Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 573 PLEASANT STREET 4/30/2018 (2) 573 PLEASANT STREET 0 PLEASANT STREET 210/0 MC-0028-0000.0 210/037.C-0026-0000.0 r Variarme ® Special Permit APPUCATI®N FILED DECISION DUE ON: ro rz U� a \ G G� 3 ac6 s �3 OeQ��I( SQL v 13Fisding, EIB / Applirition filed am `°��-• f v Heating due w D'e'S'ou.due cin:. c� ESSELTE MADE IN U.S.A. NO. 752 113 0 0 0 e Legal,Ndflce : TOWN OF f NORTH ANDOVER •;s BOARD OF APPEALS '-NOTICE: f NORTFf '±� ITS cHus� May 21;:1985 >t Notice Is tie'reby given that the Board of'Appeals r will.give i a hearing:at the Townt wilding,`:, North,Andover; on«`tMonday' ,evening, the=10th`day of June; 1985,at 7:30 o'clock,to all par ties interested in the appeal=of ; CYR ENGINEERING SERVICES, °.INC,.for Merrimack Valley Realty and .Development Group 'ie- .questing a variation.of Section 4.133, Paragraphs c and d of r the Zoning By Law:so as to per mit the continuation-of construe-' ` tion of single,Mmily dwellings on premises located at the south., side of Pleasant Street known as Lots 56,58,59,60and 10 Plea - " ,sant Street:* •. s., By Order of the Board of Ap- . . , peals. ; .x Frank Serio;Jr.. Publish N.A.-Citizen`.Mayman23 and 30,1985- g14 NOR TM O p . r ► ,SSAC Nl1S�t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS -- BOARD OF APPEALS Notice lav 21 , 1985 Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeals wi' l give a' hearing at the Town Building, North Andover, on Monday evening, the 10th day of June , 1985 at 7 : 30 p.m. to all parties interested. in the appeal of CYR ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC. FOR MERRIMACK VALLEY REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP requesting a variation of Section 4 . 133 , Paragraphs c and. d of the Zoning By Law so as to permit the,. .continuation of construction of single family dwellings on premises located at , the south side of Pleasant Street known as Lots 56_, 58 , 59 60 , and 10 Pleasant Street . By Order of the Board of Appeals By : Frank Serio, Jr. , Chairman Publish : Citizen: May 23 anal 30 ,. 1985 Send bill to: Cyr Engineering Services , Inc. 234 Essex St. Lawrence , MA 01840 m _.I •`3►: ,� .3 pk 3rd 6_ `8 'If ic- File Edit View Document Tools Window Help K 271 � 16 10 0 � 10 311 5D5 521 C6 535 g 0 325 11 543 20 573 ' 21 32 10 345 , 31 48 54 74 8494, 0 X15 X57 41 51 254 175 X61 75 5 s 0 105 112 11 202 72 10 134 .15fl 170 235 44 2t 27 CL 55 243 cT 1,35 1555 41 55 5 c� o 0 0 101 50 71 \P L 15 X54 175 _. f.,7- _f1-- -_�ao,�t� ._y-�-.--�^fryY,1 y---- ----,t.. y(��7n 7� V �r��g Fi4 ^tO^1 ���yy c�,4���! ({� �) s �}� ,^!{ Inbox-Miaoseft Outlook �I� �GVL+�l�'�G�. C6�i� ('7 V67 ����\7��{7'1.�3L�.1"�t�h� ��t}6i 1�$ ..-�I e1''r'^�I`J�7 E'GCDuiI'LV�LFS.C.,. � 'rP.wi ° � � Wr 1��✓f Y� �_i�_^�'+ __I1 Residential Property Record Card PARCEL_ID:210/037.C-0028-0000.0 MAP:037.0 BLOCK:0028 LOT:0000.0 PARCEL ADDRESS:573 PLEASANT STREET FY:2008 PARCEL INFORMATION Use-Code: 101 Sale,Price: 1 Book 00094 Road Type T Inspect Date. 07/14/2004 Tax Class: T Sale Date: 12/14/_95 Page: 0165 Rd Condition P Meas Date: 07/14/2004 Owner: Tot Larid Area: 1 18 Sale Valid: P Cert/Doc 12340 , " !� Traffic. CORREIA, MARIA O M Entrance: X Tot Fin Area' yp Address: r: FCORREIA, RERNANWater Collect Id RRC �.DO. S m , p . r_. .. 573 PLEASANT STREET Graritaewer Ins ect ea M NORTH ANDOVER MA 01845 Exempt-B/L% / Resid-B/L% 100/100 Comm-B/LP/o Indust-B/L% / Open Sp-B/L% / RESIDENCE INFORMATION LAND INFORMATION Style:" CIL Tot Rooms: 7 'Main Fn Area: 1258 Attic; NBHD CODE: 5 NBHD CLASS: 5 ZONE R2 Se P e CO de S ethod 43560 1A 000 In•, „r. , 197, Story Height: 2.00 Bedrooms: 4 Up Fn Area: 1258 Bsmt Area 1258 9 YP, q- flu Y/N" Value Class Roof: H Full Baths: 2 Add Fri Area: Fn Bsmt Area; 326 Ext Wall: FB Half Baths: 1 Urfin Area: Bsmt Grade: 2 P 101 A 0 0.180 20,088 Masoriry.Trim: Ezt Bath Fix 0 Tot Firi Area 2516 VALUATION INFORMATION Foundation: CN Bath dual: T RCNLD 325009 y Current Total: 542,400 Bldg: 325,000 Land: 217,400 MktLnd: 217,400 Kitch Qual T "Eff Yr Built: ," 1987 " Mkt Adj Prior Total: 566,500 Bldg: 337,600 Land: 228,900 MktLnd: 228,900 n_.. Heat Type: HW Ext Kitch Year Built: 1985 Sound Value: Fuel Type: . G Grade" 97 G Cost Bldg 325,000 Fireplace 2 Bsmt Gar Cap: 2 Condition: G Att Str Val 1: k li� 'r e 3 _ - Central AC: Y A8smt Gar ft Gar SF:F: 576 P' 'Att Str Val2 .' ' �` Good P/ete F/E/R: /100/100/91 f �- Gt V e o l I'P.150-y1 Porch Type Porch Area Porch Grade Factor G I W 196 SKETCH PHOTO a, i �^ $F � w a 196 S � m rr 14 �� 1414 48 36 Fp l�i�'13 w �< 1258 Sq.Ft 23 26 14 3 $<i ' Y 36 573 PLEASANT STREET Parcel ID:210/037.C-0028-0000.0 as of 11/20/08 Page 1 of 1 Property Record Card PARCEL_ID:210/037.C-0026-0000.0 MAP:037.0 BLOCK:0026 LOT:0000.0 PARCEL ADDRESS:[PLEASANT STREET FY:2008 PARCEL INFORMATION Use-Coder 130 Sale Price: 35,600 Book: 00066 Road Type: T Inspect Date: 01/24/2606 Tax Class T Sale Date: 11/14/84 Page: 0285 Rd Condition: P Meas Date: Owner: Tot Fin Area: 0Sale Type: L Cert/Doc: Traffic: M Entrance: PLEASANT TIMES REALTY TRUST Tot Land Area: 1.01 Sale Valid: Y Water: Collect Id: SGC Address: Grantor: ANDOVER SAVINGS BANK Sewer: Inspect Reas: 126A PLEASANT STREET METHUEN MA 01844 Exempt-B/L% / Resid-B/L% 100/100 Comm-B/LP/o Indust-B/L% / Open Sp-B/L% / LAND INFORMATION NBHD CODE: 5 NBHD CLASS: 5 ZONE: R2 Seg . Type Code Method Scl-Ft-7.Sq-Ft-7. Acres nflu-Y/N Value Class 1 P 130 S 43560 1.000 177,593 2 R 130 A 0 0.010 76 VALUATION INFORMATION Current Total: 177,700 Bldg: 0 Land: 177,700 MktLnd: 177,700 Prior Total: 187,100 Bldg: 0 Land: 187,100 MktLnd: 187,100 SKETCH PHOTO Ice�cture: Anj I a b I i(a t✓i��� f 'I Parcel ID:210/037.c-0026-0000.0 as of 11/20/08 Page 1 of 1 NonrH Town Of 1 2l)M aM Street 0171=ICES OF: o °m YNWEA► S NORTH ANDOVERNr)rtla Andover, Nl,]SS�)ChUseISO 1845 CONSERVATION SSACNUSEt I>I\T-;ION(A (617)6804775 1117-_AI:rl-1 PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAREN 1-1.11. NELSON, LARGC'1'011 March 3 , 1990 Mr . Charles F . Perrault Fitzgibbons , Slil_p & Homs.oy lE6A Pleasant Valley Street Methuen, 1�1A 01 1�f�F Re : treF?t Dear Mr . Perrault : Upon further review of this very complicated matter , I have made the following findings : Findings ( 1 ) Form A P.lon( s ) signed by the Planning Board on 8/31 /91 - which /31 /81which created one plan which showed lots VD, 30B and 39B. A second plan showed lot 9B, 309 and 399, but also showed land court lot numbers 44 , 45 , 51 , 50, 52 , 53, 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58, 5? , 6Q , 61 and 62 . ( 2 ) The Form A Plan filed with the Registry of Deeds Office on SpP (;e mher 7 , 1992 on Plan #3:3573 showed 2 sheat;s which quntained the land court lots only and not lots 9131 30B and 399 . ( 3 ) Building Permits were issued for lot ( s ) 10 ° 60 and for lot 5V on September 13 , 1985 . ( 4 ) Board of Ppppals issued a decision on 7/2/85 dealing with the Watershed District for lots 56 ' 58 , 59 117'? and 6n <-,L;pvnved a permit for a driveway on lots 10 and 60 , denied a pol mi. t for lots 56 , 58 , and 59 . Fhe building permit for tot 59 iSsued ' on 2/12/85 was: voi 'de'd an 5110/95, (5 ) A hom=e was constructed lots 10 and 60 and the foundation fnr a house on lot 59 was removed a=_. required by the Board of Appeals decision on 7/2/85 . ( 6 ) A house enints u" lots 10 and 60 which is awaiting a Certjficate of Occupancy from the Building Inspection office . . Page^ 2; ^/ Bas:Rd on the finding-; cited , the fol lowing conditions are deemed to apply to the 1ot� in que� tion : ' ( l ) Lots 9B , ]811 �nd 3 'B do rmt exist since no plan was filed with t!,e Deeds Office which indicates thes2 lots . The a�plicant admits this fact by filing for buildi/`g -ermit using the land court lot numbers and nut the FOIm A |ot numbers , ( 2 ) The bui |di /ig permit issued to lots 10 and 60 was improperly issued on 2/ 1 -j/85 since the area included in lot- 10 and 60 did not contain one ( l ) acre as required b / the Zoni/`g District in place ( R-2) . At the time {he permits w�_nre i ssued accord ing to the Asses�ors m�ps . lot ) 0 contains 25,092 square feet a`,d lot IM ( which doe,- not c,' ists ) contains 26,472 square feet . Hoyever , if you remove the area contained in land cmirt lnts 5C , 52 and 62, I estimate that the total are'/ contained in Iot 6O is not adequate to make the two ioLs ( 10 �r 6Q ) equal 43,560 square feet as required . ( 3 ) Deed Plan 33537J is different in form and is not an approved Forn A Plan . The plan is different because ( l ) it creates lots of record which do not have accesson a yay a�d ( 2 ) has lots which do not haxe the minimum frontage on a way required by the Subdivision Controi Lae ' ( 4 ) The app ] i(_ant dnes no have a filed Form A Plan with the Regist' y of Deeds Office which the Planning 8oard or the 8ui ) dJng Tnspectior Office can claim is a legally binding plan of record for purposes of the Zoninq O�, lyw . Therefor� the Folloming conclusions are reached by my office : Conclusions ( 1 ) Deed Plan 33537J is not a 1egal Form A Plan and is not jecognized lnts of record for purposes of the Zoning Bylaw. (2 ) The building permit issued on 2/ 13/85 was improper duF � to a plan of record which is not an approved Form A � Plan . T1-1erefore , the house on lots 10 and 60 is illegal under the Zoning Bylaw, ( 3) The plan recnrH fnr the property involved on Deed P ! an 3�537J e� ists pr \ or to 8/31 /8l which ser,ed as the starting p | an for the applicants Form A Plan signed by +hc Planning Board ' Since Form A Plans grandfathered zooing changes for three ( 3 ) years , the *ppiicanL i~ /`o }n«grr protec \�ed for d`e property in question avd must adhere to the Zoning Bylaw in effect today . . ' , 3: ' If you any tiorr- regarding this matter or contest the findings, present rondit, ions and r.onclusions contained in this letter , please notify me at your ear1iest cnnxenience , Sincerely , Scott A. Stocking9 P Town Planner SAS: jle cc : Building lnspcction Town Councel Board of Appeals Karen Nelson ^ igransfer Tertifirate of IMP No. ......... r) V7 From .. Cartiftt.N.A,..AS.`'.I--,.,QrWMHY Re&tsv*d .0.UAV,-,X;i,'. ResistroIlon Book..bio...... Pus A,..19 3,...for the Northern Reilistry District of Essex County. that (Au A. ..................................... .......................................................................................... .......................................................................................... ......................................................................................... of ..;��- .......... in the County of..-LA-O ........and Commonwealth of MAsuchusetts ............................ .Mande. ..................................................... ...........................e............................................................. ............................t........................................................... the owner...............In fee simple P--, as-.eju� .,L.k4r, LULVLA��.4 JWA;L.a�.X�. 4,PA-A- f1.v.-a(0.9,310, .............................................................................. of that certain parcel of land situate .................................... In the County of Esse and said Commonwealth, bounded and described as follows: ........................................... ............Ir.............................................................................. oiv.PJA4,v.AO-A 3S 3.1 C,, .4 ............................................. ............................................... 3 0 C)4 ........................................................... ................................. ................................................... ........................................................................... ..................................................................................... n I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ol F t :,.387 ., ~1 1r eh ) SHEET 2 OF 'J s I 1 c 10 3;5329 6 B N° L.C.D. \ No50 oI t P� ^ 1969 11 � 60 o a ,o Q U i 135.83 �' AB A6 N51°2606 10.00 f S ° 62 p 4 1 - I93�61, S' y �p 6 29 59 f 6L e1 _il 561 21�061 =r{, ♦ good e"d�i 5.39°35 54 w/ 1 S 58." !B 23 iY t �5 p26 N !11.45^' t i ` s 32 56 0 I e I %01- 44 1544 i 0 ♦lei X57 I e 58 54' N <: N7N32',6"w 2h. i I: 1703 tA ;1 .� II ,•-.'✓ N!6°38'46"W �0 1� y � v r v � � t g: 30.95 10, I Ib Q Q s is 43 ` '7r 54 p I 7 � 1 !h S �Oe e9ej �� I •`�92 a u•. O 4 t � ° 37l f .P/on 378 I No. 335 Scob of!Ali Pian 40 fllr to on Inch -o i A. 7 } 387 Il I ( I � ar SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LAND IN NORTH ANDOVER 33537 f Frank C. Gelinas and Associates Inc., Surveyors SHEET l OF2 August 29, 1981 Detail. 1 © £ 60 ,4 #of sco„ rF` � 52 f J, J 59 56 I f /O " •, N o 54 s°"p.� J/ S• ~ i 44 e ,850 60 52 t ,f�'' •69c a ��� s 6 `�� 40 wy 59 56 Na 5 f6 JoJ6 !`P I rs£f o£>aal '58 ti .44 o e All �eQig p 57 N � 54 h" R }'-ii lit..I I'RABON ko CtOCK.�.�.....rw .......R..M 42 ^' `D 45 " Z. ; ' M '% '%MOTION BOOK-T9..PAGE.0.1 ,. t 58�o 40.00-- N86006,01", 0.._ FO X H OO e y e It W ! 1 d � fc4 ggpp�� Ec 46 thru 49 ' X �RNeion of Lots 41, 43, : Plan 335372, sheets 1 & 2 trtth Cert. of Title No. 4...... .. 111UNIgletry District of Essex County K3 N r w 01,**3 of firl�mey be iSSued her land I �^O�RS.RtI! at --- lAru62 � �ofden I LAND PEGUTRATION arna I r t` ocr i9ei j r of MisD4 f r",fo m inch CO - - ----- - -__ -_ _ RC.CeI/,fq,DwulEnpintir/osCoail :,{`t��}lxy; + 1 'r:c• .�, r +,'„':S �.� r:r=r. '� `zs.� + �;. ilx;t' .s°=:� �[`a r l`" �,�'� "4+:`� �( .•.3 h'Fr: d Y]� �}•�2� t., a .. i R rai •"� �/t,�Mfr ' R t7 �, (} a 'sgI'i 7 � + 4 +' ' .�. � >4 � s y + J.VI• j fr. �,.1�t�f,'`h'����a�Fy� .t�i tt�.• d , '. f. 1 i >k ', �' a:.,Y � ',1 ,��� `j-! aro [��w��4 ),}W ,rI J'',. '��+I����6�� Sf ��•, s �F��4'7 1 ,+� rH' e,, i��• t ' ,fi r - � C�`j� fi < t' tr `,r! � f :.3 a �l.3xr r r'� «Wx�e „7fly' � v�. �� '' S k �h .+, ,�b•� .` "f•S ��{,f 1t{t!�{ Qt,�.t'� .�, + r`�f I i c Si }�r}� ° ,.>, 4�n��l����� ►f,.•. �� { R•.� 9.` n � a � r N � v r. .�t, ? �a3��j„ ";f1 Y�"c51J± tGa�77r1i rt rd� ,JaX`i dr'•T` �,a N .a l }e d � r„V• >D .� e^ 'ry4"�'1- r, A+A ��n i��! r�'hro,}y ,i r ,p '' fF}. 2'i.. !b A t{'fy'!S;�j a.0 f'r rb'�) �v. ,{y�! , 1 rot,. �'. y '1 1 1��'+ "Y' i•�(-i.. ♦ r` I a 7 t r�,{'r�7- a�¢.I�,J� r �•�} �r y _trk t•+1' }"r rirD(''�1'� •'f r r r� t t. i',/ �'kti1 aly `fi' e�� .r[3#3F?v�iy�•,�+` �# ' , r �S 'ee,� } E •t. d, rJ., i 1�' -•,t -•w.'s+ba '3;i:t 3 � e� t (S t� ,�!�''},i 7L .• '� '�. '� �'t";. �. �,� d x�}��.�`h '' � 3f, I �;f f• -b•'f>; Via+.'�4�r S 4+r l �� r �.f� �`�]`�1,�, ,. :j F K .�- 5 ,t ���a r s F;f t1Y,A r•1tf��r"�+S ��� tfw` ro^�� e.i�ar'f��g��,a�.^ t 2R'��i �Yrb K rVA643t'�.'F'r 48Ak V.1 Piro tu'}L'yr,�k" w4T k t':, K r •. 1 ''�' } �� ik�t.lht y {t'+Y , t `t<r•� %�y�, ', �y thrc ���g� 'Y }'i,}�1'�^� '�,y� r ,/a+t� R E' ,ak C I �• t .r � � ,r, ��yrf'u '�i-1 �' f z� Tii td ro•..v'1P,V �,,�j I4,I: f� ;+da i�"7 y� �• i A :t a 7. _ fr ' r Vit+ ,E r . i f ' t��'f"fd'N„'� C P• Vt �:� ��k��•A�O t. a�F r +Tt� 1, �JJ ' r` �+ '�`-t'Rt�• `;t.r. {r{., �E.fi 11t�i��,•anc.'1 .�rj v '� .� r t d ku �} � t{r' �D• 5�, e ra� >•i.v q 4'tt E rr`rr' Y. tf. [ro - .`< 'At•t , ?�f !� .Yr T I � � ..� rrt` Cf ?� 'i t ror t U•. ,1t4. t y�{'Jr k. .,1V .. 3a({!$.Y-�'•+1X wF'e,j .7' 7 } v ' y r- j'a ' !r'1. (' t 1 r' y� Cr`'1-i � AY{ ��f^ f ,Y" t �a rP';� H•.�4i'p >r t' CQ y t>•a- in � 7 pr t '?„s� [�� �' .�r"t!I}�'y' %t' �Ck � +} r,'f�'' "•r4 a,• �'�"y''+'j�. a 'Tr t t n < t:' I t } ' i fr i= ;ice Q 3t r- ar '��t 71 r l\ti•? , �i i. +r. op r ��t ' �A� trS.`.S�>�_r f "�' "•��. X'`� F' ti ,sy!!+ " 'X 9 e y. .f. `1)V '11 :(' }` �/ Ir Sx� gAB'+. �[t. * ria/QY l j4� r4of 'res,:c:; 7��T , 3>r t, r.�t r- �a { r. f , f,'t; Y '�':. N _ fit• rlY14 . r Zluf e 3 s "raY'• S !13 �i 4 1'S P } 'i w•fJ li<7r y' , trs, i S,'t '' a 1j s',r� - /'' ::-/'�IrB� f F i +51 r t 7 7 + r it u»a + j�'tct�1�e1{l r V/P.• �o / �' L.�i� „p -4 � ,., a ro Ohl '` �' i i 7 (' 1f al'J. f,r ��,C�� �r�• 0 r � 17 f rr F' ,t�V4p1 ly.� ,r , ti ;�'•a s +,' .,, �I+I'+yy.,��t4Y1 �j'� .?v r 5.346.F. c d)J 11 f,1 '�r Y t' •-Ira► i ) 't4'Jr^ �'' '�a Q 'S } , �' p. -'• r r Fk �, f , +C �,.}'�a t1r't "`' .,,, $Y ,t^E:/• i,'. a - r l .` ' q"')7; 1 4r '�.t! 7f ,.t c + � f �J s s �rt�""^� A���, r�` � y��por+fGe• }�� a 4�.�� ' 11'44 1 +: �} )-7}:'< tf+ra f -! a ♦ ro k.k r.'-X a M ,.,7 V9 �� 0 4,;, \ ;,� 3045, AA S4r bA'WN 11 „k ' f �1N SF..1Z.T. A. 17' la N r.�®, fl)�S� }°'�'S+.Yr r r rcX15T r.;• 1a.x d`54'.r :t ^, ! , u Y ' � '� ,+�..' (♦!I P)Na N °t X10 LV=dZ9 4110 .561.5 .•'r � ay:, ' {: . � .t. �-1„ a, t r 5 ti 7. c", � r'•p ,t;,. :r � 1� 4tir.iLb�rao^G � tror. J°.' e s '11 ,.:041 r r �" $ ryar'. .. `.'.. :..21GS Y6i.'y'• Zo`S6.4b 6 Qar s�,'� 3 -1' t �, s11r31 SI'W t f , 4f qna 1 tE L oT 39 ' It r i +�. .GA.>14LAA1Lmr 7laY`+ 4 Edti. t r ix t �0. 1+ '? •, ! a�} pylar aK � f .' } I .:� I%' l{i t f' I t � rA z 1 ` i t i•:�ro �/' t”" t'{.4 r + �A f. �'•�P �u,,¢�a y' {P%'�ll y;+� f v r�.8 h.'`t"C �+�i+' g:re. •V i'r i +l +. v:11:"fijy a 1t E{a'I ,.r:t. , „irti Ya”L� �r� 'L, 1 +r . .fl t '• R'_7yr o♦ .l:af'. .a:,a f -1�' ,W,(a. s .r #,'. <: ,r t ,V , 1 r 7 S f ; �� 4 r r i.i i{sr s tt ,e Y-_ s,JA Inf+'d": tirrt ,}Ni F'r'`I *t lad+ t .,y � {:.r ♦r- .., rt 'e + r1 s�t}JF ''trcp ¢L'• ••+ a 'i +�l'is� :� tyd 14 , 3� t. x r.,,4K i� 1 var+' �`IG �`4,. 1 J / ra �. `! r) t- s t. , w yfy., � 1 r � t•.;t' {.-'.v. V t S. ? ! ' rar, S �K�pr�. `' G'�.t t 7ad4. 4: a�j' ,�•r�y'!1f ' 4°Sa"` - , :..n t H �E� 3 't�. ,(3a8��•'i• 1 1. j 5.X11 s �.r ,.. ,.�, r `� ay' M5;, +}. y 5 Z ,f r�:,4�t r �'t•�.1?(� t�fYS�l(>�✓ ,1 T r? •ti �Y f?• rf � 1.r tt A - � �' dt h�'1�Irt �7 , e3''zh' 1 d��a,y .;{. r r s,a .t }'� s r q��.( � „y{';¢ 1 [ �:Q �'` i 4✓df flt.� � r:t2 �� [ .. 1.,` rvH,,•tn Y x %+ �4+•1}ro c :/ a7} ?•y 'yl�x 1 t J Tib i' c 1 -.s; *9 ,�`�tr rt �• c sib, +: t If s 4,�i v . .. fr r i t� ' + (ice•' t-. t i .tom tmr+;� "tr,.,. t i' r,, 7 r rAj"Z�i�- ..»�'fr3. d.. .i� , >tltf P�y !O $''4"E' a t}: I, t� „l t :• !: s, C-+y.! t tt a y,�, ,y l [T rl, {' - 7 0• r t ft �a1' ,"`ti,•. , cs ve:.'iY K'i �- v 1 - S 'Y r 1 7., � + t :rt�<i r�,��,� '?+�'i �`+d� i4'y.r.�' AtT ,,,.g�81T#1+Sve!'•'("t� � , :,?n,t k"- ,. �� ` r. �F i ilia `1'.p Y(tr�' ;ti tiro v2 '}.-6 rr w c1„ FZ ic} i V 'tri k•H (7r`.g12_ :.v i '4 i5' i ,r `,1 � }}awr � }>�-g c t j '$' �F�r fil. �;� .r�� 5 t - -�+• 7y� .'��` v-.,t c :;t�}}1t��r ��t l'J'�` k��P( f lt���^�'y'�V�('+i•,'.���i���.�k�` 3 ave• ',S�Y:s�!Y�1 ro•�;}F" ty ),(11'N,�'j.1pj r'�•'.'�V � ,v e.� ° �„•t�, r1 7a �r !�"'�' ��' �" r�,S' .:'1 �'+, rk.+�`a �yf,A �,id`1 }�• $ 't 7 t. .t'� �1:_�7t��! S tqr'�ri5r,:E :�13}p� •a �.,,) I �'r()' t:,��,ti� •1�1 L r t - 7 ,1 i } � - '.��,1 ..'�'� k i �y'i� hr ILj'� r ,�"�'. c:f' 't�i,S"'.".s.�Y 1,}a9r �( ;f�'} d' '1 ) 4�-�1.. 1 } ' r + ( "'< ✓.t}�a �/ .1�. •;` , �,. t.w� �l- {X}3j'`S Y f f�'(.!�t,� �' y+7”} 5 ,.,auu,, ) 1�. 's.J'•' t?,�.5 !rA 1 4y »� ) �r'r�( 4 �, r z, a� i r 1 � "`C{;.1 �! �tl t f ,� 1h !� �"i'6 F� r.y,''� Ai ,{ :'� l• J 5 � i b +f �?l �, !.y 4 /.,tp4f61 l � ' -i `=:t 4 �t��'� �'�'9 I�++e vv�' j J },x' .,`�' e Srg �' flfl %',t�',,Y .15- t'� ��' tr• .s i 7'1...rt`'ri � f t i -' >,v t a,p •. ��rFN Gg rY.�•i t t.t +� �"r' KT}j Ty�{tty.7CQ':51+�:� �6 -ver,,r.'!t '{ S � 4S�(, 7� a� t t '� h c f,y .tt^ ���w}. `%t' N;+�}x{,]'�8 i�ti. t$i'*L,��'�3r1�.4-.F,t�17K 3"^''�}`i/':,.�'�(}6�Ye�.r:j�1 -�J' S:�SJrd 't7 �1"�t �,-!•'•'}S�y r�!xti.5{•r fy�'f ' i Y .i +f t s:f.V }X�t- .( •,i t '1S ���� r � ti F*.i r'�'1. � lJ^C:drr?V?�t'�r ��p Y'6.' �..� (' )t�13 L .. :•l;ri :i:s t f , ..: � '{a�'�ro 4::x�. r i .:,•t .•r •��;s^f�'tY,(It"ra,�'h`',�!`:� �{�,�,n /3i✓�'_- 7a.�.,� roro.r ,,�.rf ,{.,•,�7aya, t t�Jr .,{�r,�.1,r.-rfr,le'1�.fir.,; a `�ir,ty+' fy 4riY,� r-r >_ <7l'�vs,�t .r�. ';t .,.i. .��[t4° .. 'y � •,�(}. r5. ls>?. w y+t��4a11 �i!` � {.�s�,',;4 #fS.1d i l✓s::� v tt�'Jh9 1.�, c'JSl K,.3.; db}, ,t: � ., a tl-�, I . j, �. 1 'G ������ ���t �'Y4'.� i 'n ik,� "' „�^ n �'lr r( 4F # t. i �✓',i p i••4 7 1 'tY a '� •j ;ra" }.� ���,i� Cy!•. FY�-Y� �a ,� � b"74. -..r,,.r .'Y}J,f�•t r. '�ii Lr"r„tom_}r� ili.'/ '.�'>tkt� 'te]Y 't'.l�i y�r"��'K,�1 Ycr+--1 t(�1,. .,� `L�.�r21��a'��.ayst.r:�i'+Y.�,ad'.�....f.:�-_:�' 'i .Y�a...� :^tt �..r R•�9+,.� r �t.rif y�)?`.�ry�•.t,:y. 7,a l xti. a t' .:%', J . � � t7 . IrDc _ NpRT11 F S s s j ,SSAGNUs�t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS December -1 2 , 1985 Mr. Charles Foster Building Inspector . 120 Main. Street North Andover, MA 01845 Dear Mr. Foster: In the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals , the new set of plans submitted by the Cyr Engineering Company are approved for Pleasant Times Realty . J Sincerely , BOARD OF APPEALS CJ Frank Serio, Jr. Chairman /awt cc: Pleasant Times Realty A y ko*T" R ,SSAGHUs�t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS November 13, 1985 Mr. Charles Foster Building Inspector 120 Main Street North Andove, MA 01845 Dear Mr. Foster: In reference to variance ,granted t C r Engineering �r lots on Pleasant Street, we know that the foundation on lots , 59 have been re- moved. We are requesting an update on all other conditions specified in the granting of this variance. It is our understanding that a building permit has been issued and that construction is underway. Your prompt attention to this matter will be great ly,appreciated. Sincerely, 0 RD% F APPEALS Frank Serio, Jr, Chairman /aw t t FITZGIBBONS, SLIPP & HOMSEUAR1ELy TOWN CLE-RK ATTORNEYS AT LAW NORTH ANDOVER 316 ESSEX STREET JOSEPH FITZGIBBONS LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS 01840 AUY 4 faaa�Y7 y �� 'XLEPHONE PETER T.SLIPP 111 CCUU )681.0666 KENNETH M.HOMSEY August 6, 1985 Town Clerk Town of North Andover North Andover, MA 01845 r Re: Board of Appeals, Petition No. 85 Petition of Cyr Engineering Services Dear Sirs: Please be advised that Peter T. Slipp, Trustee has brought an action to appeal the decision of the Board of Appeals in the above-captioned case. Enclosed is a copy of the Complaint. Very truly yours, FITZGIBBONS, SLIPP & HOMSEY se Fitzgi bon JF:eml Enclosure RECEIVED DANIEL LONG TOWN CLE,j{bPO�ALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NORTH AFID„V"t ESSEX,AWT � ,� 1U RT SRIAL UPERIORUCOURT ttll U DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. PETER T. SLIPP, TRUSTEE ) OF PLEASANT TIMES REALTY ) TRUST, Plaintiff ) vs. ) COMPLAINT FRANK SERIO, JR. , ) ti ALFRED C. FRIZELLE, ) , • WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, ) WALTER F. SOULE, and ) MAURICE S. FOULDS, AS ) THEY ARE MEMBERS OF THE ) BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE ) TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, ) Defendants ) I � 1. This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Town of North Andover (Board of Appeals) pursuant to M.G.L.A. , Chapter 40A, Section 17. Said . decision is dated in July, 1985, and was filed with the Clerk, Town of North Andover on July 19, 1984, a-copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A". 2. The Plaintiff, Peter T. Slipp, Trustee, is Trustee of the Pleasant Times Realty Trust. 3. The Defendants are the members of the Board of Appeals of the Town of North Andover. 4. The Plaintiff owns five lots of land in North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 5. The Plaintiff duly filed an application for a variance from the provisions of Section 4 .133 of the Zoning By-Laws of the Town of North Andover which provides in pertinent part that "no construction shall occur two hundred fifty (250) feet horizontally from the annual mean high water mark of Lake Cochichewick and one hundred (100) feet horizontally from the edge of all tributaries, except by -special permit. t 6. The Plaintiff and Defendants treated the application as one for a variance as a result of a change in the By-Laws. 7. The Plaintiff had commenced construction on the premises due to an engineering error. 8. The Plaintiff demonstrated to the Board of Appeals that the only feasible construction on the lots required a d variance. 9. The Board of Appeals found that no building could otherwise be placed on said lots; however, it also found that no hardship was shown by the Plaintiff. 10. The decision of the Board of Appeals was erroneous in that the failure to grant the variance renders the lots valueless. The decision of the Board of Appeals is legally untenable and, thus, exceeds the authority of the Board of Appeals. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands: \A. That the Court enter a judgment to annul the decision of the Board of Appeals.. B. That the Court enter such further order and/or judgment as it deems just. PETER T. SLIPP, TRUSTEE By 't6rney SEPH FITZGIBBONS, ESQ. ,- 316 Essex Street Lawrence, MA 01840 Tel. No. 617-685-3090 i """"� •ods•• ••:��I vJ `r. ArRUT" ib .�' Chu'��� TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF DECISION Date . . .July. . . . .19.85.. ... . .... . Petition No.. . . . . :.8 5. . . ... .. .. . jDate of Hearing. . .June. J.O,. .] 9.85 Petition of C r . Enaineerin . S.ervice.s . .Inc. .For .Merrimack. Valle . .Reap:. . Y � g Y Y . . ` & Development Group Premises affected Lots. .56.,,. . 5.8, . .59,..60. .and . ].0 .Pl easant . St. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . . Zonina . .By. .L,,.w Section . ] 33, Paragraphs c . and. d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . so as to permit the continuation of construction -of. -two • single family dwellings on separate lots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to brant and deny a portion of the request and :hereby authorize the Building Inspector to issue-a permit to said petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . for the construction of the above work, based upon the folloAing conditions: i Denying the variance for Lots 56, 58 & 59 and order that the foundation be removed fortL,with and the land be returned to the con�ition which existed prior to construction . Grant variance for Lots ] 0 & 60 subject to cond.itic that foundation set forth above be removed and land restored.. Signed Frank Serio, Chairman,. Alfred E. Frizelle,. -Esq. .Vice-Chairman i tAugustine .W.. .Nickerson . . . . . . . . ` halter F. .Soule i Raymond A. .Vivenzio, Esq. . . . Board o/Appeals f _ r O• ..•• - 440 - . L TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS July . , 1985 Cyr Engineering Services, Inc For Merrimack Valley Realty & Development Group . "Lots 56, 58, 59, 60 and 10 Pleasant St. Petition No. - 85 Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Town Office Building North Andover, MA 01845 Dear Mr. Long : The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Monday evening, June 10, 1985 upon the application of Cyr Engineering Services, Inc. , for Merrimack Valley Realty and Development Group. The hearing was duly advertised in the North Andover Citizen on May 23 and 30, 1985 and all abutters were notified by reqular mail . The follow— inq Board members were present at the public hearing and again on June 26, 1985, when the Board rendered its decision: Frank Serio, Jr. , Chairman; Alfred E. Frizelle, Esq. , Vice-Chairman; Augustine W. Nickerson, Walter F. Soule, and Ra)•r.ond A. Vivenzio, ESQ. The Petitioner seeks a variation of Section .4 . 133 , Paragraphs c and d of the Zoning By-Law so as to permit the continuation of construction of two single-family dwellings on separate lots on ; premises located at the south side of Pleasant Street, known as Lots 56 , 58 , 59 , 60 and 10 Pleasant Street. Mr. 'James Curren of Cyr Engineering appeared on behalf of the Peti- tioner. Mr. Curren testified that the Petitioner desires to conti- nue to develop two Parcels and to continue the construction of two single-family dwellings . The problem, according to Mr. Curren, is that the "No Construction Zone" as set forth in Paragraph c of Sec- tion 4 . 133 Watershed District, thr-ough an error on the part of the . engineering plans runs through the driveway of Lots 10 and 60. F .v b4e ' The lots were joined to create two "buildable" lots. The engineer erroneously thought the "No Construction Zone" was 200 feet from the lake and prepared the plans accordingly. According to Mr. Cur- . ren, the only way the Petitioner can complete construction is to request a variance. According to Mr. Forster, the Building Inspector, the Building Department, in reliance on the engineer's certification that all zoning requirements were met, issued a building permit and the Pe- titioner began construction. Mr. Foster testified that the appa- rent error was brought to his attention by an abutter and a stop ' work order was issued for Lots 56, 58, and 59. The Building De- partment would issue a stop work order on Lots 10 and 60 if a va- riance was not acted upon at the Public Hearing. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the Petition: John Harriman; Attorney Russell Bodnar; representing John Hart; Lawrence Ward; Bruce Davis; and John Gromko. In summary, the op- position argued that they were led to believe the lots were non- buildable; that the construction presents potential injury to Lake Cochichewick; that the matter is essentially an environmental matter. Upon a motion made by Mr. Frizelle, seconded by Mr. Vivenzio, the the Board voted as follows: Lots 56, 58, and 59 - to deny the variance requested and to order that the foundation be removed forthwith; that the land be returned to their condition which ex- isted prior to construction by seeding with grass and be fertilized with non-chemical fertilizer, and that the ,plans be revised to show said changes. r Lots 10 and 60 - to grant the variance requested to permit a driveway within the Watershed District 2 - p t 50 Y foot ."No Construction Zone" on the lot as shown on the plan accompanying the petition, subject to the condi- tion. that no trees along the property line of the lot on Pleasant Street be cut to allow installation of the driveway; and subject to the condition that the founda- tion on lots 56, 58, and 59 be removed and the land i be restored as aforesaid; and that the plans be revised and recorded prior to the reissuance of a building `per mit for Lots. 10 and 60, or lifting of a stop work order relating thereto. In denying the variance requested for Lots 56, 58, and 59 , the Board finds that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the con- struction of the dwelling meets the standards set forth in Section , 10 . 4 of -the By-Law. Specifically, the Board finds that the con- struction of the dwelling as shown on the Plan was not because of soil conditions, slope or topography of ..the- land or structure, but AFT was caused by an error of the engineer, compounded perhaps by -the issuing of a building permit. -The Board finds that the relief, . if granted, would be of substantial detriment to the Zoning Dis- trict. The District in question is the Watershed District. Sec- tion 4 .133 (1) Purpose: states that: "The Watershed District surrounding Lake Cochichewick, our source of water supply, is intended to preserve and maintain the filtration and purification function of the land, the ground water table, the purity of the ground water table and the lake, to conserve the na- tural environment and to protect the public in health, safety and welfare. " The Board finds that such construction would not act to' benefit the public health and welfare, taking note of the action' of Town Meeting, wherein a building moratorium surrounding the lake was en- acted. The Petitioner is not without relief and has other avenues to follow. No substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, was demonstrated by the Petitioner at the hearing. In granting the variance for Lots 10 and 60, the Board finds a different set of facts. The dwelling being constructed thereon does not fall within the "No Construction Zone" of Section 4 .133. The only construction within the "Zone" is for a driveway located as far as possible as shown on the plan, from the major area of the lot within the "No Construction Zone". The Board notes that the effect on the Lake of. this "minor" construction as compared to the building requirements on .the abutting Lots 56, 58, and 59 is minimal and does not create a substantial detriment to the pub- lic health and welfare. The Board further finds that because of the shape of the parcel , construction of the driveway within the "Zone" is necessary, and that the dwelling will be connected to the town sewer system. The other conditions of Section 10 .4 have likewise been satisfied, and there would appear to be substantial hardship if the dwelling, which has been framed (as compared to Lots 56, 58, and 59, wher,e only a foundation was constructed) was . required to be removed, and the land could be combined with the abutting Lots 56, 58, and 59, so that damages would ,be, minimized by selling one large lot and the Petitioner would not be saddled with unusable land. The relief herein granted i� not of substan- tial detriment to the public good as stated above, and will not nullify nor derogate from the intent and purpose of the By-Law and , more specifically, from the intent and purpose of Section 4 . 133 (1) . Sincerely, BOARD OF APPEALS -vim `�"`d` "� 1. c�-c •i Fra4 Serio, Or. , Chairman AEF/kdp Oil Wagon1890s Oil Wagon1890a Oil Wagon 1N9N OiI Wagon INJ(h oil"' bgon I89()5 Oil Wagon lii<J0s ` Board of Appeals 1� A MILE" 1MUSA 1tJL11S" 141tiSA :L(UUS` Town Office Building 1 J•. . North Andover M •�,. asa. 01845 j•v�] �. V.+.K t��`11 •.r r lJ.a%�.•. ,il 47- CLAIM CHECKIt ! . Oiln 1890bOi N'a ;, �. 1 00263 -7 A OHOLD yq Irl/\� _ __-_"_ � e :Y _ ,�•� Cr . DATE ,I Cyr Engineering Services, Inc. �YXf r! T; 1ST NOTICE�� 234 . ssex Street •'"'�' � • Lawrence, MA 2ND NOTICE ® 01 RETURN P . 567 940 062 Datachod from " PS Form 3849—A y _.h OCL 1980 1 � -F, MORTM F 9 i •i i $4cNUS�t TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD 'OF APPEALS July 1985 Cyr Engineering SerV-ices, Inc For Merrimack Valley Realty & Development Group Lots 56, 58, 59 , 60 and 10 Pleasant St. Petition No. 40 - 85 Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Town Office Building North Andover, MA 01845 Dear Mr. Long: The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Monday evening, June 10, 1985 upon the application of Cyr Engineering Services, Inc. , for Merrimack Valley Realty and Development Group. The hearing was duly advertised in the North Andover Citizen on May 23 and 30 , 1985 and all abutters were notified by regular mail . The follow- ing Board members were present at the public hearing and again on June 26, 1985, when the Board rendered its decision: Frank Serio, Jr. , Chairman; Alfred E. Frizelle, Esq. , Vice-Chairman; Augustine W. Nickerson, Walter F. Soule,. and Raymond A. Vivenzio, Esq. The Petitioner seeks a variation of Section 4 .133, Paragraphs c and d of the Zoning By-Law so as to permit the continuation of construction of two single-family dwellings on separate lots on premises located at the south side of Pleasant Street, known as Lots 56, 58, 59 , 60 and 10 Pleasant Street. Mr. James Curren of Cyr Engineering appeared on behalf of the Peti- tioner. Mr. Curren testified that the Petitioner desires to conti- nue to develop two parcels and to continue the construction of two single-family dwellings. The problem, according to Mr. Curren, is that the "No Construction Zone" as set forth -in Paragraph c of Sec- tion 4 .133 Watershed District, through an error on the part of the engineering pians runs through the driveway of Lots 10 and 60 . The lots were joined to create two "buildable" lots . The engineer erroneously thought the "No Construction Zone" was 200 feet from the lake and prepared the plans accordingly. According to Mr. Cur- ren, the only way the Petitioner can complete construction is -to request a variance. According to Mr. Forster, the Building Inspector, - the Building Department, in reliance on the engineer's certification that all zoning requirements were met, issued a building permit and the Pe- titioner began construction. Mr. Foster testified that the appa- rent error was brought to his attention by an abutter and a stop work order was issued for Lots 56 , 58, and 59. The Building De- partment would issue a stop work order on Lots 10 and 60 if.,a va- riance was not acted upon at the Public Hearing. The following individuals spoke in opposition 'to the Petition: John Harriman; Attorney Russell Bodnar, representing -John Hart; Lawrence Ward; Bruce Davis; and John Gromko. In summary, . the op- position argued that they were led to believe the lots were non- buildable; that the construction presents potential injury to Lake Cochichewick; that the matter is essentially an environmental matter. Upon a motion made by Mr. Frizelle, seconded by Mr. Vivenzio, the the Board voted as follows: Lots 56, 58, and 59 - to deny the variance requested and to order that the foundation by removed forthwith; that the land be returned to their condition which ex- isted prior to construction by seeding with grass and be fertilized with non-chemical fertilizer, and that the plans be revised to show said changes. Lots 10 and 60 - to grant the variance requested to permit a driveway within the Watershed District 250- foot "No Construction Zone" on the lot as shown on the plan accompanying the petition, subject to the condi- tion that no trees along the .property line of the lot on Pleasant Street be .cut to allow installation of the driveway; and subject to the condition that the founda- tion on lots 56 , 58, and 59 be removed and the land be restored as .aforesaid; and that the plans be revised and recorded prior to the reissuance of a building per- mit for Lots 10 and 60, or lifting of a stop work order relating thereto. In denying the variance requested for Lots 56, 58, and 59, the Board finds that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the con- struction of the dwelling meets the standards set forth in Section 10.4 of the By-Law. Specifically, the Board finds that -the con- struction of the dwelling as shown on the Plan was not because of soil conditions, slope or topography of the .land or structure, but was caused by an error of the engineer, compounded perhaps by -the issuing of a building permit. The Board finds that the relief, if granted, would be of substantial detriment to the Zoning Dis- trict. The District in question is the Watershed District. Sec- tion 4 .133 (1) Purpose: states that: "The Watershed District surrounding Lake Cochichewick, our source of water supply, is intended to preserve and maintain the filtration and purification function of the land, the ground water table, the purity of the ground water table and the lake, to conserve the na- tural environment and to protect the public in health, safety and welfare. " The Board finds that such construction would not act to benefit the public health and welfare, taking note of the action of Town Meeting, wherein a building moratorium surrounding the lake was en acted. The Petitioner is not without relief and has other avenues to follow. No substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, was demonstrated by the Petitioner at the hearing. In granting the variance for Lots 10 and 60, the Board finds a different set of facts. The dwelling being constructed thereon does not fall within the "No Construction Zone" of .Section 4 .133. The only construction within the "Zone" is for a driveway located as far as possible as shown on the plan, from the major area of the lot within the "No Construction Zone" . The Board notes that the effect on the Lake of this "minor" construction as compared to .the building requirements on the abutting Lots 56, 58, and 59 is minimal and does not create a substantial detriment to the pub- lic health and welfare. The Board further finds that because of the shape of the parcel, construction of the driveway within the "Zone" is necessary, and that the dwelling will be connected to the town sewer system. The other conditions of Section 10 .4 have likewise been satisfied, and there would appear to be substantial hardship if the dwelling, which has been framed (as compared to Lots 56, 58, and 59, where only a foundation was constructed) was required to be removed, and the land could be combined with the -- abutting Lots 56, 58, and 59, so that damages would be minimized by selling one large lot and the Petitioner would not be saddled with unusable land. The relief herein granted is not of substan- tial detriment to the public good as stated above, and will not nullify nor derogate from the intent and purpose of the By-Law and, more specifically, from the intent and purpose of Section 4 .133 (1) . Sincerely, BOARD OF APPEALS Fr k Serio, r. , Chairman AEF/kdp rry►E XAORTI f ZF. APRIL :�► i•, isss �•�' �'s SHCHUSF'�1► ►r►rrvyr� TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF DECISION Date . . :July . . . .19.8 5. . . . . . . . . . . Petition No. r.8 5. . . . . . . . . . . . Date of Hearing. . .June. .].0,. 9.8 5 Petition of Cyr . Engineering. S.erv.ice.s, . :Inc. .For Merrimack. Valley. Realty & Development Group - Premises affected . Lot s. .5 6.,. . 5.8, . 59,. .60- and . ].0 .Pl ea.s a nt .St. . . . . . . Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . .Zoning. . .By. Law Section. .4 . ].33,. .Paragraphs. c . and. d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . so as to permit . .the continuation of- construct-ion. ,of. -two • s-ingle- -famnily- dwellings on separate lots. After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to .Grant. andft deny a portion of the request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and hereby authorize the Building Inspector to issue a permit to . .said petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . for the construction of the above work, based upon the following conditions: Denying the variance for Lots 56, 58 & 59 and order that ' the foundation be removed forkwith and the land be returned to the con�ition which existed prior to construction. Grant variance for Lots ] 0 & 60 subject to condition that foundation set forth above be removed and land restored. Signed Frank. $er.io,. .Chairman. . . . . . . . . . . . . Alf.xed. .E.. .>ir.ize.11e.,. .Fsq,. .Vice Chairman Augustine. M.. Nickerson . . . . . . . . . Walter. T—Soule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . Raymond .A. .V.ivenzio, ..Esq... . . . . Board of Appeals NORTH ANDOVER BUILDING DEPARTMENT NORrh 120 MAIN STREET o,•"9°;•��o NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 a s - s RATIO ,SSACHUS� INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS TEL. 888-8102 ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR GAS INSPECTOR June 10, 1985 Board of Appeals Town Office Building North Andover, Ma. Re: Petition of Cyr En eering.L Pleasant Street Gentlemen: Enclosed you will find a copy of a stop work order to Pleasant Times Realty Trust issued May 10, 1985• At that time, construction was stopped on Lot #59 and no work has been done since that time. No construction on the lots shown on the application may be allowed without a variance, since these lots were not part of a subdivision. I now find, from the plan submitted to your Board, that the driveway on the adjacent lot is also less than 200 feet from Lake Cochichewick. Unless a variance is granted by your Board, work will also be stopped on this lot immediately. Very truly yours, CHARLES H. FOSTER INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND ZONING OFFICER CHF:of Enc. - erYYY\1IlY llitYdYW +11 Received by Town Clerk: EIVED tea 1EL LONG 00RTH MOVER TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHU*x'iJ 1 tQ BOARD OF APPEALS 0 M APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Applicant CVR ENGINEERING SERVICES,_INC. Address 234 ESSEX STREET, LAWRENCE. A.01840 1. Application is hereby made: a) For a variance from the requirements of Section4. 133 Paragraph and Table of the Zoning By Laws . 4 SUB-SECTION C: 9 D b) For a Special Permit under Section Paragraph of the .Zoning By Laws . - .. ..__. ._ c) As a Party Aggrieved, for review of a decision made by the Building Inspector or other authority. 2. a ) Premises affected are land X and building(s ) X numbered LOTS #56-P58- 6 59.9. LOTS 60-6-10 PLEASANT Street . b) Premises affected are property with. frontage on the North ( ) " South (X ) East ( ) West ( ) side of PLEASANT STREET Street , and known as No. Street . c ) Premises affected are in Zoning DistritR-2 d the premises . affected have an area of ,' square eet an frontage of feet . SEE ATTACHED LOTS `5G,580 9 59 FRO = 270.74 AREA * 3. Ownership LOTS 10 9 60 FRONTAGE = 315.64 AREA a) Name and address of owner ( if joint ownership, give all names ) : MERRIMACK VALLEY REALTY 9 DEVELOPMENT GROUP (AL A-DEH - PHIL DIGt(NW (Axessaoau . S,4aags Teuoigtppe asn) 7 . Description of~{relief .sought on this petition PERMITTED, CONTINUATION OF CONSTRUC,TION,OF•,,SIIVlLE FAMILY DWELLING WITHIN 250' OF. LAKE. 8. Deed ecord d� irY ' thd Registry of Dedds 'in Book Page Land Court Certificate No. Book ,57 Page 69 57 65 The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows.: (must be ,stated in detail ) IN PLANNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE LOTS WE WERE MADE AWARE OF THE DWELLINGS WITH THEIR PROXIMITY TO LAKE 00CHICHEWICK AND UNDERSTOOD THAT THE REQUIRED SET BACK WAS 200 FEETFFS– ET AND SHOWED SUCH OFFSET ON PLANS, NLY AFTER AN "INQUIRY BV AN A UTTER DID WE REALIZE THAT 250 FEET WAS REQUIRED. _ I agree to pay the filin ee, advertising in newspaper , and incidental . expenses* 7 Sign titioner (sT— Every applicat' on or actio by the Board shall be made on a form approved by the Board. ese for s shall be furnished by the Clerk upon request . Any communication purpor ina to be an application shall be treated as mere notice of intention to seek relief until such time as it is made on the official application form. All information called for by the form shall be furnished by the applicant in the manner therein: prescribed. Every application shall be submitted with a list of . "Parties In Interest" which list shall include the petitioner , abutters , .)wners of land- directly-:..' opposite on any public or private street or way, ,xnd abutters to the abutters within three hundred feet ( 300 ' ) of the property line of :the -- - ---petitioner as they appear on the most recent app.'.icable tax list, notwithstanding that the land of any such owner is �.ocated in another . ci'ty_ or town, the Planning Board of the city or town, snr;, the Planning Board of every abutting city or- town. *Every application shall be submitted with an appli._:ation charge cost in the amount of $25.00. In addition, the petitioner shall be responsible for any and all costs involved in bringing the petition before the Board. Such costs shall include mailing and publication, but -are not necessarily limited to these. Every application shall be submitted with a plan of land approved by the Board. No petition will be brought before the Board unless said plan has been submitted. Copies of the Board' s requirements regarding plans are attached hereto or are available from the Board of Appeals upon request . LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST Name Address **SEE ATTACHED LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST j/ LAWRENCE R. 8 DEBORAH H. MICHAUD 535 PLEASANT STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 GERALD A. 8 PAULINE F. HRENCHIR 561 PLEASANT STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 JOHN B. 8 ELIZABETH W. HARRIMAN 102 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 ROSE M. DeFUSCO 112 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 J CHARLES 'R. 6 CAROL A. DELLA-CROCE 202 GREAT POND ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 JOHN T. 9 ANDREA S.HART 94 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 LAWRENCE A. 9 LOIS H. WARD 84 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 0184'5 / RONALD J. 8 LILLIAN LEVESQUE 14 SUTHERLAND STREET ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 018,10 WILLIAM J. 8 EIKO TURNER 64 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 0184 . MERTON 0. 8 PHOEBE ANN LINDQUIST 48 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 WILLIAM A. JR. 8 CAROLYN R. SULLIVAN FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 YOUNG CHANG 8 SUK KYONG CHOI 20 FOX HILL ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 / BEAR HILL DEVELOPMENT, INC. 910 BOSTON POST ROAD MARLBORO, MASSACHUSETTS 0175.2 MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY 1101 TURNPIKE STREET C/0 FENTON W. VARNEY V.P. NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 b� Board of Appeals $ a M ; Town Office Building North Andover, Mass. 01845 ` , V ? _ TO SENDER REASON REASON CHCU D --� Unclaimed Pcfu^ed P Addressee unknc.vi___ Insufficient No such streot___._numhar_.__ No such oilice in state )o not rema.t in this envelope 1 Q V -I Legal;Notice 7' TOWN OF - NORTH ANDOVERp `*\<' BOARD OF APPEALS,,, ; NOTICE'1 .� rf NORTH 7,- mus 4! :May 21,1985 4' Notice is herebyy given that the , < Board of Appeals-will•`give.Ia hearing:at lhe.jown Building,.,.- a R',•r North;'Andover, on:;Monday. evening the'10th'day•of June ; I 1985 at 7:30 o'clock,to all par- ties ar ties interested-in,the appeal of CYR ENGINEERING SERVICES, ' r% INC,.-for Merrimack Valley Realty ~ands.DeJelopment Group re i/ questing'•a':variation.of Section-., 4.133, Paragraphs.c and d of �11.r the Zoning By Law;so as to per ; 14 mit the.contmuation of construe .' y. tion of single family'dwellings on' i side of Ple2santf Stlocaed'reettknownhe �as ! Lots 56,58;59 60 and 10 Plea :' .. ; sant Street �' fir By.Order of the Board of peals. . Frank Seno'Jr -Chairman Publish N.A. Citizen: May 23 ' and 30,1985 g14 t a Board of Appeals Town Office Building o 0 North Andover, Mass. 01845 23 MAY is 'Ft E tu/' '' SEfi,�ER Cr 1 � Legal.Notice TOWN OF J NORTH ANDOVER .: BOARD OF APPEALS,-.;j {NOTICE40 O G 11'.1985' Notice Is hereby given tat the Board of',Appeals>will give's hearing.at the Town eBuilding :- --"- I North on',•yMonday r evening, the•10th'day of June 1 1985,at 7:30 o'clock,to all par- ties ar ties interested,in,the appeal-of ' CYR ENGINEERING SERVICES, ".INC,.for Merrimack Valley Realty , r and Development Group re- questing'a variation.of Section 4.133, Paragraphs c and d of i .4 the Zoning By Law.so as to per mit the continuation of construc a tion of single,Mmily'dwellings on t,', , f . premises located at the south,,;'• . side of Pleasant Street known as ! Lots 56,58,59,60 and 10 Plea-," sant Street:'` " :. • 'i�, By Order of the Board of Ap- peals. w Frank Serio Jr ;Chairmah Publish N.A. Citizen..,May.23 ; and 30,1985• g14 a.` ,kl 4 � - -i W. a May 10, 1985 ;11, 4.sant Times Realty Trust 22 Monteiro Way North Andover, NIA. 01845 He: Lot Y59 Pleasant Street Gentlemen: I DI The question was raised by an abutter wether the_ house on Lot 59 Pleasant Street met the required ;:50 ft. , setback from Lake Cochichewick. None of the i—anF showed the setback from the' Lake, so I asked Cyr Engineer-'.ng to , check the distance and inform me as to whether or nov the fo.mdation met the zoning setbacks. Cyr Engineeri.ig in.- formed me that the foundation was less than 250 feet from the Lake. . Since the foundation does not meet the required setback, you are in violation of the Zoning By, Law and all \ /f work on Lot 59 must atop immediately. Building Permit �65 V issued February 131 1985 to Pleasant .Times Realty Trust is hereby revoked. Very truly yours, CHARLES H. FOSTER INSPECTOR OF BUILDI'GS and ZONING OFFICM, CHF:af