HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170620 Application 58 Country Club Circle 2/2/2017 It
Olt
4y,
y, ✓ "
u
:r
/A'
4 Ili
DEPARTMENT'PLANNING r
SpcLml
Please,type or print clearly.
I Donald D. Stanlq
'1. Petitioner,
Pe,tit'lo,ii,er,fs,Addres,sil,-,-58 Country Club Ci"Tcle-, N'orth. Andover _,._,_MA 01845
r t ii ri r l Ill 9 9 e dons 8 8 h t a .c
2.0wriersoftheLand: Donald D. Der tang
Address,, 5,8 CountEy C i4b Circle North Andover MA 018445
Number :1 16, 1 2 Years
&Year Ion was,created: 1998
4. Is the rot currently onsepitic or sewer?
?
On Town Sewer
If on sewer,please provide,date the sewer,connection was
completed.,- June 2000
. Description of Proposed,Project: _ mit construct ion of a r t ,i i ng
w spa, wallcmay anl associated ad ng and.,
n c a, � n
. n the non—di* sturb,ance zone of the wat rs hed
"protection district,
6. Descri1ption of Premises- eve e re resi* . lot
'.,Addies r y Being Affected: 58 Country Club C-i ce
g District, tershe: Protection Dl t qr �t
Assessors ap- 64 Lot151 0
Registry of eeds Ik 1 3 7 page 2 4 1
8. xi tiro 'Lot-,
Lot Area(Sq. F it in ei I3 5
Street Frontages 7 k b k310. 17
'Front,Setback& 87, 7 Rear c 3T
r rRatio: 2 � Lot Coverage', ��
9. Proposed Lot(if applicable,)
Lot Area . : ' 2 1 BuildingHeight-, 35,
Street ron
N,qje. ..o�
�.blwww ,�yY �vYY dove riffla.as�a,J,�u�
� «~ �
) «\` \
«/�� >
� � ��v
� � � �}
4
Front Setbacks 87 - 7 Rear Seta ack:_ 20 (Pool)_
Floor.Area Ratio: of Coverage: 9l,5%
I(I. Required Lot(as required by Zoning Bylaw)s
LotArea(SqI. Ft)II 87 , 120, Building!Height., 3 5
Street Frontage: 175 Side Setbacks 30
Front Setback: 3 0 Relar Setback-6, 30
Floor Area Ratio:_N\A Lot Coverage: N\A
O�
'11.Existing Building(if applicable): 2
Ground Floor(Sq. Flt-)IjN 5,1 7 8,0 #of Floors:
Total Sq. Ft,.-*" 10, r 810 8, Height: 35
dingle Family Dwelling OF Wood �Frame
Use:-S " Type of Construction.,,
lice hide garage
12. Proposed Building-. N/A
Ground Floor(Sq. Ft.): r 280*
#of Floors:
Total Sq. Ft.__1,2 Hel'gilt-: N/A
Use- Resi'-denti-al Type of Construction
pool and ret., wall..
13, Has truer been a previous applit cati on for a Special Permit from the Planning Board on these
e b, 2110 07
preml,ses? Yes— If so,when and for what type,of construction? Garage F
14.Section of Zoning Bylaw that Special Permit is Being
ctli
0
Requested Seon 14 , 136,3,,,,c.�ii., 1.2.3.
,r.5 L 6
15. Petitioner and Landowner sigiliature(s):
Every application for a Special Permit shall be made on, this form, wlei is,the official forrn of the
Boa
Planing nrd. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk'k
s, office., It shall be the
responsi'bility of the petitioner to furnish all, supporting documentation with this, application., The
,,
dateld copy of this,application received by the Town Clerk or Plannln ice doles not absolve the
applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be responsible for all,expenses for filing and
legal no�tificatiloln. Failure t,o comply with application, requirem,ents,, as cited, herein and 'in the
Planning Board Rules and Regulations may result in a dismissal by the Planning Board of this
application,a s i" omp Ilete.
t un
Petitioner's Signature: o
old Stanl��
Print,or type name here: r7;
Owner's Signature:
Print,or type name here- Donald, D
16. P,Ielase list title of'plans and docurnents you will be attaching to,this application.
1. ) Permit Plan at 58 Country Club C"Ircle, North, Andover, MA
Ro Q t�p
...........
...........
Page,
120 Main,Street, Plaiv,i ig Dept, North Andover,, Massa0usefts 01845,
Pholne,9178.6,88.19535 F'ax 978.6,88,9542 Web v
DONALD D STANLEY 7 2222
110 RESORT LN 53-111110 W
rV 2
PALM BCH GDNS,FL 33418-7033 IL2,7//-7 6660
Date
Pay to the
/ $
Orderof
SR
Dooso
llars I*
s sBankof America
i AC H Rff 0 11 OODI 38
F or ---------
DONALD D STANLEY 1416
DEBFAA M S'TA NLEY
W44gVRffffie-t*� 6 r 180-568/1012
NO ANDOVER, MA 01845 Date- lld--21�7
Pay to the 2
Ofder of'
06",At of
Dollars
EXPUISECODEE United Missou�Sank
Fideffly V Iaww.blassoun
Fot UP
• R
721
PALMH DN ,FL 33418-70 8 I #
Pay to the $ 39.
Order Of
Dollal's phbtb
America
� E
AC H Rtf 011 DOD'36
4 wx�
For
'r
}
Abutter to Abutter Building Dept. Conservation ( Zoning
Town of North Andover
Abutters LI
QUIREAWNT. k[GL 4OA.Sed*o#i states in pars'Pa Itie s in interest sus used iri thrs chapter shal)rne0n tha petiliO fter,
abutters,ot.,x ers of land id ire 0ty opposIle on any public or prNate�v�rj.and abuIters to abu less vilhin
three h undred(M)f,et of tha pre perty line of the pe61ioner as IhGy appear on the rrta6t recent appl-tah`e
lax l-sl,not%vit rslanding that the land of any such o-.wer js located iri aimilier city or to v,ilie planning
board of the city ar tirhn,and the planning hoard of every abutting city cc lovmr 4
Subject Properly:
MAP PARCEL Name Address
64 150 Donald Stanley 58 Coun try #tab Circle, lVorth Andover,W 018
Abutters Pr+ erfes
Ma J2
Parcel Narrro Address
37.A 29 Old North Andover Realty Trust 69 Old Village Lane,North Andover,MA 01845
4 0&7 NoFth Andover Country Club 500 Great Pond Road,North Andover,MA 01845
84 17 Scott Clementi 505 Creak Pond Road,North Andover,MA 01845
84 29 Donald Stanley 58 Country Club Cifcte,North Andover,MA O1845
84 71 John McDermott 475 Gteat Pond Road,Nofth Andover,MA 0184
64 75 Robert Dennehy 44 Country Club Gfr e,North Andover,MA 018 5
84 151 Bernard Kelly 81 Country Club UWe,North Andover,MA 01845
4 152 Stephen Mader 45 Country Club Dir e,North Andover,MA 01845
$ 1'
VIC—
f
AtlanticEngineering ur•� �f �� ���� � , ��� �oh��B.Paulson,��.�.. .President
97 Tenney street Georgetown,MA 1
George J. � our s,�. .
97 - -7 70 • 7 - -9940(fax) tl nti 4 cr mall.eor
February 1, 2017
Tovm of North Andover
Planning Boar
20 Main Street
North Andover, MA o 1845
Re: Special Permit Application
8 Country Club Circle, North Andover
Dear Planning Board Members,
In accordance witb the require=nts of the Watershed Special Permit Application, I respectfully
submit berewith a completed Application for a Watershed Special Permit and a plan entitled
"Permit Plan at 58 Country Club Circle in NoilhAndover, Ma. . The following paragraphs and
supporting
documentation address the requirements to be met for obtaining a Watershed Special
Permit.
G N RAL N S
1. Encouraging the most appropiiate use of land;
The project proposes the reconstruction of existing walks,patios; the expansion o
lawn and landscape areas and the construction of a Pool, spa, fence and retaining
wall which are co siste I with normal residential uses and accessory elements an
structures associated mpitb a single family residential house lot.
2, Preventing o erel-o dillg of land;
The proposed improvements will not change the existing use of the struGture or
lot. The existing single amity residence will remain a single mils residence,
g '
maintaining the current population density.
. ConserNling the value. of land andbuildings;
There is no proposed change to the existing house or garage, The proposed
improvements er an expansion of the sites existing esthetics and value. The
proposed site lm rover e is increase lot coverage from 8.3% to 9.5% and will be
complementary to the design of the existing site.
. Lessening congestion and traffic;
The Proposed project will have no impact on congestion and traffic.
1
5. Preventing undue concentration of population;
The use of the lot will continue as an existing single family residential home and
will not affect the concentration of population.
. Providing adequate light and air;
The proposed project will have no impact on the adequacy oflight or quality of
air to the surrounding properties.
7. Reducing the hazards from fire and other danger;
The proposed pool, spa and associated appurtenances will meet{all applicable
building codes for the minimization of fire and hazards.
. Assisting in the economical provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parrs,
and other public facilities;
Where are no proposed changes,in lot usage which will cause any expected
increase 'n the demand for the above list of community resources. The
construction of the pool and increased landscaping will result in negligible
increase ofseasonal water usage.
. Controlling the use ofbodies of water, including watercourses;
There is no proposed change in any water body or course.
10. Reducing the probability of losses resulting from floods;
The project will have no effect on the probability of loss due to flooding.
11. Reserving and increasing the amenities of the Tows;
There is no anticipated effect on the amenities of the Town.
ARTICLE 10.31
1. The specific site is an appropriate location for such a use, structure, of condition;
The proposed accessory structure and site amenities are normal and customary for
residential lots.
2. The use as developed will not adversely affect the neighborhood;
The proposed pool and s ppoi ing site improvements will be, an enhancement to
the existing property and will mimic site features in existence within surrounding
properties thereby maintaining the residential nature of the neighborhood.
. There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians;
There proposed improvements will not result in any nuisance or serious hazard to
vehicles or pedestrians as a result of this project.
. ,adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the
proposed use;
No further Facilities are required for the proper operation of the proposed use.
5. The Special Permit Granting Authority shall not giant any Special Permit unless they
make a specific finding that the use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
this Bylaw.
The proposed project is for residential site ii provemonts which are in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the Bylaw.
2
i
SPECIFIC IREMENTS
L Written ceitification stating that there will not be an), significant degradation of the
quality or quantity of water in or entering Lake Cochicl e is .
As proposcd, the project employs the use of gain gardens to mitigate the effect the
increase of impervious aroa will have on the rate and volwiie ofrun-off.
During colistruction of the improvements, best management practices will be used
to control erosion and the transportation of sedimelits thereby ensuring the
protection of Lake Cochic ewlcl . In addition as noted on the plans the use of
fertilizes will be restricted to organic slow release nitrogen products. 'With the
implementation of fertilizer restrictions and the stormwatei-ineas res proposed
the project will not have any effect on either the quantity or quality oft e water in
or entering Lake Cochichewic .
2. Proof that there is no reasonable alternative location outside the Noii-- Disturbance and/or
the Non-Discharge Buffer Zones, whichever is applicable, for any discharge, structure, or
adivity, associated with the proposed use to occur.
Due to the existing locatiM and configuration of the lot and structures; and the
location of the Ion- Disturbance and Non- Dischargc Zones there is no
reasonable alternative location for the proposed site in-1pro ements.
3. Evidence of approval by the Mass. Dept. of Envirol oriental Protection P of any
industrial waste water treatment or disposal system oil any waste water treatment sister
fifteen thousand (15,000) gallons per day capacity.
The existing lot is serviced by Town Sewerage, and has no waste water treatment
or disposal stem on the premises.
. Evidence that all on-site operations l cl dl g, but not 11mited to, construction, waste
water disposal, fertilized applications and septic systems will not create co ee tratimrs of
nitrogeii on groundwater, greater thaD the Federal limit at the down gradient propcily
boundary.
The plaD Dotatlons require the use of organic slow release nitrogen fertilizers in
compliance with local a d Federal regulations. The use of these products will
ensure the proposed activities will have no adv rse effect on the conmitration of
nitriogeii in the groundwater.
5. Pr iectlons of down gradient concentratims of nitrogen, phosphorus and other relevant
cheinicals at property boundaries and other locations deemed perti exit by the SPGA..
The prqjected down gradient concentrations of nitrogm, phosphorus and other;
chef icals at property boundaries nd other locations are expected to ren-min
unchanged y this project.
6.
The SAGA may also require that supporting r aterials e prepared b i other pr� fes ionals
including, but riot limited to a registered architect, registered landscape arc ltect,
registered land surveyor, regi t i*e d sanitarian, biologist, geologist or hydrogeologist
when� In itsjudgment ti e cor lexlt oft •oposed work �ar�rants the relevant
� p
expertise.
Additional supporting materials will be muted if i•e i�• d.
}
p g
yS
k{
S
E
S
F
y
}
r
Y
r
If you ,have any questions regarding this special permit request please feel free to call. Thank you
for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
George J. Zambo ras, P.E.
Cc: Don D. Stanley
4
o ic R rt
�L�idr
ProposedS to Improvements
located a
8 Co nhy Club Circle
North Andover, Massachusetts 018
Prepared 'o7-
Donald D. Stanley
58 Country Flub Circle
Nor#h And vei', AM
2, 10, & 100 Year Storm
24 Hour Duration
e J'
A INS P-P 111 F-11 A ,
Date: Fe i a ,20
Atlantic ngineerin &Survey Consultants Ine.
97 Tenney Street, G eorgetown,Massachusetts o 18 33
(978) 352-7870
`r
}
2
TABLE of CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
I . EXISTING CONDITIONS
111. PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IV. SITE SOILS
V. STRMWTR MANAGEMENT
VI. SUMMARY
VII. ASSUMPTIONS AND DESIGN CRITERIA
111. PRE-DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
IX, POST-DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS
X. NRCS SOIL REPORT
2
I ", C ' N:
This report describes the pre and post hydraulic analysis and stormwater management measures
proposed to be implementcd to initigate the potential impacts to the 'Watershed Protection
District resulting -om the proposed site improvements to the re idwitial propert3t located at 58
o nt { Club Circle, North A d over, Massachu etts o 18 4 5.
The design ofthe stormwa ter system"s co ipo gents and the coy putation ofpre and post
development runoff rates and volumes are based on a hydraulic analysis per ormcd utilizing
"HydroCAD Storm water Modeling Softare"for storm events of t, 10 and I -- ear storm
frequencies.
EXISTING CONDITIOAIS:
The prgject site is located on the northeasterly end of the Country Club Circle cul-de-sac and is
bounded by residential properties to the ji rth, south and cash and westerly by the North
Andover Counts r Club. The site is comprised of a 2 acre and developed residwitial lot.
The parcel is within the Watershed Protection District and is located in excess of 400f et from
the mean annual high water mark of Lake Cochic e ric , the To n's public drinking water
supply. A bordering vegetated wetland (BAND whieb is tri utaiy to Lake Coebichewick is
located to the east of the site. As a result.of the sites pro imit, to the MFW the site is located
within the Non-Discharge Zone and Nora-Disturbance Zone of the Watershed Protection District.
The improvements proposed for the site consist of the following itc s:
0 Repiaccr ent of existing walkways
Replacement and enlargement of existing patio
• Installation of a pool with spa and associated deck
Installation of protective encing
0 Installation of a retaining wall
Expansion of lawn area, landscaping and associated fill and grading
40 Kahl Gardens
The retaining gall;portions of th pool and pool deck; and portions of the fill, la it alld
landscape areas are located within the Ion-Distur antic Zone. All other proposed improvoinwits
are located vit iii the Non-Discharge Zone.
The installation of the raiii gardens are proposed to mitigate the increases of post run-off rates
and volumes to levels equal to or below pre-development rates and volumes.
3
SITE S OIL S#
e hydraulic, analysis provided herein is based o site soils
as
� o� tests� r performed and '
classification by NRCS. The-NR
CS soils report hick is appended to this hydraulic,analysis,
classifies site soils a
those being of the Chatfield-Hollis-Rock outcrop complex.
soils are comprised of lle to gravelly sandy loan with
� ia� eld��o��� �-Roes rye underlying unweathered - o
bedrock. The Chatfield soils are soils belonging to the hydrologic i said
group A and Hollis soils are of the D hydrologic soil group.
` establishing a comparison of pre and post run-off rates and
o tale co�� e�-� tie approach ���
odes th
e site was modeled as I SG soils in the hydraulic analysis.
Additionally �� corresponding Rawls infiltration rate of 1,02 inches per hour for TSB B sandy
�
loams is utilized 'nmodelingthe infiltration rates for the proposed rain gardens.
�
SIL TA TJ ON,AND E OR SN CN
o effectively manage the impacts the, environment, to the surrounding properties and to the
ens the
Watershed
Protection District during construction of the of the proposed site imps
ovem
following BMP's arc proposed.
siltation barrier'will b installed and maintained at the proposed
� Siltation -barrier s��ta � transportation of
work during construction to control and prevent erosion and transport
i�����t o g � •' This barrio` ball be
Sediments to the reso rm area and Watershed District.
maintained until suitable growth of vegetation has been estabiishcd in all disturbed
areas.
. Construction
• entrance will be installed and maintained to prevent erosion and
transportationof sediments during construction.
protected concrete washout area shall be established for collection and for the
proper disposal of spent concrete products.
During construction materials will be properly stored and disposed . r
tl�e�'construction MP' shall be utilized as deemed necessary during contraction to
�
ensure .
the protection of theresource area and Watershed District.
a
J UMMA E
As indicated in the surninary Belo r, with the incorporation of tale proposed Fain al-dens, the
post-deg{elop e t run-off rates and volumes equal or result a reduction of the pre-development
run-off'rates and volumes for the 2, 10 and I -- e r storm eilent .
Hydraulic Analysis Summary
8 Country Club Circle— North Andover, MA
Srrrr map of Total Site f schar- e Floi s n ' lut es
------------------
. r�slrrr; rslra g lrr rre Max Volume
(CFS.) (CF,I S. (CU-FT,) (C U-F T.)
PlIe- Post-t- Pt•e- P s-
eijeloprn rrt. Dei)e1opment Depelopment, Deilelopment
2 Yr. 0.27 0.30 . ,090 Jy 9
10 'r. 0.77 0.74 2,565 21494
100 Yr. 1,62 1.62 2 .',.l 74 ..5)130
s'sunin dIII?
Th followi g assumptions are itse . r e ra n purposes
1) 2, 10 & 1 0 ye rrr storinfrequenoil,
2) 24 hour storin duration (mM.)
3) Tice NR CS I pdi-rl rgie so Us groups.for#lire r-uri-off arieas are clasv�fled clatv as "A
and " "sobs,for theprrrpose this analps s the soils ba1)e beers rrro lele l as "
Soils.
4) Existing an dprop rsed Ot values are its toes in the report,
5) Within .small drainage areas a rrrir imrrrrr Te whie of 6 min. is used.
6 E.Nflltration rate se on the applicable R awIs ratefor#lowns. .02 hillir;
5
x r` rr Criteria:
1) j?rrr of f -2 r tensitr numbers
rrarr r
2) -1=3.1 for 2 r 24 h # 111iration , 4,5 in.125 y1s, & 6.5 MA00
3) Proposed osed Di values are as noted in the r•e ort.
}
Hvetorap hAae =s.CS (eastern U.S.
ow rate of 5) The tnaximumfl rl- r#tyre. . design storms which are
ill e e real or less t (in pre-de ve o men f n-o+f.
r#ores t�r� �r��r rrtarr�ae ster��
6
PRE- DE VEL OPMENT
r
LOT 2
10.
4
f
LOAKMAPM
of
Jf
LAW
ATM
� I
f
1 +
op 4
1
i
�' LOT 3 PAM p Awro
s'
2l SF +
ti Two}lquim
x
Ew
" f ASS �.
AP=n +
UfAIJrY
IW3,Ab"YAM PROP.
cewoom
f} 4
fit•!- ,
OUTDK*
+ •!`'
++f VLF. k
•�/ d 1 5
�• * 4 SLY
OM
DATA Mn z
ou N TR
U R ALE LOT 4UB W#4 AOM iffy
Awr
.�.
1
+
ENGINEER:
J Y171C E§Cl§if7 fjrj4jVjTSj1VC, PRE-DEVELOPMENT SUBCATCHMENTS
jTM HAV & MRITY COATI
97 TENNEY STREET —•• GEORGETOWN, MA 016
---
PHONE: 7 - -7 0 FAX: - - SCALE. 1�� = r DATE. JAN. 2, 2017
$ F
Exist . Conditions
.S b at Reach Zon Link- Flouting Diagram for 8 Country Club-0 0117
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering&Survey Consultants Inc,, Printed 2l11 017
HydroCADO 10.00-18 sin 01066 Q 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
8 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club-020117 Printed 211 0 7
Prepared b AtlanticEngineering Sir Cs � r�� Inc.
l droAl 1 0.00-1 sl 01066 201
drop Software
Solutions �.�� P
Area Listing (selected nodes)
Area CN DescrIption
{sq- su catch ent-numbers)
61482 61 7 % Gress cover, Good, HSG S
31792 48 Landscape, HSG 1S
1�180 86 leap Flap, HSG B (IS)
3,251 98 Roofs, HSG (1 S)
11681 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, HSG (IS)
51675 66 foods, Good, HSG B (IS)
22,041 66 TOTALAREA
58 Country Club-Existing
58 Count Club-020117 Type 11 2 -err 2-Year Rainfa&3.10,E
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 2/1/2017
HydroCADO 10.00-18 s1n 01066 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page,3
Time spats= . -36. r , dt=0.05 hr , 721 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, =SCS, Weighted-M
Reach routing by Stor-lnd+Tr ns method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchmentl& Exist. Conditions Runoff Area=22,0 1 sf 22.29% Impervious Runoff Depth= . "
Tc=6.0 min CN=66 Runoff=0.27 efs 1,090 f
Total Runoff Area 221041 f Runoff Volume = 1, f Average Runoff Depth = , "
.71% Pervious 17,1 f 22.29% Impervious 41912 f
f
f
}
}
f
Y
Y
k
i
s:
i
8 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Clubw020117 Type 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 2 1 2 1
dr CAD . -18 s/n 0 10 66 @ 201 d� CAD Sof ware Solutions LLC Pa e
Summary for Subcatchment 1S Exist. conditions
Runoff 0.27 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 15090 cf, D'p h= 0. 9"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, Uri=S S, Weighted-c , Time Span= 0.00.3 , hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type fil 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10"
Area sf CN Description
3t251 98 hoofs, H S G
19661 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, HSG
61482 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG
3979 8 Landscape, HSG
11180 80 Rap Rap, HSG
V ood Good HSG
22YO41 66 Weighted Average
171129 77.7 % Pervious Area
t912 22.29% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity capacity Description
rein feed f#ft) (fUseq) (cfs
.9 Direct Entry, in-Travel Time
8 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club- 2011 !12 -hr RYear F try l= . "
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & survey Consultants Inc. Printed 1 2 1
d roCADO 10.00-1 s1n 0 1066 @ 2016 H VdroCA soft rare Solutions LLC Page
Time span=0.00-8 . hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 721 points
Runoff by SCs T - O method, =SCS, vei kited-M
Reach routing by Stordnd+Trans method - Pod routing by stor-Ind method
S ubcatchment IS: Exist.Conditions Runoff roams 2,0 1 sf 22,29% Impervious Runoff Depth=1. "
Tc=6.0 min CIS= 6 Runoff=0.77 cfs 2,565 cf
Total Runoff Area 22,041 sf Runoff Volume = 2,565 cf Average Runoff Depth = , 0"
77.71% Pervious 17,129 sf 22.29% Impervious 4x 1 sf
'r
}
}
}
}6
}}3
F
66 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club,,020117 Type /ll 2 -hr -Year ' ire ll�6.5 "
Prepared Atlantic Engineering & Surrey Consultants Inc. Printed 2/112 1 '
Solutions LLC Page
Time span= .o R36. 6 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 721 points
Runoff ff y SOS TR-20 method, -SCS, 1I i # d-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatch ment 1 S: Exist. Conditions Runoff Area=22,041 sf 22.2 % Impervious Runoff Depth=2. "
Tc=6.0 min CN=66 Runoff=1.62 ofs 5,174 cf
Total Runoff Area = 22r041 sf Runoff off Volume = 5,174 of Average Runoff Depth = ,8 "
77,7 % Pervious = 17,129 sf 22. 9% Impervious =4,912 sf
POSTDEVELOPMENT
k
LOT 2
jw"Aow 0 NMI
UYZWAPM
f•
r
�.EAT�bFfI
sk
W`
PM 4y
lk LOT
f �
J f •+
PAW N&3
2 , '
AW 01 ARAM M y
/Fro11 X
r
Ir
-. � RUMpNq
ii
•i
f
IML7A ]C
' %EYLA+o roc
r V
UNTP\Y
R C LE LOT 4 AgS
�C]bfi�JrI�R Y
A3
APPFk7bt"T[
PADH9 LDC'AnM Al
} ENGINE :
r 4TL4yrj(l
S(l)?VfYCONS[IL A7TS JAT P 0 S T -DE V ELOPMENT S U B C A T C H M E N T S
r 97 TENNEY STREET - — GEORGETOWN, MA 01833
r PHONE: - -W- FAX: - - SCALE: 1�� = DATE: JAN. 2, 2017
2S 3S 4
............
Prop.. Con itions Area t RG-1 Area t RG-2
RG-
.RG-2
R ` GRain Garden-2
7L
Proposed Total
dub F e h oil � Link Routing Diagram for 5 �'
Country Club-D D1
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering Sur
Consultants Inc., Printed ICI 077
Hydro AD 10,00-18 s1n 0 1066 0 2016Hydro AD Software Solutions LL
58 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club,- 2 1 7 Printed 2 017
Prepared Atlantic Engineering Surrey Consultants Inc. 2
d
r CAD 1 ,9 -18 s/n 0108 o 8 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Area Listing (selected nodes)
Area CN Description
s - suatent-numbers)
19883 9 59-75% Grass corer, Fair, HSG B
61559 61 75% Grass cover, Good, HSG 2S, 3 ,4S
3128 48 Landscape, HSG B S
3,251 98 Roofs, 2
3148 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, H G B S, 3S, B
2t701 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 2
1$15 71 TOTAL AREA
*Excludes Pooh. Water Surface Area of 8 i
. . as re
does contribute to run-off.
58 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club- 2 Type // 2 - r 2-Fear Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 2 1 20 7
d roCA D@ 10.00-18 sin 0 1066 @ 2016 H ydro CAD Software Solutions LLC Page..3
Time span=o.00- .o lrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 721 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, =SCS, 11oi # -CIN
Reach routing by Stor-lied+Trans method - Pond routing y Stor-Ind method
Su oatohr ent Ss Prop..Conditions Runoff Area= 8,101 sf 28.4 % Impervious Runoff Depth= . "
Tc= .0 min CN=69 F unoff=0.30 cfs 1,097 cf
Su c tc ent : Area to RG-1 Runoff Area=1,738 sf 52.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.39"
T = .0 miry CN=81 unoff=0.00 cfs 201 cf
Subcat hment4 : Area to 1 G-2 Runoff Area=1,223 sf 52.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=1,3 "
c= .0 min CN=81 Runoff=0,04 cfs 142 cf
Pond G- . Rain Garden-1 Peak Elev=184.61' Storage=91 cf Inflow 0,o0 cfs 201 cf
Discarded=0.00 ofs 201 cf Primary=0. o cfs 0 cf Ou fl w=0. 0 cfs 201 cf
Pond G- ; Bala Garden-2 Peak E1ev:--184.27" Storage=55 cf inflow=0. 4 cfs 142 cf
Discarded=0.00 cfs 142 cf Prirnary=0.00 cfs 0 of Oufflow=0.00 cfs 142 cf
Link L: Proposed Total lnflow=0.30 ofs 1,097 cf
Primary=0.30 ofs 1,097 cf
Total Runoff Area 211152 sf Runoff Volume e = 1,441 cf Average Runoff Depth = . 2"
,18% Pervious 14,421 sf 31.82% Impervious ,731 sf
}
58 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Clu� 2 '�
2 y r 2-Fear Rainfall--3. to
Atlantic Engineering � S rve Consultants Inc. Printe l 2i 1
2017
Prepared tl �
dr CA 0. 0-18 s/n 01080 @ 2016d roCAD Software Solutions LLC Page
Summary for Born 2S# Prop,. Conditions
Excludes Pool Water Surface Area of 889 s.f. as It does not contribute to run-off
Runoff -- 0.30 ofs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1 F 97 of, Depth= .72"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 4-hr 2-Year I inf if=3.
Area sf CN Description
8�2 1 98 Roofs, HSG
`I,916 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, HSG B
5, 82 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG
3,278 48 Landscape, HSG
1,8 3 69 5 -75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG
7 1 55 Woods, Geoff HSC;
18F191 59 Weighted Average
13,024 1. 0% Pervious Area
511 28.4 % Impervious Area
Te Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min).... ,tiff fusee ofs
. Direct Entry, Miry-gravel Time
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Area to G-
Runoff 0,06 ofs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 201 e , Depth= 1.89"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= . -3 . hrs, d t= 0,05 hrs
Type III 24- r 2-Year I a infall=& "
Area sf CN Descrl tlon
919 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, HSG
819 61 7 % Grass oov B
11738 81 Weighted Average
819 47. 2% Pervious Area
919 52,88% Impervious Area
Te Length Slope Velocity Capaelty Description
ription
(miqL (feet (ftlelcfs)
Direct Entry, Min-Travel Time
.9
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Area to G-
Runoff 0.04 ofs @a 12.10 hrs, l of me= 142 cf, Depth= 1.3911
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, Ulf=SCS, Weighted-CN,Time Span= . - 0.0 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type Ill 24-hr -boar Ra inf ll= .1
r 1.
8 Country club-Existing
58 country club- 2D1 Type I ! 2 - 2-Ye ar i i r ll�3.10"
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 2#1 2017
F dr CAD 1 .0 -1 /n 01066 @ 2016..HydroCAD Software SolutionsLLc Page 5
Area sf CN Description
645 98 Walks-Patio-Walls, HSG
578 61 7 % Grass cover, Good tjS
1*223 81 Weighted Average
578 47.26% Pervious Area
645 52.74% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity capacitor Description
(min) feet ft f Lft/sec) cfs
6.0 Direct Entry, Min-Travel Time
Summary for Pond G-1: Baia Garden-1
Inflow Area 11738 sf t 52.8 % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.39" for 2-Year r event
Inflow 0.0 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 201 cf
Outflow � 0.90 cfs @ .70 hrs, Volume= 201 cf, Atten= 93%, Lag= 0.0 miry
Discarded 0.00 cfs @ 11.70 hrs, Volume= 201 cf
Primary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Vol me= o cf
Routing by Stor--Ind method, Time Span=0.00-3 .00 hrs, d = 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 184. 1' a@ 14.29 hrs S rf.Are = 177 sf Storage= 91 cf
Plug-Floe detention time= 211.5 min calculated for 201 Cf 100% of inflow)
Center-Df-Mass det. time 211.2 r in 1,052.3 -841.1
Volume invert Avail.Stor e Storage Description
#`I 3.00' 170 cf custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed Belo I ec lc
Elevation Surf.Area Perim. holds Inc.Store CU .Store I et.Are
feet s feet (%) cubic-feet c is-feet sq-f
183.00 186 73.0 0.0 o o 186
184.00 186 73.0 40.0 74 74 259
186.50 151 70.0 1 t 9 63 137 441
186,70 175 80.0 100.0 33 170 561
Device Routing Invert outlet Devices
1 Discarded 183.00` 1.020 lai r E filtrati n over Surface area
2 Primary 8 . 0' . ' long x 1.0' breadth Broad-crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1,00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
.50 3.00
oef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3,31
3. 0 3.31 3.32
Discarded Outflow Max=0,00 cfs @ 11.70.hrs HW=183. 4' (Free Discharge)
'l=E filtrati n .(Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs)
Primary o tFlow l la =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs I'W=1 3.o ' (Free Discharge)
2=Broad-crested RectangularWeir( controls 0.0cfs)
6 Country Club-Existing
58 Country Club- 2011 Type //I 2 - r 2-Year Rain a#=3.10"
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 211 20 7
droCA 1 o.o -18 s/n o 10 66 @ 2016 H ydroCAD Software SoI u i ns LLC Pa
Summary for Pored G-2: Baia Garden-2
Inflow Area 1122 sf; 52.7 % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.3 " for -Year event
Inflow 0.04 cfs @ 12,10 hrs, Volume 142 of
Outflow -- 0.00 cfs @ 11.75 hrs, Vita e= 142 cf, Me = 9 %, Lague 0.6 min
Discarded 0,00 cfs @ 11.75 hrs, Velure= 142 cf
Primary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= o c
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time S pan= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 2
Peat Elev= 1 4.27' @ 13.22 hrs Surf.Are t- 180 sf Stora e� 56 of
Plug-Flow detention time= 119.1 ruin calculated for 142 of % of inflow)
Center-of-bass det. time= 118.9 min 960.E - 64 1.1
Volume Invert Avall.Storage. Storage Description
#1 16 ,5 ' 166 cf Custom stage Data (Irregular)Listed below I eo lc
Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Voids Inc. tore Cum.Store Wet.Area
feet s - feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-,ft
183.50 180 6 .0 0.0 0 0 180
184.50 180 64.0 40.0 72 72 244
187.00 150 60.0 15.0 62 134 404
167.20 170 70.0 100.0 32 166 508
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
1 Discarded 13 . 0' 1.020 i 1 r Exfiltration over Surface area
2 Primary 7M' 3. ' long x 1. ' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular weir
Head (feet) 6.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.66 3.06
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.06 3.20 3.28 3.31
,pisoarded ou to Max�0.00 cfs @ 11.75 hrs 1--I1I` =1 3.64 (Free Discharge)
= filtration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs
Primary out low Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs I W=1 3. o' (Free Discharge)
= road-Crested Rectangular weir Controls 0.00 fs
Summary for Link 7L: Proposed Total
Inflow Area = 21,152 sf, 31, % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.62" for 2-Year event
Inflow 0.30 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 12097 cf
Primary 6.36 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1,097 cf, Men= %, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary out ow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
58 Country Club-Proposed
58 Country Club-.o o 7 Type / - r - e r J r l = .50"
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Surrey Consultants Inc. Printed 2 1 2o17
droCA 0.00-18 s/n M66 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Time s n=0.o0-36.0o hrs, dt=0.05 hr , 721 points
Runoff by SS TR-20 method, =SCS} Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Tr n method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
SubcatchmentM Prop..Conditions runoff Area=18,191 sf 28.40% impervious Runoff a pt =1#60"
T =6.o min CN=69 Runoff=0.74 cfs 2,429 f
S t h nOS: Area to G-1 Runoff Area=1,738 sf 52.88% Impervious Runoff o th=2. 5"
` c=6.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.12 cfs369 cf
u tehm t S: Area to RG-2 Runoff Area=1, 23 sf 52.7 % Impervious Runoff De th=2.55"
Te=6.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.0 f 260 cf
Pond GA Bala Garden-1 Peak Elev=186.6 f Storage=1 6 cf lnflow=0.12 cfsf
Discarded=0.00 cfs 306 cf Prirnary=0. 2 cfs 63 cf fflo =0.03 cfs 369of
Pond I -2* Baia Garden-2 Peak Ele gy187.00' Storage16 f Inflow=0.08 cfs 260 cf
Discarded= .60 cfs 258 of Primary=0.00 cfs I cf Oufflow=0.00 cfs 260 of
Link 7LF Proposed Total lnfiow=0.74 cfs 21 f
Primary=0.74 cfs2,494 cf
Total Runoff Area �21JI52 sfRunoff Volume = 3,058 f Average runoff Depth - '1,7 i,
8.18% Pervious = 14,421 f 31.82% Impervious � 61731 sf
58 Country'Clu -Proposed
8 Country Clu w 2 17 Type II 2 -h -Ye r in li= .
Prepared by Atlantic Engineering & Survey Consultants Inc. Printed 2 }2 17
,Hydr A 1 . - 8 s/nO1066 @2016Hydro CAD Software are Solutions LLC Page
Time span= . - . rs, dt=0.05 hrs, 721 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, t.JH=SCS, v i hted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-ind+Trarns method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
SubcatchmentM Prop., Conditions Runoff Area=18,191 sf 26. % Impervious Runoff Depth= ,1 V
Tc=6.0 min CN=69 Runoff=1. 9 ofs 43712 cf
Subca tch en S: Area to RG-1 Runoff Area=1,738 sf 52.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.34"
Tc=6.0 min G =61 Runoff`=9.20 ifs 629 d
S u o t me : Area to I G-2 Runoff Area=1,223 sf 52.74% Impervious Runoff epth=4. "
T = .6 miry CN=81 Runoff=9.14 ifs 443 d
Pots RG-1: RainGarden-1 Peak Elev=l66.67' Storage=1 65 cf I flo =6.29 ofs 629 cf
isoarded=6.90 cfs 3 54 of Pr1 air =0.16 ifs 278 cf 0 utfl v=6.17 cfs 63 2 of
Pond -2: Rain Garden-2 Peak Bev== 7. ' Stora g e=141 cf Infiow= .14 efs 443 of
Discarded=6,96 ifs 301 cf Primary=0.99 cfs 140 of Outflow=0.09 efs 441 cf
Lid 7L: Proposed Total Inflow=1.62 cfs 5,130 of
Prir ery=1.62 ifs 5,130 of
Total Runoff f Area = 21,152 sf Runoff Volume = 5,783 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.2 ",
.1 % Pervious � 140421 sf 31. 2% Impervious = 69731 sf
NR CS SOILS RESO UR CE REPOR T
A '0 do # 0 06 ! do 1p 0 a
Am + 40
.. 9-0. a 0a9� . A 6
9-0. 4b •
l • A r • •
mr
• Ob . 4 . • 40 # •
a 0 R a �At
& a a
r , : ..'' .i t S�F.f ' . - -. ;�' - .a .r. .`•ir a {r �f'
1 + ..Y,'!+.' , - - - ... a - - .. .. .. - - .. Jam.
' f# * 1_S. L. ._ LJ! },�r(r-''.{1 1'..;! .y .}i. _ _ M1 - - .
f .+f - r.Ft'--1f" ; a iA.ws.rY,'_+ +1 .} - .. - ._. J
Y .. /
Y , ... ..... r. .. .. ... z
W.
.:: ) ? . . .. -.. ".- . .
f s
y
}
lrl�
,i: _ _ _ f'' __ a _ tr4 aI. J'.Y, 4 _Y iI'ii``'�..` , . a�a ,
.f+-5- -i * r .x '{ -J r 'ti, .. `. P r,-1*'. ';r .T-Yy. '.{-�. r' i f .. f r,!,i,
r k' ,r n F - a _ - .. _ x .. - -J :{ _F.' .\ ..r a .. -1 t.. '{ f FR• ";':r
•� ,
t
L - _ _ r i L
i Y= r
-' '• - _ __
-r.
a
_ -
%
flr- `.'.' r _.... '. r - *, _R s-���� _ .-. .. - r.: - .[{' _ - 'ss �r-3- f
" , a _. _ ��
h
I {i'
:� t
t
,L .
r'
.. 3 ,�L �,,r -yam
'. x+r .i_. • .a _r., #{'. •y #A��' ...:r a-Y* _ _ - - .. - Y.T a.}Y.. �+f�
_, + ra
.
4.
r, .._ .
r y''a#"f -,:_-r5 + _,� •'i._ _fr",�',�. .Q% - ,_ �'} .._ - '1E v• i. - y 4
{ k
1,.t -- - _ - r - -
,.. n `
} i V.
.; i
i
r:
_ r _
'a r .r i_ -` --`: . :e_ .,' - +Y r . - .- , __ -LLF s x
.r �.
%
r e
y. - r-. ..' - k r ;' - .
.. ,rt - - ?# ._
-v .. -
i�
' s r" h^.. iy o- a:.# w
c'.y - - `
rLtic o. : , .r'_ _. - ' -r7..,..'��`{. -r iz''x_ 'f r• tip:'.'...' . - .4. - -' ,
a :
' w. •{ �''`"Y. iav r t '' .o- *'-r'. •[: �- a =fi'f` *r - ,t
44
$ - y�
..{ _ L !- - }!,i, t.'- x.{, +*1 }k T+ L{ *:}'L-,.'--
'1_i:' 'r..j L-F' _ -.e � - •i.. +L
I- .. T
- - f y
+fr+ - -. , °.:..- - ' ��_ .I - y'' +"iF a" _[ _' Yr- i wl.f i' ;'- -t
r..
€ 1 ,. ...-,,.... ..^S_.:Y-*='r'•-'-- .. .[,F `_ 'i=:''17+'�r _ ' x' x� -;'.r :t'_ .
1Y#,r - - �T' -
..i,_ {it ..' L �'.. �. .. .,'I.t r:..' �Y. 1 4 3 `_� .{r' :}. - ''f_r v :
{ '.L+Ni
,
�pL� l4 -
i r1'4• _ _ -
..
t
't+ 4 .4 S :Y
r} _ : '.... x' -ate _ �J
:,
a:� n
rT-
:i': .... Y.. A. :. R An 7. .. #a.3
:.
L r... L .. ...T .. :,, - - y. %% :L-_::'+ k+/ •1 M1 �F. ''Yy -
.T-" d' ..{Y _ _•_.,�. 1. _ += 4 fr, r ....'• _ ;a .. -,.
r
i�
..{' f.. '_ ALt
III .
`r
e.r. '- !s'. '.a' _, .,ram# - !.#_`:;•y.= .i.
tia" '.x. p
- ?r: ice' _ - T_i'-'
h :F*Z'�
L
r:,r , r
+ J ..r
. -. - •-y,
..... 4 _
'i. . -
.. :...a. }'_. FS,r' x. ...t-' i t .. - _'.� .5. ..1; - r Y;•.. ��{I 4u..'L 5 _ - .t. _
/ -
{.
',; ....J'# ...__. rts,.. r- r._`;t'' t 'a ter', f'
v
/y
F T F i' - i��r.#....�. �. ". ..,�.,,._.,.f"�*1 •..... - i l r± �- tea. - - _r _r
2 ��.# ..� ..__._._.:._ :- !� .,x....�.'..„L'r"_. ,.,..,.. .'#r-; '7,-.. vie, :.; _.� V.
F~ a� ,}
,offmot_. '�'y, _ k' s'S: _ ,'.. :' _ {- "xF:. -_ .�.i;- .Y-: _o-� _-a'? i=;� t�lI / j 1
r_. -_ ..7#}1 - "ram
4 - �4 .,:.,.z f. - _ Y,, .'F F S.:}...- .��t;. __ .=SC.._ 7r: a
i- '
1.
r+.4. - + Wy yy ,. 1 a
2 .;_ ` '_,'!,:r._ - -, < ,x:i ..1 Y�G I,x.- a-. R' k �*. --. �.r. -.-.r .11
.. } �-
r .. .d}'r - 'i.r, sY. . } Y'' - -4n; ''.r.-_- ;'7 :}f f'r�':'':- .-t�'#e'=x
r'
.. Wiz' - .'7•:_
¢x, - ;�Y l =`.?' _ LU.-"_'Y'z'r -7 , -_ .r :?:' �'_r]j - -IL '_'2_, _sy _r'-JW-`T
�- irZ
q. .1�:�'' .�..:. ...i a. ti "� •r -.Y .#a I r- •: 'e {.:}�f+ .i*tfr.33'x':`r'f!?. - u} '' -
# - =._ ..... C,1 A-'.,yam. .3r.. ... _ '..�r- Aj'."--- Y S. _.��_.. : r _ "c
l r- -{..�k - a�}. YA-.4ZF-'.. - �i _..y-�..-.;'---� }�.'' .':_ ,{,t..,.x Y am.} ,"'r`if'_'. r-� 'i r. •�•�#Tu{.
-
'3..i• .' ,..-. _...�v' !F'.�YJ-: }'... __ t ... -= t'�'' ''"~4'' -7'ry.- -:ti. _ _'.5 i2_.':_-rk' Y•
:
%
rff-''f ''Yi It=...ter. a,._# . n1 _ _ _ ..,,
„' L
- 2 ; F s'�,r..� ''4 _:',':'._'. ■'11.. �s�xLLry'= R'rk - �,i _ 'fN�_ _- ..ice - _._ y3__ � lx;"_..�-_,
._.. ",_ .x..v __ _ _
,,. ._,x_,..Y� .�i+-"Y,�;.-' _��. .L c. , X' pi .'+'v.' r- `�._.' ..y�i ra.' �.;.'_ a`6.- - ''1
r+. �..,2 yk. --':._.::. - �.,;.-. r .•,--'.._• L `,i_-.• .. _ '�'= -._, yn. ;:�_'i: _ =eT tea''-{�`
Y� 2.SS J ...i ., ..=:..: �.A,.. ,L �L. {_ - - ,:.Sy z:;,: \% }r]A 'Y.-}* il"
L L __ ..r .. -;l re .. I� .. -.r+i. 1 rY1 - L,-
}'�.%r rZ.}r _ - '4' fi'-..> ,,¢: Yt
-a.. -- -1 7 a ...,s,...',.-. *" r,. 4_ .. ..�.. :u _ _ 3;%I--.._ :'�'_;e" s=i'�'.c:=�vFa - :s�.J, �
- a_. n F.. _ f Y ,... rr, .,.,.f. .. -r_: - "t',gym. --�=_- 3�.r'�..��*aa.t�j4`�- - c, Y7.
., ./.. _, r S_ n. , ,'.: M1.-' ,.. } Yr ''- :x. <. = i. t'.r_.;}: r�.,Ff' a jl'
k_. '` '-.,�.� ::# j.,5<' -•,r7,;T:.,,.a.. rc ;� .' :'-kt-.''�x _ x� 'tN - •:_r:' _.- -''�-'''�'''3.. - Y.f,;'k:A .-rY t;_y%"=r�lr��i-ry��� L
._,..�,ry....... _ --.'-a, l..:r.r. - 'sr.�.- ._{'a _ - ��-,- _ - '?.,'.. "s `'§;:-,w'=•S-
T.
[.
}µ] }l�..
. v>
..
Ll
.. .._,.,.._ :s.::_ '..'_� ,_. .�...rs'.::..Y:.::1 N.k-x:,l• ?.r:: r." - -?�J� _i% - Jx'.}+ +'r.' ���F,r..:k•: •-a.- .k.:d�'�' i .9
„'
=.r {s%....A r _ r �_., ,a�..'_7_:.,,w' _ ai _.rw t 'x x£. ?.3.C%'F ra.1 -- .S�_'� #� ?. -`._� _'�,:'.._aY F�j'k�i'
Y t''-'r o- ..�-T'r..-'.)- f r- w ,.i 'L ',+r: _ �.. '.= x3. 'y:. ;.9_; _1 a y 1 .` --r.
L .,.^,.. .,1 _..•. _ r wA,V S.xr :3-*' '_ Y'l of? _. xl+ _ ...-:'r:. ,';.�' V't• - :C 'r;: k-.4.. :.- +-ar ��.
'S-�} , \. 1.1 ryt� ..r .-..;r-3"-.;.' :'�.i'% "V ,:Y r'}. *.- - F "}",{�� 'r+.:.r:° :'lip.' - -F x� "Q -_
''-}.S r+.:o.;x _. .�.1... ,_. r.-',F, de.:i„'.�L_'7. �' l c_ I. 'Y't, .-ir - :;,. - tfJ f�.-,_'{� '..T- •if._.:r2n - L-=' 3 }nj.h�_ s
w.-,a,:,'-� .-._- :, r-.::. `-ass--,. r: 3 -a �., ,Yk n;,f 2- - -_,: � :f,::.-,'ry:�. _3�. ...+ _
_ }}
_ r.
F'
>".r' t .{ .::ryr:.".- .4...,.-V=.?4" ,rf- _1""{ a: -_ % - 'x_o max' _'�s-'•''y-,�4 riF:S'•.'a�G"'�K.�-:t> T s: ..- } -r° .,
L..J.-_.+kk y. s x ll't'c-`C.:,i._ L' i, hx }�'-- •' :' ::1S ='X. ems. Laa 4.' _ ..V L+.: ,iyr.::_ rct''�;:'* - {} E
..:: ■Y - f' '....�_ ,_ 'L..:_""' {i'= "}+�l}� _ tv`r.� '.:�i*T. 4s.�'- .'..___ w. y:...,f tS 'f r-rfi _i_ - YL.-f+
}.-:Y}.Y':.Y �: .K.. .L -._ +.,.�: :i, `zr -''� _'� 1.k',=�l" IC± _ ,� "~ - 3'r- �V
4 , 'f -T t
:..E,,=:".:_ . c pr _. ._ir."-,---"'..�.: ff �. - A-je"'�� -.n �... A- L r:a'.i� x_Fr: ;�;_ :�:r
r :-'
i
r.
.. i,'Sa L a, ._y ..,, ty, .•i' .. ',.#g-Y.x,. :Y...-,:#,,,.}=,r' ...;+.':.'• _ ..4.s,[s: ,.,-'. T .J;�,.� _ --- �"l;J.'..i
-x-- _ _.. :_,.'_ ..--. _ ..., ^'iM c. 4-f:r.�� .-�._ 2F:4-r _�. ..- 4:.a..r_ "`1:. -
r ....
"'.;: V.
;fy. ..��' . .., 'I'.
;y_.{.F...;..: ..' ..r,..- - ;y _ _':'_. - .:b.Y:.(:17 n.f n,.yy c -�`'Y:%}-.7=::._' °..,:';.+#y':L 's r"y'' _ "'i.-L"
a.#(?,rr�,_._ fig.:S, -!' -'tom i.•. -* - �'"„ ._♦r; _-- .r I%�"_:: �o. _..�.�'�r�w-: .�;�'d�.,,,�r:. ..� �r'.:r..r, ;�,).��... ..r mar.2'::, y''rt' �.�.+ .f.
' n'-fx ,i _ ter' ,ry - ;L,J-:"`-'7 c,. ._,r•., rS - - .',...� {X, 4# t�-:�.
Y--'_#r am. -. "a, - .'i'" �'C' 'z�. ,"*s +1�, a'}--t-,-..-r,_ f
T ,
,ft:'._•x J'�-, -.2w -T ':1 , ,.. ':M1t P �t,� faa%-n=r- ,-x'' ., l - '- - ; r #
' r
`'x s wit ma's x .,Y 'x 'rx ..r..
t'�-..,. k y!r'.x•. ,n-.,._ -:..r - -,r� ?:,'�!-= x.. M1=''cr '.a sS''Y=:i'°'. 'rz.,rr.. ,_y..
". +
..;r'{ y.T.:..'L__.Y.. ...;:'.-__._, ---par ,-'L"'kph:: ,%{;lK=.":3,}h "- ��'. _ ':5 ;. *.�L j=Y ,�',;_
r rL �..,.T L .• - -- - '-rx"*k,. 4•._._-r='r-'--W t _ ':=z....'1' - _'{ ':v:;2 V.� :t.._ :_,ti ly_. .,.. t}!� Yr '°.rill _ '"
w
n
..
f x,.4 .. _ - -_ r'r:: - --�G '�{ - '' fie.
F'..+.4..�..:'n?x.:.�. ..' �_�'.�rn.'r...,* '-...,. �aa._.. '7.4 .�Yw }�..,� .. - �'�.. _* _ •lf:,: ..7 r?:1ti+::.' �;r-'+'w... w3#i x�'k
i'a...',Y'=-.Y -•-s,:•o-'._ _:•--'"' wrl::;I"=="• "IVY• %_ _7::r. - Yl' 7. - -- b.=. __ -Ly.
.. ,5�. .F• , ...Y ,Jf t- - - .ry;�,.y-.-.,. ar ,f K_=rv" � - .3'�i.. 'y.'= - rY.-,ji ,-14..?- .9 -.��s~.�:..,'��^ ".
i ..-.'• - f.'.,!'..x'.�. .. --:3-_... .#- - - 'r':*._ .1 1--t-'f 1 ' ;.-"k "'rw„'.•-' .5� a'a^u' -i'x
-.'ithS>:r,% -.�.,=-]T", h :.1'r'i y'S' '"�•=_i'r 'F;-[. A: - +#a •s vY'i'may. - ..r'k,X: JI __ #_'Y.�rtx', %-fiLk?,!7 Xc--y -
�'..:.._.._..r`'rLL.L .."- - `.7;'l':{ -� e.f i k _ ry a_ - �:s-t-.-'rs` M:{',Y 9t.�:r_....•.Y ram- =}.til '#.:ti-
+�.
'.17,r.}.F L'.:'L__ v'- '- r -'_r ... - =' �i 9. # ,iP�'.xx:„K�F-,�{.%. ry -__. _K.S :.'Yg. -'iui
x .- .3"0."'- �s'r'. -_ fe_'S+l c'x i.. s'-' rG..+_- - i.X�'.'x:_'-.: {x� �:.J -- -."
ter.:- �w _ 'f'. x�.r _ --
y.' r. �.. cff A-
.._._..
�„ _ W. .
r
_,..".:.a. - r .$. .-- .,Z'.Y:>: Li -t- ::r�'� <. - *ryj ..:.. `'r"4 }. x#a r=.;�� xr. >.,
t r�'•:...-.•.-..-F ;`.� r R ._#.•' :_7 - -_-} �._ - - - *'-:iu-�S�E.. _.'.5.. _,r LL' _.,3s ... s'y-� .s.__ _1...:- r. .
+t
r. o- - s..'_.
�'.: yy� ry zy _ '�i::i,',t" }* _ ..... - _-.}7F." a..it? 3.�_ti ][a ,:r
_ s���.�,T7. � �r Y -�+'k3�.'"I..,�..µ�.+J',.:,;,'" 'firY_' ry.,;w �Y r�.�L -"}--% -o-. -._j.
:.}'•r}X' Lr1� //',y5,.'*,-14 -...'..ti...'vt�,- 4 ry e..xx-err+ZL .-f -�`_Y •."�. 'a�-,...-
.-'i .' F+�Y,. 4 i._- .`�.:.. f_ +, ,k' .�^�'-"wp,�.'�f:{'�"i.G " :4_IM1'#'.k:.
v,
h
r.'. Y� •/�'..
r 1 !
_ A'�'. - �k - 'rt.
r
a':-.'.
fn
� r
« ,,^'•`. *:..- "-A_:n-: .'.f-{'-"'_ :.�:_ 7_..e11, � -__e /Y�" �, - .*�'r� x:-;i' _tiSF€:3+4 -'ia,..k_ :t L?'..
,
1.
i a i
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas..
They highlight sell limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
fanners, community officials, engineers, develo erso builders,and bone buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, wasto
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impase
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identity soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and voider area
planning,, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soll quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps
or allnres/r alnlsolls/healt / and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(btti s://offices. C.e DV. da. o /locator/ pp*agency=nres or your i l S State Soil
Scientist ttptl/ww .nrc ,usda. ov/wps/portal/nres/detall/soils/contact s '
cid=nrcs 14 2p _o 3 'k).
Great differences in sail properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet sails are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields, A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The national Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies$ State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S, Department rtment of Agriculture (USDA)prohibits discrimination in all Its programs rams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
au iotape, etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202) 20-26 0 (voice
and T . To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office o
Civil nights, 1400 Independence Avenue, .11 ., Washington, D.C.20250-9410 or
call o 9 -32 2 voice or 202 20-6362 TDD . USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
_,____________.2
preY�ua—~---^-----------~------- __,____~___. 5
�m�n | �ap —'--~--------~--'
--~—~-----' _~_,_____.0
Soil map... —,—,—,—_-------_—,—..
^—^—~—~—^—'' ,_,_~_____.7
Leg —^--~--------~—~--'
-'~ ~--'------ ,_,_~8
K�apUn� Leoond~---^—^—^------~—~—~----^---^—_,_~..8
Map UnKDeauUpuona—~---------~------^—~----- 0
�aaaxCoun�. Woo�auhuao�o` No�her Po�—~----.---.-----. .
15ko2G o ercenta�poa ...10
711 D�h�m�u�ou��nmn" =`p=. .
4
{
F i
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soli reap units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map,Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the snap, and a description of each soil map unit,
• I's
-...I I.'., n#:k` Ih :Ik ... .. I ... ... ... .
.:a .. - J,
' - .. .. .
is� _ I v
!a
i .. ..
•h-
I..*' ... .. .. .
w ' F
+d- ..
'4
>�, ... ..
.
•i _ t}'` '
. }3:�i
k
.;
'{ {.
. ..
... + '
}'. ..
1�' ..
.. .. ,
*\•
.' a .. }
*.I:.S L..fry_ .� % f
�: s .'�
. ...}_.. .;r
... .. .. .. ... '::y .... ..
` i
t i.'...i.:�..'.:.. ,:1
.�,. :.i r{ . . w .. ... .
+dux" t"kg'. ,yx .. .
'.:: - - . . ...
r .I ..
R rj::t:.' :fly \ t; .. .•4+ 'y.}
4 s '. .. .
I rr' :y* .
F N.rya .. }i i
:t'
'f.. ..
4 ..r a ti•
ki - 'i£ tl tom'' .!'r+:. ..
+# .{�t '>#,. _�. iy rye i ..#`{: ' '
'.].%". k'. ! y," +oak .. ...
'I. .. Y
:'y :;' I
M11., l\ '
t; .:
..
Ys �5
.. {
r .. __:#_
i:: .
9...::';':'.: '=ri
.t.
_ 'f ..
try:a`....
Y F
..:.. ..
fib.
._ .. *:a........
,:
:'.�/S:f
{ ,
-r -.tit rh; —
%S.
'i'!` "{
�T .. .t.rt ..
1'.'.` mot' ?'+t,'i
........s.'...1:: .o
.'............ s
.. w ..
. M1'.':.
y�� �Y 4K - k' .
.-�J� :\ -
. \ .
:{ L
".' :�' .
' � H s}
'i ..
1
. ..
tl i r
...'• :.. a:.' ... .�:S:i..' t
sk
.. rti r o W ��:$ ..'r .
.. S«'
?z' r
!•Y
iyt ,
.4 s.wa. +4n c...r —
*� '*
�•
+ -
k4
i #. "�. `
>}. ri<'
':i - }�.'
.. .{�'
''-3'. tih. v.4 wii' .
N'SNC '"
_ r'
_ - i-:
kr .. _
#'>''
Y;. -
,�4 tiSi f�' rrr.P'i_inp r''r t
r+
x ,} :. s, +j _ {
:. ", e�,..,r
'.�w.� .'t.. _
.._S s,.. ..�.. :........ .."k - ,..a.. :.: .....v..4�'- :I ..♦ '' ya.4:. :vy >y;f _r .�?s.i!' r -
7............ ..... .:.: }� -
' F: 1'�
7E.. .. ..., ...:. .ti.. .:•:�f •�K ti'� y •a' 'r,r's°`!;`#,. ^2- '•r
.:,
+:'.
k .:..'
• ' y
.� } ..
. '. .4L..
,i S {•
'+ �.
. ; x':
.f' `�J.L} f�..
. > :r .
* .t. %Iti' #": �S.r# -:LAB
'.'j' '.': :ri cY ......;:''=.:.;' .gip. -_ '
.x C R }4�,jI
o tom.". .`k::E.. ': dux- r ii E `, ,
?"' yt� x�' ,
i' yy.. f .. +
F
%t .J .. ? _
? -
f' .
::.+r
ti :.1::..,-... ,k :t ��� .
ry
.i ..:.. .:..-: .. ...YF.: r. "#:
... ,. .. ....... ..._sue!. ' .:{,:..
v
'r '':yk=-• ` r.. �, £mot i 'tit *xn"' ..
"1..
,,}}�# ';*14+L?k r'.4a'#i°" ....�.4,::,r r• . .. .
}."` _ y
"rYY. ,
` .
' : �i; - .
.
:t r* ■.Y i.4 +.�..,>•y3:°{.... ;; ... .I ,t'a* 't,':tl� a�•�'M.,, .. .a
^4 r�
:%, '. . s�` xt 4§' ..:d4S'h `'"^ r- - s,ti<a.1.
;,i::3'; .4 V' .iy,.may, �A�xl.` - -;'ti ti4'4?.A;' ` ..
. r� I:`
:`\ :x., r
1. ''t+ i. `IW :•: ',` .. ..
J .
`'JI`
x'
ix#k! .
s,'-' '
n.....
i:1 - i
'i• ��i ..
.7-r L Y .a;:.ma 's y`: .. ..
S: '� .a
:}'.YES _ l�' i• '.}r, ,'.
xh \ x ...
.'k..
k
4 _. „
✓'�M1 v
\ mil-''• ti ..
{h'.
K 7/
.. ..
e
�% ..
:i
P:s it
•R. -r ..
.4
,
k. I:
;Y ti
.! ...
.-;
„x.:. .. ., y'x
. ..w ........ .s. ...... ..... ... .. h 3. ..
't\
y}xT
f+
y x
/ waxy k� .�
..l`... .• ...
rw+•is � ..
{:.:�
R.A. 1�x (? M1 }r^. 7r ird ..
.i7iF. .';.y'':..' r.t +•><' Irx A�klo'J` .
3:s'f
.'t .
�. .:
a. }'..s.S+�I .
`'.3'.`:.:.
'x+ K 3
. x 4 4J01'
..r:....:. t...t Cn >j--f. -.5'.r;;!.k#'''.'s:t. .. :'.TL
,....::.,n....'.....:::. - ._ •gyp'/y,. .. y
.. +.5�+'}y
'.;,q.' 'tiff 554'i+' t;,'s�. � �k k'i.t!v:t:}t% i! i 'S •.Y'_� .. .
'i.;� ,i? Ott. .. ..
'i`'r:
r a'.
a r. .
I•I �{ I' r ..
jj},f'' `tea }'. ?F":tiro
.�. i:
... ...f s..?.
�,:'
,.
..r'. '!.:.! .:.x'
<. :...
_ t j-.
:{
.... — 't
:j'.
}'` 4'
:::
4 + �i
48
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest( fi) �_ Spoil Area The Sail Ury that corr�pri your Ail
Area of interest( 1) v'lr�r ma plead �
Stony Spot
Soils
VerY Stony Spot
- oil map unit Polygons "�' Wet Spot Waming:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
^
Soil leap Unit Lines ''''7
Other Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
o��map u�E#Points "� Misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy ccuracy of soil
Special Point Features
Specrai Line Features line Placement.The maps do not show the small areas&
U0 BlowoutWater Features contrasting soils that Could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Trarrsportati Clay Spot a i�s Please rely on the bar scale n each map 0 sheet for F�� map
measurements.
f~, Closed Depression
Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit � Source of l lap; l atural Resources Conservation Service
, { Routes Soil SurveylL:
Gravelly Spot ordinate System: Web Mercator PS $
Major roads �
Landfill
Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based ort the Web l
-� Lava I�`�o pro� ctron,which preserves direction Mercator
Background and shape but distorts
marsh or swamp � aerial Photography distance and area_A projection that preserves area,such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
11e or Quarry accurate c2iculations of distance or area are required.
.ram Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS Certified data as
of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Essex County,Massachusetts,Northern Part
Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 12,Sep 14,2016
.. Sandy Spot
A+�
: Soil map units are labeled a space allows)for map aj
. , Severely eroded Spot 1: ,000 or larger.
Sinkhole
lid orip Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Aug 2 ,2014-fie
19,201
Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these reaps.As a result,same minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7
ustorn Soil Resource Report
Map U
E sex'County,Massa husetts,Northern Pars #A 0 )
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In A 1 = Percent of A01
711 D Chariton-Rock ooh outcrop-Hollis 1. 10 .0%
complex, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of interest 1.5 100.0%
Map Uni Descry bons
The reap units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The neap unit descriptions, along
with the reaps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A reap unit delineation on a soil reap represents an area dominated by one or more
major binds of soil or miscellaneous areas.A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonornic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however,the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic ie classes. Consequently, every reap unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and sorer minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to these of the dominant soil or soils in the
neap unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
non contrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management,These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components.They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scab used. Some shall areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps, if included in the database for e
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the wrap unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of Minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex c that it
was unpractical to rate enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic Masses but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
land form segments that have similar use and management requirements,The
delineation of such segments on the reap provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. if intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
8
Custom Soil Resource report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
Are identifying symbol precedes the reap unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a so#series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have,major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil pluses. Most of the areas
horn on the detailed soil reaps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management.er ent. For example, Alpha
silt loam, o to 2 percent dopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some reap units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
Whose reap units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion f the sails or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex,, o to 6 percent slopes, is are example.
n association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
,miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to reap the sods or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar.Alpha--beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are rapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management.ement. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a napped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or rnisc ilaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them.Alpha and Beta soils, o to 2 percent slopes, is are example.
Some surreys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no sail
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
9
custom Soil Resource Report
Essex
County, Massachusetts) Northern Part
711 — -Dock outcrop,-Hollis complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes
heap Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: v
Mean annual precipitation to 54 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 4 3 to 54 degrees i'
Frost-free period: 12 to 240 days
Farmland classlficationir Not prime farmland
Map Unit composition
Charlton and similar soils: 6 0 percent
Rock outcrop: 16 percent
Hollis and similar soils: 15 percent
Minor components percent �the rrra r�rri.
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and tans t
Descrition of Charlton
Setting
Landform: midges, kills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position(three-di ensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent r ater'ial: Friable coarse-loamy eosi n deposits over friable coarse-soa r
basal till derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
H1 - o to 4 inches: fine sandy loam
2-4 to 28 inches: gravelly fire sandy loam
H - 28 to 60 inches: gravelly time sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 1.6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer'to transmit water Ks t : Moderately high t
p '
high (0.60 to 6.00 inihr
Depth to grater table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Nome
Frequencyof po ding,' None
Available water storage in profr'le: Moderate (about T5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Lard capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Lard capability classification nonlm'gated: 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group.
Hydric soil ratings: No
Description of Flock outcrop
Setting
Parent material: Granite and gneiss
10
Custom Soli Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope.- 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restricfive feature.& 0 inches to llthic bedrock
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification nonirrlgated: 8s
Hydric soli rating: Unranked
Description of Hollis
Setting
Landform Ridges, mills
Landform position (two-dimensional).- Backslope
Landfor rr position (three-dimensional) Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
i parent material: Shallow, friable loamy basal till derived from granite and gneiss
over granite and gneiss
Typical profile
-0 to I inches: muck
H2- I to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
3-2 to 17 inches: gravelly fine sandy loan
ff - 17 to 20 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and dualities
Slope.' 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 10 to 00 inches to lithlc bedrock
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Very low (0 00 to 0.00
i nib r
Depth to grater table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
requency ofponding., None
Available water storage in profile: Very low(about 2.5 inches
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Lard capability classification nonirrr`gated: 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Woodbridge
Percent of reap unit: 7 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Filbury
Percent of reap unik 2 percent
Landform Depressions
Hydric soil rating., Yes