HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 731 WINTER STREET 4/30/2018 (2)s
F
-•►- -.....mow..«wu.-,..r. �...a .•v- ...... ...--.a..-....w+-..v.... .-.�...... ...« ..... r.w_.n�wn+.www.r.....rsw.Baa..u....�.wr.......e..._......-�._- - � ✓�
;f
A
TOP FND
DNELLOUT
ST INLET
ST OLJUT
D BOX IN
D BCC OUT
END FIELD
♦ � -R ,,,,ti �. �,; Z N;c' e'er
W,K �
ELEVATIONS
148,91 t X)
145.42
14`»27
1*06
IM162
144.42
187
5
1
PLM 9 -OWING SUBSUPFACE 5EWERPGE I
' I CFKTIFY THAT IHE SEPK sY�r04., "! INSTALLED AS , �5A4� yz l AS -BUILT
SI-ts VNaTNI5 PLAN IS NCTT IN'i' W) CO,/C A tW-1tT Y 4F TRE j
SYSTEM-FROPER Y Cin, CHIF-jiC)N ROA N&b PLAN '756C? `3 �D94 ' �'`d����� M. M A R N O
LDCATION. LOT 9A .W T TER -ST,
E W T E 7-30-8. SCALE,
PREPARED BY-
-NN
Y—
fi: Yip r ; l r• ;'�2�"�^/'�. ' ! G.._...J 7 �1 1 ` Y ss� _ o P,,
p 0', BOX 5�l/,- 7_�O W) N. Ho 0,38,65
I
-z, �J
V1,
Cp.
� kk
\4N
\N -R S-,-To-�
, q\F,
I CFkT I FY rHA 'I I'HE SIEP19C Sy7_EM..WYz -I NSTALLH) A
"J
SI-JOWN,TH IS PLAN IS NT IN iEP iDfi& A YVAkP/-kITY OE THE
Syt.'7EM-�OPEgry DE: CRIF'110N 04CO. N&C) PLAN-758C,4133,D9,
I
101? FND
DY _qL M
INLET
ST MLET
0 BOX IN
0 BOX OUT
END RELD
ELEVATIONS
A4 91X}
14S.42
14",027
Ilt,51 02
144.62
14412
14387
SPLA\, auwlNG SUBSURFACE 5EWERAGE-
DBPOSALSYSTEMJ AS -BUILT
JM.MARINO
L�,(YMON OF9A WINTER S T
WE TZO-84. SCALE
PREPARED BY-
po cc,
Bj 0 X 5 69
0 1", V No /--/o 03865
t if'%
Page 1 of 2
DelleChiaie, Pamela
From: Merrill, Pamela
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 12:39 PM
To: DelleChiaie, Pamela
Subject: FW: Water level on Winter St.
-----Original Message -----
From: McKay, Alison
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:13 AM
To: Rees, Mark
Cc: Bellavance, Curt
Subject: RE: Water level on Winter St.
Hi Mark,
I believe I had spoken with Ms. McDonald once (maybe twice, but I don't believe so) as Pam and Michelle had
been looking into the situation prior to that. After speaking with Ms. McDonald at that time, I informed her that I
would immediately follow-up with Pam to discuss this and to see if we could reassess the site/situation. Pam and
I spoke in this regard at our meeting of 4/13. 1 can't recall our exact discussion at that time, but I do know that ,
Pam had conducted an inspection (with the health inspector I believe) some time prior to that and I believe it was
determined that the beaver dam was not on her property and not posing a health or safety issue at the time. I had
asked Pam to call Ms. McDonald and perform a second inspection to determine if things had changed since the
initial inspection and to figure out some sort of solution for Ms. McDonald.
I will follow up with Pam today to make sure I have all of the correct information and findings to make sure that
this can get addressed/resolved in some way to satisfy Ms. McDonald's concerns. I will let you know what
we come up with.
Alison
-----Original Message -----
From: Rees, Mark
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 9:07 AM
To: McKay, Alison
Cc: Bellavance, Curt
Subject: FW: Water level on Winter St.
Alison, could you please provide me with a status report on this resident's concerns?
Thanks,
Mark
Mark H. Rees
Town Manager
Town of North Andover
120 Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
email: mrees@townofnorthandov_er_com
Phone: 978-688-9510
Fax: 978-688-9556
From: Philip D. McDonald [mailto:pdm33tgm@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 5:55 PM
5/24/2007
S7
,'
Page 2 of 2
To: Rees, Mark
Subject: RE: Water level on Winter St.
Mr. Reese,
I have spoken many times with Pam and Allison from Conservation about the rising water level behind
my house at 731 Winter St. and the area just before my house. I have lived at this residence for 8 years, 6
years on Forest St. before this and the water has come out of nowhere over the last 10months. The beaver
dam in Sawmill Rd. is enormous and must be broken up long enough to allow for some of this water to flow
where it is supposed to flow. The water in the back of my house will flood my basement if we have a wet
May.
Pam first told me it was my responsibility but the dam is not on my property. I will not spend a penny of
my own money to fix this problem. This problem has a solution. I have become very vocal about this issue
and will not stop being vocal until the town takes responsibility. Winter St. is either going to collapse or
atree will come down on a car or school bus because of all the dead trees. I invite you to my home to
observe first hand what I am talking about. I will contact you by the end of the week.
Thank you,
Theresa McDonald
731 Winter St.
978-683-9531
5/24/2007
t I
NEW ENGLAND ENGINEERING SERVICES
INC
April 29, 1999
North Andover Board of Health
Town Hall Annex
27 Charles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
RE: TITLE V REPORT: 731 Winter Street, North Andover
Enclosed is a copy of the Title V report for the above referenced property. The systemap sses our
inspection. _
If there are any questions please call me at my office, 686-1768.
Yours truly,
4 (f
Ben C. OULT.
President
Ira
33 WALKER ROAD - SUITE 23 - NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 - (978) 686-1768 - (888) 359-7645 - FAX (978) 685-1099
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON MA 02108 (617) 292-5500
TRUDY CORE
Secretary
ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI DAVID B. STRUHS
Governor Commissioner
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION
Property Address: ? j( W c Ica- St. Name of Owner )Pa U (
'V 6')" CL Address of Owner: 7 3l
Date of Inspection: ' ( [,-d `i`1 /l/ - l�nc'i?uC2-
Name of Inspector: (Please Print) lien] amin C. Osgood, Jr
1 am a DEP approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000)
Company Name: New England Engineering Services Inc.
Mang Address: 33 Walker Rd., Siiitp 93, Nnrf•h Andover, MA 01845
Telephone Number: 978-686-1768
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
I certify that 1 have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported below is true, accurate
and complete as of the time of inspection. The inspection was performed based on my training and experience in the proper function and
maintenance of on-site sewage disposal systems. The system:
Passes
Conditionally Passes
_ Needs Further Evaluation By the Local Approving Authority
Fails
Inspector's Signature: " Date:
,17
The System Inspector shall submit a copy oft is inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or DEP)within thirty (30) days of
completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner
- shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the Department of*Environmental Protection. The original should *be sent tovw
system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving authority.
NOTES AND COMMENTS
revised 9/2/98 Page I of 11
%. Prmied on Recycled Paper
,t t
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address: 7 31 Herz st. A�
Owner:
Date of Inspection:
INSPECTION SUMMARY: Check A, B, C, o/ D:
A. SYSTEM PASSES:
- I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure conditions described in 310 CMR 15.303 exist. Any failure
criteria not evaluated are indicated below.
COMMENTS:
B. SYSTEM CONDITIONALLY PASSES:
One or more system components as described in the "Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon
completion of the replacement or repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass.
Indicate yes, no, or not determined (Y, N, or NO). Describe basis of determination in all instances. If "not determined", explain why not.
_ The septic tank is metal, unless the owner or operator has provided the system inspector with a copy of a Certificate of
Compliance (attached) indicating that the tank was installed within twenty (20) years prior to the date of the inspection; or
the septic tank, whether or not metal, is cracked, structurally unsound, shows substantial infiltration or exfiltration, or tank
failure is imminent. The system will pass inspection if the existing septic tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as
approved by the Board of Health.
_ Sewage backup or breakout or high static water level observed in the distribution box is due to broken or obstructed pipe(s)
or due to a broken, settled or uneven distribution box. The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of
Health).
broken pipe(s) are replaced
obstruction is removed
distribution box is levelled or replaced
The system required pumpfrtg-Tnore than four -times n yeardue to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system Wilhpess-�
inspection if (with approval of the Board of Health): -
broken pipe(s) are replaced
obstruction is removed
revised 9/2/98 Page 2of11
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address:
Owner:
Date of hupection:
C. FURTHER EVALUATION IS REQUIRED BY THE BOARD OF HEALTH:
Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect the
public health, safety and the environment.
1) SYSTEM WILL PASS UNLESS BOARD OF HEALTH DETERMINES W ACCORDANCE WITH 310 CMR 15.303 (1)(b) THAT THE SYSTEM
IS NOT FUNCTIONING IN A MANNER WHICH -WILL PRQTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTKAND SAFETY AND THE ENWHONMEKT:
Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of surface water
Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh.
21 SYSTEM WILL FAIL UNLESS THE BOARD OF HEALTH (AND PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIER, IF ANY) DETERMINES THAT THE SYSTEM IS
FUNCTIONING IN A MANNER THAT PROTECTS THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT:
The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) and the SAS is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or
tributary to a surface water supply.
The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system and the SAS is within a Zone I of a public water supply well.
The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well.
The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a
private water supply well, unless a well water analysis for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the
well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less
than 5 ppm. Method used to determine distance - (approximation not vafid).
3) OTHER
revised 9/2/98 Page 3ofII
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address: ? .� ( IN i n �<JL , C+ rU , f�•.cS �:�i i:IL i
Owner: •�
Date of Inspection: Y c ,� ►�, 1 s
Lq <co
D. SYSTEM FAILS:
You must indicate either "Yes" or "No" to each of the following:
I have determined that one or more of the following failure conditions exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303. The basis for this
determination is identified below. The Board of Health should be contacted to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure.
Yes No
Backup of sewage into facility-*r-9"tern component- due tto an overloaded orclvgged SAS,or'cesspool.
Discharge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or
cesspool.
Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool.
Liquid depth in cesspool is less than 6" below invert or available volume is less than 112 day flow.
Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due to clogged or obstructed pipe(s).
Number of times pumped _.
Any portion of the Soil Absorption System, cesspool or privy is below the high groundwater elevation.
Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply.
Any portion of a cesspool or privy is -within a Zone I of a public well.
Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well.
Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100 feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water supply well with no
acceptable water quality analysis. If the well has been analyzed to be acceptable, attach copy of well water analysis for
—coliform bacteria, volatile organic compounds, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen.
E. LARGE SYSTEM FAILS:
You must indicate either "Yes" or "No" to each of the following:
The following criteria apply to large systems in addition to the criteria above:
The system serves a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater (Large System) and the system is a significant threat to public
health and safety and the environment because one or more of the following conditions exist:
Yes No
the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply
the system is-+wi*in 200 €��to€r► Hibutaryr tea suriaoa d.inkiwg water supply -- -- - —
the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area - IWPA) or a mapped Zone II of a public
water supply well)
The owner or operator of any such system shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.304(2). Please consult the local regional
office of the Department for further inforuiation.
revised 9/2/98 Page 4of11
'SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART 8
CHECKLIST
Property Address: 7,31 w i e ¢c2 .Si-, 4 _ S ,:, , ,,c
Owner: i ( K,
Date of kmpection:
) I
Check if the following have been done: You must indicate either "Yes" or "No" as to each of the following:
Y
Yes / No
Board Health.
Pumping information was provided by the owner, occupant, or of
_
None of the system coa*oaents.kaw6l en pnatiped,tor-aRJeast ,two awe&k6 and•the-system hasAmmmaceir+iwgmomw -low
_✓
rates during that period. Large volumes of water have not been introduced into the system recently or as part of this
inspection.
As built plans have been obtained and examined. Note if they are not available with N/A.
The facility or dwelling was inspected for signs of sewage back-up.
_
The system does not receive non -sanitary or industrial waste flow.
The site was inspected for signs of breakout.
_
All system components, excluding the Soil Absorption System, have been located on the site.
The septic tank manholes were uncovered, opened, and the interior of the septic tank was inspected for condition of baffles
or tees, material of construction, dimensions, depth of liquid, depth of sludge, depth of scum.
The size and location of the Soil Absorption System orr the site has been determined based on:
_
Existing information. For example, Plan at B.O.H.
Determined in the field (if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue, approximation of distance is unacceptable)
115.302(3)(b))
/
_✓ _
The facility owner (and.occupaats.if differepi from.owner),iwete,pravided.with inrnrmArioann r e rnnar Aintanaac ;f
SubSurface Disposal Systems.
revised 9/2/98 Page 5ofII
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM' INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION
Property Ad&ass: -731 w , st: ti - :� �S12 it
Owner:
K.r-1•s
Date of Inspection:
FLOW CONDITIONS
RESIDENTIAL:
Design flow: g.p.d./bedroom.
Number of bedrooms (design):_ Number of bedrooms (actual):-//
Total DESIGN flow
Number of current residents: 6
Garbage grinder (yes or no):
Laundry (separate system) (yes or no)ti4O: If yes, separate inspection required
Laundry system inspected (yes or no)
Seasonal use (yes or no):—Alo
Water meter readings, if available (last two year's usage (gpd):
Sump Pump (yes or no): .4/0
Last date of occupancy:��11✓�
COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL:
Type of establishment:
Design flow: gpd ( Based on 15.203)
Basis of desion flow
Grease trap present: (yes or no)_
Industrial Waste Holding Tank present: (yes or no)_
Non -sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5 system: (yes or no)_
Water meter readings, if available:
Last date of occupancy:
OTHER: (Describe)
Last date of occupancy:
GENERAL INFORMATION
PUMPING RECORDS and source of information:
jP0 i2i4ec, i S -' r,/ti't bet 4 62-(? �
System pumped as part of inspection: (yes or no)l�fL
If yes, volume pumped: gallons
Reason for pumping:
TYPE OF SYSTEM
Septic tank/distribution box/soil absorption system
Single cesspool
Overflow cesspool
Privy
Shared system (yes or no) (if yes, attach previous inspection records, if any)
I/A Technology etc. Attach copy of up to date operation and maintenance contract
Tight Tank Copy of DEP Approval
Other
APPROXIMATE AGE of all components, date installed{if known) -end source of4Wormation: /�� C,�u� QS -f3✓� �-! _
Sewage odors detected when -arriving at the site: (yes or no)
revised 9/2/98 Page 6of11
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSA4 SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: 731 S1re cY d C('C,,c L'
Date of Inspection:
BUILDING SEWER:
(Locate on site plan)
Depth below grade:
Material of construction: _ cast iron 1-'40 PVC _ other (explain)
Distance from private water supply well or suction line Nf`I'
Diameter 1
Comments: (condition of joints, venting, evidence oflvakage,-etc.)
SEPTIC TANK:_
(locate on site plan)
Depth below grade:
Material of construction: lzconcrete _metal _Fiberglass _Polyethylene _other(explain)
If tank is metal, list age _ ls_age.confirmed by Certificate of Compliance _ (Yes/No)
Dimensions:
Sludge depth: L>�
Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee orbaffle:�j_
Scum thickness:—/ rr
Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle:
Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffler
How dimensions were determined: WeCts,;r[.. -<nC(�
Comments:
(recommendation for pumping, condition of inlet and outlet /tees or-bpffles, depth of I' Ad level. in relation to o}'tlet invert, structur tegrity,
evidence of leakage, etc.) (/ w B Cin / l6rit rr !C JZ f/�S
vrieti a." n s c ��[ ' �= c
GREASE TRAP
(locate on site plan)
Depth below grade:_
Material of construction: _concrete _metal _Fiberglass _Polyethylene _other(explain)
Dimensions:
Scum thickness:
Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle:
Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle:
Date of last pumping:
Comments:
(recommendation for pumping, condition of inlet and outlet tees or baffles, depth of liquid level in relation to outlet invert, structural integrity,
evidence of leakage, etc.)
revised 9/2/98 P2ge7of11
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: 731 ilk I
Date of kispec :
TIGHT OR HOLDING TANK-_&& (Tank must be pumped prior to, or at time of, inspection)
(locate on site plan)
Depth below grade:_
Material of construction: _concrete _metal _Fiberglass _Polyethylene _other(explain)
Dimensions:
Capacity: gallons
Design flow: gallons/day
Alarm present
Alarm level: Alarm in working order: Yes _ No_
Date of previous pumping:
Comments:
(condition of inlet tee, condition of alarm and float switches, etc.)
DISTRIBUTION BOX:_
(locate on site plan)
f ,•
Depth of liquid level above outlet invert:
Comments:
(note if lev and distribution is equal, evidence of solids carr
PUMP CHAMBER:/
(locate on site plan)
evidence of leakage ipto or out of box, et ) — -
I— �'! "Ir -J vr' l''[;� �C'/r[C it
Pumps in working order: (Yes or No)
Alarms in working order (Yes or No)
Comments:
(note condition of pump chamber, condition of pumps and appurtenances, etc.)
revised 9/2/98 page 8ortl
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: 7 3 l Gu , n toz
Owner:
Date of Inspection:
SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (SAS):_
(locate on site plan, if possible; excavation not required, location may be approximated by non -intrusive methods)
If not located, explain:
Type
leaching pits, number:
leaching chambers, number:_
leaching galleries, number:_
leaching trenches, number, length:
leaching fields, number, dimensions:
overflow cesspool, number:_
Alternative system:
Name of Technology:
Comments:
(note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, damp soil, condition of vegetation, etc.)
CESSPOOLS:
(locate on site plan)
Number and configuration:
Depth -top of liquid to inlet invert:
Depth of solids layer:
Depth of scum layer:
Dimensions of cesspool:
Materials of construction:
Indication of groundwater:
inflow (cesspool must be pumped as part of inspection)
Comments:
(note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of -vegetation, etc.)
PRIVY: _
(locate on site plan)
Materjals of construction: Dimensions:
Depth of solids:
Comments:
(note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation; etc.)
revised 9/2/98 Page 9or11
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address:
y3 t „�ie/Z sr,n� � c �. i9 -IS" c L
Owner:
Date of kupectkm: il� ..
SKETCH OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
include ties to at least two permanent reference landmarks or benchmarks
locate all wells within 100' (Locate where public water supply comes into house)
� 10
V
i
revised 9/2/98 Page to or 11
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM'
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address:
owner: l K-
Date of kupection: y I c} i 7' j
NRCS Report name x C;CS
Soil Type_
Typical depth to groundwater 7�-J
USGS Date website visited
Observation Wells checked,
Groundwater depth: Shallow Moderate Deep
SITE EXAM Slope
Surface water
Check Cellar
Shallow wells
Estimated Depth to Groundwater> Feet
Please indicate all the methods used to determine High Groundwater Elevation:
Obtained from Design Plans on record
Observed.Site (Abutting property, observation hole, basement sump etc.)
Determined from local conditions
Checked with local Board of health
Checked FEMA Maps
Checked pumping records
Checked local excavators, installers
Used USGS Data
Describe how you established the High Groundwater Elevation. (Must be completed)
f
revised 9/2/98 Page 11 of 11
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY AS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSA 1
PART A
CERTIFICAT
Property Address: 731 Winter Street
North Andover_
Owner's Name: _Phillip McDonald
Owner's Address: _731 Winter Street
_ North Andover, MA 01845_
Date of Inspection: _11/7/2006_
Name of Inspector: Neil J. Bateson_
Company Name: Bateson Enterprises Inc._
Mailing Address: _111 Argilla Road_
_Andover, MA 01810
Telephone Number: _( 978 ) 475-4786_
REI
N
pEc 1 106
TO IEN �H DEPAR�M SER
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
I certify that I have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the information reported
below is true, accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed based on my
training and experience in the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. I am a DEP
approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000). The system:
X Passes
Conditionally Passes
Needs Further Evaluation by the Local Approving Authority
F 'ls
Inspector's Signature: Date: _11/17/2006_
The system inspector shall submit a copy of this inspection report to the Approving Authority (Board of Health or
DEP) within 30 days of completing this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000
gpd or greater, the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional office of the
DEP. The original should be sent to the system owner and copies sent to the buyer, if applicable, and the approving
authority.
Notes and Comments:
****This report only describes conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that
time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different
conditions of use.
' Page 2 of l l
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street_
_ North Andover—
Owner: —McDonald—
Date
McDonald_Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006 _
Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E / ALWAYS complete all of Section D
A. System Passes:
X I have not found any information which indicates that
any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not
evaluated are indicated below.
Comments:
B. System Conditionally Passes:
One or more system components as described in the
"Conditional Pass" section need to be replaced or repaired. The system, upon completion of the replacement or
repair, as approved by the Board of Health, will pass. Answer yes, no or not determined (Y,N,ND) in the for
the following statements. If "not determined" please explain .
The septic tank is metal and over 20 years old*
or the septic tank (whether metal or not) is structurally unsound, exhibits substantial infiltration or exfiltration or
tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as
approved by the Board of Health.
*A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound, not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance
indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available.
ND explain:
Observation of sewage backup or break out
or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s) or due to a broken, settled or
uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health):
broken pipe(s) are replaced
obstruction is removed
distribution box is leveled or replaced
ND explain:
The system required pumping more than 4
times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if (with approval of the Board of
Health):
broken pipe(s) are replaced
obstruction is removed
ND explain:
Page 3 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_ North Andover—
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006 _
C. Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health:
Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system
is failing to protect public health, safety or the environment.
1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CMR 15.303(1)(b) that the
system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health, safety and the environment:
Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water
_ Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh
2. System will fail unless the Board of Health (and Public Water Supplier, if any) determines that the
system is functioning in a manner that protects the public health, safety and environment:
_ The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) and the SAS is within 100 feet of a
surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply.
The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within a Zone I of a public water supply.
_ The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well.
The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a
private water supply well". Method used to determine distance _
"This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform
bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and
the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other
failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form.
3. Other:
` Page 4 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART A
CERTIFICATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_ North Andover—
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006 _
D. System Failure Criteria applicable to all systems:
You must indicate "yes" or "no" to each of the following for all inspections:
_ No Backup of sewage into facility or system component due to overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool
_No_ Discharge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or
clogged SAS or cesspool
No Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or
cesspool
_No_ Liquid depth in cesspool is less than 6" below invert or available volume is 1/2 day flow.
_No_ Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due to clogged or obstructed pipe(s).
Number of times pumped
No Any portion of the SAS, cesspool or privy is below high ground water elevation.
_No_ Any portion of cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface
water supply.
_ _No_ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within a Zone 1 of a public well.
_ _No_ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well.
_ _No_ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100 feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water
supply well with no acceptable water quality analysis. [This system passes if the well water analysis,
performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds
indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia
nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm, provided that no other failure criteria
are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form.]
_No_ (Yes/No) The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described
in 310 CMR 15.303, therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to
determine what will be necessary to correct the failure
E. Large Systems:
To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000
gpd•
You must indicate either "yes" or `no" to each of the following:
(The following criteria apply to large systems in addition to the criteria above)
yes no
the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply
_ the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply
the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area (Interim Wellhead Protection Area — IWPA) or a mapped
Zone II of a public water supply well
If you have answered "yes" to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat, or answered
"yes" in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a
significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR
15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department.
Page 5 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART B
CHECKLIST
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_ North Andover _
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006_
Check if the following have been done. You must indicate "yes" or "no" as to each of the following:
Yes No
Yes_ _ Pumping information was provided by the owner, occupant, or Board of Health
No Were any of the system components pumped out in the previous two weeks?
Yes_ _ Has the system received normal flows in the previous two week period?
No Have large volumes of water been introduced to the system recently or as part of this inspection ?
Yes _ Were as built plans of the system obtained and examined?
Yes — Was the facility or dwelling inspected for signs of sewage back up ?
Yes Was the site inspected for signs of break out ?
Yes — Were all system components, excluding the SAS, located on site ?
_Yes_ _ Were the septic tank manholes uncovered, opened, and the interior of the tank inspected for the
condition of the baffles or tees, material of construction, dimensions, depth of liquid, depth of sludge and depth of
scum ?
_Yes_ _ Was the facility owner (and occupants if different from owner) provided with information on the
proper maintenance of subsurface sewage disposal systems ?
The size and location of the Soil Absorption System (SAS) on the site has been determined based on:
Yes No
_Yes_ _ Existing information.
_Yes_ _ Determined in the field (if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue approximation of
distance is unacceptable) [3 10 CMR 15.302(3)(b)]
Page 6 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM - NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_North Andover–
Owner: McDonald
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006_
FLOW CONDITIONS
RESIDENTIAL
Number of bedrooms (design): _4_ Number of bedrooms (actual): _4_
DESIGN flow based on 310 CMR 15.203 _600_
Number of current residents: _2
Does residence have a garbage grinder (yes or no): No_
Is laundry on a separate sewage system (yes or no): No_
Laundry system inspected (yes or no): _
Seasonal use: (yes or no): No_
Water meter reading: Yes_
Sump pump (yes or no): _No_
Last date of occupancy: _Current
COMAIERCIALANDUSTRIAL
Type of establishment:
Design flow (based on 310 CMR 15.203): _gpd
Basis of design flow (seats/persons/sgft,etc.):
Grease trap present (yes or no):
Industrial waste holding tank present (yes or no):
Non -sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5 system (yes or no):
Water meter readings, if available: —
Last date of occupancy/use:
OTHER (describe):
GENERAL INFORMATION
Pumping Records
Source of information: Pumped this year, owner _
Was system pumped as part of the inspection (yes or no): No_
If yes, volume pumped: , gallons -- How was quantity pumped determined? _
Reason for pumping: _
TYPE OF SYSTEM
_X_ Septic tank, distribution box, soil absorption system
_ Single cesspool _ Overflow cesspool
_ Privy
Shared system (yes or no) (if yes, attach previous inspection records, if any)
_ Innovative/Alternative technology. Attach a copy of the current operation and maintenance contract (to be
obtained from system owner)
_ Tight tank _ Attach a copy of the DEP approval
____ Other (describe): _
Approximate age of all components, date installed (if known) and source of information:_ 22 years old, 7/30/1984
As built plan _
Were sewage odors detected when arriving at the site (yes or no): No
Page 7 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street
_North Andover _
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006
BUILDING SEWERS _ X _ (locate on site plan)
Depth below grade: _20"
Materials of construction: _X_ cast iron _X 40 PVC _other
Distance from private water supply well or suction line:
Comments (on condition of joints, venting, evidence of leakage, etc.) _ 4" Cast iron thru wall, 3" PVC in house.
No leaks visible.
SEPTIC TANKS: X
Depth below grade: _8" _
Material of construction: X concrete — metal _fiberglass polyethylene
_other(explain)
If tank is metal list age: _ Is age confirmed by a Certificate of Compliance (yes or no): — (attach a copy of
certificate)
Dimensions: _10' x 5' x 41j—
Sludge
'Sludge depth: _1"_
Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: 26" _
Scum thickness: _2"
Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle:-8"—
Distance
affle_8"_Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: _19"_
How were dimensions determined: _Tape Measure _
Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels
as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc _ Inlet tee ok. Outlet tee ok. Depth of liquid at outlet invert.
No evidence of septic tank leaking. _
GREASE TRAP: _(locate on site plan)
Depth below grade: _
Material of construction: _concrete _metal _fiberglass _polyethylene _other
(explain):
Dimensions:
Scum thickness:
Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle:
Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle:
Date of last pumping:
Comments (on pumping recommendations, inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition, structural integrity, liquid levels
as related to outlet invert, evidence of leakage, etc.):
Page 8 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street_
North Andover_
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006_
TIGHT or HOLDING TANK: (tank must be pumped at time of inspection)(locate on site plan)
Depth below grade:
Material of construction: concrete metal fiberglass polyethylene other(explain):
Dimensions:
Capacity: gallons
Design Flow: gallons/day
Alarm present (yes or no):
Alarm level: Alarm in working order (yes or no):
Date of last pumping:
Comments (condition of alarm and float switches, etc.):
DISTRIBUTION BOX: X
Depth below grade
Depth of liquid level above outlet invert: _0_
Comments (note if box is level and distribution to outlets equal, any evidence of solids carryover, any evidence of
leakage into or out of box, etc.):–D-box level & distribution equal, has flow levelers. No evidence of leakage.
Evidence of carryover, pumped d -box to clean. _
PUMP CHAMBER: — (locate on site plan)
Pump in working order {yes or no):
Alarm in working order (yes or no):
Comments (note condition of pump chamber, condition of pumps and appurtenances, etc.): _
Page 9 of l l
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_ North Andover—
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006_
SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (SAS): X (locate on site plan, excavation not required)
If SAS not located explain why:
Type
leaching pits, number: _
leaching chambers, number: _
leaching galleries, number:
leaching trenches, number, length: _
X leaching field, number, dimensions: —1 field 30' x 361
_
overflow cesspool, number:
innovative/alternative system Typetname of technology:
Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, damp soil, condition of vegetation,
etc.): _Soil ok. Vegetation ok. No sign of ponding to surface. _
CESSPOOLS:
Number and configuration: _
Depth — top of liquid to inlet invert:
Depth of sludge layer: _
Depth of scum layer: _
Dimensions of cesspool: _
Materials of construction:
Indication of groundwater inflow (yes or no): —
Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.):
PRIVY: (locate on site plan)
Materials of construction:
Dimensions:
Depth of solids:
Comments (note condition of soil, signs of hydraulic failure, level of ponding, condition of vegetation, etc.):
Page 10 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION
Property Address: _731 Winter Street _
_North Andover—
Owner: McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006
SKETCH OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
Provide a sketch of the sewage disposal system including ties to at least two permanent reference landmarks or
benchmarks. Locate all wells within 100 feet. Locate where public water supply enters the building
A to 1= 2613"
A to 2 = 33'6"
A to D -Boz = 4493"
Bto1=12'7"
Bto2=16'8"
B to D -Boz = 25'4"
• Page 11 of 11
OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM — NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM
PART C
SYSTEM INFORMATION (continued)
Property Address: 731 Winter Street _
_ North Andover—
Owner: _McDonald_
Date of Inspection: _11/17/2006_
SITE EXAM
Slope
Surface water
Check cellar
Shallow wells
Estimated depth to ground water _ >4' _
Please indicate (check) all methods used to determine the high ground water elevation:
X Obtained from system design plans on record - If checked, date of design plan reviewed: _5/10/1980_
Observed site (abutting property/observation hole within 150 feet of SAS)
Checked with local Board of Health -explain: _
Checked with local excavators, installers- (attach documentation)
Accessed USGS database -explain:
You must describe how you established the high ground water elevation: Water 8' deep. Info from design plan_
Summary Record Card generated on 11116/2006 2:51:43 PM by Elaine Barclay Page 1
Town of North Andover
Tax Map # 210-104.A-0025-0000.0
731 WINTER STREET
MCDONALD, PHILLIP
731 WINTER STREET
N. ANDOVER, MA
01845
Class 101 Single Family
Size Total 1.04 Acres
FY 2007
UB Mailing Index
Name/Address Type Loan Number
MCDONALD, PHILLIP Payor
731 WINTER STREET
N. ANDOVER, MA
01845
UB Account Maint.
Property Type
Active/lnect. From
Account No Cycle Occupant Name
Bldg Id. 18026.0 - 731 WINTER STREET Last Billing Date 10/16/2006
3180055 03 Cycle 03
UB Services Maint.
b Badger
w Water
Service Code
Posted Date
Rate
MISCFEE ADMIN FEE
0.635/8
WTR WATER
4/17/2006
01 ALL METER SIZE
UB Meter Maintenance
26
Serial No Status
31
Location
32892291 a Active
7/15/2005
ERT HH
Date Reading
Code
9/19/2006
30
m Manual estimate
MSG
7/30/2004
61
6/21/2006
0
a Actual
3/18/2006
0
n New Meter
3/18/2006
3032
r Replacement
1/3/2006
3015
a Actual
9/26/2005
2989
a Actual
Trouble Code:03
6/21/2005
2958
a Actual
3/22/2005
2934
a Actual
12/16/2004
2909
a Actual
Trouble Code:03
9/28/2004
2888
a Actual
6/16/2004
2856
a Actual
4/26/2004
2841
a Actual
Active/Inactive
Active
Charge Multiplier/Users
7.82 1/
111.00 /1
Brand
Type
b Badger
w Water
Consumption
Posted Date
30
10/20/2006
7/10/2006
0
4/17/2006
17
4/17/2006
26
1/17/2006
31
10/14/2005
24
7/15/2005
25
4/5/2005
21
1/14/2005
32
10/8/2004
15
7/30/2004
61
5/17/2004
Size
0.63 0.63
1 Residential
Until
YTD Cons
Variance
100%
-13%
-18%
21%
1%
-2%
14%
5%
-40%
0%
Tel: (978) 475-4786
Fax: (978) 475-5451
BATESON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Excavating -Water.& Sewer Lines -Septic Systems & Pumping Service
111 Argilla Road Andover, Mass. 01810
Title 5 Inspection Report
Property Address: 731 Winter Street, North Andover
Owner: McDonald
Date of Inspection: 11/17/2006
My report contained herein does not constitute a guarantee of future usage and the functionality of the existing
septic system. Such report issued herewith is merely based upon my observations, and I hereby disclaim any further
operation of your current septic system.
Ne41teson
Bateson Enterprises, Inc.
SOIL PROFILE & PERCOLATION TEST DATA
North Andover, Mass. Street No A11A1TE.e Let No
Loc/Subdiv. Pland Owner U 0 Vezr
Investigator 5-*X0B Observer6.3
SOIL
SOIL PROFILE DATES
1.'Elev 2.Elev 3.Elev 4.Elev
iN ol,D �'ST
0 Go V/ 0 0 0
1 1 1 1
5 ,Bo,R/Ey
I A/o ev's
Benchmark
Elevation
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATES
2
3
4,
5
6
7
8
9
10
Location
Datum
PERCO;,ATION TESTS
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Timms Pits est
i o �3E
N�*d D•4� �f7�lcl�
z - PErtc. ?Ebr
is e4pAesooTsr"A
Alo CgAl~.-�
,clegopEv
Pit Number
1 2
3
4
Start Saturation
Soak -Minutes
ar e
Drop of 3" -Time
Drop of 6" -Time
Mwms-lst 3" drop
Mins.2nd " Drop
Percolation
CONDITIONS CONTINUED PAGE 2 FILE NO. 242-31
6. No work may be commenced until all appeal periods have elapsed from the
order of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department
of Environmental Quality Engineering.
7. No work shall be undertaken until the final Order, with respect to the proposed
project, has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds for the district in which
the land is located within the chain of title of the affected vzonerty. Copy
to be furnished to issuer of this Order showing book and page prior to
commencement of work.
8. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith
request, in writing, that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that
the work has been satisfactorily completed.
9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than-• two square feet or more
than three square feet bearing the wor's, "Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Quality Engineering. Number 242-31 1',
10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make
a determination and to issue a superseding order, the Conservation Commission
shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department.
11. The work shall conform to the following described plans, and additional
conditions.
"Notice of Intent". For an undeveloped 45,000 S.F. +/- lot (Lot 9) located
on the westerly side of Winter Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. Prepared
for Land/Vest Properties, May 24, 1978 by Frank C. Gelinas & Associates,
Architects and Engineers, North Andover, Massachusetts. Four (4) pages, and
one (1) locus map. Also "Soil & Drainage Study" Lot 9 Winter Street, North
Andover, Massachusetts., by Frank C. Gelinas & Associates (no date), one (1)
sheet. And "Plan of Subsurface Disposal System" Lot No. 9, Winter St.,
North Andover, Massachusetts by Frank C: Gelinas & Associates. Rev. 5/8/78,
one (1) sheet, listed as Pg. 1 of 5.
12. No fill shall be placed below E1. 135.0 as shown on the above plan unless
and until plans showing compensation for lost storage volume below this
elevation are approved by the Department and filed with the No. Andover
Conservatin Commission.
13. Before any work is begun on any part of the Lot, the 135.0 contour line shall
be clearly staked at 20 foot intervals. Except where filling is approved
under (12) above, the stakes shall be maintained until all work is completed.
-27-
Board of Health
North An ver Haas..
5EPTIC SIST�i
Ll ST
C.�
LOT'' - OjAr
INSTALLATICK CHECK
J1
:.,
OM DATE
HISUPR ID
,- AVATICIR Ob FAIL
_
;.
eascnst
N q4
if
t
FAn
OK
1.
Distance Tot
4
a. Wetlands
b. Drains
Co. Well
2.
Water Line Location
3.
No PVC Pipe
Septic Tank -
a. _Tees -_Length & To Clem Ont Covers.
b. Cement Pipe to Tank - On Both Sides
of Tank
5.
Distribution Box
a. Covers & Box - No Cracks
b. All Lines Flowing Equal Anoints
'
c. No Back Flow
•
60.
Leach Field or Trench
a. Dimensions
'
b. Stone Depth
:-
c: Capped Eads'
i;
d. Clean Double Washed Stone
7.
Leach Pits
+f
a. Dimensions
:r
b. Stone Depth
i=
c. Splash Pads
d. Tees
e. Ceneint Pipe to Pit - Both Sides
I:
f. Clean -Double Washed Stone
i'
8r
No Garbage Disposal
is
9.
Final Grading Inspection
,•
lo.
Barricading covered system
F
11.
As Built S- ibmitted
-
a. Lot location
b. Dimensions of System
c. Location with Regard -to Perc Test
d. Elevations
' •
e; Water Table
i
Bon, *-'--
f Health
NorU: Andover,Mass
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN CHECK LIST
LOT
YPROnM DATE
'rovided:
DISAPPROVED DATE —
Reasons:
.
! i
i
'itle
FASL
OK _.
eg,2.5
The submitted plan mist show as a minimum:
a) the lot to be served -area, dimensions lot #.. abutters
b location and log deep observation hoes -distance to ties
location and results percolation tests -distance to ties
design calculations & calculations showing required leaching area
e) location and dimensions of system -including reserve area
f) existing and proposed contours I
iC
(g) location any vat areas within loot of sewage disposal system or
. disclaimer -check wetlands mapping
(h) surface and subsurface drains within loot of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer
.
(i) location any drainage easements within loot of sewage disposal
system or disclaimer -Planning Board files
.
(j) knokn sources of mater supply within 2001 of selage disposal _
system or disclaimer
-
� =.1)
(k) location of any proposed well to serve lot -loot from leaching facility
location of water lines on property -lot from leaching facility
m) location of benchmark
) driveways
gn)
o) garbage disposals
no PVC to be used in construction
q) profile of system -elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank,
distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and
other elevations
(r) maximum ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system
('s) plan mast be prepared by a Professional Engineer or other
professional authorized by lax to prepare such plans
Reg 6
Septic Tanks
(a) capac t es- % of flow, grater table' tees, depth of tees,
access, pumping
(b) cleanout
(c) 101 from cellar wall or inground sui ming pool
251 from subsurface drains
((d)
eg 10.2.
eg 10.4
Distribution Boxes
..a) slope greater ME 0.08
b) au p 4
,toard of Health "
aorto IndoverjMasa
StTBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN CHECK LIST
APPROM DATE g/ 2.i 3
Provided*-
DISAPPROM DAT
Reasonss
LOT �i//•�l T� _
Title V
v FAIL
1.1'TT ';'A.o►� . w t�r..� 'DA•T�h '� �`
Reg 2.5
a submitted plan must show as a mi.niu !
the lot to be served -area, dimensions lot #,abutters
location and log deep observation holes -distance to ties
location and results percolation tests -distance to ties
design calculations & calculations shoring required leaching area
location and dimensions of system -including reserve area
J(h(h
existing and proposed contours
location any vet areas Athin 100' of sewage disposal system or
disclaimer -check wetlands mapping
surface and subsurface drains within 100' of sewagedisposal
system or disclaimer(i) location any drainage easements thin 100' of serge disposal
system or disclair—er-Planning Board Piles
(j) know sources of -.ater supply within 2001 of wage disposal e
system or disclainer
) location of any proposed well to serve lot -1001 from leaching facilit:
location of water lines on property -101 from leaching facility
(m) location of benchmark
(n) driveways
o) garbage disposals
J�p) no PVC to be used in construction
(q) profile of system- elevations of basement, plumb, pipe, septic tank,
distribution box inlets and outlets, distribution field piping and
Other elevations
maam ground water elevation in area sewage disposal system
Am
(s) plan must be prepared by a Professional Engineer or other
professional authorized by lax to prepare such plans
.Reg 6
Septic Tanks
(a) capacities- 50% of flog, water table, tees, depth of tees,
access, pumping
(b) cleanout
(c) lot from cellar wall or inground s .-ng Pool
I
(d) 251 from subsurface drains
I
Reg 10.2
Reg 10.4
Distribution Foxes
a) slope gr eater than 0.08
b) stamp
FRANK C. GELINAS AND ASSOCIATES
IENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS - LAND PLANNERS
FRANK C. GELINAS, R.P.E., R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE PARK
SCOTT L. GILES, R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. 01845
JOSEPH D. LA GRASSE, A.I.A.
July 17, 1980
Mr. Edward Scanlon
Chairman
North Andover Board of Health
Town Hall
Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
TELEPHONE 887.1483
Re: Variance From North Andover Board of Health Requirement 3.1.3
100 Foot Minimum Distance to Wetland, Lot 9, Winter Street
Dear Mr. Scanlon:
On behalf of my client, North Andover Associates, I am requesting
the North Andover Board of Health grant a waiver from paragraph
3.1.3 of their Rules and Regulations requiring a 100 foot minimum
setback of the septic system from wetlands.
As can be seen from the enclosed plan, it has not been possible
to place the leaching area the minimum 100 feet from the edge
of existing wetland because of the requirements of both the
North Andover Conservation Commission and the Department of
Environmental Quality Engineering prohibiting my client to
fill in any of the wetlands. The setback distance, or course,
conforms to Regulation 3.7 of Title V which requires a minimum
setback of 50 feet.
If I can be of further service to you in this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely yours,
r '
/Joseph B. Cushing
cc: Richard Perkins, North Andover Associates
North Andover Conservation Commission
Enclosure
jt
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
WETLAND PROTECTION ACT
G. L. C. 131 S. 40-
EXTENSION
Q
EXTENSION PERMIT
FILE NO. 242-31
DATE; April 21, 1983
PROJECT LOCATION:Winter St., North Andover
URTIT'IED '.-SAIL. NO.:
TO: Land/Vest Properties
14 Kilby Street
Boston, MA 02109
This document extends the Order issued to Land/Vest Properties
for a period of one year, from the date of termination of the last
Order issued in regard to this project or extension of same whichever is the
later date.
Final Order issued March 2, 1979.
Subsequent extensions valid through March, 1983.
This Document extends the Order through March, 1984.
William J. St. Hilaire P.E.
Regional Environmental Engineer
_'ietropolitan Boston/Northeast Reziioi
On this 22nd day p of_ April 19 83
_ __T� before me personally
appeared William J. St. Hilaire, P.E., Regional Environmen a Engineer
to me known to be the person describe_1 in and .::}o--x�cuted the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged that he executed ti - a:; f,,.; r -2 ict and deed.
JS/nes
Notary Public
v Cour�iasion Espires
cc: Conservation Commission, Town Hall, North Andover, MA
M
TOL 617-661-7301
Land/Vest Properties,
14 Kilby Street
Boston, Massachusetts
Gentlemen:
07�
is
(, /�.'R
Inc.
02109
9�ak�, 4aaO"4ettd 09876
i. A Z)
March 1, 1979
C\_
RE: NO ANDOVER_FILE # 242-31
iot_ 9 -Winter Street
Enclosed is a Superseding Order of Conditions issued by the Department
of Environmental.Quality Engineering in the above referenced matter.
The Order requires that compensatory storage volume be provided for any
fill placed below E1. 135.
It is recognized that compensation for the fill volume initially pro''
ed
may be difficult to accomplish within the confines of the lot; however, a -
less extensive intrusion into the wetland may be possible if the sewage TA
disposal expansion area can be moved uphill or realigned to require less
fill. Further, you should note that Title 5 of the State Environmental Code
requires a minimum distance of 50 feet from leaching works to surface waters,
and that a variance from the local 100 foot requirement would obviate the need
for significant filling in the wetland area. Such a variance should pose no
untoward threat to the wetland, provided that other requirements of Title
5 can be satisfied.
Very truly yours,
For the Commissioner,
C_"' &,-, a_e Z_ 1, L
Gerald W. McCall_
EGM/Ekt/jb Acting Regional Environmental Engineer
Metropolitan Boston -Northeast Region
CC: Conservation Commission No. Andover
Frank Gelinas r j/
J.C.
f ��
lob\ 10
ONDTTIONS C^��`- T,„U ED PAGE 2 FILE NO. 242"31
6.' No work may be commenced until all appeal periods have elapsed from
the order of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by
the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
7. No work shall be undertaken until the final Order, with respect to
the proposed project, has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds
for the district in which the land is located within the chain of
title of the affected property. Copy to be furnished to issuer of
this Order showing book and page prior to commencement of work.
8.'• Upon completion of the work describ-d herein, the applicant shall
forthwith request, in writing, that a Certificate of -Compliance be
issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed.
9.. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet
or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. Number 2L3131 "®
10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is
requested to make a determination and to issue a superse8ing order,
the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency pro-
ceedings and hearings before the Department.
11: The work shall- conform to the following described plans and
additional conditions.
"Notice of Intent". For an undeveloped 45,000 S.F. +/-.lot (Lot 9)
located on the westerly side of Winter Street, North Andover, Klass.
Prepared for Land/Vest Properties, May 24, 1978 by Frank C. Gelinas
& Associates, Architects and hngineers, North Andover, Plass. Four
(4) pages, and one (1) locus map. Also "Soil & Drainage Study"
Lot 9 Winter Street si North Andover, Puss., by Frank C. Gelinas &
Associates (no detel, one (1) sheet. And "Plan of Subsurface Disposal
System” Lot No. y, Winter St., No. Andover, Mass. by Franx C. Gelinas
& Associates, Rev. 5/8/78, one (1) sheet, listed as Pg. 1 of 5.
12. Significant detrimental alterations of the Wetlanu would occur if
60 oI' the atland of the -site were filled. No dredging, filling
or altering will be allowed below contour 135, the edge of Wetland,
as shown on the above mentioned plans.
-27-
40RTH
BOARD OF HEALTH
Julius Kay, M.D., Chairman o b o0
NORTH ANDOVER $ 2
R. George Caron 41
MASSACHUSETTS • z
Edward J. Scanlon 01845 '• "'`�-� ~'•�
SSACHUSES
TEL. 682-6400
May 25, 1983
Mr. Marc Gowdy, Project Mgr.
Land Vest
14 Kilby St.
Boston,Mass.
Dear Sir:
On May 24, 1983 Lot 9 Winter St
was retested. Results of this retesting confirmed
previous data on file for this lot.
The SSDS design for this lot has been
reviewed and is acceptible for installation.
Very truly yours,
Michael Rosati
Health Inspector
LandVest
14 KILBY STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 0 2 1 0 9 INCORPORATED
Estate Marketing May 24, 1983
Land Planning & Appraisal
Residential Sales
Timberland Management
Institutional Brokerage
BRANCH OFFICES
P.O. Box 41
Shelburne, VT 05482
Telephone 802 658-4649
342 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone 212 986-3799
P.O.Box 158
Proctor Square
Henniker, NH 03242
Telephone 603 428-3510
76 Main Street
Yarmouth, ME 04096
Telephone 207 846.5111
Mr. Michael Rosati
Board of Health Agent
Town Hall
Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Dear Mike:
I spoke with Al Shaboo on Tuesday, May 24, after he returned from
Haymeadow Road where you were testing with him. Al told me that
the high water test on Lot 9 corresponded with the test performed
for the SSDS design, which was compiled in July, 1980.
Would you please send me an acknowledgement of the test results
so that a prospective buyer will know that the disposal works con-
struction permits and the design approval permit are obtainable.
Thank you very much for your prompt attention. I look forward
to meeting with you again in the future.
Best regards,
,r
Marc Gowdy
Project Manager
MRG : sjp
cc: Al Shaboo
Robert Hall /
Richard Perkins I^r
ti J
4�
yl�I
)TELEPHONE
6 1 7 7 2 3- 1 8 0 0
BOARD OF HEALTH
Julius Kay, M.D., Chairman NORTH ANDOVER
R. George Caron MASSACHUSETTS
Edward J. Scanlon 01845
May 5, 1983
Mr. Marc Gowdy
Land Vest Inc.
14 Kilby St.
Boston, Mass.
DearMr. Gowdy:
f gORTpl
O
F e
. 9
«
�SS^cNus'-
TEL. 682-6400
I am in receipt of your letter dated 5/4/83
According to our files the disposal works construction permit
was issued in 1980.for Lot 9 Winter St. 310CMR, 15.02.4 of
Title V states that such a permit shall expire two years
from date of issue.
In order to issue a disposal works con-
struction permit and a building permit, Lot 9 must be retested
and possibly redesigned. I have received payment from your
engineer to conduct such testing. However, a definite date
has not been set. Please be advised that the cut off date
for testing is June lst.
If you have any questions, or if I can be
of further assistance to you in this matter, feel free to
contact me at 682-6400.
Yours truly,
Michael J. Rosati, R.S.
14 KILBY STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Estate Marketing May 4, 1983
Land Planning & Appraisal
Mr. Michael Rosati
Residential Sales Board of Health Agent
Town Hall
Main Street
Timberland Management North Andover, MA 01845
Institutional Brokerage
Dear Mr. Rosati:
LandVest
0 2 1 0 9 IN C OR P OR ATE D
Enclosed is an Order of Conditions and a recent extention permit for
Lot 9A on Winter Street, File No. 242-31. Also enclosed is the sub-
surface disposal system design for Lot 9A,
I am sending these to you for your files. In a short time, AI Shaboo
will be requesting a disposal works construction permit for Lot 9A.
We have a buyer who is very anxious to get started on this lot. I
hope that the information enclosed will be sufficient so that you may
grant a disposal works construction permit and a building permit
for this parcel.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Best regards,
Marc Gowdy
Project Manager
MRG : sjp
BRANCH OFFICES Enclosures
P.O. Box 41
Shelburne, VT 05482
Telephone 802 658-4649
342 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone 212 986-3799
P.O.Box 158
Proctor Square
Henniker, NH 03242
Telephone 603 4283510
76 Main Street
Yarmouth, ME 04096
Telephone 207 846-5111
TELEPHONE 6 1 7 7 2 3- 1 8 0 0
i 1
FRANK C. GELINAS AND ASSOCIATES
t ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS- LAND PLANNERS
FRANK C. GELINAS, R.P.E., R.L.S.
SCOTT L. GILES, R.L.S.
' JOSEPH D. LA GRASSE, A.I.A.
September 29, 1980
Mr. Thomas Murphy
North Andover Board of Health
North Andover Town Hall
Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: Lot 9A, Winter Street
Dear Tom:
NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE PARK
NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. 01845
TELEPHONE 887.1483
Enclosed you will find several copies of the revised plan
for the subsurface disposal system for lot 9A, Winter Street.
This plan incorporates the revisions you required as a condition
of granting the variance at the Board of Health meeting held on
September 23, 1980. I have sent a copy of this plan and letter
to the North Andover Conservation Commission.
If I can be of further service to you in this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
os
ing
cc: North Andover Conservation Commission
Richard Perkins, North Andover Associates
Enclosure
;t Al
�N
Sept 91 198
I;r. James R. Lafond, Chairman Re: Variance request
No.Andover Conservation Commission Lot 9 Winter St.
No.Andover, Mass.
Dear 'Mr. Lafond:
Thos Board would appreciate meeting with you,
as a representative of your Board, so that we can discuss the
soptic systen plans for the above-mentioned lot on Tuesday,
September 23, 1980 at 6:30 P.M.
Very truly yours,
Julius E ay, A.D.
Chairrran
jk;n, I
FRANK C. GELINAS AND ASSOCIATES
I ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS- LAND PLANNERS
FRANK C. GELINAS, R.P.E., R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE PARK
SCOTT L. GILES, R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. 01845
JOSEPH D. LA GRASSE, A.I.A. TELEPHONE 887-1483
September 3, 1980
Mr. Thomas Murphy
North Andover Board of Health
North Andover Town Hall
Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: Lot 9A, Winter Street
Dear Mr. Murphy:
As you can see from the enclosed plan, the modifications
that you requested of this office during our meeting of
August 29, 1980 have been incorporated into the subsurface
disposal system of lot 9A, Winter Street. We believe
these changes to the design will protect the interest of
the North Andover Board of Health and the Department of
Environmental Quality Engineering, Title V.
If I can be of further assistance to you in this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Frank C. Gelinas
Registered Professional Engineer
Enclosure
jt
FRANK C. GELINAS AND ASSOCIATES
I , ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS- LAND PLANNERS
FRANK C. GELINAS, R.P.E., R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER OFFICE PARK
SCOTT L. GILES, R.L.S. NORTH ANDOVER, MASS. 01845
JOSEPH D. LA GRASSE, A.I.A. TELEPHONE 687.1483
August 12, 1980
Thomas Murphy
North Andover Board of Health
North Andover Town Hall
Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: Lot 9, Winter Street, North Andover, Mass.
Dear Tom:
Enclosed you will find the material which you requested of
me during the'Board of Health meeting of August 11, 1980.
It includes:
1. The original Order of Conditions issued by the North
Andover Conservation Commission June 29, 1978.
2. The Superceding Order of Conditions issued by the Depart-
ment of Environmental Quality Engineering March 2, 1979.
3. The covering letter to the Superceding Order of Conditions
issued by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
In designing this system, we have taken our lead from the
covering letter in .that we have moved the disposal system
uphill and realigned it in order to encroach less into the
wetland area. Now we are asking the Board of Health for a
variance to the 100 foot wetland setback believing that there
will be no threat to the wetlands provided that the other
requirements of Title V are satisfied.
If I can be of further service to you in this matter, please
do not hesitate to get in contact with me.
Yours truly,
V
Joseph B.—Cushing J
cc: Richard D. Perkins
jt
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS
OFFICE OF
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
TELEPHONE 683-7105
August 10, 1980
Mr. Edward Scanlon
Chairman
North Andover Board of Health
Town Hall, Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: Variance of requirement 3.1.3, Lot 9, Winter Street.
Dear Mr. Scanlon:
Please be advised that the North Andover Conservation Com-
mission is against the waver of this requirement. We feel
that 100 feet from the Wetland area is a minimally acceptable
distance.
In the case of Lot 9 on Winter Street, we feel that this
100 foot distance could be maintaned by some alteration in
the present plans. Although we are not condoning nor suggest-
ing any particular action, we do feel that in this case the
Board of Health regulations can be maintaned.
If we can be of any furthur help to you, please feel free to
contact me. I would also appreciate any new information re-
garding the status of this lot.
Sincerely yours,
eed"'�e_ �44��
aZtR. Lafond
Chairman, NACC