HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - 88 Jerad Place4
MAP # LOT #_._..................... �.....1.
PARCEL # —__ _—_ STREET._ '�
C.O,NSTR.UCT_I_QN_.._APPR.OVAL
HAS PLAN REVIEW FEE BEEN PAID? YES NO
PLAN APPROVAL: DATE�� 9/ _ APP. BY__.__,
DESIGNER:�vC PLAN DATE._._.....___ .._. / ..._
CONDITIONS
WATER SUPPLY: <TOWN WELL
WELL PERMIT_— ----- — DRILLER..._..........._.._ .............. .
WELL TESTS: CHEMICAL DATE APPRUVED
BAC -TER I A I Df 1 I E (11- PRUVED
BACTERIA II DATE APPROVED
COMMENTS:
FORM U APPROVAL: APPROVAL 10 I Sc'UE ES NO
13 �'
DATE ISSUED_ _ BY.______..... .__...._.. .....
CONDITIONS:
FINAL APPROVAL:
ALL PERMITS PAID NO
WELL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL YES NO
SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION APPROVALf::5� NO
OTHER YES NO
ANY VARIANCE NEEDED YES NU
FINAL BOARD OF HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE,-�?11/yt BY:_VA/4
-At
qFPI.Tr SYSTEM TWRI-InI I nTTnN
A�
ISSUANCE OF DWC PERMIT
IN
DWC PERMIT NO. SSS
IS THE
INSTALLER LICENSED?
-TYPE OF
CONSTRUCTION:
EXCAVATION INSPECTION.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN REVIEW
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(FROM FORM U
A�
ISSUANCE OF DWC PERMIT
DWC PERMIT NO. SSS
'BEGIN INSPECTION YE NO:
EXCAVATION INSPECTION.
NA
-PASSED
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION:
T�.
NEEDED:
NEEDED:
AS BUILT PLAN SATISFACTORY:
APPROVAL, TO BACKFILL: DATE:
FINAL .GRADING APPROVAL: DATE_
FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL:
NO
REPAIR
NO
NO
NO
INSTALLER:___ N/44,5
YES: 50-516
BY
m_v
DATE:
........... .
r- 1
.5 -4-A
/-Vrz oVerl en,d 0-(
Jea�lz arm.
ove/_1 //J1 -e5
l,';�; ;,'µr' '.• ' ;,l 1. . - �.
L-79
W
O
Z
a
Ix
1-
O
LL
O
3t
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
a
v 1
�JJJ
�
(�
�
F..
f-
W
f••
M
�
� �
' �
ti
1L
O
\V
yaj
Z
?
y
?
W
-
Q
c
`
u
z
Z
• V
L-
z
?
\
.�
m
m
m L C
o' E
J
a
L
m m
3,
W
L
�' >
3 �
L
m .Y
c o
o L c
ir U U-
o E
[C
o m -
¢ to U-
o
Cc
E
m CO
W
O
Z
a
Ix
1-
O
LL
O
3t
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
O
•v
v 1
�JJJ
c
' �
a�
m
U u'
c = U
a E ti
U a E
U
O m
o C a
ii o
_U c f�
_c
''- U C
U m {°
of
m
I
U-)
O
•v
c
' �
O
y
w
C
• V
V
00
°
go
E
c
a.
C
a
o
4)
OG---
C
6�
O
C6
_
_
V
c
w'
u
•�
z
c
10
O
°
O
O
crA
a
e
N
o
0
o.
to
z
t
�
C
a+
V
rA
c
Q
c
O
O
-7777-77-;'---
A
i 'k
t,.
;.i
• Town of North Andover, Massachusett F°"" N°'
{ I°
BOARD OF HEALTH C40Q'
• 3r.�. - ..°� 6 19�
=/'• DESIGN APPROVAL FOR
HUS SOIL SOIL ABSORPTION SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
Applicant Test No
ej,
—�
Site Location—
C)
ocation
Reference Plans and Specs. � t
ENGINEER DESIGN .
Permission is granted for an individual soil absorption sewage disposal system to be i
001,
in accordance with regulations of Board of Health.
CHAIRMA , BOARD OF HCACrtr
• .h
Ln
II
Er
c3
N
1
ZUl
W
m
O
h rA
cr
m ru
Y
y rm
Ococc
c. O
AUGUST 8, 1991
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
120 MAIN STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MA. 01845
ATTN: MR. MICHAEL ROSATI
DEAR MR. ROSATI:
I HAVE ENCLOSED THREE REVISED COPIES OF THE SEPTIC DESIGN
FOR LOT 17 JERAD PLACE II. THE ONLY CHANGE CONCERNS THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS WHICH HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO REFLECT
REGRADING OF THE ISOLATED WETSPOT.
I RECEIVED YOUR NOTE CONCERNING THE NEED FOR A 14 FOOT
DEEPHOLE TO BE DUG ON THE ROCKY KNOLL. THIS IS SCHEDULED TO
BE DUG NEXT TUESDAY, SO THAT IT MAY BE OBSERVED BY YOU.
WOULD YOU LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU CAN SCHEDULE A SITE VISIT?
THE PLAN INDICATES THIS KNOLL WILL BE REGRADED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 168 FEET.
SINCERELY,
RO / JANUS
40 S SET RO K RD.
ANDOVER, MA. 01810
r
i • 41
r r � t. ,r i ,.. .� � �� � ala .. •+'{-f� _
1 ti
' DATE
Sheet
BOARD OF HEALTH
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN REVIEW
of
FEE PERMIT # DATE RECEIVED
APPLICANT
ADDRESS
ENGINEER
ADDRESS
PLAN DATE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
APPROVED \'
DISAPPROVED
ASSESSOR'S MAP
PARCEL #
LOT #
STREET C
REVISION DATE
NORiN
OFFICES OF: o 9 Town Of 120 Main Street
APPEALS NORTH ANDOVER North Andover,
BUILDING'`;: Vie:;. Massachusetts O 1845
CONSERVATION ee CHUS DIVISION OF (617) 685-4775
HEALTH
PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
KAREN H.P. NELSON, DIRECTOR
To: Neve Associates
From: Mike Graf, Health Dept
June 14, 1989
Re: 5 plans, Jerad 2
I reviewed all 5 plans and have the following comments.
Lot 17 Leach area too close to wetland, variance necessary. What
will happen to that wetland when filling for detention pond and
drains dams it up? That is my main concern here. Gave copy of plan
to Conservation Commission.
Lot 24 Plan is acceptable but temporary detention pond will have
to be filled and permanant one ready before final approval.
Lot 23 Topography appears wrong, tests are actually in a swale.
Perk results given are for lot 11 Candlestick 2. (Jerad 1) Can
not find record of perks for this lot.
Lot 42 Not acceptable. Not enough breakout fill, too close to
proposed low area at border of lot 43.
Lot 43 Not acceptable. Not enough breakout fill, too close to
proposed low area at border of lot 42.
cc: Bob Janucz
RECEt'vzC � 1 6
nor l �2
w. T6 SOPPLI Q]- ❑ WELL ,�P�o�c-D114TC
53StPT1c s Y sTT,j VE -SI 6AJ �.
A "O\j Iiv Port'
PLA J
APR?OvING Aun-.)ol?rry
0E51 C,Nc)� FaV PX -V
DCDJVfT(o,05
1, iao 6L05e 7-z) lv�rC/�iVl�
R JSONS : c>�Z, W f-)/ T wILG f� /�(�E� %U 7 w67-c4A4>
COPY Fol -z' j<e -
�t1�r-IG,r��s ot-1 vc jr:- ro Svf�ctc�
�-
Dw(�'5 Pr(c 5 6TEM 1 J STA lATIOA J
C Y 4V4T(OIJ ),-)c PEGTIDAU M-rc
Q Pass U F41L-
I Q5PFcrioo P(PE Ff2v A-\ H0L)S ry T/J 0 t: 7 Pry S5 I--7 F/0)L
4 PFROOED fATC /6pn)vuvG 4�T+to►�►, y
NS T4U�R
DISAPMO\JFIp DAT -C
RE/j� NS •,
FI/AL A PPINOVAL p rE
APPR0,1VJ6 6u i Hod l t y ,