HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-21 Traffic Study u
5 -
RouTE 114 TRAFFIC STUDY
May 1985
prepared by
Merrimack Valley Planning Commission
The preparation of this report has been financed under contract #22947 with
the Massachusetts Department of Public Works and with the cooperation of the
Federal Highway Administration.
Merrimack Valley Planning Commission, 350 Main Street, Haverhill, MA 01830
1115111
Prepared by the staff of the Merrimack Valley Planning Commission.
Gaylord Burke, Executive Director - Reviewer
Thomas F. Rossi, Transportation Program Manager - Study Co-author
Paul Laponius, Planner - Study Co-author
Robert Tassinari, Planner - Data Analysis
Eric Waaramaa, Planner - Data Analysis
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The MV PC would like to acknowledge the important contibutions of the
following people:
Keith Bergman, Executive Secertary, Town of North Andover
Daniel Cahill, Community Development Director, City of Lawrence
Joseph D'Angelo, Project Engineer, MDPW District 5
Dennis DiZoglio, Community Development Department, Lawrence
Karen P. Nelson, Town Planner, Town of North Andover
Benjamin Osgood, local developer
North Andover Board of Selectmen
Chrlstine Smith, Chairman
Ramsey Bahrawy
Kenneth Crouch
John Graham
Charles Salisbury
0
SUMMARY
The RQUto j_IA Ira= Studywas undertaken by the MVPG in April 1984
at the request of the Town of North Andover and the MDPW. The study area
encompasses
1t town line. 1-495 The followingaiseaisummarynce to t
he North
of the
Andover/Middleton findings
of the study.
The Western Segment of Route 114, from 1-495 to the Andover Bypass,
is characterized by congestion and slow travel speeds. These conditions
are at their worst during the afternoon peak period. Three signalized in-
tersections--at Any�r Street, Route 133, and the North Andover Mall
entrance--operate at service level. urJ.ng this period, n Ica ng o a-
non at or near capacity. rThis congestion also contributes to the high
incidence of accidents at these intersections;J T to 1 intersection
year ner'End.
is the m c en -
' There are currently no serious congestion or
to North Andover-Middleton
afety problems along the
Eastern Segment of Route 114 (Andover Bypass
line.
* A large amount of growth is expected in the Route 114 corridor, both
along Route 114 and in nearby areas. New developments are planned, par-
ticularly along the Eastern Segment, which will greatly increase traffic
ncrease will affe • fie entire length of /
on Route 114. This tr 1 will aft
Route 114 in e study area• All intersections on the Wes ern i��ege►,t
will operate over capacity during peak periods, and congestion problems
will spread to the western end of the Eastern Segment as well. The devel-
opment of the North Andover Business Park may prompt the need for signali--
zation of the Route 114-Willow Street intersection.
Several measures for improvement of the traffic conditions on Route
114 were looked at in the study. A group of Transportation Systems Man-
agement actions, including signal timing improvements, lane striping:
in-
tersection approach widening, and institution of bus service, could im-
prove traffic flow and safety; however, they would not solve the severe
congestion problems projected for Route 114. T-To do this, oitb 114 would tanv K
have to be widened to four lanes from Io to M�� vw4 y
lanes provided at all signalized intersections. This reconstruction would 4
have major impacts such as property takings and would be expensive.
The study recommends the short-term implementation of the Transporta-
tion Systems Management actions as they become feasible; many willbe section im-
plemented by the MDPW as part of a resurfacing project on s
Route 114. Also recommended is the initiation of preliminary engineering
for the long-term reconstruction of Route 114 from 1-495 to Willow Street
as proposed in the report. The North Andover Board of Selectmen has re-
quested that the MDPW follow these recommendations.
LaL
qtt_ d accident record obtained These data wrom the ere for to lthe fiv es-
fy hazardous locationstQ,98 study
of
year period from 1976 The total
° area number
detemined.ntsAccidents�oe-
each major intersection in the study rately. These totals are
curring between intersections were recorded sepa
shown in Table 11-6. ore
to tion e nee
As shown in Table 11-6 the er o his n-
a�cidents than an other intersection duri the stud
ec on s c aracter�zed narrow a roach widths on Route i ap
and
ers These
chin from or entering Route 133•
small turning radii. This resuoas in turnip movements and slow
pro', speeds for traffic al acci en s on al
unex ec e s ow owns cause re data reveals that
t c dents at
sis o MD acc This ercenta e s the
o e var
he ante
hi highest among the si nalized intersections in the studyare
a.
ver
Another roblem with this intersectianis di B green signal indication
ty turning left from Route 114. while the opportunity for some unopposed
for southeast-bound traffic provides
elanalon is insufficient to accommodate
left turns in this direction, s in opposing through traffic are in-
the entire left turn
demand,
d gaps vehicles O can make turns during the re-
guaranteesufficient to hase. This causes accidents between conflictingrivers
mainder of the gree opposing through traffic and accidents involving
left turning and attempting to pass left turning vehicles on the right.
A third safet roblem with the Route 133 intersection common to the
Andover Street and Waverly Road in is that the intersection op-
ates so close to capacity. This causes some drivers to become impatient acci
er to "beat" the red signal indication, causing
and to disobey or try half of the recorded acci-
dents with conflicting traffic flows. Nearly
dents during the study period were between conflicting flows-
dents
nearly as many ae-
The Andover Street intersection did not exp of the recorded ac-
cidents as the Route 133 junction. The vast majoritrpaches. This is pri-
eidents involved vehicles an the Andover
of leftreet turns pon these two approaches
marily due to the large percentages hase• This causes
and the fact that they share a common traffic signal p acrosseet to be made posing through
all left turns from Andover conflicts and the potential foraccidents.
traffic, thereby creating
8
f
TABLE II-6
T TOTALS FOR ROUTE 114 INTERSECTIONS AND LINKS, 1976-1980
ACCIDEN 0
Intersections
flnr+ia
o at on
64
1 Waverly Road 182
j Route i 94
Andover Street 95
Andover Bypass 29
I� Hillside Street* 2
Mill Road/Willow Street 6
Johnson Street 8
Boston Road 0
Sharpners Pond Road
Accidents
Location
144
I-fig, to And Street 20
Andover St. to Andover Bypass 35
Andover Bypass to Johnson St. 81
Johnson St. to Middleton line
196
Unspecified Locations
onstruc
* The Hillside Road intersection has
been r a c decrease ein accidents.nter-
seetion since 1980, provably resulting
Conditions at the Waverly Road intersection have been a controversial
topic in North Andover. While accident stat earsstooexittndSince the in-
s serious potential azard er ..� in
ior roblem, tr c on aver
Road must wait for gaps
ter section suns gna ized, ass through the intersection. Because
Route 114 traffic in orderhtduring peak periods, there are not enough
Route 114 traffic i othigh du all Waverly Road traffic to safely pass
sufficiently long gaps
through the intersection. This causes drivers
safeepassage through the intersece
11 during gaps insufficient to a
potentially dangerous conflicts with Route 114 traffic.
Lion, creating p a s is the "creeping out of
Another affect of the lack of sufficient g P in
This leaves
WaVerZy Road vehicles into the intersection.m causing un xpectedmhazardsgfor
the intersection for short periods of ,
Route 11u traffic. The fact that westbound
1 slope of�the aroad makes these
relatively high speeds due to the downhill
conflicts even more hazardous•
9
ti
ed below be required for all new de-
nfuture actions" list ..
_-that the Route 114.
velopments along
u s ardless of what other
certain actions r b taken as land along
TheVPC recomme s taking These should T5M-
These might be classified as
resent and will only become
improvements to Routed 1 the future. These Route 114 is develop required at p
type actions,
but they are not velopments are constructed.
necessary as individual future
Lions include:
Route 11�4 for new developmentsere
curb cuts along driveway or road.
--al low no new rov ide access via
access is available menu to sharenexisting gcurb cuts or p
new develop
side streets- entrances for
widen the paved
--provide acceleration/deceleration laneIfarequir d+a es are
menu along Route 114.
all new develop to Provide these lanes. driveway entrances
surface of the roadway nalization at
high enough, determine whether sib
is needed. existing driveway
- o be used far access to a new development.
--entrance
ide accelerationldt Celeration lanes at an
p
entrance or side street
�D
27
TOWN OF NORTY1 ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
µON7M
+ OL
� a
�,iSSACHJ`+*i
January 113 1985
Board of Selectmen
120 Main Street.
North Andover, MA
RE: . Route 114 Traffic Study
Dear Members of the Board:
The Planning Board has reviewed with the Town Planner Merrimack Valley Planningthe various
Commission's
recoinmendations outline.c2 in the Me As a result of the continued increase
crease
. with
( �} Rouge -114 Trtff is -Stud Route 114,
construction along thought out
in industrial/office spaceh traffic, this
a carefully e task
the high counts of daily through the town board's
long-tee solution should be addressed at this tioxt among the a
large
Co accomplish, however,
with coordination and support
riort list. 1C
a citizens we can•'Put the 114 issue at the top of our p y
may be a state owned r
oad, but it has and will continue to be a town safety
problem. e character of the road in hard numbers
The report brings Co light the true
resent need to do some remedial action
accurbcut
and facts which demonstrates the p along with the need to p
Flagship pr. /Mill Rd. intersection;
asp near the North Andover Business Park.
onto the 125/ByP art of Selectmen
i Again, the Planning Board supports any effort on the p
atever action ig.needed to make Route 114 a safer road Co travel •
to take wh .
Sincerely, rr jr
•,Paul A. Hedstr+om
Chairman
F. /KN