The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-10-31 Engineer Review 4 TOWN OF NOICfH ANDO ER PLANNING BOARD EN(.INEERI NG REVIEW OF SITE PLAN{SPECIAL PERMIT FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE TOWN OF NORTH AND OWR ZONING BYLAW STANDARD ENGINEERING PRACTICE E Site Plait Title: Proposed Site Uevelapment V11B o.. 06716.44 Lacatinn: 1270 Salem Turnpike(Route 114), Map 107A Lot 148 Owner & Applicant: Seven Hills Foundation 81 Hope A.vcnwc, WorcrMer MA 0)603 Applicant's Engineer: M I IF Design Con wItants, Inc. 103 Stiles R"], S wile One, Salem NH 03079 Plan Date; 7-31.01 Review Date: 9-25-01 'Fhe Applicant submitted plans and documents to V1413 for review on August 4,2001. The site lilan submission was reviewed for conforrrkancc to the appropriate sections of the 1972 Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw arm,,nded on Dccembtr 11,2000 and standard engineering practice. The proposed site is located in the Village C:omrnercial (VQ District. The Applicant submitted the followlnp, inforination for V11C3's review- Site Plan (I I sheets)dated 7-31-01 Drainage Calculations dated 6-22-01 Project Deport dated 8-03-01 Thu following comments note non-conformance with specific sections and q€estionsfcorr men is on the proposed design. 1) V1-1B recomniends that the existing condition p]an (sheet ) be stamped and signed by a registered Professional T,and Surveyor in the Commonwealth of Massachuwtts. 2) Scctioik 7.4: According to Table,2— Suinmary of Di in ens ianaI Requ i rernents,the propmed building height w€II be Moiled to 40 feet. Aitcr revie ing the architedi ral drawing, it appears that the building height ieyui rein unt is satisfied. However, theme appears to be a rnisprint in note#6 on Sheet 3_ The inaximurn Height of the proposed building should be mvise to 40 feel from 55 feet. 3) Section 8.3. .c requires that a certified landscapc architect prepare the landscape plans, T}►e appIicant should verify that this regLiirement has beers niet. 4) T'hi� following information is required by Section 8.3.5.e and VHB offers the following comments, a) EASEMENTS 1 LEGAL CONDITION - The site plan indicates that an existing sewer pump station is to be rctaincd at the soiahcast comer *f fhc site, Tic Applicant should r 11nlau.,Lr�Le�06l1�3#�doi9�aepocL51'�-heu�3ilkxser�e5. eyok.do€ verify that the pump station casement does not contain legal encumbrances that would pirwent or place conditiuns on Ilse proposed develo ment, b) STDRMWATER DRAINAGE/DRAINAGE BASIN STUDY. See comments below under the itein 4) Drainage Rev ie . 5.} DRAINAGE REVIEW:VHB has reviewed the drainage design and calculations. The proposed drainage design is a closed drainage system that inc:[tides the following; catch basin,drain manhole, roof drains, downstream defender and a subsurface detention systenr. VHB otters the following comments regarding the proposed drainage design: a) After"reviewing the existing contributing areas, it appears that the existing subcstchment area # 1 should be labeled as- 2 ai d vice versa. b) After review€rig the proposed contributing areas, it appears IhaI subealchment area R I and 44 are underestimated. The Applicant should review these areas and revise all pertinent drainage analysis 1 calculations accordingly, .) Section 8.4 has Lan&cape requimments for Village C'osr merclaI Zoning Distriels. The applicant should verify that the rcqui rem rkits have been reset. T) STANDARD EN 61NiH:ih RIN PRACTICE: VHB has reviewed the site plans for eonform ancc to standard engineering practices. The purpose is to docirmcrit the engineering and potential con.stmc€ion issues as-,ociated with the project. VHi3 offers the following comments. a The Applicant has not shown a prnpnsed left turn lane to accommodate any left turn movements entering the proposed development, The applicant rosy want to explore whether nr not the existing multi-use lane (center lane)between station 1274-00 and f 3MO can be uliIizcd as the left turn Isne_ The applicant should revise the plans accordingly. b) A detail of the proposed bollard system is n{nt shown on the plans. VHB recommends that a proposed bollard detail be shown on thcc site plan. c The A plan shows that there is a proposed Isndscape wall at the west side of the parking edge. The plans do not indicate: a wall plan detail. V H R recommends that a wall detaiI be shGwn on the site plan per section 8 3.5.e.xii. It is recommended that the applicant.provide WRITTEN RESPONSES to the issues and comments contained herein- 2 ��i1[ana[r�dc�95716E9�doc5��e}4�ki�S�rPn HiliS lk4I�+w l2ppai.d�C Revielved : Date: ( )/ Danny H. Wong, tzE EWi En gi nee r- I.I i ghw a nd Mun icipal{ bte6 Checked : Z�4 LIA Mi h E Muchncc HiRRins, m m Son 9rPrj0 �lEng i ncc —Highway an D I Engineering l _W. _.AL_ 7�l S Sl24471 10 19 6038930733 hW DESIGN PAGE 02 %A+'t A f,CUM d_q&ln VFfif NMO,27 AMP.2 1 ,F a t. TOWN OF NORTH ANDMM PLANNING BOARD ENGJ[N'URLNG REVIEW OF SM PLAN/SPECIAL PERAUT FOR CONFOPMANCE V4'FFJa'>i'ki-TOWN OF NO H ANDOVEg ZONING RYIAW& STAMAIMENGINMR CY PRAMCF, Site Pl,,,Uf1e: Proposed Site Devolopmvnt YRR Wim. 06716A4 It aesttnn: I270 Salem Turnpike Wvte I t4),Map I07A Lot 149 Own �r APpllcsnt; saveR Hills Foundation 9l Hope Avetxx�o,WwcwerMA01603 -kpp1tcan1V3 Engioeer: MM Design o to %No. 103 Stiles Road,$trite Coe, Salcj)m,NN 03079 Plan DaItt. I0-15-01 ReWow Dole. 111-1741 Ile Applicant submitted revised gljwq and documents to VIM for review ou rteber 17,2W1. The i im plan mbmisslon was reviewed for ce&omamw to the ap prsate sections of the 1972 Town of Mextb Andover Z<mFus Bylaw ammded on December 11,2000 md etaMard engln=ing practice, The pmposed$It#i a located in the village C01MMOMW I VC)Digb*t.The A,pplicat sltbmimd tho follower information for VFW Is review, me Plan(I I ateets)dwod 10.1 Sol 1- DYAM96 Caleiolalosla dated 1U-I I-01 ResponsaLem dntod I0.02,01 (with red line addidans) The Mowing oomments are in rwpmse ito rtvisad plans snd docuanests submitted to 1) O lgins!VHB aor=ent has been satMod Tegarding tho erAIS14 eondibon plan being stamped mad sdirad by a re tersd No&ssional Lwd Surveyor in the CtutsMcnwealth of Massachusetts. . ) Odginal VEB cormueat hn been&-kisfied reg"ing tba proosed WM4 height, 1) Tbd Wheaot hea requaspad a walwr regarding the sukject of a r.astiiiad landg" item propasing the taudscape plats. 4) Original VIM comment hag been aad fled iregardingthe pump ate zt eawment. 5.)Original VHB oornmimw havo been zm6y cd regarding the drainage review. ,)Cr4&iml VHB rcq= iat has bEen safi,iiad regard4#ae lmdsmpe�oars. 7,)Original VHB comments have b=saiisficd mgarc3 ng the Center gum lane,bollard detail fled vtt detail. j 10/18I2f!)Ol 10; 19 6033930733 MHF DESla-t PAGE 03 UL i .l r.ifml�1 d.'r44yI9 7 P.3 It appeam that all of VI 's comments have been adex uedy addressed (keiu&'g rQgUC5ts far waivers and 's oonoem s in this meatier have beta:�atiaf d. No fiu*cr eD a] Ming mview it Mquired at this time. If you leave ay goes ' s or c onems ease nag at y CiAnvi.,1 a rce, Wnde by: Date: 10/I7/01 iahole Mwhnw ffiggi Senior Prn,�FIet d er— . way unioipat P.nglneerir,g 2 ��#E,wN7'�o�-05�16�4��SK*�fCAatr5C4 'bh f1113�FW7ow�rpt¢��ci T