HomeMy WebLinkAboutMicrosoft PowerPoint - ARTICLE 7 - SCHOOL [Compatibility Mode] NORTH ANDOVER
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Proposed Budget
1999 = 2000
EDUCATION BUD ET
• Supports Existing Programs and Services
• Meets State Mandates
• Meets North Andover's Expectations
• Will Improve Our Students ' Performance
FORCES DRIVING THE
EDUCATION BUDGET
• Philosophy and Mission
• District Goals
• Strategic Planning Committee Survey
STRATE IC PLAN
SURVEY
• " Quality of Life" Priority
1 A Town with a Highly Rated School System
2 A Town Committed to Quality Education
3 A Town Valuing Public Education
FORCES DRIVING THE
EDUCATION BUDGET
• Philosophy and Mission
• District Goals
• Strategic Planning Committee Survey
• Master Plan --1998
MASTER PLAN
We started from the premise that our
Town must plan for and direct change
that: (among other things)
> Provides for educational
excellence in our public schools .
FORCES DRIVING THE
EDUCATION BUDGET
• Philosophy and Mission
• District Goals
• Strategic Planning Committee Survey
• Master Plan --1998
• Town Mission Statement
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MISSION STATEMENT
• If we are successful in serving
the North Andover community :
• Our children will develop to their
full potential and be capable of
competing with world class skills .
FORCES DRIVING THE
EDUCATION BUDGET
• Education Reform Act 1993
• Mandates -- Curriculum and Instruction
Student Performance
Professional Development
• Recommendations :
• Pupil :Teacher Ratio
• 22:1 Elementary
• 25:1 Middle School
• 17:1 High School
• Increasing Enrollment
North Andover Education Spending
FY 186 = 198
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
(D 1` CO O O r N M 'IT LO w 1` CO
00 CO CO CO O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r r r r r r r r r r r r r
North Andover Education Spending
FY 186 - X98
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0 00 G1 O r N M le LO CO I*- CO
r r r r r r r r r r r r r
North Andover Per Pupil Expenditure
FY 186 - 198
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Cfl 1` 00 C7 O r N M � � Cfl 1` 00
00 00 00 00 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r r r r r r r r r r r r r
North Andover Per Pupil Expenditure
FY 186 - 198
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Cfl 1` CO O O r N M LO w 1` 00
00 00 00 00 O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r r r r r r r r r r r r r
Per Pupil Expenditure vs .
State Averages 194 = 697
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Cfl 1` W M O r N M qe 0 w 1` w
00 00 00 00 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r r r r r r r r r r r r r
❑ = State Average
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
• To address new expectations for
curriculum
• To address new expectations for
instruction
• To develop new assessment
strategies
• To meet the needs of every student
MCAS R MAY 1998
Grade 10
100
90
80
70
60 ® English
50 ® Math
40 11 Science
30
20
10
0
Failing Need Imp. Proficient Advanced
BUDGET PRIORITIES 1999=2000
FUNDED
• Contracted Sala ry Increases
• Transportation
• Special Education
• Professional Development
• 6 Middle School Teachers
BUDGET PRIORITIES 1999=2000
OVERRIDE DEPENDENT
• 5 Elementary Teachers
• 4 High School Teachers
• Centralized Programs
• Maintenance
• Support and Technology
• Athletics
COURSE OF ACTION
• Three-Year Plan for Personnel
• Objective : Meet North Andover's Goals and
those of the Commonwealth
• Action :
• Reduce Class Size
• Professional Development
• Curriculum Development
• Support Existing Programs and Services
EXPECTED RESULTS
OVER 3 YEARS
• Improved Instruction
• Using Technology
• Integrated Curriculum
• Meeting Students' Needs
• Responding to Individual Differences
• Curriculum Aligned with State
Frameworks
Expected Results ( Cont'd .
• Improved Student Performance
• State Assessment
• National Assessments
• Local Assessments
EXPECTED RESULTS
We W'111 no atta 'in e
expected results wimthout
a successful overr'ide .
NOTHIN WE DO FOR
CHILDREN IS EVER
WASTED .
Keillor