Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-08-16 Correspondence BIBLE CHURCH FELLOWSHIP 55 Tuvqpike Sltxreet -top p o 1 4 wiW..mY:Cr z.. f Richard Nardella, Chairman Planning Board Town of Nbrth Andover 120 Main street North Andover, MA 01845 r Mr. and l l : Pledse be advised that Th mag G. Kennedy and First St Development, Inc , Ore authorized to ap W1YtO the Planning Board for Site Plan Review on the pr pert rii Qllow h,ip ni ale Church presently Owns located at 525 Tura NO Week North ,Andover, as describod .i U First Street Dev8lepm ant inc , os Application for Site plan Review - Special Armit Wed Fellowship Bible Church Viat which we have seen cvxl heard d6clare we unbo you, that ye all may, have� l ,p wj.th us; and tady ctjr f _71cw p Is with Fat , and wltli, his, Son Jesu5Fir john 1 FIRST 'STREET ',LOPM IENT INC. .500 Broadoway 02149 ,sY. ( 17) 3 7-170 AN h- Jib ` � y �r Mr. Richard Nardella, Chairman Planning Board, Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 e co Drug Store, Fellowship Bible Church, 515 'Turnpike Stre Orth Andover, Dear Mt. r .e"lla: Please he advised that Thoma8 G, Kenn d nd First Street Development, Inc. hereby respectfullywithdraw their Application for Site Plan Review Special Permit dated December 16, 1993 without prejudice. First Street Development, I nq a Thomas 0. Kennedy; President CDW CONSULTANT S, INC. Jartuafy 7, 1,994 Ias. ucli ' illeru.s, � NiMPA Unit ,.< - Massachusetts Office of Enviro,nmental Affair.,3 100 Cambiridge Street h Boston, MA 0220:2 Re; E EA Project #9761 ENT Adderud= - Osco Drugs 52,5 Salem Turrupi e, N.. Andover, MA > ear Wilkens,: This letter is in :reference to the above i-mmmentioned proposed construction of time property aa.t 525 alermm Tum-mapike in forth Andover, MA. A completed Environmental Notification Form (ENF' was submitted t our office previously'. The project as proposed has been modified since the original ENF submittal as follows: L The existirug church building will be demolished. The demolition of time church building will resent in an increase in solid waste generated as a result of time construction. The waste mill consist of approximately 500 additional terms; of construction debris, . 'The proposed Boston Chicken Restaurant mill be constructed adjacent to time proposed se , Drtig.building. This will result in an overall increase in the originatly proposed gross floor building area from 22,300 to 23,300 square feet, o aather significant enviru nmmmern,al impacts are expected from, this project revision, The attached Site Plan shows time project revisions. As you indicated„ this submittal may be viewed as an addendum to the original hNF application, A copy of this submittal will be ;sent to all partied on the original distribution list, Please call with. any qLiostion:9- Very truly yours,. 7D r � � TILT �"`�, u_ulmn l - Walker xecutive Vice President I I I Speen , tr t, Suite 10,, F,ramir gham, MA 017 t' ( ) 8 75-2657 FAX ( ) '75- ' 1 & c R,TERtA IC - ea _ E�.AIZWA. , c&5�A. . . �w _» �_© 0 `2 , f "an.A 1.IM#A._ ¥ , Mw n -,� . § + �-�/� - i ° \ 8 09t n ` ` r . XZ re $ 2 i r ` Z i �� d ■ 'L f,ao e Drug L \ P� | ! jr ■ - . , % . . . a . . !g / - ----- -- ` \ R0U7E E ) i i ■ ; i FROM Meirrirumack C G North Andover, "ass achwetts ttt, 15, -68 111. ()f'tice of pay Planning and Project Management June 17,19914; r. George Reich Chairman,Conservation ornrn,ia,4011 Town of Nuarth Andoverco�' 1 0Mainn St, Ply North. ndo,vet,Ma. 0,1845 Dear Mr., Reich: On Wednesday,June 15, 1994 the punblic hearing regarding the Osco Drug project cunnntirnueal. `Yhe hearing unpened with cliscausskm1;concerning the respumnmAa letter,from CDW Ccnrnsual tan, ts to the t`onservautimarm Cornniission re i rd ing MerT i rriack's,co ncornq about the proposed' proje t"s drainage, Specifically, Mr, John Walker responded to my letter dated June 6, 19,94E to the Conservation "orrnnnmissio n. the Conservation Co nnnnissiIon requested.a reachon from Merrimack concern arng the respcunse.fron'n DW' Consultants. l informed the Cunrnrnission that after,several attempts to obtain an advance copy of the wrwitttn respunnsew l w j^,,; unsuccessful,and this wa6 the college°'us first Opportunity to review the response, 1 reu'pnnested the f.:o mrruinzssion to continue time project without ani deternnninna[ionm.aarntiI the College could further study the response,. The tv;o mrniasicnn felt that the project would Mill likely fake opposiing,opt nnions from "duelinn engineers". Time orrnnnnission voted nnunnaanirnm,ranr lly to hire a third party engineering firrrn to e'walurakc the meffindology of the calculations and time other listed concerns. i informed the, 'anrnnnnissionm that Merrimack College was not interested in cornpetirng with CD'W Consultants and the Cumllen, ems corncernns were normal alnnitterS ccnunc:ems, l ak-o indicated that the college was not and will not be involved in a "duching engineers"confrontation, Additionally, l reulnneste the opportunity to met with Mr.ThOnl3s Kennedy, Esq. (the eweloper) to inftarrnn him. personally of the ollege'u concerrns,. It becaame apparent to rune by tlnc ulu tStirnns Mr, Ken was,asking the CunnnmrniSSiOn, that Mr. Kennedy was not aware of the drainnage plans arnd a ssurnnptio ns for the project. Following tinny staternent ,time Commission granted a two,daisy waiting period for Merrimack and Kennedy Development to work out our rlifferernccs, if the Collegeand Kennedy Development could not reach an agreement by 4.00 prom on Friday,June 17'.11994,a third party enn,ginnccr would be hired at the expense of ernnnedy Developinennt for an total not to exceed 0,0 .ilile Mr.George Reich Chairman,Clonservation.Commission Osco Drug Prot fu ne 17,1994 Page 2. As Tequesfed, the college has again reviewed the plans for this project as well as the respo nse letter froin CD W Asvuciate.,; dated June 9, '199'4. Merrimack College is still of the opinibn that this project vAll have. impacts oil a numberu,f wet lands issues,drainage issues and existing flooding, problem,; that we,believe,will, reach beyond the Merrimack College campus, In order to further clarify our, position,we offer the attachcd list of que5tions,and, concem.,,; in a written fo,rrnat for the CommissioW s and the Applicants review and response. UnfUTtklnatelly, tile Cbll'Og� MUSt agree with.diccision of the,Conservation Clonimissifin, to pr�.iiceed with. assigning a third party ungineering, firm to will evaluate the pry pow project. requested by the Conservation COMrnission, I will be in attendanciezat the next Scheduled Planning floarwl uneeting to in this board of Merfirriack's concerns- By copy of this', letter and the attached doeurnent, the Appliczints ruprewntative will be notified in, writin,g of the College"s concerns. OTI l eivalf of Nlen rirnack Q)Ilese,thank you for your time a nd service to our community. Should you require any additiOrEal infomiation, please don't hesitate to contact my office. Sincerelly, Scott A. CW6 Director of Space,Planning, & Project.ManagemenL SAC/hs Attachments cc. Mr. John Pahnucci, Vicel"resident, Merrimack College Mr. john 'Walker, CD W Consultants, III Speen St, Suite. 119, Fra mien gharn, Ma. 0,1701 Mr.,Richard Doucetle, North Andover Conservation Co,romission Mr. Richard Nardefla, Cllairman, ,North AndcYver Planning Board OMM IT /Q E TIQN REGARI)IN Q RQPQ AL. .-___ LPL . 1. The construction of 825 feet of new drainage changes the configuration of the existing watershed. Now a new hydraulically connected subwatershed with 1.67 acres (with CN = 98 & T - 6 min.) has been proposed. This new subwatershed together with the remaining 1.02 acres should be examined concurrently with the entire watershed to determine the total impact on post-development runoff. 2_ The proposed drainage system discharges/concentrates the runoff from the "now" 1.67 acre subwatershed at a new/different point in the wetlands, has there been are analysis of the impact this change will have on thewetlands? There can be several different impacts-from this change. 3_ The travel path for the surface runoff used in calculating the tunes of concentration, for both pre-development and post-development, should be shown in detail on the plans. All calculations for this important parameter should also be available and easy to fallow. 4. The applicant has modified the runoff calculations (i.e. reduced the runoff Fates) by stating that the roof of the building will act as a "detention pond." However, no plans are submitted to show this proposed pond, no physical features are presented and no calculations are supplied to substantiate this reduction in runoff. Where are the details of this claim? This is particularly important since the roof drains are connected directly to the proposed drainage system. Also, is there any potential contamination from roofing materials during construction? 5. There is also a concern abort the quality of the runoff which will exit the site and its impact. All erosion control measures and an erosion control plan should be made a part of the proposal before approval. Estimates of sediment loss during and after construction should be provided and control methods adequately engineered. How much sediment will find its way into the wetlands and go downstream beyond the site? . There will be a sigD.i.ficant incre . e in the number of vehicles using this site under the proposal. The applicant claims {letter of 18l94} that the "piped system ... allows for the collection of any sediment or trace pollutants associated with parking lot runoff." However, the applicant has riot supplied information, including scientific reports, data and calculations, which support this statement. In addition, what happens to the runoff which does not go into the proposed drainage collection system, do the pollutants reach the wetlands? What is their impact on the wetlands and downstream areas? 7. Under the Wetlands Protection Act the applicant is required to slow if the proposed project will alter any resources areas. Therefore, the present conditions in the resource areas should be identified, any changes in quaHy or quantity characteristics of the runoff recognized, and changes in the resource areas addressed. As an example, in the applicant's letter ( 19l94) it states that the 'culvert running under Route 125" is the design point for the runoff calculations. Calculations should be provided to show the impact on the wetlands located at the entrance to this culvert? to addition, if the culvert ender Route 1 , for which the applicant supplied incomplete and erroneous information, hoes not have sufficient capacity to conv y the peak rate of runoff front the site, what areas will be hooded? If any area is presently subject to flooding, the Town should be made aware of the probleixi so that it can be addressed at this time. Data and routing calculations should be required to address this situation. By the way, are there any other plans to change the drainage in this watershed associated with this project (e.g., changes in street drainage initiated by the state or applicant due to this proposal)? & The applicant's letter (6l9f94) states their objective "was to determine if this project was going to increase the rate of runoff or volume of runoff." While there remains several unanswered questions regarding the submitted runoffcalculatiortsr this is an erroneous and incomplete statement of the applicants requirements under the Wetlands Protection Act. Since the point of concentration for a 14 acre watershed j (noted in applicant's letter of 114) is on the applicant's site, the applicant, as a minimum, should be required to identify any existing problems at this point. It is unrealistic for the applicant to assume that there will be no impact from their proposal if existing problems are not identified, quantified and addressed on their site, regardless of the source of those problems. i 9, The applicant is required to identify the type of resource areas present on the site and on urn erate their statutory values, supported with appropriate data - 310 C MR 10.99. For example, will there be are impact to wildlife habitat, as identified under the Wetlands Protection Act? Has this been adequately addressed in the applicant's submission? 10. Has the applicant obtained or apply for all obtainable permits as required by the Wetlands Protection Act - 310 CMR 10,05(4)(e)? OFFICE of the PERMIT, MANAMR r ^ ,, ___. ._____.________. N 4 ..._. 83 MEMORANDUM 6 4 ` 1 i 'ro: Kathleen Bradley Colwell IDSAnne Marie Tiucciar ne, Permits Manage' HK Osco, Drug Decision Attached please find the draft of the amended decision from last night 's Planning Bcaard meeting. Janet faxed it to all of the members, and this came back f 1 Casks Richard Rowen, Karen suggested I leave it for you to do the rewording, If you have any questions, please see me., AAA NArckovf ' �-Z) a4b j, cayz ToCne ISAKIA-1 Uczrr,�,�S, _94 14,0 FR')N R �` TF�Et r l A�lDO� E�? ?i 1t= 'iJ � ___ F.GJ ' K 1 e1<soH ! . Bradley fA'%,M bate: 3 Auglist, 194 From: P.- S. RowerMemo No.- 94;004 Subject. Darn Dvug Dist: R. A, Nardella At last ni jgs jneetsng we ciis $sed sever'ai issLtes which are to be included itl the de ilia such as the requirement for the Wficant to apply to the state for pel-Missiol, to uIstaH Pedestrian fights to POmlit ssfe C1-0,SsiRg of ROutes 125 and 114. The it err.s fisted be[Ow-weTP,discussed ffom a concepwal paint c)f view, of not at all, but I relieve the should be addressed and iuckided in the Decisit%ji. I've discussed each item with R.iok and lie agrees that they should be included ill the updated DRAFT copies to he roviewed by the. Board rrme h(-,vs befove the next meeting- 3GL ttafs : I . T11 deciduous free$ alolig Foute 114 are shown cia the L ands 'I1)0 ' arc 4soaks, 0s r ;zs all (TPO9UVdty to allow the propoi W develop anew distinctive �' p� :%,;gl ' b6eve all theme tree8 should be OX! sLrme specie& IvWch shop ifd Eit on I b i€All .:)lay citheF in the Vr�)P, 4r the fafl. My nim-ndat jo s, is to plant orange. - m.d <pl along f e.Route 114 strip, ACh Perhaps ye-Vow foliage d cidtrotls tare in tiie parki ng areas- A.ltematively, the Route 114 aces could be spring htooc�x�.. Karr r� h Er es er Sousa � agsvonds. l tgll aF'e hudy :n t=;e area. . Wt, discussed ch w-Ong the [Over gro"111 andsmpi ag along the Rothe 114 4.sfi qCl ,y sf1 I Lchingfrost the rmss d illl berlies shown, to a fence with $ 12080 uI fiWLI continue,the exisfixig plaf,a# ChesInut Csreell. dithoUt gold plat thf; T v crul tN_in - thm pCrkWS tbig scheme sbould run froln the C11eQtnut Green pret?�-r€�� a1v Osro entr4t- , then transition back to the proposed 3c;,;, $Jyo;Vtj] ,,h4 V J k;o 3•epresonred that they would snstall a row ox shnibs aLlo,kq thv 3v 5 foc,k b t;.t3 Y Sfvrecr yy\elc� th-,Wlseivei and the Chestnkk t Grcvl pafking tot. S t.hf,-ak it would be ap!�tot�ria1e tc� d�r�vld� a break in time bari-ier- 1d provic#e a set of stairs (perhaps IaT).dscape -'rmt'svrs Ali+,h WO-u d 1)West&u access to Qsco from Clj ;jtjjut. Cireerr, and t#,e R6 homes, If tits 130 Yd agrws that thOW changes Aould be made, them the Deci:;ion should in(Aude iangiiage that the Land scaping Plan Must be revised accordingly prior to endorser�re�f by the BOa1'd. The Decision theB need s to state that kmd8imping must bih, iristatied per the ,and-sea} Plan as eildoi-sm Y,TS �- p. C.-. i I L.f4)PMENTj INC, L• ,ut; 11164117.0 . WE t a ohs S ;;T,7 A. - "--'- � "'--'--"-...�--'--'-��r...�-�',��h,-,::5,:'�.r�" 'k ' ;S��� w}. �+,-.�l l�- �'•f?l-•��'-s�..,��'}4.'_3 S!-+ ��."'li .}C . . .. _ .__ �:J .---- h&v*r any Problems r-liblk:ms or q:E W 9 i.=)L:i y { 7�,.�....,.�__ GLMENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. VVESTHOLLISTON PROFESSIONAL PAHK 1750 WASHINGTON STREET a HOLLISTO , MASSACHUSETTS 01746 429.1100 REGISTERED CIVIC. ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS T0: OW-4 F 1c- __ }ATE: I lf6 , I �'�o uS r i 14 A -i- .._ RE: ��kr� �ks K1EA r� v I Z0 Art t� vJ4 kl y e P, We are sending you bie fallowing items: PRINTS SPECIFICATIONS WORKING DRAWINGS 'TRACINGS COPURESPONDENCE OTHER r - c� fZ 1 t rJ A. t L-A FOR YOUR APPROVAL FOR REVISION APPROVED AS CORRECTED FOR REVIEW & CO�21aTS FOR YOUR FILES FOR YOUR USE QTI{�R REMAR1<9. IAK - I E!.�,J E- y 0 S E r. a--_ 7�-ks RmJ , C_.c tl ra l6 So nA eE- ll 'l - , -1-14 ks -P, €-gip --j"� Au.- F-- ado ��-�A �� �. , r SIGNED TC)YCE-. iir-tltJEWAAL, CC;MHL'WO.L. /,Nl)- 9NDUS"ItIAL SITE PtANW&44- f,ND DE:d EcN - PDELEC wCRKL; FJ4G[NL-ikjH+L. �FP114 DESIGNS -- HYDROLOGY AND FLOOD CONUML -- COST ESTEIuhTENG TOPOGRAP51EC GURVIEYS SOEL ANALYSIG Proposed Easement Time Line Osco Drug #18-330 North Andover, Massachusetts 1. March 4, 1997 - Spoke with Kathleen Colwell regarding walkway easement. _ March 9 , 1997 - filet with Brian Sheehy of Kebb Property Management, property manager for Chestnut Green an site regarding walkway easement, . August '1 , 1997 - Received final site plan for proposed walkway. 4, September 2, 1997 - Forwarded site plan to Colleen Kelly of Kebb Property Management. 5, October 2, 1997 - Forwarded draft of easement agreement to Brian Sheehy of Kebb Property Management. 6, Novomlber 14, 1997 - Received eived comments from Brian Sheeny regarding agreement. 7. November 21, 1997 - Prepared and forwarded, revised, simpler license agreement to Brian Sheehy of Kebb Property Management. 3. December 16, 1997 - Spoke with Brian Sheehy whereby he informed A PI that trustees of Chestnut Green have decided against entering into a walkway easement agreement_ . December 16, 1997 - Spoke with Kathleen Colwell, Planner, Town of North Andover, who recommended that ASPI request to be placed on February 3,11398 agenda to request release of band_ AMEHICAN,IiTung,S PROPERTIES,INC- 1955 WEST HORP I AVENUE MELROSE PARK, IL 60 1 GO,-I 10 1, A E P n E S E 04 T I N In TEL(708)5,31-6000 ACME MARKETS 0 JEWEL FOOU,SITOALS e JEWEL O CO FAX Q08) /H6-al k8 December 17, 19197 LARAT t,11014 ES F OSGO DRUG ,F SAVON DRUG I SUPER SAWE R. Via 2-Day Federal Express Delivery Ms,, Kathleen Colwell 'Town of North Andover N ING 1416 Main Street North Andover, MA 018,45 Re: Osco Drug North Andover, Massachusetts Dear Kathleen: As I mentioned, the trustees of Chestnut Green have decided against entering into ar pedestr[an walkway easement agreemant with American Stores. Consequently, I would like to ask that American Stores Properties, Inc., be placed on the February 3A 19,98 Planning Board': meeting in order to request the release of the $135,000 en is,ting bond for sacid w all way., Attached please find documentatilon relatin to ASPI's attempts to secure said easemient. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me, Sincerely, R.obert-A. Stack Senior Real Estate Manager RAS�:[c/I etter.do,c Attachment cc,- Rich: Hayes COMMATE OFFTCE SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH A 80rKROY V AnmMan,6'Nfes CoropRny NES508- 3-6531 NES sre t#f (f -824-355 GROUP s{�f-83-4055 '. _ .. �1cw Etgl3rad Src:tieiiy . P ionald H, s cow England Scrurity 200 Myles Standish Bou[cvarc3, nt MA 02780 . rrraaif: Rkvartx(��ne,�-grotFF.cnsn ' C�3.�1� - '44=I�BS—gzoap,{'o3R L rr ak lJa,s gn 'yx jec �l anagiolaw Corr.r�r zr� ,Tune 6, 00 Mr. Michael McGuire, Building inspector Town of North Andover 7 Charles Street North Aiidover, MA 01 45 Inc. Proposed Fleet Bank ATM Kiosk 525 Turnpike Street North Andover, I1fi,A Dear Mike; As por our pry ioas phone.conversation, the property is in a B- gone and a'n ATM Kiosk is altowed b + right, The enclosed drawing addresses the.I00' setback as welfas the rem val of 2 parking- spaces and 3reglacfng then witli 3 spaces, If this site plea meet with your approval, we WiIi proceed ith the Architects drawings': for the kiosk atydwilI submit same fora building permit, If you have, any questidhs,_ e call Inc at try direct phone ('505) 824- 555.' Mau thanks for your msistance.. very,truly yours, -NE ' oup - Rory Swartz EnciosUres Via Airborne Fxpress 200 Myit:s Stan&,,3h Bokalevard, ' hunton MA 02780 Tel 508-823-6531 F;�x 508-8 2-8930 E-snailmnn group(ane -group.com •Web StEe: wWw.hesgrouP,com Bank l esGg r prqd?ct ill nrrgelherit F Cry sr� dirt r Town of North Andover Office of the Plaguing UeparJrnien Conim u n i ty Develo ment and Services Division 7 Charles Shut NoAh Andover, M o ssichuseU.9 € 1845 Telephone ( 78) 688-9535 Fax (978) 688-9542 July 18, 2002 NFS Group 200 Myles Standish Boulevard Taunton MA 02780 Via Fax: 508-822-8 30 e: Proposed ATM Kiosk— 525 Turnpike Street Dear W. arNt The Bu9ding Department has 1oi- warded your correspondence regarding the above kiosk, Condition 21 of the Notice of Decision for dills site requims that "any revisions...be submitted to the Town Plwmer for review. If these revisions are deemed substantial, the applicant must subn-& revised plans to the Plaim ng Board for apptroval." Notice of Decision - 525 Tumpi a Street. in accordance with this provision, prior to any approval through the Planning Department, the following information must be submitted to make an hiformed decision regarding the scope of the proposed revisions; • Indicatiorr of compliance with the original decision. (t have attached a copy for your review). Renderings of the desigji of the kiosk indicathig its harmony with the architectural theine present on the site. A detailed depiction of the lighting indicathig compliance with the original decision. A sketch showing the proposed impact to traffic on the site and p d tri x routes that may be impacted by the proposed comtruction. If the above idermation indicates that there is no substantial invact to the site, you may proceed to the building pern* stage, a finding of a substantial impact will require a modification of the Original Site flan Special Permit Approval. If you have any quc hesitate to contact rune. ors, Interim Town Planner DOAnIi t W APPEALS 6Z�S-L�54I 3�aJI€f}Fi�[i GS 8-:'S t3 C�AfS£€��rl l tC1'ti fi8$•9330 I€r k1:t H afBS V3 ED 3�J..#��lt�(i G88-9535 N.ES el. 5�}5-823mb53 1 NES it� #508-54-35�5�5 OUP F 508-8 3-405 GROUP Ronald 14, 1-tz New Fnxland Se -urhy {?D My�e trt3ci�sta 3c�et3ev;Mrd, nt , MA 02790 Emaif: RStvartz@rLrs•groraj�,cati� YetnSit , w.rics-gru�r�o-.cprri Mr. Michael McGuire, Building Inspector Town of Norih Andover 7 Charles Sixect North Andover, MA 0184 Re: Proposed Fleet Bank ATM Ki Osk 525 Turnpike Street Noirth A11dover, MA Dear MikC !- As per ow previous pljonc.conversation, the property is in a B-2 zone and-att TM Kiosk is allowed by right. 'Me enclosed drawing addresses (lie 100'.setback a; el I .as the rernovai of 2 parking spaces and xeplacirt them with 3 spaces. If"s site plate meeis with your approval, we will proceed wi(h.the'A3reliitecis drawin&. for the ia'sk and ill submit same tor'a building permit. If you have any questipits,please call me at any direct Phone ( 08) 4- 55. Many thanks Joj-your assistance, Very truly yours, ICE ' cup i oil Swartz F�iclositr�s - Via i�7bornc >express Ott MY10H Starrhih 13oralevard, Ta3rrltOn MA 0 780 J'el, 508-823-6531 Pax 508-8 -B934 E-3yiskil:nt Tronp4nes-group.coltk •Web Site: www.nes-grotip.vom BaFA Design t Projeci 11-fan rgyement • Coarsrt 611,9 11/08�20102' 11;37 FAX, 978 085 7'878 Coolidge Construction Co 00 1 JOHN F. MCGAPAY ATTORNEY AT LAW 401 ANDOVER STREEq- NO'HIM ANPOWR.MASSACIRISETTS 0 19,45 TELEPHONE (-978�) 686-1111 T"AX (978) 48$,7878 Novembor,5, 2002 W Kathy WKen NorlhArl&(vcr Platinhig Directiol. 27 Wholes Street Nonh Andover, MA 0 18,45 via Fax. M-68,9-9$42, RE: 530 Turnpike St�.,Ne.A.FildQvcjr, MA Duar Ms. McKerma: I hereby inquest a waiver from Site:Mtn Review pul.,suant to Article 8.3,should the Planning Board detOrrniae that said section is apphr-able to the intended renavatiori of 53ol 'I'limplike Street- "rhank you� Sincerel ohn F wGwry Xwfis 53UTpk