Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-11-20 Traffic Impact & Access Study SPR i I TRAFFIC IMPACT & ACCESS STUDY PROPOSED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Turnpike Street (Route 1 14k North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent PRJ Development o(poration June 1997 i i prepared by Dermot J_ Kelly Associates, € 1c. Traffic Engineeringlrrat]sPortation Planning Two Dundee Park, Suite 301 Andover, MA 01810 508-474-1994 Fax-, 508-474-1778 Y7x,H�*1.elac CnFryrifj10 E991 by OAK- All 6ghrs rese"" � TABLE OFCONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY-------. ................. ..................................—........... ......................... ^ PROJECT DESCRIPTION—...................................... ................. ................................... ` ALTERNATIVESTUDIES------—..................-- ...............................................................2 STUDY AREA 2 --------____--____—___________________ � EXiDlIN�� TRAP��(� CCVNDO'NONS--------_------------------' FUTUREC0ND7TC�1G— .................... .....................................— ...........—...................2 2 Tnx�k: GnoWh--------'— --------------''''''- - Site-GenematcdTrnfU�................................................................................ ...............3 TripDiskibw1k»n------------—.................... -- ------------- ........................................ ......^ � YRAFF|/� ��l�ER/Q'|()N/\NALYSlS -----.--------.--'- ' '--'-...------'' CONCLUSIONS ..................................... --- ----------- ---.............. ............. ---3 PROJECTDESCRIPTION.......................... ......................................... ...... -------° PROpO0AL 4 -----------______—______—______—______—. /\LTERNAJlVES TOTHE PROJECT........................... ...... _ ------------ — .................... ......n ALTERNAUVE8TOTHEPR OJECT....................... ---_----------- --------------- .........n � E�|STIN(� C�)NDIT|O@�G----------------------------------' FIELD SURVEY-------------------------------------'" � GEOMETR]CS ...........................--- ... --------------------- — .............-- .................... -- TmnVike Skeet------------------------------------" TRAFFIC VOLUMED 7 ----------------___-----____-----__ HkSTCVR I CAL TRAPF|CVOLUMES-- ................... --- ------------------------------------* FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDUTkON5....................... — -------------------____----------------9 INTRODUCTION............................... ---------------------- ---------------- -------------------9 8ACKGRO UNDT RAF FlC GROWTH......................... ...___------------- --- -----------------9 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------- ...... ---------------- ---------------------10 VEHICLETFUP-GEN2RAT|0NCOMKPARl SON-------- .....................................................12 TRAFFIC O;OTRIBUTtONIASS|GNMENT ------ ....................................................12 2OO2F3UiLD TRAFFIC VOLUME CON��T��N�.—_-------------------1O TRAFFIC VOLUME iNGREA8E3--------------- -- .........................-------------------14 TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASES----- --- ...................... ........................ .................14 APPENDIX ---- ........................... ----__ -------------------------------------- —--------------1S ` �pyFiqKt~ VmnbvmJK. Alf�iw"��� LIST Of TABLES Page TABLEIEFISTINGTRAFFICVOLUVESUNMAR .......................................... �� —a TABLE 2 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY..... .................................................3 TABLE 3 VEHICLE-TRIP GENERATION SUMMAPY............................................................II TABLE VEHICLE TRI GENERAL ON CO URA ,90N - PREVI OUS ANAL SISv CURRENT PROPOSAL..........................................................................................12 TABLE 5 PROJECT-GENERATED VEHICLE-TRIP ASSIGNMENT----------------------___����13 'FABLE 6 ROADWAY TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY. ............................................... 14 LIST OF FIGURES HGURE1 . 1997EXISTING WEEKDAY FVENING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE2. 2002 NO BUILD WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR TRAP+« VOLUMES FIGURE ± 2002 BUILD WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ­32-RIH c Ana +t® ,wIw mw All nglacremod. F ECUTIVE SUMMARY EJerrnot J- Kelly Assoriotes, Inc. (EJKl has evaluated the potential traffic-ralated impacts associated with the proposed developmi� nt projert and identifit-d potential traffic related mitigation measures Fie cessafy to ri3inirnize the irr3paCt of the project. PROJECT DE CRIP`CION The project proponent. PBJ Development Corporation} pregantly is plarining for the construction of an {approximate 4,000 square font ( F) office building, The project is located adiacent to Crossroads Plaza east of Turnpike SLfeet and south of the Route 125 intersection in Nord) Andover, Massachtisetts. Turnpike Street adjacent to the site is marked as Route 114 and it is a state-owned and maintained Ngh ay- The primary access to and egress from the site is {Manned to Occur via the existing north drive at crossroads Plea. The srjrrourldi,19 1{jrjd us3;s il�clude a €.c minerc{al office building and a retail conLer located to thi- west, and a residential dwelling loca Pd to the east. The sate is zoned GOIleral 1 USiness, GB, Which PcrMits tf'r' construrti()n of offiic�-, retail and oll-jer similar faEld uses- Businoss zoned land abkats then site to thri I)ofth, south and west, while residential zoned land abuts Thee site to the east. 1 332-R�i71,do c [.apyright 17 19137 by ImK. AR rights essorved, ALTERNATIVE STUDIE.S. For the purpcjses of ttlis report, tf�ex following alternatives weer= evalriatt-d; • l!a-Build - The) € o-Bui€d altofnativ(- was eX a IT)ined to establish tlye 2 002 baseIina tratfic:-voiurne conditions. The incre monLal inlj)aets of fire} proposed project may be deterrnined by rrtaking coMparisona to the o-Build alterFlative- The.} Flo-Build alternative ;jssujxles that the project is not built. • Rur'f(! - The BOW alternative irscludes the developrile nt of the proposed projrlct. The Build alternative is evaltiated its this report and is compared to the No-Build einalysis condition. The Build corlditlon rePrOsMts the increase ir) t€affic from tht- F)reviOUS corldltion to tkvo propoae3d conditj()rj {i.e„ the deity impact}. The Build condition includes tile cofistfrMctron of the proposed 4,000 scluare=. root (SF) office building, TUDY AREA The Turnpike Street stud} area inefudes the following €r}c.ations= Turnpikp trt:et at Crossroads Plaza North Drivc Turnpike Street at Crossroad-, Plaza South Drive EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITION Analysis of the recwit traffic coorin indicates that average eekday volumea arc approximately 29,500 vpd (vehicips per day) along Turnpik(_: StTeet past the sits; during June, 1997. D(Iring the weekday evening peak travel dmnand periods, which oc:cttrfed between 4:30 and 5.30 PM Friday, 2,710 vph {vehicles per hour) were. observed along Turnpike Street passing IhP site. FUT RE CONDITION Bpckground Traffic Growth To repreaerlt future 200 No-Build traffic-volurne conditions. the existing traffic volunjes were increased to account for background traffic growth. Accordingly, thtx existif)g traffic volumes were increased by +1 .0 percent per year { _1 `9'r} total) up thro4,gh 200 2, Additionally, the eAsd119 traffic volumes were increased to account for the pote3rytial development of four othef development prf)*Ls: • a 100-lot subdlvisjon to he [ocated along Turnpike Street near Harold Parker Road; 50,000 SF of Industrial R&D space to be located wost of the Turnpike treet/Willa tfeet ir�terseotion; 2 3-17 3apn-dog [=ppyeiglil 0 1 DF37 by O.W. All rhyhtx feselvod_ • 32,000 F� of R&D Computer Software space to be local-d west of the Turnpike StreetlWfllow Street intersection; and • 77,054 SF Supermarket to be located on along Turnpike Street at the Mc.Lay Road intersection. ate-t;enerated Traffic Basco on the Institute of Transportation Engineering UTE) trip generation rcpxt and the most consefvative office land use category, it is arTticipated that the proposed devf-10F)E-r12r1t pfo}ect world generate up to 166 vehicle trips pc:r day (vp(J) kjrider weekday c0ndifi0F)s. During the weekday evening peak Dour, the proposed dovelopment project would, again biased on the ITE trip gonerafion report and the rricsst coOsorvative land use category, generate up to 19 vellicle-trips per ho4jr (vph) with 5 vph i nterjng the site and 14 vph exitiTIg the site, Trip Distribution Trip-distrihilti0rl patterns wero developed specifically for this study acid are summarized as follows, • Turnpike Street to/from the, North 5 % • Turnpike Street tolfrom the South 47% TOTAL 100% TRAFFIC OPERATION ANALYSIS Both the north and south Crossroads Plaza drives ore located within several hundred feet of the existing traffic signal located at the Route 125 intersection. Consequently, the LOS at these inferser:tions are controlled by the gaps created in the existing traffic strearn by the tratfic signal at Route 1 5_ Given the marginal additional traffic generated by this project the (MiStirig LOS will remairT urichar)go[f. CO.N L ION Existing traffic volumes observed at the exii thng Crossroads Plaza were compared to the previous projections as presented in the January 1995 Traffic Irnpect Study prepar�id for the Lhen proposed Crossroads Plaza_ This comparison revealed that the Uxi8tiF10 Crossroads Plaza Es geF)eFatilIG $botct one- half of the previously projected tratfic. Fufthermore, with the additional office dovelopment the actual generated traffic: will still be less than tht) previously projected volurnes_ * The proposed office building would generate up to a 0,4 percent increase irl traffic along Turopike Street, 3 Z332-4ipLa_Vbc {:apFyri�ld l' ITO fly i1 K. Ala righm rcEarved. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSAL The projRct proponent. PBJ Development CoFpor8§on presently is planning ! the. construction of an approximate 4,000 square foot (SF) of r e building- The project is heated adja(;ent to and ear of Cry 7p s m,�z a which is east Turnpike Street and south of the Route 125intersection W N 7 th Andover, MassachusFUS. The primary arm SSA and egress from the site 6 plarl to o mvia the existing north drive at Crossroads Plaza. 4 :112-n!P0 a_ .®1m, w 2w AN$n rcm . ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ALTERNATIVES .0 T-HE PROJECT For the purposes of this report, the. following alternatives were evatti ted; - t-Rurld - The No.-Build alternative was examined to establish the 2002 baselirie traffic-volume conditions. The incrWnental impacts of the proposed project may be determined by making comparisons to Ole No-Build alternative. TheND-Build alternative assures that the project is not built, - Suild - The Build alternative incliides the development of the proposer} project, The Build alternative is evaluated in this report and is compared to the No.-Build analysis condition- The Build ccrlditiOn i'epresents the increase in traffic from the previous condition to the proposed coildition (i,e„ the delta impact). The Build condition includes the constru€:tiori of tf)o proposed 4,000 squaro foot NSF} office building. 3a2-RptI-dac C:1353ye igh!"`1997 by LIJK- All iIgl its ieeeaved. EXISTING CONDITIONS FIELD SURVEY cornprehonsive field iriventory of the adjacent roadway system was conducted during Jurie 1997_ The field Inventory incfuded collection of existing raadVVay geurnotrics and traffic volume information for th8 roadways and intersections, in the immediate vicinity of the site. Traffic volumes were measkired by manual intersection turning-movement and vehicle-classification counts and compared to previous traffic counts cunducted ir1 tho area. Manual intersection turning-MaverrIant cnLrMs were eondkicted at the following locations: Turnpike Street at Crossroads Plaza Nofth Drive • Turnpike Street at Crossroads Plaza Sotith Drive Safety iriventorles included vehicle sped observations WId a detailed eV211J0tiG11 Of the safety sight linos at the, existing driveways located along Turnpike Street. GEOMETRiCS TyTnpike Street Tu mpilce Street in the immediate vicinity of tine site is generally a threeffcur-lane roadway with the roadway widening to a five-lane Cross section at the Route 125 intersection. South of the site Turnpike Street generally consists of one through lame for each direction of travel with a dual use center left-turn lark. North of the site Turnpike Stre€A consists of two through lanes for each direction at travel 6 j32-Rpn.dat Cnrhylighl 0 IW7 by WK. All rirthlx rrscrwcd. separated by a raised median. Turnpike Street provides access{egress to numr irons adjacent highway €:{]Frtrrier€.iallretail and residential laird uses along its entire lcingth, Turnpike Street consists of bituminous concrete pavement ill fair condition with no major pavemarrt break-up or edge reveling noted during the field inVeritory period, l--€omfontal and vertical alignment are fair along Turnpike Street with the road �iy eXhihi ir3g a general W110011t aii ni-nent over relatively level terrain adjacent to the Vehicular movements along Turnpike Street are controlled by two fully actuated traffic signals located at the irttersections of Turnpike Street at Willow Sues# and Mill Road and at the intersection of Turnpike Street at Route 125 and Royal Crest Apartments, In the io-nmediate vicinity of the site, there are nurnerous curb cuts serving adjacent land uses, including the existing Crossroads Plaza € fives, Film Microelectronics, Osco Drugs, and Chestnut Green. TRAFFIC VOLUME Existing traffic volumes were measured by actual manual irktersection turning Fnoverne,nt grid VE l.'N .le € 1a8sifioati0r1 corMSl Vehicle classifir-ation and manual turning mp via,rneint counts were EDndL1ctsd i r 1 1 5-inif%te intervals between 4-0 0 end ;00 PM Friday, .June 13, 1997. These traffic volurnes were reviewed to determine peek-hour traffic vclurnes art the study area roadways and intersections. Tahie 1 ,,umf-n{lrizes the 1997 traffic-volume data collected along Turnpike Street- Analysis of the receni traffic counts indicates that weekday volurneLs arc approximately 29,500 vpd fvellicles per day) along Turnpike Street adjacent to tN-, site. During the peak eeklJOY evening travel demand pe0od, WhiC h 0r.C.Urred between 4,30 and 5,30 PM Friday, 2,710 vph (elides per hour) were observed along Turnpike Street passing the site. Figure 1 presents the results of then rnar�ually turning-movement count survey for the weekday evening peak Doerr. 7 332-Rpt 1-dac Cupyright''199f try 0.1K. Ail righXx mserve•.d. 12Rrc 1: 1997 Existing Weekday K7enln2 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7§Ln m ,! ƒ 4 NORM DRIVE ,9 .J, 0 m§^ / 312E IL mw� y- oGen ernted mk e ,5 Out 116 > T« 2 a z a / §_ R i \ ISOUTH NNE' f � 7Ln Schern atic DJKDermot £ Kelly Associates. Jn T f[ c Enghieering/TransporLation Planning ropAhC m. w _. ate w ��c � TABLE 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY .......... Daily Peak-Hour Traffic Traffic Locationl (24 hour) Peak Volume K Directional Time Period {upd}ri Flour (VPwb Faoter'� Distributions Tu€ pike Street Adjacent to tyre Project Parcel Friday 27,767 4:45-5:45 PM 2,551 q,2 F)M% SS AugkjsC 23, 1593 Frid.iy 4,30-:30 P€k+S 7,,170 h,12% NB June 13, 79°1l Nehideos per day- k1Ve}uCjes per hour- a'PorcclL4 of riaily trallia accurrine}durint)thFr peak houa. dV Ftluas arc fur 4h . 1,rtcEomi rant di rcaSau rn ilu ring eiaotL peak Inue. �'EtAimated hawed an Liuwul ptak hour rourNs conrEuuted di Fri nq June 1 S97 arLd{Lena& hourfd ail V Iraltic cuunE ru[i(0 IroirL AujutA 4'Igl rounts- HiSTORI AL TRAFFIC VOLUME AFMall average dt3ily traffic (AADT) data available from the aSSaeh Setts High ay Department (MHD) pexnnanent traffic count station located on Route 1 14/1 25 ir1 North Ar)dOVer IC3dlGateS that the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) frofn 1990 through 1995 has actually decreased by a 15tal of 4.0 percent or an average -0-8 perCf-IF)t per year- Table 2 summarizes the annual average daily traffic data artd tl7e fe,5Ulting decreasing growth rate for MHD Permanent Traffic Couf1t Station No. 502 located on F2nute 1 14/125 in North Andover- TABLE HISTORICAL TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMCOARY" -_..... w Annual Cumulailve Average Growth Growth Growth Time (Front Compared to Rate from Period AADTb Year to Year) 1$89 ... 1°9S9 Y 1990 37,177 --- --- 1991 36,04 -3-1 `AFL -2,3% -1- % 1992 3ts,958 -0.2% -2.6% -0.9% 1993 33A76 -6,9 u -9.3% -2,3 1994 33,842 + 1.1 `do- -8.3% -1 .7% 1995 35,691 +5„5% -4.0% -US urcc= Massachwsetts Hi4hway Qepairtme`nt Parrnaricat Traffic Count Sta64Ei No. '-o;,, Route 't l4 and f 25, Nurth of thn Andaver By Bass, Nnrrh Andover. li'Annual :sverage daily:ra?fic- "_'J 2d9PL1 A0r. r,npyilght''1D97 by DJK- All rigNs 2e8eived- FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS INTRODUCTION This section of the report determines tho traffic-related impacts of the proposed project on the study area roadway systern under future traffic volume conditiDFIS. To bL- consistent with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs and the Executive Office of Transportation and Constructiort Guidelines for EIRIEIS Traffic, Impact Assessment, future conditionS Were prsrjected to corner a five-year planning horizon. To determine the irnpac:t of site-generated traffic volufnes on the roadway €ietwork under facture conditions, file existing traffic volurnes in the study area were projected to the year 2002, at which time the proposed development is expected to he completed ar)d well under operation- Traffic volurnes on the roadway network at that time will include all existing traffic, background traffic growth, and the increase in site-generated traffic volumes- BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH Traffic growth on area roadways is a fUnrti0r3 of the expected lard developiFl.ent in the immediate- area as we'll as the surrounding region. Several methods can he used to estimate, this growth. A pmnedura frequently employed is to identify the location and type of new developments planned to occur during the designated planning horizon, estimate the traffic: to be generated arl.d assign it to the area roadway network. This method usually produces a realistic estimate of growth for kcal traffic- Four other development projects Were identified to gerierata traffic which should be accounted for with tho analysis of this project: 9 -33.2-ft'1.dac Cupyrh3h!" 1997 by DJK- All rights msvfyrd. i a I00-lot subdivision to he located alorig Turnpike SIMPt FIpar Herold Parker Road; - 50,000 BF of Industrial R&D space to be located west of the Turnpike Street/Willow Street Intersectlonr- 32,000 SF of R&D Computer Software space to be located west of the TurnpikeStreet/Willow Street intersection; and 77,084 SF %upermarlcc-.,t to he located on along Turnpike Streat at thF McLay Road inte.rsertion. In addition to UILc other devolOPHIPM PrOjPC t , oxxstir}g tra#fir: vOIUMf2S VV0r0, irxcrcased by 1 .0% per year {5.1 % totel) to account for background traffic: grGwth the It May occur up through 2002. Figure 2 prosents the 2002 No Build traffic volumes for thco Turnpike #tf�et wdy aria intersi-cti€ins_ SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC ES Similar to Inar)y oth(-:f types of IUrld uses, office dewilopments r:reElt8 COFICU2F)trati0F15 Of traffic volurt�es WhiCh tyF}ieFJHy or:cur in rathff e11-Aefirted patterns algid, coF)8e4UeTItly, ere readily predictable by the use of variable empirical rates_ Meaak3rements of numerous such developments published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers OTE) bavo establiShOd trip-gWoration rates which have been standardized for analysis purpasas. Table 3 compares anticipated traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed affice based on four alternative types of office use: General Office, Single Tenant, Flesoarcll & DevoloprriorIt, and Medical-Derr#al Office Building. Tablo 3 also Prf:?SeFA8 tf1e traffic voIuma used for this study- The highest land use r ate gory was usod tci deterrrIirke tfke ar3ti1,ip ate d traffic generation during each #inks period_ 10 332-ApL1,doc C:npyligh#0 1 RU by 0,11K. Alt rights reserved_ Figure ± 2002 No Build Weekday Evenings meek Hour Traffke Volumes $\- +,.,71 j 4 NOHIH DRIVE in � &) LU 3fi y \ S' gm a In a @l m6 * T a 252 / _ / , n nH wE f � M Cilern a[ic Dermot J. Kehy AssociatU3, B . !r me Engincering/TransportaLiork Planning ter. & ,_ &O'K. � m _� T&BLE3 VEHICLE-TRIP GENERATIONSUMMAR Vehicle-Trips h :e %s h[cle T ip-s Vehicle-Tri Based on Based on Based on Based on Vehicle-Trip |TE Tip Rates |IE Trip Rates |T E Trip Rates |T E Trip Rates Used me Periodl LUC No. 710 LUC No. 715 LUC No, 760 LUC No. 720 for Direction ofTRgvg General office m#Tenant Research & �velopment Medical-Denta[ Office Th|g Stud v WEEKDAY Morning Peak aooz Eme§n 22 14 5 7 2 ' 23 ENitra 9 Al 2 1 � � Total (v ) 1e 7 8 Evening Peak Rom£ mw (v ) 3 2 1 5 5 Exiting (vDM 14 13 8 11 14 Td6 (v ) 17 is § 16 49 Daily Traffic,' %hng R / 62 83 39 41 83 Exq (v ) 62 63 39 41 83 Total (vpd) 124 166 78 62 166 41.s_ A9mwp mafwa,.ri Ed Nori, rnstftutlon amrmmkm&A_rp&, ,gtamDKi9�1. mp;@.b* AUb@p troy, w M. �] Q ,R 9 g w-:)-'K—Alri�-Ve c VEFl€Iwt_E TRIP-GENERATIQN COMPARISON The above-described Vehiele trips al'16 ipated to be generated by the proposed proje-a wl}re compared to the previous projections as shown in Table 4. TA13LE 4 VEHICLE TRIP-GENERATION COMPARISON - PREVIOUS ANALYSIS vs. CUR14ENT PROPOSAL Piroiected Existing Projected Vehicle- Vehic-le-Trips June 1997 Vehicle-Trips Trips Presented in the Vehic-le-Trips Compared to Used for Time Period) January 1995 at the Observed This Direction of Travel Traffic Impact Stuly Crossreads Plaza Vehir_[e-Trips Stud WEEKDAY Evening Peak Hour Erilefi ng (vph):8 157 136 -1-21 5 Exiting (vph) 143 15 +125 Total (vph) 300 154 +145 19 Daily Traf#ir; (vpd)b 3r982 2,050° -1 1,9 2 166 -- - --- -................. uvph vchlcic trigs per hour. bVpd = uehiclrk IripS pee dily- 4_Bui cd on 69 4-nr3tiparmon of actual pcak (sour cuunLS at Cro;rsro�ts Plaza and the ratio of ptw3' hour to daily traffic proiccliulku- This comparison revealed than: did existing Crossroads Plaza is generatifisg abort (ane-#calf Of the previously projected traffic:. Furthermore, with the additional otfic;e development the actual generated traffic will still be less than the previously projected vol times, TRAFFIC DISTRIBUT€ONfASSi I_VMENT Directional distribution of Oenerated trips to and from Lhe proposed duve-lopment is based on existing traffic: patmerns Which, in turn, €s a function of populaGon derti itie , s110ppil) opportslrkities, and ands of el-nployment. Accordingly, tktie directional split Of the Flew trips originating from, or destined to, the development was based on traffic c ouf)ts conducted at the existing Crossroads Plaza. The directional distribution and the actual traffic VGlurnes assignrnPI)t of 11eW trips to tfye Site art- prssLinted in Table 5, 12 332-RiN!-,roc €.nIsydighl In 1997 by IJJH- All ilgKn reaeived_ TABLE 5 PROJECT GENE&TED VEHICLE—TRIP ASSIGNMENT Site T fF n N mlh IF s SOUth Time Pe m Drivaways Trm■ Tumpike Direction @ »w Total amm WEEKDAY . grz Peak Hz . Entering N P R 23 12 11 E»,lbg »ph) �.. 7. 4 Total &p| ) 30 16 14 1--vening Peak Hour mlmHng (v ph ) B 8 2 Exd (VOW 14 ................... 7 Total (vp) ]§ ]O g Daffy Traffic E t ,g R ml@ 83 44 ae E»l, mg Npd| 83 . _44 351 Total (v ) ]de 88 78 m = �+� . m — — ............... avi �Q = ka pef 4 ZOOZAk|[D TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS The Build, t -d dopmol� tlg9± vo»m admie !| oe/Sting oiff tmf§c volumes, p1tis backgMUFld Lra{Hc growth, plus the site.gertrated peak-hour traffic volumes. Fin e S graphically pmSeM8 the Build tfaffir, vRum for me weekday eve&rm peak how. 1, :am_ c.vy4uht©,g7w DJK. All Tight*rc�vw a. Figure : 2002 Build weekdc ly Evellings Peale l.li)ur Traffic Volurrics 'j 1 ` ; 34 WORTH DRIVC �9-J, 4� tf. n .... at _................. LLI Of 1TE V3 Existing Site Ngw Site rotd Site Generated Generate4 Gmcraied 1rortlre Trafri€ TrOMIC L i 1n 136 g 14$ _Y Out }16 t4 434 a Tpto1 252 1s 27t ;•l w V 1+ 1 SOUTH D 21W r 02 of au C � X7f1s7t .1C KDermot J. KeRy AN,;oc.iates, Tnc_ Traffic Engineering Trap%portation Planning Ccp}righh 0 7$97 BX 4.K. M1 aghks rc.crvcd. 3je" g3 TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASES TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASES The traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development will result in small increases (i_e_, 0.4 percent or less) to peak-hour and daily traffic volumes along the study area roadway segments. Table 6 presents a comparative evaluation of existing traffic versus the site-generated traffic in terms of peals hour and daily roadway traffic volumes. The perrenta a of increase for the study area roadways range from 0_4 percent along Turnpike Street north of the site to t}.3 percent along Turnpike Street south of the site. TABLE 6 ROAD AY TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY 1997 Existing Site,- 1997 Percent (%) No Build Generated Build Increase Traffic Only Traffic aver Location/Th-ne Perron volumes Traffic Volumes Existing iurelp ke Street nor ell of the Ote ccluiay Evening Pcai€ i-lour 2,906 10 2rM 0,4 Weekday daily Traffic :30,650 88 30,738 0-13 f impikr_x Street srrrflfr of the she Weekday Evenirig Peak i-mf 2,727 9 2,736 0.3 WPi-kday Do-Hy Traffic; 29,800 78 29,878 0.3 #d Capyrighi u 15)97 by D.W. AEI elglitz roscrwmj- APPENDIX # TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA s toa2pex.dar CuPw iglit" 1997 by D.FK. All rigkhtt reaeaved_ • TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA CoRYFigh4� 199'1 by !JJK. AM rigjiys desH]vsd. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY _ — —... —....� 33 cro sroaifs i ... a.€�{ Associates, Inc, I = wob id-,!, ' —. . --' — ...- R# 114 at rossroad Nar#€1 6T!y Two Dundee Park, Suite 309Andover, MA 0 1810-3725 �FEle�s�ct3ar� :; - F, $ — — _ Ilpffown, tale: Nod' o lh' Andover, MA t Weatller:;Su lioy, I asC#e of Count ap 6113197 Fax: 508-474_1778 �F_.. ........ o � I 7 .Al veh0es -' (0s{:a DFEVc 'i 14 EB R1v,114 B Drossroaas N Dr. W8 Rte_ 114 B -- _. TiErre 1 1 2 3 4 �_ T 6 $ 9 i0 11 I 1 To[a cctltl�t_ 1 —-- Iff Tll I- RT TE, L RT TIC LT -...Ftf j ___.LT _ TaEal ...- ..... _ .....__- 4: 4-1r !'.IVJ. 7 1 t 2 13 199 I 5 I I 3 321 5 �Fs -- ' — :# 2 267 505 4:15 �i:30 P_31+1_ I9� 0 7 41 225 7 21 " —' -- .... — —.... — — - f 0 2 346 6 70fs 4:30'4:415 P,M- 7 � 2S8 10 t6 ........ —. .. 4,4�i•6-Q0I',I+ _ 8 r �4 308 24 k8-T 0 G 7728 5;80 5= P_I14, 8 0 s 3 12 240 94 17 1 2 s) 345 IO Ei 2 269 - -. ... - -- — 316 17 29 3 10 2 347 7 740 2879 _ —.. # 3 S ... . .I#} 17 ...'. __11 671 2844 i-4 'G:03 P,IVI. 14 1 ! 5.... 15, I 27D 30 19 12 2 26a i 10 641 2113 4:(FS 1 18 45 4028 4E363 20 8 1315 i -23 2Ei8�_..._... U y 15 44 9069 ff, 72 4 1 �� .-- E3 1342 28 76qri 4:30-5:30 P.M. 33 0 ! 11) 4+4 1160 71 4 27 � 5 1422 29 21379 .. 4:45-5-45 P-M. 36 1 �2D1 46 1168 74 72 1„�.?� - 13 3 F34 2 �#4 ...._ ,..... ......T -T . ... 5:00 6:00 .... 42 2 19 4 I�32 i i30 l b 33 S 42 2�: 38 27I3 — 1'- .... T t .. 1- . T , I —. .. —_.I... r z ;spa-{,nssroau Norlh Page I TURNING NY MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY - - — DJK ASsocaate , l€�c_ � —3 I �.. l._— i _ I }ob �d:�332 crossroads -- L Two �?r��rd c Park. Suite 0 G Intcr�section = Rt 114 at Crossroads odt� Drive — �. �.--- ...- _ -.... . _ -.. Andover, M a ��-3725 i — f _� � City/TowE�, date'i�n€##r Ar�dovee, N�11 — — —..... - — .—..... ...__.— -- 1� t UUeathe�: rE�rny, D[y — _ —. I _...—I Date of oflt: rEday, 6113197 Fax- 508"-474-177B _ —_ I....— Lou eti F . . I — — — �.....—i —�.. 114 SB C` S €]r.VV$ rRlc. N13 qRte-—...... ....... ...... Time1 I � :� �# 6 foEaS Ace��—... — LT Tf. T LTTo#aE___. 1 471 4Af: I)P_put_ ik �..243 .... EO ~ 284.... 53€ +'i=3[3-4=45 p_Swi, 2 � 2 0 �EI 678 :46�,00 P_T 3 3 E 0 1 318 646 2333 I ' i:0b-5'15 F.M_ 4 297 5 0 4 330 59 -- 5:15.5.30 _itM1_ .... 5 i 295 4 # 353 676 EiS — . 5.30 5: _ 2 i 1 T .... 28�13 1- - - _ - - - � . ;a 6:00 P.M" �08 0 17 285 6 � ��s 5 -..... } L00-5-Al)()P.�n_ 1077 I 7 ! 1 s'r 120 — —.. - ... 4.30-5.30 ['_i4+9. ' 14 I 1 31 13 13"' 2650 _ _ I r r $1 1291 M3 P 4'4 . 11, 15 i 128 i I 5_00-6:00 P144_ 11 16 1224 r 17 2 £rB 1 58 2585 f — - . T..... ..... _J_ - I I . �.... . ..... — s f ........... i — j -- - - - -- ...... r - .. r 332 Cto: clads Mki[b Page I