Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-10-31 Department Review i North Andover Fire Department Memo RECEIVED Tw. Plarkrring Departmerrt Fmm: U, Mdfew MelnIkas, Fire Prevention offircer AUG1 5 20DI CC: Chief William V_ Dalarr NORTH ANDOVER Data. 8/14101 PLARU NCA I7K-PABTMENT Re: Seven Hills 1 Salem Tumpike The Pfarth Andover Fire Department has reviewed the plans for the proposed development and has Oct. following recommendations: 1. Even though the building is spr nkter ed ,two side aoress is a minimum _ A barrier needs to be in place because the propane tarries are within 20 feet of the parldng area and atso any form of vegetation should not be planted is dose proxira 4y to there The master bax and dire departwent wnnectian will be located at J near the rain entrance Please call should there ba any questions 1 'Tomi of Nttrdh /Uidove r' � Office of the Flanning 11)epartm,erd, I at Devek 'tr tent aniid Sete° ,(,es F)ivisionI� u NiIprl,Q"II, Andovodr, 01,8 0 � 10 (9,78) 68 ,.95"a5 'fO: Planning Board IRO Heidi Griffin,l'own Planner °, , Site flan Review Seven I ins rioundatioru — Proposed 570,0 s,.f. Office ee Building DATE- August 29, �2001 The applicant lica n proposes ai 5700 sqmre fiooI professional elfiee building in the Vilauge Cornmerciai Zone. The rear portion of the buUding will be one story., with the °euut portiere h ing emnp ised of two Steri. s 1 rier History In December of 1999, the Plannhig Board denied a site plan aaP plicatioll ore tluis site for a proposed nursery. 11-ds application is mlt 11r uabita of a reptiti e petition as (.his proposal is ftorn a new applicant, proposing a completely dillierent use from that,,, which was proposed uu the latter of I99 . My review is, as follows i. NORTH A.RROWfLOCJVI'I(')N MAP, his has been provided. ii„ SURVEY OF L(f17111ARC L, This has been provided. iii,. N ,ME/DEC IPTI I' OF I(OIECI"; his has been provided. ilw. 1 ASRMEN"I" fLEGAL CONDITIONS: An casement erat exists on the property for the existing pumip station.. V. l'OP GRAPI Y: This has,been pro vided. Vi,. ZONING INItY" R1" ATTON. Zoning, information has been provided and is located on heel he vial uu e commercial district requires the followirig specific setl:x1cks: HIE)A 0)II" )dJIPEIJ,S 68 914 D >EN�]H,DIIN"G fiS 9541 ��b�w�rl� M�.`�Dk r16A�' ')i R1 111 ZU"F]I>[,XK 9,W IN "A J"Y'�l� wilrAr A,�,,535 • 50' font setback, no parking allowed, must be utilized as a buffer 0 25' sire and rear setbacks, unless adjacent to a residential district, which mandates a setback ol'40% the first 5' of the setback niust be udIizRd as an eflective visual bu cr It appears that this parcel abuts ,enteral business and village commercial property, with residential properly to the rear. All of the setback recluirernents have beat meet. 1 will need to meet with the 1106ag Commissioner relative to the, Contiguoms buildable Area Requirement on this lot. This lot contains 9% CBA vs. the roquired 7 %. The prior filing seemed to indicate that the Building Covon ssiuner ruled that this lot was granc;fathered from this requimment; I would like to doublecheck however. CBA is required for any new tots created alter 19 ; a deed hi the prior filing indicates this lot existed in the 1970's. vii. STORMWA1ER DRAINAGE: Pkkase see attached review performed by the Town's consulting engineer. vdi. BUILDING LOCATION. Tbte Mding is located behind the pump station. ix. BUILDING ELEVATION: Building elevations and Iloor plans have been provided. The elevation plans should depict the proposed materials of the building and der not; the proposed building is colonial-style. The application indicates that the building will be comprised of clapboard vinyl siding, and are "interesting" gabled roofline. 1 think that architectural renderings should be supplied to visnalize better the building as it is comprised of two different stories and based upon its configuration of the lot. X. LOCATION OF P,ARKWO/WALI WAYS: The parking lot contains 19 spaces and is located in front of the building with a minimum 5' site drive. The application iaxlicates that tl-c employees will utifize 10-14 of these parkitag spaces. Parking cale-ulations should be placed on the plans for verification ol'the use and compliance with the bylaw, though 1 surmise they utilized the calculation for office use. xi. LOCATION OF ETLANDS/Na IcE OF INTENT, The applicant has filed a Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission. xii. LOCATION OF WALLS/SIGNS- A. site sign is located at the entrance cif the site chive. A detail of the proposed nianwucnt sign is located on Sheet 9. It is a very attractive sign. xili. LOCATION OF ROADWAYS/DRIVES: The site drive is 25' wick and is straight upon entrance. The site drive ME be shared for both access to the proposed office buildi4, and to the punk station. The Firs Department nicinorandum elated 8114/01 indicates that "two side access is a minimum", I wM verify with the fire department if they feel this has been demonstrated on the plan. A new lim hydrant is proposed on the plans at the access of the street, There is a ' brick walkway Iiom the picnic area whkIi extends to the front of the offloc hcnlding and is then comprised of a biturnino us Walkway, xiv. OUTDOOR ST RAGE 7ISPLAY ARRAS: There is no outdoor storage being ,proposed; there is a picnic area for the cinployccs near the, building. The show storage areas indicated on the grading plan (sheet 5) seem to overlap with some of the proposed landscaping on liact 4. This creeds to be idadfiecl as it appears the snow will be stored on trip off` sonae of the proposed landscaping. As the site is limited disc to the large amount of wetlands, this greeds to be defined more clearly. v. LANDSCAPrN PLAN: The. Jandscaping plan is extensive in nature and will provide for effective buffering. Within the fast 50' there are seasonal plautiiigs, silver mounds, blue junipers, flowering crabapples and other plantings. The planting plan continues along the perimeter of the parking iot, iri front of the office building, around the pioilic area and surrounding the propane tanks. Overall, the laiidscaping plan is more than adequate. xvi. REFUSE AR AS. The dwupster is located to the left as you knniediately enter the parking lot. I'm not sure this is Clip, "bes-C' location for a dump,4e-r as it woMld be the first thing you see as you enter the parking lot, It could possibly be relocated to a less obtrusive area, maybe even on the opposite side of the parking lot near the pump station. The dumpster is enclosed with a stockade pressure treated fence, the detail is located on Sheet 6 of the plain. xvii. LICMING FACti,iTI1 S. Theme are four lights proposed on the site; one as you enter the site drive and three around the peiriineter of'the .parking hat. The lamp, design is on s-heet 6. The design is a 0' pole, with a concrete fouirc€ation. The applicant hw, also supplied an illurnination plan on the sank sheet which indicates the illrirni.riatioii will be inn inial at the perilmeters of the lot. xvii.i. D AINAGF, S STFM: Please refer to the outside consulting engineer's report. ixc TRAFFIC INVACF RJDY: A tw fic impact study has not been provided; rather a traffic sk�mmary statement has been provided, hlue to this proposal's proximity to the proposed Berry Street O iee Building and the propwwd Roston Ski Mill development, coupkcl With the I'orestvie 'Subdivision, the Plannhig Board may wish to ie€ u€ -e snore detailed traffic data being scipplicd at a milRii urn. (i.e. Data from the iTF Traffic Generator Manual would be more helpfu I in assessing this situation) xx. COI MON WFALTII REV IEW: The, applicant has applied for a state peiinit to revise the driveway locationi ou this site. x c, UTILITIES: This has been provided oil the plans on Sheet 5. All utilities will be placed underground, quid the site will have sewer and water, 'rhe severer deAgll will also provide for the abutter to hook up if they so choose to do, FISCAL IMPACT: Ti s has been provided and a positive cash flow will be given to the town. x ii. COMMUNITY IT IMPACT: The plans indicate that this building is consistent with the colonial style buildings ibe Village Commercial District encourages. Town of forth Andover Kflft rH Yi14 '; Mice of the Conservation Department Community Development and Services Division x . 7 C'hartes Strcot North An&v(�.', Massxchusc�tts 0184,15�i t'arrritn Teieplrnne (97$) 688-95:3{T Cony i'.rvat ozi Adin.inistratur Fax (978)688-9542 Sevim Hills Community Se-mces, lrkc. M dope Streat Worcester, MA-01603 Re: Request for a Certificate of Comp Iiance '12701'urnpike Street 1!/! Dear Applicant: �wrf; Dtr , A 1 equest for a Certificate of Compliance (CCIC) was filed with the North Andover Conservation L Nrtment on May 16, 2003 for the above referenced project. The request was filed prior to the completion of hmd 'aping activities and stabilization of the site, therefore, the request was not placed ou the agenda and the as-built plans and CC7C request was not thorougl-dy reviewed at that time. Compliance will not be issued for sites that are not folly st hill d, 'rhis site has been inspected on numerous occasions since the request was submitted, however, oach inspection revealed the site was trot yet fully stabilized- On ju ly 7, 2003, the Conservation Department re-inspected the site -md carefully reviewed the Subunit --d as-built plans, noted change-5 and Order of C:ondftion require-ments. The site i�;still-not eligible far a C'eAil`icate of C:omphatnue. The following itetmxs must be addressed pa-ior to the issuance of a Certificate of Cornp#.fiance: a A request for a modification rnust to the Conservation Conindssion for approval of the noted changes 1n the letter dated May 16, 2003, preparers by Hancock Engineering Associates; ■ Rip-rapped areas must be displayed clearly on (lie plans; The sty rip-rapped slopes along the westerly edge of the project site were not approved on the record pla[is and must be included in the mod ifica tion request; a proposed landscape wall was approved to be coiistructed in this ar a and was not cons]ructed; * As-built plans must be subyrutted at fhic same scale as the approved p]ans, w 11ich is l"= 0'; • The area southeasterly of the front right hand corner of the building has not been seeded and is not vege[ated; * Upon stabihzation of the site, erosion control trust be uernxoved and un-vegeta ted areas beneath the bales must be stiabiIized im ed tely; # Some of the wetland markers were temporarily pasted on the sttafees associated with the erosion control; they must be permanently installed on stakes or trees; 1* Condition 67 regtdres the installation of peTm;meW signs designating,"No-Salt Zone and "No-Snow Stockpiling"; these sigC1.5 have riot yet been installs cd; I30.1RL}C]I=�Y�'I:�l4�.��s-9g.at F�zili.3]1�CT688.95,}c Ci�'�Sli�t'�'rl'C�C?�(o-KR-J73i] H�;,�L'�F#�iBS•974t1 FL,L��ll?rciGYH-�5.�� Condition 62 crf the Order of Conditions regtires that evidence of the stormwater management systems must:be submitted to the NACC on an a.nnuaI basis by a P.E. for a period of two years from [lie dale said gtr�ic_tures gp can Iine;no evidence of these reports exist in the ivcoiyJ file and the site will not eligible for€;omphance until this condition is satisfied; The above required report must be submitted immediately to thiq Depax:lmeut; All above items most be addressed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact rite. `l h aink you. Sin€=rrr , n no, C nervation Administrator c c; N A C C I leidi Griffin, C:ommmi ty Development Director Igor cock Engineering Assad6t David L. Bilodeau&Sons file