HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-01-08 Planning Board Minutes Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
E. Goldberg, Chairman J. Simons
1�1' Aaron Preston
Peter Boynton
Lori Crane,Assoc.
Jennifer Luz
1
i
Tuesday January 8 2019 7 p.m. 566 Main Street School Administration Bld . North Andover MA J
01845
1
2 Present: E. Goldberg,P. Boynton,J. l..,uz, J. Simons A. Preston, L. Crane
3 Absent:
4 Staff Present: J. Enright,M. Gregoire, B. Wolstromer
5 E. Goldberg, Chairman: The Planning Board meeting for Tuesday, January 8, 2019 was called to order at 7 p.m.
6
7 BOND RELEASE
8 575 Osgood Street,Pond Pasture LLC,Bob Coppola: Request for release of two$10K performance bonds associated with
9 a Watershed Special Permit and Site Plan Review Special Permit for the construction of a 38,760 SF Continuing Care
10 Retirement Center(CCRC)with forty(40)units in the"Small Home"style.
11 M. Gregoire: We have received all necessary decision requirements and documents.The site has been reviewed by the
12 Planning staff,we received a copy of the recorded Conservation Restriction, an as-built plan and letter of compliance has been
13 submitted from the architect and the parking spaces for access to the Trails has been constructed.There is no further work to
1.4 be completed. I recommend full release of the two bonds.
15 MOTION: J. Simons made a motion to approve the bond release(s)for the full amount$20K., including interest, for 575
16 Osgood Street,Pond Pasture,Bob Coppola.A.Preston seconded. The vote was 5-0,unanimous in favor.
17
18 DISCUSSIONS
19 234 Brentwood Circle Sara Goldsmith Schwartz&William Hannum: Waiver Request for a Watershed Special
20 Permit under Sections 195-4.136, 10.3 and 10.31 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The Applicant proposes to remove an
21 in-ground swimming pool within the Non-Disturbance Zone. The project is located within the Residential 1 (R-1)Zoning
22 District. [Discussion item postponed to danumy 22, 2019 Planning Bow d meeting)
23
24 707 Turnpike Street,William Sweet: Waiver Request for Site Plan Review under section 195-8.11 for Chimney Sweep
25 Office,
26 William Sweet 2 Wynmoor Drive Scarborough,ME,Chimney Sweep: Reviewed plan to establish his business at the site
27 which was previously a real estate office(GB);with parking being the only issue changing.Perimeter driveway parking is
28 discouraged due to proximity to wetlands. He has(10)employees and(6)vans. Reviewed conceptual parking plan showing
29 (12)total parking spaces; (9-along the building rear;3-currently designated for an existing lawn area along the right front of
30 the building behind snow stockpile area).
31 MOTION: J. Simons made a motion to waive Site Plan Review providing the applicant(a)returns to the Board for a
32 stormwater review if the existing gravel driveway is to be paved,(b)the applicant receives approval from.Conservation and
33 (c)returns to the Board with site photos within one year for an update. A. Preston seconded.The vote was 5-0,unanimous in
34 favor.
35
36 Mill Road & Johnson Street,TKZ: Request for Extension of a Land Disturbance Special Permit approved on February
37 20,2018.
38 T.Zahoruiko: Requested an extension be made on the original permit LDP issued a year ago(2/20/2018)on four lots on Mill
39 Road and.Johnson Street. The extension request is being submitted a year in advance of its expiration. He does not have a
40 contract on the lots adjacent to the two currently being constructed,however anticipates the development of the two additional
41 lots.An extension would make it three years from today(2/20/2022).1 am only allowed one extension and it lapses
42 (2/20/2020).
43 M. Gregoire: The current bylaw General Conditions 7 states that a Land Disturbance Permit must be completed within two
44 years of permit issuance. Referenced Section 165-5.M of the Stormwater Management and Erosion Control.Bylaw states
1
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
E. Goldberg, Chairman • - J. Simons
Peter Boynton Aaron Preston
Jennifer Luz
,,p,!o/ Lori Crane,Assoc.
TuesdaV Januarp 8, 2019(a) 7 p.m. 566 Main Street School Administration Bldg. North Andover,MA
01845
45 extensions of time can be granted by the Planning Board upon formal written request by the applicant,however if not granted
46 the permit shall be considered revoked.
47 E.Goldber& After reading the above referenced bylaw,stated that the bylaw can be interpreted as allowing for one extension
48 from the date of the original issuance of the permit.
49 MOTION: J. Luz made a motion to extend the Land Disturbance Special Permit to February 20,2022,. J. Simons seconded.
50 The vote was 5-0,unanimous in favor.
51
52 Potential May 2019 Town Meeting Zoning Bylaw Amendments:
53 Bowdoin Capital Group,Alex Loth.: Potential for a Zoning Map amendment article for a zoning district change from
54 Corridor Development District 2(CDD2)to General Business(GB)for the following parcels of land located at the corner of
55 Hillside Road and Turnpike Street: 190 Hillside Road, 182 Hillside Road,and 582'Turnpike Street located at the corner of
56 Hillside Road and Turnpike Street.
57 Alex.Loth,76 Innis Street/Bowdoin Capital Group: Discussed the challenges associated with determining the appropriate
58 zoning for a commercial lot which is under the 2 acre minimum particularly where drive thru(s)are being considered. Should
59 we consider revising the current CDD2 zoning which was established to foster commercial development?Reviewed adjacent
60 lots and uses similar in size.
61 John.-Casey, 84 Innis Street: There is a big difference between CDD2 and GB. 'There is one acre zoning across the street and
62 nothing has happened there. My backyard abuts this proposed development.Not opposed to a doctor's office, a bank or coffee
63 shop with limited hours which will have less impact than a fast food restaurant. I'm not opposed to revising the CDD2 which
64 protects us and appreciate your consideration of setbacks."Traffic needs to be considered. The gate at Hillside Road
65 Crossroads Plaza was designated for delivery vehicles only and is now being used as an entrance and egress to the plaza.
66 J. Sirnons: The lots across the street are smaller,wetter and shallower. The lots on your side are a little bigger which is why
67 we set the minimum at 2 acres. The issue is whether we can reduce the size of the lot(s)and still protect the neighborhood.
68 We have an existing zone in place and it's not successfully encouraging development. Tile question becomes whether we
69 make the lot sizes smaller and allow for drive thru's.
70 Bill._Diadam_c,_15 Greenwood East Lane:Requested clarification to where the Board is headed and how many properties are
71 being considered.Are we referencing conceptual plan 1 or 2?Felt it premature to consider changing the bylaw versus a
72 particular area to accommodate all tine parcels along Corridor 114.There is no guarantee as to what MINCO would like to
73 build here.A drive thru on Hillside is problematic.Encouraged Board to carefully and thoughtfully consider this proposal.
74 Susan Breen,5 Oak Avenue: This area of 114 is already congested. Vehicles cut through Hillside and Chestnut.The
75 intersection is scary and dangerous. Would a traffic light and safe sidewalks be considered at the corner of Hillside and 114?
76 Police and Fire are dispatched to this area of Route 114 daily.
77 J. Zahoruiko: Expressed concern for his isolated CDD2 parcel (residential home)if an agreement for his lot to be included in
78 the project is not reached.How will this impact these lots?This proposal loses approx. 1 OK sq.ft. if you consider the deeded
79 access right of way/driveway easement to my property that crosses the proposed lots. I wonder if you consider 1.5 acres.
80 Gerald Brecher,488 Pleasant Street: I am not in favor of this proposal which imposes commercial use upon Hillside Avenue
81 an entirely residential area.Vehicles driving in and out of a commercial site; adjacent to a nice residential area will pollute the
82 residential area in a very serious way. It sets a bad precedent.
83 ,. Goldberg:The Board is interested in sponsoring this initiative,we are leaning toward tweaking the CDD2,lowering the
84 acreage requirement and will have Planning proceed by drafting a warrant article which can then be discussed at two February
85 meetings and hold the two public hearings in March for an April warrant posting prior to Town Meeting May 14,2019.
86 [Discussion item continued to 112212019 meeting]
87
88 Tom Zahoruiko 1665 Great Pond Road: Potential amendment article to the Large Estate Condominium Conversion
89 Zoning Bylaw,
90 Tom Zahoruiko,__1b6S_Great_Pond_Road/TKZ I,LC: I have no new technical infonnation. This proposal takes a large mill
91 structure and reuses it for housing units.It is a responsible use of valuable resources.
2
Town of'North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
E. Goldberg, Chairman `
J. Simons
Peter Boynton �����1j�,� ���o��'. Aa�r�an Preston
Jennifer Luz F ffii Lori Crane,Assoc,
Tuesday January 8, 2019 La) 7 p.m. 566 Main Street School Administration Bldg: North Andover, ALA
01845
92 E. Goldbe1g:Thanked the public for all of their thoughtful input.The options for our'Board are to either-(1)say no,(2)
93 support the change to the Large Estate Condominium Conversion bylaw,or to(3)be supportive to changing the zoning for
94 this particular parcel. I'm not sure this property is marketable if we don't consider changing the zoning.
95 Doug Evans, 114 Academy Road:Expressed that this issue is premature and needs more time and consideration noting the
96 l iistorical Society has more work to do.Empathetic to the society's financial situation. Their bylaws prohibit the sale of the
97 building.This project is diametrically opposed to their mission and focus.
98 Michelle Saracusa 210 Andover Street: Stressed her objection to this proposal, affinity for the building and common, stating
99 this effort is premature.
100 Gerald Brecher,488 Pleasant Street: The essence of this plan is to simply change what goes on inside the building without
101 changing the footprint. It has been in existence since 1.961. The'Textile Museum entertained many community goers.
102 Academy Road is a gorgeous street,however the residents of that street should not be telling everyone how to live. 'This is the
103 best way to support the historical Society and its mission.No matter the proposal,the zoning would have to change. Living
104 around the common has not been objectionable and the character of the building will not change. I have no objection to this
105 project.This Board's task is to simply determine whether this is an appropriate use for this property.
106 Susan Haltinaier,90 Herrick Road: As a member of the Board of Directors of the Historical Society,we have seen a recent
107 surge of new members and are processing them. I'm of the opinion that the building deserves to remain in place as part of the
1.08 Common. Our next meeting of the Historical Board is on.January 23,2019;1 anticipate the vote will be on the agenda. A
1.09 business use would require a more substantial change from residential.No one liked that idea.The working group sessions
110 occurred during summer and then this proposal came forward. We have spent numerous society hours and funds to install
111 sump pumps,repair windows,restore electricity and heat to stabilize the building.There are already multifamily units that
112 exist across from the brick store. I respectfully ask this Board not to delay their decision.
113 E. Goldberr :The Historical Society needs to determine soon where and when the meeting is going to occur and to make it a
114 transparent process. Have the discussion with everyone and tell us how your members voted. We need that piece.
115 Brad Wakeman, 140 Academy Road: Stressed that this process needs to slow down. Condos will change the historical
116 colonial atmosphere on the Common adding cars and artificial light. In 2006,when W. Barrett wanted to develop 114
117 Academy Road with condos the HS said precedent setting changes would change the character of the historic neighborhood
118 (the fagade was not changing)yet today they are supportive of this and proponents of this on the Common. We need to look
119 into the future. Conflicts with small condo associations are likely to arise putting the fabric of the building at risk. We should
120 ask what this will look like 100 years from now. Dark sky lighting is initially being mentioned however a theft, slip and fall
121 will likely add flood lighting, There is no guarantee that TKZ LLC will carry this project to the end.Dozens have expressed
122 displeasure. I suggest we wait to see what the Historical.Society reports back after their meeting. The notion of creating open
123 space has been entertained before in North Andover;referencing the fields across from Weir Hill.A dense condo
124 development could harm the character, integrity and tranquility of our town Common. We should take the longer view.
125 E. Gal g: I'm struggling with the pause; continuing to wait again concerns me.
126 Diane Huster,279 Winter Street:It is an iconic building.You should be involved. The Society needs your help. We want this
127 Board to tell us what we should be doing. Mr,Lahoruiko has prepared a proposal which minimizes impact. We spent 20 years
128 trying to preserve the building. The Historical Society does not have the funds to tear the building down. Condos/townhornes
129 at the value they're being sold for will be kept up.Provided brief history of Caroline Stevens Rogers building which was built
130 at the time she created Center Realty Trust which bought all the buildings in the Old Center in carder to save the Old Center.
131 We have to get the information out to our membership;it may take two meetings. We are working off of ten volunteers.I'm
132 hoping you can help us do the right thing.
133 Bob Curtin,28 Phillips Common: Based on the money they put into refurbishing the Old Center and based on my latest tax
134 bill, I don't understand why the CPA can't fund this project or have the Historical Society sell the building or lot for a$1 to
1.35 the Trustees of the Reservation.Either renovate the building or knock it down and plant trees.
136 Antonio Macon 36 Andover Street: I live on the Common and am a former Historical Society trustee and member and agree
137 with the adaptive reuse proposal; it's the best proposal anyone has made in 20 years. The proposal does not change the
i
3
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
E. Goldberg, Chairman • ' J. Simons
Peter Bal'ntarr 1 %I%%f; Aaron Preston
��� „�.
o
Jennifer Luz Lori Crane,Assoc.
,
TuesdaV JanuarE 8 2019 a7 7 P.m. 566 Main Street School Administration Bld , North Andover MA
01845
138 building. I urge this Board not to pause so this building can be back up and running for this community and not sitting in.
139 disrepair.It would be really great to have this building back for this community.
140 Doug.Fvans, 114 Academ Ind: Is this building iconic and is saving it a greater mission than tearing it down? It's not
141 historic and it's not within their mission as a Society;that being preservation of an historic district. I disagree that this will be
142 totally unchanged.Eight condos will affect the area, increased traffic,frretruck turnarounds, lighting,etc. I strongly disagree
143 that things will not change. It will be inconsistent with what the town has done with the Common.
144 J. Simons: It's no surprise that this is a use that I've been skeptical about clue to the impact on the Common. It's not a use 1
1.45 support,therefore I'd vote against it.I don't think changing the Large Estate bylaw works at all,.
1.46 J. Luz: Regardless of what you think of the particular proposal,this building is a really important piece of our town. Changing
147 the zoning bylaw to shape our Common involves the Planning Board,however we are not ready to decide without the
148 Historical Society's decision.
149 A. Preston: This is the Historical Society's property. The property owner should have latitude as to how they develop their
150 property.The Historical Society wants to keep the structure as it is and the Master Plan promotes adaptive reuse whether
151 structures are historical or not.No matter the condition of the building,we should help them get to where they want to be yet
152 protect the Common. I don't think changing the Large Estate Condominium bylaw is the answer.
153 L. Craue:-We are getting mixed messages from the historical Society and there is confusion. I admire the Common and the
154 greenspace and wonder if any outside consultants were entertained to re-purpose the building. I understand there are
155 infrastructure needs yet the building has significance to the town. I suspect other ideas need to be entertained.
156 P. Boynton: Despite what is on the table,there are red flags in the process. We need more sufficient information;the Common
157 and the area will be impacted,i.e. safety. This is not just an issue of historic value,but importantly of property values. People
158 are attracted to this town because we've managed to preserve this Common which greatly preceded the date in a different
159 farm when it was turned over to the town(1959/1.961).Is the Historical Society preserving a building?Or the Common?West
160 Mill is a great example of maximizing reuse. Sometimes maximizing the use doesn't mean"doing more".The reason we have
161 a Common today is'because we chose to limit use,so that plot of'land was not frill of activities.The footprint of this building
162 does change, due to an 8 car parking garage. The purpose of the building makes a difference. You can argue that the reason
163 the building was built because its purpose was consistent with the purpose of the Common. The Common is a place where all
164 members of the town can gather to obtain use.The building was intended for all members of the town to use. That will end
165 once its private residences.It will no longer be part of"the Common use"of that parcel that attracts people to town.The next
166 critical piece we need is the vote of the Historical.Society.
167 E. Goldberg: Currently,the building has no value to the town or use to the public, however the building is iconic. We need to
168 support the most positive change.I think it's our job to make the best decision on the proposal in front of us. We need the
169 support and vote from the Historical Society. We'll need additional information.I don't see an impact that 8 townhouses will
170 make. I don't think this should be a citizen petition,this should come as a proposal from Lis to the town. This will be placed.
171 this on the agenda for January 22,2019.
172 T. Zahoruiko: This is a difficult decision for everyone. I feel the right conclusion will be made.
173 [Discussion item continued to 112212019 meeting)
174
175
176 1874 Turnpike Street,Bob Lavoie:Potential for a Zoning Map amendment article for a zoning district change from Village
177 Residential (VR)to General Business(GB)for land located at 1874 Turnpike Street.
1.78 Robert Lavoie Attorneyand Rep7rsentative far applicant Jame Cl'Donnell: Seeks support on a rezoning article for 1.874
179 Turnpike stating adjacent properties on either side of the property are zoned B4 and General Business,i.e. Stonewall Plaza,
180 versus the current property's designation as Village Residential. The one acre lot is isolated.Noted that parking requirements
181 for a 12K sq. ft. dance studio could be accommodated in the front of the building allowing for a 100 ft. setback.
182 (Discussion item continued to 112212019 meetingl
183
4
Town of'North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
Simons
E. Goldberg, Chairman J, . mons
Peter Boynton ��1�����������i ', Aaron Preston
Jennifer Luz
Lori Crane,Assoc.
� 1
1
i
1
Tuesday January 8, 2019(a), 7tr.m. 566 Minn Street SclroolAdmirxistratiort Bid, . North Andover,MA
01845
184 Article 5: Earth Materials Removal: Provide for exemptions from this bylaw consistent with Chapter '165-4.13 Stormwater
185 Management and Erosion Control
186 J. Enright: This article proposes to add the language from the Land Disturbance Permit exemption to Article 5. Site Plan
187 Review and the Land Disturbance Permit have been added to the zoning bylaw since Article 5 was established. I have
188 confirmed with the Building Commissioner that he is supportive of this change. The Operating Standards required in the
189 Earth Removal Permit are accounted for in both Site Plan Review and the Land Disturbance Permit. If less than an acre of
190 land is proposed to be disturbed the Building Commissioner can trigger this bylaw. Board recommended Jean draft:the
1.91 warrant article. [Discussion item continued to 112212019 meetingl
192
193 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
194 350 Great Pond Road,Christopher Burt& Ellen Goodwin: Application for a Watershed Special Permit under
1.95 Sections 195-4.17 and 195-10.7 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The Applicant proposes replanting of landscaping in the
196 Non-Discharge and Non-Disturbance Zones.The project is located within the Residential 1 (R-1)Zoning District. �
197 Chris Burt Homeowner&James Emmanuel: Described submitted planting plan incorporating large and small trees,noting
198 quantity,types and locations.
199 M:Gregoire: Explained that this is an after the fact request due to extensive tree cutting between November Th when she
200 visited the site with the Conservation Inspector and met with the property owner,identified trees within the and November
201 1.3`'when she noticed the cutting. The application is for the replanting of trees removed. Unsure of the number of trees
202 removed.
203 J.Emmanuel: The applicant is interesting in constructing the patio areas marked on the landscape plan.
204 The Board recommends that the applicant discuss the project further before the next meeting.
205 [Continued to the.January 22, 2019 Planning Board meeting]
206
207 4 High Street,RCG West Mill NA LLC: Application for a Subdistrict A Definitive Master Plan Special Permit for
208 Phase I under sections 195-6.6.,195-8.1 through 195-8.8, 195-10.7,and 195-1.8.9 through 195-18.20 of the North Andover
209 Zoning Bylaw. The Applicant seeks a Subdistrict A Definitive Master Plan Special Permit for existing uses and improvements
210 at'West Mill, and to allocate a total of 837 existing parking spaces for West Mill on the property located at West Mill,on
211 streets within 100 yards,on parking spaces leased or owned within 400 yards, and shared parking spaces. The property is
212 located in the I-S, GB,and R-4 underlying zoning districts, as well as the Downtown Overlay Zoning District,Part 2
213 Subdistrict A: Historic Mill Area.
214 D. Steinberg&John.Smolak,Atty.:Explained that this exercise is a consolidation of previous permits under the bylaw noting
215 where parking is to be located for Phase I and future phases.No proposal has been submitted yet. It allows f'or 837 existing
216 parking spaces at 4 High Street-West Mill,
217 J._Smolak: We are simply combining previous decisions and all prior approvals and bringing them into Subdistrict A with.
218 adjustments to parking recodification under new zoning and consolidating them on site.
219 D. Steinbere: Presented a Table of i.Jses noting several different requirements and for Phase 1&11 parking.
220 Betsy Cate, 116 High Street:Voiced concern for light,noise and traffic pollution in general area.
221 Candy Robinson,Owner-Green Apple_Caf6 57 Water Street: Two hour parking restrictions are not enforced in this area and j
222 should be revisited.Concern for future development.
223 Kim Pass, 110 High Street: Concerned about Phase II and light pollution,snow placement and logistics of walking from the
224 covered parking garage.
225 Guy Richards,Owner-Richards TV 48 Water Street:Parking needs to be analyzed in the general area.There are no
226 crosswalks in the area which have been taken up by parking spots.
227 Board request decision draft for the next meeting.[Discussion item continued to 112212019 meeting] 1
228
5
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
E. Goldberg, Chairman J. Simons
Peter Boynton %/%O%///ice .Aaron.Preston
Jennifer Luz
Lori Crane,Assoc.
TuavdaV Jan uarV 8 2019 7 p.m. 566 Main Street School Administration B&I . North Andover MA
0.1845
229 [Continued to the January 22, 2019 Planning Board ineeting]
230
231 MINUTES APPROVAL
232 MOTION: P,Boynton made a motion to approve the December 18,2018. minutes. J. Simons seconded. The vote was 5-0,
233 unanimous in favor.
234
235 ADJOURNMENT
236 MOTION: P.Boynton made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by J. I_.uz,The vote was 5-0,
237 unanimous in favor.Meeting adjourned 1.1:00 p.m.
238
239 MEETING MATERIALS: Planning Board Meeting Agenda January 8,2019,DRAFT Planning Board Meeting Minutes
240 December 18,2018; 575 Osgood Street,Pond Pasture LLC,Bob Coppola,: 575 Osgood-F,dgewood Locus Map,
241 161101_Edgewood_5750sgood MODCCRC FINAL, 16110I_Edgewood 5750sgood_MODSPR FINAL,
242 161101_Edgewood._575Osgood WSPp FINAL, 181206 Conservation Restriction Recorded,06072018 As-Built, 06072018
243 Compliance Letter,CR Plan; 350 Great Pond Road,Christopher Burt&Ellen Goodwin:Department Review:20180102
244 Conservation Comments,PhotograRhs: 201,81.113 151639,20181113_151723,20181113 151724,350 Great Pond Locus
245 Map,20110617 Site flan 350 Great Pond Rd,Landscape Permit Plan 350 Great Pond Layoutl;4.Iliglr Street,RCG West Mill
246 NA L,LC : Abutters List,Application Narrative,FINAL,Application,Phase 1,EXIIIBI`l'A-West Mill Locus Plan,
247 EXHIBI"T B—West Mill Parking Lot As-Built(11-1-1.8), EXHIBIT C-West Mill___Proposed Definitive Master Plan, EXHIBIT
248 D-C,orr' rbined Mills Master Plan,EXHIBIT E-Parking Table with Campus Map,EXHIBIT F-'West Mill Parking Exhibit,
249 Planning Board Presentation, 1-8-19,West Mill Locus Map;234 Brentwood C irclq,Sara Goldsmith Schwartz&Williarn
250 Ilannum: 234 Brentwood Circle Locus Map, 19991202 As-Built Plan,20181128 Negative Determination Conservation,
251 201901.03 WSI'S Waiver Request,Authorization;707 Turnpike Street,William Sweet: Sweet 707 Turnpike driveway
252 measurements 190103, Sweet 707 Turnpike full plot with parking 190103,Sweet 707 Turnpike parking&snow plan 190103,
253 Sweet 707'Turnpike St updated Proposal 190103;Mill Road&Johnson Street TKZ: 185 &203 Mill.Road Locus Map,
254 32018 Recorded Decision;Potential May 2)19 Town Meeting Zoning Bylaw Amendments: Bowdoin Capital Group,Alex
255 Loth:, 191204 Conceptual 2 Lots, 181204 Conceptual 3 Lots,CDD1 and CDD2 Parcel Data,Hilighted Bylaw,Map CDD1
256 and CDD2, 190108 PB Meeting doe-Zoning Chart-Hillsidc;Torn Zahoruikq,m 1665 Great Pond Road:Resident Comment:
257 180108 Resident Comment B Wakeman, 1901.08 Resident Comment A Cohen, 190108 Resident Comment D Huster, 1.90108
258 Resident Comment J Fresen, 190108 Resident Comment J Lafond, 190108 Resident Comment K Kaufman, '190108 Resident
259 Comment K Stevens, 190108.Resident Comment M Larson, 1901.08 Resident Comment M Mendez, 190108 Resident
260 Comment P Craney, 190108 Resident Comment Comment P Rodrigues, 190108 Resident Comment P Slade, 190108
261 Resident Comment S Haltrnaier 2, 190108 Resident Comment S Haltmaier, 1901.08 Resident Comment S Novak, 1901.08 PB
262 Meeting doc-Resident Comment G Brecher,2019 NAHS Proposal for the Preservation of the Caroline Stevens Rogers
263 Building, 190108 Bldg Comrn GFA Cale; 1874 Turnpike Street,Bob Lavoie: MIMAP Location, ODonnell 1874 Turnpike
264 Re-zoning P1Bd Memo 1-8-19, 190108 PB Meeting doe-Plan of Land;Article 5: Earth Materials Removal : Proposed
265 Exemption for Earth Materials Removal Bylaw. (00126980xBC41`6)
6