Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-02-01 Conservation Commission Minutes 1 I } l'h � following r1lir,utE.,90 were approved on August 16, 1989 N@pth ftnd@V@r C0n§@Vygtj@h Q@fflfrlioaion meeting of February 11 1969. D. Moores W. V i cens, Chair G. Sc:'hoerow L. Sru i rlooger (gyp 1 W P. T'ar i of M. Boudrot, Sec. A P^ :isuit ive Duterminat ion will be signed tonight. Excavation ion near, swe l easy and filling in back of lot near railroad tracks, was of c.-onc:ern to Cori missii_in. A Notice of ;intent will be required j before building cornraences, as the project is in the buffer zone. Ei;C iJk ta_T _._E- R—G ER7!L i FF.x qi,Ti:,_ dE C.CJLE!L x OR Q E Th;is Lot is plat ON HOLD. A site visit to be made by Bill Sol.tsa. { QN P. T'ariot motioned to issue as Partial Certificates of Domp]. I r,c:e. D. Sousa seconded, motion carried. 'rhea status Inquivy applies to the Bond on Barker Utreet which has expired and a renewal needs to take place. P. Tariof will be working on this project, in the form of a letter to Travelers Tndeminity. No vote wass3 taken. Carl bchoene to cheek this area. BE I EW_ A. Res'i c a will review. P. T'ariot motioned to accept they amended Minuteas of January 14, 1987 and August 311 19138. B. Sousa %caa ended, motion carried. I _:UM W I S Modification plane were presented arid described to the Comm issasaion. "fotal crossing of 39000 square feet on land subject j to flooding, a s:;on ern of NACICI. This project has areas i where it i ii very hard to pinpoint where the wetlands are. Crossings area in the buffer zone. An appeal of the Determination on this project was discussed. No decisiran harm been made or, this � being a limited project? I Steve Stepinski of Merrimac Engineering representing Houston Builder% appeared before the Commission and pre%ented plans. p portion of they duplex on Lot 2 is within the 100 year flood od plain of the Shawssheen fiver. The foundations for these buildings would have to be of impervious building material. NACC received a letter from the 'TownO w Building Kspectcr, Robert Nicetta rotating his disapproval of any construction at this site. However, if the Commission deems that construction is permissible them new plans would have to be required showing special foundation material to sustain flooding of the area, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Abutters present at this meeting were Joseph Palaci, John Rafffer, Lewis Napling, Mike Phelan anti Peter Solemi. L. Bruinooge motioned we close the public hearing with the request that a latter stating flagging and staking of the wetlands ham taken place, we will then issue an Order of Conditions within 21 days. P. Tariot seconded, motion carried. Wf�C,7UC:,l-UGl__,_I_RW5. DATUROXOM John Willis Jr. , attended the meeting with an up--date: on how this project was progressing. HSC was called in by Planning for a drainage review, the outcome of the report was a modification on this area. We will put this on our next agenda of Feb. 15, 1989. No vote taken. W 1 L-lmf]WA T C... XTI;' I f]i_�/_E `�"N_l._F_'—gIU_Y_E. Paul T ar i of motioned we adopt the Order of Conditions as amended. 0. Souse seconded, motion carried. LOLIM-9 Q. :.._CdIVD x 1_ CIL43.--fik;l LlUT L. Bruinooge motioned that if we did not rec;eive an extension request for the Urder of Conditions by February 7th under the :Mate Act and Town Bylaw, they project would be denied. P. Trariot seconded, motion carried. .__._ Discussion took plaace by W. Vicenn and the Commissioners on the pros and cons of the sites in question. Xf was finally decided that a letter to William Brush of the School Building Committee stating the pooit ion of the Commission. B. Sousa motioned ioned to approve they letter to William Brush as amended. C. Schoene seconded, motion carried. P. 'Tariot abstained. Meeting adjourned at 1105 P. M. .x. .� k