The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987-07-29 Conservation Commission Minutes NACC Meeting of July 29, 1987 Present., C cee (absent) Jack Linden L. Bruinooge (absent) AO Resca (8: 00) N. Sullivan, Cons. Admin., W., vicens M. Boudrot, Sec. it thee mmbeent Meeting was convened at 7 ,: 25 P,WOW1 h r e rs pres . LOTS 610A, 612A AND 64A AY AD ROAD ENFORCEMENT ORDER Nancy Sullivan, gave a brief discussion of the work completed on the crossing area and indicated that work was allowed on the, interior of Lot, 60A. She also ind"I" cated that the wetland delineation had been verified in the field. The, app.L icant, presented the Commiss ion with new plans showing the delineation and a proposal for a wetlandS 4-,,n, replication for the, This I# �0 NI reel cat was neciessary because of field modifications associated with the crossing., Comments were accepted from, the public concerning the status of the pond as it relates to, the fi' lligig required for the crossing and placement of erosilon control devices on the site. An abutter, Bob Davidson,, spoke to the Commiss, n regarding this matter,, Re felt that hay bales, were blocking 'water flow from the pond. The Commission stated that h,aybia.les would not stop, water flow from the pond. The applicant discussed with the Commission that status of' the remaining, lots specifically lots, 62A and A. They requested that work be allowed, on 62A, since, the, common driveway permit had been applied for and the Commission determined that no other work could take, place on the site until a site "inspection, had been conducted, s,1 A si'te, visit will be, made Saturday, August 1st at 89.130 A.M'., The Commission voted, to allow the site visit, team 'to authorize permission to go ahead on Lot 60A. 'if the team decided that 'it was app ropriat B. Mansour stated that 'it was all right to go ahead e., wit work on Lot LOT 3 BERRY STREET PUBLIC HEARING 'W.. Vices read the legal notice advertising the Request fog 'Determination for Lot 3 Berry Street., He commented on the recent exposure that the proposal had received, specifically the articles in the Boston Herald, Eagle Tribune and the telephone conversations, with the Governor's, office. He suggested and hoped for better information and a better pro3ec,t accompanying this submittal, Mr. Stack began his, presentation with a discussion relating to his land being damaged while he was overseas. He was requested 61 by the, Conservation Administrator and the, Chairman to direct his 0 1 111 11 discussion to Conservation issues. Mr., Stack indicated that the wetlands appeared on his, land as a result of' work previously done on abutting lots. He felt that the development on Route 114 and location of a culvert on Berry Street had directed the water towards his property, He specifically mentioned Elm Square Builders,, Nancy Sullivan indicated that a valid Order of so 41 6 Conditions was i ssued for this, pro3ect. 11 Willie Vicens indicated that the pro]ect proposed a wetland crossing into an 'island of land. Both W. Vice ns and A. Resca remembered the site visit and indicated, that uplands did. exist on the site. Mr. Stack, discussed the fact that no wetlands existed on the site when he purchased it and that, again, water has been forced onto his, property,. Jack Linn asked why a, Request to Determine was, filed, and not, a Notice of' Intent? Is N. Sullivan indicated that the Request to Determine was filed so that a wetland, delineation could be done by herse prior to the fi 1,ing of a Notice of Intent, She also indicated that Mr. Stack agreed that whatever delineation was done, by her would be the one used for the site plan as submitted with the Notice of Intent. She indicated that once this was done then, the other, issues relating to this file could be, addressed at the Notice of Intent stage. Mri. Stack indicated that the driveway could be moved,, Mr., 'sheen e reiterated his concerns as they related to the septic, requirements and necessary mitigating measures, Mr. Stack discussed the proposal to allow his neighbor to pipes their water from, his well. Mr, Stack requested the Commission to allow him to move the wetlands off his property. Mr. Re,sca indicated that the regulations regarding wetlands had changed and that filling of wetlands was, much more, restrictive M . Resew also suggested that M'ri. Stack employ the services lelf an engineer and have it present at the meeting. Mr. Stack began discussing the 'issue of wetlands being created on his property. Mr. Sichoene reiterated 01 his concerns that Mr. Stack, try to address leis regarding his proposal as outlined 'in the, denial "issued by the NACC. 11 Mr. Stack began a d iscussion of the re-zoning that took place *lie he was gone, to serve the country He felt that he should,i 0, have been notified, and that his, family should have, been notified of the change. Willie Vicens asked Mr. Stack the status of the septic approval Mr. Stack indicated that -the septic system originally submitted to, the Board of Health had been refused. He stated that hie still, did not have Board of Health, approval on his septic system. C. Sichoene asked, that Mr. Stack also address the 'issue, of the 100 year flood plaice elevations on the site, indicating that this had not been previously done, He also asked that when Mr. Stack submits his Notice, of Intent that he address, the specific issues that had been, identified in the denial, and further explained, at this meeting, Mr. Lindon, asked if the wetland cut, across, the back of the lot.? He was concerned as to whether there, existed any dry land where a replication, if needed, may be placed,. NO Sullivan incticated that the wetland did cut across the, rear portion o�f the lot and a I that replication would not be possible if the plan submitted was similar to the original plan,, 0 9 a Further discussion ensued regarding Mr., Stack' s right to pursue this matter 'in the court, system,, N. Sullivan indicated to, Mr. 11 Stack that hi' s en, ineler should get, in, touch, with her so that the 9 specific concerns of the NACC would be addressed prior to the filing ft, N1 iling of a Notice of Intent. Willie Vicens motioned for a positive Determination on the Request to, Determine,, Jack, Lindon seconded, it was a unanimous vote., SQL EM FOREST II REQUEST FOR EXTENSION The owner, George Farr was, granted a one-year's extension, expiring July 29,, 19 W', Vicens motioned we "issue an Extension on Salem Forest Ii. A. Resca seconded I motion carried., LOT 15C DUN CAN 'DRIVE, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE W. Vicens motioned we, issue a Partial Certificate of Compliance 11 on Lot 15C Duncan Drive, A. Resca seconded, motion carried,. KNIGHTSBRIDGE SITE PLAN' REVIEW Tlh is area is an established, he converted into of is space across from the, Eagle Tribune on Route 114 ., They are requesting to, convert 'it into a financial institut,ion It was establ i4shed 11 41 1, -% 6 1 a by 'the ACC that this area was not in our juriscilcrion, To TECHNOLOGIES ORDER, OF CONDITIONS C., Scheme, motioned we approve the order of Conditions on A,T,, & T, (DEQE #242-417) as written with the request for further rotor to, come as, a moldification, A. Resca seconded, W. 0 11, Vicens and J. Lindon each abstained., Motion carded.. 1070 OSGOOD STREET - ORDER OF CONDITION'S 11 Due to 'information that came in today the deadline for the Order I of Conditions was extended, MABLIN AVENUE - ORDER OF CONDITIONS As of this date, no number has been received from Do,E.Q,,E,,, Because of erroneous eng,ineering data (using a 500 year storm ,instead, of a 1010 year storm) ,, W. Vice motioned we 'issue a denial without pre 3udice on the Ma n Avenue property, A., Resca seconded, motion carried, % 1, Meeting ad3ourned 10: 30 P,M*