Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 57 HIGH STREET 4/30/2018 / \ J � �� � � �� �/b��- �� ����J r5 I � ij . �. C�6 a - � �( a I � . } N n , � � � �, ,�� �� �, � y� a I I i 1i/�G�r�,/t�'�I�o�d1 � S1 r�nI(f �� ��q/�° .i a µ°RTH * * toycL « ; « ,JSACHUgeS NORTH ANDOVERc� OFFICE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Any appeal shall be filed NOTICE OF DECISION within(20)days after the date of filing of this notice Properly at: 57 High Street in the office of the Town Clerk, NAME: Stephen Halem, dlb/a The Dentist's Collaborative DATE: 4/14/99 ADDRESS: 57 High Street PETITION:002-99 North Andover, MA 01845 HEARING: 4/13199 The Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Tuesday evening,April 13, 1999 upon the application of Stephen Halem,57 High Street,d/b/a The Dentists Collaborative, North Andover, MA requesting a variance from the requirements of Section 6.6D: Business&Industrial Districts, Paragraph 1: Primary wall&roof signs. And for a Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size(area)&Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits. Petitioner wishes to place one sign on each side of building so signs can be seen either way along High Street,the property is in the I-S Zoning District The following members were present:Raymond Vivenzio,Walter F. Soule, George Earley, Ellen McIntyre, Scott Karpinski. The hearing was advertised in the Lawrence Tribune on 2123/99&3/2199 and all abutters were notified by regular mail. No persons appeared in opposition to the petition. Upon a motion made by Scott Karpinski and 2nd by Ellen McIntyre the Board voted to GRANT a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.61), Paragraph 1,to allow a total of 2 signs with a continuous border on each sign, containing lettering and address as shown and referred to on"Plan E",and to GRANT a Special Permit from the requirements of Sections 6.3&6.4, Paragraphs 19& 2,to allow a maximum square footage of 15 sq.ft.for each sign including the border which shall be located on 2 different sides of the same building known as the East and West side of said building and with lettering and street address as shown and referred to on a Plan E"as submitted by the applicant.Voting in favor. Raymond Vivenzio,Walter F. Soule,George Earley, Ellen McIntyre, Scott Karpinski. The petitioner has satisfied the provision of Section 10,paragraph 10.4 of the Zoning Bylaw and that the granting of these variances will not adversely affect the neighborhood or derogate from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The Board found that the street address on the building would be important for public safety reasons, especially where the street numbering is inconsistent and whereas Elm Street and High Street are one and the same roadway. Note: The granting of the Variance andlor Special Permit as requested by the applicant does not necessarily ensure the granting of a building permit as the applicant must abide by all applicable local,state and federal and building codes and regulations,prior to the issuance of a building permit as requested by the Building Commission. Board of Appeals, Raymond Vivenzio acting Chairman attachment of"Plan E" ml/1999decision/6 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PL.N'NING 688-9535 i f ' r ,1 i TT I OL""r pl seal ,-% AfteCi1 ,7 �� L y ractice Hl 77 114 1-G T D � it h -F, T ' 3 6- _ /s s /C-7-- FZ NORTy F? •_:r ,•,` Ow �`#`�,mss.1• r bo4no✓� h 13S^ CNu _ NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 I Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the 1 Senior Center, 120R Main St., North Andover, MA on Tuesday the 9th day of March, 1999 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal Stephen Halem, 57 High Street, d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative, North Andover, MA , requesting a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.610: Business & Industrial Districts, Paragraph 1: Primary wall & roof signs of the Zoning Bylaws. And for a Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size (Area), & Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits of the Zoning Bylaws. Petitioner wishes to place I' one sign on each side of building so they can be seen either way along High Street. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the South West side of 57 High Street, which is in the I-S Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the Office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles St., North Andover, Monday through Thursday, from the hours of 9:AM to 1:PM. I 1 IBy Order of the Board of Appeals, William J. Sullivan, Chairman I f Published in the Eagle Tribune on 2/23/99 & 3/2/99. 0Legalnov/2 3 �C°vm�<m�N9Ul,,l'smm$.�ro k3mo Dmvmmcimomm<,oOmpQ_�c»gym2wm 3m Sy-AS»�ory.Np ��-T I � s1mosmmZ02�, 3am (Z' 0' m§.0-N(D 5g79W�?aoZ,ommm_(w-'-- vo ro vo WZm_n np' s � o mQ cn; 12ys5m FEE a � m.i �=ncuONT oWmomonNTo maooa . mooDOO2mma4 � tqzn m,ma 3oaoz .?OFO,a V0gypO m.+U ��mP (o �DZ� i ��oammw < mmc�'o��o�ov `�mcQ�� �Q3o- , m""ma��y �mma.oa �coAimyD m Bww a0'� mocDxcDasfc°mo�'rny-'aD�czaMo�< 70 70 _Nm 7_vl '7"m(D..-�•o cnc m mco o-•o�],m o �3-ice o ym�cn�-..p�'o �f.� O. W K tlI fD J• T_V 7 Vl..v.*X.0-7.. 7 3.3 a m..T 7 3. N d N o �7 fD= - iI BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 I t r �, 1 , pOR7N. 41 .,Lap Ca1� 3?��tr • +aOOL 9 • jo AC US NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St., North Andover, MA on Tuesday Y the 9th da of March, 1999 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal Stephen Halem, 57 High Street, d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative, North Andover, MA , requesting a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.61): Business & Industrial Districts, Paragraph.1: Primary wall & roof signs of the Zoning Bylaws. And fora Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size (Area), & Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits of the Zoning Bylaws. Petitioner wishes to place one sign on each side of building so they can be seen either way along High Street. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the South West side of 57 High Street, which is in the 1-S Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the Office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles St., North Andover, Monday through Thursday, from the hours of 9:AM to 1:PM. By Order of the Board of Appeals, William J. Sullivan, Chairman Published in the Eagle Tribune on 2/23/99 & 3/2/99. Legalnov/2 8m -- o � (p � �W� (w m-?��< s�NN.o'D.Wsw�'"0o3�opD �`� ,�zm»Or x3mmm hom-4fz-nr�AD��vaowm�yZ m � 3 . o N�9^o ?3 Do-c7�vmocZamom,��mo s.�fmmO a xxm� - hfO a?O - oW m(oma<-oN ( C-- nD.O(D xmmNO— x mD� 095 (n o 3- m�y anMx��� �� m3m�3maOzTm�- m zammmmam� � O-mn3 011- Qam R° � < - mow 34 mco.•< m LD. °o� co Qm 107� lnD3md � a_ � 30Q= m ��m� m o03oNf N° o3ZanM00)mmHrn�.3<y ' �OO a- NsCTOa W�07A7C�D CD NNW CD -4 g0 ] rm 3_ oAN(-D O 03=m.�— zixOc � CD= BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 NORTN loll �, ► p �" :� � o Tr i;to certify tW t<venfy(2c),-r NORTH ANDOVER A c R Z I � �� A Obw Copy Ji " th elapsed from date of d siar,Wall Q 3i�trcrat filing OFFICE OF 0t !. Date ' THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Jcyce A.Bra&haAi 27 CHARLES STREET TWM Clak Town Clerk NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 \� FAX(978)688-9542 Any appeal shall be filed NOTICE OF DECISION within(20)days after the date of filing of this notice Property at: 57 High Street in the office of the Town Clerk. NAME:Stephen Halem, d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative DATE: 4/14199 ADDRESS: 57 High Street PETITION:002-99 "5 North Andover, MA 01845 HEARING: 4/13/99 *411 The Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Tuesday evening,April 13, 1999 upon the application of Stephen Halem,57 High Street,d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative, North Andover, MA requesting a variance from the requirements of Section 6.6D: Business&Industrial Districts, Paragraph 1: Primary wall&roof signs. And for a Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size(area)&Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits. Petitioner wishes to place one sign on each side of building so signs can be seen either way along High Street,the property is in the I-S Zoning District The following members were present: Raymond Vivenzio,Walter F. Soule, George Earley, Ellen McIntyre, Scott Karpinski. ,py 13199 Am-!1:2°3 r. x The hearing was advertised in the Lawrence Tribune on 2123199&312199 and all abutters were notified by regular mail. No persons appeared in opposition to the petition. Upon a motion made by Scott Karpinski and 2nd by Ellen McIntyre the Board voted to GRANT a Variance from the N requirements of Section 6.61), Paragraph 1,to allow a total of 2 signs with a continuous border on each sign, CD containinglettering and address as shown and referred too " x 9 n Plan E,and to GRANT a Special Permit from requirements of Sections 6.3&6.4, Paragraphs 19& 2 to allow a maxim om the C � um square footage of 1 q g 5 sq,ft.for each CD sign including the border which shall be located on 2 different sides of the same building known as the East and West a ao side of said building and with lettering and street address as shown and referred to on'Plan E"as submitted by the Cl M applicant.Voting in favor. Raymond Uvenzio, Walter F. Soule, George Earley, Ellen McIntyre,Scott Karpinski. The petitioner has satisfied the provision of Section 10,paragraph 10.4 of the Zoning Bylaw and that the granting of p these variances will not adversely affect the neighborhood or derogate from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The Board found that the street address on the building would be important for public safety reasons, especially where the street numbering is inconsistent and whereas Elm Street and High Street are one and the same roadway. Note: The granting of the Variance andlor Special Permit as requested by the applicant does not necessarily ensure the granting of a building permit as the applicant must abide by all applicable local,state and federal and building codes and regulations,prior to the issuance of a building permit as requested by the Building Commission. Board of Appeals, Raymond Vivenzio acting Chairman attachment of"Plan E" ml/1999decisioN6 BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688.9540 PLANNING 688'9535 TOWN I, YORTH lo B1.% CIA-n in 7-1 3 � i > ` ! i {' 0111 LAB ATI 9 a a a, ntal ,JeciakY practice 7 i aD STItLE—l " FLIq/ L�II ot t%ORT#1 0 1: "I'T 111 & Y C. NORTH 71: -j� ATIEST. to certPY tha-�tvveOj(2r) % NORTH ANDOVER A MW copy apsed from(We of dQWw,ffled .Ithcut filingof an OFFICE OF 041m DateMMM/5,--/999 THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Jcyccz A.l3m&Fa--vj ' Town Clerk Tc,,-jn C!crk 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Any appeal shall be filed NOTICE OF DECISION within(20)days after the date of filing of this notice Property at: 57 High Street in the office of the Town Clerk. NAME: Stephen Halem, d/b/a The Dentists Collaborative DATE: 4/14199 ADDRESS: 57 High Street PETITION:002-99 North Andover, MA 01845 HEARING: 4/13/99 The Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Tuesday evening,April 13, 1999 upon the application of Stephen Halem, 57 High Street, d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative, North Andover, MA requesting a variance from the requirements of Section 6.6D: Business&Industrial Districts, Paragraph 1: Primary wall&roof signs. And for a Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size(area)&Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits. Petitioner wishes to place one sign on each side of building so signs can be seen either way along High Street, the property is in the I-S Zoning District The following members were present: Raymond Vivenzio, Walter F. Soule, George Earley, Ellen McIntyre, Scott Karpinski. The hearing was.advertised in the Lawrence Tribune on 2/23/99&3/2/99 and all abutters were notified by regular mail. No persons appeared in opposition to the petition. rn Upon a motion made by Scott Karpinski and 2n'by Ellen McIntyre the Board voted to GRANT a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.61), Paragraph 1, to allow a total of 2 signs with a continuous border on each sign, (D containing lettering and address as shown and referred to on'Plan E",and to GRANT a Special Permit from the Z X :0 requirements of Sections 6.3&6.4, Paragraphs 19& 2, to allow a maximum square footage of 15 sq.ft.for each 0 (D sign including the border which shall be located on 2 different sides of the same building known as the East and West s Cc side of said building and with lettering and street address as shown and referred to on'Plan E'as submitted by the applicant.Voting in favor. Raymond Vivenzio, Walter F. Soule, George Earley, Ellen McIntyre, Scott Karpinski. 0 The petitioner has satisfied the provision of Section 10,paragraph 10.4 of the Zoning Bylaw and that the granting of a these variances will not adversely affect the neighborhood or derogate from the intent and purpose of the Zoning CD Bylaw. The Board found that the street address on the building would be important for public safety reasons, 4. 40 especially where the street numbering is inconsistent and whereas Elm Street and High Street are one and the same roadway. Note: The granting of the Variance and/or Special Permit as requested by the applicant does not necessarily ensure the granting of a building permit as the applicant must abide by all applicable local, state and federal and building codes and regulations,prior to the issuance of a building permit as requested by the Building Commission. Board of Appeals, Raymond Vivenzj'o— attachment of"Plan E" acting Chairman ml/1999decision/6 B0AIZD0FAPPEkLS688-954I BUILDINGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION685-9530HEALTI-1688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 r L_ NORTH 77 COLLA -- _ 1 l LSYpEANra cvao, a GeT 1-G S T •. Gv� i ti' �;'C��/� ,cam II FL /V ZE I I THOMAS J. BURKE, ESQ. REGISTER OF DEEDS NORTHERN DISTRICT .�` ,v l��'f. ' it 'l ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS f�,� LAWRENCE,MASSACHUSETTS 01840 17787 BOARD Of APPEALS e7 CHARLES ;STREET HQR'TH ANDOVER MA 01E45 v Hitt l! ii Il { It i !1 1131111 it 50%RECVCLED PAPER �•'^t'x�.x �.,, /1�l1 111111111111111111 i t!f i f!i 11 !4 46i�i Ili f 31 20%POSTCONSUMER I Received by TowD-Clerk: TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FOR REUEF-FROM THE ZONING-ORDINANCE c��7) applicant S E P H L"N (� AL E M Address -5- 7 (-11 G H ST t s , pP Tel. No. f 40 Y- f s cL jl. Applicant is hereby made: j -7 LL2 a) For a variance-from the requirements-of Section Paragraph and Table of the Zoning Bylaws. j . 3 P/t (Q- I b) For a Special Permit under Section 6 , f Paragraph of the Zoning Bylaws c) As a Party Aggrieved, for review of a decision made by the Building Inspector or other authority. 2. a) Premises affected are land and building(s) numbered S 7 A/i i Street. ' b) Premises affected area property with frontage on the North( ) South (6'East ( ) West (� side of S Street. c) Premises affected are in Zoning District_ — and the premises affected have an area of square feet and frontage of feet. 3. Ownership: a) Name and address of owner (if joint ownership, give all names): VUIgM IX17r Date of Purchase i7 Previous Owner b) 1. If applicant is not owner, check his/her interest in premises: Prospective Purchaser Lessee Other i j 5 of 8 • 1 4. Site of proposed-building: IVIA -front; All -feet-deep; Height stories; C? fN�i�- feet. a) Approximate-date-of erection b) Occupancy or use of each floor: V C- ^j i i s r s 9 F'1:1' i c E S C) Type of construction F-I it D r'r t C 1< 5. Has there been a previous appeal, under zoning, on these premises? ty 0 When 6. Description of-relief sought on thispetitionS t-i Tv P U T S i GNS ON S 1 D>< OF BU ILD1NC Sd �T-HG rf1N Cis S�CN Ccs/-tiNC� r= JTFIE2 W.,/{ Y. A L- ON G {-I I GH ST"(,E ET o ti 6 ` 3 7. Deed recorded m the Registry of Deeds m Book No. '6 3 Land Court Certificate No. (��J�i� -Book N / Page The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows: (must be stated in detail) (7N A u6-�-vS--r 5 1 99 7 •T i-'F= PI-A NIJ/l Je ' 6� AI? w A I \/-Ek- O J S t'Tc: 1,-[--A/V NE V/E'tl %6>/�Z G>rO--l C,/V e o Al d/i/ o N 1,'-"/1 Z j/GN WO c>L.P LC THS B/il�.-.D/�V�, Tf/E F f'livT �'�' i fid ls'///Li�irVl is T moi/ 141 V C 4 S/l�, /,L/o v L D //,.-p9�4-1167T�>� . S7 7 TWA /GiPP�L /) NT iU��7 L./ .eE s. _5n / T-.; U N//v�,- ��/1 F� �✓�. i.F'E-�� F f mit/ i"eN I agree to pay the filing fee, advertising in newspaper, and incidental expenses* i GI � i Signature of Petitioner (s) 6of8 I ' I i i t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER UST Of PARTIES Of INTEREST: PAGE,_OF / SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP JPAR #j NAME 83 /�, ADDRESS ABUTTERS: 'OV",- /l�i�s v/ 3 Z fj 7`- i v . 4 7 04 AV 6 �' � � 7 8 - .� y � - ..� 10G G _ 12 13 14 E1615 17 18 i9 ?0 CERT. B DATE: Z- Z.� i MAR 3 Q 90 Planning Board Minutes DPW Conference Room BOARD OF APPEALS August 5, 1997 Members Present: Joseph V. Mahoney,Richard Rowen, Chairman, Alison Lescarbeau, Vice Chairman, and Alberto Angles. John Simons arrived at 7:20 PM. Richard Nardella was absent. Staff Present: William Scott,Director CD&S substituting for Kathleen Bradley Colwell who is on maternity leave, and Karen Fitzgibbons substituting for Amy Chongris who is enjoying a vacation. Minutes: July 15, 1997 July 15, 1997 executive session On a motion by Ms. Lcscarbcau, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Planning Board voted unanimously to approve the minutes of July 15, 1997 as written. Endorse Plans: 757 Turnpike Street(Stop& Shop)site plan review Ona motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Ms. Lescarbeau, the Planning Board voted unanimously to endorse the plans for 757 Turnpike Street(Stop&Shop). Discussion: Building#22 North Andover Mills i Michael Strahm Architects, Inc. was present representing Dr. Steven Halem, owner of The Dentists * laboi'ative'-and future tenant of building#22 North Andover Mills. The applicant is requesting a waiver from the site plan review requirements. The proposal will convert the single story brick building into a dental practice. The addition is planned for the west side of the building. Mr. Strahm stated the addition will be 900 sq. ft to be located on the rear of building#22 on High Street. The building will follow the roof lines of the existing building and will be handicap accessible. There are no setback issues. There was some discussion of the parking, and the applicant stated they need 14 parking spaces for employees and 10 for patients,they have already spoken to Bob Nicetta regarding the parking and they have his approval. The sign will be very small and located in front of the building. A light in the parking lot may r be moved. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Ms. Lescarbeauibe.Planning Board voted ,:to aii ita. lan Review aiver sub'ect to the Hudd n Inspector's app i e ardirt turf oas y -8r _. , S �'__._ __._ __W J ... _ �... g pp g _ L e parking. �.. Rezoning Tumpike Street e � 1? Mr. Lenny Annaloro,property owner at the corner of Turnpike Street and Willow Street,was present and stated he would like his parcel of land to be rezoned. It is presently zone residential and Mr. Annaloro P i would like it changed to enable him to construct an office building at the location. Mr. Rowen stated the Master Plan Committee is working on a plan for Route 114 and we will have to wait for their recommendations. Mr. Rowen asked Mr. Scott how far along is the Master Plan Committee from giving their recommendations and Mr. Scott replied they should be ready to present at the fall Town Meeting. Mr. Simons stated that the overall total picture of Route 114 needs to be looked at and that is what the Master Plan Committee is doing,for example, how much of abutting land is wet? We don't know that i1 UH y iwf . b ^ X f Y �.e� • i t4. • rf^'�f• ahµ,_t r kr` r� •x i A I ,/7/-/�/- 7/777--,/;,77,=777 /'�//%�•/ /�• �� '/ •' //�i x u.�J I I 1 • 1 r n �.� W 30 .�P-D aF APPEAL_ y 5 7 m H C ,r TISTS OLLA -BO V I 4611 � T 5" sv dentalspeciaity 3 ract-ce 1 I Tif 5 7 . 7 r I.-GI-I S.TR-E-ET I 4b.5 5 x 7" - - L !ET7,f-R To 9, f s7- 4 &rA-L MO(JiV T,"D o IV RED 8�P/Ck 8�//LD/JY6" l�t/fIL.L ti �w 01, `1O • p � f A M M i Y ��sS�cNuse• NORM ANDOVER OFFICE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 27 CHARLES STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845 FAX(978)688-9542 Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing at the Senior Center, 120R Main St., North Andover, MA on Tuesday the 9th day of March, 1999 at 7:30 PM to all parties interested in the appeal Stephen Halem, 57 High Street, d/b/a The Dentist's Collaborative, North Andover, MA , requesting a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.6D: Business & Industrial Districts, Paragraph 1: Primary wall & roof signs of the Zoning Bylaws. And for a Special Permit from the requirements of Section 6.3, Paragraph 19: Sign Size (Area), & Section 6.4, Paragraph 2: Permits of the Zoning Bylaws. Petitioner wishes to place one sign on each side of building so they can be seen either way along High Street. Said premises affected is property with frontage on the South West side of 57 High Street, which is in the I-S Zoning District. Plans are available for review at the Office of the Building Dept., 27 Charles St., North Andover, Monday through Thursday, from the hours of 9:AM to 1:PM. By Order of the Board of Appeals, William J. Sullivan Chairman Published in the Eagle Tribune on 2/23/99 & 3/2/99. Legalnov/2 Vim. o cd.4.4.(n2;Er 9 . ..5S T•r-uN!-so a 5nr� Zo=�v m-�c o 5 .,<-0 m o��� m m m wm _ s�rn c o � mg m o am o 1 w y,�.Zo m m�`��m m�Cf,DOi;y:O� m m Q;ppa y-»�v ?ao o m o�' .m, O Q r YDS?CakM'o(:;3 C G� _��m 2'm.�m ovo"� c 7 yNai �� '40 m m ON 2 $�m r.D D w0_�4s£co���oc�m�mi�� fo»�m�.Dy�� w• �c� Qay �O-n -� 12)MM m'a�mm �Ty=�� `Da_�ia mm-mao-°_'.m��mQncAoocW—> m>z�tD 0o m ?m mmcDo m..f�.a:.. vm� < o_^A �mmo � s � �zc� w ' �ao��mN'OW 0; CDo^cmi �0S �(�Om ,ymGm�'N .��< snmiaomL�Rt� n m.gym, m.o:,o — �X00�m Oran m i:,p can».a -w00 mc�. oos:ov �•�D� c3otO�,�."m ELM- SD m_m�aoa� jomtnDTm z D° _.o ?omm > >tn�, mvc� 35:�m � mmc z -Nd 7.fn.J-..:a.T.W N 5.�.. .N v,O.O.. N8p-At0 O OO 7.� O.DfD SfJIS�-�0 m .'.CD`G cn-CV- T V 7.4i.%`C',6-:3. 7 3 3 0.y-.. r� 3_ A J N O 7 3(D = BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDNGS 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNNG 688-9535 i P,E0E1.YED Vr JOYCE BRAD"HAW TOWN CL9.,11r, d NORTH AFi00VER Received by Town-Clerk: FEB q 2 07 AM '�9 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS ` BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FOR RELIEF-FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE Applicant P r t ✓:N (.4 A L C M Address 5- 7 0/6,0 ST ' No. I. Applicant is hereby made: a) For a variance from-the requirements-of Section 'Paragraph and Table of the Zoning Bylaws. � . 3 P/-1 (2 ( 9 b) For a Special Permit under Section �� `f Paragraph Z— of the Zoning Bylaws t f c) As a Party Aggrieved, for review of a decision made by the Building Inspector or other authority. 2. a) Premises affected are land and building(s) numbered S 7 /� I- Street. / 6 b) Premises affected area property with frontage on the North( ) South (y'East ( ) West (vf side of S � /I/ Street. C) Premises affected are in Zoning District— --and the premises affected have an area ofuare feet-and frontage of feet. � g 3. Ownership: a) Name and address of owner (if joint ownership, give all names): mdly /w,,>,tiPS j /Ile/1 f f Date of Purchase_�Ikll PreviousOwner b) 1. If applicant is not owner, check his/her interest in premises: I Prospective Purchaser / Lessee Other 5 of 8 I I i I r D 4. Site of proposed building: IVIA -front; All -feet-deep; � J� Height. _stories; C� /` feet. a) Approximate date of erection art/L-7 /4 i b) Occupancy or use of each floor: V c) Type of eonstr-uction C D J- I C I< 5. Has there been a previous appeal, under zoning, on these premises? f�'��� When 6. Description of relief sought on this petition W I S h v PUT S i GNS ON S 1 D C f c)F BU ILI)W6 SO 'T'0G'—r eA'\) 13E SEN C`)M 'NG E I T HER- WAY, 7. Deed recorded in the Registry of Deeds in Book No. � '6 3 Page i q 3 Land Court Certificate No. i -Book Page The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows: (must be stated in detail) U � A vr'v5-F 5 1 9 g 7 1 Its /'L/IN&;/OJe;! 11�'0/1 RD 9,4N-f r� WA i «p-� S ''TIC N NE V/E lt-1 /=c>2 /V e �-o N d i T/ ci N IA-11-1 s" 711e- 7- 11e-T Fi<no/"1 THE S T�C'� T/ri�� /F i���Jc %� rIVovLD -�A��' T' �''-- ����"-c��� �,�✓��' �i Tfi�'!� 1.1/A Y' /i i,-.�1.[/�� S7 i c lc v v o ✓�� 7// S/vWi9�K %r� �Er EFFE_�T/Vc, TI-16 "L_ /�/) N7 DnE ,)7 /.! �F Vis//s. Sn / T.s o �5-/N �� �T/ifJ i SNE i'�Ji9 lye, � --5; I agree to pay'the filing fee, advertising in newspaper, and incidental expenses* i Signature of Petitioner(s) 6of8 i I r TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER PST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST: PAGE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP j—PAR #1 NAME ADDRESS /`=' S`TE�G f/.�LE�J f T ,a/OO<E c ABUTTERS: C. 3 Z- v� le: 'IT 6 L9 ZZ2— G � � 10 G 11 12 13 14 15 16 E?o17 18 19 i CERT. 61T? DATE: s' i Project: Town Of North Andover Building Department artment a` ,aor+rN A The Dentist Collaborative ti 27 CHARLES STREET 3} 57 fiigti street 508-688-9545 � • North Andover MA 01845' K APPLICANT : R J Engineering 4� t`g g g SS S�cNUSE � • RE: Sign Permit Appication DATE: January 21, 1999 Title of Plans and Documents: The Dentist Collaur_orative Please be advised that after review of your Building Permit Application and Plans that your Application is DENIED for the following reasons: Zoning Use not allowed in District Not in conformance with Phased Development Violation of Height Limitations Sign exceeds requirements Violation of Setback Front Side Rear Insufficient Lot Area Insufficient Parking Violation of Building Coverage Insufficient Open Space Use requires permits prior to Buildin Permit Sign requires permits prior to BuildingPermit Form U not complete b other departments Not in conformance with Growth By-Law Other Sign location & size require ent of sit plan review Remedy for the above is checked below. Dimensional Variance Special Permit for Watershed Review Special Permit for Site Plan Review Special Permit for sign Complete Form U sign-offs Copy of Recorded Variance Information indicating Non-conforming status Copy of Recorded Special Permit Other Other Plan Review The plans and documentation submitted have the following inadequacies : 1.Information Is not provided,2.Requires additional information, 3.Information requires more clarification,4. Information is incorrect. 5.All of the above. # I J # Foundation Plan Plumbing Plans Subsurface investigation Certified Plot Plan with proposed structure Construction Plans 116 Affidavit Mechanical Plans and or details Plans Stamped b roper discipline Electrical Plans and or details F aming Plan Fire Sprinkler and Alarm Plan Roofing Footinq Plan Plans to scale Utilities Site Plan Water Supply Sewage Disposal Waste Disposal other ADA and or ABBA re uirements Administration The documentation submitted has the following inadequacies : 1.Information Is not provided.2.Requires additional information. 3.Information requires more clarification.4. Information is incorrect.5.All of the above. # # Water Fee State Builders License Sewer Fee Workman's Compensation Building Permit Fee Homeowners Improvement Registration Building Permit Application Homeowners Exemption Form Other other The above review and attached explanation of such is based on the plans and information submitted. No definitive review and or advice shall be based on verbal explanations by the applicant nor shall such verbal explanations by the applicant serve to provide definitive answers to the above reasons for DENIAL. Any inaccuracies,misleading information,or other subsequent changes to the information submitted by the applicant shall be grounds for this review to be voided at the discretion of the Building Department.The attached document titled"Plan Review Narrative'shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein by referepce. The building department will retain all plans and documentation for the above file.You must file a new building permit licati fo and t permitting process. 1/12/99 1/19/99 Building Department Officia Signature Application Received Application Denied If Faxed Denial Sent 1/21/99 i Referral recommended : Fire Health r Police X Zoning Board Conservation Department of Public Works Planning Historical Commission Other Building Dept cc: William Scott • I Plan Review Narrative The following narrative is provided to further explain the reasons for denial for the building permit for the property indicated on the reverse side: Code Reasons for Denial 'F -;Reference -. ,• Sec 6.3 Sign Size (area) - The surface area of any sign is the entire area within a single continuous perimeter enclosing the extreme limits of lettering, representation, emblems, or other figures, together with any material or color forming and integral part of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backgrou d i I against which it is placed. Structural members bearing no sign copy shall not be included. Zoning Board Applications may be pick-up in our Office i I I i. I I v ' f I ------- ____ -- 57 --a� T HEDE. - T1 S S I T k..AOL'"' LAI"mionAT1 ue� T 5'1 dentalspecialty r fice 3�� TO i k L CT7-e,es --o EE c19 s7-- /1 L 611*-I/^/64A� AICVNTED ON RED 8R/C'�C .BU/LD//116 vt/f�L.! i i e Y r Planning Board Minutes DPW Conference Room August 5, 1997 Members Present: Joseph V. Mahoney,Richard Rowen, Chairman, Alison Lescarbeau, Vice Chairman, and Alberto Angles. John Simons arrived at 7:20 PM. Richard Nardella was absent. i Staff Present: William Scott,Director CD &S substituting for Kathleen Bradley Colwell who is on maternity leave, and Karen Fitzgibbons substituting for Amy Chongris who is enjoying a vacation. Minutes: July 15, 1997 I July 15-1997 executive session On a motion by Ms. Lescarbeau, seconded by Mr. Mahoney,the Planning Board voted unanimously to approve the minutes of July 15, 1997 as written. Endorse Plans: 757 Turnpike Street(Stop&Shop)site plan review On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Ms. Lescarbeau, the Planning Board voted unanimously to endorse the plans for 757 Turnpike Street(Stop&Shop). Discussion: Building;#22 North Andover Mills Michael Strahm Architects, Inc. was present representing Dr. Steven Halem, owner of TWR. enlists IPTMliorative,and future tenant of building#22 North Andover Mills. The applicant is requesting a waiver from the site plan review requirements. The proposal will convert the single story brick building into a dental practice. The addition is planned for the west side of the building. Mr. Strahm stated the addition will be 900 sq. ft to be located on the rear of building#22 on High Street. The building will follow the roof lines of the existing building and will be handicap accessible. There are no setback issues. There was some discussion of the parking,and the applicant stated they need 14 parking spaces for employees and 10 for patients,they have already spoken to Bob Nicetta regarding the parking and they have his approval. The sign'will,be very small and located in front of the building. A light in the parking lot may be moved. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Ms Lescarbeau,the P.Ianrung Boafd-voted _ �- , w i t� flnot�l��`grazte,Site;�lai��teve�v�aiver�ubject tg�;�he rig -Melhspector's:,approval regar`di; ezonin Turnpike Street r. Lenny Annaloro,property owner at the corner of Turnpike Street and Willow Street,was present and stated he would like his parcel of land to be rezoned. It is presently zone residential and Mr. Annaloro would like it changed to enable him to construct an office building at the location. Mr. Rowen stated the I Master Plan Committee is working on a plan for Route 114 and we will have to wait for their recommendations. Mr. Rowen asked Mr. Scott how far along is the Master Plan Committee from giving their recommendations and Mr. Scott replied they should be ready to present at the fall Town Meeting. Mr. Simons staled that the overall total picture of Route 114 needs to be looked at and that is what the Master Plan Committee is doing,for example, how much of abutting land is wet'? We don't know that - 1 af:A,,.,� VI �; -s { ra � 4 , 1 4� F .j Town of North Andover * NORTN , OFFICE OF 3�0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES p 27 Charles Street WILLIAM J. SCOTT North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 �.1 4a,fHus���y Director (978)688-9531 � 1� � �x�7 8-9542 April 13, 1999 Mr. Steven Halem BOARD OF APPEALS 57 High Street North Andover,MA 01845 Fax(978) 975-7788 Re: Sign at 57 High Street Dear Mr. Halem, At the Planning Board meeting of April 6, 1999 the Planning Board voted to clarify the site plan review waiver for 57 High Street. The Planning Board only reminds you to remain in compliance with the Town's sign bylaw. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at (978),688-9535. Sincerely, . Wi Scott Director of C unity Development CC: Zoning Board of Appeals Robert Nicetta, Building Commissioner BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 Apr- 13-99 02 : 44P North Andover Com Dev . 508 688 9542 x . 02 r ufpiinH i ivauroola.�a(; QzUtlu U4 ,�, : :- r - f' C6-SR9 igLh) Ir ILL' r», <r"a Saoijsanb.zauLmj �jv a.%ru no ii k%rj�q uts syAo1 ;qj q;i% a,u&,liuuuoa sr a:� u�a.l ��� no.� s�Utu.Ia.t 1ju0 �1�ci� �:nuuc,ca a'-{.l 'laa1;� a"II•� LS lc�j �a,�r..,'- t��.�aa upla )his aul 1,11 Il') t% pawn PJ Ofl nulUuuIl aITl 6661 '9 IUCIN'10 "ou11aaui PJL, 8 outuUv d a.:? lF 4av1�,, u 1N U. SfS 10 \-I 'aa,nput,' qjA I Iaol�� u�ir1 _: • J r- / . J Apr- 13-99 02 : 43P North Andover Corn_ Dev . 508 688 9542 P . 01 r A'iOL'2a 101 ,.wt V T ales - r� i t ! Project: Town Of North Andover_ �I Building Department ' N°;T�141 '4The Dentist collaborativ 27 CHARLES STREET s? 57�Hi.gh Street ° . ? � � North Andover MA 01845 508-688-9545 . APPLICANT : R J Engineering ��SS�cHugEtt Sign Permit Appication DATE: January 21, 1999 RE: Title of Plans and Documents: The Dentist Collak�roYative Please be advised that after review of your Building Permit Application and Plans that your Application is DENIED for the following reasons: Zonin Use not allowed in District Not in conformance with Phas2edDeve'o De velopment Violation of Height Limitations Sign exceeds requirements._ Violation of Setback Front Side Rear Insufficient Lot Area Insufficient Parkin Violation of BuildingCoverage Insufficient Open Space Use requires permits prior to Si n r uires ermits rior to Buildin Permit Form U not com lete b othe Not in Conformance with Growth By-Law Other Sign location & sizent of sit plan review Remedy for the above is checked below. Dimensional Variance Special Permit for Watershed Review Special Permit for Site Plan Review Special Permit for sin Complete Form U si n-offs Co of Recorded Variance Information indicatin g Non-conforming status Copy of Recorded S ecial Permit Other Other Plan Review The plans and documentation submitted have the following inadequacies : 1.Information Is not provided,2.Requires additional information, 3.Information requires more clarification,4. Information is incorrect. 5.All of the above. Foundation Plan Plumbin Plans Subi rfi lation I Certified Plot Plan with proposed structure Construction Plans 116 Affidavit Mechanical Plans and or details Plans Stamped by proper discipline Electrical Plans and or details Framing Plan Fire Sprinkler and Alarm Plan Roofing Footing Plan Plans to scale Utilities Site Plan Water Su ply Sewage Disposal Waste Disposal Other ADA and or ABBA requirements Administration The documentation submitted has the following inadequacies : 1.Information Is not provided.2.Requires additional information. 3.Information requires more clarification.4. Information is incorrect.5.All of the above. Water Fee State Builders License Sewer Fee Workman's Compensation Building Permit Fee 991 Homeowners Improvement Registration Building Permit Application Homeowners Exemption Form i Other Other The above review and attached explanation of such is based on the plans and information submitted. No definitive review and i or advice shall be based on verbal explanations by the applicant nor shall such verbal explanations by the applicant serve to provide definitive answers to the above reasons for DENIAL. Any inaccuracies,misleading information,or other subsequent changes to the information submitted by the applicant shall be grounds for this review to be voided at the discretion of the Building Department.The attached document titled"Plan Review Narrative"shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein i by referepce. The building department will retain all plans and documentation for the above file.You must file a new building permit Alicati fro Hnd t permitting process. All 1/12/99 1/19/99 Building Department Offid-al Signature Application Received Application Denied If Faxed Denial Sent 1/21/99 Referral recommended : Fire Health PoliceZonin Board Conservation Department of Public Works Planning Historical Commission Other Building Dept cc: William Scott l Plan Review Narrative The following narrative is provided to further explain the reasons for denial for the building permit for the property indicated on.the reverse side: bode Reasons for Denial:..',. ; Reference Sec 6.3 Sign Size (area) - The surface area of any sign is the entire area within a single continuous perimeter enclosing the extreme limits of lettering, representation, emblems, or other fig es, together with any material or color forming and integral part o I the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backgrouild i against which it is placed. Structural members bearing no copy sign co shall not be included. i Zoning Board Applications may be pick-up in our office I i I f i I ,