HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-23 Response Comments _. nQ3/L4/ZO0 } 16:31 17AX 781 982 5490 C(LHF&C{Tf.:LI'SDNf0 I?jOC12
CL
COLANTON102
EMGINCL7a5 Aryl SCgr=W ig rS
March 14, 2000
Heidi Griffin
Ptamiing Board
Tuwn IIall Amex
27 Charles Street
Alc+rth Andower, MA 01845
RE, 1 nL-ineeiing Inc view
Fagle Tribune Redevelopment
Site Platy Review
Dear Ms. Griffin:
Its region Be to yarn- request, Coler & COlantonio, itrc- has reviewed thu submittal package
for the above referenced site. Our elTorEs irteluded a comparison (f`information submitted
with respect to the regnirernents of ilie Zoning Bylaws- We also compared the design
assurnptiont and calcalatioiis with standard ougineming pr=[iCe. We visited the site on
Much 9, 2600 to observe existing conditions, Thy submitial package inn-ludcd the
fallowing information:
flans Entitled
"Site Plan R)r Eaglc Tribune Redevelopment", located in North Andover,
Mass." consisting of nine Teets dated V17/00, PrWpared by V anasse Hanger
Brustlin, hic. Receives! 2128100.
Rcports Entitled:
# "Stormwater Management Report", darted 2/00, Prepared by Vanxqse Hmig n
Brusthn, inc- Received /28/00.
We offer the following comments,
Zoning Bylakvs:
Section 8.3)5-)e,-)i-) The locus Should be at a scale of l"-1500'-
ection S.3)5 v.) It is not clear that the proposc€1 construction eatsenleilt on the sou Ih
si&e of the site has bcen auquired.
iOl Accord Pafk I)rjve 781-992-5400 t
Norwell,NIA 02061-1585 Fax: 781-982-5490
u3/14/2000 16,3 EA 781 98 2 5490 OLt;WOi.elN"1ON IO IjP 003
Scelion R_3 5_)e.)v,) TGpography oii the sotith side of the site shi nuld be expanded to
a4�curateiy deti lCrmine the catc:lirnelit area boundaries. Existing off-site ninolf frOM the
scud) in ay iTiapact the design of drainage facilities,
Section 8.3)5.)e.)v11-.) A F;ioiiflcant portloa of the site drains to an existing wetland area
along 1b,- noilhcffly side of the property a4lacetil to Dartnrtouth Street_ i~Iow out of this
wetland is disclnarged vja a l -inch pipe under Dartrnoulh Street, It is Our underswnding
that this area is subject to flooding based on discussions with Town Staff, The drainage
inodel Should utilise the existing culvert as a eolttrol point and inodel the wetland as a
pond to detcrniirie lbe, impact of the propos,� devoloprnent oil flood eievAion,% ig thu
wetland.
The cutchment area plans indicate minor discrepandes relative to tlhe ,repr(es nlatrorj of
watersheds 101, 102, 011 and 2021.
Proposed Ponds 203, 2011 and 2012 are located inn clots 0Fup to 5-feet_ It is not clear tl}at
these ponds will be located above the seasonal rnaxin'ium high graru)dwater elevation and
as a result it is unclear that the full volxime of storage should be included in the model
without thy; subintual cf test pits. Nmd 203 iuclridcs an w Aer-drain set approxima#c1y 4-
feet below the existing ground elevation. It is not clear that this drain will be located
alcove the high groundwater eievation without the.anibinission oft,-,Ft pits. The under drain
app=&to be dcsigne€1 as a fitter rather than an interceptor for go oundwa[a.
The existing on site stonnwater systcm should be inspected to determine it's condition
and adequacy,
Proposed shallow ratth basins do not provide 4'-swops_ Inlet calculations should be
submitted relative to bypass specifically for Catch Basin 3, 4 and 7. Shallow cover pipes
should be cop.5Inicted of Ctiss V RCP or ductile i3ron to accoinmodate loading conditions.
The shallow pipe cover detail indicates a miniminn cover of lei-incites, however the plans
indicate the -minimurn cover as 6-inches. It is not clear that adequate cover will be
provided over pipe 40 ( tomiCAD reference ntmiber). Pipe calculations should compare
actual flows us. capaci i.cs. Thr. hydraulic profiles indicate symcm surcharge during Troth
prc and post development conditions.
We recoinmemd that stounwater facilities be designed conslani kith the rcquircments of
ASCF Manual and Departs of Engineering Practice No. 77 and the DEY Stormwater
M;magemcnt Policy- It is recommended the drainage basin berin be a mbihnuin 8 feet
vide for the, purpose of maintenatiee vehicle access. It is not clear that die propose
fombay will properly drain without the subraissiGn of a detail and test pits. The diwharge
final the basins should be dl-ircted via riprap s ales toward tic off site stream and
wetland. We are concerned with erosion at tliese outlets dne to ffit, steep existing grade of
5.1_
Section 8,3)5.}c.)ix. An elevation view of the,propesed building should be subrrrittcxl.
Section 8.3)5. )xi)It iq iiot clear that the notice of iatemt has beam filtd.
Section 8.3)5.)e.)xvii.) Proposed lighting and specificatioats fbr fixtures should be
sublrnitted.
O3/14/2000 16,32 FAI 78l 982 54a0 COF..ER&COLAj%Tf)' 10 004
Section 8,3.)6.)d,) It is not clear that Elie existing state stornlwater system is adequate for
cxis;fing or proposed flows withont bypass. TM8 j ssoo should be investigated altd roodcicd
appropriately.
Section 8.3.)6.)f) An erosion control plan should be developed for proposed slopes.
Haybales and silt Pem;es on the north side of the site slimild be maintained until stafficicnt
slopc sta ikizafion has devciopcd,
Table 2 Dimensionat Requirements:
The side sctback requizvmi w on the north side of the site is not met under pre or past
Constmefiol)-
GeneralComments'
3, Profiles for the ptupcsed sewer conuiectioii should be submittcd_
We appreciate the opportunity to assist thr, Conservation Commission on this project and
hope that this information is sufficient for your needs_ We would be pleased to rneat with
the Board or the design cngincer to disc,oss this project at your conv-,niemce, If you have
any questions please do not hesitate to con lac E tis.
c.ry truly yours,
.CAL R &COLANTONIO, INC.
LA" 0 Oce�
oln C}- C,hessia, P.E.
X - Vanasse Hangen Brastl4 Inc.
Jim Rand
]asfjC
3
05{12/2300 12: 37 FAX 781 9A2 5496 COLElVOLAWON]0 €anon
L
CLANTNI z
FNGiNF(-HG AND SCIENT1`57-53
May 12, 2000
Heidi Griffin
Planning Board
Town Mall Annex
27 Charles Stma
Noi-[h Andover, MA 01945
RE= Supplemental E119i'ieeri"r, Review
3iogle Tribtimc Redevelopment
Site Plan Review
1?cm-'l+is.GYM iw
In response, to yom- re[luest, Coffer & oh"llonio, Ino. has veviewed the supplemental
submittal package fov the. above r6 rencerl siie. ow: e1fom included a comparison of
informat1an submitted wits, ;,cspec€ to the reqn[rerments of the Zoning 13ylaws. We also
compared the desigri assumptions and calculations with standard �-agineeriii pl-actice-
The s b ittal packagc inultided the l:ollo ing information
Plans Entitled
i "Site Plan for Eagle Tribune l xpansioW% located in Forth Andover, Mass."
consisting of nine sheets daicrl 3129/00, Revised 4/26/00 Prepared by Vanagse
1-1angtn Riust[in.laic. Reccived 412VOO.
* "Hydrology Report and related data", dated March 3, 2000, Revised 020100
and Prep amd by Vanmse Hangers B rustlin Inc. received 4/29/00.
* "Plan of Land in North ndo%,er showing propoged drainage irnprovements„
ruled July 21, 1991 and prepared by Dior and Cn. No. Andover, MA.
Received 511100.
• "Re ponsc ttee' dated March 30, '?E}E}E}, and piWared by Vanassc ffiaugeli
ffivstlin Inc. Received 412 5100.
We offer [lie fallowing commenvu.;
101 AucuT€1 PaFk Dfkve 781-982-5400
Nurwetf,MA 02061.16 5 Fax, 78i-992-5490
05/1112000 12;38 FAX 781 982 549D CC MCOLAN OLN10 IjD4E0
Zoning Bylaws--
Section 8.3} ,)e.)i.)The Iuons should be at a scuie of t"=1500',
'I'llu loraas Tarts been scaled to }"=150 '. .Satisfactc-UY 47ddreNscd.
Secdon 8-3)5,)e-)iv.) It is not clear that the proposed construction easemcslt on the south
side of the site has beexh acquired,
peparledly, Me a[?jacentt P'-OPe'-1Y i-7 'Controlled' by Fagle TrUnme. Safisfactorily
radekessed.
Section 93)5. .)v.) Topog-aphy On the south sine of the site should be expanded to
accurately detea-nline, the catchment a1ra bourjda;-jes. Existing off-site mnoff frum 1h
south may impact thte design of drainage f'aicilWes
77te cff site topogrripity to the ,south has freers included aEa the pTatnts', however canttrol
structures and cover types have not been indicaled.
Section 8.3)5.)e-)vd-) A significant portion of tlhe site &airs to an existing wetland area
along the northerly aide of tine praperty adjacek3t to DailmokA h Street. Flow Ott Ot this
wetland is thscharged via a 12-inch pipe under Daaxnxouth SVeEL It is uor understanding
that this area is subject to flooding based on discussions witlt'l'own i Staff- The dvainagc
madd ghoaid utilim the existing culvert ns a controi poihit and model the wctland as a
pond to determine the impact of the proposed develogmew on flood ekvations in the
lore#land.
Tire excSfing calch basin has beenarrodcfed fr�r Me 2.S-year sionn, The proposed plan for
rile crater, basut upgrade is coneeptually acceptable. The prg1,)oserl grates should weet
NviTh Andover DPW slandard.5- We recommend #tat actual topogWhic survey data be
uldi;ed to deteyminae the elevations of the existing -system and that the final design be
based on actual lopogn gpldc dwa- The entire system inchoding the Swale and wetland
should be modeled for oll stonn events, compfete topwgraphy linking the site should be
submitted and a maiplete remedial design ,Thould be 4mbmfteed. The DPW should
eommen?t on the plant prior to approval,
The catchment area plEstla indicate rnin€rt relative to the rgxrsentation of
w atersheds 101, 102, 2011 and 2021-
These catchment area boundaries have been claai-f-red. Satisfactorily addressed.
€ltoposcd Pond 203, 2011 and 2012 are located in cats of up to 5-feet, it sa not cleats' that
these, pondq will be located above the seawnal maximum high groundwater elevation and
as a result it is unclear that the, full volurrte of storage should be included in the model
without tine submittal of test pits. Pond 203 incl Wes an ull&d r-draia set approy,imately, -
feet below the existing ground elevation, It is not clear that this drain will be located
above th, high growidwater elevation wiIhout thr, submission of test pits. The strider drain
appeni-s to be designed as a fiiteir ranter than an inm:i�eptor for grokind ater.
The proposed dcten 6rm basin has been redesigned to allow a -0.5 fi?Or separation to
high groundwair er-. Sraiisfactorily addressed-
2
05r E 212000 1 2:38 E AN 781 982 5490 {:OH.,'R&COE.AN'f'El 10 01.1
J'hc existing on siW stoc'zrtwntez:sYsten, shocild be inspected to delcmirle its condition and
ari uacy-
Redoruedf , dig on site stony wOfer s)'VeM was inver.`led by the in October
19y , These results should be subndRed
Proposed sljajlow catch basiais do not pt:ovid(; 4'-(;Urnpg- ft}let. calculations S1101116 1
stxt3mitted m1ative to bypass specifically for Catch Basin 3, 4 and 7. Sh all O%v COWr pipes
shoc:ld #)e collsit-acted of Class V RCP or ductile iron to accommodate loading conditions,
Tile shallow pipe covet-detail incUcateg a nimum cover of 14-irtc;hcs, hmvrvet'the plans
indicaie (bto inininmrno cover as -inchos. It is Eyo# clear that adequate cover will he
pl,ovide,d over Pipe 40 (StounCAS re%ixLmee minibei�), t'ipe shoe ld campare
a stral flows vs, capacities. The hydrauhu profiles indicate syo-,m surc:hnrgc during boll]
pz-p-- aacl post development conditions.
Sumps !wive beery pr Nided as rye<'essayy� Rcportedly, pipes twitlt less than 24" of cover
will he conni-i+cred of Class V C'oncrele Pipe. Pares savers haw l en brcreased as
neeessary. A comparison of actual pipe ,floiv.s vs. [.-aptccilies COO be deirive-d from tice
h3rilr-rarrlic prafale which i?rdicutes r'rrEprovemeni iinder pn posed condrYions, holveyer the
systetrr vill rerrx rilr subjece to sambarge. Sa i,sfacgory-
We recommend that srormwateF faeilitios be dn)8-t11-,d c AsbTnt wit43 the vcqui mwiesfts of
SCL MaEltial aria Repmts of Engineebio Practice No. 77 and the OOP Stormwawr
anaxgr,majrt Policy- It is rccon a sled the drainage basin berth be a minimum 8 feet
wide for tlic purpose of maintenance vehicle access;. it is not clear that the pa:aposed
forehay will ptv�rly drain without the "balissi€n Df a del ail and test pity. Tile discharge
from thr basins shoWd be directed via tiprap swales toward the off site Arearn and
wetland- we q1-e concerned with erosion at these outlets dwre to the existing 5.1 grade.
The rfelenrion bt4'iu has been revised to addr ass these concerns.ns. jere rerzrahv;an issue
regarding cro-Oon in the downgradiew }vedand.
Section 8.3)5-)e.)iQ An elt-vation view of the prop wAf buiIding sholiJd be subiI1it led-
7-hese plans are typically revic PvM by the Plar:rrr►g Doard, no,irrlkcar cart menl,
Section $.3)5.)e.)xi.)It is nGI clear that the Notice of Intent has been filed,
A Notice been led. We are enclosing a copy of our leve.si comments
o)t Me NOL
Section 8.3)5- .)?,vii,) Proposed fighting and specifications for fixirEz:es should be
stihillitted.
77iesp plans rare typically reviewed by the Planning Don rd, no f4r1her comment.
Section S.3.) .)d.) It is not clear tha r.t1w existing state stormwatei- syst-ein is adequate for
existi ng ov pTojnrncxl flows without bypass. This i3stic,shouId be investigated and modeled
appmoarely-
Provide h' u-57 Higlimly accept's Me playa thiF issue has been safisfraclorily addressee#,
0S112Z2001r 12:3A VAX 781. 982 5 90 i N1,01NI
Section 5.3,)6.)f.) Arc erosion con(Ml plats should be developed for ptopased OoPt*s.
Haybale's And silt fences on the north side of thcc site sl�onld be niilintsfticd n11til F't1f'ieicA)t
slerpe stabilization has developed.
No f7rrilfer conimeuf.
Table Z Dimensiomal Requirements'
Thy side setback tequii€rmnt on the north sii �2 of the- site is not net as dcr pre ar 1 t
construction.
01rr Cprrrrraerrf WVS relative to the 50'paverr ew ,rMxrck ad jacerng fv a residerrtifrl district,
rviricli is ?tot met under pre or posf rondifions- 1je Planning Boor should Comment on
Iris issue.
General Comments-
I- Profilt;s fal. the propa�ti sewer caijrrcoioii shoidd lac submitted,
Not applicable no new server connectivii r,s pi-oposetl.
We appreciate the oppoilordty to assist the Fianrift Board on this projcc:t and hope that
this illfior-rnatiol) i-, sub#ivnt for your needs. We would be pleased to meet with tho
board ov the design an ineer to dtscuss tljis project at your eonvenienee. If you have an
questions please do not hesitate to cont act n5.
Very tally yours,
COLER & COLA TON10, LNC-
J 111) C. Chessia, P.E.
C: Van asse,Hangen Brustliji, Inc,
.fire Rare
jaSfj C
4
,JNJ,. L11�
CLR
C LAN NI Z
EN a'dvESi--S AFC❑;CiEmT:5TC,
jurte 1, 001)
Heidi Uri€Fill
Planning Board
Town Hall Annex
7 Cltiarles Street
North Andover, MA 01845
WE- Supplemental Tn"'lincering Review
Eagle ` dbune Redevelopment
Site,Platy )review
Dear Ms. G6ffil11,
Ire response to your Tequest, Cider &. Colantonio, Inc. has t-eviewM the supplemental
submittal package for the abovo rQfurt~=cd situ. Our eFforis included a comparison of
infofmation siiibmiitc€1 with r6pect to the reguirtfinents Qf the Lming Bylaws. We, also
cornpared the desip as�urnptions and calculations with standard engineering practice.
The submittal package included the following information,
Plans Entifled
* "Site Plan for Eagle Tribune, Expansion", located in forth Andover, Mass,"
consisting of nine sheets dated 31 9100, Revised 4126100 prepared by Vanassc
Hangers Bmstlin,Inc. Received 412.8100. -
* "Hydrology Report and related data", dated barest 3. 2000, Rvvised 41 6100
and Prepw-d by Vana&;e Hang= $rustlin Inc. Received 4)28l00_
* "Plan of Und in North Aridover showing proposed drainage improvements"
dated July 23, 1991 and prepared by Dion and Co. No- Andover, MA,
received 511100.
* "Response €Eace' dated l arc i 30, 2000, and prepared by VaFta5se Hangen
B rusttin Inc, Received 4l 5100.
The followsrig is our response to the subrnittfls fti-�n lla=3as a Hangen %-usthn dated
Apill 24, 2000 through ,tuna 1, 2000.-
Zoning Bylaws:
Section 8,3} .}e, i. rI he loots should l-pc at a sr,ale of 1"=1500'.
The loans hers been scaled to 1"=1500" Satisfactorily adilreys'ed,
101 Accord Park Drive 781-952-5400
Norwell, MA 0206 1-1 655 Fax; 781-982-�,490
v 4a{ V., rV+JLA -L, t. Ua J•]l. �00i J-+.rcl +..0 CA,M&LUL_i-1 i U6%lU WJ U0.$, {f1C
Section $.3}5.?e,-)iv•) It is not clean that the proposed coristtuctioa ea;emt!nl on the south
side of the site has been acquired.
Reportedly, the adjacent property is W nirolled' by Eagle Tribune, S'atfsfaclordy
addressed.
Section 8.3)5.)e.)v.) Topography on the south side of the site should be expanded to
accurate,Jy determine the catchment area boundaries. Exis€ing off-site rur*ff fi-om the
south may impact tht design uI drain age Faciliries-
76he riff xiie I ol wg f-uphr to the -- turf! has be-en hwhielcd ooi IN,- plans, hrrr ever cowrol
strur.,11ri-f.S 14f?d f`r trey,typr-s hova nol fro'.-n inn r'rVeff
"over types have been indicated and drainage straaures are reportedly nOn-existerrl, No
fi?Filter Comment,
Section > ,3}S,}e,}vii, A significant portion of the site gains to are existing weiland area
along the northerly side of the property adjacent to Darlmouth Street. Flaw out of this
wetland is disehaw�g via a 12-inch pipe under Dartmouth Street- it is our uIlde[ standirig
that this area is sub*( to flooding bowel on discussions with Town Staff. The drainage
mvdei shornld utilize the existing cuivea as a contrei point and model the wetland as a
pond to determine the impact of Lhc ptoposcd dovelupment on flood elevations in the
wedand.
,The uxisling ciac;h Irtasirr has been modcled.16v 1h, 5 year sfor m, The propiNed l tan f t)r
the. ,atch basin Upgrode is eonec-}pau fly, avctp1a1We, The pro pfr-Sed grfflr.'-s sYho.zld f1wel
Nfnih Aude)t-or- L)PIV siandarxds- We reconlrue)Irrl 1111)1 rr['laal inpogrrrphit' sarveY dam be
i ilized to determine ilia elesvulio)zs of fire existing s'ysteln and thca t ie final de,si-en be
17ased on aclual iopcogr�aph.ic data. The mitre ,visreal inc`hoding the ,3'kraye flail tiv.-Hanel
she idd be rnvz?cled ftrr ail siorm vi,tnvs, c omplerr. rope,�qr-uplzy hiking trig .site should he
.4irbm ried and a. r_c7m[Vete re-niedied rlrra`ign ,-dwidd he slihillilitt . The DPW s mild
c'rrrrtrrxrrtr rJrr III ePlan prior to approved,
'omplefe topographical d atf:, propoxed remedial design and stonnwater modefing has
been .submitted. Sati,sfacforfly zaddressed,
The catchment ai�a plans indicate zdnor d1'&Cs-eparr1c1r relative to the reP1-escritatioi1 of
watersheds 101, 102, 2011 and 2021.
7hase ceoichnwnt area borcad ar ies haver been r:lavified. Sfflisftil:ford-y caddrussed.
Proposed Ponds 203, 2011 and 2012 are located in cuts of up to -F t. It is Tpot clear that
these ponds will be located above die seasonal maximum high groundwater elevation and
ai a result it is uncloar [Prat [tie M] vohimi� of sloraage flimild he included iR the model
without the submittal of test pits. Pond 203 includes an under-drain set approximately 4-
feet below the existing ground clevalion, ft is not clear that [his drain will be localcd
above the bigh groundwx iter elevation without the submissinn of test pits. The, undev drain
appears to be designed as a filter ranter than an interceptor for groundwater.
The proprr,-rd deientirspil basin has N.-Cai to alirrhv a 04 5lbor ,s(,pC:t1-ritir7rt trr
lrll;lr ,�f.�axurrd �rr�:r; Srr1+-gf7;c.'Jrrr`ll.y r�t�rlrc�3.4erJ.
2
VVr I--- -. VV 1 JQ I'_L,\ I a L , L1- Jrt'JU L-Ui,l_L &LAjiti;*1 U-tiU *J tl U-r U1
The existing on size stonnwater systcm shotAd be in pcctcd to deiermine. its condi Lion and
.adecluicy,
lkepartrelly. 11w inz .s'ifc ,_,1,3-timn was rrvipecied by the applieand in Ocic+ho-
1999, rVrJ1f riher i.-onorraew-
Vroposcd t;hallow catch basins do not provide, 47-sumps- Inlet calculations should he
submitted relative to bypass speciticaft for Catch Basin 3, 4 and 7. Shallow vcr pIfres
should he constructed of Class RCP or ductile iron to acc[frrrmodaw loading condition .
The,shallow pipe cover detail indicates a minimum cover of 14-jnches, however the plans
indicate the rninimurn covej• as 6-inches. It is not clear thut adequate covet- WiF ire
provided ovrr Pipe 40 ( torin AD reference, number). Pipe caiciaiations should comp
actual flows vs. capacities. The, hydraulic proiiles indicate systihm surcharge during both
pry: and post dovulopinent cs nditionb.
4unips have. been pr-m,idre,{ cis nece.%Lva-y. #eparrcciLr, pipesvith less Man 4' qj'cnt;e'r'
will h't, c=crrrsir-rrcrcd 1> ' chzs-.t: V C"r�r+crr�e Pipe. 7'JJ U.s lrcrM� ;.?P�Yr icrCr-e`(rser[ a.V
neressurv. A cf)rnpatT .wn qJ' actual pille flows vs_ a'[1#)nchie.S Calk hr derfred from lire
frvt}r-unUC I)o1jile which roil -crle's improvement wider proposed c'r}r difioim Izow',,reF the
. v.ftertf svtlf to.err r-c hargr. .Seer#af irc lorily addre y,s ed-
We recominend that storm water facilities be dcsigncd constant with the rcgtjiremenis of
ASC E Manual and Reports of Engineering Practice. NQ- 77 and the DEP Stannwater
Managernent Policy. It is recommended the drainage basin beam be a rninimum 8 feet
wide for tlti,, purpose of mainterianoe vchicic avccss. R is not clear that tho vropo8cd
forebay will properly drain without the submission of a detail and test}pits. The dischafge,
from the basins should k directed via riprap swales toward the off site caream and
wotland. We are concerned with erosion at these, ou[lets due to the existing 5.1 grade.
I detention busier has lxeen r'rvixed lc? ffddre.ss 1 (.fv' concc'mn 'the)) remains an 1',Vsloe
resfrrr!#gk arosion in I& elfnungrz+chc±rrt wetland,
A satisfactory r-enj dration design has been submitted for- the down gradient vuelland
area. A inanitoring p#cur should be developed for this woo *. No firrtlrer comment.
cetiorr 8,3}5, . ix.} An elevation view of the proposed Wilding shmild be 8ubmitied.
These plans are tYpically re.i• eLi-ccl pl,y dw Phil a2iTTA, Board. rzo fill-the E nrrnprent.
Section 5,3 _)e_ xi- It is not cl= that the Notice of Intent has bee-U filed_
A Notice e)r Infen( (a' ol) terns be.'r+f ied. W. rtrc± aw-losing a corl,)y c}f-orcr latest car m.F?ients
oil the OVOL
Section 8-3) - ,)xviQ Proposed lighting and specifications for fjxtnres should bo
sub itted.
77w-ve,plans aj-e rypica Uly rcvi sve-d bV the P#crrrr hig Baum!. 11r;ficrehei-a-rrjzPrrr Mf.
3
LIL}, iJ—. —u4Ju k.J-.,r L-.1-L r0i J0.: a}-J V L4J �._ .. yLJ,1111 I011 S1 Li. 4Jl�
Section 8. -) .)d-) It is riot clear that the existing state stormwater system is adequate, for
existing or proposed flows without hypass. Th is issue should be invcstigated and modeled
appropriately.
JI'f[f<'rJ I"If(Ws t14ghIVeII' el T1,1tN C PhJ J10 1..ItiN i.V.941- has been sufisjelcrorily eidefr-r°sse-If
Section 83-) -)f-) An er€usi€>n control plan should be developed for pi-oposed slopes.
Haybalcs and silt fences on thr, north side orthe site should lac maitrtained uniil sufficient
slope stabilization has d v opc€ .
No irrr&r cor,rm ew.
Table 2 Dimensional Requirements-
The side sutbnk requiromew on the north side of the site is not mot under fire or post
construction.
Our comment Was I-Clative try Prc, 50., [r[rvtimew .Yc lbacT; rrdjaceld lei a residerrtrrrf dfsrricl,
k,.-J�ic'Jt r,� rtr�t �rat�� rrr+rlcr!'r'{' c��•�rrrsr r�r�rrrlir�r�u,c. �l�c T'Etti��r�rr,�x f3ca[rr-t� ,,•�rrrarlri r�€�trarrrc°x�d r�r�
IJtrrs i,s,sile,
General Comments:
l- Fmfiles for the proposc!d sewer connection should be stibmitted-
,..Vol �Ippfidmdlle! no ;4civ xvII-t'r coo 2 11 ectir?i I is prf? N}sed,
o apprcchau the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that
this information is sufficient for your ncz& We would be pleased to aneet with the
Board or the design engineer to discuss fts project at ycsur convcnicnec. if you have any
questions please do not hesllate to contact us-
very Mly yolxt-,,
ohn C. Chcssia, P-E-
anaSse Hangers Bnisthn, lMI.
Jim Rand
jaLgI C
4