Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous - 60 BEECHWOOD DRIVE 4/30/2018
40-60 BEECHWOOD DRIVE JS-2004-0824 Proiect Detail Report Printed On:Mon Mar 01,2004 Project Name: GIS#: 1634 Project No: JS-2004-0824 Owner of Record ALBACADO LIMITED& Map: 034.0 Date Submitted: Feb-11-2004 1755 OSGOOD STREET Block: 0051 Status: Open NORTH ANDOVER,MA 01845 Lot: Work Category: Septic System Work Location: 40-60 BEECHWOOD DRIVE Zoning: Proposed Use: District: land Use: 316 Proposed Use Detail Subdivision Description Rev.1-Plan Review Comments: of Work: Department Status GeoTMS Module: Status File No. Comments: LCDate: Board of Health GREEN FLAG BHJ-2004.0038 2/27/04-Plan Denial. 2/11/04-Rev.1 submitted for 40-60 Beechwood Drive,Map 34,Lot 6 Original Plan dated March 6,2002. Permit History Type: Permit No: Issue Date Status Work Category Contractor Project No: Description of Work: Plan Review BHP-2004-0300 Feb-27-2004 DENIED JS-2004-0824 Rev.1 Septic Plan Review(original plan from Marc GeoTMS®2004 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. Page i of 1 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER f NORTH Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES HEALTH DEPARTMENT t , w 400 OSGOOD STREET `►�°+ NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 •° °��� �Ja�cHustt Susan Y. Sawyer, REHS/RS 978.688.9540—Phone Public Health Director 978.688.9542—FAX January 18,2005 Benjamin C.Osgood,Jr,P.E. New England Engineering Services,Inc. 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover,MA 01845 RE: 45 Bridges Lane,North Andover,MA Dear Mr. Osgood, The proposed septic system design plans for the above site dated October 15, 2004, revised 12/03/04 and 12/20/04 and received on December 30,2004 have been reviewed. Unfortunately, it cannot be approved until the following items are corrected. Each item is followed by the specific section in Title 5: 310 CMR 15.000, or North Andover regulation which is not met by this design. 1. The pressure distribution system shall be designed in accordance with the procedures set forth in Department guidance. (3 10 CMR 15.254(2)(c)). The following items in the design plan do not conform to the Title 5 Pressure Distribution Design Guidance: a. The minimum dose volume should be 5-1 Ox the lateral void volume. This should be 121 — 143 gallons per dose. b. The total dose volume does not include the.proper drainback volume,which should be on the order of +/-28 gallons. c. A shield is required for any perforations located at the 6:00 o'clock position to reduce scouring of the aggregate below the lateral. Alternatively,perforations may be placed alternately at 5 o'clock and 7 o'clock positions without a shield. d. All perforations should be considered when doing calculations. It appears that the optional perforation vent hole at the distal end of the elbow of the lateral sweep is not accounted for in the volume discharge computations. Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to working with you to obtain a septic system which will be in compliance with all regulations and assure protection of public health and the environment of North Andover. :Sincer r-�'S an Y. Sawyer, REHS/RS Public Health Director cc: Owner File ' tipRTk TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT 27 CHARLES STREET p�H4YE0 i`PPy�� NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 gSS,gCHUS�i Heidi Griffin Telephone(978)688-9540 Acting Health Director FAX(978)688-9542 FAX Benjamin C.Osgood,Jr.,EIT From: Pamela To: NEW ENGLAND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover,MA 01845 978-685-1099 Pages: Fax: 978-686-1768 Date: Phone: Septic Plan Response CC: File Re: ❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle 0 Comments: Attached is the response from the Health Agent regarding Septic Plans for the following property: 0— 6) O A copy has also been mailed to the homeowner. Please call 978-688-9540 for assistance with any questions. Thank you. Xc: Address File Chrono File HP Fax K12201i Log for NORTH ANDOVER 9786889542 Feb 27 2004 4:49pm Last Transaction Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result Feb 27 4:46pm Fax Sent 89786851099 2:42 3 OK 'DelleChiaie, Pamela From: Sawyer, Susan Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:43 AM To: DelleChiaie, Pamela Subject: 40-60 Beechwood We need to add to the review for Beechwood the following comments. Feel free to edit. I did this quick. Thanks The health department has considered your request for an in house review of your revised septic plan for the property listed above, dated March 6, 2002, revised January 27, 2004. Unfortunately, since March of 2002, not only have we changed septic consultants, we have become more comprehensive in our goal to accurately meet the requirements laid out in Title V. For this reason, a new review was done on the plan. After speaking with Ben Osgood, I personally went over the new review. I am in agreement with the consultant that the plan needs improvements. The changes detailed will ultimately provide the septic installer with a product that is accurate and complete. It will also provide the property owner with a system that meets the codes.The issue Ben and I discussed, concerning the use of a field, is not a matter of preference in this particular case. As referenced in the review, it is a code requirement for the type of system you have chosen to have it designed "conformance with the provisions"as are required for trenches. This item and other important items are detailed below in the usual review format. Susan Sawyer, Public Health Director Town of North Andover 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 1 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Office of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES F? •'y+ `'• °p HEALTH DEPARTMENT 41 27 CHARLES STREET "n NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 'SSACHU+Et Susan Y. Sawyer,REHS/RS 978.688.9540—Phone Public Health Director 978.688.9542—FAX February 18, 2004 Richard C. Tangard, PE New England Engineering Services 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover, MA 01845 RE: 40-60 Beechwood Drive,North Andover, MA Map 34, Lot 6 The health department has considered your request for an in-house review of your revised septic plan for the property listed above, dated March 6, 2002, revised January 27, 2004. Unfortunately, since March of 2002, not only have we changed septic consultants, we have become more comprehensive in.our goal to accurately meet the requirements laid out in Title V. For this reason, a new review was done on the plan. Unfortunately, the plan cannot be approved as submitted. After speaking with Ben Osgood, I personally went over the new review. I am in agreement with the consultant that the plan needs improvements. The changes detailed will ultimately provide the septic installer with a product that is accurate and complete. It will also provide the property owner with a system that meets the codes. The issue Ben and I discussed concerning the use of a field, is not a matter of preference in this particular case. As referenced in the review, it is a code requirement for the type of system you have chosen to have designed as "conformance with the provisions" as are required for trenches. This item and other important items are detailed below in the usual review format. The following items are in need of attention prior to plan approval: 1. The building sewers and septic tank and their associated invert elevations are not shown on the plan profile. (3 10 CMR 15.220(4)(0) and North Andover 8.02c) 2. No scale is provided on the plot plan. 3. The second building location, building sewer path and elevation details should be shown on the site plan. (3 10 CMR 15.220(4)(c)) 4. There appears to be a mismatch of the property boundaries when comparing the Locus Plan with the Site Layout plan. 5. Please provide offset distances to the septic tank and SAS from the building and property lines(North Andover 8.03 a-c)Please provide information on the use of the existing sewer lines. This sewer line should meet all of the requirements for a building sewer as specified in 310 CMR 15.222. Y 6. The existing 2500 gallon septic tank will not accomodate 200% of the design flow as required. (310 CMR 15.220(4)(f)&310 CMR 15.223(1)(a)). 7. Please include details on the septic tank configuration(3 10 CMR 15.227). 8. Since the flow in this system is>1000 gpd, the design must consist of 2 tanks or 2 compartments (3 10 CMR 15.223(1)(b)) 9. Trenches are required when pressure dosing to a distribution box(3 10 CMR 15.254(1)(c)). 10. Setting the pump floats in the field is not considered to be adequate design. Please provide sufficient information to assess the adequacy of the pump and the pump chamber. The chamber should meet all of the requirements specified in 310 CMR 15.231 and the pump must be demonstrated to be appropriately specified. 11. Please indicate how the vent is to be protected from precipitation and animal entry. (310 CMR 15.241(1)(b)) 12. Please provide additional information regarding the existing catch basin located between the building and the soil absorption system, including its possible connection to a piping network, its relationship to ground water, etc. Additionally, you may wish to consider some of the following items in the plan revision: A. The septic tank must have a minimum of 9" of final cover. Please specify this to provide clarity for the disposal system installer. (3 10 CMR 15.228). B. You may wish to consider a drainage swale to divert surface water from the back of the property around the soil absorption system. Please feel free to contact the office with any questions you may have. We look forward to working with you to obtain a replacement septic system that will be in compliance with all regulations and assure protection of public health and the environment of North Andover. Sincerely Su an Sawyer, REHS/RS Public Health Director cc: Homeowner File TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVE l BOARD OF HEALTH Location Permit # Food Service $ Retail Food $ Limited Retail $ Seasonal $ Disposal Works Installers $ Disposal Works Construction $ Soil Testing $ Design Approval Permit $ Dumpster Permit $ Burial Permit ] Swimming Pool Permit $_ Animal Permit Recreational Camp Permit $ Well Construction Permit $ Funeral Directors Permit $ Massage Establishment License $ Massage Practice License $ Suntanning Establishment $ Offal/Trash Hauler $ Other $ 7461 ' Health Agent White - Applicant Yellow - Dept. Pink - Treasurer TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVE ,• BOARD OF HEALTH Location l Permit Food Service $ Retail Food $ Limited Retail $ Seasonal $ Disposal Works Installers $ Disposal Works Construction $ Soil Testing $ Design Approval Permit,,,/ $ � Dumpster Permit $ /� Burial Permit $<27,11dj L2 Swimming Pool Permit $_ _ Animal Permit (�/f / . Recreational Camp Permit $ Well Construction Permit $ Funeral Directors Permit $ Massage Establishment License $ Massage Practice License $ Suntanning Establishment $ Offal/Trash Hauler $ Other $ �j 7 L} G 1 _ , Health Agent White - Applicant Yellow - Dept. Pink - Treasurer SEPTIC PLAN SUBMITTALS 1 LOCATION: 0 !3eec� c.�ooD D(2-tL/e- Map &Parcel NEW PLANS: YES $225.00/Plan Check#: REVISED PLANS: YE $ 60.00/Plan-)L Check#: SITE EVALUATION FORMS INCLUDED: YES LOCAL UPGRADE FORM INCLUDED: YES DATE: l�� y DATE TO CONSULTANT: DESIGN ENGINEER: IL C w E N & [-AND Telephone#: i; r (-OG-(76 3 ENG-l.v E (L6-- When —When the submission is complete (including check),date stamp plans, COPY for Conservation,and place in existing file with green Design Approval form. Commercial Property Record Card#1 3ARCEL ID: 210/034.0-0006-0000.0 MAP 034.0 BLOCK 0006 LOT 0000.0 PARCEL ADDRESS: 45 3 BEECHWOOD DRIVE as of:1/27/04 PARCEL INFORMATION Use-Code: 340 Sale Price: 1 Book: 06736 Road Type: T Inspect Date: 9/15/97 Tax Class: T Sale Date: 3/22/02 Page: 0142 Rd Condition: P Meas Date: 9/15/97 Tot Fin Area: Sale Type: P Cert/Doc: Traffic: M Entrance: C Owner: ALBACADO BEECHWOOD LIMITED Tot Land Area: `�S5'. Sale Valid: B Water: Collect Id: JEL Grantor: CONTARINO,JEANNE A Sewer: Inspect Reas: R Address: 45 BEECHWOOD DRIVE Exempt-B/L% / Resid-B/L°/, / Comm-B/L% / Indust-B/L% / Open Sp-B/L% / NORTH ANDOVER MA 01845 COMMERCIAL SECTIONS/GROUPS LAND INFORMATION NBHD CODE: 34 NBHD CLASS: 4 ZONE: 11 Section: Section: Section: Section: Seg Type Code Method Sq-Ft Acres Influ-Y/N Value Class ID Use-Code ID Use-Code ID Use-Code ID Use-Code 1 P 340 S 115262 2.65 N 518679 101 340 201 340 Category:4 Category:4 Category: Category: Grnd-Fl-Area:3416 Grnd-Fl-Area:5527 Grnd-Fl-Area: Grnd-Fl-Area: Story Height:2 Story Height:2 Story Height: Story Height: Bldg-Class:D Bldg-Class:D Bldg-Class: Bldg-Class: Yr-Built: 1981 Yr-Built:1981 Yr-Built: Yr-Built: DETACHED STRUCTURE INFORMATION Eff-Yr-Built:1981 Eff-Yr-Built:1981 Eff-Yr-Built: Eff-Yr-Built: Str Unit Msr-1 Msr-2 E-YR-BIt Grade Cond %Good P/F/E/R Cost Class Cost Bldg:398000 Cost Bldg:704500 Cost Bldg: Cost Bldg: AS S 18000 1981 A A 50///50 16600 3 Groups: Groups: Groups: Groups: LI C 5 1982 A A ///88 6000 3 Id Cd B-FL-A Firs Unt Id Cd B-FL-A Firs jLni Id Cd B-FL-A Firs Unt Id Cd B-FL-A Firs U t 1 4003120 2 0 1 400 5527 2 0 2 401 2824 1 0 2 401 5527 1 0 VALUATION INFORMATION Current Total: 1650400 Bldg: 1131700 Land: 518700 MktLnd: 518700 Prior Tot: 1148000 Bldg: 935400 Land: 212600 MktLnd: 212600 SKETCH PHOTO NEW ENGLAND ENGINEERING SERVICES INC February 112004 TC k,Vii OF NORTH ANW*1-,H-% Susan Sawyer sOD.4T�OF HEALTH � - North Andover Board of Health 1. 27 Charles Street L FEB 1 1 20"4 North Andover, MA 01845 Re: 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover Septic system design Dear Susan: Enclosed are 5 sets of revised septic system design plans for the above referenced property. The following changes have been made to address the comments in a letter . dated March 28, 2002. From John Noonan at Noonan and McDowell 1. The assessor's documentation is enclosed. The system has been made larger to l accommodate the larger size listed by the Assessor's office. 2. The date of soil testing has been corrected. f` 3. A cross section of the leaching facility has been provided. 4. The leach field has been shifted slightly to be at a lower ground elevation in lieu of being raised. 5. A note regarding risers has been added to the plans as construction note 14. 6. Construction note 14 addresses this comment. 7. A d-box detail with inlet tee detail has been provided. 8. Construction note 12 has been added to address this issue. 9. Construction note 12 addresses this issue. It is more appropriate to have the engineer present at the time the new system is constructed to supervise the placements of floats to insure their proper placement. 10. Construction note 13 has been added to address this comment. The pump currently is wired as required. ., 11. A note stating See Construction note #4 has include on the plan view. - 12. The inlet and outlet elevations do not need to be revised since the system elevations were note revised. 60 BEECHWOOD DRIVE-NORTH ANDOVER,NIA 01845-(978)686-1768-(888)359-7645-FAX(978)685-1099 In most instances these plans would be sent to the consultant being used by the Town to review plans. In this instance, since the consultant who is presently reviewing plans for the commission is different than the one who was previously reviewing plans for the town, I was wondering if the final review could be done by you. I have had three plans reviewed by both consultants and it has resulted in a redesign of the plan each time. The new consultant has some issues with some aspects of design that are inconsistent with the previous consultant. I am hoping to avoid having to re design another plan. Your cooperation in this matter would be greatly appreciated. If you have any comments or questions please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, -- 0 r Benjamin C. Otdod, Jr., EIT President Page 1 of 1 'DelleChiaie, Pamela From: Dan Ottenheimer[info@millriverconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:11 PM To: Susan Sawyer; Brian LaGrasse; 'Pamela Dellechiaie' Subject: 40-60 Beechwood Drive Sue, Brian and Pam, Attached please find the design plan review letter for the property at 40-60 Beechwood Drive. I am not certain what they were trying to accomplish here, but they are seriously missing the mark on some basic design issues such as the septic tank is too small, the pump chamber is not specified, the pump is not specified, trenches are required to be used not a field, and the piping elevations are not all provided. Just some basic items... :) Dan 0 Daniel Otfenheimer, President Mill River Consulting Septic System Management Services 2 Blackburn Center Gloucester, MA 01930-2259 978-282-0014 or 1-800-377-3044 fax: 978-282-0012 www.miliriverconsulting.com info@millriv_erconsultineq com 2/25/2004 NOONAN & Mc DOWELL, INC. 25 Bridge Street, Voice (978) 6X� E 731, Date: March 28, 2002 HEALTH Town of North Andover Office of the Health Department B Community Development and Services , 27 Charles Street } North Andover,MA 01845 j RE: Subsurface Sewage Disposal S, Plan Review, 1770/051A 60 Beechwood Drive Assessors Map 34,Lot 6 Dear Members of the Board, Please be advised that Noonan&McDowell,Inc. has reviewed the plan dated March 6,2002 by New England Engineering Services,Inc. It is our opinion that the proposed design will meet the requirements of Title 5 and the North Andover Board of Health`By-Laws"if the following is addressed: 1) Provide Town Assessors documentation of total floor area. NA 8.02 i 2) Correct date of soil testing 11/15/01. 3) Provide cross section of leaching facility. NA 8.02 w 4) Adjust bottom of leaching bed to highest ground elevation(114.5)for offset to ESHWT. 5) Provide riser to within 6 inches of final grade for septic tank if none currently exists. 228(3) 6) Provide gas baffle on outlet of septic tank if none exists. 227(4) 7) Provide detail of D-Box with inlet teelbaffle. 8) Provide pump curve and performance data on pump. If information is not available provide a note that states that pump shall be field tested prior to use. 9) The soil type requires 4 doses/day. Provide inside dimensions of existing pump chamber and elevation for off/on/alarm/floats. 220(4)(r) Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Environmental Planners NOONAN & Mc DOWELL, INC. 25 Bridge Street, Suite 6, Billerica, MA 01821-1023 Voice (978) 667-9736 Fax (978) 671-9565 Email: nm@netwU.com Date: March 28,2002 TG"�i BOADOOF HEARTH °H,._n/ Town of North Andover Office of the Health Department [APR 0 2 Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 1 ' RE: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Plan Review, 1770/051A 60 Beechwood Drive Assessors Map 34,Lot 6 Dear Members of the Board, Please be advised that Noonan&McDowell,Inc. has reviewed the plan dated March 6,2002 by New England Engineering Services,Inc. It is our opinion that the proposed design will meet the requirements of Title 5 and the North Andover Board of Health`By-Laws" if the following is addressed: 1) Provide Town Assessors documentation of total floor area. NA 8.02 i 2) Correct date of soil testing 11/15/01. 3) Provide cross section of leaching facility. NA 8.02 w 4) Adjust bottom of leaching bed to highest ground elevation(114.5)for offset to ESHWT. 5) Provide riser to within 6 inches of final grade for septic tank if none currently exists. 228(3) 6) Provide gas baffle on outlet of septic tank if none exists. 227(4) 7) Provide detail of D-Box with inlet tee/baffle. 8) Provide pump curve and performance data on pump. If information is not available provide a note that states that pump shall be field tested prior to use. 9) The soil type requires 4 doses/day. Provide inside dimensions of existing pump chamber and elevation for off/on/alarm/floats. 220(4)(r) Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Environmental Planners 10) Provide a note for pump and pump chamber to be checked for separate circuits,alarm,manual switch and bleeder hole. 11) Add see note 4 on plan view. NA 8.022 12) Revise elevation of inlet and outlet of distribution box. Respectfully, John L.Noonan,P.L.S.-P.E. F:office/letter/1770-051A Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Environmental Planners 2 Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No.2 f NORTry BOARD OF HEALTH 19-O t �ao is lti , w 9 DESIGN APPROVAL FOR no C"°SE` SOIL ABSORPTION SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM • Applicant r ���� ��c/cJ� Test No. : Site Location '��—lad � �C'�/yLll50� �U/�• • Reference Plans and Specs. /46!E5 • ENGINEER DESIGN DATE Permission is granted for an individual soil absorption sewage disposal syste to be installed in accordance with regulations of Board of Health. ' /CHAIRM ,BO DOHEALTH Fee m Permit No. / NOONAN & Mc DOWELL, INC. 25 Bridge Street, Suite 6, Billerica, MA 01821-1023 Voice (978) 667-9736 Fax (978) 671-9565 , Email: nm@netway.com Date Town of North Andover Office of the Health Department Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Plan Review, 1770/ -7 5 / A Assessors Map 3fLot 6 Dear Members of the Board, Please be advised that Noonan &McDowell, Inc. has reviewed the plan dated by N�iy �'v 6 � � fir- i.✓�zrr�r�v�- s5 yr G S /-.� c f It is our opinion that the proposed design will meet the requirements of Title 5 and the North Andover Board of Health `By-Laws"if the following is addressed: f�c G c��s c-�✓ TTi cv .�� �`� n 'Z (, Z� G40 1'- 07 T Lir s e— T� f rt ss c1/ r. c; A,1 s ; !!�7e__ 7,�ti d G�� To 46�-s/ w T_ rri OAT Respectfully, �Ory C Pi�� �� � � Y -mac / STS Z Z 8'/3) John L. Noonan, P.L.S.-P.E. G:office/forms/tonarev 15'*-*Z67 P/ Gam`S C3/I`- 'i ce Q N v i e- 7 S &� 7-?' /' 1 s T S Zz7Q Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Environmental Planners 6:7- C2 � `// (/A- o /!- G;' 7-- �-- / d CHECKLIST FOR NORTH ANDOVER SEPTIC SYSTEM PLANS N&M Job 1770/ (2-51A The following is a checklist that incorporates all Title 5 and local regulations for septic plans. Name of Applicant: 7)1- T7rL r T- Name of Designer: Plan Date: -3 G A 2 Revision Date: Date of Review: Property Address: Map:3 Lot: BOH Reviewer: �- �"��"� �`� Type of Plan(new or grade): Number of Bedrooms in Assessor's Records: gpd)_Garbage Disposal Allowed: General Information: N.A.=North Andover Septic Regulations Other numbers refer to Title 5 OK problem N/A Street number and map/lot-220(4)(u) Maximum scale of 1 "=40'for plot plan-220(4) Maximum scale of 1 "=20'for profile and component details-220(4) Legal boundaries of the facility being served-220(4)(a) Names of abutters from recent tax map- NA 8.02j lNumber of bedrooms,design calcs.,-NA 8.02i Name&address of record owner&applicant- NA 8.02k Name&address of designer-NA 8.021 Holder and location of all easements-220(4)(b) Date plan drawn&any revision date- NA 8.02m All dwellings and buildings,existing and proposed-220(4)(c) ✓' Location of all existing or proposed impervious areas-220(4)(d) All distance on site plan-NA 8.03a-c �-^ Elevation of proposed driveway-NA 8.02t Location and elevation of foundation drain-_NA 8.02y Location and dimensions of the system incl.reserve(new const.)-220(4)(e) �l Limits of excavation of leach area on site plan-NA 8.02z Locus plan-"220(4)(t) (Not to scale) North arrow-220(4)(g) ' Existing and proposed contours-220(4)(g) ✓' Locations and logs of deep holes-220(4)(h) Locations and logs of percolation tests-220(4)(i) Z Date(s)of soil testing-220(4)(h)&(i) Existing grade elevation of each deep hole-220(4)(h) _ Elevation of percolation tests-N.A. 8.02n Name of approving authority representative-220(4)(h)&(i) Name of soil evaluator-220(4)0) Soil logs and perc test logs match BOH records Locations of waterlines,drains,and subsurface utilities-220(4)(m) Observed and adjusted g.w.elevation in the vicinity of the system-220(4)(n) Complete profile of the system to scale-220(4)(o),NA 8.02c Cross section of leaching facility-NA 8.02w (Not to scale) Location of benchmark(s)within 50-75 feet of facility-220(4)(q) -� Note listing all variance requests with proper citations-220(4)(p) Local upgrade approval request form submitted-403(1) �c Original R.S./P.E.stamp,signature&date-220(l)&(2) ✓' If P.E.,discipline specified within stamp. MGL C. 112 s. 81M sfc.supplies(w/in 400'),pub. wells(w/in 250'),pvt.wells(w/in 150')-220(4)( _ Location of watercourses,wetlands,wells,etc. Win 150'of system-NA 8.02r �^ Wetland disclaimer-NA 8.02s ----� RLS plan reference&certification required(prop line setbacks)-220(3) --� Use approvals/standards checked for I/A system-DEP docs., 2 4 *� Perc rate>30 MPI-not allowed for new,LUA for upgrade-245(1)&('3) Perc rate>60 MPI-must use modified tight tank or UA technology-245(4) Proposed system qualifies as "shared"system-002(definitions) Flow is over 2,000 gpd-No R.S. allowed-220(1) - �' Design flow was set in accordance with code-203 Existing system location and note_on proper abandonment-354 �—" Leaching facility at least 1' above Base Flood elevation—NA 9.05 �- All piping Sch 40 minimum—NA 10.01 Basement floor minimum 1' above groundwater elevation—NA 5.04 Foundation drain present with elevation—NA 8.02y On-site Soil and Groundwater Review OK Problem N/A Proper deep observation hole logs on plan-220(4)(h) V' All deep holes and peres shown,including aborted tests—NA 8.02n Soil evaluation forms submitted within 60 days of field work-018(2) Proper percolation test log-220(4)(i) Ample deep observation holes in primary disposal area(minimum 2)- 102(2) Ample deep observation holes in secondary disposal area(minimum 2)- 102(2) Ample perc testing(one in each disposal area,3 in prim.>2,000 gpd)- 104(4) Deep hole testing conducted within two years—NA 7.05 Hole Identification Numbers: ground elevation el. acceptable soil el. Leach facilitv invert el. ground water el. ----- refusal el. bottom of leach facility el. / thickness of acceptable soil before&after soil R&R separation to groundwater separation to refusal soil class perc rate loading rate septic tank below g.w.table (yes or no) pump tank below g.w.table (yes or no) l.f in fill i" -255(l) Setback Distances(Given in feet) 15.21 1 YES NO Is the lot in the Lake Cochiewick Watershed? NA 6.00&5.02 OK Problem N/A Septic Tank Leach Facility Property line 10 10 y Cellar wall 10 20 2 0 3 Inground pool 10 20 G� Slab foundation 10 10 Deck,on footings,etc. 5 10 Waterline 10 10 Private drinking well 75 100 Irrigation well 75 100 c� Wetlands 75 100 Public well 400 400 Wetlands bordering surface 150 150 water Supply or trib.(in Watershed) c/- Trib.To Surface Water supply 325 325 Reservoirs 400 400 Tributaries to reservoirs 200 200 e-- Drains(wat.supply/trib.) 50 100 - Drains(intercept g.w.) 25 50 Foundation drains 10 20 Drains(Other) 5. 10 Drywells 20 25 Downhill slope 15'to 3:1 slope w/o barrier Building Sewer OK Problem N/A Grease trap required for certain uses(check 230 for details) Pipe diameter listed(4"minim - 2(1) Pipe schedule listed 2 Pipe cast iron or 40 PVC-NA 11.02 Watertigh�J mts specified-222(3)&(4) Pipe,J on compact,fin base-222(5) pe laid on continuous grade in straight line-222(7)@ Cleanouts precede all changes in alignment and grade-222 8 Cleanout provided every 100 feet-222(8) Manhole at any 90 degree alignment chan 2(8) Invert elevation at building: Invert elevation at septic Length of run: Slope: minimum of 0.01 -0.02 desired)-222(6) 10'offset to = ate well or suction line-222(2) 3 4 Septic Tank OK Problem N/A T' Tank is accessible-228(3) No structures above tank-(228(3) Tank can accommodate both primary&reserve-NA 9.04 00%of flow(required&provided given. 1500 min.)-220(4)(f)&223)(1)(a) 532 -3" drop from inlet to outlet-227(5) inimum of 4'liquid depth-223(2) "airspace above tees/baffles(minimum)-227(4) 'air space above flow line(minimum)-227(4) ees are not to be replaced by baffles-227(1) ees extend 6"above flow line-227(1) nlet tee extends 10"below flow line(minimum)-227(6) ^ Outlet tee extends 14"below flow line(more for deeper tanks)-227(6) Gas baffle installed on outlet-227(4) Access manhole cover above center of tank&each tee(except 2 compart)228(2) 3-20"manholes-228(2) 1 childproof,24"riser/manhole w/in 6"of final grade if<1000gpd-228(2) Inlet and outlet tees on center line-227(1) Soil compaction below tank specified(if soil is non-native)-221(2) 6"of<=3/4"stone beneath tank specified-221(2)&22 8(1) If> 1,000 gpd AND not a single fam.dwell.must be 2 tks or 2 comp.-223(1)(b) If plan specifies disposal must be 2 tanks in series or 2 compart.tank-223(1)(c) BuoyAncy calcs.required if tank at or below water table-221(8) fik is watertight-221 (1) 9"of cover over tank(minimum)-228(1) H- 10 loading(min.)-H-20 if traffic-226(3) Top of tank<=36"below grade-221(7) All pumping to tank(if applies)in accordance with-229 Tank is set to keep old system in service during install if possible Distribution Box(Check here if not present: ) - A;roblem N/A Inlet elevation: -Z, Outlet elevation:0.17'drop from inlet to outlet(minimum)-232(3)(b) V' 6"sump(minimum)-232(3)(e) All outlets at same elevation-232(3)(b) f Outlet pipes laid level for first 2 ft.-232(3)(c) Pipe Sch 40-NA 10.01 Number of outlets: Number of laterals: Size of outlets: Inlet baffle/tee min. 1"over outlet invert for all d-boxes-232(3)(a), Soil compaction below distribution box specified(if soil is non-native)-221(2) 6"of stone beneath distribution box specified-221(2) Box is watertight-221 (1) Top of box<=36"below grade-221(7) 4--� Buoyancy calculations required if box is at or below water table-221(8) Pump Chamber(Check here if not present: ) OK Problem N/A Volume specified: 220(4)(r) �— Pump on elevation- 220(4)(r) Pump off elevation: 220(4)(r) Alarm on elevation: 220(4)(r) Number of cycles per day-220(4)(r)(also 254(1)(d)if gravity from d-box) Minimum 2 delivery line to d-box if gravity-254(1)(c) 4 •r 5 Pressure dosed l.f.if flow>=2,000 gpd-254(1)(a)&254(2)(a) Cycles per day is consistent with chamber volume-23 1 Volume calculations include flowback volume-2') 1(2) 24 hour storage capacity above pump on elevation-231(2) Number of pumps: 2 if system serves>2 dwelling units-231(6) Capacity of pump(s)- gpm @ 'TDH-220(4)(r) Pump can pass 1 1/4 "solids(minimum)-231(7) Pump controls specified-220(4)(r) Alarm equipment specified-231(2) Alarm is in building and powered on separate circuit from pump-2') 1(9) 1 Q Pump sequence correct(off-lead on-lag on-alan-n on)-231(8) Pump performance curves included-220(4)(r) Manual operating switch-NA 12.01 Check valve,bleeder hole-NA 12.01 1 childproof,24"riser/manhole to final grade-2'31(5), Soil compaction beneath pump chamber specified(if soil is non-native)-221(2) 6"of<=3/4-"stone beneath chmbr.specified-221(2)&228(1), Buoyancy calculations if chamber is at or below water table-221(8)@ 9"of cover over chamber(minimum)-228(1) H- 10 loading(min.)-H-20 if traffic-226(')), Chamber is watertight-221 (1) Top of chamber<=36"below grade-221(7) Leaching Facility(general-complete for all designs) OK Problem N/A 50%larger if garbage disposal-240(4) Trenches to be used whenever possible-240(6) No vehicle or imperv.area above 11.unless unavoidable-240(7);NA 13.02 Vented if under impervious cover-241 (1) Vented through same pipes as distribution system-241 (1)(a) Vent protected from precipitation/animal entry-241 (1)(b) �- Vent is placed beyond traffic or impervious area-24 1 (1)(c) _!l All lines connected to vent if bed or trenches-241(1)(d) 9"cover over peastone-240(9) Reserve area provided(new construction)-248(1) Reserve 4' from primary leach area-NA 9.04 4'(5'if perc rate<=2 MPI)separation to g.w.-212(a)&(b) _ 4'(down to T with variance or I/A-upgrades only)of natural soil under 11. GW separation is adjusted to highest existing grade if facility cuts into a hillside Pipe slope minimum of 0.005 -251(9) Require 5'removal and replacement if in fill-255(5) `✓� Top of leach facility<=36"below grade-221(7) Final grade over 11 minimum 0.02 ft/ft-240(10) Surface&subsurface drainage away from It -240(1 1)&245(5) c_r Minimum design flow 440 gpd without deed restriction-NA 13.01 3:1 slope where grading required-255(2) Toe of fill slope stops 5'from property line or swale installed-255(2) Impermeable barrier if<3:1 slope or< 15 feet to-3:1slope-255(2) ---�"� Impermeable barrier/retaining wall poured concrete-NA 9.02 Retaining wall stamped by P.E.-255(2)(b) �---� Top of retaining wall>=top of peastone elevation-255(2)(f) r—• 10'offset from edge of leach facility to edge of ret.wall-255(2)(g) t� Perc test(s)done in most restrictive layer- 104(2) Perc test 4'below leaching elevation-NA 7.06 Design flow listed and required/provided leach area given-220(4)(f) �- Leach pipes SCH40 PVC-NA 10.01 f Leach pipes.minimum 4" diameter except for dosed system-NA 14.04 -�� Leach lines capped,vented,or connected together-251(9) Pressure dosing guidance followed if pressure distribution-254(2)(c), Pressure dosing required over 2,000 gpd or with I/A remedial use-231(1) 5 6 Leaching Trenches(Check here if not present: ) OK Problem N/A Number of trenches: Minimum of 2 trenches-NA 9.01(2) Depth of trenches(max eff.-2'): -247(l) Width of tren ps4-T rmn.,4'max.): -251 (1)(b) Leng�f-trenches(100'max.): -25 1 (1)(a) Trenches are vented(when>50')-251 (11) Trenches follow contour lines-251(2) Trench spacing times effective width or depth minimum-251 (1)(d) In fill or reserve between trenches, 10'min.-NA 14.01& 14.03 Available leach area given(Min.500 s.f.)-NA 9.01(2) Bottom=L x W -= s.f. Sidewall=L x D x# x2= s.f. Effective le ch area given Lo dmg factor: ective =total area s.f.x�Ved = glday Effectiv ea is>=design flow of facility bei 2"of 1/8"- 1/2"2x washed peastone.-247 Trench depth of 3/4"to 1 1/2"double washed stone-247(1)` Leach Fields(Check here if not present: ) OK Problem N/A _ Number of fields: (need dosing chamber if> 1,231 (1)) Length(100'max.): -252(2)(b) Width: Total area:L x W Minimum 900 square feet-NA 9.01(1) -5 , C? 5,T - Distribution lines connected with solid pipe-NA 15.01 ' �-. Effective leach area given - Loading factor: Effective area=total area s.f x LTAR = g/dav Effective area is>=design flow of facility being served Minimum of two distribution lines-252(2)(a) 6'line separation(max.)-252(2)(d) �- 4'maximum separation from edge of field to line-252(2)(e) y' 10'minimum separation between adjacent leach fields-252(2)(f) `— Between 6"and 12"of 3/4- 1 1/2"stone beneath field-252(2)(g)&247(2) 2"of 1/8"-1/2"2x washed peastone.-247(2) Final Grading OK Problem N/A &--- Slope over leach area;minimum of 0.02 feet/foot-240(l 0) Grading shall divert drainage away from leach area-240(l 1) Grading slopes away from dwelling 5/24/01 £/office/forms/tonackltr.doc 6 WX Wind2 FIVIS-floonan&McDowell,Inc. rFile Edit: Tools Qata Maintain Process View fleport J�tgi IA"ows Help Billing Groups Fft Ur E31 Project: Office of Health Department 27 Charles Street,No.Andover, SII Billing Group ID: Billing Type: Fixed Fee R Billing Fee: 150.00 Card ID: IToNA M clr� I Billing Classification GLAccoqnt-s Pilling Messages_I-Afed�sr Staffing Activities g Info _Qontract Info Proposal Number: pAssign To IDepartment: Contract Number: Contract Date: 1 Work Start Date: 1,418102 Expected Finish Date: IJ—use Government Invoice Style Description: Engineering services required for plan review Engineer:NEES 978-686-1768 Assessors Map 34,Lot 6 Applicant:AFC Realty Trust 60 Beechwood Drive Project Request Record Town of North Andover Date: 4zela Client Id:ToNA Card.Id:ToNA Client/Company Name:Board of Health Card:Tyue-Cfient Cbntact Name: Ms.Sandra,Starr Phone:. 978-688-95401'-4-- Title:Director Fax:. 978-688-9542"- Address:. 78-688-9542 Address:. 27 Charles Street ; Email: sstarr.@townofnorthandover.com. Notes:. Town: North Andover i!'_ r State MA Zip Code 01845 Otli'er contacts if applicable..i ngin /Iinstaller.. 9, Name.1 ti •' mac-' Phone• ,% Title Fax: 'fitj Address. Email: Notes 1 Town:. State: Zip Code: •:;j Proiect: Project Id: 1770 Project Title: Town of North Andover,Board of Health (JOB NO) (PROJECT NAME&STREET ADDRESS) Manager:NOW Billing Group: 0.3 I A Billing CA:FixedFee IS—Q Contract Info.Project Description for each billing group BG/ 4 5IA Ap licant A zf G ��—�c�—Y 77Zy S T ;. Assessors Map 3 Lot # Street 6':7 8 AcG l&vim o D P/-t . i -Type of service e5- es r Office,/forms/jbrqutona a- Wz!�='5 4 r FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUA'T'OR FORM Page 1 of 3 No. Date: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Soil Suitabili Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal) Performed B '� y: ......................... ................ .............................� ✓'�z Date: Witnessed B e�' ;z5W ....... mom/, lit/............................. _..... . . By:: .................. ..... L=wion Address or /D v/� Ownet's Name, Ux �/� Address,and AATelephone/ ��c_: •-r i �m0� �i� • �O ��Cl�l��r'� New Construction ❑ Repair V 8 '5559"z— Office 9"z l0 9 Office Review Published Soil Survey Available: No ❑ Yes Year Published Iq ...... Publication Scale 1.11--511��. Soil Map Unit Drainage Class � ... Soil Limitations - Surficial Geologic Report Available: No X Yes ❑ Year Published Publication Scale GeologicMaterial (Map Unit) ..........................................................................................................._ __ ..... ........ Landform .............................................................................................................................................................._ ... __.._ Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No ❑Yes N Within 500 year flood boundary No ❑Yes ❑ Within 100 year flood boundary No ❑Yes ❑ Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) .................................._.._.................. Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) ......... ........................................... . ._ Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month Range :Above Normal ❑Normal ❑Belcw Normal Other References Reviewed: — -- DEP APPROVED FORM-12/07/95 ` r FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR F0101 Page 2 of 3 Location Address or Lot No. y �C' /VC, On-site Review l6 Deep Hole Number ..:/ -::. Date:.( Ai-�� Time:.. 1..�'�06 Weather#/,p— Location (identify on site plan) -, Land Use . C-'SA'YWaZCL¢G Slope (%) -- Surface Stones Vegetation Landform .. . Ty�gJ�... / .:: ... Position on landscape (sketch on the back) �.D- L��`�� Distances from: �� yL®�� feet Drainage way0�'® feet Open Water Bod 9 Possible Wet Area���.. feet Property Line .. feet Drinking Water Welly/-5� feet Other ....:..:...:..:""'..,_::::.:...... :.. DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG` Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface (Inches) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure, Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % Gravel) .�- 3 - � v �r X �� �12 « r / Tg Parent Material (geologic) �`QCP� ��C DepthtoBedrock: _ Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from Pit Face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: _ --- DEP APPROVED FORM- 12/07/95 FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR F0101 Page 2 of 3 Location Address or Lot No. On-site Review � a Deep Hole Number L..:: Date:.://l:' Time:..�� �Jr— Weather Location (Identify on site plan) Land Use / 0,—* C L_ Slope (%) 2 Surface Stones Vegetation �ma Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) Distances from: Open Water Bodyfeet Drainage ways feet Possible Wet Area feet Property Line feet Drinking Water Well���`^� feet Other : .::.:: DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG` Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface (Inches) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure, Stones, Boulders, Consistency, % Gravel) 7� �9 7 ` q.- �y Ci 4 vp 6/ am C 7 � d Parent Material (geologic)_ 0;�z�/,-' D pthtoBedrock: Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from Pit Face: �m Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: _— ---- DEP APPROVED F101"I- 12/07/95 FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 3 of 3 Location Address or Lot No.�oO�� �l�yl� �i�- /V• ir-/l��/ K Determination for Seasonal High Water Table Method Used: ❑ Depth observed standing in observation hole . inches ❑ Depth weeping from side of observation hoe ........ inches ® Depth to soil mottles .:...: .' inches ❑ Ground water adjustment ................... feet2 Index Well Number .................. Reading Date .................. Index well level Adjustment factor ................... Adjusted ground water level ............... _ Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in I areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on 451 (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise and experience described in 310 CMR1 7. Signature LC'r/ Date c� ��— DEP APPROVED FORM•12!07195 FORm 11 - S01L EVALUATOR FORM Page 2 or 3 Location Address or Lot iJo. "%� t:✓ ,t On-site Review Deep Hole Number Date:-�'+./%lfn ' Time: Weather Location (identify on site plan) Land Use 4,v,;, Slope (%) Surface Stones Vegetation 4' o c" Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the backs Distances from: Ip,-mss Open Water Body feet Drainage way feet eF`Z.r Possible Wet Area ': ,IKYI feet Property Line feet f r'^ Drinking Water Well lees Oilier """ l t/Ir J DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG' Depth from Son Sol Texture Soil Color Sol OtherSurface tlnches) Soil Horizon (USDA) !Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders,Consistency, % Gravel) ?, rt 4F MINI ki EVERY PRO)PUSLO DIS Parent PAwerial(geologic) av r ✓vj 'r!_j Q 00pC11toBeQrodr Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from Pit face: Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water DET APPROVED FORM-CM71VS FORA 11 - SOIL EA ALL'ATOR FOR 11 Page 2of3 Location Address or Lot 11o. C2 J On-site Review _ Deep Hole Number — Dater 'f �;•'' Time: 1;�/�- Weather Location (identify on site plan) Land Use Slope (°.6) Surface Stones Vegetation Landform ' Position on landscape (sketch on the back) . .__.. Distances from: Open Water Body feet Drainage wayfeet Possible Wet Area ''/L feet Property Line feet Drinking Water Well LL" `i- feet Other ' e- -4- DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG' Depth from Soil Horizon Sol Texture Soil Color Soil tither Surface (Inches) {USDA) tmurwell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency, % Gravel) /10, rc �1 y t c P E�/Ir�ic� r' 114 Parent Material(geologic) ay 7"i+✓Y e"Y DepCRoBfdrodr ✓ Death to Groundwater; Standing Water in the Hole: Weeping from pit Face: .v ,-.v Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water- -7 C7 DE?APPRo}'ID FORM-12107/15 FORA 12 - PERCOLATION TEST Location Address or Lot No. �.• j <. T, i COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS t-'"` �` c- , Massachusetts Percolation Test` 1 Date: Time:. Observation Hole # . Depth of Perc L Start Pre-soak LF—' End Pre-soak Time at 12" g Time at 9" Time at 6" Time (9"-6"► Rate Min./inch i Minimum of 1 percolation test must be performed in both the primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed ❑." Site Failed ❑ ........................ Performed By: c2 J , Witnessed By: a✓® o �v r� �� Comments: DEP APPROvM POR.ti1-12/07/9S I j 1 ,l SYSTEM PUMPING 1Z.ECOIIDI--' DATE: /� Z SYSTEM C1�'NEI2 .. ADIME,SS SYSTEM LOCATION (example: left front of house) Ict QS n4TE OF P111iPING../,� f!-1 UANT('rY I'V iii' Y��f� GALLONS CESSPOOL; NO � XES SEPUCTANK, NO � YES NATURE 01 S.r RVICE: B-011'TINF v EMERGENCY OBSERVATIONS: CiOOD CONan-1 x J. FULL TO COVER IIJCAVY GREASr B,,1-F LES IN PLACE ROOTS LEACHFIT.Lb RUNBAC.'K. _ EXCESSIVE SOLIDS FLOODED SOLIDS CARRYOVER OT-aER (EXPLAIN) v'I-Pt, Y INA&Z COMMENTS: C()N"til�iTS TftAIVSI'£IZREL) '1 U: McDowell, Iffl,0Et Fde Edit Tools Data Maintain Process View Report Ceps Windows Help Fr IV 14=1 Billing Groups Project: 1770 Office of Health Department 27 Charles Street,No.Andover,_ J Billing Group ID: IM t Billing Type: Fixed Fee Billing Fee: 200.OJ; Card ID: ToN� A-T^,} Mgin Billinglnfo J ContractInfo 1-Classification �' GLAccounts Billing Messages Alerts i Staffi-ng Activities ssign To— Proposaler: --- -- ----------_ —J Department: Number: i Contract Contract Date: 19f25f2001 l Work Start Date: 912512001 Expected Finish Date: 110/512001 Al fJ Use Government Invoice Style Description: — Engineering services required for soil testing inspection. 1 Engineer:NEES,Phone 978-686-1768 Applicant:AFC Realty Trust I 60 Beechwood DR,Assessors Map34,Lot 6 a j� Save Close Notes... 5-1671 IV (2 Project Request Record Town of North Andover Date: p 0 Client Id:ToNA Card Id:ToNA Client/Company Name:Board of Health CardrTyue-rr hent''; ); ', ?'ContactrName . Ms'.Sandra Starr. Plione. -978 688'-9540r'r , r,rl rri+1l: 4rT�tle +DiFec-tor Fax:. .97.8'68,8-9f542"`-''.' fjfAddress 2/''Chaz1es:Streetr Email:sstarr-@townofnorthandover-:com rJ; r Notes:. !1 i„T,own, North.Andover ++ +1 r.:i State MA Ztp Corde 01845 frr l70-4 /rrtr 1 , ,1©ther,contacts if`apphcabie e,Enguieer/.I taller' /JJName Phone: �7 Sr.-- �7 1Tttle Fax.; +'r +�Addfess Email! `` ,, lrrrif !r r r Notes: 1�T.own ;State• Ztp Code " , "W.. ��1r �lrtNaru/r17(/ii.�/f11.i Proiect• Project Id: 1770 Project Title: Town of North Andover,Board of Health (JOB NO) (PROJECT NAME&STREET ADDRESS) Manager:NOW Billing Group: Billing Cod4:Fixed Fee Contract-Info.ProjectDescription+for.each,billing,.group 1r i BGT Applicant. : /f�G /e�iStLTY 7;---,(,-:P7- `. ,(,--,Assessors, Issessors,lVlan 3 - ot. �' Street G0 8 /1w nn D l�i-C I t ir'Typei of service- 00- t— S o G- T2L � cin/ ,. Office/forms/jbrqutona n Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No. 1 ` NORTH BOARD OF HEALTH OF�"So 16 0 r 04q<o<,EE,. ,, APPLICATION FOR SITE TESTING/INSPECTION �9SSACHUS���y t nn t Applicant�Q � `��iL� % ' t�L( ��• NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Site Location ID6 u/���C�L.L � �.�e Engineer &gz� NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE T_ Test/I nspection Date and Time CHArRMAN,BOARD OF HEALTH Fee ` ,m'o. Test No. &g S.S. Permit No. D.W.C. No. C.C. Date Plbg. Permit No. BOARD OF HEALTH _ NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 v 978-688-9540 APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: q Ile c-'/ MAP & PARCEL: 34 LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: b L% (ma c-C'c <, ,�. , �J(24 OWNER: �� ��-�( "]1;G; TEL. NO.: c'I ADDRESS: I I csecc n .� � -° i7 �f'i tet' _.�.� i ENGINEER: )1r,_. �,��c_�;� C"�y.., ^ei /L�;`iy TEL. NO.: 178/' _ 6>�.iC.- 17 E, CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Single Family Home Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: ?C Undeveloped lot testing: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No eC THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM 1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test) 2. Plot plan & Location of Testing 3. Fee of$425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of$200.00 per lot for repairs or upgrade . (If time is not critical, fee for repairs is $75.00) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. 3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area. 4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (no smaller than 1"-100') shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. Please Do Not Write Below This Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: ( L.2L 01 Date Received: E1' v rye�^` ,: Check Amount: -"Ji . Check Date: j ri ILS IL II� IIB � N/FTION oN5TRUC �� '° C RCN /IN , E BI �wQTERo4 I0� T 2' vv 5->'ING I IOL foo = ASM k / Cl 30 WIDE WA T SXMN ` rs EI � --EX T ,E u Po I. E�'TE/ /015Ej5A WANEC.3'. AI SUMP I Ey l 57- '70 r -- _ _ V� 1NVOL17 -- J MI �, I 5G 5 ,I o� RIM�U7 93. XI5T 0.84 / ,108.834/ RIM 94 e _ INV i X15r D.M.N. RlM = 1qo Z7 w z EX15T 12"R �� _, .�f BOARD OF HEALTH D NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 978-688-9540 � 2� r� , APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: (�i� ©� MAP & PARCEL: 34 — f� LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: 6�0 OWNER: Fc— L( T.vG i TEL. NO.: ADDRESS: % �� C<sE �C-YN B -c-u m ENGINEER: J)c �,•, �.7 C�-•w; re.��rc, TEL. NO.: IT 7 e Q,C_ 17 E, ce) CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: gcvL �i 2 �-ic'Z (' `Tc Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Single Family Home Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: `X Undeveloped lot testing: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No �C THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM 1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test) 2. Plot plan & Location of Testing 3. Fee of$425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and j two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of$200.00 per lot for repairs or upgrades. (If time is not critical, fee for repairs is $75.00) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. 3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area. 4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan(no smaller than 1"A 00') shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. Please Do Not Write Below This Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: Date Received: gCheck Amount: ;,71064 Check Date: i r _ _o _..Fd� 1 srx3 I Z O6 = Z! N/i1 Nl 11 ,� Z = ?V/d' ANI qb _ N 01SIX3 I /1 / 1SIX� SNI i b100W1� ti� S 9 ISIX3 '�72\ S n1 0 ' nr ----- - --- .� bb 170 • \ ., awns ,._ %o _. --- S14,r31,1SIX3 �. \ �, —_ - �mNOm jIX3l . ,yY; S is 3 -� �M ,o� "ls X3 %o� N1dMz IIZI ��9 �1�NM NOT IN r 21 opt ' I FORM I1 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Paas 2 of 3 I Location Address or Lot i-jo. 'e-' r• wo o P (Joe, ev C7 P L/,-- r'c On-site Review _ I Deep Hole Number f - Date: 1� .. .5, o/ Time: Weather G Location (identify on site plan) Land Use G✓oo/! Slope (%) z— Surface Stones ti p�iz Vegetation �'`� o9�C, r3 iK L Yv Pi�4-- Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) . 1.4 1Z� Distances from: Open Water Body '_Z10e9 feet Drainage way . .?,/a#0 feet �eF fi � r-4. 4- Possible Wei Area _216;e2 feet Property Line feet P �jTIp 1 . Drinking Water Well -rOwN feet "Other i DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG' Depth from Soil Horizon Sol Texture Sol Color Soil Other Surface(inches) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders,Consistency, Ifo Graven 0 la -30 --- o y'0'S/+ 7 sycx/ 4P MINIMUM OF 2 HOLFS REQUIRED AT&VERY PROPOSED DISPOSA.LbEx Parent Material(geologic) QV % y r t 5'f-1 OepOttoBadrodc Q Death to Groundwater: Standing Water in the Hole: 16-10 Weeping from pit face: ,2 Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: 8 �a DFl APPRON'M FORM_t2ie7rlS r FORM 11 - SOIL EN ALUATOR FORI%l Paae 2 or 3 I-77Ola �/ Location Address or Lot Ao_ i IV /j av C7 0 1/ ate On-site Review _ Deep Hole Number Date: Time: 114'-7 Weather Location (identify on site plan) Land Use t'r/0 0 0 Slope M 2- Surface Stones Vegetation Landform Position on landscape (sketch on the back) . Distances from: Open Water Body -21c,92 feet Drainage ways/v9 feet Possible Wet Area 7ioo feet - Property Line feet ' Drinking Water Well ��'v41�-#eet Other i DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG* j •L 0VQ C7,(V od a/ Depth from 5oii Horizon Sol Texture Sol Color Soil pts I Surface(Inches) 1USDA) (Munsell) MoriGng !Structure,Stones,Boulders,Consistency,% Graven — t! f T I Parent Material(Qeoiopie) d 117 w.,Y e,14 Depdtto6*&oek: Death to Groundwater Standing Water in the Hole: /✓ Weeping from pit pace: iv p Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water: 7 67' DEP APPRONIM FORM-am71fs FORNI 12 - PERCOLATIO:N TEST Location Address or Lot No. ,So Z> Iry i COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS N�Ai✓�ov�—rte_ , Massachusetts Percolation Test' i Date: �i�is�i Time:, /o; s-3 Obser7Perc le # . l DepthStart ' End Pre-soak Time at 12" s Time at 9" Time at 6" Time (9"-6") 3 Rate Min./inch Minimum or 1 percolation test must be performed in both the primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed ©/ Site Failed ❑ ................:.............................. Performed By: Witnessed By: opo o N J Comments: i i DEP APPROVED FORM-12/07/9S i t Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No. 1 NORTH BOARD OF HEALTH 0* OL *nD 0n APPLICATION FOR SITE TESTING/INSPECTION 7,�ADRA TED PPP�,��J SSACHU$ AppIicantl7-e, r>/ % - '��c�hilcl2r)t �Q. NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Site Location 6 Engineer Zgg 0,1G6,oh J ze NAME f ADDRESS TELEPHONE Test/Inspection Date and Time CHAnZMAN,BOARD OF HEALTH Fee Test No. & S.S. Permit No. D.W.C. No. C.C. Date Plbg. Permit No. 111111111 Town of North Andover, Massachusetts Form No. 1 NORTiy32O .� BOARD OF HEALTH�11 `ED l6 4,,,D 19 o , - m 3 APPLICATION FOR SITE TESTING/INSPECTION SAC14USE��� Applicant NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Site Location Engineer NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Test/Inspection Date and Time CHAIRMAN,BOARD OF HEALTH Fee Test No. S.S. Permit No. D.W.C. No. C.C. Date Plbg. Permit No. BOARD OF HEALTH - ' k NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 978-688-9540 APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: 16104 MAP & PARCEL: 34 LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: Coy O WNER: (f TEL. NO.: c' ADDRESS: j.;-> °c_s�� o r>yt ����' ;� Do,t: A" r ENGINEER: Pe, F!2je,,:) E191 ^ec'A TEL. NO.: q'? CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: IL' ' �.1 a- , Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Single Family Home Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: ?C Undeveloped lot testing: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No �C THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM 1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner r test) 2. Plot plan & Location of Testing 3. Fee of$425.00 per lot for new construction. Thi two deep holes and two percolation tests required for each dispo- lot for repairs or upgrades. (If time is not critical, fee for r GENERAL INFORMATION mli I. Only Certified Soil Evaluator. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitari, 3. At least two deep holes and two 'sposal area. 4. Repairs require at least two deep h, n of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all act, 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (. sLted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests 4�1 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forr,. Please Do Not Writ Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: L.2 L 1 Date Received: O/Check Amount: Check Date: �� BOARD OF HEALTH NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 978-688-9540 APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS �Ipo � I DATE: MAP & PARCEL: 34 (� LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: (�c> C5 e OWNER: �� fiFei( �Trv4 TEL. NO.: ADDRESS: �/o L i7 °c-_sc �eY\ L1L5L,cl 'c_ e ENGINEER: Pe, 1^� �.� ��..� .r ec TEL. NO.: tet`7 ' - 1-7 CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: Cay✓t- Q! t'L�0 71 Mc, t Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Single Family Home Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: 'C Undeveloped lot testing: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No X THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM 1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test) 2. Plot plan & Location of Testing 3. Fee of$425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of$200.00 per lot for repairs or upgrades. (If time is not critical, fee for repairs is $75.00) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. 3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area. 4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan(no smaller than 1"-100') shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. Please Do Not Write Below This Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: L.2 L o l Date Received: u ///99/,-4wfCheck Amount: ,, ' 6, Check Date: wp o� IJ¢ i / fly 114-� 118 N/F STRICT N / � ' E3 RAN c A/IN /0(0oo V1/N /T,N� EM Eo EM Ex 30 -� s PYA a ►sT. � EX17�NER — O \ 5ATE G" WAT �. IN -- — - ----- 5ump i I � 0 � MN " ExSr D 79 - — - — - _ \ --- R/M�T gp.49 V ,NV o � r� (� �o T XIS 55 S RIM -Tg493 (o5 ST C.B' ' INV.0� � EXI Ipp.8 N � i r - Q Q RV:94 IIlil'' T D. f EXIS _ 37 I EX15T 1z"R�° RIM - 90 ?- INVIN 12", : 89.47 BOARD OF HEALTH NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 BOAR",fl ;,Cr ,A7-1 978-688-9540 y' 2001 APPLICATION FOR SOIL TESTS DATE: q I���fl/ MAP &PARCEL: 34 -' ho LOCATION OF SOIL TESTS: Coo QeCc o OWNER: a if a ecithTrv�c TEL. NO.: c ADDRESS: e�G�.�t�� S7ri�e� N- f}✓�fl ENGINEER: jJe, TEL. NO.: ri 7 17(o 9 n CERTIFIED SOIL EVALUATOR: gev� 0 ��:9 �9 2 (,`c irfCZ C, Intended Use of Land: Residential Subdivision Single Family Home Commercial Is This: Repair Testing: x Undeveloped lot testing: In the Lake Cochichewick Watershed? Yes No �C THE FOLLOWING MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THIS FORM 1. Proof of land ownership (Tax bill, or letter from owner permitting test) 2. Plot plan & Location of Testing 3. Fee of$425.00 per lot for new construction. This covers the minimum two deep holes and two percolation tests required for each disposal area. Fee of$200.00 per lot for repairs or upgrades. (If time is not critical, fee for repairs is $75.00) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Only Certified Soil Evaluators may perform deep hole inspections. 2. Only Mass. Registered Sanitarians and Professional Engineers can design septic plans. 3. At least two deep holes and two percolation tests are required for each septic system disposal area. 4. Repairs require at least two deep holes and at least one percolation test, at the discretion of the BOH representative. 5. Full payment will be required for all additional tests within two weeks of testing. 6. Within 45 days of testing, a scaled plan (no smaller than 1"-100') shall be submitted to the Board of Health showing the location of all tests (including aborted tests). 7. Within 60 days of testing soil evaluation forms shall be submitted. Please Do Not Write Below This Line N.A. Conservation Commission Approval: Date Received: W/Check Amount: a Del Check Date: 1 r 110 L � IL N/ F CTIDN IIZ108 ` COOFO WN�TE BAR M,4 IN G 12/atWATE� 104P Xj5 � t MEOO EE - vvATER E pE W EXI H c 5 TI EX 5� 30 U POL s py EA A i 015 EX�nNGR _ EXI TE, W,4 E - --- SA / AIN - SUMP i EX \\ C) \ Ex/ST M N- W 95 79O _ \ INS ///T 90 49 I M� j5T Ci 55G5 B ' NIS 93. ; EXIST C Q RSM14 / INS � to EXIST RlM = l00 0 ms 27 w EXIST 1z IN 12 : 9 4 IN „ _ 89 , 1) Q n` TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER SYSTEM PUMPING RECORD DATE: SYSTEM OWNER& ADDRESS SYSTEM LOCATION (example: left front of house) DATE OF PUMPING: 3',,7/-O QUANTITY PUMPED GALLONS F CESSPOOL: NOES SEPTIC TANK: NO YES NATURE OF SERVICE: ROUTINE EMERGENCY OBSERVATIONS: / GOOD CONDITION FULL TO COVER HEAVY GREASE BAFFLES IN PLACE ROOTS LEACHFIELD RUNBACK EXCESSIVE SOLIDS FLOODED SOLIDS CARRYOVER OTHER(EXPLAIN) SYSTEM PUMPED BY: n ' v� COMMENTS: Ghvrvl her- CONTENTS er-CONTENTS TRANSFERRED TO: buy APR ' 4 2001 Commonwealth of Massachusetts = City/Town of NORTH ANDOVER MASS System Pumping Record Form 4 MAY 1 9 2008 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. The System PuTe'B iv � rd must be submitted to the local Board of Health or other approving authority. kRTMENT A. Facility Information Important: When filling out 1. System Location: forms on the L10L10P computer,use only the tab key Address to move your &I. A'"tA,cy-e e' cursor-do not City/Town state Zip Code use the return key. 2. S stem Owner: Name gym"' Address(if different from location) City/Town State Zip Code Telephone Number B. Pumping Record p 9 1. Date of Pumping L� T Lig— 2. Quantity Pumped: Date Gallons I Type of system: ❑ Cess ool (s) Septic Tank ❑ Tight Tank ❑ Other(describe): 4. Effluent Tee Filter present? ❑ Yes'`y' No If yes,was it cleaned? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Condition of System: 6. System-P mped By: me Vehicle License Number 0ompany 7. Location where contents were disposed: signature of auier Date http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/approvals/t5forMS.htm#inspect t5form4.doc•06/03 System Pumping Record•Page 1 of 1 � I i i �-\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION METROPOLITAN BOSTON— NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE MITT ROMNEY RECEIVED ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY MAR 14 2005 ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT March 9,2005 Benjamin C.Osgood,Jr.,P.E. New England Engineering Services,Inc. 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 RE: Deed Restrictions Dear Mr. Osgood: The Metropolitan Boston-Northeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection received your March 4, 2005 letter in which you request clarification regarding the deed restrictions. Specifically you outline that a number of boards of health(local approving authorities)in your area do not permit the addition of a room to a dwelling,whether it be via an expansion of the footprint or the finishing of.a basement,with a deed restriction limiting the number of bedrooms to the existing number. As such, property owners must decide whether they wish to expand the leaching area to meet the requirements of Title 5 or to leave the home as-is. 310 CMR 15.002 defines bedroom to potentially include any and all rooms, including finished basements,other than kitchens,bathrooms, living rooms, dining rooms,hallways and unheated storage areas. The Code's presumption of the number of bedrooms serving a dwelling may be overcome by a , deed restriction granted to the local approving authority. However,both the grantor of the restriction,and the local approving authority to whom it is granted,must agree to the grant of restriction and its terms. If one party does not,then the presumption cannot be overcome and compliance with the presumption must be met. The Department trusts that this letter has clarified this.matter. If you have any questions on the contents of this matter,please contact Claire A. Golden of my staff at(617)654-6516. Very truly yours, Madelyn Morris, MM/CAG/cg Deputy Regional Director \2005clarification I\deed restrictions 1 Bureau of Resource Protection cc: Susan Sawyer,Director,Health Department,400 Osgood St,North Andover,MA 01845 This information is available in alternate format.Call Debra Doherty,ADA Coordinator,at 1-617-292-5565.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02108•Phone(617)654-6500•Fax(617)292-5850•TDD#(800)298-2207 DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.state.ma.us/dep Z«1 Printed on Recycled Paper Commonwealth of Massachusetts �.. `..__ RECEW W City/Town of No. Andover a System Pumping Record MAR 14 2005 Form 4 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVttl:2 HEALTH DEPARTMENT DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other fo e information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. The System Pumping Record must be submitted to the local Board of Health or other approving authority. A. Facility Information Important: When filling out 1. System Location: forms on the computer, use 1175 Turnpike St. only the tab key Address to move your No. Andover MA 01845 cursor-do not City/Town State Zip Code use the return key. 2. System Owner: B &C Realty Trust Name 14 Gates Rd. tow Address(if different from location) Middleton MA 01949 City/Town State Zip Code Telephone Number B. Pumping Record 1. Date of Pumping 2-17-05 2. Quantity Pumped: 3230 Date Gallons 3. Type of system: ^:❑ Cesspool(s) XX Septic Tank ❑ Tight Tank ❑ Other(describe): 4. Effluent Tee Filter present? ❑ Yes Ef No If yes, was it cleaned? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Condition of System: 6. System Pumped By: Benjamin Shute H79 406 Name Vehicle License Number J's Septic& Drain Company 7. Location where contents were disposed: GLSD 2-17-05 igna e of Hauler Date t5form4.doc•06/03 System Pumping Record•Page 1 of 1 MAR 2-9 2005 - ' Gas MAA 5 NOTICE OF DECISION TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT Any appeal shall be filed within(20) days after the date of filing this notice in the office of the Town Clerk. Date: March 17, 2005 Date of Hearing: 11/16/04, 3/15/05 Date of Decision: March 15, 2005 Petition of Key Lime,Inc.,60 Beechwood Drive, North Andover, MA 01845 Premises affected: off Salem Turnpike Street, Route 114, Map 107B, lots 16 and 73. Referring to the above petition for a Site Plan Special Permit. The application was noticed and reviewed in accordance with Section 8.3 and 10.3 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw and M.G.L. Chapter 40A, Section 9. So as to allow: the construction of 56 residential units within the Village Residential Zoning District. After public hearings given on the above date, and upon a motion made by John Simons to close the hearing on the Site Plan Review Special Permit,2nd by Richard Nardella, the vote was unanamous, 5-0: Board members voting: Angles, White,Nardella, Simons, Phinney the meeting was closed. Upon a motion made by John Simons and 2na by Richard Nardella, to DENY the Site Plan Review Special Permit based on the following findings, and upon unanamous vote of 5-0,by Board members: Angles, White,Nardella, Simons, Phi ey th tition was denied. i Signed: Al o Angles, hairman cc: Applicant George White, ice Chairman Engineer John Simons Abutters Richard Nardella Town Departments James Phinney Key Line,Inc. Salem Turnpike,a/k/a Old Salem Village Denial of Site Plan Special Permit Page.1 Old Salem Village Site Plan Special Permit Denial The Planning Board herein denies the Site Plan Special Permit for the construction and use of 56 multi-family dwelling units on 17.9 acres located off Turnpike St. (Route 114) located in the Village Residential (V-R)Zoning District. The application was submitted by Key Lime, Inc. 60 Beechwood Drive,North Andover, MA 01845 on October 12, 2004. Public hearings were opened on November 16, 2004 and continued through March 15, 2005. Findings of Fact The Planning Board denies this Site Plan Special Permit because the plan as presented is not in compliance with the Town Bylaws. This denial is based on the following specific findings: 1) Section 7.7 of the Zoning Bylaw states that the"maximum dwelling unit density (dwelling units per acre) shall be as set forth in Table 2." 2) Table 2 then explicitly states that the maximum dwelling unit density for the Village residential (V-R)Zoning District is one dwelling unit per acre. 3) Since the definition of a"dwelling unit"per Section 2.35 of the Zoning Bylaw is"one or more rooms, including cooking facilities, and sanitary facilities in a dwelling structure, designed as a unit for occupancy by not more than one family for living and sleeping purposes,"then each multi-family dwelling unit within a structure counts as a separate dwelling unit. 4) Consequently, since the applicant has proposed 56 multi-family dwelling units on a 17.9-acre parcel,then the proposed density far exceeds the limit of one dwelling unit per acre and thus does not comply with the Zoning Bylaw. 5) Footnote 12 to Table 2 of the Zoning Bylaw provides further clarification that multi- family dwellings are subject to the maximum dwelling unit restriction of one unit per acre per Table 2. It reads that"if multi family structures are selected to attain the maximum density allowed, the proposed project shall be subject to the minimum open space requirements found in Section 8.5 (Planned Residential Development), and to the Site Plan Review requirements of Section 8.3." And this footnote further mentions that"the allowed density in the Village Residential Zone shall be one dwelling unit per acre." 6) Thus Footnote 12 is very clear that multi-family dwelling are subject to the maximum density cap and that this limit is one unit per acre. The references to Sections 8.5 and Key Line,Inc. Salem Turnpike,a/k/a Old Salem Village Denial of Site Plan Special Permit Page 2 8.3 stipulate as additional requirements that the applicant for multi-family projects must comply with the open space requirements of Section 8.5 and all of the requirements of Site Plan Review per Section 8.3. 7) Footnote 14 of the Zoning Bylaw provides additional guidance regarding the V-R district. It states that `the dimensional criteria described in the table below applies only to detached single-family development. Multi-family structures developed in this district shall be subject to all criteria applicable to multi-family development as stated in Section 8.5. However, in no instance shall the bonus density subsections of 8.5 apply in the Village Residential District." 8) This Footnote 14 needs to be interpreted both in the context of Footnote 12 and Table 2 as well as the characteristics of multi-family dwellings. Specifically, °a) The applicable dimensional requirements for V-R in Table 2 (Lot area, height, frontage and setbacks) all pertain to single-family residences on dedicated lots. b) But, if an applicant were to propose multi-family dwellings in this district,the appropriate standards would be different since each unit is not on a separate lot. So the footnote refers us to Section 8.5 that includes a section on dimensional requirements for site planned(i.e. multi-family) projects(Section 8.5, 6(C). c) However,nowhere does the footnote state that the allowed density limit of one unit per acre is eliminated; it merely points to Section 8.5 which provides additional dimensional information that would pertain to multi-family projects. d) Footnotes 12 and 14 are complementary. Footnote 12 is very explicit that there is a density limit for multi-family dwellings within V-R; Footnote 14 provides additional guidance for setbacks and other dimensional criteria applicable to multi-family dwellings. 9) The Planning Board has also assessed its interpretation of this section of the Zoning Bylaw based on the original passage of this section of the Bylaw in 1987 and a subsequent amendment in 1997. Based on the history of the original Town Meeting presentation in 1987, it was clear that the intent of the V-R Bylaw was to provide a cap on the number of dwelling units in both single family and multi-family projects. In addition, the amendment approved in 1997 was made explicitly to reduce the allowed maximum density from 4 units per acre to one unit per acre. 10)Section 10.31 of the Zoning Bylaw provides that"the Special Permitting Granting Authority(the Planning Board in this case) shall not approve any such application for a Special Permit unless it finds that in its judgment all the following conditions are met: a) The specific site is an appropriate location for such a use, structure or condition; b) The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood; c) There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians; Key Line,Inc. Salem Turnpike,a/k/a Old Salem Village Denial of Site Plan Special Permit Page 3 e d) Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use; e) The Special Permit Granting Authority shall not grant any Special Permit unless they make a specific finding that the use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Bylaw." 11)The Planning Board finds that this Special Permit application does not comply with the above conditions because the density far exceeds what is permitted in the Village Residential Zoning District. Given this excessive density, the specific site would not be an appropriate location for the use proposed; the use would adversely impact the neighborhood; there would be a potential nuisance to vehicles; and the use would not be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Bylaw. 12)This proposal must also comply with the Special Permit provisions of PRD Section 8.5(C)which stipulate that the project be"in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this section and Section 10.3 and that the PRD contains residential development and open space in a variety to be sufficiently advantageous to the Town." The Planning Board finds that this Special Permit application does not comply with these standards because of the excessive density of the project in excess of the Bylaw. This density also results in required minimum open space that is not advantageous to the Town because it includes areas directly abutting buildings that are not practical for common use. 13)In addition this proposal must comply with the provisions of Section 8.3(7)(a)(iii)(b) which states that the Planning Board may deny approval of a Site Plan for several reasons including"the plan as presented is not in compliance with Town Bylaws." The Planning Board finds that due to the excessive density of the project compared to the Zoning Bylaw, the plan as presented is not in compliance with Town Bylaws. The following plans are included as part of this decision: Plan: Old Salem Village Owned by: L.A.M. Realty Trust, 89 Main Street,North Andover, MA 01845 Harold & Beverly Whipple, 123 Winchester Drive, Monroe,NH 03771 Applicant: Key-Lime, Inc. 60 Beechwood Drive,North Andover, MA 01845 Prepared by: Hayes Engineering, Inc., 603 Salem Street, Wakefield, MA 01880 Dated: October 4, 2004 Sheets: 1-14 More plan information is continued to page 5 Key Line,Inc. Salem Turnpike,a/k/a Old Salem Village Denial of Site Plan Special Permit Page 4 Plan information continued for Key Lime, Inc., denial. Plan: Preliminary Landscape Plan Prepared by: Huntress Associates, Inc. Landscape Architecture & Land Planning 17 Tewksbury Street Andover, MA 01810 Dated: September 2004 Sheet: 1 Plan: Route 114, North Andover, MA Prepared by: O'Sullivan Architects 40 Salem Street, Building Two, Suite Two Lynnfield, MA 01940 Dated: 9/17/04 Sheets: 1-2 Document: Traffic Impact &Access Study Proposed Residential Development Project Turnpike Street North Andover, MA Prepared for: Key-Lime, Inc. Prepared by: DJK Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 10864 Dated: July 30, 2004 Document: Drainage Study Old Salem Village, Route 114 No. Andover, MA (Four lot subdivision) Applicant: KEY-LIME, INC. 60 Beechwood Drive North Andover, MA 10845 Prepared by: Hayes Engineering, Inc. Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors 603 Salem Street Wakefield, MA 01880 Dated: August 27, 2004 desktop/final Den ial OldS al em V ill age Key Line,Inc. Salem Turnpike,a/k/a Old Salem Village Denial of Site Plan Special Permit Page 5