HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-03-05 Planning Board Minutes Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
i
Eitan Goldberg, Chairman John Simons
Peter Boynton Aaron Preston
Lori Crane
Tuesday March 5 2019 7 .m. 120 Main Street Town Hall North Andover MA 01845
1
2 'resent: E. Goldberg,P. Boynton,J. Simons,A. Preston, L. Crane
3 Absent:
4 Staff Present: Jean Enright,M. Gregoire,B. Wolstroer
5
6 E. Goldberg, Chairman: The Planning Board meeting for Tuesday,March 5,2019 was called to order at 7 p.m.
7
8 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
9 350 Winthrop Avenue,Delta MB LLC: Application for a Site Plan Review Special Permit under sections 195-
10 8.8(D)(5) & 195-10.7 of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw for Common Parking Areas and Multiple Use
11 Facilities and a modification to a September 2, 1998 special permit to perform certain site improvements to correct J
12 existing ADA deficiencies.The site improvements will result in a loss of fourteen(14)parking spaces. The
13 property is located in the B-3, B-4 &R-4 zoning districts. [Applicant has requested to Continue to the March 19,
14 2019 Planning Board meeting-No Evidence Heard]
15 MOTION: J. Simons motioned to continue 350 Winthrop Ave.to the March 19,2019 Planning Board meeting.
16 P. Boynton seconded.The vote was 5-0, unanimous in favor.
17
i
i8 NE-W PUBLIC .k EA.kt,lN
19 0 Great Pond Road,LRC Builders,LLC c/o Robert Innis: Application for a Watershed Special Permit under
20 Part 5. Watershed Protection District and Section 1.95-10.7 of the Town of North Andover Bylaw. The applicant
21 seeks to construct a new single family dwelling with improvements to existing driveway and connection to
22 existing utility services within the Residential I zoning district with work within the Non-Disturbance Buffer Zone
23 of Lake Cochichewick. (Applicant has requested a Continuance to the April 16, 2019 Planning Board meeting.)
24 [Opened; Continued to April 16, 2019 Planning Board meeting;No Evidence Heard]
25 MOTION: J. Simons motioned to continue 0 Great Pond Rd, LRC Builders, LLC c/o Robert Innis to the April
26 16,2019 Planning Board meeting.P. Boynton seconded. The vote was 5-0,unanimous in favor.
27
28 EXECUTIVE SESSION
29 M.G.L. Chapter 30A, §21(a)-reason#3 to discuss strategy with respect to litigation,Varsity Wireless v.North.Andover
30 Planning Board.
31 The Planning Board will go into:Executive Session for confidential communications to discuss litigation strategy r
32 within the case of Varsity Wireless v.North Andover Planning Board. The Chair has declared an open meeting
33 would be detrimental to the Town's litigation strategy. Open Session to reconvene at the conclusion of the
34 Executive Session. #
35 MOTION: (7:06 p.m.)A. Preston motioned to go into Executive Session for a consultation with Town Counsel to
36 discuss confidential litigation strategy within the case of Varsity Wireless v.North Andover. P. Boynton seconded
37 the motion..
38 Roll.Call Vote: John Simons voted to go into Executive Session.Aaron Preston voted to go into Executive
39 Session. Eitan Goldberg voted to go into Executive Session.Peter Boynton voted to go into Executive Session.
40 Lori Crane voted to go into Executive Session.. (General public left the Boardroom and videography was
41 temporarily terminated)
42
43 (Open Session reconvened at 7:49 p.m.)
1
1
Town o,f North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
Eitan Goldberg, Chairman John Simons
Peter Boynton Aaron Preston
Lori Crane
a
TuesdaE Mareh 5 2019 7 p.m. 120 Main Street Town Hall North Andover MA 01845
44
45 Annual Town Meeting Zoning Bylaw/Map Bylaw/Map Amendment Articles:
46 Article 6: To amend the Zoning Bylaw,Article 6 Signs and Sign Lighting Regulations,requirements and
47 permitting process for certain signs and to delete sections of Article 6 that are inappropriately categorized as sign
48 regulations.
49 S. Egan, Town Counsel: Has made suggested edits to amend the sign bylaw and the sign lighting regulation to
50 comply with the Federal First Amendment Law; sign content regulations have to be"content neutral"v. specific as
51 to what they are advertising. Referenced areas containing edits.
52
53 Article 10: To amend the Town's Zoning Map-Parcel 106.D-0045-0000.0 (1874 Turnpike Street)to be included
54 within the Business 2 zoning district.
55 J. Enright: Noted an explanation has been added. The proposed us is office and a dance sturdio.A signed covenant
56 was submitted to the Planning Director at the meeting.
57
58 Article 16: To amend the Zoning Bylaw,Article 16 Corridor Development District(CDD),pennitted uses to
59 allow for drive-through facilities for banks within the CDDI and CDD2 zoning districts by special permit and to
60 amend the dimensional requirements within the CDD2 zoning district,
6i i.Enright: The changes are to allow banks with drive tlaroLIgh facilities lay Special rernin in C""i 2 and to
62 amend dimensional requirements in CDD2 to make them more consistent with.CDD1.
63 J.Enright:Article 5: To amend the "Zoning Bylaw, Article 5 Earth Material Removal,to provide for exemptions
64 from requirements for certain activities.
65 J.J. Enrighn: This article provides for exceptions consistent with the Land Disturbance Permit. The Earth Material
66 Removal bylaw predates Site Plan Review,the wetlands protection regualations and Land Disturbance Permit. The
67 revisions attempt to streamline the permitting.process.
68 [Articles Continued to the March 19, 2019 Planning Board ineeting]
69
70 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
71 495 Main Street,Town of North Andover: Application for a Special Permit--Site Plan Review under sections
72 195-8.10 through 8.17 and 195-10.7 of the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw. The Applicant proposes to
73 construct a recreational complex including athletic fields,tennis courts, picnic areas and associated packing areas,
74 walkways and emergency/maintenance access paths. The Property is located in the Residential 4(R4)Zoning
75 District.
76 E. Goldber : Provided project background and explained purpose of Site Plan.Review. Explained that topics that
77 The Board would on would be lighting,traffic and construction phasing.
78 Waterfield Design Group,Jacob Murray&Dave Miller: Presented new information in response to questions from
79 the last meeting. Reviewed lumens plan on the softball and soccer field. 0.4 foot-candles is the equivalent of
80 moonlight. The blue line represents the moonlight line. Showed slide where the pedestrian lights are removed
81 from the lighting analysis and only account for athletic play for comparison. When comparing both slides,you
82 can see that the moonlight line is practically at the fence. The lights have a cut off feature on the lens that drops
83 the light vertically down and out onto the field of play with darkness on one side and light on the field of play.
84 Showed photos of lighting provided by the lighting manufacturer. This is the same effect that will be on the
85 project site. At Merrimack College,the lights are designed to illuminate the pedestrian area around the field. This
2
Town of North Andover J
PLANNING BOARD
Eitan Goldberg, Chairman John Sintons
Peter Boynton �lJ 11 ,�� *� Aaron Preston
Lori Crane
1
TuesdaE March S 2019 7 p.m. 120 Main Street Torun Hall North Andover MA 01845
86 is different than what is proposed. The Greater:Lawrence Vocational is identical in the product and application at
87 this site.
88 L. Crane: Asked for examples of fields that abut neighborhoods.
89 Waterfield Design Group,Jacob Murray&Dave Miller: Looking at what comes off the pole. If it is dark on one
90 side of the light pole,and the field is lit,what is the difference?
91 P.Boynton: Attended both site visits and saw that the drop off of light at the Lawrence Vocational was very
92 dramatic; the photo you are using is better than what I saw at Lawrence Vocational. Is the photo what you are
93 going to provide. t
94 A,Prestion: Asked about L-I plan. Can you describe quality of light near the fence?
95 Waterfield Design Group,Jacob Murray&.Dave Miller: At yellow circles, it is the equivalent of being Linder a
96 light in a parking lot. That is at 4.0 lumens. The pole height can be reduced to reduce the light levels,but there
97 will be less light for°the safety of the walkway.. This is the hardest,most remote place on the footprint. Bollards
98 can be used,but they are susceptible to vandalism/baseball bats and throw less light for safe use of the walkway.
99 Every other light could be eliminated. If changes are made in the field,you have to buy the fixture but there will
100 be restocking fees for unused fixtures can be expensive.
101 J. Simons: "What hours will the lights be on?
102 Regina Kean, Chairperson of the Board of Selectman: Andrew Maylor made the suggested the establishment of a
103 committee ,; ith resident participants to advise en hours of operation and field lights. 'Eke Board of Selectmen is
104 supported of this idea and expects this to be a committee.
105 Jacob Murray&Dave Miller: Arborvitae can be used as a barrier and if need be, adjustments can easily be made
106 in the field.
107 Joe Reardon 62 Parker Street: Expressed support for improved quality of fields and opposition to lighting the
108 playing fields. Why are lights needed?Why not improve the fields and play sports during the day light? The
109 impact of the lighting was seen during the site visits.This will impact their lives. (questioned the control of the
110 light. Security light at the Atkinson currently shoots directly into my living room. Supports safety and security
111 lighting. Concerned for impact this project has on this neighborhood. We don't know the hours of operation.
11.2 Hours should be put in the special permit. The existing lights were put installed for football games;there were 5-6
113 per year,
114 Kim Reardon 62 Parker Street: Often lights are left on all night:.The site visits were helpful. Commented on the
115 context of the site visits;there are no homes adjacent to those fields.The neighbors directly abutting the fields will
1.16 have several layers of lighting to contend with; pedestrian lights, softball lights.and beyond that.are themain
117 multipurpose lights. Artificial turf can be plowed,this implies that the fields can be used day and night all year
118 round creating a dramatic change from the current use, This is an R4 zoning district;while this district allows for a
1.19 variety of uses,the zoning law as currently written affords us neighbors certain protections.The reason why this
120 project requires a special permit is because it falls outside the normal use of the property. When you simulate
121 daylight to extend the number of hours the fields are used it invites noise,traffic and parking issues. (Shared
122 literature regarding authority of the Planning Board)
123 E.E.Goldberg: We are trying to be mindful of this neighborhood and the goals and objectives for the town. Terms of 1
124 operation are outside of our boundaries. The point of Site Plan.Review is to condition the use. j
125 P.Bo, n�ton_: Our decisions do reference hours of construction,noise, etc. This is intriguing,I'd like to hear from
126 the town visionaries. Why are lights proposed for this project?
127 J. Simons: The problem is we have to wait for the committee to form; we are at the limit of our authority.
128 Cautioned against including specific time frames in a Planning decision,
3
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
Eitan Goldberg, Chairman John Simons
Peter Boynton 1���%f/o��i Aaron Preston
!r j
Lori Crane
TuesdaV March 5 2019,A, 7 .m. 120 Main Street Town Hall North Andover MA 01845
129 M. Gregoir Noted Section 8.15 does state authority and guidance on lessening impact.
130 K. Reardon: Asked Board to review page 3-Special Permit;this Board absolutely has the authority. Concerned
131 about the temptation to bring in more revenue in the future after set hours through field rental rent the fields.
132 :tick Green Chairman of the NAME Fields Committee: Always intended to have lights there and encourage
133 people of all age groups to this area. In 2016,we wanted lights at both fields.We desire use of this area and have a.
134 shortage of fields. Eventually, Osgood fields will be lost. The high school baseball fields are in deplorable
135 condition right now; artificial turf will allow them to play at the facility and Grogan's is out of service due to
136 Columbia Gas. The high school softball team plays at McEvoy Field and they are interested in this field. 1
137 understand the abutters concerns and we have been working with them since day one. We have discussed hours of
138 operation and we have never been disingenuous about lighting the fields. We have made a commitment not to
139 have construction traffic on neighborhood streets. We discussed the Parker Street gate with the NAPD requesting
140 stepped up patrols. Playing under the lights is a great value to the student athlete.
141 P. Boynton: Was there any thought on lighting the east fields which are not tucked into a neighborhood and not
142 lighting the west fields?
143 R. Green: We vetted several designs and the activity is mainly toward Route 125.We had 21 public meetings
144 including at the middle school for the abutters. Can attest that we have tried to work with them and last week we
145 talked about more screening. We want to be a good neighbor, The formation of a committee has been discussed
40' since 20 i 5.
1.47 L. Crane: Was there ever another location in town suggested?A project of this scale; shoe-horned in with tln-ee
148 schools, a new addition to the Kindergarten, plus a potential addition to the Middle School at some point; it's
1.49 taken away from what these fields actually need to do for the town. I don't see the benefit; I see this as a
150 distraction.
151 R._G-re-en,: Proximity adds to the success of this facility. Sharpners Pond is very wet;there are problems with
152 wetlands and Osgood is not available to the town.This was a town controlled property(by the schools)however
153 ownership was transferred to the town last year at a town meeting vote.
154 J. Simons: That whole complex was already used for athletic purposes,however it was universally acknowledged
155 that it was extremely and inefficiently being used.
156 R. Green: We had the circus there over the years which damaged the fields. Sharpners Pond and high school fields
157 have a geese problem with a lot of geese droppings. Artificial turf doesn't have that problem and it stands up to the
158 wear and tear. Grass fields cost us a great deal of maintenance.
159 WDG: Addressed the impass and suggested mitigation including the creation of a green wall to add a vertical
160 evergreen element; perhaps a structural element.
161 Nancy Claussen, 31 Spruce Street: Just learned about this project though a letter. Attending the site visit I was
162 sick to my stomach. Loves being part of this neighborhood and the proximity to the school after school activities,
163 marching band etc. but I don't want to live next to"Fenway Park". There are children's bedrooms a few feet from
164 these playing fields. This is not the neighborhood I moved into.
165 Susan Faucher, 50 Parker Street: Agreed with the Reardon's perspective;the parking will be atrocious and the
166 lighting and traffic will have a tremendous impact on our little neighborhood.Recent father/daughter dance and
167 people parked in front of her house on Parker Street. Our streets will be atrocious with all the sports being played
168 here all at once. If we have to sell,we'll sell.
169 E. Goldberg: Parking outside the actual site is an enforcement issue.We have jurisdiction over traffic and parking
170 on the site.
4
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
EitanGoldberg, Chairman . • John Simons
Peter.Boynton
• "`r Aaron Preston
� fljl��J1��G1, "
Lori Crane
Tuesday March 5 20I9 7 p.m. 120 Main Street Town Fall North Andover AM 1I184S
171 WDG: The School Administration expressed concerned about access to the site during construction. At the last
172 meeting we discussed traffic flow issues,parking and capacity ad this was previously addressed and resolved.
173 ;lean Kulash 55 Bradstreet Road: Would like a field trip to a more similar neighborhood. Lilies the idea of no
174 lighting or the Board could condition no lighting at the field closest to the abutting neighbors and perhaps no
175 artificial turf there.
176 WDG: We would have a Title 9 issue if we didn't treat the boys and girls fields equally, i.e. if we don't light the
1.77 girls softball field. Geometrically speaking,the fields need to remain located where they are. f
178 M. Legal: You do not have to call it a girls softball field because it is not; the boys use it for gym class daily 1
179 during school hours. There is no Title 9 issue. I have lived there 35 years and I watch what is played there.
180 WDG: You will still have a Title 9 issue and being a little league sized diamond warrants boys playing little league
181 on it-that doesn't mean it's not a girls softball field. A separate"construction only"entrance will be located off of
1.82 Route 12.5. Construction vehicles will not compete with school access in any way. We are creating an intersection
183 off the middle school road and flagmen will be on site as needed. Signage will be on site. When school is out,
1.84 construction vehicles and workers can use the Middle School entrance as well. There will be construction during
185 the school year. The construction traffic will be intermittent and sporadic. If there is going to be a constant now of
186 construction traffic,we will require this to be scheduled in advance. 'There will be no restrictions on the time that
187 construction vehicles can come and go.
188 T E"Yr.'"ht: Construction entr:nc'e an Fj 125 —01 MR Iy rPnv.;rp u AA A L1OT pert""'..:r A rP 1h..�.re�:ny rp�tr:C *.n C1 Gn thE',
189 time the construction vehicles can come and go? School starts at 7 a.m.
190 WDG: Construction hours will be 6:30 a.m.-6 p.m.
191 Jim Mealey, Assistant Superintendent of Schools: Supt. Gilligan would like windows of time when there will be
t
192 no construction traffic at all. We requested them for morning and afternoon during pick up and drop off. We need
193 better communication than what we had during the construction of the early childhood center.These vehicles will t
194 be crossing the traffic versus running parallel with it and there will be flagmen. (The Board will defer to the
195 schools on this).
196 WDG: Assurances will be written into the contractor's contract and this will be legally binding. We are creating a
197 bituminous walkway for the students protected by a jersey barrier and a fence and windscreen for the dust. This
198 will be there until it is time to build in this area. At that time, access will be provided a different way. The same
199 buffer will be at the Atkinson playground. Work will be in the parking lot early in the process so that the parking
200 lot can be used by the school. The construction staging area has been moved to the middle of field.
201 Jennifer Murphy, 50 Bradstreet Road: Requested that a water truck be considered on site for dust mitigation; dusk
202 doesn't stay below 5 ft.
203 WDG: Dust control is already part of the spec,
204 Steve&Emily Kennedy. 135 Beacon Hill Boulevard: Expressed concern for the health effects of the synthetic
205 artificial turf. These are not maintenance free fields at all; it is necessary to spray chemicals/pesticides(to keep
206 weeds from growing through them) and antimicrobial cleaning solutions on them. They have an 8-10 year life
207 span until they are replaced. Due to the toxicity to our landfills,there is a high cost to dispose of these materials-
208 most incinerators and landfills will not take them. The EPA and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
209 Registry have studies published showing that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons increase cancer rates and chances
210 of birth defects.The EPA, CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry have launched a study
211 to determine synthetic fields in general(not just PAHs)this is a concern of direct abutter's with children..
212 E. Goldberg: The specifications of the artificial turf seem to have met the required lead levels, my understanding
213 was that the BOH had no further concerns.
1
5
1
Town of North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
titan Goldberg, Chairman John Simons
Peter Boynton //J/1,;, ,•, Aaron Preston
%i
M
Lori Crone
Tuesday TueNday March 5 2019 7 p.m. 120 Main Street Town Hall,North Andover AM 01845
214 P. Boynton: The Board of Health weighed in on the lead. Can we have the Board of Health weigh in on other non-
215 lead related health concerns"?I think the full Board needs to weigh in versus only the Director.
216 WDG: The high school has vetted the toxicity issue;the Town Manager said that no issues have arisen. Can we
217 close the hearing and get input afterwards?These materials are all reviewed and approved by the state and DER
218 Margaret Legal, 26 Hemlock Street: Referenced her previous handout and wondered if the Board of Health
219 commented on any of the information she submitted.
22.0 M. Gregoire:_ The Board of Health Director reviewed this material and voiced no concerns. Will request this
221 information to be provided to the Rill board.
222 J. Enrigh: The Board of Health meets the last Thursday of the month.
223 M.Gregoire: Fire will be reviewing the materials for flammability. Can you condition a review by the Board of
224 Health as you do not know what the specs of the materials will be?
225 E.Goldber : Yes,we can ask the question; we can potentially vote on it having a condition that we get some sort
226 of approval or review by them; if they were to review it after the fact and there was an issue,we would be well.
227 within our rights to reopen and discuss again as a change in conditions. We may look to close this at the next
228 meeting.
229 J.Kulash:The EPA considers artificial turf a flame retardant carcinogen. Referenced Martha's Vineyard project
230 where they debated the use of it for 3 years and decided on a compromise. One field was installed as artificial turf
231 and the others were grass. Let's consider the health and safety of our community.
232 Waterfield Design Grout: 'These are matters the town decided on two years ago. We are not here to flake turf off
233 the table. We are here for Site Plan approval.
234 J. Enright: Storinwater peer review is complete.There are few items left at the discretion of the board and these
235 will be conditions in the decision..
236 E. Goldberg: Requested draft decision prepared with placeholders i.e. grass v. turf,BOH, pedestrian lights,heights
237 of the light poles and quantity, construction traffic detail rip rap for review at the next Planning Board meeting.
238 [Continued to the March 19, 2019 Planning Board ineeting]
239
240 NEW PUBLIC MEETING
241 4 High Street R.CG West Mill NA LLC: Application has been made for Planning Board approval of a proposed
242 3-lot preliminary subdivision plan on an approximate 18.5-acre parcel of land located at what is known as 'Nest
243 Mill located off High and Water Streets as further described below. The Premises Affected is located within the I-
244 S, GB, and.R-4 underlying zoning districts,as well as the Downtown Overlay Zoning District,Part 2 Subdistrict
245 A: Historic Mill Area.
246 E. Goldberg: Explained the limitations of public comment during a public meeting v. a public hearing.
247 fania Hartford: RCG is here to present a Preliminary Subdivision for a proposed 3 lot subdivision at West Mill
248 and existing roadway which separates the three it will be designated as a private way and open access to Lot 2.
249 There are 3 separate lots which will be improved. Lot I is the Historic Mill,Lot 2(ballfields parcel) is the area of
250 future development(which is under agreement with Avalon Bay who will be coming before the Board for
251 development of that lot) and Lot 3 will be a parking area shared between Lot 2 and our development. We are
252 proposing a waiver request.The roadway will be enhanced. It will not be a public way,but we do have an
253 obligation to Sutton Pond Condominiums to have access; an easement area.The old easement(cuts through Lot 1)
254 is evident; a plan was never filed with the registry for the newer one done in the 90's. We will file the new plan to
255 show the access to the Sutton Pond Condominiums at the registry.
6
Town ref North Andover
PLANNING BOARD
Eitan Goldherg, Chairman John Simons
Peter Boynton 11�j���y' jai • .Aaron Freston
.Lori Crane
i
Tnesday March S 2019 7 p.m. 120 Main Street Torun Hail North Andover MA 01845
256 John Smolak,Atty. for RCG: The proposed roadway is approx. 376 ft. in length. It's a bit of an unusual roadway,
257 but not unique to the town.In the past,this Board has granted waivers to roadways so they don't have to be built
258 to certain design specifications. The roadway is within an existing parking area. We would like to float some ideas
259 by the Board in terms of types of waivers we may be looking for. The casement that runs to Sutton Mill
260 Condominiums which was originally there since the early 70's;with the purchase of Davis&Furber in the early
261 90's a replacement casement was entertained.
262 J. Simons: You are doing a preliminary subdivision for the roadway.
263 J. Smolak: It's a proposed mixed-use;we need to go through this preliminary subdivision step. We are seeking
264 feedback for some of the requested waivers, i.e.the roadway,the elimination of a cul-de-sac for this proposed new
265 roadway. We have had discussions with the NAFD who deemed there was sufficient access to the parking area so
266 there is no need for a separate turnaround. We suggest reducing the width of the right of way from 60 ft.to 50 ft.
267 and we'd like to go down to 26 ft. in width. Waiver requests include: There is a requirement for an environmental
268 & community impact study; we feel that would be part of the Phase 11 Site Plan Review.
269 T. Hartford: Avalon will be approaching the Board informally within the next month;they'll file after that. It is
270 comprised of all residential apartments, similar to what is in the Master Plan.
271 M. Gregoire: Outlined additional Preliminary waiver, explained that all the submitted application materials were
272 distributed to the required department.The Board has 45 days to approve or disapprove the preliminary. (NAFD
171 requested a s—ept path +µn_lJysic Co sen�: tion is looking Lor the "75%upland requirement BOH has n^ corm ent
274 DPW noted there is a 12"water main within the 25 ft. access easement which provides water service to Sutton
275 Pond Condominiums and there is a 20 ft.wide sewer easement containing a portion of the town's 24"east side
276 trunk sewer-a major line that leads to town's sewage GLSD. They recommended the driveway be shifted to align
277 with the intersection of Prescott St, Building asked for CBA calculations,the School Dept. commented on Lot 2
278 regarding the impact 3 bedroom units have on the school system as well as low income housing,NAPD has no
279 issue with the preliminary plans yet would like input on the landscape and accessibility for police cars related to
280 service.)
281 J. Smolak: Most of these are appropriate to Phase It that you will eventually see.
282 Steve Saraceno, 102 High Street: The roadway should be improved to subdivision standards.I assume the
283 developer will present to the Board what they intend to do with lot 2 and present traffic studies, etc. High Street
284 has become a major roadway;trucks loading and unloading. Voiced concern for snow stockpiling,noise;there is a
285 lot of activity going on at this site and no one is policing it. I urge you not to be too lenient;we have a bylaw in
286 place for a reason.
287 Robin Mor ansen 147 High Street: This is the first I'm hearing about development of Lot 2. My question is how
288 many apartments and additional traffic in this neighborhood. Is there conservation land in this area and how does
289 this play into this development?
290 , Goldberg: This will all be reviewed as the process unfolds. The road has me concerned.
291 M. Gregoire: The applicant has 45 days after submission of the preliminary plan which you notify the applicant
292 whether the plan is approved or denied. You can add conditions now prior to the definitive subdivision plan. This
293 was submitted on January 31"and technically the Board has until March 171'-Sunday. You are allowed to add
294 modifications to this.
295 J. Smolak: We'll be back with the definitive whether the Board approves or denies this.
296 MOTION: J. Simons made a motion to deny the preliminary subdivision plan because it doesn't apply to our rules
297 and regulations, P. Boynton seconded. The vote was 5-0,unanimous in favor
298
299 MEETING MINUTES: Approval of February 27 &28,2019 Site Visit meeting minutes.
7
I
-awn of 1Varth Andover
PLANNING BOARD
Eitan Goldberg, Chairman Jahn Simons
Peter Boynton ,f %G;%� ;y, •� Aaron Preston
Lori Crane
Tuesday March 5 2019 A, 7 .m. 120 Main Street Town Hall North Andover A 01845
300 MOTION: P. Boynton made a motion to approve the February 19 meeting minutes.A. Preston seconded the
301 motion. The vote was, 5-0, unanimous .in favor.
302
303 ADJOURNMENT
304 MOTION: P. Boynton made a motion to adjourn the meeting. A. Preston seconded. The vote was, unanimous in
305 favor. Meeting adjourned 10:30 p.m.
306
307 T'VIEETING MATERIALS: Planning Board Meeting Agenda March 5, March 5,2019 Planning Board Agenda—Revised;
308 February 27,2019 Meeting Minutes-Site Visit,February 2.8,2019 Meeting Minutes-Site Visit; 0 Great Pond Road(Lot 3):
309 Department Review:Fire Department: 24096 Turning Radius,20190221 Fire Department;20190219 Conservation
310 Department,20190219 Police Department,20190220 Health Department,20190225 Conservation.Department; 19900710
311 Plan of Land Lots 1234 Great Pond Road, 19990517 Lots 1234 Great Pond Detail Sheet I of 2, 1999051.7 Lots 1234 Great
312 Pond Detail Sheet 2 of 2, 19990517 Site Plan Lots 1234 Great Pond, 19990730 Common Driveway Memo Lots 1234 Great
313 Pond,20040507 Decision.Lot 3 Great Pond Road,2.0050223 Covenant Lots 1234 Great Pond Rd,NOAGrtPondWatrshd
314 AppFiling;44 High S eet: Application:20190111 West Mill Preliminary Subdivision—Plan Set, Abutters list,Abutters List,
315 Form B—Application,PB Cover Letter 1-31-19,Prelim. Subdiv. Waiver Memo,West Mill; Department Review: 20190201.
316 Conservation.20190201 Conservation Department Review-4 High Street Preliminary Plan,24096 Turning Radius,20180207
317 Health Department Review—4 High Street Preliminary Plan,2.0190207 DPW Review-4 High Street Preliminary Plan,
3 i 0 20 l Y^W2144 `fo ucpaiiieiciat P'o—i6 ,2019021 T uilCliar61wVi�'w,e U i 2 i Y Pulii �itic`r`iCvv,2�v T Jtr21 i 0-1,uu'e I�c1i�4 uir"rant 2,
31.9 20190304 DPW T.,eUer High Street 4,West Mill Subdivision Preliminary Plan_(2019-02-26);495 Main Strcet; 190305 K
320 Reardon submission,20190227 Planning Board Agenda-2.27.19-Site Visit to Merrimack,20190228 Planning Board Agenda-
321 2.2.8.19 Site Visit to Greater Lawrence Tech,20190305 Planning Board Presentation Plans(5), Construction Entrance
322 location,Photometric with Field&Walkway Lights(1),Photometric with Walkway Lights Only(1),Recreation Complex
323 Permitting Plans 2-22-19;Annual Town Meeting Zoning Amendment Articles: Article 5 Earth Material Removal: 190206
324 Warrant Article Earth Material Removal, 190227 Warrant Article Earth Material Removal with Explanation; Article 6 Sign
325 and Sign Lighting Regulations: 190227 memo re amendments to the sign bylaw, 190301 Warrant Article SIGNS AND SIGN
326 LIGHTING REGULATIONS;MLU_Decision_- 7-3-2018 -_8783_-_OTIS_-:Article 16 Corridor Development District:
327 181204 Conceptual 2 Lots, 1900206 Warrant Article CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Amendment, 1900227
328 Warrant Article CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Amendment Explanation, CDDI and.CDD2 Parcel Data,Map
329 CDDI and CDD2;Map Amendment 1874 Turnpike Street: 190122 1874 Turnpike Re-zoning P1Bd Sketch with Setbacks.Tan
330 2019,. 190301 Draft 1874 Turnpike Restrictive Covenant, 190301 Warrant Article with explanation, 190305 owner executed
331 covenant,B1,B2,GB Permitted Use Table,B2 Existing Properties,MIMAP Location,ODonnell 1874 Turnpike Re-zoning
332 PLBd memo 1-8-49, Sununary of Dimensional Regulations, Summary of Use Regulations.
8