Ln Depth :Excavation tiores Description Soil Effort -00- Tail grass and SILT. some fine and medium Sand. weeds. solia plastic; Organic Matter. Dark. Dr-,-a-l�oriror. and F:�L cot- Ease wasteg- j Small pieces of ; -02- Moderate metal. solid plastic Medium to course SAI`. some fine ! FILL GraN-el. Moist aastc AutomotiN,c parts. Course SAND. some fine GraN-el. little -03- Moderate solid plastic -waste ; Silt. trace Organic Matter. Moist i FILL I Trace metals. solid' Medium to fine SAND and SILT. trace FILL and Pleistocene -o +- Moderate plastic.waste fine Gravel. Dark. Moist i deposits No mctais j o= Moderate obscr%-cd. solid Fine SAND and SILT. trace Clay. Moist ! Pleistocene Ile deposits trace clastic,,aste ! I FILL 06- i End Of Test Pit -07- -08- -U9- -to- i End of Diosing " G' Nater encountered 71 N/A i� n U n n n n Li r Li n n n u I NEED -New England Environmental Technologies Corporation I TEST PIT LOO Pro i ect - Paul Driscoll 379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA ni: ID: : n 'Project = 98064;-77 Preoared bv: David Stanton 1 Date:. 06:30;98 i Depth To Ground),vater. N A Site Description: Grass and weeds near edge of dense brush. Five feet from old road connecting the rear of the property. Standing water after many days of rain. Depth Excavation Notes Description ' Soil Effort -00- Brush and slion Fine to medium SAND. some Boulders grass. solid plastic and Cobbles. trace Organic .Matter. FILL and som-- T._.: Soil -ot- ! Moderate waste Moist Small pieces of Uz Difficult metal. solid plastic ; Medium to course SAND and FILL j waste BOULDERS. trace Silt 03 Difficult 'automotive pans. Course SAND. some fine Gravel. large solid plastic Nvastc Boulders and Cobbles FILL No ntctais Fine GRAVEL and BOULDERS and i u Difficult observed. solid COBBLES. trace medium and course FILL and Pleistocene clastic waste Sand Deposits �" Difficult No metals Fine GRAVEL and BOULDERS. little observed medium Sand Pleistocene Deposits 06" End Of Test Pit i -07_ ! i -n8- iU- End of Dlooipn ;J. J water encountered cr. N/A C New England Environmental Technologies Corporation TEST PIT LOG Prosect Paul Driscoil 379 Boxford Street North Andover. '_VIA ID: TP -8 Proiect = 9M6.7-7 Prepared b%': David Stanton Wit: 06.3098 Depth To Ground"ater: N.A Site Description: Along the edge of an abandoned dirt road leading to the rear of the property. A large row of shrubs is also next to the site. Solid plastic waste is evident at the surface. E u C C Depth Excavation Notes Description Soli Effort -00- : Brush and short Orass. solid Medium SAND. some Boulders and FILL and soiu -op Soil plastic Cobbles. trace Organic Matter. Moist -01- Difficult waste Small piece of BOULDERS and COBBLES. medium �, FILL -02- Difficult metal. solid plastic' to course SAND. trace Silt waste I i Metal pipe and bed I BOULDERS and COBBLES. some -03- Difficult frame. large course SAND. some fine Gravel FILL amount of plastic No metals i fine ` -04- Difficult obsen-cd. solid j BOULDERS and COBBLES. some trace medium and course Sand FILL plastic wasteGravel. No metals Fine GRAVEL and BOULDERS. little FILL1-,Md Picistoccue 0_ Difficult observed. solid medium Sand Deposits plastic waste -06-. I I i I . End Of Test Pit -07- I I i 08 i 09- i it End of Diaginu 'ii 6' water encountered a N/A C El i C U1 New England Environmental Technologies Corporation TEST PIT LOG Pro ect Paul Driscoll 379 Boxford Street North Andover, MA Test ?a ID: TP -9 Prt*et = 9806577 Prepared b%•: David Stanton Date. 06: 3098 Depth To Groundwater: N .-k Site Description: Along the edge of an abandoned road to the rear of the property, and along an edge of large shrubs. Solid plastic waste is evident on surface. Depth : Excavation i I dotes i Description Soil Effort oo- Brush and short sass. solid plastic Course SAND. some Boulders and FILL of Difficult Haste Cobbles. little fine Gravel Metal rods and BOULDERS and COBBLES. medium 02 ' Difficult pipes. metal to course SAND. trace Silt FILL ; grating. SPW 03- ! Difficult Metal pipe and [neral grating, Course SAND and BOULDERS and FILL i I solid plastic waste , COBBLES. some fine Gravel. -04- ! Difficult No metals I observed. solid BOULDERS and COBBLES. some fine FILL and Pleistocene plastic waste Gravel. trace medium and course Sand ' Deposits �`" Difficult No metals Fine GRAVEL and BOULDERS. little ; Pleistocene Deposits observed medium Sand -06' I j End Of Test Pit -07- I -08- 09- -to- ' End of Digging d 6' tater encountered e. N/A New England Environmental Technologies Corporation TEST PIT LOG Project. I Paul Driscoll (Test Pit ID: TP -10 I Project = 9806577 379 Boxford Street Prepared bv: Da%id Stanton. North Andover NIA ' I _ 1 Date: 06.30:98 I Depth To Groundwater: N ?. n Site Description: A barren area. consisting of travel and sand, car parts are in the vicinity. Thick brush is a few feet from the site. V U n a i Lj C i� f -i 1 u Depth i Excavation Notes I Description p Soil Effort i oo- ! Course SANDsome Cobbles. some fine No vegetation Gra FILL -0t-i Moderate ��2 Difficult Automotive Door Medium and course SAND and fine i FILL i GRAVEL -03- i Difficult I Automotive pans Medium and course SAND and fine j GRAVEL � FILL BOULDERS and COBBLES. some fine FILL and Pleistocene -04 Difficult 'Small metal pieces Gravel. trace medium and course Sand Deposits End Of Test Pit -09- .tQ- I I End of Di�=gin z 1. 5 ' - i water encountered :'Ii. N/A