The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140715 Correspondence - Correspondence - 500 GREAT POND ROAD 3/24/2014 a is z 3 3 AC INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: March 24,2014 TO: Judy Tymon FROM: Gene Willis CC: RE: North Andover Country Club site development plan I have received a draft plan from Morin-Cameron group dated March 06, 2014 for site development. The plan shows: 1 . Parking/use of land area inside the town right of way. Permission for use of this land must be obtained. I believe the authorize entity for this is the Board of Selectmen. 2. The grades indicate runoff flows toward Great pond road. Surface runoff must be kept on sight 3. The driveway entrance must conform to the town's driveway policy with regards to negative pitch off the roadway edge of pavement. 4. Will there be mitigation of runoff water? Enright, Jean From: Enright,Jean Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 1:24 PM To: 'Lisa Eggleston'; Kathy Molina Cc: Scott Cameron; Bellavance, Curt Subject: RE: Email 1 of 3 - North Andover Country Club Hi Lisa, Yes,the review can be started. The applicant has established a $2,000 escrow account. The public hearing is scheduled to open on June 3, 2014. Jean From: Lisa Eggleston [mai Ito:Iisa@)egglestonenvironmentaI.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:32 AM To: Kathy Molina; Enright, Jean Cc: Scott Cameron Subject: Re: Email 1 of 3 - North Andover Country Club Jean, Just verifying that I have your go-ahead to initiate this review?Also, when does it go before Planning Board. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit #29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 From: Kathy Molina <Kathy@morincameron.com> Date: Friday, May 2, 2014 2:06 PM To: Lisa Eggleston<Lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com>, "ien right @townofnorthandover.com" <ienright@townofnorthandover.com> Cc:Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Subject: Email 1 of 3- North Andover Country Club Good afternoon Lisa Et Jean, Find attached the pdf files for the Watershed Special Permit Et Site Plan Review applications we filed with the Planning Department this morning for the North Andover Country Club; also attached are the plans that were submitted. Since the report was so extensive, I broke it down into separate pdf files(I'll have to send it in 3 separate emails since the first email 1 just sent came back to me.) Lisa, a hard copy of this filing was mailed to you today. If you have any questions or need anything else from our office please do not hesitate to contact our office. Kathy Molina THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. 447 Boston Street, US Route 1, Topsfield, MA 01983 p 1 978-887-8586 f I 978-887-3480w lwww.morincameron.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to:hftp://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. 1 Enright, Jean From: Hughes,Jennifer Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 3:42 PM To: Bellavance, Curt; Willis, Gene Cc: Enright,Jean Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club parking expansion The hearing with Conservation is this Wednesday, FYI. Jennifer A.Hughes Conservation Administrator Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street,Suite 2035 North Andover,RSA 01845 Phone 978.689.9530 Fax 978.688.9542 Email ihughes@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com From: Bellavance, Curt Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 3:32 PM To: Willis, Gene Cc: Hughes, Jennifer; Enright, Jean Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club parking expansion Gene- When we met with the proponent last month we did let them know to meet with you. They did just submit their application and will be appearing on the June 3 Planning Board meeting. Lisa Eggleston,the PB`s stormwater consultant will review drainage on this plan but I would assume you would review engineering. The applicant should be working to satisfy your concerns/issues!!l Please let me know hat you need or want to seem We can do an internal no applicant) C if you would like. The applicant will also be going before the B€1S(June 12?)to seek approval to park in the Great Pond Road R-O-W. Curt. From: Willis, Gene Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:33 PM To: Bellavance, Curt Cc: Hughes, Jennifer Subject: North Andover Country Club parking expansion Curt i See a copy of the memo sent to TM on project and of my TRC notes. I have not been contacted or asked to review the engineering on this project. The grades, increased impervious area, and problems we experience in Great Pond Road during winter give me concern. Has there been an outside review of the engineering especially with regards to hydraulic modelling and stormwater runoff? The design engineering firm should contact me before Planning approves the project. Eugene P.Willis P.E.M.S. Division of Public work Director of Engineering Town of North Andover 384 Osgood Street Forth Andover,MA 01845 Phone/cell 978.685.0950 x44021 Fax 978.688.9573 Email gwillis@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: http:lfwww.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 Enright, Jean From: Bellavance, Curt Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:04 PM To: 'kathy@morincameron.com' Cc: 'Lisa Eggleston'; 'scott@morincameron.com'; Hughes,Jennifer; Enright,Jean Subject: FW: North Andover Country Club parking expansion Attachments: BOS memo 05_12_14.pdf;TRC comments 03_26_14.pdf Hi Kathy: Your office should contact Gene Willis(Town Engineer). Gene's phone number is(978) 685-0950. He will be reviewing the plans as well and will be submitting his comments to the Planning Board. See attached comments. Curt Bellavance Com Dev Director From: Willis, Gene Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:33 PM To: Bellavance, Curt Cc: Hughes, Jennifer Subject: North Andover Country Club parking expansion Curt See a copy of the memo sent to TM on project and of my TRC notes. I have not been contacted or asked to review the engineering on this project. The grades, increased impervious area, and problems we experience in Great Pond Road during winter give me concern. Has there been an outside review of the engineering especially with regards to hydraulic modelling and stormwater runoff? The design engineering firm should contact me before Planning approves the project. Eugene P.Willis P.E.M.S. Division of Public Work Director of Engineering Town of North Andover 384 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Phone/cell 978.685.0950 x44021 Fax 978.688.9573 Email gwillis@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: hftp://www.sec.state.ma,us/pre/t)reidx.htm. 1 INTEROFFICE O DATE: May 12,2014 Andrew Maylor Gene Willis CC:Bruce Thibodeau North Andover Country Club parking. Today 1 received a letter and Blau##2 of 4,dated ay 1,2014 from the Morin-Cameron Group e.for Practice Facility&Parking Lot Expansion at the North Andover Country Club. The request to widen Great Pond Road to create public parking in the right of way will not affect any current plans that the DPW has for work in the area. 1 have not reviewed the engineering designs for the project. I assume this design review been done by outside consultants during either the Planning or Conservation approval process. Enright, Jean From: Enright,Jean Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:18 AM To: McCarthy, Fred Cc: Bellavance, Curt; Enright,Jean Subject: NA Country Club Site Plan Review. Attachments: Site Plans 5-1-14.pdf, NA Country Club meeting minutes.docx Fred, A TRC meeting was held 3/26/14 for a proposed parking lot expansion at 500 Great Pond Road (NA Country Club). Neither you nor Andy were able to attend. I have attached the plans for your review and the TRC minutes. If you have any concerns/comments please let me know. I have full size plans in my office if you would prefer to look at those. The public hearing for the project opens on June 3, 2014. Jean Enright Planning Assistant Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street, Suite 2035 North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978-688-9535 Fax: 978-688-9542 Email: jenright@townofnorthandover.com Web: www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: http:/twww-sec-state-ma.us`/``prelpreidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 Enright, Jean From: Lisa Eggleston <lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:17 PM To: Bellavance, Curt; Hughes,Jennifer Cc: Enright,Jean;Willis, Gene Subject: North Andover Country Club review comments Attachments: North Andover Country Club review letter#l.pdf See comments attached. Let me know if you have any questions or want to set up a meeting with the applicants to discuss the comments. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit #29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to:http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 Eggleston Environmental May 14, 2014 North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Attn: Curt Bellevance, Director of Community Development RE: Stormwater Review North Andover Country Club Parking Lot Expansion Dear Mr. Bellevance and Board Members: Per your request, I have reviewed the May 1, 2014 Watershed Special Permit and Site Plan Review Application packet for the above-referenced project. Included in the materials I received and reviewed were the following: ■ Watershed Special Permit & Site Plan Review, North Andover Country Club Parking Area & Practice Facility Expansion, prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group and dated May 1, 2014. ■ Site Plans, Sheets 1 through 4 of 4, Practice Facility & Parking Lot Expansion, prepared for North Andover Country Club by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. and dated May 1, 2014. My primary focus in this technical review is on the overall stormwater management approach and design concepts used in the project, as well as its compliance with the Town of North Andover's zoning requirements for Watershed Protection Districts and Site Plan Review, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Stormwater Management Standards and Regulations, and the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw. It is my understanding that a Notice of Intent(NOI) application for the project has been or will be filed concurrently with the Conservation Commission. My review is aimed at assisting both boards in their respective reviews of the project. The project site is located on the Country Club property on the southeast side of Great Pond Road, where an existing parking lot, putting green and paddle tennis courts are located. Drainage in this area is in a generally northeasterly direction toward an onsite wetland system that drains through an existing culvert under Great Pond Road toward Lake Cochichewick. The proposed project calls for an expanded parking area, golf cart parking and practice greens on the Country Club property and four new parking spaces within the right-of-way of Great Pond Road. Proposed drainage facilities include a relocated sediment forebay/detention basin, a CDS treatment unit, and a bioretention basin. , c ` ;, 32 Old Framingham Rd Unit 29 Sudbury MA 01776 tel 508.259.1137 North Andover Country Chub, Stormwater Review 2 May 14, 2014 My initial comments on the application are outlined below: 1. The entire project site is located within the Watershed Protection District (WPD). It is my understanding that the lot(s) was/were created prior to Oct. 24, 1994 and is therefore not subject to the "Conservation Zone"requirements of the Watershed Protection District regulations. However, the Non-Disturbance Zone should be shown on the plan as extending 100 feet from the edge of all wetland resource areas within the watershed district. Likewise, the Non-Discharge Zone should be shown to include all of the area within 325 feet of the edge of all wetland resource It,J, Avbl',wt - areas within the watershed district. I believe, therefore, that all of the proposed �,n;� work falls within one of these two protection es.zon The propose uses are 15 7allowed by Special Permit within these zones, however the construction of a new permanent structure within the Non-Disturbance Zone also requires a variance ( A-C-11 k �� ' t' from the Zoning Board of Appeals. It is unclear whether any of the proposed facilities (parking lot, golf cart parking, practice greens or paddle tennis court) would constitute a permanent structure under the Zoning Bylaw. 2. In accordance with the Special Permit Requirements of the Watershed Protection District (Section 4.136 (4) of the Zoning Bylaw) the application must include written certification by a Registered Professional Engineer or other qualified scientist stating that there will not be any significant degradation of the quality or quantity of water in or entering Lake Cochichewick as a result of the project, as well as proof that there is no reasonable alternative location outside the Non- Disturbance and/or Non-Discharge ones for any discharge, structure or activity associated with the proposed use to occur. Neither of these items was included in the materials I reviewed. 3. Data available from Mass GIS indicates that a significant portion of the project site is also within the Zone A for the Lake Cochichewick public water supply; this boundary should be shown on the plan as well. Zone A is defined by the Massachusetts Drinking Water Regulations (310 CMR 22.02) as including: (a) the land area between the surface water source and the upper boundary of the bank; (b) the land area within a 400 foot lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source, as defined in 314 CMR 4.05(3)(a); and (c) the land area within a 200 foot lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a tributary or associated surface water body. The bordering vegetated wetland immediately northeast of the project area is a tributary wetland; hence Zone A includes the land within 200 feet of that wetland. 4. It should be noted that Standard 6 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards specifically prohibits the discharge of stormwater within Zone A, as is called for on the proposed plan. I believe that some allowance can be made for this project since the drainage from the existing parking lot currently discharges within Zone North Andover Country Club, Stormwater Review 3 May 14, 2014 A with minimal treatment, but only if it can be demonstrated that there will be a net improvement in the water quality of the discharge as a result of the project. For the reasons outlined herein I do not believe that has been accomplished with the proposed plan. I also recommend against allowing the stormwater discharge(s) to be moved closer to the tributary wetland. 5. While I understand that the detailed design of the proposed practice greens are to be done by others the plan needs to show the approximate elevation of the greens and the limits of side slope grading,particularly next to the wetland. 6. The plan should also include the limit of work or of vegetation clearing per the Special Permit requirements. 7. Both the Site Plan Review requirements (Sections 8.3(5) and (6) of the Zoning Bylaw) and the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Standards require that the rate of runoff from the post-development site be mitigated to pre-development rates. Stormwater management needs to be accomplished on the project site, before the runoff leaves the property. Based on the proposed grading, all of the runoff from the Phase 1 parking area and much of the Phase 2 parking area would drain directly onto Great Pond Road,bypassing the detention(and treatment)Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the site. This is both inconsistent with the requirements/regulations and a potential public safety hazard. 8. Soils in the project area are mapped as being Hydrologic Soil Group B and C, however the application states that the soils are more characteristic of HSG D soils based on four soil test pits excavated to the northeast of the existing parking area which indicated shallow depth to groundwater and bedrock. The proposed design therefore provides minimal recharge of stormwater runoff from the site. It is my opinion that shallow groundwater and ledge is not inconsistent with the mapped soil types, and that the limited soil testing conducted does not meet the parameters for soil reclassification outlined in Volume 3, Chapter 1 of the DEP Stormwater Handbook. Absent such data, a waiver of the groundwater recharge requirement under DEP Stormwater Standard#3 should not be granted. 9. On page 5 of the submittal letter the application also states that the Town's Watershed Protection District regulations "do not promote groundwater recharge in order to insure protection of the groundwater entering the lake." To the contrary, Section 4.136(4)(g) of the Zoning Bylaw specifically stipulates that within the Non-Disturbance Zone and Non-Discharge Zone any runoff from impervious surfaces shall, to the extent possible, be recharged onsite. I would also point out that the discharge of stormwater runoff to a surface water tributary of the lake is significantly less protective of the water quality in the lake than recharging the runoff to the groundwater would be, since the travel time through the groundwater is considerably longer and provides additional filtration of the runoff. North Andover Country Club, Stormwater Review 4 May 14, 2014 10. Based on the four soil test pits excavated on the site, the estimated seasonal high groundwater(ESHGW) elevation is at approximately elevation 142 in the vicinity of the proposed bioretention basin, or about a foot above the floor of the basin. The hydrologic analysis should therefore include no storage below ESHGW and should not include any exfiltration from the basin. 11. Since the water quality treatment in a bioretention basin is provided in large part through filtration and pollutant uptake in the subsoil, the proximity to groundwater would also render the proposed bioretention basin ineffective in providing the required treatment of runoff flow to the basin. The DEP Stormwater Handbook calls for two to four feet of soil media between the floor of the basin and ESHGW to achieve the necessary treatment, and an additional two feet of separation if the basin is also designed to exfiltrate. Given the shallow groundwater on the site, I suggest that alternative BMPs such as construcWA- stormwater-wetlands,may be more suitable measures to treat the runoff, - 'Per the DEP Stormwater regulations, proprietary devices such as the proposed CDS unit are to be used for pretreatment of stormwater runoff only, and then only if they are placed in an off-line configuration and sized in accordance with the recent DEP guidelines. In order to meet both Standard #4 (TSS removal) and Standard #6 (Critical Areas) of the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards it must be demonstrated that the first inch of runoff from all new pavement areas on the project site will undergo treatment in one of the Treatment BMPs identified in Table CA-2 of the Stormwater Handbook as being suitable for use in a Critical Area. In order to demonstrate a net improvement in water quality, existing pavement areas should also be treated. 13. The TSS removal calculations should include all proposed treatment trains for pavement runoff and should account for any flow that bypasses the treatment BMPs altogether. Unless it has been confirmed that the existing catchbasin on the site is equipped with a deep sump and a hooded outlet it should not be included in the TSS removal calculations. 14. I have the following additional comments on the hydrologic analysis submitted in support of the application: ■ The hydrologic analysis should include the 1-year storm, as is required by the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw. ■ The model should account for all drainage onto the project site, including that to the south and east of the interior lot lines. ■ The model should include control points at all locations where runoff leaves the project site, e.g. Great Pond Road. ■ All vegetative cover on the existing site should be assumed to be in "good" condition, not"fair" or"poor". ■ In the post-development hydrologic model, Subcatchment P1B should be routed to P3A, or the two combined. Based on the proposed grading it should not be routed through the detention basin and bioretention basin. North Andover Country Club, Stormwater Review 5 May 14, 2014 15. As is indicated in the Stormwater Checklist and identified on the plans, the proposed project entails more than an acre of land disturbance and is subject to the requirements of EPA's Construction General Permit (CGP). It will require filing for coverage under the CGP and the preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S)APPP) prior to construction. The SWPPP should be prepared in conjunction with the site contractor and should include a construction sequence aimed at minimizing the duration of exposure of unstabilized soils on the project site. It should also address stabilization/covering of soil stockpiles and any anticipated dewatering measures. The SWPPP should be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board and/or Conservation Commission prior to any disturbance on the site, and the board(s) may want to request documentation of coverage under the CGP and copies of the monitoring reports. I appreciate the opportunity to assist the North Andover Planning Board and Conservation Commission with the review of this project, and hope that this information is suitable for your needs. Please feel free to contact me if you or the applicants have any questions regarding the issues addressed herein. Sincerely, EGGLESTON ENVIRONMENTAL r Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. C: Jennifer Hughes, Conservation Administrator Enright, Jean From: Bellavance, Curt Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:57 PM To: 'Kathy Molina'; Scott Cameron Cc: Enright,lean;Willis, Gene Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club Great—thanks! From: Kathy Molina [mailto:Kathy(aDmorincameron.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:53 PM To: Bellavance, Curt; Scott Cameron Cc: Enright, Jean; Willis, Gene Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club Thank you Mr. Bellavance, we did receive the email and Scott will be in touch with Mr. Willis; he's not in the office right now, so I'm responding on his behalf. Kathy Molina THE MORIN-CAM R®N GROUP, INC. 447 Boston Street, US Route 3, Topsfield, MA 01983 p 1 978-887-8566 f 1 978-887-3480 w � www.morincameron.com From: Bellavance, Curt [mai Ito:cbel lava @townofnorthandover.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:52 PM To: Kathy Molina; Scott Cameron Cc: Enright, Jean; Willis, Gene Subject: North Andover Country Club Hi Kathy/Scott: I sent an email out the other day, not sure if your received it, but you should reach out to the town engineer, Gene Willis to discuss this project. The planning board will be looking to get a supporting letter from Gene's office. I've included Gene on this email chain for convenience. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Curt. Curt T. Bellavance,AICP Director,Community Development Division Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Phone 978.688.9531 Fax 978.688.9542 Email cbellavance@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com 1 Enright, Jean From: Bellavance, Curt Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:45 PM To: Willis, Gene; Enright,Jean Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club review comments Gene: I sent them an email the other day to reach out to you. I'll try again! From: Willis, Gene Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:40 PM To: Enright, Jean Cc: Bellavance, Curt Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club review comments Curt I need to see plans associated with report. Design engineers should contact me. Eugene P.Willis P.E.M.S. Division of Public Work Director of Engineering Town of North Andover 384 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Phone/cell 978.685.0950 x44021 Fax 978.688.9573 Email gwillis@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com From: Enright, Jean Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:40 AM To: Willis, Gene; 'Lisa Eggleston'; Bellavance, Curt; Hughes, Jennifer Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club review comments Attached From: Willis, Gene Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:27 PM To: 'Lisa Eggleston'; Bellavance, Curt; Hughes, Jennifer Cc: Enright, Jean Subject: RE: North Andover Country Club review comments I'd like to see the hydraulic modelling. Eugene P.Willis P.E. M.S. Division of Public Work 1 Director of Engineering Town of North Andover 384 Osgood Street North Andover,MA 01845 Phone/cell 978.685.0950 x44021 Fax 978.688.9573 Email gwillis@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com y. From: Lisa Eggleston [mailto:lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:17 PM To: Bellavance, Curt; Hughes, Jennifer Cc: Enright, Jean; Willis, Gene Subject: North Andover Country Club review comments See comments attached. Let me know if you have any questions or want to set up a meeting with the applicants to discuss the comments. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit #29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to:http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 `%ORT#1 O�,ico 6 qa0 O 9 �9SSACHUS�� INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23,2014 TO: Curt Sellavance FROM: Gene Willis CC: RE: North Andover Country Club site visit 052314 Original Comments March 24, 2014: 1 . Parking/use of land area inside the town right of way. Permission for use of this land must be obtained. I believe the authorize entity for this is the Board of Selectmen. 2. The grades indicate runoff flows toward Great pond road. Surface runoff must be kept on sight 3. The driveway entrance must conform to the town's driveway policy with regards to negative pitch off the roadway edge of pavement. 4. Will there be mitigation of runoff water? Site visit 05 23 14 Attendees Jenn Hughes, Lisa Eggleston, Gene Willis, Patrick Higgins, for town of N. A.; Scott Cameron of Morin — Cameron: Country Club staff 1 . 2 year event 3.1" 2. Pre development CN is 90 - 49,918 SF woods & grass poor, 14,826 SF fair. Post CN 89 24,06SF Grass good 30,476SF fair 3. Approx. 32% impervious cover? a. Pre-2 year storm — 3.10" - 4.18 cfs runoff outflow from design point b. Post 2 year storm — 3.10" - 3.75 cfs runoff outflow from design point c. Pre-10 year — 4.5" 6.82 cfs runoff outflow from design point d. Post-10 year— 4.5" 6.65 cfs runoff outflow from design point e. Pre 100 year — 6.5" 10.64 cfs runoff outflow from design point f. Post 100 year— 6.5" 10.18 cfs runoff outflow from design point Page 2 05/23/14 Construction: 1 . Overseen by Lisa? a. Remove restrictive layers and replace with Title 5 sand in Bioretention area — what depth? Comments: 1. The Town experiences icing problems when the existing culvert in road shoulder northeast of WF C9 gets cogged in winter. Can it be removed and replaced with an open swale? 2. The volume and velocity of runoff from the eastern portion of "PARKING PHASE 1" should be listed. There should be a defined swale all along Great Pond Road frontage including at driveway entrances. The design of the swale in the road shoulder should verify its capacity to carry that flow. The grades of road shoulder swale should be shown with 6" contours. 3. The driveway entrances, including cart path, must meet design standards as posted on DPW website. There must be a negative pitch off the existing Great Pond Road pavement — (culvert/swale across driveway?) 4. There must be a crown created in the driveway leaving "PARKING PHASE 2" with spot grades shown on plan. There must be a negative pitch leaving "PARKING PHASE 2" so that the catch basins are a minimum 6" below high point. 100% of runoff from PHASE 2 should be captured by catch basins. TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER DIVISION OF PUBLIC WO X 384 OSGOOD STREET NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS 01845-2909 Enright, Jean From: Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 11, 2014 9:18 AM To: Hughes, Jennifer, Enright,Jean Cc: Iisa@egglestonenvironmental.com; Richard Doherty;Willis, Gene; Ross Forbes (rnforbes@myfairpoint.net); Stephen Kohr <skohr@northandovercc.com> (skohr@northandovercc.com); peter vandegraaf(pvandegraaf@comcast.net) Subject: RE: NACC Response package (DRAFT) for Cons Com & Planning Board Attachments: Copy of Planting Spec - NACC - 06-10-14 (2).xls; HydroCAD summary.pdf Attached are 2 more supporting documents for the response package. Please incorporate these into the documents from my prior email. 1. Seeding Schedule 2. HydroCAD Analysis Summary Respectfully, Scott P. Cameron, P.E. THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. 447 Boston Street, IDS ROUte 1, Topsiield, MA 01983 p 978.887.8586 rn � 781.520.9496 n!, 978.887.3480 vas I www.morincameron.com Please consider the environment before printing this email! From: Scott Cameron Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:58 PM To: Jhughes@townofnorthandover.com; ienright@townofnorthandover.com Cc: lira@egglestonenvironmental.com; Richard Doherty; Willis, Gene (gwillis(atownofnorthandover.com); Ross Forbes (rnforbes@myfairpoint.net); Stephen Kohr <skohr@northandovercc.com> (skohr@northandovercc.com); peter vandegraaf(pvandegraaf@comcast.net) Subject: NACC Response package (DRAFT) for Cons Com &Planning Board Jenn/Deane: Enclosed please find the draft response package addressing Lisa's and Gene's review comments. I think we are there in concept and have done our best to document compliance with applicable regulations. We will look forward to working out any other questions/comments from Lisa/Gene ahead of filing the hard copies of the final plans (the board member's still remain to have some comment on the project so I'll reserve the potential for another plan change). Lisa/Gene: As far as schedule, we are hoping to attend the Planning Board meeting on the 17th under the assumption that we have the plans and response to comments addressed (if not in writing than hopefully in concept). The revised plans are due to be filed with the Conservation Commission on the 181h in order to make the hearing on the 25th. That is our target date to file the final plans and documents with both Boards although it would be great to have the plans on the 171h so the planning board can vote on them. Please advise if your schedules are prohibitive to reviewing the attached package prior to the planning board on the 17th so we can make provisions to continue the hearing. I am available by phone or email to answer any of your questions or concerns if you want to forego the time involved with writing formal responses. 1 Lastly, if you haven't already heard,the Selectman endorsed the parking spaces with the street right of way at last night's meeting. Thank you all for your help and input on this project. Respectfully, Scott P. Cameron, P'E' THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP` INC. 447 Boston Street, U3 Route |. TnpsGe|d. MA 01983 p � 978,887.8586mn � 701.520.9496 ,f 1978.887.3480w I Please consider the environment before printing this email! Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 GRASSING SCHEDULE Location Area Botanical Name Common Name Method Putting Greens 6,150 sf Agrostis palustris 'Declaration' Declaration Creeping Bentgrass Seed Collars & Fairways 1,500 sf Multiple varieties Penntrio Creeping Bentgrass Sod Agrostis palustris 'Penncross' Penncross Creeping Bentgrass Agrostis palustris 'Penneagle' Penneagle Creeping Bentgrass Agrostis palustris 'Pennlinks' Pennlinks Creeping Bentgrass Maintained Rouqh 7,000 sf Multiple varieties Bluegrass/Fine Fescue Blend Sod Poa pratensis Kentucky Bluegrass Festuca rubra var. commutata Chewings Fescue Native Rough/Slopes 6,000 sf Multiple varieties Fine Fescue Blend Sod Festuca rubra var. commutata Chewings Fescue Wetland Basins 5,000 sf Multiple varieties New England Wetmix(NEWP, Inc) Seed Carex vuppinoidea Fox Sedge Carex Lurida Lurid Sedge Carex scoparia Blunt Broom Sedge Verbena hastata Blue Vervain Scirpus atrovirens Green Bulrush Carex lupulina Hop Sedge Bidens cernua Nodding Bur Marigold Carex comosa Bristly/Cosmos Sedge Carex crinita Fringed Sedge Juncus effusus Soft Rush Scirpus cyperinus Wool Grass Glyceria grandis American Manna Grass Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe Pye Weed Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset Alisma subcordatum Mud Plantain Aster puniceus Purple Stemmed Aster Glyceria canadensis Rattlesnake Grass Scirpus validus Soft Stem Bulrush Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed Mimulus ringens Square Stemmed Monkey Flower Seeding Rate 2#per 1000 sf N/A N/A N/A 1#per 2400 sf HydroCAD Analysis Summary Following is a listing of the total pre and post statistics for the Hydrologic analysis of the site for the 1, 2, 10 and 100 year rainfall events: Stormwater Rate of Runoff at the Design Point Event Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change in Peak (Years) (Peak CFS) (Peak CFS) (CFS) 1 2.74 2.57 -0.17 2 3.88 3.87 -0.01 10 6.66 6.28 -0.22 100 10.77 10.74 -0.03 Stormwater Volume of Runoff at the Design Point Event Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change in Peak (Years) (Peak CF) (Peak CF) (CF) 1 11,315 10,384 -931 2 15,892 15,121 -771 10 27,276 26,770 -506 100 44,386 44,110 -276 Stormwater Velocities from the Post-Development Stormwater BMP's Event Water Quality Swale Pocket Wetland Culvert Pocket Wetland Weir (Years) (FPS) (FPS) (FPS) 1 1.01 1.78 0 2 1.18 2.44 p 10 1.43 3.82 0 100 1.71 4.97 1.36 t%0RTjj CHUS .INTER-0- FFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 11, 2014 TO: Curt Bellavance FROM: Gene Willis CC: Scott Cameron RE: North Andover Country Club Parking Expansion review I I am in receipt of Draft plans dated 6/10/14 from the Morin-Cameron Group. I offer the following comments. 1 . Plan 1 of 4 shows a sewer line and cleanout on north side of Great Pond Road. Is this shown correctly or does the line tie into a sewer main? The country : club is rerouting sewer on private property. The installation of , rerouting work must be inspected by Town. 2. No water service to maintenance garage is shown on existing conditions plan. This should be included on plan. 3. The rim elevation of the trench drain between phase 1 & 2 must be ,0.5' lower than the pavement grade on the north side of the drain. Grades as shown do not indicate this. 4. The previously proposed catch basin to the southwest of the connecting drive between phase 1 & 2 has been removed. This should be placed back in the drawing with the trench drain flowing to both catch basins. 5. Plans should have arrows through sections with references to detail sheet location. 6. A detail for installation of trench drain must be included showing it embedded in well drained soils. 7. A detail of the reconstructed road shoulder along Great Pond Road should be provided. Unsuitable sub soil material must be removed and replaced with well-draining soil and a 1' depth of dense graded stone. The shoulder should extend as far as possible but a minimum 2' off the edge of pavement. 8. A detail of the swale at the removed culvert location should be provided including road shoulder. Enright, Jean From: Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 18, 2014 2:34 PM To: Willis, Gene Cc: Hughes,Jennifer, lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com; peter vandegraaf (pvandegraaf@comcast.net); Stephen Kohr <skohr@northandovercc.com> (skohr@northandovercc.com); Ross Forbes (rnforbes@myfairpoint.net); Enright,Jean Subject: NACC Attachments: 20140618142913665_0001.pdf, 20140618142913665_0002.pdf Gene: We removed the trench drain from the plans in accordance with our conversation. We will keep the catch basins from our original submittal and create a defined gutter to ensure we capture 100%of the runoff from the upper parking area. The existing catch basin we can grade almost as a low point and the new catch basin will have a cascade style grade with a high inflow capacity. We've added the cross section details requested along with references to their locations on the plan. I've enclosed the interim plans incorporating your additional comments for review. Once we receive the comments from Lisa,we will issue a formal response package. Respectfully, Scott P. Cameron, P.E. THE MOB> - AMERO ' GROUP, INC.4-4 Boston Street, US Rou�e I, Topsfield, MA 0l98 978.887.8586 r � 781.520.9496 ,a 1978.887.3480 vv � www.morincameron.com Pieose consider the environment before printing this email:` Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: http.f .sec.state rna.usfore/prei€ix.htrn Please consider the environment before printing this email 1 Enright, Jean From: Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Sent: Thursday,June 19, 2014 9:06 AM To: Lisa Eggleston; Hughes,Jennifer Cc: Ross Forbes (rnforbes@myfairpoint.net);Will Schkuta; Enright,Jean Subject: RE: NACC Lisa/Jenn: Since we aren't quite sure how the hydrologic connection is going to function after the basins are constructed, our position is that any detailed planting plan is a wasted effort as it is not likely we will be able to predict what can survive the various wet zones of the basins. We don't want to be held to a planting plan;that is impossible to sustain and the club doesn't want to be replacing expensive plants on a regular basis because construction conditions are different than what we anticipate. So,instead of a detailed planting plan,we want to take a.simpler approach and seed the wet areas of all 3 basins with:new England wetland seed mix. This will,ensure that we are getting a wide variety of plant types and theoretically,the dominant plants suitable for the actual growing conditions of the constructed basins should take.. in other words, let mother nature take care of the vegetation instead of trying to force something to grow. Here is the note that Ross Forbes,the project golf course architect,recommended we add to the plan details: Note: All areas below the normal high water mark of the upper detention basin, pocket wetland/bioretention area, and the eater quality swale shall be seeded with New England Wetmix, prodded by New England Wetland Plants, Inc., at a rate of 1 pound per 2,400 square feet. The Wetmix typically consists of the following species: Carex vuppinoidea (Fox Sedge), Carex Lurid@ (Lurid Sedge), Carex scoparia (Blunt Broom Sedge), Verbena hastata (Blue Vervain), Scirpus atrovirens (Green Bulrush), Carex lupulina (Flop Sedge), Bidens cemua (podding Bur Marigold), Carex comosa (Bristly/Cosmos Sedge), Carex crinta (Fringed Sedge), Juncus effusus (Soft Push), Scirpus cyperinus (Wool Grass), Glyceria grandis (American Manna Grass), Eupatorium maculaturn (Spotted Joe Pye Weed), Eupatorium perfoliaturn (Boneset), Alisma subcordaturn (laud Plantain), Aster puniceus (Purple Stemmed Aster), Glycerin canadensis (Rattlesnake Grass), Scirpus validus (Soft Stem Bulrush), Asclpias incarnata (Swamp Milkweed), Mimulus ringens (Square Stemmed Monkey Flower). Areas above the high water marks shall be sodded or seeded with multiple turf grass varieties suitable for golf course use. Thoughts? Respectfully, Scott P. Cameron, P.E. TIHE M ; t R t GROUP, INC.447 Boston Street, US Route 1, Topsiield, MA 0 1983 p 978.887.8586 rn 1781.520.9496 f 1978.887.3480 w orinca eron_corn Please consider the environment before printing this email! From: Lisa Eggleston [mailto:lisaC�gggl onenvironmentat.g Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:45 FM To: Enright, Jean; Jennifer Hughes Cc: Scott Cameron Subject: NACC Scott, I have reviewed,the 6110 draft revisims the the NACC project and joist have a couple of comments: It appears that you are not designing,the pocket wettand to have a permanent pool or to be constantly wet,; so I would suggest referencing,it as a pocket wetlandybi=oret tionbasin- The reality,is that it wiR function as a bioretention basin during tow groundwater conditions and a 1 wetland during higher groundwater conditions, and it should be vegetated accordingly. Proposed vegetation should be included on the plan. I would also suggest underlaying the in with 18 inches of the bioretention soil mix, and then the septic sand below that. That witt provide the connection to groundwater but give the plants something to grow in, filter the exfiltrate, and prevent the in from draining too quickly. • Likewise, the wet swate is not likely to have a permanent pool since the adjacent wetland doesn't. It should be vegetated accordingly. I would suggest adding a permeable it mix (Like the bioretention mix)at the bottom of the swaLe to support vegetative growth and promote infiltration during tow groundwater conditions. • The outlet from the pocket wetland should be pulled back as much as possible from the existing wetland and some stone added to help disperse flow where it daylights. • Well need a revised OaM plan to include the revised BMPs- Let me know if you have any questions. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit#29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: htto:/ATimi.sec-state.ma-ustprelore .htm,. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 Enright, Jean From: Lisa Eggleston <Iisa@egg lestonenvironmental.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 24, 2014 1:30 PM To: Enright,lean; Hughes,Jennifer Cc: Scott Cameron Subject: Re: NACC Jennifer and Jean, Just letting you know that I have reviewed the June 20th revisions on the North Andover Country Club project and am satisfied that all of my previous comments have been addressed. do want to stress that the stormwater treatment provided by both the pocket wetland/bioretention basin and the wet swale requires that they be well vegetated. It is unclear at this time whether the specified seed mix will accomplish this since the nature of the vegetation will be dependent on the actual hydrology of the basins once they are built. I therefore recommend that several years of post-construction monitoring of the basins be required to ensure that they are successfully vegetated, and that allowance be made for planting of the basins in the event that the seeding does not take. I also recommend that on an ongoing basis the basins be mowed no more frequently than once per year, and then only as needed to prevent woody vegetation. As with similar projects permitted in the Watershed Protection District, new landscape areas should be constructed in such a manner as to minimize the maintenance that is required, e.g. the soil should be well aerated, it should have a minimum of 6-inches of topsoil and, where possible, native vegetation should be planted to minimize the need for fertilizer and watering. The use of fertilizers and other landscape chemicals on the site should be limited to organic, slow-release and low-phosphorus products, and the use of sodium-based deicers should be prohibited within the Watershed Protection District. Also consistent with recently permitted projects within the District, these restrictions should be permanently recorded on the deed to the property. Lastly, I recommend that the use of coal tar-based pavement sealants also be prohibited on the property, as they have been determined to contribute high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to stormwater runoff. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else from me on this project. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit#29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 From: Lisa Eggleston <lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com> Date:Wednesday,June 18, 2014 4:45 PM To: "Enright,Jean" <ienright@townofnorthandover.com>,Jennifer Hughes<Jhughes@townofnorthandover.com> Cc:Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Subject: NACC Scott, I have reviewed the 6/10 draft revisions the the NACC project and just have a couple of comments: • It appears that you are not designing the pocket wetland to have a permanent pool or to be constantly wet, so I would suggest referencing it as a pocket wetland/bioretention basin. The reality is that it will function as a bioretention basin during low groundwater conditions and a wetland during higher 1 groundwater conditions, and it should be vegetated accordingly. Proposed vegetation should be included on the plan. I would also suggest underlaying the basin with 18 inches of the bioretention soil mix, and then the septic sand below that. That will provide the connection to groundwater but give the plants something to grow in, filter the exfiltrate, and prevent the basin from draining too quickly. • Likewise, the wet swale is not likely to have a permanent pool since the adjacent wetland doesn't. It should be vegetated accordingly. I would suggest adding a permeable soil mix (like the bioretention mix) at the bottom of the swale to support vegetative growth and promote infiltration during low groundwater conditions. • The outlet from the pocket wetland should be pulled back as much as possible from the existing wetland and some stone added to help disperse flow where it daylights. • We'll need a revised OEtM plan to include the revised BMPs. Let me know if you have any questions. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit #29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 Enright, Jean From: Willis, Gene Sent: Wednesday,June 25, 2014 11:05 AM To: Enright,Jean Subject: N.Andover country Club Jean I have read designers letter and they have addressed my points satisfactorily. Eugene P.Willis P.E.M.S. Division of Public Work Director of Engineering Town of North Andover 384 Osgood Street North Andover,IAA 01845 Phone/cell 978.685.0950 x44021 Fax 979.688.9573 Email gwillis@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records.For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/prelpreidx.htm Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 ' Enright, Jean From: Scott Cameron <scott@morincameron.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 01, 2014 4:04 PM To: Enright,Jean Cc: Bellavance, Curt; Kathy Molina; Stephen Kohr <skohr@northandovercc.com> (skohr@northandovercc.com); peter vandegraaf(pvandegraaf@comcast.net) Subject: RE:Tonight's Planning Board meeting Jean: Thanks for the advance notice about the Board attendance this evening. yes, please continue the hearing for the Country Club Watershed and SPR Special Permits until the July 15�'meeting. Respectfully, Scott P. Cameron, P.E. THE CRf -C ERO GROUP, INC.447 Boston Street, US Route 1,Topsfield, MA 01983 p 1978.887.8586 m 1781.520.9496 f 1978.887.3480 w I www.morincameron.com Please consider the environment before printing this email! From: Enright, Jean [mailto:jenrightCcbtownofnorthandover.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:03 PM To: Scott Cameron Cc: Bellavance, Curt Subject: Tonight's Planning Board meeting Hi Scott, As discussed, only three Board members can attend tonight's meeting. Although this is enough for a quorum, the Special Permits for 500 Great Pond Road require four votes. The meeting will be held, but the Board will continue all hearings to the July 15, 2014 meeting date. We intend to have draft Notice of Decisions for both the Site Plan Review and Watershed Special Permits prepared for that meeting date. I am sorry for the inconvenience. Jean Enright Planning Assistant Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street,Suite 2035 North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: 978-688-9535 Fax: 978-688-9542 Email: jenright@townofnorthandover.com Web: www.TownofNorthAndover.com Enright, Jean From: Lisa Eggleston <lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 02, 2014 10:38 AM To: Hughes,Jennifer Cc: Enright,Jean; Bellavance, Curt Subject: Re: OOC Country Club I would suggest a finding that basically says that while the regs do not allow new stormwater discharges within a Zone A, there are existing stormwater discharges in the Zone A that currently discharge untreated pavement runoff from the project area. The proposed project calls for a modification of those discharges, and the Applicant has demonstrated that the proposed BMPs will provide a net benefit to the water supply by reducing the mass of stormwater pollutants discharged within the Zone A and toward the wetland resource areas. As far as the prohibition on coal tar sealants I believe that Judy was including it as a standard condition in the WPD permits. That said, you may also want to consider using it as a standard condition in your OOCs; the science is really quite compelling. Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit#29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 From:Jennifer Hughes<Jhughes@townofnorthandover.com> Date:Wednesday,July 2, 2014 10:16 AM To: Lisa Eggleston <lisa@egglestonenvironmental.com> Cc: "Enright,Jean" <ienright@townofnorthandover.com>, "Bellavance, Curt"<cbeI lava @townofnorthandover.com> Subject: RE: OOC Country Club Per one of our earlier discussions, I would like to include a "finding"to explain why we are allowing a new discharge in the Zone A. My understanding per Standard 6 is that a new discharge should not be allowed? Stormwater discharges within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water supply,and stormwater discharges near or to any other critical area,require the use of the specific source control and pollution prevention measures and the specific structural stormwater best management practices determined by the Department to be suitable for managing discharges to such areas,as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.A discharge is near a critical area if there is a strong likelihood of a significant impact occurring to said area,taking into account site-specific factors. Stormwater discharges to Outstanding Resource Waters and Special Resource Waters shall be removed and set back from the receiving water or wetland and receive the highest and best practical method of treatment. A"storm water discharge"as defined in 314 CMR 3.04(2)(a)1 or(b)to an Outstanding Resource Water or Special Resource Water shall comply with 314 CMR 3.00 and 314 CMR 4.00. Stormwater discharges to a Zone I or Zone A are prohibited unless essential to the operation of a public water supply. Would you suggest language for that findings section?Also, I think the prohibition on the coal tar sealants should be in the ZBA decision or is that something that would fall within the scope of the WPA and stormwater standards? Jennifer A. Hughes Conservation Administrator Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street,Suite 2035 North Andover,MA 01845 1 Phone 978.688.9530 Fax 978.688.9542 Email ihughes@townofnorthandover.com Web www.TownofNorthAndover.com From: Lisa Eggleston (mailto:lisa(a)egglestonenvironmental.com] Sent: Tuesday,July 01, 2014 5:47 PM To: Hughes,Jennifer Subject: Re: OOC Country Club 310 CMR 10.02(3)(c) Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd, Unit#29 Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel 508.259.1137 From:Jennifer Hughes<Jhughes@townofnorthandover.com> Date:Tuesday,July 1, 2014 5:24 PM To: Lisa Eggleston <lisa@?egglestonenvironmental.com> Subject:OOC Country Club Lisa, What section of the regulations should I reference in the following condition: ® The NACC finds that the intensive use of the upland areas and buffer zone proposed on this site will cause further alteration of the wetland resource areas. In order to prevent any alteration of wetland resource areas a twenty five foot(25`) No-Disturbance Zone and a fifty foot(5(Y)No-Construction Zone shall be established from the edge of the adjacent wetland resource area as shown on the herein referenced plans.The Conservation Administrator and/or other agents of the NACC do not have the authority to waive these setbacks as established under the local bylaw. No disturbance of existing grade,soils or vegetation is permitted in the No-Disturbance zone. (See Section 3.4&Appendix F of the local Regulations). It should be noted that the creation of the pocket wetland/bioretention area does not create additional wetland resource area or associated buffer zone on the property in accordance with M.G.L.c.131,§40 Jennifer A. Hughes Conservation Administrator Town of North Andover 1600 Osgood Street,Suite 2035 North Andover,MA 01845 Phone 978.688,9530 2