HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-07-16 Planning Board Supplemental Materials
199 Newbury Street, Suite 115 ● Danvers, MA 01923 ● 978.777.7250 ● fax 978.777.8650 ● www.lynnfieldeng.com
June 26, 2013
North Andover Planning Board
1600 Osgood Street
Building 20, Suite 2-36
North Andover, MA 01845
Attention: Ms. Judy Tymon, Planner
Subject: Peer Review Summary
1077 Osgood Street
Application for Site Plan Special Permit
LEI Job No. 480-60
Dear Ms. Tymon:
This correspondence has been prepared on behalf of Angus Realty Corporation North
Andover, MA in response to correspondence received dated April 1, 2013 from Joseph
Peznola, P.E. Hancock Associates Marlborough, MA regarding the Pentucket Bank
development at Butcher Boy Marketplace 1077 Osgood Street North Andover. Copies of
correspondence are presented in Attachment No. 1.
A. COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM HANCOCK ASSOCIATES
1. The Special Permit - Watershed Permit Application is incomplete and should
include the proposed building height, setbacks Lot Coverage.
Proposed Retail Bank Building
Building Height: 35’
Front Yard Setback: 85’
Side Yard Setback: 56’/>450’
Rear Setback: >250’
Lot Coverage: 1.1%
Existing Butcher Boy Marketplace
Building Height: 20’ +/-
Front Yard Setback: 122’
Side Yard Setback: 89’/99’
Rear Setback: 54’
Lot Coverage: 9.3%
Ms. Judy Tymon June 26, 2013
Town of North Andover Page 2 of 5
K:\480-60\Reports\Butcher Boy Response to Hancock Assoc. 062613\01_Tymon J_062613_let_resp.doc
Proposed Butcher Boy Marketplace and Retail Bank Buildings
Building Height: 35’/20’
Front Yard Setback: 85’/122’
Side Yard Setback: 56’/89’
Rear Setback: >250’/54’
Lot Coverage: 10.4%
2. The Special Permit - Site Plan review Application is incomplete and should
include the proposed building height, setbacks and Lot Coverage.
Refer to Response No. 1.
3. As the proposal is an expansion of the existing retail center, the Applicant
must present zoning compliance information for the entire site as well as impact
on prior approvals and conditions of approvals for the site.
4. The proposed sign must be in conformance with Zoning Section 6.
Comment noted.
5. The applicant must demonstrate that adequate parking in compliance with
Zoning, Section 8, exists on the site for the current use. (Zoning Section 8.2a)
Refer to Table No. 1.
6. The Landscape Plan must be prepared and stamped by a Landscape
Architect not a Sanitary Engineer. The landscape plan refers to relocation of trees
and shrubs without itemizing quantities. It appears more trees are proposed than
available for relocation. The Applicant should provide a plant list containing new
and relocated species and sizes should relocation prove unsuitable. The Applicant
must demonstrate compliance with Zoning By-law Section 8.4.
Refer to revised Drawing L-1, Landscape Plan.
7. The landscape island modified by the reconfigured entrance is only three (3)
feet wide. This is far too narrow for effective landscaping. The Applicant should
comment on the impact to the overall Butcher Boy Market Place compliance with
Zoning By-law Section 8.4 given the proposed modifications.
Refer to revised Drawing L-1, Landscape Plan.
8. The Existing Conditions plan must be prepared and stamped by a Registered
Professional Land Surveyor, not a Sanitary Engineer. A Registered Architect must
stamp the Architectural Plans, they are unstamped. (Zoning Section 8.3.5.b)
Comment noted. Drawing C-2, Existing Conditions Plan, is stamped by a Registered
Professional Land Surveyor. Drawings A210 and A211 are stamped by a Registered
Architect.
Ms. Judy Tymon June 26, 2013
Town of North Andover Page 3 of 5
K:\480-60\Reports\Butcher Boy Response to Hancock Assoc. 062613\01_Tymon J_062613_let_resp.doc
9. The modification to the access road and layout of the entrances to the bank
parking lot and tellers is unconventional potentially causing conflicts with the
existing marketplace traffic. This office will defer to the traffic engineering review
being provided by Vanasse Associates, Inc. (VAI) under separate cover for
additional comments regarding the layout.
Comment noted.
10. The location of the proposed stabilized construction entrance should be
added to sheet C-3.
The stabilized construction entrance has been added to Drawing C-3, Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan.
11. The plans should clarify if the proposed entrance is one or two-way and
provide appropriate signage on sheet C-4.
The site entrance is one way. Proposed signage is presented on Drawing C-5, Site Layout
Plan.
12. The plans received by this office are very difficult to read, with the grey-
scaled background almost unreadable, please provide more readable copies for
future reviews.
As requested, the grey scale used has been adjusted to allow the Existing Conditions Plan to
be more easily read.
13. Provide top and bottom of retaining wall elevations on sheet C-5. It appears
the wall will be as much as seven (7) feet high along Pond Road. The applicant
must provide design plans for the wall stamped by a structural engineer.
The top and bottom of wall elevations have been added to the plans. The plans are for
permitting purposes only. The wall will be designed by a structural engineer prior to
application for a building permit.
14. The proposed retaining wall is directly over the existing sewer main that
feeds the adjacent pump station. The applicant should provide details on how this
wall will be constructed without damaging the existing main, and comment on the
ability to repair or replace the sewer main once the wall is constructed on top of it.
The proposed Versa Lok retaining wall will extend approximately 12” - 16” below the
existing grade, approximately 5 to 6 feet above the existing pipe. The Contractor shall video
inspect the sewer line prior to and after construction to document the condition of the sewer
line.
15. Hancock defers to Eggleston Environmental for a detailed stormwater
review, however we would like to offer several observations.
Comment noted.
Ms. Judy Tymon June 26, 2013
Town of North Andover Page 4 of 5
K:\480-60\Reports\Butcher Boy Response to Hancock Assoc. 062613\01_Tymon J_062613_let_resp.doc
16. Proposed catch basin PCB10 appears to connect directly into the drainage
system without treatment and does not meet the 80% Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) removal requirement.
Refer to the revised site layout and storm drain system.
17. The applicant should provide a detail of the catch basin frame and grates,
with dimensions demonstrating that they can be constructed with only 1.5± feet
of cover over the pipe as they are designed.
In order to construct the catch basin structures and install the pipe the minimum cover over
the HDPE is 1.7 feet. This would include a frame and cover 8 inches deep and a flat top
catch basin which is 12 inches thick.
18. The applicant has not provided infiltration as required by the MADEP SWM
Regulations.
A substantial portion of the property is located in a Zone A Area. The design provides
infiltration of the roof area of the proposed bank. The infiltration system will treat the one
inch rainfall event. The overflow from the infiltration system will then discharge to extended
dry detention systems.
19. The applicant has considered the underground detention area an "extended
dry detention basin" with a TSS removal rate of 50%, they should provide the
appropriate data and calculations including volumes and detention times between
the low flow orifice elevation and the first primary outlet to document this
assumption or change the design to a "dry detention basin" which has no TSS
removal. We note that volumes between the bottom of the stone and the low flow
orifice appear to be included in the calculations despite having no way to drain
this volume between storms.
Refer to the revised extended dry detention basins design.
20. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" must be stamped by a registered
Professional Engineer".
The stormwater checklist has been stamped by a Professional Engineer.
21. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" indicates the site is a mix of new
development and redevelopment, as such the project "must improve existing
conditions" per the MADEP SWM Regulations. "New stormwater controls
(retrofitted or expanded) must be incorporated into the design and result in a
reduction in annual stormwater pollutant loads from the site. Proponents of
redevelopment projects shall make full use of all opportunities for controlling the
sources of pollution and to incorporate environmentally sensitive site design and
low impact development techniques."
The bank site design complies with the stormwater regulations and has complied with, to
the maximum extent feasible, Standard 3 Recharge. The site is comprised solely of C soils
and is located in a Zone A. Recharge for the bank roof area has been provided to control the
Ms. Judy Tymon June 26, 2013
Town of North Andover Page 5 of 5
K:\480-60\Reports\Butcher Boy Response to Hancock Assoc. 062613\01_Tymon J_062613_let_resp.doc
one inch rainfall event. In addition, the Applicant will provide 80% TSS removal for the
entire site impervious area with the addition of a Contech CDS unit to be located on the
existing storm drain exiting the property.
22. The applicant should provide the "Redevelopment Checklist" from MADEP
SWM Vol. 2 Chapter 3 to document compliance with all the requirements of
Standard 7.
The checklist standards are addressed within the Stormwater Report.
23. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" indicates that certain standards are
not met, the applicant should clearly indicate what standards are not met and why
with Stormwater Report.
The Stormwater Report indicates what standards have not been met.
24. The traffic report indicates an average weekday daily traffic for the bank of
544 trips. The applicant needs to provide the number of trips for the entire site,
and if the total is over 1,000 trips per day the site is considered a Land Use with
Higher Pollutant Loads and the drainage design must be updated accordingly.
The original Butcher Boy Marketplace was constructed in the early 1990’s, m ore than 20
years ago. This project is not considered to be a phased project; therefore the entire site
should not be reviewed as a whole. In addition the majority of the existing site is located
outside of the wetland buffer zone and the stormwater system discharges to the Merrimack
River. The bank traffic is estimated to be approximately 544 vehicle trips per day which
does not classify as a LUHPPL. However, the Applicant is providing improvements to the
existing stormwater system. A hydrodynamic separator is proposed, prior to the existing
storm drain system exiting the site. The hydrodynamic separator will provide TSS removal
for the entire site in an effort to improve the overall stormwater quality exiting the property.
If you have any questions or desire any additional information regarding this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact me at 978.777.7250 Ext. 12.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lynnfield Engineering, Inc.
Richard Barthelmes, P.E.
enclosures
c: Joseph Peznola, P.E., Hancock Associates
Alan Yameen, Angus Realty Corporation
K:\480-60\Reports\Butcher Boy Response to Hancock Assoc. 062613\02_62413_tab_Off-Street Parking
Parking Total Required
Use Requirement Parking
Butcher Boy Marketplace Grocery 6 spaces x 14,271 square feet (sf) =86
1,000 sf
Lobster Tail, Orzo's Restaurant Restaurants 15 spaces x 6,400 sf =96
and Perfecto's Café 1,000 sf
Jackson Kitchen Design,Retail 3.5 spaces x 9,760 sf =34
Art & Frame Source 1,000 sf
Nature's Cleaners
Ciao/Bow-wow
Tran Tran Nails
Use
Retail Bank Bank with 5.5 spaces x 3,672 sf =21
Drive-Thru 1,000 sf
Total Parking Required 237
Existing Parking Butcher Boy Marketplace 208
Proposed Parking Retail Bank 21
Proposed Butcher Boy Marketplace 9
Total Provided 238
TABLE NO. 1
Proposed Project
Off-Street Parking Requirement
Butcher Boy Marketplace
1077 Osgood Street
North Andover, Massachusetts
Existing Occupancy
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Correspondence Hancock Associates
April 1, 2013
Ms. Judy Tymon, Planner
North Andover Planning Board
1600 Osgood Street – Bldg. 20 Suite 2-36
North Andover, MA 01845
Subject: Peer Review Summary
1077 Osgood Street
Application for Site Plan Special Permit
Dear Ms. Tymon:
Hancock Associates has completed a review of the documents submitted to the Planning
Board for the proposed Site Plan at 1077 Osgood Street. The following documents were
reviewed.
1. Proposed Site Plans, "Pentucket Bank at Butcher Boy Marketplace", prepared by
Lynnfield Engineering, Inc., dated March 15, 2013, containing twelve (14) sheets.
2. Application for Site Plan Special Permit and Watershed Special Permit dated
March 15, 2013.
The following was used to assist in our review:
1. Zoning Bylaw of Town of North Andover last amended June 12, 2012
2. General Bylaws of the Town of North Andover, (adopted April 23 1979 as
amended).
Project Description
The project entails development of a portion of the Butcher Boy Market Place site current
occupied by a stormwater detention basin and access drive from Osgood Street with the
construction of a 3,672 square foot bank with a three lane drive-through window
featuring two teller lanes and one automated teller machine (ATM). A twenty-one-space
parking lot and connection to on site utilities is also proposed. Access to the site will be
provided via the existing one-way entrance and exit driveways that serve the current
marketplace from Osgood Street.
Marlborough, MA Danvers, MA
315 Elm Street 185 Centre Street
www.hancockassociates.com
Comments
1. The Special Permit - Watershed Permit Application is incomplete and should
include the proposed building height, setbacks Lot Coverage.
2. The Special Permit - Site Plan review Application is incomplete and should
include the proposed building height, setbacks and Lot Coverage.
3. As the proposal is an expansion of the existing retail center, the Applicant must
present zoning compliance information for the entire site as well as impact on
prior approvals and conditions of approvals for the site.
4. The proposed sign must be in conformance with Zoning Section 6.
5. The applicant must demonstrate that adequate parking in compliance with Zoning,
Section 8, exists on the site for the current use. (Zoning Section 8.2a)
6. The Landscape Plan must be prepared and stamped by a Landscape Architect not
a Sanitary Engineer. The landscape plan refers to relocation of trees and shrubs
without itemizing quantities. It appears more trees are proposed than available for
relocation. The Applicant should provide a plant list containing new and relocated
species and sizes should relocation prove unsuitable. The Applicant must
demonstrate compliance with Zoning By-law Section 8.4.
7. The landscape island modified by the reconfigured entrance is only three (3) feet
wide. This is far too narrow for effective landscaping. The Applicant should
comment on the impact to the overall Butcher Boy Market Place compliance with
Zoning By-law Section 8.4 given the proposed modifications.
8. The Existing Conditions plan must be prepared and stamped by a Registered
Professional Land Surveyor, not a Sanitary Engineer. A Registered Architect
must stamp the Architectural Plans, they are unstamped. (Zoning Section 8.3.5.b)
9. The modification to the access road and layout of the entrances to the bank
parking lot and tellers is unconventional potentially causing conflicts with the
existing marketplace traffic. This office will defer to the traffic engineering
review being provided by Vanasse Associates, Inc. (VAI) under separate cover
for additional comments regarding the layout.
10. The location of the proposed stabilized construction entrance should be added to
sheet C-3.
11. The plans should clarify if the proposed entrance is one or two-way and provide
appropriate signage on sheet C-4.
12. The plans received by this office are very difficult to read, with the greyscaled
background almost unreadable, please provide more readable copies for future
reviews.
13. Provide top and bottom of retaining wall elevations on sheet C-5. It appears the
wall will be as much as seven (7) feet high along Pond Road. The applicant must
provide design plans for the wall stamped by a structural engineer.
14. The proposed retaining wall is directly over the existing sewer main that feeds the
adjacent pump station. The applicant should provide details on how this wall will
be constructed without damaging the existing main, and comment on the ability to
repair or replace the sewer main once the wall is constructed on top of it.
Marlborough, MA Danvers, MA
315 Elm Street 185 Centre Street
www.hancockassociates.com
15. Hancock defers to Eggleston Environmental for a detailed stormwater review,
however we would like to offer several observations.
16. Proposed catch basin PCB10 appears to connect directly into the drainage system
without treatment and does not meet the 80% TSS removal requirement.
17. The applicant should provide a detail of the catch basin frame and grates, with
dimensions demonstrating that they can be constructed with only 1.5± feet of
cover over the pipe as they are designed.
18. The applicant has not provided infiltration as required by the MADEP SWM
Regulations.
19. The applicant has considered the underground detention area an "extended dry
detention basin" with a TSS removal rate of 50%, they should provide the
appropriate data and calculations including volumes and detention times between
the low flow orifice elevation and the first primary outlet to document this
assumption or change the design to a "dry detention basin" which has no TSS
removal. We note that volumes between the bottom of the stone and the low flow
orifice appear to be included in the calculations despite having no way to drain
this volume between storms.
20. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" must be stamped by a registered
Professional Engineer".
21. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" indicates the site is a mix of new
development and redevelopment, as such the project "must improve existing
conditions" per the MADEP SWM Regulations. "New stormwater controls
(retrofitted or expanded) must be incorporated into the design and result in a
reduction in annual stormwater pollutant loads from the site. Proponents of
redevelopment projects shall make full use of all opportunities for controlling the
sources of pollution and to incorporate environmentally sensitive site design and
low impact development techniques."
22. The applicant should provide the "Redevelopment Checklist" from MADEP
SWM Vol. 2 Chapter 3 to document compliance with all the requirements of
Standard 7.
23. The "Checklist for Stormwater Report" indicates that certain standards are not
met, the applicant should clearly indicate what standards are not met and why
with Stormwater Report.
24. The traffic report indicates an average weekday daily traffic for the bank of 544
trips. The applicant needs to provide the number of trips for the entire site, and if
the total is over 1,000 trips per day the site is considered a Land Use with Higher
Pollutant Loads and the drainage design must be updated accordingly.
We believe the Applicant should address the issues raised prior tot the Board finalizes
their deliberation of the matter. Should you have any questions or comments, please do
not hesitate to contact our office.
Marlborough, MA Danvers, MA
315 Elm Street 185 Centre Street
www.hancockassociates.com
Sincerely,
Hancock Associates
Joseph D. Peznola, PE
Principal
Marlborough, MA Danvers, MA
315 Elm Street 185 Centre Street
www.hancockassociates.com